Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-04-28 15:55:28 UTCsamely Hi! thanks for contributing to OSM. I saw you are adding arabic names, which are wonderful, however could you split the names? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2075469537/history for "Goré" - "غوري", you can leave the name in the official language and ad...
12017-04-26 19:27:36 UTCsamely Hi! Thanks for adding many places! I'm wondering about the source because I cannot easily find them googling.
12017-04-26 19:04:12 UTCsamely you traced a road that doesn't match with the imagery, can you check it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489565604/history
12017-04-26 18:47:56 UTCsamely I've also reverted this changeset
12017-04-26 18:15:35 UTCsamely You changed many objects to a shop item. I reverted it.
12017-04-26 16:16:28 UTCsamely Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM. I saw you changed the place description. Do you know the differences between them? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb. I think it was ok before your change.
Regards,
Eliane
22017-04-27 09:47:59 UTC_ANick_ Hi, Eliane!
Which objects you mean? I see two Residential complex that marked as suburb (already changed): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437276226
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392624870
12017-04-25 15:40:37 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. I'm wondering if this feature: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489330569 i really a city. Can you check it?
12017-04-20 16:32:55 UTCtrigpoint Hi, thank you for your contribution however there are a few issues with this edit.

1. You have not tagged it as junction=roundabout.
2. A roundabout normally takes the highest classification, so this one should be primary. Exceptions are when there are motorways involved but that doesn't apply h...
22017-04-20 17:03:45 UTCsamely Thanks Phil! I've already added these details.
12017-04-20 16:38:55 UTCsamely Hi, I saw you deleted `name:en` for many places, I'm wondering if you can improve the names rather than delete them.
Regards,
Eliane
12017-04-18 16:00:39 UTCsamely Hi, I saw you changed the type of places of many points to city, and I was comparing them with wikipedia and I couldn't find the change as a the correct option. Can you tell me what is your source to change the type of place. See: https://openstreetmap.org/node/4306910709
22017-04-19 03:59:06 UTC中鲁潍昌 您好,我是潍坊本地人,到达过这些地方。我从潍坊政府网站和百度百科上知道了这些地点的正式名称。Hello, I am a native of Weifang, I have been to these places. I know the official name of these sites from the Weifang government website and the Baidu encycloped...
12017-04-13 21:24:15 UTCsamely Hola!
Trabajando por esta zona veo que esta vía: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384900296 es exclusivamente para bus, sin embargo en la imagen satelital veo que no hay varias vías y más parece que se debería agregar estos datos como una relación. Podría ...
12017-04-03 18:33:27 UTCsamely Hi Riajuu,
I noticed you had added a "-" for the "name:en", is there any convention for korean names?
22017-04-12 17:34:37 UTCRiajuu Hello, I am sorry for late answer.
In South Korea (not including North Korea) follow the Revised Romanization of Korean (RRK).
According to Article 2-2 of RRK, "when there is the possibility of confusion in pronunciation, a hyphen '-' may be used.". http://www.korean.go.kr/front_eng/roma...
32017-04-12 18:59:18 UTCsamely Thanks for such a great explanation
12017-04-11 16:14:28 UTCsamely Hi,
I was working around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173529930/history and it looks like the roads are not properly traced, can you confirm it? Thanks.
12017-03-13 01:26:19 UTCsamely Hi Paolo, thanks for contributing to OSM. I found this way 477080062, looks like you forgot to add any tag. We have unconnected roads here. Can you fix it?
Regards,
Eliane
22017-03-13 08:28:30 UTCpaolobenve thank you, I corrected it
12017-03-13 01:18:45 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing, I found many features without clear tags, can you fix them ?
Regards,
Eliane
12017-03-13 00:20:10 UTCsamely Hi JJGreen, thanks for contribuying to OSM, I was working around this area and I found many ways without any tag, and also they doesn't look to be based on the Bing imagery. Can you confirm that those exist?
Regards,
Eliane
22017-03-13 01:04:08 UTCJJGreen Hi, Eliane,
Check out the City's website it also shows these roads in the new development called Brighton.
http://apps2.saskatoon.ca/app/aRRCP/
12017-03-02 09:51:27 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi samely, you entered 8x tag "1"="yes", e.g. way/379682013. This seems to be a typo, as it has no meaning. Could you please fix it? Thanks, Alex
22017-03-02 20:36:31 UTCsamely Hi Aleks,
It's definitely a typo, thanks for flagging this out, I've already fixed them.
Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-27 21:32:47 UTCsamely Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664
12017-02-27 21:32:43 UTCsamely Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664
12017-02-27 21:32:37 UTCsamely Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46388664
12017-02-27 21:32:27 UTCsamely Thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I found many streets with bridge tag, I already fixed them.
12017-02-24 20:13:46 UTCsamely Hi jonadelcrispin,
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this areas and found that your edit has duplicate streets, I reverted it.
22017-02-26 03:03:23 UTCTagaSanPedroAko I reverted part of your changeset ,that added duplicate streets around Calicanto and Poblacion areas of Batangas City, at this changeset (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46406952), as those streets may affect routing if not removed.
32017-02-26 03:08:09 UTCTagaSanPedroAko I know it is your first edit in OpenStreetMap, but be aware that you do not damage existing map data. And if you went straight to editing without taking the short tutorial, take that first to learn basic mapping in OpenStreetMap.
12017-02-20 17:04:58 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475288683 and found you added many streets but there is matching with Bing or Mapbox satellite imagery, can you share your source, please?
22017-02-20 18:17:43 UTCsamely I mean *No matching*
12017-02-20 17:28:04 UTCsamely Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found some untagged ways such https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475527986 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475566470, which even don't match with satellite imagery, could you please confirm or delete them?
Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-20 17:21:36 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found some overlapped ways, I delete them. The same in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46190938
Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-20 17:16:44 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for your amazing contribution to OSM. However, I found some ways that were overlapped and crossing with existing ways, I deleted them.
Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-20 17:01:10 UTCsamely Hi, thank you for your amazing contribution to OSM, I found some overlapping issues with this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475312173, can you fix it, please?
Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-16 17:31:46 UTCsamely Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM can you check, please, the park at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3549658714/history#map=19/27.03923/88.26255? it looks good, I also can see two parks that aren't visible based on the satellite imagery, both of them really exist?
Regard,
Eliane
12017-02-16 17:19:54 UTCsamely Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OSM, I was wondering the real imagery you used to trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473876691/history#map=19/37.38525/127.95742, because it's doesn't match with Bing imagery, could you please revert it?
Regards,

Eliane
12017-02-16 17:13:22 UTCsamely Hi!
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found many ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520384 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520800 without tags, could you please check and clean them if those don't have any sense to still exist on the map?
12017-02-16 17:05:32 UTCsamely Hi maphunter36! thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this area and found some duplicated and overlapping roads, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372854869/history#map=16/33.3457/126.2427, could you fix them please?
Regards,
samely
12017-02-06 20:48:14 UTCsamely Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, I replace your edit with a proper geometry.
12017-02-06 20:36:06 UTCsamely Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, however I will revert this change since all roads are duplicate.
12017-02-06 20:32:54 UTCsamely Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, however I will reverted since all those streets are duplicate.
12017-02-06 20:25:41 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however there are some features that are not properly mapped. so I will delete them.
12017-02-06 19:51:36 UTCsamely Hi, I will revert this edit since it's not properly.
12017-02-03 19:42:24 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I will revert this edit since doesn't match with the imagery.
12017-02-03 19:36:19 UTCsamely Hi sody134, thanks for contributing to OSM, you made a great job, I just deleted some wrong features and re-tagged ways.

Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-02 20:48:32 UTCsamely Hi KLon12, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found you traced many ways near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469368874/history. I will delete this geometry.

Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-02 20:39:28 UTCsamely Hi Arun, thanks for contributing I found you traced many roads, but all are disconnected, and also looks like is not based on satellite imagery. Can you fixed them?

Regards,
Eliane
12017-02-02 20:31:57 UTCsamely Hi Andrew, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around this zone and found you traced this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20724089/history which has impossible angles and doesn't seem to be based in satellite imagery. Can you check it please?
Regards,
Eliane
22017-02-02 20:37:42 UTCAndrew Matheny Fixed! Looks like this was just one particularly nasty TIGER street that needed to be cleaned up the rest of the way
12017-02-02 19:38:00 UTCsamely Hi On Top, thanks for contributing to OSM. I was working around and found an island trace, can you please fix this, and add the relation to the existing street?

Regards,
Eliane
12017-01-31 19:53:24 UTCsamely Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks not to be based on Bing imagery, can you please confirm if these streets exists or revert them?
12017-01-31 19:39:11 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks strange, can you confirm these streets exists or revert it please?
12017-01-31 19:29:28 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, can you please add the tags to the streets you added?
12017-01-31 19:20:22 UTCsamely Hi zebanshee, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found a way that doesn't appear in the imagery, can you confirm this exists https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469891519/history?
12017-01-31 19:14:27 UTCsamely Hi Pizza15, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, this edit looks a little it strange so I will revert it.

Regards,
Eliane
12017-01-31 19:11:20 UTCsamely Hi 멍게Y 이,
Thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it.

Regards,
Eliane
12017-01-31 19:09:43 UTCsamely Hi dox333, thanks for contributing to OSM, however this edit looks a little bit strange, I will revert it.
12017-01-31 18:43:21 UTCsamely Hi Ali, I will proceed to revert this edit.

Regards
Eliane
12017-01-26 21:37:22 UTCSpanholz Hey,

probably Drive-Through is not the right tag for this kind of way. Just found it while cleaning some imaginery Pokemon Go edits.

Thanks and hope you have still a little bit of fun after such an amazing amount of changesets.
22017-01-27 16:40:34 UTCsamely Hi Spanholz,
Thanks for pointing this out! I was just fixing connectivity issues, so I didn't review tags around this zone. You are completely right, it's not a "service=drive-through" feature, it should probably be tagged as "highway=path" or "highway=track", dependin...
12017-01-27 16:40:25 UTCsamely Hi lowa Kid,
Thank you for the great contribution you do to OSM. I'm wondering if the tag "service=drive-through" you added to these paths and others around are based on some wiki. This should probably tagged as ''highway=path" or"highway=track" depending on if the way is ...
12017-01-17 19:19:01 UTCsamely Hi istvanv_telenav,
Thanks for contributing to OSM. While working around this zone, I realized that your edit has generated overlapping issues around this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466381778. Can you check it?

Regards,
Eliane
22017-01-17 19:20:28 UTCsamely And please, also take a look to the street that seems to be deleted. Thanks.
12017-01-16 22:28:06 UTCsamely Hi again. Can you check this edit please, looks like there are duplicated ways. Thanks.
12017-01-16 22:19:35 UTCsamely Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, however, looks like you made a double trace for an existing road. Can you check it please?
Regards,
Eliane
12017-01-13 13:34:21 UTCmueschel Hi,
could you check the tagging of this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465259458

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-13 14:37:44 UTCsamely Hi Jan,
Can you be more specific, please? I checked it out, however, I didn't find anything special.

Regards,
Eliane
32017-01-13 14:39:35 UTCmueschel The way has the tag "170 south=Andover Lane"
42017-01-13 14:45:09 UTCsamely I was reviewing the big street, thanks for pointing this out, I've already fixed it.
12017-01-11 22:57:06 UTCsamely The same here, can you confirm it?
Eliane
12017-01-11 22:52:33 UTCsamely Can you also check this changeset, please?
Eliane
12017-01-11 22:37:59 UTCsamely Hi! Can you also check this changeset please?

Eliane.
12017-01-11 22:27:32 UTCsamely Hi again! The same case here, can you confirm the existance of these roads?
Thank you,
Eliane
12017-01-11 22:20:42 UTCsamely Hi Gã Trùm, thanks for contributing to OSM. I've been working in this area and I realize that you added two ways which doesn't match with Bing aerial imagery. Could you please confirm that these roads exist, otherwise revert your change?
Thank you,
Eliane.
12016-12-20 23:09:45 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:25 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:19 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:15 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:11 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:47 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:05 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:48 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:59:02 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:48 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:58 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:50 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:46 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:35 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:31 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:28 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:23 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:20 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:15 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:08 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:51 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:58:03 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:52 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:53 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:52 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:49 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:44 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:39 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:35 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:25 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:21 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:17 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:13 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:08 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:56 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:57:04 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:56 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:59 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:56 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:54 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:50 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:46 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:41 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:36 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:32 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:23 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:58 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:18 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:15 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:09:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:08 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-20 23:10:00 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
22017-01-06 14:56:04 UTCsamely woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-19 16:57:14 UTCAlexey Lukin Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your chan...
22016-12-19 19:18:40 UTCwoodpeck I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
32016-12-19 19:21:13 UTCAlexey Lukin Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:

I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has
happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street
crossings here, it will become apparent:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999

In fact, the ...
42016-12-19 20:23:47 UTCsamely Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.

Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.
Let me know if you need...
52016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
62016-12-21 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
72017-01-06 14:55:37 UTCsamely Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12017-01-05 18:44:42 UTCsamely Testing To-fix
12017-01-05 15:54:21 UTCsamely Testing to-fix plugin.
12017-01-04 15:11:18 UTCsamely Hi ellen_era. I'm glad to see you contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added "name:en=养生蚝的农场" tag, which doesn't look as an English name, can you please fix this? Thank you.
12016-12-16 16:04:34 UTCSomeoneElse It would be really helpful here if the bounding box for two changes didn't include about a quarter of the planet. That way local mappers can see what has been affected near them.
Best Regards,
Andy
22016-12-16 19:46:21 UTCsamely Hi Andy
Thanks for notifying this since we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes using to-fix plugin. We are working on fixing this bug and tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74.
12016-12-16 15:36:26 UTComargibran Hello. Thanks a lot. Although I see Mexico in the orange square, it is not listed in the github link of countries. Are mexican highways being corrected? Cheers
22016-12-16 19:36:50 UTCsamely Thanks for noticing this, actually changes were in Los Angeles and Japan and not in Mexico. However, thanks to your comment we realized that we are generating big bounding boxes that we are tracking here https://github.com/JOSM/tofix/issues/74
12016-11-25 20:06:18 UTCDenisCarriere How did this happen? This Wikidata code is for Iran?
22016-11-27 17:48:59 UTCsamely Hi Denis. I'm not sure how this happened, however, I'll compare values carefully. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it.
12016-02-09 14:26:34 UTCcarciofo Please note that Taft Street is *not* a dual carriageway as it has no physical separator. In addition, when splitting dual carriageways, ensure that you have connected intersecting roads to both one-ways and set oneway=yes on both directions. That was not done here.
22016-09-26 16:25:42 UTCsamely Hey, carciofo.
You are completely right, not all Taft Street is a dual carriage. So thank you for fixing the segment which has no physical separation and sharing the way this should be mapped.
12016-09-21 00:19:17 UTCApo42 way 396026060 is not a building. It's a camper van. please stop tracing buildings automatically if the algorithm is not able to do it correct.
22016-09-26 16:05:26 UTCsamely Hi Apo24.
I added it because it looks like a little part of the house. However, if you know better this place, please, feel free to retagging it or even deleting it. Thanks for contributing to improving the map.
12016-09-23 17:12:17 UTCSomeoneElse Hello again,
This looks like quite a large changeset for only 3 changes :)

Rather than adding #gibberish changeset comments could you please describe what you changed and where?
Best Regards,
Andy
22016-09-26 16:00:02 UTCsamely Hey Andy.
I agree with you, it wasn't intentionally since I could mistake the edit layers while fixing unclosed multi-polygons by deleting an overlapped way around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3786309618 and adding this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131693153. Thanks for pointing...
12016-07-17 10:07:03 UTCSomeoneElse Hi,
Just for info, I've added a changeset comment to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40195315 to try and get this fixed properly. The current layout of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361673628/history (with zig-zags in it) is clearly wrong now and the history shows that that was caused b...
22016-07-20 23:50:23 UTCsamely Hey Andy.
Thanks for notifying this.
Greetings!
32016-07-20 23:53:43 UTCSomeoneElse For info, following a note to talk-au it's now been patched up in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40810205 .
12016-07-08 02:04:30 UTCMikeN Hi, Thank you for the fix. White Horse Road Extension is mostly 2 lanes, with only a tiny part with a left turn lane.

Also, some of the turn:lanes:forward tag is blank, which does not match the turn lane tagging in Wiki
22016-07-11 16:14:03 UTCsamely Hey there!
I've already fixed the number of lanes in all the road. Thanks for your feedback.
12016-07-08 01:09:52 UTCrickmastfan67 Just so you know, these are emergency access roads for fire departments and the police so they can access the PA Turnpike network quickly between interchanges, They are almost never 'oneway=yes', and should be tagged as 'oneway=no' instead.
22016-07-08 01:13:48 UTCrickmastfan67 So, in the future, just take 5 seconds to look at the Bing imagery. If you see a 'gate' on any point of the ramp in the imagery, 99.9% chance it should be 'oneway=no', especially if the highway it connects to is a toll highway. Also, the 'white' lines on each side of the ramp are a dead giveaway t...
32016-07-11 16:03:59 UTCsamely Hey there!
I removed the oneway tag so you can, please, fix it! Thanks for your very clear explanation about this kind of access.
12016-07-06 13:52:32 UTCSomeoneElse Why is "samely_labuildings" editing in Europe? :)
22016-07-06 19:42:19 UTCsamely Hi Andy!
I had mistaken my user configuration in some editions. And about the size of my changeset I'll try to not doing it again. Thanks for your feedback.
12016-07-01 22:13:00 UTCsamely Importing buildings. Sorry for the comment.
12016-05-28 18:24:14 UTCeastender I think that the road added by this changeset is wrong. There used to be a road for traffic here, but it was removed several months ago. The satellite imagery hasn't caught up with this development yet. Currently there is a pedestrian square being constructed in the area between Aldgate High Street ...
22016-05-30 15:31:35 UTCsamely Hey! there,
I traced this road because there was a feedback saying that this road was missing, and based on satellite imagery I decided to trace it. Now that your feedback is kind contradictory to the other one, I decided to delete it and leave a note instead (openstreetmap.org/note/577832). Thanks...
12016-05-05 10:06:09 UTCChris Fleming I'm struggling to see the point of this "fix". Also it's bad form to delete and recreate a way (loosing the history) just to add a small "kink" into the road that I don't believe exists on the ground?
22016-05-05 12:43:03 UTCsamely Hey there! I can see in the satellite imagery that this road exist, this road was self intersected forming 0º. You can clearly see this solved error if you revert the changeset.
12016-04-07 09:35:25 UTCВладимир К Hello!
I see, you added nodes 4055312665 4055312664 and so on.
They are right for validator, but they make routing wrong.
For example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.74396%2C52.39203%3B55.74417%2C52.39199
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_c...
22016-04-07 15:07:35 UTCsamely Hey there! I think it's necessary to connect those major highways, I don't know this place, but if you do, it would be great that you add those relations. I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38383360) Thanks for your feedback!
32016-04-08 11:31:08 UTCandygol Добрый день, Владимир К

Для того чтобы правильно прокладывался маршрут необходимо устанавливать, с помощью отношений, запреты поворотов - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/384...
42016-04-11 07:43:51 UTCВладимир К Спасибо, я знаю.
52016-04-11 07:45:42 UTCВладимир К А не слишком ли много там запретов? ну то есть разве не достаточно просто только прямо?
62016-04-11 10:15:12 UTCandygol Можно, конечно, поэкспериментировать с запретами, чтобы точно понять какие из них нужны
72016-04-11 10:16:32 UTCandygol Если опираться на знаки (я смотрел на Яндекс Панорамах) то для каждого направления нужно по два релейшена "только прямо"
82016-04-11 10:38:15 UTCВладимир К как тут?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37761536#map=19/55.73407/52.42464
92016-04-11 11:32:22 UTCandygol Да. Только нужно подождать пока данные попадут в OSRM или Mapzen, чтобы проверить это утверждение.

Вполне возможно, что можно ограничиться и одним релейшеном вместо дв...
102016-04-11 11:39:50 UTCandygol Пока что только мои предположения, если использовать средний сегмент линии с ролью 'via', то при построении маршрута от него (от этого сегмента) необходимо задавать д...
12016-04-07 06:31:53 UTCGS25 Hi there!

This road is not connected, which is why I didn't connect it.

Please do not blindly follow some software's idea of what is an error in OSM. There is no substitute for local knowledge (I live locally). If you are not sure, move on to another area, or ask the original mapper.

Than...
22016-04-07 14:37:47 UTCsamely Hey there. I really considered that roads should be connected. However I've already [reverted my changeset](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38382289) and I suggest connecting the piece of road that seems to be an island. Thank you for you feedback!
12016-03-29 21:47:52 UTCJeopardyTempest Hi samely... I'm newish at OSM, and seems you've got a lot more history than I, but I'm really confused by these changes. You gave a US Interstate a Japanese name and speed limit, and added a strange 1 tag. I'd look about reverting, but you seem to know what you're doing enough to fix\\understand!...
22016-03-30 04:58:15 UTCmanings @JeopardyTempest, thank you for flagging this edit. I reverted the changes now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38157753
32016-03-30 08:50:30 UTCJeopardyTempest Thanks!
42016-03-30 13:44:56 UTCsamely Thanks manings for reverting it! Thanks JeopardyTempest for your feedback, I'll be careful next time
12016-03-23 12:59:22 UTCSomeoneElse Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here? "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.

Also what are the turn restrictions at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2667031585 ?
22016-03-23 14:11:48 UTCsamely Hey there! I was working on connectivity errors using To-Fix : http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/stats/highwayhighway. I didn't consider the turn restriction, but now is done! Thanks for your feedback.
32016-03-23 14:55:58 UTCSomeoneElse https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6074901 isn't correct. Traffic from the west can carry on along the ring road as well as turn right. It can't turn left. You'd need to survey it to see if u-turns are prohibited here.
There will be other similar restrictions at the other nodes too.
42016-03-23 19:47:56 UTCsamely You were right. I fixed it and added a note because I don't know about turn restrictions at this point. I just wanted to intersect highways. I'll be careful next time. Thanks!
12016-01-17 23:55:18 UTCMike Baggaley Hi, is Future Nocton Park Road the name of the road, or is it a road that will be named Nocton Park Road in the future? If the latter, I suggest changing the name to Nocton Park Road and setting highway=construction with construction=residential or highway=proposed. Cheers, Mike
22016-01-19 15:23:24 UTCabel801 Hi Mike, I really don't known what is the real name, because I only use satellite imagery.

32016-01-19 16:30:15 UTCSomeoneElse Rather than guesing, might it be better to add an OSM note? The Bing imagery here shows no road at all. What information do you have that there is a road here (now, as opoosed to a proposed or under-construction one)? Did a customer of one of Mapbox's customers report it?
42016-01-25 16:02:59 UTCabel801 > Hi SomeoneElse, the residential road was added by the [previous mapper](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319222705/history) and my edit was only to fix the connection. The mapper has [many local edits](http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Lincoln%20Edge/history#map=14/53.1732/-0.3968) and I assume...
52016-01-25 17:54:40 UTCSomeoneElse In this case I'd be tempted to ask the previous mapper whether it's been built yet. It's quite likely it wasn't when they added it, but might have been now. Also, you could ask them what it's (now) called?
62016-02-25 21:40:29 UTCsamely Message has been sent it to Lincoln Edge. If he answer to me, I'll share it.
72016-03-06 15:27:28 UTCLincoln Edge It's open now, and it is called Nocton Park Road.
82016-03-21 14:29:28 UTCsamely Thank you Lincoln Edge!
12016-02-10 11:39:43 UTCmalenki Hi samely,
I just fixed the reservoir you broke in this edit.
What did you do?
You split a self intersecting outer way which resulted in
* an intersection between multipolygon ways (you should unglue these ways) and
* an outer way inside the outer ways (map them as inner ways)
hth
malenki
22016-02-15 17:14:32 UTCsamely Hey malenki. Thanks for your feedback and fixing the reservoir. I was working ungluing objects that was intersected each other. Btw, I'll be careful. Thanks
12015-12-22 14:34:04 UTCsamely Hi. Take a look, there some building inside building issues.
12015-12-22 14:29:13 UTCsamely Hi. Take a look, there are more buildings to map.
22015-12-22 14:55:18 UTCediyes Hola samely,
Gracias por su observación, en nuestro siguiente proyecto http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/14# se mapearan todos los edificios que faltan.
12015-12-22 14:24:22 UTCsamely Those buildings need to be improved:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468808/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386468804/history
22015-12-28 07:29:35 UTCjinalfoflia Thank you for the feedback. These are my corrections. Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36213237
12015-11-20 20:20:53 UTCsamely This changeset was reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35470137
12015-09-02 19:55:19 UTCikz Are you sure in this points?
Yes, we can put nodes in intersections, but then we need to split ways and make lot of restrictions.
22015-11-16 14:25:01 UTCsamely Hi ikz, thanks for your feedback. I was fixing crossing ways, I think you should add at least turn restrictions, instead of deleting intersections.
32015-11-16 17:56:18 UTCikz KISS principle :) I took same results without any restrictions.
And point in way intersection is not necessary, but "useful practice".
42015-11-16 19:31:58 UTCsamely Hey there. I agree with this "useful practice".
12015-06-09 17:35:14 UTCmhenson Thank you! I have done a lot of mapping, but I have not reverted any change sets.
22015-11-16 14:06:49 UTCsamely Thanks to you.
12015-11-07 03:18:30 UTCmaxerickson There was some sort of accident with ways 17835459 and 171258574 here, they got connected to a bunch of the foot paths. I've fixed it.

It also seems it wasn't a hotosm project.
22015-11-09 14:01:37 UTCsamely Hi max erickson, thanks for fixing them. I made a mistake with the comment. I'll be careful. Thanks again.
12015-10-28 18:00:22 UTCskorasaurus http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357532353 is not a named road, but just an unnamed driveway; I've driven past it numerous times.


I've updated it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34932290
22015-10-28 18:43:05 UTCsamely Hey there! Thanks for updating the information about this way.
12015-10-25 14:07:23 UTCcarciofo Please be more careful and thorough when splitting dual carriageways. NW 56th Ave north- and south-bound segments were left unconnected, the entire undivided stretch between Sunrise Blvd and NW 19th St was left as one way, and many intersections were not extended to both directions. Thanks.
22015-10-26 14:20:29 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I saw you've already fixed them. I will keep your recommendation in mind . Thanks again.
12015-10-09 16:25:30 UTCsamely POI's were added.
12015-09-29 16:43:34 UTCikiya Please stop mass editing.
Please explain what you are doing for Japan OSM community.
22015-09-29 17:06:53 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I'm aligning principal roads (primary, secondary and tertiary) based on GIS imagery. In this case I aligned tertiary roads.
32015-09-30 10:34:15 UTCikiya Thank you for your explanation.
I understand.
Today there was a detailed explanation about the cleanup project.
(Japan Community mailing lists)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2015-September/009083.html
12015-09-01 01:37:15 UTCRub21 Esta segura de que un track esta connectando con un motroway?
22015-09-01 02:45:18 UTCsamely Según la imagen satelital del Bing hay varias vías que conectan con el motorway.
Sin embargo deje una nota. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33717486
12015-08-24 20:31:15 UTCMikeN Hi, thank you for the edits. I found some problems -

Frontage road was blocked years ago because it was a dangerous turn. It looks strange for a named road to be connected only by a driveway, but that's the real way it ended up. It would be dangerous for drivers to try to follow GPS for the ...
22015-08-24 22:24:31 UTCMikeN One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it.
32015-08-24 22:46:12 UTCsamely Hi there. Thanks for your feedback. I've been working based on TIGER, and I will consider your suggestion. Thanks again for fix them.
42015-08-30 21:34:21 UTCMikeN Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes. What was the reference used in moving those nodes? Thank you
52015-08-31 14:29:57 UTCsamely Hey there. I just tried to align the edited area based on Bing satellite imagery. Thanks for the comments again.
12015-08-21 23:30:03 UTCSomeoneElse Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659454313 is really the intersection of the trunk road on the bridge and the smaller road below?
22015-08-22 23:18:00 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, definitely those roads don't intersect each other. I've already fixed my mistake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33515239
Thank you again.
12015-08-07 17:07:58 UTCSomeoneElse I'm not sure what "Highways were aligned" means - which highways were aligned with what?
22015-08-07 17:15:16 UTCsamely Hey there. I aligned the road based in Bing satellite imagery, where is not out of phase. And it's in the source comment.
32015-08-07 17:55:51 UTCSomeoneElse I'd consider comparing with OS OpenData StreetView here too - as the note on the Via Gellia suggests, getting a GPS signal at the bottom of the valley among the trees is tricky, and Bing here can be misaligned due to the trees (though it's better than it was).
12015-07-23 18:48:18 UTCtrigpoint Hi
I have just spotted your change, whilst the crossing ways are a database error they need more than simply fixing them. All that is doing is fixing the symptom, without fixing the problem and also creating a much bigger one. A bit like removing the sticking plaster and leaving the patient to blee...
22015-07-23 18:54:02 UTCtrigpoint now means that potentially dangerous turns could be included in routing instructions. That is far worse than an error on a QA site.
Fixing the error may look good, 'look boss I have fixed xx bugs today', butit is not the way to make a high quality map.
I have added the turn restrictions.
Please t...
32015-07-23 20:31:40 UTCsamely Thanks. I can see sort of see why you added a turn restriction for B4602 leading onto A470. But why is there a turn restriction effectively prohibiting a U turn from southbound A470 while northbound A470 allows a U turn on the same junction?
42015-07-23 22:58:24 UTCtrigpoint You are right, I had missed that one
12015-07-20 12:18:48 UTCSomeoneElse What was the "Oneway problem" that "was fixed" here?
22015-07-20 13:46:30 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. It's a mistake in the comment, because I've aligned both highways. I'll be careful next time.
12015-07-18 04:01:48 UTCFTA This is indeed a one way road.
22015-07-19 04:35:13 UTCsamely Hey there! Thanks for your feedback. I'll be take care next time.
32015-07-19 04:38:12 UTCFTA No problem! I went ahead and changed it, and also added some more context in this area. Best, ~FTA
12015-07-17 21:32:55 UTCchillly Yet another stupid edit by a remote Mapbox editor.

This is a oneway road into a car park over a shopping centre. If you want to correct it VISIT THE SITE.

I will revert this.
22015-07-17 22:08:27 UTCsamely Hey there. Thank you for reverting this mistake. I'll be more careful.
12015-07-10 01:53:05 UTCskorasaurus thanks for tracing, but Girard Street no longer exists. I live less than a km from here and I've past thi location plenty of times. There's no street sign to say it's a road either.

See here for an image. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SfJKP8BMy94LnEoTy_2Yaw
22015-07-10 02:24:46 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, I've already removed Girard Street. See: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32533422
12015-07-08 19:34:31 UTCMikeN Hi, thank you for the edit. Both streets were already surveyed on the ground and marked to remove tiger:reviewed=no. McLeod Street does not go through to Lafayette Street and that segment does not exist. TIGER was out of date for that street.
22015-07-08 22:22:17 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback.
12015-06-30 17:06:38 UTCskorasaurus
Hi,

Thanks for editing although there's a barrier on it so it doesn't connect to Steelyard drive. I have corrected it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32313660
22015-06-30 17:34:44 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for fixing it.
12015-06-15 18:25:51 UTCBeep21 You were somewhat sloppy here. You tagged a pitcher's mound as a building and added a curve to the walkway.

I'm not even sure that the ways that you connected ought to be connected. I don't know whether you realized this when you made the changeset, but this is a loading dock, and the walkway is ...
22015-06-15 19:17:15 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. Connecting nodes and tag the area as a building were mistakes, so It was reverted. Look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31990805.
I'll be careful of this from now.
32015-06-15 20:03:36 UTCBeep21 I appreciate it.
12015-06-15 18:53:32 UTCsamely Chageset 31515601 was reverted.
12015-06-13 20:52:29 UTCmhenson your imagery is outdated. please revert change set
22015-06-15 13:36:17 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback again. I've already reverted the changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31984193
12015-06-11 18:33:51 UTCmaxerickson Are you using an imagery offset? Comparing against the OSM GPS Trace layer from Mapbox and the Strava Cycling Heatmap, the imagery in the Grand Rapids area appears to be quite well aligned, and in many cases you have offset the center lines of roads about 20 feet from Bing and those GPS layers.
22015-06-15 13:31:39 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I work with Bing Aerial Imagery and I made a mistake moving all nodes in the box, so I've already reverted the changeset. I'll be careful of this from now.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31933699
12015-06-09 15:58:58 UTCrickmastfan67 Please update your changeset comment in JOSM. You're saying 'Changeset 31829188 was reverted.' across the entire country.

Thanks.
22015-06-09 16:03:06 UTCsamely Hey there. Thanks for your feedback. I've already changed my comment.
12015-06-09 13:21:40 UTCmhenson The imagery used for change set 31829188 is out of date. The roads added, I removed months ago when they were replaced by buildings and/or barricaded.

Please revert change set 31829188.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31829188

Your local mapper in Stillwater, OK

Mike
22015-06-09 13:31:38 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already reverted the changeset.
32015-06-09 13:41:51 UTCmhenson : ) Thank you Mapbox for helping OSM in being the best map out there!
12015-05-21 14:03:13 UTCneuhausr Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??
22015-05-21 15:29:53 UTCsamely Thanks for your feedback. I already fixed my mistake.
12015-04-23 16:19:07 UTCkatpatuka Is it possible that you've added highway=unclassified to ALL ways?
22015-04-23 16:23:15 UTCsamely Hey there, sorry I have to confused my keyboard shortcut. I'll revert those changes.
12015-03-30 11:57:27 UTCZbigniew_Czernik This changeset has been reverted due forum request: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=494166#p494166
22015-03-30 14:22:43 UTCsamely Thanks for you feedback and fix my mistake. I'll be take care about the satellital image in Poland.
12015-03-25 11:44:30 UTCSomeoneElse I think that something has gone wrong here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334601141 seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311531344 ?
22015-03-25 15:04:41 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I've already fixed the overlapping mistake.
12015-03-24 21:52:26 UTCij_ Why why why? What are you doing and why? This has nothing to do with alignment!
22015-03-24 22:02:03 UTCij_ Ah, now I got. You seemed to remove duplicate object but please put a proper comment next time. The highway=footway was bogus addition though I think and I removed that.
32015-03-24 22:06:08 UTCsamely Thanks for your observation, I'm connecting nodes and I forgot to change my comments.
12015-02-09 22:41:45 UTCSomeoneElse Hi - just spotted that you've joined Colbeck Street and the car park http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323832277 to the west. Do these definitely join? The imagery suggests probably not. There's already a note in the area http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/277305 , so I've added a comment to that t...
22015-02-11 04:13:42 UTCsamely Hi there, yes there appears to be a wall separating the street and the parking aisle. I've disconnected them and connected by a footway. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
12015-01-20 16:22:52 UTCneuhausr Hi, I see some errors with this changeset in the Vicksburg, Mississippi area. You duplicated data and misused basic tags. For example, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114814 and the nearby Culkin Road bridge. Please correct ASAP.
22015-01-29 22:24:49 UTCsamely Hey there - thanks so much for reporting - there were a couple of duplicate ways due to a broken upload, I went through the entire changeset and fixed them all.
32015-01-30 17:58:12 UTCneuhausr Thanks! There are still some ways with incorrect tagging (name is used as a key instead of as value), probably just a typo or cut/paste issue. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322503620, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114569, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322114772, http://www.openstreet...
42015-01-30 18:20:06 UTCsamely Thanks a lot for your feedback. I fixed them all.
samely has contributed to 159 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 306 comment(s)