Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-12-17 12:42:01 UTCzstadler NOTE:
This changeset has created and then deleted of 2 ways and a relation.
.
Initially, the nature reserve was modeled using a relation with two ways.
Subsequently, a single way was used instead:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392924300
12017-12-12 16:59:43 UTCzstadler Hello yrtimiD,

In this edit you have created a "bridleway" road near כמון:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191293267
.
Is this a way intended for primary use by horse riders?
22017-12-12 18:12:14 UTCyrtimiD wow, 5 years ago... really can't say.
if unsure, just mark it as fixme or let's open a note...
32017-12-15 07:46:22 UTCzstadler I do not see that "fixme" notes have any impact. For example, there are many "temporary" highway=road tags with fixme notes that are stil open since 2009...
.
I prefer to make it a path since according to the sat imagery.
42017-12-15 16:27:21 UTCyrtimiD Go for it
52017-12-16 21:57:16 UTCzstadler Done
12017-12-12 17:12:30 UTCzstadler Hello Lavad,
.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
.
In this edit you have mapped two "bridleway" roads:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186894487
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186906128
.
Are these roads intended for primary use by horse riders?
.
Please also check the b...
22017-12-12 17:34:02 UTCLavad http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186894487
This is a meandering path that runs along a steep slope, between two asphalt roads. This trail can pass only a pedestrian. Employees use to shorten the path.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186906128
This is an old dirt road, shortens the path between...
32017-12-15 07:52:14 UTCzstadler I'll change them to path, track and track, accordingly.
12017-12-12 17:01:48 UTCzstadler Hello Ilya Prokator,

In this edit you have created a "bridleway" road:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512771002
.
Is this a way intended for primary use by horse riders?
22017-12-12 17:06:46 UTCIlya Prokator I haven't seen anyone on this road. Just was curious and used in in my run routine (to check if it have any destination), but this is dead end.
PS: no horses near by
32017-12-12 17:29:31 UTCzstadler If so, please map it as "track", "path", or "footway", as appropriate.
42017-12-12 17:31:27 UTCIlya Prokator done
52017-12-12 17:42:18 UTCzstadler Thanks!
12017-12-12 17:18:59 UTCzstadler Hello WillRock41,
.
Thank you for your contributions to OSM!
.
In this edit you have mapped the eastern part of the "Harod" street in Ramat Gan as a "bridleway":
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221453103
.
Is this a road intended for primary use by horse riders?
12017-12-12 17:14:41 UTCzstadler Hello Yaniv Eliash,
.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
.
In this edit you have mapped two "bridleway" roads:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263217484
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263217485
.
Are these roads intended for primary use by horse riders?
22017-12-13 07:44:59 UTCYaniv Eliash This is a mistake, it's a single (in my case, bicycle)
12017-12-12 17:07:00 UTCzstadler Hello Shurkevich,
.
Thank you for your contribution to OSM.
.
In this edit you have mapped two "bridleway" roads near The Technion's Kfar haMeshtalmim:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233839794
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160109441
.
Are these roads intended for primary use b...
12017-12-12 16:57:48 UTCzstadler Hello yfto,

In this edit you have created several "bridleway" roads near כמון
.
Are these ways intended for primary use by horse riders?
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320751014
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320751013
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320751008
http://w...
12017-12-12 15:59:35 UTCzstadler Hello Ilya Kogan,

In this edit you have changed
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223593621/history
from "footway" to "bridleway".
.
Is this "A way intended for use by horse riders"?
.
Please also check other nearby ways you tagged as highway=bridleway:
.
http...
12017-12-12 15:48:47 UTCzstadler Hello Dr Abdelbaset Rabaiah

In this edit you have changed "Emmat Li'yal"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257808668/history
from "unclassified" to "bridleway".
.
Is this "A way intended for use by horse riders"?
12017-09-26 15:22:37 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521802556 has no tags. Please specify what is it.
.
Thanks!
22017-12-10 12:22:55 UTCzstadler Hello BMM994,

Please respond
12017-10-31 13:22:21 UTCSanniu You have added untagged linehttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532254284 - what is it?
22017-11-12 01:44:50 UTCzstadler Hi נועם המטייל
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532254283
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532254284
have no tags.
Please tag them or delete them
32017-12-10 12:21:36 UTCzstadler Hello נועם המטייל,

Please respond
12017-12-10 12:20:10 UTCzstadler Hello sivan00,

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543400397 created in this edit has no tags.
22017-12-10 12:41:42 UTCsivan00 Fixed.
12017-11-12 01:40:06 UTCzstadler Hi RonHL and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533863400 has no tags.
Please tag it or delete it
22017-12-10 12:05:23 UTCzstadler Please respond
12017-12-10 12:04:27 UTCzstadler שלום אבירם וברוך הבא ל
OSM
.
בעריכה זו הספת מספר קווים, אבל לא הגדרת מה הם.
אפשר להניח שרצית להוסיף דרכי, אבל בלי תוויות כגון
highway
הקווים לא יופיעו על המפה.
12017-03-27 10:26:36 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359243144
has no tags. What is it?
22017-12-10 11:52:27 UTCzstadler Hi Shay,
Please respond.
12017-03-27 12:12:43 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307017151,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307017152,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307017154
have no tags. What are they?
22017-12-10 11:49:08 UTCzstadler Hello FrançoiseR,
In this edit you have created several ways without any tags.
Please respond.

Google Translate:

Bonjour FrançoiseR,
Dans cette changeset, vous avez créé plusieurs façons sans balises.
Répondes s'il vous plait.
12017-12-07 16:07:39 UTCSanniu image is not accessible now
22017-12-08 11:25:38 UTCzstadler Opened an issue for Israel Hiking Map Site
https://github.com/IsraelHikingMap/Site/issues/572
32017-12-08 14:45:32 UTCzstadler Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54460982
12017-12-08 10:30:41 UTCzstadler שלום אבירם וברוך הבא ל
OSM
.
בעריכה הזו בצעת מספר שינויין לא ברורים במפה הכללית. בינהם: הזזת תחנת אוטובוסים למפגש שבילים ויצירת קודומה לכביש קיים ללא סימון משמעות הקו...
12017-12-06 11:23:27 UTCzstadler Hello דוד-צבי,

In this edit you have deleted 3 ways:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230904064
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523996380
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523996381
.
These 2 ways were part of turn restrictions:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7567517
http://ww...
12017-12-06 11:09:50 UTCzstadler Hi matresh and welcome to OSM!
.
In this edit, you have created a turn restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7664042#map=18/31.23739/34.77244
.
This turn restriction has only a "to" member while turn restrictions need to have at least 3 members with "from", "...
12017-12-06 07:13:16 UTCzstadler Hello amirgo and welcome to OSM!

In this edit you have added a few lines ("ways" in OSM terminology), but they had no tags.
.
If they represent a 4x4 route, as the name of this edit suggests, then they need to have a "highway" tag with a "track" value.
.
It also ...
12017-11-12 01:41:37 UTCzstadler Hi Dumkoff and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532917349 was no tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
22017-12-05 12:59:24 UTCzstadler Hi,
Could you please respond?
12017-12-05 12:25:29 UTCzstadler Hello jgc,
In this edit you have added the boundary of an imagery source.
Since this source is no longer available, please consider deleting it.
Best Regards
12017-11-13 12:19:20 UTCzstadler Hi Mosh Feu,
In this edit you named 5 ways as "test 001 gs".
Can you explain, delete, or fix the names?
22017-12-03 13:27:52 UTCzstadler Hello,
Can you please respond?
32017-12-04 08:36:14 UTCMosh Feu I don't remember that I did those changes (which are not make scenes anyway). How can I delete it?
42017-12-04 09:33:21 UTCzstadler Please click on the "Edit" button above, click to select each way to be deleted and click on the trashcan icon.
12017-12-04 09:08:07 UTCzstadler Hello drorari,
In this edit you have created a bicycle route relation
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7640900
.
The relation has just one member way, and does not have any name or operator tags.
Is there a need for this relation?
Thanks!
12017-12-04 06:01:35 UTCzstadler Hello yonglas,
.
Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding the blue trail south of
נופי פרת.
.
Was this blue trail created by the
וועדה לשבילי ישראל
or another organization, such as
תיירות חבל בנימין
?
Thanks!
12017-12-03 16:57:28 UTCzstadler Hi,
In this edit you have created Kimmel Gate.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/883429638
Can you explain what makes it a tourist attraction?
Thanks!
12017-12-03 16:34:40 UTCzstadler Hello,
In this edit, you have added a gate http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5153636964, but it is not connected to the nearby road.
As a result, it is not applied to the road.
22017-12-05 06:11:07 UTCYGMZ corrected
12017-12-03 13:02:43 UTCzstadler Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119843108 is self-intersecting http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.55636&lat=31.59762&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
22017-12-03 13:05:37 UTCsivan00 Already fixed.
32017-12-03 13:12:00 UTCzstadler Thanks!
12017-12-03 13:09:14 UTCzstadler Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119016187 is self-intersecting
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.25251&lat=32.71950&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
22017-12-03 13:10:14 UTCzstadler and so is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201679205
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.30453&lat=32.68158&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
32017-12-03 13:58:41 UTCsivan00 Already fixed.
42017-12-03 13:59:11 UTCsivan00 Already fixed.
12017-12-03 13:07:25 UTCzstadler Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381380826 is self-intersecting.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.24321&lat=31.76042&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
12017-12-03 12:59:49 UTCzstadler Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486986942 is self-intersecting
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.82002&lat=32.06065&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
22017-12-03 13:02:12 UTCsivan00 Already fixed.
12017-11-05 13:27:16 UTCzstadler Hi,

In this edit you have created several issue by moving nodes belonging to ways in the Weizzman Institute.

For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53397135 was distorted because https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/909597094 was moved.
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5114682...
22017-11-07 07:54:55 UTCSafwatHalaby Moovit Team seem to never respond to changeset comments. Are they a single person or a generic account?
32017-11-07 07:57:51 UTCSafwatHalaby For the record: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=1190212
42017-11-07 08:01:30 UTCSafwatHalaby I've sent them a PM, in case that catches their attention.
52017-11-07 13:25:42 UTCzstadler I've sent the following e-mail to the OSM Data Working Group:
.
Hello DWG members,
.
Over the last 3 years 13 changesets created by Moovit Team have been discussed with a total of 16 comments regarding potential mapping errors. The Moovit Team did not respond to any of them.
.
We would appreci...
62017-11-08 17:48:55 UTCSafwatHalaby The DWG have soft-blocked Moovit Team, until they read this message: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1620
72017-11-08 17:52:10 UTCSafwatHalaby I suspect they've already introduced many weird access tags that were uncaught by our QA.
82017-11-16 15:12:54 UTCSomeoneElse @Safwat The change at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53842443 suggests that "Moovit Team" might actually be reacting to comments, even if they're not replying in changeset discussions.
Best Regards,
Andy
92017-11-16 20:56:25 UTCSafwatHalaby No, that's a generic description I've seen earlier too. And the post-block permissions still look weird and out of place with the normal way we tag footways or paths. The soft block had no effect whatsoever on behavior or communication as of now.
102017-11-16 20:57:14 UTCSafwatHalaby For instance, this is totally confusing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53842919 , why not just use highway=footway?
112017-11-16 20:59:42 UTCSafwatHalaby Specifically, this way was edited after the block: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541053309
122017-11-16 21:06:33 UTCSafwatHalaby I sent the following "support request" from their site, in case they're somehow missing this:
.
Hello, your OpenStreetMap editing account, "Moovit Team", is not behaving according to community standards. Since 2014, several users asked questions about many different edits, and ...
132017-11-19 11:55:12 UTCMoovit Team Thank you for your comments.
Up until now, we did not received updates regarding discussion about our edits.
In the following days we will check your comments and reply accordingly.

Thanks for your understanding,
Moovit Team.
142017-11-21 12:19:11 UTCMoovit Team Hi Zeev,

Thank you for the detailed comments.

In this changes set i tried to change the name of the street and verify that the permissions are correct.
If i make change in the graphic line you are more than welcome to reverse my changes.

Sorry if the change I made caused you problems.
152017-11-21 13:22:02 UTCzstadler Hello Moovit Team,
Thank you for responding to the comments.
.
If I understand you correctly, you have modified the geometry of ways and location of nodes when you wanted just to change their tags.
.
IMO, it is an unreasonable conduct for a mapper with more than 1000 edits.
12017-09-27 14:07:59 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Thanks for the map updates!
.
In this edit you have marked a red track on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300456684 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476052741 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526837179
.
This red track does not show on the marked trails map nor in the updates pag...
22017-11-05 14:34:06 UTCzstadler red colour tag was removed
32017-11-15 19:15:22 UTCzstadler Red colour tag was restored following an update in https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=430
12017-11-14 06:55:01 UTCzstadler Hi MattKaza and welcome to OSM!
Please note that the way to tag a pedestrian area is with "highway=pedestrian" and "area=yes". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian
I have corrected
I've corrected the areas in HaKfar HaYarok.
12017-11-14 06:38:16 UTCzstadler Hi MattKazza and welcome to OSM!
In this edit, you have created self-intersection in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100405978
Use a multipolygon in order to create an area with a "hole". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
Please let me know if you prefer me...
12017-11-13 20:37:21 UTCzstadler Hi Gugul,
In this old edit, a path was changed to a track with no motor vehicle access. Can you explain why?
22017-11-18 20:51:39 UTCGugul because a lot of sand on tracks in this area. also a track in light green area at left side is only for pedestrians
12017-11-13 12:12:42 UTCzstadler Hi דוד-צבי,
Here are also several self-intersecting ways.
See them at http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.16770&lat=31.99577&zoom=13&opacity=0.67&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
.
Please use multi-polygons to map areas with &quo...
12017-11-13 12:07:31 UTCzstadler Hi דוד-צבי,
In this edit, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52424226, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52562649
you crated several self-intersecting ways. See
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.34551&lat=31.95767&zoom=14&opacity=0.67&o...
22017-11-13 12:12:30 UTCzstadler Hi דוד-צבי,
In this edit, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52424226, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52562649
you crated several self-intersecting ways. See
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.34551&lat=31.95767&zoom=14&opacity=0.67&o...
32017-11-15 15:57:12 UTCדוד-צבי I'm really sorry, but I still do not know how to edit properly this way. As soon as I know I will.
If you can do it yourself, this of course will be a great contribution :)
12017-11-13 12:08:03 UTCzstadler See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52441910
12017-11-13 12:07:55 UTCzstadler See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52441910
12017-07-16 11:43:48 UTCSafwatHalaby I've been cleaning up the area. I'm not very knowledgeable on this subject, but could you explain the "ההיכל" and "שער האולם" and "בית קדשי הקדושים"? I don't see them here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Map_of_Jerusalem_-...
22017-07-17 11:29:58 UTCדוד-צבי These are places where holy places stood for Judaism. You can find the details in the Bible
32017-07-17 11:43:06 UTCדוד-צבי There were two temples there: from 830 BCE until 420 BC (the First Temple, the Book of Melakhim), and from the year 350 BCE until 70 CE (the Second Temple, the Book of Ezra).
42017-07-18 08:12:30 UTCSafwatHalaby Thanks.
52017-11-13 07:23:01 UTCzstadler Hi דוד-צבי,
Are there any remains "ההיכל", "שער האולם" and "בית קדשי הקדושים" in existence?
As https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic says:
"For features which no longer exist see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Compar...
62017-11-13 07:43:27 UTCSafwatHalaby It is likely that there are remains below the dome.
.
I don't think there are visible remains.
72017-11-15 15:37:08 UTCדוד-צבי Of course, there are many remains under the upper plaza
82017-11-15 15:53:31 UTCדוד-צבי This is the holiest place for Judaism. On the other hand, Islam is of third importance, and there is great controversy in Islam whether this is indeed the place (the Koran is mentioned "Praise be to the one who drove his slave with the night of the Al-Haram Mosque to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Everyth...
12017-11-12 09:05:44 UTCzstadler Hi דוד-צבי,
The addition of the "רמאללה" name tag to the residential area of Ramalla
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316511713
created duplicate labels for the city, in addition to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2717915.
Please delete the name tags
12017-09-26 16:21:18 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521668840 but it has no tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
22017-10-02 17:15:13 UTCzstadler Thanks for the correction!
32017-11-12 01:58:22 UTCzstadler The above thanks were meant for
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sanniu
who deleted the way.
There was no response from BMM994.
12017-11-12 01:50:46 UTCzstadler Hi Alaa Odeh and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529473350 has no tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
12017-11-12 01:46:07 UTCzstadler Hi BMM994,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531495100 has no tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
12017-11-12 01:38:23 UTCzstadler Hi Safwat,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535327187 has no tags.
Please tag it or delete it
22017-11-16 06:57:45 UTCSafwatHalaby Thanks! Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53830517
12017-11-12 01:37:08 UTCzstadler Hi vsvsvsvs and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536519776
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536519777
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536519778
have no tags and overlap existing buildings.
Please delete them or fix them.
12017-11-12 01:31:57 UTCzstadler Hi vsnight and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536520816 has no tags.
Please tag it or delete it
12017-11-12 01:30:14 UTCzstadler Hi vsvsvsvs and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536521414 has no tags and it overlaps an existing building.
Please delete it or fix it.
12017-11-12 01:26:57 UTCzstadler Hi rishikagogi and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536522591 does not have any tags and it overlaps an existing road.
Please delete it or fix it.
12017-11-12 01:15:56 UTCzstadler Hi T Raiss and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536525498 was added without tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
12017-11-08 05:21:57 UTCSafwatHalaby Hi Connor and welcome to OSM!
.
I have some tips that may be useful to you.
.
Unfortunately, this is not a dirt road, it's actually a waterway!
.
Also, it seems you simply wrote "dirt road" as the road name, but that's not how dirt roads should be tagged. The name is the actual name...
22017-11-12 01:13:18 UTCzstadler Hi ConnorMegan and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539100160 was added without any tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
12017-11-12 01:10:11 UTCzstadler Hi Sivan,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539369665 has no tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
22017-11-12 06:31:35 UTCsivan00 Done.
12017-11-12 01:07:32 UTCzstadler Hi nicomar,
Several ways were added without any tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287393
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287394
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287414
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287416
Please tag them or ...
12017-03-26 13:38:51 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440028604
has no tags. what is it?
22017-11-12 00:51:27 UTCzstadler This way was created by ESNG, as part of the Battir imports.
Fixed by tagging as a barrier=wall
12017-11-09 07:53:46 UTCzstadler Hello sivan00,

This changeset as well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53593661 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53604597 introduced self-intersecting ways, as can be seen in OSM Inspector:
.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=35.29166&lat=32.64091&am...
22017-11-09 07:58:59 UTCsivan00 Please do.
12017-11-05 06:03:35 UTCzstadler Hi,

According to
.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.60154&lat=31.65901&zoom=17&opacity=0.67&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
.
in this edit you have created a self-intersecting way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537233411
....
22017-11-07 17:52:54 UTCMr Massri It proposed to be bridge. I'll fix it.
32017-11-08 14:05:11 UTCzstadler Thanks for the fix.
I've removed the descriptive "Untitled Path" name tags.
12017-10-02 05:54:35 UTCzstadler Hi Ori,
.
6 years ago, in this changeset, you have added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99654769 - a cliff within the מימדיון in Tel Aviv.
.
The OSM wiki says "A cliff is a vertical or almost vertical natural drop in terrain topography", which seems unlikely to happen there.\...
22017-11-05 14:35:19 UTCzstadler Way was deleted
32017-11-05 15:07:46 UTCOri952 Which tags did you have in mind?
42017-11-05 16:45:46 UTCzstadler What is it that you wanted to map?
52017-11-05 19:01:12 UTCOri952 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Memadion006.jpg

It doesn't really disclose the height, but the hill is quite steep
62017-11-05 19:31:40 UTCzstadler I now understand your intention.
.
Hills are generally not mapped, even when descending is not possible, which is probably not the case here. See examples of several inactive dump areas ("הרי זבל"), such as
https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/17/32.2076/34.8515
.
IMO, there is no...
72017-11-05 20:27:11 UTCOri952 Okay. Thanks
12017-11-05 18:32:17 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Please note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536520756 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536520757 are not connected and have no tags.
.
Best regards
12017-11-05 13:38:36 UTCzstadler The changeset was reverted. See the issue and lack of author response at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42049161 discussion.
12017-09-16 12:47:31 UTCzstadler Hello Oleg,
.
Thanks for mapping these attractions, and the attractions in Ra'anana Park - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42296032
.
Without any description, name, or additional tags, these attractions have no use.
.
Can you add them please?
22017-11-05 13:36:26 UTCzstadler The changeset was reverted.
12017-11-05 13:30:46 UTCzstadler Hi,

I understand that in this edit you have fixed an issues created in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53397135
.
Unfortunately, this is not the only issue in that changeset.
.
I think it will be best to revert both the original changeset and its partial fix. I have also contacted its...
22017-11-05 13:32:25 UTCSanniu Ok, I've failed to trace origin of problem, so fixed manually. Reverting problematic CS is better.
12017-07-21 06:24:59 UTCzstadler There seems that a new building added in this changeset:
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492103952
.
is overlapping an existing building:
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90828224
22017-07-21 10:54:10 UTCYnhockey This is intentional: https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=32.07537&lon=34.78338&zoom=19&rotation=0&tilt=30
32017-07-23 07:40:35 UTCzstadler Thanks! I didn't notice the "building:part" tag...
42017-10-25 19:32:10 UTCzstadler Would it be possible to define this building part without using any node more than once (except for closing the way)?
.
The current shape creates a self-intersecting way.
.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Self_intersecting_way_reports
52017-10-25 19:34:02 UTCYnhockey It's possible, if the part is split into five. Can you point me to an explanation of why this is such a big problem though? The linked page only says it could be a problem. Why?
62017-10-25 21:14:29 UTCzstadler The problem is when software tries to analyze the shapes in the map or store them in geographic databases that allow search. A self-intersecting polygon created issues.
.
For example, there is an error when reading this way to the search database for IsraelHiking.osm.org.il
.
To avoid self-inter...
72017-10-25 21:52:58 UTCzstadler The shape in the previous comment got distorted.
.
Please see if http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535361487 or something similar can replace http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90828224
82017-11-03 23:26:44 UTCYnhockey I have modified the building, hopefully it doesn't cause the same problems anymore.
92017-11-05 13:00:40 UTCzstadler Thanks!
I appreciate your help!
12017-10-27 17:06:13 UTCdsh4 Hi zstadler,

You changed the tagging of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346149552#map=18/32.76804/35.02787 from highway=track to highway=unclassified. Could I double-check that that's correct? It would be unusual for a road inside a forest to be "unclassified".

https://wiki.opens...
22017-10-27 19:51:00 UTCzstadler I have not been there personally, I just adjusted the highway tag to match the description (name) and the surface tag.
.
The non-name you deleted was "Paved road..." and the surface tag is "paved". Therefore, it is not a track.
.
It is not unusual to have sections paved roads...
32017-10-27 20:21:34 UTCdsh4 Thanks for the reply.

Considering https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified , I think this road is not an "unclassified" road: it is not interconnecting, it is not used for local traffic.

Since https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track says that highway...
42017-10-27 21:02:22 UTCzstadler Please refer to the Israel wiki page for the highway tag classification
52017-10-28 07:48:25 UTCSafwatHalaby Perhaps the IL wiki is conflicting with the global guidelines in this regard; we're using track exclusively for unpaved.
62017-10-28 12:35:50 UTCdsh4 Let's discuss this further on the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=670142#p670142
72017-11-21 08:33:04 UTCSafwatHalaby ...dedicated thread here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=673613
12017-10-24 23:01:34 UTCzstadler הי איציק,

תודה שהצטרפת לעורכי המפה של OpenStreetMap
.
בעריכה זאת נראה שהוספת הערה פרטית "גמר מסלול 1/4" לעין ירקעם.
.
על פי כללי הפרוייקט, אין להכניס הערות פרטיות למפה....
22017-10-25 19:46:37 UTCitzikora קיבלתי הודעתך ואמנע מכך
32017-10-25 20:51:43 UTCzstadler תודה!
12017-10-25 09:50:25 UTCzstadler ‎הי bilbolim,

‎תודה שהצטרפת לעורכי המפה של OpenStreetMap
.
‎בעריכה זאת נראה שהוספת הערות פרטיות כגון "התחלה - קטע"
.
‎על פי כללי הפרוייקט, אין להכניס הערות פרטיות ...
12017-09-25 05:36:00 UTCSafwatHalaby Track with sidewalk?
22017-10-15 20:08:39 UTCzstadler Which element are you referring to?
Did i create it?
32017-10-17 06:13:36 UTCSafwatHalaby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222996942
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527217866
42017-10-17 11:55:20 UTCzstadler The sidewalk tag was there when I've split the way in order to correct the junction geometry. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52322050
.
The history at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527217866/history shows that the tag was part of the creation of the way, done over 4 years ago by...
12017-06-06 09:40:21 UTCSafwatHalaby_bot Total names copies: 5967
Total name to name:en: 874
Total name:he to name: 0
Total name to name:he: 5093
Total name:ar to name: 0
Total name to name:ar: 0
Whitespace fixes: 638
Total scanned: 18528
Total unhandled errors: 203


http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803001097: name is not ar,...
22017-10-15 08:50:04 UTCzstadler Hi SafwatHalaby,
.
In this edit, the bot copied numbered names to name:en. For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2994312/history
.
Do you think it is useful?
32017-10-17 06:22:14 UTCSafwatHalaby I don't think it's useful. I'll fix this.

Do you think it's useful?
42017-10-17 11:45:34 UTCzstadler I agree, it is not useful.
Thanks for taking ownership on fixing it.
12017-10-02 17:17:50 UTCzstadler Thanks for the correction!
12017-09-26 16:22:50 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514141807 but it has no tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
22017-10-02 17:16:14 UTCzstadler Thanks for the correction!
12017-09-26 15:26:57 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525397706 has no tags. What is it?
.
Thanks!
22017-10-02 06:21:19 UTCzstadler Thanks for the correction!
12017-10-02 06:21:10 UTCzstadler Thanks for the correction!
12017-10-02 06:19:50 UTCzstadler Thanks for the correction!
12017-09-26 16:23:26 UTCFlayer Done
22017-10-02 06:18:18 UTCzstadler Thanks for the fix!
12017-10-02 06:17:24 UTCzstadler Thanks for the fix!
12017-09-28 13:05:44 UTCzstadler Hi Guy,
.
Thanks for your on-going updates of the map!
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3448750143 - a gate at Nirit and several turn restrictions around it.

Placing a gate on a junction should be avoided because it is not clear which highway is gated. In this c...
22017-09-28 18:27:26 UTCGuy A Thanks for the comment.
I have edited the map as you suggested.
32017-09-28 19:09:01 UTCzstadler Thanks!
You can also delete all the turn restriction relations.
42017-09-29 09:42:01 UTCGuy A I have removed the turn restrictions.
Thanks!
52017-09-29 13:11:06 UTCzstadler Thank you!!!
12017-09-28 17:04:35 UTCzstadler Hi Yakir,
.
In this old edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1351405574 - a gate that is disconnected from any road or fence.
.
Do you remember what it is gating?

Thanks!
12017-09-26 23:26:36 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4169324780, but this gate is not connected to any footway or path.
.
Thanks!
22017-09-27 20:44:51 UTCYnhockey I put a foot path there now, but don't remember which entrance exactly it connects to. Hopefully I am not in Beilinson again soon to find out!
32017-09-28 11:44:43 UTCzstadler Thanks!
I've connected the footway to the nearest road. Further tuning can be done in the future.
12017-09-28 07:58:09 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Thanks for updating the OSM map!
.
In this edit you have changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407537063 from footway to path. Is it accessible by any means other than by foot?
.
Thanks again!
22017-09-28 08:21:56 UTCylivny Hi

No, it is only accessible by foot. I am not sure why I changed the 'highway' attribute (it way a long time ago). Maybe by mistake (this was one of my first edits)
32017-09-28 11:40:00 UTCzstadler OK. I'll change it back to footway.
Thanks!
12017-09-28 07:28:17 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added 2 turn restrictions: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7169265/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7169266
.
The turn restrictions were incomplete as they did not have "to" and "from" ways.
.
I've fixed this in https://www...
12017-09-26 23:21:43 UTCzstadler Hi Liron,
.
In this edit you have added 3 barriers of type "puddle". Can you please clarify what is it?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 23:09:11 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4703498061 but this gate is not connected to any road or linear barries, such as a fence. Can you identify what it is gating?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 16:28:29 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Thanks for your first contribution to Open Street Map!
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522799649 but it has no meaningful tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 16:20:10 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525212557 but it has no tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 16:17:31 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512782952 but it has no tags and it is not part of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
22017-09-26 18:01:03 UTCsivan00 It's a left over. I deleted it.
12017-09-26 16:15:33 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524777191 but it has no tags. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 16:12:58 UTCzstadler HI!
.
Thanks you for contributing to OSM. Some of the features you added have no tags. Can identify what they are:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519142163
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519142164
and in a separate changeset also
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519143287
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 15:42:38 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
The feature you added has no tags. What is it?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 15:41:26 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
The way you've added has no tags. What is it?
.
Thanks!
12017-07-12 11:25:52 UTCSanniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497111093 - have no tags. What is it?
22017-09-26 15:39:15 UTCzstadler Removed this feature due to no response.
12017-09-26 15:35:30 UTCzstadler Hi Omri,
.
Thanks for contributing to OSM!
.
On this edit you have removed the "building" tag from some shapes. As a result, these are unknown features. Did you intend to delete the buildings, or was the tag removal an error?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 15:27:39 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524145601 has no tags. What is it?
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 15:21:01 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524089773 has no tags. Please specify what is it.
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 15:20:06 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Ways http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524087223 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524087220 have no tags. Please specify what are they.
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 15:18:13 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521336287 has no tags. Please specify what is it.
.
Thanks!
12017-09-26 13:09:46 UTCzstadler Hello,
.
Thanks for the update.
When you add a way to a landuse multi-poligon, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523721993, please add an "outer" or "inner" rone. Empty roles are no longer valid according to new OSM definitions.
.
Also, there is no need to duplicate t...
12017-09-26 12:42:45 UTCzstadler שלום דוד-צבי,

תודה על העריכה!

In this changeset you have added a tracktype tag to
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491364619
.
Unfortunately, the value "grade3-5" is not an option. Please choose "grade3", "grade4" or "grade5".
...
12017-09-26 12:33:07 UTCzstadler Hi Flayer,
.
Thanks for the update!
.
In this changeset you have changed the ref tag of several ways to "6,70". Note that OSM used a semicolon(";") when multiple values are needed for a single tag. In this example, "6;70" would be the proper way to make the change ...
22017-09-26 13:25:11 UTCFlayer Thank you! I'll will use semicolon from now on.
12017-09-26 11:48:58 UTCzstadler Hi Daniel,

In this changeset you have created parallel paths for the black marked trail

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2189167#map=18/31.28976/34.81148
12017-09-26 11:39:18 UTCzstadler Hi Daniel,

The blue trail (12583) was cancelled, as I've written in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46890024

This is based on the announcement at
https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=433
12017-09-26 11:32:47 UTCzstadler Hi Nadav,

Please note that OSM used the "colour" tag rather than "color".
12017-09-22 10:22:35 UTCzstadler Hi,

In this old changeset you have mapped Ein Pit as an archaeological site in addition to being a spring.
.
Lately, you have mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1518072771 as the Ein Pit spring.
.
As a result, there are two "Ein Pit" springs very close to one another.
.
See...
12017-09-17 13:05:44 UTCzstadler Hi Matan,

Unfortunately, IHM POI interface allowed you to change the classification of the trail.
The result is an illegal OSM relation definition.
.
To add a spring to the map, please make sure the trails layer is hidden.
.
I will have to revert this change.
22017-09-17 15:05:43 UTCzstadler We are also exploring the possibility that this was a bug in the POI update interface of IHM.
32017-09-17 15:11:21 UTCMatanBM You right. I added this POI by mistake. You have a bug that while editing a trail it comes into POI when clicking on edit.
Also the button is not clearly enough. I thought the button is for uploading file, not submit.
12017-09-17 14:07:08 UTCzstadler Hi,
There is a conflict between defining a water source as a spring and as a water well.
From a recent update of the description, it looks like a man-made well.
12017-07-25 13:46:34 UTCSanniu Are they bomb shelters? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9966 discuss the bomb shelter mapping. Can you fix tag if appropriate?
22017-07-27 07:43:37 UTCzstadler Hi RTtect,
.
Recently you have created several ways that have no tags. Could you review the list at
.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qDb
.
and either fix or delete them.
.
Thanks!
32017-08-01 11:19:19 UTCzstadler Hi RTtect,
.
Thanks for deleting most of the orphan ways! The list above still shows 7 of them have not been fixed.
42017-09-16 12:53:18 UTCzstadler OK. I will delete the remaining ways.
12017-03-27 11:14:19 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122228486
has no tags. What is it?
22017-08-21 09:58:47 UTCzstadler Removed in changeset 51298168
12017-08-01 16:42:12 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
In this edit, the recycling bin www.openstreetmap.org/node/1567116165
was moved into the nearby path.
12017-07-03 07:13:38 UTCSanniu http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502216670 - look like you have not finished the roundabout?
22017-08-01 16:39:10 UTCzstadler It loos like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502216670 was used to draw the new geometry of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502216670 and its nearby streets.
.
Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50757837
12017-08-01 16:29:28 UTCzstadler Hi and welcome to the OSM mappers community!
.
Please note that you have left http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512074583 without any tags...
22017-09-13 08:57:04 UTCshoshiwe שלום!
אני עובדת במכון ויצמן
אנחנו מנסים לעדכן את המפה עם כל השבילים במכון
אין לנו מספיק נסיון במפה הזאת
?האם אתה מעוניין לעזור לנו
32017-09-13 15:33:51 UTCSafwatHalaby שלום!

ניתן לשוחח עם הקהילה הישראלית כאן:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=33
12017-08-01 16:24:31 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398602061 was no tags. should it be deleted?
12017-08-01 16:21:24 UTCzstadler Hello and welcome to the OSM mappers community.
.
Note that in this edit, you have removed the "highway=footway" tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98779830. This deletes the path from the map. The geometry of the path was also changed, disconnected from other paths, and overlaps t...
12017-07-12 11:20:35 UTCSanniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504816656 - way have no tags, what is it?
22017-08-01 16:06:02 UTCzstadler Fixed in changeset 50757118
12017-07-31 09:53:55 UTCzstadler אני מניח שהתכוונת שהשביל על החומה סביב מגדל דוד לא מתחבר לשביל על החומה דרומה ממנו
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/31.77551/35.22777
22017-08-01 18:43:51 UTCדוד-צבי אכן כך. בדקתי זאת בעצמי לפני מספר שבועות
12017-07-30 21:36:29 UTCzstadler האם השביל שמיפית בראש החומה צריך לעבור גם מעל שער יפו
?
22017-07-30 22:05:59 UTCzstadler אני מניח שכן. תקן אותי אם אני טועה
32017-07-31 07:26:51 UTCדוד-צבי בפירוש לא. הכביש נכנס לעיר דרך פתח מחולט בחומה (לא שער). השביל לא יכול לעבור שם כי זה חלק בלי חומה כלל
42017-07-31 07:33:14 UTCדוד-צבי זה מעבר שנפתח ע"י הפחה העות'מאני לכבוד ביקורו של הקייזר הגרמני שביקר בעיר בי"ג חשוון ה'תרנ"ח - 29 באוקטובר 1898. הפתח נפתח ע"מ שהקיסר יוכל לעבור עם מרכבתו ופמליי...
12017-07-27 07:36:39 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Can you please define http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489813779 because it currently has no tags.
.
Thanks!
12017-07-27 07:34:18 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Can you please check out http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509526625 because it has no tags.
.
Moreover, it is a few meters in size, yet it has 60 nodes...
12017-04-03 08:12:55 UTCzstadler Using "white" colour for a trail is not very useful in maps, as t will not show on most of them.
.
Please consider using another colour for
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467711910
22017-04-03 19:34:31 UTCWadisTrail It is marked in white-blank-white in reality.
How else can we mark it on the map?
32017-04-04 05:24:19 UTCzstadler זה נראה כמו סימון שבילים "רגיל" של שביל שחור.
.
זה סימון שלכם או של הוועדה לשבילי ישראל?
42017-04-04 10:53:05 UTCWadisTrail אנחנו עדיין מדברים על זה?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467711910

זה סימון של עמותת ירוק בלב, ב-2 פסים לבנים עם רווח לא צבוע ביניהם.
אין באזור ואדי עובדיה סימון שביל שחור.
52017-04-05 22:09:44 UTCzstadler כן, מדובר על השביל הקצר הזה.
.
אם כך, אני מציע שתשתמשו באותו תיוג ויחס כמו שבילים שקופים של הוועדה. פרטים בדף הוויקי
.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Main_conventions
62017-04-06 12:23:26 UTCWadisTrail עכשיו זה בסדר?
72017-07-26 19:38:19 UTCzstadler הורדתי את תגית הצבע מהשביל ועכשיו זה בסדר
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50598869
12017-07-21 08:49:44 UTCzstadler https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7304999 is the relation for the "Green Line" and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294464667 is already a member of it.
.
The "trick" of adding a new relation seems to be an example of "tagging for the renderer" and should be avo...
22017-07-21 11:50:55 UTCSafwatHalaby Yes. this is explicitly tagging for the renderer, or more precisely for almost all renderers out there.

Despite being discouraged, it's better than a border which doesn't render. I left it that way till I find a better solution to the following problem:

The "green line" relation does...
32017-07-21 11:51:19 UTCSafwatHalaby Yes. this is explicitly tagging for the renderer, or more precisely for almost all renderers out there.


Despite being discouraged, it's better than a border which doesn't render. I left it that way till I find a better solution to the following problem:


The "green line" relation ...
42017-07-21 11:52:24 UTCSafwatHalaby Also, adding "administrative" to the green line is factually wrong, I think.
52017-07-23 07:49:49 UTCzstadler If the 1949 armistice line is an historical line. Currently, it does not serve as an administrative boundary, not even a disputed boundary, because it was superseded by the Oslo agreements.
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome says: "What it [the map] doesn't include is opinionated data li...
62017-07-24 05:22:15 UTCSafwatHalaby The reason I added a relation is to get it to render while avoiding adding "administrative" on the way itself. Do you have a better alternative?
72017-07-24 06:11:44 UTCzstadler I think that the line should not be rendered.
82017-07-24 07:21:14 UTCSafwatHalaby Is there anything different about the left just west of it? If not, why should one of them render, and the other shouldn't?
92017-07-24 20:07:13 UTCzstadler If you refer to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288825225, then it is a member of a (disputed) boundary=administrative admin_level=2 relation - http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1703814
102017-07-24 20:13:53 UTCSafwatHalaby I think you're missing my point: Both 294464667 and 288825225 are disputed. So, there isn't anything special about either of them, both should be rendered the same. But only the western one renders, because only the western one is part of the PL relation which is tagged administrative.
112017-07-24 20:15:31 UTCSafwatHalaby So I added this hack to make the Eastern one render. We have a very unique case a country (or pseudo-country if you will) has "two" borders. Putting them both in the PL relation is bad because it messes out outer/inner, so I had to do this hack.
122017-07-25 05:35:04 UTCzstadler A dispute can only be on a boundary claimed by some entity. No claim implies no dispute. Way 288825225 is part of the boundary claimed by Palestine and disputed by Israel.
.
Way 294464667 is not claimed to be a boundary by any entity - neither Palestine nor Israel. Therefore it is not a bounda...
132017-07-25 07:04:54 UTCSafwatHalaby Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50547120
142017-07-25 07:49:47 UTCzstadler I appreciate your listening and open-mindness!
152017-07-25 08:42:49 UTCSafwatHalaby :)
162017-07-25 08:45:49 UTCSafwatHalaby What was the historical rationale for having the green line split into two at this section?
172017-07-25 11:23:56 UTCzstadler I'm not an historian, but I think there was a no man's land area/שטח מפורז between the Israeli-controlled and the Jordanian-controlled areas.
12016-06-14 16:00:53 UTCRicoZ The reverted changeset clearly had some errors but I think many of the objects are in fact cave_entrances.
22016-06-14 16:16:17 UTCSomeoneElse @RicoZ Indeed, and local mappers will I'm sure pick those up over time.

The solution to "some cave entrances are incorrectly mapped as caves" is not to change ALL caves to cave entrances - that's just differently wrong.

By their very nature (being underground and not visible on aeria...
32016-06-17 15:20:23 UTCRicoZ Thanks, I have started http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave and am looking at those places now
42017-04-02 08:16:25 UTCzstadler Currently, there is "cave" is not an approved tag.
.
I find is strange that the most appropriate approved tag "natural=cave_entrance" was replaced by an tag that was proposed at the time of the change.
.
As a result of this change, applicable caves have disappeared from maps...
52017-07-23 07:38:51 UTCzstadler The proposed "natural=cave" proposal applies to ways and areas.
.
I therefore changed/reverted all "natural=cave" nodes in Israel and Palestine to "natural=cave_entrance".
62017-07-23 09:23:52 UTCSomeoneElse @zstadler OSM does not have "approved" tags, If someone has mapped something beyond a "cave entrance" as a "natural=cave" then that's perfectly OK. As noted above, as with any "odd tagging" I'd expect local mappers to check examples near them, as I presume y...
72017-07-23 10:04:46 UTCRicoZ @zstadler: most of the nodes natural=cave should be natural=cave_entrance but not all. It may be that in Israel the data is sufficiently homogenous that you can simply replace it but in other countries I found mappers tagged wine cellars, restaurants and many other objects with nodes of type natura...
82017-07-23 15:09:30 UTCzstadler Yes, I'm the original mapper of all recently corrected entries, and they should have been "natural=cave_entrance" in the first place.
@SomeoneElse: The https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process says a proposal can be approved by voting. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pr...
12017-07-21 13:27:34 UTCzstadler Hi Yaniv,
.
Thanks for adding the marked trails south of Sdemot Mehola.
.
It looks like there is a strange split in the green trail:
.
http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/15/32.3304/35.5185
.
Isn't there a blue trail going east-west?
.
Please let me know if you need any help editing.
22017-07-23 06:09:26 UTCYaniv Eliash I remember it was green but I might be mistaken (it was hot that day :-) )
BTW, the entry to the trail from the east side is also double and not a single as seen in the map
32017-07-23 11:21:40 UTCzstadler I've fixed the trail type. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50499250
12017-07-21 12:57:56 UTCzstadler Is this new way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506220396 an officially marked ITC red trail?
.
It does not appear on the marked trails map or at the update page https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=442
22017-07-21 14:19:26 UTCMosh Feu I don't have the ITC maps. But there are some new trails in the area of "נחל שילה" I think that the reason they not appear in the printed map. You can read a little more about it here: http://www.gobinyamin.org.il/%D7%A8%D7%A9%D7%AA-%D7%94%D7%A9%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A9%...
32017-07-23 08:33:04 UTCzstadler It looks like the trails are created (the "operated" tag) by this local organization: "תיירות חבל בנימין", and that's why they are not mentioned by the ITC.
.
I've added a hiking route relation in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50495664. Would you like t...
42017-07-31 11:53:50 UTCMosh Feu I'm not sure how the relation works and how to add them?
Also, as much as I understood from "תיירות חבל בנימין" the trails were marked by ״החברה להגנת הטבע״
12017-07-21 13:39:05 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
After this update, the red trail has a Y shape:
.
http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/18/32.7894/34.9783
.
Is this OK?
22017-07-21 13:42:39 UTCWadisTrail Unfortunately yes, this is what they did.
We'll keep this in mind when planing future marking and rehabilitation hikes.
12017-07-21 13:02:31 UTCzstadler Is these new ways part of an officially marked ITC red trail?
.
It does not appear on the marked trails map or at the update page https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=442
22017-07-21 14:25:37 UTCMosh Feu Well, I don't know. I saw the marked stones in the trail and on the signposts.
12017-07-21 12:18:04 UTCzstadler Hi Mosh,
.
Can you please check the blue trail at http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/15/32.0654/35.3418
.
It seems to be split into two parts, and one part includes a loop...
.
Thanks!
22017-07-21 14:10:52 UTCMosh Feu I merged the 2 parts. About the loop, that's the trail as I saw.
Thanks!
12017-07-21 09:36:01 UTCzstadler http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490586260 has no tags. What is it?
12017-07-21 09:09:11 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507012017 does not have any tags. Should it be removed?
.
Thanks!
12017-07-21 08:36:28 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
Please try to set the role of every member in a multipolygon. Leaving an empty role is deprecated, and an "outer" role is expected instead.
.
I've set the role of all members of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7266553 to "outer".
.
Thanks!
12017-07-21 08:32:47 UTCzstadler Hi Mr. Massri,
.
Please try to set the role of every member in a multipolygon. Leaving an empty role is deprecated, and an "outer" role is expected.
.
I've set the role of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507336645 to "outer".
.
Thanks!
22017-07-21 13:49:11 UTCMr Massri Hi Zeev,
Thanks for your attention. I've missed that.
12017-07-21 08:23:42 UTCzstadler Hi,
.
The "tracktype" tag is not mandatory. If the value is unknown, then just don't add it.
.
Thanks!
12017-07-21 08:07:29 UTCzstadler Hi Alon,
.
Thanks for mapping this trail!
.
Could you add some details on this trail. For example, who created it ("operator" tag).
.
You may also want to see if a "colour" tag is needed for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491449927
.
Also, the purpose of http://www.open...
12017-07-12 23:41:49 UTCzstadler Please note that a combination of highway=footway with bicycle=designated is suspicious.
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66490692/history
12017-07-12 23:39:36 UTCzstadler Please note that you have removed the "highway" tag from way 398965036 rather than changing it.
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398965036/history
22017-07-13 07:43:03 UTCMosh Feu Updated. Thanks!
12017-06-28 08:21:23 UTCzstadler Are you sure this section is part of the blue trail?
.
As far as I remember, and as the map previously had, the junction of the blue and red trails is at
.
http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#!/?s=CuzxYXtCfR
22017-06-28 08:36:36 UTChyperhard Well, I was physically there in May, and saw the new marking...
12017-06-18 11:39:19 UTCSanniu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/806891495 - מעלה כנען or גבעת שושנה?
22017-06-18 11:52:07 UTCzstadler Fixed.
גבעת שושנה is a different node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/835702317
12017-06-15 09:55:43 UTCSanniu http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2909990493 - should it be marked as peak or similar?
22017-06-15 11:05:50 UTCzstadler Frankly, I do not remember.
12017-04-30 10:47:35 UTCSafwatHalaby Now crossing are tagged with "highway=path, footway=crossing". Doesn't seem right.
22017-05-02 16:52:12 UTCzstadler I'll look at this later on.
32017-05-02 18:19:53 UTCSafwatHalaby It appears the convention for crossing is a way with "highway=footway, footway=crossing, cycling=yes", the crossing is terminated by two "highway=crossing" nodes at each side of the street.
42017-05-02 18:23:27 UTCSafwatHalaby It appears many people don't put the "cycling=yes" part. I wonder if it messes with nav apps. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:footway%3Dcrossing#does_footway.3Dcrossing_imply_cycling.3Dyes.3F
52017-05-07 05:38:42 UTCSafwatHalaby Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48466184
62017-05-07 05:48:13 UTCSafwatHalaby My bulk edit wasn't perfect. some *=designated paths shouldn't have been changed.
72017-05-07 05:50:48 UTCSafwatHalaby Nevermind the last comment. If there's a footway=*, then it should be highway=footway.
82017-05-07 05:59:15 UTCSafwatHalaby Correction: when there was an already cycling=* tag present, I shouldn't have touched it.
12017-05-02 16:17:27 UTCtdctdctdc Hi zstadler,
Today I walked the "blue" track from Mihmoret to Givat Olga, which you created in this changeset. I did not see any blue markings on the ground, not once. Are you sure this track should really be "blue"?
22017-05-02 16:49:40 UTCzstadler As you can see, this was mapped almost 3 years ago. I'm quite sure that there were trail marks at the time.
.
I also don't see an announcement of a trail cancelation at
.
https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=428
12017-04-10 08:23:56 UTCzstadler Hello samely,

Rawabi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1336647687
is clearly not one of "the largest settlements within a territory" for the Western Bank, as defined by the OSM wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity
.
Please keep its place=town tag.
12017-04-07 21:24:28 UTCzstadler What is the source of the name of the viewpoint?
12017-04-07 21:21:11 UTCzstadler It looks like a mistake. Please check.
12017-04-04 11:29:38 UTCzstadler Hello,

I don't think there is a need to put "no u turn" restrictions on entrances to roundabouts, such as
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4128134/history
12017-04-04 10:08:59 UTCzstadler Each of the following restrictions
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3922180
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3946274
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3922106
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3987490
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3987487
http://www.openstreetmap.org/...
12017-04-04 10:05:24 UTCzstadler The "only_straight_on" restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4069851
is missing a "from" and "to" ways.
12017-04-04 10:04:13 UTCzstadler The "only_straight_on" restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2855819
is missing a "from" and "to" ways.
12017-04-04 09:56:45 UTCzstadler The "no_u_turn" restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4593925 is missing a "from" and "to" ways.
12017-04-04 09:30:32 UTCzstadler The "only_straight_on" restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3202063 is missing a "from" and "to" ways.
12017-04-04 09:30:03 UTCzstadler The "only_straight_on" restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3189825 is missing a "from" and "to" ways.
12017-04-04 09:26:55 UTCzstadler The u-turn restriction http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5496364 is missing a "from" and "to" way.
12017-04-04 09:15:08 UTCzstadler The "no left turn" restriction at
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5187767
.
is missing the "from" and "to" definitions.
22017-04-04 14:19:10 UTCIlanride22 Thank you. I deleted this restriction.
12017-04-04 08:00:18 UTCzstadler Pharan or Faran is not a valid pronunciation in Hebrew
12017-04-04 07:33:14 UTCzstadler השם המקורי, כפר הריף, היה קרוב יותר לשם הנכון, כפר הרי"ף. הכפר נקרא על שמו של הרי"ף הוא הרב יצחק אלפסי, מגדולי הפוסקים, שחי בעיר פס שבמרוקו בימי הביניים.
.
https://he.wiki...
12017-04-03 15:04:12 UTCzstadler Hi,

It looks like way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484377558
does not have any tags. What is it?
22017-04-04 06:47:01 UTCSanniu Thanks, fixed
12017-04-03 15:02:17 UTCzstadler Hi,

You forgot the building tags
12017-04-03 08:33:42 UTCzstadler Hi Dror,

In OSM Israel we try map only trails and singles that were created by some authority, such as,
.
הוועדה לשבילי ישראל
.
KKL, regional councils, etc.
.
Who is the creator of this route: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7128114 ?
12017-04-01 19:48:45 UTCSanniu The gaps in mineral transporter are strange, why some parts are not tagged as railway?
22017-04-02 05:44:39 UTCzstadler Fixed. The mineral transporter is not a railway. It's a man_made=goods_conveyor. Some parts were not corrected in this edit.
12017-03-26 08:47:18 UTCSanniu Way: 398455276 have no tags, is it path?
22017-03-26 12:04:56 UTCzstadler Fixed. Thanks!
32017-03-29 14:37:22 UTCzstadler Based on your initiative, I've created a query that finds all the ways in Israel that have no tags and are not a member of a relation. I've fixed what I knew and sent messages to most others.
.
If you want, the query is available at
.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nTf
.
You can change the initial...
12017-03-27 11:22:26 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98483620,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98483754
have no tags. What are they?
22017-03-27 12:47:57 UTCNautic Im Luftbid sehe ich Schienen entlang der Ladekante, auf denen sich die Hafenkräne bewegen.
32017-03-27 13:58:59 UTCzstadler Would you be willing to tag them?
42017-03-29 14:29:11 UTCzstadler I've posted a question at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:man_made%3Dcrane#Mapping_of_crane_rails
on how to tag them.
12017-03-26 13:15:25 UTCzstadler Ways 380785433, 320355764 have no tags. What are they?
22017-03-26 13:32:31 UTCzstadler Correction: Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380785433
has no tags. what is it?
32017-03-27 13:33:13 UTCzstadler Correction (again...): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320355764
has no tags. What is it?
12017-02-08 10:38:54 UTCSanniu Way: 421491738 is it footway?
22017-03-26 13:15:55 UTCzstadler Ways 380785433, 421491738 have no tags. What are they?
32017-03-26 13:33:26 UTCzstadler Correction: Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380785433
has no tags. what is it?
42017-03-27 13:32:15 UTCzstadler Correction (again...): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421491738
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-26 13:16:55 UTCzstadler Ways 380785433, 154456997 have no tags. What are they?
22017-03-27 13:27:08 UTCzstadler Correction: Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154456997
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:25:44 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263080921,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263080923,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263080924,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263080925,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263080927
have no tags. What are they?
12017-01-30 11:51:52 UTCSanniu The way with no tags, should it be road? Also it not connected to road network, so not-navigatable.
22017-03-27 13:19:58 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373980740
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:18:54 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306666021,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306666022,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306666023,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306666024,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306666025,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306666026,
http://www.openstreetmap...
12017-03-27 13:18:10 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161063675
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:17:40 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177272545
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:17:12 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181222489
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:16:47 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277532829
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:16:23 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288759540
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:15:57 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290832910
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:15:35 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292171423
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:15:04 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355535358
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:14:44 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360399411
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 13:14:23 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362067897
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:57:43 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372981958
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:57:12 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377204638
has no tags. What is it?
12017-02-08 09:00:01 UTCSanniu Way: 389765969 have no tag. What it should be?
22017-03-27 12:56:37 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389765969
has no tags. What is it?
Is it duplicate way that should be deleted?
12017-03-27 12:55:41 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395891458
has no tags. What is it?
12016-11-14 08:56:01 UTCSanniu You have ways_without_tags on 398412603, should it be building?
22017-03-27 12:55:21 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398412603
has no tags. What is it?
12017-01-24 10:10:21 UTCSanniu Way: 399525181 Missing tag or role on way
22017-03-27 12:54:57 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399525181
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:54:29 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408009662
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:53:52 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408876804
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:53:33 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418363838
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:52:39 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423654143
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:51:17 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462662631
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:50:31 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442387866,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442387867
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 12:44:50 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362697453,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362697454
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 12:44:18 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456197605
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:43:44 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287509133
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:43:15 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383468600
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:42:31 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462101209
has no tags. What is it?
12016-09-24 12:46:46 UTCSomeoneElse There's still a real problem with the way that you are importing this data. To take just one example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440033477 should clearly join adjacent features, yet you have just uploaded it without any editing or review.
The poor-quality way that you are approaching this dat...
22017-03-27 12:39:52 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440025026,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027573,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027593,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027617,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027622,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440027680,
http://www.openstreetmap...
12017-03-27 12:31:16 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388137336
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:28:42 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122155453
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-28 19:29:44 UTCeric22 Fixed
12017-03-27 12:28:15 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124599945
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-28 19:32:06 UTCeric22 Fixed
12017-03-27 12:27:42 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170665413
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-28 19:41:43 UTCeric22 Made it into a wadi. There might also be a trail there, but I don't know so I didn't put it.
12017-03-27 12:27:07 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185369907,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/185369910
have no tags. What are they?
22017-03-28 19:45:11 UTCeric22 Fixed
12017-03-27 12:26:27 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405370550
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-28 19:46:48 UTCeric22 Fixed
12017-03-27 10:45:56 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297576741
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-27 11:49:48 UTCPeda Actually I have no idea but I suppose it's a highway=residential. I have no idea as this way had been remote-mapped via an HOT task two years ago.
32017-03-27 12:21:33 UTCzstadler May I ask that you either tag it as highway=residential or delete it?
42017-03-27 13:10:36 UTCPeda Sure, done.
12017-03-27 12:14:02 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305244950,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305244951
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 12:13:28 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305403804
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:12:01 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306667232
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:11:34 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431327542
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:10:58 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300603354
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:08:51 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240518273
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:06:33 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289829023
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:06:06 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289911738
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 12:05:16 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289968001,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289968004
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 12:00:35 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120510225
has no tags. What is it?
Is it a duplicate that should be deleted?
12017-03-27 11:59:57 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249856034
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:59:26 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353268547
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:58:51 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224518820,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224518821
have no tags. What are they?
12017-01-30 10:33:03 UTCSanniu Way: 226193984 - should it be the wall too?
22017-03-27 11:58:15 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226193984
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:56:18 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247361965
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:54:58 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258781298,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258781299
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 11:53:13 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481866071
has no tags. What is it? Is it a duplicate that should be deleted?
12017-03-27 11:49:48 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481352864
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:47:39 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377839956
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:46:45 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37147466
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:46:24 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37155972,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37156957
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 11:45:49 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37157395
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:45:12 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37159079
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:44:25 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37162086
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:43:37 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37163473
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:37:19 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37166408
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:36:54 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37168171
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:36:20 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37168580,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37168680
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 11:34:25 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37172640
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:33:00 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37173394
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:25:12 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119090226
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:23:33 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237109065
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:23:09 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372292527
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:21:42 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264855502,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264855504
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 11:20:27 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322200744
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:19:40 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414211324
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-27 13:16:46 UTCMax-- Just a tack that I forgot to tag from bing satellite image when I mapped some stuff in the area earlier this year. Fixed it, thanks for spotting it!
12017-03-27 11:17:44 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296786463,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296786465
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 11:16:37 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119847,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119849,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119850,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119852
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 11:13:12 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474621383,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474621384,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474621385
have no tags. What are they?
Are they duplicates?
12017-03-27 11:12:01 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358489946
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:11:28 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445888463
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:10:47 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445888463
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:09:57 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310129005
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:09:18 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257129239
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:07:49 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433799546
has no tags and is not part of any relation. What is it?
12017-03-27 11:04:13 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457956961
has no tags and is not part of any relation. What is it?
12017-01-30 10:58:03 UTCSanniu Way: 316353843 - should it be path?
22017-03-27 11:03:10 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316353840,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316353841,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316353842,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316353843,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316353844,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316353845
have no tags. What are th...
12017-03-27 11:01:40 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316364669,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316364686,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316364687,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316364689,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316364691,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316364697
have no tags. What are th...
12017-03-27 11:00:04 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478996069
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:59:23 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361665576
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:58:58 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361665576
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:58:29 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290631142
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:57:58 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415446379
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:57:25 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273011194
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:56:52 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331784526
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:56:22 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366115224
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:55:50 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325764826
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:55:22 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311461949
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-27 11:02:33 UTCnomisonson Changed it, according to bing satellite maps i think it is a greenhouse
12017-03-27 10:54:52 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/413842850
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:54:15 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336702665,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336702666,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336702667
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:52:38 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454849735,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454849736
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:50:40 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417211696
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:50:02 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196217406,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196217411,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196217413
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:48:51 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196674418
has no tags. What is it?

12017-03-27 10:48:22 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198290631
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:47:52 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198388709
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:47:27 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220845269
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:46:45 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255793980
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:43:24 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258371857,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258371859,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258371861,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258371863,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258371868,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258371872
have no tags. What are th...
12017-03-27 10:41:25 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329125,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329130,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329131,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329132
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:40:30 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124774199
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:39:51 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284377235
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:39:08 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320939573,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320939575
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:38:29 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454352197
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:33:17 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417192410,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/417192412
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:32:31 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243565311
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:26:09 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236069540
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:25:42 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121396141
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:24:34 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467385450
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:23:45 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256031091
has no tags. What is it?
12017-01-22 09:07:27 UTCSanniu Way: 317407960 should be footpath?
22017-03-27 10:21:36 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317407960
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:21:05 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219048420
has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-27 12:49:59 UTCTzafrir Cohen A building. Just one of the buildings there. Nothing special.
12017-03-27 10:20:38 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448471313
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:20:02 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306683751
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:19:20 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306918661,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306918663,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306918667,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306918668,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306918675,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306918677,
http://www.openstreetmap...
12017-03-27 10:17:41 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306812282,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306812284
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:17:06 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306935393
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:16:17 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307015322,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307015323
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:15:19 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306684827
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:14:44 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306989940,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306989941
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:13:49 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306990070
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:12:40 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176663355
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:12:05 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278180740
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:10:28 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350624090
has no tags. What is it?
12017-01-24 10:53:38 UTCSanniu Way: 453049615 have no tags
22017-03-27 10:09:14 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453049615
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:07:39 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205897391
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:06:54 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205948945
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:05:37 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323137314,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323139303,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323139796
have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-27 10:04:15 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395860072
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 10:03:25 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307661118
has no tags. What is it?
12017-01-24 11:06:22 UTCSanniu Way: 229036528 - no tags - what is it?
22017-01-24 15:24:54 UTCYnhockey Fixed.
32017-03-27 10:02:38 UTCzstadler Apparently, it was not fixed.
.
Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229036528
still has no tags.
12017-03-27 10:00:57 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293403513
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 09:38:36 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307002762
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 09:37:35 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306771982
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 09:31:41 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306771982
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 09:31:16 UTCzstadler Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306813281,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306813282,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306813283
have no tags. What are they?
12016-12-18 10:48:15 UTCSanniu Please add footpath tag to new way.
Also, if you adding Cyrillic street-name in address, add Cyrillic name to street itself
22017-03-27 09:09:12 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460280155
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-27 09:07:56 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388029672
has no tags. What is it?
12017-03-26 13:14:24 UTCzstadler Way 380785433 has no tags. What is it?
22017-03-26 13:32:00 UTCzstadler Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380785433
has no tags. what is it?
12017-03-26 13:17:20 UTCzstadler Ways 380785433, 125600261 have no tags. What are they?
12017-02-08 09:10:06 UTCSanniu Way: 449855015 - should it be part of emergency road or it's a footway only?
22017-03-26 13:16:28 UTCzstadler Ways 380785433, 449855015 have no tags. What are they?
12017-03-21 06:17:12 UTCzstadler You may have not noticed, but there was already a peak fro Mt. Eitan which also has height info, and a viewpoint tag:
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/961528265
.
Now there is a duplication.
22017-03-21 07:42:10 UTCzstadler Also, the information, copied from Wikipadia, is incorrect. Mt. Eitan is not a National Park, according to the Nature and Parks Authority (רשות הטבע והגנים)
12017-03-13 19:05:51 UTCzstadler Hi Shmulik,

This edit created a Y-shaped green trail at
.
http://israelhiking.osm.org.il/#/17/31.4319/35.3166
.
One of the forks should not be green...
.
Thanks,
Zeev
12017-03-13 18:38:20 UTCzstadler Hi Shmulik,
.
As a result of this edit, there are two parallel blue roads at the bottom (south) of Yair Ascend.
.
When I was there 2 years ago, the way you coloured blue
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291520176
.
was washed away and a detour was created.
.
Have you been there lately?...
12017-03-02 19:17:48 UTCzstadler The red trail
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199721998#map=15/30.5504/35.1087
.
was replaced by a straight line...
Do you need help restoring it?
12017-02-27 14:54:20 UTCSanniu Way 388398875 was residential, why it untagged now?
22017-02-27 16:33:14 UTCzstadler That change was a JOSM usage mistake, and it's fixed now.
32017-02-27 21:33:23 UTCSanniu Thanks
12017-01-03 13:19:07 UTCzstadler Hello e330,
.
Please clarify if the object you have created are real.
.
For example, I visited the viewpoint location and found no viewpoint.
.
Also, it is not likely to have a travel agency in the middle of the desert track.
.
Thanks,
Zeev
22017-02-27 12:40:11 UTCzstadler This changeset was reverted by changeset 45783103
12017-02-22 07:30:41 UTCzstadler Dear angys,
.
Your edit of Gaza and Tel-Aviv-Yafo introduced errors in existing name tags.
.
You changed the name:ru from the correct equivalent of "Tel-Aviv-Yafo" to "Tel-Aviv". Moreover, alt_name:ru was already set to "Tel-Aviv".
.
In Gaza you changed the corre...
12017-02-10 07:53:22 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi zstadler, could you please fix "d"="d" tag.
You inserted it at node/1166158561
Thanks, Alex
22017-02-10 14:34:26 UTCzstadler Fixed. Thanks for the comment!
12017-01-03 08:49:49 UTCSanniu משצק:יק=נחל יתיר
22017-01-03 09:02:55 UTCzstadler Corrected. Thanks!
12016-12-30 09:01:33 UTCzstadler Hello LDVD,
.
While updating the woodland at
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/33.03991/35.23461
.
the nearby track was distorted, because a common node was moved.
12016-12-28 15:16:51 UTCzstadler Hello BMM994,

In this edit, there are 3 new ways without any tags. See:
.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=35.77473&lat=33.15145&zoom=14&overlays=ways_without_tags
.
It looks like incomplete mapping of fences. Could you look at them?
.
Thanks,
.
Zeev

12016-12-21 18:55:32 UTCzstadler Hi Eliyak,

This relation had no country-level tags.

It is useful in cleaning up OSM data using Overpass Turbo.

Zeev
22017-06-04 07:52:21 UTCSafwatHalaby It is also super useful for automated edits, and generic overpass queries for statistics and so on.
12016-12-21 09:32:18 UTCzstadler Hi Eric,

This change introduced an error in the Area B multipolygon:
.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=35.20144&lat=32.41343&zoom=16&overlays=touching_rings,ways
.
As a result of this, Area B is longer shown on the Israel Hiking and Biking maps.
.
It looks lik...
22016-12-21 10:07:21 UTCeric22 I made this change in an effort to reduce or eliminate the shapes with "errors" on OSM Inspector, to make it easier to spot genuine information errors. Now that I know that this particular change is a problem for the Israel Hiking map, I won't touch it again.
32016-12-21 13:21:15 UTCzstadler Thanks!

It seems like OSM inspector still complained about "touching rings" after your edit. Maybe it would complain no matter what we do with this X-shaped geometry...
42016-12-21 13:59:22 UTCeric22 Yes, that is my conclusion too.
52016-12-21 17:53:37 UTCzstadler By the way, OSM Inspector says that "touching rings" is not necessarily an error...
12016-07-25 07:40:50 UTCpoornibadrinath Hi Wisams,
You have created two castles, with names that seems like personal names. Can you please explain what you were trying to map? Or whether you added castle tags by mistake? For more reference on where the "historic=castle" is used, please refer http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik...
22016-12-02 09:25:41 UTCzstadler The name of one castle was later changed to "Castello Di Wisam Shamroukh", however no such castles exist.
12016-12-02 05:30:27 UTCzstadler Dear sivan00,

What is the source of the changes done to the blue trail south of Manot:
.
http://strava.github.io/iD/#background=MAPNIK&map=16.88/35.19636/33.03618
.
The new version seems to be less accurate than the original, GPS-based version.
.
My experience is that aerial imagery is...
12016-11-22 20:48:57 UTCzstadler This multipolygon includes both Israel and Palestine, not just "Israel inside the green line"
12016-11-15 12:07:10 UTCSanniu Reverse roundabout on way 112976546, don't think we have such in Israel
22016-11-16 07:52:05 UTCzstadler I've only added a roundabout tag.
The way direction and the oneway tag were set in changeset 8131512.
.
However, from the patterns of car movement as seen in the Rehovot GIS orthophoto - http://v3.gis-net.co.il/gisnet3/rechovot/?citycode=8400 - it looks like these are not necessarily one way roa...
32016-11-16 10:18:37 UTCSanniu It still normal roundabout, somewhat abused for parking, also locals short-cutting it, will fix direction.
42016-11-16 19:58:09 UTCzstadler Can you please check if there is any roundabout or one way traffic sign there.
Otherwise, it would be legal to drive around in both clockwise and counterclockwise directions
12016-10-19 08:44:37 UTCzstadler Hello,

I'm not sure this qualifies as an archaeological_site because the archaeological exhibits shown in this garden were not originally from there.
.
Similarly, a museum is not tagged as an archaeological_site when it has archaeological exhibits.
22016-10-23 13:24:30 UTCIlanride22 What do you suggest to do instead? According to the wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=archaeological%20site?uselang=en) what you are writing isn't explicit from the text.
32016-10-25 18:42:57 UTCzstadler As far as I understand, this is an exhibition of archeological findings.
I therefore suggest the tourism=museum tag without a building=yes tag.
.
I also wonder if it is worth mapping, as this exhibition is closed to the general public. In a way, it is not much different than a private art collect...
12016-10-25 08:47:48 UTCzstadler Thanks for the update!
.
Can you check a couple of zig-zags at:
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448774461#map=17/30.57435/34.87690
.
and
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448774461#map=19/30.55884/34.85667
12016-09-16 13:35:26 UTCzstadler Hi WillRock41,

It seems like there is a discrepancy about the inter-city highway classification on the Israel OSM wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Inter-city_Roads_-_Guidelines

On one hand it says "First rule for numbered roads: The category is determined by the ...
22016-10-09 14:21:42 UTCzstadler Hello WillRock41,

There was no response from you and you have been editing since my previous comment.

Unless there is a response in another week, I will assume you do not object to me reverting the highway classification of Hwy 5 and similar blue-signed highways to a "motorway" and t...
32016-10-11 10:20:49 UTCWillRock41 I think that the road standards should determine the highway classification

some parts of highway 5 have sidewalks and some have narrow shoulders
42016-10-11 11:17:23 UTCzstadler Highway classification is about road importance - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
.
Looking at the final proposal
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17256
in the discussion that led to the decision on the highway tagging, I see that It's the road sign color that was ...
12016-09-04 17:55:47 UTCzstadler Hello Yoni,

Welcome to the OSM contributors community, and congratulations on the edits you've done

I'd like to let you know that the OSM convention is to use a the locally used language in the "name" tags. In Israel it means Hebrew, and Arabic in some places.

In [this map](http:/...
22016-10-09 14:24:16 UTCzstadler Hello Yoni,

Since there was no response and no editin activity on your part, I will go ahead and fix the name tagsin the Nir David area.

Best regards,
Zeev
12016-09-04 19:08:25 UTCzstadler Hello mapeditor999,

I believe the removal of the construction tags was premature.
According to the wiki

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#start_date_and_opening_date

the construction tag needs to be used until the opening of the railway to the public.
\...
22016-09-04 20:02:35 UTCanonymous_gushdan_mapper I don't see where on this wiki page it says that the track is still considered "under construction" if it is not open for passengers. Israel has a bunch of railway branches which are not open for passengers, yet not mapped differently than ones which are open for passengers.

The tracks ...
32016-09-04 20:09:43 UTCanonymous_gushdan_mapper Also note that for hikers and such using the map, having the rails *not* marked as "under construction" is probably better: when a railway is under construction you don't expect trains to run on it, so you might feel like you can just cross it wherever you want. However, this track already...
42016-09-04 21:35:17 UTCzstadler I think you have made several good points. Reading the wiki again, it is not so clear as I though.
Most important, IMO, is that you say trains are running on the tracks, which I was not aware of.
Thanks,
Zeev
12016-09-04 19:13:35 UTCzstadler !!!תודה
12016-09-04 16:57:14 UTCzstadler Hello Aharon,

Thanks for updating the OSM map.

The OSM name tag is expected to be in the name used locally.

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization

Thanks,
Zeev
12016-07-08 10:21:52 UTCzstadler It looks like you have mapped more than 7000 walls in and around Battir, as can be seen on Overpass Turbo : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/hc8

Based on Bing images and the shape of the walls, it looks like most, if not all, of the walls are agricultural retaining walls.

If so, according to the wi...
22016-07-19 17:52:56 UTCzstadler In a few days, 2 weeks after my previous message I'm planning to change the tags to retaining wall.
If you have any objections, please let me know.
32016-09-01 08:38:35 UTCSomeoneElse @zstadler Thanks for helping to resolve the mess here!
42016-09-02 22:22:28 UTCzstadler @SomeoneElse Thanks for noticing. However, there is still a long way to go in this area....
12016-08-27 11:53:20 UTCzstadler שלום זיו,

האם בכוונה שינית את צבע החלק עליון של השביל משחור לאדום
?

בנוסף, השם בעברית צריך להרשם כרגיל, ולא בהיפוך אותיות.

תודה,
זאב
22016-08-27 13:15:40 UTCziv2102 היי זאב,
להבנתי שני החלקים של השביל בדרוג אדום - תיקנתי את הכיתוב ההפוך
תודה
זיו
32016-08-27 15:35:04 UTCzstadler הי זיו,

תג הצבע מציין את צבע סימון השבילים, לא את קושי הרכיבה.

לקושי הרכיבה יש תגים אחרים שאני מכיר פחות.

תודה,
זאב
42016-08-27 17:18:52 UTCvalleyofdawn הי זיו וברוך הבא ל osm.
לתייג את רמות הקושי במפת האופניים צריך להשתמש בתגית mtb:scale.
0 ירוק
1 כחול
2 או 3 אדום
4 או 5 שחור
6 לא רכיב. מסומן כשביל רגלי.
גיא
52016-08-28 05:37:57 UTCzstadler תודה גיא,

אגב, את ההגדרה המלאה של
mtb:scale
אפשר לקרוא ב
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale#mtb:scale.3D0-6
62016-08-28 15:06:33 UTCzstadler הי זיו,

אני רואה שגם שינית את סוג הדרך ל
cycleway
סוג זה התקבע אצל רוכבי האופניים לציון שבילים עירוניים/סלולים
להבנתי השביל מיועד להולכי רגל ולרוכבי אופניים ולכן הוא ...
12016-07-20 08:53:00 UTCzstadler The tagging of this area is somewhat unclear. If this is the final shape of the building, then the tags need to be "building=construction" and the construction tag need to hold the future value of the building tag. For example "construction=commercial" or "construction=yes&q...
22016-08-16 07:50:23 UTCzstadler Since there was no response, I will assume this is not the shape of the proposed building and correct the tags accordingly.
12016-08-16 07:20:13 UTCzstadler Hi,

Please note that when creating new trail, you also need to create a new relation.
The relation has the operator and network tags, not way such as
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433278942.
12016-08-06 14:14:48 UTCzstadler Hello ENSG Battir,

The deletions in this changeset are mostly for elements created by ENSG Battir, but they also include several unclear deletion to ways created by others. For example, hiking trails north of the railroad and segments of a proposed highway.
If this was by mistake, please let me ...
12016-07-27 07:43:05 UTCzstadler Hello Anatoly,

Are these two parallel paths?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217749974

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369282636

Thank You

Zeev

22016-08-08 13:13:14 UTCanatoly77g Yes. Two-way traffic for cows, I guess.
12016-07-24 00:52:48 UTCEzekielT Why did you make Palestine become the West Bank?
22016-07-24 00:54:57 UTCEzekielT Or was it another editor?
32016-07-24 00:55:28 UTCEzekielT I can't find out cause history is "taking too long to retrieve".
42016-07-24 07:15:04 UTCzstadler No, I did not change the name tag.

The full tag history of relation 1703814 is available at http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1703814

It looks like this relation is undergoing a new dispute or "edit war" - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes. The wiki clearl...
12016-07-12 17:24:16 UTCzstadler Who is the owner of this marks?
ITC, KKL, Haifa Wadies, or unknown?
22016-07-13 10:48:02 UTCWadisTrail סימון שביל ואדי ורדיה נעשה ע"י מתנדבי עמותת ירוק בלב, אך למיטב ידיעתנו עיריית חיפה אחראית באופן בלעדי לכל תחום השיפוט שלה
32016-07-14 06:13:55 UTCzstadler בהוספת שביל מסומן יש להוסיף גם
relation
עם הפרטים שלו, כמו שקיים לשביל הואדיות
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3734116

כאן צריך
network=lwn
כי זהו שביל מקומי. בשני המקרים יוצר השביל הוא...
42016-07-19 17:45:03 UTCzstadler I've created the required relation in changeset 40874697
12016-07-18 05:40:23 UTCzstadler Hi,

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed says: "The way to tag planned features is to use the main tag (Key, e.g. highway, railway, amenity, aeroway, ...) and add proposed as value. Then you create another tag proposed=* with x being the <value you usually would put on the main...
12016-07-17 13:15:43 UTCzstadler I believe the removal of the constraction tags was premature. According to the wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#start_date_and_opening_date
the construction tag needs to be used until the opening of the railway.
As of now, the most eastern operational rail...
12016-07-15 20:47:56 UTCzstadler Thanks for translating the two Hebrew names to Arabic!
Please note that "name:ar" is the tag for Arabic names, just like the Hebrew name is "name:he". The "name" tag is used for the local name - Hebrew.
12016-07-15 16:19:55 UTCzstadler Hi,

You probably don't know, but the official OSM tag for color using British spelling - "colour".

I also understand you have mapped two section of a regional walking and bicycle network - "Derech Halev". For more information on how to complete the mapping with relations, p...
12016-06-28 12:45:31 UTCzstadler Dear BMM994,

Is there indeed a street called "Ha'Nahash" (the snake) in Nahariyya?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73173705/history
12016-05-23 21:23:57 UTCzstadler Dear Marten,

Was there any special reason to split the boundary of the Nahal Dalton Nature Reserve into 2 separate ways?

Usually, boundaries do not need to interact with traisl or roads and they can cross one another even without creating a junction.

Best regards,
Zeev

22016-05-31 19:24:24 UTCMarten2300 Dear Zeev,
I only noticed your message now, To be honest I don't now how this happend. I did not split the bounderie on purpose. I did add a trail in this area. So there is no reason at all to spit this bounderie.

Kind regards,
Marten
12016-05-10 05:25:17 UTCzstadler Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the boundary and for fixing my tagging error.

Nature reserves' boundaries are a sensitive issue for hikers, as visitors are required to comply with certain restrictions, and the boundaries are not always clearly marked "on the ground". We therefore want to ke...
22016-05-10 16:16:58 UTCFvGordon I only corrected the typing of the word "boundary" and replaced type=multipolygon by type=boundary because in the wiki at "Relation:multipolygon" I found that "type=multipolygon" is deprecated for boundaries. On 2016-03-31 you changed it back to the wrong "type=mul...
32016-05-10 17:05:04 UTCzstadler My intention is only to restore the original shape, at the resolution provided by the authorities.

As for the tagging of the relation, I'm using "type=multipolygon" because as far as I understand, type=boundary is applicable only for boundary=administrative and the relation is boundary=...
42016-05-20 08:51:00 UTCzstadler I've reconsidered comment about restoring the original shape, and I agree with you. The length of the section simplified in this changeset is about 6 meters, and the simplification done in this changeset is appropriate.
Thank you for your feedback,
Zeev
12016-05-10 19:43:10 UTCzstadler bahnpirat,
In changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39226685 I've made updates to mapping you did in this changeset.

I would appreciate if you could review the changes, as I'm not familiar with power lines mapping.
Zeev
12016-05-10 14:25:27 UTCzstadler Hi,
This changeset modifies the boundary of a nature reserve - http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4726674

Nature reserves' boundaries are a sensitive issue for hikers, as visitors are required to comply with certain restrictions, and the boundaries are not always clearly marked "on the g...
12016-05-09 18:29:45 UTCzstadler Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and we try to keep them according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserves proclamations.

Is the change in the boundary of Caesarea National Park [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395559964] based on any approved land plan (תב"ע)?

...
12016-05-04 09:11:46 UTCzstadler Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and we try to keep them according to the approved land plans and Nature Reserves proclamations.

Is the change in the boundary of Har Amiad - “Em HaHita” Nature Reserve [way 358358670](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391782515) based on...
12016-05-03 15:05:54 UTCzstadler Nature reserve boundaries are a sensitive issue, and se try to keep them according to the approved land plans.

Is the change in way 358358670 - the nature reserve boundary around Harashim - based on any approved land plan (תב"ע)?

If so, can you please add its ID to the existing list i...
12016-04-27 18:14:45 UTCzstadler Thanks for adding green colour to way
146820042 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146820042)
Are you sure that it should all be green, or just until the junction with Ein Hatzeva field school?

If needed, you can cut a way in two and mark just the part that needs to change.
See http://forum.op...
12016-04-17 12:54:19 UTCzstadler Hi Denis,

Thanks for updating the OpenStreetMap map.

A viewpoint is used in mapping of a place for tourists and travelers.

It is probably not what you had in mind.

The name of the military base can be added to the area:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60263456

We also separate the...
12016-04-17 12:44:29 UTCzstadler Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap editing!

I understand the supermarket changed name from Mega BaIr to Victory.

In OSM we try to separate names according to the languages.

The "name" tag is used for the local language, "name:en" is for the name in English, and "name:h...
12016-04-17 12:18:04 UTCzstadler Hi,

Thanks for adding these two businesses to OSM.

It would be useful if you a tag, like (shop){http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop} or (office){http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office], to indicate the kind of business they do.

Also, the location is not very clear.

"...
12016-04-16 21:12:21 UTCzstadler Hi,

Recently, parts of the construction roads were opened for public use.

There are some differences between the original plan and the actual execution.

For example, the west roundabout at the Dvira junction is actually west of its planned location.

Is there a way to update the map accor...
12016-04-06 19:19:40 UTCzstadler Can you please clarify why the 4 buildings were replaced by multipolygons?
12016-04-06 17:53:06 UTCzstadler Dear Peda,

In this changeset you have removed the note on the "Jerusalem" name dispute

It looks like you did not notice that the resolution of the dispute was already violated and the node does has the banned "name" tag.

Please also consider restoring the note.
22016-04-06 21:13:57 UTCPeda Hi zstadler,

as I pointed out in a private mail too, this dispute can be seen as settled as there had not been edit wars for a long time and as the actual dispute is not visible anymore due to the license change back then (version 22-39 are missing). Due to the huge amount of name:xx tags, the no...
12016-03-06 13:36:28 UTCzstadler Is the red trail between A'aron and HaRofe streets an ITC (Israel Trails Committee) trail or was it created by some other organization?
22016-03-06 14:05:26 UTCWadisTrail This was done by another organization, supported by Yarok Balev NGO.

Tel. 053-530-6988
YarokBalevNGO@gmail.com
32016-03-06 15:05:32 UTCzstadler I have added all red segments to a new trail relation - https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6029783 with a "Yarok Balev" operator.
If you are using the save marking as ITC - red stripe between two white stripes, then the relation should also have the "osmc:symbol" tag set to ...
42016-03-06 16:31:13 UTCWadisTrail החלה"ט אינם מתירים סימון שבילים בשיטה שלהם, לבן-צבע-לבן, ולכן אנחנו מסמנים שבילים אך ורק בשני פסים.

השביל מרח' הרופא לסמטת אהרן הוא עם סימון בשטח של לבן-אדום.
12016-03-06 13:51:18 UTCzstadler It looks like the new way 401628991 is part of the Red ITC trail relation, biut it does not have a colour=red tag. Should it have that tag, or should it be removed from the relation?
zstadler has contributed to 364 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 625 comment(s)