Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-11-23 14:24:11 UTCcarciofo Hi, this changeset among many others from your colleagues at Mapbox from Oct 23/24 adds duplicated/overlapping roads. Here NW 18th Ct. Kindly coordinate and fix (cross ref changeset 53189994)
22017-11-23 14:41:59 UTCkaritotp Hi, thank you for notifying us about this issue, I've just fixed it in this changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54027811.
Regards!
12017-11-23 14:23:55 UTCcarciofo Hi, this changeset among many others from your colleagues at Mapbox from Oct 23/24 adds duplicated/overlapping roads. Here NW 18th Ct. Kindly coordinate and fix (cross ref changeset 53190045)
12017-11-23 14:20:59 UTCcarciofo Seems like your colleagues from Mapbox edited this place at the same time and resulted in not only duplicate turn restrictions, but duplicated ways as well. Please fix the relation and overlapping ways on NW 22nd St @ NW 67th Ave. Thanks (cross ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53196663)
12017-11-23 14:20:48 UTCcarciofo Seems like your colleagues from Mapbox edited this place at the same time and resulted in not only duplicate turn restrictions, but duplicated ways as well. Please fix the relation and overlapping ways on NW 22nd St @ NW 67th Ave. Thanks (cross ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53196661)
12017-11-23 14:15:25 UTCcarciofo Hi, this changeset among many others from your colleagues at Mapbox adds duplicated/overlapping roads. Here, NE 6th Ave was duplicated so that two overlapping ways exist. Kindly fix. Thanks. PS: Since many instances of the same error have been popping up for Oct 23/24, I'm guessing this was at a hac...
12017-11-23 13:53:26 UTCcarciofo Hi, this changeset among man others from your colleagues at Mapbox adds duplicated/overlapping roads. Here, West Dixie Hwy was duplicated so that two overlapping ways exist. Kindly fix. Thanks. PS: Since many instances of the same error have been popping up for Oct 23/24, I'm guessing this was at a ...
22017-11-24 09:55:01 UTCIqhra hey, we have fixed the issue. It was not a hackathon. We observed that it happened because several members has been working on the same road and this caused the issue. We fixed most of the issues around the same time, but missed a few. Thanks for bringing it into notice.
12017-11-23 13:48:16 UTCcarciofo Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in the southbound NE 18th Ave way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53225741). Thanks
12017-11-23 13:47:52 UTCcarciofo Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in the southbound NE 18th Ave way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53225778). Thanks
12017-11-23 13:33:42 UTCcarciofo Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in NE 1st Court way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53173628). Thanks
22017-11-24 09:54:35 UTCTeesta We have fixed the issue. It was not a hackathon. We observed that it happened because several members has been working on the same road and this caused the issue. We have fixed most of the issues around the same time, but missed a few. Thanks for bringing it into notice.
12017-11-23 13:28:41 UTCcarciofo Hi, it looks like you duplicated NE 6th St so that there are two ways overlapping each other. Could you kindly fix? Thanks
12017-11-23 13:26:19 UTCcarciofo Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in the southbound A1A way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53203796). Thanks
12017-11-23 13:25:59 UTCcarciofo Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in the southbound A1A way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534829867). Thanks
12017-11-16 08:41:34 UTCcarciofo Hi, regarding the segments from Natioanal Highway 29 which were changed from highway=trunk to motorway in this changeset, please note that these roads don't satisfy the requirements for motorways. Kindly set back to trunk. Thanks
22017-11-16 15:41:18 UTCJan van Bekkum Hello,

I drove the road in March of this year.Not only it was indicated as Motorway, but in my opinion it also met the Colombian requirements for Motorways. Therefore I don't believe it is necessary to reverse the change I made.
32017-11-18 18:41:42 UTCcarciofo How exaclty is it "indicated as a motorway"? The local name "autopista" does not mean that the road qualifies as a motorway: for starters, the road has at-grade intersections and does not have controlled access (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). The...
42017-11-19 06:30:24 UTCJan van Bekkum The definition in OSM for Motorways includes the following:
1. GENERALLY resemble a controlled access road and must be free from intersection controls (such as traffic-signals, rotaries and roundabouts, and stop signs or stop markings);
2. Typically have at least two lanes in each traffic directio...
52017-11-20 08:37:34 UTCcarciofo The road is *colloquially* called Autopista, not autovia. As you probably are aware, names don't necessarily map to tags in OSM, much less in cases where international meaning of the same word varies greatly. Further, 3 is also not satisfied as the intersections are not serviceways (both tertiary an...
12017-11-06 12:23:50 UTCcarciofo ALL lane and turn:lane information around El Dorado Airport was destroyed in this edit... sigh...
22017-11-08 21:31:14 UTCCorban8 I took a quick look over the changes that I made and under this change set and all I saw was that I added a speed limit to the road and changed the classification of a link. I don't know how these minor changes would effect turn lanes but If you could explain to me how this may have destroyed the tu...
12017-10-09 14:48:53 UTCburtlang Do you think moving addr:street to short_name is good alliterative? The tag would read (short_name: AK 9). This will free up addr:street for residential addresses.
22017-10-09 17:37:07 UTCcarciofo No, for two reasons: there are several common abbreviation schemas in use at this locale with all being equally valid possibilities. Secondly, both AK and K would be valid short names for this road within that particular abbreviation schema. Short name is not for things like Avenue or Boulevard; a r...
32017-10-09 23:16:56 UTCburtlang I agree with NOT using addr:street. Although short_name is actually used and appears that way (abbreviated) on the street signs throughout the city. Where do you recommend that information should go? It should not just be deleted, the way you deleted it in this change set.
42017-10-15 09:44:31 UTCcarciofo I've never come across signs with that abbreviation that I can remember, but no one is stopping you from using short_name for this. Just make sure to document that it is signed that way by adding a note tag. I don't necessarily agree that it's a good idea for the reasons explained above, and someone...
52017-10-28 12:05:54 UTCcarciofo Actually, on second thought, short_name should definitely *not* be used for this. It is clearly stated in the Wiki: "should be a recognizable, commonly used short version of the name, not a nick name (use alt_name for that) and _not an abbreviation_" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key...
12017-10-22 10:17:57 UTCcarciofo Hi, can you please provide a reason for deleting the node for El Poblado? The changeset comment has nothing to do with the content of the changeset. If the deletion was in error, please revert your changes. Thanks.
22017-10-28 00:16:54 UTChansonwj I deleted the node as I believed it did not provide any additional value. There is a node right next to it (344911539) also named El Poblado which has the tag place=neighbourhood. I believe neighbourhood is more appropriate but please feel free to edit the remaining node's attributes if you disagree...
32017-10-28 07:25:38 UTCcarciofo Hi, thanks for getting back to me. The two nodes are actually correct, even if they have the same name, since they are at different administrative levels: one at the neighborhood level and the other at the commune (borough) level (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Poblado#Neighborhoods) You might...
12017-10-24 18:43:16 UTCcarciofo You seem to have duplicated a large stretch of Carreta 7 along with several residential roads to the east of their correct location. Please revert your changes
22017-10-24 19:01:01 UTCcarciofo This is much worse than I thought: there are duplicated ways as far west as San Jose de Bavaria. JOSM should have shown hundreds of warnings about crossing ways... please fix or I will revert the changeset fully. Thanks.
32017-10-26 10:48:58 UTCcarciofo Thanks for fixing this! :) 👍
12017-10-25 18:11:23 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo, la etiqueta ref solo se debe usar para carreteras que estén se~nalizadas con el numeral. Las carreteras secundarias no están se~nalizadas con el numeral (excepto en mojones kilométricos). Por lo tanto, use la etiqueta unsigned_ref para el identificador numé...
12017-10-25 16:45:08 UTCcarciofo Hi, the boundaries for Comuna 13 were added. I've deleted your node as it is now represented in a boundary relation. Thanks.
12017-10-21 14:09:55 UTCcarciofo Hi, I've removed tags making reference to Carrera 45 on Autopista Norte north of the city limits as the nomenclature is only applicable within city limits.
12017-09-03 09:29:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
I stumbled over highway=pendiente on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335875843
Sat images don't show a road. Do you think that one is planned there?
22017-10-15 09:27:05 UTCcarciofo Hi Federico, I'm not exactly sure what you meant with your note "map better", but as users don't get notifications about such notes, I would suggest leaving either a changeset comment such as this one, or contacting the author directly through a message in OSM might be more effective. Alte...
12017-10-14 09:29:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review position of this highway=secondary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336091538
Current Bing shows a road next to this roughly drawn way.
22017-10-14 09:32:54 UTCGerdP .. at least in the northern part ;-)
Maybe you also know what this is?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335875843
32017-10-15 09:03:53 UTCcarciofo Hello, there was no high resolution imagery available at the time the way was created, thus the rough alignment. Regarding the northern part (i.e. north of Barbacoas), if you're referring to the weird highway=pendiente tag, I was not the author: I had added it as highway=unclassified but it was chan...
42017-10-15 09:20:35 UTCGerdP OK, thanks, Will have a look at it later.
12017-10-07 09:24:44 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello carciofo. AT
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530246756
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530265579
you have tagged
`source:destinarion` instead of
`source:destination`, right? #typo
22017-10-07 12:12:23 UTCcarciofo Thanks for the heads-up. Changeset 52706233 fixes all instances of the tag Overpass could find. Cheers.
12017-07-26 16:51:58 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo. Me pregunto la razón para haber borrado la relación de la Variante de Tuluá (25 VL E) en este changeset al igual que la eliminación de la mayoría de los segmentos del tramo 25-05 de la Ruta Nacional 25 en varios de sus changesets (sin comentarios, a...
22017-07-26 18:40:06 UTCcris_1994 Se borraron todas las vias antiguas por mal trazado en el mapa, en base a la guia proporcionada por las nuevas vistas satelitales. Si gustas, puedes editar los datos de los tramos que mencionas, mas no el trazado que esta conforme a la vista satelital reciente. Cualquier duda, estoy por acá a...
32017-07-27 06:29:48 UTCcarciofo Me refiero a la relación 5128404 que corresponde a la Variante de Tuluá (25 VL E), la cual fue borrada en este changeset. También se borraron muchos de las vías de la relación 4864513 entre Buga y Andalucía, que corresponden al trayecto 2503 de la Ruta Nacio...
42017-08-23 10:07:58 UTCcarciofo No he recibido respuesta con respecto al borrado. En adicion a las relaciones antes descritas, veo que adicionalmente se borraron en este changeset relaciones de administrative boundaries, todo sin comentrario explicando la razon para el borrado. Le pido de nuevo que revierta el borrado de las relac...
52017-10-06 07:58:11 UTCcarciofo I never heard back and the deleted relations were never restored, despite newer changesets by your user account. I have gone ahead and restored the relation for National Highway 25 in question for this changeset. In the process, I also noticed that all previous segments for that relation were delete...
12017-10-05 20:04:15 UTCcarciofo Hi, please note that the segments crossing over the Turnpike (or any controlled-access highway for that matter) are not motorway_links but rather service ways available *only* to emergency vehicles or police. They should be tagged with highway=service, access=no, emergency=yes. Leaving the access ta...
12017-03-24 20:33:01 UTCsergioablanco Ésta edición está apareciendo en el Mapa Base, está afectando la cartografía que lo consume.
22017-04-16 10:40:27 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo marcodena, la etiqueta bus_guideway es válida para el Transmilenio. Véase http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway: "Do not use this on normal paved roadways that are designated for buses only. One correct tagging for those is highway=service, a...
32017-04-16 10:41:47 UTCcarciofo perdón, la etiqueta **no** es válida
42017-05-06 09:32:53 UTCmarcodena I'm very very sorry. I was wrong and I was slow to revert. Thanks
52017-10-04 15:51:46 UTCcarciofo Marco, this is still not fully reverted...
62017-10-04 15:52:20 UTCcarciofo See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s93
12017-09-27 11:08:38 UTCcarciofo Hi, regarding the cross-over segments on I-75 which you and other Mapbox mappers are adding, please note that access=permissive is not correct for these segments. They are signed "emergency vehicles only" which goes against the definition of permissive, which implies that access has been g...
12017-09-09 18:07:19 UTCcarciofo Hi there, I just reverted the addition of highway=service to the Doral admin boundary relation (relation 1216666), which I'm sure was added by accident. Would be great if you could review the changeset again, though, to check the specific are you were editing for errors. Thanks! :)
12017-09-08 14:45:15 UTCcarciofo Hi, thanks for adding the turn restriction from NE 62nd St onto northbound NE 2nd Ave. Please note, however, that a turning lane is available, so this restriction breaks navigation as well as bus route 202 which turns left at that intersection. I've added the missing turning segment (since there is ...
12017-08-29 10:09:00 UTCcarciofo Seems weird that the changeset where I added the fixme to alert about the incorrect highway tagging for this feature would be flagged as bad in OSMCha. I wasn't the original authorl I actually fixed the bad tagging https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/99871682. Not sure how much bearing t...
12017-08-29 09:40:15 UTCcarciofo Ok, this is much worse than I thought. You seem to have edited ALL aerialways in the city and broken the public_transport schema for all stations, stops and platforms in the city. Kindly revert your changes completely. I encourage you to read up on the public transport schema (https://wiki.openstree...
12017-08-28 18:15:50 UTCcarciofo Hi, this changeset breaks public transport relations for Metrocable. What was the reason for the edits? Please revert your changes or fix the public transport features. Thanks.
22017-08-28 18:18:38 UTCcarciofo Also, please add more detailed comments to your changesets. "Details" is not specific enough.
32017-09-20 14:23:49 UTCMartijn van Laar (Colombia) Can we revert this?
12017-08-28 09:02:53 UTCcarciofo Hi there, please note that the segments crossing over the Turnpike are not motorway_links but rather service ways available *only* to emergency vehicles or police. They should be tagged with highway=server, access=no, emergency=yes. Leaving the access tag out will make it come up as an error in QA ...
22017-08-28 09:03:25 UTCcarciofo that should read highway=service, of course :-)
12017-08-23 11:39:15 UTCcarciofo Hi there, just curious what the basis is for the change to highway=primary from Seville to National Highway 40? These roads don't appear to be part of the National Highway system, so secondary seems to have been the correct category prior to this changeset. Thanks in advance for the info!
12017-07-06 16:08:48 UTCcarciofo Hi there, could you please review your changes in this area? The roads you added already existed and now they are all overlapping existing feature (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126173422). Thanks in advance.
22017-07-27 07:13:46 UTCcarciofo I've removed the duplicate roads. Make sure to check for existing features when uploading tracks :) Thanks & happy mapping!
12017-07-07 20:28:52 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo. Quisiera saber la razon para haber borrado las relaciones correspondientes a la Ruta Nacional 40? Si fue por error, por favor revierta el borrado de ambas relaciones borradas.
22017-07-24 09:22:50 UTCcarciofo I've undeleted the relations in changesets 50521875 & 50521935.
12017-07-08 20:32:37 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo y gracias por su contribución. Esta carretera (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495336944) ya habia sido añadida por usted mismo como way 444180948. Por favor borre el duplicado y asegúrese de haber descargado el area de trabajo en JOSM antes de subir tracks. Grac...
12017-07-07 18:20:16 UTCcarciofo Hi, just curious what the basis or source was for downgrading the priority of all these roads? They are part of the national highway system and connect towns with each other and a major trunk road. I've upgraded them to tertiary for now pending your response. If there is a strong argument against pr...
12017-07-07 13:46:46 UTCcarciofo Hi there, thanks for your contribution. Are you sure this road exists in reality? Was this an on-the-ground observation? Thanks
22017-07-09 21:35:50 UTCFlipsideZA Hi, yes 100% sure. I walked the road, and watched many cars and taxi's drive into this road from the main road.
12017-07-06 16:27:53 UTCcarciofo Hi, please double check your updates to this area. there are duplicate overlapping ways (e.g. 45397393 and 479917166). You also seem to have created intersections to a river and an administrative boundary. Please check that this is desired. Thanks in advnace!
12017-06-27 09:56:52 UTCcarciofo Hi, I'm forced to revert your addition of leisure=park yet again. I've left numerous comments on your changesets with no response from your part. This is a community effort which requires active communication with other mappers. The areas you continue to mark as park as not parks under the definitio...
12017-06-24 16:58:05 UTCcarciofo I'm reverting leisure=park to the feature south of CR 92 (way 497194410) as mapping for the renderer. No such park exists
12017-06-24 16:47:47 UTCcarciofo I've reverted your change to leisure=park on Picayune Strand State Forest. I'd appreciate it if you would respond to the comments I've made on your changesets regarding mapping for the renderer. Communication is a central part of this community endeavor. Thanks.
12017-06-23 10:23:52 UTCmaxerickson Hi-

For some reason the name and various other tags of the airport didn't get copied over to the relation you created. I guess if you are adding details to airports that is something to keep an eye out for. I've fixed it.

Max
22017-06-23 13:44:26 UTCcarciofo Hi Max, thanks for the fix! I probably relied on the JOSM tool to create the multipolygon but forgot to verify the results. Cheers! :-)
12017-06-06 09:27:29 UTCcarciofo I'm reverting the leisure=park tag for relation 7233208 as no such park exists. Since there's been no response in the discussion of changeset 48850559, I can only assume this to be a case of mapping for the renderer. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark for information about the...
12017-05-27 11:34:36 UTCcarciofo Hi there, regarding the Keewaydin Island Preserve "parK" which was added in this changeset, I'm curious to find out what the source for it is (your changeset didn't include a source)? It's not listed in the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and Google only has 1 hit for the name (and it's no...
22017-05-27 11:41:57 UTCcarciofo Park feature: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494915788. Additional "parks" in question: ways 495211148, 495528218, 495215332, 495209488, 495209205, 495210617, 495531727, 495531725, 495217734
12017-05-12 16:13:24 UTCcarciofo Hi there, I'm curious what park this is? Since it was created without a name tag it's hard to tell and impossible to try to ook for it elsewhere... I'm not aware of a park at this location and it is not listed in the list of natural areas from the State of Florida either. The relation is 6275564 (th...
22017-05-13 07:21:23 UTCjptolosa87 Hello. I don't know either. Probably it doesn't exist. Some state parks was converted from leisure=park to leisure=nature_reserve. The first is commonly used in urban parks and the second for natural protected areas.
Regards.
32017-05-13 10:41:42 UTCcarciofo Thanks for your reply. I'm aware of the tagging, but since the relation was created by you in this changeset I thought you'd have an idea about what real-world feature it was supposed to represent. I'll remote the park tag and leave a note referencing this discussion. Cheers.
42017-05-13 11:18:59 UTCcarciofo For cross-referencing, the changesets for the removal of the leisure=park tag are 48646492, 48646535, and 48646662
52017-05-13 18:04:59 UTCjptolosa87 Yes, before my changeset the park was a polygon. Then, I have converted some polygons to a relation. But really I'm not the creator.
12017-05-06 14:55:02 UTCcarciofo Hi 3yoda, can you elaborate on the change to trunk on A1A from Ormond Beach to what looks like the city limits of Flagler Beach? It isn't a divided road, so I'm curious how this stretch constitutes trunk? It's primary before and after, so it looks very much like a discontinuity with no change in the...
12017-04-21 14:15:02 UTCcarciofo Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for your contributions in Boca! Just a quick note to let you know that the "backyard ponds" are actually private swimming pools, so a more appropriate tag would be leisure=swimming_pool along with access=private :) You may also find the "straigh...
12017-04-16 09:01:02 UTCcarciofo Hi & welcome to OSM! Thanks for your very detailed contributions! Just wanted to welcome you and invite you to visit the wiki page (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org) where you can find additional information about tags. More specifically, the mapping of turning lanes as individual ways is discourag...
12017-04-15 18:25:35 UTCcarciofo Hi there, just thought I'd mention that perhaps covered=yes would be a better tag for roads which pass through a roof structures without walls on all sides (such as the ones in front of the cruise terminals). This is specially true if you'll be doing large scale imports. Cheers & happy mapping
22017-07-31 18:42:31 UTCjlevente Woops, I missed this comment completely... Yeah, actually it makes a lot of sense. I'll be changing the old tunnel=building_passage tags in the area soon. Luckily there aren't that many around (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qJh). Thanks for the suggestion.
32017-07-31 19:57:47 UTCjlevente FYI fixed in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50732078
12017-04-13 14:41:54 UTCcarciofo Hi, I'm not really sure why you've decided to re-align the whole of A1A in Miami-Dade to the outer lane? The convention is to align to the road's centerline. For such widespread changes, please consider discussing your idea with the rest of the community via the mailing list before endeavoring into ...
12017-03-13 14:16:28 UTCcarciofo Hi there and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your additions to Delray Beach. Please make sure to connect sidewalks to the road network at crossings so that they can be used for routing :) Happy mapping!
12017-03-05 16:20:19 UTCcarciofo Hi there, thanks for your update of the I-4 @ Maitland Blvd exit. I noticed that you deleted the NB exit ramp towards the west. Couple of things: 1) there are two 90B exits now since the old exit is still tagged. 2) Since the ramp is still visible on the current imagery, I'd suggest using the approp...
22017-03-05 20:59:20 UTCJeopardyTempest Oye, made a bunch of changes yesterday, and of all the ones to falter on. I optedto copy the exit point to speed/ensure the new point had the same information, but forgot to delete the old.

Reading through key:construction, construction:minor sounds more valid for the exit (and all of the inters...
32017-03-06 17:33:28 UTCcarciofo No problem at all! It was just a small detail really, nothing to worry about. The important thing is that what you mapped matched reality, and at the end of the day that's all that matters.

Thanks for removing the tags from the duplicate exit node. I went ahead and reverted the deletion of the r...
42017-03-06 19:27:44 UTCJeopardyTempest Cheers :-) I still use Potlatch, so things like reversions are more challenging. Yeah, I know we've got a few places prepared with the new layouts using the construction details... and I've spent far too long looking at that PDF trying to work out exact details of it all. Hadn't realized you were...
12017-02-24 18:05:44 UTCcarciofo Hi there Davvan, thanks for your contributions! When mapping parking isles, it would be great if the roads didn't backtrack existing roads as it comes up in data quality checks as an overlapping road (which is considered an error). Feel free to get in touch if you have any questions! Happy mapping!
12017-02-24 17:29:12 UTCcarciofo Hi lazy5, thanks for your contributions in and around Amelia Earhart Park. It look as if you may have forgotten to check for overlapping roads & trails as some of the paths overlap existing features. Uploading unchecked GPX tracks is discouraged, so just make sure you check them next time before...
12017-02-21 17:08:33 UTCcarciofo Hi, regarding your changes to Collins Avenue, can you let us know what the basis is for moving the way off the centerline yet again after it had been fixed from your earlier changesets? As a convention, roads are mapped on the centerline. You haven't used any placement tags, either, so I'd appreciat...
22017-02-21 17:16:46 UTCcarciofo Also, road priority changes need a source, but you have left no comment on your changeset either. Leaving meaningful comments helps other mappers with verifiability (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability). Thanks again. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch ...
12017-02-21 16:50:09 UTCcarciofo Hi, I'm not sure why you disconnected all footways from the cul-de-sacs near the beach? Without a connection to the road network, no walking directions can be provided...
12017-01-06 14:53:05 UTCcarciofo Hi & thanks for your upload. In future, please take care to check beforehand if roads don't already exist before uploading GPX tracks in order to avoid duplicated/overlapping roads. Thanks.
12016-12-16 14:53:47 UTCcarciofo Hi & thanks for your edit! Regarding Bill Dr & West Anoka Ln, is it possible to cross by foot? If so, could you please connect them with a highway=footway (or path as appropriate); if not, please add noexit=yes to the terminal node of W Anoka Ln in order to avoid data quality tools marking t...
12016-12-03 12:54:54 UTCcarciofo Hi, I've reverted your changes to road priorities as they were correct prior to your edits. For cross-referencing, I didn't received a response to my question regarding the source for these changes which I posted to your changeset 42052810. The wiki is a great place to get information about tags in ...
12016-11-26 10:01:18 UTCcarciofo Hi, thanks for your edit. Might I ask according to whom, or to what source, are the road priorities incorrect? Thanks.
12016-11-24 10:42:51 UTCcarciofo Hi abel801, thanks for your contribution. Way 354595007 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354595007) showed up in data quality since no junction nodes were created for the ways it intersects along the way. Could you be so kind and create intersection nodes with the existing road network for this way...
12016-11-23 12:42:26 UTCcarciofo Hi Davvan, unfortunately I've had to remove once again the lanes you mapped as individual ways in Plant City, FL, despite my comments in your previous changesets (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34004745). Please note that individual lanes are not mapped as separate ways in OSM; rather,...
12016-11-15 10:01:18 UTCMKnight Öffnungszeit am Atrium ist falsch, ich habe sie wieder gelöscht.
22016-11-15 19:59:01 UTCcarciofo As you know, edits in OSM should be verifiable (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability). Your statement that they are "wrong" is unsubstantiated; my edit, however is verifiable through the mall's official website. You did not add the allegedly "correct" hours but si...
32016-11-15 23:12:36 UTCMKnight The building (!) isn't closed after 20:00, the right OH are on the most POIs in the building (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3276496356).

For "verifiing" example: http://www.weimar-atrium.de/store/herkules/ is open Th-Fr up to 22:00. At the top of the page you can see, that POIs...
42016-11-16 18:59:02 UTCcarciofo Thanks for the info & feedback. The issue here is that the building and the mall features have been conflated into a single feature, and since we can't have different opening hour tags for the same feature I've split the feature into building and mall to better represent the data since –I'...
52016-11-16 19:18:51 UTCscai With the new shop=mall node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4504849799) it is completely unclear for which objects and/or building parts these opening hours apply.
62016-11-16 20:29:49 UTCMKnight its not better now. the building and the mall (is the same) have no closing time. the shops (most already tagged) have it.
72016-11-17 13:10:11 UTCcarciofo @scai the opening hours of the mall are reflected in the mall feature, and the opening hours for the building are in the building feature. There was no data before, so I'm not sure how this can more confusing compared to no data?
@MKnight I was under the impression based on your original comment th...
82016-11-17 15:42:22 UTCscai It is unclear which shops belong to the "mall feature". Therefore the opening hours on the "mall feature" are pretty useless in my opinion.
92016-11-17 16:22:01 UTCcarciofo @scai I imagine you are referring to the scenario where the mall is mapped as a node instead of the building tagged as mall. Even in the latter case, we're still left with the absence of a tag which can be interpreted to mean that the data is missing.
12016-10-23 20:08:01 UTCcarciofo Carlos,
Bienvenido a OSM y gracias por sus contribuciones. Desafortunadamente las ediciones han aparecido en las herramientas de calidad de datos principalmente porque se mapearon rutas de bus como carreteras/calles una sobre la otra. Esto debe hacerse mediante una relación de transporte p&u...
12016-10-14 13:46:38 UTCcarciofo Bienvenidos a OpenStreetMap. Fue cambiada la categorización del nodo "Sede Familias en Acción" a un centro comunitario, ya que había sido etiquetado erroneamente como una ciudad. Si esta etiqueta no es correcta para este nodo, los invitamos a visitar la página w...
12016-10-10 17:08:11 UTCcarciofo Hi, regarding your dual carriageway split on Nat'l Hwy 25, please note that your edits came up as issues/errors in data quality since you neglected to properly connect intersecting roads. The relation for the National Highway was not updated either. Kindly make sure all intersecting roads connect pr...
12016-10-07 12:31:58 UTCcarciofo Hi Joshua, thanks for your contributions! Just wanted to let you know that your changes popped up on data quality tools mostly because the pedestrian crosswalks you added do not intersect the highways they cross. This is a problem because the intersection node also needs to be tagged as a crossing f...
12016-10-03 14:41:31 UTCcarciofo Bienvenido a OpenStreetMap. El nombre que le está asignando a los objetos no es válido. Toda la información que entre a OSM debe ser real y verificable. Para mayor información, visite la página wiki de la etiqueta de nombre http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nom...
12016-09-22 21:20:19 UTCcarciofo Welcome to OSM. Regarding the dual carriage split you made on Carrera 65, please note that data quality tools picked up a number of errors from Calle 102 northward, as these streets were left unconnected. The carriageway itself was alse left with no name. Kindly fix and clean up this changeset. Than...
12016-07-13 13:07:44 UTCcarciofo Bienvenido(a) a OSM. Gracias por tus contribuciones. Te invito a que visites la wiki donde encontrarás más información acerca del significado de las etiquetas. La vía que etiquetaste como trunk ya existía. En OSM hay una política de representar dentro de lo ...
12016-06-08 19:28:59 UTCcarciofo Hola cris, veo que revertiste algunos cambios de prioridad de carreteras en la carretera Viterbo-Apía. En este caso, alguien se tomó la molestia de escribir una nota indicando que este tramo hace parte de una ruta nacional, y por lo tanto es una vía primaria. Si no estas de acue...
12016-05-26 19:58:18 UTCcarciofo Hola Juan Sebastián, bienvenido a Open Street Map! Gracias por tus contribuciones. Te invito a revisar la Wiki en wiki.openstreetmap.org, donde encuentras información acerca de las etiquetas usadas en el mapa. Si tienes alguna duda, también puedes buscar ayuda en help.openstreet...
12016-05-26 17:56:50 UTCcarciofo Please note that your edit has been considered vandalism. If you were trying to add a business, please find help via the different channels available (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Get_help).
12016-03-15 11:08:10 UTCcarciofo Hola, gracias por tu contribución! Al añadir ciclorutas, por favor asegúrate de crear intersecciones con la red vial, ya que sin ellas están desconectadas y los motores de rutas no las tomarán en cuenta para crear rutas. Igualmente, para ciclovias contiguas a calle...
12016-03-03 10:38:12 UTCcarciofo Thank you for your contribution. When creating parking isles, please create individual roads for each isle instead of using the same object to overlap the service roads, as overlapping roads are raised as a data quality error.
12016-03-03 10:28:14 UTCcarciofo Thank you for your contribution. When creating parking isles, please create individual roads for each isle instead of using the same object to overlap the service roads, as overlapping roads are raised as a data quality error.
12016-03-03 10:08:10 UTCcarciofo Thank you for your contribution. You have drawn roads which overlap on themselves; this is raised as a data quality error as roads should not overlap. Please create individual roads for each segment instead of using the same road to go back and backtrack onto itself. Also, there are no intersection ...
12016-02-11 14:48:21 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo Felipe Andrés. Por favor asegúrese en el futuro de chequear primero que los objetos que está añadiendo no existen ya, especialmente si está subiendo tracks de GPS. Adicionalmente, separe y cree intersecciones con las demás calles, de lo contra...
12016-02-11 14:43:28 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo. Por favor asegúrese de crear un nodo de intersección entre ciclorutas y la red vial, de lo contrario no se podrá rutear por ellas. Adicionalmente las intersecciones sin nodo son consideradas como erros por las diferentes herramientas de control de caldad de OSM. ...
12016-02-10 07:49:21 UTCGerdP Hi there!
I've noticed the tag highway=demolished:residential which is only used here. I think you should better use demolished:highway=residential.
22016-02-11 08:28:59 UTCcarciofo Thanks for the heads up, GerdP! My intention was to apply the prefix to the key instead of the value, but I probably clicked the wrong field in JOSM and started typing without noticing. I've applied a fix and committed it in changeset 37141121. Cheers.
32016-02-11 08:53:35 UTCGerdP OK, thanks for the feedback :-)
12016-02-09 14:26:34 UTCcarciofo Please note that Taft Street is *not* a dual carriageway as it has no physical separator. In addition, when splitting dual carriageways, ensure that you have connected intersecting roads to both one-ways and set oneway=yes on both directions. That was not done here.
22016-09-26 16:25:42 UTCsamely Hey, carciofo.
You are completely right, not all Taft Street is a dual carriage. So thank you for fixing the segment which has no physical separation and sharing the way this should be mapped.
12015-11-29 18:41:09 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo y gracias por su contribución. Por favor recuerde que los nombres deben ser entrados sin abreviaciones (Calle 102A y no Cll 102a).
12015-11-29 18:26:31 UTCcarciofo Please be more careful when splitting dual carriageways. All ways connecting to SW 100th Ave south of Griffin Rd were left unconnected
12015-11-29 18:21:21 UTCcarciofo Please be more careful when splitting dual carriageways, Golden Shoe Road northbound and southbound at SW 29th Place were left unconnected
12015-11-06 18:06:12 UTCcarciofo Hola, bienvenido/a a OSM. La categoría highway=trunk se usa para vías de doble calzada. La carretera entre Caldas y Angelópolis es una carretera regional, por lo tanto la etiqueta trunk no le corresponde. Para mayor información puedes consultar la Guía para mapear ...
12015-10-25 14:17:58 UTCcarciofo Again, please be more careful and thorough when splitting dual carriageways. You've left both sides of North Park road as northbound only! Also, attributes like traffic lights at intersections must be propagated to the new/split road, and the lanes attribute must be adjusted (i.e. split).
22015-10-29 13:49:46 UTCediyes Hello carciofo, thank you for noticing this error and correct it. I'm going to be more careful about this in the future.
Do let me know if there's anything else I could improve on, thanks again.
Edith.
12015-10-25 14:07:23 UTCcarciofo Please be more careful and thorough when splitting dual carriageways. NW 56th Ave north- and south-bound segments were left unconnected, the entire undivided stretch between Sunrise Blvd and NW 19th St was left as one way, and many intersections were not extended to both directions. Thanks.
22015-10-26 14:20:29 UTCsamely Hey there, thanks for your feedback. I saw you've already fixed them. I will keep your recommendation in mind . Thanks again.
12015-10-17 16:01:47 UTCcarciofo Hi, regarding the tags highway=turning_circle and highway=turning_loop in this commit, please note the difference: turning_loop has a non-transversable island, while turning_loop has no non-transversable island. It seems you've got these two mixed up since they were applied here opposite to their me...
22015-10-17 16:03:11 UTCcarciofo Oops, that should read of course: "while turning_circle has no non-transversable island". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_circle and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop
32015-10-31 11:05:36 UTCSeandebasti thx for commiting, I realized this problem too, because other mappers did add the wrong tag. I thought I did it right here, do you have a specific area here?
12015-10-07 21:05:19 UTCcarciofo Hi there, regarding your changes in Plant City, FL, where you added separate ways for each lane (Alexander St & SR 39, for example). Please note a road should be mapped as a single way with attributes to denote that it has several lanes. You can use the lanes=* tag along with turn:lanes to map i...
12015-10-05 13:37:48 UTCcarciofo Please be more careful next time with unfinished dual carriageways. You left a long segment of Lyons Road with oneway=yes without a corresponding way in the opposite direction.
22015-10-31 11:17:40 UTCSeandebasti which one exactly, did you fix it? would be nice if you can point it when you commit something . because i dont see what you mean if you do not point it. thx
32015-10-31 11:30:34 UTCSeandebasti and actually did you know that the carriageways are abandoned, so please fix it the right way
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Dual_carriageways
12015-09-27 21:01:34 UTCcarciofo Hi, as I mentioned before, roads which back-track on themselves keep coming up in data quality tools as overlapping. Please draw roads as single segments with other roads intersecting them, as opposed to having the same road backtrack and go in a different direction. If you have any questions, pleas...
12015-09-24 16:19:57 UTCcarciofo Cordial saludo. Quisiera confirmar que los cambios a los nodos de la Ruta 45 en la glorieta con la Ruta 40 en los que añade decenas de traffic_calming=bump son correctos? No conozco el area, pero me parece extraño que hubiera tantos policias acostados consecutivamente. De ser un error,...
22015-09-24 20:41:51 UTCjuanda097 Lo podéis apreciar en una foto de la zona y no están pintados en el asfalto son reales http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/EzDw9fjcO6US0cJ6Tco-bg/photo
32015-09-24 20:45:07 UTCjuanda097 además te dejo una guía de mapeo que dejaron en la comunidad, yo tengo que quitar el RN de las carreteras y autopistas que edité.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
42015-09-25 16:45:32 UTCcarciofo Gracias por las fotos, juanda097. La verdad no alcanzo a apreciar en ellas rieleve en el asfalto para categorizarlo como un "bump", pero si usted conoce el área eso es lo importante. En caso de no tener relieve, los categorizaría entonces como traffic_calming=rumble_strip. Gr...
12015-09-18 09:34:03 UTCcarciofo Hola Iván, la etiqueta highway=motorway no aplica a vías en Colombia (véase http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia#Etiquetas_de_rutas_en_Colombia). Estas vías tienen una definición específica restringida en OSM y bajo esa defini...
12015-09-07 10:58:04 UTCmueschel Hi carciofo,
with this changeset you introduced the misspelled key "destinaton:lanes" (missing 'i') on several ways. Could you check / correct for that? As another remark, all these tags contain only ref numbers of roads - these are usually tagged as "destination:ref:lanes" inst...
22015-09-07 12:21:38 UTCcarciofo Hi Jan,
Thanks for the heads up! I've corrected the spelling on the key on the instances of destinaton:lanes returned by overpass turbo. As far as your remark is concerned, I didn't used destination:ref:lanes as the ref value on the destination roads does not match, e.g. I-595 East/West (which is w...
carciofo has contributed to 96 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 165 comment(s)