Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-04-26 16:09:58 UTCpiligab Hi Zazette.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added several objects, but not coincident with the Bing imagery, Can you explain or confir this edition?
For example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489576342
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217843416
https://www.openstree...
22017-04-26 17:08:52 UTCZazette Hi,
The club moved 4 weeks ago.
The old is destroyed.
12017-04-24 18:34:05 UTCpiligab Hi ben-dd.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added several highway, but in comparison with Bing imagery the highways can not be seen. Can you confirm this mapping
Regards.
12017-04-24 18:28:29 UTCpiligab Hi ben-dd.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added several highway, but in comparison with Bing imagery the highways not exist. Can you confirm this mapping?
Regards.
12017-04-18 17:26:34 UTCpiligab Hi Commodoortje

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a park, Can you indicate which is the correct area?, because exist other area with teh same name --> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36732245
Regards.
22017-04-18 22:00:09 UTCCommodoortje Thank you for your reaction.
I have fixed the situation
12017-04-18 16:43:28 UTCpiligab Hi AshfaqueH.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a several "leisure=park" tag, can you align this area?, because it encompasses buildings.
Also indicate that if you use the leisure tag, it isn't necessary to add a node with the same tag.
https://www.openstreetm...
12017-04-06 20:04:48 UTCpiligab Hi Maarten:
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you split a point of intersection in 2 more points.
Does that make sense? Also indicate that you use left restriction and take another road, I think it must be the other road. Please, could you explain it?
Regards.
Pilar.
12017-03-14 15:11:16 UTCpiligab Hi pnorman redaction revert:
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you deleted several highways, can you explain wich the reason for this? because there are many unconnected highways. For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35850820#map=13/37.0294/129.3952
Regards.
Pilar....
22017-03-14 20:57:20 UTCpnorman This changeset removes objects from changesets which used vworld, a government source. For more information you can read https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ko/2017-February/000260.html or contact the Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
12017-03-01 16:49:27 UTCpiligab Hi Esperanza36:
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a lot of tags "built", please, can you explain what is the reason?, because if you refer at year of construction, that tag would will "star_date " http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date.

Al...
22017-03-08 13:45:53 UTCEsperanza36 Thanks for your comment, I noticed that also about the "start_date". "Built" was used before on similar POI. We can also merge attributes from points and buildings areas.
Best regards,
12017-02-27 22:49:53 UTCpiligab Hi.
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed that added some highways with weird names. Can you explain why?
Regards.
22017-02-27 23:26:27 UTCpiligab https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46315329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46314746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46315329
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46315073
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46314150
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46312295
12017-02-27 17:33:45 UTCpiligab Hi mattm01.
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed that added highways not coinciden with the imagery bing or mapbox. Did you use imagery Texas Orthophoto;Local GPX. Can you explain this imagery please?
Regards.
22017-02-27 17:42:08 UTCmattm01 Personally ridden trails with GPS/GPX files that were compared and matched with Texas Orthophoto.
32017-02-27 19:46:56 UTCpiligab Texas Orthophoto is free?
42017-02-27 22:37:26 UTCmattm01 Yes - it's a background option in the iD editor.
12017-02-22 16:05:02 UTCpiligab Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found some overlapped ways, such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363054105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363054082
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362907011
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362902075
could you pl...
12017-02-22 15:38:21 UTCpiligab Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I noticed that you added some highways, such https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365216994 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474092993, which even don't match with satellite imagery, could you please confirm or delete them?
Regards.
12017-02-22 15:26:22 UTCpiligab Hi,
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I found some untagged ways such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474643179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474643212
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474643210
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474643196
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474643187
h...
12017-02-22 14:40:36 UTCpiligab Hi Mikhail246.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a lot of highways that do not match satellite image or what type imagery has used? and also exist overlaping of highways. Please, can you confirm mapping?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46153928
https://www.openst...
12017-02-14 17:49:31 UTCHjart Why did you split this road?
22017-02-14 19:25:48 UTCpiligab Hi Hjart:
Sorry, I'll be more careful. Thank you.
Regards.
12017-02-07 14:18:10 UTCpiligab Hi Risserache.
I noticed that you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472153564, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45811260 and it does not have tag. Please, Can you review this?
Regards.
22017-02-11 00:18:46 UTCRisserache Sorry This is Whittington Park and I was marking its foot paths
12017-02-03 21:57:18 UTCpiligab Hi Penom.
I noticed that you added un highway = trunk superimposed on highway = secondary. Please, can you indicated why?
Regards.
12017-01-31 23:38:22 UTCpiligab Hi pjaejun.
I noticed that you added highways, landuse and others, Please, could you confirm the mapping? the image does not match your mapping. Thank you.
Regards.
12017-01-30 23:07:57 UTCpiligab Hi EunHo.
I noticed that you deleted "highway = residential", can you indicate why? Or maybe you could confirm that mapping? Because there are not good image.
Regards.
12017-01-24 19:42:14 UTCpiligab Hola Betiana.

Gracias por contribuir con OSM, me di cuenta de que agregaste un área el cual engloba a edificios importantes en zonas de Cipolletti que sufre inundaciones. Mi consulta es: "hay alguna entrada en wiki osm para agregar esos objetos a OSM?" o cómo los est&aacut...
22017-01-25 04:36:21 UTCAgusQui Hola piligab, te cuento mas o menos como es la cosa: estas ediciones de inundaciones las hacen maestros de todo el país en un curso de especialización online, la mayoría sólo edita para cumplir con el trabajo práctico que les piden, no tienen ninguna intenció...
32017-01-26 21:11:11 UTCpiligab Hola AgusQui:
Gracias por la información.
Saludos.
12017-01-26 14:44:19 UTCpiligab Hola charly zaa:
Gracias por contribuir con OSM, he notado que haz hecho un trazo, pero no tiene etiqueta, podrías revisarlo por favor?.
Si no estás seguro de la etiquetas que debe tener, puedes revisar aquí https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
12017-01-24 17:43:45 UTCpiligab Hi rabon.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added turn lanes here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2923501, As the image should be turn: lanes: backward = left | through | right
Could you check it please.
Regards.
22017-01-24 22:08:59 UTCrabon Hi piligab,

Thank you for your comment. I am sorry, but the way you have linked does not exist anymore. Can you describe which road you mean? I vaguela remember to add the turn lanes on Columbia NW, turning left into 18th, but not sure.
Regards,
Steffen
32017-01-24 22:36:11 UTCpiligab Hi rabon.
I have reviewed and does not appear the link that I sent you because they someone had already corrected it, here I send the new edition. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29235011
Regards.
12017-01-21 19:56:53 UTCmueschel Here is another new way with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466974600

22017-01-21 20:21:31 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel.
I proceeded to change the tags. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-19 14:24:07 UTCpiligab Hi YanTremblay,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted some objects that had several tags and added again it but only with some tags. It would be great if explain why he did that. It is advisable to keep all the corresponding tags.
Regards.
12017-01-08 12:36:00 UTCmueschel Here are at least two more ways with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463735984
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463734477

Jan
22017-01-10 02:32:26 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel,
I am sorry.
Thank you for bringing this to my notice. What you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have corrected the tag of my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-06 11:38:12 UTCmueschel Hi,
you created four roads with very strange tags, e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463734354

Could you have a look & fix it?

Cheers, Jan
22017-01-06 13:28:08 UTCpiligab Hi Mueschel,

Thank you for bringing this to my notice. What you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have corrected the tag of my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
12017-01-03 18:20:50 UTCAndersAndersson Hello,
Are you sure that these roads are connected? By looking at the aerial photos when mapping I couldn't be sure if it was a tunnel, a crossing or the service road blocked by debris. That is why I intentionally left the roads overlapping without sharing nodes until me or someone else could surve...
22017-01-03 18:49:50 UTCpiligab Hi AndersAndersson,

Thank you for bringing this to my notice. This edit was done during adding junction nodes or bridges to overlapping highways using to-fix. Agreed that the imagery is outdated and what you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have reverted my changeset. Henceforth, I will make sur...
32017-01-03 19:06:30 UTCAndersAndersson Thank you. Have a nice day!
12016-12-15 10:09:45 UTCrorym Hi. Thanks for your interest in Irish Townlands. However it looks like your edit has actually broken a valid relation, because you removed a way from the relation. I have reverted this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44419224
22016-12-19 14:54:07 UTCpiligab Hi rory.
I'm not sure how this happened, maybe I could have confused any tags and deleted. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback.
12016-12-05 21:01:30 UTCdoktorpixel14 Sorry, but the railway crossing is obstructed now! The bing imagery is not up to date!
22016-12-06 15:34:28 UTCpiligab Hi doktorpixel14,

Thank you for bringing this to my notice. This edit was done during connecting motorable roads using to-fix. Agreed that the imagery is outdated and what you have mentioned is right. Hence, I have reverted my changeset. Henceforth, I will make sure to double check and add a note...
12016-12-06 14:26:53 UTCpiligab Hi Masatu.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a lot of points of interes which already exists (22 points in specific) http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44209730, can you confirm which is the right position of these points?
12016-12-02 16:49:48 UTCpiligab Hi Bootprint.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a point of interes which already exists, in specific is the shop LCBO https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/414740127, can you confirm which is the right position of this shop?
22016-12-02 16:56:52 UTCBootprint Thanks for pointing that out. I've removed my POI and adjusted andrewpmk's POI to the better location.
That's one of the things I hate about in the field editing with Maps.Me, that some POIs are hidden when they are too close to each other.

12016-12-02 14:39:19 UTCpiligab Hi Michael.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a point of interes which already exists, in specific is the shop The North Face https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4455191589, can you confirm which is the right position of this shop?
12016-11-30 21:46:08 UTCpiligab Hi user3441:
Thank you for contributing to OSM.
Please, could indicate why he deleted tag "amenity" and added tag "waterway"?
22016-12-01 11:07:31 UTCuser3441 Hi,
omg, definetely, I didn't do it with purpose. AFAIR, I only changed rating field. It's quite odd. I'll delete the tag.

P.S.: thanks for the notice, I was pleasantly surprised, usually other contributors use "strong language" by commenting my edits :*
12016-11-29 15:35:25 UTCpiligab Hi Belinda.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a point of interes which already exists, in specific is the school St. Paul's https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357410517, can you confirm which is the right position of this school?
12016-11-19 22:39:19 UTCAlan Trick Estrada da Serrada got a big kink it it as a result of this changeset (I think). It's an easy fix and I'll have it done shortly, but just be careful when using JOSM, it has some surprising behaviors.
22016-11-22 14:57:37 UTCpiligab Hi Alan Trick:
I was working on fixing impossible angles in highways using #to-fix and I now reviewing this changeset I saw the highway had an overlapping, which I resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43871380. Thanks for your feedback.
Pilar.
12016-10-17 18:45:54 UTCRoadGeek_MD99 Piligab: Noticed you had added node 4244431268 to Montgomery Road/MD 103 and accidentally added it to US 29/Columbia Pike. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4244431268). Please watch when adding a new node that you don't connect a bridge (tunnel) to another road at a different layer. I've remov...
22016-10-26 15:09:06 UTCpiligab Hi RoadGeek_MD99,
Thank you for notifying me about this error. This must have happened when I was splitting the Montgomery Road to add turn lanes. I will make sure to check for such errors before uploading.
Thanks!
12016-09-29 13:52:09 UTCLittlebtc Refined:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42519296
22016-09-29 18:55:07 UTCpiligab Hi Littlebtc.
I could explain me what the problem please?
Thank You.
12016-06-05 19:21:57 UTCd1g Road or footway is clearly visible, but we are not sure if this is a motorized road or just a footpath.

It takes time to check all barriers around such roads.

As you can see this part is quite remote from the city, we don't have human resources to check this area for now.
22016-09-28 14:17:39 UTCpiligab Hi dg1.
I was working on connecting island roads and I think you are right since we need local mappers to confirm the right tags for those roads. Thanks for adding 'fixme' tags so you help us to improve the map.
12016-06-11 18:02:06 UTCMikeN Hi, thank you for the fix. It seems that using a blank for the turn lane is not valid. See the normal usages at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn:lanes (the word 'none' is fully spelled out for special cases, but does not mean that no text is required )
22016-09-27 19:09:47 UTCpiligab Hi MikeN,

Both the none and blank tag is used while tagging turn lanes as can be verified from taginfo. The Lane and road attributes style also takes both the tagging scheme as valid. Since, there is no consensus on the tagging style to be adopted, our team decided to stick with blank instead of ...
12016-08-10 22:55:09 UTCpiligab Good night Longhorn256:
Adding turn lanes is correctly?
Because turn lanes in satellite imagery are not coinciding with your mapping, also the turn lanes is incorrectly starting.

Nice to meet you.


22016-08-14 15:05:30 UTCLonghorn256 Upon review of your comment, I have modified a few objects, however I don't think it would satisfy your question. I know it looks strange in places, but I preserved the original TIGER data and I am trying to make it as simple as possible to not confuse future mappers when they go to edit. It would c...
piligab has contributed to 40 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 69 comment(s)