Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12018-10-17 22:53:43 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569053713 did you set layer=-33 on purpose or is it a typo?
22018-10-17 23:11:22 UTCMacLondon Definite typo. I think layer=-33 might well be in Australia! I've corrected it now.
12018-10-17 00:50:12 UTCkocio Hi,

Could you explain what do you mean by "it does not match reality"? Is there something not real with gulf being limited by the coastline - other than coastline not being accurate in itself (which is the real source of what you called pseudo precision)?

Southern line was just firs...
22018-10-17 06:47:29 UTCwoodpeck I should have been more precise; it is a random subset of reality. The gulf is part of the baltic sea which is not mapped as a named polygon. The gulf consists of smaller named water bodies, namely the "Bothnian Bay" in the North, and the "Bothnian Sea" in the South. These are no...
32018-10-17 06:53:23 UTCwoodpeck I forgot to mention that if someone *did* want to properly map the Bay of Bothina and the Bothnian Bay and Luodonselkä, these would be three partly overlapping natural=bay objects which would likely cause editor warnings and mis-countings ("hey, OSM has so-and-so many square kilometres of...
12018-10-13 17:47:31 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2288 hatte ich Dich darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass wir bei OSM sehr auf unsere Quellen achten müssen. In diesem Changeset hier hast Du wieder einigen Haltestellen ein "ref:VBB" hinzugefügt (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/no...
22018-10-14 21:28:50 UTCjohndoe Hallo woodpeck,
bitte recherchiere in Zukunft doch besser: der Tag ist bereits vor vier Jahren auf die zugehörige Relation gesetzt worden (vgl. Relation #4432716, Version #3). Bitte schließe Dich nicht jetzt auch noch der Hexenjagd an!

Beste Grüße
johndoe
32018-10-15 16:33:08 UTCbergaufsee Hallo johndoe,
warum gehst du immer davon aus, dass man dir etwas Böses will? In dem von dir erwähnten CS wurde immerhin eine Quelle genannt, nur das wird auch von dir erwartet. Auch wenn die Quelle leider nicht im aktuellen Zustand zulässig ist, da die vom VBB geforderte Nennung in ...
12018-10-09 22:24:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 10:03:51 UTCMKnight Wäre es nicht irgendwie sinnvoller, ein issue für iD zu schreiben, statt etabliertes Tagging zu ändern?
22018-10-09 14:04:02 UTCyopaseopor Sorry but I don't speak German.
Applying this solution the iD issue was closed.

This edition is about the discussion done in tagging list http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Re-Traffic-sign-direction-tagging-td5923137.html about the subkeys forward and backward (my favourite option, this was not an ...
32018-10-09 22:24:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 09:51:19 UTCPeilscheibe I reverted this changeset because diligent tagging (e.g. about different traffic signs per direction) was removed and replaced by wrong information. This is not acceptable at all.
22018-10-09 14:02:03 UTCyopaseopor This edition is about the discussion done in tagging list http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Re-Traffic-sign-direction-tagging-td5923137.html about the subkeys forward and backward (my favourite option, this was not an easy decision for me but I have prefered the enable in iD and close the discussion) a...
32018-10-09 14:37:09 UTCPeilscheibe Just a few examples:
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/25717685
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/629964077
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/629964082
On this ways (and a lot of others) there was a different traffic sign tagging per direction.
Why? Becau...
42018-10-09 22:24:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:08 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:08 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:08 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-09-20 06:12:06 UTCdvdhoven I have reverted this changeset.
You use wrong tags, see the topic in the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=716507#p716507 and please, discuss first before you do such things at greater scale. To me this seems to be mechanical edits and these should be discussed first before do...
22018-09-22 08:29:58 UTCyopaseopor Sorry but I think you are wrong:
1- If you read Wikipedia or http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0004825/2018-07-01#Bijlage1) .... I don't see any 0 in NL:C2 or NL:A1 so your code is not correct.
2-In OSM (not the real world) ways have always a direction (the way it was drawn, like the rivers) so you ca...
32018-10-09 22:24:07 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:07 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:07 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-09-20 06:14:17 UTCdvdhoven I have reverted this changeset.
See my comment in changeset 62743866
22018-10-09 22:24:04 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 12:24:29 UTCmueschel Please stop this undiscussed mechanical edit until further discussion.
It breaks many cases of traffic sign tagging.
22018-10-09 14:09:48 UTCyopaseopor -This (non-mechanical) edition is not undiscussed.
This edition is about the discussion done in tagging list http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Re-Traffic-sign-direction-tagging-td5923137.html about the subkeys forward and backward (my favourite option, this was not an easy decision for me but I have p...
32018-10-09 14:32:08 UTCmueschel The discussion ended with your question about the change, not a single answer approving it. Mass edits should be announced and agreed on in a broader community, and not in the depth of a thread without anybody noticing.


You also edited ways with traffic_sign:* tags, where this scheme will not...
42018-10-09 17:45:27 UTCgeri-oc Also, the specification direction is correct only with degrees or compass. forward or backward is related to the direction of the path in OSM.

I am for a revert of these changes (worldwide).
52018-10-09 19:59:53 UTCgeow I asked the data working group to revert all changesets of user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/yopaseopor/history where the cS comment is: "#fastag #traffic_signs Apply traffic_sign:direction tag to avoid problems with new iD editor as an agreement on tagging list“

Thanks
geow
62018-10-09 22:24:04 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:03 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:03 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:02 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 17:16:17 UTCgeri-oc direction ist ein verkehrter Schlüssel in Bezug auf die Wegrichtung von Verkehrszeichen. Die Änderungen sind alle falsch, da direction in Grad oder Himmelsrichtung angegeben wird.
22018-10-09 20:01:19 UTCyopaseopor The cardinal direction is not a good idea: roads and streets are not so straight then direction would change in every curve, every kilometer. Imagine at the mountain :
direction=SW and 100 meter later direction=N . It is not confusing, drawn way has a direction (this direction would be the same abo...
32018-10-09 22:24:02 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:02 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:24:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 19:34:29 UTCstreckenkundler It sucks to adjust the data to the Editor. I have chosen this worde deliberately. This is the best way to scare mappers from OSM.
In my opinion, all your changes must be reset immediately and promptly.
Stinky Greetings...
22018-10-09 20:41:46 UTCyopaseopor Ok. Thanks for the election of the words. So you are saying iD editor sucks? (Because this adaptation is due the issue of iD done by bhousel ). Does the possibility of edit traffic signs via iD by newbie mappers scare them?
You can say also this words to them in their issue:
https://github.com/ope...
32018-10-09 22:24:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
42018-10-10 07:17:00 UTCstreckenkundler Whether iD is bad or not, I can't say. Your way of pushing your ideas was Bad. First a huge proposal, where hardly any one looks through and it is not yet Decided. Then quickly change data to match the programming of iD to create Facts.
That's not how it works.

Thanks to woodpeck for the Revert...
12018-10-09 22:24:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:55 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:55 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:55 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:49 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:49 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:49 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:47 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:47 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:47 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:46 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:46 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:46 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 22:23:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-10-09 17:12:15 UTCgeri-oc Du hast hier Änderungen vor genommen die nicht zutreffend sin. Die Richtung in Sinne des Weges ist backwart oder forwart. direction gibt eine Richtung in Grad oder Himmelsrichtung an.

Ich erwarte eine Revert in angemessener Zeit von dir - zu mindest für diesen Änderungssatz. Ü...
22018-10-09 17:57:37 UTCgeri-oc 57,7274424, 16,5246249 ist nach den richtigen Angaben laut WIKI und JOSM-Plugin gemappt:

57,7273945, 16,5241181 hast du geändert.

Es existieren zwei verschieden Schlüssel in unmittelbarer Nachbarschaft und nach der alten Auswertung erscheint der zweite Node nicht mehr. Ich werden d...
32018-10-09 22:23:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
12018-09-27 07:10:01 UTCNegreheb Hallo,
hier sind dir leider wieder einige Adressen auf die Straße gerutscht. Unter anderem dort:
Neudorf, Mettersdorf, Grafendorf, Stainz
Doppelte Adresse ist zumindest eine passiert in Stainz (Maschinen Schattinger)
Bitte selbstständig den gesamten Änderungssatz kontrollieren ...
22018-09-27 10:45:35 UTCaddresshistory*org Danke für die Info,
bei einem in JOSM geöffneten Changeset mit ca 6000 Veränderungen schwingt immer die Gefahr mit, dass JOSM hierbei abstürzt und die Arbeit von ca 4 Stunden hierbei verloren geht. Es sind also mehrere Arbeitsgänge notwendig. Zum Glück sind wir hier n...
32018-10-03 20:48:51 UTCNegreheb Ich wiederhole mich:
Mach halt kleinere Changesets. Selber schuld.
Weitere Fehler in Mettersdorf, Grafendorf, etc.
Geh bitte dein GESAMTES Changeset durch, kontrolliere alles und korregiere alles.
42018-10-03 21:33:01 UTCaddresshistory*org Mein Kommentar dazu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=718693#p718693
52018-10-03 21:50:30 UTCNegreheb D.h. du wirst deine Fehler hier nicht beheben, oder wie?
62018-10-05 08:27:56 UTCNegreheb Und, werden die Fehler noch behoben? z.B. in Neudorf bei Stainz und westlich davon?
Und überhaupt im ganzen Changeset?
72018-10-05 09:10:42 UTCaddresshistory*org Im Kontext zu Deiner eigenen Mitwirkung in OSM Lieber Negreheb du stalkst mich als erneut. Stalking ist in Österreich ein strafbarer Tatbestand. Bitte unterlass das, Mitwirkung in OSM immer herzlich willkommen, aber bitte nicht so.
82018-10-05 15:01:06 UTCwoodpeck Verstehe ich das richtig, hier wurden irgendwelche nicht fertig verarbeiteten Daten mal zu OSM hochgeladen, mit dem Plan, sie später noch zu überarbeiten, weil, wenn man versucht, die Daten vor dem Upload zu korrigeren, die Absturz-Wahrscheinlichkeit zu hoch ist?

Aber wenn das so ist, w...
92018-10-05 15:03:12 UTCwoodpeck Ach, ncohwas zum Thema "Stalking" - bitte nicht versuchen, andere Mapper mit juristischen Drohungen an berechtigter Qualitätskontrolle zu hindern. Es gibt "Stalking" in OSM, aber wenn einer nachweislich in der Vergangenheit Mist gebaut hat, ist es völlig legitim, wenn a...
102018-10-05 17:37:25 UTCaddresshistory*org Hallo woodpeck, danke für Deine Sichtung der Thematik. Eine unangenehme Angelegenheit, es handelt sich hier um einen Ausläufer einer Diskussion hier https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=718972#p718972 ich bin immer für konstruktive Verbesserungsvorschläge aufgeschlos...
112018-10-05 19:24:23 UTCNegreheb @woodpeck
Hm, ja, das ist, denke ich, ganz gut zusammengefasst.
Und das mit adresshistory.org - frag nicht, das gehört hier eig. nicht rein...
@adresshistory
What? Kritik gilt also nur, wenns von mehreren gemeldet wird? Und es kommen halt 13 ähnliche lautende Changesetkommentare weil ...
12018-10-03 17:12:08 UTCwoodpeck Wieso steht im Changeset-Kommentar etwas von "Reichsgrenzgebiet (bis 1918)"? Wäre es nicht sinnvoll, den heute gebräuchlichen Namen der Gegend anzugeben? Gibt es für die Wahl dieses Namens einen vernünftigen Grund, oder ist das nur Provokation?
22018-10-04 12:00:05 UTCgadacz 1. Aus hiesiger Sicht ist die Region eher als Grenzort bekannt. Siehe Mitte des deutschen Reichs in Senftenberg (daher kam auch mein Ansatz, die exakte Grenze zu ermitteln)
2. Ich wollte gerade deutlich machen, das es eine historische Feststellung ist und nur bis 1918 (bzw. 1920) Bestand hatte. Dam...
32018-10-04 13:50:13 UTCwoodpeck Ich schlage vor, solche inhaltlichen/geschichtlichen Auseinandersetzungen anderswo zu führen als in OSM-Changesets. Es wäre höchst unerfreulich, wenn "Reichsbürger" und ihre Gegner auf die Idee kommen, auf dem Rücken von OSM ihre Differenzen auszufechten.
12018-09-29 13:06:11 UTCwoodpeck In what way does this changeset which removes a single node that I never touched "repair vandalism" as you claim in the changeset comment?
12018-09-29 13:04:11 UTCwoodpeck Dear Papou, if you find that any of my edits amount to "vandalism", please let me (or the DWG at data@osmfoundation.org if you prefer) know and I/we will look into the issue. Adding a ton of changesets that call out a particular mapper by name - whether it is me or anyone else - without ev...
12018-09-27 20:28:54 UTCwoodpeck Please try to remain factual in your changeset comments - describe what it is you cleaned up, don't write "douchebaggery".
22018-09-27 20:45:13 UTCCarniLvr79 Oh gimmie a break. Apologies for my comment. I thought it was abundantly clear what had been cleaned up? Love you~
32018-09-28 05:15:00 UTCfreebeer It is clear from a link to https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=62989377 that says somewhat more, given that douchebaggery, asshattery, vandalismery, and ``creative interpretation of an enhanced reality'' can cover a wide variety of edits not limited to the Jackson Pollockery of pasta footway...
42018-09-28 09:57:09 UTCCarniLvr79 Thank you for your input.
52018-09-28 16:30:54 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Replying to freebeer: Trump 2020, and if you want a beer: buy it

To everybody else: When I took over this city there was nothing but residential roads, schools, the golf course, and 4 parks. As you can see, I added many thousands of items, and was hoping that in return you would give me a shred ...
62018-09-28 16:32:33 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 You all jumped in at the last minute like a bunch of lazy douchebags who only delete stuff, and won't even map a blank city like Redmond, 20 miles west,
72018-09-28 16:45:43 UTCb-jazz (Assuming that DuhMapMaster5000 and RomanoLuingine are the same person.) You're edits and contributions to the map are very appreciated, WHEN they follow guidelines and aren't meant to advantage you when playing PokemonGo (which your original comments clearly indicate). You make it sound like you're...
82018-09-28 19:06:00 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 That was actually a friends house, he requested I do that lmao.

Yes, both those accounts are me.
92018-09-28 19:06:52 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 If city owned and operated landscaping is not a park, then why are trees a forest? Is that not wrong?
102018-09-28 19:07:52 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Whoever jacked up Ochoco Creek park by putting multiple forests in it deserves to be banned.
112018-09-28 19:11:37 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 I'll cut you all a deal: I map the entire city of Redmond by your standards, if you allow the landscaping in Prineville to be labeled "park". I looked for an appropriate tag, and "park" is the closest I could find for an area like that. Believe me, in no way whatsoever do I want ...
122018-09-28 19:12:08 UTCwoodpeck As a rule of thumb, if something is less than one acre, it would need very good reasons to be marked a park. One such reason would be if it was listed as a park somewhere on the web site of the city, or commonly known in the neighbourhood as "xyz park", or if there was a sign (that isn't s...
132018-09-28 19:14:10 UTCwoodpeck Also, a general request, even if not everyone here might be grown-up let's as least act as if we were, and skip the frequent "lol", "lmao" etc., as well as any expletives.
142018-09-28 19:14:44 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Do you understand what this thing called "incentive" is? I am asking for a small concession to basically giving weeks of free labor away.
152018-09-28 19:16:28 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 I am going to re-add the city hall courtyard, because it is in fact a park btw. I just noticed someone deleted it -.-
162018-09-28 19:20:56 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Do we have a deal on the Redmond proposal?
172018-09-28 19:21:56 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Also, I'm going to add in a ton of tags around downtown to businesses that I know of
182018-09-28 19:23:45 UTCwoodpeck The "small concession" you are asking is essentially for us all to lower our standards so you can have your fun. We will not do this, and if you make allowing your fantasy parks a condition of your further contribution, then we have to pass on that further contribution.
192018-09-28 19:25:53 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Have fun mapping Redmond then, I'm out
202018-09-28 19:26:59 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Oh wait, you never will map Redmond, because you only care about deleting stuff, not contributing,
212018-09-28 19:30:28 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 "Lowering your standards" and butting out are not the same btw, learn your vocab
222018-09-28 19:30:57 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Your standards are blank maps besides roads, it really can't go any lower.
232018-09-28 19:37:04 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 Hell, I'll make those landscaping parks so small you cant even see them, thinner than the sidewalk line is, if you really want me to!
242018-09-28 19:39:53 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 To woodpeck: I just read that there is a "landcover = grass" tag, I would be content with that instead of "park" lmao. I searched long and hard for something like that and failed to even find it...
252018-09-28 19:43:50 UTCDuhMapMaster5000 I just want my city to be as heavily mapped as possible, that's all
262018-09-28 19:50:53 UTCCarniLvr79 DuhMapMaster5000: I am certain you are capable of making some awesome map edits and contributions. There is so much out there that needs a first time mapping. Just going into a city and adjusting roads for accuracy is an enormous help. Putting in buildings is a HUGE help. With their addresses - ...i...
272018-09-29 05:46:17 UTCRomanoLinguine "Entering into an already established and mapped city and making changes to it, shouldn't you take into consideration a sense of respect for the artist who worked tirelessly on it?"

This account and 5000 are the same person: me

I created it really fast after this was blocked for a bi...
12018-09-28 05:51:40 UTCwoodpeck This sidewalk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628610759 is not connected to the road network, or any sidewalks across the road, except in the NW corner. This may look pretty on the map but it foils any attempt at pedestrian routing, and certainly doesn't match what I see on the aerial imagery.
12018-09-27 20:24:06 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628477500 is certainly not a park either!
22018-09-27 20:31:02 UTCwoodpeck Please don't give buildings a name like "housing" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602285887). Use building=residential (or house, or apartments, or similar) instead, and do not specify a name.
32018-09-27 20:34:31 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202635077 doesn't seem to be a building to me on the aerial image.
12018-09-27 20:33:39 UTCwoodpeck None of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617356591 and the neighbouring footways are discernible on the Bing aerial imagery that you claim to have used. Where does the footpath information come from, and are you sure it is correct?
12018-09-27 20:31:54 UTCwoodpeck A little grass strip around a footway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628472148) is not a park, please don't map it as such.
12018-09-27 20:29:51 UTCwoodpeck Please don't give buildings "names" like "825 NE Crest Dr". Instead, use "addr:housenumber" and "addr:street" tags for that.
12018-09-27 20:26:12 UTCwoodpeck "A heath or heathland is a dwarf-shrub habitat, characterized by open, low growing woody vegetation, often dominated by plants of the Ericaceae (Heather)." - natural=heath is certainly not the vacant building plot between two houses!
12018-09-27 19:33:50 UTCCarniLvr79 You should be able to report it to Glassman and he can have their account deleted... I think that is who we report to. ANd I think that is how its done? I am so sorry about this. I actually saw this last night when I was fixing a couple of errors around here. I figured whoever spent that much time o...
22018-09-27 20:23:31 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628465186 is certainly not a park?
32018-09-27 20:42:55 UTCCarniLvr79 Dang, man. This is a whole lot worse than I had first thought. No that is not a park. Why would someone waste the time of the life it takes to do this meticulous damage when there is so much out there that could be legitimately done that needs doing - and take pride in that instead of ruining someon...
12018-09-27 20:22:41 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628443839 is not a park.
12018-09-27 20:21:47 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628479164 is not being "meticuously correct" about parks, it is making fun of the concept of parks.
12018-09-26 09:15:44 UTCMichael_H Ich weiß nicht, warum hier plötzlich so viele Leute diese Kommentare lesen. In jedem Fall geht es hier um eine Landkarte und nicht um Politik. Riad hat ja auch einen deutschen Namen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315358390). Da können wir für unsere Orte wohl auch auslä...
22018-09-26 10:01:15 UTCwoodpeck (Ich habe in dieser Diskussion einige fremdenfeindliche Kommentare entfernt, sowie weitere Kommentare, die an sich vielleicht nicht fremdenfeindlich waren, aber eine off-topic-Reaktion auf die ursprünglich gelöschten.)
32018-09-26 09:07:48 UTCKornficker Habe ich richtig verstanden: Als ein User sich über das Übermaß an arabischen Touristen in der bayrischen Heimat beschwert, habt ihr das einfach wegzensiert? #zensur #PascalNeis #Feige
42018-09-26 09:15:44 UTCMichael_H Ich weiß nicht, warum hier plötzlich so viele Leute diese Kommentare lesen. In jedem Fall geht es hier um eine Landkarte und nicht um Politik. Riad hat ja auch einen deutschen Namen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315358390). Da können wir für unsere Orte wohl auch auslä...
12018-09-24 08:22:03 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you deleted a pond, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596922941/history, and re-created it as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/621359467, thereby losing the old name "থানার পুকুর" and replacing it with "Thana Pond". It would have been better...
12018-09-24 08:13:45 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you have deleted a school (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596657329/history) that was mapped with a proper local name, number of storeys, and opening hours. You replaced it later with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5741983896 which has much less information. Why? Your change...
12018-09-24 08:06:23 UTCwoodpeck Dear Mahede Hasan, I have looked at some of the buildings you drew in this changeset and the Bing aerial imagery which you cited as a source does not really match what you have drawn, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627325599 and neigbouring houses. Did you have another source in addit...
12018-09-24 07:59:47 UTCwoodpeck Hello Mahede Hasan, it would be super helpful if you could use changeset comments that say what you have done and that can be understood by humans (e.g. "added buildings in SOMEPLACE", "updated POIs", something like that). The hashtags you use may be added to a changeset comment ...
12018-09-22 20:17:57 UTCwoodpeck Please refrain from politically motivated boundary edits like that. If you believe the boundary is wrong, discuss the matter on the relevant mailing lists and seek a consensus before acting. I have reverted the changed.
22018-10-09 22:06:02 UTCjlcc78 ¿Por qué dibujan ustedes aguas territoriales a Gibraltar pero no a Ceuta??
32018-10-09 22:08:56 UTCjlcc78 Mas bien creo que las motivaciones políticas están en los que dibujaron esos límites para Gibraltar (probritanicos) y para Ceuta (promarroquies). Esos límites sobran en estos momentos.
42018-10-10 06:38:56 UTCSomeoneElse As suggested in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62809907 , the discussion is probably best had on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 to be honest - that way any interested parties will have a chance to comment.
Best Regards,
Andy
52018-10-10 06:39:18 UTCSomeoneElse Tal como se sugiere en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62809907, la discusión es probablemente la mejor en https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207 para ser honesto, de esa manera cualquier parte interesada Tendré la oportunidad de comentar.
Atentamente,
Andy
12018-09-19 08:56:24 UTCflohoff Hi Ratz,
ich habe hier mal das Waldgebiet an der Tritstraße getrennt - Die Straße gehört ja nicht zum Wald.

Flo
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62718053
22018-09-19 12:29:18 UTCOF0 Hallo Ratz41,

auch hier war eigentlich alles richtig. Das Teilen von Nodes durch Flächen, wie etwa Straßen und angrenzende Landnutzungsflächen ist eine anerkannte Mappingmethode. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
32018-09-19 12:57:07 UTCflohoff
Hallo OF0,

ich werde das hier mal zum Anlass nehmen mich bei der DWG erneut zu beschweren. Du mappst hier nicht, du hast dir nicht angesehen worum es geht, geschweige denn den Bereich im Editor geladen. Dazu geht es in diesem Changeset nicht um eine Mappingmethode sondern ich habe ein Waldgebie...
42018-09-19 15:35:28 UTCwoodpeck https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2241 - ehrlich gesagt verstehe ich den Rummel nicht, das von OF0 angeführte Dokument unterstützt hier doch klar flohoffs Aktion: "when the way is a highway, it usually is most accurate to include a gap, so that the area ends by the side of the...
52018-09-19 18:43:32 UTCOF0 @woodpeck

Es geht doch immer noch eine Stufe tiefer. Die Tatsache, dass man hier Kritiker aussperren lassen kann halte ich nicht für akzeptabel. Nochmal: Aus http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4945640&commented sollte zweifelsfrei ersichtlich werden, das...
62018-09-20 06:18:00 UTCRatz41 Kann mir hier jemand mal mit ein paar einfachen Sätzen sagen, worum es hier eigentlich geht?
Geht es darum, dass ich hier grundsätzlich etwas falsch gemacht habe?
Ehrlich gesagt, verstehe ich nur 'Bahnhof'!
72018-09-20 06:31:38 UTCwoodpeck @Ratz41, nein, es ist alles ok, Du bist nur zwischen die Fronten eines länger schwelenden Konflikts geraten. Dabei geht es um die Frage, ob die Linie, die Du als Straße zeichnest, zugleich die Grenze eines Waldes o.ä. sein kann, oder ob diese Grenze separat als eigene Linie gezeichne...
82018-09-20 06:32:50 UTCwoodpeck Ersetze "separat als eigene Linie gezeichnet werden darf." durch "separat als eigene Linie gezeichnet werden muss.", Tippfehler.
92018-09-20 11:35:12 UTCflohoff
Hier sind keine Linien und Flächen verbunden worden und ich habe nichts dergleichen aufgeräumt. OF0 hat das nur "behauptet" in dem er eben völlig irrelevantes zeugs hier verteilt hat.

Ratz hat ein Waldstück angepasst und ich habe das aufgeteilt weil es zu groß...
12018-09-16 21:34:56 UTCwoodpeck Die Löschung ist gerechtfertigt. Bitte erst wieder eintragen, wenn hier tatsächlich eine Baustelle ist.
12018-09-16 20:42:54 UTCwoodpeck Die Löschung des Ways 415621374 war berechtigt - zumindest ist auf dem Luftbild keine separate "Abfahrt" für Radfahrer von der Hirschwiesenstr. zu erkennen. Dass man über den Bordstein fahren kann, rechtfertigt keinen "highway=cycleway".
12018-09-16 13:04:39 UTCwoodpeck Die Löschung der Relation 8435993 war berechtigt, weil es sich um ein Abbiegeverbot in eine schon mit access=no markierte Strasse handelte. Es kann nicht schaden, so etwas genauer anzugeben.
12018-09-14 23:10:21 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Oberaffe, kannst Du verraten, wie Du was hier mappst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462885420/history - ich erkenne auf keinem der verfügbaren Luftbilder den Verlauf dieser Hochspannungsleitung, geschweige denn, welche Spannug und wie viele Kabel sie hat...?
12018-09-12 09:57:02 UTCwoodpeck It is ok to remove "pokemon" tags but some of these items were legitimate artworks and should not have been deleted!
12018-09-09 07:56:49 UTCwoodpeck Hello MariaAS - thank you for your contributions to OSM. It would be great if you could separate your "missing maps" edits from regular map edits at home (by using different changesets for each) - that would help to avoid huge changeset bounding boxes like this one!
12018-08-24 21:44:23 UTCwoodpeck You have changed the name of the city of Skopje in this changeset. Please don't do that. The name tag should reflect what is used locally.
12018-08-20 08:22:08 UTCkartler175 Achte bei der Aufteiling von Waldflachen bitte auf korrekte Modellierung der Flächen: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.12102&lat=48.06839&zoom=14&opacity=1.00

Woher beziiehst Du übrigens die Bezeichnungeen der Waldstücke? Das sieht mir doch sehr wie...
22018-08-20 08:51:34 UTCLuckMartin Wieso nicht legale Quelle, das ist die höchste Stelle für Kartendaten. Wenn man die Glaubwürdigkeit vom Landesamt für Vermessung und des Finanzministerium anzweifelt, kann man es ganz bleiben lassen oder Reichsbürger werden und eigene Staaten gründen...
Die Namen bezie...
32018-08-20 15:00:43 UTCToniE 'legale Quelle' != 'glaubwürdige Quelle'

Es geht nicht darum., ob der Bayernatlas glaubwürdig ist, sondern darum, dass uns der "Besitzer" der Rechte am Bayernatlas nicht erlaubt, die Daten aus selbigem zu benutzen (Hausnummern, Straßennamen, ...).
Die Daten des Bayernat...
42018-08-20 20:15:46 UTCopendcc Ich habe mir heute die Mühe gemacht und bin da mal zu Bauern hingeradelt und habe nach Forstnamen gefragt - und auch Auskunft erhalten. Und das habe ich eingetragen - die Geometrie braucht noch etwas Feinschliff. Servus
52018-08-21 06:19:24 UTCLuckMartin Woher die Daten kommen ist doch egal solang es sich um keine kreative Eigenleistung handelt, die kopiert wird, kann einem keiner nachweisen, dass er rechtswidrig gehandelt hat.
Ob ich jetzt vor Ort die Hausnummer raussuche (und mich ggf. daheim vorm Bayernatlas nochmal versichere) oder direkt etwas...
62018-08-21 06:40:41 UTCopendcc Hallo,

sorry, da hast Du das mit Urheberrecht usw. nicht verstanden. Das bitte nochmal nachlesen. Geklaute Inhalt gefährden OSM als Ganzes. Massiv! Nur weil es frei zugänglich ist, darf man es nicht nehmen. Hinfahren, fragen, mit GPS aufzeichnen. Und mal angenommen, da liegt eine bewu&s...
72018-08-21 13:30:05 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, opendcc hat recht: "Ich hätte mir diese Information auch auf legalem Wege besorgen können" ist keine akzeptable Ausrede für das Ignorieren von Lizenzen. Wenn Du eine Karte hast, deren Urheberrechtsschutz abgelaufen ist, dann kannst Du die verwenden UND BITTE ALS QUELL...
82018-08-21 13:37:32 UTCLuckMartin Ihr geht ja mal mega steil. Ich finde es auch herrlich wie Ihr mir unterstellt, dass ich das Urheberrecht nicht wertschätze, wenn ich meine Quellen gegenchecke nachdem ich mal rund um mein Zuhause unterwegs bin.
Es ist wohl nicht illegal, wie Opendcc herumzugehen, sich Notizen zu machen oder s...
92018-08-21 13:55:30 UTCopendcc Hallo,

hier geht es keineswegs um Hexenjagd, sondern darum, eine gute, freie und benutzbare Karte zu erzeugen. Der Herausgeber des Bayernatlas hat sich schon einmal über illegal kopierte Inhalte beschwert (damals wurde als Reaktion ziemlich flächendeckend gelöscht) - sowas birgt im...
12018-08-19 15:39:18 UTCwoodpeck Dear germwbe, you are adding a lot of buildings with a precision that does not seem to be attainable from currently available aerial imagery. In the future, please always specify your data source when uploading data!
12018-08-19 15:31:06 UTCwoodpeck Dear user "assenizator0", it would be great if you could make it a habit to use a more descriptive changeset comment than "db assenization". Out of interest, in which language is this a word? Best I could find online was "to make something look like the (Dutch) city of Assen...
22018-08-19 16:37:31 UTCassenizator0 this is a transliterated russian-language term: "ассенизация" - comes from the french word "assainissement", which means "sanitation". because this is my main goal.

just occasionally, so to say "hooked for some place". even here, although I did a...
12018-08-18 15:08:03 UTCassenizator0 You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
22018-08-19 15:28:20 UTCwoodpeck Dear Dinamik, could you please explain why you have added the word "озеро" to the names of these lakes. It does not seem to be a part of the the proper name?

Also, please use real changeset comments (an appropriate changeset comment here would have been "change the names of В...
32018-08-20 06:04:24 UTCDinamik Dear colleagues, I’ll give a comment – sorry, if it will be a little bit short and/or not completely full. Your questions are welcome.

assenizator0, let us not to misinform them. You changed (modified or deleted) a hundreds of names waterbodies during a few days without preliminary di...
42018-08-20 22:01:02 UTCАртём Крюковский at first "Don't tag for the renderer"(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer)

secondly. let us not to misinform them - there was never any agreement on compulsory writing of a generic name with a proper name in the russian community. incorrect information was enter...
52018-08-20 22:05:39 UTCАртём Крюковский https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
62018-08-20 22:14:31 UTCАртём Крюковский https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C&diff=next&oldid=796220
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU%3A%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C&am...
72018-08-21 00:31:29 UTCАртём Крюковский "озеро Вуокса" and "Судаковское озеро" NOT CORRECTED form of name. corrected form is "Вуокса" and "Судаковское" ONLY.
82018-08-21 00:35:07 UTCАртём Крюковский используя родовые имена вместе с именем собственным, ты во-первых вводишь в заблуждение о том, как водный объект называется на самом деле. и во вторых, делаешь невоз...
92018-08-21 00:36:10 UTCАртём Крюковский using generic names along with the proper name, you first mislead about how the water object is actually called. and secondly, you make it impossible to process data on this basis by third-party services.
102018-08-21 00:40:47 UTCАртём Крюковский In addition, if you incorrectly place local or alternative names in the main tag for names, you are also misleading about the actual name of the object and information is lost as to what type these names are. moreover - this or that object, may not have names other than local or alternative and this...
112018-08-21 00:45:30 UTCАртём Крюковский on this basis the database is assenized. and you return the data back to the dirty state, incorrectly naming it "stable version". =/
122018-08-21 00:49:59 UTCАртём Крюковский я много лет занимаюсь наименованиями водных объектов. работаю с огромным числом источников. и в отличие от подобных тебе не вношу данные по желанию левой пятки, а п...
132018-08-21 00:53:02 UTCАртём Крюковский во всех базах, а до этого списках топонимов - отдельно указывается наименование и отдельно его тип. а уже в процессе обработки этих данных формируется подпись для т...
142018-08-21 00:53:50 UTCАртём Крюковский in all databases, and before that lists of place names - the name and its type are separately indicated. and already in the process of processing these data, a signature is formed for this or that object.
152018-08-21 00:55:36 UTCАртём Крюковский OSM is primarily a data set, but certainly not a map.
162018-08-21 00:58:06 UTCАртём Крюковский и тебе с твоими взглядами надо отправляться, либо в викимапию, либо в НЯК.

and you need to go with your views, either to the wikimapia or to the YMP.
172018-08-21 00:59:12 UTCАртём Крюковский dixi
182018-08-21 04:01:37 UTCАртём Крюковский описался. не родовое наименование, а родовое слово, конечно же.

i errated. not a generic name, but a generic word, of course.
192018-08-21 14:40:50 UTCDinamik Артём Крюковский (if it is better to use your another name, please, tell me), you showed, that note was added 6 years ago in reference to forum message due to hidrography tradition. Why do you insist on deletion information, if discussions about these deletions ended with nothing? &qu...
202018-08-21 15:10:12 UTCАртём Крюковский lake Судаковcкое is named "Судаковcкое", but not "Судаковcкое озеро". ONLY.

legitimate source: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/8456895 #2995
212018-08-21 15:28:57 UTCАртём Крюковский when discussing this issue in a telegram chat, many of the most active participants of the OSM speak out against inclusion with the name of their own generic word, if it is not part of the proper name.
222018-08-21 15:33:57 UTCАртём Крюковский allegedly "hydrographic tradition" follows from the instructions for the designation of elements of hydrography on maps. no more. but at the same time, a GENERIC WORD IS NOT A PART OF THE PROPER NAME INDICATED BEFORE NAME and in the form of a reduction.
232018-08-21 15:34:13 UTCАртём Крюковский but the OSM is not a map.
242018-08-21 15:37:11 UTCАртём Крюковский with you it is impossible, that either to discuss, because if something white you will persistently prove that it is black. simply because you can not see otherwise.
252018-08-21 15:39:44 UTCАртём Крюковский and I repeat (and emphasize this):
using generic names along with the proper name, you first mislead about how the water object is actually called. and secondly, you make it impossible to process data on this basis by third-party services.
262018-08-21 15:40:56 UTCАртём Крюковский heck. again i'm errated.
272018-08-21 16:23:48 UTCАртём Крюковский woodpeck, do you have something to say?
282018-08-21 18:12:52 UTCАртём Крюковский woodpeck, neither here, nor in other edits of this user, "озеро" is not part of the name.
292018-08-21 18:28:31 UTCАртём Крюковский here is an example from my practice of collecting local toponyms of water bodies (hydronyms). for example this lake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42606880, to my question "what is this lake called" all the answers were "Щучье"("Shchuch'ye"), not "Щучь...
302018-08-22 06:35:31 UTCDinamik This is an official list of objects - it follows some specific rules due to sorting necessity. Are you really want to say, that, for example, "Белое 4" is normal name?). Perhaps, the issue is in used terminology? When you say "generic word" it looks like some separate word, ...
312018-08-23 12:35:45 UTCАртём Крюковский woodpeck?
322018-08-29 13:06:38 UTCDinamik Артём Крюковский, are planning to give answers or you are just planning to write comments to me in automatic mode? I've asked you to cancel your automatic edits of hundreds of waterbodies and start discussion essentially. My insignificant manual reverts to stable versions of objects a...
332018-08-29 19:35:52 UTCАртём Крюковский this not "stable". this bullshiting of toponims. you edits for render, not for dataset. you must gone from OSM.
342018-08-30 06:00:34 UTCDinamik As I remember, I've already told, that "stable" in joint projects doesn't mean "ideal" or "the best": it means "version before active controversy". If this "bullshited" version existed long time, it will be not a big deal if it is around few weeks mo...
352018-08-30 15:49:27 UTCАртём Крюковский Edits for render.
362018-08-31 19:37:49 UTCDinamik Adding of normal/common/natural name is not a tagging for render. Tag name is designated, curios to relate, for name. P. S. You wrote several hundreds comments "Edits for render" during a few hours. Shouldn't one detailed answer from human be better than several hundreds automatically writ...
372018-08-31 19:51:04 UTCАртём Крюковский you corrupt the proper name. especially for render of osm.org
382018-08-31 23:18:48 UTCDinamik I think, that there are more reasons to say, that you try to move database to some specific state, which corresponds to your special exporting software, because you use non-standard variant of tagging. Let's try to find appropriate algorithm, which allows to export data without neccessity to modifyi...
392018-08-31 23:46:13 UTCАртём Крюковский I do not export. I improve tagging and correct errors in the data. In addition, I am adding new data to the fact that OSM is a data set that is used by many different people for various purposes and that the data must be entered so as to help them with this with minimal effort on their part without ...
402018-09-01 01:30:16 UTCАртём Крюковский damn.
412018-09-01 01:32:37 UTCАртём Крюковский и это не говоря уже о том, что вносимые данные должны быть максимально насколько это возможно точными.
422018-09-01 01:42:32 UTCАртём Крюковский addition for woodpeck and other/

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62121918
432018-09-01 20:24:19 UTCDinamik You wrote, that the data must be entered so as to help them with this with minimal effort on their part without resorting to refined methods or refusing to use data, but you separate common name to different tags and propose to glue information from different tags to get normal human-readable name.
442018-09-01 21:20:51 UTCАртём Крюковский Yes. Because it will be correct and reflect the reality. Since then the name of the object will not be distorted.

Besides. At least so everyone will see how the river is really called, and those who want to sign it on their map in accordance with Russian standards and traditions will be able to d...
452018-09-01 21:24:22 UTCАртём Крюковский I do not call to delete always the generic word. You are those cases when it even coincides with the type of object, but is part of the proper name - it must be in the tag name=*. But if this is not part of the proper name, it should not be there.
462018-09-01 21:25:41 UTCАртём Крюковский damn. i'm errated.
472018-09-01 21:26:20 UTCАртём Крюковский You are those cases -> In those cases
482018-09-07 20:05:25 UTCDinamik I propose to specify, when we can say, that generic word is part of proper name. What can you say about asseveration, that generic word is part of proper name, when name has form of adjective or form of noun in genitive case, and is not part of proper name, when name has form of noun in nominative c...
492018-09-09 09:57:16 UTCАртём Крюковский incorrect assertion
502018-09-14 19:57:16 UTCDinamik Could you, please, clarify your objection? Is the reason in fact, that you don't see grammatical difference between name in form of adjective and name in form of noun (you don't feel it by your linguistic intuition)? Or in fact, that you trust only registers with short form of names?
512018-09-17 12:08:44 UTCАртём Крюковский you confuse the toponyms with their use. even in the form of a noun, a the toponym can contain a generic word, i.e. consist of a pair of separate nouns. in fact, in the toponymic card only the name in full form is displayed - i.e. If the generic word is not an integral part of the name, the full for...
522018-09-22 21:27:44 UTCDinamik I think, the origin of our dispute is in different understanding of idea of the common default name (which corresponds to name). The commond default name should be natural, comprehensible, humanistical. Adjective without noun is not comprehensible in Russian (although situation with settlements is s...
532018-09-22 21:40:52 UTCLesovichok Во-первых, зачем вы тут на английском срач развели? Во-вторых, Артём, ты в корне не прав, потому что согласно правилам проекта русское сообщество для своей территори...
542018-09-25 07:24:27 UTCАртём Крюковский Dinamik, official_name тут не применимо.
552018-09-25 07:31:34 UTCАртём Крюковский Lesovichok, на английском, потому, что предполагается что тему отслеживают иноязычные участники в частности из DWG.

русскоязычное сообщество на этот счёт ничего не реш...
562018-09-28 21:04:37 UTCDinamik Артём Крюковский, sorting_name?
572018-09-29 15:18:40 UTCАртём Крюковский а это тут с чего. тем более даже для улиц для которых он вводился от него отказываются.
582018-09-29 21:48:20 UTCDinamik С того, что как раз в этот тег можно загонять названия, усечённые до формы, позволяющей осуществлять их машинную обработку.
592018-10-14 12:54:49 UTCАртём Крюковский тем более даже для улиц для которых он вводился от него отказываются.
602018-10-14 12:55:22 UTCАртём Крюковский значит, не очень то и помогает даже в этом. =В
612018-10-17 21:24:41 UTCassenizator5 и это не усечённое, а полное имя собственное - в данных случаях "озеро" не является его частью.
12018-08-18 09:31:49 UTCwoodpeck Wieso wurde in diesem Changeset der Fussweg 617525519 mit dem Gebäude 303185448 verknüpft?
12018-08-18 09:29:57 UTCwoodpeck Bitte unterlasse diesen aggresiven Tonfall in Changeset-Kommentaren. Was Du hier gelöscht hast, war kein "Migrolino", sondern ein Objekt, das mit "disused:shop" getaggt war - es stand also schon da, dass es sich hier um etwas handelt, das mal ein shop *war*.
22018-08-18 12:44:11 UTCEagleeye_ZRH Seit wann erfasst man Objekte auf OSM die mal dort waren?
12018-08-16 09:45:55 UTCwoodpeck Hello clairedelune, as you likely know we have some rules regarding data imports, including that a proposed import and the methodology should be discussed with the community before it is executed. The un-verified import of computer generated geometries is generally not welcome. Can you explain the &...
22018-08-16 14:01:21 UTCPierZen @woodpeck What's make you think that way 614459980 do not express reality? This landuse polygon corresponds to a certain density of houses in the area while less dense areas are ignored. I revised all polygons and they all correspond to housing.

clairdelune is doing a great job in RDC coordinat...
32018-08-16 14:38:47 UTCwoodpeck PierZen, I have looked at the way in an editor showing imagery, and I could immediately identify some equally dense housing extending past the area, so the creation of the area is totally arbitrary. For this one way alone, I can spot quite a few houses where it is totally illogical that the area was...
42018-08-16 15:14:02 UTCPierZen *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
52018-08-16 16:56:49 UTCRobJN Broadly speaking that way looks ok. A couple small bits on the east that you might change, and you would probably draw it differently of the roads were in place first, but as a first pass it seems ok to me. I think we just need to be clear to any future "on the ground mappers" that they ca...
62018-09-17 09:11:10 UTCMateusz Konieczny @author of this edit

Do you plan to fix badly mapped/imported ways objects like for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614459980 ?
72018-09-19 08:18:46 UTCMateusz Konieczny Is this mechanical edit following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
?

If not - are you planning to fix it (and revert it, if not accepted by OSM comminity)?
82018-09-20 07:25:10 UTCclairedelune This edit was a first pass to help identify areas that need to be worked on. I will personally fix each of the ways that still require it (and haven't already been improved by other contributors).
92018-09-20 16:20:16 UTCMateusz Konieczny It is nice to hear that cleanup is planned.

Can you link to documentation of this import?
102018-10-17 13:19:45 UTCMateusz Konieczny What is the expected time when cleanup of this import will be completed?

What is the expected time when this undocumented import will be documented?
12018-08-13 23:15:51 UTCwoodpeck Dear spietsnaz, I am increasingly skeptical of your adding of "Italian" names. In this changeset you added the name "Vecchia strada carreggiabile Hilbe" but it seems to me that this exists only in your imagination. You seem to have translated the German name to Italian, but that ...
22018-08-14 08:58:52 UTCspietsnaz Alto Adige-Südtirol is bilingual. So I applied bilingualism. I'd like to know what are the sources in German.
For ANY changes in the future I'll list my sources, my mistake. Do you want to erase them? Do it.
You are not correct. This is Italy not Austria, got it? There are laws for the bili...
32018-08-14 13:42:00 UTCluschi @apietsnatz: you are wrong. Südtirol is not in all points bilingual!
There are places they only have German names of streets. Also there are places they use only Ladin names.
The "Geobrowser" or the GeoKatalog from the "Südtiroler Bürgernetz" are not the bes...
12018-03-11 18:08:57 UTCEssin Google Maps är upphovsrättsskyddat och får inte användas som underlag för OSM, se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data . Allt som har lagts till med Google Maps som källa måste tyvärr tas bort.
22018-08-13 22:46:49 UTCwoodpeck I have removed and redacted the contents of this changeset.
12018-08-12 09:51:34 UTCwoodpeck Some of the buildings you have mapped are not visible on the Bing aerial imagery. Can you clarify which "data file" you have loaded information from, or which other data source led you to draw e.g. this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616249837 -- also, if you are reasonably co...
12018-08-09 20:57:35 UTCwoodpeck Please do not upload plus codes to OpenStreetMap. Apart from being an undiscussed import, it does not make sense - it is as if you were to add a "lat=..., lon=..." tag to a building. The plus codes can be determined by an algorithm from the coordinates, they do not have to be stored in OSM...
22018-08-11 06:26:22 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61558473 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import adding of Plus Codes and sizes of buildings. The codes can be derived from the coordinates. The size can be derived from the building geometry. See https://lists.openstre...
32018-08-19 06:28:52 UTCMateusz Konieczny @Nakaner Thanks for reverting this pointless and undiscussed import.
12018-08-07 13:07:24 UTCDaveF Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8506033/history

Are you adding historic county boundaries from new or updating existing?
22018-08-07 14:37:38 UTCsmb1001 Hi,
I've been adding them from new as none exist at present. The result of my work thus far is
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ARB
Given it's a manual job, I have to frequently go back and "correct" sections I missed or the like, but although I frequently add the relation to existing bounda...
32018-08-07 14:56:32 UTCDaveF Hi
Where are you obtaining your historic data?

From the historic wiki page
"historic objects should not be mapped as it is outside of scope of OSM"

Boundaries are amended regularly. What is the date of your 'historic' additions. How far back in time are you planning to go?

42018-08-07 16:12:13 UTCsmb1001 In this case they are not 'historic' but current. (Now with governmental backing also: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/by-george-englands-traditional-counties-can-return-to-englands-roads ) They represent the immutable divisions of England from Saxon times until the boundary acts of the 1880s, a...
52018-08-07 17:30:53 UTCDaveF I'm struggling to comprehend 'historic' as "current".

TBH, I see your comments as self defeating. If they're "immutable" & "unaffected" over time, how come you're adding ways?

As this is a country wide endeavour has it been discussed on Talk-GB?

Which versi...
62018-08-07 18:11:17 UTCDaveF Note: You are incorrectly add identical tags to both ways & relations. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613388972
72018-08-07 21:58:54 UTCwoodpeck Historic boundaries should be added to a suitable project e.g. openhistoricalmap, not OSM. Boundaries are problematic in OSM in every case since they are rarely observable; the only reason we have county boundaries at all is that their usefulness (not least to mappers) outweighs their lack of observ...
82018-08-09 09:04:53 UTCsmb1001 (Re: adding tags to both ways and relations) Are you talking about the boundary=historic on the way? -- every admin boundary has boundary=administrative in both the way and relation. I'm fine to leave those off the way, but isn't the standard to put an indicative tag on the way so potlatch, etc make...
12018-07-24 09:48:04 UTCwoodpeck In diesem Changeset wurde der "Schiffs-Spielplatz" seiner Spielplatz-Eigenschaft beraubt, und der benachbarte Park ist nun kein Park mehr. Warum? Und was hat das mit dem Changeset-Kommentar "Geocaching" zu tun?
22018-07-25 06:27:15 UTCtux67 Wenn du mal die anderen Changesets mit gleichem Betreff durchsiehst .. fast alle haben einen destruktiven Charakter - löschen Parks oder legen neue an .. hat m.E. nichts mit Kartenverbesserungen zu tun.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.co...
32018-07-25 06:36:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61042579 where the changeset comment is: Verschlimmbesserungen revertiert, nachdem der Mapper zu Kommentaren nicht Stellung nahm
12018-07-08 21:37:37 UTCwoodpeck Hallo FranzF, beim FOSSGIS ist eine Beschwerde über die Ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117236720 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117236722 eingegangen. Angeblich endet der Weg von norden kommend an dem Haus, danach führt nur noch ein privater Feldweg auf die Wiese, und weiter...
12018-07-04 07:51:04 UTCwoodpeck Dear Зелёный Кошак, there has been a copyright complaint about the track layout of the Anetta Valley & Western Railroad. Could you explain more about your data source? If you have used copyrighted material, like a leaflet or their web site, then we have to remove the information from...
12018-06-26 11:29:41 UTCstromo This is a mechanical edit. I doubt, that you have really verified all 448 features on imagery and so reverted your changeset.
22018-06-26 16:58:28 UTCForstEK Hi, young mapper!
First, this is not a mechanical edit, but a correction of the wrong tagging scheme according to the wiki. Openstreetmap is a large geodatabase, and there are rules, they are set out in the wiki, the database must be in order, and your rollback has returned a mess. The tag man_made...
32018-06-26 21:14:52 UTCwoodpeck Hi, young mapper yourself. Please be advised that what you have done *is* a mechanical edit, whether it contains mistakes or not. Any edit where you change objects without inspecting the individual object is a mechanical edit and MUST be discussed with the relevant community beforehand (in this case...
42018-06-26 22:28:19 UTCForstEK Hi, woodpeck.
Try to understand.
Yes, I know this rule, but I repeat that the all objects in this changeset were checked by bing images in QGIS, the same could have been created in JOSM, so I do not agree about mechanical editing. Yes, you find a mistake with a chimney inside the cooling tower, bu...
52018-06-26 22:33:11 UTCdieterdreist I propose you fix the Russian translation of the wiki definition for man_made=cooling_tower
The tag is not deprecated, although there is some discussion because of the 2 alternative ways to tag them
62018-06-26 22:43:30 UTCForstEK It's deal with not a Russian or English page, but in a centralized solution. How many useless fixes! My argument is for the predominant option according to taginfo - there's less work to do to bring everything to one scheme (in the world). We have four different wiki pages now: in English, Czech, Ge...
72018-06-27 08:25:17 UTCdieterdreist According to the recent discussion, there is not a clear winner between man_made=tower with tower:type=cooling and the tag man_made=cooling_tower, they are both used in similar numbers.
If you tag these as man_made=tower you will not create more consistency (there are already other objects with &qu...
12018-06-15 07:56:08 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, ich habe diesen Editwar in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59861459 kommentiert. Würde Dich aber bitten, auch bei Meinungsverschiedenheiten mit anderen Mappern respektvoll umzugehen und bei Uneinigkeit Dritte hinzuzuziehen (Forum, Mailingliste o.ä.) statt einfach "EOT&q...
12018-06-15 07:53:21 UTCwoodpeck Es ist zu unterscheiden zwischen dem Namen eines Gebäudes und dem Namen eines Geschäfts, das das ganze Gebäude oder den Teil eines Gebäudes innehat. Die allermeisten Geschäftsgebäude haben gar keinen Namen, und dann taggt man oft sowas wie name=Migros direkt an das Geb&...
12018-06-14 04:18:02 UTCBaKaUma 你好,
在變更集內的內容並不能反映在地圖上,而我已經在先前變更集留言指出使用highway=construction的原因。
另外因應本路位於香港內,而使用zh-hant作為zh名稱。
就此本人已用郵件向OpenStreetMap官方反映,希望你可以在以社區...
22018-06-14 18:54:06 UTCwoodpeck Dear 融融 young, I wish to support BaKaUma's statement. I see the bridge is scheduled to open for vehicular traffic on July 1st, about 2 weeks from now. Please leave the "highway=construction" in place until the bridge is actually open. Thank you!
12018-06-04 21:30:55 UTCwoodpeck Are you sure that "Gardens of Memory" is a park and not a cemetery?
12018-06-04 21:29:16 UTCwoodpeck "Museum Courtyard" and "Porter Park" and "Poplar Head Park" do not look like parks to me. Are you sure? Is there an online resource that has something about these parks?
12018-06-04 21:28:07 UTCwoodpeck This does not look like a park to me. Can you point to an online resource that mentions "Downtown Park"?
12018-06-04 21:26:27 UTCwoodpeck Dear Artifactor, please stop adding leisure=park to the Dothan Area Botanical Gardens. If you believe that tagging them as "garden" is wrong, please write a comment here and explain why.
12018-04-01 20:07:27 UTCflohoff Hi Abrensch,
das war absicht das zu trennen - Ich behebe gerade ~24000 Fehler in OWL wo Flächen und Straßen verbunden wurden. Das ist ein Topologiefehler.

Flo
22018-04-01 20:29:02 UTCflohoff *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
32018-04-01 20:30:45 UTCOF0 Das Verbinden von Wegen und Flächen ist eine anerkannte vorgehensweise.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
42018-04-01 20:45:49 UTCflohoff Ich sehe das nicht so - Und die OWL Community ebenfalls nicht. Dadurch das du als mein Stalker das immer wieder wiederholst wird das nicht richtiger.

Und zitier bitte auf was du dich beziehst. Dadurch das wir das abtrennen erhöhen wir die genauigkeit und beheben den Topologie/Lagefehler der ...
52018-04-01 21:28:23 UTCOF0 [..] Dadurch das du als mein Stalker das immer wieder wiederholst wird das nicht richtiger. [...]

Ich wirke lediglich Deiner Desinformationskampange entgegen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57314116
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/53143994 
https://openstreetmap.org/change...
62018-04-01 21:49:56 UTCflohoff > "That being said, when the way is a highway, it usually is most
> accurate to include a gap, so that the area ends by the side of the
> road and does not share nodes with the road's way. " [...]
>
> Das Wiki sollte eigentlich die gelebte Mappingpraxis dokumentieren un...
72018-04-02 06:15:26 UTCOF0 [...] Also - Nicht ICH habe das Wiki angeführt sondern Du [...]

Das ist richtig.

[...] Leider hast du dabei in jeglicher Diskussion unterschlagen das du eben auch keine Mehrheitsmeinung vertrittst [...]

Klicke mal auf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventio...
82018-04-02 07:10:12 UTCabrensch Will mich ja nicht in Eure Diskussion einmischen, aber mein Changeset hat ein **LOCH** in der K73 geflickt (das Loch ist in manchen Zoomstufen auch noch zu sehen). Und da war tatsächlich auch die Strasse noch mit einem Landnutzungspolygon verbunden, und ja mich stört das auch, weil zumind...
92018-04-02 07:46:39 UTCOF0 Ja, da haben wir beide Deinen Changesetkommentar fehlinterpretiert.
102018-04-02 08:18:20 UTCHarald Hartmann Also wenn ich einwas in den letzten Jahren in OSM gelernt habe, dann das es in keinem Punkt überhaupt eine Mehrheit gibt und über alles streiten kann. Aber ich glaube die Etiquette erlaubt es einem sehr wohl, sich nach den Gepflogenheiten vor Ort zu richten.

@OF0: Leider weiß ich ...
112018-04-02 08:22:20 UTCHarald Hartmann Ach und ich für mich persönlich würde auf Grund der mittlerweile sehr guten Luftbilder in meiner Gegend auch keine highways mehr mit landuses verkleben ... zwischen dem abstrakten highway (der straßenmitte) und einem angrenzenden Wald gibt es ja vielleicht auch noch den Stra&szl...
122018-04-02 10:02:31 UTCflohoff Hi Harald,

ich würde auch die Straßengräben/Wasserwege/Waterways mit keinen Flächen verkleben. Für sie gilt am Ende die selbe Semantik wie bei Straßen. Wir mappen nur die Mitte des Grabens. Die Böschung würde ich ja eher zum "waterway" zähl...
132018-04-02 10:09:12 UTCHarald Hartmann Mit "Straßengraben" meinte ich auch nicht zwingend irgendwas mit waterway=ditch usw. sondern auch wieder "flächenbehaftete Polygone". Als weiteres Beispiel: klar waterway=river würde ich als abstrakten Weg in der Mitte nicht verkleben, waterway=riverbank als Fl&au...
142018-04-02 10:17:40 UTCflohoff Genau - Typischerweise verbinde ich nur gleichartige objekte. Highway/Highway Landuse/Landuse - Aber eben kein leisure/amenity mit Landuse - Der Kundenparkplatz ist ein amenity=parking das von einem landuse=retail/commercial komplett eingeschlossen wird. Polygone (auch an den rändern) zu verbin...
152018-04-02 10:27:50 UTCHarald Hartmann Hmm, ich habe ein Einkaufscenter und mappe die komplette Fläche als landuse=commercial/retail. Dann setze ich einen Parkplat mit amenity=parking und wenn er an den Rand stößt, verbinde ich das auch mit dem äußeren landuse. Ich bilder kein MP, schneide es also nicht aus. We...
162018-04-02 10:45:33 UTCflohoff Es gibt eben PostGIS themen - ST_Within/ST_Intersects/ST_Overlaps/ST_Touches und einige triggern halt wenn es anschliesst obwohl es eher unintuitiv ist. Ich schliesse das auch nicht weil ich oft nicht glaube das es wirklich angrenzt. Man kann das jetzt Erbsenzählerei nennen. Oft ist aber noch e...
172018-04-02 11:04:49 UTCOF0 [...] Ach und ich für mich persönlich würde auf Grund der mittlerweile sehr guten Luftbilder in meiner Gegend auch keine highways mehr mit landuses verkleben ... zwischen dem abstrakten highway (der straßenmitte) und einem angrenzenden Wald gibt es ja vielleicht auch noch den St...
182018-04-02 11:11:46 UTCOF0 [...] @OF0: Leider weiß ich gerade nicht, wie ich folgenden Teil einer deiner letzten Changesetkommentare deuten soll: 
...Es muss aber auch drecksarbeiterledigende Mapper wie mich ge[...]

Damit möchte ich vorrangig persönliche Nachrichten "altgedienter" Beitragend...
192018-04-02 14:59:28 UTCOF0 @flohoff

Gerade erst gesehen:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2018-April/114782.html

Du schreibst dort, ich hätte Dich aufgefordert es bitte zu unterlassen Deine Bemühungen als Mehrheitsmeinung darzustellen.

Wo bitte habe ich das gemacht? Ich hatte dich meiner...
202018-05-24 17:40:15 UTCpos_ei_don Ich war früher selbst Anhänger des verklebens, da es einfach auch Daten reduziert. Mittlerweile jedoch bin ich eindeutig dagegen und finde die Diskussion hier Recht witzig aber auch mega unnötig. Ein Punkt, der nicht auf der Straße ist, hat dort nichts verloren, also gehört...
212018-05-24 17:50:39 UTCpos_ei_don "There is not clear consensus"
Ergänzung: Dieser Satz stammt von 2009 und ist mittlerweile sicherlich anders zu formulieren. Solch altes Zeug gilt sicherlich nicht als Maßstab!
222018-05-24 19:34:32 UTCOF0 @pos_ei_don

Du kommst zu spät für die Diskussion. Mutmaßlich hat sich flohoff die indirekte Aufforderung von Michael Reichert (aka Nakaner) zu eigen gemacht...

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2018-April/114881.html

... und mich von der DWG verwarnen lassen...
232018-05-25 11:08:43 UTCwoodpeck Bitte Changeset-Diskussionen auf das beschränken, was unmittelbar den Edit betrifft. Für allgemeine Diskussionen ist das Medium nicht geeignet (besser: Mailingliste, Forum).
242018-05-25 15:17:59 UTCOF0 @woodpeck

[...] Bitte Changeset-Diskussionen auf das beschränken, was unmittelbar den Edit betrifft. [...]

Ja, das mag die goldene Regel sein.

[...] Für allgemeine Diskussionen ist das Medium nicht geeignet (besser: Mailingliste, Forum). [...]

Das ist leider nur zum Teil n...
12018-05-21 22:29:25 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 59114530, 59114612, 59114743, 59114776, 59115547, 59115866, 59116255, 59116591, 59116769, 59116990, 59117214, 59117291, 59117610, 59118088, 59118481, 59118788, 59119040, 59119147, 59119198, 59120422, 59124435, 59124461, 59124521.
22018-05-22 05:53:07 UTCAndre68 Hallo Frederik, ich hatte eigentlich alles so weit repariert, dass es hätte gut sein sollen. Jetzt ist vieles wieder kaputt. Mein eigener Checker wirf jedenfalls viele Fehler und ich habe heute keine Zeit, es wieder zu reparieren. Was war denn am Stand von gestern falsch? (nach meinen Korrektur...
32018-05-22 16:00:48 UTCwoodpeck Ich habe einfach die Changeset-IDs in den Reverter geschmissen, ohne genauer hinzuschauen. Wäre aber kein Problem, den Stand von Dir wiederherzustellen, wenn der ok war.
12018-05-17 08:41:40 UTCwoodpeck Hallo felkel1982, es wäre wirklich gut, wenn Du Dir angewöhnen könntest, zu jedem Changeset auch einen (gern kurzen, aber aussagekräftigen) Kommentar einzugeben. Viele Rückfragen können dadurch vermieden werden, und es gehört einfach zum respektvollen Umgang mit de...
12018-05-17 06:00:49 UTCwoodpeck You drew a somewhat circular (oval?) way in this changeset but didn't apply any tags; also the way doesn't conform to anything visible on aerial imagery. Can you check and possibly correct this?
12018-05-17 05:59:07 UTCwoodpeck You have drawn a few strangely shaped objects that bear no resemblance to aerial imagery in this changeset. Can you please delete these objects or correct them?
12018-05-13 04:47:22 UTCuser_5359 Welcome to OSM! You imported 44 nodes with unusually tags without any check of duplicates. Example for the first node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5614462476? Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/367797842?
Did you validate the license?
The wrong keys are ADDRESS (addr:fu...
22018-05-13 07:41:47 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58917660 where the changeset comment is:
32018-05-13 07:46:08 UTCwoodpeck Hello gamulea4, I'm afraid I had to revert your changes because they violated our import guidelines (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import). These guidelines mandate a previous discussion with the community, which would among other things have helped avoid the obvious issues pointed out by ...
42018-05-14 22:15:22 UTCgamulea4 Hi, so this was mostly just a test import. My internship plans on importing a lot of data from Prince George's County and wanted to see the best way to accomplish that. In the future I will ensure that the data is good. Is the only problems with this data about the tags and that I dont have a licen...
52018-05-15 04:30:18 UTCuser_5359 Please read the mentioned link of woodpeck: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import. Communication for the data to be imported is very important. Maybe you start with statistics, how much information is missing or can be corrected.
12018-05-08 20:15:40 UTCwoodpeck Dear spietsnaz, you are adding lots of Italian names to objects but you are not saying where the information comes from. Please make it a habit to provide a proper source tag. You have in the past used Google maps and maps from regione.fvg.it, both of which are not legal sources to use in OSM. So pl...
12018-05-08 19:05:30 UTCwoodpeck Dear Liju Thomas, the roads you have added in this changeset are clearly not "unclassified" but "residential" roads, because they lead right through densely built-up areas!

Also, the "source" that you are specifying is not a "source". Valid source tags wou...
22018-05-09 12:30:11 UTCGodsOwnJeeper Hi, Thanks for the comments. Will add the profile... In this case, already existing near by roads where "unclassified" and hence marked as "unclassified".. We work with Navigation traces from the field force. So we dont have much information on the classification on the road...
12018-05-06 18:17:45 UTCwoodpeck It appears that you are fixing intersections world-wide. Please explain which QA tool you are using to find these intersection, and on whose behalf you are making these edits. Are you a member of the GISua team, or working for someone other? It would be good to have this information on your user pro...
22018-05-10 17:01:16 UTCFarkad5 Hello!
I am using https://www.keepright.at/index.php?lang=en.
It's just a little hobby.
12018-05-04 12:09:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo fell3, einige Leute wundern sich über die von Dir hinzugefügten Details. Kannst Du mir ganz konkret sagen, wo zum Beispiel diese Hecke herkommt. "private Wegaufzeichnungen" wohl kaum (oder zeichest Du einzelne Hecken auf?). Aufzeichnungen von Radelfreunden? Auf dem Bing-Luf...
22018-05-14 17:51:24 UTCfell3 In dem fall war ich persönlich letztes jahr dort. Bing nutze ich wie ich schon öfters gesagt habe nur zum groben Überblick. Ich (wir) waren nun vom 10.13.5. wieder in Thammühl die Hecke steht noch!!!! Wo hast du geguckt?? Kamil Robert Mike Matias Bärbel Linda Antje und noch ...
32018-05-14 17:54:56 UTCfell3 korrektur läuft (nicht leuft), 10. bis 13.5. nicht 10.13.5.
Wer weitere Rechtschreibfehler findet, darf sie sich behalten. ; )
12018-04-25 05:50:00 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58396885 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus Wohnpark Walldorf entfernt, siehe entsprechende User-Blocks
22018-04-25 10:21:24 UTCOF0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BananaBanana scheint die nächste Sockenpuppe zu sein.
32018-04-25 11:13:07 UTCwoodpeck Schon gesehen, die Edits sind bislang harmlos, aber beim ersten "recreation ground" fliegt alles wieder raus.
12018-04-10 17:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Hallo! Ein Wohngebiet wird nicht zu einem "recreation_ground" oder "park", nur weil es dort ein paar Wiesen oder Basketballfelder gibt. Bitte orientiere Dich beim Mapping an der Realität und nicht an einer Imagebroschüre des Stadtmarketing. Ich werde das jetzt zurü...
22018-04-24 12:04:12 UTCValarMapulis Es ist kein Wohngebiet. Es ist ein Wohnpark. Und es gibt nicht ein paar Wiesen, sondern der gesamte Wohnpark ist eine große bepflanze Wiese. Bitte mal bei der großen Suchmaschine die mit G anfängt nachschauen. Danke.
32018-04-24 13:18:01 UTCParzelle13 Ja und? Da sieht es auch nicht anders aus als jedes beliebige Wohngebiet mit Grünflächen und Spielplätzen, die ebenfalls dadurch nicht zu Parks werden.
42018-04-24 18:24:00 UTCOF0 Es geht weiter?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58379393
52018-04-24 21:43:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58389889 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus Wohnpark Walldorf entfernt, siehe entsprechende User-Blocks
62018-04-25 05:49:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58396885 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus Wohnpark Walldorf entfernt, siehe entsprechende User-Blocks
12018-04-07 21:32:39 UTCwoodpeck Why do you make edits in the south of India and tag them "#Tanzania" and "#TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust"?
12018-03-17 21:49:38 UTCwoodpeck Kennst Du Dich in den Gegenden aus, in denen Du diese "nach suburb verschoben"-Änderungen machst, oder ist das rein algorithmisch nach dem Motto "finde den Place-Node und richte alles danach aus"?
22018-03-18 12:04:06 UTCRopino Hallo,
ich habe mich u.a. an Wikipedia
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satow - Ortsteile
und (wenn verfügbar) an Mapillary
z.B. hier für einen andern Ortsteil von Satow:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.03896521567315&lng=11.950561416070771&z=14.78630578574794&focus=pho...
12018-03-04 19:02:16 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56858688, 56859381, 56870178, 56870921.
22018-03-04 19:49:28 UTCPrince Kassad This revert accidentally moved over a thousand nodes to (0,0), some of them with TIGER data. Fixed this with changeset 56879900: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56879900
32018-03-04 22:19:52 UTCIDKS What are you guys doing? Blocking legitimate users and fixing reverts by deleting bunch of nodes?
42018-03-05 11:01:30 UTCwoodpeck Indeed, the revert script had a bug where those nodes that it wanted to delete (because they were deleted before, and had been re-activated in the changeset to be reverted) were instead moved to 0,0. Thank you for fixing this.
12018-03-04 22:06:48 UTCIDKS She/he was doing good work mapping ways, and I don't understand your reasons behind the block - they are quire vague and non-understandable. Have you check the user history?
Most of the edits are in one area and to me they do not look like they are automatic.
Care to explain yourself a little bit ...
22018-03-05 10:55:18 UTCwoodpeck Did you read the block message? Thousands of un-attributed and un-used nodes, often re-using node IDs from across the globe that were long since deleted, re-activating these buggy notes without comment after they were deleted by a community member, and not reacting to questions asked about these iss...
12018-03-01 09:10:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56782000 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
12018-02-26 10:35:25 UTCpatrick noll Leavitt locations you changed in this changeset were correct. Why did you remove them as advertising?
22018-02-26 10:44:41 UTCwoodpeck They were added by a SEO company (using 4 different throwaway accounts that will not respond to comments, and are not interested in learning how to make correct contributions to OSM). The SEO company took care to get all the contact data right but there wasn't a single shop or amenity or other tag t...
12018-02-25 21:57:20 UTCwoodpeck Hi d_berger, reverting these edits was the right thing to do, but writing "FU", "Plonk", and "moron edits" was not. If your temper makes it impossible for you to show some politeness towards someone who has made a mistake, then simply let someone else do the revert.
12018-02-22 12:56:02 UTCGerold Warum hast Du die Bachstraße 6/2 von building=house auf building=yes getaggt?
22018-02-22 14:54:27 UTCPT-53 Wie Du vielleicht schon festgestellt hast, trage ich nicht da und dort mal was ein sondern überarbeite Gemeinden immer komplett. Dabei verwende ich für Gebäude - mit Ausnahme von Kirchen etc. - generell buildung=yes.
Grüße
32018-02-22 15:46:19 UTCGerold Wie aus der Revisionsgeschichte dieses ways ersichtlich ist, hast Du korrektes und realitätskonformes Tagging geändert.
Warum?
42018-02-22 16:13:35 UTCPT-53 Habe ich Dir doch bereits erläutert!
52018-02-22 16:38:19 UTCGerold Also nimmst Du einfach Änderungen vor, weil dir das grade passt. Ohne Rücksicht auf das was tatsächlich getaggt werden sollte?

Nennt man auch Vandalismus...
62018-02-22 17:25:31 UTCPT-53 Wow,
ich ergänze / überarbeite hunderte von Gebäuden und Adressen und verwende dabei einheitliche Werte. Das nennst Du Vandalismus?
Ist building=yes denn falsch?
72018-02-22 18:41:47 UTCGerold building=house war richtiger, weil es eben in der Realität ein entsprechendes Wohnhaus ist.

Dein edit war somit völlig überflüssig und Du hast vorsätzlich Informationen gelöscht, die die Realität besser wiedergeben als das was Du eingetragen hast.

"Sesse...
82018-02-22 19:15:43 UTCPT-53 Wem nützt die Info, daß das nicht nur ein Gebäude sondern ein Wohnhaus ist?
Viel Wind um nichts!
92018-02-22 19:39:15 UTCGerold Dein beschränktes Vorstellungsvermögen soll die Grundlage für Datensammlungen wie OSM sein?
Ernsthaft?

Und nur weil dir kein Einsatzzweck dafür einfällt, wird es auch sonst nie jemanden geben, der damit was nützliches macht?

Als der alte Planck sich vor über...
102018-02-22 19:42:51 UTCTourenbikerFKB Genausogut könnte man fragen: "wem nützt 3D-Mapping bei Gebäuden". Wenn Du dir nichts vorstellen kannst: andere haben vielleicht eine Anwendung dafür. In meiner Gegend unterscheide ich auch Wohn/Gewerbegebäude und würde es als Frechheit ansehen, wenn jetzt jem...
112018-02-22 19:44:44 UTCTourenbikerFKB mein vorheriger Beitrag gilt PT-53. Sollte man aber erkennen können :-)
122018-02-23 07:55:29 UTCPT-53 @tourenbiker:
Es gibt 3D-Anwendungen, gibt es auch Anwendungen wo Einfamilienhaus ausgewertet wird ?
132018-02-23 08:27:52 UTCGerold Falls es dafür aktuell keine Anwendung gäbe, wäre das ein legitimer Grund, einfach korrekte Daten zu löschen/ändern?

Dass Du mit deinen entsprechenden edits die Nützlichkeit einer solchen Anwendung bereits verringert hast, ist dir noch nicht aufgefallen?

Dass dein...
142018-02-23 08:45:11 UTCPT-53 Ich wiederhole:
Hier wird viel Wirbel um nichts gemacht!
152018-02-23 09:25:12 UTCwhb @PT-53
Ja, es gibt Anwendungen, welche building=house auswerten, z.B. OsmAnd.
Systematisches und vorsätzliches Entfernen von genauen Gebäudetypen ist nicht akzeptabel.
162018-02-23 09:34:53 UTCwoodpeck +1, alle Änderungen, bei denen Du ein "building=<irgendwas spezifisches>" auf das weniger informationskräftige "building=yes" reduziert hast, sollten rückgängig gemacht werden.
172018-02-23 09:41:15 UTCstreckenkundler Also ich die Beschwerde von Gerold nachvollziehen... Vandalismus ist zwar ein harter Vorwurf ich hätte den Vorwurf aber auch gemacht...

Ich jedenfalls würde es unter allem Umständen vermeiden, Gebäude z.B. von house nach yes zu ändern. Im Gegenteil... Ich bin ein Freund ...
182018-02-23 09:43:15 UTCstreckenkundler Ach ja,

die Ito-Maps unterscheiden auch:
http://product.itoworld.com/map/group/4
192018-02-23 09:49:54 UTCPT-53 OK. Auch wenn ich immer noch keinen wirklichen Sinn an building=houese etc.erkennen kann, werde ich künftig darauf achten, vorhandene Eingaben nicht aus rationellen Gründen anzupassen. Ich werde aber sicher nicht meine bisherigen Eingaben alle sichten und evtl. Anpassungen zu reverten.Fals...
202018-02-23 10:05:51 UTCNakaner Hallo,

unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61448 wird auch darüber diskutiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
212018-02-23 10:47:32 UTCHarald Hartmann @PT-53: wärst du vielleicht so nett und freundlich uns transparent mitzuteilen, welche Keys du noch aus deinen persönlichen rationellen Gründen angepasst hast?
PS: Nein, du musst dich nicht rechtfertigen, aber das würde vielleicht dein hiermit beschädigtes Image als langj&a...
222018-02-23 11:00:42 UTCfreebeer As an aside. StreetComplete handles building=yes and building=something differently, when deciding to complete missing housenumbers.
This can be seen recently in Australia where an entire residential neighbourhood was tagged building=residential, and now has more accurate building=shed, building=ga...
232018-02-23 12:08:22 UTCkreuzschnabel Ich finde die grundsätzliche Einstellung mehrkwürdig.

Mal so zum Nachdenken: Du baust ein Haus und hast selbst schon ein paar Lichtschalter Busch-Jaeger ASDF kirschrot eingesetzt, weil sie dir gefallen und gut zum Haus passen. Du beauftragst einen Elektriker, die Arbeit fertigzustellen...
242018-02-23 12:13:01 UTCHarald Hartmann Ach und PT-53, dir sei noch wärmstens das JOSM Style (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AStyles/Coloured_buildings) ans Herz gelegt.
252018-02-23 14:32:36 UTCuvi Diskutiert wird dieses Thema auch hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61448
262018-02-23 14:38:39 UTCHarald Hartmann ?! siehe Nakaner vor 5 Stunden?
272018-02-23 15:34:41 UTCuvi ups, übersehen!
12018-02-20 11:05:01 UTCwoodpeck Hallo LottiKarotti, bitte füge keine persönlichen Daten (wie hier geschehen: E-Mail-Adressen) zu OpenStreetMap hinzu. Erstens verletzt Du damit u.U. die Privatsphäre der Betroffenen, zweitens sind das keine überprüfbaren Geodaten. Bitte entferne alle E-Mail-Adressen, die Du ...
22018-02-20 11:06:51 UTCwoodpeck (Falls das nicht klar war: Die Daten, die Du hier einträgst, sind öffentlich einsehbar!)
12018-02-16 23:43:24 UTCwoodpeck This edit, and the edits you made in January 2018, do not correspond to actual features on the ground. Please refrain from adding fictional data to OpenStreetMap. I have reverted the edits in question.
12018-02-08 17:33:28 UTCazsr I really don't think any of these edits were necessary. Even though these were added by purpose-built hit-and-run throwaway accounts specifically for adding their businesses on the map, they still added map data without having annoying descriptions. What was there is on the ground, anyways, but we'r...
22018-02-08 17:49:07 UTCwoodpeck Not only were these purpose-built hit-and-run accounts that will never respond to anything you would ask of them, they were also created by an SEO firm that has zero interest in our map other than putting their customer's name on it. This is much worse than an individual owner adding their own busin...
32018-02-09 14:29:57 UTCazsr Thanks for your quick reply. Do we know the SEO that does this?
42018-02-09 22:27:54 UTCwoodpeck FSVO "know", yes. I know from my work at DWG that they all come from the same IP range in Asia and most have signed up with an email address pointing to an US SEO business.

I have a couple 100 more of these across the US that I would like to weed out but while I do have strong opinions ...
12018-02-05 08:25:03 UTCwoodpeck Der Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478918750 (und vielleicht auch andere - ich habe nur diesen stichprobenartig gegriffen) ist in diesem Changeset als bearbeitet markiert, wurde aber gar nicht verändert. Hast Du dafür eine Erklärung - könnte das ein Bug in einem Plugin sei...
22018-02-11 23:56:26 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 56277501, 56277015, 56277682, 56275296 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and undiscussed address import/mass modification by user geocodec. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2018-February/009114.html. This...
12018-01-24 14:05:10 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, woher stammt der Name "Casa de Chela"? Bist Du selbst vor Ort gewesen und hast den dort erfasst, oder könnte der eventuell "aus Versehen" auch aus einer anderen Karte stammen?
22018-01-24 17:56:53 UTCBratananio Ich bin seit 20 Jahren auf allen Inseln der Kapverden unterwegs und bekomme die Informationen sowohl von Freunden vor Ort als auch durch meine Eigenbesuche und Wanderungen.
12018-01-24 07:16:18 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you have added the name "212" to a number of hiking paths. Your source is "bing, knowledge". Since the number cannot come from Bing: Where does your "knowledge" come from? Have you been there and surveyed the path, has there been a sign with that numbe...
22018-01-24 17:55:33 UTCBratananio I am since 20 years on all these islands and I have the information from my friends there.
If it has changed, please add the new number for the path.
12018-01-24 07:14:05 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, Du hast hier einen Weg angelegt mit dem Namen "106". Wo kommt dieser Name her, hast Du den selbst vor Ort von einem Schild abgelesen oder könnte es sein, dass der aus einer anderen Karte kommt?
12018-01-23 16:50:58 UTCneuhausr Hi, I am an area mapper, wondering why this POI got flagged for removal of data for advertising? Aside from not having the leisure=tanning_salon tag, it seems like legitimate data, and doesn't have a lot of the "description" garbage like a lot of SEO spam does.
22018-01-23 21:04:19 UTCwoodpeck I am investigating a pattern where a SEO firm has created a single account for each of their clients, and used that account to add one POI only, and added that POI with a focus on getting the business name and website URL into OSM, without respecting OSM customs (often using spammy descriptions; not...
32018-01-23 22:01:29 UTCneuhausr Fair enough, I monitor this area and I've certainly seen plenty of obvious SEO spam! However, if a business owner wants to get their business name in OSM, I hope it won't get flagged for removal just because they used their business name for their account and only did one badly tagged node. Note, I ...
42018-01-24 11:33:55 UTCfreebeer Hi neuhausr,
Refer to the initial changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41861684 .
There you see the particular edit was questioned by Georg but no reply was given, in over a year.
If this were to have been a legitimate business playing by OSM rules, they would have been interested ...
52018-01-24 15:15:22 UTCneuhausr good point, I'd missed that
12018-01-17 17:26:29 UTCwoodpeck Please use source=survey only when you have been there and looked at something (which I find unlikely in this situation). I noticed that you changed a lot of relations to type=cluster which is a very rare value, and doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. Is this the result of some discussion, or ju...
22018-01-18 21:27:22 UTCanderfo Hi,
I actually wondered how to put source for this sort of editing. For example when correcting typos, removing validation errors etc, I don't know which source to choose and I thought survey was the "best fit".

type=cluster is described in the wiki under place=archipelago:
https://wi...
12018-01-17 17:19:18 UTCwoodpeck Hello, can you explain why you created this object in Iceland with area=yes (and no other tags): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553783240
12018-01-14 20:39:19 UTCwoodpeck In diesem Changeset werden viele Gebäude gelöscht und neu eingezeichnet. Waren die alten denn so schlecht, dass das sein musste? Normalerweise versuchen wir, das zu vermeiden, weil man damit die Erfassungsgeschichte entfernt. Manchmal sind die Umrusse aus dem Sachsen-Atlas auch recht selts...
22018-01-15 11:19:07 UTCNakaner Für das Protokoll – folgende PN wurde soeben an ihn versendet:

Hallo M_Kucha,

mehrere Benutzer haben in den vergangenen Tagen und Wochen deine Änderungssätze kommentiert, du hast sie jedoch ignoriert. Bitte stelle sicher, dass die Benachrichtigungs-E-Mails, die du erhä...
12018-01-09 12:43:06 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you have modified 17 and added around 50 new names for the Cook Islands, many of these in languages that do not use Roman script. You claim that this information was sourced through "investigation", but could you shed more light on this?
12018-01-08 14:04:28 UTCwoodpeck Please try not to edit the same object 6 times when instead you could just edit it once. This creates 5 unnecessary copies of the object in our database (and in changeset streams). Also, please specify adequate sources for the official_name:* tags you are adding. If this is an automated process, it ...
12018-01-04 21:52:00 UTCwoodpeck Dear Jubaerorun, I am unsure about htese changesets you are adding. Every single one of your changesets has a comment of "please update information" - what does that mean? Whom are you addressing here, whom do you want to "update" the information you are adding? Also, if you don'...
12017-12-14 19:14:43 UTCnaoliv Hi, Juggalo_Kyle.
It seems that you did remove 4 areas which were representing some schools. For example, the White Knoll High School https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546860888/history
Did you see something wrong with the objects, maybe? Or there was another reason to remove them?
22017-12-18 16:36:59 UTCnaoliv Juggalo_Kyle, I restored the school areas. Note that these areas are representing the school grounds and not the school building, for example.
Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any doubts.
32017-12-19 05:23:16 UTCDarth_Vader The "school grounds" detail affects apps for people who work, visit, and interact with these places in a negative way. Myself being one of them. In order to prevent this, this detail should not be mapped. Labeling the school building is detail enough. The "school grounds" detail ...
42017-12-19 09:30:54 UTCfreebeer A better philosophy for you to grasp is, OpenStreetMap documents the world as it exists.
We do not map for the app, we map reality.
We map landuse.
These are school grounds, and that is fact.
If these facts bother you, take it up with your app, it is not for OSM to pander to the apps or their us...
52017-12-19 10:24:20 UTCnaoliv Which app you are using that makes this looks like an error?
You should try to fix it in the app that you are using (by contacting the developers, maybe), instead removing a valid data that everybody else uses.
And again, please, don't remove these areas.
62017-12-19 14:47:07 UTCDarth_Vader If you insist on creating problems for the people that actually live around these places, the locals and myself, then I will create problems for everyone else by creating multiple accounts and mass deleting features all around the world.
72017-12-19 15:03:54 UTCwoodpeck Darth_Vader, what you are threatening here is computer vandalism and it is illegal in South Carolina. Participating in such activity can severely affect your school/college experience or career. Think twice before you do anything you regret later - it's not worth it.
82017-12-20 22:47:43 UTCCarnildo Naoliv, I'm pretty sure the app in question is "Pokemon Go": it doesn't spawn Pokemon on school grounds, but it does spawn them on meadows, grass, forests, and sand -- or in other words, exactly the detail that Darth_Vader has added to Carolina Springs Elementary School.
92017-12-21 11:26:45 UTCnaoliv @Carnildo it seems to be the case, indeed. Yesterday a friend also sent some links, like https://pokemongo.gamepress.gg/q-a/poke-spawns-stopped-my-city-college which says "Niantic has stopped pokemon spawning in schools."
12017-12-18 08:09:36 UTCwoodpeck Is this an import? You added this "farmland"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547471799 which lies wholly inside this other "farmland" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547471807 that you created 2 weeks ago. Did you not notice?
22017-12-18 08:14:02 UTCwoodpeck You also added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547470728 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547470610 in this changeset, and one lies inside the other. There seem to be more cases like this. Is there an explanation for this that is not "badly executed import"?
32017-12-18 18:48:09 UTCSkinfaxi Hallo woodpeck,
Yes i havet copied from shapefiles of lantmäteriet. I havet discussed THE working methode in THE Swedish community and even om the import mailinglist.

And you are right: in that area is the work not completed. Totalt avoid verry big changesets i try to upload in serveral st...
42017-12-18 18:49:47 UTCSkinfaxi I tried to anser you from my mobile phone so excuse my spelling...
12017-12-18 08:08:26 UTCwoodpeck Is this an import or a manual tracing?
22017-12-18 18:51:26 UTCSkinfaxi It comes from manuell import of shapefiles. THE working metod is discussed in THE Swedish community and in the import mailinglist.
12017-12-18 07:59:45 UTCwoodpeck This import consist of over 100k edits altogether. Has it been discussed either in the Finnish community or internationally before it was performed? Please point me to that discussion.
12017-10-10 18:08:08 UTCpitscheplatsch Hi Kerman Ganesh, welcome to OSM. You created more than 2,800 changesets in almost 30 minutes. Which source did you use for your edits? Is this mass-edit discussed with the community and documented? Thanks.
22017-10-10 19:08:51 UTCMiMiNo Hi Pascal,
I think that all changesets of this user are candidates for revert. Reasons:
1) source is unknown (for sure it is not GPS survey)
2) this mass-edit was not discussed anywhere (not on the OSM Wiki, nor in the forum of Slovak OSM community)
3) consistency of tagging is not maintained in...
32017-10-12 02:56:39 UTCpitscheplatsch Hi Tibor, thanks for your answer.
I think we (or you as a local?) should contact the DWG.
All the best,
Pascal
42017-12-15 09:38:24 UTCwoodpeck Changes have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54647052 - please discuss imports/automated edits with the community beforehand to avoid issues with data quality and licensing.
12017-06-06 09:22:29 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49299541 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy vandalism
22017-09-20 11:41:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52208464 where the changeset comment is: Revert all Itzscallywagyt changesets that had not be reverted already. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1482
32017-12-08 07:38:03 UTCJohn Grubb I see that a path running through the area bounded by this changeset's outline is tagged with a name of "Your Mom." I suspect that this is not factually accurate! I'm unfamiliar with the area so do not know if the path actually has a name or not, else I'd dive in and rename or delete the n...
42017-12-08 08:29:02 UTCwoodpeck It might actually be - MTB cyclists seem to have a strange sense of humour see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-October/008145.html
52017-12-08 16:12:36 UTCJohn Grubb You're kidding?! Figured it might be left-overs from the original vandalism!

Every day's a school day...
62017-12-13 08:25:38 UTCkeithonearth I can't speak for the validity of the name, as I've not ridden in the trails around Squamish, but knowing MTB'ers I find the name entirely plausible. Trails like these are made by a bunch of dudes with shovels and bikes.

"Dude, we should *totally* call this one 'Your Mom', cuz, then we'd be...
72017-12-29 14:42:57 UTCJohn Grubb The mind boggles...
12017-11-04 02:51:58 UTCHubMiner Driveway around Sonic looks off, please recheck. If possible, draw driveway to Motorcycle Swimsuit, otherwise if anyone used it for navigation, it they may approach it from wrong street.
22017-12-04 09:01:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54322536 where the changeset comment is: revert all 'Zowie Polie' edits because of continued vandalism.
32017-12-04 22:04:00 UTCHubMiner Understood, thanks. Please share if there is procedure to review user's edits (now reverted) to see if anything should be reinstated, or if standard-operating-procedure to ignore all those edits once a user is deemed not sane.
42017-12-05 16:12:05 UTCfreebeer Speaking as a user who is not sane, if you want to waste your time on a g00gle text search for ' "Motorcycle Swimsuit" "guymon" ' (as I have done, having neither common sense nor sanity), then feel free.
Remember that then you take responsibility for the data you restore, so be ...
52017-12-05 16:18:24 UTCwoodpeck g246020 - the answer is "it depends". In this particular case, "Zowie Polie" has shown to be learning resistant to a degree where we cannot continue to assume good intentions, hence I believe reviewing their edits will be a waste of time. But that is a judgement call and not a st...
62017-12-06 23:03:22 UTCHubMiner Thanks for answers!
12017-11-28 19:25:49 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Garmano, in diesem Changeset, das Du mit "Added Westpark" tituliert hast, wurde auch die Stadt Hong Kong von einer Stadt zu einem Miet-Lagerplatz (shop=storage_rental) herabklassifiziert. Kannst Du Dir erklären, wie das passiert ist? Kannst Du es reparieren, oder benötigst ...
22017-11-29 19:04:36 UTCGarmano Hallo Woodpeck,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Ich hatte mir zwar vor meiner Änderung Hong Kong angeschaut, war aber nicht wissentlich in der Nähe dieses Punktes. Warum ich die Information geändert habe und warum ich das bei den Änderungen übersehen habe, ist mir v&oum...
12017-11-23 22:54:39 UTCwoodpeck Hello FreedSky, please start using changeset comments to describe what you are editing - at least in cases where it is likely that more people will be interested, for example like this changeset where you edited the border between China and India. What is your source for this edit? Why was this edit...
22018-02-09 16:10:48 UTCFreedSky I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reas...
12017-11-22 20:41:23 UTCwoodpeck Correction, accidentally copied over previous changeset comment - this one was just advertising in a description tag.
12017-11-20 22:44:47 UTCwoodpeck Ist das hier wirklich ein "Marktplatz" (wo man hingehen und einkaufen kann), oder doch nur das Büro eines Dienstleisters? Der Eintrag kommt mir ein bisschen sehr "werblich" vor.
12017-11-17 13:28:38 UTCma-rt-in Hallo,

wie kommst du dieser pauschalen Änderung?
22017-11-17 15:39:26 UTCgeozeisig amenity=chapel ist nicht richtig es muss building=chapel + amenity=place_of_worship heißen.
32017-11-17 17:10:21 UTCvillage hm, du hast aber z.B. eine Grotte zu einem Gebäude gemacht und hier: http://osm.org/node/1180382109 einen node als Punkt in einem Gebäude auch als Gebäude getaggt.
Das sieht mir doch etwas zu mechanisch aus.
42017-11-17 17:12:35 UTCvillage Wenn man schon Orte bearbeitet, die man gar nicht kennt, ist es bei 42 Nodes wohl nicht zu viel verlangt, da mal hinzuschauen - noch ein building node in building: http://osm.org/node/2915662625
52017-11-17 17:14:16 UTCvoschix ... and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1323976715 looks more like histroric=wayside_shrin
62017-11-17 17:43:15 UTCPolarbear Und ich hatte am Vorabend grade noch auf genau dieses Problem bei mechanischen Edits hingewiesen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53295049
Und neu ist das Verhalten, ohne Ortskenntnis Formalien korrigieren zu wollen, auch nicht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53254287
https://w...
72017-11-18 10:28:17 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53896411 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edits by geozeisig
82017-11-18 10:30:42 UTCwoodpeck Ich revertiere jetzt die mechanischen Edits der vergangenen Wochen. Geozeisig, jeder andere würde bei derart dickköpfigen Regelverstößen - ist ja bei Dir nicht das erste Mal, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28861610 vom Februar 2015 - eine längere Sperre kassi...
92017-11-22 20:36:31 UTCSafwatHalaby User has done similar, yet unreverted edits for Synagouges. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53866108
12017-11-10 11:58:51 UTCwoodpeck Mir ist aufgefallen, dass im Dateinamen was vom "3. Weltkrieg" steht. Zum Glück ist es derzeit noch offensichtlich, dass es ein Fehler ist ;) da das File aber auf Wikimedia Commons liegt und auch bei openplaques verlinkt ist, habe ich mich nicht getraut, was zu ändern.
12017-11-08 20:57:12 UTCwoodpeck Hello luiswoo, it appears to me that this, and a couple similar changesets, may have been an undiscussed data import that happened five years ago. Do you remember what you did here? The houses carry a source tag of "rosreestr" - what data source is that, and what license is it published un...
22017-11-09 02:02:36 UTCluiswoo Как такого импорта данных не было. Адреса брались в процессе обрисовки зданий по снимкам. Во всяком случает source=rosreestr относится к адресам, а не к самим зданиям.

Рос...
32017-11-09 02:05:41 UTCluiswoo Декларация российского совета OSM по адресным данным Росреестра https://goo.gl/wjjBLi
42017-11-09 07:26:40 UTCwoodpeck You say that the buildings were drawn from photos. Looking at the current Bing imagery, the building outlines do not match the imagery, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=156818899#map=19/47.26188/39.69043 - the shape of the building is different. What imagery did you u...
52017-11-09 10:15:47 UTCluiswoo Сейчас снимки не высшего качества, тогда были ещё хуже. Больше 17 масштаба и не было. Yahoo был от силы 16 масштаба. Ошибки распознания снимка. Делал, скорей всего, по Bing. П...
12017-11-08 20:45:12 UTCwoodpeck Hello DenisJu, in this changeset you are modifying a lot of roads that were part of an buggy import from 2010 (changeset 4557844 et al.). I'm unsure what the legal situation of the data source is; there's a wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp that seems to be con...
22017-11-12 10:22:46 UTCDenisJu Hallo Frederik!
Danke für deine Nachricht.
Ich kenne die "AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp"-WikiSeite nicht, aber hab einige von diesen Namen während der Editierung gesehen.
Ich werde einen Blick mal draf werfen und besser/detailierter die Seite lesen/checken und dann werde ich mic...
32017-11-12 10:24:00 UTCDenisJu Achavi für diesen changeset:
- http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46834933
12017-11-02 17:39:50 UTCHubMiner This change sounds rough, simply deleting their description. Please tell them how to correct it / OSM guidelines.
22017-11-02 22:37:49 UTCwoodpeck I don't think it needs more correction and wouldn't normally have bothered waking up a 1-year inactive user for it but here you go: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41625699
32017-11-03 02:28:42 UTCHubMiner Thanks!
12017-11-02 22:36:18 UTCwoodpeck Hello wpedmonson, I have removed the "description" again because it (1) contains non-factual advertising text, (2) is incomplete, and (3) might very well violate copyright (since you say you took it from the hotel web site).
12017-11-01 22:42:48 UTCwoodpeck Comment cock-up. Should have been: "remove advertising (spammy description)".
12017-10-29 22:53:05 UTCwoodpeck unvollst. Changeset-Kommentar: zusätzlich auch 2 Briefkästen gelöscht, die zu einem neuen zusammengelegt wurden.
12017-10-29 19:54:37 UTCwoodpeck Dear radek-drlicka, could you please clarify in how far you applied "user knowledge" (your source tag) to make these edits. Is it possible that instead of applying "user knowledge", you simply went to each Wikipedia page and copied the Wikidata link that was given on the page?
22017-10-29 20:08:35 UTCradek-drlicka It is simple: I pressed enter before changing source. Why are you asking? I suppose that it is clear from the nature of the things. Thanks Radek
12017-10-26 06:32:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. It looks like you uploaded some data from an external source here. First, all these objects do need a proper tag to describe what they are.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Please h...
22017-10-26 12:41:59 UTCwoodpeck Jonathan, I am sorry but I will have to remove this un-discussed and badly tagged import. Please check with the "imports" mailing list to get support in doing this right.
32017-10-26 12:43:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53262481 where the changeset comment is: remove what appears to be a 3D structure import
12017-10-25 22:40:49 UTCRoterEmil Hi woodpeck, would you mind to create smaller CS? It's impossible to use achavi (etc.) to have a closer look what you've changed. Would be really great!
Second, an example: I don't get why you deleted description=... @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4144996689. It included useful information fo...
22017-10-25 22:55:09 UTCwoodpeck My changes are really just to individual objects so they are immediately obvious from the object history or from the deep diff tool here http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=4144996689. I have about 1000 more to go, the overwhelming majority are in the US, maybe I can split them out and separate...
32017-10-26 00:40:58 UTCRoterEmil Thanks for your quick response!
Splitting the uploaded data into to big pieces like contients won't help "average" mappers doing QA, I believe. The easiest and well-established tool, achavi, will fail.

Your changes here: I do agree that pure advertising shouldn't be part of OSM and can...
12017-10-25 20:41:38 UTCaftertea I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description should be updated with your criteria for deleting POI's.
The fourth random POI I checked that you deleted didn't violate any items on that page (node 4891959222). I'd be annoyed if I'd added it!

The wiki entry for Tag:tourism=guest_hous...
22017-10-25 21:28:02 UTCwoodpeck Hi, "...offers the latest in proven medical and surgical care" is clear advertising speak that has no place in OSM. Also, the node had no amentity/office/craft or tag like that, so if it had been added to make the practice findable on OSM, it didn't even do that (or at least not in the way...
32017-11-05 15:03:00 UTCtrial Frederik, you're right. I also read the 2 other discussions mentioned in OSMHebdo.
But why do *you* spent time correcting adverts from a few SEO spammers? In France we have had some trouble with a similar company, we asked the DWG to block the account until they read the message so that they stoppe...
12017-10-24 21:59:05 UTCSafwatHalaby Hi woodpeck. I think your definition of spam is too broad. For instance, this random POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4923689269
.
Yes, its editor has only one edit. And yes, the editor has a direct interest in advertising their POI. However, these facts do not make it spam. Let's analyze t...
22017-10-24 22:00:55 UTCSafwatHalaby That was one example, but a significant number of your reverts do not remotely qualify as spam, and I think no one would have had any problem if an experienced mapper had added them.
32017-10-24 22:02:35 UTCSafwatHalaby Although the intentions are clearly good, in my humble opinion this is harming the map and must be discussed.
42017-10-24 22:03:47 UTCSafwatHalaby For comparison, this is something I would flag as spam for the excessive ad tone, and I would justify its removal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5135107648/history
52017-10-24 22:10:20 UTCSafwatHalaby Just another comparison to draw a clear line between spam and self-interest driven neutral edits:
SPAM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4885634483/history
.
Not spam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4989363747/history
62017-10-24 22:15:28 UTCSafwatHalaby It seems the majority of this changeset is real, clear cut spam, though.
72017-10-24 22:29:50 UTCwoodpeck SafwatHalaby, the line I have drawn is: If the self-interest mapper can at *least* be bothered to find out the proper OSM tag to describe their business, then I will only remove the spammy "description" and leave the rest in place. There are quite a few of that sort here. If, however, the ...
82017-10-25 04:43:33 UTCSafwatHalaby I agree to that line. (And I'd suggest leaving the description too if it's factual and not spammy).
.
But the second POI in particular: The right tagging was used, office=lawyer, and the description is completely factual and not spammy, "Personal injury attorney assisting clients throughout M...
92017-10-25 11:14:54 UTCfreebeer I agree with Frederick, this reads too much like self-promoting advertising that has little to do with a geographic database that is OSM, and too little like a short informative description that I would expect to find.
(I wonder if the present 255-character/byte limit that mercifully truncates many...
102017-10-25 11:26:44 UTCSafwatHalaby Thank you for the thorough comment. You changed my mind. I now agree that the attorney example is too self-promoting and could have been 3-4 words, and that its word redundancy is spammy.
112017-11-04 07:51:18 UTCVerdy_p Note that Frederik removed "description" and "name" (also "phone" and "email" or contact info) added to address nodes only (housenumbers with street names) that were actually not qualified with actual POI classification (e.g. "shop=*" or "amenit...
12017-10-20 23:49:22 UTCmuralito I could provide some nodes that were deleted and were not advertising.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1118036691

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5135199111

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5057146412/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5042809017/history

The 4 seems va...
22017-10-21 04:16:55 UTCnaoliv It seems the same case from some nodes in Brazil.
I wouldn't call them *wrong* but incomplete and/or with unnecessary information.
(New) users sometimes misunderstand the "description" tag and are too much verbose when using it.
Instead deleting, is it possible to create a list of affec...
32017-10-21 05:55:29 UTCfunnimonk please never do things like this again. you've basically deleted street names etc from the dataset. some of us rely on these things like names an geometries and now we have to restore them and you know how difficult that is!! to what end, all this deletion? couldn't you just change the descriptions?...
42017-10-21 08:23:30 UTCwoodpeck Hello, I'm sorry if I have accidentally deleted things that were not advertising. I'll look into the IDs specified by muralito and replace them. I have only deleted objects that were created by users who had a very small number of edits (usually, only one edit!) and who have added a long description...
52017-10-21 08:25:44 UTCPrince Kassad This changeset also deleted objects that no longer had SEO advertising in their newest revision, i. e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266904941/history. This is an extremely harmful changeset and should be undone immediately.
62017-10-21 08:54:35 UTCВладимир К is this a joke? all objects i checked are NOT SEO or even advertising! These descriptions were just descriptions. I think it is totally wrong to delete things, you even don''t understand in another language! You even deleted the hole building, that exists on satimagery!
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
72017-10-21 09:05:24 UTCВладимир К in Moscow only 2 of 8 deleted objects have description! and another exxisting building was deleted
82017-10-21 09:49:23 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир К, Prince Kassad, indeed I have removed objects even if they *had* advertising in the past, and other mappers had removed the advertising in the mean time. That was unnecessary. I'll undelete the affected objects. Please refrain from reverting the full changeset because that ...
92017-10-21 10:55:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted this and now re-created things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 - will you now take over and do this properly, removing advertising from where it doesn't belong, or do you expect others to do this?
102017-10-21 20:13:08 UTCmuralito I just wanted to raise the flag that there are some false positives in the algorithm, so i asked for an improvement, I also understand if the algorithm is not disclosed as it can be used by advertisers for "tunning" their ads.

In thousands of elements there are probably a lot of distinc...
112017-10-21 20:38:24 UTCwoodpeck Yes, it was not an algorithm that I was planning to run regularly, I just had identified long-description objects made by users who have contributed very little, and then went through the list manually, using a translating web site for anything other than English and German. Quite possible that I ac...
122017-10-21 22:36:06 UTCSimonvdP Did you even check your example?, removing part of a likely valid secondary road seems worse than leaving it there with the useless description on it,
132017-10-22 22:48:21 UTCChris Fleming This feels excessive to me - generally when I see these added, provided the information is accurate then I don't mind the "spammy description"; but there is also a case for removing. My worry with this changeset is that by completely removing the object we remove information that had been...
142017-10-23 05:47:30 UTCwoodpeck I think that any contribution made by a spammer should be entirely removed because it has not been made with OSM's interests at heart; most likely the coordinates are from a proprietary geocoder and the object will usually be placed with little regard to what's around it. So if the spammer adds a ho...
152017-10-23 13:19:47 UTCChris Fleming Thanks - I think we are in Broad agreeement :)
162017-10-24 07:45:14 UTCGRUBERND i think deleting things by algorithm is the most wrong thing one can to do to the OSM database. especially at this scale. it's the same as an import: automated changes of HUGE amounts of data.

things like these should always run through individual inspection on a case-by-case basis. cue map-roule...
172017-10-24 11:28:46 UTCmuralito @GRUBERND, I would agree if you write that sentence considering that using an algorithm does not necessarily imply automation.
182017-10-24 11:33:29 UTCmuralito @woodpeck (regarding your last comment)
Often a spammer (or any other user) deletes an existing object (street, POI, etc.) and adds a new one with her data. Please consider those cases when deleting or redacting objects.
192017-10-24 18:55:26 UTCwoodpeck I have started carefully removing the spam objects here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53216381 : Where a spammy description and contact information were added to a building but there was no shop/office/amenity tag (just name/phone/payment methods etc), I reduced the object to a mere buildi...
202017-10-24 20:55:42 UTCSafwatHalaby I think the algorithm is horrible.
212017-10-24 20:58:12 UTCSafwatHalaby For instance, this has a slightly "positive tone" but seems to be a 100% valid node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5109075827
.
I think your definition of a "spammy description" need to be narrowed.
222017-10-24 21:00:25 UTCSafwatHalaby Oh, I was reviewing via OSMCHA and I have a long backlog, and it seems that particular node was added back. Please ignore my comment if all the non spammy nodes were reverted.
12017-10-21 11:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted my changeset 53114647 instead of waiting for me to repair the problems. Now you are responsible for creating things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 and several 1000 other SEO entries in OpenStreetMap. Will you continu...
22017-10-23 21:32:31 UTCwoodpeck I see that you're making edits again; would you kindly comment on my question above? Do you intend to do anything about the SEO entries that you have re-added to OSM in this changeset?
32017-10-24 06:32:31 UTCВладимир К I didn't see any SEO entries. All POIs I saw are quite correct
42017-10-24 11:48:45 UTCSomeoneElse https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899123/history just looks residential to me. Are you sure that there's actually a furniture shop located there? If it's a "work from home" business, and there's nothing visible on the street, then it shouldn't really be in OSM. Also, you've left th...
52017-10-24 12:37:03 UTCwoodpeck The changeset contains a ton of nodes that are meaningless in OSM because they lack a POI type, but that carry advertising messages like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529863394 - or look at the way I pointed to in my comment above (a highway with a spammy description added), or click o...
62017-10-24 12:58:48 UTCВладимир К @SomeoneElse
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899123 has website and address on it is same as on the node.
Anyway, I don't see there SEO or something else, you should delete node.

@woodpeck What do you want? revert my revert? You deleted valid buildings, highway, nodes. Do you want others...
72017-10-24 13:01:43 UTCВладимир К all I see are some invalid tags on some of these POI. They should be fixed, not deleted
82017-12-22 08:18:20 UTCMateusz Konieczny Are you aware that you added spam in this edit?
92017-12-22 08:19:29 UTCMateusz Konieczny "I didn't see any SEO entries. All POIs I saw are quite correct"

So you made automatic edit without proper checks. Great.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302768566/history had for example name set to "When you donate your vehicle to Breast Cancer Car Donations, the proceeds f...
102017-12-22 08:20:28 UTCMateusz Konieczny The same for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511823420 and other.
112017-12-23 08:36:17 UTCВладимир К yep, but firstly i reverted the huge autoatic edit without proper checks, In comments for reverted changeset i posted examples, there the hole buildings with adress was deleted! also your examples of roads was copletely deleted! not spam tag, but the whole way! Are your seriously defend such edits??...
12017-10-22 19:30:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello lorec10, please do not add "proposed" boundaries to OSM. They are nearly impossible to verify, they make editing more difficult for everyone who touches one of the members of the relation, and they are of little use. In this particular case, you also fail to explain who is proposing ...
22018-08-28 14:20:34 UTCjoost schouppe Since the mapper didn't reply to two other changeset comments either, and it is clearly not a real boundary, I have deleted this in changeset 62073000
12017-10-22 19:21:27 UTCwoodpeck Hello lorec10, please do not add hardly-verifiable boundaries to OpenStreetMap. Even if you *were* living in the region and could therefore observe what language is spoken there, we don't usually map language areas in OpenStreetMap because they are so difficult to verify. Current administrative boun...
12017-10-22 09:54:25 UTCwoodpeck Hi,

you seem to be adding lots of objects to OSM that have an address and a name but nothing else. This is not useful; you must use a tag that describes *what* the object is. Also I doubt that your use of the name tag is correct, since it would indicate that there must be an object CALLED "J...
12017-10-20 00:56:48 UTCaharvey What's the policy on SEO edits, I encounter them almost every day and not really sure what to do. The ones I encounter it's a new OSM account for each "customer" and they never use the correct format for opening_hours or accepted payments etc.
22017-10-20 05:55:55 UTCwoodpeck There's no written policy but first and foremost the rule is "no advertising", i.e. anything with a "description" tag that tells us how the excellent lawyer has been helping their clients for a decade should be deleted on sight. Another frequent problem is bad or missing tags, or...
12017-10-19 21:11:05 UTCwoodpeck Warum die kommentarlose Löschung von hazmat und lane-Tags?
22017-10-19 21:28:19 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
12017-10-17 00:02:24 UTCwoodpeck Please do not create historic boundaries on OpenStreetMap. They unnecessarily complicate the editing process for others. Check out OpenHistoricalMap for a project to map historic boundaries and other historic facts.
12017-10-14 23:40:03 UTCwoodpeck Why did you remove the end_date=1947 from this boundary in this changeset? Is the "Geographical region of Italy" (that includes Corse and Istria) more than a historic boundary?
12017-10-14 21:25:15 UTCwoodpeck Hello ninjamask, please be more careful when you apply such large-scale fixes. It is obvious that you have *not* really checked these 10,000 objects that you "fixed" here or else you would have seen that a lot of it is really broken data that does not belong in OSM (e.g. https://www.openst...
12017-10-13 05:54:06 UTCwoodpeck Hello Drew_P, are *any* of the edits you made to OSM real, or are they all about fictional stuff and funny names?
22018-07-19 22:51:42 UTCJack the Ripper I'm take "fictional stuff and funny names" for $1,000, Alex.
12017-10-08 18:18:15 UTCfserges Если в отношение добавляются члены, то им должны присваиваться роли. Член без роли по умолчанию воспринимается как outer. В этом changeset были массово добавлены члены пох...
22017-10-11 11:57:11 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted these edits because they violate a DWG resolution regarding the Crimea. Please don't remove Crimea from the Ukraine relation. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52822088
12017-10-10 19:49:07 UTCrazor74 Hello. Why delete street names contribute by other user than chdr? This is not normal to revert data by assuming that they are copyright violation from google only because that user didnt respond about his sources... It is only assuming... Google copyed from us alot. I aim certain that they copy fro...
22017-10-11 07:39:15 UTCwoodpeck I have deleted only street names contributed by user chdr, not those contributed by other users. The user has been proven to have used Google in some situations and this nourishes the suspicion that he used Google in other areas too. If he had used a different source, it would have been easy for him...
12017-10-10 19:01:38 UTCwoodpeck You specified "Bing aerial imagery" as a data source for this change of a hotel name - surely that can't be right. What is the correct data source for the name change?
22017-10-11 11:15:56 UTCGoWestTravel In this case, I'm the source myself. I visited this hotel last month on the first day of the name change (Sep 18). I was not aware Bing was mentioned as a source here.

Thanks,

GoWestTravel
12017-10-10 11:47:12 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Georg, hier hast Du abermals einem problematischen Datensatz, der eine werbliche "description" enthielt, ein "office=lawyer" hinzugefügt. Als Quelle hast Du "ESRI World Image" angegeben, obwohl das Gebäude darauf nicht ausreichnd zu sehen ist. Dass es hi...
22017-10-10 15:26:54 UTCuser_5359 Hallo, nur weil einer in der description ausschweifend wird, existiert noch lange keine Grund, die Angaben komplett zu löschen, zu mal kein weiterer Grund vorliegt (wie keine ähnliche Straße in der Nähe oder als Kirche gekennzeichnet).

Korrektur der source Angabe Knowledge &...
12017-09-08 18:12:40 UTCbergaufsee Hallo geozeisig,
wo ist jetzt hier dein Problem? Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport#Busse steht doch eindeutig: Wenn ein richtiger Bussteig vorhanden ist -> An der Halteposition des Busses einen Node auf der Straße ... Er erhält auch das Tag highway=bus_stop...
22017-09-09 08:13:57 UTCgeozeisig highway=bus_stop muss auf jeden Fall seitlich am besten da wo das Haltestellenschild ist. Sonst wird die Bushaltestelle mittig gerendert und man weiß nicht für welche Richtung die Haltestelle zuständig ist. Wenn du schon Bussteige einzeichnen willst nimm der vorderen node in Fahrtric...
32017-09-09 10:09:56 UTCbergaufsee Das Thema der Fahrtrichtung ist doch auch bei public_transport=stop_position gegeben?! Das Problem ist doch aber mit der Eintragung der Bussteige gelöst, die sind ja an der richtigen Stelle. Außerdem geht dies auch aus den Busrouten hervor.
Deine Darstellung hat sich nicht bewährt s...
42017-09-10 20:29:26 UTCNakaner Hallo geozeisig,

könntest du bitte, bevor du mit weiteren Umtaggingaktionen in Berlin und Umgebung fortfährst, diese auf der Berliner Mailingliste diskutieren?

Des Weiteren möchte ich dich bitten, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare einzugeben, erst recht, wenn du ...
52017-09-11 06:36:48 UTCgeozeisig Gewöhnlich werden in einem Änderungssatz mehrere verschiedene Änderungen gemacht, die kann man nicht noch einzeln erklären.
Auch ist es unüblich alle Änderung vorher in einem Forum zu diskutieren. Da gibt es immer jemand der ein Bedenken äußert. Und zum Schl...
62017-09-24 14:49:35 UTCbergaufsee CS reverted, ich behalte mir vor ähnlich gelagerte CS die dem wiki entgegenlaufen gleich zu tun. Weitere Kommentare hierzu wird es auch von mir an dieser Stelle nicht mehr geben.
72017-09-25 06:04:13 UTCgeozeisig Da es massenweise Beispiele für Haltekanten gibt, welche von schienengebundenen und nicht schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen gibt wurde dieses Tag durch public_transport=platform ersetzt.
Original Wiki
82017-10-08 11:59:31 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Geozeisig, Du hast insofern recht, als dass Dein Tagging nicht "dem Wiki entgegenläuft", zumindest nicht mehr oder weniger als das, welches bergaufsee bevorzugt; beide Arten sind im Wiki dokumentiert. Letzten Endes ist es Geschmackssache, wie man es macht - ähnlich wie z.B....
92017-11-04 09:58:12 UTCgeozeisig Es gab ein Übersetzungsfehler auf der Seite DE:Public_transport der jetzt behoben ist. So sollte es in Zukunft möglich sein Bushaltestellen (highway=bus_stop) neben der Straße zu mappen, wie es auch landläufig üblich ist.
102017-11-04 11:09:42 UTCNakaner Hallo geozeisig,

die "Korrektur" der Wikiseite stammt von dir. Du hast dort eine Änderung vorgenommen, die am 21. Oktober 2017 der Benutzer Selfish Seahorse auf der englischen Seite vorgenommen hat.

Deine Änderung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE%3APubli...
112017-11-05 07:01:47 UTCgeozeisig Des Thema wurde schon ausführlich auf https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59047 diskutiert. Für mich gilt aber weiterhin was auf den Wiki-Seiten steht.
Gruß Dieter
12017-10-06 21:04:20 UTCChrissW-R1 Please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4016746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917

It is a peninsula, but boundary=land_area in combination of place=peninsula is a good compromise for me.
22017-10-07 09:42:21 UTCwoodpeck I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
32017-10-07 09:47:17 UTCwoodpeck I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
12017-10-04 20:22:17 UTCwoodpeck Hello Nordpfeil, it would be great if you could spend a little more time on setting proper changeset comments. "Details added/updated" is a changeset comment that probably applies to 99% of all edits made in OSM. The changeset comment is there for others to understand the nature of your ed...
12017-10-04 16:13:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-09-28 12:02:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding a huge number of new and undocumented tags on these objects (listed below). Please clean this up. The number of nodes on each object also seems to be much too high - especially those half-circular shapes.

LCC \tA12-A2-A6
aream2 \t97530.06567
date \t1-spt-2017
escala \t1:25k\...
22017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
32017-11-18 11:19:47 UTCmueschel Hi PC10,
did you actually read and understand all the changeset comments and the user block message?
Your edits have been deleted because of their quality. Now you start over and re-import all of this again? Please stop it!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53884840
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 07:58:10 UTCwoodpeck This data is buggy. It does not match available imagery and has strange tracing artifacts. Do not upload more of this data. Discuss it in the imports list and seek help in attaining a proper process.
22017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 11:34:48 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Georg, bitte beachte die Regeln für "mechanisches Editieren". Diese besagen, dass man nicht "blind" an Objekten herumbasteln soll. Du bist ein erfahrener Mapper, wenn Du hier genau hingeschaut hättest, hättest Du gemerkt, dass (1) ein unsinniges Tag "ord...
22017-10-04 15:55:19 UTCfreebeer Hallo 'peck,
ESRI has imagery up to zoomlevel 17 here.
Looks (quickly) the same as Bing, without the artificial overzoom to z19.
Which also seems the same as DigitalGlobe Premium, with a different overzoom process (blocky instead of blurry).
Nonetheless, the area looks like a mess seen by me in ...
32017-10-04 16:30:00 UTCfreebeer Sorry to reply, but after posting I downloaded some history and remember this is a controversial import being reverted.
Not only do all the now-length entries have 5-decimal precision, but many are identical, when I measure nearly 100m for some.
I would guess (why would I even bother?) these are a...
12017-10-04 10:01:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52244481, 52244523, 52244534, 52244547, 52244561, 52244572, 52244592.
12017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-09-22 08:44:01 UTCwoodpeck Please explain why you have uploaded a village boundary with name:en="we are evil"?
22017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-09-22 09:05:14 UTCwoodpeck what does "cop=do not share" mean on this boundary?
22017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 08:33:48 UTCwoodpeck Dear user Ladamafria. You seem to be working with users PC10 and/or opengislab and perhaps others on some sort of project. Please have the project lead/coordinator contact the OSMF data working group at data@osmfoundation.org. We need to talk to you. You are uploading data in violation of the data i...
22017-10-04 20:11:26 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636453 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed and buggy import of waterways (bad tags, don't match imagery, intersect with existing geometries, etc.) that is claimed to have been extracted from SRTM
12017-09-22 08:48:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello PC10, these data imports are faulty (they introduce bad keys and they have over-noded, pseudo-precise geometries that seem to come from converting a raster map to vectors). Before you import anything more, please consult the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidel...
22017-09-22 10:23:14 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52...
32017-10-02 18:54:42 UTCmueschel Hi PC10, hi woodpeck,
there are many more nodes and areas imported since, including newly invented tags (aream2, LCC, proyecto, ...). It also seems that most features do not correspond to actual features in the satellite images - e.g. forest multipolygons have the largest trees excluded, borders do...
42017-10-04 08:23:23 UTCwoodpeck Yes they should. We know nothing about the source - it is claimed that there's some community project - but the data suffers from geometry anomalies and bad tagging and the import hasn't been discussed. I am deleting the data now and have asked PC10 to discuss any further plans on the imports list.
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 48865841, 48865877, 49321250, 49486123, 49851029, 49851047, 49851066, 49851084, 49851100, 49851112, 49851130, 49851132, 49851155, 49851185, 49851225, 49851235, 49851258, 49851271, 49851278, 49851308, 49975039, 49975054, 49996614, 49996723, ...
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-27 05:02:38 UTCnammala Hi Zowie Polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting valid data and also adding rails over the roads, OSM is the real map of the world and deleting the data is not encourgable. Don't do random edits on the map.

22017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-26 12:17:33 UTCwoodpeck What does this change have to do with Northridge shopping center?
22017-07-26 13:58:27 UTCiandees Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50590816
32017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:08 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:02 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-25 04:49:37 UTCupendrakarukonda Hi Zowie Polie,

This is a known ID editor bug, where it deletes the wikidata tag, while mapping through it. Can you get back the wikidata tag to the feature again?

Regards,

Upendra
22017-10-03 00:05:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-25 05:45:49 UTCnammala Hi Zowie polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting lot of valuable data. I have reverted your changeset. Please make sure the data in the OSM is crowd sourced and the data is so valuable please don't delete the data.

Regards,
nammala
22017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-26 13:58:01 UTCiandees Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50590816
22017-10-03 00:04:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:47 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:46 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-09-16 03:48:23 UTCPaul Johnson I'm probably going to be reverting this changeset as it has appeared to have removed major streets in Guymon, and broken the relations for OK 3, US 54, US 64, and US 412 simultaneously.
22017-09-16 04:09:47 UTCPaul Johnson This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52085816 where the changeset comment is:
32017-09-16 04:21:05 UTCPaul Johnson OK, was able to get that rolled back; sorry if I undid anything you might have done in the process, losing connectivity to four cross-state highways was pretty noticeable. I'm not mad or anything, but I do ask for a little more care when deleting features.
42017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-01 19:07:39 UTCwoodpeck nyuriks, you have in the past made edits claimed to be "as per discussion on talk list" when the discussion on the talk list certainly not meant you had an all clear for the edit. Now you claim to make edits "per community discussion in telegram chat", which third parties cannot ...
22017-10-01 19:27:32 UTCnyuriks fair point (and no, I come from Wikipedia background and really don't like sockpuppets). Take a look at the #osm-ru IRC channel - the channel topic says: "https://telegram.me/ruosm >> жизнь переехала в телеграм" (there are ~250 people there). Also, IRC cha...
12017-09-30 15:17:37 UTCwoodpeck Dear osmviborg, the OSMF Data Working group has received several complaints over your use of the source "SDFE-data/survey/knowledge". You are editing all over Denmark. In the future, please make it clear for every edit whether this comes from a survey or from an external data set and if so...
12017-09-30 15:09:37 UTCwoodpeck Is "stadnina koni" really a tourist attraction?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088526122

And your "Wieża widokowa Joanna" has already be deleted by someone else.

Please: Only add data to OSM that is actually verifiable on the ground, and that is correct to your kn...
22017-10-01 20:40:34 UTCRicoElectrico @woodpeck This is sadly quite a problem with maps.me edits if you watch the edits regularly. The users apparently aren't told not to enter places for which there's no category.

If only we could push maps.me to improve this (as well as using notes/POI for private bookmarks due to poor UI wording)....
12017-09-29 12:15:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has accidentally broken the geometries https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485019675 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157366833 - they now look "blocky" and have many self-intersections. Can you repair this yourself or would you like help in reverting the edit?
22017-09-29 12:59:00 UTCraito @woodpeck I think it is rather this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52402340 that broke it, or the previous one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52165496.

This one with comment "validation" is probably trying to fix it but not properly.
32017-09-29 14:04:58 UTCwoodpeck Indeed. I'll have a look at reverting these two landuse areas.
42017-09-29 23:38:10 UTCDewi Sulistioningrum Hi woodpeck

I will check this changeset on Monday and repair the problem

Thank you
52017-09-29 23:44:01 UTCDewi Sulistioningrum On the changeset, I was validated the infrastructures from survey data and delete import=yes from some line boundary administrative in the area. I didn't changed the landuse, perhaps my team has changed the landuse and broke the landuse. Because we were working with some people for the area.
But,...
12017-09-27 21:17:32 UTCwoodpeck I don't think this is right. Aldi Süd and Aldi Nord are not two different operators of the same brand; the brand is different (different logo, different products on the shelves, etc). I'm unhappy that someone from England feels empowered by Wikidata to make judgements about German supermarkets ...
22017-09-27 21:28:33 UTCpigsonthewing I'm not sure what you mean by "empowered by Wikidata", and the fact that I am from England does not prohibit me from editing an item in Germany, a country I have visited - and shopped in - often, so please tone down the frankly unacceptable nationalist rhetoric.

As to a "common bra...
32017-09-28 06:03:30 UTCR0bst3r Just a question: who needs all this *:wikidata, if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve? You can find brand and operator on this page. Mabe think about it ... the nationalistic rhetoric remembers me of some discussions as I edited some breweries I visited in London. So not very uncommon.
42017-09-28 07:02:07 UTCpigsonthewing " if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve?"

That case is false, so your question is moot.
52017-09-28 07:03:24 UTCpigsonthewing Also, I'm sorry to hear of your experience editing around London; that is equally unacceptable.
12017-09-25 11:42:45 UTCwoodpeck Dear rondock, there are two issues with this changeset. One is that you aren't giving an appropriate changeset comment - you write "details" but what you are doing is deleting all sidewalks. Your changeset comment should have been "Deleting sidewalks", and it should also have giv...
12017-09-19 18:13:58 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello cat_crash. In the last days, you have edited http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396714343 a lot. Also you have introduced a lot of new (so far unknown) keys (e.g. additional_amenities, own_parking, pets_allowed, ssync:osm). All this with a "new editor", or what is "Services_OpenSt...
22017-09-23 15:09:36 UTCcat_crash Hi,
we are piloting on integration OSM with our cloud solution helps venues keep OSM data up-to-date.
New key will be introduced in accordance with process or removed after piloting. Please notice - we are piloting only on 2 venues. No any mass loads will be done
32017-09-23 20:03:10 UTCwoodpeck Please note there's a development server at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org that we recommend to be used for testing out new software. I don't know what your cloud solution entails but please keep in mind that it is very important to OSM that those who contribute information react to chang...
12017-09-22 09:08:10 UTCwoodpeck This is an undiscussed import that not only introduces a wrong key ("lenght") but also seems to be totally out of sync with available aerial imagery. Please follow the OSM import guidelines, and discuss such imports before you execute them. The imports will be reverted.
22017-09-22 09:14:29 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52269404 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from opengislab, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245612
12017-09-05 14:25:47 UTCwoodpeck This changesert is vandalism.
12017-09-02 23:31:42 UTCadjuva Hallo Frederik!

Die Bahnsteig-Multipolygone in Luisental und Bous (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1620893 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1620862) waren aus meiner Sicht nicht überflüssig. Sie entsprachen einem im Wiki dokumentiertem Tagging-Schema (http://wiki.openstre...
22017-09-03 07:55:43 UTCwoodpeck Ja, Du hast recht, mit den Bahnsteigkanten habe ich etwas übertrieben. Ich werde das wieder zurück-ändern. Allerdings ist es m.E. trotzdem falsch, die *Bahnsteigkante* als Stop in die Routenrelation aufzunehmen, stattdessen sollte das *Bahnsteigmultipolygon* als Stop in die Route. Ode...
12017-08-30 00:53:49 UTCArlas prima di cancellare i nomi delle strade, perché non chiedi a "Ludovic Drouard" il perché delle sue modifiche? se ha mappato in loco (cosa molto probabile) stai rovinando ore di lavoro di altre persone
22017-08-30 06:15:46 UTCwoodpeck It appears that you are on a crusade to delete names from those small parts of roads that lead on and off roundabouts, and you're doing that not only in your local area but over large parts of Sicily. I think that this is something you should discuss with the community before, as opinions seem to di...
32017-08-30 08:45:40 UTCthetornado76 He deleted also names from pedestrian zone like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51458691
12017-08-30 06:11:55 UTCwoodpeck Why did you delete the name "Via Fernando Magellano" (way 519743740)?
12017-08-20 23:23:52 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Ruhrpottkast, danke fuer Deine Beitraege. Leider ist der "Eisenbahnatlas" keine fuer OSM erlaubte Quelle, daher muss ich diese Aenderungen wieder entfernen. Das heisst nicht, dass die Information falsch waere (ich kenne mich mit Eisenbahnen nicht so gut aus), aber wie gesagt, der Eis...
22017-08-21 18:50:33 UTCRuhrpottkast Wenn man sich zum Beispiel https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/27490724 anschaut, hat die Strecke in OSM schon einen regelmäßigen Wechsel zwischen main und branch hinter sich. Wäre an der Zeit, hier mal zumindest für OSM sich festzulegen. Nirgendwo wird schnell gefah...
12017-08-20 23:23:36 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Ruhrpottkast, danke fuer Deine Beitraege. Leider ist der "Eisenbahnatlas" keine fuer OSM erlaubte Quelle, daher muss ich diese Aenderungen wieder entfernen. Das heisst nicht, dass die Information falsch waere (ich kenne mich mit Eisenbahnen nicht so gut aus), aber wie gesagt, der Eis...
22017-08-21 18:31:53 UTCRuhrpottkast Ich hatte mit dem Changeset mehr geändert als nur branch->main (unter anderem Gleisanzahl).
Das habe ich wiederhergestellt.
Nach § 40 EBO (Fahrgeschwindigkeit) gilt auf Nebenbahnen maximal 100 km/h. Dort gilt aber stellenweise 110 km/h. Folglich ist es auch deshalb als Hauptbahn ident...
32017-08-21 18:42:13 UTCRuhrpottkast Die Strecke hatte zunächst usage=main. Erst mit Changesetz 51314899 wurde dann durch HelgaZ am 16.11.2016 usage=main zu usage=branch geändert. Änderungssatzkommentar war: "Flächennutzung Kiebingen". Quelle war: "Bing; extrapolation". Ist schon reichlich komis...
12017-08-04 21:45:15 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted this changeset because it created one huge building=residential relation that contained the buildings of half a village, and all the outer rings forming the buildings were imported with a ton of non-OSM tags. Please discuss any data import on a suitable mailing list (at least talk-it...
12017-07-28 11:24:17 UTCwoodpeck Hello Seznam2 (and Seznam),
it appears that you are making a very large number of edits to OSM with an automatic script. Please note that we have rules for such kinds of edits (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits) - among other things you are expected to discuss the scope and type of...
12017-07-27 13:42:29 UTCwoodpeck Has this import been discussed / documented somewhere?
22017-07-27 17:08:30 UTCViriatoLusitano https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005014.html
32017-07-27 18:27:28 UTCralley LINZ imports were originally discussed staring 17/08/12 on the imports list. The imports have been going on intermittently since this time as tracked through http://linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz/workslices/list/?ws_state=&dataset=&layer=river_cl&user=&order_by=checked_out_at
Docume...
12017-07-24 12:53:04 UTCwoodpeck This changeset appears to import a large number of duplicate nodes and rectangles that bear no tags that OSM recognizes. It looks as if the OSM database was used to mark the mapping status certain map squares. Can you explain?
12017-04-23 16:21:26 UTCdatendelphin What was your source for the names you added here, for example Halde?
22017-04-24 00:05:56 UTCdonovaly > What was your source?

The GWR. There is an official frontend for this register:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/?zoom=9&lang=de&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.swissimage&catalogNodes=457,491&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register&X=227873.34&Y=623013.50
32017-04-24 19:19:23 UTCdatendelphin The GWR and generally anything on map.geo.admin.ch are not valid sources for OSM. Don't copy from other maps.
42017-04-25 20:24:44 UTCdonovaly > Don't copy from other maps.

I don't copy from other maps. I had a long discussion with Simon Poole, from the Swiss OSM user groupd about this. In my opinion it does not violate any license to put in official names into OSM. I requested to inform me if I am wrong and the user group discussed ...
52017-04-25 20:53:51 UTCSOSM I gave you all the relevant legal material that shows that the GWR data cannot be used in the way you have used it in the current legal framework. You continued to make up reasons why the laws don't apply to you, we needn't go over that again.
62017-04-25 21:08:02 UTCdonovaly > I gave you all the relevant legal material that shows that the GWR data cannot be used in the way you have used it

That is not true. I clearly stated why I disagree with you, I even offered to pay my lawyer to look over the licenses to clarify what is OK and what not.

It is strange that I...
72017-04-25 21:25:09 UTCSimonPoole Quoting from my response to your first mail:
"Ich kann auch nicht ganz nachvollziehen wieso du auf
http://www.geo.admin.ch/internet/geoportal/de/home/geoadmin/contact.html#copyright
glaubst keinen Hinweis auf eine Beschränkung der Nutzung der GWR-Daten
zu finden, die 6 (mehr oder wenig...
82017-04-25 21:47:10 UTCdonovaly Siehe meine Antwort darauf vom 26.4.2016:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/read/566658

Dort schrieb ich ganz unten:
"Kurzum, ich möchte hiermit die Diskussion beenden und zu einem Ergebnis kommen. Ich bitte Sie mir die entsprechenden Textpassagen aus der GWR-Verordnung zukommen zu...
92017-04-25 21:49:03 UTCdonovaly Um nochmal ganz konkret meine Frage zu stellen:
"
Ist es explizit nicht erlaubt, Folgendes zu tun?: 1. man schaut z.B. in http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/VD/5672.html 2. man sucht manuell nach "Forel-sur-Lucens" und gelangt zu https://map.geo.admin.ch/?X=175120.72&Y=553007.53&zo...
102017-04-26 19:20:43 UTCdatendelphin Deine Idee des "reinwaschen der Information" ist nicht neu. Du kannst gerne dazu weitere Meinungen aus des community einholen, z.B. auf der internationalen https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk talk mailingliste. Weil das ist wirklich etwas was die gesamte community betreffen w&uum...
112017-04-26 19:57:40 UTCromanh Danke donovaly für Deine gut gemeinte Arbeit.
Leider ist dies so aber nicht o.k.

GWR-VO Art. 13 Weitergabe der Daten zu anderen Zwecken: 4) "..., oder andere kommerzielle Zwecke, ist untersagt."
Somit ist es nicht für OSM verwendbar, da eine kommerzielle Nutzung der OSM D...
122017-05-10 00:46:27 UTCdonovaly Hallo Roman und Datendelphin,

vielen Dank für eure Erläuterungen. Ich möchte dennoch nicht einfach aufgeben, denn es wird sich nur etwas ändern, wenn man Druck aufbaut, sei es mit einem Rechtsgutachten oder durch direkten Kontakt mit dem BFS und natürlich, indem man Polit...
132017-05-10 21:05:36 UTCSimonPoole OSM ist kein Projekt zur Erforschung rechtlicher Grauzonen (die es in diesem Fall aber gar nicht gibt).

Auch wenn es eine rechtliche Lücke geben würde (die ich aber nicht sehe), die Willensäusserung des Gesetzgebers ist klar. Wir (die Schweizer OSM Community) stehen immer wieder ...
142017-05-10 21:38:40 UTCwoodpeck Und die DWG hat sich hier in Verbindung gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344
152017-05-25 23:59:26 UTCdonovaly > Auch wenn es eine rechtliche Lücke geben würde (die ich aber nicht sehe), die Willensäusserung des Gesetzgebers ist klar.

Dann lass es uns ändern! So klar kann es aber nicht sein, wenn ein Fachanwalt es überhaupt nicht so klar sieht.

> Wir (die Schweizer OSM Co...
162017-05-26 09:59:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo donovaly, Du hast bislang nicht auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 reagiert. Bitte lasse uns bis zum 18.6.2017 eine Liste aller Änderungen, bei denen Du Dich auf GWR-Daten oder andere nicht explizit freigegebene Quellen gestützt hast, zukommen. (Es reicht auch eine wi...
172017-07-23 20:36:58 UTCdonovaly > Bitte lasse uns bis zum 18.6.2017 eine Liste aller Änderungen, bei denen Du Dich auf GWR-Daten oder andere nicht explizit freigegebene Quellen gestützt hast, zukommen.

Servus liebe Kollegen,

was geht denn hier? Ihr habt den Sachverhalt nicht rechtlich klären lassen, obwohl...
182017-07-23 20:41:52 UTCdonovaly > Du hast bislang nicht auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 reagiert.

Doch, hier, denn auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 kann ich nichts kommentieren. Mit einem Frederik Ramm, der mich gesperrt hat, hatte ich vorher noch nichts zu tun und es gibt auch keine Inf...
192017-07-23 21:59:52 UTCdas-g > Mit einem Frederik Ramm, der mich gesperrt hat, hatte ich vorher noch nichts zu tun und es gibt auch keine Info wie man ihn erreichen kann.

Frederik Ramm = woodpeck. Du kannst ihm also über seinen OSM-Account eine Message schreiben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck --> http...
202017-07-24 09:10:25 UTCwoodpeck "das-g" hat die Situation richtig erfasst. Wir werden alle Namen, die aus GWR kommen, aus OpenStreetMap rauswerfen, und erbitten Deine (donovalys) Hilfe dabei, zu unterscheiden, wo Du GWR benutzt hast und wo nicht; kannst oder willst Du diese Hilfe nicht leisten, werden alle von Dir beiget...
212017-08-02 13:14:59 UTCSimonPoole Um kurz noch ein rechtliches Update zu geben: am 1. Juli trat die reviderte Fassung des VGWR in kraft: https://www.edi.admin.ch/edi/de/home/dokumentation/mm.msg-id-66999.html und http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/41672

Wie befürchtet bleibt es weiterhin unklar ob die Daten t...
222017-08-06 22:12:47 UTCdonovaly > Wir werden alle Namen, die aus GWR kommen, aus OpenStreetMap rauswerfen, und erbitten Deine (donovalys) Hilfe dabei, zu unterscheiden, wo Du GWR benutzt hast und wo nicht; kannst oder willst Du diese Hilfe nicht leisten, werden alle von Dir beigetragenen Namen entfernt. Diese Entfernung ist bes...
232017-11-01 23:31:22 UTCdonovaly Hallo liebe OSMler,
wie ich sehe, wurde JEDER meiner Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Das verstehe ich nicht. Warum kann man es nicht auf sich beruhen lassen? Es gab keinen von außen, der es moniert hat. Ich habe zugesagt, nichts mehr an OSM in der Schweiz zu machen und fertig. W...
12017-07-22 22:33:17 UTCgeow Ist die Angabe "für Fahrräder nicht erlaubt" per E-Mail nachvollziehbar belegt worden? Falls nein, sollte das Verbot IMHO nicht ohne Vor-Ort-Wissen ergänzt werden.
22017-07-23 08:49:39 UTCwoodpeck Das thüringische Waldgesetz erlaubt das Radfahren (nur) "auf befestigten Wegen und Straßen". Ein Blick auf das Luftbild liess es mir unwahrscheinlich erscheinen, dass sich an dieser Stelle ein befestigter Weg befindet - unwahrscheinlich genug, um der E-Mail zu glauben, die wir e...
32017-07-23 10:05:21 UTCgeow Danke, ich habe noch einen Hinweis ergänzt, in der Hoffnung auf bessere Sichtbarkeit für lokale Kenner, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1075389

Die allgemeine Diskussion zum Wegerecht in Thüringen könnten wir ja im Forum vertiefen, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic...
42017-07-26 19:39:03 UTCgeow Hmm, jetzt hat sich ein neuer user (e-quadrat) angemeldet und die 2 Wegabschnitte südlich des Oberen Hermannsbergsteins gelöscht. Ich habe es hier mal andiskutiert...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50592716
12017-07-10 07:20:22 UTCwoodpeck Hello Aleks-Berlin, you have been warned a number of times not to perform mechanical edits. A mechanical edit is one where you edit objects without looking at them individually. In this changeset you have removed two tags from a series of hydrants, while leaving a ton of other useless tags in place ...
22017-07-10 09:20:35 UTCAleks-Berlin Hello Woodpeck, how should I know that the other tags have no intention (I call them private/unique keys, even others argue that everybody can create his own keys/tags).
Of course I do not like them and I noticed them, but as I read once "we should respect the work of others". This is a c...
12017-06-15 11:18:39 UTCwoodpeck I am concerned that your adding of area data for motorways will make editing unnecessarily complicated. We don't normally do that in OSM - have you discussed these plans with the Polish community?
22017-06-15 22:15:08 UTCRicoElectrico This actual edit aside (I did not check it), what is wrong? There's a 30 pages long thread: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12337 and also a Wiki page.
32017-06-15 22:17:23 UTCRicoElectrico @woodpeck How did you get here, if I can ask? It wouldn't seem to trip deletion alerts or rarely used key alerts (a:h is somewhat popular).
42017-06-16 09:51:20 UTCwoodpeck I knew that Marek had once done some streets-as-areas mapping in a test area but I wasn't aware of any consensus to do this Poland-wide. But I'm happy to defer to the community about that. -- How I got here? I randomly looked at recent changesets out of idle curiosity.
52017-06-26 08:08:02 UTCmarek kleciak Hi Frederik,
because of our Lobbying OSM community may use the high resolution gov. images for mapping. Some areas are in common sense already "dead" for active mappers, See Wroclaw or Szczecin. The users add there massively the street areas. There are already 4 renderers they use this t...
12017-06-15 11:21:53 UTCwoodpeck Mir scheint, dass Du in diesem Changeset eine Reihe von Straßen gelöscht und dann wieder neu erstellt hast. Warum? Dabei geht ja die Änderungs-Historie verloren, und die ist u.U. nützlich.
22017-06-15 11:24:28 UTCwoodpeck Kann es sein, dass Du es ausserdem versäumt hast, die "neuen" Straßen in die diversen Wanderweg-Relationen einzufügen, in denen die alten steckte, und dadurch jetzt die Relationen Lücken haben?
32017-06-15 14:02:37 UTCma-rt-in Hallo woodpeck,

in diesem Fall wurde die Straßen neuverlegt und dabei entsprechend mit Key´s versehen, gelöscht werden ein einfachhalber. Zudem ist mir bei jetzigem nicht ersichtlich, inwieweit die History nützlich ist.
2. Sind alle Relationen so, wie sie seien sollen.
42017-06-16 08:44:24 UTCNakaner Hallo ma-rt-in,

durch die Versionsgeschichte der Objekte (auch "History" genannt) ist ersichtlich, wer wann ein Objekt bearbeitet hat. Wenn du Objekte löscht und dann neu anlegst, geht diese Information verloren. Darüber hinaus erweckst du damit den Eindruck, dass du die Wege ...
12017-06-13 12:51:45 UTCPaul Johnson Is this in regards to the DACGroup edits?
22017-06-13 13:55:58 UTCwoodpeck Yes, the bulk was deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49484818 but some that had been edited by other people remained; it turned out that those edited by others were mostly still useless and they were then deleted in this changeset.
32017-06-13 14:37:34 UTCPaul Johnson OK. Were any of those in Oklahoma east of I 35? I know I worked on conflating some of those with existing data.
42017-06-14 11:27:38 UTCPaul Johnson OK, I think this might have been overzealous. I see this removed Node: 4897994740, which I had fixed.
52017-06-14 11:48:50 UTCwoodpeck I did a spot-check of some of the "fixed" objects and found that in many cases, only a part of the original problem had been repaired - sometimes a tag was fixed but the location was still in the middle of the road, or vice versa. In your particular example, you did fix the amenity tag but...
12017-06-14 11:21:01 UTCwoodpeck You moved the node "satyashor shiva mandir" a little bit - why? The Bing imagery doesn't really agree with the new position. Did you notice that the node was tagged "addr;city" (instead of addr:city), or that it is part of an useless, untagged rectangle that you could have delete...
22017-06-14 19:30:06 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi woodpeck,

in taginfo I saw an "addr;city"-key.
which I tried to fix for node/4908609673 which is close by. But by accident I moved it a little and more sad the key got not fixed. After this I saw, that the building looks rect-like in picture but not in shape of line. So applied the...
12017-06-13 17:35:35 UTCNakaner Hi EliotB,

please stop your ongoing import!

You posted on the Imports mailing list 11 days ago but the documentation page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=LINZ/Address_Import&oldid=1481962) lacks some important information about your import and you are not using a dedicate...
22017-06-13 20:28:09 UTCEliotB Which particular information do you think is lacking? Please comment on the talk page of my documentation page.
BTW others have gone ahead with much bigger imports with zero discussion and no consequence or revert .
(I've been working on this on the NZ list for 2.5 years)
32017-06-13 20:37:14 UTCNakaner I answered your email on the Imports mailing list a few minutes after I commented on this changeset. The Imports mailing list is a qualified place for discussions about imports. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005026.html
42017-06-13 20:52:43 UTCwoodpeck Eliot, feel free to point out those non-discussed other imports and we can deal with them appropriately. -- I notice that you've placed "ref" tags on these address points which is highly unusual and seems to contradict your own wiki page. Don't add "ref" tags.
52017-06-13 21:09:53 UTCEliotB @woodpeck, Yes, I will replace these with LINZ:address_id as on my wiki page.
(or otherwise as results from further discussion)
12017-06-09 13:36:02 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, could you explain more about this "place of worship" named "ALMIGHTY 2WHEEL GODS" that you have added here? I could not discern anything on the aerial imagery that you quoted as a source. Please note that adding fictional data to OSM throws a bad light on *all* you...
12017-06-09 13:33:27 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, can you please explain the source for the names you have assigned in this changeset, especially "Mat(t) Sav Construction Climb", "Tily's Run", and "Princess Kubiak"? As you surely are aware, mapping names requires verifiability, and you can't just add any...
12017-06-09 13:27:55 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, could you please explain why you believe that the correct name for this path is "Princess Kubiak", as you seem to have asserted in multiple edits over the past years?
12017-06-03 22:06:29 UTCwoodpeck Are you aware of the guidelines about "mechanical edits"? Please don't make large-scale changes like this without looking at the objects you're editing. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What's_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F for an explanation of the issue.
22017-06-04 14:52:59 UTCmweper @woodpeck Sorry, I revert it?
32017-06-05 23:54:43 UTCRicoElectrico I am fine with my POIs staying as-is now.
12017-05-26 06:22:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has uploaded alomost 5000 objects tagged as "shop=TD". What does that mean? And what does the highway tag with a numeric value mean? Further, you have not specificed a data source. Is this from a survey? If not, are you aware of the OSM data import policy?
22017-05-26 07:08:25 UTCDanhthanhnguyen94 Dear sir,
I'm going to do a survey to update address for my city, using ArcGIS and Vespucci (smartphone). Because of the limitnation of the fields in data when using ArcGIS Editor for OpenStreetMap so i have to temporarily use "highway" tag for "address" tag (data imported by A...
32017-05-26 07:31:37 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48992034, 48991550, 48992768, 48992498, 48992250, 48991347, 48991791 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and un-discussed data uploads (shop=TD)
12017-05-24 06:05:07 UTCwoodpeck Hello 25or6to4, it appears that you're importing data from an NRHP data set in this and other similar change sets. Could you please ensure that the import is properly documented on the Wiki (I checked and at least it didn't seem obvious), and that you specify proper sources when making the edits? Th...
12017-05-23 20:37:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Miple, es gibt vermehrt Zweifel an der urheberrechtlichen Eignung Deiner Quellen. Bitte gib künftig routinemäßig bei Deinen Edits die Quelle an - "survey", wenn Du es selbst vor Ort erfasst hast, oder eben welches Luftbild es ist, oder bei Straßennamen oder Gren...
22017-08-02 04:03:09 UTCMiple OK, mache ich.
32018-09-17 11:56:38 UTCNakaner Hallo Miple,

warum hast du denn bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62647308 und all den anderen Änderungssätzen der letzten sechs Monate keine Quellen angegeben?

Viele Grüße

Michael
42018-09-26 09:37:57 UTCMiple Hallo Michael,
als Quelle habe ich die Karte auf https://www.geoportal-th.de/de-de/ verwendet.
Ich halte das für urheberrechtlich erlaubt, weil Thüringen in seinem Landesprogramm „Offene Geodaten“ (https://www.geoportal-th.de/Portals/0/Downloads/IKG-GIZ/download/Landesprogra...
52018-09-26 12:15:02 UTCNakaner Hallo Miple,

das von dir verlinkte Dokument ist kein Lizenzvertrag. Absichtserklärungen sind nicht von Bedeutung.

Die thüringischen Daten stehen unter der Datenlizenz Deutschland Namensnennung 2.0. Die Lizenz verlangt eine Nennung der Quellenangabe, die OpenStreetMap nicht leisten ka...
12017-05-23 14:44:26 UTCwoodpeck Hello jeijei66, it would be super helpful if you could make it a habit to add meaningful changeset comments to your edits, instead of ".". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for a more detailed explanation.
12017-05-23 09:24:28 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Graf Westerholt, bitte beschränke Dich mit solchen Änderungen künftig auf Gegenden, in denen Du Ortskenntnis besitzt.
12017-05-23 04:31:16 UTCMarián Kyral Ahoj, žádná wikidata tam nevidím, zato mraky posunutých bodů, které udělaly zubaté cesty: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.1037/14.3004 :-(
22017-05-23 06:29:31 UTCelkueb Err,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9232412#map=15/48.2464/16.4048

huh?
32017-05-23 06:41:07 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48906966 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally seems to have moved a lot of nodes, breaking geometries
42017-05-23 06:46:11 UTCwoodpeck It appears that this changeset accidentally moved a large number of nodes. Strangely, the longitude has not been changed, and the latitude has been reduced by approximately 0.01 (~ 1 kilometre) for all nodes. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/9232412.png (temporary link) for a screenshot of the...
52017-05-23 15:42:24 UTCrmikke What I have done:

* Loaded results of this query to JOSM: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/peX
* Retrieved wikidata IDs with wikipedia plugin
* Saved that back to OSM.

There were some errors detected when uploading to OSM, but I haven't tried to correct any of them. However, the whole process took...
62017-05-23 15:52:29 UTCrmikke By "errors when uploading to OSM" I mean JOSM's validator detected errors that existed earlier - there was a duplicated relation at least, and countless warnings. I haven't tried to correct any of it exactly because I didn't want to touch anything else than wikidata IDs.
72017-05-23 21:30:55 UTCrmikke OK, I've repeated the procedure. It took much less time now, as most wikidata ids have been added in an earlier run (before the error).
Please check, there should be no displacement.
82017-05-23 21:33:26 UTCrmikke By the way, all the objects returned by the Overpass query now, require some manual action. In Poland it was usually updating a wikipedia link, as someone changed the title of wikipedia article for whatever reason.
12017-05-21 20:22:37 UTCwoodpeck Hello justascii, your data import technically violates the import guidelines which require prior discussion. It is much appreciated that you seem to be local to the area so you know what you're importing - but still, before you import anything larger, please check out and follow http://wiki.openstre...
22017-05-22 21:35:47 UTCjustascii Thank you, I'll go through the guidelines and follow the proscribed steps before bringing in anything else from this dataset. The data is reportedly from 2008, and it does contain outbuildings as well as houses.
12017-05-15 06:41:13 UTCwoodpeck I'm afraid this, again, is a change that breaks the map instead of improving it. I will revert your problematic edits now.
22017-05-15 06:41:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
12017-05-07 17:28:04 UTC16356Ahr Sind jetzt alle edits von diesem user verworfen?
22017-05-07 17:28:27 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 46581332, 46582093, 46582131, 46593560, 46594633, 46595576, 46603718, 46661012, 46661261, 46875045, 46929359, 46941721, 46941868, 46955624, 46955627, 46956418, 46977824, 46978128, 46981345, 46982526, 46984675, 46988086, 46988952, 46989056, ...
32017-05-07 17:30:08 UTC16356Ahr Warum? Die meisten waren doch sinnvoll.
42017-05-07 21:11:26 UTCwoodpeck Wenn wir klären können, woher dieser User seine Informationen hat, ob die Quelle zulässig ist, und wenn er aufhört, bei seinen Edits so viele Kollateralschäden zu verursachen, dass sie sich ständig Leute über ihn beschweren, dann können wir ja einige/viele/all...
12017-04-23 08:16:23 UTCwoodpeck What is wrong with you? For the third time now I have asked you to explain why you consider this to "not be a park" when the Long Beach municipal web site clearly lists it as a park - and you would think they should know better, no?
22017-04-28 23:20:14 UTCthomaswest7891 this was put as a park, someone with out being named wants the game pokemon go to spawn more pokemon. it is just a grassy area not a park.
32017-04-29 16:25:20 UTCwoodpeck Ok I'll use simpler language. This area was put as a park. Because it is a park. The City of Long Beach thinks this is a park. They have a description of this park on their web site. Many parks are really just grassy areas. But this grassy area is a park. Please leave it.
42017-04-29 16:29:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48260079 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism
12017-04-28 22:02:23 UTCRichRico Hi Woodpeck_repair, thanks for contibuting with osm.
I found a edition in one of your changeset, you modified the tag of a bridge `bridge = yes` and `bridge:sctructure=suspension` by just `bridge=suspension` acording the wiki the previous edition is correct.
maybe you have another explication
22017-04-29 16:22:11 UTCwoodpeck The problem is that someone simply hit the "fix everything" button on the JOSM validator for a very large number of items. While this did probably do the right thing in many cases, it also did the wrong thing in many cases. The JOSM validator is not a tool to be used indiscriminately like ...
12017-04-21 15:39:32 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48007226 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally moved many nodes by more than 100km
22017-04-24 08:30:43 UTCpfg21 The transfer of points was meaningful, all objects after editing locally validated, and any errors found corrected. Asked to cancel the rollback edits.
32017-04-24 08:32:32 UTCpfg21 The map after edits in fully working state
42017-04-24 09:01:59 UTCwoodpeck The move of the nodes in this changeset was clearly a mistake and has temporarily led to a broken map display. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/47972480.png for an illustration.
52017-04-26 08:24:23 UTCpfg21 I always check the result of my actions in josm.
the error that shows in the picture, sometimes because of problems in the servers of OSM.
Mapnik when updating the tiles gets to the time when the position of points are changed, but the points still belong to the old lines.
If you send /dirty a wh...
62017-04-26 08:32:24 UTCwoodpeck Are you saying that you have re-used node IDs for something entirely different in another area?
72017-04-26 09:09:36 UTCpfg21 Yeah, that happens sometimes
82017-04-27 07:38:51 UTCwoodpeck 1. You shouldn't do that (re-use node IDs), 2. here's the Achavi link that shows the broken changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47972480 - this is not a temporary rendering problem, at least three ways were totally broken in your changeset.
12017-04-25 21:05:05 UTCwoodpeck Please observe the following rules:
1. Do not put advertising copy in your changeset comment. A good changeset comment is "added Qtrust insurance", not what you wrote here.
2. Do not put advertising copy in the "description" tag or any other tag for that matter.
3. If you uplo...
12017-04-23 09:25:59 UTCwoodpeck Sebastic, if you delete polygons and someone else undoes your deletion, the correct approach is to discuss the issue, not stubbornly delete them again.
22017-04-23 09:48:10 UTCKostik https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6129&p=120
32017-04-23 09:55:36 UTCKostik Do not remove the relationship 3767168, 3767169 and the like!
42017-04-23 09:56:31 UTCKostik 3919370, 3919098
52017-04-23 10:17:54 UTCKostik 4471401
62017-04-23 10:23:28 UTCKostik 5372735
72017-04-23 11:18:02 UTCsebastic Please give these relations proper tags so that they don't qualify as old-style multipolygons.
82017-04-23 14:40:01 UTCKostik Before removing something, a good tone to write to the author of editing.
92017-04-23 14:42:42 UTCKostik Is the tag "note" not enough for you?
102017-04-23 14:52:47 UTCKostik I added a tag to the "note:de" for more of your understanding.
112017-04-23 15:31:03 UTCsebastic Neither the "note" nor "note:de" tag is sufficient to not have those relations be considered old-style multipolygons.

If you want to keep those relations in OpenStreetMap you should improve their tagging so they are not considered old-style multipolygons.

I'm not german BTW...
122017-04-23 16:28:04 UTCKostik If you do not want to roll back your vandal corrections, do not touch my relations.
132017-04-23 17:28:15 UTCsebastic If you don't want people to touch your relations, they shouldn't be in the OSM database that anyone with an account can edit. They should live in your own system to which only you have access.
12017-04-23 08:42:52 UTCwoodpeck Can you explain why you reverted this edit? Did it break anything or was it otherwise wrong? Please make it a habit to explain such things directly in the changeset comment when you revert something unless it is totally obvious.
22017-04-23 09:43:42 UTCKostik Были удалены отношения которые не стоило удалять. Причём без должного комментария почему это было сделано. Я вернул нужные мне мультиполигоны.

Relations have been removed are no...
12017-04-14 17:36:34 UTCrgt there are multiple references to this being a park on the internet so actually it is
22017-04-18 22:43:07 UTCiMarbot @rgt they are a malicious account. Look at their change history.
32017-04-19 15:45:35 UTCwoodpeck Curt, could you explain why you believe this is not a park. I found this on the web http://www.longbeach.gov/park/park-and-facilities/directory/marina-green/ which seems to say that at leas the city of Long Beach believes it is a park.
12017-04-19 13:49:07 UTCwoodpeck You appear to have deleted a lot of data in this and other nearby changesets. May I ask why?
12017-04-07 12:08:33 UTCDaveF Hi ti-lo
I've notice you've changed shop=motorcycle_repair to shop=motorcycle
What source did you use to ascertain they sell motorcycles?
22017-04-07 13:43:08 UTCti-lo A shop=motorcycle doesn't have to sell motorcycles. It's possible they repair, sell tyres, clothes or other stuff. To enable frontends to filter this, I'm standardizing the key. This means the "main" category is "shop", the "subcategories" motorcycle *:* (called "s...
32017-04-07 20:27:39 UTCDaveF Even if the revised tagging system is adopted (Was there any discussion?) you haven't confirmed whether it sells motorcycles or not.
42017-04-07 21:37:11 UTCti-lo I'not sure whether I get the point.
Which discussion do you mean, this one ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
And do you mean I should confirm whether this shop sells motorcycles ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3179844246
(can't do that as my crystal bal...
52017-04-07 22:06:40 UTCDaveF I'm unsure why you don't get my point.
Was it discussed on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/ ?

"can't do that as my crystal ball is broken" < this is the problem. You've edited a tag from being correct to incorrect without any knowledge.
According to you're wiki ed...
62017-04-08 14:13:35 UTCti-lo Hi Dave,
the former tagging was :
name \tPete Robson
service \tMOT_motorcycle
shop \tmotorcycle_repair
Now it is :
motorcycle:repair \tyes
name \tPete Robson
service \tMOT_motorcycle
shop \tmotorcycle

The description of shop=motorcycle
says since 15 August 2010 :
"A shop that sell...
72017-04-08 14:47:36 UTCDaveF Hi
"as I can't say whether it (meanwhile) possibly sells used bikes." < Again, this is the problem. You've explicitly changed it from 'definitely doesn't sell bikes' to 'definitely does sell bikes' *without* any knowledge.
82017-04-08 15:17:30 UTCti-lo Hi Dave, I'm not sure whether you read my answers. The description of shop=motorcycle INCLUDES REPAIR SINCE 2010 : "A shop that sells motorcycles and/or related accessories, clothes, parts, repair and rental services."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
So this is ...
92017-04-08 15:40:46 UTCDaveF Hi
if I were in your position I wouldn't have made the amendments due to lack of *any* knowledge to justify the changes. Your last sentence confirms why.

shop=motorcycle_repair means it doesn't sell bikes. You've now made it, at best, ambiguous.
102017-04-08 16:18:26 UTCti-lo In my point of view it's just another way to express the same thing (and to enable people to tag further properties of the item).
It would be great if you'd propose how to solve this (in your point of view) "issue" instead of keeping on complaining. In the last seven years there would hav...
112017-04-10 11:25:01 UTCDaveF As explained previously you've change the meaning of the entity, not provided an alternative.

There is no 'issue' to solve. The entity was accurately & legitimately tagged before your amendments.
As you've no knowledge of this shop you should not have made any changes.

I'm 'complaining' b...
122017-04-10 18:28:01 UTCti-lo What do you think about that ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repair
132017-04-10 19:24:36 UTCti-lo Would you please add your concerns to the discussion page ? (So everyone may add his/her point of view) :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
142017-04-10 20:38:35 UTCDaveF What are your plans to revert your erroneous edits?

PS
"These SHOULD be proposed on the tagging group!!! Not proposed on a wiki page."
152017-04-12 07:15:43 UTCwoodpeck The bulk of ti-lo's motorcycle adjustments have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47664678 and I recommended that a discussion is held on the tagging mailing list before changes are re-introduced.
162017-04-12 10:12:41 UTCDaveF @ti-lo
I look forward discussing your proposal on the Tagging mailing list.
12017-04-10 20:05:30 UTCstreckenkundler Bitte Edit sofort stoppen und im Forum disskutieren:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=640665#p640665
22017-04-11 10:41:53 UTCFahRadler Hi,
habs gerade gelesen.
CS ist kommentiert.
KEIN mech. edit !
Basis sind dooleys Listen und Wikipedia mit den offiziellen Namen.

FahRadler
32017-04-11 11:22:00 UTCstreckenkundler Ich sehe das anders... Vor allem aber auch weil die Changesets nicht räumlich begrenzt sind, habe ich auch ein Problem damit. Gängige Tools wie achavi oder History-Viewer steigen bei diesen aus. Eine Kontrolle ist nicht möglich.

Oder kannst du an einen DSL-Hauptverteiler einn Brief...
42017-04-11 11:31:57 UTCNakaner Hallo FahRadler,

ein mechanischer Edit muss nicht zwangsläufig automatisiert erfolgen. Es genügt eine größere Menge Objekte in JOSM zu ändern, ohne jedes einzelne Objekt zu prüfen. Die von streckenkundler aufgezeigten Beispiele belegen das. Siehe dazu auch https://w...
52017-04-11 11:32:54 UTCwoodpeck streckenkundler hat recht; die genannten Beispiele sind klare Indizien für einen "mechanischen Edit". Der liegt auch dann vor, wenn man z.B. in JOSM alles sucht, was "addr:city=a" hat, und das durch "addr:city=b" ersetzt. Überlasse doch diese Korrekturen Leute...
62017-04-11 11:33:31 UTCwoodpeck Ups, jetzt hat Nakaner fast das gleiche geschrieben und war auch noch früher dran.
72017-04-11 13:37:54 UTCFahRadler wie im Formum beschrieben änderte ich die addr:city Fehler die auf OSMsuspect gelistet wurden.
Meine manuelle Vorgehensweise habe ich geschildert.
Sicher wäre es schön alle "Fehler" (Adressen auf DSL-Hauptverteiler, Parkplatz) zu beseitigen. Mein Fokus in der Bearbeitung l...
12017-04-04 08:46:23 UTCwoodpeck Hello Zowie Polie, this changeset deletes a lot of valid data. Maybe you are not aware that your edits actually affect every user of OSM, not just the map you are seeing. Please stop breaking the map.
22017-05-15 06:41:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
12017-03-28 22:10:36 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you fixed the coastline of Gosti island, but there is a lot of extremely jagged other coastline nearby that you did not touch. May I ask why you focussed on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do...
22017-03-30 02:39:36 UTCJason Roy I focused on Gosti Island because I found it through a Maproulette challenge designed to find jagged islands that can use better alignment. I am part of a small group of OSM users working on improving these islands.
12017-03-28 22:07:47 UTCwoodpeck You have moved the nodes making up this island http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224776118 but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery actually are good enough to even see that island. Your source specification ("Bing") must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit ...
22017-03-30 02:22:06 UTCKate Diaz You are right, I should not have moved the nodes making up that island. It is simply not visible in Bing or Mapbox. Please observe that I made these edits 6 days ago, and since then I have avoided making similar edits when no imagery is available. I certainly won’t any more. I am finding these...
12017-03-28 22:01:06 UTCwoodpeck You aligned this island with Bing but you left the nearby, larger island untouched even though it, too, is very much out of sync with imagery. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 02:36:07 UTCShaun Austin I am finding these islands through a MapRoulette challenge. I did not fix the other island because it may be another task and I wanted to save it for others working on the challenge.
12017-03-28 21:56:27 UTCwoodpeck You modified this island but left the glacier in place that now cuts right through the island which can't be right. Why the focus on just the island geometry? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 03:39:50 UTCEvelyn Desouzaa Hey Woodpeck,




Thanks for pointing that out, I have since fixed the glacier feature to not intersect the island.  This edit was made as part of a MapRoulette challenge for Island and Shoreline alignment.  There's is a small group of us working on fixing small islands in OSM. &nb...
12017-03-28 21:54:59 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery just shows a blurry cloud of white and you can't even see that there's supposed to be an island here so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRou...
22017-03-30 23:39:12 UTCAshley Rose There's some rock visible in Bing here. Its not unreasonable to assume that the blurry rock seen in imagery is the same feature represented by the existing island (w232976567), so I tried to improve the island with Bing. However you are right that I should not have edited this island with only Bing....
12017-03-28 21:53:39 UTCwoodpeck You have improved the coastline for this island, but there's an out-of-sync admin boundary half overlapping the island. Did you notice that? It would have been good if, while modifying the island, you had corrected the admin boundary as well. (Admin boundaries are broken all over the place but if yo...
22017-03-30 02:30:14 UTCEva Blue I noticed the admin boundary, but I was under the impression that these features should only be edited with special resources, especially because they are not visible in imagery. I think that if I was in the habit of editing admin boundaries using only Bing and Mapbox, other OSM users would rightly ...
12017-03-28 21:50:36 UTCwoodpeck You have aligned this one island with Bing imagery, but the three nearby islands were horribly out of sync with imagery and you haven't even made an attempt to repair them too. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct...
22017-03-30 02:43:25 UTCJames Millar I found this island through a MapRoulette challenge, I’m part of a small group who are attempting to improve the alignment of these islands using MapRoulette and JOSM.
32017-04-18 10:15:59 UTCSomeoneElse Hi James.
There have been worrying changes such as this elsewhere; you simply can't rely on Bing imagery where it might be offset (which is anywhere that you don't have something else to corroborate it).
Can you explain who the "small group" are?
Your profile doesn't say anything abou...
42017-04-19 02:09:13 UTCJames Millar Hi Andy,
We also use Mapbox, and by using a combination we can usually make improvements to these islands regardless of potential Bing offset. Alternatively we make the decision to not make any edits in an area (we do this often). Can you point me to some of the worrying changes? I can always fix t...
52017-04-19 07:58:14 UTCSomeoneElse Re "worrying changes", you can see a discussion with comments at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imagico/diary/40759 .
Also, you're saying "we" again. Who exactly are "we"?
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-03-28 21:48:52 UTCwoodpeck You have neatly aligned this island with the imagery, but you left the jagged 6-node form of the other nearby Roberts Island unchanged. Why the focus on this one particular island, instead of repairing other things that catch your eye too? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and ...
22017-03-30 02:16:12 UTCkevin Prince Thank you for the compliment, these types of islands are sometimes tough to align because MHWS is not clear in the imagery. Yes, I am using a MapRoulette challenge in order to find these islands, then using JOSM to align the islands with Bing and Mapbox. I did not edit the other island because I tho...
woodpeck has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 1041 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)