Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-06-20 14:35:22 UTCdieterdreist This changeset added a wikidata reference to this node, which is referring to the museum. The museum already has the wikidata reference.
22017-07-05 15:29:11 UTCsamely Hi dieterdreist. Thanks for deleting this duplicate feature and for contributing to OSM.
12017-04-20 16:32:55 UTCtrigpoint Hi, thank you for your contribution however there are a few issues with this edit.

1. You have not tagged it as junction=roundabout.
2. A roundabout normally takes the highest classification, so this one should be primary. Exceptions are when there are motorways involved but that doesn't apply h...
22017-04-20 17:03:45 UTCsamely Thanks Phil! I've already added these details.
12017-04-10 08:23:56 UTCzstadler Hello samely,

Rawabi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1336647687
is clearly not one of "the largest settlements within a territory" for the Western Bank, as defined by the OSM wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity
.
Please keep its place=town tag.
12017-03-02 09:51:27 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi samely, you entered 8x tag "1"="yes", e.g. way/379682013. This seems to be a typo, as it has no meaning. Could you please fix it? Thanks, Alex
22017-03-02 20:36:31 UTCsamely Hi Aleks,
It's definitely a typo, thanks for flagging this out, I've already fixed them.
Regards,
Eliane
12017-01-26 21:37:22 UTCSpanholz Hey,

probably Drive-Through is not the right tag for this kind of way. Just found it while cleaning some imaginery Pokemon Go edits.

Thanks and hope you have still a little bit of fun after such an amazing amount of changesets.
22017-01-27 16:40:34 UTCsamely Hi Spanholz,
Thanks for pointing this out! I was just fixing connectivity issues, so I didn't review tags around this zone. You are completely right, it's not a "service=drive-through" feature, it should probably be tagged as "highway=path" or "highway=track", dependin...
12017-01-13 13:34:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465259458

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-13 14:37:44 UTCsamely Hi Jan,
Can you be more specific, please? I checked it out, however, I didn't find anything special.

Regards,
Eliane
32017-01-13 14:39:35 UTCmueschel The way has the tag "170 south=Andover Lane"
42017-01-13 14:45:09 UTCsamely I was reviewing the big street, thanks for pointing this out, I've already fixed it.
12016-12-20 23:09:45 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:25 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:19 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:15 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:11 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:47 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:05 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:48 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:02 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:48 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:58 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:50 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:46 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:35 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:31 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:28 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:23 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:20 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:15 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:08 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:03 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:52 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:53 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:52 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:49 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:44 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:39 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:35 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:25 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:21 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:17 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:13 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:08 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:56 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:04 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:56 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:59 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:56 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:54 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:50 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:46 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:41 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:36 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:32 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:23 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:18 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:15 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:08 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:10:00 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:04 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-19 16:57:14 UTCAlexey Lukin Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your chan...
22016-12-19 19:18:40 UTCwoodpeck I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
32016-12-19 19:21:13 UTCAlexey Lukin Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:

I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has
happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street
crossings here, it will become apparent:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999

In fact, the ...
42016-12-19 20:23:47 UTCsamely Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.

Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.
Let me know if you need...
52016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
62016-12-21 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
72017-01-06 14:55:37 UTCsamely Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12017-01-05 18:44:42 UTCsamely Testing To-fix
12017-01-05 15:54:21 UTCsamely Testing to-fix plugin.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:47 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:45 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:45 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:44 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:43 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:43 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:43 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:42 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:42 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:42 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-20 23:09:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-16 16:04:34 UTCSomeoneElse It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet. That way local mappers can see what has been affected near them.
Best Regards,
Andy
22016-12-16 19:46:21 UTCsamely Hi Andy
Thanks for notifying this since we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes using to-fix plugin. We are working on fixing this bug and tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74.
12016-12-16 15:36:26 UTComargibran Hello. Thanks a lot. Although I see Mexico in the orange square, it is not listed in the github link of countries. Are mexican highways being corrected? Cheers
22016-12-16 19:36:50 UTCsamely Thanks for noticing this, actually changes were in Los Angeles and Japan and not in Mexico. However, thanks to your comment we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes that we are tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74
12016-11-25 20:06:18 UTCDenisCarriere How did this happen? This Wikidata code is for Iran?
22016-11-27 17:48:59 UTCsamely Hi Denis. I'm not sure how this happened, however, I'll compare values carefully. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it.
12016-02-09 14:26:34 UTCcarciofo Please note that Taft Street is *not* a dual carriageway as it has no physical separator. In addition, when splitting dual carriageways, ensure that you have connected intersecting roads to both one-ways and set oneway=yes on both directions. That was not done here.
22016-09-26 16:25:42 UTCsamely Hey, carciofo.
You are completely right, not all Taft Street is a dual carriage. So thank you for fixing the segment which has no physical separation and sharing the way this should be mapped.
12016-09-21 00:19:17 UTCApo42 way 396026060 is not a building. It's a camper van. please stop tracing buildings automatically if the algorithm is not able to do it correct.
22016-09-26 16:05:26 UTCsamely Hi Apo24.
I added it because it looks like a little part of the house. However, if you know better this place, please, feel free to retagging it or even deleting it. Thanks for contributing to improving the map.
12016-09-23 17:12:17 UTCSomeoneElse Hello again,
This looks like quite a large changeset for only 3 changes :)

Rather than adding #gibberish changeset comments could you please describe what you changed and where?
Best Regards,
Andy
22016-09-26 16:00:02 UTCsamely Hey Andy.
I agree with you, it wasn't intentionally since I could mistake the edit layers while fixing unclosed multi-polygons by deleting an overlapped way around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3786309618 and adding this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131693153. Thanks for pointing...
12016-09-11 20:08:25 UTCPaul_012 Reverted by changeset 42049445 because the edit introduced layer conflicts and was inaccurate.
12016-09-11 20:05:43 UTCPaul_012 Partially reverted by changeset 42049972 because the edit introduced layer conflicts.
22016-09-11 20:08:02 UTCPaul_012 And further reverted by changeset 42049972 because of inaccuracy.
12016-09-11 20:04:56 UTCPaul_012 Reverted by changeset 42049445 because the edit introduced layer conflicts.
12016-09-11 20:04:51 UTCPaul_012 Reverted by changeset 42049445 because the edit introduced layer conflicts.
12016-07-17 10:07:03 UTCSomeoneElse Hi,
Just for info, I've added a changeset comment to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195315 to try and get this fixed properly. The current layout of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361673628/history (with zig-zags in it) is clearly wrong now and the history shows that that was caused b...
22016-07-20 23:50:23 UTCsamely Hey Andy.
Thanks for notifying this.
Greetings!
32016-07-20 23:53:43 UTCSomeoneElse For info, following a note to talk-au it's now been patched up in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40810205 .
12016-07-08 02:04:30 UTCMikeN Hi, Thank you for the fix. White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane.

Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki
22016-07-11 16:14:03 UTCsamely Hey there!
I've already fixed the number of lanes in all the road. Thanks for your feedback.
12016-07-08 01:09:52 UTCrickmastfan67 Just so you know, these are emergency access roads for fire departments and the police so they can access the PA Turnpike network quickly between interchanges, They are almost never 'oneway=yes', and should be tagged as 'oneway=no' instead.
22016-07-08 01:13:48 UTCrickmastfan67 So, in the future, just take 5 seconds to look at the Bing imagery. If you see a 'gate' on any point of the ramp in the imagery, 99.9% chance it should be 'oneway=no', especially if the highway it connects to is a toll highway. Also, the 'white' lines on each side of the ramp are a dead giveaway t...
32016-07-11 16:03:59 UTCsamely Hey there!
I removed the oneway tag so you can, please, fix it! Thanks for your very clear explanation about this kind of access.
12016-07-01 22:13:00 UTCsamely Importing buildings. Sorry for the comment.
12016-05-28 18:24:14 UTCeastender I think that the road added by this changeset is wrong. There used to be a road for traffic here, but it was removed several months ago. The satellite imagery hasn't caught up with this development yet. Currently there is a pedestrian square being constructed in the area between Aldgate High Street ...
22016-05-30 15:31:35 UTCsamely Hey! there,
I traced this road because there was a feedback saying that this road was missing, and based on satellite imagery I decided to trace it. Now that your feedback is kind contradictory to the other one, I decided to delete it and leave a note instead (openstreetmap.org/note/577832). Thanks...
12016-05-05 10:06:09 UTCChris Fleming I'm struggling to see the point of this "fix". Also it's bad form to delete and recreate a way (loosing the history) just to add a small "kink" into the road that I don't believe exists on the ground?
22016-05-05 12:43:03 UTCsamely Hey there! I can see in the satellite imagery that this road exist, this road was self intersected forming 0º. You can clearly see this solved error if you revert the changeset.
12016-04-07 09:35:25 UTCВладимир К Hello!
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c...
22016-04-07 15:07:35 UTCsamely Hey there! I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I don't know this place, but if you do, it would be great that you add those relations. I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38383360) Thanks for your feedback!
32016-04-08 11:31:08 UTCandygol Добрый день, Владимир К

Для того чтобы правильно прокладывался маршрут необходимо устанавливать, с помощью отношений, запреты поворотов - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/384...
42016-04-11 07:43:51 UTCВладимир К Спасибо, я знаю.
52016-04-11 07:45:42 UTCВладимир К А не слишком ли много там запретов? ну то есть разве не достаточно просто только прямо?
62016-04-11 10:15:12 UTCandygol Можно, конечно, поэкспериментировать с запретами, чтобы точно понять какие из них нужны
72016-04-11 10:16:32 UTCandygol Если опираться на знаки (я смотрел на Яндекс Панорамах) то для каждого направления нужно по два релейшена "только прямо"
82016-04-11 10:38:15 UTCВладимир К как тут?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37761536#map=19/55.73407/52.42464
92016-04-11 11:32:22 UTCandygol Да. Только нужно подождать пока данные попадут в OSRM или Mapzen, чтобы проверить это утверждение.

Вполне возможно, что можно ограничиться и одним релейшеном вместо дв...
102016-04-11 11:39:50 UTCandygol Пока что только мои предположения, если использовать средний сегмент линии с ролью 'via', то при построении маршрута от него (от этого сегмента) необходимо задавать д...
12016-04-07 06:31:53 UTCGS25 Hi there!

This road is not connected, which is why I didn't connect it.

Please do not blindly follow some software's idea of what is an error in OSM. There is no substitute for local knowledge (I live locally). If you are not sure, move on to another area, or ask the original mapper.

Than...
22016-04-07 14:37:47 UTCsamely Hey there. I really considered that roads should be connected. However I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38382289) and I suggest connecting the piece of road that seems to be an island. Thank you for you feedback!
12016-03-29 21:47:52 UTCJeopardyTempest Hi samely... I'm newish at OSM, and seems you've got a lot more history than I, but I'm really confused by these changes. You gave a US Interstate a Japanese name and speed limit, and added a strange 1 tag. I'd look about reverting, but you seem to know what you're doing enough to fix\\understand!...
22016-03-30 04:58:15 UTCmanings @JeopardyTempest, thank you for flagging this edit. I reverted the changes now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38157753
32016-03-30 08:50:30 UTCJeopardyTempest Thanks!
42016-03-30 13:44:56 UTCsamely Thanks manings for reverting it! Thanks JeopardyTempest for your feedback, I'll be careful next time
12016-03-23 12:59:22 UTCSomeoneElse Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.

Also what are the turn restrictions at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2667031585 ?
22016-03-23 14:11:48 UTCsamely Hey there! I was working on connectivity errors using To-Fix : http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/stats/highwayhighway. I didn't consider the turn restriction, but now is done! Thanks for your feedback.
32016-03-23 14:55:58 UTCSomeoneElse https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6074901 isn't correct. Traffic from the west can carry on along the ring road as well as turn right. It can't turn left. You'd need to survey it to see if u-turns are prohibited here.
There will be other similar restrictions at the other nodes too.
42016-03-23 19:47:56 UTCsamely You were right. I fixed it and added a note because I don't know about turn restrictions at this point. I just wanted to intersect highways. I'll be careful next time. Thanks!
12016-02-10 11:39:43 UTCmalenki Hi samely,
I just fixed the reservoir you broke in this edit.
What did you do?
You split a self intersecting outer way which resulted in
* an intersection between multipolygon ways (you should unglue these ways) and
* an outer way inside the outer ways (map them as inner ways)
hth
malenki
22016-02-15 17:14:32 UTCsamely Hey malenki. Thanks for your feedback and fixing the reservoir. I was working ungluing objects that was intersected each other. Btw, I'll be careful. Thanks
12015-11-20 20:20:53 UTCsamely This changeset was reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35470137
12015-09-02 19:55:19 UTCikz Are you sure in this points?
Yes, we can put nodes in intersections, but then we need to split ways and make lot of restrictions.
22015-11-16 14:25:01 UTCsamely Hi ikz, thanks for your feedback. I was fixing crossing ways, I think you should add at least turn restrictions, instead of deleting intersections.
32015-11-16 17:56:18 UTCikz KISS principle :) I took same results without any restrictions.
And point in way intersection is not necessary, but "useful practice".
42015-11-16 19:31:58 UTCsamely Hey there. I agree with this "useful practice".
12015-06-09 17:35:14 UTCmhenson Thank you! I have done a lot of mapping, but I have not reverted any change sets.
22015-11-16 14:06:49 UTCsamely Thanks to you.
12015-11-07 03:18:30 UTCmaxerickson There was some sort of accident with ways 17835459 and 171258574 here, they got connected to a bunch of the foot paths. I've fixed it.

It also seems it wasn't a hotosm project.
22015-11-09 14:01:37 UTCsamely Hi max erickson, thanks for fixing them. I made a mistake with the comment. I'll be careful. Thanks again.
12015-10-28 18:00:22 UTCskorasaurus http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357532353 is not a named road, but just an unnamed driveway; I've driven past it numerous times.


I've updated it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290
22015-10-28 18:43:05 UTCsamely Hey there! Thanks for updating the information about this way.
12015-10-25 14:07:23 UTCcarciofo Please be more careful and thorough when splitting dual carriageways. NW 56th Ave north- and south-bound segments were left unconnected, the entire undivided stretch between Sunrise Blvd and NW 19th St was left as one way, and many intersections were not extended to both directions. Thanks.
22015-10-26 14:20:29 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I saw you've already fixed them. I will keep your recommendation in mind . Thanks again.
12015-10-09 16:25:30 UTCsamely POI's were added.
12015-09-29 16:43:34 UTCikiya Please stop mass editing.
Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
22015-09-29 17:06:53 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) based on GIS imagery. In this case I aligned tertiary roads.
32015-09-30 10:34:15 UTCikiya Thank you for your explanation.
I understand.
Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.
(Japan Community mailing lists)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html
12015-09-01 01:37:15 UTCRub21 Esta segura de que un track esta connectando con un motroway?
22015-09-01 02:45:18 UTCsamely Según la imagen satelital del Bing hay varias vías que conectan con el motorway.
Sin embargo deje una nota. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33717486
12015-08-24 20:31:15 UTCMikeN Hi, thank you for the edits. I found some problems -

Frontage road was blocked years ago because it was a dangerous turn. It looks strange for a named road to be connected only by a driveway, but that's the real way it ended up. It would be dangerous for drivers to try to follow GPS for the ...
22015-08-24 22:24:31 UTCMikeN One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it.
32015-08-24 22:46:12 UTCsamely Hi there. Thanks for your feedback. I've been working based on TIGER, and I will consider your suggestion. Thanks again for fix them.
42015-08-30 21:34:21 UTCMikeN Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes. What was the reference used in moving those nodes? Thank you
52015-08-31 14:29:57 UTCsamely Hey there. I just tried to align the edited area based on Bing satellite imagery. Thanks for the comments again.
12015-08-21 23:30:03 UTCSomeoneElse Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659454313 is really the intersection of the trunk road on the bridge and the smaller road below?
22015-08-22 23:18:00 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, definitely those roads don't intersect each other. I've already fixed my mistake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33515239
Thank you again.
12015-08-07 17:07:58 UTCSomeoneElse I'm not sure what "Highways were aligned" means - which highways were aligned with what?
22015-08-07 17:15:16 UTCsamely Hey there. I aligned the road based in Bing satellite imagery, where is not out of phase. And it's in the source comment.
32015-08-07 17:55:51 UTCSomeoneElse I'd consider comparing with OS OpenData StreetView here too - as the note on the Via Gellia suggests, getting a GPS signal at the bottom of the valley among the trees is tricky, and Bing here can be misaligned due to the trees (though it's better than it was).
12015-07-23 18:48:18 UTCtrigpoint Hi
I have just spotted your change, whilst the crossing ways are a database error they need more than simply fixing them. All that is doing is fixing the symptom, without fixing the problem and also creating a much bigger one. A bit like removing the sticking plaster and leaving the patient to blee...
22015-07-23 18:54:02 UTCtrigpoint now means that potentially dangerous turns could be included in routing instructions. That is far worse than an error on a QA site.
Fixing the error may look good, 'look boss I have fixed xx bugs today', butit is not the way to make a high quality map.
I have added the turn restrictions.
Please t...
32015-07-23 20:31:40 UTCsamely Thanks. I can see sort of see why you added a turn restriction for B4602 leading onto A470. But why is there a turn restriction effectively prohibiting a U turn from southbound A470 while northbound A470 allows a U turn on the same junction?
42015-07-23 22:58:24 UTCtrigpoint You are right, I had missed that one
12015-07-20 12:18:48 UTCSomeoneElse What was the "Oneway problem" that "was fixed" here?
22015-07-20 13:46:30 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. It's a mistake in the comment, because I've aligned both highways. I'll be careful next time.
12015-07-18 04:01:48 UTCFTA This is indeed a one way road.
22015-07-19 04:35:13 UTCsamely Hey there! Thanks for your feedback. I'll be take care next time.
32015-07-19 04:38:12 UTCFTA No problem! I went ahead and changed it, and also added some more context in this area. Best, ~FTA
12015-07-17 21:32:55 UTCchillly Yet another stupid edit by a remote Mapbox editor.

This is a oneway road into a car park over a shopping centre. If you want to correct it VISIT THE SITE.

I will revert this.
22015-07-17 22:08:27 UTCsamely Hey there. Thank you for reverting this mistake. I'll be more careful.
12015-07-10 01:53:05 UTCskorasaurus thanks for tracing, but Girard Street no longer exists. I live less than a km from here and I've past thi location plenty of times. There's no street sign to say it's a road either.

See here for an image. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SfJKP8BMy94LnEoTy_2Yaw
22015-07-10 02:24:46 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, I've already removed Girard Street. See: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32533422
12015-07-08 19:34:31 UTCMikeN Hi, thank you for the edit. Both streets were already surveyed on the ground and marked to remove tiger:reviewed=no. McLeod Street does not go through to Lafayette Street and that segment does not exist. TIGER was out of date for that street.
22015-07-08 22:22:17 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback.
12015-06-30 17:06:38 UTCskorasaurus
Hi,

Thanks for editing although there's a barrier on it so it doesn't connect to Steelyard drive. I have corrected it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32313660
22015-06-30 17:34:44 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for fixing it.
12015-06-15 18:25:51 UTCBeep21 You were somewhat sloppy here. You tagged a pitcher's mound as a building and added a curve to the walkway.

I'm not even sure that the ways that you connected ought to be connected. I don't know whether you realized this when you made the changeset, but this is a loading dock, and the walkway is ...
22015-06-15 19:17:15 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. Connecting nodes and tag the area as a building were mistakes, so It was reverted. Look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31990805.
I'll be careful of this from now.
32015-06-15 20:03:36 UTCBeep21 I appreciate it.
12015-06-15 18:53:32 UTCsamely Chageset 31515601 was reverted.
12015-06-13 20:52:29 UTCmhenson your imagery is outdated. please revert change set
22015-06-15 13:36:17 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback again. I've already reverted the changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31984193
12015-06-11 18:33:51 UTCmaxerickson Are you using an imagery offset? Comparing against the OSM GPS Trace layer from Mapbox and the Strava Cycling Heatmap, the imagery in the Grand Rapids area appears to be quite well aligned, and in many cases you have offset the center lines of roads about 20 feet from Bing and those GPS layers.
22015-06-15 13:31:39 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I work with Bing Aerial Imagery and I made a mistake moving all nodes in the box, so I've already reverted the changeset. I'll be careful of this from now.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31933699
12015-06-09 15:58:58 UTCrickmastfan67 Please update your changeset comment in JOSM. You're saying 'Changeset 31829188 was reverted.' across the entire country.

Thanks.
22015-06-09 16:03:06 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I've already changed my comment.
12015-06-09 13:21:40 UTCmhenson The imagery used for change set 31829188 is out of date. The roads added, I removed months ago when they were replaced by buildings and/or barricaded.

Please revert change set 31829188.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31829188

Your local mapper in Stillwater, OK

Mike
22015-06-09 13:31:38 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already reverted the changeset.
32015-06-09 13:41:51 UTCmhenson : ) Thank you Mapbox for helping OSM in being the best map out there!
12015-05-21 14:03:13 UTCneuhausr Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??
22015-05-21 15:29:53 UTCsamely Thanks for your feedback. I already fixed my mistake.
12015-04-23 16:19:07 UTCkatpatuka Is it possible that you've added highway=unclassified to ALL ways?
22015-04-23 16:23:15 UTCsamely Hey there, sorry I have to confused my keyboard shortcut. I'll revert those changes.
12015-03-30 11:57:27 UTCZbigniew_Czernik This changeset has been reverted due forum request: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=494166#p494166
22015-03-30 14:22:43 UTCsamely Thanks for you feedback and fix my mistake. I'll be take care about the satellital image in Poland.
12015-03-25 11:44:30 UTCSomeoneElse I think that something has gone wrong here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334601141 seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311531344 ?
22015-03-25 15:04:41 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already fixed the overlapping mistake.
12015-03-24 21:52:26 UTCij_ Why why why? What are you doing and why? This has nothing to do with alignment!
22015-03-24 22:02:03 UTCij_ Ah, now I got. You seemed to remove duplicate object but please put a proper comment next time. The highway=footway was bogus addition though I think and I removed that.
32015-03-24 22:06:08 UTCsamely Thanks for your observation, I'm connecting nodes and I forgot to change my comments.
12015-02-12 16:52:04 UTClxbarth This may be a residential development rather than a neighborhood. Either way, it's for sure not a `place=hamlet` so this change is fine. i left a note for further investigation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/315502
12015-02-09 22:41:45 UTCSomeoneElse Hi - just spotted that you've joined Colbeck Street and the car park http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323832277 to the west. Do these definitely join? The imagery suggests probably not. There's already a note in the area http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277305 , so I've added a comment to that t...
22015-02-11 04:13:42 UTCsamely Hi there, yes there appears to be a wall separating the street and the parking aisle. I've disconnected them and connected by a footway. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
12015-01-20 16:22:52 UTCneuhausr Hi, I see some errors with this changeset in the Vicksburg, Mississippi area. You duplicated data and misused basic tags. For example, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114814 and the nearby Culkin Road bridge. Please correct ASAP.
22015-01-29 22:24:49 UTCsamely Hey there - thanks so much for reporting - there were a couple of duplicate ways due to a broken upload, I went through the entire changeset and fixed them all.
32015-01-30 17:58:12 UTCneuhausr Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322503620, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114569, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114772, http://www.openstreet...
42015-01-30 18:20:06 UTCsamely Thanks a lot for your feedback. I fixed them all.
12015-01-29 21:34:02 UTClxbarth Hello Eliane - this is a test.
22015-01-29 21:44:06 UTClxbarth Another test - are you seein gthis?
32015-01-29 21:45:49 UTClxbarth Another test!
116 changeset(s) created by samely have been discussed with a total of 246 comment(s)