Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-03-17 09:46:01 UTCliteran Здравствуйте! Насколько я понимаю, оборот по открытому вчера участку со стороны Делового центра идет через тупики в "неправильном" направлении. Вы случаем не в курс...
22017-03-17 13:59:13 UTCAlexey Lukin Здравствуйте! Тупик посередине перегона ДЦ-ПП. Вечером нанесу на карту.
12017-03-01 09:18:55 UTCliteran Смотрю, серьезно здесь сдвинули все... Если не секрет - откуда проекты берете? На Нашем транспорте нашел только еле видную картинку без геоподосновы, поэтому привязы...
22017-03-01 14:20:17 UTCAlexey Lukin Приветствую! Я не сдвигал, а всего лишь откорректировал ширину междупутья, проверив привязку к котлованам по спутинковым снимкам. Изначально у меня не было информа...
32017-03-01 14:29:55 UTCliteran Ну, вот здесь видно http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=46484232 что вы эскалаторы сдвинули (красное- старое местоположение, зеленое - новое). Я без каких-либо претензий, у меня привя...
42017-03-01 14:34:30 UTCAlexey Lukin А, понял. Изначально платформу нарисовали не совсем посередине междупутья. Я сдвинул ее в середину междупутья, расширил до 12 м и укоротил до 163 м. При этом вместе с пл...
52017-03-01 15:11:41 UTCAlexey Lukin Могу вечером попробовать уточнить сдвиг влево-вправо, если на каком-то из планов с привязкой будет достаточно разрешения.
62017-03-01 15:19:45 UTCliteran те, что с НТ, как мне показалось, просто сфотографированы на фотоаппарат с плаката или со стенда, так что скорее всего их привязывать бессмысленно из за искажений
72017-03-01 22:40:00 UTCAlexey Lukin Сделал абсолютную привязку станции к местности по проекту планировки. Тоннели лежали идеально, а станцию и входы-выходы из нее чуть подвинул.
82017-03-02 07:26:41 UTCliteran Отлично! теперь вражеское высокоточное оружие не пролетит мимо %-)))
12016-12-19 16:57:14 UTCAlexey Lukin Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your changes to Cam...
22016-12-19 19:18:40 UTCwoodpeck I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
32016-12-19 19:21:13 UTCAlexey Lukin Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:

I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has
happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street
crossings here, it will become apparent:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999

In fact, the ...
42016-12-19 20:23:47 UTCsamely Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.

Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.
Let me know if you need...
52016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
62016-12-21 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
72017-01-06 14:55:37 UTCsamely Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-06 05:20:37 UTCmanoharuss Hi margonotmango,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed you have been creating, tagging a number of ways at intersections with relation `type=lanelet` giving roles to ways `left` and `right`. This seems odd. I couldn't find information r...
22016-12-06 05:29:00 UTCmargonotmango HI Manohar,
Please check this https://github.com/phbender/liblanelet.
But now I encountered some problems,When I upload the data to the server, it will prompt a lot of conflicts, I would like to temporarily change the data back to the initial state, and I also back up the initial data, but when I...
32016-12-06 06:15:26 UTCmanoharuss Hi margonotmango,

This seems like a private project and the changes to the data on OSM seems to be undiscussed. Could you please revert all your changesets that have lanelet mapping. Let me know if you need help in reversion.

Best,
Manohar
42016-12-06 07:24:36 UTCmargonotmango Hi manoharuss,
Please tell me how to revert,thanks a lot.
Best,
Margonotmango
52016-12-06 08:53:04 UTCmargonotmango Hi manoharuss,
I have the previous osm file,but I don't know how to revert.
Margonotmango
62016-12-06 12:09:18 UTCmanoharuss Hi margonotmango,

I see that you are using JOSM. You can goto `Data` in top menu, -> Select `Revert Changeset`. You should give each changeset ID and revert. Remember that you cannot do randomly. You must revert in the order of latest to last. Please follow this guide. Once you revert all the cha...
72016-12-07 01:01:55 UTCmargonotmango Hi manoharuss,
Thank you.I will try.
Best,
Margonotmango
82016-12-12 02:30:45 UTCmargonotmango Hi manoharuss,
I was trying to revert changes.It started well, but after a few times, when I click "revert changeset",it says"unable to upload or download data from http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/44174029 due to data transfer issues.
What should I do?
Best,
Margonotmango
92016-12-19 03:09:18 UTCAlexey Lukin Can someone help revert this series of changesets? It breaks continuity of many roads and intersections in Cambridge, MA, and also shifts Red Line tracks away from their accurate alignment established in a changeset 31029556.
102016-12-20 01:40:05 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-12 18:50:51 UTCridixcr Margonotmango you can specify why you added such amount of routes in a relationship with the unique tag type = lanalet this change is generated several errors.
22016-12-14 07:39:11 UTCmargonotmango Please check this https://github.com/phbender/liblanelet.
But now I'm trying to revert changeset.
I'm so sorry.
32016-12-19 03:03:06 UTCAlexey Lukin Many roads in Cambridge, MA, have become disconnected after these changes. The Red Line has also shifted away from its accurate track alignment established in a changeset 31029556.
Can someone please cleanup this mess?
42016-12-20 01:40:07 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-19 02:55:08 UTCAlexey Lukin This moves the Red Line away from its accurate track alignment established in a changeset 31029556. Apparently a mistake that has to be reverted.
22016-12-20 01:40:08 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-12-19 02:48:49 UTCAlexey Lukin This changeset breaks continuity of many roads and moves the Red Line away from its accurate track alignment. A clear mistake that has to be reverted.
22016-12-20 01:40:01 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
12016-02-14 12:31:58 UTCliteran Алексей, приветствую! А станцию Саларьево отрисовать хотя бы примерно не сможете? Завтра открыть обещают...
22016-02-14 17:59:20 UTCAlexey Lukin День добрый! Да, нарисую вечером.
12015-12-16 22:56:27 UTCBushmanK Могу дополнительно подтвердить, что тоннель Сокольнической линии проходит под дорожным полотном Большой Черкизовской в районе д. 26 - во время строительства движен...
22015-12-17 02:41:50 UTCAlexey Lukin Спасибо за информацию. Я чуть поправил трассу у пруда. Там есть изгиб, но большего радиуса. Можете посмотреть на видео: https://youtu.be/LJza-IS_BXM?t=2937
и по техзоне: http://audio.rightmark....
32015-12-24 19:00:10 UTCBushmanK И по поводу участка, который проходит перед домом 9к1 по Большой Черкизовской. Там, возможно, и есть этот изгиб - не могу ничего сказать, но точно помню, что забор стро...
42015-12-24 19:33:43 UTCAlexey Lukin Спасибо. Кстати, там в прошлом году что-то раскопали, сделав объезд. Не перегонные ли туннели?
52015-12-24 19:36:36 UTCBushmanK Нет, это роют совершенно ненужный в этом месте подземный переход, открытым способом. В Google Earth процесс неплохо виден.
62015-12-24 19:41:46 UTCAlexey Lukin Ясно. Я чуть подвинул трассу. Небольшой изгиб там есть, он виден на видео и на фотках у Руссо.
12015-12-19 16:53:57 UTCjremillard The Wachusett Mountain State Reservation includes the ski area. Changing the boundary of the reservation around the ski slopes renders nice but it is not tagged correctly. The reservation boundary should match the MassGIS parcel, the ski slopes should be a new ways with something like natural=grassl...
22015-12-19 16:58:54 UTCjremillard Also, I guess it would make sense to remove the landuse=forest from the relation....
32015-12-19 17:15:37 UTCAlexey Lukin I agree. Will revert a changeset and map differently.
12015-10-09 08:44:37 UTCliteran Алексей, "Петровско-Разумовская" это название станции, а не платформы. Поэтому на контуры платформы тег name ставить не следует. Удаляю.
22015-10-09 12:40:33 UTCAlexey Lukin Спасибо. Я поправлю и другие места.
Alexey Lukin has contributed to 11 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 48 comment(s)