Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-10-20 23:49:22 UTCmuralito I could provide some nodes that were deleted and were not advertising.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1118036691

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5135199111

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5057146412/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5042809017/history

The 4 seems va...
22017-10-21 04:16:55 UTCnaoliv It seems the same case from some nodes in Brazil.
I wouldn't call them *wrong* but incomplete and/or with unnecessary information.
(New) users sometimes misunderstand the "description" tag and are too much verbose when using it.
Instead deleting, is it possible to create a list of affec...
32017-10-21 05:55:29 UTCTre0xf please never do things like this again. you've basically deleted street names etc from the dataset. some of us rely on these things like names an geometries and now we have to restore them and you know how difficult that is!! to what end, all this deletion? couldn't you just change the descriptions?...
42017-10-21 08:23:30 UTCwoodpeck Hello, I'm sorry if I have accidentally deleted things that were not advertising. I'll look into the IDs specified by muralito and replace them. I have only deleted objects that were created by users who had a very small number of edits (usually, only one edit!) and who have added a long description...
52017-10-21 08:25:44 UTCPrince Kassad This changeset also deleted objects that no longer had SEO advertising in their newest revision, i. e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266904941/history. This is an extremely harmful changeset and should be undone immediately.
62017-10-21 08:54:35 UTCВладимир К is this a joke? all objects i checked are NOT SEO or even advertising! These descriptions were just descriptions. I think it is totally wrong to delete things, you even don''t understand in another language! You even deleted the hole building, that exists on satimagery!
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
72017-10-21 09:05:24 UTCВладимир К in Moscow only 2 of 8 deleted objects have description! and another exxisting building was deleted
82017-10-21 09:49:23 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир К, Prince Kassad, indeed I have removed objects even if they *had* advertising in the past, and other mappers had removed the advertising in the mean time. That was unnecessary. I'll undelete the affected objects. Please refrain from reverting the full changeset because that ...
92017-10-21 10:55:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted this and now re-created things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 - will you now take over and do this properly, removing advertising from where it doesn't belong, or do you expect others to do this?
102017-10-21 20:13:08 UTCmuralito I just wanted to raise the flag that there are some false positives in the algorithm, so i asked for an improvement, I also understand if the algorithm is not disclosed as it can be used by advertisers for "tunning" their ads.

In thousands of elements there are probably a lot of distinc...
112017-10-21 20:38:24 UTCwoodpeck Yes, it was not an algorithm that I was planning to run regularly, I just had identified long-description objects made by users who have contributed very little, and then went through the list manually, using a translating web site for anything other than English and German. Quite possible that I ac...
122017-10-21 22:36:06 UTCSimonvdP Did you even check your example?, removing part of a likely valid secondary road seems worse than leaving it there with the useless description on it,
132017-10-22 22:48:21 UTCChris Fleming This feels excessive to me - generally when I see these added, provided the information is accurate then I don't mind the "spammy description"; but there is also a case for removing. My worry with this changeset is that by completely removing the object we remove information that had been...
142017-10-23 05:47:30 UTCwoodpeck I think that any contribution made by a spammer should be entirely removed because it has not been made with OSM's interests at heart; most likely the coordinates are from a proprietary geocoder and the object will usually be placed with little regard to what's around it. So if the spammer adds a ho...
12017-10-22 19:30:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello lorec10, please do not add "proposed" boundaries to OSM. They are nearly impossible to verify, they make editing more difficult for everyone who touches one of the members of the relation, and they are of little use. In this particular case, you also fail to explain who is proposing ...
12017-10-22 19:21:27 UTCwoodpeck Hello lorec10, please do not add hardly-verifiable boundaries to OpenStreetMap. Even if you *were* living in the region and could therefore observe what language is spoken there, we don't usually map language areas in OpenStreetMap because they are so difficult to verify. Current administrative boun...
12017-10-22 09:54:25 UTCwoodpeck Hi,

you seem to be adding lots of objects to OSM that have an address and a name but nothing else. This is not useful; you must use a tag that describes *what* the object is. Also I doubt that your use of the name tag is correct, since it would indicate that there must be an object CALLED "J...
12017-10-21 11:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted my changeset 53114647 instead of waiting for me to repair the problems. Now you are responsible for creating things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 and several 1000 other SEO entries in OpenStreetMap. Will you continu...
12017-10-20 00:56:48 UTCaharvey What's the policy on SEO edits, I encounter them almost every day and not really sure what to do. The ones I encounter it's a new OSM account for each "customer" and they never use the correct format for opening_hours or accepted payments etc.
22017-10-20 05:55:55 UTCwoodpeck There's no written policy but first and foremost the rule is "no advertising", i.e. anything with a "description" tag that tells us how the excellent lawyer has been helping their clients for a decade should be deleted on sight. Another frequent problem is bad or missing tags, or...
12017-10-19 21:11:05 UTCwoodpeck Warum die kommentarlose Löschung von hazmat und lane-Tags?
22017-10-19 21:28:19 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
12017-10-17 00:02:24 UTCwoodpeck Please do not create historic boundaries on OpenStreetMap. They unnecessarily complicate the editing process for others. Check out OpenHistoricalMap for a project to map historic boundaries and other historic facts.
12017-10-14 23:40:03 UTCwoodpeck Why did you remove the end_date=1947 from this boundary in this changeset? Is the "Geographical region of Italy" (that includes Corse and Istria) more than a historic boundary?
12017-10-14 21:25:15 UTCwoodpeck Hello ninjamask, please be more careful when you apply such large-scale fixes. It is obvious that you have *not* really checked these 10,000 objects that you "fixed" here or else you would have seen that a lot of it is really broken data that does not belong in OSM (e.g. https://www.openst...
12017-10-13 05:54:06 UTCwoodpeck Hello Drew_P, are *any* of the edits you made to OSM real, or are they all about fictional stuff and funny names?
12017-10-08 18:18:15 UTCfserges Если в отношение добавляются члены, то им должны присваиваться роли. Член без роли по умолчанию воспринимается как outer. В этом changeset были массово добавлены члены пох...
22017-10-11 11:57:11 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted these edits because they violate a DWG resolution regarding the Crimea. Please don't remove Crimea from the Ukraine relation. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52822088
12017-10-10 19:49:07 UTCrazor74 Hello. Why delete street names contribute by other user than chdr? This is not normal to revert data by assuming that they are copyright violation from google only because that user didnt respond about his sources... It is only assuming... Google copyed from us alot. I aim certain that they copy fro...
22017-10-11 07:39:15 UTCwoodpeck I have deleted only street names contributed by user chdr, not those contributed by other users. The user has been proven to have used Google in some situations and this nourishes the suspicion that he used Google in other areas too. If he had used a different source, it would have been easy for him...
12017-10-10 19:01:38 UTCwoodpeck You specified "Bing aerial imagery" as a data source for this change of a hotel name - surely that can't be right. What is the correct data source for the name change?
22017-10-11 11:15:56 UTCGoWestTravel In this case, I'm the source myself. I visited this hotel last month on the first day of the name change (Sep 18). I was not aware Bing was mentioned as a source here.

Thanks,

GoWestTravel
12017-10-10 11:47:12 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Georg, hier hast Du abermals einem problematischen Datensatz, der eine werbliche "description" enthielt, ein "office=lawyer" hinzugefügt. Als Quelle hast Du "ESRI World Image" angegeben, obwohl das Gebäude darauf nicht ausreichnd zu sehen ist. Dass es hi...
22017-10-10 15:26:54 UTCuser_5359 Hallo, nur weil einer in der description ausschweifend wird, existiert noch lange keine Grund, die Angaben komplett zu löschen, zu mal kein weiterer Grund vorliegt (wie keine ähnliche Straße in der Nähe oder als Kirche gekennzeichnet).

Korrektur der source Angabe Knowledge &...
12017-09-08 18:12:40 UTCbergaufsee Hallo geozeisig,
wo ist jetzt hier dein Problem? Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport#Busse steht doch eindeutig: Wenn ein richtiger Bussteig vorhanden ist -> An der Halteposition des Busses einen Node auf der Straße ... Er erhält auch das Tag highway=bus_stop...
22017-09-09 08:13:57 UTCgeozeisig highway=bus_stop muss auf jeden Fall seitlich am besten da wo das Haltestellenschild ist. Sonst wird die Bushaltestelle mittig gerendert und man weiß nicht für welche Richtung die Haltestelle zuständig ist. Wenn du schon Bussteige einzeichnen willst nimm der vorderen node in Fahrtric...
32017-09-09 10:09:56 UTCbergaufsee Das Thema der Fahrtrichtung ist doch auch bei public_transport=stop_position gegeben?! Das Problem ist doch aber mit der Eintragung der Bussteige gelöst, die sind ja an der richtigen Stelle. Außerdem geht dies auch aus den Busrouten hervor.
Deine Darstellung hat sich nicht bewährt s...
42017-09-10 20:29:26 UTCNakaner Hallo geozeisig,

könntest du bitte, bevor du mit weiteren Umtaggingaktionen in Berlin und Umgebung fortfährst, diese auf der Berliner Mailingliste diskutieren?

Des Weiteren möchte ich dich bitten, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare einzugeben, erst recht, wenn du ...
52017-09-11 06:36:48 UTCgeozeisig Gewöhnlich werden in einem Änderungssatz mehrere verschiedene Änderungen gemacht, die kann man nicht noch einzeln erklären.
Auch ist es unüblich alle Änderung vorher in einem Forum zu diskutieren. Da gibt es immer jemand der ein Bedenken äußert. Und zum Schl...
62017-09-24 14:49:35 UTCbergaufsee CS reverted, ich behalte mir vor ähnlich gelagerte CS die dem wiki entgegenlaufen gleich zu tun. Weitere Kommentare hierzu wird es auch von mir an dieser Stelle nicht mehr geben.
72017-09-25 06:04:13 UTCgeozeisig Da es massenweise Beispiele für Haltekanten gibt, welche von schienengebundenen und nicht schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen gibt wurde dieses Tag durch public_transport=platform ersetzt.
Original Wiki
82017-10-08 11:59:31 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Geozeisig, Du hast insofern recht, als dass Dein Tagging nicht "dem Wiki entgegenläuft", zumindest nicht mehr oder weniger als das, welches bergaufsee bevorzugt; beide Arten sind im Wiki dokumentiert. Letzten Endes ist es Geschmackssache, wie man es macht - ähnlich wie z.B....
12017-10-06 21:04:20 UTCChrissW-R1 Please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4016746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917

It is a peninsula, but boundary=land_area in combination of place=peninsula is a good compromise for me.
22017-10-07 09:42:21 UTCwoodpeck I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
32017-10-07 09:47:17 UTCwoodpeck I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
12017-10-04 20:22:17 UTCwoodpeck Hello Nordpfeil, it would be great if you could spend a little more time on setting proper changeset comments. "Details added/updated" is a changeset comment that probably applies to 99% of all edits made in OSM. The changeset comment is there for others to understand the nature of your ed...
12017-10-04 16:13:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-09-28 12:02:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding a huge number of new and undocumented tags on these objects (listed below). Please clean this up. The number of nodes on each object also seems to be much too high - especially those half-circular shapes.

LCC \tA12-A2-A6
aream2 \t97530.06567
date \t1-spt-2017
escala \t1:25k\...
22017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 07:58:10 UTCwoodpeck This data is buggy. It does not match available imagery and has strange tracing artifacts. Do not upload more of this data. Discuss it in the imports list and seek help in attaining a proper process.
22017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 11:34:48 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Georg, bitte beachte die Regeln für "mechanisches Editieren". Diese besagen, dass man nicht "blind" an Objekten herumbasteln soll. Du bist ein erfahrener Mapper, wenn Du hier genau hingeschaut hättest, hättest Du gemerkt, dass (1) ein unsinniges Tag "ord...
22017-10-04 15:55:19 UTCfreebeer Hallo 'peck,
ESRI has imagery up to zoomlevel 17 here.
Looks (quickly) the same as Bing, without the artificial overzoom to z19.
Which also seems the same as DigitalGlobe Premium, with a different overzoom process (blocky instead of blurry).
Nonetheless, the area looks like a mess seen by me in ...
32017-10-04 16:30:00 UTCfreebeer Sorry to reply, but after posting I downloaded some history and remember this is a controversial import being reverted.
Not only do all the now-length entries have 5-decimal precision, but many are identical, when I measure nearly 100m for some.
I would guess (why would I even bother?) these are a...
12017-10-04 10:01:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52244481, 52244523, 52244534, 52244547, 52244561, 52244572, 52244592.
12017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-09-22 08:44:01 UTCwoodpeck Please explain why you have uploaded a village boundary with name:en="we are evil"?
22017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-09-22 09:05:14 UTCwoodpeck what does "cop=do not share" mean on this boundary?
22017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 08:33:48 UTCwoodpeck Dear user Ladamafria. You seem to be working with users PC10 and/or opengislab and perhaps others on some sort of project. Please have the project lead/coordinator contact the OSMF data working group at data@osmfoundation.org. We need to talk to you. You are uploading data in violation of the data i...
22017-10-04 20:11:26 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636453 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed and buggy import of waterways (bad tags, don't match imagery, intersect with existing geometries, etc.) that is claimed to have been extracted from SRTM
12017-09-22 08:48:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello PC10, these data imports are faulty (they introduce bad keys and they have over-noded, pseudo-precise geometries that seem to come from converting a raster map to vectors). Before you import anything more, please consult the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidel...
22017-09-22 10:23:14 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52...
32017-10-02 18:54:42 UTCmueschel Hi PC10, hi woodpeck,
there are many more nodes and areas imported since, including newly invented tags (aream2, LCC, proyecto, ...). It also seems that most features do not correspond to actual features in the satellite images - e.g. forest multipolygons have the largest trees excluded, borders do...
42017-10-04 08:23:23 UTCwoodpeck Yes they should. We know nothing about the source - it is claimed that there's some community project - but the data suffers from geometry anomalies and bad tagging and the import hasn't been discussed. I am deleting the data now and have asked PC10 to discuss any further plans on the imports list.
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 48865841, 48865877, 49321250, 49486123, 49851029, 49851047, 49851066, 49851084, 49851100, 49851112, 49851130, 49851132, 49851155, 49851185, 49851225, 49851235, 49851258, 49851271, 49851278, 49851308, 49975039, 49975054, 49996614, 49996723, ...
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-27 05:02:38 UTCnammala Hi Zowie Polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting valid data and also adding rails over the roads, OSM is the real map of the world and deleting the data is not encourgable. Don't do random edits on the map.

22017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-26 12:17:33 UTCwoodpeck What does this change have to do with Northridge shopping center?
22017-07-26 13:58:27 UTCiandees Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50590816
32017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:08 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:02 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-25 04:49:37 UTCupendrakarukonda Hi Zowie Polie,

This is a known ID editor bug, where it deletes the wikidata tag, while mapping through it. Can you get back the wikidata tag to the feature again?

Regards,

Upendra
22017-10-03 00:05:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-25 05:45:49 UTCnammala Hi Zowie polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting lot of valuable data. I have reverted your changeset. Please make sure the data in the OSM is crowd sourced and the data is so valuable please don't delete the data.

Regards,
nammala
22017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-26 13:58:01 UTCiandees Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50590816
22017-10-03 00:04:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:47 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:46 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-09-16 03:48:23 UTCPaul Johnson I'm probably going to be reverting this changeset as it has appeared to have removed major streets in Guymon, and broken the relations for OK 3, US 54, US 64, and US 412 simultaneously.
22017-09-16 04:09:47 UTCPaul Johnson This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52085816 where the changeset comment is:
32017-09-16 04:21:05 UTCPaul Johnson OK, was able to get that rolled back; sorry if I undid anything you might have done in the process, losing connectivity to four cross-state highways was pretty noticeable. I'm not mad or anything, but I do ask for a little more care when deleting features.
42017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-01 19:07:39 UTCwoodpeck nyuriks, you have in the past made edits claimed to be "as per discussion on talk list" when the discussion on the talk list certainly not meant you had an all clear for the edit. Now you claim to make edits "per community discussion in telegram chat", which third parties cannot ...
22017-10-01 19:27:32 UTCnyuriks fair point (and no, I come from Wikipedia background and really don't like sockpuppets). Take a look at the #osm-ru IRC channel - the channel topic says: "https://telegram.me/ruosm >> жизнь переехала в телеграм" (there are ~250 people there). Also, IRC cha...
12017-09-30 15:17:37 UTCwoodpeck Dear osmviborg, the OSMF Data Working group has received several complaints over your use of the source "SDFE-data/survey/knowledge". You are editing all over Denmark. In the future, please make it clear for every edit whether this comes from a survey or from an external data set and if so...
12017-09-30 15:09:37 UTCwoodpeck Is "stadnina koni" really a tourist attraction?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088526122

And your "Wieża widokowa Joanna" has already be deleted by someone else.

Please: Only add data to OSM that is actually verifiable on the ground, and that is correct to your kn...
22017-10-01 20:40:34 UTCRicoElectrico @woodpeck This is sadly quite a problem with maps.me edits if you watch the edits regularly. The users apparently aren't told not to enter places for which there's no category.

If only we could push maps.me to improve this (as well as using notes/POI for private bookmarks due to poor UI wording)....
12017-09-29 12:15:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has accidentally broken the geometries https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485019675 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157366833 - they now look "blocky" and have many self-intersections. Can you repair this yourself or would you like help in reverting the edit?
22017-09-29 12:59:00 UTCraito @woodpeck I think it is rather this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52402340 that broke it, or the previous one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52165496.

This one with comment "validation" is probably trying to fix it but not properly.
32017-09-29 14:04:58 UTCwoodpeck Indeed. I'll have a look at reverting these two landuse areas.
42017-09-29 23:38:10 UTCDewi Sulistioningrum Hi woodpeck

I will check this changeset on Monday and repair the problem

Thank you
52017-09-29 23:44:01 UTCDewi Sulistioningrum On the changeset, I was validated the infrastructures from survey data and delete import=yes from some line boundary administrative in the area. I didn't changed the landuse, perhaps my team has changed the landuse and broke the landuse. Because we were working with some people for the area.
But,...
12017-09-27 21:17:32 UTCwoodpeck I don't think this is right. Aldi Süd and Aldi Nord are not two different operators of the same brand; the brand is different (different logo, different products on the shelves, etc). I'm unhappy that someone from England feels empowered by Wikidata to make judgements about German supermarkets ...
22017-09-27 21:28:33 UTCpigsonthewing I'm not sure what you mean by "empowered by Wikidata", and the fact that I am from England does not prohibit me from editing an item in Germany, a country I have visited - and shopped in - often, so please tone down the frankly unacceptable nationalist rhetoric.

As to a "common bra...
32017-09-28 06:03:30 UTCR0bst3r Just a question: who needs all this *:wikidata, if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve? You can find brand and operator on this page. Mabe think about it ... the nationalistic rhetoric remembers me of some discussions as I edited some breweries I visited in London. So not very uncommon.
42017-09-28 07:02:07 UTCpigsonthewing " if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve?"

That case is false, so your question is moot.
52017-09-28 07:03:24 UTCpigsonthewing Also, I'm sorry to hear of your experience editing around London; that is equally unacceptable.
12017-09-25 11:42:45 UTCwoodpeck Dear rondock, there are two issues with this changeset. One is that you aren't giving an appropriate changeset comment - you write "details" but what you are doing is deleting all sidewalks. Your changeset comment should have been "Deleting sidewalks", and it should also have giv...
12017-09-19 18:13:58 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello cat_crash. In the last days, you have edited http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396714343 a lot. Also you have introduced a lot of new (so far unknown) keys (e.g. additional_amenities, own_parking, pets_allowed, ssync:osm). All this with a "new editor", or what is "Services_OpenSt...
22017-09-23 15:09:36 UTCcat_crash Hi,
we are piloting on integration OSM with our cloud solution helps venues keep OSM data up-to-date.
New key will be introduced in accordance with process or removed after piloting. Please notice - we are piloting only on 2 venues. No any mass loads will be done
32017-09-23 20:03:10 UTCwoodpeck Please note there's a development server at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org that we recommend to be used for testing out new software. I don't know what your cloud solution entails but please keep in mind that it is very important to OSM that those who contribute information react to chang...
12017-09-22 09:08:10 UTCwoodpeck This is an undiscussed import that not only introduces a wrong key ("lenght") but also seems to be totally out of sync with available aerial imagery. Please follow the OSM import guidelines, and discuss such imports before you execute them. The imports will be reverted.
22017-09-22 09:14:29 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52269404 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from opengislab, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245612
12017-09-05 14:25:47 UTCwoodpeck This changesert is vandalism.
12017-09-02 23:31:42 UTCadjuva Hallo Frederik!

Die Bahnsteig-Multipolygone in Luisental und Bous (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1620893 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1620862) waren aus meiner Sicht nicht überflüssig. Sie entsprachen einem im Wiki dokumentiertem Tagging-Schema (http://wiki.openstre...
22017-09-03 07:55:43 UTCwoodpeck Ja, Du hast recht, mit den Bahnsteigkanten habe ich etwas übertrieben. Ich werde das wieder zurück-ändern. Allerdings ist es m.E. trotzdem falsch, die *Bahnsteigkante* als Stop in die Routenrelation aufzunehmen, stattdessen sollte das *Bahnsteigmultipolygon* als Stop in die Route. Ode...
12017-08-30 00:53:49 UTCArlas prima di cancellare i nomi delle strade, perché non chiedi a "Ludovic Drouard" il perché delle sue modifiche? se ha mappato in loco (cosa molto probabile) stai rovinando ore di lavoro di altre persone
22017-08-30 06:15:46 UTCwoodpeck It appears that you are on a crusade to delete names from those small parts of roads that lead on and off roundabouts, and you're doing that not only in your local area but over large parts of Sicily. I think that this is something you should discuss with the community before, as opinions seem to di...
32017-08-30 08:45:40 UTCthetornado76 He deleted also names from pedestrian zone like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51458691
12017-08-30 06:11:55 UTCwoodpeck Why did you delete the name "Via Fernando Magellano" (way 519743740)?
12017-08-20 23:23:52 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Ruhrpottkast, danke fuer Deine Beitraege. Leider ist der "Eisenbahnatlas" keine fuer OSM erlaubte Quelle, daher muss ich diese Aenderungen wieder entfernen. Das heisst nicht, dass die Information falsch waere (ich kenne mich mit Eisenbahnen nicht so gut aus), aber wie gesagt, der Eis...
22017-08-21 18:50:33 UTCRuhrpottkast Wenn man sich zum Beispiel https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/27490724 anschaut, hat die Strecke in OSM schon einen regelmäßigen Wechsel zwischen main und branch hinter sich. Wäre an der Zeit, hier mal zumindest für OSM sich festzulegen. Nirgendwo wird schnell gefah...
12017-08-20 23:23:36 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Ruhrpottkast, danke fuer Deine Beitraege. Leider ist der "Eisenbahnatlas" keine fuer OSM erlaubte Quelle, daher muss ich diese Aenderungen wieder entfernen. Das heisst nicht, dass die Information falsch waere (ich kenne mich mit Eisenbahnen nicht so gut aus), aber wie gesagt, der Eis...
22017-08-21 18:31:53 UTCRuhrpottkast Ich hatte mit dem Changeset mehr geändert als nur branch->main (unter anderem Gleisanzahl).
Das habe ich wiederhergestellt.
Nach § 40 EBO (Fahrgeschwindigkeit) gilt auf Nebenbahnen maximal 100 km/h. Dort gilt aber stellenweise 110 km/h. Folglich ist es auch deshalb als Hauptbahn ident...
32017-08-21 18:42:13 UTCRuhrpottkast Die Strecke hatte zunächst usage=main. Erst mit Changesetz 51314899 wurde dann durch HelgaZ am 16.11.2016 usage=main zu usage=branch geändert. Änderungssatzkommentar war: "Flächennutzung Kiebingen". Quelle war: "Bing; extrapolation". Ist schon reichlich komis...
12017-08-04 21:45:15 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted this changeset because it created one huge building=residential relation that contained the buildings of half a village, and all the outer rings forming the buildings were imported with a ton of non-OSM tags. Please discuss any data import on a suitable mailing list (at least talk-it...
12017-07-28 11:24:17 UTCwoodpeck Hello Seznam2 (and Seznam),
it appears that you are making a very large number of edits to OSM with an automatic script. Please note that we have rules for such kinds of edits (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits) - among other things you are expected to discuss the scope and type of...
12017-07-27 13:42:29 UTCwoodpeck Has this import been discussed / documented somewhere?
22017-07-27 17:08:30 UTCViriatoLusitano https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005014.html
32017-07-27 18:27:28 UTCralley LINZ imports were originally discussed staring 17/08/12 on the imports list. The imports have been going on intermittently since this time as tracked through http://linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz/workslices/list/?ws_state=&dataset=&layer=river_cl&user=&order_by=checked_out_at
Docume...
12017-07-24 12:53:04 UTCwoodpeck This changeset appears to import a large number of duplicate nodes and rectangles that bear no tags that OSM recognizes. It looks as if the OSM database was used to mark the mapping status certain map squares. Can you explain?
12017-04-23 16:21:26 UTCdatendelphin What was your source for the names you added here, for example Halde?
22017-04-24 00:05:56 UTCdonovaly > What was your source?

The GWR. There is an official frontend for this register:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/?zoom=9&lang=de&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.swissimage&catalogNodes=457,491&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register&X=227873.34&Y=623013.50
32017-04-24 19:19:23 UTCdatendelphin The GWR and generally anything on map.geo.admin.ch are not valid sources for OSM. Don't copy from other maps.
42017-04-25 20:24:44 UTCdonovaly > Don't copy from other maps.

I don't copy from other maps. I had a long discussion with Simon Poole, from the Swiss OSM user groupd about this. In my opinion it does not violate any license to put in official names into OSM. I requested to inform me if I am wrong and the user group discussed ...
52017-04-25 20:53:51 UTCSOSM I gave you all the relevant legal material that shows that the GWR data cannot be used in the way you have used it in the current legal framework. You continued to make up reasons why the laws don't apply to you, we needn't go over that again.
62017-04-25 21:08:02 UTCdonovaly > I gave you all the relevant legal material that shows that the GWR data cannot be used in the way you have used it

That is not true. I clearly stated why I disagree with you, I even offered to pay my lawyer to look over the licenses to clarify what is OK and what not.

It is strange that I...
72017-04-25 21:25:09 UTCSimonPoole Quoting from my response to your first mail:
"Ich kann auch nicht ganz nachvollziehen wieso du auf
http://www.geo.admin.ch/internet/geoportal/de/home/geoadmin/contact.html#copyright
glaubst keinen Hinweis auf eine Beschränkung der Nutzung der GWR-Daten
zu finden, die 6 (mehr oder wenig...
82017-04-25 21:47:10 UTCdonovaly Siehe meine Antwort darauf vom 26.4.2016:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/read/566658

Dort schrieb ich ganz unten:
"Kurzum, ich möchte hiermit die Diskussion beenden und zu einem Ergebnis kommen. Ich bitte Sie mir die entsprechenden Textpassagen aus der GWR-Verordnung zukommen zu...
92017-04-25 21:49:03 UTCdonovaly Um nochmal ganz konkret meine Frage zu stellen:
"
Ist es explizit nicht erlaubt, Folgendes zu tun?: 1. man schaut z.B. in http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/VD/5672.html 2. man sucht manuell nach "Forel-sur-Lucens" und gelangt zu https://map.geo.admin.ch/?X=175120.72&Y=553007.53&zo...
102017-04-26 19:20:43 UTCdatendelphin Deine Idee des "reinwaschen der Information" ist nicht neu. Du kannst gerne dazu weitere Meinungen aus des community einholen, z.B. auf der internationalen https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk talk mailingliste. Weil das ist wirklich etwas was die gesamte community betreffen w&uum...
112017-04-26 19:57:40 UTCromanh Danke donovaly für Deine gut gemeinte Arbeit.
Leider ist dies so aber nicht o.k.

GWR-VO Art. 13 Weitergabe der Daten zu anderen Zwecken: 4) "..., oder andere kommerzielle Zwecke, ist untersagt."
Somit ist es nicht für OSM verwendbar, da eine kommerzielle Nutzung der OSM D...
122017-05-10 00:46:27 UTCdonovaly Hallo Roman und Datendelphin,

vielen Dank für eure Erläuterungen. Ich möchte dennoch nicht einfach aufgeben, denn es wird sich nur etwas ändern, wenn man Druck aufbaut, sei es mit einem Rechtsgutachten oder durch direkten Kontakt mit dem BFS und natürlich, indem man Polit...
132017-05-10 21:05:36 UTCSimonPoole OSM ist kein Projekt zur Erforschung rechtlicher Grauzonen (die es in diesem Fall aber gar nicht gibt).

Auch wenn es eine rechtliche Lücke geben würde (die ich aber nicht sehe), die Willensäusserung des Gesetzgebers ist klar. Wir (die Schweizer OSM Community) stehen immer wieder ...
142017-05-10 21:38:40 UTCwoodpeck Und die DWG hat sich hier in Verbindung gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344
152017-05-25 23:59:26 UTCdonovaly > Auch wenn es eine rechtliche Lücke geben würde (die ich aber nicht sehe), die Willensäusserung des Gesetzgebers ist klar.

Dann lass es uns ändern! So klar kann es aber nicht sein, wenn ein Fachanwalt es überhaupt nicht so klar sieht.

> Wir (die Schweizer OSM Co...
162017-05-26 09:59:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo donovaly, Du hast bislang nicht auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 reagiert. Bitte lasse uns bis zum 18.6.2017 eine Liste aller Änderungen, bei denen Du Dich auf GWR-Daten oder andere nicht explizit freigegebene Quellen gestützt hast, zukommen. (Es reicht auch eine wi...
172017-07-23 20:36:58 UTCdonovaly > Bitte lasse uns bis zum 18.6.2017 eine Liste aller Änderungen, bei denen Du Dich auf GWR-Daten oder andere nicht explizit freigegebene Quellen gestützt hast, zukommen.

Servus liebe Kollegen,

was geht denn hier? Ihr habt den Sachverhalt nicht rechtlich klären lassen, obwohl...
182017-07-23 20:41:52 UTCdonovaly > Du hast bislang nicht auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 reagiert.

Doch, hier, denn auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 kann ich nichts kommentieren. Mit einem Frederik Ramm, der mich gesperrt hat, hatte ich vorher noch nichts zu tun und es gibt auch keine Inf...
192017-07-23 21:59:52 UTCdas-g > Mit einem Frederik Ramm, der mich gesperrt hat, hatte ich vorher noch nichts zu tun und es gibt auch keine Info wie man ihn erreichen kann.

Frederik Ramm = woodpeck. Du kannst ihm also über seinen OSM-Account eine Message schreiben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck --> http...
202017-07-24 09:10:25 UTCwoodpeck "das-g" hat die Situation richtig erfasst. Wir werden alle Namen, die aus GWR kommen, aus OpenStreetMap rauswerfen, und erbitten Deine (donovalys) Hilfe dabei, zu unterscheiden, wo Du GWR benutzt hast und wo nicht; kannst oder willst Du diese Hilfe nicht leisten, werden alle von Dir beiget...
212017-08-02 13:14:59 UTCSimonPoole Um kurz noch ein rechtliches Update zu geben: am 1. Juli trat die reviderte Fassung des VGWR in kraft: https://www.edi.admin.ch/edi/de/home/dokumentation/mm.msg-id-66999.html und http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/41672

Wie befürchtet bleibt es weiterhin unklar ob die Daten t...
222017-08-06 22:12:47 UTCdonovaly > Wir werden alle Namen, die aus GWR kommen, aus OpenStreetMap rauswerfen, und erbitten Deine (donovalys) Hilfe dabei, zu unterscheiden, wo Du GWR benutzt hast und wo nicht; kannst oder willst Du diese Hilfe nicht leisten, werden alle von Dir beigetragenen Namen entfernt. Diese Entfernung ist bes...
12017-07-22 22:33:17 UTCgeow Ist die Angabe "für Fahrräder nicht erlaubt" per E-Mail nachvollziehbar belegt worden? Falls nein, sollte das Verbot IMHO nicht ohne Vor-Ort-Wissen ergänzt werden.
22017-07-23 08:49:39 UTCwoodpeck Das thüringische Waldgesetz erlaubt das Radfahren (nur) "auf befestigten Wegen und Straßen". Ein Blick auf das Luftbild liess es mir unwahrscheinlich erscheinen, dass sich an dieser Stelle ein befestigter Weg befindet - unwahrscheinlich genug, um der E-Mail zu glauben, die wir e...
32017-07-23 10:05:21 UTCgeow Danke, ich habe noch einen Hinweis ergänzt, in der Hoffnung auf bessere Sichtbarkeit für lokale Kenner, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1075389

Die allgemeine Diskussion zum Wegerecht in Thüringen könnten wir ja im Forum vertiefen, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic...
42017-07-26 19:39:03 UTCgeow Hmm, jetzt hat sich ein neuer user (e-quadrat) angemeldet und die 2 Wegabschnitte südlich des Oberen Hermannsbergsteins gelöscht. Ich habe es hier mal andiskutiert...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50592716
12017-07-10 07:20:22 UTCwoodpeck Hello Aleks-Berlin, you have been warned a number of times not to perform mechanical edits. A mechanical edit is one where you edit objects without looking at them individually. In this changeset you have removed two tags from a series of hydrants, while leaving a ton of other useless tags in place ...
22017-07-10 09:20:35 UTCAleks-Berlin Hello Woodpeck, how should I know that the other tags have no intention (I call them private/unique keys, even others argue that everybody can create his own keys/tags).
Of course I do not like them and I noticed them, but as I read once "we should respect the work of others". This is a c...
12017-06-15 11:18:39 UTCwoodpeck I am concerned that your adding of area data for motorways will make editing unnecessarily complicated. We don't normally do that in OSM - have you discussed these plans with the Polish community?
22017-06-15 22:15:08 UTCRicoElectrico This actual edit aside (I did not check it), what is wrong? There's a 30 pages long thread: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12337 and also a Wiki page.
32017-06-15 22:17:23 UTCRicoElectrico @woodpeck How did you get here, if I can ask? It wouldn't seem to trip deletion alerts or rarely used key alerts (a:h is somewhat popular).
42017-06-16 09:51:20 UTCwoodpeck I knew that Marek had once done some streets-as-areas mapping in a test area but I wasn't aware of any consensus to do this Poland-wide. But I'm happy to defer to the community about that. -- How I got here? I randomly looked at recent changesets out of idle curiosity.
52017-06-26 08:08:02 UTCmarek kleciak Hi Frederik,
because of our Lobbying OSM community may use the high resolution gov. images for mapping. Some areas are in common sense already "dead" for active mappers, See Wroclaw or Szczecin. The users add there massively the street areas. There are already 4 renderers they use this t...
12017-06-15 11:21:53 UTCwoodpeck Mir scheint, dass Du in diesem Changeset eine Reihe von Straßen gelöscht und dann wieder neu erstellt hast. Warum? Dabei geht ja die Änderungs-Historie verloren, und die ist u.U. nützlich.
22017-06-15 11:24:28 UTCwoodpeck Kann es sein, dass Du es ausserdem versäumt hast, die "neuen" Straßen in die diversen Wanderweg-Relationen einzufügen, in denen die alten steckte, und dadurch jetzt die Relationen Lücken haben?
32017-06-15 14:02:37 UTCma-rt-in Hallo woodpeck,

in diesem Fall wurde die Straßen neuverlegt und dabei entsprechend mit Key´s versehen, gelöscht werden ein einfachhalber. Zudem ist mir bei jetzigem nicht ersichtlich, inwieweit die History nützlich ist.
2. Sind alle Relationen so, wie sie seien sollen.
42017-06-16 08:44:24 UTCNakaner Hallo ma-rt-in,

durch die Versionsgeschichte der Objekte (auch "History" genannt) ist ersichtlich, wer wann ein Objekt bearbeitet hat. Wenn du Objekte löscht und dann neu anlegst, geht diese Information verloren. Darüber hinaus erweckst du damit den Eindruck, dass du die Wege ...
12017-06-13 12:51:45 UTCPaul Johnson Is this in regards to the DACGroup edits?
22017-06-13 13:55:58 UTCwoodpeck Yes, the bulk was deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49484818 but some that had been edited by other people remained; it turned out that those edited by others were mostly still useless and they were then deleted in this changeset.
32017-06-13 14:37:34 UTCPaul Johnson OK. Were any of those in Oklahoma east of I 35? I know I worked on conflating some of those with existing data.
42017-06-14 11:27:38 UTCPaul Johnson OK, I think this might have been overzealous. I see this removed Node: 4897994740, which I had fixed.
52017-06-14 11:48:50 UTCwoodpeck I did a spot-check of some of the "fixed" objects and found that in many cases, only a part of the original problem had been repaired - sometimes a tag was fixed but the location was still in the middle of the road, or vice versa. In your particular example, you did fix the amenity tag but...
12017-06-14 11:21:01 UTCwoodpeck You moved the node "satyashor shiva mandir" a little bit - why? The Bing imagery doesn't really agree with the new position. Did you notice that the node was tagged "addr;city" (instead of addr:city), or that it is part of an useless, untagged rectangle that you could have delete...
22017-06-14 19:30:06 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi woodpeck,

in taginfo I saw an "addr;city"-key.
which I tried to fix for node/4908609673 which is close by. But by accident I moved it a little and more sad the key got not fixed. After this I saw, that the building looks rect-like in picture but not in shape of line. So applied the...
12017-06-13 17:35:35 UTCNakaner Hi EliotB,

please stop your ongoing import!

You posted on the Imports mailing list 11 days ago but the documentation page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=LINZ/Address_Import&oldid=1481962) lacks some important information about your import and you are not using a dedicate...
22017-06-13 20:28:09 UTCEliotB Which particular information do you think is lacking? Please comment on the talk page of my documentation page.
BTW others have gone ahead with much bigger imports with zero discussion and no consequence or revert .
(I've been working on this on the NZ list for 2.5 years)
32017-06-13 20:37:14 UTCNakaner I answered your email on the Imports mailing list a few minutes after I commented on this changeset. The Imports mailing list is a qualified place for discussions about imports. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005026.html
42017-06-13 20:52:43 UTCwoodpeck Eliot, feel free to point out those non-discussed other imports and we can deal with them appropriately. -- I notice that you've placed "ref" tags on these address points which is highly unusual and seems to contradict your own wiki page. Don't add "ref" tags.
52017-06-13 21:09:53 UTCEliotB @woodpeck, Yes, I will replace these with LINZ:address_id as on my wiki page.
(or otherwise as results from further discussion)
12017-06-09 13:36:02 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, could you explain more about this "place of worship" named "ALMIGHTY 2WHEEL GODS" that you have added here? I could not discern anything on the aerial imagery that you quoted as a source. Please note that adding fictional data to OSM throws a bad light on *all* you...
12017-06-09 13:33:27 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, can you please explain the source for the names you have assigned in this changeset, especially "Mat(t) Sav Construction Climb", "Tily's Run", and "Princess Kubiak"? As you surely are aware, mapping names requires verifiability, and you can't just add any...
12017-06-09 13:27:55 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, could you please explain why you believe that the correct name for this path is "Princess Kubiak", as you seem to have asserted in multiple edits over the past years?
12017-06-03 22:06:29 UTCwoodpeck Are you aware of the guidelines about "mechanical edits"? Please don't make large-scale changes like this without looking at the objects you're editing. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What's_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F for an explanation of the issue.
22017-06-04 14:52:59 UTCmweper @woodpeck Sorry, I revert it?
32017-06-05 23:54:43 UTCRicoElectrico I am fine with my POIs staying as-is now.
12017-05-26 06:22:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has uploaded alomost 5000 objects tagged as "shop=TD". What does that mean? And what does the highway tag with a numeric value mean? Further, you have not specificed a data source. Is this from a survey? If not, are you aware of the OSM data import policy?
22017-05-26 07:08:25 UTCDanhthanhnguyen94 Dear sir,
I'm going to do a survey to update address for my city, using ArcGIS and Vespucci (smartphone). Because of the limitnation of the fields in data when using ArcGIS Editor for OpenStreetMap so i have to temporarily use "highway" tag for "address" tag (data imported by A...
32017-05-26 07:31:37 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48992034, 48991550, 48992768, 48992498, 48992250, 48991347, 48991791 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and un-discussed data uploads (shop=TD)
12017-05-24 06:05:07 UTCwoodpeck Hello 25or6to4, it appears that you're importing data from an NRHP data set in this and other similar change sets. Could you please ensure that the import is properly documented on the Wiki (I checked and at least it didn't seem obvious), and that you specify proper sources when making the edits? Th...
12017-05-23 20:37:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Miple, es gibt vermehrt Zweifel an der urheberrechtlichen Eignung Deiner Quellen. Bitte gib künftig routinemäßig bei Deinen Edits die Quelle an - "survey", wenn Du es selbst vor Ort erfasst hast, oder eben welches Luftbild es ist, oder bei Straßennamen oder Gren...
22017-08-02 04:03:09 UTCMiple OK, mache ich.
12017-05-23 14:44:26 UTCwoodpeck Hello jeijei66, it would be super helpful if you could make it a habit to add meaningful changeset comments to your edits, instead of ".". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for a more detailed explanation.
12017-05-23 09:24:28 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Graf Westerholt, bitte beschränke Dich mit solchen Änderungen künftig auf Gegenden, in denen Du Ortskenntnis besitzt.
12017-05-23 04:31:16 UTCMarián Kyral Ahoj, žádná wikidata tam nevidím, zato mraky posunutých bodů, které udělaly zubaté cesty: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.1037/14.3004 :-(
22017-05-23 06:29:31 UTCelkueb Err,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9232412#map=15/48.2464/16.4048

huh?
32017-05-23 06:41:07 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48906966 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally seems to have moved a lot of nodes, breaking geometries
42017-05-23 06:46:11 UTCwoodpeck It appears that this changeset accidentally moved a large number of nodes. Strangely, the longitude has not been changed, and the latitude has been reduced by approximately 0.01 (~ 1 kilometre) for all nodes. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/9232412.png (temporary link) for a screenshot of the...
52017-05-23 15:42:24 UTCrmikke What I have done:

* Loaded results of this query to JOSM: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/peX
* Retrieved wikidata IDs with wikipedia plugin
* Saved that back to OSM.

There were some errors detected when uploading to OSM, but I haven't tried to correct any of them. However, the whole process took...
62017-05-23 15:52:29 UTCrmikke By "errors when uploading to OSM" I mean JOSM's validator detected errors that existed earlier - there was a duplicated relation at least, and countless warnings. I haven't tried to correct any of it exactly because I didn't want to touch anything else than wikidata IDs.
72017-05-23 21:30:55 UTCrmikke OK, I've repeated the procedure. It took much less time now, as most wikidata ids have been added in an earlier run (before the error).
Please check, there should be no displacement.
82017-05-23 21:33:26 UTCrmikke By the way, all the objects returned by the Overpass query now, require some manual action. In Poland it was usually updating a wikipedia link, as someone changed the title of wikipedia article for whatever reason.
12017-05-21 20:22:37 UTCwoodpeck Hello justascii, your data import technically violates the import guidelines which require prior discussion. It is much appreciated that you seem to be local to the area so you know what you're importing - but still, before you import anything larger, please check out and follow http://wiki.openstre...
22017-05-22 21:35:47 UTCjustascii Thank you, I'll go through the guidelines and follow the proscribed steps before bringing in anything else from this dataset. The data is reportedly from 2008, and it does contain outbuildings as well as houses.
12017-05-15 06:41:13 UTCwoodpeck I'm afraid this, again, is a change that breaks the map instead of improving it. I will revert your problematic edits now.
22017-05-15 06:41:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
12017-05-07 17:28:04 UTC16356Ahr Sind jetzt alle edits von diesem user verworfen?
22017-05-07 17:28:27 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 46581332, 46582093, 46582131, 46593560, 46594633, 46595576, 46603718, 46661012, 46661261, 46875045, 46929359, 46941721, 46941868, 46955624, 46955627, 46956418, 46977824, 46978128, 46981345, 46982526, 46984675, 46988086, 46988952, 46989056, ...
32017-05-07 17:30:08 UTC16356Ahr Warum? Die meisten waren doch sinnvoll.
42017-05-07 21:11:26 UTCwoodpeck Wenn wir klären können, woher dieser User seine Informationen hat, ob die Quelle zulässig ist, und wenn er aufhört, bei seinen Edits so viele Kollateralschäden zu verursachen, dass sie sich ständig Leute über ihn beschweren, dann können wir ja einige/viele/all...
12017-04-23 08:16:23 UTCwoodpeck What is wrong with you? For the third time now I have asked you to explain why you consider this to "not be a park" when the Long Beach municipal web site clearly lists it as a park - and you would think they should know better, no?
22017-04-28 23:20:14 UTCthomaswest7891 this was put as a park, someone with out being named wants the game pokemon go to spawn more pokemon. it is just a grassy area not a park.
32017-04-29 16:25:20 UTCwoodpeck Ok I'll use simpler language. This area was put as a park. Because it is a park. The City of Long Beach thinks this is a park. They have a description of this park on their web site. Many parks are really just grassy areas. But this grassy area is a park. Please leave it.
42017-04-29 16:29:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48260079 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism
12017-04-28 22:02:23 UTCRichRico Hi Woodpeck_repair, thanks for contibuting with osm.
I found a edition in one of your changeset, you modified the tag of a bridge `bridge = yes` and `bridge:sctructure=suspension` by just `bridge=suspension` acording the wiki the previous edition is correct.
maybe you have another explication
22017-04-29 16:22:11 UTCwoodpeck The problem is that someone simply hit the "fix everything" button on the JOSM validator for a very large number of items. While this did probably do the right thing in many cases, it also did the wrong thing in many cases. The JOSM validator is not a tool to be used indiscriminately like ...
12017-04-21 15:39:32 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48007226 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally moved many nodes by more than 100km
22017-04-24 08:30:43 UTCpfg21 The transfer of points was meaningful, all objects after editing locally validated, and any errors found corrected. Asked to cancel the rollback edits.
32017-04-24 08:32:32 UTCpfg21 The map after edits in fully working state
42017-04-24 09:01:59 UTCwoodpeck The move of the nodes in this changeset was clearly a mistake and has temporarily led to a broken map display. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/47972480.png for an illustration.
52017-04-26 08:24:23 UTCpfg21 I always check the result of my actions in josm.
the error that shows in the picture, sometimes because of problems in the servers of OSM.
Mapnik when updating the tiles gets to the time when the position of points are changed, but the points still belong to the old lines.
If you send /dirty a wh...
62017-04-26 08:32:24 UTCwoodpeck Are you saying that you have re-used node IDs for something entirely different in another area?
72017-04-26 09:09:36 UTCpfg21 Yeah, that happens sometimes
82017-04-27 07:38:51 UTCwoodpeck 1. You shouldn't do that (re-use node IDs), 2. here's the Achavi link that shows the broken changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47972480 - this is not a temporary rendering problem, at least three ways were totally broken in your changeset.
12017-04-25 21:05:05 UTCwoodpeck Please observe the following rules:
1. Do not put advertising copy in your changeset comment. A good changeset comment is "added Qtrust insurance", not what you wrote here.
2. Do not put advertising copy in the "description" tag or any other tag for that matter.
3. If you uplo...
12017-04-23 09:25:59 UTCwoodpeck Sebastic, if you delete polygons and someone else undoes your deletion, the correct approach is to discuss the issue, not stubbornly delete them again.
22017-04-23 09:48:10 UTCKostik https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6129&p=120
32017-04-23 09:55:36 UTCKostik Do not remove the relationship 3767168, 3767169 and the like!
42017-04-23 09:56:31 UTCKostik 3919370, 3919098
52017-04-23 10:17:54 UTCKostik 4471401
62017-04-23 10:23:28 UTCKostik 5372735
72017-04-23 11:18:02 UTCsebastic Please give these relations proper tags so that they don't qualify as old-style multipolygons.
82017-04-23 14:40:01 UTCKostik Before removing something, a good tone to write to the author of editing.
92017-04-23 14:42:42 UTCKostik Is the tag "note" not enough for you?
102017-04-23 14:52:47 UTCKostik I added a tag to the "note:de" for more of your understanding.
112017-04-23 15:31:03 UTCsebastic Neither the "note" nor "note:de" tag is sufficient to not have those relations be considered old-style multipolygons.

If you want to keep those relations in OpenStreetMap you should improve their tagging so they are not considered old-style multipolygons.

I'm not german BTW...
122017-04-23 16:28:04 UTCKostik If you do not want to roll back your vandal corrections, do not touch my relations.
132017-04-23 17:28:15 UTCsebastic If you don't want people to touch your relations, they shouldn't be in the OSM database that anyone with an account can edit. They should live in your own system to which only you have access.
12017-04-23 08:42:52 UTCwoodpeck Can you explain why you reverted this edit? Did it break anything or was it otherwise wrong? Please make it a habit to explain such things directly in the changeset comment when you revert something unless it is totally obvious.
22017-04-23 09:43:42 UTCKostik Были удалены отношения которые не стоило удалять. Причём без должного комментария почему это было сделано. Я вернул нужные мне мультиполигоны.

Relations have been removed are no...
12017-04-14 17:36:34 UTCrgt there are multiple references to this being a park on the internet so actually it is
22017-04-18 22:43:07 UTCiMarbot @rgt they are a malicious account. Look at their change history.
32017-04-19 15:45:35 UTCwoodpeck Curt, could you explain why you believe this is not a park. I found this on the web http://www.longbeach.gov/park/park-and-facilities/directory/marina-green/ which seems to say that at leas the city of Long Beach believes it is a park.
12017-04-19 13:49:07 UTCwoodpeck You appear to have deleted a lot of data in this and other nearby changesets. May I ask why?
12017-04-07 12:08:33 UTCDaveF Hi ti-lo
I've notice you've changed shop=motorcycle_repair to shop=motorcycle
What source did you use to ascertain they sell motorcycles?
22017-04-07 13:43:08 UTCti-lo A shop=motorcycle doesn't have to sell motorcycles. It's possible they repair, sell tyres, clothes or other stuff. To enable frontends to filter this, I'm standardizing the key. This means the "main" category is "shop", the "subcategories" motorcycle *:* (called "s...
32017-04-07 20:27:39 UTCDaveF Even if the revised tagging system is adopted (Was there any discussion?) you haven't confirmed whether it sells motorcycles or not.
42017-04-07 21:37:11 UTCti-lo I'not sure whether I get the point.
Which discussion do you mean, this one ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
And do you mean I should confirm whether this shop sells motorcycles ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3179844246
(can't do that as my crystal bal...
52017-04-07 22:06:40 UTCDaveF I'm unsure why you don't get my point.
Was it discussed on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/ ?

"can't do that as my crystal ball is broken" < this is the problem. You've edited a tag from being correct to incorrect without any knowledge.
According to you're wiki ed...
62017-04-08 14:13:35 UTCti-lo Hi Dave,
the former tagging was :
name \tPete Robson
service \tMOT_motorcycle
shop \tmotorcycle_repair
Now it is :
motorcycle:repair \tyes
name \tPete Robson
service \tMOT_motorcycle
shop \tmotorcycle

The description of shop=motorcycle
says since 15 August 2010 :
"A shop that sell...
72017-04-08 14:47:36 UTCDaveF Hi
"as I can't say whether it (meanwhile) possibly sells used bikes." < Again, this is the problem. You've explicitly changed it from 'definitely doesn't sell bikes' to 'definitely does sell bikes' *without* any knowledge.
82017-04-08 15:17:30 UTCti-lo Hi Dave, I'm not sure whether you read my answers. The description of shop=motorcycle INCLUDES REPAIR SINCE 2010 : "A shop that sells motorcycles and/or related accessories, clothes, parts, repair and rental services."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
So this is ...
92017-04-08 15:40:46 UTCDaveF Hi
if I were in your position I wouldn't have made the amendments due to lack of *any* knowledge to justify the changes. Your last sentence confirms why.

shop=motorcycle_repair means it doesn't sell bikes. You've now made it, at best, ambiguous.
102017-04-08 16:18:26 UTCti-lo In my point of view it's just another way to express the same thing (and to enable people to tag further properties of the item).
It would be great if you'd propose how to solve this (in your point of view) "issue" instead of keeping on complaining. In the last seven years there would hav...
112017-04-10 11:25:01 UTCDaveF As explained previously you've change the meaning of the entity, not provided an alternative.

There is no 'issue' to solve. The entity was accurately & legitimately tagged before your amendments.
As you've no knowledge of this shop you should not have made any changes.

I'm 'complaining' b...
122017-04-10 18:28:01 UTCti-lo What do you think about that ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repair
132017-04-10 19:24:36 UTCti-lo Would you please add your concerns to the discussion page ? (So everyone may add his/her point of view) :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
142017-04-10 20:38:35 UTCDaveF What are your plans to revert your erroneous edits?

PS
"These SHOULD be proposed on the tagging group!!! Not proposed on a wiki page."
152017-04-12 07:15:43 UTCwoodpeck The bulk of ti-lo's motorcycle adjustments have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47664678 and I recommended that a discussion is held on the tagging mailing list before changes are re-introduced.
162017-04-12 10:12:41 UTCDaveF @ti-lo
I look forward discussing your proposal on the Tagging mailing list.
12017-04-10 20:05:30 UTCstreckenkundler Bitte Edit sofort stoppen und im Forum disskutieren:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=640665#p640665
22017-04-11 10:41:53 UTCFahRadler Hi,
habs gerade gelesen.
CS ist kommentiert.
KEIN mech. edit !
Basis sind dooleys Listen und Wikipedia mit den offiziellen Namen.

FahRadler
32017-04-11 11:22:00 UTCstreckenkundler Ich sehe das anders... Vor allem aber auch weil die Changesets nicht räumlich begrenzt sind, habe ich auch ein Problem damit. Gängige Tools wie achavi oder History-Viewer steigen bei diesen aus. Eine Kontrolle ist nicht möglich.

Oder kannst du an einen DSL-Hauptverteiler einn Brief...
42017-04-11 11:31:57 UTCNakaner Hallo FahRadler,

ein mechanischer Edit muss nicht zwangsläufig automatisiert erfolgen. Es genügt eine größere Menge Objekte in JOSM zu ändern, ohne jedes einzelne Objekt zu prüfen. Die von streckenkundler aufgezeigten Beispiele belegen das. Siehe dazu auch https://w...
52017-04-11 11:32:54 UTCwoodpeck streckenkundler hat recht; die genannten Beispiele sind klare Indizien für einen "mechanischen Edit". Der liegt auch dann vor, wenn man z.B. in JOSM alles sucht, was "addr:city=a" hat, und das durch "addr:city=b" ersetzt. Überlasse doch diese Korrekturen Leute...
62017-04-11 11:33:31 UTCwoodpeck Ups, jetzt hat Nakaner fast das gleiche geschrieben und war auch noch früher dran.
72017-04-11 13:37:54 UTCFahRadler wie im Formum beschrieben änderte ich die addr:city Fehler die auf OSMsuspect gelistet wurden.
Meine manuelle Vorgehensweise habe ich geschildert.
Sicher wäre es schön alle "Fehler" (Adressen auf DSL-Hauptverteiler, Parkplatz) zu beseitigen. Mein Fokus in der Bearbeitung l...
12017-04-04 08:46:23 UTCwoodpeck Hello Zowie Polie, this changeset deletes a lot of valid data. Maybe you are not aware that your edits actually affect every user of OSM, not just the map you are seeing. Please stop breaking the map.
22017-05-15 06:41:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
12017-03-28 22:10:36 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you fixed the coastline of Gosti island, but there is a lot of extremely jagged other coastline nearby that you did not touch. May I ask why you focussed on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do...
22017-03-30 02:39:36 UTCJason Roy I focused on Gosti Island because I found it through a Maproulette challenge designed to find jagged islands that can use better alignment. I am part of a small group of OSM users working on improving these islands.
12017-03-28 22:07:47 UTCwoodpeck You have moved the nodes making up this island http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224776118 but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery actually are good enough to even see that island. Your source specification ("Bing") must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit ...
22017-03-30 02:22:06 UTCKate Diaz You are right, I should not have moved the nodes making up that island. It is simply not visible in Bing or Mapbox. Please observe that I made these edits 6 days ago, and since then I have avoided making similar edits when no imagery is available. I certainly won’t any more. I am finding these...
12017-03-28 22:01:06 UTCwoodpeck You aligned this island with Bing but you left the nearby, larger island untouched even though it, too, is very much out of sync with imagery. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 02:36:07 UTCShaun Austin I am finding these islands through a MapRoulette challenge. I did not fix the other island because it may be another task and I wanted to save it for others working on the challenge.
12017-03-28 21:56:27 UTCwoodpeck You modified this island but left the glacier in place that now cuts right through the island which can't be right. Why the focus on just the island geometry? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 03:39:50 UTCEvelyn Desouzaa Hey Woodpeck,




Thanks for pointing that out, I have since fixed the glacier feature to not intersect the island.  This edit was made as part of a MapRoulette challenge for Island and Shoreline alignment.  There's is a small group of us working on fixing small islands in OSM. &nb...
12017-03-28 21:54:59 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery just shows a blurry cloud of white and you can't even see that there's supposed to be an island here so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRou...
22017-03-30 23:39:12 UTCAshley Rose There's some rock visible in Bing here. Its not unreasonable to assume that the blurry rock seen in imagery is the same feature represented by the existing island (w232976567), so I tried to improve the island with Bing. However you are right that I should not have edited this island with only Bing....
12017-03-28 21:53:39 UTCwoodpeck You have improved the coastline for this island, but there's an out-of-sync admin boundary half overlapping the island. Did you notice that? It would have been good if, while modifying the island, you had corrected the admin boundary as well. (Admin boundaries are broken all over the place but if yo...
22017-03-30 02:30:14 UTCEva Blue I noticed the admin boundary, but I was under the impression that these features should only be edited with special resources, especially because they are not visible in imagery. I think that if I was in the habit of editing admin boundaries using only Bing and Mapbox, other OSM users would rightly ...
12017-03-28 21:50:36 UTCwoodpeck You have aligned this one island with Bing imagery, but the three nearby islands were horribly out of sync with imagery and you haven't even made an attempt to repair them too. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct...
22017-03-30 02:43:25 UTCJames Millar I found this island through a MapRoulette challenge, I’m part of a small group who are attempting to improve the alignment of these islands using MapRoulette and JOSM.
32017-04-18 10:15:59 UTCSomeoneElse Hi James.
There have been worrying changes such as this elsewhere; you simply can't rely on Bing imagery where it might be offset (which is anywhere that you don't have something else to corroborate it).
Can you explain who the "small group" are?
Your profile doesn't say anything abou...
42017-04-19 02:09:13 UTCJames Millar Hi Andy,
We also use Mapbox, and by using a combination we can usually make improvements to these islands regardless of potential Bing offset. Alternatively we make the decision to not make any edits in an area (we do this often). Can you point me to some of the worrying changes? I can always fix t...
52017-04-19 07:58:14 UTCSomeoneElse Re "worrying changes", you can see a discussion with comments at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imagico/diary/40759 .
Also, you're saying "we" again. Who exactly are "we"?
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-03-28 21:48:52 UTCwoodpeck You have neatly aligned this island with the imagery, but you left the jagged 6-node form of the other nearby Roberts Island unchanged. Why the focus on this one particular island, instead of repairing other things that catch your eye too? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and ...
22017-03-30 02:16:12 UTCkevin Prince Thank you for the compliment, these types of islands are sometimes tough to align because MHWS is not clear in the imagery. Yes, I am using a MapRoulette challenge in order to find these islands, then using JOSM to align the islands with Bing and Mapbox. I did not edit the other island because I tho...
12017-03-28 21:46:13 UTCwoodpeck You have aligned this island to Bing imagery but the nearby coastline, which is equally out of sync, has not been touched by you. Why the focus on this island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 03:34:08 UTCJones Sandy Hello,



My edit was confined to the island using Bing imagery as a source because I was focusing on island geometry per a MR task.  We’re a small team working on fixing island geometry.  

Thank you.

12017-03-28 21:41:58 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery is too blurry to discern the shape that you have drawn so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct...
22017-03-30 03:32:18 UTCEdward Munch Hi Woodpeck,

Bing imagery was the correct source.  It’s not great, but the resolution was good enough to make improvements to the really angular island geometry that existed prior to my edit.  There is a small group of us working on tasks like this from MapRoulette focusing on sma...
12017-03-28 21:39:23 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery in this area is so cloudy that the island shape cannot be discerned, so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you...
22017-03-30 03:35:43 UTCBecca Wilson Hello Woodpeck,

Bing is okay in this area, but it is a little hard to determine the extent of the island due to the ice.  I aligned the island as best I could and removed the simplified geometry which originally existed. You can check out my edit here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?ch...
12017-03-28 21:37:00 UTCwoodpeck You fixed this island's coastline in this changeset, but you did not change anything about the nearby other coastlines which were equally imprecise. May I ask what was your workflow here - why were you interested in this one island but completely ignorant of the data around it? Have you made this ed...
22017-03-30 19:06:13 UTCSandro Alex Hi Woodpeck,

My workflow was based on fixing tasks from a MapRoulette challenge for Islands and Shorelines, which is why my focus was on a single feature rather than the entire area.  There is a small group of us working on fixing the geometry of islands in OSM.  Thanks!
12017-03-28 21:31:17 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have aligned something to Bing in this changeset, but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery show anything else than a large blurred area here, certainly nothing from which one could move a node. The source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this...
22017-03-30 19:03:38 UTCJenny Johal Hi Woodpeck,

This changeset was a single upload from an edit I made on the entire island feature as seen in this changeset view: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47222149, where I aligned the entire island to Bing.  It’s blurry, but I felt the imagery is good enough to ma...
12017-03-28 21:27:32 UTCwoodpeck Hi, you have modified a large number of buildings that had been tagged "area=yes" and you put "building=yes" instead. However the Mapbox imagery you are using shows many more buildings in the area. May I ask why you chose to edit the existing buildings but not to add the missing ...
22017-03-30 01:34:15 UTCLexi Johnson Hi Woodpeck. These are buildings and area=yes is meaningless without other tags: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area. I'm doing the second step of the HOT Tasking Manager process, which is after someone marks a square as “done” then others double check the “done” task...
12017-03-28 21:21:49 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery just shows a blurry cloud of white and you can't even see that there's supposed to be an island here so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRou...
22017-03-30 19:07:21 UTCPhilip Guston Hi Woodpeck,

The source for my edit was indeed Bing, though I recognize it’s not the best quality.  I rounded out the small island per what I could see in imagery, and felt that was an improvement to the previous geometry.  There is a small group of us fixing island geometry in Ma...
12017-03-18 08:55:18 UTCwoodpeck Hello, may I inquire about the source of these added POIs? You have added a bunch of restaurants, cafes and gift shops across the planet, without names or specifying where the data came from.
12017-03-16 22:37:36 UTCwoodpeck Hi jcaviborg, it appears that this change set touches a lot of objects without actually changing them (other than the source tag is removed from the objects). What does that mean? Just to pick an example, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220619614/history you remove "source=bing", and ...
22017-03-17 06:39:42 UTCosmviborg All objects are compared against "GeoDanmark Ortofoto". Ortofoto are aerial photos of Denmark taken on yearly basis.
12017-03-12 22:00:10 UTCSomeoneElse Relation 7066589 has 37,948 nodes as members. It's just broken an osm2pgsql import here, and I suspect I wont be the only one.

What is it actually supposed to be?
22017-03-12 22:18:07 UTCwoodpeck I have also noticed that this import seems to have first been raised on talk-br on March 9, two days before the import was started. Problems like a collection relation with 37k members would have been found before the import if people had actually had time to look at what was proposed.
32017-03-12 22:21:56 UTCwoodpeck The survey points seem to contain this message: "Não alterar: coordenadas originais do IBGE". I wonder why they are imported in OSM at all; what use is data that you cannot alter in OSM? Anyone interested in doing anything with the survey points can just use the shape file.
42017-03-12 22:24:37 UTCpnorman Hello,

Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), one of which the community is consulted prior to the import, including the imports@ mailing list.

Because this import is causing technical problems and has not been discussed, I'm go...
52017-03-12 22:29:36 UTCsmaprs Ok, if you think its' better to revert it. We discussed it in Brazilian community thinking these survey points have precise coordinates and can help align imagery in remote regions of Brazil. I'll read carefully your remarks and see what can be done better.
62017-03-12 22:39:38 UTCwoodpeck I have looked that the Bing imagery surrounding some of the points and found nothing visible on the ground that I could have used to align the image though. I think the matter deserves a more thorough discussion. We'll revert it for now but that doesn't mean it can never come back.
72017-03-12 22:51:03 UTCsmaprs Ok. Sorry for the unexpected problems.
12017-03-09 20:57:54 UTCwoodpeck This import is badly executed. In blatant contravention to the RABA-KGZ import page on the Wiki, polygons have NOT been combined with neighbouring ones (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479459103 ends clearly at a grid boundary), and data has NOT been visually compared with existing stuff (see...
22017-03-10 15:38:22 UTCPeter_Klofutar_import I've been working on that since. Please review and let me know, if you find any other inconsistencies.
12017-02-09 13:21:13 UTCShinigami Hello Frederik,

I just found you have rolled back hours of my work, when I merged loots of little counties to big polygones with same timezone. Unfortunately you did not revert those countries infos, so big part of the USA is without timezone data now.

Ad mapping of timezones - borders of cou...
22017-02-09 14:06:38 UTCwoodpeck Admin boundaries and maybe sometimes post code boundaries are the big exceptions; their presence in OSM doesn't mean that we can now map any kind of boundaries that are not visible or verifiable on the ground! This just doesn't scale - we can't add all boundaries that someone might find interesting ...
32017-02-09 14:32:15 UTCShinigami Having tons of small polygons tagged with TZ instead of one big does not scale too.. And local time is not something one might find interesting but really important thing. It is common in US, that half of state have one TZ, other second. It means tens of counties with one, tens with other. And borde...
42017-02-10 09:31:38 UTCShinigami Could you please rollback your changes?
52017-02-10 11:06:13 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted my deletions. I still believe it's wrong to map time zones, and all time zone boundaries in OSM should be deleted, but I agree it was premature to delete them nilly-willy. I will bring this matter up for discussion on the tagging mailing list. Please join me there.
62017-03-07 06:46:15 UTCwoodpeck I have started a discussion on the tagging mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031453.html
12017-02-28 19:59:43 UTCwoodpeck How did you manage to draw this building outline with 40 points when all that the Bing imagery shows is a construction site? Is it possible that you forgot to specify a data source?
22017-02-28 20:58:02 UTCaccay Hi,
This a high residential towers that have been developed a few years back. The footprint is exactly what it looks like and this area is develop ed now. The bings imagery is like 10 years old i think. Thats why it is showing a construction site.

The source is land surveyw done by the local sur...
12017-02-28 19:57:51 UTCwoodpeck Could you please explain the source of this data. It appears that you have added a large number of buildings, but forgot to tag them correctly. You've also added a large number of duplicate nodes. It looks like this might be an import that is not following our imports policy http://wiki.openstreetma...
22017-02-28 20:52:24 UTCaccay Hi Woodpeck,

Thank you for the comments.
I am a GIS analyst working at the local goverment authority who is the master planner and developer of this city. Our corporation is called HDC ( 100% goverment). www.hdc.com.mv
Our data is sourced through land and topographic surveys, demarcation surve...
12017-02-27 13:51:02 UTCwoodpeck I'm afraid I will have to remove these imports because they haven't been discussed with the community (as mandated by the import policy), and (probably as a consequence of such lack of discussion) are faulty, using invalid tags and duplicating information that already is in OSM.
12017-02-20 23:16:00 UTCwoodpeck Oh dear, this changeset and the few others you uploaded at the same time have actually *duplicated* almost all the data in the city - now your new data sits on top of the unchanged old data. I think we should remove your new data again, to give you a chance to properly conflate your changes with the...
22017-02-25 00:41:21 UTCcelayer how can i fix the issue ?
32017-02-25 09:25:18 UTCwoodpeck You would have to download the area (or parts of it at at time) into JOSM and then manually delete the duplicate data.

Or, if you want I could simply revert the whole changeset in which you uploaded the duplicate data, and then you could go through your improvements offline and add them piece by ...
42017-02-27 18:51:34 UTCcelayer thank you for explanation Woodpeck
i prefer to do revert for whole changeset.
thank you !
12017-02-21 22:07:15 UTCwoodpeck Importing Canvec data requires some diligence. You cannot just take a Canvec tile and dump it into OSM (else others would have done it long ago). You need to compare Canvec data to existing data or even aerial imagery to make sure you're not making the map worse. See for example https://www.openstre...
22017-02-21 22:13:29 UTCwoodpeck It appears you have imported a new road over an already existing road here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476144200#map=18/49.12053/-70.11346&layers=D and tagged the new road with "lanes=-1"?
32017-02-22 12:01:57 UTCLogicalViolinist I'll fix it up, not sure why JOSM didnt catch that error, I might have to reset my settings.
42017-02-22 12:24:24 UTCLogicalViolinist both instances have been fixed. will check if there's anymore data that had already been added that is overlapping
12017-02-17 13:19:26 UTCwoodpeck Hello, in this changeset you deleted y couple of buildings and your comment says that you deleted them because they are in a security area. However, OSM does not generally respect specific national security interests with regards to mapping. If a building is visible on aerial imagery, then it may be...
12017-02-16 10:47:57 UTCwoodpeck Wie hast Du entschieden, welche Objekte ein "beacon:type=vor-dme" bekommen? Hast Du hierzu eine externe Quelle verwendet, oder Dich rein auf existierende OSM-Tags verlassen? Hast Du jedes einzelne Objekt bei OSM angeschaut, das Du bearbeitet hast? Hast Du diesen mechanischen Edit vorher mi...
22017-02-17 06:48:27 UTCgeozeisig Ich habe mich rein auf die schon existierenden OSM-Tags bezogen. Ja, ich habe die Objekte einzeln bearbeitet. (Bei manchen war die Frequenz in kHz statt MHz angegeben, bei anderen fehlte die Einheit)
12017-02-15 13:15:31 UTCwoodpeck Hello HourOfTheWulf, it is interesting how you're adding 9 playgrounds across all of Holland. Have you recently been on a nationwide playground survey trip, or what is the source of this data?
22017-02-15 21:20:09 UTCmarczoutendijk Recently the Dutch Community has been flooded with user notes pointing to either Playgrounds or Mailboxes.
There has been quiet some discussion on the Dutch Forum about how to handle this:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57192.
With respect to Mailboxes it was agreed NOT to accep...
32017-02-17 10:21:44 UTCligfietser Those playgrounds are probably marked by Pokemon Go players. Those notes appear are all over the place like mushrooms.
42017-05-13 19:04:21 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48656854 where the changeset comment is: Revert HourOftheWulf imports/mechanical edits after multiple complaints from Dutch community, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1347
12017-02-07 14:41:07 UTCsbiribizio Hi,
why did you delete in Casale Monferrato the small landuse=residential and create a big landuse=residential instead?
Your big landuse have inside it some landuse=playground, streets, pitch, etc.
This mapping is not accurate.
Please revert your changes or I'll do it for you.
Thanks
22017-02-07 17:01:07 UTCdieterdreist generally, please do not create big landuse areas with a lot of different stuff in it (especially do not create a single landuse=residential around a village, use place areas for this). Thank you.
32017-02-07 19:29:54 UTCFredie hm.
Is there a common agreement ?
Do you have a link ?
I haven't seen an area tagging for residential anywhere else, yet.
problem encountered on huge landuse ?
Can't see one up today ?
Inform me, please ?
42017-02-07 22:12:20 UTCwoodpeck Hello Fredie, of course if you map new things then you get to decide how you map them; a large landuse area for a whole village or smaller areas - no problem. But you should not delete the work that others have done and replace it with "your style". Also, your changeset deletes a large num...
52017-02-08 07:07:31 UTCFredie you are right
I'll take consequences from this
I'll explain to sbiririzio personally
62017-02-08 07:45:39 UTCsbiribizio Personally you explained to me that:
"I've deleted your post without reading"
I explained in detail my complaints, why don't discuss?
I asked gently for proofs of your work.
No aswer from you.
72017-02-09 11:42:09 UTCdieterdreist for reference, there is also a thread on talk-it about this: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-February/057032.html
82017-02-09 12:00:47 UTCdieterdreist In one of your replies to sbiribizio you (Fredie) have written a lot of alternative facts, which I will comment here:

> All my work is carefully researched used sat data from
> 2016. If you use Bing Sat data make clear that those are pretty > 6
> years old.


Who is the copyright...
92017-02-09 16:27:05 UTCFredie agree
12017-01-29 08:56:19 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45614261 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (propably Pokémon edits). See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/ how you should edit OpenStreetMap and why you should not add fictional data!
22017-01-29 08:59:56 UTCNakaner Hallo karottenjunge1,

ich habe dir gestern Vormittag geschrieben, dass deine Beiträge in der Form, wie du sie derzeit hochlädst, bei uns unerwünscht sind. Wir erfassen nur real existierende Dinge. Einträge, die nur darauf abzielen, Pokémons anzulocken werden gelösc...
32017-02-04 06:41:20 UTCkarottenjunge1 Dieser markierte Park existiert wirklich. Dort steht ein Kriegsdenkmal und die Grünfläche ist für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Im Park sind mehrere öffentliche Fußwege inklusive Sitzmöglichkeiten. Der Park bietet weiterhin einen Zugang zur Unterführung...
42017-02-04 06:43:18 UTCkarottenjunge1 Und ohne kritisierend zu wirken, in anderen Kartendiensten ist der Park bereits als Grünfläche markiert :) bitte also um Recherche/Korrektur
52017-02-04 06:55:00 UTCkarottenjunge1 Es handelt sich hierbei übrigens um den öffentlich zugänglichen Garten der St.Bonifatius (katholischen Kirche Metzingen) katholischekirchemetzingen.de Ein Teil des Gartens ist auf der Homepage der Kirche zu erkennen. Liebe Grüße
62017-02-04 11:22:27 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, kann es sein, dass hier ein Missverständnis vorliegt? Die Grünfläche, um die es hier geht - private Gärten im Dreieck Noyon-Allee/Emil-Mörsch-Weg/Herbstweg - ist (a) weder ein Park, (b) noch auf anderen Karten als Grünfläche markiert, (c) noch auf dem Gel&au...
72017-02-05 10:32:20 UTCkarottenjunge1 Tatsache. Nun sehe ich meinen Fehler auch. Der Edit galt dem Grundstück weiter südlich. Ich werde es direkt beheben! Vielen Dank für das Feedback!
12017-02-01 22:55:36 UTCwoodpeck Please explain why this was downgraded from service road to footpath?
22017-02-02 13:17:19 UTCSpanholz He still changes roads to footways, for example in the cemetery above.
12017-02-01 22:53:33 UTCwoodpeck Hello, why did you change 115th avenue into a footway? It looks like a normal residential road to me. Please explain.
12017-01-31 10:01:10 UTCwoodpeck Hello, could you explain the reason for deleting these roads, and your other deletions nearby? Your changeset comment is "Modifications", but this doesn't say why you thought these roads should be removed.

(automatic translation follows)

مرحبا، هل يمكن أن تفسر سب...
22017-01-31 13:09:10 UTCطائر الجنوب تحية طيبة
شكرا لاهتمامك
هذا الطرق التي تم حذفها لم يراعى عند رسمها قوانين المرور وايضا تم رسمها بصورة عشوائية وانا قمت بحذفها لكي اعيد رسمها بصورة صحيحة
تحياتي لك
32017-01-31 21:00:05 UTCPeda You are saying you deleted it to redraw it? But I don't see any new ways. I only see an empty region now. That's why I will revert your deletions. Please do not delete them again. You can improve them or you can add new ways. But if you want to delete existing work from your fellow mappers please di...
42017-01-31 22:54:39 UTCPeda_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
12017-01-20 00:26:38 UTCwoodpeck Du hast bei diesem Changeset als Quelle "Google" angegeben. Es ist uns leider nicht erlaubt, Daten aus Google in OpenStreetMap zu übernehmen. Kannst Du erklären, was Du mit "Google" als Quelle gemeint hast?
22017-01-20 08:13:03 UTCRaymond Gute Frage, ich habe keine Idee, wieso ich "Google" eingetragen habe. Nutze ich für OSM nie. Immer eigene Fotos und eigenes Wissen. Und eigenes Wissen auch in diesem Fall, da ich in der Gegend gewesen war.
12017-01-19 08:02:35 UTCwoodpeck Hello SHARCRASH, please consider using different changeset comments. "See the history of the elements from the according changeset." is without meaning, as checking the history of elements is exactly what one has to do if the changeset comment is missing! Nobody expects you to write a nove...
12017-01-05 22:22:20 UTCwoodpeck Hello Stephen214, in this changeset you seem to have deleted a large number of "mini roundabouts". Can you explain the reasoning behind this? Have you actually looked at the objects in question, or have you simply removed them according to some search/replace logic? Looking, for example, a...
22017-01-05 23:07:06 UTCStephen214 I looked at each one (of thousands, so hours of work) via sat imagery. Many cases, including the one you cited, were actually roundabouts, which have a non-mountable island, rather than mini_roundabouts, which have a mountable (often just paint) island. About as many cases were actually turning_ci...
32017-01-06 10:21:52 UTCPaul Johnson For example, the only mini-roundabout that I have found in the US so far is at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1555921214
42017-01-10 19:36:04 UTCStephen214 These islands look mountable (just paint) as well:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/95712768
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271831024
I have local knowledge these are mountable:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/767536813
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2958897476
In general, I assumed t...
52017-01-11 13:16:45 UTCPaul Johnson Those last two look iffy from the aerials but I'll take your word for it. The first two are definitely mini-roundabouts, good finds!
12017-01-02 12:42:19 UTCwoodpeck Hello richardsonp, in this changeset and a couple others you claim to have traced thousands of buildings from Bing imagery. Many of the buildings you have added have much more detail than can be seen on Bing though, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381251369 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa...
12016-12-28 14:05:13 UTCwoodpeck OpenStreetMap maps facts not fiction. Please provide evidence for the existence of this place, or if your edits were meant to be funny, please remove them from OpenStreetMap again. There are other projects like opengeofiction.net that are dedicated to drawing fictional maps; OSM is about reality!
12016-12-20 20:52:36 UTCwoodpeck Dear user LogicalViolinist. I have reverted an earlier import of yours because it was not sufficiently discussed. Now you claim to be "tracing missing buildings" from sources "Bing; Mapbox". I can say with 100% certainty that for example builidng https://www.openstreetmap.org/way...
22016-12-20 21:04:29 UTCLogicalViolinist This is most definitely not an import, I'm currently on mobile and will get back to you. This addition done by hand via mapbox, bing and local survey of the area. I have no desire to import data anymore as it will just get reverted if not passed through the proper channels. I'm currently tracing bui...
32016-12-20 21:16:27 UTCLogicalViolinist I've also been using ortho photos that are compatible with OSM tracing from the city of ottawa and carleton university(carleton you need to be a student to access the data, sorry)
http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/aerial-photographs
http://carleton-u.maps.arcgis.com/apps/PublicInformation/index.html?...
42016-12-20 21:29:09 UTCLogicalViolinist I've learned from past events, its not worth importing. I've even reported imports to the DWG recently. I decide to do something manually and by the books and get threated with a revert. This is pardon my language bullshit.
52016-12-20 21:33:50 UTCwoodpeck Right, so you're saying you have accidentally left out the correct source tag for the imagery you've been using, and that nobody can double-check your statement unless they're students. May I respectfully ask you to be more careful in specifying exactly which imagery you are tracing from in the futu...
62016-12-20 21:39:36 UTCLogicalViolinist I'm sorry, the source field doesnt allow for long ass urls(character cap in JOSM) I will specify my proper sources in future changesets. The only reason you cant access the imagery from CarletonUniversity is because it's in their library that their GIS deparment conducted in 2014(20cm ortho) anyone ...
72016-12-20 21:47:33 UTCwoodpeck Well it doesn't say you need to specify an URL in the source tag. But the source tag is there for a reason. You specified a source tag that was obviously wrong, to anyone who cared to look; not even a local person with local knowledge would have known where to look had they wanted to verify what you...
82016-12-20 21:53:44 UTCLogicalViolinist Would saying CarletonU ortho(2014) and City of Ottawa ortho be sufficient?
92016-12-20 22:42:54 UTCLogicalViolinist I've looked on Bing and although it's offset(all imagery in Aylmer is, which only local knowledge would know) You can still see the details (though a bit pixelated) you can still trace from it with a good decerning(from bad imagery) eye
http://imgur.com/a/FO5dB
102016-12-20 23:54:59 UTCDevonF That's really awesome that aerial imagery is published under their opendata licence. Do you know if anyones converted it to a tile map on a public server? It'd be nice to add it JOSM

Also curious, would you mind posting a screenshot of the imagery you used to trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/w...
112016-12-21 00:19:07 UTCLogicalViolinist Unfortunately DevonF I cannot as although carleton University allows creating derivative works and tracing from their aerial imagery, they do not allow to copy/redistribute it(only for students/faculty at Carleton university), doing so may be punishable by revocation of access to the imagery.

So ...
122016-12-21 00:39:42 UTCLogicalViolinist Also DevonF, if a user cant add 1000ish buildings without being the spanish inquisition, osm will fall behind everyone. It's probably why digital globe and a relief effort have forked OSM and started contributing to their own fork and not OSM, because small time mappers waste their time.
132016-12-21 02:35:23 UTCLogicalViolinist Don't believe me? https://www.nga.mil/MediaRoom/PressReleases/Pages/2015-16.aspx
142016-12-21 04:33:24 UTCDevonF I agree nobody likes it when people are breathing down your neck and it's a waste of time checking every edit. However you have attracted some attention to yourself by some less-orthodox editing practices. But hopefully you'll be able to regain peoples trust. There are good reasons why I care about ...
152016-12-21 04:33:45 UTCDevonF After reading http://lifehacker.com/193343/ask-the-law-geek--is-publishing-screenshots-fair-use I'd say it's pretty damn safe to share a screenshot. But it looks like it's the same as what's hosted at http://maps.ottawa.ca. You can access JS slippy maps and WMTS api via http://maps.ottawa.ca/arcgis/...
162016-12-21 04:33:52 UTCDevonF That's really awesome about https://github.com/ngageoint/hootenanny. There are so many powerful tools which I dream about for making mapping much more fun and safe for everyone. I'm not sure where I see it mentioned about forking though. Many one-off contributors are just as important as massive imp...
172016-12-21 10:31:04 UTCLogicalViolinist I'm not using ottawa'ortho I know its from 2005. Im using the 2014 from carleton u that their gis department took(2014) http://carleton-u.maps.arcgis.com/apps/PublicInformation/index.html?appid=a9602c9a15fd4db898c7b8a264442038
As I am taking classes there, I have access to it.
182016-12-21 11:30:39 UTCLogicalViolinist Here's a ss of that building, now if you dont mind, i'll return to tracing.
http://imgur.com/a/pzdNL
192016-12-22 18:30:30 UTCDevonF The CU and Ottawa datasets are the same for 2014 judging by your screenshot. Here's a side-by-side of the house you added and the 2014 imagery http://imgur.com/a/pQZwP. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a house somewhere else with an incorrect footprint matching this house. I think this strongly re...
202016-12-22 18:33:03 UTCLogicalViolinist Devon quit wasting my time. maybe learn some HOT mapping or learn some building tracing, I'm not here to hold your hand.
212016-12-22 18:38:36 UTCLogicalViolinist This is from bing: http://imgur.com/a/9zU2K I may have missed some of the building, but i'm trying to trace quickly. I admit that the OttawaCarleton imagery is different, but I used a combination of Mapbox,Bing, OttawaOrtho and Carleton.
222016-12-22 18:56:59 UTCDenisCarriere Devon, your numerous comments in Canada are becoming very annoying to many of the "power" mappers. Just because you like to use iD & OSMAnd to map 1-2 features at the time. Some users are using JOSM to map multiple hundreds of buildings at a time.

You should spend your time doing mo...
232016-12-22 19:21:36 UTCwoodpeck Denis, you should be ashamed at trying to pull rank at someone whose comments you don't like. Stick to the facts.
242016-12-22 19:28:09 UTCwoodpeck LogicalViolinist, there is no way anyone would trace the building in http://imgur.com/a/9zU2K from the imagery in that picture. Neither Bing nor Mapbox nor whatever is in that picture has the detail to trace that outline. Not even a combination of all of them. -- And the only thing you have to say i...
252016-12-22 19:33:36 UTCLogicalViolinist Hi woodpeck, as you may know Denis and I know eachother in real life and are local mappers to the Gatineau/Ottawa valley. Is it surprising that I may have linked him my changeset via chat? No? Ok.

http://imgur.com/a/dRNnD
See how the white pixels follow the thing I traced? Well I followed the pi...
262016-12-22 19:39:45 UTCLogicalViolinist http://imgur.com/a/3BmD5
The top I followed the pixels again.
272016-12-22 19:43:36 UTCLogicalViolinist Not sure why so much scrutiny is going into one building when some people would just draw a rectangle over it and call it a day. Would they be brought in a microscope analysis of what they did and did not do? Nope. If you want me to fix the back of the house I'll gladly do it, but don't accuse me of...
282016-12-23 01:23:26 UTCscruss Sorry, but it doesn't look as if you can use the Carleton data to trace from: https://library.carleton.ca/sites/default/files/find/gis/DataUseAgreement.pdf
292016-12-23 10:57:03 UTCLogicalViolinist Thay seems to be talking about the imagery directly and not derivative work scruss
302016-12-23 13:46:13 UTCscruss Are your OSM contributions "for the exclusive purposes of teaching or academic research" at Carleton? If not, you can't use the data here, and you've signed something to say you won't when you started your course. Derivative works retain rights too: that's why we can't copy from Google Map...
312016-12-23 13:53:30 UTCLogicalViolinist I'll start working on reverting the changesets that used this imagery then.
322016-12-23 14:38:39 UTCLogicalViolinist Started the revert process
332016-12-23 16:05:57 UTCosmcanada_fix This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44622688 where the changeset comment is: Reverted traced buildings due to imagery source
12016-12-19 16:57:14 UTCAlexey Lukin Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your chan...
22016-12-19 19:18:40 UTCwoodpeck I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
32016-12-19 19:21:13 UTCAlexey Lukin Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:

I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has
happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street
crossings here, it will become apparent:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999

In fact, the ...
42016-12-19 20:23:47 UTCsamely Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.

Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.
Let me know if you need...
52016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
62016-12-21 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
72017-01-06 14:55:37 UTCsamely Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-19 19:16:47 UTCwoodpeck Hello MDIV, it appears that 2 yrs ago you mapped some buildings twice here, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29627050 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330248229 ...
12016-12-18 21:01:51 UTCwoodpeck Dear user Geozeisig, you have been told not to make mechanical edits like this in the past. Please adhere to these rules. It is not plausible that you have indeed looked at the objects you modified here individually because some of them contain other tagging inconsistencies that you have not fixed.
22016-12-19 09:06:10 UTCgeozeisig position=underground ist der falsche Tag. Karten die das auswerten sollen können damit nichts anfangen. Steht auch so in der Wiki
Gruß
12016-12-13 06:46:58 UTCwoodpeck Please write your changeset comment in the "comment" field (not "comments") so that it can properly be processed and displayed.
22016-12-13 08:45:57 UTCWetitpig0 How to reopen a changeset?
32016-12-13 09:43:18 UTCwoodpeck You can't reopen it. I meant just for the future, apparently you're not using one of the standard editors, so whatever software you use, make sure you use the "comment" field not "comments".

Regarding the boundary zone. You have mapped a very large area that is up to 10km wide...
12016-12-12 18:10:04 UTCwoodpeck There are two problems with this. First of all, you must not import data into OSM without following our import guidelines which mandate that you discuss the import before you act. Second, you must not import data that is "free except for commercial use", because the license that OSM itself...
22016-12-13 14:10:57 UTCfredi_alf I will revert back to previous.
Sorry.
32016-12-16 00:45:55 UTCfredi_alf This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
42016-12-16 00:56:42 UTCfredi_alf This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
12016-12-11 23:33:33 UTCwoodpeck Hello, could you please explain what the data source "ruian" is? Is this building import documented on the Wiki? Has it been discussed on the mailing list?
22016-12-12 05:55:41 UTCJandaM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RUIAN

RUIAN data are manually traced in JOSM using Tracer plugin.
12016-12-08 19:54:00 UTCmikelmaron @woodpeck_repair was there any public discussion of reverting this import? I agree that imports should have discussion -- but also think reverts should have discussion too, and a chance for things to be made right.
22016-12-08 20:35:54 UTCwoodpeck We don't publicly discuss reverting imports but we usually seek to get in touch with the importers (in this case, three unsuccessful attempts have been made by various people in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37015792 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36896136 http://www.openstreetmap.o...
32016-12-09 15:34:18 UTCmikelmaron Thanks for the reply @woodpeck. I definitely agree we need documented imports, but I'm unclear about the proactive import process, and I'm far from the only one in the community confused by it. A few questions to help get a better picture.

* How are undocumented imports discovered? Are they repor...
42016-12-09 15:34:55 UTCmikelmaron s/proactive import process/proactive import revert process/
12016-12-05 10:11:24 UTChighflyer74 Hi there!

Is there any place where these imports have been discussed? I am just asking this, as your account is quite new and usually it is not the first action for a new OSM member to do large scale imports in several states. In addition to that some of the buildings have bad geometry (not recta...
22016-12-06 14:15:22 UTCosm_rucksackradar Hi, you are right. Another user gave me advice to announce large imports earlier. I will do that in the future on Slack https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ and on talk-us.
I addressed the geometry problem manually, the problem is that many buildings have different shapes than rectangle, for exampl...
32016-12-06 14:34:16 UTChighflyer74 Hi Michael!

Thanks for your quick reply! Concerning the building shape: I was referring to buildings that are actually rectangular. I stumbled across some that were not corrected. I am not sure, as I am not a license specialist, but you might run into major problems if the license under which the...
42016-12-06 16:10:23 UTCNakaner Hi Oliver,

the Talk-us mailing list is not sufficient. See step 2.2 of the Import Guidelines available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_2_-_Community_Buy-in. In addition, I want to point out that Slack is not even mentioned by the Import Guideline and no official comm...
52016-12-06 16:49:41 UTCwoodpeck I would also like to point out that the guidelines do not talk about *announcing* an import; they talk about discussing it and assuring the community is happy for the import to go ahead. A mere announcement is certainly not enough. I'm afraid these edits will have to be reverted.
62016-12-16 20:49:22 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footpr...
12016-11-28 01:29:54 UTCwoodpeck Many of the buildings added in this changeset intersect water areas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454731131) or streets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454731761). Since you claim that you traced these almost 3,000 buildings from aerial imagery, how come you did not spot these errors?
22016-12-13 17:56:27 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_...
12016-11-28 01:24:43 UTCwoodpeck None of the sources in your source tag show a building in this location that you mapped in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455322726 - could you please specify the correct source?
22016-12-13 17:56:44 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_...
12016-11-28 01:20:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset appears to create about 24,000 buildings in one go. Are you sure that you have traced these from aerial imagery, as the source tag implies? The footprint of this building for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455207307 is hardly decipherable from either Bing or USGS...
22016-11-28 02:08:52 UTCDavidKewley As a technical note less important than the question of the source(s): The building footprint that woodpeck cited was added in this changeset as two separate but identical ways, it appears.
32016-11-30 10:02:45 UTCbotdidier2020 hi,
there is some mistake with this your changeset :
duplicated tags and geometry
- inside changeset 43886022
- between this changesets : 43962925 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43962925
issues can be see at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=0&country=usa_...
42016-12-13 17:56:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_...
12016-11-18 21:03:28 UTCwoodpeck You seem to be using an automated process to match Wikidata tags to exisitng OSM entries. This is a mechanical edit that requires prior discussion and agreement in the community. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
22016-11-18 21:28:46 UTCnyuriks @woodpeck, thanks for the heads up! I was using the JOSM's Wikipedia plugin - "Fetch Wikidata IDs" command to lookup IDs for rels and ways which had Wikipedia tag already. In the process I also uncovered a number of plugin bugs, some of which are now fixed. The process was not automated -...
32016-11-18 21:49:50 UTCwoodpeck Yeah, it is ok (even desirable) to add wikidata plugins to an individual object that you are looking at and that you have knowledge about, but it is not ok to simply mark everything and have the plugin slap on wikidata tags wholesale - that would then count as a mechanical edit.
42016-11-18 22:11:22 UTCnyuriks Understood, I will mostly work on high level objects (admin level <= 6) - those are easy to check, and provide the most interest to me.
52016-11-19 01:01:20 UTCnyuriks P.S. posted my thoughts at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618646#p618646
62016-11-23 15:21:11 UTCwoodpeck I have read your forum entry, and what you are doing there (automatically adding Wikidata IDs with a JOSM plugin) is clearly a mechanical edit. You should not be doing that kind of editing across the globe without involving the local community and discussing your approach on a suitable mailing list,...
72016-11-23 17:17:14 UTCnyuriks Woodpeck, I have already stopped changing any objects except the admin levels regions 1-6, and even those I have greatly slowed down, and began reviewing most of the auto-resolved wikidata IDs. I will cease further automodifications, and instead concentrate on getting wikidata tags quality review fo...
12016-11-23 07:44:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset seems to add over 40,000 trees at once. May I ask what the source of this data is?
12016-11-19 06:34:15 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43771527, 43735782, 43687220, 43712790, 43740825, 43741976, 43739178, 43713951, 43734444, 43733780, 43708551, 43713727, 43713559, 43713276, 43636853, 43709600, 43687159, 43710431, 43638915, 43701420, 43766338, 43700668, 43765438, 43735945, ...
22016-11-19 21:41:59 UTCDenisCarriere Well if it's such a legal issue, why don't you revert every wikidata tag in the world?? Why single out these changsets, many of these changsets were done manually.
32016-11-22 18:06:59 UTCTeiron what was an issue with this?
42016-11-22 21:32:52 UTCwoodpeck Teiron, major issue being that this was not sufficiently discussed before it was executed. You had a small number of pepole adding Wikidata entries all over the world, for places they had zero local knowledge about, aided by existing geo-information from Wikidata - which is fundamentally different t...
12016-11-18 23:41:03 UTCwoodpeck You have apparently made a series of fantasy edits in this changeset. Please do not use the main OpenStreetMap database for testing! Sign up for an account on master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org if you want to test-drive the editor!
22016-11-18 23:42:31 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43783802 where the changeset comment is:
12016-11-17 20:12:57 UTCaseerel4c26 Hi, please urgently stop your mass edits and explain what you are doing here and where it was discussed. Thank you.
22016-11-17 20:14:39 UTCLogicalViolinist Adding wikidata. You take a place name and look it up here: www.wikidata.org. The resulting ID gives you access to wikipedia pages, meta data etc
32016-11-17 20:15:29 UTCaseerel4c26 Thanks, okay. And how are you doing this? Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
42016-11-17 20:17:23 UTCLogicalViolinist I just told you.
1. Go to name field
2. Ctrl+c
3. www.wikidata.org
4. ctrl+v
5. Find city
6. Find ID
7. Ctrl+c
8. Go back and add wikidata
9. ctrl+v
52016-11-17 20:21:36 UTCLogicalViolinist It's the same idea behind:
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/geocoding-wikidata/
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/id-wikidata/

also the automated edits are not applicable in this case as I am reviewing all the changesets manually. Thank you
62016-11-17 20:21:45 UTCaseerel4c26 You are doing this that fast? Not automated? Quite strange.

So, you did not discuss this edit series somehwere?

Furthermore: could you please explain why you are reducing the percision of coordinates in some cases? E.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=773647546
72016-11-17 20:24:19 UTCLogicalViolinist I downloaded the mapbox QA-tiles a couple days ago. Extracted the nodes with "place" tag. I then have been looking up places with same name. This is the result of my labour.
82016-11-17 20:25:48 UTCLogicalViolinist The 7th position of the decimal is a precision of less than 10cm.....I may have touched it by accident in JOSM
92016-11-17 20:30:51 UTCLogicalViolinist What I find quite strange is if I were to commit this one by one. No one would bat an eye, but I do it in a batch and questions are raised. It's the same thing as if I were doing it through ID or JOSM. The IDs are correct and I am not sure why they are being questioned?
102016-11-17 20:33:29 UTCaseerel4c26 Let me cite the code of conduct: "use of find-and-replace functionality using a standard editor such as JOSM or finding using services such as Overpass API and changing without reviewing cases individually;"

Precision: I doubt that. That would not explain several objects having a loss o...
112016-11-17 20:35:59 UTCLogicalViolinist But i'm not using an API, nor find and replace so what's your point?
122016-11-17 20:36:52 UTCLogicalViolinist also what algorithm please see the steps above.
132016-11-17 20:39:32 UTCLogicalViolinist Why does a offline edit have to be discussed? Do you have to email a mailing list when you edit a road, a building, a tree?
142016-11-17 20:39:50 UTCaseerel4c26 yes, if you would add them manually (e.g. while editing that place node anyway) no one would ask. The thing is: errors happen with automated edits. More eyes spot possible errors better than one person only. You may not have thought of all possible cases which are existing in the data. Automated e...
152016-11-17 20:46:06 UTCaseerel4c26 algorithm: okay, you mentioned "offline". So you did extract all nodes with a place tag from "mapbox QA-tiles" and then look up manually (pressing ctrl+C and so one) each name? Then you looked at the wikidata result and verified that it is the correct city (and not a equally name...
162016-11-17 20:46:17 UTCLogicalViolinist Do you understand English? These. Are. Not. Automated. Edits.
172016-11-17 20:51:20 UTCLogicalViolinist Qa tiles was to obtain node ids thats it. Everything else in josm
182016-11-17 20:53:11 UTCLogicalViolinist If you are scared of poor data, kindly point out a wikidata tag that is wrong
192016-11-17 21:42:11 UTCaseerel4c26 No, I will not look through the wikidata tags. Too hard to verify them one by one.

If those are not automated edits ... wow! I would automate that! :-)

I have asked for comments at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=10
202016-11-17 21:42:39 UTCaseerel4c26 oops, this deeper URL: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56436
212016-11-17 21:44:09 UTCLogicalViolinist Well I am aware that the German populous dislikes imports
222016-11-18 21:08:04 UTCwoodpeck I am appalled that after thoroughly botching an import in your home town, and having a proven history of quite a few under-the-radar imports, you (LogicalViolinist) are still at it, far from home, at full throttle. May I suggest you simply stick to the primitive kind of mapping that other people do,...
232016-11-19 06:32:34 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
12016-11-13 00:22:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43508161, 43401664, 43586101, 43400726, 42346992, 42518732, 42347148, 42512083, 42519026, 42198424, 42346785, 42520415, 43507099, 43401372, 43402690, 42519592, 43507348, 42518667, 42521676, 42521357, 42345941, 43586234, 43402332, 42521584, ...
22017-01-23 19:26:37 UTCSK53 Looks like the reverts didnt go back far enough Lambeth Bridge is a horrendous mess
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 18:57:00 UTCAlecs01 Same as here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43586101 in this changeset you even joined a bridge to a river https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4490051800, what's the rationale behind this?
22016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
22016-11-13 06:24:23 UTCmavl Здравствуйте, Bonya_23.
В этом пакете правок вы добавили множество общих точек для линий, которые в действительно не пересекаются. Например:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139137576 ...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 19:24:50 UTCAlecs01 This changeset created 635 nodes, most of them joining ways on different layers which shouldn't be connected
22016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 18:35:54 UTCAlecs01 Hi, what are you trying to do here? you created hundreds of nodes joining roads and railways which do not intersect in real world, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4497087495 (a railway and the bridge above) or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4497087605 (an underground railway and anoth...
22016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 22:06:04 UTCwoodpeck What you are mapping here seems to be a very temporary series of agricultural tracks, and why are you using 2000 nodes for every circle - that's way too much!
12016-11-11 21:16:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43545192, 43545264.
12016-11-11 09:13:08 UTCfriedl Ich gehe davon aus, dass der Wald nicht komplett gerodet wurde --> habe den Wald wiederhergestellt.
22016-11-11 21:16:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43570082 where the changeset comment is: Datenloeschen revertiert. Bitte unterscheiden zwischen 'Weg existiert nicht' und 'Wegnutzung ist nicht erlaubt'. Auch Privatwege werden erfasst
12016-11-11 21:16:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43570082 where the changeset comment is: Datenloeschen revertiert. Bitte unterscheiden zwischen 'Weg existiert nicht' und 'Wegnutzung ist nicht erlaubt'. Auch Privatwege werden erfasst
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43561565, 43561455, 43561935, 43562209, 43561727, 43561667, 43561907, 43562097, 43562261, 43561504, 43560645, 43562146, 43561840, 43561781, 43561788, 43562704, 43561593, 43561628, 43561489.
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-09 12:07:12 UTCSHARCRASH Woodpeck your edits are flawed! You are breaking the elements i created! They didn't need any edit! I'm astonished that someone who has such a position like yours within OSMF makes SUCH MISTAKES! This is not right, you made a circular track whereas it's an area of woods: https://www.openstreetmap.or...
22016-11-09 12:09:26 UTCSHARCRASH The element which i was talking about and must be grass instead of a service area is this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452158351
32016-11-09 12:11:30 UTCSHARCRASH This place was filled with an area element: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.60999/5.90915
42016-11-09 12:21:04 UTCSHARCRASH https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.60357/5.90829
52016-11-09 12:41:16 UTCSomeoneElse @SHARCRASH You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431452509/history as a circular highway=track 4 months ago. Are you saying that that is incorrect?
62016-11-09 12:51:19 UTCSHARCRASH No, i haven't plotted that as a circular track, that's user woodpeck altering and degrading data! I had plotted that element as a MP wood. Something is flawed in the recording process of the history, some edits within MPs are not being recorded.

Also user stereo is making degradations:
https://w...
72016-11-09 13:57:03 UTCwoodpeck Yes, it appears that the "reconstruct polygon" function has a bug when it comes to copying tags. I'll investigate and fix this before I continue, but I definitely intend to "degrade" many more multipolygons created by SHARCRASH - essentially all those where several otherwise unre...
82016-11-09 14:14:24 UTCSHARCRASH Unrelated??? Of course they are JUST woods! Would you care to explain me what makes them so special and so individual one from the other??? And if they are not for some very local reason, the MP can still easily be edited by someone who needs to make that specification. You, what you are doing here ...
92016-11-09 14:25:13 UTCSomeoneElse @SHARCRASH, heres an example where it makes sense to have two polygons linked together: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4807529 . Here the two pieces of natural=wood together form "Breck's Plantation" - they are logically one thing. However it doesn't make sense to join things int...
102016-11-09 14:39:38 UTCSHARCRASH I know that Andy. But why should i be forbidden to use MPs to ease my contributions within iD while i respect in general real features and what's been ruled out in Wiki! This editor doesn't have the complex plugin tools that JOSM has! Using only polygons would slow tremendously the workflow since i ...
12016-10-26 15:14:05 UTCNakaner Hi Aleks-Berlin,

why did you add the area of Russia in this changeset? This number can be retrieved by calculating and therefore does not have to be mapped at OSM.

I will remove this tag (and maybe all other occurences of sqkm=* you uploaded) in the next days.

In addition, I want to inform ...
22016-10-26 17:44:08 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi Michael,

please read my points.

1. how to calc area of oceans (node, no borders) ?
2. all segments have to be in same orientation (e.g. clock wise) before calculation, which is not assured.
3. Huge Relations (e.g. russia.osm = 37 MB), that is much to download for get one number.
4. OSM h...
32016-10-26 17:53:57 UTCNakaner HI Aleks-Berlin,

regarding item 1: If you want to calculate the land area, that's trivial. Even if you want to calculate the area on sea which belongs to Russian territory, it is simple.

regarding item 2: If you software is unable to calculate correctly if the orientation of the segments is wr...
42016-10-26 18:22:50 UTCwoodpeck If I may add 2 points: (a) Just because there is rubbish in OSM, that's not an excuse to add more! (b) Wikidata is more often than not derived from Wikipedia which is licensed CC-BY-SA; I know that Wikidata claims to be CC0 but I highly doubt the legality of this.
52016-10-26 19:00:40 UTCSimonPoole It should be noted that the WMF does not make any representations that the contents of wikidata are actually free of any third party rights, The CC0 licence of wikidata is simply based on a position statement by the WMF that facts can't be copyrighted..
62016-10-26 21:02:43 UTCAleks-Berlin again: how to calc the area of nodes (like place=ocean, that do not have any border) ?
Who should question the free usage of facts?
I understand that area can be calulated 'easy' for smaller objects. But why download megabytes to get one number?
With this argument we should stop overpass-turbo.eu...
72016-10-26 21:31:39 UTCSimonPoole You already have the comfort of looking up the value via the wikidata reference for not essential things (as for example the area).
82016-10-26 21:34:54 UTCNakaner … and therefore there is no need anymore to add this information to OpenStreetMap because the object which represents the territory of Russia (relation 60189) already has wikidata=Q159.
92016-10-27 17:43:58 UTCAleks-Berlin removed again for this relation, but todo (next days) for others
12016-10-25 21:10:01 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset titled "substation refinement", you have added denomination and religion information to many cemeteries. It would be good if you could - for this changeset and in the future - provide information about your sources. Did you run a web search? Consult Wikipedia? Do you live...
22016-10-26 10:47:41 UTC42429 Thanks for your interest in my sources!
1. Yes, the denomination of cemeteries is derived from wikipedia and web search. I should have added a link to Wikipedia articles, thanks for that suggestion!
(cemeteries were a minor by-edit)
2. Substation details are derived from reports (balance sheets, ...
12016-10-09 21:48:00 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Peer van Daalen, dieser Changeset-Kommentar war sehr unhöflich und ist geeignet, Deine ausgezeichneten Edits in Aachen und anderswo mit einem bitteren Beigeschmack zu verderben. Ich hoffe, Du bringst, wenn Du darüber geschlafen hast, die Größe auf, Dich zu entschuldigen.
22016-10-10 06:19:58 UTCPeer van Daalen Guten Morgen und vielen Dank, woodpeck, für Deine freundlichen Worte.
-
So wie es aus dem Wald rein schallt, schallt es auch wieder zurück ...
-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/735717#map=19/50.77080/6.03663&layers=N
-
Hinzu kommt, daß es zwischen dem Mapper wambacher un...
32016-10-10 06:59:25 UTCPeer van Daalen ps: Nochmal zum Thema ´maxspeed´ in "Verkehrsberuhigten Zonen".
-
Gerade diesbezüglich habe ich mir die (oberlehrerhaften) Hinweise von MKnight mittlerweile zu Eigen gemacht und lasse seine Änderungen in dieser Sache an verschiedenen Orten in Aachen ja auch unkommen...
42016-10-10 18:42:56 UTCuvi Hallo Peer, du solltest dir im Klaren sein: Die hier von dir hinterlassenen Kommentare sind öffentlich und somit von jedermann zu lesen. Der von dir verwendete Wortschatz ist - unabhängig des dir möglicherweise entgegengebrachten Unverständnises - nicht zeitgemäß und b...
52016-10-11 21:02:30 UTCJojo4u In beiden Changeset hat Peer van Daalen zuerst diskriminierende, auf die Herkunft der anderen Mapper bezogene Worte gewählt. Dies hat meiner Ansicht nach keinen Platz in unserer Community.
12016-09-03 20:47:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset looks very similar to a number of semi-automatic changesets by contributors working for Facebook that have been reverted because of low quality and a process violation (imports must be discussed before they are performed). Can you explain the process by which you extracted these ~ 850...
12016-08-08 22:24:59 UTCwoodpeck Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!
12016-08-08 07:53:54 UTCAmaroussi I've flagged this changeset for revert because it seems this changeset just indiscriminately deleted all data without a good reason, but there are conflicts that I need help with.
22016-08-08 22:24:43 UTCwoodpeck Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!
12016-08-08 07:33:55 UTCAmaroussi You just deleted some of the most important roads in Hyderabad with this changeset.

With a lack of a meaningful comment I cannot conclude whether this edit was a mistake or a malicious edit.
22016-08-08 22:24:23 UTCwoodpeck Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!
12016-08-08 00:15:52 UTCreneman Hallo, der User hat vor dem Import sehr viele Flächen gelöscht, Wälder, Wiesen und Felder. Werden die von User Squiffy vor dem Import gelöschten Daten bitte wieder hergestellt?
22016-08-08 21:10:30 UTCwoodpeck Kannst Du das konkretisieren - auf einen Zeitraum oder eine Liste von Changesets? Ich könnte zwar "alle Flächen, die in den X Wochen vor dem Import gelöscht wurden" wiederherstellen, fürchte aber, das wäre dann vielleicht zu viel und würde Duplikate verursache...
32016-08-09 21:18:57 UTCreneman Hallo, ich bin noch 2 Wochen im Urlaub in BG und bin hier nur sporadisch mit Internet versorgt, geschweige denn das ich mein Notebook dabei habe... Ich bin auf dieses Changset aufmerksam geworden, weil ich diverse Flächen in den letzten Jahren in BG erfasst hatte. Nun war mit dem langsamen Inte...
42016-08-09 21:23:57 UTCreneman Wenn ich mir seine Kommentare ansehe, werden vermutlich alle Changesets mit dem Kommentar "error corrections and cleanup of duplicates" mal ausgewertet werden müssen :(
12016-08-08 20:58:56 UTCwoodpeck Hello huanzai, what is a "lanelet" relation, what is "role=regulatory_element", and why do your ways have approximately one node every 5 meters?
12016-08-04 22:16:33 UTCwoodpeck What do you mean with "change road rev for Rand McNally maps" - you are not copying data from Rand McNally are you?
12016-07-27 21:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Why did you delete the country node for Palestine?
22016-07-29 19:25:36 UTCPeda Hello Eliot,
as you didn't reply yet and as more complaints came in, I did revert some of your changesets to restore the deleted boundaries (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41116417).
Please refrain from fixing/touching the boundaries without prior discussion with the local community in th...
12016-07-27 21:47:03 UTCwoodpeck Why were village names deleted in this changeset?
12016-07-24 14:59:51 UTCwoodpeck This appears to be an undiscussed and faulty import of data that's more than 10 years old, with partially overlapping polygons. Can you explain?
22016-07-24 17:37:32 UTCReino Baptista Dear Woodpeck,

The data edited on this changeset (and comment as source:CLC) is from the well known "Corine Land Cover 2006" data set and was inputted accordingly with the osm recommendations on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Corine_Land_Cover.

In what concerns the data age plea...
32016-07-25 13:03:44 UTCwoodpeck RB, the wiki page you cite is not a carte-blanche for undiscussed CLC imports. You are expected to discuss your import on the imports mailing list nonetheless. Many people are of the opinion that CLC data is too old to be valuable. You appear to have deleted a large amount of data, partly forest pol...
42016-07-25 16:03:16 UTCReino Baptista Dear Woodpeck,
Thank you for your opinion.
As I previously stated I did not erase any data.
I added, joined and updated.
After you kind contact I did start revising the CLC data I added, coincidentally, around the coordinates depicted on "deletion.png".
RB
52016-07-25 23:35:15 UTCwoodpeck Dear RB, I am slightly concerned by your choice of words: "Thank you for your opinion". I might not have made myself clear enough. When I asked you to stop importing data, that was not an opinion, but a request of the OSMF Data Working Group that you would ignore at your own peril. I think...
62016-07-26 00:16:24 UTCReino Baptista Dear Woodpeck,

Please don't be alarm.
I used the word "opinion" just referring when you said: "Many people are of the opinion that CLC data is too old to be valuable" Finding this data was my motivation to do the work I did, since it dates from 12/2013. Now I know there are m...
72017-06-05 12:23:40 UTCethylisocyanat @woodpeck: What's the outcome of discussion? IMHO you should revert.
12016-07-25 21:03:23 UTCwoodpeck Hallo "vorsignal", OpenStreetMap hat einen Benutzer in Dresden wegen massiven Fehlverhaltens dauerhaft gesperrt, Bitte trage daher keine "Korrekturen im Auftrag eines unbekannten Users" ein, denn es dürfte sich dabei mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit um genau d...
22016-07-26 10:17:33 UTCNakaner zurückgesetzt durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41033907

PeterDRS/Kakaner soll keine Chance haben, seine Benutzersperren zu umgehen, auch nicht durch Anlegen anonymer Notes.
12016-07-18 22:38:02 UTCwoodpeck Please explain where the required discussion about this import was held before the import was performed.
12015-01-08 22:02:39 UTCTest360 Setting "landuse=wood" ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dwood_%28Don%27t_use%29 ) instead of "landuse=forest" seems a mistake according to the OSM wiki.
22015-01-08 22:38:24 UTCwoodpeck I agree. This does not, however, mean that you can simply chnage all landuse=wood to landuse=forst (or natural=wood) automatically. Your changesets have not been reverted because the content was wrong, but because the process was wrong.
32015-01-09 01:53:48 UTCTest360 I would like to know why the 27640972 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27640972 ) which is clearly not a mass edit as been reverted by this changeset.
42015-01-09 02:04:49 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27641137 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27641137 ), which was a local edit that fixed an obvious mistake.
52015-01-09 05:53:57 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27662643 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27662643 ) which can't be smaller because it change the way the river is tagged.
62015-01-09 05:55:19 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27662544 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27662544 ) which can't be smaller because it deals with a river.
72015-01-09 05:56:04 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27662224 changesert ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27662224 ) which can't be smaller because it change the way the river is tagged.
82015-01-09 05:57:46 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27661940 changesert ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27661940 ) which can't be smaller because it change the way the river is tagged.
92015-01-09 06:15:43 UTCTest360 I would like to know why the 27630561 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27661940 ) has been reverted. What is the problem? The changes in this changeset were not done automatically. And nobody complain in the discussion of the changeset.
102015-01-09 06:16:37 UTCTest360 I would like to know why the 27631195 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631195 ) has been reverted. What is the problem? The changes in this changeset were not done automatically. And nobody complain in the discussion of the changeset.
112015-01-09 06:17:39 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27631546 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631546 ).
122015-01-09 06:31:03 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27631744 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631744 ). Again: not an automatic edit, no complaint.
132015-01-09 06:54:47 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27631975 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631975 ). Not an automatic edit, no complaint.
142015-01-09 07:00:49 UTCTest360 Same request for the 27632063 changeset ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27632063 ). Not an automatic edit, no complaint.
152015-01-09 11:40:19 UTCRM87 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631744 - highway=services is ment to describe areas and makes no sense on ways. It would be ok to assume that this tag implies area=yes automatically. You should have made this change in the wiki not in the data. In case of wiki change a drop of note to taggi...
162015-01-09 11:51:16 UTCRM87 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631195 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27632063 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27632063 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27631975 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27632063 same as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27...
172015-01-09 12:06:42 UTCRM87 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27661940 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27662224 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27662544 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27662643

You should not make mega relations. These are hard to edit and even harder to fix as they tend t...
182015-01-09 12:25:34 UTCRM87 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27641137 seems ok. You may redo it. This time with a little bit more descriptive comment. It is hard to notice that a space was removed from the word shared _lane . If a good changeset is in the middle of not so good changesets it might be not noticed.
192015-01-09 13:07:10 UTCRM87 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27640972 5 of 6 changes were wrong (should have been surface=asphalt) and the sixth might have been wrong (felt like compacted on some parts). 5 are fixed with changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28018519
6.th one I did not touch.
Centerlines ...
202015-01-09 16:52:02 UTCTest360 About "highway=services": the OSM wiki clearly state: "Make sure you add the area=yes tag in case you tag a way, because it is not considered the default for closed ways."
212015-01-09 17:06:42 UTCTest360 The size of the relation is irrelevant. The changsets on river has been reverted because of « un-discussed mass edits », wich they are not. Where is the discussion about the size of the relation of these changesets before this revert?
222015-01-09 17:40:01 UTCTest360 About http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27641137 , you just state that it seems ok, but you don't explain why it has been reverted. I would like to know.

"good changeset is in the middle of not so good changesets it might be not noticed": are you implying that all these changesets ...
232015-01-09 17:57:58 UTCTest360 About http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27640972 , you discuss the correctness of the changeset, but you miss the point: why a non-mass edit changeset have been reverted in this changeset?

The correctness should have been discussed **before** the revert.
242015-01-09 18:01:47 UTCSomeoneElse @Test360 - although it's perhaps easy to get lost in a conversation entirely conducted in changeset discussion comments, perhaps it would help to read from the top again, including the comment that says "Your changesets have not been reverted because the content was wrong, but because the proce...
252015-01-09 18:17:21 UTCTest360 @SomeoneElse
Before my first comment, I didn't understand that this changeset reverts 80 of my changesets. I thougth that it was the revert of only one changeset. That's why I discuss the correctness. Then I understand.


"Your changesets have not been reverted because the content was wrong...
262015-01-09 18:23:33 UTCTest360 @RM87
"You should have made this change in the wiki not in the data": I don't understand at all this sentence. Can you explain in details? Thanks.
272015-01-09 18:38:07 UTCRM87 About "highway=services" do you really believe everything that is written or not written in the wiki?

I do agree that the changeset comment « un-discussed mass edits » does not fit for those river changeset reverts. Nevertheless there is a waterway relation model for the thi...
282015-01-09 18:59:52 UTCSomeoneElse @Test360, re the process: There's a mechanical edit policy described in the wiki here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy

The very first requirement is "Discuss". It's there for a number of reasons. OpenStreetMap is a shared database, but it's actually more...
292015-01-09 19:41:11 UTCRM87 About the wiki changing: the wiki page of highway=services should have say'd that this tag automatically implies area=yes on ways instead of insisting of adding area=yes to every single way. This can be done because the other option of closed way tagged an highway=services in the meaning of a non ar...
302015-01-09 19:46:35 UTCTest360 @SomeoneElse
Thank you for this detailed response, I get your point. I don't know if you had intended to answer my questions with this message, but they are left unanswered.

I have read the mechanical edit policy. Right now, I do *not* complain about the revert of my mechanical edits, I rather t...
312015-01-09 20:18:35 UTCTest360 @RM87
Thank you for this clarification. I now understand.

I see several reasons to not change the current lack of implication between highway=services and area=yes. So I won't try to change that by discussing it on the tagging list.

So do you agree that right now, a service area which is tagg...
322015-01-09 20:58:58 UTCTest360 I would like to know why the http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27643030 has been reverted: not a mechanical edit, just a group of two very local changes.
332015-01-09 21:10:48 UTCTest360 I would like to know why the http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27643284 has been reverted: not a mechanical edit, just a group of modifications that have been review one by one thanks to Bing.
342015-01-09 21:16:30 UTCTest360 I would like to know why the http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27643485 has been reverted: not a mechanical edit, just a group of modifications that have been review one by one thanks to Bing and based of the nearby streets in OSM.
352015-01-09 21:28:16 UTCwoodpeck You had made a large amount of mechanical edits interspersed by a few manual edits. The changeset comments were not suitable for determining whether something was a manual edit or a mechanical edit. I would normally have reverted *everything* done by you in that time span but instead I made an effor...
362015-01-09 22:46:44 UTCTest360 Why haven't you asked me what changeset are mechanical? If you had notified me of the revert of my 80 changesets before, I would gladly have provided you the ones that were mechanical.

"I would normally have reverted *everything* done by you in that time span". That is a very wrong way ...
372016-07-10 20:14:26 UTCgileri @woodpeck I'm interested (and I believe other mappers too) in seeing a resolution of this discussion and changesets.

Could you answer the points raised ?
382016-07-10 20:18:41 UTCwoodpeck Could you point me to the forum or mailing list where this changeset is being discussed? Only a few days ago I received inquiries from user "tuxayo" about this and I can hardly believe it is accidental that several people stumble across a year-old changeset?
392016-07-10 21:38:38 UTCgileri I'm not sure how it's relevant to the discussion of this changeset, but for full disclosure :

You're right, I stumbled upon this changeset by accident, and pointed @tuxayo to it, as we've had private discussions about this kind of changesets and their reversal by DWG.

I think we can now return...
402016-07-11 00:45:59 UTCwoodpeck See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-July/076296.html
12016-07-03 22:26:30 UTCwoodpeck Please explain why you have made this revert. Also, what does source=survey mean in this context?
22016-08-03 22:15:52 UTCSomeoneElse Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group. Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is dispute...
32016-08-30 21:04:14 UTCSomeoneElse Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area. The findings and the changes that will be made are described at
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p6...
12016-06-27 22:21:21 UTCwoodpeck Dear user asdfqwer51, there is a suspicion that you are using unsuitable third-party sources to enter your data. For example this changeset created two schools, but these schools do not exist on the ground - construction has not even started. Apart from the fact that it is wrong to tag schools where...
22016-07-03 09:06:26 UTCwoodpeck I am now reverting these edits since I haven't had any reply from you.
32016-07-05 15:15:12 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40501812 where the changeset comment is: Revert suspected copying from copyrighted data source after no reply received in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528
12016-06-21 08:15:31 UTCwoodpeck In this and a couple nearby changesets you seem to be re-adding data that was removed by DWG because it was illegally copied from a copyrighted source. What is your source for adding this information?
22016-06-21 08:32:56 UTCmalcolmh My source was the tags that remained after redaction. Those tags belong to a long-since abandoned tagging proposal, so I converted them to the non-deprecated seamark tags using the values in the remaining tags, in addition to a couple of default values that my editing tool generates (buoy shape &...
12016-06-20 15:14:08 UTCwoodpeck Hi, are you sure the source of this is Bing? Frankly it looks like you might have been using a third-party source, for example how does Bing tell you to subdivide a building like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381036028 ? Please comment.
12016-06-04 19:29:14 UTCwoodpeck Dear zohre2109, please don't draw rectangles tagged just "area=yes", they don't mean anything! Please also try and use a better changeset comment - as a rule of thumb, any changeset comment that fits all of your edits cannot be a good one! I told you so in this changset comment https://www...
12016-05-31 12:46:57 UTCwoodpeck I would appreciate it if you could use more precise changeset comments. I can see from the changeset that you edited a waterway but what exactly are you "fixing" (and, preferably, why - as you probably know, we do not usually start retagging everything just because the consensus on taggin...
22016-05-31 13:12:20 UTCRicoZ In this changeset I tried to fix JOSM warnings where the river crosses the lake shore and dam.

Btw I do try to contact the main contributors when I am doing larger scale retagging.
12016-05-25 18:50:34 UTCwoodpeck Dear zohre2109, thank you or your contributions to OSM. Please do not put house nunbers in the "name" tag, they belong in "addr:housenumber". You have also put house numbers in "addr:city", this is not correct either.

Please try to find a good description of your chn...
12016-05-24 21:00:21 UTCwoodpeck Please do NOT add house numbers into the name tag. Also, it would be helpful if you could group several changes into changesets instead of uploading every change individually, and then use a proper changeset comment instead of labelling every single one of your edits "ya ispravila zdaniye po ka...
12016-05-24 20:57:06 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you added a bank tagged builidng=commercial. You should add an amenity=bank to get it rendered correctly. Also, name:tk is not required if it has the same content as name.
12016-05-24 20:54:56 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset, you changed the name of a hotel from "Jeyhun" to "Jeyhun Hotel 49
", and then you proceeded to add the tags "name:ru=Parfiya Hotel 51" and "name:tk=Parfiya Hotel 51". There are four issues with this: (1) name:ru is usually written in cyrill...
12016-05-23 15:34:10 UTCwoodpeck Hallo micha4, was ist das "Trassenpreisprogramm" und gibt es Grund zu der Annahme, dass seine Verwendung als OSM-Datenquelle zulässig ist? Leider gibt es gerade im DB-
Bereich immer wieder Missverständnisse, was Urheber- und Datenbankrecht anbetrifft...
22016-05-23 16:04:36 UTCmicha4 Hallo woodpeck,
ich habe das für jederman zugängliche trassenpreisprogramm der db zu suchen der abkürzungen genutzt, da dies für mich der einfachste weg war.
es gibt jedoch auch andere quellen wie z.B. http://www.bahnseite.de/DS100/DS100_main.html
die abkürzungen sind als...
32016-05-24 18:16:57 UTCwoodpeck Hallo micha4, bitte verwende in Zukunft nur noch Datenquellen, von denen Dir eine explizite Genehnmigung vorliegt, oder die deutlich als offen lizenziert gekennzeichnet sind. Dass ein Programm oder eine Webseite für jedermann zugänglich ist, heißt nicht, dass wir daraus abschreiben d...
12016-05-11 16:49:51 UTCPolarbear Hallo why_not_zoidberg,
aus welchem Grund hast du in diesem CS und in 39096370 über 1200 korrekte Adressknoten gelöscht, nur um die Daten auf die Umringe zu legen? Beide Methoden sind anerkannte Mappingstile, daher lag kein Fehler vor, durch die Änderung fehlt aber die Historie der K...
22016-05-11 22:20:23 UTCwoodpeck Interessiert mich auch. Bitte ausserdem vernünftige Changeset-Kommentare benutzen (z.B. "Adressknoten gelöscht, Adresse an Gebäude angefügt weil <X>"), um künftig Nachfragen vorzubeugen.
32016-05-13 07:53:06 UTCgeow Bei EFH, DHH und RH ist jedem Gebäude(teil) in der Regel eine eindeutige Hausnummer zugeordnet, Hausnummer und Gebäudeteil bilden gewissermaßen eine Einheit. Merkmale sollen lt. Wiki nicht in zusätzlichen Nodes erfasst werden, wenn ein Objekt z.B. bereits als Polygon vorliegt. D...
42016-05-13 09:04:28 UTCwoodpeck @geow, ich sehe das so wie die leidige "Flächen verkleben"-Diskussion - wenn einer eine Gegend mappt, soll der dabei entscheiden, wie ers macht, und wir brauchen niemanden, der hinter ihm herputzt, ohne Information hinzuzufügen.
52016-05-13 10:00:58 UTCgeow @woodpeck, hm, dass nur _einer_ eine Gegend mappt, kommt ja praktisch nicht vor, zum Glück :) Da das Wiki hier auch keine Empfehlung anbietet, sind ständige Diskussionen die Folge.

Mein Vorschlag wäre: Gebäude hat nur eine Adresse => Adresse ans Gebäude.

Gebäu...
62016-05-13 10:30:48 UTCPolarbear Die Grundsatzdiskussion können wir gerne auf talk-de weiterführen (ich bevorzuge beim EFH auch den Umring), hier ging es um das mechanische Ändern mit den typischen Kollateralschäden.

Kürzlich hatte ich hier übrigens grade den umgekehrten Fall: https://www.openstree...
72016-05-13 23:18:48 UTCBeKri Hallo zusammen;
why_not_zoidberg ist ein alter Bekannter aus München und Umgebung ...
Er hat schon 2014 grossflächig in München Nodes in Umrisse verwandelt, ich und rolandg haben gebeten das zu unterlassen, er hat sich "KOMMENTARLOS" daran gehalten.
Dieses Frühjahr w...
82016-05-14 03:52:16 UTCwhy_not_zoidberg Ach BeKri lass doch das trollen...
Du hast damals doch selbst öfter Adressen von Gebäuden gelöscht und auf Knoten verschoben.
Außerdem hast du mich um gar nichts gebeten, sondern nur kommentarlos rückgängig gemacht und rolangd hatte ich damals geantwortet.

Ich bin...
92016-05-14 08:23:28 UTCzarl Wie wäre es aber mal mit der Angabe deiner Quellen für deine Edits? Ich finde in deinen changesets kein source=*
Das könnte survey sein und/oder Bing.

Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39239962
12016-05-11 21:43:51 UTCDD1GJ Der Flugplatz ist incl. der Grasbahnen korrekt in den Rohdaten getaggt. OpenStreetMap ist eine Geodatenbank. Wenn eine Karte das "überdimensioniert" darstellt, dann ist dies kein Grund, alles zu löschen.
22016-05-12 07:20:29 UTChlgsms Ok, ich sehe ein, dass das richtig mit surface "grass" agnelegt ist. War definitiv nicht richtig von mir, das zu löschen. Bitte um Entschuldigung.

Auf den OSM-Karten wirkt es für den Laien so als könnte da eine 747 landen. Vielleicht kannst Du mir einen Hinweis geben, wo ...
32016-05-12 08:04:42 UTCwoodpeck Die richtige Adresse für Verbesserungsvorschläge am Standard-OSM-Kartenstil ist https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues - wenn Du aber selbst keinen GitHub-Account hast bzw. anlegen willst, kann ich das auch für Dich dort melden. Ob/wie/wann es geändert wird, d...
12016-05-12 06:25:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has introduced a number of broken (self-intersecting) polygons with severely jagged edges - it doesn't look hand-drawn. How did you create these forest areas, was some auto-tracing plugin involved?
22016-05-12 06:55:31 UTCkariboo Hello, it's made using area selector plugin in josm.
32016-05-12 07:01:05 UTCkariboo Hallo,
do you know how join 2 intersected areas properly with 1 common line?
mfg
12016-05-11 17:11:05 UTCwoodpeck Dear Aboudrar Said, if you edit a large number of place nodes, please explain in the changeset comment what exactly you changed and don't just write "fixing" - in this case it seems you added a "capital" tag with a numeric value to places in Morocco but you would have saved me 10...
22016-05-11 18:19:39 UTCAboudrar Said ok, i will take your remark into consideration.
12016-05-09 17:21:32 UTCwoodpeck This looks like an un-discussed an un-documented data import to me. Imports not following the [import guidelines](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), which among other things require thorough discussion and community review before going ahead, are liable to be reverted.
22016-05-09 21:26:51 UTCDilys Which part of the changeset are you concerned about? The boundary line I corrected? The inholdings I added?
12016-05-04 14:48:37 UTCwoodpeck This appears to be a data import but I cannot see any discussion on the imports list or a mention in the Wiki. Are you aware of our imports policy? Please suspend any further importing activity until this is cleared up.
22016-05-04 14:58:01 UTCSomeoneElse There definitely seem to be some problems here. Have a look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2&node=4164881809#map=19/-42.92845/147.99563 (that'll show duplicate nodes clearer than JOSM will) - number of duplicate nodes show up quite clearly. Please don't try to fix it yet t...
32016-05-05 06:19:41 UTCMulti Pass Hi, I was a bit too eager and did a bulk upload of the LGA boundaries for Tasmania, with the false assumption I could easily "live edit" afterwards. I've since made significant corrections in JOSM but can't fix my prior changesets because I have not kept track of the object IDs and many of...
42016-05-06 07:00:55 UTCMulti Pass Well I tried using JOSM reverter but now have IO Exception error messages after the first successful revert. I think I will leave things alone before I start a fire somewhere...
52016-05-09 02:41:42 UTCMulti Pass FYI I have been able to clean up the mess by manually deleting the data. I'll be more careful from now.
12016-05-04 12:34:03 UTCwoodpeck Was soll denn hieran "korrigiert" sein? Erstens heißt es auf Deutsch nicht "Brandt Straße" und "Soldaten Weg", sondern "Brandtstraße" und "Soldatenweg", und zweitens handelt es sich hierbei nicht um die tatsächlichen Namen dies...
22016-05-04 12:36:33 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 39095521 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus von MonsterStreamer revertiert, siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=591228
12016-04-14 22:15:40 UTCwoodpeck It is still not entirely clear to me what happened here. A larger number of roads seem to have been accidentally deleted by various users, among them Maissara youssouf, ali said, and zainaba med, in the course of tracing buildings. I commented on some of the problematic changesets. Since there have ...
22016-04-22 14:06:47 UTCGrillo I tried to do some cleanup (mainly JOSM validator corrections) but there's so much data that doesn't make sense so it's hard to know which is correct and which is bogus and should be deleted.

Most area=yes are probably building=yes but almost all of them need to be adjusted...
12016-04-14 22:11:33 UTCwoodpeck You have deleted a couple of important roads in this changeset, which I reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38570274 - please be careful with the delete button!
12016-04-14 22:10:48 UTCwoodpeck You have deleted a couple of important roads in this changeset, which I reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38570274 - please be careful with the delete button!
12016-04-14 22:09:51 UTCwoodpeck Subsequent edits by other users have broken some of the roads on the Comores and I have tried to repair that in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38570274. It appears that you joined several roads in this changeset, and I fear I have reset things to a situation before your join. Could you check...
12016-04-14 22:07:10 UTCwoodpeck You have deleted a couple of important roads in this changeset, which I reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38570274 - please be careful with the delete button!
12016-04-04 23:31:27 UTCwoodpeck Bitte vor künftigen Namensänderungen von Städten oder Gemeinden einen Konsens entweder auf der talk-de-Liste oder im deutschen OSM-Forum suchen.
22016-04-10 10:16:06 UTCJ budissin Es gibt einen Konsens im deutschen OSM-Forum.
32016-04-10 17:06:19 UTCwoodpeck Dass Du meinen Kommentar ignoriert und den Namen in Changeset 38447189 wieder geändert hast, ist dreist. In http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31599 kann ich keinen Konsens erkennen, im Gegenteil, es gibt (neben Verständnis für Deine Sache) auch viele Gegenargumente. Die ...
42016-04-10 17:18:40 UTCwoodpeck http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=587758#p587758 neuer Thread hier
52016-07-14 13:41:42 UTCdieterdreist Es gilt im Zweifel die vor-Ort-Regel: das, was gebräuchlich ist, kommt in den name-tag. Die gesetzliche Lage sollte man nicht komplett ignorieren, es hat schon seinen Grund, warum dort neben deutsch auch sorbisch Amtssprache ist und die Beschilderung auch in sorbisch erfolgt.
62016-07-14 16:01:38 UTCJ budissin Danke. Sh. dazu auch den Diskussionsstand Mitte Mai im oben verlinkten Thread und die daraufhin gefundene Formel hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Germany
72016-07-14 16:33:41 UTCdieterdreist danke für den Link, das war mir in dem Thread entgangen, dass die Lösung gefunden wurde (ist gleich wie auch in anderen multilingualen Gegenden, z.B. Belgien, Südtirol)
12016-04-02 14:12:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset didn't "change" addr:country, it *added* addr:country to a number of ways and nodes. What data (or logic) did you use to derive the country a building was in, and why did you do it exactly for these objects and not others? Large-scale mechanical edits are generally frowned u...
12016-04-02 14:07:20 UTCwoodpeck Du hast in diesem Changeset einer Reihe von Straßenstücken ein "oneway=no" verpasst. Warum? Leider kann ich dem etwas nichtssagenden Changeset-Kommentar "Änderungen" nicht entnehmen, was die Motivation dahinter war. Es wäre super gewesen, wenn Du geschrieben ...
12016-03-30 20:19:25 UTCwoodpeck Why have you deleted the landuse=grass tag from this way and left a tag-less way in OSM?
12016-03-30 20:18:51 UTCwoodpeck Why have you re-uploaded an identical copy of this way with no changes?
12016-03-30 20:18:12 UTCwoodpeck Why have you deleted the leisure=park tag from this way?
22016-04-04 22:35:17 UTCPolarbear Noticed that problem as well, see here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35376684 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34250891

That seems to come from a specific website, that asks users to check OSM data against aerial imagery, and to either confirm or remove green feature tags: http...
32016-04-04 22:49:10 UTCPolarbear See also http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=562219#p562219
12016-03-30 20:00:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38179604 where the changeset comment is:
22016-03-30 20:05:40 UTCwoodpeck Hallo klein-schloti, ich musste Dein Changeset leider revertieren. Privatwege dürfen nicht einfach aus OSM gelöscht werden - das hat auch wenig Sinn, jemand anders wird sie kurz drauf wieder eintragen. Stattdessen markiere sie mit "access=private", dann erscheinen sie auf der Kar...
32016-03-30 20:35:42 UTCklein-schloti Das ist ja interessant, dass hier jeder Gartenweg kartiert wird.
Wenn auf dieser Plattform privates nicht respektiert wird, fühle ich mich gezwungen, andere Wege zu gehen.
Frage mich sowieso wie der "Weg" in ihr System gekommen ist.
Dieser Bereich ist privat und nicht öffentli...
12016-03-30 19:59:09 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, Dir ist ein kleiner Fehler bei Deinen Beiträgen zu OSM unterlaufen: Du hast 14 Punkte eingezeichnet, ohne aber anzugeben, worum es sich handelt. Die Punkte sind nun zwar drin in OSM, aber keiner weiss, was sie darstellen sollen! Du musst im ID-Editor im Drop-Down irgendwas auswählen...
12016-03-28 22:51:57 UTCwoodpeck Hallo wischmat, bitte unterlasse unbedingt die großflächigen Löschungen von Deiner Ansicht nach unnötigen Tags. An vielen Stellen stehst Du nun als letzter Bearbeiter einer Relation da, die durchaus auch andere Probleme und andere unnötige Tags haben könnte, aber das i...
22016-03-30 21:11:52 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38179313 where the changeset comment is: reverted mechanical edits made by newly-created user wischmat after complaints in German forum, and after wischmat neglected to explain himself there. See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic....
12016-03-28 22:46:20 UTCwoodpeck Hm, ein "shop" ist es eigentlich nur, wenn da auch Laufkundschaft hinkommen kann - hier sieht es mehr so aus, als ob jemand aus dem Wohnzimmer Wein verkauft? Ausserdem ist möglicherweise die Hausnummer falsch - am Haus steht die 47, am Node die 147?
12016-03-28 22:33:26 UTCwoodpeck Hallo 19Schmiddi90, willkommen bei OSM und Danke für Deine Beiträge! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du Deine Änderungen alle nur mit "Details verbessert" kommentierst. Das ist sicherlich zutreffend, aber es trifft auf die allermeisten Edits in OSM zu - es wäre schon super, w...
12016-03-27 22:27:36 UTCWynndale Keep up the good work. This sort of edit is absolutely the sort of knowledge base that we are trying to build.
22016-03-28 10:44:25 UTCmavl Hello, dear contributors.
Do you think that Russian traffic sign has Japanese name? [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2958972984/history]
32016-03-28 15:59:07 UTCDeanna Earley FYI, we don't put transliterated names into osm.
Names in other languages should only ever be entered if that object is truly known by that name, in that language.
Please see this page for more details: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration
Deanna, DWG.
42016-03-28 21:16:42 UTCWynndale The idea of special restrictions on any sort of multiple-language names was comprehensively rubbished on the mailing list last year. http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Can-wikidata-links-help-fight-name-inflation-td5846168.html Unfortunately the wiki hasn’t caught up until now.
52016-03-28 22:20:06 UTCDeanna Earley As had been said by other members of the DWG, osm is not the place to store transliterations.
A name should only ever be added to osm, if that place actually has that name.
If you want a local transliteration, then the data user can do that itself.
Do not make up translated data just because i...
62016-03-28 22:22:42 UTCSomeoneElse @Wynndale It wasn't "comprehensively rubbished" - for example, there's been no good answer to "How do we tell real names in use in a place from translations" and "It's not a
reasonable request to ask OSM to store up to 7,000 variants against
45,000,000 names, when most o...
72016-03-28 22:23:23 UTCwoodpeck ... and on the rare occasions where you haven't actually observed a sign that carried the name you're adding, please specify your source so that it may be verified.
82016-03-31 13:24:35 UTCetajin Japanese names are mainly from Wikipedia:ja, For example, name:ja "ヴォログダ" for the name "Вологда" is based on https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%B4%E3%82%A9%E3%83%AD%E3%82%B0%E3%83%80
If a POI has the name "Вологда", Japanese will call it "...
92016-03-31 13:48:49 UTCDeanna Earley etajin: But it's never going to be labelled (on the ground) as "ヴォログダ", therefore it shouldn't really be tagged as such. The place node/relation maybe, but nothing else.
12016-03-27 14:33:19 UTCJo Cassel Ein Bot, dumm wie Bohnstroh
22016-03-27 16:16:16 UTCNakaner Jo Cassel, kannst du das bitte genauer begründen? Eine frühere Version des Bots (ist schon ein paar Jahre her) hatte die Erlaubnis, in OSM zu editieren.
32016-03-27 19:53:42 UTCJo Cassel Hallo Nakanar!
Hat der Bot auch damals schon versucht Hausnummern zu generieren, davon lese ich nämlich nichts in der Bot-Bearbeitungs-Beschreibung.
Ich geb ja zu, dass mir bewusst war, dass mein addr-Tagging von Straßenbäumen problematisch war, aber sinnvolle Alternativen konnte m...
42016-03-27 20:19:24 UTCNakaner Danke für deine Beschreibung. Damit deine Argumentation nachvollziehbar wird, wäre es nett, wenn du auf die Objekte https://www.openstreetmap.org/(node|way|relation)/ID/history verlinken würdest.

Wenn der Bot solche Sachen macht, wäre ein Revert überlegenswert. (auß...
52016-03-27 20:31:12 UTCwoodpeck Bitte ein Beispiel zeigen, an dem der Bot Unsinn gemacht hat, OHNE dass vorher bereits Unsinn herrschte.
62016-03-27 20:38:55 UTCwoodpeck An xybot, bitte darauf achten, dass der Bot nur die Dinge macht, die auch im Wiki dokumentiert sind, und wenn Du das ausweiten willst, bitte vorher dokumentieren. Im Wiki sehe ich nichts von automatischer Hausnummer-Erkennung.
12016-03-26 00:09:41 UTCwoodpeck Hallo buffelei, willkommen und danke für Deine Beiträge! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du als Änderungskommentar immer "Update" oder "Ergänzungen" angibst. Das ist natürlich nicht ganz im Sinne des Erfinders - schliesslich ist fast jeder Beitrag zu OSM ein Up...
22016-03-26 09:21:20 UTCbuffelei Hallo woodpeck, danke für Deinen Tipp. Mir war der Sinn und Zweck des Kommentars nicht ganz klar, deshalb habe ich als Standartkommentar "Update" genommen. Werde das in Zukunft dann etwas konkretisieren, so dass man das dann besser nachvollziehen kann :)
12016-03-25 09:52:59 UTCwoodpeck Hallo He1mi, willommen und danke für Deine Beiträge! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du an einigen Stellen "oneway=no" eingetragen hast. Normalerweise lassen wir Angaben zur Einbahn-Eigenschaft weg, wenn es sich nicht um eine Einbahnstraße handelt (sonst müssten wir 99% alle...
22016-03-25 10:04:03 UTCHe1mi Hallo woodpeck!
Danke für Deine Hilfestellungen. Einbahnstraßen lasse ich dann mal weg.
Ich habe ein paar Straßen von "track" auf "unclassified" hochgestuft. M.E. handelt es sich bei diesen mehr um kleinste Verbindungsstraßen als um Feldwege. Ich bin hier...
32016-03-25 10:17:20 UTCwoodpeck Nee, war mein Versehen, ich habe "service" geschrieben, meinte aber "unclassified". In beiden Fällen kannst Du tracktype weglassen, weil man sowohl bei service als auch bei unclassified eine asphaltierte Oberfläche annimmt (wenn nix anderes dasteht). Von meinem Mapper-B...
12016-03-25 10:12:30 UTCwoodpeck Willkommen und danke für Deine Beiträge! An zwei Stellen hast Du einen Straßennamen entfernt und stattdessen eine Nummer hingeschrieben ("ERH 24", "FO 12"). Das machen wir nicht - die Nummer gehört in das "ref"-Tag, nicht in den Namen. Wenn die Stra...
12016-03-25 10:04:24 UTCwoodpeck Hallo joeschbali, willkommen und Danke für Deine Beiträge! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du den "Änderungskommentar" im Editor beim Speichern immer leer lässt. Das erschwert es anderen, Deine Änderungen anzuschauen. Gerade, wenn Du neu bist, ist es eine gute Angewohnhe...
22016-04-05 12:08:13 UTCjoeschbali Danke für den Hinweis, das werde ich beim nächsten mal gerne beachten.
12016-03-25 10:02:16 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Theo88, willkommen und Danke für Deine Beiträge! Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du den "Änderungskommentar" im Editor beim Speichern immer leer lässt. Das erschwert es anderen, Deine Änderungen anzuschauen. Gerade, wenn Du neu bist, ist es eine gute Angewohnheit, ...
12016-03-23 19:53:44 UTCwoodpeck Lieber Uwarius! Danke für Deine Beiträge. Allerdings ist es nur beschränkt nützlich, wenn Du wie hier einen Punkt mit einem Namen setzt - Du musst im Editor schon auch auswählen, dass es eine Bushaltestelle ist, erst dann erscheint das richtige Symbol auf der Karte!
22016-03-24 16:19:44 UTCUwarius im editor habe ich aber nicht symbol Haltestelle gefunden,kannst du den link mailen - Habe sogar versucht die falsche Position einer anderen Haltstelle Namens Dorfaue in der Zossener Str auf die richtige fast in der Mitte der Dorfaue zu verschieben . Löschen konnte ich das symbol auch nicht, ...
32016-03-24 16:32:40 UTCwoodpeck Ich habe mich eingeloggt im Editor und auf die Haltestelle geklickt. Dann stand oben links "Punkt" im Drop-Down. Da hab ich draufgeklickt und "Haltes" geschrieben, dann hat sich unten schon eine Liste mit Möglichkeiten aufgebaut, eine davon war "Bushaltestelle", da...
12016-03-22 23:44:26 UTCwoodpeck This looks like an undiscussed import. I can't find anything about this on the Wiki; many objects have strange, unusual tags ("gm_type"), and it is unclear if "Hargeisa District map" is a legal source! There are a couple other similar changesets nearby. I fear that it will be nec...
12016-03-22 19:46:50 UTCwoodpeck Hallo DrahtlosDSL, was ist mit diesem Punkt gemeint, der den Namen "WDSL" trägt und sonst keine Eigenschaften hat?
12016-03-22 19:42:34 UTCwoodpeck Auf dem Bing-Luftbild ist ein großer Teil des hier von Dir gelöschten Weges deutlich zu erkennen. Ist hier inzwischen (seitdem das Bild entstanden ist) eine bauliche Veränderung eingetreten? -- Falls der Weg existiert, aber nicht nutzbar ist, dann solltest Du dafür ein access=pr...
12016-03-21 22:00:13 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Christian, willkommen bei OSM und danke für Deine Beiträge! An einer Kleinigkeit muss ich allerdings herummäkeln: Segelflugplatzrunden sind in OpenStreetMap nicht erwünscht.Auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aviation findest Du mehr Informationen zum Thema.
12016-03-19 20:41:00 UTCwambacher boundary=landarea is "dead". there is no reason for that. and it is not used any more.

for island in the see, the coastline is the admin-boundary for all admin_levels > 4

please revert your changes otherwise i have to talk to the dwg.

walter
22016-03-19 20:42:26 UTCwambacher and please: you should discuss changes on admin boundaries before you change them.
32016-03-19 22:31:10 UTCVerdy_p No: the islands that were present are in false "motus" and not really the islands.
They are not even the adminsitrative boundaries (that were not tagged at all before, because the only thing that was present was the international boundary of France and there was nothing about communes, co...
42016-03-19 22:35:13 UTCVerdy_p Note: boundaries for landareas are not dead, especially not in France.
There are still lot of work to do in French Polynesia, but nothing was removed.
In a later update I'll take into account the "baselines" for communes, but for now the islands are the not the administrative "bound...
52016-03-19 22:38:20 UTCVerdy_p Also, your threat of dwg is unfair. the current boundaries of "islands" are very approximative (these are only "motus") and none of them are the "baseline" which is the adminstrative boundary for *local collectivities* (but not for the prefectoral administration of Fran...
62016-03-20 17:06:08 UTCwoodpeck Why were over 4000 ways and 49000 nodes touched in an edit that supposedly only fixes a few boundaries? Was this a mistake?
72016-03-21 08:11:00 UTCVerdy_p it started locally (in the Kerguelen islands where most of the nodes and ways are located), then there were many affected dependant relations, I checked many of them and found some of them were broken locally and I fixed them, there was also several edit conflicts on them and to solve them I had to ...
82016-03-21 08:11:28 UTCVerdy_p Note: this is discussed on the French OSM talk list.
12016-03-20 17:01:39 UTCwoodpeck Hallo ironbiff, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und danke für Deine Beiträge. -- Bedenke allerdings bei künftigen Edits, dass die Darstellung, die Du auf www.openstreetmap.org siehst, nur eine von vielen möglichen Darstellungen ist; nur weil hier zufällig - aufgrund der Wahl vo...
12016-03-20 08:26:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37951282 where the changeset comment is:
22016-03-20 08:38:09 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz, den Du "Test" betitelt hast, ein Waldstück in Dresden gelöscht. Das habe ich wiederhergestellt.
12016-03-18 06:50:30 UTCwoodpeck Dear dbusse, could you explain what your workflow was in this changeset? It appears that you have touched a large number of totally fictional roads added by use elijose, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370735050 - you cannot possibly have verified that with aerial imagery?
22016-03-18 07:15:30 UTCwoodpeck On closer inspection, you have even added new totally fictional roads like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403435390 - I find this very concerning since you are a prolific editor. Please explain how this has happened, and how we can identify other changesets added by you that also contain fi...
32016-03-18 16:49:08 UTCdbusse Hi woodpeck,

tried to check what i did.
Looks like i tried to make something completely wrong, "less wrong".
I assumed some good faith in the data (as local knowledge or something mysterious...) and tried to fix missing intersections, overlaps, self intersecting highways, ...
In doi...
12016-03-16 19:22:11 UTCwoodpeck This change is not acceptable. OSM maps countries as they call itself, not as others call them.
22016-03-16 19:23:52 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37880871 where the changeset comment is:
12016-03-09 04:05:33 UTCd1g Hello!

I plan to re-add Equator and Modern prime meridian, because there were never agreement on "constructed geometries" in the past.

Personally, I don't think that this is THAT important.

Similar objects in the past include

name=Geographic South Pole
-90,0, 0,0
http://www.o...
22016-03-09 06:41:23 UTCwoodpeck Please don't add constructed geometries to OSM. They will be removed and, if you continue to disregard this rule, your account will be blocked.
32016-03-09 09:37:26 UTCd1g > They will be removed


> disregard this rule
This isn't OSM rule. There no community agreement on this.

You clearly disrespect all discussions about this topic.

And repeating very same statement about "constructed geometries" without any proofs or explanation where or wh...
42016-03-09 10:41:14 UTCd1g Hello again!

Please, explain your concerns why Anti-meredian should be in OSM(http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3237094) , but Prime meridian isn't?

Russian speaking users would like to hear your point, if you have any.

ATM, we don't have good explanation to enter only one half and not ...
52016-03-09 10:47:24 UTCwoodpeck You are right, the Anti-Meridian is similarly constructed and hence I have removed it. Because of the limitations of our software, those parts of the A.M. that intersect administrative boundaries had to remain.
62016-03-09 10:57:24 UTCd1g Excuse me,
> is similarly constructed

but it makes no sense for South pole:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2480805007/history

Wikipedia says:
The geographic coordinates of the South Pole are usually given simply as 90°S, since its longitude is geometrically undefined and irrel...
12016-03-07 08:28:45 UTCmalcolmh OSM have requested that depth data should not be put into their DB. Depths may be added to sunken objects, but not isolated spot depth soundings or depth contours. Therefore please delete these nodes.
22016-03-08 16:28:57 UTCkallekaden Hi malcolmh,
excuse, I am German and have not possibly understood properly. is there to your request closer information?
32016-03-08 22:42:48 UTCwoodpeck Meerestiefen als Punktdaten mappen wir eigentlich nicht - wir mappen es, wenn irgendwo ein Wrack auf 123 Meter Tiefe liegt, aber nicht, wie tief das Wasser an einer beliebigen Stelle ist.
42016-03-11 10:32:56 UTCkallekaden hi woodpeck,
eine beliebige Stelle ist das nicht. Die Punkte kennzeichnen ein natürliches Fahrwasser, welches alljährlich von ca. 100 Seglern benutzt wird. Viele davon landen dabei auf den umliegenden Sandbänken.
12016-03-03 17:53:17 UTCd1g +1, we need more links to external data-sources such as Wikipedia and Wikidata
22016-03-03 19:13:21 UTCВладимир К Почему бы тогда не занести все меридианы? и вообще всю координатную сетку? Что вы делаете вообще? Вы понимаете, что это мусор в базе?
32016-03-03 21:15:13 UTCd1g Не мусор, отмечается тег Wikidata.

Да, можно внести хоть все меридианы.
42016-03-04 20:32:30 UTCwoodpeck I will revert this changeset again. I am doing so in my role as a member of OSMF's data working group. Please don't add constructed geometries to OSM or I will have to block your account.
52016-03-04 20:34:01 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37616244 where the changeset comment is: revert constructed geometries.
62016-03-09 03:57:30 UTCd1g As member of DWG group, woodpeck should wait until community consensus on topic will be settled or discussed well enough.

Instead, woodpeck immediately reverted changeset without ANY new arguments and also threatened a user with ban.

The only argument woodpeck used is "revert constructed ...
12016-02-21 22:47:04 UTCwoodpeck Hallo geofoxx, Du scheinst eine Menge Details in Wales einzutragen, möglicherweise mit Ortskenntnis von einem kürzlichen Urlaub oder so etwas. Ich sehe, dass einige Mapper vor Ort Dich deswegen angeschrieben haben (weil sie gern sicher stellen möchten, dass alles mit rechten Dingen zu...
12016-02-13 21:41:52 UTCwoodpeck Der deutsche Name von Kaliningrad ist "Kaliningrad" und nicht "Königsberg", ich habe das bereits in einer längeren Diskussion mit dem User "Fritz18" erklärt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36328757

Bitte ausserdem "source=Atlas" pr&a...
12016-02-04 00:21:12 UTCwoodpeck This reverst Hong Kong highway type changes and several other problems as reported to DWG by jc86035. Note, some objects outside the Hong Kong region were accidentally modified by this changeset and then changed back again.
12016-02-01 04:33:16 UTCjc86035 Please stop retagging trunk roads as highway=motorway. If a road doesn't have the green highway signs then it should be tagged as highway=trunk (or highway=trunk_link for ramps/slip roads and Penny's Bay Highway), and if it doesn't have a route number then it should be tagged as highway=primary (exc...
22016-02-02 08:58:41 UTC00crashtest A road need not have green signs or government designation to be a motorway. Look at these links, they call Gloucester Road a motorway, which I do agree.
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/world/rush-for-cash-after-van-spills-banknotes-on-hong-kong-motorway-6211539

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/worl...
32016-02-02 09:21:42 UTCjc86035 see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36839404
42016-02-03 22:27:05 UTCwoodpeck I will revert these changes later today. 00crashtest, your contribution is welcome but when you make edits of such scale, don't just do them without discussing it with the community first (through the talk list or another, more local, forum).
12016-02-01 04:50:48 UTCjc86035 Please don't re-tag trunk routes not classified as highways (i.e. with green signs), or not in tunnel areas, as motorways (highway=motorway). These roads should be tagged as trunk roads (highway=trunk).
22016-02-01 16:45:17 UTCWest Lake Apologies. I was assuming because they met all criteria for motorways they should be upgraded for routing consistency as well as rendering consistency. Is there a resource you use to verify which roads are trunk vs. motorway? (i.e. list of route names/classifications)

Thanks
-W
32016-02-02 06:40:52 UTCjc86035 OSM Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HK:Hong_Kong_tagging#.E8.A1.97.E9.81.93.E5.88.86.E9.A1.9E_Classifications_of_streets

Generally, expressways in Hong Kong are distinguished by green destination signs and kilometre markings. Most of them are part of the route system, but two (Penn...
42016-02-02 13:17:45 UTCjc86035 FYI the reason the situation currently looks so inconsistent is because user 00crashtest, for some reason, decided without any community discussion whatsoever to tag every road without an at-grade intersection as highway=motorway. I have asked data@openstreetmap.org to revert this change, per https:...
52016-02-03 22:24:44 UTCwoodpeck I'll attempt to fix this later today.
12016-01-30 15:31:27 UTCwoodpeck Dear Sabeeh Sabir Baz, your import does not comply with our import rules (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines). The source and license are unclear, and previous discussion has not happened. There are technical issues with your import (importing lots of nodes first, and matching ...
12016-01-27 08:11:19 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, was genau meinst Du mit "Nein und nochmals nein" im Changeset-Kommentar? Ist das die Antwort auf die Frage, ob Deine Edits einen Sinn haben ;) welchen Sinn verfolgst Du beispielsweise mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393920402, wo Du einen "admin_level" aber kein &quo...
22016-01-27 10:40:01 UTCwambacher ach ja, deine "Aktivitäten" werden bereits im Forum diskutiert: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53463

es sieht danach aus, dass deine Edits (von "euren" brauch ich ja wohl nicht reden) demnächst komplett revertet (gelöscht) werden könnten. ...
32016-02-04 17:26:33 UTCNakaner This and all other changesets of user bope have been completely reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37002859
12016-01-14 21:10:56 UTCtkedt Dear Frederik,
your changeset left 69 villages in Poland (plus possibly other places that I do not monitor) without the "name" attribute. Here is an example: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=692620929.
Please repair this asap. Thank you.
22016-01-14 21:27:29 UTCwoodpeck Hi tkedt, indeed I see my script had a bug and was a bit over-zealous in places. I am working on a fix.
32016-01-14 21:49:50 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset accidentally deleted some perfectly ok tags from 100 objects, and these were reinstated in 36581272
42016-01-15 07:32:03 UTCtkedt Thank you for the quick fix. Nevertheless, two villages are still affected: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=373901512, http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=359947037
12015-09-29 13:49:38 UTCPolarbear Der historische deutsche Name ist bereits in "old_name:de" beschrieben. Warum versuchst du den aktuellen deutschen Namen in "name:de" auf den historischen Wert zu setzen? (Bsp. Kaliningrad https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27048976 , Mamonwo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/60...
22015-09-29 20:30:01 UTCFritz18 Weil die offizielle deutsche Bezeichnung für die russische Stadt Kaliningrad eben bis heute Königsberg lautet und daher der mehrsprachige Name auf Deutsch Königsberg lautet. Hier ist er nicht nur irgendein historischer Name, genauso wenig wie Mailand, Florenz oder Prag für die S...
32015-09-30 23:45:59 UTCPolarbear Was ist die Quelle der besagten heutigen "offiziellen deutschen Bezeichnung"?

Die Beispiele der anderen genannten Städte passen nicht, da es Eindeutschungen des originalsprachlichen Namens sind, und keine Ergebnisse von Umbenennungen.
42015-10-01 07:22:04 UTCFritz18 In den öffentlich-rechtlichen Fernseh- und Radiosendern werden grundsätzlich die amtlichen Namen für im Ausland gelegene Orte und Länder verwendet. In der Tagesschau werden Sie niemals Wroclaw, Gdansk oder Szczecin in Kartendarstellungen der Nachrichtensendungen lesen oder von Sp...
52016-01-12 13:33:28 UTCwoodpeck Die offizielle deutsche Bezeichnung für die Stadt Kaliningrad ist Kaliningrad und nicht Königsberg. Das ist bei Gdansk anders, das heisst tatsächlich heute noch auf Deutsch Danzig. (Ebenso bei Wroclaw oder Szczecin.) Daher darf Gdansk auch ein name:de=Danzig haben, Kaliningrad muss si...
62016-01-13 08:14:06 UTCFritz18 Hallo!
Die Kritik an der Nutzung des „tag“ „name:de“ ist unbegründet.

Königsberg ist der offizielle deutsche Name der seit 1945 zu Russland gehörenden Stadt und eben nicht lediglich ein historischer Name. Deshalb ist diese Stadt – sowie im Übrig...
72016-01-13 09:26:02 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Fritz18, es ist mir egal, ob Du meine Begründung akzeptierst oder nicht; Du wirst Dich daran halten müssen oder Dir ein anderes Betätigungsfeld suchen. Ich wiederhole: "name:de" an Straßen nur, wenn vor Ort Schilder sind, und "name:de" an Städten n...
82016-01-13 19:45:04 UTCgeow Hallo Fritz18,
name:de=* hat nicht die Funktion deutschsprachigen Touristen im Ausland die Orientierung zu erleichtern, insbesondere nicht in Staaten, die vom Nazi-Regime überfallen wurden.
92016-01-13 23:32:01 UTCwoodpeck_repair Edits in this changeset have partly been reverted or modified in 36561697 after complaints to DWG.
102016-01-17 23:47:16 UTCFritz18 1.
Wo kann man diese (wann durch wen getroffene? )Regelung für die OSM-Karten zu den mehrsprachigen Straßenbezeichnungen nachlesen. Wo kann man die damalige Diskussion einsehen, so dass man die vorgebrachten Argumente für diese Entscheidung in Erfahrung bringen kann?

Die Ihnen g...
12016-01-12 18:37:15 UTCElliottPlack some of these, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/227128783 seem to be part of ways that don't need to be deleted. Any chance for a partial revert?
22016-01-12 19:56:12 UTCwoodpeck Don't understand - the changeset did not delete any ways, just removed some tags from nodes. The node you pointed out seems to have been part of a way that was deleted 7 months ago in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21117928/history
12016-01-12 13:16:12 UTCwoodpeck Lieber Fritz18, bitte verwende das "name:de"-Tag ausschliesslich für noch heute gültige Namen. Kaliningrad heißt seit 1946 auf Deutsch "Kaliningrad" und nicht "Königsberg". Wenn Du den alten Namen aufzeichnen willst, benutze dafür "old_nam...
22016-01-12 13:27:44 UTCPolarbear Wir hatten das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34066712 bereits kommentiert, du hast den name:de-Wert hier schon mehrfach umgesetzt.
32016-01-13 08:11:35 UTCFritz18 Hallo!

1.
Ihre Kritik an der Nutzung des „tag“ „name:de“ ist unbegründet.

Königsberg ist der offizielle deutsche Name der seit 1945 zu Russland gehörenden Stadt und eben nicht lediglich ein historischer Name. Deshalb ist diese Stadt – sowie im &Uu...
42016-01-13 11:59:43 UTCPolarbear Das Auswärtige Amt der BRD unterhält ein Generalkonsulat in Kaliningrad
http://www.germania.diplo.de/Vertretung/russland/de/04-kali/0-gk.html und http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/332372/publicationFile/212292/DtAuslandsvertretungenListe.pdf .

Du vermischst in dein...
52016-01-13 23:32:13 UTCwoodpeck_repair Edits in this changeset have partly been reverted or modified in 36561697 after complaints to DWG.
12016-01-11 22:06:05 UTCwoodpeck Dear testerx1, I am writing in my capacity as a member of OSMF's Data Working Group. It is against OSM's rules to delete correct information. That this information pertains to objects in military or restricted areas is not reason enough to delete them. Please do not perform such deletions in the pas...
12016-01-06 16:55:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36407926 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed mechanical edit
22016-01-06 17:00:27 UTCwoodpeck Please stop making these types of edits. "Gardening" is ok as long as you actually look at the individual objects you're editing. Loading a large number of objects through Taginfo/Overpass and mass-changing one property is not ok. A number of objects changed in this changeset have tags tha...
12015-12-27 16:46:20 UTCArlas Solo nodi cancellati senza motivo
22016-01-03 11:17:32 UTCwoodpeck Dear user "select", could you please explain why you deleted these nodes? Are you the same person as "gnuckx"?
32016-01-05 12:40:09 UTCgnuckx which nodes exactly?
42016-01-05 16:45:45 UTCwoodpeck There were 93 nodes deleted in this changeset and the comment given - "trace" - is insufficient to explain. Data Working Group has received a complaint about this and other deletions performed by you and user "select", and we're considering to revert all your edits made with mean...
52016-01-05 16:52:29 UTCgnuckx the garbage dumpers in the city are illegal as of eu law and they are being removed by the catania city hall by implementing a door to door garbage collect system. moreover it is totally disproportionate to put 5 6 or 7 dumpers in the collecting same point for every single dumper in OSM. it is total...
62016-01-05 18:27:51 UTCArlas 1) "overbloating" is not this case where object are mapped by people that follows osm wiki rules
2) openstreetmap is not a simple "map" of things that you wish in and wish not. It's a more complex geodatabase. If someone puts data inside, that's useful data. Moreover if someone ...
72016-01-06 00:43:46 UTCwoodpeck gnuckx, you have used the changeset comment "trace" instead of, what now seems more appropriate, "deleting garbage dumpers because they will be removed". Why? Also, in this changeset you deleted other things for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2431432250 - why? -- As a ...
12016-01-03 11:12:04 UTCwoodpeck What is going on here? You are deleting 56 nodes and the changeset comment is "shelter"? What does that mean? Is it a mistake?
12015-12-26 09:23:48 UTCNakaner Schön, dass du einen Editwar anfängst. Aber der von mir revertierte Änderungssatz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36163944) war in Teilen einfaches mechanisches Umtaggen. Hättest du die von dir bearbeiteten Objekte genauer angesehen, wären dir syntaktisch falsche Te...
22015-12-27 17:22:56 UTCatpl_pilot Und wenn Du Dich mit meinem Änderungssätzen in den letzten Tagen beschäftigt hättest, dann hättest Du erkennen müssen, das ich systematisch gemäß DPAG und berlinadd.morbz.de alle Adressen berichtige. Wenn hierbei - und wenn auch auch nur Teile eines Edits sin...
32015-12-27 19:24:25 UTCwoodpeck Ein mechenischer Edit liegt dann vor, wenn jemand im Blindflug das Tag A gegen das vermeintlich richtigere Tag B austauscht, ohne auf den Einzelfall zu achten. Solche Edits sind unerwünscht bzw. erfordern vorherige Diskussion. Deine hier vorgenommene Änderung, atpl_pilot, ist *offensichtli...
42016-01-02 14:30:39 UTCatpl_pilot Das wäre dann der Fall, wenn ich umtaggen würde und mich dann nicht mehr weiter um diese Daten kümmern würde. Das tue ich jedoch nicht. Ich gehe gans systematisch eine Adresse nach der anderen durch und kontrolliere die Angaben. Es macht nur wenig Sinn, ständig "contact...
12015-12-09 08:40:10 UTCwoodpeck This footway is not really visible on aerial imagery. Are you sure that there is a footway there, and is it publicly accessible or perhaps just a private path? We had a complaint at DWG saying that using this footway would amount to trespassing.
12015-12-09 07:03:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset appears to have introduced a large number of geometry errors (intersecting inner rings etc.), for example ways 329019306 and 329019257. I was looking at repairing it but it seems a lot of work cleaning up after broken software ;( i wonder if I should just revert the changeset.
22015-12-09 12:48:31 UTCVort There is no need to revert this change. I have fixed most of the problems for this lake.
32015-12-09 16:00:07 UTCmalenki Thank you for finding and fixing the issues.
I am sorry to have caused that work. It seems in one of my last uploads in this region I wasn't as careful as I use to be. Due to the lack of time I haven't continued my work on Lake Nasser and so failed to see the introduced issues myself.
12015-12-06 18:59:25 UTCwoodpeck Bitte unterlasse die (hier noch dazu völlig sachfremde) Herabwürdigung anderer Nutzer ("Spezialist aus Dresden").
12015-11-28 09:51:41 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you have moved hundreds of trees. Was that intentional?
22015-11-28 09:52:56 UTCwoodpeck Ah sorry, I see it now - not moved but re-tagged.
12015-11-12 08:00:34 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Oderplantscher, hast Du von Netto eine Genehmigung zum Abschreiben von Daten von deren Webseite, oder steht auf der Webseite ausdrücklich, dass die Weiterverwendung der Daten erlaubt ist? Ansonsten gilt nämlich - selbst dann, wenn die Seite öffentlich abrufbar ist - das Datenban...
22015-11-12 09:12:04 UTCoderplantscher Die Daten wurden nicht abgeschrieben, sondern es wurde nur geprüft, ob es sich um den "roten" oder den "schwarzen" Netto handelt und der jeweilige Betreiber eingetragen und die dazugehörige Internetseite einetragen. Die Punkte bzw. Gebäude stammen aus OSM. Die erg&...
32015-11-12 10:58:51 UTCwoodpeck Hm, woher kommt dann z.B. im Way 39353090 die Info, dass es sich um die Hausnummer 31a handelt? Das war ja OSM nicht zu entnehmen. Woher kommen die Öffnungszeiten z.B. in Way 172830358, warst Du vor Ort in Polen, um das zu prüfen?
42015-11-12 11:23:04 UTCoderplantscher Wenn sich die genannte Internetseite ansieht, wird man von dieser die Informationen nicht bekommen. Aber vielleicht sollte ich die Datensätze rückgangig machen, umweitere Diskussionen zu vermeiden.
12015-11-12 08:15:49 UTCwoodpeck It appears unlikely that "Adam's house" is the correct name tag for this house. Should it officially have that name, then "addr:housename" instead of "name" would be suitable. Otherwise, remove the tag altogether.
12015-11-12 08:11:23 UTCwoodpeck I note that in this changeset with a description of "popul 20c x3" (what does that mean?), you have added a postal code and elevation to a town in Mexico. Where does that data come from? You are making a lot of edits across the world and it seems unlikely to me that you actually have first...
22015-11-15 13:31:01 UTCAleks-Berlin (sorry for the delay, I was in holidays.)
the source of fixing it is mainly the OSM-wiki + TagWatch (e.g. population=20,000 to 20000) and OSM database itself (is_in:iso, is_in).
I try to make OSM data easy useable (e.g. no comma , ; inside integer values, or pop=20 habitants, means no useless unit...
woodpeck has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 1035 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)