Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-03-24 05:25:47 UTCnammala Hi logalvao,

The edit you have given for landuse=residential is not a valid one , the residential tag should be given for the buildings not this whole coverage. Could you please correct the edit. Check this wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

regards,
nammala
12017-03-24 05:11:39 UTCnammala Hi moraes19,

May I know the reason behind giving this tag, which is not a valid one . Could you please check it once.

regards,
nammala
22017-03-24 20:57:54 UTCmoraes19 Prezado nammala.
OK. Mudado para Jardim.
Obrigado.
moraes19.
12017-03-21 10:19:46 UTCnammala Hi Wilmer Osario,

May I know the reason behind changing this way to trunk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115769732.

Regards,
nammala
22017-03-22 11:07:54 UTCWilmer Osario This segment of road is a national road (In Venezuela called "Troncal") which connects the capital city of Delta Amacuro state (Tucupita) with the rest of the country
12017-03-21 06:45:11 UTCnammala Hi Jtfree,

The landuse industrial tag which you have given for the way 165498282 is incorrect. So, I went ahead and deleted the tag.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-20 18:19:22 UTCStrangerVP Hi nammala,
I noticed you deleted my changed. May I ask what was wrong with it? I started mapping just couple of days ago and would like to learn.
22017-03-21 04:02:46 UTCnammala Hi StrangerVP,

I have deleted only the area you have given without any tag, I just kept the node with the information. The area with no tag is not valid so I deleted it.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-20 11:21:15 UTCnammala The park is not correct tagging, it should be given as natural=wood. I went ahead and changed it
12017-03-20 11:20:41 UTCnammala Hi danzilla,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Please make sure you add valuable data to the map. OSM is the real map of the world. Don't add fantasy data, The park you added doesn't make much sense.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-20 09:51:12 UTCnammala Hi Justin Exprimesesopinions,

May I know the source of adding the POI's . Could you please let me know about adding these POI's

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-20 09:15:04 UTCnammala Hi lks2511,

The way you edited the park is going over the highways and it is not a good practice. Please don't do bad stuff on the map.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-20 09:02:57 UTCnammala Hi alemm,

Dont make the map vandalized by adding water=lake over the buildings which is not inappropriate. Make sure you add valuable data, please don't repeat it again.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-17 10:13:08 UTCnammala Hi DrSatanX666,

Please dont vandalize the map by editing fake data , Make sure you add valid data.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-17 10:05:06 UTCnammala Hi DrSatanX666,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world make sure you add valuable data not fantasy data and vandalizing the map. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset. Please don't repeat doing this kind of edits.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-17 09:31:37 UTCnammala Hi dlibby24,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The building tag doesn't require for the leisure place.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-17 05:35:14 UTCnammala Hi metalcruedude,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I cant see a building in the imagery, could you please confirm is there any change in the ground.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-16 08:44:12 UTCnammala Hi 300game,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap(OSM). The edits you have made seems good in some case and other looks inappropriate like editing a lake over a lake and the beach tag you have been giving is not a valid editing in OSM. OSM is the real map of the world make sure to...
12017-03-16 06:36:16 UTCnammala Hi fmcfad01,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Make sure you add valuable data not fantasy data. The park in that area doesn't make sense.

regards,
nammala
22017-03-16 06:46:50 UTCnammala Sorry, I bought back the changeset while looking into Mapbox Satellite Imagery, Make sure you add the imagery source properly
12017-03-15 10:38:29 UTCnammala Hi missdenisebee,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Make sure if you edit the edits should not overlap with other ways , for example, the parks you have edited seemed to have interacted with the roads which is not a good practice. Let me know if you need anything regardi...
12017-03-15 09:27:09 UTCnammala Hi wajiw casey,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world , the data we add should be ground truth. Make sure we add valuable data to OSM. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-15 06:43:14 UTCnammala Hi freckless123,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The park and the non tagged area you have added seems inappropriate. Make sure you add valuable data on the map.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-15 06:27:57 UTCnammala Hi timchin,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The buildings needs some orthogonalized and make sure you tag the swimming pools as `leisure=swimming_pool` not `natural=water`. I have made corrections please make sure to tag properly.

Let me know if you need anything.

Rega...
12017-03-15 05:48:37 UTCnammala Hi johndon928,

Make sure you add valuable data to OSM, the park which is not on the ground seems inappropriate. Please add valuable data to the OSM.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-15 04:24:59 UTCnammala Hi Villodie,

May I know the reason behind adding these many landuse residential tags in an single area which is not correct way of tagging https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential should be given to bigger area not like small regions. Could you please clean up your data.

...
22017-03-18 12:58:30 UTCmuralito nammala: He is probably adding the "parcelario" (allotments).
It would be useful if each "parcela" (allotment) have it's own data, for example, address data.

Hola Villodie:

Las parcelas serian utiles cada una con su respectiva direccion. Dividirlas como estan hasta ahora no tiene demasiado se...
12017-03-15 04:00:06 UTCnammala Hi Villodie,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding empty nodes which doesn't give any information on the map. OpenStreetMap is the real world of the map, the data we add should be ground truth and useful. Please do add data which is valuable.
...
22017-03-18 12:51:04 UTCmuralito Hola Villodie:

Si esto es una importacion de datos pon una referencia a la documentacion de la misma.

Para toda importacion hay ciertos pasos a seguir. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Avisa si precisas ayuda.
12017-03-09 06:53:57 UTCnammala Hi oizumi,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. make sure you don't add test data to the map. Please add valuable data since OSM is the real map of the world.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 22:48:20 UTCmaraf24 Takie wandalizmy nie będą tolerowane.
22017-03-07 04:11:43 UTCnammala Hi maraf24,

Do you think the edits were wrong. Could you please get back the edits if they are valid to be on Map.

Czy uważasz, że wprowadzone zmiany były błędne. Czy mógłbyś wrócić do zmiany, jeśli są one ważne, aby być na mapie.

Regards,
nammala
32017-03-07 08:14:23 UTCmaraf24 I will revert this changeset soon.
42017-03-07 10:02:16 UTCnammala Great Thanks maraf24
12017-03-07 06:12:43 UTCnammala Hi engineer2009,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The `name:en` tag is only used when we give english names not other languages . Use multilingual naming for name tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names.
Let us know if you need anything.

regards,...
12017-03-07 06:06:49 UTCnammala Hi angys,

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the real map of the world. The data we add should be ground truth not the in valid data. The name tag you have added seems inappropriate. I went ahead and deleted the tag. Please make sure to add valid data.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping

R...
12017-03-06 10:27:58 UTCnammala Hi StevenChun,

The name tag you have given as `sidewalks` seems inappropriate. Make sure not to add inappropriate data , OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the real map of the world. the data should be ground truth.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 10:20:06 UTCnammala Hi StryFay,

welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth. Make sure you don't add inappropriate data and also no personal information.
Let us know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
namma...
12017-03-06 07:25:01 UTCnammala Hi Mustafa Sami,

Could you please confirm the tags and the names you have added. Are they are valid data.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 05:27:17 UTCnammala Hi Nuting Like a good Nut,

May I know the reason behind the source of adding the road name.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 05:23:11 UTCnammala Hi Nuting Like a good Nut,

Make sure the tracing of building is proper and please don't add personal information on the map.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 05:21:12 UTCnammala Removed the name tag for the building
12017-03-06 05:20:10 UTCnammala Hi Nuting Like a good Nut,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth. The landuse=residential and the name tags you have added seems inappropriate . I went ahead and deleted the inappropriate data. ...
12017-03-06 05:14:32 UTCnammala Hi aNut,

Make sure you add proper data to the map.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 05:13:31 UTCnammala Deleted the area tag, Make sure to add valuable data to the map.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 05:11:59 UTCnammala Hi aNut,

Make sure you don't add personal information in the OpenStreetMap.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-06 05:08:18 UTCnammala Hi aNut,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world. The data we add should be ground truth and valuable. The landuse residential and the name tags for all the buildings seems inappropriate. I went ahead and deleted the inappropriate edits. Make s...
12017-03-03 07:52:12 UTCnammala Hi tatang rusdayat,

welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add in OSM should be ground truth. Make sure you add valuable data to OSM and not fantasy data which is inappropriate and if you continue doing bad stuff, Will Complai...
12017-03-03 06:25:53 UTCnammala May I know the reason behind deleting the valid data which is on the map. Make sure you don't delete the data again.
12017-03-03 06:04:48 UTCnammala Hi Stefano Carlone,

May I know the reason behind deleting the valid data , I have brought back the deletions you have made. OpenStreetMap is the map of the world , don't delete the data .

regards,
nammala
22017-03-03 16:40:08 UTCAlecs01 Reverted
12017-03-02 11:47:50 UTCnammala Could you please confirm the edit you have made
12017-03-02 11:47:22 UTCnammala i deleted the edit
12017-03-02 11:46:22 UTCnammala I deleted the edit
12017-03-02 11:42:57 UTCnammala deleted the edit
12017-03-02 11:30:13 UTCnammala Hi Stefano Carlone,

I reverted your changeset.
12017-03-02 11:28:55 UTCnammala Hi Stefano Carlone,

Please don't delete valuable data on the map. Otherwise I should be complaining to OpenStreetMap Data Working Group (DWG). I am reverting your changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-02 11:21:32 UTCnammala Hi Stefano Carlone,

welcome and thanks to OpenStreetMap (OSM), The edit you have made is not a restaurent it should be tagged as `leisure=swimming_pool`. I have corrected the tag. Please make sure you add valuable data to the map.

Regards,
nammala
12017-03-02 10:49:02 UTCnammala HI Stefano Carlone,

May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings which exists in the Bing imagery. Could you please confirm the edits you have made.

regards,
nammala
22017-03-03 16:42:30 UTCAlecs01 Reverted
12017-03-02 10:16:16 UTCnammala Hi Marina Kudryavceva,

Make sure you add valid classification for highway. `highway=unvalid` is not a proper tag. Please follow the tagging scheme while tagging the roads https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway.

regards,
nammala
12017-03-02 09:59:13 UTCnammala Hi Namita Kaishwar,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world. The data we add in OSM should be ground truth and not fantasy mapping which is not on the ground. I have seen your edits which are not appropriate, make sure you add valuable data not...
12017-03-02 09:43:46 UTCnammala Hi alberetete,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The buildings=apartments you have edited seems inappropriate, the buildings should be traced properly the edits you made has been overlapping the ways and touching the nodes which is not a good practice. Please clean up the buil...
12017-03-02 09:21:57 UTCnammala Hi Thyais Meade,

Could you please confirm the source of adding this school, which is not visible in Bing imagery.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-28 06:09:42 UTCnammala Hi Solvarg,

Could you please add a tag for the name you have given.

regards,
nammala
12017-02-24 23:17:48 UTCaharvey What's that untagged area you added? What are you trying to map here?
22017-02-28 05:57:43 UTCnammala Removed the untagged ways aharvey.
32017-02-28 05:59:00 UTCnammala Hi lufyx,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world . Please do add data which is on the ground .
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-27 09:14:53 UTCnammala Hi Theoketos333,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems unrealistic and doesn't seem to have on the ground. Please don't add fantasy data on the map. OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-27 07:51:56 UTCnammala Hi Guardo545,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. the tag landuse=quarry` is not valid. could you please confirm what was the edit you want to make.

regards,
nammala
12017-02-27 06:04:31 UTCnammala Hi Σευειτ,

Please dont add personal information on the map.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-27 05:52:44 UTCnammala Hi Waqar Aziz Raja,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made with office-government and the name tags seems suspicious with alpha-numeric names. Could you please confirm the edits you made. Please do add valuable data to the map.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-27 05:42:35 UTCnammala Hi Klnn7575,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems like tagging issues and also in the middle of the parking sites and also which is not on the ground. Could you please confirm the edits you have made.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-24 06:39:52 UTCnammala Hi ahzx22,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The reservoir which you have added is not on the Map. OpenStreetMap is the map of the world and please add valuable data .

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-23 06:48:56 UTCnammala Hi MP84,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The Parks which you have added doesn't look on the ground. OpenStreetMap is a crowdsourced project, the data we add should be ground truth and on the ground. Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping. I went ahead and made th...
22017-02-23 18:33:29 UTCMP84 Hey the are little garden spots, Its kind of like a small greenspace in NYC. Kinda common actually. I didnt know how to code them, only green space in OSM is called park. Anyways to clasify them better?

32017-02-24 03:43:39 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back. You can refer to this wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass for tagging those. But parks doesn't make sense.

Regards,
nammala
42017-02-24 16:53:03 UTCMP84 OK i put garden instead. I didnt know you can type in a value instead of using presets!
12017-02-23 08:11:15 UTCnammala Hi Liam Piper,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The natural=yes tag is not valid, it should be given as `natural=reef` (wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dreef). I am correcting the edits.

Regards,
nammala
22017-02-24 19:50:05 UTCVerdy_p way 282484195 still has natural=yes that incorrectly replaced the previous correct value natural=reef
32017-02-24 20:06:11 UTCVerdy_p Note also that this the way for this reef is also used as a boundary line. If the reef is emerging, the way referenced by the boundary should still be natural=coastline.

In that case you'll need to create a one-member relation including that closed coastline way to tag the relation also as a natu...
42017-02-24 20:16:14 UTCVerdy_p So i looked at aerial images, and it is clearly a submerged reef (and should not be a coastline (this makes doubts for including it in land boundaries (the 12 miles maritime boundary is elsewhere and enclose all islands and reefs, it starts normally from the coastline excluding reefs)
52017-02-24 20:33:41 UTCVerdy_p So I restored the natural=reef (should it still be part of boundaries ? I doubt this matches the definition of baselines across bays, that normally connect two points of actual land with a straight segment at a limited distance from the coastline, generally not more than about 50-100 meters from it)
12017-02-23 07:01:52 UTCnammala Hi Ibrar Hussain,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The artwork you have given seems to be in the centre of the road. Could you please confirm and change if required.

regards,
nammala
12017-02-23 01:58:43 UTCCarnildo Please don't add fictional content to the map.
22017-02-23 06:10:40 UTCnammala Carnildo, Great you have cleaned up the data
12017-02-23 04:23:13 UTCnammala Hi Jayadeva,

Welcome and Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the roads which exists in the Imagery. OpenStreetMap is the map of the world , the data added should be very valuable . Could you please confirm the deletion you have made.

Regards,
nammal...
22017-02-23 04:54:51 UTCJayadeva Hi nammala,
Thanks for your concern and it is good thing that some one observing the changes in small time compared to google. I'm happy to bring some more changes to openstreetmap. This deleted route is a only walk path and it is private and not permanent walk path. This field owner can modify thi...
32017-02-23 05:23:30 UTCnammala Hi Jayadeva,

It is great that you got back , Since OpenStreetMap is a crowdsourced project and it is not great to delete other work without any proper reason and cause. So, as per your message it is still existing so it is not good to delete , instead you can add `access=private` tag as you are s...
12017-02-21 12:15:21 UTCMapeiro Why did you do remove them all!?

Just because each invididual pharmacy the same value in ther name and name:pt fields? But they had different hames between them.

Please undo that changeset. It doesn't make sense to me.
22017-02-21 12:19:45 UTCnammala Thanks for the clarification. Got back the edits http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46273194
32017-02-21 12:41:55 UTCMapeiro Thanks!
12017-02-21 05:22:15 UTCnammala Hi Fonchy,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed that you have been some buildings and also some buildings with `area=yes` tag . May I know the reason behind doing this. I also observed one user who is doing this kind of mapping activity like giving `area=yes` to building...
12017-02-21 04:30:56 UTCnammala Hi julio osorio,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The `area=yes` tag is not valid for buildings. The buildings should be given http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-21 04:16:46 UTCnammala Hi Fonchy,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Noticed a lot of buildings were deleted. May I know the reason deleting the buildings. Could you please confirm the deletions you have made.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-20 04:06:00 UTCnammala Hi ninjaslayer461,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-17 06:39:13 UTCnammala Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from `town` -> `village` of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/415155951/history. Can you please mention the source.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-17 05:48:10 UTCnammala Hi sw2393,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits in the changeset like waterbody (469255467) and the national park with a relation doesn't make proper data which is not on the ground. Make sure you add ground truth data rather than adding fantasy data. I am going ahead a...
12017-02-15 05:55:55 UTCnammala Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from town -> village. Could you please confirm the change.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-15 04:07:44 UTCnammala Hi user204938,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the imagery source you have been using is open to use or not. Is it legal to use http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ . Since we should not use proprietary sources. Could you please confirm.

환영합니다...
12017-02-14 05:34:33 UTCnammala Hi Nesim,

The edit you have made for the change in the `place` tag from city to town . But as the wikipedia says it is a district https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ata%C5%9Fehir. Could you please confirm the change.

Happy Mapping

Regards,
nammala

22017-02-14 10:36:32 UTCNesim It is referred to as the Town of Turkey.
32017-02-14 11:09:41 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back Nesim
42017-02-14 11:17:03 UTCkatpatuka Up to now place=district hasn't been used anywhere in Turkey ;) One could consider starting to use it for the district relations (ilçe) and set place=town for the admin centres (node). Turkish Wikipedia articles describing districts usually do not distinguish between the district center and surroun...
12017-02-14 07:34:17 UTCnammala Hi BesfortGuri,

May I know the reason behind changing the `place` tag from town -> city . Which is resembling as town in the wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ka%C3%A7anik.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-14 06:36:04 UTCnammala Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the name tags to the way -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/415156304/history. Also the source of changing.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-14 06:17:28 UTCnammala Hi Something B,

The `name:en` tag you have provided for the way -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232537150/history#map=18/44.96644/35.26266 seems inappropriate as the tag `nudism=yes` is already mentioned and I am going ahead and deleting the tag.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-14 06:06:28 UTCnammala Hi orangelemonjelly,

May I know the reason behind changing the place tag from town to village for the node -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/415158163/history.

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-28 04:43:19 UTCnammala Hi NormanNorman,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The Water body you added doesn't seem appropriate. So I went ahead and deleted the changeset. Let us know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
22017-02-04 04:08:28 UTCVerdy_p It really seems that there's some water there, possibly the result of temporary flooding after some heavy rains.
Don't take imagery as a proof of non-existence: snapshots displayed on Bing are frequently old (more than 4 years ago) even if they are released very recently.
Given the size of this wa...
32017-02-04 04:13:56 UTCVerdy_p In fact I think that the addition of the swamp was accurate, even when I look at Bing: there are many missing ponds in this area, most of them surrounded by trees, but clearly visible, and connected by drains.
On Bing they appear are dark (almost black) area, and you can easily distinguish borders ...
42017-02-06 04:05:50 UTCnammala Hi Verdy_p,

Thanks for getting back, The user is new to the OSM and he has only 1 edit and I commented on the changeset one month ago and he didn't get back for the clarification and the edit was also not that appropriate like he drew a square box for the pond which is not precise. As you said th...
52017-02-06 04:17:51 UTCVerdy_p small edits by new comers are not bad by definition. In this case this was the addition of a 4-nodes way and a correct tag, and your false comment says that you don't see it in Bing when I perfectly see the swmap in Bing imagery, provided you zoom in to distinguish it clearly from the surrounding tr...
62017-02-06 04:24:25 UTCnammala I also cross checked with other imageries and seems the water body exists. I went ahead and resolved the reversion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45845176. My bad I haven't compared with other imageries and the Bing is not that clear .
12017-02-03 06:19:23 UTCnammala Hi 포고고고,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems intentionally okay you have been deleting some bad stuff on the map. But the footways you have added doesn't have good alignment or precision. I am deleting the edits . Make sure you add data wit...
12017-02-02 06:41:45 UTCnammala Hi dElEtE4EvEr,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems incorrect make sure you add valuable data on map. I am going ahead and deleting the edits you have made.

Regards,
nammala
12017-02-02 06:26:27 UTCnammala HI iyszxqandar,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have made seems inappropriate. OSM is the real map of the world, Please add data which is on ground. I am going ahead and deleting your changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-27 06:38:43 UTCnammala Hi donpedro1980,

You have added park but in the imagery it doesn't seem to be park, Could you please confirm.

Regards,
nammala
22017-02-01 17:37:36 UTCPaul Johnson There's not a park here.
32017-02-02 04:18:43 UTCnammala Thanks Paul Johnson for getting back and deleting the change
42017-02-02 06:46:31 UTCPaul Johnson No problem.
12017-02-01 06:02:16 UTCnammala Hi Adnin Annas,

May I know the reason behind deleting the road which exists in the Imagery. I bought it back. Could you please let know whats the actual reason

Regards
nammala
12017-01-31 04:18:57 UTCnammala Hi Stretch Longfellow,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The ways you have deleted May I know they doesn't exist now or is there any construction work going on. Could you confirm whats the reason behind.

Regards,
nammal
22017-01-31 13:57:49 UTCStretch Longfellow Construction work at this interchange is complete in converting to a diverging diamond interchange. I live in the area and have confirmed.
32017-02-01 03:44:40 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back

Happy Mapping
12017-01-31 07:04:07 UTCnammala Hi mllefoo,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpemStreetMap (OSM). The tag you have given is not used for this purpose. Please go through this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow for the usage. Please do add valuable data on the map.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-31 06:32:27 UTCnammala Hi Imeverlasting2,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have made seems inappropriate and the park and footway doesn't make any sense. Make sure OSM is real map of the world and we should add ground truth data on the map. Let me know if you need anything. I de...
12017-01-04 21:10:46 UTCgrouper Welcome to OSM! I'm curious - why would hunting stands be located on road centerlines?
22017-01-31 06:24:18 UTCnammala Hi Steven Santiago,

Based on the above comment made by grouper, the hunting_stands doesn't seems appropriate in the centre of the road. I am going ahead and deleting all of these.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-21 03:45:10 UTCemulsi Welcome to OSM. It looks like you uploaded some personal notes (in multiple changesets) to the public database. Can you please explain your abbreviations. If you were trying to add house numbers, I recommend this page on Addressing:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
22017-01-31 06:07:46 UTCnammala Hi emulsi,

Whats the next action here. Can we go ahead and revert the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-31 06:01:25 UTCnammala Hi Jigair37,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The attraction tags you added seems inappropriate and make sure you add valuable data on the map.
I have reverted your changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-31 05:43:54 UTCnammala Hi Patrick Deardeuff,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). May I know the source of adding this park and footway, Are you sure about this. It would be great if you can share the source of adding these.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-31 04:12:24 UTCnammala Hi RyanofArabia,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). May I know the reason behind deleting water bodies which exists in the imagery.

Regards,
nammala
22017-02-16 17:38:39 UTCRyanofArabia Because they aren't bodies of water. They are shadows from the cliffs. I hike this canyon all the time. There are no bodies of water
12017-01-27 06:42:35 UTCnammala Hi Landon Oliver,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have made seems inappropriate. Make sure you had valuable ground truth data on the Map not fictional data. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
22017-01-27 14:15:38 UTCLandon Oliver Not sure what you mean. This park has been there for has long has I have been alive. Which is 37 years. it has undergone many many upgrades. Why dont you just hope over to google maps and look for yourself!!!
32017-01-30 04:23:47 UTCnammala Hi Landon Oliver, Thanks for getting back , if you have mentioned it was made based on the local knowledge in the changeset comment it would be fine . And the point to be noted is in OpenStreetMap (OSM) we don't use any proprietary sources like google etc. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyrigh...
42017-01-30 04:26:01 UTCnammala http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ
52017-01-30 13:38:10 UTCLandon Oliver Google maps is free to use to make a reference. I never said you had to use there code. I wanted to show you that I was not "lying" about what I am editing. So, if you don't mind im going to put the walk path back on there. Thanks
62017-01-31 03:43:40 UTCnammala If it is real on the ground, you can go ahead and make the edit. And one point to make clear is I never said you `Lied` . Make sure you keep the comment properly to avoid such issues
12017-01-30 07:36:22 UTCnammala Hi hiji cathry,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have added seems inappropriate in tagging. The Market should not be given attraction tags. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tourism. I am reverting your changeset and let me know if you need anything....
12017-01-30 05:52:34 UTCnammala Hi 조준영대새끼다,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The intention of your mapping seems good but the edits seems fishy like adding footways in the middle of the roads and also not connecting them properly. Overall, some of them looks nice but some are not proper on th...
12017-01-27 06:59:42 UTCnammala Hi Jigair37,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The Attractions you have added seems appropriate and make sure that OpenStreetMap is based on ground truth and don't add fantasy data on Map. I went ahead and reverted your changeset. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,\...
22017-01-28 05:26:46 UTCJigair37 I don't know how this works. I'm just setting up a map for me to use, so u can keep reverting it and till I know this route I'll keep putting info I need on it.
Thanks
12017-01-27 06:49:01 UTCnammala Hi jordalini28,

There is already a bridge tag given to it. You edited a duplicate of it. So I went ahead and deleted the edit.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-27 06:34:14 UTCnammala Hi donpedro1980,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The Park and the footway you have added seems not present in the imagery and also OpenStreetMap (OSM) is based on real world map and every data should be ground truth. So, Please don't add fictional data. Let me know if you ne...
12017-01-27 06:29:19 UTCnammala Hi Brandon Oswalt,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The footways you have made seems not proper to the imagery. Make sure you add valuable information to the Map. Let me know if you need anything.

Cheers,
Nammala
12017-01-27 06:24:05 UTCnammala Hi John Soria,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made seems inappropriate and OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world which is based on ground truth data. So, I am going ahead and deleting the edits you have made. Please let me know if you need anything.\...
12017-01-25 06:39:44 UTCnammala Hi Diego Perona,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The village names you have given has inappropriate tag `office=government`. So I replaced all of them with `place=village` tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dvillage. Let me know if you need anything .

Regar...
12017-01-25 06:25:47 UTCnammala Hi mmclougherty,

Thanks for your interest in adding data to OpenStreetMap. The data you have added bus_stops doesn't make sense with the names you have provided. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-25 04:26:27 UTCnammala Hi scottypro63,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The buildings you deleted seems not in shape agree but can you please add those buildings again with proper shape. So that we can have valuable data on map. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-24 05:38:47 UTCnammala Hi Ema Wakeford,

The tourism tags which you have provided seems inappropriate. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
22017-01-24 22:24:09 UTCTheSwavu Some of these have already been reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44225111

I'd say you could safely revert all of the changesets.
32017-01-25 04:14:07 UTCnammala Ya saw that it was already been reverted by the community.

Cheers,
nammala
12017-01-24 04:49:23 UTCnammala Hi Squiddo,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The OSM is a crowd sourced project and every data we add should be ground truth and informative. So the footways you added seems inappropriate I am going ahead and deleting the footways.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-23 07:56:59 UTCnammala Hi Luce31V,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The information you have added seems very informative but some of yours edits look weird like adding bus_stops in the river. I partially deleted some of them. Make sure you add valuable information to OSM.

Happy Mapping.
...
12017-01-23 07:46:30 UTCnammala Hi Leito Benel,

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. The information you have added doesn't make sense. So I went ahead and reverted the changeset. OpenStreetMap is a crowd sourced project make it awesome by adding valuable information. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-21 07:18:23 UTCnammala Hi Monkeybird,

May I know the reason behind giving the name tag as `xtreme air` and let us know.

regards,
nammala
22017-01-22 20:00:19 UTCTheDutchMan13 It's been confirmed, here's the website
http://xtremeairparks.com/pecosroad
I moved the poi to the correct position.
32017-01-23 04:41:10 UTCnammala Thanks TheDutchMan13 for getting back and confirming :)
12017-01-12 05:53:00 UTCnammala Hi Villarriel,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The electronic shops which you have added doesn't make appropriate so I am reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-12 05:03:11 UTCnammala Hi GRawat006

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and lot of community members are involved in adding and improving the data which is ground truth and exists on the ground. The edits which you have made has been destructing the map . Please...
12017-01-10 05:45:34 UTCnammala Hi firepanda11,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Some of the footways created in this location doesn't seem appropriate. Could you please confirm the source of adding these because I am not seeing in the satellite Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
22017-01-10 07:03:13 UTCfirepanda11 I am the source. I happen to know this area very well. A lot of it is hidden by the building or trees.
32017-01-10 07:07:16 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back.

Happy Mapping.
42017-01-27 14:43:43 UTCmanoharuss I have deleted your mapped object. Please do not continue mapping for PokemonGO.
12017-01-06 07:11:01 UTCnammala Hi adam2099,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The footway you added seems proper but make sure that the ways get connected and ended properly. Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
12017-01-06 06:25:13 UTCnammala Hi pedroyoshio22,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind changing all the residential roads to footways which is inappropriate. I suggest you not to change the tagging system, you can go through this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway f...
22017-01-23 07:40:58 UTCgeohacker This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45388276 where the changeset comment is: reverting 44929866 with invalid footways
12017-01-05 06:19:27 UTCnammala Hi Ashryn,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is a crowd sourced project where it is called real map of the world, The data added should be in the ground truth. Please make sure that you add proper data to the map and maintain the awesomeness of OSM. I am going ahead ...
22017-01-06 00:00:15 UTCAshryn Hi Nammala,
I apologise for adding all the pokemon items and causing you more work - I read a reddit post that gave me the impression it was ok, and encouraged to map such virtual things. I did have a look around the site to see if i could find a layer or something to add virtual items to, but cou...
32017-01-06 03:53:47 UTCnammala Hi Ashryn,

Thanks for getting back. Apart from the pokemon stops and pokemon gyms all the edits of yours seems real world edits. Keep on adding real data to OSM and make the map awesome. Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Happy Mapping.

Cheers,
nammala
12017-01-05 12:39:12 UTCnammala Hi liaowang1989,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The footway you have added seemed overlapped with the highway which already exists, which is a bad way of editing . Could you please make the correction.

Regards,
nammala
22017-01-05 12:50:20 UTCliaowang1989 Hi Nammala

I added the sideway walk on Madioenstraat and Bonistraat where I live. Those two street are not highway, but accessible by both vehicles and pedestrians.

liaowang1989
32017-01-05 12:54:44 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back liaowang1989, the sidewalks you added are in the centre of the road overlapping with other road. Could you please check it and correct
12016-12-31 07:23:55 UTCnevw Please only add things that exist in the real world to the OpenStreetMap and not fantasy game items.
22017-01-05 06:37:19 UTCnammala With reference to the above comment, I am reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
32017-01-05 08:22:04 UTCnevw Thanks, there are a few more in the area too.
Overpass Turbo search: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kWN
Many of Ashryn edits are fine and generally to map new footways, but the Pokemon stuff needs to be deleted.
42017-01-05 08:35:18 UTCnevw mammala, let me know if you want me to delete the other Pokemon ones. I will check the footways and join to roadways where it looks appropriate, though I am not local to this area, and will need to use satellite data.
52017-01-05 08:35:35 UTCnammala Thanks nevw for bringing this up. I have deleted the bad stuff on map. Please feel free to remove the bad data which is on the map.
62017-01-05 08:38:15 UTCnevw Ok, thanks, I will fix the other bits in next few days.
72017-01-05 09:28:20 UTCnammala Happy Mapping
12017-01-05 06:41:43 UTCnammala Reverting the changeset as it makes no sense. Add data which is on the ground not fictional data.
12017-01-05 06:40:01 UTCnammala Reverting the changeset which not makes sense. Add data which is on the ground
12017-01-03 07:25:30 UTCnammala Hi velmyshanovnyi,

The edit you have made seems inappropriate. Please make sure not to do this bad stuff in the map. OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world with lot of quality data being added. Let us know if you need anything. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammal...
12017-01-03 05:04:24 UTCnammala Hi firepanda11,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits in the changeset seems inappropriate, there is no way that these many footways exists at single location. OpenStreetMap is a crowdsourcing project and every data we add should be relavent and proper. Could you please...
22017-01-03 05:25:06 UTCfirepanda11 I get it and I understand why you are upset with the changes I made but is there any chance you can let this just stay? You know my motives behind this already and this is in a rural area that nobody would notice.
32017-01-03 06:45:52 UTCnammala Hi firepanda11,

Thank you for your prompt response. OpenStreetMap OSM is a real map of the world were mappers around the globe are adding features that can be verified on the ground. The verification can happen through field surverys or through satellite imagery. OpenStreetMap follows the rule of...
12017-01-03 05:21:19 UTCnammala Hi firepanda11,

Following up from comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44719510. The edits seems inappropriate there is no way that these many footways exists. I am going ahead and deleting the data: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44862436. Please make sure that the data you a...
12016-10-26 03:47:47 UTCnammala Hi Yulia_Car,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting `natural=wood`.

Regards,
krishna
22016-12-29 20:00:43 UTCSomeoneElse Hi @nammala,
What are the planned next steps with this one?
Cheers,
Andy
32017-01-02 04:00:37 UTCnammala Hi Andy,

The user still didn't get back and there is no changes to the changeset. Would you like go ahead and revert the changeset.

Cheers,
nammala
12016-12-29 05:52:38 UTCnammala Hi Urba-Noyarey,

May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
22016-12-29 08:48:01 UTCUrba-Noyarey Bonjour,
Le secteur a évolué avec plus de bâtiments à l'Est et moins à l'Ouest. Vous pouvez observer ce changement sur http://geoportail.gouv.fr (plus récent que la vue aérienne OSM)
Hi,
This aera change with more building on East and less on West. More informations on http://geoportail.go...
32016-12-29 10:01:33 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back Urba Noyarey.

Happy Mapping
12016-12-27 04:35:57 UTCnammala Hi skyegod,

Thanks and contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding cricket pitch and football pitch in the Imagery. It seems to be inappropriate in the Map. Could you please confirm.

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-23 06:56:19 UTCnammala Hi tenderfiddles,

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind giving water=fountain which is not visible in the Imagery. Since it is a crowdsourced project make sure not to add any bad data to the map. Let us know if you need anything. I am going ahead and reverting the chan...
22016-12-24 16:27:37 UTCtenderfiddles Hi there, it's probably because that imagery is a couple years old... I took some pictures to show what I'm talking about, but I dont see a way to attach it...any thoughts?
32016-12-27 04:16:32 UTCnammala Hi tenderfiddles,

If the water fountain exists in the imagery you can go ahead and add saying the source correctly like survey or some ground truth something like that. So that it would have been appropriate. Let me know if you need anything

Happy Mapping

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-23 06:17:59 UTCnammala Hi Junkman08,

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edit seems inappropriate for adding the park I am going ahead and reverting the changeset. Let Us know if you need anything from us. Follow this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute.

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-23 05:56:11 UTCnammala Hi Roberto Savi,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edit of changing path to footway seems inappropriate . May I know the source of doing this. I am going ahead and bringing back the old edit. Let us know if you want anything from us.

Ragards,
nammala
12016-12-23 03:40:14 UTCnammala Hi _gnX_,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. It is an crowd source project and every data you add here is very valuable and make sure you do proper edits and not personal information. The way you have added is not valid and I am going ahead and reverting the changeset as it mak...
12016-12-22 07:08:13 UTCnammala Hi shibiinshibiin,

Welcome and Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems nice for some POI's and May I know the name tags you have been giving to `tourism=attraction` are proper. Could you please confirm.

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-21 07:27:44 UTCnammala Hi Chanman,

Could you please tell the reason behind adding the name tag as `The car`.

regards,
nammala
12016-12-21 07:25:21 UTCnammala Hi Jeremy Sweeny Wong,

The edit seems to be appropriate I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

regards,
nammala
12016-12-21 07:22:08 UTCnammala Hi Monkeybird,

The name tag you have given is not appropriate so I am going ahead and fixing the edit.

cheers,
nammala
12016-12-20 06:16:07 UTCnammala Hi Manuel Primicias,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding numbers to the name tag for `tourism=attraction` tags.

regards,
nammala
12016-12-12 06:30:05 UTCnammala Hi Attila194,

May I know the reason behind adding `tourism=attraction` tags to the buildings.

Regards,
nammala
22016-12-19 23:23:52 UTCluschi @nammala: next time please open a note if you find strange mappings in Europe.
Here are a lot of mapper they have local knowledge(and language) and they don't check changeset comments, because Attila194 use this combination on all his edits: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kLo
32016-12-20 04:16:08 UTCnammala @luschi Thanks for getting back and raising the point on this. From next time if I find any issue in Europe will leave both changeset comment and also note on this for the community to see and take action.

May I know the next action on this. Could you help coordinate with the Europe community an...
12016-12-19 04:20:18 UTCnammala Hi Jesse Baker,

May I know the reason behind adding names like 500,550 etc to the bus_stop.

Regards,
nammala
12016-12-01 03:45:09 UTCnammala Hi astra2,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding these benches randomly which doesn't seem appropriate. It would be great if you can share how you added these data.

Ragards,
nammala
12016-11-30 05:41:36 UTCnammala Hi carlo fornaciari,

May I know the reason of giving the highway names as `via Roma` , `via Mazzini` etc. Is that appropriate.

Regards,
nammala
12016-08-22 03:49:31 UTCJothirnadh Hello Silvio50,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The data you added in this changeset is not overlapping with the ground data. Due to the non-availability of the source or comment for this changeset, it's hard to understand the quality of the data. Can you please verify the data once ag...
22016-11-29 04:19:46 UTCnammala There is no response from the user . I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

32016-11-29 04:25:24 UTCnammala Oops it already been reverted by community.
42016-11-29 04:26:14 UTCJothirnadh This changeset is already reverted @nammala.
12016-11-29 04:12:49 UTCnammala Hi Silvio50,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made looks inappropriate in giving the names to the camp_sites. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
12016-11-27 06:44:54 UTCDavidKewley CountableRex89, you've done a lot of edits today that deleted a lot of objects. Why? Please respond ASAP. Thanks, David
22016-11-27 19:56:29 UTCpitscheplatsch one more: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43974956
32016-11-27 19:57:23 UTCpitscheplatsch and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43974760
42016-11-28 04:11:39 UTCnammala one more:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43974707
52016-11-28 07:20:58 UTCDavidKewley CountableRex89 has made 25 changesets, of which all but three were mostly deletions, with no evidence that the deletions are helpful. I've contacted the Data Working Group for help; let me know if you want any details.
62016-11-28 08:21:02 UTCnammala Great work @davidkewley
72016-11-28 11:18:07 UTCSomeoneElse These deletions have been reverted in a series of changesets up to and including https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44004466 . A couple of minor issues were spotted on the way - for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162317709/history has duplicate nodes with adjacent buildings, which i...
12016-11-24 05:56:51 UTCnammala Hi New England Skier 13,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting data on this changeset and also the roads.

Regards,
nammala
22016-11-24 15:54:26 UTCNew England Skier 13 I didn't intend to change any roads. My apologies if I did.
32016-11-25 03:49:14 UTCnammala May I know the source of this changeset. Because I am seeing roads not aligned to Imagery
42016-11-25 15:43:33 UTCNew England Skier 13 It looks fine with everything aligned to me. Changes are based on http://skisundown.com/Portals/0/trailmap_open.jpg
52016-11-28 05:52:41 UTCnammala ok. Thanks for getting back. Let me know if you need anything
12016-11-25 04:04:20 UTCnammala Hi myheat6,

May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings and amenities in this changeset.

regards,
nammala
22016-11-25 18:25:02 UTCmyheat6 Hi nammala, sorry this was a mistake. Please undo these changes.
32016-11-28 04:57:19 UTCnammala Fixed the changes
12016-11-25 04:00:58 UTCnammala Hi myheat6,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you have been deleting some buildings in this changeset. May I know the reason behind deleting those.

Regards,
nammala
22016-11-25 18:24:57 UTCmyheat6 Hi nammala, sorry this was a mistake. Please undo these changes.
32016-11-28 04:29:09 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back myheat6, Got back the changes. Let me know if you need anything.
12016-11-28 04:13:22 UTCnammala Hi CountableRex89,

May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
12016-11-28 04:05:29 UTCnammala Hi CountableRex89,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings which exists in the imagery.

Regards,
nammala
12016-11-24 05:10:20 UTCnammala Hi Bored,

May I know the reason behind deleting the roads which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
22016-11-25 03:57:05 UTCBored Hi nammala,
Certain counties come with driveways that are already in the TIGER data in the US. These driveways are frequently out of place, and are often for features that don't exist. Those are what I deleted.
32016-11-25 04:12:10 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back Bored.

Happy Mapping
12016-11-22 05:52:09 UTCnammala Hi Trieu Van,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems good but observed that you have been changing the neighborhood name to virus for so many places which seems inappropriate. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset to keep the data clear.

regards,
nammal...
12016-11-22 03:50:48 UTCnammala Hi AlyssaS,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your comment says update roads for zoning map, but May I know the reason behind deleting the roads .

regards,
nammala
12016-11-21 05:00:32 UTCnammala Hi Maximus Sayan,

May I know the reason and source for adding these names to the roads.

regards,
nammala
22016-11-21 11:43:23 UTCMaximusSayan its the real name from the province of quebec.

http://www.sepaq.com/rf/por/
32016-11-21 12:07:21 UTCnammala Thanks for getting back. It would be great if you can add it in the source when you upload to OpenStreetMap.

Regards,
nammala
12016-11-20 04:52:48 UTCMinh Nguyen This changeset added the wrong Wikidata entity for Yên Bình. Q8052180 is for a district (huyện), whereas Q10837974 is for that district’s capital town (thị trấn). I’ve clarified the Wikidata entities and also corrected the wikidata tag in changeset 43814653.
22016-11-21 04:21:10 UTCnammala Thanks Minh Nguyen for clarifying and correcting it
12016-11-09 10:14:29 UTCnammala Hi Angello04,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you are deleting a lot of information without any comment. Since OpenStreetMap is an crowdsourced data it is not fair deleting other work. May I know the reason behind doing this.

regards,
nammala
22016-11-18 18:25:00 UTCAlecs01 Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43774380
32016-11-21 04:18:45 UTCnammala Thanks @Alecs01for doing this :)
12016-08-31 03:50:24 UTCnammala Hi Andertxu_99,

Welocme and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the `highway=path` which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-10-11 15:09:42 UTCSomeoneElse @nammala Did you ever get an answer here? What's the next step?
32016-10-12 05:16:41 UTCnammala Hi SomeoneElse,

I haven't got the reply still now. I am thinking of going ahead and reverting the changeset as the next action.

cheers,
krishna
42016-11-12 12:31:01 UTCSomeoneElse If it still exists in the imagery, and there's been no reply, I'd restore it and add a note in case anyone local can add any more information.
52016-11-19 13:36:03 UTCSomeoneElse @nammala Do you want me to restore it and add a note, or are you going to?
62016-11-21 04:15:13 UTCnammala @someoneElse it would be great if you can do so with a note and also restoring the data
72016-11-23 18:36:31 UTCSomeoneElse Done. Changeset is http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43902702 , note is http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/793696
12016-11-16 04:01:44 UTCnammala Hi GidonW,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you have adding `curve_geometry` tags to the highways for the node, It is not good way of tagging unless and until there is a mark . So please don't add these tags.

cheers,
nammala
22016-11-16 13:17:42 UTCGidonW Hi,
I'd like to explain these tags -
I work for a company named Via, a ride-sharing transportation company.
We use OSM as one of our map data sources in order to navigate in areas
where we operate. One of the tags we use internally is "curve_geometry"
which allows us to identify nodes th...
32016-11-17 05:43:31 UTCnammala Hi GidonW,

Thanks for getting back. I really like the work you do using OSM. But the tagging system you have been following is inappropriate and that data should be on OpenStreetMap. Making OSM the best should be our motto. Hope you will stop tagging them.
Let me know if you need anything.

Re...
42016-11-17 05:52:26 UTCnammala Oops!! the data should not be on OpenStreetMap.
52016-11-17 05:59:16 UTCPlaneMad GidonW, there is nothing wrong with adding your own tags, but if its not discussed or documented, there is a high chance other mappers may remove them as being non useful. Maybe as a start, you could write a diary post explaining your rationale behind the tag and why it is useful to be on OSM.
12016-04-09 09:48:07 UTCSupaplex 中正預校哪個點真的能拖著露營車去露營嗎?
22016-04-09 10:10:09 UTCchliju 不能,我是新手,剛剛加入,不會操作,我想辦法,看怎麼改?謝謝
32016-04-09 10:21:23 UTCchliju 怎麼改?營區是軍營的意思啊!營地才是露營區吧?
42016-11-15 05:26:38 UTCnammala Deleted the bad edits
12016-11-02 12:04:40 UTCSupaplex 路中間的洗衣店?
22016-11-03 05:20:06 UTCchihchun 請問這些洗衣店的編號是什麼意義?
32016-11-15 05:10:34 UTCnammala Deleted the laundry POI's which seems inappropriate.
12016-10-26 03:56:19 UTCnammala Hi Rasheka,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting building which exists in the Imagery.

Regards,
nammala
22016-11-14 18:35:15 UTCscruss I've restored the building. Looks like an accidental deletion.

Rasheka - welcome to OSM! It's good to know there are other mappers locally.
32016-11-15 04:28:08 UTCnammala Thanks scruss
12016-06-26 06:00:19 UTCSupaplex 名稱都怪怪的?應該有中文名稱吧?
22016-06-27 10:49:26 UTCSupaplex 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯! 歡迎加入開放街圖,群眾共同參與,繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料,由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料,歡...
32016-06-30 15:30:20 UTCchihchun 此筆修改已經回退。http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40395300
42016-11-15 03:56:01 UTCnammala The edits seems to be bad by giving improper names and went ahead reverting the changeset.
12016-11-11 11:33:53 UTCnammala Hi zavalonz,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. Observed that you have dragged the building and POI. Make sure the edits looks good since it is a crowdsourced work. You can also follow the guides for editing buildings. https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-common-features/#build...
12016-11-09 04:31:46 UTCnammala Hi sushma v,

Welocme and glad that you are contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have your edits they are looking good but make sure that the roads don't overlap with the buildings. Let me know if you need anything.

cheers,
nammala
22016-11-12 08:37:19 UTCindigomc Hi sushma v
Can I add to that previous comment ? You've deleted some roads in this area and not replaced them. You've deleted others and redrawn them, but not added the names that were there originally. There may be good reason for some of this, but please check that you don't lose existing informa...
12016-11-08 04:03:22 UTCnammala Hi Tennesseer,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting buildings which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
nammala
22016-11-08 08:26:11 UTCTennesseer Hi nammala,
This is a construction site. These buildings appear on the imagery but were knock down. But I mistakenly erased some of them. A new version has been uploaded.
Best,
Tennesseer
32016-11-08 08:43:56 UTCnammala Thanks Tennesseer,

Happy Mapping :)

Regards,
nammala
12016-11-08 04:27:54 UTCnammala Hi Gnum,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting buildings.

cheers,
nammala
12016-11-08 04:20:29 UTCnammala Hi GNius,

Welocme and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings, leisure=pitch, service roads which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
nammala
22016-11-08 12:58:03 UTCGNius The buildings were torn down.
Currently there's a construction site
12016-10-26 03:38:56 UTCnammala Hi LBeidler,

May I know the reason behind deleting the roads.

regards,
nammala
22016-11-29 15:24:34 UTCSomeoneElse Hi nammala,
What are your planned next steps here?
Cheers,
Andy
12016-10-20 15:30:02 UTCDilys Why did you change the name of the Fishlake National Forest?
22016-10-21 05:31:00 UTCnammala Hi Dilys,

When I was working in fixing multi-polygon issues due to number of national parks present in area like Manti-La Sal National Forest, Fishlake National Forest and Dixie National Forest with are in complex relations. Thats the point I think I misplaced the name like.
I have seen the wik...
32016-10-21 10:21:29 UTCDilys Hi Nammala
Yeah, this is definitely Fishlake National Forest, please correct it asap. Since you work at Mapbox I trust you don't need my help ;-).
Dilys
42016-10-21 11:27:09 UTCnammala Hi Dilys,

Thanks for your valuable feedback. I have corrected it.
Happy Mapping!

cheers,
nammala
12016-09-26 04:14:31 UTCnammala Hi redneck rotolok,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
Krishna
12016-09-21 08:01:22 UTCnammala Hi rexzde,

Reverted changeset and added buildings tags to the area tags and removed duplicates.

cheers,
krishna
12016-09-21 07:57:08 UTCnammala Hi rexzde,

Reverted changeset and added building tags to the area tag and removed duplicate buildings.

cheers,
krishna
12016-09-21 07:48:57 UTCnammala Hi rexzde,

Reverted the changeset and added building tag to the area tag.

cheers,
krishna
12016-09-21 05:02:23 UTCnammala Hi rexzde,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting buildings which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-09-21 07:42:27 UTCnammala reverted and added buildings tags instead of area to the buildings.
12016-09-20 03:51:12 UTCnammala Hi donoterase,

May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings.

cheers,
krishna
22016-09-20 18:07:17 UTCdonoterase Hi,

I recently deleted the 3 buidings because they were destroyed.
The area was the former "Police office" that moved away in new buildings.

I can send a photo of this area if needed

Best regards,

donoterase
32016-09-21 03:29:23 UTCnammala Hi donoterase,

Thanks for coming back to us and confirming.

cheers,
krishna
12016-09-14 19:07:32 UTCrene78 134 empty attractions?
22016-09-18 18:23:23 UTCHerrZipp Definitely not. It was the first time that I logged in from Maps.me on my Android smartphone to edit a feature, and it seems as if all local changes I had done unintentionally before were added as well.

I'm not very familiar with editing Openstreetmap; is there a simple way for me to correct thos...
32016-09-18 18:26:03 UTCrene78 I reverted your changeset. Unfortunately the useful POI's, that you have created in this changeset have been deleted as well. I don't know how only revert certain elements. Sorry about that.
42016-09-20 03:43:16 UTCnammala Hi HerrZipp,
There were few other attractions left in the changeset. So reverted the changeset .

cheers,
krishna
12016-09-13 06:17:19 UTCnammala Hi Kwej,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-09-13 20:56:24 UTCKwej Hi Krishna,
these buildings were long time only ruins of pig farm. Before few weeks been demolished and now is here only several trees. Kwej
32016-09-14 03:46:40 UTCnammala Thanks Kwej :)
12016-09-09 04:13:21 UTCnammala Hi deffma,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. Your edits seems good and may i know the reason behind deleting haighway=tracks and waterways which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
Krishna
12016-09-02 06:04:39 UTCnammala Hi jUNKIEd,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting some buildings which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-09-02 11:43:41 UTCjUNKIEd Half of those buildings were torn down years ago. The last two in the group were torn down about a month ago.
12016-09-02 05:51:49 UTCnammala Hi Ranger444,

May I know the reason behind deleting `area=yes` tag .

cheers,
krishna
22016-09-02 14:24:19 UTCRanger444 There is no factual information in 'area=yes'. Everything could be an area. Area=yes won't even display on Open Street Map. If it's a neighborhood, tag as neighborhood, If it's a commercial area tag as commercial area, or whatever else. Thank you for the inquiry.
12016-09-01 05:34:31 UTCnammala Hi kmemmert,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting the bridges of the buildings and storage tanks which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-09-01 11:57:33 UTCmemmert Hi Krishna,
I am not aware that I deleted bridges. What I meant to delete is a railway track and other items which have been removed years ago. The whole site is currently going through an exciting change from a former concrete storage and shipping facility to private housing. Beside new apartment ...
12016-09-01 05:29:33 UTCnammala Hi Maurizio0661,

May I know the reason behind deleting buildings which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
12016-09-01 05:25:41 UTCnammala Hi Сергей Полянский,

May I know the reason behind deleting `landuse=residential` tags.

cheers,
krishna
12016-08-29 04:15:34 UTCnammala Hi Isaac Lalrinkima,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting tertiary road and residential area which exists in the Imagery.

cheers,
krishna
12016-08-26 04:04:47 UTCnammala Hi global system,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.May I know the reason behind deleting the farmlands which exists.

cheers,
krishna
22016-08-26 11:12:28 UTCglobal system Hello,
we are redoing this area, and was very poorly designed, will be remaking more correctly.
32016-08-26 12:44:01 UTCnammala Thanks

Happy mapping
12016-08-26 03:49:40 UTCnammala Hi Aseri,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems good but no need of multiple editions for the same building. I am going forward and reverting the changeset.
cheers,
krishna
12016-08-26 03:43:56 UTCnammala Hi Aseri,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edits seems good but no need of multiple editions for the same building. I am going forward and reverting the changeset.

cheers,
krishna
12016-08-24 04:16:54 UTCnammala Hi Amma2016,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits for adding tourism places doesn't have names relavent to that place. So going forward and reverting them.

cheers,
krishna
12016-08-24 04:00:06 UTCnammala Hi inzhrui,

Reverted the changeset due to the deletions of good edits.

cheers,
krishna
22016-08-24 22:29:44 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
12016-08-23 04:29:31 UTCnammala Hi Sabzevar,

Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting `landuse=residential` areas.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

cheers,
krishna


12016-08-23 04:10:46 UTCnammala Hi inzhrui,

May I know the reason behind deleting unclassified roads which exits in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-08-24 22:29:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
12016-08-23 04:01:53 UTCnammala Hi inzhrui,

May I know the reason behind deleting secondary roads which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-08-24 22:29:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
12016-08-23 04:01:21 UTCnammala Hi inzhrui,

May I know the reason behind deleting tertiary roads which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
22016-08-24 22:29:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
12016-08-23 03:42:06 UTCnammala Hi inzhrui,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions.. May I know the reason behind deleting the unclassified roads which exists in the imagery.

thanks,
krishna
22016-08-24 22:29:49 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41673567 where the changeset comment is: revert erroneous deletions and border edits between China and India
12016-08-19 03:39:33 UTCnammala Hi kirbert,

May I know the reason behind deleting the roads in the park.

Happy mapping,
cheers,
krishna

22016-08-19 08:34:33 UTCKirbert There's a lot of nonexistent roads on the Georgia map, so I delete a lot of roads. These didn't seem to exist in the satellite photos -- at least, not in the locations shown. If they are there but that well camouflaged, well, I apologize.
32016-08-23 04:00:47 UTCChetan_Gowda Looks like Kirbert deleted very old and bad TIGER highways which does not exists in Satellite photos. Not a problem because TIGER is not a exact source. It will differ a lot from the actual ground in some regions.
42016-08-23 04:10:38 UTCKirbert 95% of my editing is deletion, mainly that ridiculous camo paint job all over Georgia. If I see a road that's really there but just out of place, I'll move it. There are LOTS of roads -- especially service roads -- on the Georgia map that simply don't exist, though, shown going through corn fields...
12016-08-18 04:08:37 UTCnammala Hi pointseven,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. May I know the reason behind deleting the building as it exists in the Imagery.

Happy Mapping.
cheers,
krishna
22016-08-18 06:26:13 UTCpointseven That building does not exist anymore. There are new buildings on other locations. The satellite map layer "Orthophoto Flanders (c) AGIV" shows 1 new building and the construction of another building. Meanwhile the new buildings are finished and that old building is demolished.
12016-08-18 03:56:36 UTCnammala Hi VictorIE,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing . Great work on deleting the above edits there are another two left can you please delete the other stuff.

Happy Mapping.

cheers,
krishna
12016-08-02 07:41:41 UTCnammala Hi smija jolly,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. Your edits seems good may i know the reason for deleting buildings.

cheers,
krishna
12016-08-02 06:35:34 UTCnammala Hi Ashwin ap,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. I have gone through your edits and it looks good. But I found some issues were you were tagging the buildings as `area=yes` instead of `building=yes` in your changesets [1](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433111128), [2](https:...
12016-07-25 06:48:51 UTCnammala Hi Sandeep S Nair,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap , Your edits looks good but when are you editing the roads there is no need to keep so many nodes. And also follow the direction of the way.

cheers,
krishna
12016-07-20 06:38:09 UTCnammala Hi fredyaguirrevalencia,

welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. May I know the reason behind deleting this amenity=market_place . It exists in OSM check it out http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace.

cheers,
krishna
12016-07-20 06:28:00 UTCnammala Hi fredyaguirrevalencia,

I see a lot of nodes with no tags and improper meaning.
Reverting your changes
12016-07-19 11:30:04 UTCnammala Hi Tanini,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap , and thanks for contributing your edits looks good and the way you are editing buildings and tagging them are not appropriate and I will provide you with a tagging system in OpenStreetMap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building . And also follow this v...
12016-07-15 06:17:00 UTCnammala Hi stoni100,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap , May I know the reason behind deleting the buildings. Please don't delete the others stuff since OSM is a larger community.

cheers,
krishna
22016-07-15 07:28:20 UTCstoni100 Hello krishna,
"abgebrochen" is the german word for "tearing" or "breakaway" (just Leo has a lot of english translations)

There is no building any more :-)

regards
michael
32016-07-15 09:17:12 UTCnammala Hi stoni100,

Thank you so much :)

krishna
12016-07-15 06:40:34 UTCnammala Hi lologbn,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, May I know the reason behind deleting the roads which exists in the Bing imagery.

cheers,
krishna
12016-07-15 06:09:24 UTCnammala Hi kobrom,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap , May i Know the reason behind deleting the `landuse=residential` tag . Its a relavent tag in OSM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential. Please don't delete others stuff.

cheers,
krishna
12016-07-08 06:24:35 UTCnammala Hi bruno3955,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason why are you deleting the highway=track, Please don't do that because OpenStreetMap has so many users who are supporting so please don't delete their work.

cheers,
krishna
12016-07-08 05:59:34 UTCnammala Hi AdamLin,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap(OSM). Your edits look good and also don't delete without conforming them because OSM has several users. The road edits looks great but you need to tag the roads before uploading to OSM. You can follow the classification of road tagging by this ...
12016-07-07 06:02:54 UTCnammala Hi Xander1,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for contributing. Your edits looks good and the information provided is updated one but it is also creating duplicates. Please have a look at that.

cheers,
krishna
12016-07-05 06:40:28 UTCnammala Hi BOTP,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and the edits of yours looks good. Can you once check your changeset comment before uploading please.

Cheers,
krishna
12016-06-23 08:16:09 UTCnammala Hi LBeidler,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap , your edits looks fine. But may I know the reason why are you deleting the service roads which are edited by someone else. Please don't do that again.

cheers,
krishna
12016-06-20 06:25:54 UTCnammala Hi Dima041967,

Your edits look fine.. may I know the reason behind deleting the tanks here.

cheers,
krishna
12016-06-16 06:24:22 UTCnammala Hi hernani pacheco,

May i Know the reason why you are editing which doesnt exist on the imagery.Please don't do it again.

cheers,
krishna
12016-06-15 06:28:27 UTCnammala Hi MAAlin,
May I know what is the reason for deleting the roads. If you are not exact by the Bing imagery because you are editing in ID . I suggest you to edit using JOSM which can be more useful to swift the imagery between Bing and Mapbox satellite.
So, please don't delete the roads.
Cheers, \...
22016-06-24 23:15:52 UTCMintCondition Hey there,
It looks like its been 10 days since you were first contacted about these deletions... I don't see a reason for many of the major arteries to be deleted here. Please respond back with any additional information. Some of the major connections should be added back soon, Id like to revert t...
32016-07-06 13:11:00 UTCEzekielT Was this reverted? It probably should.
12016-06-15 06:25:09 UTCnammala Hi MAAlin,

May I know what is the reason for deleting the roads. If you are not exact by the Bing imagery because you are editing in ID . I suggest you to edit using JOSM which can be more useful to swift the imagery between Bing and Mapbox satellite.
So, please don't delete the roads.

Cheers...
22016-06-24 23:15:17 UTCMintCondition Hey there,

It looks like its been 10 days since you were first contacted about these deletions... I don't see a reason for many of the major arteries to be deleted here. Please respond back with any additional information. Some of the major connections should be added back soon, Id like to rever...
12016-05-27 17:29:57 UTCneuhausr I think using motorway_link for the new way you added is incorrect. These are more like service roads that are only to be used by authorized vehicles
22016-05-30 05:28:56 UTCnammala Thank you for your valuable feedback neuhausr. From next time I will make sure I dont repeat this again.
12016-04-26 06:30:36 UTCnammala Hey, @Arie de Graaf
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentatio...
22016-04-26 06:49:26 UTCArie de Graaf Hello Krishna,

Thanks for the information. I will not use it anymore.

Regards, Arie
32016-04-26 08:45:09 UTCnammala Thank you so much
Happy mapping

cheers,
krishna
42016-04-26 09:37:58 UTCArie de Graaf Hello krishna,

Do you know how I can remove the source from the change set? I tried it, but can not find a way.

Regards, Arie
52016-04-26 11:04:22 UTCDeanna Earley Can you confirm which data has been taken from Google?
This will stop us having to remove the entire changeset.

Thanks.
62016-04-26 11:05:23 UTCDeanna Earley You can't change the source once it's been uploaded, but you can remove any copyright infringing data that you've added and upload as a new changeset.
72016-04-26 11:15:08 UTCArie de Graaf Hello Deanna,

I did not take data from Google. I just looked at the situation of the road on Google Maps and draw the road into OSM.
82016-04-26 11:21:40 UTCDeanna Earley That is data.
Is this the only changeset you've sourced from Google?
92016-04-26 11:27:59 UTCArie de Graaf No, I just it in changeset:

38507069
38551563

And wil NEVER use it again! I promise.

Regards, Arie
102016-04-26 11:35:00 UTCDeanna Earley This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38884124.
112016-04-26 11:41:01 UTCDeanna Earley Thank you.
While the edits generally looked good and useful, we prefer to err on the side of caution with potentially copyright infringing data.
I would recommend updating the data in those 3 changesets again, using just your survey/GPS data.
Thanks
Deanna, DWG.
122016-04-26 12:23:53 UTCArie de Graaf Hallo Deanna,

I do not understand (my English is not so good). The roads look good now, but I still have to update? And how do I update? As you can see / read I am a beginner at OSM.
132016-04-26 12:33:44 UTCDeanna Earley Hello. I have just removed the changes you made in those 3 changesets. You can re do them again without Google as a source if you want.
142016-04-26 12:48:41 UTCArie de Graaf Hello Deanna,

Stupid me. I looked ad the situation (change set 38507069) and it was still there. I thought what I saw was what I made, but when I look now I see it is the older version, before my change set. I am learning every day still.

Thanks again.
12016-04-26 07:24:41 UTCnammala Hi Gulrukh,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.
Happy Mapping.
best,
krishna
12016-04-26 07:23:17 UTCnammala Hi Gulrukh,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.
Happy Mapping.
best,
krishna
12016-04-26 07:22:59 UTCnammala Hi Gulrukh,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.
Happy Mapping.
best,
krishna
12016-04-26 07:22:32 UTCnammala Hi Gulrukh,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap but the edits you are doing are from the google reference which is strictly prohibited. Please do not repeat.

Happy Mapping.

best,
krishna
12016-04-19 07:04:29 UTCnammala Hi Pakenhamin,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your building edits look great and fantastic but some of the residential roads are also given a tag building=yes , there is no need of adding building tags to the highways. Please ignore them and have a happy mapping further.

cheers,
kri...
22016-04-19 13:26:38 UTCPakenhamin My bad. I set the selection criteria wrong. I'm only interested in setting the "building = yes" tag to buildings. I'm still learning how to avoid non buildings.
32016-04-19 14:36:36 UTCnammala No issues @Pakenhamin, you can just revert the changeset to make things normal. To add 'building=yes' tag only for buildings you can create an inverse filter with "building=*". you can find more information of filters at https://www.mapbox.com/blog/2012-08-15-using-filters-josm/ . If you still face ...
42016-04-20 08:40:12 UTCPakenhamin Ok I need to know how to revert. I seem to have got the hang of adding building tags now. I'll revert and then put the proper changes in.
52016-04-20 13:30:24 UTCnammala Thank you
Happy Mapping
12016-04-13 06:14:25 UTCnammala Hi gormur,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great and the modifications you have done was awesome but the buildings are merged to one another please resolve them.

Happy mapping

cheers,
krishna
22016-04-13 12:29:09 UTCgormur Can you please link to one example building with a problem?
32016-04-13 13:10:07 UTCnammala http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100863996#map=19/63.41575/10.44675

you can see here the buildings are connecting with each other
42016-04-13 15:24:51 UTCgormur They look totally fine to me. They do touch eachother in real life too.
And by the way: I only updated the addresses in this changeset. Someone else drew the houses before me.
52016-04-14 05:03:12 UTCnammala okay fine
12016-04-13 05:17:46 UTCnammala Hi Maricar Rabonza,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your building edits look good but some of the buildings are being merged please go through them and fix them please.

Happy mapping.

cheers,
Krishna
22016-04-13 05:36:50 UTCMaricar Rabonza Hi,

I don't know what you mean by merged buildings. Are they same with overlapping buildings?
32016-04-13 05:40:02 UTCMaricar Rabonza I think I got it.
Thank you.
42016-04-13 05:45:56 UTCnammala yes don't overlap the buildings then it will be fine
12016-04-05 07:35:39 UTCnammala Hi Srikanth07,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap . your buildings look great but the alignment doesn't seem that good because buildings add beauty to the map so follow this wiki to add buildings https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping%20Common%20Features#buildings

Happy mapping,\...
12016-04-05 05:50:58 UTCnammala Hi Maricar Rabonza,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great but some of them are overlapping. Please do change them and fix.

cheers,
Krishna
22016-04-05 06:00:35 UTCMaricar Rabonza Hello Krishna,
Thanks for the comment. Is the overlapping located in this particular changeset?
32016-04-05 06:10:39 UTCnammala yes
42016-04-05 06:12:07 UTCMaricar Rabonza Alright, fixed some overlaps. Thanks
52016-04-05 06:16:45 UTCnammala with pleasure, keep contributing to OpenStreetMap
Happy Mapping
12016-04-05 06:15:35 UTCnammala Hi Maricar Rabonza,

There are overlapping buildings in this changeset also but only few please fix them too

cheers,
krishn
12016-04-05 06:07:24 UTCnammala Hi Anwar18,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap and your buildings looks great but one changeset needs to be fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407863347 . In this changeset the building is overlapping with another so make changes.

cheers,
krishna
12016-04-04 07:31:02 UTCnammala Hi krichicabacaba,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great but some of them are overlapping . Make sure to correct them.
Happy Mapping.

Cheers,
Krishna
12016-04-04 06:52:36 UTCnammala Hi Leald,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap your buildings look great but some of the buildings are overlapping. so please go through and make changes.
Happy mapping.

cheers,
krishna
22016-04-04 07:08:02 UTCleald Got it.
32016-04-04 07:11:32 UTCnammala Thank you :)
12016-04-04 07:00:31 UTCnammala Hi paulkenneth,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your buildings look great but some of the buildings are overlapping. Make sure buildings should not overlap.
Happy Mapping.

cheers,
Krishna
12016-04-01 07:04:53 UTCnammala Hi Jam,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your buildings look great could you edit them according to shape so that it looks more beautiful. Please follow the link to do so https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping%20Common%20Features#buildings.
Happy mapping!

cheers,
Krishna
12016-04-01 06:25:26 UTCnammala Hi dbusse,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap the way you have deleted has been existing in Mapbox satellite imagery. can you please check it out.

cheers,
Krishna
22016-04-01 15:21:24 UTCdbusse Hi,
sorry if i cause trouble!
You mean this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397669786

But that way conflicts with this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397676401

Don't you think one (or part of them) should be deleted?

In any way: I reverted this changeset until we both agre...
12016-04-01 06:07:50 UTCnammala Hi Jam,
Thanks for contributing to OSM. Your buildings are good but the shape of the building looks odd. so please try to edit the buildings following this link https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/wiki/Mapping%20Common%20Features#buildings

cheers,
Krishna
12016-03-28 07:27:41 UTCnammala google as a source is not allowed
22016-03-28 07:38:31 UTCnammala Hi exe,
You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition or modification of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Best,
Nammala krishna
32016-03-28 09:11:38 UTCexe Hi,
thanks for the reminder. Actually I used Mapbox satellite and copied only the streetnames from Google. Guess that's fine.
Cheers, exe
42016-03-30 06:39:55 UTCnammala Hi exe,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap using of Mapbox satellite is fine but your kind suggestion don't copy the streetnames from google.

Best
krishna
12016-03-28 08:10:35 UTCnammala Hi exe,
You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition or modification of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Best,
Nammala Krishna
12016-03-28 07:47:06 UTCnammala Hi exe,
You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition or modification of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Best,
Nammala Krishna
nammala has contributed to 234 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 423 comment(s)