Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-03-18 03:41:53 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I have reverted the addition of the many parks that you have entered, one park is enough...
12017-03-18 03:40:08 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add objects that exist in reality. I have removed this park.
12017-03-14 04:20:25 UTCmattchn Hello Babyfeet, welcome to OpenStreetMap, please only map objects that exist in reality. Since there are no buildings at the places, I reverted this change in 46829550.
12017-03-14 04:19:27 UTCmattchn Hello Babyfeet, welcome to OpenStreetMap, there is no building at this place visible in satellite images, I therefore reverted this change in 46829550.
12017-03-14 04:18:46 UTCmattchn Hello Babyfeet, welcome to OpenStreetMap, the object doesn't look like a river on satellite images, I therefore reverted this change in 46829550.
12017-03-03 02:55:29 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add things to the map that exist in reality!
12017-02-20 01:15:39 UTCmattchn Hi sspringe! Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I have removed the water objects that you added with this changeset as these would lie in or overlap with buildings.
12017-02-17 04:31:30 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I have reverted your changeset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46154208) - please only enter objects into OpenStreetMap that exist in reality.
12017-02-05 01:19:09 UTCmattchn Hi, thanks for adding these POIs. I think the bus stop is not called "Muni", this is the name of the operator rather than the name of the bus stop.
22017-02-06 04:15:03 UTCFa7C0N Hi, Thank you for pointing this out. It is very valuable. I removed the `name` tag and added `operator` tag to the bus stop.
12017-02-05 01:18:08 UTCmattchn Hi, thanks for adding these POIs. I think the bus stop is not called "Muni", this is the name of the operator rather than the name of the bus stop. The stop is - probably - called Turk (Street) & Leavenworth (Street) or similar.
22017-02-06 04:12:22 UTCFa7C0N Hi, Thank you for pointing this out. I corrected the name of the bus stop.

12017-02-05 01:12:52 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding these details to the map!
12017-02-04 22:49:40 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add things to the map that actually exist. I have reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817208
12017-02-04 22:46:17 UTCmattchn Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817130
12017-02-04 22:46:08 UTCmattchn Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817130
12017-02-04 22:45:59 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add objects to the map that actually exist. I have reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817130
12017-01-28 01:32:54 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding Coal Creek to the map! Some of your paths added look a little strange as they seem to zig-zag through private property. What kind of paths are they?
22017-01-29 00:07:23 UTCMrZuhalter they do go through private property, I marked the ones on mine and my parents property. I left it up to others to mark their own. The trails actually go all the through Brooks and up around Coal Creek Heights.
32017-01-29 19:42:59 UTCmattchn Thanks for your answer! Maybe you should add access=private to these paths (or access=permissive if the public is allowed there). See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
12017-01-29 19:40:59 UTCmattchn Hi Knuckle Mean, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your recent additions to the map! In this changeset your transformed a bike path into a footway. Note that the previous tagging already allowed people to walk there as it included a tag for foot=yes. I restored the highway=cycleway attribute a...
12017-01-28 01:07:25 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding some footpaths to the map. I will remove the park as this apartment complex it not really what people have in mind when thinking about a park: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
12017-01-28 01:07:02 UTCmattchn Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add things that exist in reality, I removed these fictional objects here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45579287
12017-01-28 01:06:42 UTCmattchn The Target is already on the map as "Super Target", I'll go ahead and remove the duplicate. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167529417
12017-01-11 19:00:31 UTCmattchn Hi dvdhns, could you double check the name of the peak that you entered as "Point 122227"? I think there is one extra digit ;)
22017-01-12 02:30:36 UTCdvdhns Thanks! Fixed now.
12016-12-24 04:40:29 UTCmattchn Hi, I've seen that tried to the way to make the way appear on the map. However, pistes are not rendered on the "standard" map that you see on osm.org. There are some specialty maps focusing on outdoor or ski activities, and pistes get rendered there (but highway=piste will not have an impact there)....
22016-12-24 23:16:50 UTCcosmocatalano Yes—I should have specified visibility on Strava's map. The issue in part seems to be that they still render closed loops as areas, even with explicit "area=no" tagging. Though the previous edit of this particular closed loop caused it to disappear from the Strava map entirely—possibly related t...
12016-12-23 04:58:48 UTCmattchn Hi rsavoye, I will undo this changeset as well as the follow-up changeset 43789884. Your change of merging these ways led to all properties of the way being applied to the entire way, so it appeared that the entire way was a bridge. If some of the properties only apply to parts of the way, it is com...
22016-12-23 05:01:12 UTCmattchn Cross-reference to reverting CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44611333
12016-10-02 22:44:45 UTCmattchn Is this still needed?
22016-10-18 02:13:17 UTCdvdhns No
12016-06-13 01:50:18 UTCmattchn Please check with Bing imagery, the current representation seems wrong. Maybe wrong forward/backward tags?
22016-06-24 15:29:45 UTCdannykath Hey there, thanks four your feedback ! I have already fix the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40264382
12016-06-11 02:51:30 UTCmattchn Welcome to OSM! Is there a reason why the service alley should not be connected to Arapahoe? This prevents routing onto this street. If cars can drive from Arapahoe into this alley, it should therefore be connected.
12016-06-11 02:44:36 UTCmattchn The lane count (lanes=5) was correct, the mistake was in the count of forward and backward lanes. I have changed this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327095053/history
22016-08-03 20:12:59 UTCdannykath Thanks for your review !
12016-06-11 02:42:26 UTCmattchn I think this was an error, but corrected in the wrong way. The error was not in the lane count, but in the turn:lane:forward value. I have changed it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400523645
22016-06-13 18:43:01 UTCediyes Hi mattchn!

Thank you for noticing this error and fixed it.
12016-06-11 02:40:09 UTCmattchn Not sure what was wrong here, I have re-tagged the lane count and the turn lanes which should be clearly visible in the Bing imagery
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400523691/history
22016-06-13 18:35:20 UTCyurasi Hello mattchn!
The satellite imagery aren't very clear, so I thought there wasn't any sign in the street.
Thanks for your feedback and for re-tagging the way since this help us to improve OSM.
mattchn has contributed to 29 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 41 comment(s)