Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-08-11 17:23:50 UTCridixcr Hi UI Guy!

In this changeset you added a restriction=no_straight_on which is not visible according to Mapillary Images also Openstreetcam you could detail the veracity and validity of this restriction.

For more details aboit this restriccion https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4285154
12017-08-02 09:54:50 UTCridixcr hi _Juul_!
Welcome to openstreetmap, In this area you added several objects like (highway=residential, natural=water and more details) not visible in the satellite images (Bing, Mapbox, PDOK Luchtfoto Beeldmateriaal 25cm) you could specify which source you used to add these objects?
22017-08-02 17:32:13 UTC_Juul_ Yes, I live there :)

New buildings are completed the last weeks. The new waters are created by the project builder (Trebbe).

See for example this renderer: https://i0.wp.com/www.stadsverarming.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Vlierhoeve-na-1.png

(Dunno if I could upload photo's over here).

...
32017-08-02 17:48:46 UTC_Juul_ A better source, from the official Municipality

https://www.nieuwegein.nl/fileadmin/bestanden/Projecten/Blokhoeve/2017-03-28_plankaart_blokhoeve_totaal_maart_2017.pdf
12017-07-12 23:49:40 UTCStereo Dude. It said "New outdoor fitness (athletics, bars) near completion.” in the changeset comment. Of course there’s no visible geometry, and now our newbie is potentially confused.
22017-07-13 06:36:57 UTCridixcr Hi! πŸ‘‹

Thanks for the clarification πŸ’‘
I proceeded to reverse my changesets

have nice day πŸ™‡
32017-07-13 14:06:47 UTCStereo Cheers! You too!
12017-07-06 14:51:46 UTCridixcr Welcome to OSM, reviewing your editions throughout this area I could see that you added several objects without any tag and with invalid names.
If you have doubts about how to add map features you can consult this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features, meanwhile I have reverted your ...
22017-07-06 16:43:36 UTCKaur Manpreet Thank you for the greetings,but I tagged all the buildings perhaps they seems invalid to you. You could tell me about that and i would definitely make the changes .
Your action of deleting all my nodes surprised me and made my efforts useless.
32017-07-07 17:37:14 UTCridixcr hi Kaur Manpreet! πŸ‘‹
Thank you very much for your contribution in Ludhiana on OSM 🌏, Sorry for the inconvenience of the elimination of untagged objects πŸ™‡, I will add more characteristics in the area so we improve together as a community.

βš™ Some plugins to help you with your OSM contrib...
42017-07-08 15:18:32 UTCKaur Manpreet Thank you a lot for your help and your suggestions will be very useful to me.
12017-07-06 14:47:22 UTCridixcr Hi Mahesh Madhav!

Welcome to OSM, reviewing your editions I could see that you added several objects without any tag and with invalid names.
If you have doubts about how to add map features you can consult this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features, meanwhile I have reverted you...
12017-06-26 23:43:59 UTCridixcr Hi tohaashrak! πŸ‘‹ 🌏
Welcome to Openstreetmap, checking your changes in all this area I saw that you are making several errors for example you use the name=yes for everything, and in some cases a bad combination of tags.
If you need help on the correct use of tags and learn good practices of m...
12017-06-26 23:43:00 UTCridixcr Hi fahimreza! πŸ‘‹ 🌏
Welcome to Openstreetmap, checking your changes in all this area I saw that you are making several errors for example you use the name=yes for everything.
If you need help on the correct use of tags and learn good practices of mapping do not hesitate to communicate with m...
12017-06-26 23:41:27 UTCridixcr Hi bindubritto! πŸ‘‹ 🌏
Welcome to Openstreetmap, checking your changes in all this area I saw that you are making several errors for example you use the name=yes for everything.
If you need help on the correct use of tags and learn good practices of mapping do not hesitate to communicate with...
12017-06-26 23:40:07 UTCridixcr Hi xihad! πŸ‘‹ 🌏
Welcome to Openstreetmap, checking your changes in all this area I saw that you are making several errors for example you use the name=yes for everything.
If you need help on the correct use of tags and learn good practices of mapping do not hesitate to communicate with me, a...
12017-06-26 23:38:41 UTCridixcr Hi Prithikona Mou! πŸ‘‹ 🌏
Welcome to Openstreetmap, checking your changes in all this area I saw that you are making several errors for example you use the name=yes for everything.
If you need help on the correct use of tags and learn good practices of mapping do not hesitate to communicate wit...
12017-06-26 23:33:50 UTCridixcr Hi Anik Roy! πŸ‘‹ 🌏

Welcome to Openstreetmap, checking your changes in all this area I saw that you are making several errors for example you use the name=yes for everything, and in some cases a bad combination of tags.

If you need help on the correct use of tags and learn good practices of...
12017-06-09 22:14:15 UTCzaizone Thank you for reverting that changeset !
22017-06-10 02:19:12 UTCridixcr hi zaizone πŸ‘‹!

We are to contribute for the well-being of our map 🌍

Have a nice day πŸ‘
12017-06-09 15:50:33 UTCridixcr Hi clemuss!
Welcome to OSM, I see that in this changeset you added several points with the single name and removed highways that are clearly visible on the satellite image for this reason I will proceed to reverse your changes, if you need help do not hesitate to contact me gladly I will help you
22017-06-09 22:22:21 UTCzaizone Bonjour "clemuss", les points que vous aviez ajouté correspondaient probablement à un petit marché local, malheureusement les informations temporaires ne sont pas prises en compte dans OpenStreetMap.
Voir : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Page_principale
Pour...
12017-06-08 20:33:14 UTCridixcr Hi Qazim Ibishi!

Thank you very much for contributing with OSM, among your changes I see you remove several tags that are valid according to reliable open sources https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q189969, according to the comment that you attached.
You could attach a reliable source that guarantees...
12017-06-07 21:24:23 UTCridixcr Use : DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery
12017-06-05 17:05:12 UTCridixcr Hi Lichfield_DC!
Thanks for contributing with OSM, I see that you added a highway that is not visible in Bing, that another source used to trace it?
22017-06-06 08:43:42 UTCLichfield_DC Yes apologies. This has been taken by the developers plan (public domain - open data) and geo-referenced via shapefile then superimposed upon the OpenStreetmap to allow for digitization of road structure
12017-05-30 13:11:20 UTCChris Fleming why did you remove the name of the artwork?
22017-05-30 14:58:15 UTCridixcr Hi Chris Fleming!
Thank you very much for contributing with OSM, I removed it because it was a Profanity name, if you confirm that the valid name will proceed to reverse my changeset.

Have a good day
32017-05-30 14:59:57 UTCridixcr Thank you for informing me, I see that you added it already.
42017-05-30 15:36:00 UTCChris Fleming Thanks a few seconds on google would have been sufficient to determine that this is a genuine name: https://www.jupiterartland.org/artwork/suck

(especially as the Editor who added the name is a experienced editor with may changesets)
12017-05-17 20:20:51 UTCAlecs01 Hi, I don't believe those could be place names, "bivio" simply means "crossroads", did you contact the original mappers?
22017-05-17 20:32:39 UTCridixcr Hi Alecs01!

Leave a note so that they can confirm the existence of the signaling nodes.
32017-05-17 20:35:25 UTCAlecs01 I'm trying to contact them via changeset comments, those are not place names for sure
42017-05-17 20:52:45 UTCridixcr The descriptions that are attached are images that show footpath signals, so change it by generic locations, with respect to the names we will have to wait for the local mappers.
52017-05-17 21:16:52 UTCAlecs01 And the name=* tag says "footpath signal" :) those are descriptive names put in by newbies, it looks like some team work, 5-6 new users started to map here recently. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the effort your team is doing helping to improve the map all over the world, but please don...
12017-05-16 15:37:51 UTCridixcr Hi rooxx!

Thank you very much to contribute with OSM, I see that in this changeset you added a building and a park, you could confirm its existence and which source of image you used, in Bing they are not visible.
12017-05-11 19:46:36 UTCridixcr Hello again!

You made the same changes as in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48569637, you modified a good geometry for another one that clearly intersects with paved areas (parking), otherwise to delimit area you can use http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier are tips for good map...
12017-05-11 19:46:14 UTCridixcr Hi Tarble_Fu!

Thank you very much for contributing on OSM, in this changeset I can see that you eliminated several 'service=parking_aisle' highways that added based on the satellite image and to the categorization according to the existing documentation: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:se...
22017-05-20 22:34:15 UTCTarble_Fu Hi ridixcr,

Sorry for any mishaps. That was my first (?) day contributing to OSM and I wasn't aware of some of the community standards. For example, I deleted and replaced that landuse (which was itself one you had previously deleted and replaced) because I did not realize it was inappropriate ...
12017-05-04 18:56:38 UTCDalkvist Hi the edit you changed was from a new user in, Sweden we prefer to talk to new users and try to inform them how to do better edits rather than just changing things, hoping to engage them in the local community (unless it is something big).
So can you give us a few days to contact them and for the...
22017-05-05 14:15:16 UTCridixcr hi Dalkvist !
Thank you very much for contributing with OSM,
Right now I will proceed to reverse my changes, guide me according to the satellite image I am sorry, please you can modify both geometry and data according to local knowledge.
32017-05-05 14:27:29 UTCridixcr https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48428786

Done, have an excellent day.

Att: Pavel

12017-04-18 02:40:59 UTCDiΓ³genes de Sinope Hello ridixcr, I could not help but notice that you had altered an edit that I had made a few days ago (the same edit that I had made prior)

the edit that is of concern to me is in regards to the 'lanes:forward' designation I had applied which you had removed in this particular changeset

I was...
22017-04-20 17:01:46 UTCridixcr Hi Diógenes de Sinope!

I read your comment on this change, I will send you more details on why you remove this tag, check your Imbox.
12017-04-15 17:23:26 UTCridixcr
Hi TueroDaniel!

Thanks for your contribution with Openstreetmap, but do you have any source or photos that guarantee that these buildings were demolished?
While I restore these buildings.

Have a good day, pavel.
12017-04-04 10:46:17 UTCDilys Bonjour,
Pourquoi as-tu supprimé ce nœud? C'est un lieu-dit/hameau que j'ai ajouté il y a quelques jours. A La Hure est son nom officiel.
Dilys
22017-04-04 20:49:50 UTCridixcr Bonjour Dilys
des excuses était une traduction littérale, en ce moment je fixe
32017-04-04 20:54:01 UTCridixcr https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47456036
42017-04-05 12:35:46 UTCDilys Merci.
12017-03-13 17:42:22 UTCridixcr
Hi John Sinclair Thanks for contributing with Openstreetmap, but I found that you added objects that are not visible in the satellite image that you used, osm does not use private sources or any other type of resource that is not free use, delete water = pond because of this, I will reverse my cha...
22017-03-14 10:31:08 UTCJohn Sinclair Hi ridixcr, I rode down the new cycle path on my bicycle and I saw the pond with my eyes, it is the biggest feature in the park.
12017-02-22 15:39:19 UTCridixcr Hey, λ‚˜λ¦°ν•œμšΈ! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
22017-02-22 15:52:19 UTCλ‚˜λ¦°ν•œμšΈ I notice that So I want to delete What I did SO How can I undo this
32017-02-26 02:11:36 UTCpnorman Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


μ...
42017-02-26 02:52:49 UTCλ‚˜λ¦°ν•œμšΈ Please delete this data.
I'm sorry to use vworld.
12017-02-22 15:25:55 UTCridixcr Hi YSJM!, in this changeset you deleted several school buildings without specifying details of said action, your comment was add building. You can reverse this changeset please.
12017-02-22 14:43:47 UTCridixcr Hey, μ˜€λ―Όμ„! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-22 14:43:30 UTCridixcr Hey, μ˜€λ―Όμ„! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:53:43 UTCridixcr Hey, oruk09! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:53:09 UTCridixcr Hey, REMIND! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:52:44 UTCridixcr Hey, minseo! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:52:18 UTCridixcr Hey, oruk09! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:51:54 UTCridixcr Hey, user204938! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:51:27 UTCridixcr Hey, REMIND! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:51:09 UTCridixcr Hey, REMIND! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:50:20 UTCridixcr Hey, Lavignein! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
22017-02-17 05:09:35 UTCLavignein I haven't consider about licence. so I don't know if Custom imagery that I used meets requirements of osm licence. If I broke osm licence, what should I do? Can I withdraw my contribute?
12017-02-16 15:49:54 UTCridixcr Hey, minseo! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:49:24 UTCridixcr Hey, astrangel! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
22017-02-26 02:17:30 UTCpnorman Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


μ...
12017-02-16 15:48:44 UTCridixcr Hey, codered2! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:48:06 UTCridixcr Hey, SeokYellow! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:47:33 UTCridixcr Hey, foxstar maje! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:45:44 UTCridixcr Hey, foxstar maje! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-16 15:44:41 UTCridixcr Hey, μ•ˆλ…•ν•˜μ„Έμš”! I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ? Seems that you do not eligible to use this source for OSM (ToS - http://user.vworld.kr/po_prcint_a001.do)
12017-02-09 15:30:27 UTCridixcr hi!
Thanks for contributing with openstreetmap, but checking your changes, I found that you deleted a natural = wood that was added by another user, could detail the reason.
22017-02-09 15:32:09 UTCridixcr The elimination can be verified here http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45890302
12017-01-28 02:26:55 UTCnyuriks Hi, I reverted this changeset because I suspect it was an accident - clearly this is not a bridge. Let me know if it should be fixed further, thanks!
22017-02-07 03:47:53 UTCridixcr Hi nyuriks!
Thank you for pointing this out and fixing it, it was one of my first edits, so it's probably a beginner mistake.
12017-01-26 15:33:31 UTCridixcr Hi Rothan22!

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. While working in this area I noticed you deleted a freeway service which is clearly visible in the satellite imagery Bing.
22017-01-26 22:04:07 UTCRothan22 Please note this is not a Freeway Service Area. Local Teamsters own this and have expanded this complex. This is considered private property and is now gated off. I can add recent pictures of the area if there needs to be further confirmation
32017-01-26 22:05:40 UTCRothan22 As a side note Building # 3825 is no longer a business and is now owned by local teamsters
12017-01-24 23:34:03 UTCridixcr
Hi virasumba!

I see that you deleted landuse's that are clearly seen in satellite image Bing, which added by another user, to which such elimination is due?
12017-01-20 09:48:59 UTCSWF8 Please take care - you are frequently using the key 'railway' instead of 'name'. Thank you.
22017-01-24 21:39:33 UTCridixcr Hi SWF8!
Thanks for pointing this out. I think it's because of the autocomplete action in JOSM, but will be careful while adding names. I also have run a query to find same mistakes around the US and I didn't find anything, notify me if you find them, please!
Thanks for your feedback again.
32017-01-25 09:07:58 UTCSWF8 Hi ridixcr.
You didn't find any because I fixed them before ;-)
Best regards, SWF8
12017-01-19 09:12:40 UTCoba510 Are you sure these service roads you added open to the public? They're on a military base and you can see a gate and concrete barriers visible in the bing aerial.
22017-01-20 17:15:45 UTCridixcr Hi Oba510,
Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I have reverted my changes and the changes can be found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299888. I will be more careful with my edits. Thanks again.
12017-01-19 09:44:58 UTCoba510 Hi, you have added a parking aisle in a small parking lot, but tagged it as highway=residential. Parking aisles should be tagged as highway=service, service=parking_aisle. Thanks!
22017-01-20 17:14:56 UTCridixcr Hi again Oba510,
Thanks again for letting me know about this and also clarifying what tags are apt. The changes have been done accordingly. They can be found in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299739.
12016-12-14 08:17:47 UTCSHARCRASH Hi, This is not a MP but a simple relation to relate several parts of the remnants from a building in ruins, therefore the exact shape is unknown.
If you were rather reported here because of a building key being set on an unclosed line element well in my opinion this is a flaw of the tag itself.
...
22017-01-16 03:12:29 UTCridixcr hi SHARCRASH!

With regards to the comment about my change, my apologies for having removed this tag and thanks for revertiro but according to the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Druins "building = ruins" are applied on areas in any case would apply this other tag &...
12017-01-09 16:26:03 UTCridixcr
Hi Yoshinion!

According to the images of mapbox satellite and bing this forest exists.

You do not specify the reason for the deletion or why you deleted another user's edition.

Please correct this change.
12016-12-12 18:50:51 UTCridixcr *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
22016-12-14 07:39:11 UTCmargonotmango Please check this https://github.com/phbender/liblanelet.
But now I'm trying to revert changeset.
I'm so sorry.
32016-12-19 03:03:06 UTCAlexey Lukin Many roads in Cambridge, MA, have become disconnected after these changes. The Red Line has also shifted away from its accurate track alignment established in a changeset 31029556.
Can someone please cleanup this mess?
42016-12-20 01:40:07 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-11-30 16:38:58 UTCHjart Please note the discussion at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44017219
22016-12-01 23:01:02 UTCridixcr Hi Hjart,
Thank you for reaching out and notifying me about this error. This is was a to-fix detection error, which now we know to not consider as an error. We will make sure that this is not repeated.

Thanks for your feedback
12016-11-30 13:26:39 UTCff5722 You connected a motorway to a tertiary road as level crossing. This only makes matters worse, please pay attention to the road types before connecting them.
22016-12-01 22:55:56 UTCridixcr Hi ff5722,

Thank you for notifying me about this. This was an oversight on my part. Hope this change hasn't done much damage to the map. I will henceforth be very careful about what I am editing on the map.

Thanks for your feedback
12016-11-27 09:50:43 UTCHjart I've simplified this, so that we avoid triggering any more issues here (noting that one of your coworkers had been here before)
22016-11-28 13:22:07 UTCridixcr Hi Hjart,
Thank you for resolving this issue and notifying me about this change. It certainly makes it simple and help in avoiding further editing conflicts.
Thank you
12016-11-15 15:07:52 UTCridixcr Hi!
In several places of this change there are tunnels please add layer = -1, a suggestion http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
12016-11-08 22:27:52 UTCzeromap Please review the discussion on this changeset, the situation is the same. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43187605

This is the object that corresponds with the wikidata tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3169206

Mass-adding tags without fixing the underlying data makes more ba...
22016-11-09 13:49:02 UTCridixcr Thank you for highlighting this. I have removed the tag from this node and will follow the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43187605 on how we should fix this.
12016-11-02 00:09:14 UTCnevw The change you have made using satellite info is incorrect. That part of Hercules Road ends in a short stub as previously mapped and has a lift gate to. Bear in mind that programs like #to-fix are only suggesting an error MAY be present, not that there is an error to correct. Mapbox and Bing are out...
22016-11-02 15:36:54 UTCridixcr Hi newv,
Thank you for notifying me about this error and also rectifying it. The imageries are outdated in certain places, agreed. I will make sure to confirm or at least add a note in places of doubt.

Thanks for your feedback.
12016-09-24 14:54:52 UTCRelakShun Problem: the roads between the Újtelep utca and Andrássy út to the east from the crucifix is not connected recently. There is a cordon which prevents to go to the Andrássy út. It is missing from Google Street View
22016-09-26 18:46:24 UTCridixcr Hey there!

Thank you very much for the info, I reversed my change.

previous change
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=42257997

current change
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42434317#map=19/47.65891/19.29273
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=42434317

Thanks for...
32016-09-26 18:56:23 UTCRelakShun You are welcome.
I wanted to use that road for cycling, but found out I won't be able to do so :( About a 100m shortcut went away :)
42016-09-26 20:06:29 UTCridixcr lol man exercise :)
12016-09-26 01:28:55 UTCKrealt Pecan lane goes through three recorded subdivisions. The most north is Yellowstone and then Driftwood and the most south is Scarlet Oaks Subdivision. Pecan is only 40 feet wide. At Cottonwood Drive the road shifts by 10 feet to the east. At that point the road is 100 feet wide by 200 feet long where...
22016-09-26 01:32:18 UTCKrealt And definitely not a highway, Pecan is only 40 feet wide. Where Dutch Leming is 100 feet wide and shifted to the east.
32016-09-26 01:51:48 UTCKrealt Look at Dutch Leming Ln Road Cycling in Google Maps. In the photo you will see the theater sign on the left and the leaning power pole on the right is the width. And you will see straight ahead what was once a sales office for lots in the nineteen sixties era. Thanks for all your help in correcting ...
42016-09-26 18:47:31 UTCridixcr Hey there! again

I use image sources Bing, Satellite MapBox, Misaligned TIGER New Roads (2015) and Large Scale USGS Imagery but do not use google maps.

if you know the city very well, please correct it and please do not leave overlapping streets that was the initial error

Thanks for your fe...
12016-09-22 03:19:08 UTCKrealt I work for the City of Cottonwood Shores on the roads, sewer and water plant. Today our team removed reflective markers from this road and the Burnet County re-topped the road. Thanks for leaving 1/2 of this road segment as Dutch Leming Lane. Please straighten and change the other portion to Dutch L...
22016-09-22 22:33:48 UTCKrealt Thanks, I am not sure where the help came from, but a change has finally been made to correct the entry to Cottonwood Shores to Dutch Leming Lane on Google Maps. Google finally accepted my request for this change, hopefully it stays. Thanks for any and all help given to get my small city I live and ...
32016-09-25 23:11:20 UTCridixcr Hey there!

Thank you very much for the information just basing correct errors with the following sources Bing, Satellite MapBox, Misaligned TIGER New Roads (2015) and Large Scale USGS Imagery but not with the source that you suggest .

my changes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4237632...
12016-09-20 17:17:26 UTCLittlebtc Some roads are wrong. There were in the military base and the place is now rebuilding industrial area. I made a changeset about that:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42304200
22016-09-25 23:10:04 UTCridixcr Hey there!

Thank you very much to reverse the change was a mistake add streets in an rebuilding industrial area.

Thanks for your feedback.
12016-09-16 16:53:27 UTCassanges The path you've added had been canceled already, which I had check by cycling hours before. Thanks for understanding.
22016-09-25 23:08:55 UTCridixcr Hey there!

Thank you very much for correcting my changes, will be very careful with areas in contruccion.

Thanks for your feedback.
12016-09-12 19:13:19 UTCdolphinling You might want to recheck this edit, it doesn't look correct.
22016-09-15 15:18:57 UTCridixcr Hey there!

Thank you very much, I improved my edits around the suggested area.

Thanks for your feedback.
12016-09-09 17:08:18 UTCTomas Straupis Simple splitting of ways does not solve the problem of impossible angle routing. Turn restriction is missing.
I've added a missing restriction here, you can check it and use the same principle in other places.
22016-09-12 22:30:06 UTCridixcr Hey there

Thanks for contributing by adding turn restrictions. I really don't know this place so I cannot guess where a turn restriction exists. About your suggestion for adding restrictions I would like you to share the wiki or any documentation that support this principle.

Thanks for your fe...
32016-09-13 08:09:19 UTCTomas Straupis Point is that it does not matter for routing purposes if OSM way is split or not. For example in this particular situation splitting the way to two segments: one going out of the red road and another going back into the red road has absolutely no impact on routing.
Routing algorithms will split the...
12016-09-01 15:23:03 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check this way:
https://osm.org/way/439756626
It has many strange tags, likely a copy and paste error.
Cheers, Jan
22016-09-12 21:47:22 UTCridixcr Hey there!
You're totally right, and I've already fixed tags on this road.
Thanks for your feedback!
12016-08-23 16:42:22 UTCridixcr fixing broken relation in Detroit
22016-08-23 16:46:48 UTCridixcr Sorry for the comment of the change set, I was a detail that was overlooked
12016-08-23 16:42:08 UTCridixcr fixing broken relation in Detroit
22016-08-23 16:46:44 UTCridixcr Sorry for the comment of the change set, I was a detail that was overlooked
12016-08-23 16:43:57 UTCridixcr fixing broken relation in Detroit
22016-08-23 16:46:08 UTCridixcr Sorry for the comment of the change set, I was a detail that was overlooked
12016-08-23 16:43:42 UTCridixcr fixing broken relation in Detroit
22016-08-23 16:46:03 UTCridixcr Sorry for the comment of the change set, I was a detail that was overlooked
12016-08-23 16:43:31 UTCridixcr fixing broken relation in Detroit
22016-08-23 16:45:59 UTCridixcr Sorry for the comment of the change set, I was a detail that was overlooked
12016-08-23 16:43:21 UTCridixcr fixing broken relation in Detroit
22016-08-23 16:45:55 UTCridixcr Sorry for the comment of the change set, I was a detail that was overlooked
12016-08-14 14:06:02 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you please check the tagging of this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436792107
Looks rather strange.
Cheers, Jan
22016-08-16 20:19:42 UTCridixcr Hey there!
This looks as a data stored pasted by mistake while mapping turn:lanes. I've already fixed it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41496731 and I also looked for data with this possible wrong tags.
Thanks for your feedback.
12016-07-30 11:46:30 UTCGazer75 This change broke https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5302948
If you do not know how to deal with large multipolygons then please ask for help fixing errors.

I have fixed the problem.
22016-08-10 16:47:09 UTCridixcr Hey there!

Thanks for notifying me about this change. I will be more careful in future especially when working on large multipolygons and relations.

Thank you for your feedback.
12016-07-21 20:26:19 UTCCarnildo Please pay attention when dealing with this sort of mis-tagged way. Yes, it was mis-tagged as a quarry. But it is also mis-tagged as a mineshaft, a ditch, a peak, and an incorrectly-named road.
22016-07-22 20:39:57 UTCridixcr As I commented in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40909243, I removed only the landuse=quarry because I fixing broken polygons. And in the same way, I've already reverted my edit here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40922008. Thanks for your feedback again.
12016-07-21 03:13:56 UTCCarnildo When you come across an issue like this in the Inland Northwest area of the United States, there's usually more than one problem with the data. In this case, for example, way #13922679 was simultaneously tagged as a mine, a stream, and two different roads.
22016-07-22 20:39:02 UTCridixcr Hey there!
The tag landuse=quarry is recommended just for points or areas, and as you can see in the changeset comment I was working on broken polygons so that was the reason for removing just the mentioned tag. However if you know better this area, you can please clean up all the incorrect tags in...
12016-05-20 15:27:27 UTCtrigpoint *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
22016-05-20 15:27:34 UTCSomeoneElse Oops, I think that you accidentally deleted the towpath here http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327119715/history .

Also how is it related to "Add missing turn lanes from satellite imagery in Dallas and Fort Worth https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/180"? Has someone discovered oil ...
32016-05-20 16:05:13 UTCtrigpoint I have reverted this, and your other changeset.
I did spot that prior to your original change, the towpath had been drawn under the bridge and you incorrectly moved it into the field.
42016-05-24 16:52:52 UTCridixcr Hey there!
trigpoint, thanks for reverting this changeset, I will keep in account your suggestion about leaving notes in places that the satellite imagery doesn't permit to difference accurately paths. Thanks to you all for the feedback.
12016-05-04 22:29:09 UTCrickmastfan67 Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one state or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area...
22016-05-20 16:47:51 UTCridixcr Hey there!

I think it is a mistake that I committed layers,from now onwards not commit.

Thanks for your feed back!
32016-05-20 17:02:06 UTCridixcr Hi rickmastfan67,
I'm not sure how this happened since I'm working with To-Fix Plugin, maybe I could have confused the layers while downloading data manually. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback
12016-05-07 23:49:35 UTCFTA Hi, is there any way you can confine edits across the world to separate changesets? It's difficult see what exactly was changed when the bbox covers nearly all longitudes.
22016-05-20 16:46:25 UTCridixcr Hey there!

I think it is a mistake that I committed layers,from now onwards not commit.

Thanks for your feed back!
32016-05-20 17:00:51 UTCridixcr "Hey! there,
I'm not sure how this happened since I'm working with To-Fix Plugin, maybe I could have confused the layers while downloading data manually. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback"
12016-05-14 00:30:03 UTCFTA Hi, I commented on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39148570 last week about minimizing the coverage of edits in the same changeset. Can you try to separate edits from across the world into multiple changes? Otherwise, monitoring local edits is more difficult.
22016-05-20 16:46:00 UTCridixcr Hey there!

I think it is a mistake that I committed layers,from now onwards not commit.

Thanks for your feed back!
12016-05-19 18:52:22 UTCtrigpoint Hi, are you sure about this?
You have just connected a towpath (way 327119715) to a bridge at level 1.
First sanity check is how would this work without disconnecting the horse from the boat?
Bing imagery fortunately answers this, the path is under the bridge, there is no connection. The fixme on...
22016-05-20 16:26:56 UTCridixcr Hey there!
I didn't realize about this path, thanks for reverting my changeset. I will take in account your suggestion, and also I will be careful next time.

Thanks for your feedback.
ridixcr has contributed to 84 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 164 comment(s)