OpenStreetMap (OSM) Changeset Discussions

Changeset	No.	Date	Contributor	Comment

44094630 by samely	1	2017-06-20 14:35:22 UTC	dieterdreist	This changeset added a wikidata reference to this node, which is referring to the museum. The museum already has the wikidata reference.
	2	2017-07-05 15:29:11 UTC	samely	Hi dieterdreist. Thanks for deleting this duplicate feature and for contributing to OSM.

45961139 by granpueblo	1	2017-06-21 19:11:39 UTC	samely	Hi! I checked this segment, and it looks like it should be residential. Can you confirm the classification?
	2	2017-06-21 19:13:59 UTC	samely	https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473677802

49446419 by herald93	1	2017-06-12 20:00:32 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I realized that you added some polygons in order to refer a town, are you sure about the boundaries? I would just add the `landuse=residential` tag

49330200 by GibusFreddy	1	2017-06-08 19:08:59 UTC	samely	Hi! Welcome to OSM, I saw you added many footways that are connecting to roads that according to the satellite imagery are not. Also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498817950 building shouldn't join to the roads.

48401458 by nyuriks	1	2017-05-31 21:38:47 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for your contribution. I found you added wiki id, however those don't match with any wiki entry. Can you confirm your source?
	2	2017-06-01 02:41:47 UTC	nyuriks	@samely, hi, specifically which object are you referring to?
	3	2017-06-01 19:53:50 UTC	samely	Hey! see this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33261351/history
	4	2017-06-02 19:23:49 UTC	nyuriks	Hi, i have been trying to open that history link, but it keeps giving me timeout errors. Looking at the way object itself, the wikidata item seems to be set correctly, and that's the only thing I was doing.

49133345 by DidiDidiDidi	1	2017-06-01 19:07:22 UTC	samely	Hi! Welcome to OSM! Can you please confirm if this path exists? According to the satellite imagery, it looks like it doesn't exist. Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-06-01 20:47:50 UTC	DidiDidiDidi	Hi, That proves that the sat image is too old ;-) Seriously, the path really exists. It is currently unpaved, but free for anybody. I assume it is prepared as intermediate road for upcoming construction work for new houses. For bikers or pedestrians it is nevertheless a nice alternative. Che...

49092590 by ElliottPlack	1	2017-05-31 21:49:23 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for your contribution to OSM. I saw you added some items, which have just area tag, can you complete the tags? See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

49065918 by Hao Duong	1	2017-05-30 21:16:25 UTC	samely	Hi! I found some elements like: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357568353. it looks like you touched it. Do you know what is it?
	2	2017-05-31 13:34:06 UTC	TuanIfan	Hi @samely, the piece you quoted is part of Phong Nha - Ke Bang National Park. What is wrong with it?

48838782 by gureo182	1	2017-05-22 16:32:17 UTC	samely	Welcome to OSM! I found you changed a school to building, can you fixed? It's ok in the way it was, and you can trace all buildings you can see inside the amenity.

48882319 by aerdenoo	1	2017-05-22 16:24:15 UTC	samely	Welcome to OSM! I found this item https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495166066/history, can you fix the shape according to the satellite imagery?

48823746 by WeiChvn	1	2017-05-22 16:18:50 UTC	samely	Same issue here!

48822387 by WeiChvn	1	2017-05-22 16:18:00 UTC	samely	Welcome to OSM! thank for contributing. I found some of you edits and I realized you added building=university, however those should be tagged as buildings, since we already have a landuse there which is defining this place.

48834174 by lionzuki	1	2017-05-22 16:12:45 UTC	samely	Welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing, I found this park, but it looks like it is not matching with the satellite imagery, since you included some parking lots and buildings. Could you check it out?

48887193 by Vika Krut	1	2017-05-22 16:06:24 UTC	samely	Hi! Welcome to OSM. I found some of your edits, and it looks like you added as a name the type of feature, could you deleted all the names of your parks?

48724788 by RulerJH	1	2017-05-17 16:57:01 UTC	samely	Welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added canals, however this kind of features should be added to ways or relation. So, can you please draw just way and add this tag for all of them around this area? Check this out: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dcanal\...

48757938 by Amidia	1	2017-05-17 16:52:14 UTC	samely	Hi Amidia... welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing, I just wanna let you know that you overlapped some building like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494151135/history. We just trace the building itself, the construction and not all the parcel. If you have any doubt you can review any guide ...

48753224 by none name	1	2017-05-17 16:43:47 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I've noticed you added many places, but with the same name as the type, could you deleted them?, and leave a note if you don't know what is the place? Usually we add the data we are sure exist based on open data or satellite imagery. Regards, Eliane

48706554 by GMON3Y10	1	2017-05-16 16:04:25 UTC	samely	Hi. Welcome to OSM! I noticed you added names to the building you traced, can you please confirm if it's correct? otherwise deleted. Regards, Eliane

48379128 by tdias55	1	2017-05-16 15:33:30 UTC	samely	Hi, welcome to OSM! I noticed you changed the type of the place, and I'm wondering what is you source. Based in the satellite imagery it looks like a village, can you fix it?

48372903 by Pitambar Bhattarai	1	2017-05-16 15:31:25 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing, I noticed you changed the type of place, and I'm wondering what is your source, since in wiki it looks ok as it was before your change. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohami

48390212 by hanchao	1	2017-05-16 15:13:15 UTC	samely	The same here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shengsi_County
	2	2017-05-17 04:39:13 UTC	hanchao	Same as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244077950

48390976 by hanchao	1	2017-05-16 15:12:37 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed you changed the type of this place and I'm wondering what is your source since in wiki looks like it's a county. Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daishan_County
	2	2017-05-17 04:36:13 UTC	hanchao	It's really a county.But the county won't show it on the map, so I changed it into the city.

48730892 by OVRK2015	1	2017-05-16 15:05:44 UTC	samely	check this out: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
	2	2017-05-17 16:42:19 UTC	mavl	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352].

48730933 by OVRK2015	1	2017-05-16 15:05:14 UTC	samely	http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
	2	2017-05-17 16:41:37 UTC	mavl	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352].

48730973 by OVRK2015	1	2017-05-16 15:05:05 UTC	samely	http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
	2	2017-05-17 16:42:11 UTC	mavl	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352].

48731040 by OVRK2015	1	2017-05-16 15:04:52 UTC	samely	Can you check also this? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
	2	2017-05-17 16:42:06 UTC	mavl	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352].

48731075 by OVRK2015	1	2017-05-16 15:04:12 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you changed the type of place for many nodes, and I'm wondering what is your source, because these places look ok as suburbs, look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-05-17 16:41:51 UTC	mavl	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48767568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1352].

48630260 by lufas	1	2017-05-12 21:22:00 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed that you added duplicate items with the same name, the park just need the name in the polygon and it looks like the points are not necessary.
	2	2017-05-13 11:56:53 UTC	lufas	Hi, those points are information points. Kind of panels with information on it.
	3	2017-05-15 19:44:04 UTC	samely	Great, would you mind to fix them? I noticed you added correct tag for this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4850188659, the others should have the same tags and delete the `name` one.

48685688 by tsengel	1	2017-05-15 19:38:31 UTC	samely	Hi! welcome to OSM. I'm wondering about the park you added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4854431952/history, it's clear there is no park over there, can you check it?

48639238 by JH H	1	2017-05-15 19:35:39 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM, I was checking available imagery but no success. Would you tell me what imagery resources did you use to trace parks
	2	2017-05-19 08:24:31 UTC	JH H	Hi! I just read your comments now. I think I used DigitalGlobe satellite data II ... like that. I'm afraid I can't check this cause I'm using my mobile phone now. I'll see when I get to my computer and then let you know the exact resources.
	3	2017-05-20 23:19:16 UTC	JH H	DigitalGlobe standard imagery. I checked the layers. This is the recent satellite imagery of this city that I live. This city is new and a lot of sites are still under construction.

48638276 by keizo17	1	2017-05-15 19:24:18 UTC	samely	Hi! welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing. I noticed you added a park but looks like there is another park in the same place called Pinheiros, can you fix that?

48662364 by dnroamhicsir	1	2017-05-15 18:54:59 UTC	samely	Hi! Welcome to OSM! thanks for contributing. I just noticed you added some polygons but I think you need to read the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure. So can you fix type of the items you added?

48645384 by 334554	1	2017-05-15 18:46:57 UTC	samely	Hi, thank for contributing to OSM! I noticed you duplicated a park, I deleted it, also it would be great if you can draw it as a polygon.

48684595 by DerGuteMercator	1	2017-05-15 16:39:24 UTC	samely	Hi! I noticed you are changing the type of place and I'm wondering what is your source, since in wikipedia it's not matching the info you are changing, for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Pe%C3%B1asco, you changed it from city to village.
	2	2017-05-20 11:25:37 UTC	DerGuteMercator	Hi, sorry for the late reply, I have been busy last week. The wiki link above is pointing to some city in Mexico, I assume you refer to https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Pinasco ? (The article still is about the municipio of Puerto Pinasco, not the urban agglomeration that I have reteagged. T...

48703247 by emugee	1	2017-05-15 16:16:14 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found many parks you added, however those don't match with the satellite imagery. Would you mind to check out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark and you can ping me if need any help.

48630003 by Gigu3012	1	2017-05-12 19:26:42 UTC	samely	"Residence" doesn't look as a correct name, can you confirm it?
	2	2017-05-13 09:25:10 UTC	datendelphin	It looks like they do have a phone book entry. Looks good to me.

48630155 by Gigu3012	1	2017-05-12 19:25:10 UTC	samely	Can you also confirm if this park exist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493086307/history?

48630045 by Gigu3012	1	2017-05-12 19:23:19 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM! while working around this area I found some new park as nodes which according to the satellite imagery are not there, so I deleted them. And I'm wondering if this park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493085904/history exists, can you please confirm it? otherwi...
	2	2017-12-16 12:19:10 UTC	SelfishSeahorse	Hi! I've just been there and I can confirm that neither <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493085904> nor <http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493086307> is a park. I've deleted them now. Regards

48617144 by Hieu Van	1	2017-05-12 17:37:03 UTC	samely	Hello! Thanks for contributing to OSM! While working around this area I found you changed the name of this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369493064/history, I'me wondering what's is your source since I was googling and it looks like the name before your change was correct https://vi.wikip...
	2	2017-05-17 06:26:10 UTC	Hieu Van	"Văn Điển" and "Văn Điển Town" is different. I just replaced the old name with the full name to prevent confusion :)
	3	2017-06-13 01:39:11 UTC	Hieu Van	Old name reverted.

48557865 by DerGuteMercator	1	2017-05-10 18:50:30 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed you deleted the `place` tag, can you check of this is not a mistake? Maintaining both `place` + `admin_level` are still under discussion, so why delete it? Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-05-11 07:25:21 UTC	DerGuteMercator	Hi samely, Thanks for your concern. I had deleted it because it was tagged as "city", which is wrong. This tag is reserved for large urban settlements. Appropriate would be tagging it with one of the administrative keywords, probably county or municipality. As I do not know what is c...
	3	2017-05-11 17:30:21 UTC	samely	I think a quick research can help, so we avoid just deleting the tags. I found this: [https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Departamento_de_Presidente_Hayes], looks like the `place` tag should be change to `district`, Would you mind fixing: [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1476524592] and [https://www.o...
	4	2017-05-11 19:14:03 UTC	DerGuteMercator	Well, yes, I had seen that, but also the official convenciones for Paraguay: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Paraguay#Convenciones And they do not list the use of the place tag but prescribe using admin level only. I'd rather discuss it there to achieve a common agreement but ...
	5	2017-05-11 19:17:18 UTC	DerGuteMercator	I should add that I will add it to the boundary, not the admin_centre node, because that is where it belongs.
	6	2017-05-11 19:29:43 UTC	samely	Yup! That is ok. Thank you and have a nice day!
	7	2017-05-11 19:39:41 UTC	DerGuteMercator	Actually I detected that I had misinterpreated the admin_centre role. I believed it to be the centre of the district, however it is supposed to demark its administrative capital. Thus I now re-added the place tag, but with the appropriate village tag. Thanks, I learned something!
	8	2017-05-11 19:40:15 UTC	DerGuteMercator	It was very confusing that the districts and the villages have almost the same name
	9	2017-05-11 20:01:14 UTC	samely	Thank you for sharing what you learned. I will check it!

48599073 by test0022012	1	2017-05-11 17:33:21 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM, working around this area I found you added info to the name tag, did you check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names? I think you can split into specific tags the name. Regards, Eliane

48593043 by Marc Konjuhi	1	2017-05-11 16:07:30 UTC	samely	Hello! First of all thanks for contributing to OSM. I just was checking this area and I found you edited many places `name=`, I'm wondering if you know about multi-language tagging, looks like you are trying to combine all names in just the `name=` tag, can you check this url: http://wiki.openstre...
	2	2017-05-11 16:42:27 UTC	Marc Konjuhi	Hey, the problem is that Kosovo is a country with 2 national languages, therefore there has to be Albanian and Serbian names. when you look at e.g. Podujevë / Besianë, both names are in use, therefore none of them is an alternative one
	3	2017-05-11 16:44:05 UTC	Marc Konjuhi	maybe there can be a discussion about this somewhere?
	4	2017-05-11 17:00:00 UTC	Marc Konjuhi	or do you think that the name should be everywhere in Albanian? (like it is in Belarus in Russian)?
	5	2017-05-11 17:12:02 UTC	samely	Oh yup! There is no consensus about the names in Kosovo yet. But I think you should add the name for each language specifically --> `name:=` tag, so everybody have the chance to show the map in the language of their preference. i.e Istog / Burim - Istok.

48223619 by ألبرشت شونكا	1	2017-04-28 15:55:28 UTC	samely	Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I saw you are adding arabic names, which are wonderful, however could you split the names? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2075469537/history for "Goré" - "غوري", you can leave the name in the official language and ad...

48166168 by yuantouniaoren	1	2017-04-26 19:27:36 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for adding many places! I'm wondering about the source because I cannot easily find them googling.

48159917 by FreedSky	1	2017-04-26 19:04:12 UTC	samely	you traced a road that doesn't match with the imagery, can you check it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489565604/history
	2	2017-05-04 04:40:14 UTC	FreedSky	I was drawn according to the picture of the building.

48167703 by Zestenzieher	1	2017-04-26 18:47:56 UTC	samely	I've also reverted this changeset

48163947 by Zestenzieher	1	2017-04-26 18:15:35 UTC	samely	You changed many objects to a shop item. I reverted it.

48143713 by _ANick_	1	2017-04-26 16:16:28 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM. I saw you changed the place description. Do you know the differences between them? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb. I think it was ok before your change. Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-04-27 09:47:59 UTC	_ANick_	Hi, Eliane! Which objects you mean? I see two Residential complex that marked as suburb (already changed): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437276226 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392624870

48126981 by Adrian78951	1	2017-04-25 15:40:37 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I'm wondering if this feature: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489330569 i really a city. Can you check it?

47976840 by samely	1	2017-04-20 16:32:55 UTC	trigpoint	Hi, thank you for your contribution however there are a few issues with this edit. 1. You have not tagged it as junction=roundabout. 2. A roundabout normally takes the highest classification, so this one should be primary. Exceptions are when there are motorways involved but that doesn't apply h...
	2	2017-04-20 17:03:45 UTC	samely	Thanks Phil! I've already added these details.

47964575 by yuantouniaoren	1	2017-04-20 16:38:55 UTC	samely	Hi, I saw you deleted `name:en` for many places, I'm wondering if you can improve the names rather than delete them. Regards, Eliane

47765544 by 中鲁潍昌	1	2017-04-18 16:00:39 UTC	samely	Hi, I saw you changed the type of places of many points to city, and I was comparing them with wikipedia and I couldn't find the change as a the correct option. Can you tell me what is your source to change the type of place. See: https://openstreetmap.org/node/4306910709
	2	2017-04-19 03:59:06 UTC	中鲁潍昌	您好，我是潍坊本地人，到达过这些地方。我从潍坊政府网站和百度百科上知道了这些地点的正式名称。Hello, I am a native of Weifang, I have been to these places. I know the official name of these sites from the Weifang government website and the Baidu encycloped...

35817620 by vacavinci	1	2017-04-13 21:24:15 UTC	samely	Hola! Trabajando por esta zona veo que esta vía: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384900296 es exclusivamente para bus, sin embargo en la imagen satelital veo que no hay varias vías y más parece que se debería agregar estos datos como una relación. Podría ...

47352150 by Riajuu	1	2017-04-03 18:33:27 UTC	samely	Hi Riajuu, I noticed you had added a "-" for the "name:en", is there any convention for korean names?
	2	2017-04-12 17:34:37 UTC	Riajuu	Hello, I am sorry for late answer. In South Korea (not including North Korea) follow the Revised Romanization of Korean (RRK). According to Article 2-2 of RRK, "when there is the possibility of confusion in pronunciation, a hyphen '-' may be used.". http://www.korean.go.kr/front_eng/roma...
	3	2017-04-12 18:59:18 UTC	samely	Thanks for such a great explanation

12540762 by eXmajor	1	2017-04-11 16:14:28 UTC	samely	Hi, I was working around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173529930/history and it looks like the roads are not properly traced, can you confirm it? Thanks.

46473991 by paolobenve	1	2017-03-13 01:26:19 UTC	samely	Hi Paolo, thanks for contributing to OSM. I found this way 477080062, looks like you forgot to add any tag. We have unconnected roads here. Can you fix it? Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-03-13 08:28:30 UTC	paolobenve	thank you, I corrected it

46734783 by dhia althaf	1	2017-03-13 01:18:45 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing, I found many features without clear tags, can you fix them ? Regards, Eliane

27139033 by JJGreen	1	2017-03-13 00:20:10 UTC	samely	Hi JJGreen, thanks for contribuying to OSM, I was working around this area and I found many ways without any tag, and also they doesn't look to be based on the Bing imagery. Can you confirm that those exist? Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-03-13 01:04:08 UTC	JJGreen	Hi, Eliane, Check out the City's website it also shows these roads in the new development called Brighton. http://apps2.saskatoon.ca/app/aRRCP/

37767406 by samely	1	2017-03-02 09:51:27 UTC	Aleks-Berlin	Hi samely, you entered 8x tag "1"="yes", e.g. way/379682013. This seems to be a typo, as it has no meaning. Could you please fix it? Thanks, Alex
	2	2017-03-02 20:36:31 UTC	samely	Hi Aleks, It's definitely a typo, thanks for flagging this out, I've already fixed them. Regards, Eliane

46393907 by ᄒᄒ (lee0502)	1	2017-02-27 21:32:47 UTC	samely	Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664

46394043 by ᄒᄒ (lee0502)	1	2017-02-27 21:32:43 UTC	samely	Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664

46390762 by ᄒᄒ (lee0502)	1	2017-02-27 21:32:37 UTC	samely	Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664

46388664 by ᄒᄒ (lee0502)	1	2017-02-27 21:32:27 UTC	samely	Thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I found many streets with bridge tag, I already fixed them.

46357197 by digmaan	1	2017-02-24 20:13:46 UTC	samely	Hi jonadelcrispin, Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this areas and found that your edit has duplicate streets, I reverted it.
	2	2017-02-26 03:03:23 UTC	TagaSanPedroAko	I reverted part of your changeset ,that added duplicate streets around Calicanto and Poblacion areas of Batangas City, at this changeset (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46406952), as those streets may affect routing if not removed.
	3	2017-02-26 03:08:09 UTC	TagaSanPedroAko	I know it is your first edit in OpenStreetMap, but be aware that you do not damage existing map data. And if you went straight to editing without taking the short tutorial, take that first to learn basic mapping in OpenStreetMap.

46183774 by orangelemonjelly	1	2017-02-20 17:04:58 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475288683 and found you added many streets but there is matching with Bing or Mapbox satellite imagery, can you share your source, please?
	2	2017-02-20 18:17:43 UTC	samely	I mean No matching

46206240 by HippoPunch	1	2017-02-20 17:28:04 UTC	samely	Hi, Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found some untagged ways such https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475527986 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475566470, which even don't match with satellite imagery, could you please confirm or delete them? Regards, Eliane

46191002 by Arun M Unnithan	1	2017-02-20 17:21:36 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found some overlapped ways, I delete them. The same in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46190938 Regards, Eliane

46187670 by ArizonaMapper	1	2017-02-20 17:16:44 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for your amazing contribution to OSM. However, I found some ways that were overlapped and crossing with existing ways, I deleted them. Regards, Eliane

46168950 by maphunter36	1	2017-02-20 17:01:10 UTC	samely	Hi, thank you for your amazing contribution to OSM, I found some overlapping issues with this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475312173, can you fix it, please? Regards, Eliane

45995108 by Siddharthdewan064	1	2017-02-16 17:31:46 UTC	samely	Hi, Thanks for contributing to OSM can you check, please, the park at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3549658714/history#map=19/27.03923/88.26255? it looks good, I also can see two parks that aren't visible based on the satellite imagery, both of them really exist? Regard, Eliane

45983800 by 김익명	1	2017-02-16 17:19:54 UTC	samely	Hi, Thank you for contributing to OSM, I was wondering the real imagery you used to trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473876691/history#map=19/37.38525/127.95742, because it's doesn't match with Bing imagery, could you please revert it? Regards, Eliane

44699255 by TheSwavu	1	2017-02-16 17:13:22 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found many ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520384 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520800 without tags, could you please check and clean them if those don't have any sense to still exist on the map?

34393927 by maphunter36	1	2017-02-16 17:05:32 UTC	samely	Hi maphunter36! thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this area and found some duplicated and overlapping roads, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372854869/history#map=16/33.3457/126.2427, could you fix them please? Regards, samely

45765892 by 연아킴	1	2017-02-06 20:48:14 UTC	samely	Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, I replace your edit with a proper geometry.

45811761 by Sampool15	1	2017-02-06 20:36:06 UTC	samely	Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, however I will revert this change since all roads are duplicate.

45795539 by Liju Thomas	1	2017-02-06 20:32:54 UTC	samely	Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, however I will reverted since all those streets are duplicate.

45817919 by Bryan Sabbag	1	2017-02-06 20:25:41 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however there are some features that are not properly mapped. so I will delete them.

45741941 by 유네성	1	2017-02-06 19:51:36 UTC	samely	Hi, I will revert this edit since it's not properly.

45711587 by 오한나	1	2017-02-03 19:42:24 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I will revert this edit since doesn't match with the imagery.

45717400 by sody1324	1	2017-02-03 19:36:19 UTC	samely	Hi sody134, thanks for contributing to OSM, you made a great job, I just deleted some wrong features and re-tagged ways. Regards, Eliane

45681045 by KLon12	1	2017-02-02 20:48:32 UTC	samely	Hi KLon12, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found you traced many ways near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469368874/history. I will delete this geometry. Regards, Eliane

42600303 by Arun Dhilogics	1	2017-02-02 20:39:28 UTC	samely	Hi Arun, thanks for contributing I found you traced many roads, but all are disconnected, and also looks like is not based on satellite imagery. Can you fixed them? Regards, Eliane

45732091 by Andrew Matheny	1	2017-02-02 20:31:57 UTC	samely	Hi Andrew, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this zone and found you traced this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20724089/history which has impossible angles and doesn't seem to be based in satellite imagery. Can you check it please? Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-02-02 20:37:42 UTC	Andrew Matheny	Fixed! Looks like this was just one particularly nasty TIGER street that needed to be cleaned up the rest of the way

45718393 by On Top	1	2017-02-02 19:38:00 UTC	samely	Hi On Top, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found an island trace, can you please fix this, and add the relation to the existing street? Regards, Eliane

45618806 by 변우성	1	2017-01-31 19:53:24 UTC	samely	Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks not to be based on Bing imagery, can you please confirm if these streets exists or revert them?

45537935 by 이윤우	1	2017-01-31 19:39:11 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks strange, can you confirm these streets exists or revert it please?

45521624 by rnwlsdud11	1	2017-01-31 19:29:28 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, can you please add the tags to the streets you added?

45612076 by zebanshee	1	2017-01-31 19:20:22 UTC	samely	Hi zebanshee, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found a way that doesn't appear in the imagery, can you confirm this exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469891519/history?

45576260 by Pizza15	1	2017-01-31 19:14:27 UTC	samely	Hi Pizza15, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, this edit looks a little it strange so I will revert it. Regards, Eliane

45645571 by 멍게Y 이	1	2017-01-31 19:11:20 UTC	samely	Hi 멍게Y 이, Thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it. Regards, Eliane

45671874 by dox333	1	2017-01-31 19:09:43 UTC	samely	Hi dox333, thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it.

45644202 by Ali OZDEMIR	1	2017-01-31 18:43:21 UTC	samely	Hi Ali, I will proceed to revert this edit. Regards Eliane

40882763 by samely	1	2017-01-26 21:37:22 UTC	Spanholz	Hey, probably Drive-Through is not the right tag for this kind of way. Just found it while cleaning some imaginery Pokemon Go edits. Thanks and hope you have still a little bit of fun after such an amazing amount of changesets.
	2	2017-01-27 16:40:34 UTC	samely	Hi Spanholz, Thanks for pointing this out! I was just fixing connectivity issues, so I didn't review tags around this zone. You are completely right, it's not a "service=drive-through" feature, it should probably be tagged as "highway=path" or "highway=track", dependin...

22955221 by Iowa Kid	1	2017-01-27 16:40:25 UTC	samely	Hi lowa Kid, Thank you for the great contribution you do to OSM. I'm wondering if the tag "service=drive-through" you added to these paths and others around are based on some wiki. This should probably tagged as ''highway=path" or"highway=track" depending on if the way is ...

45215569 by istvanv_telenav	1	2017-01-17 19:19:01 UTC	samely	Hi istvanv_telenav, Thanks for contributing to OSM. While working around this zone, I realized that your edit has generated overlapping issues around this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466381778. Can you check it? Regards, Eliane
	2	2017-01-17 19:20:28 UTC	samely	And please, also take a look to the street that seems to be deleted. Thanks.

45191785 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-16 22:28:06 UTC	samely	Hi again. Can you check this edit please, looks like there are duplicated ways. Thanks.

45192060 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-16 22:19:35 UTC	samely	Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, looks like you made a double trace for an existing road. Can you check it please? Regards, Eliane

45086075 by samely	1	2017-01-13 13:34:21 UTC	mueschel	Hi, could you check the tagging of this way? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465259458 Cheers, Jan
	2	2017-01-13 14:37:44 UTC	samely	Hi Jan, Can you be more specific, please? I checked it out, however, I didn't find anything special. Regards, Eliane
	3	2017-01-13 14:39:35 UTC	mueschel	The way has the tag "170 south=Andover Lane"
	4	2017-01-13 14:45:09 UTC	samely	I was reviewing the big street, thanks for pointing this out, I've already fixed it.

45017616 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-11 22:57:06 UTC	samely	The same here, can you confirm it? Eliane

45017983 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-11 22:52:33 UTC	samely	Can you also check this changeset, please? Eliane
	2	2017-10-18 06:59:18 UTC	GerdP	I wonder if the primary road is in a tunnel? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464661119 It seems to go straight through buildings with both lanes.

45017622 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-11 22:37:59 UTC	samely	Hi! Can you also check this changeset please? Eliane.

45018760 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-11 22:27:32 UTC	samely	Hi again! The same case here, can you confirm the existance of these roads? Thank you, Eliane

45018140 by Gã Trùm	1	2017-01-11 22:20:42 UTC	samely	Hi Gã Trùm, thanks for contributing to OSM. I've been working in this area and I realize that you added two ways which doesn't match with Bing aerial imagery. Could you please confirm that these roads exist, otherwise revert your change? Thank you, Eliane.

44409804 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:45 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:59:25 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44412931 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:46 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:59:19 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408732 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:46 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:59:15 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44406743 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:46 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:59:11 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44405371 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:47 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:59:05 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44412848 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:48 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:59:02 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44404200 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:48 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:58 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44410250 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:49 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:50 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409998 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:49 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:46 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409078 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:49 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:35 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408027 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:49 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:31 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44404903 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:50 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:28 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409751 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:50 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:23 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44406901 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:50 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:20 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44412832 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:51 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:15 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408655 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:51 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:08 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408411 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:51 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:58:03 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408581 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:52 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:53 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409977 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:52 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:49 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44405691 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:53 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:44 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44413012 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:53 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:39 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408806 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:53 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:35 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44407759 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:53 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:25 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44413260 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:54 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:21 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44404772 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:55 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:17 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44405247 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:55 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:13 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44404038 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:55 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:08 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44413124 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:56 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:57:04 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409193 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:56 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:59 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44406354 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:56 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:54 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409639 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:57 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:50 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44406026 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:57 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:46 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44407266 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:57 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:41 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44408688 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:58 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:36 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44409164 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:58 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:32 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44413347 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:58 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:23 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44413211 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:58 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:18 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44405144 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:59 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:15 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44406819 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:09:59 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:08 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44410415 by samely	1	2016-12-20 23:10:00 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	2	2017-01-06 14:56:04 UTC	samely	woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44405524 by samely	1	2016-12-19 16:57:14 UTC	Alexey Lukin	Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your chan...
	2	2016-12-19 19:18:40 UTC	woodpeck	I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
	3	2016-12-19 19:21:13 UTC	Alexey Lukin	Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem: I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street crossings here, it will become apparent: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999 In fact, the ...
	4	2016-12-19 20:23:47 UTC	samely	Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way. Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this. Let me know if you need...
	5	2016-12-20 23:09:54 UTC	woodpeck_repair	This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
	6	2016-12-21 00:05:06 UTC	woodpeck	I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
	7	2017-01-06 14:55:37 UTC	samely	Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.

44928754 by samely	1	2017-01-05 18:44:42 UTC	samely	Testing To-fix

44926872 by samely	1	2017-01-05 15:54:21 UTC	samely	Testing to-fix plugin.

44705365 by ellen_era	1	2017-01-04 15:11:18 UTC	samely	Hi ellen_era. I'm glad to see you contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added "name:en=养生蚝的农场" tag, which doesn't look as an English name, can you please fix this? Thank you.

44409238 by samely	1	2016-12-16 16:04:34 UTC	SomeoneElse	It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet. That way local mappers can see what has been affected near them. Best Regards, Andy
	2	2016-12-16 19:46:21 UTC	samely	Hi Andy Thanks for notifying this since we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes using to-fix plugin. We are working on fixing this bug and tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74.

44410333 by samely	1	2016-12-16 15:36:26 UTC	omargibran	Hello. Thanks a lot. Although I see Mexico in the orange square, it is not listed in the github link of countries. Are mexican highways being corrected? Cheers
	2	2016-12-16 19:36:50 UTC	samely	Thanks for noticing this, actually changes were in Los Angeles and Japan and not in Mexico. However, thanks to your comment we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes that we are tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74

43188405 by samely	1	2016-11-25 20:06:18 UTC	DenisCarriere	How did this happen? This Wikidata code is for Iran?
	2	2016-11-27 17:48:59 UTC	samely	Hi Denis. I'm not sure how this happened, however, I'll compare values carefully. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it.

31818541 by samely	1	2016-02-09 14:26:34 UTC	carciofo	Please note that Taft Street is not a dual carriageway as it has no physical separator. In addition, when splitting dual carriageways, ensure that you have connected intersecting roads to both one-ways and set oneway=yes on both directions. That was not done here.
	2	2016-09-26 16:25:42 UTC	samely	Hey, carciofo. You are completely right, not all Taft Street is a dual carriage. So thank you for fixing the segment which has no physical separation and sharing the way this should be mapped.

37000532 by samely	1	2016-09-21 00:19:17 UTC	Apo42	way 396026060 is not a building. It's a camper van. please stop tracing buildings automatically if the algorithm is not able to do it correct.
	2	2016-09-26 16:05:26 UTC	samely	Hi Apo24. I added it because it looks like a little part of the house. However, if you know better this place, please, feel free to retagging it or even deleting it. Thanks for contributing to improving the map.

42213280 by samely	1	2016-09-23 17:12:17 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hello again, This looks like quite a large changeset for only 3 changes :) Rather than adding #gibberish changeset comments could you please describe what you changed and where? Best Regards, Andy
	2	2016-09-26 16:00:02 UTC	samely	Hey Andy. I agree with you, it wasn't intentionally since I could mistake the edit layers while fixing unclosed multi-polygons by deleting an overlapped way around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3786309618 and adding this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131693153. Thanks for pointing...

40530425 by samely	1	2016-07-17 10:07:03 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi, Just for info, I've added a changeset comment to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195315 to try and get this fixed properly. The current layout of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361673628/history (with zig-zags in it) is clearly wrong now and the history shows that that was caused b...
	2	2016-07-20 23:50:23 UTC	samely	Hey Andy. Thanks for notifying this. Greetings!
	3	2016-07-20 23:53:43 UTC	SomeoneElse	For info, following a note to talk-au it's now been patched up in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40810205 .

40557410 by samely	1	2016-07-08 02:04:30 UTC	MikeN	Hi, Thank you for the fix. White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane. Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki
	2	2016-07-11 16:14:03 UTC	samely	Hey there! I've already fixed the number of lanes in all the road. Thanks for your feedback.

40553544 by samely	1	2016-07-08 01:09:52 UTC	rickmastfan67	Just so you know, these are emergency access roads for fire departments and the police so they can access the PA Turnpike network quickly between interchanges, They are almost never 'oneway=yes', and should be tagged as 'oneway=no' instead.
	2	2016-07-08 01:13:48 UTC	rickmastfan67	So, in the future, just take 5 seconds to look at the Bing imagery. If you see a 'gate' on any point of the ramp in the imagery, 99.9% chance it should be 'oneway=no', especially if the highway it connects to is a toll highway. Also, the 'white' lines on each side of the ramp are a dead giveaway t...
	3	2016-07-11 16:03:59 UTC	samely	Hey there! I removed the oneway tag so you can, please, fix it! Thanks for your very clear explanation about this kind of access.

40488650 by samely_labuildings	1	2016-07-06 13:52:32 UTC	SomeoneElse	Why is "samely_labuildings" editing in Europe? :)
	2	2016-07-06 19:42:19 UTC	samely	Hi Andy! I had mistaken my user configuration in some editions. And about the size of my changeset I'll try to not doing it again. Thanks for your feedback.

40429179 by samely	1	2016-07-01 22:13:00 UTC	samely	Importing buildings. Sorry for the comment.

39607276 by samely	1	2016-05-28 18:24:14 UTC	eastender	I think that the road added by this changeset is wrong. There used to be a road for traffic here, but it was removed several months ago. The satellite imagery hasn't caught up with this development yet. Currently there is a pedestrian square being constructed in the area between Aldgate High Street ...
	2	2016-05-30 15:31:35 UTC	samely	Hey! there, I traced this road because there was a feedback saying that this road was missing, and based on satellite imagery I decided to trace it. Now that your feedback is kind contradictory to the other one, I decided to delete it and leave a note instead (openstreetmap.org/note/577832). Thanks...

38953116 by samely	1	2016-05-05 10:06:09 UTC	Chris Fleming	I'm struggling to see the point of this "fix". Also it's bad form to delete and recreate a way (loosing the history) just to add a small "kink" into the road that I don't believe exists on the ground?
	2	2016-05-05 12:43:03 UTC	samely	Hey there! I can see in the satellite imagery that this road exist, this road was self intersected forming 0º. You can clearly see this solved error if you revert the changeset.

37761536 by samely	1	2016-04-07 09:35:25 UTC	Владимир К	Hello! I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on. They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong. For example http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199 http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c...
	2	2016-04-07 15:07:35 UTC	samely	Hey there! I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I don't know this place, but if you do, it would be great that you add those relations. I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38383360) Thanks for your feedback!
	3	2016-04-08 11:31:08 UTC	andygol	Добрый день, Владимир К Для того чтобы правильно прокладывался маршрут необходимо устанавливать, с помощью отношений, запреты поворотов - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/384...
	4	2016-04-11 07:43:51 UTC	Владимир К	Спасибо, я знаю.
	5	2016-04-11 07:45:42 UTC	Владимир К	А не слишком ли много там запретов? ну то есть разве не достаточно просто только прямо?
	6	2016-04-11 10:15:12 UTC	andygol	Можно, конечно, поэкспериментировать с запретами, чтобы точно понять какие из них нужны
	7	2016-04-11 10:16:32 UTC	andygol	Если опираться на знаки (я смотрел на Яндекс Панорамах) то для каждого направления нужно по два релейшена "только прямо"
	8	2016-04-11 10:38:15 UTC	Владимир К	как тут? http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37761536#map=19/55.73407/52.42464
	9	2016-04-11 11:32:22 UTC	andygol	Да. Только нужно подождать пока данные попадут в OSRM или Mapzen, чтобы проверить это утверждение. Вполне возможно, что можно ограничиться и одним релейшеном вместо дв�...
	10	2016-04-11 11:39:50 UTC	andygol	Пока что только мои предположения, если использовать средний сегмент линии с ролью 'via', то при построении маршрута от него (от этого сегмента) необходимо задавать д�...

37551242 by samely	1	2016-04-07 06:31:53 UTC	GS25	Hi there! This road is not connected, which is why I didn't connect it. Please do not blindly follow some software's idea of what is an error in OSM. There is no substitute for local knowledge (I live locally). If you are not sure, move on to another area, or ask the original mapper. Than...
	2	2016-04-07 14:37:47 UTC	samely	Hey there. I really considered that roads should be connected. However I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38382289) and I suggest connecting the piece of road that seems to be an island. Thank you for you feedback!

37767348 by samely	1	2016-03-29 21:47:52 UTC	JeopardyTempest	Hi samely... I'm newish at OSM, and seems you've got a lot more history than I, but I'm really confused by these changes. You gave a US Interstate a Japanese name and speed limit, and added a strange 1 tag. I'd look about reverting, but you seem to know what you're doing enough to fix\\understand!...
	2	2016-03-30 04:58:15 UTC	manings	@JeopardyTempest, thank you for flagging this edit. I reverted the changes now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38157753
	3	2016-03-30 08:50:30 UTC	JeopardyTempest	Thanks!
	4	2016-03-30 13:44:56 UTC	samely	Thanks manings for reverting it! Thanks JeopardyTempest for your feedback, I'll be careful next time

37905675 by samely	1	2016-03-23 12:59:22 UTC	SomeoneElse	Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything. Also what are the turn restrictions at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2667031585 ?
	2	2016-03-23 14:11:48 UTC	samely	Hey there! I was working on connectivity errors using To-Fix : http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/stats/highwayhighway. I didn't consider the turn restriction, but now is done! Thanks for your feedback.
	3	2016-03-23 14:55:58 UTC	SomeoneElse	https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6074901 isn't correct. Traffic from the west can carry on along the ring road as well as turn right. It can't turn left. You'd need to survey it to see if u-turns are prohibited here. There will be other similar restrictions at the other nodes too.
	4	2016-03-23 19:47:56 UTC	samely	You were right. I fixed it and added a note because I don't know about turn restrictions at this point. I just wanted to intersect highways. I'll be careful next time. Thanks!

29915022 by abel801	1	2016-01-17 23:55:18 UTC	Mike Baggaley	Hi, is Future Nocton Park Road the name of the road, or is it a road that will be named Nocton Park Road in the future? If the latter, I suggest changing the name to Nocton Park Road and setting highway=construction with construction=residential or highway=proposed. Cheers, Mike
	2	2016-01-19 15:23:24 UTC	abel801	Hi Mike, I really don't known what is the real name, because I only use satellite imagery.
	3	2016-01-19 16:30:15 UTC	SomeoneElse	Rather than guesing, might it be better to add an OSM note? The Bing imagery here shows no road at all. What information do you have that there is a road here (now, as opoosed to a proposed or under-construction one)? Did a customer of one of Mapbox's customers report it?
	4	2016-01-25 16:02:59 UTC	abel801	> Hi SomeoneElse, the residential road was added by the [previous mapper](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319222705/history) and my edit was only to fix the connection. The mapper has [many local edits](http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lincoln%20Edge/history#map=14/53.1732/-0.3968) and I assume...
	5	2016-01-25 17:54:40 UTC	SomeoneElse	In this case I'd be tempted to ask the previous mapper whether it's been built yet. It's quite likely it wasn't when they added it, but might have been now. Also, you could ask them what it's (now) called?
	6	2016-02-25 21:40:29 UTC	samely	Message has been sent it to Lincoln Edge. If he answer to me, I'll share it.
	7	2016-03-06 15:27:28 UTC	Lincoln Edge	It's open now, and it is called Nocton Park Road.
	8	2016-03-21 14:29:28 UTC	samely	Thank you Lincoln Edge!

33960772 by samely	1	2016-02-10 11:39:43 UTC	malenki	Hi samely, I just fixed the reservoir you broke in this edit. What did you do? You split a self intersecting outer way which resulted in * an intersection between multipolygon ways (you should unglue these ways) and * an outer way inside the outer ways (map them as inner ways) hth malenki
	2	2016-02-15 17:14:32 UTC	samely	Hey malenki. Thanks for your feedback and fixing the reservoir. I was working ungluing objects that was intersected each other. Btw, I'll be careful. Thanks

36036278 by abel801	1	2015-12-22 14:34:04 UTC	samely	Hi. Take a look, there some building inside building issues.

36021162 by ediyes	1	2015-12-22 14:29:13 UTC	samely	Hi. Take a look, there are more buildings to map.
	2	2015-12-22 14:55:18 UTC	ediyes	Hola samely, Gracias por su observación, en nuestro siguiente proyecto http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/14# se mapearan todos los edificios que faltan.

36025778 by jinalfoflia	1	2015-12-22 14:24:22 UTC	samely	Those buildings need to be improved: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468808/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468804/history
	2	2015-12-28 07:29:35 UTC	jinalfoflia	Thank you for the feedback. These are my corrections. Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36213237

35467229 by samely	1	2015-11-20 20:20:53 UTC	samely	This changeset was reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35470137

33714845 by samely	1	2015-09-02 19:55:19 UTC	ikz	Are you sure in this points? Yes, we can put nodes in intersections, but then we need to split ways and make lot of restrictions.
	2	2015-11-16 14:25:01 UTC	samely	Hi ikz, thanks for your feedback. I was fixing crossing ways, I think you should add at least turn restrictions, instead of deleting intersections.
	3	2015-11-16 17:56:18 UTC	ikz	KISS principle :) I took same results without any restrictions. And point in way intersection is not necessary, but "useful practice".
	4	2015-11-16 19:31:58 UTC	samely	Hey there. I agree with this "useful practice".

31844248 by samely	1	2015-06-09 17:35:14 UTC	mhenson	Thank you! I have done a lot of mapping, but I have not reverted any change sets.
	2	2015-11-16 14:06:49 UTC	samely	Thanks to you.

31371735 by samely	1	2015-11-07 03:18:30 UTC	maxerickson	There was some sort of accident with ways 17835459 and 171258574 here, they got connected to a bunch of the foot paths. I've fixed it. It also seems it wasn't a hotosm project.
	2	2015-11-09 14:01:37 UTC	samely	Hi max erickson, thanks for fixing them. I made a mistake with the comment. I'll be careful. Thanks again.

32317063 by samely	1	2015-10-28 18:00:22 UTC	skorasaurus	http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357532353 is not a named road, but just an unnamed driveway; I've driven past it numerous times. I've updated it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290
	2	2015-10-28 18:43:05 UTC	samely	Hey there! Thanks for updating the information about this way.

28595169 by samely	1	2015-10-25 14:07:23 UTC	carciofo	Please be more careful and thorough when splitting dual carriageways. NW 56th Ave north- and south-bound segments were left unconnected, the entire undivided stretch between Sunrise Blvd and NW 19th St was left as one way, and many intersections were not extended to both directions. Thanks.
	2	2015-10-26 14:20:29 UTC	samely	Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I saw you've already fixed them. I will keep your recommendation in mind . Thanks again.

34533291 by samely	1	2015-10-09 16:25:30 UTC	samely	POI's were added.

34329826 by samely	1	2015-09-29 16:43:34 UTC	ikiya	Please stop mass editing. Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
	2	2015-09-29 17:06:53 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) based on GIS imagery. In this case I aligned tertiary roads.
	3	2015-09-30 10:34:15 UTC	ikiya	Thank you for your explanation. I understand. Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project. (Japan Community mailing lists) https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html

33715228 by samely	1	2015-09-01 01:37:15 UTC	Rub21	Esta segura de que un track esta connectando con un motroway?
	2	2015-09-01 02:45:18 UTC	samely	Según la imagen satelital del Bing hay varias vías que conectan con el motorway. Sin embargo deje una nota. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33717486

30249051 by samely	1	2015-08-24 20:31:15 UTC	MikeN	Hi, thank you for the edits. I found some problems - Frontage road was blocked years ago because it was a dangerous turn. It looks strange for a named road to be connected only by a driveway, but that's the real way it ended up. It would be dangerous for drivers to try to follow GPS for the ...
	2	2015-08-24 22:24:31 UTC	MikeN	One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it.
	3	2015-08-24 22:46:12 UTC	samely	Hi there. Thanks for your feedback. I've been working based on TIGER, and I will consider your suggestion. Thanks again for fix them.
	4	2015-08-30 21:34:21 UTC	MikeN	Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes. What was the reference used in moving those nodes? Thank you
	5	2015-08-31 14:29:57 UTC	samely	Hey there. I just tried to align the edited area based on Bing satellite imagery. Thanks for the comments again.

32764368 by samely	1	2015-08-21 23:30:03 UTC	SomeoneElse	Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659454313 is really the intersection of the trunk road on the bridge and the smaller road below?
	2	2015-08-22 23:18:00 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, definitely those roads don't intersect each other. I've already fixed my mistake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33515239 Thank you again.

33100601 by samely	1	2015-08-07 17:07:58 UTC	SomeoneElse	I'm not sure what "Highways were aligned" means - which highways were aligned with what?
	2	2015-08-07 17:15:16 UTC	samely	Hey there. I aligned the road based in Bing satellite imagery, where is not out of phase. And it's in the source comment.
	3	2015-08-07 17:55:51 UTC	SomeoneElse	I'd consider comparing with OS OpenData StreetView here too - as the note on the Via Gellia suggests, getting a GPS signal at the bottom of the valley among the trees is tricky, and Bing here can be misaligned due to the trees (though it's better than it was).

32779233 by samely	1	2015-07-23 18:48:18 UTC	trigpoint	Hi I have just spotted your change, whilst the crossing ways are a database error they need more than simply fixing them. All that is doing is fixing the symptom, without fixing the problem and also creating a much bigger one. A bit like removing the sticking plaster and leaving the patient to blee...
	2	2015-07-23 18:54:02 UTC	trigpoint	now means that potentially dangerous turns could be included in routing instructions. That is far worse than an error on a QA site. Fixing the error may look good, 'look boss I have fixed xx bugs today', butit is not the way to make a high quality map. I have added the turn restrictions. Please t...
	3	2015-07-23 20:31:40 UTC	samely	Thanks. I can see sort of see why you added a turn restriction for B4602 leading onto A470. But why is there a turn restriction effectively prohibiting a U turn from southbound A470 while northbound A470 allows a U turn on the same junction?
	4	2015-07-23 22:58:24 UTC	trigpoint	You are right, I had missed that one

32608781 by samely	1	2015-07-20 12:18:48 UTC	SomeoneElse	What was the "Oneway problem" that "was fixed" here?
	2	2015-07-20 13:46:30 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. It's a mistake in the comment, because I've aligned both highways. I'll be careful next time.

32637548 by samely	1	2015-07-18 04:01:48 UTC	FTA	This is indeed a one way road.
	2	2015-07-19 04:35:13 UTC	samely	Hey there! Thanks for your feedback. I'll be take care next time.
	3	2015-07-19 04:38:12 UTC	FTA	No problem! I went ahead and changed it, and also added some more context in this area. Best, ~FTA

32656413 by samely	1	2015-07-17 21:32:55 UTC	chillly	Yet another stupid edit by a remote Mapbox editor. This is a oneway road into a car park over a shopping centre. If you want to correct it VISIT THE SITE. I will revert this.
	2	2015-07-17 22:08:27 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thank you for reverting this mistake. I'll be more careful.

32522248 by samely	1	2015-07-10 01:53:05 UTC	skorasaurus	thanks for tracing, but Girard Street no longer exists. I live less than a km from here and I've past thi location plenty of times. There's no street sign to say it's a road either. See here for an image. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SfJKP8BMy94LnEoTy_2Yaw
	2	2015-07-10 02:24:46 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, I've already removed Girard Street. See: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32533422

32500295 by samely	1	2015-07-08 19:34:31 UTC	MikeN	Hi, thank you for the edit. Both streets were already surveyed on the ground and marked to remove tiger:reviewed=no. McLeod Street does not go through to Lafayette Street and that segment does not exist. TIGER was out of date for that street.
	2	2015-07-08 22:22:17 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback.

32165984 by samely	1	2015-06-30 17:06:38 UTC	skorasaurus	Hi, Thanks for editing although there's a barrier on it so it doesn't connect to Steelyard drive. I have corrected it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32313660
	2	2015-06-30 17:34:44 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for fixing it.

31515601 by samely	1	2015-06-15 18:25:51 UTC	Beep21	You were somewhat sloppy here. You tagged a pitcher's mound as a building and added a curve to the walkway. I'm not even sure that the ways that you connected ought to be connected. I don't know whether you realized this when you made the changeset, but this is a loading dock, and the walkway is ...
	2	2015-06-15 19:17:15 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. Connecting nodes and tag the area as a building were mistakes, so It was reverted. Look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31990805. I'll be careful of this from now.
	3	2015-06-15 20:03:36 UTC	Beep21	I appreciate it.

31990805 by samely	1	2015-06-15 18:53:32 UTC	samely	Chageset 31515601 was reverted.

31927674 by samely	1	2015-06-13 20:52:29 UTC	mhenson	your imagery is outdated. please revert change set
	2	2015-06-15 13:36:17 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback again. I've already reverted the changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31984193

30273888 by samely	1	2015-06-11 18:33:51 UTC	maxerickson	Are you using an imagery offset? Comparing against the OSM GPS Trace layer from Mapbox and the Strava Cycling Heatmap, the imagery in the Grand Rapids area appears to be quite well aligned, and in many cases you have offset the center lines of roads about 20 feet from Bing and those GPS layers.
	2	2015-06-15 13:31:39 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I work with Bing Aerial Imagery and I made a mistake moving all nodes in the box, so I've already reverted the changeset. I'll be careful of this from now. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31933699

31847830 by samely	1	2015-06-09 15:58:58 UTC	rickmastfan67	Please update your changeset comment in JOSM. You're saying 'Changeset 31829188 was reverted.' across the entire country. Thanks.
	2	2015-06-09 16:03:06 UTC	samely	Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I've already changed my comment.

31829188 by samely	1	2015-06-09 13:21:40 UTC	mhenson	The imagery used for change set 31829188 is out of date. The roads added, I removed months ago when they were replaced by buildings and/or barricaded. Please revert change set 31829188. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31829188 Your local mapper in Stillwater, OK Mike
	2	2015-06-09 13:31:38 UTC	samely	Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already reverted the changeset.
	3	2015-06-09 13:41:51 UTC	mhenson	: ) Thank you Mapbox for helping OSM in being the best map out there!

28308743 by samely	1	2015-05-21 14:03:13 UTC	neuhausr	Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??
	2	2015-05-21 15:29:53 UTC	samely	Thanks for your feedback. I already fixed my mistake.

30408542 by samely	1	2015-04-23 16:19:07 UTC	katpatuka	Is it possible that you've added highway=unclassified to ALL ways?
	2	2015-04-23 16:23:15 UTC	samely	Hey there, sorry I have to confused my keyboard shortcut. I'll revert those changes.

29787722 by samely	1	2015-03-30 11:57:27 UTC	Zbigniew_Czernik	This changeset has been reverted due forum request: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=494166#p494166
	2	2015-03-30 14:22:43 UTC	samely	Thanks for you feedback and fix my mistake. I'll be take care about the satellital image in Poland.

29715052 by samely	1	2015-03-25 11:44:30 UTC	SomeoneElse	I think that something has gone wrong here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334601141 seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311531344 ?
	2	2015-03-25 15:04:41 UTC	samely	Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already fixed the overlapping mistake.

29712705 by samely	1	2015-03-24 21:52:26 UTC	ij_	Why why why? What are you doing and why? This has nothing to do with alignment!
	2	2015-03-24 22:02:03 UTC	ij_	Ah, now I got. You seemed to remove duplicate object but please put a proper comment next time. The highway=footway was bogus addition though I think and I removed that.
	3	2015-03-24 22:06:08 UTC	samely	Thanks for your observation, I'm connecting nodes and I forgot to change my comments.

28352489 by samely	1	2015-02-09 22:41:45 UTC	SomeoneElse	Hi - just spotted that you've joined Colbeck Street and the car park http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323832277 to the west. Do these definitely join? The imagery suggests probably not. There's already a note in the area http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277305 , so I've added a comment to that t...
	2	2015-02-11 04:13:42 UTC	samely	Hi there, yes there appears to be a wall separating the street and the parking aisle. I've disconnected them and connected by a footway. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

28148682 by samely	1	2015-01-20 16:22:52 UTC	neuhausr	Hi, I see some errors with this changeset in the Vicksburg, Mississippi area. You duplicated data and misused basic tags. For example, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114814 and the nearby Culkin Road bridge. Please correct ASAP.
	2	2015-01-29 22:24:49 UTC	samely	Hey there - thanks so much for reporting - there were a couple of duplicate ways due to a broken upload, I went through the entire changeset and fixed them all.
	3	2015-01-30 17:58:12 UTC	neuhausr	Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322503620, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114569, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114772, http://www.openstreet...
	4	2015-01-30 18:20:06 UTC	samely	Thanks a lot for your feedback. I fixed them all.