| Changeset |
No. |
Date |
Contributor |
Comment |
|
| 44094630 | dieterdreist | This changeset added a wikidata reference to this node, which is referring to the museum. The museum already has the wikidata reference. |
| samely | Hi dieterdreist. Thanks for deleting this duplicate feature and for contributing to OSM. |
|
| 45961139 | samely | Hi! I checked this segment, and it looks like it should be residential. Can you confirm the classification? |
| samely | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473677802 |
|
| 49446419 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I realized that you added some polygons in order to refer a town, are you sure about the boundaries? I would just add the `landuse=residential` tag |
|
| 49330200 | samely | Hi! Welcome to OSM, I saw you added many footways that are connecting to roads that according to the satellite imagery are not. Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498817950 building shouldn't join to the roads. |
|
| 48401458 | samely | Hi! Thanks for your contribution. I found you added wiki id, however those don't match with any wiki entry. Can you confirm your source? |
| nyuriks | @samely, hi, specifically which object are you referring to? |
| samely | Hey! see this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33261351/history |
| nyuriks | Hi, i have been trying to open that history link, but it keeps giving me timeout errors. Looking at the way object itself, the wikidata item seems to be set correctly, and that's the only thing I was doing. |
|
| 49133345 | samely | Hi! Welcome to OSM! Can you please confirm if this path exists? According to the satellite imagery, it looks like it doesn't exist.Regards,Eliane |
| DidiDidiDidi | Hi,That proves that the sat image is too old ;-)Seriously, the path really exists. It is currently unpaved, but free for anybody. I assume it is prepared as intermediate road for upcoming construction work for new houses.For bikers or pedestrians it is nevertheless a nice alternative.Che... |
|
| 49092590 | samely | Hi! Thanks for your contribution to OSM. I saw you added some items, which have just area tag, can you complete the tags? See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass |
|
| 49065918 | samely | Hi! I found some elements like: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357568353. it looks like you touched it. Do you know what is it? |
| TuanIfan | Hi @samely, the piece you quoted is part of Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park. What is wrong with it? |
|
| 48838782 | samely | Welcome to OSM! I found you changed a school to building, can you fixed? It's ok in the way it was, and you can trace all buildings you can see inside the amenity. |
|
| 48882319 | samely | Welcome to OSM! I found this item https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495166066/history, can you fix the shape according to the satellite imagery? |
|
| 48823746 | samely | Same issue here! |
|
| 48822387 | samely | Welcome to OSM! thank for contributing. I found some of you edits and I realized you added building=university, however those should be tagged as buildings, since we already have a landuse there which is defining this place. |
|
| 48834174 | samely | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing, I found this park, but it looks like it is not matching with the satellite imagery, since you included some parking lots and buildings. Could you check it out? |
|
| 48887193 | samely | Hi! Welcome to OSM. I found some of your edits, and it looks like you added as a name the type of feature, could you deleted all the names of your parks? |
|
| 48724788 | samely | *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org |
|
| 48757938 | samely | Hi Amidia... welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing, I just wanna let you know that you overlapped some building like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494151135/history. We just trace the building itself, the construction and not all the parcel. If you have any doubt you can review any guide ... |
|
| 48753224 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I've noticed you added many places, but with the same name as the type, could you deleted them?, and leave a note if you don't know what is the place? Usually we add the data we are sure exist based on open data or satellite imagery.Regards,Eliane |
|
| 48706554 | samely | Hi. Welcome to OSM! I noticed you added names to the building you traced, can you please confirm if it's correct? otherwise deleted.Regards, Eliane |
|
| 48379128 | samely | Hi, welcome to OSM! I noticed you changed the type of the place, and I'm wondering what is you source. Based in the satellite imagery it looks like a village, can you fix it? |
|
| 48372903 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing, I noticed you changed the type of place, and I'm wondering what is your source, since in wiki it looks ok as it was before your change.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohami |
|
| 48390212 | samely | The same here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shengsi_County |
| hanchao | Same as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244077950 |
|
| 48390976 | samely | Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed you changed the type of this place and I'm wondering what is your source since in wiki looks like it's a county. Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daishan_County |
| hanchao | It's really a county.But the county won't show it on the map, so I changed it into the city. |
|
| 48730892 | samely | check this out: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place |
| mavl | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352]. |
|
| 48730933 | samely | http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place |
| mavl | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352]. |
|
| 48730973 | samely | http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place |
| mavl | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352]. |
|
| 48731040 | samely | Can you check also this? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place |
| mavl | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352]. |
|
| 48731075 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you changed the type of place for many nodes, and I'm wondering what is your source, because these places look ok as suburbs, look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:placeRegards,Eliane |
| mavl | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352]. |
|
| 48630260 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed that you added duplicate items with the same name, the park just need the name in the polygon and it looks like the points are not necessary. |
| lufas | Hi, those points are information points. Kind of panels with information on it. |
| samely | Great, would you mind to fix them? I noticed you added correct tag for this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4850188659, the others should have the same tags and delete the `name` one. |
|
| 48685688 | samely | Hi! welcome to OSM. I'm wondering about the park you added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4854431952/history, it's clear there is no park over there, can you check it? |
|
| 48639238 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM, I was checking available imagery but no success. Would you tell me what imagery resources did you use to trace parks |
| JH H | Hi! I just read your comments now. I think I used DigitalGlobe satellite data II ... like that. I'm afraid I can't check this cause I'm using my mobile phone now. I'll see when I get to my computer and then let you know the exact resources. |
| JH H | DigitalGlobe standard imagery.I checked the layers.This is the recent satellite imagery of this city that I live. This city is new and a lot of sites are still under construction. |
|
| 48638276 | samely | Hi! welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing. I noticed you added a park but looks like there is another park in the same place called Pinheiros, can you fix that? |
|
| 48662364 | samely | Hi! Welcome to OSM! thanks for contributing. I just noticed you added some polygons but I think you need to read the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure. So can you fix type of the items you added? |
|
| 48645384 | samely | Hi, thank for contributing to OSM! I noticed you duplicated a park, I deleted it, also it would be great if you can draw it as a polygon. |
|
| 48684595 | samely | Hi! I noticed you are changing the type of place and I'm wondering what is your source, since in wikipedia it's not matching the info you are changing, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Pe%C3%B1asco, you changed it from city to village. |
| DerGuteMercator | Hi, sorry for the late reply, I have been busy last week. The wiki link above is pointing to some city in Mexico, I assume you refer to https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Pinasco ? (The article still is about the municipio of Puerto Pinasco, not the urban agglomeration that I have reteagged. T... |
|
| 48703247 | samely | Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found many parks you added, however those don't match with the satellite imagery. Would you mind to check out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark and you can ping me if need any help. |
|
| 48630003 | samely | "Residence" doesn't look as a correct name, can you confirm it? |
| datendelphin | It looks like they do have a phone book entry. Looks good to me. |
|
| 48630155 | samely | Can you also confirm if this park exist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493086307/history? |
|
| 48630045 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM! while working around this area I found some new park as nodes which according to the satellite imagery are not there, so I deleted them. And I'm wondering if this park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493085904/history exists, can you please confirm it? otherwi... |
|
| 48617144 | samely | Hello! Thanks for contributing to OSM! While working around this area I found you changed the name of this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369493064/history, I'me wondering what's is your source since I was googling and it looks like the name before your change was correct https://vi.wikip... |
| Hieu Van | "Văn Điển" and "Văn Điển Town" is different. I just replaced the old name with the full name to prevent confusion :) |
| Hieu Van | Old name reverted. |
|
| 48557865 | samely | Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed you deleted the `place` tag, can you check of this is not a mistake? Maintaining both `place` + `admin_level` are still under discussion, so why delete it?Regards,Eliane |
| DerGuteMercator | Hi samely,Thanks for your concern. I had deleted it because it was tagged as "city", which is wrong. This tag is reserved for large urban settlements. Appropriate would be tagging it with one of the administrative keywords, probably county or municipality. As I do not know what is c... |
| samely | I think a quick research can help, so we avoid just deleting the tags. I found this: [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Departamento_de_Presidente_Hayes], looks like the `place` tag should be change to `district`, Would you mind fixing: [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1476524592] and [https://www.o... |
| DerGuteMercator | Well, yes, I had seen that, but also the official convenciones for Paraguay: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Paraguay#ConvencionesAnd they do not list the use of the place tag but prescribe using admin level only. I'd rather discuss it there to achieve a common agreement but ... |
| DerGuteMercator | I should add that I will add it to the boundary, not the admin_centre node, because that is where it belongs. |
| samely | Yup! That is ok.Thank you and have a nice day! |
| DerGuteMercator | Actually I detected that I had misinterpreated the admin_centre role. I believed it to be the centre of the district, however it is supposed to demark its administrative capital. Thus I now re-added the place tag, but with the appropriate village tag. Thanks, I learned something! |
| DerGuteMercator | It was very confusing that the districts and the villages have almost the same name |
| samely | Thank you for sharing what you learned. I will check it! |
|
| 48599073 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM, working around this area I found you added info to the name tag, did you check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names? I think you can split into specific tags the name.Regards,Eliane |
|
| 48593043 | samely | Hello! First of all thanks for contributing to OSM. I just was checking this area and I found you edited many places `name=*`, I'm wondering if you know about multi-language tagging, looks like you are trying to combine all names in just the `name=*` tag, can you check this url: http://wiki.openstre... |
| marcrks | Hey, the problem is that Kosovo is a country with 2 national languages, therefore there has to be Albanian and Serbian names. when you look at e.g. Podujevë / Besianë, both names are in use, therefore none of them is an alternative one |
| marcrks | maybe there can be a discussion about this somewhere? |
| marcrks | or do you think that the name should be everywhere in Albanian? (like it is in Belarus in Russian)? |
| samely | Oh yup! There is no consensus about the names in Kosovo yet. But I think you should add the name for each language specifically --> `name:*=*` tag, so everybody have the chance to show the map in the language of their preference. i.e Istog / Burim - Istok. |
|
| 48223619 | samely | Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I saw you are adding arabic names, which are wonderful, however could you split the names? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2075469537/history for "Goré" - "غوري", you can leave the name in the official language and ad... |
|
| 48166168 | samely | Hi! Thanks for adding many places! I'm wondering about the source because I cannot easily find them googling. |
|
| 48159917 | samely | you traced a road that doesn't match with the imagery, can you check it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489565604/history |
| FreedSky | I was drawn according to the picture of the building. |
|
| 48167703 | samely | I've also reverted this changeset |
|
| 48163947 | samely | You changed many objects to a shop item. I reverted it. |
|
| 48143713 | samely | Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM. I saw you changed the place description. Do you know the differences between them? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb. I think it was ok before your change. Regards, Eliane |
| _ANick_ | Hi, Eliane!Which objects you mean? I see two Residential complex that marked as suburb (already changed): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437276226https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392624870 |
|
| 48126981 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I'm wondering if this feature: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489330569 i really a city. Can you check it? |
|
| 47976840 | trigpoint | Hi, thank you for your contribution however there are a few issues with this edit.1. You have not tagged it as junction=roundabout.2. A roundabout normally takes the highest classification, so this one should be primary. Exceptions are when there are motorways involved but that doesn't apply h... |
| samely | Thanks Phil! I've already added these details. |
|
| 47964575 | samely | Hi, I saw you deleted `name:en` for many places, I'm wondering if you can improve the names rather than delete them. Regards,Eliane |
|
| 47765544 | samely | Hi, I saw you changed the type of places of many points to city, and I was comparing them with wikipedia and I couldn't find the change as a the correct option. Can you tell me what is your source to change the type of place. See: https://openstreetmap.org/node/4306910709 |
| 中鲁潍昌 | 您好，我是潍坊本地人，到达过这些地方。我从潍坊政府网站和百度百科上知道了这些地点的正式名称。Hello, I am a native of Weifang, I have been to these places. I know the official name of these sites from the Weifang government website and the Baidu encycloped... |
|
| 35817620 | samely | Hola!Trabajando por esta zona veo que esta vía: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384900296 es exclusivamente para bus, sin embargo en la imagen satelital veo que no hay varias vías y más parece que se debería agregar estos datos como una relación. Podría ... |
|
| 47352150 | samely | Hi Riajuu,I noticed you had added a "-" for the "name:en", is there any convention for korean names? |
| Riajuu | Hello, I am sorry for late answer.In South Korea (not including North Korea) follow the Revised Romanization of Korean (RRK).According to Article 2-2 of RRK, "when there is the possibility of confusion in pronunciation, a hyphen '-' may be used.". http://www.korean.go.kr/front_eng/roma... |
| samely | Thanks for such a great explanation |
|
| 12540762 | samely | Hi,I was working around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173529930/history and it looks like the roads are not properly traced, can you confirm it? Thanks. |
|
| 46473991 | samely | Hi Paolo, thanks for contributing to OSM. I found this way 477080062, looks like you forgot to add any tag. We have unconnected roads here. Can you fix it? Regards,Eliane |
| paolobenve | thank you, I corrected it |
|
| 46734783 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing, I found many features without clear tags, can you fix them ?Regards, Eliane |
|
| 27139033 | samely | Hi JJGreen, thanks for contribuying to OSM, I was working around this area and I found many ways without any tag, and also they doesn't look to be based on the Bing imagery. Can you confirm that those exist?Regards,Eliane |
| JJGreen | Hi, Eliane,Check out the City's website it also shows these roads in the new development called Brighton.http://apps2.saskatoon.ca/app/aRRCP/ |
|
| 37767406 | Aleks-Berlin | Hi samely, you entered 8x tag "1"="yes", e.g. way/379682013. This seems to be a typo, as it has no meaning. Could you please fix it? Thanks, Alex |
| samely | Hi Aleks,It's definitely a typo, thanks for flagging this out, I've already fixed them.Regards,Eliane |
|
| 46393907 | samely | Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664 |
|
| 46394043 | samely | Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664 |
|
| 46390762 | samely | Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664 |
|
| 46388664 | samely | Thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I found many streets with bridge tag, I already fixed them. |
|
| 46357197 | samely | Hi jonadelcrispin,Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this areas and found that your edit has duplicate streets, I reverted it. |
| TagaSanPedroAko | I reverted part of your changeset ,that added duplicate streets around Calicanto and Poblacion areas of Batangas City, at this changeset (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46406952), as those streets may affect routing if not removed. |
| TagaSanPedroAko | I know it is your first edit in OpenStreetMap, but be aware that you do not damage existing map data. And if you went straight to editing without taking the short tutorial, take that first to learn basic mapping in OpenStreetMap. |
|
| 46183774 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475288683 and found you added many streets but there is matching with Bing or Mapbox satellite imagery, can you share your source, please? |
| samely | I mean *No matching* |
|
| 46206240 | samely | Hi,Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found some untagged ways such https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475527986 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475566470, which even don't match with satellite imagery, could you please confirm or delete them?Regards,Eliane |
|
| 46191002 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found some overlapped ways, I delete them. The same in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46190938Regards, Eliane |
|
| 46187670 | samely | Hi, thanks for your amazing contribution to OSM. However, I found some ways that were overlapped and crossing with existing ways, I deleted them.Regards, Eliane |
|
| 46168950 | samely | Hi, thank you for your amazing contribution to OSM, I found some overlapping issues with this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475312173, can you fix it, please?Regards,Eliane |
|
| 45995108 | samely | Hi,Thanks for contributing to OSM can you check, please, the park at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3549658714/history#map=19/27.03923/88.26255? it looks good, I also can see two parks that aren't visible based on the satellite imagery, both of them really exist?Regard,Eliane |
|
| 45983800 | samely | Hi, Thank you for contributing to OSM, I was wondering the real imagery you used to trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473876691/history#map=19/37.38525/127.95742, because it's doesn't match with Bing imagery, could you please revert it?Regards,Eliane |
|
| 44699255 | samely | Hi!Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found many ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520384 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520800 without tags, could you please check and clean them if those don't have any sense to still exist on the map? |
|
| 34393927 | samely | Hi maphunter36! thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this area and found some duplicated and overlapping roads, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372854869/history#map=16/33.3457/126.2427, could you fix them please?Regards,samely |
|
| 45765892 | samely | Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, I replace your edit with a proper geometry. |
|
| 45811761 | samely | Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, however I will revert this change since all roads are duplicate. |
|
| 45795539 | samely | Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, however I will reverted since all those streets are duplicate. |
|
| 45817919 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however there are some features that are not properly mapped. so I will delete them. |
|
| 45741941 | samely | Hi, I will revert this edit since it's not properly. |
|
| 45711587 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I will revert this edit since doesn't match with the imagery. |
|
| 45717400 | samely | Hi sody134, thanks for contributing to OSM, you made a great job, I just deleted some wrong features and re-tagged ways.Regards,Eliane |
|
| 45681045 | samely | Hi KLon12, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found you traced many ways near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469368874/history. I will delete this geometry.Regards,Eliane |
|
| 42600303 | samely | Hi Arun, thanks for contributing I found you traced many roads, but all are disconnected, and also looks like is not based on satellite imagery. Can you fixed them?Regards, Eliane |
|
| 45732091 | samely | Hi Andrew, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this zone and found you traced this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20724089/history which has impossible angles and doesn't seem to be based in satellite imagery. Can you check it please?Regards,Eliane |
| Andrew Matheny | Fixed! Looks like this was just one particularly nasty TIGER street that needed to be cleaned up the rest of the way |
|
| 45718393 | samely | Hi On Top, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found an island trace, can you please fix this, and add the relation to the existing street?Regards,Eliane |
|
| 45618806 | samely | Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks not to be based on Bing imagery, can you please confirm if these streets exists or revert them? |
|
| 45537935 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks strange, can you confirm these streets exists or revert it please? |
|
| 45521624 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, can you please add the tags to the streets you added? |
|
| 45612076 | samely | Hi zebanshee, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found a way that doesn't appear in the imagery, can you confirm this exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469891519/history? |
|
| 45576260 | samely | Hi Pizza15, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, this edit looks a little it strange so I will revert it.Regards,Eliane |
|
| 45645571 | samely | Hi 멍게Y 이, Thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it.Regards, Eliane |
|
| 45671874 | samely | Hi dox333, thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it. |
|
| 45644202 | samely | Hi Ali, I will proceed to revert this edit.Regards Eliane |
|
| 40882763 | Spanholz | Hey,probably Drive-Through is not the right tag for this kind of way. Just found it while cleaning some imaginery Pokemon Go edits.Thanks and hope you have still a little bit of fun after such an amazing amount of changesets. |
| samely | Hi Spanholz,Thanks for pointing this out! I was just fixing connectivity issues, so I didn't review tags around this zone. You are completely right, it's not a "service=drive-through" feature, it should probably be tagged as "highway=path" or "highway=track", dependin... |
|
| 22955221 | samely | Hi lowa Kid, Thank you for the great contribution you do to OSM. I'm wondering if the tag "service=drive-through" you added to these paths and others around are based on some wiki. This should probably tagged as ''highway=path" or"highway=track" depending on if the way is ... |
|
| 45215569 | samely | Hi istvanv_telenav,Thanks for contributing to OSM. While working around this zone, I realized that your edit has generated overlapping issues around this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466381778. Can you check it?Regards,Eliane |
| samely | And please, also take a look to the street that seems to be deleted. Thanks. |
|
| 45191785 | samely | Hi again. Can you check this edit please, looks like there are duplicated ways. Thanks. |
|
| 45192060 | samely | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, looks like you made a double trace for an existing road. Can you check it please?Regards,Eliane |
|
| 45086075 | mueschel | Hi,could you check the tagging of this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465259458Cheers, Jan |
| samely | Hi Jan,Can you be more specific, please? I checked it out, however, I didn't find anything special. Regards,Eliane |
| mueschel | The way has the tag "170 south=Andover Lane" |
| samely | I was reviewing the big street, thanks for pointing this out, I've already fixed it. |
|
| 45017616 | samely | The same here, can you confirm it?Eliane |
|
| 45017983 | samely | Can you also check this changeset, please?Eliane |
|
| 45017622 | samely | Hi! Can you also check this changeset please?Eliane. |
|
| 45018760 | samely | Hi again! The same case here, can you confirm the existance of these roads? Thank you,Eliane |
|
| 45018140 | samely | Hi Gã Trùm, thanks for contributing to OSM. I've been working in this area and I realize that you added two ways which doesn't match with Bing aerial imagery. Could you please confirm that these roads exist, otherwise revert your change? Thank you,Eliane. |
|
| 44409804 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44412931 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408732 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44406743 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44405371 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44412848 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44404200 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44410250 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409998 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409078 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408027 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44404903 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409751 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44406901 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44412832 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408655 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408411 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408581 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409977 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44405691 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44413012 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408806 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44407759 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44413260 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44404772 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44405247 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44404038 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44413124 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409193 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44406354 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409639 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44406026 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44407266 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44408688 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44409164 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44413347 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44413211 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44405144 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44406819 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44410415 | woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| samely | woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44405524 | Alexey Lukin | Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your chan... |
| woodpeck | I'll try to fix this with DWG tools. |
| Alexey Lukin | Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that hashappened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at streetcrossings here, it will become apparent:http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999In fact, the ... |
| samely | Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.Let me know if you need... |
| woodpeck_repair | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion. |
| woodpeck | I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert). |
| samely | Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area. |
|
| 44928754 | samely | Testing To-fix |
|
| 44926872 | samely | Testing to-fix plugin. |
|
| 44705365 | samely | Hi ellen_era. I'm glad to see you contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added "name:en=养生蚝的农场" tag, which doesn't look as an English name, can you please fix this? Thank you. |
|
| 44409238 | SomeoneElse | It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet. That way local mappers can see what has been affected near them.Best Regards,Andy |
| samely | Hi AndyThanks for notifying this since we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes using to-fix plugin. We are working on fixing this bug and tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74. |
|
| 44410333 | omargibran | Hello. Thanks a lot. Although I see Mexico in the orange square, it is not listed in the github link of countries. Are mexican highways being corrected? Cheers |
| samely | Thanks for noticing this, actually changes were in Los Angeles and Japan and not in Mexico. However, thanks to your comment we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes that we are tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74 |
|
| 43188405 | DenisCarriere | How did this happen? This Wikidata code is for Iran? |
| samely | Hi Denis. I'm not sure how this happened, however, I'll compare values carefully. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it. |
|
| 31818541 | carciofo | Please note that Taft Street is *not* a dual carriageway as it has no physical separator. In addition, when splitting dual carriageways, ensure that you have connected intersecting roads to both one-ways and set oneway=yes on both directions. That was not done here. |
| samely | Hey, carciofo.You are completely right, not all Taft Street is a dual carriage. So thank you for fixing the segment which has no physical separation and sharing the way this should be mapped. |
|
| 37000532 | Apo42 | way 396026060 is not a building. It's a camper van. please stop tracing buildings automatically if the algorithm is not able to do it correct. |
| samely | Hi Apo24.I added it because it looks like a little part of the house. However, if you know better this place, please, feel free to retagging it or even deleting it. Thanks for contributing to improving the map. |
|
| 42213280 | SomeoneElse | Hello again,This looks like quite a large changeset for only 3 changes :)Rather than adding #gibberish changeset comments could you please describe what you changed and where?Best Regards,Andy |
| samely | Hey Andy.I agree with you, it wasn't intentionally since I could mistake the edit layers while fixing unclosed multi-polygons by deleting an overlapped way around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3786309618 and adding this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131693153. Thanks for pointing... |
|
| 40530425 | SomeoneElse | Hi, Just for info, I've added a changeset comment to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195315 to try and get this fixed properly. The current layout of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361673628/history (with zig-zags in it) is clearly wrong now and the history shows that that was caused b... |
| samely | Hey Andy.Thanks for notifying this.Greetings! |
| SomeoneElse | For info, following a note to talk-au it's now been patched up in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40810205 . |
|
| 40557410 | MikeN | Hi, Thank you for the fix. White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane.Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki |
| samely | Hey there!I've already fixed the number of lanes in all the road. Thanks for your feedback. |
|
| 40553544 | rickmastfan67 | Just so you know, these are emergency access roads for fire departments and the police so they can access the PA Turnpike network quickly between interchanges, They are almost never 'oneway=yes', and should be tagged as 'oneway=no' instead. |
| rickmastfan67 | So, in the future, just take 5 seconds to look at the Bing imagery. If you see a 'gate' on any point of the ramp in the imagery, 99.9% chance it should be 'oneway=no', especially if the highway it connects to is a toll highway. Also, the 'white' lines on each side of the ramp are a dead giveaway t... |
| samely | Hey there!I removed the oneway tag so you can, please, fix it! Thanks for your very clear explanation about this kind of access. |
|
| 40488650 | SomeoneElse | Why is "samely_labuildings" editing in Europe? :) |
| samely | Hi Andy!I had mistaken my user configuration in some editions. And about the size of my changeset I'll try to not doing it again. Thanks for your feedback. |
|
| 40429179 | samely | Importing buildings. Sorry for the comment. |
|
| 39607276 | eastender | I think that the road added by this changeset is wrong. There used to be a road for traffic here, but it was removed several months ago. The satellite imagery hasn't caught up with this development yet. Currently there is a pedestrian square being constructed in the area between Aldgate High Street ... |
| samely | Hey! there,I traced this road because there was a feedback saying that this road was missing, and based on satellite imagery I decided to trace it. Now that your feedback is kind contradictory to the other one, I decided to delete it and leave a note instead (openstreetmap.org/note/577832). Thanks... |
|
| 38953116 | Chris Fleming | I'm struggling to see the point of this "fix". Also it's bad form to delete and recreate a way (loosing the history) just to add a small "kink" into the road that I don't believe exists on the ground? |
| samely | Hey there! I can see in the satellite imagery that this road exist, this road was self intersected forming 0º. You can clearly see this solved error if you revert the changeset. |
|
| 37761536 | Владимир К | Hello!I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.For examplehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c... |
| samely | Hey there! I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I don't know this place, but if you do, it would be great that you add those relations. I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38383360) Thanks for your feedback! |
| andygol | Добрый день, Владимир КДля того чтобы правильно прокладывался маршрут необходимо устанавливать, с помощью отношений, запреты поворотов - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/384... |
| Владимир К | Спасибо, я знаю. |
| Владимир К | А не слишком ли много там запретов? ну то есть разве не достаточно просто только прямо? |
| andygol | Можно, конечно, поэкспериментировать с запретами, чтобы точно понять какие из них нужны |
| andygol | Если опираться на знаки (я смотрел на Яндекс Панорамах) то для каждого направления нужно по два релейшена "только прямо" |
| Владимир К | как тут?http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37761536#map=19/55.73407/52.42464 |
| andygol | Да. Только нужно подождать пока данные попадут в OSRM или Mapzen, чтобы проверить это утверждение.Вполне возможно, что можно ограничиться и одним релейшеном вместо дв... |
| andygol | Пока что только мои предположения, если использовать средний сегмент линии с ролью 'via', то при построении маршрута от него (от этого сегмента) необходимо задавать д... |
|
| 37551242 | GS25 | Hi there!This road is not connected, which is why I didn't connect it.Please do not blindly follow some software's idea of what is an error in OSM. There is no substitute for local knowledge (I live locally). If you are not sure, move on to another area, or ask the original mapper.Than... |
| samely | Hey there. I really considered that roads should be connected. However I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38382289) and I suggest connecting the piece of road that seems to be an island. Thank you for you feedback! |
|
| 37767348 | JeopardyTempest | Hi samely... I'm newish at OSM, and seems you've got a lot more history than I, but I'm really confused by these changes. You gave a US Interstate a Japanese name and speed limit, and added a strange 1 tag. I'd look about reverting, but you seem to know what you're doing enough to fix\\understand!... |
| manings | @JeopardyTempest, thank you for flagging this edit. I reverted the changes now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38157753 |
| JeopardyTempest | Thanks! |
| samely | Thanks manings for reverting it! Thanks JeopardyTempest for your feedback, I'll be careful next time |
|
| 37905675 | SomeoneElse | Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.Also what are the turn restrictions at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2667031585 ? |
| samely | Hey there! I was working on connectivity errors using To-Fix : http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/stats/highwayhighway. I didn't consider the turn restriction, but now is done! Thanks for your feedback. |
| SomeoneElse | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6074901 isn't correct. Traffic from the west can carry on along the ring road as well as turn right. It can't turn left. You'd need to survey it to see if u-turns are prohibited here.There will be other similar restrictions at the other nodes too. |
| samely | You were right. I fixed it and added a note because I don't know about turn restrictions at this point. I just wanted to intersect highways. I'll be careful next time. Thanks! |
|
| 29915022 | Mike Baggaley | Hi, is Future Nocton Park Road the name of the road, or is it a road that will be named Nocton Park Road in the future? If the latter, I suggest changing the name to Nocton Park Road and setting highway=construction with construction=residential or highway=proposed. Cheers, Mike |
| abel801 | Hi Mike, I really don't known what is the real name, because I only use satellite imagery. |
| SomeoneElse | Rather than guesing, might it be better to add an OSM note? The Bing imagery here shows no road at all. What information do you have that there is a road here (now, as opoosed to a proposed or under-construction one)? Did a customer of one of Mapbox's customers report it? |
| abel801 | > Hi SomeoneElse, the residential road was added by the [previous mapper](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319222705/history) and my edit was only to fix the connection. The mapper has [many local edits](http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lincoln%20Edge/history#map=14/53.1732/-0.3968) and I assume... |
| SomeoneElse | In this case I'd be tempted to ask the previous mapper whether it's been built yet. It's quite likely it wasn't when they added it, but might have been now. Also, you could ask them what it's (now) called? |
| samely | Message has been sent it to Lincoln Edge. If he answer to me, I'll share it. |
| Lincoln Edge | It's open now, and it is called Nocton Park Road. |
| samely | Thank you Lincoln Edge! |
|
| 33960772 | malenki | Hi samely,I just fixed the reservoir you broke in this edit. What did you do? You split a self intersecting outer way which resulted in * an intersection between multipolygon ways (you should unglue these ways) and* an outer way inside the outer ways (map them as inner ways)hthmalenki |
| samely | Hey malenki. Thanks for your feedback and fixing the reservoir. I was working ungluing objects that was intersected each other. Btw, I'll be careful. Thanks |
|
| 36036278 | samely | Hi. Take a look, there some building inside building issues. |
|
| 36021162 | samely | Hi. Take a look, there are more buildings to map. |
| ediyes | Hola samely,Gracias por su observación, en nuestro siguiente proyecto http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/14# se mapearan todos los edificios que faltan. |
|
| 36025778 | samely | Those buildings need to be improved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468808/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468804/history |
| jinalfoflia | Thank you for the feedback. These are my corrections. Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36213237 |
|
| 35467229 | samely | This changeset was reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35470137 |
|
| 33714845 | ikz | Are you sure in this points?Yes, we can put nodes in intersections, but then we need to split ways and make lot of restrictions. |
| samely | Hi ikz, thanks for your feedback. I was fixing crossing ways, I think you should add at least turn restrictions, instead of deleting intersections. |
| ikz | KISS principle :) I took same results without any restrictions.And point in way intersection is not necessary, but "useful practice". |
| samely | Hey there. I agree with this "useful practice". |
|
| 31844248 | mhenson | Thank you! I have done a lot of mapping, but I have not reverted any change sets. |
| samely | Thanks to you. |
|
| 31371735 | maxerickson | There was some sort of accident with ways 17835459 and 171258574 here, they got connected to a bunch of the foot paths. I've fixed it.It also seems it wasn't a hotosm project. |
| samely | Hi max erickson, thanks for fixing them. I made a mistake with the comment. I'll be careful. Thanks again. |
|
| 32317063 | skorasaurus | http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357532353 is not a named road, but just an unnamed driveway; I've driven past it numerous times.I've updated it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290 |
| samely | Hey there! Thanks for updating the information about this way. |
|
| 28595169 | carciofo | Please be more careful and thorough when splitting dual carriageways. NW 56th Ave north- and south-bound segments were left unconnected, the entire undivided stretch between Sunrise Blvd and NW 19th St was left as one way, and many intersections were not extended to both directions. Thanks. |
| samely | Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I saw you've already fixed them. I will keep your recommendation in mind . Thanks again. |
|
| 34533291 | samely | POI's were added. |
|
| 34329826 | ikiya | Please stop mass editing.Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community. |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) based on GIS imagery. In this case I aligned tertiary roads. |
| ikiya | Thank you for your explanation.I understand. Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.(Japan Community mailing lists)https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html |
|
| 33715228 | Rub21 | Esta segura de que un track esta connectando con un motroway? |
| samely | Según la imagen satelital del Bing hay varias vías que conectan con el motorway.Sin embargo deje una nota. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33717486 |
|
| 30249051 | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edits. I found some problems -Frontage road was blocked years ago because it was a dangerous turn. It looks strange for a named road to be connected only by a driveway, but that's the real way it ended up. It would be dangerous for drivers to try to follow GPS for the ... |
| MikeN | One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it. |
| samely | Hi there. Thanks for your feedback. I've been working based on TIGER, and I will consider your suggestion. Thanks again for fix them. |
| MikeN | Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes. What was the reference used in moving those nodes? Thank you |
| samely | Hey there. I just tried to align the edited area based on Bing satellite imagery. Thanks for the comments again. |
|
| 32764368 | SomeoneElse | Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659454313 is really the intersection of the trunk road on the bridge and the smaller road below? |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, definitely those roads don't intersect each other. I've already fixed my mistake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33515239Thank you again. |
|
| 33100601 | SomeoneElse | I'm not sure what "Highways were aligned" means - which highways were aligned with what? |
| samely | Hey there. I aligned the road based in Bing satellite imagery, where is not out of phase. And it's in the source comment. |
| SomeoneElse | I'd consider comparing with OS OpenData StreetView here too - as the note on the Via Gellia suggests, getting a GPS signal at the bottom of the valley among the trees is tricky, and Bing here can be misaligned due to the trees (though it's better than it was). |
|
| 32779233 | trigpoint | HiI have just spotted your change, whilst the crossing ways are a database error they need more than simply fixing them. All that is doing is fixing the symptom, without fixing the problem and also creating a much bigger one. A bit like removing the sticking plaster and leaving the patient to blee... |
| trigpoint | now means that potentially dangerous turns could be included in routing instructions. That is far worse than an error on a QA site.Fixing the error may look good, 'look boss I have fixed xx bugs today', butit is not the way to make a high quality map.I have added the turn restrictions.Please t... |
| samely | Thanks. I can see sort of see why you added a turn restriction for B4602 leading onto A470. But why is there a turn restriction effectively prohibiting a U turn from southbound A470 while northbound A470 allows a U turn on the same junction? |
| trigpoint | You are right, I had missed that one |
|
| 32608781 | SomeoneElse | What was the "Oneway problem" that "was fixed" here? |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. It's a mistake in the comment, because I've aligned both highways. I'll be careful next time. |
|
| 32637548 | FTA | This is indeed a one way road. |
| samely | Hey there! Thanks for your feedback. I'll be take care next time. |
| FTA | No problem! I went ahead and changed it, and also added some more context in this area. Best, ~FTA |
|
| 32656413 | chillly | Yet another stupid edit by a remote Mapbox editor. This is a oneway road into a car park over a shopping centre. If you want to correct it VISIT THE SITE.I will revert this. |
| samely | Hey there. Thank you for reverting this mistake. I'll be more careful. |
|
| 32522248 | skorasaurus | thanks for tracing, but Girard Street no longer exists. I live less than a km from here and I've past thi location plenty of times. There's no street sign to say it's a road either. See here for an image. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SfJKP8BMy94LnEoTy_2Yaw |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, I've already removed Girard Street. See: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32533422 |
|
| 32500295 | MikeN | Hi, thank you for the edit. Both streets were already surveyed on the ground and marked to remove tiger:reviewed=no. McLeod Street does not go through to Lafayette Street and that segment does not exist. TIGER was out of date for that street. |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. |
|
| 32165984 | skorasaurus | Hi, Thanks for editing although there's a barrier on it so it doesn't connect to Steelyard drive. I have corrected it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32313660 |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for fixing it. |
|
| 31515601 | Beep21 | You were somewhat sloppy here. You tagged a pitcher's mound as a building and added a curve to the walkway.I'm not even sure that the ways that you connected ought to be connected. I don't know whether you realized this when you made the changeset, but this is a loading dock, and the walkway is ... |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. Connecting nodes and tag the area as a building were mistakes, so It was reverted. Look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31990805. I'll be careful of this from now. |
| Beep21 | I appreciate it. |
|
| 31990805 | samely | Chageset 31515601 was reverted. |
|
| 31927674 | mhenson | your imagery is outdated. please revert change set |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback again. I've already reverted the changeset.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31984193 |
|
| 30273888 | maxerickson | Are you using an imagery offset? Comparing against the OSM GPS Trace layer from Mapbox and the Strava Cycling Heatmap, the imagery in the Grand Rapids area appears to be quite well aligned, and in many cases you have offset the center lines of roads about 20 feet from Bing and those GPS layers. |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I work with Bing Aerial Imagery and I made a mistake moving all nodes in the box, so I've already reverted the changeset. I'll be careful of this from now.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31933699 |
|
| 31847830 | rickmastfan67 | Please update your changeset comment in JOSM. You're saying 'Changeset 31829188 was reverted.' across the entire country.Thanks. |
| samely | Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I've already changed my comment. |
|
| 31829188 | mhenson | The imagery used for change set 31829188 is out of date. The roads added, I removed months ago when they were replaced by buildings and/or barricaded.Please revert change set 31829188.http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31829188Your local mapper in Stillwater, OKMike |
| samely | Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already reverted the changeset. |
| mhenson | : ) Thank you Mapbox for helping OSM in being the best map out there! |
|
| 28308743 | neuhausr | Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits?? |
| samely | Thanks for your feedback. I already fixed my mistake. |
|
| 30408542 | katpatuka | Is it possible that you've added highway=unclassified to ALL ways? |
| samely | Hey there, sorry I have to confused my keyboard shortcut. I'll revert those changes. |
|
| 29787722 | Zbigniew_Czernik | This changeset has been reverted due forum request: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=494166#p494166 |
| samely | Thanks for you feedback and fix my mistake. I'll be take care about the satellital image in Poland. |
|
| 29715052 | SomeoneElse | I think that something has gone wrong here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334601141 seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311531344 ? |
| samely | Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already fixed the overlapping mistake. |
|
| 29712705 | ij_ | Why why why? What are you doing and why? This has nothing to do with alignment! |
| ij_ | Ah, now I got. You seemed to remove duplicate object but please put a proper comment next time. The highway=footway was bogus addition though I think and I removed that. |
| samely | Thanks for your observation, I'm connecting nodes and I forgot to change my comments. |
|
| 28352489 | SomeoneElse | Hi - just spotted that you've joined Colbeck Street and the car park http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323832277 to the west. Do these definitely join? The imagery suggests probably not. There's already a note in the area http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277305 , so I've added a comment to that t... |
| samely | Hi there, yes there appears to be a wall separating the street and the parking aisle. I've disconnected them and connected by a footway. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. |
|
| 28148682 | neuhausr | Hi, I see some errors with this changeset in the Vicksburg, Mississippi area. You duplicated data and misused basic tags. For example, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114814 and the nearby Culkin Road bridge. Please correct ASAP. |
| samely | Hey there - thanks so much for reporting - there were a couple of duplicate ways due to a broken upload, I went through the entire changeset and fixed them all. |
| neuhausr | Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322503620, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114569, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114772, http://www.openstreet... |
| samely | Thanks a lot for your feedback. I fixed them all. |