Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-04-20 16:05:31 UTCAlesw This is an old building "Prior Přerov"
12017-04-19 12:14:11 UTCimperialmog Wanted to let you know i cleaned up some areas around here to add some more detail and based on OSM standards.You can take a look at what has been added. Eventually plan on doing a number of nearby changes due to mapping errors in the area and update information.
12017-01-19 09:16:13 UTCoba510 This appears to be a private driveway serving a couple of houses, not a residential road. Are you sure the tagging is correct?
12017-01-18 20:29:29 UTCn76 Looking at Bing imagery, I think the new ways would be better tagged as "highway=service". Maybe even way 30819881 should be "highway=service" too.
12017-01-05 10:40:46 UTCAndersAndersson When you "fixed" the problem, how did you verify if this is a tunnel, if the service road got debris on it or if it is an actual crossing? I looked at three different aerial photos of the place but couldn't come to a conclusion.
12016-08-21 13:27:32 UTCminourii The edits was reverted based on the discussion in talk-ja ML, because the original edit was from Google Map copy. Thanks for understanding.
22016-09-23 15:06:09 UTCRichRico Hello minourii,
thanks for your cooperation, I thank you for the solution.
12016-06-01 04:01:18 UTCroadgeek99 I'm concerned about the past couple of edits because you have made existing turn restrictions broken, like removing a street from http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6272043/history. Is there any reason why this is happening, and how could you prevent that from happening again?
22016-08-05 16:31:06 UTCRichRico Hi roadgeek99
Because of the existing of too many traffic signs around I must have confused the turn restriction sign. To avoid this happen again, I will review in more detail every sign and add a note if I'm not sure about. Thanks for noticing this and fixed it.
12016-05-03 20:09:32 UTCCarnildo I'm not sure what you were trying to do here, but it left US-95 tangled up, with the northbound and southbound sections crossing over each other and running the wrong way at the intersection with Hidden Haven/1st/North Llumina. I've done my best to fix it.
22016-08-05 16:18:31 UTCRichRico Hi Carnildo.
I worked on intersecting highways where they needed. Seems to be a slipping issue while joining nodes. I will review in more detail before making a change. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it.
12016-07-22 09:31:37 UTCSomeoneElse Hi,
Please try and restrict changeset size to at least less than one continent!
Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - "fixing way" does not explain what geographical features you actually changed, why, and based on what source.
Best Regards,
Andy
22016-07-30 01:18:03 UTCRichRico Hi Andy;
I made a mistake to uploading two changes in different areas at the same time, I will be more careful to uploading changes in the future.
Thanks for your feedback.
32016-07-30 01:29:34 UTCRichRico I will try to put best comments on my changes according to the type of changes made
12016-03-16 14:19:53 UTCJacek Placek Where have you found name of the road :) ?
22016-07-22 19:22:53 UTCRichRico Hi Jacek Placek
The road was named by "JacekR"
12016-05-17 17:48:03 UTCLuuuddooo I don't think there is a bridge here. The imported riverbank was shifted.
22016-05-20 01:05:29 UTCRichRico Hi Luddo
Thanks for the feedback, I corrected the road.
This's the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2680293249/history
12016-04-28 09:59:36 UTCR0bst3r Hi RichRico,

sth went wrong on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413693685. I removed the comment tags.

Cheers, R0bst3r
22016-04-29 20:53:23 UTCRichRico Thanks very much, I do not know how it happened, thanks for correcting :-)
Cheers
12016-04-27 20:34:10 UTChsimpson Hi, it seems that you put a gap in this street. I don't know, how this happened, but I will fix it now. Please have a check how this could happen.
Regards.
22016-04-29 20:39:25 UTCRichRico Hi, Thancks for feedback, I'll keep that in mind and I'll be careful
12016-04-14 15:47:34 UTCLLlypuk82 Please, do not create a common node, it is feature for correct routing.
22016-04-29 20:26:06 UTCRichRico Hi, Thanks For the feedback, I'll have more care
12015-11-24 14:24:13 UTCGerdP Hi there!
I've changed layer=Tranquil Lane
to name=Tranquil Lane
OK?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35551531
22016-04-29 20:16:54 UTCRichRico Excelentet :-)
12015-10-27 22:37:47 UTCRobJN Reverted as they don't join. We have higher quality imagery for this region (Coventry and Warwickshire) should you wish to view it. Please search mappa-mercia.org for Warwickshire County Council Aerial imagery and you'll find the tile URL.
22016-04-29 20:12:39 UTCRichRico Hi RobJN, Perfect, good observation, thanks for rapair
12015-10-17 08:25:39 UTCGerdP please review:
your change left a tag
"highway": "residential;tertiary",
I've tried to repair this.
22016-04-29 19:59:25 UTCRichRico Thanks for repair
12015-01-04 12:55:51 UTCSomeoneElse The bounding box here is huge and the description suggests TIGER fixing only, yet http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115431481 is obviously not TIGER. Could you please (a) use smaller changeset bounding boxes and (b) use meaningful changeset comments?
22016-04-29 19:46:40 UTCRichRico Thanks for the observation, I'll keep that in mind.
12016-04-07 09:25:26 UTCВладимир К Hello!
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c...
22016-04-07 22:37:04 UTCRichRico Hi Владимир К
The changes that I did was because I was working on the task of crossing highway, but I already reverted the changes

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38393808
12016-01-25 14:36:07 UTCRichRico Hi Telecas
Thank you for catching this mistake, the changes have now been reverted to the previous state. Please do check and let me know if its ok.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36740437
12016-01-25 14:35:18 UTCRichRico Hi Telecas
Thank you for catching this mistake, the changes have now been reverted to the previous state. Please do check and let me know if its ok.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36740397
12015-01-21 11:52:06 UTCSomeoneElse What does "Unconnected major1 , http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/?error=unconnected_major1" mean? The bounding box of the changeset is very large - how do I as a local mapper in (say) Spain know what has been changed locally to me, why, and based on what source?
22015-10-21 22:18:08 UTCRichRico Thanks for the obsrvations
The area appears big because I made a mistake while climbing a set of changes in different parts of the world, after that, I have more careful when uploading changes
32015-10-21 22:18:26 UTCRichRico Thanks for the obsrvations
The area appears big because I made a mistake while climbing a set of changes in different parts of the world, after that, I have more careful when uploading changes
12015-06-23 07:18:20 UTCGum4eg Pls read notes before making changes. The true way was to delete this line.
22015-10-21 22:01:31 UTCRichRico I do not remove the line because there was a note, I was in the task of "highway intersects highway"
12015-07-20 13:05:34 UTCSomeoneElse Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263258600/history is actually a parking_aisle? It seems to be outside the bounds of the car park.
22015-10-21 21:52:37 UTCRichRico in the place I corrected the task of "Impossible oneways", I don't know if the road is parking aisle or not
12015-07-16 19:46:29 UTCndm Did you survey this?

I think it's a bad idea to treat private roads as impossible -- often there's a direction indicator on the public highway -- but without clear satellite imagery it can't be completely mapped. Better to add a note or a FIXME.
22015-07-17 08:41:38 UTCSomeoneElse All an "impossible" oneway entrance road normally means is that someone hasn't mapped the corresponding exit yet. It makes sense for a QA site to highlight this as something needing surveying, but you shouldn't just remove the data that caused the QA entry - it removes valid information f...
32015-10-21 21:42:01 UTCRichRico Thanks for the note. You're right, could be much better is add notes, and keep the oneway tag,in this case I reverted my changeset: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32786706) and I added a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/400894
12015-07-24 21:21:03 UTCGoffredo please, don't add nodes where there are none. A motorway that share nodes with a track look a bit strange, no?
22015-10-21 21:05:19 UTCRichRico I intersected the roads because I worked with To-fix in the task "highway intersect highway", but the error it was already reversed
12015-08-06 09:51:57 UTCSomeoneElse Hi - just wondered what the actual change was here - http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=33113079 shows the road being straightened a bit - is that what "Fixing kinks Roads" means? Also for info a look at the underlying GPS traces suggests that the imagery might be out a couple...
22015-10-21 20:51:05 UTCRichRico I aligned the road because the images of Bing doesn't match with the trace
12015-09-24 21:31:39 UTCRub21 Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
22015-09-24 21:49:48 UTCRichRico ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯
12014-11-12 10:31:38 UTCSomeoneElse I notice that you've joined a footpath and bridleway here. What is the source for this? The footpath was "source=npe", meaning that it was copied from an old map. Are you sure that it still exists?
22014-11-17 18:44:43 UTCRub21 hello, I fixed it, i think it doesn't exist the footway, the data is from 2009 and the images bing are more recently
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26849654
32014-11-17 18:55:44 UTCSomeoneElse Thanks - the data for the footway's actually from around 1950, not 2009! (it's source=npe). I'll close http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/236762 and create another one the other side of Hungerhill Lane, suggesting that a survey is done there.

In situations such as this it's really not helpful to ...
29 changeset(s) created by RichRico have been discussed with a total of 55 comment(s)