Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-12-18 09:19:59 UTCsaikabhi Wrong changeset comment: Changed the fork geometry
12017-12-07 08:43:29 UTCcarciofo Hi, could you double check this turn restriction, please? There's a left turn lane on SB 72nd Ave, so it would seem strange that no left turn is allowed. Thanks.
22017-12-07 08:52:23 UTCsaikabhi Hey carciofo,

Yes you are correct. Double checked through OpenStreetCam. Removing this restriction. Thank you for pointing out the error.

Cheers
Abhishek

12017-12-03 13:48:32 UTCmueschel Please fix your workflow to include spell checking of tags. I'm fixing wrong spellings of 'implicit' almost every day.
22017-12-05 04:47:34 UTCsaikabhi Hello Mueschel,

Thank you for solving this error. I will be informing my team of this error and we will also be running a linter to detect these issues.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-11-03 12:12:37 UTCRoadGeek_MD99 Hi Saikabhi, I noticed on your oneway fix of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383087783 that you used oneway=1, which is a discouraged alternative to "yes". It is also rare, as "1" gets 0.04% versus 76.8% for "yes", according to Taginfo. Please consider using standa...
22017-11-03 12:32:21 UTCsaikabhi Hi Roadgeek_MD99,

Thank you for pointing this out. I think I used it mistakenly when editing this road. Changing it to `oneway=yes`.

Cheers
Abhishek
12017-08-30 07:39:25 UTCsaikabhi Removed a turn restriction that is not there in Mapillary
12017-08-28 09:30:10 UTCsaikabhi Wrong comment: Adding turn restrictions in Phoenix
12017-08-23 09:51:08 UTCsaikabhi Wrong comment: Added turn restrictions and dual carriageways in Los Angeles
12017-08-23 09:50:58 UTCsaikabhi Wrong comment: Added turn restrictions and dual carriageways in Los Angeles
12017-08-17 20:24:45 UTCØukasz thanks for catching this, i was just trying to figure out where did the label i was looking for go ;)

it seems there is some overlap between this and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/599019138 - both are tagged as capital for some reason. i'm not quite sure what the relationship between these t...
22017-08-18 09:17:12 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Maybe you can try this in OSMCha: https://tinyurl.com/ycmytk5m and go through all his edits where he deleted the name:en tags. Thanks.

Abhishek
32017-08-20 11:43:23 UTCØukasz Thanks again,

is there a way to have OSMCha (or other tool) show me changesets by this user where name:en tags were deleted or altered?
12017-08-17 06:17:16 UTCsaikabhi HI,

This way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514484312 does not look like a river to me. Can you please correct this?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-08-18 08:57:07 UTCfreebeer After a quick review, all this user's changesets outside Nigeria, that is - in Texas, should be reverted, as they add fictional data. They all use this same changeset comment. See the nearby `MY HOUSE' to the northeast with some 250 metre walls... And the TRAIN STATION to the north...
32017-08-18 09:07:43 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thanks for catch. Can you go ahead and revert/fix this user's other edits also?

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-08-17 06:47:51 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Can you recheck the waterbodies in this changeset?

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-16 06:28:55 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you please tag swimming pools with this convention:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool?

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-16 05:08:09 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Can you recheck this waterway that you added www.openstreetmap.org/way/515960743/history. Does not appear in satellite imagery.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-16 04:13:59 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

You have deleted the wikipedia tags for this feature. Can you look at it again and restore the tag if required?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-08-16 17:30:59 UTCst-norbert-abbey Wikipedia link added!
12017-08-16 03:33:40 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Can you change this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218626604 back to the previous tags. That looks correct.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-16 03:17:25 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Please keep OSM naming conventions in mind while naming parks. The first letter of each word should be capitalized. Can you please go ahead and make these changes?

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-14 08:43:10 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Put back the 'City' back in the name based on wikipedia and the wikidata.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-08-14 05:32:19 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Why are you adding fictional waterways to the map? Please do not do that. Reverting your changes.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-14 05:19:39 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged this entire area as a building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91576630. Please do not do that. Always draw individual buildings based on satellite imagery and then tag each with building=yes. Correcting this back to landuse=res...
12017-08-10 06:07:42 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Can you review this river: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513273060. Looks like unfinished.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-08 06:25:25 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have mapped a bunch of footways and named them as field path. Only use official names for roads. Field path is not a name. Also please recheck the footways.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-07 07:26:38 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Do not use OSM for testing. Only add real data on the ground.

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-10-01 16:54:27 UTCSupaplex 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯! 歡迎加入開放街圖,群眾共同參與,繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料,歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ta...
12017-08-07 07:12:43 UTCsaikabhi Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513117061? This has been tagged as leisure=park which does not look true.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-07 06:35:33 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please only give official names in name=* tag. Please remove the unofficial name you have give to the park. Also, draw and area around the park and then tag it with leisure=park instead of a node.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-07 06:23:41 UTCsaikabhi Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You have added a park node. Can you recheck this?

Thank you
Abhishek
22017-08-07 08:39:39 UTCAlexander-II Обе ваши правки откатываю. Смысла в них нету никакого.
12017-08-07 06:21:00 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Parks should only be named with name=* tag for official names. You can also draw the area of the park and tag it with leisure=park. Please make these changes

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-07 05:39:53 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck the park you have added in this changeset?

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-08-07 05:06:12 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck the park you have drawn?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-08-07 08:34:05 UTCAlexander-II Даже, если вы отдыхаете на грядках с телефоном в руках, ловя покемонов, то это еще не повод создавать несуществующие объекты. Правку откатываю.
12017-08-07 04:54:44 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure the park exists? Can you recheck it?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-11-03 22:35:26 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53491480 where the changeset comment is: Revert fake park
12017-08-07 04:22:35 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have seen that you have added a park. Does not appear in satellite imagery. Can you please re check?

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-07-18 06:21:55 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

The wikidata tag for the town node has been deleted. Any particular reason or doing that? Can you recheck and add it back?

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-07-18 06:03:25 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing to the map. I have noticed that you have added POI data for a lot of places. For buildings, can you draw the outline of the buildings and then add any extra information. For more information please refer to this page: http://wiki.openstr...
12017-07-18 05:59:58 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please do not use OpenStreetMap for advertising and do not use google as your source while adding new data to OpenStreetMap. Reverting your changesets for now.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-07-18 05:03:35 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You have drawn a park over residential areas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508307451. Can you please take a look at it and correct the data? From satellite imagery it looks like a residential area with no `leisure=park`.

Thanks,
Abhishek Saikia
12017-07-17 12:01:05 UTCsaikabhi Correction for comment: Added a turn restriction in this changeset
12017-07-04 06:37:37 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you look at this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504702029/history and confirm if that segment exists. Not seeing anything on satellite imagery nor in Strava. If not, please fix it.

Thanks
Abhishek Saikia
12017-07-04 06:34:26 UTCsaikabhi I have reverted this changeset and also cleaned up bad data in changeset: 50020492. There appears to be a lot of fictional ways added by you. Please be careful while adding data to OpenStreetMap. To know best practices and guides, you can follow: http://learnosm.org/en/.
Thank you,
Abhishek Saiki...
12017-07-04 06:32:18 UTCsaikabhi I have reverted this changeset and also cleaned up bad data in changeset: 50020492. There appears to be a lot of fictional ways added by you. Please be careful while adding data to OpenStreetMap. To know best practices and guides, you can follow: http://learnosm.org/en/.

Thank you,
Abhishek Saik...
12017-07-04 05:05:05 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
In this changeset, you have changed the layout of the roads, deleted a service road and the layout does not seem to match satellite imagery. Any particular reason for doing that? Do you have local knowledge of this area?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-07-04 09:13:27 UTCPHOEBU5 Yes, I live in the neighbouring estate. There was previously a large factory on this site but a new housing estate has been in development there for the past couple of years. This is nearing completion with just the roads to be tarmacked. Google maps shows more recent imagery: https://www.google.co....
32017-07-05 15:21:16 UTCCebderby It's important to OSM for copyright reasons not to copy from Google maps. However the DigitalGlobe imagery is more recent than the Bing imagery at present in this area and shows some of the housing, and the OS Locator boxes can help with street names and alignments.
42017-07-06 11:09:07 UTCGinaroZ *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
12017-06-23 06:18:07 UTCsaikabhi Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap. We should draw individual buildings, not mark the entire area as building. Can you go ahead and make those changes?

Thanks,
Abhishek Saikia

12017-06-23 06:09:03 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure about the location of Graham Reserve? It looks like a residential area on the map to me. Can you please review?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-06-23 07:55:50 UTCaharvey It looks good to me from the LPI Imagery (it's the area in between the dual carriage way of Palace Street.

Though I'd tag it as leisure=park instead, as leisure=nature_reserve is "A protected area of importance for wildlife, flora, fauna or features of geological or other special interest.&q...
32017-06-23 07:58:54 UTCaharvey https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=nature_reserve

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
12017-06-23 05:27:50 UTCsaikabhi Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please tag features following the OSM conventions. If you need any help, please visit http://learnosm.org/en/. Please review your edits again.

Thanks
Abhishek
12017-06-19 06:24:29 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I think you have used the wrong tags here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501162242. It is not a river. can you go ahead and correct the tags?

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-06-24 13:49:04 UTCSALEY Ibrahim Ok thanks
12017-06-19 06:20:19 UTCsaikabhi Hi, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. A man made pool should not be tagged with `natural=water`. If it is a swimming pool, `leisure=swimming_pool` might be a better tag.

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-06-19 06:20:55 UTCsaikabhi The way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501172001
32017-06-19 06:39:43 UTCTourenbikerFKB Wie man am Schattenwurf erkennt, ist das kein fest installierter Pool, sondern eines dieser Teile, die in der Regel nur im Sommer aufgebaut sind. Von der Sorte gibt es noch weitere in der Gegend. Man sollte sowas nicht mappen.
12017-06-19 05:33:11 UTCsaikabhi Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for adding valuable information to the map. In OSM, we do not need to name a pond as `pond` again. If the waterbody has an official name only then should we use `name=` tag. Please do keep on contributing to OpenStreetMap. Similarly with all other names yo...
12017-06-19 05:30:51 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for adding valuable information to the map. In OSM, we do not need to name a pond as `pond` again. If the waterbody has an official name only then should we use `name=` tag. Please do keep on contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-06-14 06:05:21 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Can you recheck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499994189/history? Appears to be a long segment.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-06-12 06:45:34 UTCsaikabhi Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for contributing to the map. I have seen you have added a lot of waterways in your edits? Are you sure these exist? And can you re look your edits and make changes and corrections if necessary?

Thank you,
Abhishek
12017-06-06 06:21:22 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you redraw the apartment building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498124833 to better reflect the outline on the ground? Also, no need to have a relation for the church: www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7309873 with only one way. You can remove the relation and...
12017-06-06 05:56:10 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You might have unintentionally created a huge way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498137188 that is cutting across continents. Please be careful in the future while editing in JOSM. You might drag nodes and create bad data by mistake. I am deleting the w...
12017-05-29 06:47:49 UTCnammala Hi sajid,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have deleted wikidata tag . May I know the reason behind doing this.

Best Regards,
nammala
22017-05-29 06:48:13 UTCsaikabhi Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for contributing in correcting the building footprint. But I have noticed in your edit that you have deleted the wikidata tag associated with the building? Any particular reason for doing that? Can you please go ahead and add the wikidata tag back?

Th...
12017-05-18 05:38:32 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In OpenStreetMap, we only add real features that are on the ground. You can learn how to add data to OpenStreetMap by using: http://learnosm.org/en/. Meanwhile, can you verify why you added a pond here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494331629 and make sure it ...
12017-05-16 07:11:38 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have seen that you have adjusted the park boundaries to cover a lot of residential buildings. Are you a local and are you sure that the park covers a bigger area now? There is no evidence to be seen from aerial imagery. Can you revisit your park boundaries and m...
12017-05-16 06:52:55 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Any reason why you changed the format of opening and closing times? The earlier format appears to be the correct one. Can you please change it back to the earlier format of timings? Thank you and do keep on contributing to the map.

Cheers,
Abhishek
12017-05-16 05:23:12 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for contributing to the map. Please make sure you add relevant tags for ways and nodes, eg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493222364 was left untagged; https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4851541953/history way should also be tagged with `leisure=pitch` a...
12017-05-15 07:26:47 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have seen that you have removed `tourism=attraction` tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354734948. Any particular reason why you did that? Please restore the tag back if it is correct.

Thanks
Abhishek
22017-05-15 07:49:18 UTCAidilEllal Hello,
sorry for the inconvenience. Based on visitor activities, the area is more suited as a park in according to the nearby Darul Aman park (6.2560,100.4370). The area are divided into two. the one with the tower ( keris sculpture) is a restrictive area, reserve for special occasions.
I figur...
32017-05-15 07:55:34 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you again for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I think the edits made based on your local knowledge is entirely correct. I leave it to your judgement to decide if `tourism=attraction` tag should still be there to the park. keep on adding information to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks,
Abhishek
42017-05-15 08:00:47 UTCAidilEllal hello,
Sorry i simply replace the tag. Added back the original tag. sorry for the inconvenience

Aidilellal
52017-05-15 08:05:00 UTCsaikabhi Thank you AidilEllal. Please add more features to OpenStreetMap and keep mapping. Do ask me if you have any questions. You can also take the help of http://learnosm.org/en/ to learn how to add data to OpenStreetMap. Happy mapping!
Cheers,
Abhishek
12017-05-15 07:40:31 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
You have changed the relation :https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/305914 from `natural=wetland` to `landuse=forest`. Any particular reason for doing that? Can you please re verify your edits?

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-05-15 07:20:09 UTCsaikabhi Left a comment on the new user changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48670749
12017-05-15 07:06:20 UTCsaikabhi Hi Aroha Koopu,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's a free editable, shareable map of the world. Here we to add what's there on the ground and we will avoid fictional edits. You have added few parks, footways randomly. I'm going to fix them now. Please follow https://learnosm.org to begin and learn e...
12017-05-15 06:33:52 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have seen that you have tagged two ways as the same park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28918314 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/493506639. Can you change it so that there is duplication and only one way is tagged with the park name?...
12017-05-11 06:34:50 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck the `Playa Park` you have drawn: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492645725 and tagged as riverbank and fix it? There is already the boundary of the river drawn in the area.

Thank you
Abhishek
12017-05-11 06:27:06 UTCsaikabhi Hello,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have added a stream https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492668339 that is not visible in satellite imagery. Have you added it from local knowledge? Can you please verify your edits again?

Thank you,
Abhishek
12017-05-11 06:04:46 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have seen that you have added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492683798/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492683071/history as waterways to the map. These features are not visible from satellite imagery. Have you traced them from...
12017-05-11 05:51:26 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that the lake https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492693098 you have added might be redundant information as there is already a multipolygon way tagged as `wetland`. Can you please go ahead and remove your `lake` feature? Thank you....
12017-05-11 05:41:58 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I see that you have added waterway=river for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492693131. Are you sure that waterway is a river? A more appropriate tag might be`waterway=stream`. Can you please verify again?

Thank you,
Abhishek
12017-05-03 06:57:06 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you are adding fictional waterways to the map. Going ahead and reverting those changes. Please be careful while adding data to OpenStreetMap.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-05-03 06:54:21 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are you sure this lake: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490985355 exists on the ground? I cannot verify it through satellite imagery.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-05-02 06:42:05 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I am noticing some fictional parks and waterways added by you to the map. I am reverting your changeset for now. Please don't add fictional data to the map in future. Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Cheers,
Abhishek
12017-05-02 06:25:22 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Again, continuing on from the changeset comment: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48323895, this changeset also contains fictional waterways. Reverting this changeset too for now.
Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-05-02 06:15:46 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Looks like you are adding fictional waterways to valid cycleways and fictional lakes. Please do not add fictional data to the map. Only features on the ground should be mapped. Any particular reason for doing this? Going to revert your changeset now. Please be carefu...
12017-05-02 05:52:08 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Again in this changeset, you are tagging parks with multiple leisure=* tags. That might not be required. Can you just review your edits and remove any unnecessary tags for parks that you have created?

Thank you again for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Cheers,
Abhishek
12017-05-02 05:49:04 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. This way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468752230 was tagged with multiple leisure=* tags. Removing all the other tags and keeping only leisure=park. That one tag should be enough.

Thank you
Abhishek
12017-05-02 05:42:20 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151479829 you have changed landuse=residential to landuse=meadow which appears to be incorrect. Can you please change the tag back to the previous state?

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-05-02 05:29:46 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing for OpenStreetMap. You have changed the tags of this feature from lanuse=village_green to landuse=meadow for this way:http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458109988/. Any particular reason for doing that? The earlier tag appears to be correct. Can you change it back to ...
12017-05-01 08:50:49 UTCsaikabhi Hi Bhavana,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged the entire building along with the nodes with building=yes tag. You dont need to tag building nodes with building tag. Only the way needs to be tagged with building=yes. For now to fix your errors, run JO...
12017-05-01 07:33:27 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged the entire area as a building. Individual buildings should be traced separately and then tagged with building=* tags rather then the entire area. Can you please go ahead and make the changes accordingly for:http:...
12017-05-01 07:26:05 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In case of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490500075, you should trace individual buildings within the school campus from satellite imagery and tag them with building=* rather than tagging the entire school area as one building. Can you go ahead a...
12017-05-01 07:02:04 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
I am seeing that you are adding large buildings for areas. building=* tag should only be added to the building outline as seen from the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. Can you go ahead and trace the individual buildin...
12017-05-01 06:54:18 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
I am seeing that you are adding large buildings for areas. building=* tag should only be added to the building outline as seen from the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. Examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49061...
12017-04-26 06:04:20 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Following on from the comment in your other changeset, building=* tag should not be over an entire area. It should only cover individual building footprints as seen in the satellite imagery. The area can be tagged with landuse=* tags. I am going ahead and making the correrctions to this ch...
22017-04-26 06:09:38 UTCnigelcharles Thanks for the information. I am new to editing maps and still learning.
32017-04-26 06:19:54 UTCsaikabhi Thanks for the prompt responses and fixes. Welcome to OpenStreetMap and please keep contributing more edits.

Cheers,
Abhishek
42017-04-26 06:24:35 UTCnigelcharles Sorry to bother you. But would you happen to know if Niantic(Pokemon Go) happen to use OSM? I noticed many parks,etc in my area were not tagged, which is why I am trying to help out.
52017-04-26 07:40:23 UTCsaikabhi
If you have local knowledge of any parks and any other features in your area, please go ahead and map them. Please keep contributing.
62017-04-26 07:44:08 UTCnigelcharles I surely will. Hopefully I will not make too many mistakes. Thanks for your patience.
12017-04-26 06:53:38 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have tagged an entire area with building=yes. Individual building footprints as seen from the satellite imagery should be traced separately within the area. The areas can be tagged with landuse tags. This is the link to the fe...
12017-04-26 05:43:55 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have drawn a large building over an entire area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489466790and . The building should be ideally drawn only over the building outline you see in the satellite imagery. Can you please go ahea...
22017-04-26 05:45:19 UTCsaikabhi Correct link to the feature: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489466790
32017-04-26 06:03:14 UTCnigelcharles Done
12017-04-26 05:27:13 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that you have drawn a large building over an entire area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489485834. The building should be ideally drawn only over the building outline you see in the satellite imagery. Can you please go ahead an...
12017-04-24 10:53:40 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have observed in this changeset that you have changed the place node for Xangri-lá from town to village. Any particular source or local knowledge for the change?

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-04-09 00:28:35 UTCAddison Djatschenko These are the names that we call these lakes (I live here, and I know 8 people who would call them by these names).
22017-04-09 06:36:37 UTCsaikabhi Hi,
Thank you for commenting back. The reason I deleted these names was because these names did not look official and rather something that was used individually. Since you are sure about these names and a local, you can add them back. Apologies for the mistake. Thank you again for the feedback. H...
32017-04-09 08:42:41 UTCAddison Djatschenko Oh thanks, sorry for the confusion however I didn't think that anyone would even look at here.
42017-04-09 10:08:51 UTCsaikabhi The community in OpenStreetMap verifies edits coming to OpenStreetMap to make sure bad edits do not come into the map. Please make sure that you are adding only correct information to the map. Thank you for contributing to mapping. Happy mapping again.

Cheers
Abhishek
12017-04-07 09:27:13 UTCsaikabhi Reverting changeset: 47514714
12017-04-06 10:29:48 UTCsaikabhi Hello,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this particular changeset, I have noticed that you have deleted sections of the road plus surrounding building. Any reason for doing that? I am reverting this changeset for now.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-03-27 16:59:13 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Again similar issues in this changeset as to this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47188620. When we delete buildings instead of modifying it, we lose some important information.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-03-27 16:40:00 UTCsaikabhi Hello 3yoda,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap.
In this particular changeset, I have noticed you have deleted some buildings and ways and created your new version, instead of preserving user history? Objects should be modified and not deleted unless absolutely necessary to preserve pre...
22017-04-02 22:10:24 UTCsnodnipper I too had some concerns with changeset 47185328.

Data appears to be removed from the map, such as the The Wizarding World of Harry Potter way - which is a popular tourist destination.

Perhaps 3yoda can comment further?
12017-03-23 15:53:54 UTCEssin Do you have any firm evidence that Skurubron has been reclassified as a motorway recently, or were you just guessing? The legal instrument that lists public roads in Stockholm County mentions a gap in the motorway between Skuru and Björknäs junctions. http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/Stockholm/...
22017-03-23 16:09:21 UTCsaikabhi Hello Essin,

Thank you pointing this out. Review of satellite imagery and the fact it was buffered on both ends by motorways was the reason behind my changes. Obviously, on the basis of your local knowledge and evidence, it's clear that I made a mistake. I apologise for the error. Can you please ...
32017-03-23 21:01:17 UTCEssin Okay, I've reverted the changeset. Please check Mapillary next time.
12017-02-23 08:17:18 UTCsaikabhi Source is OSMCha
12017-02-17 06:20:55 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. I have seen that you have added ways without any valid keys with only altitude tags. I am reverting this changeset for now. Please take care in the future.

Thanks,
Abhishek Saikia
12017-02-17 06:11:23 UTCsaikabhi Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have noticed that this particular changeset has untagged ways. Any particular reason behind the additions? Can you please review and make corrections?

Thanks,
Abhishek Saikia
12017-02-16 06:04:57 UTCsaikabhi Hi cicconep,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. I have noticed some random footways and the same park added twice. Please be careful in the future while adding data to OpenStreetMap. Reverting your changeset for now.

Thanks,
Abhishek
12017-01-25 10:24:40 UTCsaikabhi Slight correction: Not restricted to SF area only
12017-01-25 10:24:10 UTCsaikabhi Slight correction: Not restricted to SF area only
12016-11-02 10:51:49 UTCsaikabhi Same issues as commented in : http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43337505 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43337820
12016-11-02 10:45:12 UTCsaikabhi Hello, I am seeing that your changeset has created duplicates of the features in OSM. Any reason as to why that happened? Can you please go ahead and review these changes and revert them? Simillar issues also in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43337505

Thank you,
Abhishek
22016-11-05 12:45:05 UTCmueschel This seems to affect at least 10300 objects, possibly more.
32016-11-06 22:20:24 UTCkerrymapper I believe I was able to successfully revert these changesets to remove the duplications using the reverter in JOSM.
12016-11-02 10:44:15 UTCsaikabhi Hello, I am seeing that your changeset has created duplicates of the features in OSM. Any reason as to why that happened? Can you please go ahead and review these changes and revert them?

Thank you,
Abhishek
22016-11-02 18:17:46 UTCkerrymapper Thank you for the heads up Abhishek. I exported this work as geojson in JOSM to validate it, and it appears to have duplicated everything when I re-uploaded it. I will use the reverter plugin to backtrack. It's not working for me right now, but I will fix it. I will just revert all, then revalidate
32016-11-06 16:03:16 UTCmueschel If you have trouble doing the revert, let us know. There are "experienced reverters" who know how to solve common problems.
12016-10-25 11:25:02 UTCsaikabhi Wrong comment. Comment is "adding wikidata"
12016-10-25 11:23:33 UTCsaikabhi Wrong comment. Comment is "Adding wikidata"
12016-10-25 11:18:19 UTCsaikabhi Wrong comment: "Adding wikidata" is the right comment
12016-08-19 04:06:10 UTCsaikabhi Source is : Tiger roads data
12016-08-12 06:55:48 UTCsaikabhi Sourec: OSM inspector
12016-08-12 06:43:58 UTCsaikabhi Source is `OSM inspector`
12016-08-09 09:54:32 UTCsaikabhi Hey Kevo, excellent work on adding such great data to OSM. Was going through updating and validating the turn restrictions using mapillary in this area and came across some restrictions which do not quite match the mapillary images: e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4627220/history. Can yo...
22016-08-09 11:53:33 UTCKevo Most of the restrictions like this are common sense for Ontario drivers and aren't signed. The example you cite also has a solid white line until you're merged with the flow of traffic and the centre line is double solid yellow, making a left turn legally impossible. Furthermore, there is a ramp a...
32016-08-10 08:52:10 UTCsaikabhi Thank you the detailed explanation. Makes it a lot clearer.

12016-07-26 08:29:55 UTCsaikabhi Wrong changeset comment. Comment is: Updating turn restrictions in Ottawa using Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213
12016-07-26 08:29:44 UTCsaikabhi Wrong changeset comment. Comment is: Updating turn restrictions in Ottawa using Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213
12016-07-26 08:28:51 UTCsaikabhi Wrong changeset comment. Comment is: Updating turn restrictions in Ottawa using Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213
12016-07-26 08:28:37 UTCsaikabhi Wrong changeset comment. Comment is: Updating turn restrictions in Ottawa using Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/213
12016-07-22 00:07:03 UTCFTA I think it may make more sense to tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385087969 as a regular footway and instead add a railway=crossing tag where it intersects the railroad.
22016-07-25 08:40:38 UTCsaikabhi Thank you for the corrections.
12016-06-30 11:58:59 UTCsaikabhi Source is "Mapillary"
12016-06-30 10:53:07 UTCsaikabhi Source is "Mapillary"
12016-06-30 08:08:51 UTCsaikabhi Source is "Mapillary"
12016-06-30 08:08:33 UTCsaikabhi Source is "Mapillary"
12016-06-30 08:08:14 UTCsaikabhi Source is "Mapillary"
12016-05-30 06:32:37 UTCsaikabhi Wrong changeset comment. The comment should be: `Updating turn restrictions in Washington DC using Mapillary imagery https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/187` and sourec is `Mapillary`
12016-04-29 06:20:07 UTCsaikabhi I have observed that in your recent changesets you have been deleting perfectly good buildings from OSM which are present in satellite imagery. Can you please give any reason why you have deleted these buildings? Also the changeset comment says "Mapping missing roads around Gurgaon,New Delhi&qu...
12016-03-21 08:45:22 UTCsaikabhi Similar to our earlier discussion on this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37848984, there are untagged roads also in this changeset. Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404712054/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404712056/history.

Please review the entire area...
12016-03-17 12:49:42 UTCsaikabhi Great mapping effort. I have some observations on your edits

Untagged roads:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403894809/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403894821/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403894811/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403894805/history
https...
22016-03-17 12:51:58 UTCsaikabhi Please go through http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features to understand how to tag real world objects on OpenStreetMap.

This link http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway can help you with tagging of highways.

Please fix these based on the documentation I have shared here...
32016-03-21 08:42:49 UTCsaikabhi I am noticing that there are still untagged roads in the area. Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403894818/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404712055/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403894794/history.

These are only some of the ways. I am noticing some more untagge...
12016-03-09 06:28:24 UTCsaikabhi Great work on getting the GPS traces of the area. Just an issue here. There is no need to tag the road names as `name=none`. If the streets have no names you can use this proposed tag: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Noname#noname.3Dyes
12016-02-08 06:29:53 UTCsaikabhi As the source for this changeset, you have mentioned using "Aerial view from Google". In OSM, we don't use Google as a source for the data: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F. Can you please clarify the license for the &qu...
12016-01-29 06:43:30 UTCsaikabhi The entire stretch of the way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111050389/history has been marked with turn lanes which does not appear to be correct. Can you look into this once and verify it?
22016-01-29 10:19:59 UTCandygol Thank you @saikabhi for remark. I fixed this issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36875999
12016-01-19 09:22:49 UTCsaikabhi I have observed your edit in this area specifically this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369769205 which does not have any proper tags. Can you please check this way out and re tag with correct tags or maybe remove the way?
22016-01-20 22:07:28 UTCYagilH How do I remove it?
32016-01-21 12:18:48 UTCsaikabhi Can you tell me what did you mean to represent by the tag "Rec center- Around"? Did you mean to represent a road or a landuse?
12016-01-19 11:31:30 UTCsaikabhi There seems to be significant offsets between the building footprints in your changeset and those in Bing imagery. Can you please confirm and verify the source for your building edits and also the source date for the data?
12016-01-16 09:38:50 UTCdidier2020 the way 390035658 is not a building,
can you find better tag ?
thanks
22016-01-17 07:52:46 UTCsaikabhi Thank you for the feedback and pointing the error out to me. It was an oversight on my part. Have removed the invalid building. The changes are reflected in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36628736
12015-12-22 17:38:09 UTCdannykath Please realign some buildings like this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386119102/history
22015-12-23 14:19:52 UTCsaikabhi Realigned and added the building:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36126541
12015-12-22 15:36:06 UTCkaritotp There are some buildings which are in overlapping
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386314048/history
22015-12-23 14:01:45 UTCsaikabhi Deleted and edited the overlapping buildings:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386327054/history
12015-12-22 15:26:08 UTCediyes Hi,

Please extrude building to match imagery,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385959897/history
22015-12-23 03:59:13 UTCsaikabhi Building extruded to match imagery:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385959897/history
12015-12-11 16:09:12 UTCPlaneMad Turn lanes on this way looks incorrect: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95973116

Can you check?
22015-12-14 07:25:48 UTCsaikabhi Thank you for the feedback. Can you take a look at the changes made.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35939027
12015-12-11 16:30:43 UTCPlaneMad The turn lanes on this way looks incorrect: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66984273

Can you check?
22015-12-11 16:30:57 UTCPlaneMad Also check the other roads around this intersection.
32015-12-11 19:10:02 UTCPlaneMad Also your changeset comments don't match the edits.
42015-12-14 07:02:43 UTCsaikabhi Thank you for the feedback. Have made the required changes.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35938814
12015-12-14 06:41:18 UTCsaikabhi Source: Mapbox and Bing
12015-11-05 09:42:52 UTCsaikabhi * http://tasks.teachosm.org/project/104 instead.
12015-10-27 08:25:55 UTCsaikabhi Wrong Tag. willey road in Short hills provincial park(US)
12015-10-14 11:05:57 UTCsaikabhi JORHAT EDITS.WRONG TAG
22015-10-16 06:55:38 UTCsaikabhi #Jorhat Town,Assam Edits. Error on my part while giving the changeset name
12015-10-14 11:06:15 UTCsaikabhi JORHAT EDITS.WRONG TAG
22015-10-16 06:55:22 UTCsaikabhi #Jorhat Town,Assam Edits. Error on my part while giving the changeset name
12015-10-14 11:05:38 UTCsaikabhi JORHAT EDITS.WRONG TAG
22015-10-16 06:54:13 UTCsaikabhi #Jorhat Town,Assam Edits. Error on my part while giving the changeset name
12015-10-14 11:05:22 UTCsaikabhi JORHAT EDITS.WRONG TAG
22015-10-16 06:53:45 UTCsaikabhi #Jorhat Town,Assam Edits. Error on my part while giving the changeset name
12015-10-14 11:05:09 UTCsaikabhi JORHAT EDITS.WRONG TAG
22015-10-16 06:53:30 UTCsaikabhi #Jorhat Town,Assam Edits. Error on my part while giving the changeset name
12015-10-14 11:04:33 UTCsaikabhi JORHAT EDITS. WRONG TAG
22015-10-16 06:53:09 UTCsaikabhi #Jorhat Town,Assam Edits. Error on my part while giving the changeset name
12015-10-06 09:30:07 UTCsaikabhi # Bolai Gohain Pukhuri Jorhat
12015-10-06 09:29:38 UTCsaikabhi # Janapath and Chandan Nagar
12015-10-06 09:29:10 UTCsaikabhi #Dohabora Jorhat
12015-07-08 13:44:43 UTCPlaneMad This is amazing work! But i'm seeing there is a lot of duplicated ways since you are drawing on top of roads that already exist. Did you download the existing data before you started?
22015-07-09 07:43:13 UTCsaikabhi Thank you Arun for the comments. Yes, I did not download the layer first. Instead I digitized the whole map in JOSM using reference of BING imagery and uploaded the new layer. That is the reason you are finding the duplicate layers. I have just started with open street mapping and it was an error on...
32015-07-09 09:18:50 UTCPlaneMad Aha thought so. Thats the whole power of OSM that you work on existing data instead of creating your own from scratch.

See if you can download all the data again and merge features by removing the duplicates. You would need to split(p), join(j) and combine(c) ways for this. let me know if you ar...
42015-07-09 10:01:29 UTCsaikabhi Thank you. Will do that and get back to you.
52015-07-09 21:29:18 UTCsaikabhi Arun. Please have a look. I have tried but the process may still be erroneous. If yes, please provide me some pointers to the places I am going wrong. I have edited the downloaded data and tried to remove the duplicates. Thank you for your patience.
saikabhi has contributed to 144 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 212 comment(s)