Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12018-08-19 15:39:18 UTCwoodpeck Dear germwbe, you are adding a lot of buildings with a precision that does not seem to be attainable from currently available aerial imagery. In the future, please always specify your data source when uploading data!
12018-08-19 15:31:06 UTCwoodpeck Dear user "assenizator0", it would be great if you could make it a habit to use a more descriptive changeset comment than "db assenization". Out of interest, in which language is this a word? Best I could find online was "to make something look like the (Dutch) city of Assen...
22018-08-19 16:37:31 UTCassenizator0 this is a transliterated russian-language term: "ассенизация" - comes from the french word "assainissement", which means "sanitation". because this is my main goal.

just occasionally, so to say "hooked for some place". even here, although I did a...
12018-08-18 15:08:03 UTCassenizator0 You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
22018-08-19 15:28:20 UTCwoodpeck Dear Dinamik, could you please explain why you have added the word "озеро" to the names of these lakes. It does not seem to be a part of the the proper name?

Also, please use real changeset comments (an appropriate changeset comment here would have been "change the names of В...
32018-08-20 06:04:24 UTCDinamik Dear colleagues, I’ll give a comment – sorry, if it will be a little bit short and/or not completely full. Your questions are welcome.

assenizator0, let us not to misinform them. You changed (modified or deleted) a hundreds of names waterbodies during a few days without preliminary di...
12018-08-18 09:31:49 UTCwoodpeck Wieso wurde in diesem Changeset der Fussweg 617525519 mit dem Gebäude 303185448 verknüpft?
12018-08-18 09:29:57 UTCwoodpeck Bitte unterlasse diesen aggresiven Tonfall in Changeset-Kommentaren. Was Du hier gelöscht hast, war kein "Migrolino", sondern ein Objekt, das mit "disused:shop" getaggt war - es stand also schon da, dass es sich hier um etwas handelt, das mal ein shop *war*.
22018-08-18 12:44:11 UTCeagleeye_zh Seit wann erfasst man Objekte auf OSM die mal dort waren?
12018-08-16 09:45:55 UTCwoodpeck Hello clairedelune, as you likely know we have some rules regarding data imports, including that a proposed import and the methodology should be discussed with the community before it is executed. The un-verified import of computer generated geometries is generally not welcome. Can you explain the &...
22018-08-16 14:01:21 UTCPierZen @woodpeck What's make you think that way 614459980 do not express reality? This landuse polygon corresponds to a certain density of houses in the area while less dense areas are ignored. I revised all polygons and they all correspond to housing.

clairdelune is doing a great job in RDC coordinat...
32018-08-16 14:38:47 UTCwoodpeck PierZen, I have looked at the way in an editor showing imagery, and I could immediately identify some equally dense housing extending past the area, so the creation of the area is totally arbitrary. For this one way alone, I can spot quite a few houses where it is totally illogical that the area was...
42018-08-16 15:14:02 UTCPierZen *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
52018-08-16 16:56:49 UTCRobJN Broadly speaking that way looks ok. A couple small bits on the east that you might change, and you would probably draw it differently of the roads were in place first, but as a first pass it seems ok to me. I think we just need to be clear to any future "on the ground mappers" that they ca...
12018-08-13 23:15:51 UTCwoodpeck Dear spietsnaz, I am increasingly skeptical of your adding of "Italian" names. In this changeset you added the name "Vecchia strada carreggiabile Hilbe" but it seems to me that this exists only in your imagination. You seem to have translated the German name to Italian, but that ...
22018-08-14 08:58:52 UTCspietsnaz Alto Adige-Südtirol is bilingual. So I applied bilingualism. I'd like to know what are the sources in German.
For ANY changes in the future I'll list my sources, my mistake. Do you want to erase them? Do it.
You are not correct. This is Italy not Austria, got it? There are laws for the bili...
32018-08-14 13:42:00 UTCluschi @apietsnatz: you are wrong. Südtirol is not in all points bilingual!
There are places they only have German names of streets. Also there are places they use only Ladin names.
The "Geobrowser" or the GeoKatalog from the "Südtiroler Bürgernetz" are not the bes...
12018-03-11 18:08:57 UTCEssin Google Maps är upphovsrättsskyddat och får inte användas som underlag för OSM, se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data . Allt som har lagts till med Google Maps som källa måste tyvärr tas bort.
22018-08-13 22:46:49 UTCwoodpeck I have removed and redacted the contents of this changeset.
12018-08-12 09:51:34 UTCwoodpeck Some of the buildings you have mapped are not visible on the Bing aerial imagery. Can you clarify which "data file" you have loaded information from, or which other data source led you to draw e.g. this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616249837 -- also, if you are reasonably co...
12018-08-09 20:57:35 UTCwoodpeck Please do not upload plus codes to OpenStreetMap. Apart from being an undiscussed import, it does not make sense - it is as if you were to add a "lat=..., lon=..." tag to a building. The plus codes can be determined by an algorithm from the coordinates, they do not have to be stored in OSM...
22018-08-11 06:26:22 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61558473 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import adding of Plus Codes and sizes of buildings. The codes can be derived from the coordinates. The size can be derived from the building geometry. See https://lists.openstre...
32018-08-19 06:28:52 UTCMateusz Konieczny @Nakaner Thanks for reverting this pointless and undiscussed import.
12018-08-07 13:07:24 UTCDaveF Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8506033/history

Are you adding historic county boundaries from new or updating existing?
22018-08-07 14:37:38 UTCsmb1001 Hi,
I've been adding them from new as none exist at present. The result of my work thus far is
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ARB
Given it's a manual job, I have to frequently go back and "correct" sections I missed or the like, but although I frequently add the relation to existing bounda...
32018-08-07 14:56:32 UTCDaveF Hi
Where are you obtaining your historic data?

From the historic wiki page
"historic objects should not be mapped as it is outside of scope of OSM"

Boundaries are amended regularly. What is the date of your 'historic' additions. How far back in time are you planning to go?

42018-08-07 16:12:13 UTCsmb1001 In this case they are not 'historic' but current. (Now with governmental backing also: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/by-george-englands-traditional-counties-can-return-to-englands-roads ) They represent the immutable divisions of England from Saxon times until the boundary acts of the 1880s, a...
52018-08-07 17:30:53 UTCDaveF I'm struggling to comprehend 'historic' as "current".

TBH, I see your comments as self defeating. If they're "immutable" & "unaffected" over time, how come you're adding ways?

As this is a country wide endeavour has it been discussed on Talk-GB?

Which versi...
62018-08-07 18:11:17 UTCDaveF Note: You are incorrectly add identical tags to both ways & relations. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613388972
72018-08-07 21:58:54 UTCwoodpeck Historic boundaries should be added to a suitable project e.g. openhistoricalmap, not OSM. Boundaries are problematic in OSM in every case since they are rarely observable; the only reason we have county boundaries at all is that their usefulness (not least to mappers) outweighs their lack of observ...
82018-08-09 09:04:53 UTCsmb1001 (Re: adding tags to both ways and relations) Are you talking about the boundary=historic on the way? -- every admin boundary has boundary=administrative in both the way and relation. I'm fine to leave those off the way, but isn't the standard to put an indicative tag on the way so potlatch, etc make...
12018-07-24 09:48:04 UTCwoodpeck In diesem Changeset wurde der "Schiffs-Spielplatz" seiner Spielplatz-Eigenschaft beraubt, und der benachbarte Park ist nun kein Park mehr. Warum? Und was hat das mit dem Changeset-Kommentar "Geocaching" zu tun?
22018-07-25 06:27:15 UTCtux67 Wenn du mal die anderen Changesets mit gleichem Betreff durchsiehst .. fast alle haben einen destruktiven Charakter - löschen Parks oder legen neue an .. hat m.E. nichts mit Kartenverbesserungen zu tun.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.co...
32018-07-25 06:36:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61042579 where the changeset comment is: Verschlimmbesserungen revertiert, nachdem der Mapper zu Kommentaren nicht Stellung nahm
12018-07-08 21:37:37 UTCwoodpeck Hallo FranzF, beim FOSSGIS ist eine Beschwerde über die Ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117236720 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117236722 eingegangen. Angeblich endet der Weg von norden kommend an dem Haus, danach führt nur noch ein privater Feldweg auf die Wiese, und weiter...
12018-07-04 07:51:04 UTCwoodpeck Dear Зелёный Кошак, there has been a copyright complaint about the track layout of the Anetta Valley & Western Railroad. Could you explain more about your data source? If you have used copyrighted material, like a leaflet or their web site, then we have to remove the information from...
12018-06-26 11:29:41 UTCstromo This is a mechanical edit. I doubt, that you have really verified all 448 features on imagery and so reverted your changeset.
22018-06-26 16:58:28 UTCForstEK Hi, young mapper!
First, this is not a mechanical edit, but a correction of the wrong tagging scheme according to the wiki. Openstreetmap is a large geodatabase, and there are rules, they are set out in the wiki, the database must be in order, and your rollback has returned a mess. The tag man_made...
32018-06-26 21:14:52 UTCwoodpeck Hi, young mapper yourself. Please be advised that what you have done *is* a mechanical edit, whether it contains mistakes or not. Any edit where you change objects without inspecting the individual object is a mechanical edit and MUST be discussed with the relevant community beforehand (in this case...
42018-06-26 22:28:19 UTCForstEK Hi, woodpeck.
Try to understand.
Yes, I know this rule, but I repeat that the all objects in this changeset were checked by bing images in QGIS, the same could have been created in JOSM, so I do not agree about mechanical editing. Yes, you find a mistake with a chimney inside the cooling tower, bu...
52018-06-26 22:33:11 UTCdieterdreist I propose you fix the Russian translation of the wiki definition for man_made=cooling_tower
The tag is not deprecated, although there is some discussion because of the 2 alternative ways to tag them
62018-06-26 22:43:30 UTCForstEK It's deal with not a Russian or English page, but in a centralized solution. How many useless fixes! My argument is for the predominant option according to taginfo - there's less work to do to bring everything to one scheme (in the world). We have four different wiki pages now: in English, Czech, Ge...
72018-06-27 08:25:17 UTCdieterdreist According to the recent discussion, there is not a clear winner between man_made=tower with tower:type=cooling and the tag man_made=cooling_tower, they are both used in similar numbers.
If you tag these as man_made=tower you will not create more consistency (there are already other objects with &qu...
12018-06-15 07:56:08 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, ich habe diesen Editwar in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59861459 kommentiert. Würde Dich aber bitten, auch bei Meinungsverschiedenheiten mit anderen Mappern respektvoll umzugehen und bei Uneinigkeit Dritte hinzuzuziehen (Forum, Mailingliste o.ä.) statt einfach "EOT&q...
12018-06-15 07:53:21 UTCwoodpeck Es ist zu unterscheiden zwischen dem Namen eines Gebäudes und dem Namen eines Geschäfts, das das ganze Gebäude oder den Teil eines Gebäudes innehat. Die allermeisten Geschäftsgebäude haben gar keinen Namen, und dann taggt man oft sowas wie name=Migros direkt an das Geb&...
12018-06-14 04:18:02 UTCBaKaUma 你好,
在變更集內的內容並不能反映在地圖上,而我已經在先前變更集留言指出使用highway=construction的原因。
另外因應本路位於香港內,而使用zh-hant作為zh名稱。
就此本人已用郵件向OpenStreetMap官方反映,希望你可以在以社區...
22018-06-14 18:54:06 UTCwoodpeck Dear 融融 young, I wish to support BaKaUma's statement. I see the bridge is scheduled to open for vehicular traffic on July 1st, about 2 weeks from now. Please leave the "highway=construction" in place until the bridge is actually open. Thank you!
12018-06-04 21:30:55 UTCwoodpeck Are you sure that "Gardens of Memory" is a park and not a cemetery?
12018-06-04 21:29:16 UTCwoodpeck "Museum Courtyard" and "Porter Park" and "Poplar Head Park" do not look like parks to me. Are you sure? Is there an online resource that has something about these parks?
12018-06-04 21:28:07 UTCwoodpeck This does not look like a park to me. Can you point to an online resource that mentions "Downtown Park"?
12018-06-04 21:26:27 UTCwoodpeck Dear Artifactor, please stop adding leisure=park to the Dothan Area Botanical Gardens. If you believe that tagging them as "garden" is wrong, please write a comment here and explain why.
12018-04-01 20:07:27 UTCflohoff Hi Abrensch,
das war absicht das zu trennen - Ich behebe gerade ~24000 Fehler in OWL wo Flächen und Straßen verbunden wurden. Das ist ein Topologiefehler.

Flo
22018-04-01 20:29:02 UTCflohoff *** SPAM *** not displayed - visit osm.org
32018-04-01 20:30:45 UTCOF0 Das Verbinden von Wegen und Flächen ist eine anerkannte vorgehensweise.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
42018-04-01 20:45:49 UTCflohoff Ich sehe das nicht so - Und die OWL Community ebenfalls nicht. Dadurch das du als mein Stalker das immer wieder wiederholst wird das nicht richtiger.

Und zitier bitte auf was du dich beziehst. Dadurch das wir das abtrennen erhöhen wir die genauigkeit und beheben den Topologie/Lagefehler der ...
52018-04-01 21:28:23 UTCOF0 [..] Dadurch das du als mein Stalker das immer wieder wiederholst wird das nicht richtiger. [...]

Ich wirke lediglich Deiner Desinformationskampange entgegen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57314116
https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/53143994 
https://openstreetmap.org/change...
62018-04-01 21:49:56 UTCflohoff > "That being said, when the way is a highway, it usually is most
> accurate to include a gap, so that the area ends by the side of the
> road and does not share nodes with the road's way. " [...]
>
> Das Wiki sollte eigentlich die gelebte Mappingpraxis dokumentieren un...
72018-04-02 06:15:26 UTCOF0 [...] Also - Nicht ICH habe das Wiki angeführt sondern Du [...]

Das ist richtig.

[...] Leider hast du dabei in jeglicher Diskussion unterschlagen das du eben auch keine Mehrheitsmeinung vertrittst [...]

Klicke mal auf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventio...
82018-04-02 07:10:12 UTCabrensch Will mich ja nicht in Eure Diskussion einmischen, aber mein Changeset hat ein **LOCH** in der K73 geflickt (das Loch ist in manchen Zoomstufen auch noch zu sehen). Und da war tatsächlich auch die Strasse noch mit einem Landnutzungspolygon verbunden, und ja mich stört das auch, weil zumind...
92018-04-02 07:46:39 UTCOF0 Ja, da haben wir beide Deinen Changesetkommentar fehlinterpretiert.
102018-04-02 08:18:20 UTCHarald Hartmann Also wenn ich einwas in den letzten Jahren in OSM gelernt habe, dann das es in keinem Punkt überhaupt eine Mehrheit gibt und über alles streiten kann. Aber ich glaube die Etiquette erlaubt es einem sehr wohl, sich nach den Gepflogenheiten vor Ort zu richten.

@OF0: Leider weiß ich ...
112018-04-02 08:22:20 UTCHarald Hartmann Ach und ich für mich persönlich würde auf Grund der mittlerweile sehr guten Luftbilder in meiner Gegend auch keine highways mehr mit landuses verkleben ... zwischen dem abstrakten highway (der straßenmitte) und einem angrenzenden Wald gibt es ja vielleicht auch noch den Stra&szl...
122018-04-02 10:02:31 UTCflohoff Hi Harald,

ich würde auch die Straßengräben/Wasserwege/Waterways mit keinen Flächen verkleben. Für sie gilt am Ende die selbe Semantik wie bei Straßen. Wir mappen nur die Mitte des Grabens. Die Böschung würde ich ja eher zum "waterway" zähl...
132018-04-02 10:09:12 UTCHarald Hartmann Mit "Straßengraben" meinte ich auch nicht zwingend irgendwas mit waterway=ditch usw. sondern auch wieder "flächenbehaftete Polygone". Als weiteres Beispiel: klar waterway=river würde ich als abstrakten Weg in der Mitte nicht verkleben, waterway=riverbank als Fl&au...
142018-04-02 10:17:40 UTCflohoff Genau - Typischerweise verbinde ich nur gleichartige objekte. Highway/Highway Landuse/Landuse - Aber eben kein leisure/amenity mit Landuse - Der Kundenparkplatz ist ein amenity=parking das von einem landuse=retail/commercial komplett eingeschlossen wird. Polygone (auch an den rändern) zu verbin...
152018-04-02 10:27:50 UTCHarald Hartmann Hmm, ich habe ein Einkaufscenter und mappe die komplette Fläche als landuse=commercial/retail. Dann setze ich einen Parkplat mit amenity=parking und wenn er an den Rand stößt, verbinde ich das auch mit dem äußeren landuse. Ich bilder kein MP, schneide es also nicht aus. We...
162018-04-02 10:45:33 UTCflohoff Es gibt eben PostGIS themen - ST_Within/ST_Intersects/ST_Overlaps/ST_Touches und einige triggern halt wenn es anschliesst obwohl es eher unintuitiv ist. Ich schliesse das auch nicht weil ich oft nicht glaube das es wirklich angrenzt. Man kann das jetzt Erbsenzählerei nennen. Oft ist aber noch e...
172018-04-02 11:04:49 UTCOF0 [...] Ach und ich für mich persönlich würde auf Grund der mittlerweile sehr guten Luftbilder in meiner Gegend auch keine highways mehr mit landuses verkleben ... zwischen dem abstrakten highway (der straßenmitte) und einem angrenzenden Wald gibt es ja vielleicht auch noch den St...
182018-04-02 11:11:46 UTCOF0 [...] @OF0: Leider weiß ich gerade nicht, wie ich folgenden Teil einer deiner letzten Changesetkommentare deuten soll: 
...Es muss aber auch drecksarbeiterledigende Mapper wie mich ge[...]

Damit möchte ich vorrangig persönliche Nachrichten "altgedienter" Beitragend...
192018-04-02 14:59:28 UTCOF0 @flohoff

Gerade erst gesehen:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2018-April/114782.html

Du schreibst dort, ich hätte Dich aufgefordert es bitte zu unterlassen Deine Bemühungen als Mehrheitsmeinung darzustellen.

Wo bitte habe ich das gemacht? Ich hatte dich meiner...
202018-05-24 17:40:15 UTCpos_ei_don Ich war früher selbst Anhänger des verklebens, da es einfach auch Daten reduziert. Mittlerweile jedoch bin ich eindeutig dagegen und finde die Diskussion hier Recht witzig aber auch mega unnötig. Ein Punkt, der nicht auf der Straße ist, hat dort nichts verloren, also gehört...
212018-05-24 17:50:39 UTCpos_ei_don "There is not clear consensus"
Ergänzung: Dieser Satz stammt von 2009 und ist mittlerweile sicherlich anders zu formulieren. Solch altes Zeug gilt sicherlich nicht als Maßstab!
222018-05-24 19:34:32 UTCOF0 @pos_ei_don

Du kommst zu spät für die Diskussion. Mutmaßlich hat sich flohoff die indirekte Aufforderung von Michael Reichert (aka Nakaner) zu eigen gemacht...

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2018-April/114881.html

... und mich von der DWG verwarnen lassen...
232018-05-25 11:08:43 UTCwoodpeck Bitte Changeset-Diskussionen auf das beschränken, was unmittelbar den Edit betrifft. Für allgemeine Diskussionen ist das Medium nicht geeignet (besser: Mailingliste, Forum).
242018-05-25 15:17:59 UTCOF0 @woodpeck

[...] Bitte Changeset-Diskussionen auf das beschränken, was unmittelbar den Edit betrifft. [...]

Ja, das mag die goldene Regel sein.

[...] Für allgemeine Diskussionen ist das Medium nicht geeignet (besser: Mailingliste, Forum). [...]

Das ist leider nur zum Teil n...
12018-05-21 22:29:25 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 59114530, 59114612, 59114743, 59114776, 59115547, 59115866, 59116255, 59116591, 59116769, 59116990, 59117214, 59117291, 59117610, 59118088, 59118481, 59118788, 59119040, 59119147, 59119198, 59120422, 59124435, 59124461, 59124521.
22018-05-22 05:53:07 UTCAndre68 Hallo Frederik, ich hatte eigentlich alles so weit repariert, dass es hätte gut sein sollen. Jetzt ist vieles wieder kaputt. Mein eigener Checker wirf jedenfalls viele Fehler und ich habe heute keine Zeit, es wieder zu reparieren. Was war denn am Stand von gestern falsch? (nach meinen Korrektur...
32018-05-22 16:00:48 UTCwoodpeck Ich habe einfach die Changeset-IDs in den Reverter geschmissen, ohne genauer hinzuschauen. Wäre aber kein Problem, den Stand von Dir wiederherzustellen, wenn der ok war.
12018-05-17 08:41:40 UTCwoodpeck Hallo felkel1982, es wäre wirklich gut, wenn Du Dir angewöhnen könntest, zu jedem Changeset auch einen (gern kurzen, aber aussagekräftigen) Kommentar einzugeben. Viele Rückfragen können dadurch vermieden werden, und es gehört einfach zum respektvollen Umgang mit de...
12018-05-17 06:00:49 UTCwoodpeck You drew a somewhat circular (oval?) way in this changeset but didn't apply any tags; also the way doesn't conform to anything visible on aerial imagery. Can you check and possibly correct this?
12018-05-17 05:59:07 UTCwoodpeck You have drawn a few strangely shaped objects that bear no resemblance to aerial imagery in this changeset. Can you please delete these objects or correct them?
12018-05-13 04:47:22 UTCuser_5359 Welcome to OSM! You imported 44 nodes with unusually tags without any check of duplicates. Example for the first node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5614462476? Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/367797842?
Did you validate the license?
The wrong keys are ADDRESS (addr:fu...
22018-05-13 07:41:47 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58917660 where the changeset comment is:
32018-05-13 07:46:08 UTCwoodpeck Hello gamulea4, I'm afraid I had to revert your changes because they violated our import guidelines (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import). These guidelines mandate a previous discussion with the community, which would among other things have helped avoid the obvious issues pointed out by ...
42018-05-14 22:15:22 UTCgamulea4 Hi, so this was mostly just a test import. My internship plans on importing a lot of data from Prince George's County and wanted to see the best way to accomplish that. In the future I will ensure that the data is good. Is the only problems with this data about the tags and that I dont have a licen...
52018-05-15 04:30:18 UTCuser_5359 Please read the mentioned link of woodpeck: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import. Communication for the data to be imported is very important. Maybe you start with statistics, how much information is missing or can be corrected.
12018-05-08 20:15:40 UTCwoodpeck Dear spietsnaz, you are adding lots of Italian names to objects but you are not saying where the information comes from. Please make it a habit to provide a proper source tag. You have in the past used Google maps and maps from regione.fvg.it, both of which are not legal sources to use in OSM. So pl...
12018-05-08 19:05:30 UTCwoodpeck Dear Liju Thomas, the roads you have added in this changeset are clearly not "unclassified" but "residential" roads, because they lead right through densely built-up areas!

Also, the "source" that you are specifying is not a "source". Valid source tags wou...
22018-05-09 12:30:11 UTCGodsOwnJeeper Hi, Thanks for the comments. Will add the profile... In this case, already existing near by roads where "unclassified" and hence marked as "unclassified".. We work with Navigation traces from the field force. So we dont have much information on the classification on the road...
12018-05-06 18:17:45 UTCwoodpeck It appears that you are fixing intersections world-wide. Please explain which QA tool you are using to find these intersection, and on whose behalf you are making these edits. Are you a member of the GISua team, or working for someone other? It would be good to have this information on your user pro...
22018-05-10 17:01:16 UTCFarkad5 Hello!
I am using https://www.keepright.at/index.php?lang=en.
It's just a little hobby.
12018-05-04 12:09:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo fell3, einige Leute wundern sich über die von Dir hinzugefügten Details. Kannst Du mir ganz konkret sagen, wo zum Beispiel diese Hecke herkommt. "private Wegaufzeichnungen" wohl kaum (oder zeichest Du einzelne Hecken auf?). Aufzeichnungen von Radelfreunden? Auf dem Bing-Luf...
22018-05-14 17:51:24 UTCfell3 In dem fall war ich persönlich letztes jahr dort. Bing nutze ich wie ich schon öfters gesagt habe nur zum groben Überblick. Ich (wir) waren nun vom 10.13.5. wieder in Thammühl die Hecke steht noch!!!! Wo hast du geguckt?? Kamil Robert Mike Matias Bärbel Linda Antje und noch ...
32018-05-14 17:54:56 UTCfell3 korrektur läuft (nicht leuft), 10. bis 13.5. nicht 10.13.5.
Wer weitere Rechtschreibfehler findet, darf sie sich behalten. ; )
12018-04-25 05:50:00 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58396885 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus Wohnpark Walldorf entfernt, siehe entsprechende User-Blocks
22018-04-25 10:21:24 UTCOF0 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BananaBanana scheint die nächste Sockenpuppe zu sein.
32018-04-25 11:13:07 UTCwoodpeck Schon gesehen, die Edits sind bislang harmlos, aber beim ersten "recreation ground" fliegt alles wieder raus.
12018-04-10 17:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Hallo! Ein Wohngebiet wird nicht zu einem "recreation_ground" oder "park", nur weil es dort ein paar Wiesen oder Basketballfelder gibt. Bitte orientiere Dich beim Mapping an der Realität und nicht an einer Imagebroschüre des Stadtmarketing. Ich werde das jetzt zurü...
22018-04-24 12:04:12 UTCValarMapulis Es ist kein Wohngebiet. Es ist ein Wohnpark. Und es gibt nicht ein paar Wiesen, sondern der gesamte Wohnpark ist eine große bepflanze Wiese. Bitte mal bei der großen Suchmaschine die mit G anfängt nachschauen. Danke.
32018-04-24 13:18:01 UTCParzelle13 Ja und? Da sieht es auch nicht anders aus als jedes beliebige Wohngebiet mit Grünflächen und Spielplätzen, die ebenfalls dadurch nicht zu Parks werden.
42018-04-24 18:24:00 UTCOF0 Es geht weiter?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58379393
52018-04-24 21:43:46 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58389889 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus Wohnpark Walldorf entfernt, siehe entsprechende User-Blocks
62018-04-25 05:49:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58396885 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismus Wohnpark Walldorf entfernt, siehe entsprechende User-Blocks
12018-04-07 21:32:39 UTCwoodpeck Why do you make edits in the south of India and tag them "#Tanzania" and "#TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust"?
12018-03-17 21:49:38 UTCwoodpeck Kennst Du Dich in den Gegenden aus, in denen Du diese "nach suburb verschoben"-Änderungen machst, oder ist das rein algorithmisch nach dem Motto "finde den Place-Node und richte alles danach aus"?
22018-03-18 12:04:06 UTCRopino Hallo,
ich habe mich u.a. an Wikipedia
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satow - Ortsteile
und (wenn verfügbar) an Mapillary
z.B. hier für einen andern Ortsteil von Satow:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=54.03896521567315&lng=11.950561416070771&z=14.78630578574794&focus=pho...
12018-03-04 19:02:16 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56858688, 56859381, 56870178, 56870921.
22018-03-04 19:49:28 UTCPrince Kassad This revert accidentally moved over a thousand nodes to (0,0), some of them with TIGER data. Fixed this with changeset 56879900: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56879900
32018-03-04 22:19:52 UTCIDKS What are you guys doing? Blocking legitimate users and fixing reverts by deleting bunch of nodes?
42018-03-05 11:01:30 UTCwoodpeck Indeed, the revert script had a bug where those nodes that it wanted to delete (because they were deleted before, and had been re-activated in the changeset to be reverted) were instead moved to 0,0. Thank you for fixing this.
12018-03-04 22:06:48 UTCIDKS She/he was doing good work mapping ways, and I don't understand your reasons behind the block - they are quire vague and non-understandable. Have you check the user history?
Most of the edits are in one area and to me they do not look like they are automatic.
Care to explain yourself a little bit ...
22018-03-05 10:55:18 UTCwoodpeck Did you read the block message? Thousands of un-attributed and un-used nodes, often re-using node IDs from across the globe that were long since deleted, re-activating these buggy notes without comment after they were deleted by a community member, and not reacting to questions asked about these iss...
12018-03-01 09:10:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56782000 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
12018-02-26 10:35:25 UTCpatrick noll Leavitt locations you changed in this changeset were correct. Why did you remove them as advertising?
22018-02-26 10:44:41 UTCwoodpeck They were added by a SEO company (using 4 different throwaway accounts that will not respond to comments, and are not interested in learning how to make correct contributions to OSM). The SEO company took care to get all the contact data right but there wasn't a single shop or amenity or other tag t...
12018-02-25 21:57:20 UTCwoodpeck Hi d_berger, reverting these edits was the right thing to do, but writing "FU", "Plonk", and "moron edits" was not. If your temper makes it impossible for you to show some politeness towards someone who has made a mistake, then simply let someone else do the revert.
12018-02-22 12:56:02 UTCGerold Warum hast Du die Bachstraße 6/2 von building=house auf building=yes getaggt?
22018-02-22 14:54:27 UTCPT-53 Wie Du vielleicht schon festgestellt hast, trage ich nicht da und dort mal was ein sondern überarbeite Gemeinden immer komplett. Dabei verwende ich für Gebäude - mit Ausnahme von Kirchen etc. - generell buildung=yes.
Grüße
32018-02-22 15:46:19 UTCGerold Wie aus der Revisionsgeschichte dieses ways ersichtlich ist, hast Du korrektes und realitätskonformes Tagging geändert.
Warum?
42018-02-22 16:13:35 UTCPT-53 Habe ich Dir doch bereits erläutert!
52018-02-22 16:38:19 UTCGerold Also nimmst Du einfach Änderungen vor, weil dir das grade passt. Ohne Rücksicht auf das was tatsächlich getaggt werden sollte?

Nennt man auch Vandalismus...
62018-02-22 17:25:31 UTCPT-53 Wow,
ich ergänze / überarbeite hunderte von Gebäuden und Adressen und verwende dabei einheitliche Werte. Das nennst Du Vandalismus?
Ist building=yes denn falsch?
72018-02-22 18:41:47 UTCGerold building=house war richtiger, weil es eben in der Realität ein entsprechendes Wohnhaus ist.

Dein edit war somit völlig überflüssig und Du hast vorsätzlich Informationen gelöscht, die die Realität besser wiedergeben als das was Du eingetragen hast.

"Sesse...
82018-02-22 19:15:43 UTCPT-53 Wem nützt die Info, daß das nicht nur ein Gebäude sondern ein Wohnhaus ist?
Viel Wind um nichts!
92018-02-22 19:39:15 UTCGerold Dein beschränktes Vorstellungsvermögen soll die Grundlage für Datensammlungen wie OSM sein?
Ernsthaft?

Und nur weil dir kein Einsatzzweck dafür einfällt, wird es auch sonst nie jemanden geben, der damit was nützliches macht?

Als der alte Planck sich vor über...
102018-02-22 19:42:51 UTCTourenbikerFKB Genausogut könnte man fragen: "wem nützt 3D-Mapping bei Gebäuden". Wenn Du dir nichts vorstellen kannst: andere haben vielleicht eine Anwendung dafür. In meiner Gegend unterscheide ich auch Wohn/Gewerbegebäude und würde es als Frechheit ansehen, wenn jetzt jem...
112018-02-22 19:44:44 UTCTourenbikerFKB mein vorheriger Beitrag gilt PT-53. Sollte man aber erkennen können :-)
122018-02-23 07:55:29 UTCPT-53 @tourenbiker:
Es gibt 3D-Anwendungen, gibt es auch Anwendungen wo Einfamilienhaus ausgewertet wird ?
132018-02-23 08:27:52 UTCGerold Falls es dafür aktuell keine Anwendung gäbe, wäre das ein legitimer Grund, einfach korrekte Daten zu löschen/ändern?

Dass Du mit deinen entsprechenden edits die Nützlichkeit einer solchen Anwendung bereits verringert hast, ist dir noch nicht aufgefallen?

Dass dein...
142018-02-23 08:45:11 UTCPT-53 Ich wiederhole:
Hier wird viel Wirbel um nichts gemacht!
152018-02-23 09:25:12 UTCwhb @PT-53
Ja, es gibt Anwendungen, welche building=house auswerten, z.B. OsmAnd.
Systematisches und vorsätzliches Entfernen von genauen Gebäudetypen ist nicht akzeptabel.
162018-02-23 09:34:53 UTCwoodpeck +1, alle Änderungen, bei denen Du ein "building=<irgendwas spezifisches>" auf das weniger informationskräftige "building=yes" reduziert hast, sollten rückgängig gemacht werden.
172018-02-23 09:41:15 UTCstreckenkundler Also ich die Beschwerde von Gerold nachvollziehen... Vandalismus ist zwar ein harter Vorwurf ich hätte den Vorwurf aber auch gemacht...

Ich jedenfalls würde es unter allem Umständen vermeiden, Gebäude z.B. von house nach yes zu ändern. Im Gegenteil... Ich bin ein Freund ...
182018-02-23 09:43:15 UTCstreckenkundler Ach ja,

die Ito-Maps unterscheiden auch:
http://product.itoworld.com/map/group/4
192018-02-23 09:49:54 UTCPT-53 OK. Auch wenn ich immer noch keinen wirklichen Sinn an building=houese etc.erkennen kann, werde ich künftig darauf achten, vorhandene Eingaben nicht aus rationellen Gründen anzupassen. Ich werde aber sicher nicht meine bisherigen Eingaben alle sichten und evtl. Anpassungen zu reverten.Fals...
202018-02-23 10:05:51 UTCNakaner Hallo,

unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61448 wird auch darüber diskutiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
212018-02-23 10:47:32 UTCHarald Hartmann @PT-53: wärst du vielleicht so nett und freundlich uns transparent mitzuteilen, welche Keys du noch aus deinen persönlichen rationellen Gründen angepasst hast?
PS: Nein, du musst dich nicht rechtfertigen, aber das würde vielleicht dein hiermit beschädigtes Image als langj&a...
222018-02-23 11:00:42 UTCfreebeer As an aside. StreetComplete handles building=yes and building=something differently, when deciding to complete missing housenumbers.
This can be seen recently in Australia where an entire residential neighbourhood was tagged building=residential, and now has more accurate building=shed, building=ga...
232018-02-23 12:08:22 UTCkreuzschnabel Ich finde die grundsätzliche Einstellung mehrkwürdig.

Mal so zum Nachdenken: Du baust ein Haus und hast selbst schon ein paar Lichtschalter Busch-Jaeger ASDF kirschrot eingesetzt, weil sie dir gefallen und gut zum Haus passen. Du beauftragst einen Elektriker, die Arbeit fertigzustellen...
242018-02-23 12:13:01 UTCHarald Hartmann Ach und PT-53, dir sei noch wärmstens das JOSM Style (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AStyles/Coloured_buildings) ans Herz gelegt.
252018-02-23 14:32:36 UTCuvi Diskutiert wird dieses Thema auch hier: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61448
262018-02-23 14:38:39 UTCHarald Hartmann ?! siehe Nakaner vor 5 Stunden?
272018-02-23 15:34:41 UTCuvi ups, übersehen!
12018-02-20 11:05:01 UTCwoodpeck Hallo LottiKarotti, bitte füge keine persönlichen Daten (wie hier geschehen: E-Mail-Adressen) zu OpenStreetMap hinzu. Erstens verletzt Du damit u.U. die Privatsphäre der Betroffenen, zweitens sind das keine überprüfbaren Geodaten. Bitte entferne alle E-Mail-Adressen, die Du ...
22018-02-20 11:06:51 UTCwoodpeck (Falls das nicht klar war: Die Daten, die Du hier einträgst, sind öffentlich einsehbar!)
12018-02-16 23:43:24 UTCwoodpeck This edit, and the edits you made in January 2018, do not correspond to actual features on the ground. Please refrain from adding fictional data to OpenStreetMap. I have reverted the edits in question.
12018-02-08 17:33:28 UTCazsr I really don't think any of these edits were necessary. Even though these were added by purpose-built hit-and-run throwaway accounts specifically for adding their businesses on the map, they still added map data without having annoying descriptions. What was there is on the ground, anyways, but we'r...
22018-02-08 17:49:07 UTCwoodpeck Not only were these purpose-built hit-and-run accounts that will never respond to anything you would ask of them, they were also created by an SEO firm that has zero interest in our map other than putting their customer's name on it. This is much worse than an individual owner adding their own busin...
32018-02-09 14:29:57 UTCazsr Thanks for your quick reply. Do we know the SEO that does this?
42018-02-09 22:27:54 UTCwoodpeck FSVO "know", yes. I know from my work at DWG that they all come from the same IP range in Asia and most have signed up with an email address pointing to an US SEO business.

I have a couple 100 more of these across the US that I would like to weed out but while I do have strong opinions ...
12018-02-05 08:25:03 UTCwoodpeck Der Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478918750 (und vielleicht auch andere - ich habe nur diesen stichprobenartig gegriffen) ist in diesem Changeset als bearbeitet markiert, wurde aber gar nicht verändert. Hast Du dafür eine Erklärung - könnte das ein Bug in einem Plugin sei...
22018-02-11 23:56:26 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 56277501, 56277015, 56277682, 56275296 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and undiscussed address import/mass modification by user geocodec. See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-at/2018-February/009114.html. This...
12018-01-24 14:05:10 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, woher stammt der Name "Casa de Chela"? Bist Du selbst vor Ort gewesen und hast den dort erfasst, oder könnte der eventuell "aus Versehen" auch aus einer anderen Karte stammen?
22018-01-24 17:56:53 UTCBratananio Ich bin seit 20 Jahren auf allen Inseln der Kapverden unterwegs und bekomme die Informationen sowohl von Freunden vor Ort als auch durch meine Eigenbesuche und Wanderungen.
12018-01-24 07:16:18 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you have added the name "212" to a number of hiking paths. Your source is "bing, knowledge". Since the number cannot come from Bing: Where does your "knowledge" come from? Have you been there and surveyed the path, has there been a sign with that numbe...
22018-01-24 17:55:33 UTCBratananio I am since 20 years on all these islands and I have the information from my friends there.
If it has changed, please add the new number for the path.
12018-01-24 07:14:05 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, Du hast hier einen Weg angelegt mit dem Namen "106". Wo kommt dieser Name her, hast Du den selbst vor Ort von einem Schild abgelesen oder könnte es sein, dass der aus einer anderen Karte kommt?
12018-01-23 16:50:58 UTCneuhausr Hi, I am an area mapper, wondering why this POI got flagged for removal of data for advertising? Aside from not having the leisure=tanning_salon tag, it seems like legitimate data, and doesn't have a lot of the "description" garbage like a lot of SEO spam does.
22018-01-23 21:04:19 UTCwoodpeck I am investigating a pattern where a SEO firm has created a single account for each of their clients, and used that account to add one POI only, and added that POI with a focus on getting the business name and website URL into OSM, without respecting OSM customs (often using spammy descriptions; not...
32018-01-23 22:01:29 UTCneuhausr Fair enough, I monitor this area and I've certainly seen plenty of obvious SEO spam! However, if a business owner wants to get their business name in OSM, I hope it won't get flagged for removal just because they used their business name for their account and only did one badly tagged node. Note, I ...
42018-01-24 11:33:55 UTCfreebeer Hi neuhausr,
Refer to the initial changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41861684 .
There you see the particular edit was questioned by Georg but no reply was given, in over a year.
If this were to have been a legitimate business playing by OSM rules, they would have been interested ...
52018-01-24 15:15:22 UTCneuhausr good point, I'd missed that
12018-01-17 17:26:29 UTCwoodpeck Please use source=survey only when you have been there and looked at something (which I find unlikely in this situation). I noticed that you changed a lot of relations to type=cluster which is a very rare value, and doesn't seem to be documented anywhere. Is this the result of some discussion, or ju...
22018-01-18 21:27:22 UTCanderfo Hi,
I actually wondered how to put source for this sort of editing. For example when correcting typos, removing validation errors etc, I don't know which source to choose and I thought survey was the "best fit".

type=cluster is described in the wiki under place=archipelago:
https://wi...
12018-01-17 17:19:18 UTCwoodpeck Hello, can you explain why you created this object in Iceland with area=yes (and no other tags): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553783240
12018-01-14 20:39:19 UTCwoodpeck In diesem Changeset werden viele Gebäude gelöscht und neu eingezeichnet. Waren die alten denn so schlecht, dass das sein musste? Normalerweise versuchen wir, das zu vermeiden, weil man damit die Erfassungsgeschichte entfernt. Manchmal sind die Umrusse aus dem Sachsen-Atlas auch recht selts...
22018-01-15 11:19:07 UTCNakaner Für das Protokoll – folgende PN wurde soeben an ihn versendet:

Hallo M_Kucha,

mehrere Benutzer haben in den vergangenen Tagen und Wochen deine Änderungssätze kommentiert, du hast sie jedoch ignoriert. Bitte stelle sicher, dass die Benachrichtigungs-E-Mails, die du erhä...
12018-01-09 12:43:06 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you have modified 17 and added around 50 new names for the Cook Islands, many of these in languages that do not use Roman script. You claim that this information was sourced through "investigation", but could you shed more light on this?
12018-01-08 14:04:28 UTCwoodpeck Please try not to edit the same object 6 times when instead you could just edit it once. This creates 5 unnecessary copies of the object in our database (and in changeset streams). Also, please specify adequate sources for the official_name:* tags you are adding. If this is an automated process, it ...
12018-01-04 21:52:00 UTCwoodpeck Dear Jubaerorun, I am unsure about htese changesets you are adding. Every single one of your changesets has a comment of "please update information" - what does that mean? Whom are you addressing here, whom do you want to "update" the information you are adding? Also, if you don'...
12017-12-14 19:14:43 UTCnaoliv Hi, Juggalo_Kyle.
It seems that you did remove 4 areas which were representing some schools. For example, the White Knoll High School https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546860888/history
Did you see something wrong with the objects, maybe? Or there was another reason to remove them?
22017-12-18 16:36:59 UTCnaoliv Juggalo_Kyle, I restored the school areas. Note that these areas are representing the school grounds and not the school building, for example.
Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any doubts.
32017-12-19 05:23:16 UTCDarth_Vader The "school grounds" detail affects apps for people who work, visit, and interact with these places in a negative way. Myself being one of them. In order to prevent this, this detail should not be mapped. Labeling the school building is detail enough. The "school grounds" detail ...
42017-12-19 09:30:54 UTCfreebeer A better philosophy for you to grasp is, OpenStreetMap documents the world as it exists.
We do not map for the app, we map reality.
We map landuse.
These are school grounds, and that is fact.
If these facts bother you, take it up with your app, it is not for OSM to pander to the apps or their us...
52017-12-19 10:24:20 UTCnaoliv Which app you are using that makes this looks like an error?
You should try to fix it in the app that you are using (by contacting the developers, maybe), instead removing a valid data that everybody else uses.
And again, please, don't remove these areas.
62017-12-19 14:47:07 UTCDarth_Vader If you insist on creating problems for the people that actually live around these places, the locals and myself, then I will create problems for everyone else by creating multiple accounts and mass deleting features all around the world.
72017-12-19 15:03:54 UTCwoodpeck Darth_Vader, what you are threatening here is computer vandalism and it is illegal in South Carolina. Participating in such activity can severely affect your school/college experience or career. Think twice before you do anything you regret later - it's not worth it.
82017-12-20 22:47:43 UTCCarnildo Naoliv, I'm pretty sure the app in question is "Pokemon Go": it doesn't spawn Pokemon on school grounds, but it does spawn them on meadows, grass, forests, and sand -- or in other words, exactly the detail that Darth_Vader has added to Carolina Springs Elementary School.
92017-12-21 11:26:45 UTCnaoliv @Carnildo it seems to be the case, indeed. Yesterday a friend also sent some links, like https://pokemongo.gamepress.gg/q-a/poke-spawns-stopped-my-city-college which says "Niantic has stopped pokemon spawning in schools."
12017-12-18 08:09:36 UTCwoodpeck Is this an import? You added this "farmland"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547471799 which lies wholly inside this other "farmland" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547471807 that you created 2 weeks ago. Did you not notice?
22017-12-18 08:14:02 UTCwoodpeck You also added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547470728 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547470610 in this changeset, and one lies inside the other. There seem to be more cases like this. Is there an explanation for this that is not "badly executed import"?
32017-12-18 18:48:09 UTCSkinfaxi Hallo woodpeck,
Yes i havet copied from shapefiles of lantmäteriet. I havet discussed THE working methode in THE Swedish community and even om the import mailinglist.

And you are right: in that area is the work not completed. Totalt avoid verry big changesets i try to upload in serveral st...
42017-12-18 18:49:47 UTCSkinfaxi I tried to anser you from my mobile phone so excuse my spelling...
12017-12-18 08:08:26 UTCwoodpeck Is this an import or a manual tracing?
22017-12-18 18:51:26 UTCSkinfaxi It comes from manuell import of shapefiles. THE working metod is discussed in THE Swedish community and in the import mailinglist.
12017-12-18 07:59:45 UTCwoodpeck This import consist of over 100k edits altogether. Has it been discussed either in the Finnish community or internationally before it was performed? Please point me to that discussion.
12017-10-10 18:08:08 UTCpitscheplatsch Hi Kerman Ganesh, welcome to OSM. You created more than 2,800 changesets in almost 30 minutes. Which source did you use for your edits? Is this mass-edit discussed with the community and documented? Thanks.
22017-10-10 19:08:51 UTCMiMiNo Hi Pascal,
I think that all changesets of this user are candidates for revert. Reasons:
1) source is unknown (for sure it is not GPS survey)
2) this mass-edit was not discussed anywhere (not on the OSM Wiki, nor in the forum of Slovak OSM community)
3) consistency of tagging is not maintained in...
32017-10-12 02:56:39 UTCpitscheplatsch Hi Tibor, thanks for your answer.
I think we (or you as a local?) should contact the DWG.
All the best,
Pascal
42017-12-15 09:38:24 UTCwoodpeck Changes have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54647052 - please discuss imports/automated edits with the community beforehand to avoid issues with data quality and licensing.
12017-06-06 09:22:29 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49299541 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy vandalism
22017-09-20 11:41:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52208464 where the changeset comment is: Revert all Itzscallywagyt changesets that had not be reverted already. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1482
32017-12-08 07:38:03 UTCJohn Grubb I see that a path running through the area bounded by this changeset's outline is tagged with a name of "Your Mom." I suspect that this is not factually accurate! I'm unfamiliar with the area so do not know if the path actually has a name or not, else I'd dive in and rename or delete the n...
42017-12-08 08:29:02 UTCwoodpeck It might actually be - MTB cyclists seem to have a strange sense of humour see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-October/008145.html
52017-12-08 16:12:36 UTCJohn Grubb You're kidding?! Figured it might be left-overs from the original vandalism!

Every day's a school day...
62017-12-13 08:25:38 UTCkeithonearth I can't speak for the validity of the name, as I've not ridden in the trails around Squamish, but knowing MTB'ers I find the name entirely plausible. Trails like these are made by a bunch of dudes with shovels and bikes.

"Dude, we should *totally* call this one 'Your Mom', cuz, then we'd be...
72017-12-29 14:42:57 UTCJohn Grubb The mind boggles...
12017-11-04 02:51:58 UTCHubMiner Driveway around Sonic looks off, please recheck. If possible, draw driveway to Motorcycle Swimsuit, otherwise if anyone used it for navigation, it they may approach it from wrong street.
22017-12-04 09:01:55 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54322536 where the changeset comment is: revert all 'Zowie Polie' edits because of continued vandalism.
32017-12-04 22:04:00 UTCHubMiner Understood, thanks. Please share if there is procedure to review user's edits (now reverted) to see if anything should be reinstated, or if standard-operating-procedure to ignore all those edits once a user is deemed not sane.
42017-12-05 16:12:05 UTCfreebeer Speaking as a user who is not sane, if you want to waste your time on a g00gle text search for ' "Motorcycle Swimsuit" "guymon" ' (as I have done, having neither common sense nor sanity), then feel free.
Remember that then you take responsibility for the data you restore, so be ...
52017-12-05 16:18:24 UTCwoodpeck g246020 - the answer is "it depends". In this particular case, "Zowie Polie" has shown to be learning resistant to a degree where we cannot continue to assume good intentions, hence I believe reviewing their edits will be a waste of time. But that is a judgement call and not a st...
62017-12-06 23:03:22 UTCHubMiner Thanks for answers!
12017-11-28 19:25:49 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Garmano, in diesem Changeset, das Du mit "Added Westpark" tituliert hast, wurde auch die Stadt Hong Kong von einer Stadt zu einem Miet-Lagerplatz (shop=storage_rental) herabklassifiziert. Kannst Du Dir erklären, wie das passiert ist? Kannst Du es reparieren, oder benötigst ...
22017-11-29 19:04:36 UTCGarmano Hallo Woodpeck,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Ich hatte mir zwar vor meiner Änderung Hong Kong angeschaut, war aber nicht wissentlich in der Nähe dieses Punktes. Warum ich die Information geändert habe und warum ich das bei den Änderungen übersehen habe, ist mir v&oum...
12017-11-23 22:54:39 UTCwoodpeck Hello FreedSky, please start using changeset comments to describe what you are editing - at least in cases where it is likely that more people will be interested, for example like this changeset where you edited the border between China and India. What is your source for this edit? Why was this edit...
22018-02-09 16:10:48 UTCFreedSky I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reas...
12017-11-22 20:41:23 UTCwoodpeck Correction, accidentally copied over previous changeset comment - this one was just advertising in a description tag.
12017-11-20 22:44:47 UTCwoodpeck Ist das hier wirklich ein "Marktplatz" (wo man hingehen und einkaufen kann), oder doch nur das Büro eines Dienstleisters? Der Eintrag kommt mir ein bisschen sehr "werblich" vor.
12017-11-17 13:28:38 UTCma-rt-in Hallo,

wie kommst du dieser pauschalen Änderung?
22017-11-17 15:39:26 UTCgeozeisig amenity=chapel ist nicht richtig es muss building=chapel + amenity=place_of_worship heißen.
32017-11-17 17:10:21 UTCvillage hm, du hast aber z.B. eine Grotte zu einem Gebäude gemacht und hier: http://osm.org/node/1180382109 einen node als Punkt in einem Gebäude auch als Gebäude getaggt.
Das sieht mir doch etwas zu mechanisch aus.
42017-11-17 17:12:35 UTCvillage Wenn man schon Orte bearbeitet, die man gar nicht kennt, ist es bei 42 Nodes wohl nicht zu viel verlangt, da mal hinzuschauen - noch ein building node in building: http://osm.org/node/2915662625
52017-11-17 17:14:16 UTCvoschix ... and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1323976715 looks more like histroric=wayside_shrin
62017-11-17 17:43:15 UTCPolarbear Und ich hatte am Vorabend grade noch auf genau dieses Problem bei mechanischen Edits hingewiesen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53295049
Und neu ist das Verhalten, ohne Ortskenntnis Formalien korrigieren zu wollen, auch nicht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53254287
https://w...
72017-11-18 10:28:17 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53896411 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edits by geozeisig
82017-11-18 10:30:42 UTCwoodpeck Ich revertiere jetzt die mechanischen Edits der vergangenen Wochen. Geozeisig, jeder andere würde bei derart dickköpfigen Regelverstößen - ist ja bei Dir nicht das erste Mal, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28861610 vom Februar 2015 - eine längere Sperre kassi...
92017-11-22 20:36:31 UTCSafwatHalaby User has done similar, yet unreverted edits for Synagouges. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53866108
12017-11-10 11:58:51 UTCwoodpeck Mir ist aufgefallen, dass im Dateinamen was vom "3. Weltkrieg" steht. Zum Glück ist es derzeit noch offensichtlich, dass es ein Fehler ist ;) da das File aber auf Wikimedia Commons liegt und auch bei openplaques verlinkt ist, habe ich mich nicht getraut, was zu ändern.
12017-11-08 20:57:12 UTCwoodpeck Hello luiswoo, it appears to me that this, and a couple similar changesets, may have been an undiscussed data import that happened five years ago. Do you remember what you did here? The houses carry a source tag of "rosreestr" - what data source is that, and what license is it published un...
22017-11-09 02:02:36 UTCluiswoo Как такого импорта данных не было. Адреса брались в процессе обрисовки зданий по снимкам. Во всяком случает source=rosreestr относится к адресам, а не к самим зданиям.

Рос...
32017-11-09 02:05:41 UTCluiswoo Декларация российского совета OSM по адресным данным Росреестра https://goo.gl/wjjBLi
42017-11-09 07:26:40 UTCwoodpeck You say that the buildings were drawn from photos. Looking at the current Bing imagery, the building outlines do not match the imagery, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=156818899#map=19/47.26188/39.69043 - the shape of the building is different. What imagery did you u...
52017-11-09 10:15:47 UTCluiswoo Сейчас снимки не высшего качества, тогда были ещё хуже. Больше 17 масштаба и не было. Yahoo был от силы 16 масштаба. Ошибки распознания снимка. Делал, скорей всего, по Bing. П...
12017-11-08 20:45:12 UTCwoodpeck Hello DenisJu, in this changeset you are modifying a lot of roads that were part of an buggy import from 2010 (changeset 4557844 et al.). I'm unsure what the legal situation of the data source is; there's a wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp that seems to be con...
22017-11-12 10:22:46 UTCDenisJu Hallo Frederik!
Danke für deine Nachricht.
Ich kenne die "AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp"-WikiSeite nicht, aber hab einige von diesen Namen während der Editierung gesehen.
Ich werde einen Blick mal draf werfen und besser/detailierter die Seite lesen/checken und dann werde ich mic...
32017-11-12 10:24:00 UTCDenisJu Achavi für diesen changeset:
- http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46834933
12017-11-02 17:39:50 UTCHubMiner This change sounds rough, simply deleting their description. Please tell them how to correct it / OSM guidelines.
22017-11-02 22:37:49 UTCwoodpeck I don't think it needs more correction and wouldn't normally have bothered waking up a 1-year inactive user for it but here you go: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41625699
32017-11-03 02:28:42 UTCHubMiner Thanks!
12017-11-02 22:36:18 UTCwoodpeck Hello wpedmonson, I have removed the "description" again because it (1) contains non-factual advertising text, (2) is incomplete, and (3) might very well violate copyright (since you say you took it from the hotel web site).
12017-11-01 22:42:48 UTCwoodpeck Comment cock-up. Should have been: "remove advertising (spammy description)".
12017-10-29 22:53:05 UTCwoodpeck unvollst. Changeset-Kommentar: zusätzlich auch 2 Briefkästen gelöscht, die zu einem neuen zusammengelegt wurden.
12017-10-29 19:54:37 UTCwoodpeck Dear radek-drlicka, could you please clarify in how far you applied "user knowledge" (your source tag) to make these edits. Is it possible that instead of applying "user knowledge", you simply went to each Wikipedia page and copied the Wikidata link that was given on the page?
22017-10-29 20:08:35 UTCradek-drlicka It is simple: I pressed enter before changing source. Why are you asking? I suppose that it is clear from the nature of the things. Thanks Radek
12017-10-26 06:32:05 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. It looks like you uploaded some data from an external source here. First, all these objects do need a proper tag to describe what they are.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Please h...
22017-10-26 12:41:59 UTCwoodpeck Jonathan, I am sorry but I will have to remove this un-discussed and badly tagged import. Please check with the "imports" mailing list to get support in doing this right.
32017-10-26 12:43:53 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53262481 where the changeset comment is: remove what appears to be a 3D structure import
12017-10-25 22:40:49 UTCRoterEmil Hi woodpeck, would you mind to create smaller CS? It's impossible to use achavi (etc.) to have a closer look what you've changed. Would be really great!
Second, an example: I don't get why you deleted description=... @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4144996689. It included useful information fo...
22017-10-25 22:55:09 UTCwoodpeck My changes are really just to individual objects so they are immediately obvious from the object history or from the deep diff tool here http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=4144996689. I have about 1000 more to go, the overwhelming majority are in the US, maybe I can split them out and separate...
32017-10-26 00:40:58 UTCRoterEmil Thanks for your quick response!
Splitting the uploaded data into to big pieces like contients won't help "average" mappers doing QA, I believe. The easiest and well-established tool, achavi, will fail.

Your changes here: I do agree that pure advertising shouldn't be part of OSM and can...
12017-10-25 20:41:38 UTCaftertea I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description should be updated with your criteria for deleting POI's.
The fourth random POI I checked that you deleted didn't violate any items on that page (node 4891959222). I'd be annoyed if I'd added it!

The wiki entry for Tag:tourism=guest_hous...
22017-10-25 21:28:02 UTCwoodpeck Hi, "...offers the latest in proven medical and surgical care" is clear advertising speak that has no place in OSM. Also, the node had no amentity/office/craft or tag like that, so if it had been added to make the practice findable on OSM, it didn't even do that (or at least not in the way...
32017-11-05 15:03:00 UTCtrial Frederik, you're right. I also read the 2 other discussions mentioned in OSMHebdo.
But why do *you* spent time correcting adverts from a few SEO spammers? In France we have had some trouble with a similar company, we asked the DWG to block the account until they read the message so that they stoppe...
12017-10-24 21:59:05 UTCSafwatHalaby Hi woodpeck. I think your definition of spam is too broad. For instance, this random POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4923689269
.
Yes, its editor has only one edit. And yes, the editor has a direct interest in advertising their POI. However, these facts do not make it spam. Let's analyze t...
22017-10-24 22:00:55 UTCSafwatHalaby That was one example, but a significant number of your reverts do not remotely qualify as spam, and I think no one would have had any problem if an experienced mapper had added them.
32017-10-24 22:02:35 UTCSafwatHalaby Although the intentions are clearly good, in my humble opinion this is harming the map and must be discussed.
42017-10-24 22:03:47 UTCSafwatHalaby For comparison, this is something I would flag as spam for the excessive ad tone, and I would justify its removal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5135107648/history
52017-10-24 22:10:20 UTCSafwatHalaby Just another comparison to draw a clear line between spam and self-interest driven neutral edits:
SPAM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4885634483/history
.
Not spam: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4989363747/history
62017-10-24 22:15:28 UTCSafwatHalaby It seems the majority of this changeset is real, clear cut spam, though.
72017-10-24 22:29:50 UTCwoodpeck SafwatHalaby, the line I have drawn is: If the self-interest mapper can at *least* be bothered to find out the proper OSM tag to describe their business, then I will only remove the spammy "description" and leave the rest in place. There are quite a few of that sort here. If, however, the ...
82017-10-25 04:43:33 UTCSafwatHalaby I agree to that line. (And I'd suggest leaving the description too if it's factual and not spammy).
.
But the second POI in particular: The right tagging was used, office=lawyer, and the description is completely factual and not spammy, "Personal injury attorney assisting clients throughout M...
92017-10-25 11:14:54 UTCfreebeer I agree with Frederick, this reads too much like self-promoting advertising that has little to do with a geographic database that is OSM, and too little like a short informative description that I would expect to find.
(I wonder if the present 255-character/byte limit that mercifully truncates many...
102017-10-25 11:26:44 UTCSafwatHalaby Thank you for the thorough comment. You changed my mind. I now agree that the attorney example is too self-promoting and could have been 3-4 words, and that its word redundancy is spammy.
112017-11-04 07:51:18 UTCVerdy_p Note that Frederik removed "description" and "name" (also "phone" and "email" or contact info) added to address nodes only (housenumbers with street names) that were actually not qualified with actual POI classification (e.g. "shop=*" or "amenit...
12017-10-20 23:49:22 UTCmuralito I could provide some nodes that were deleted and were not advertising.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1118036691

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5135199111

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5057146412/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5042809017/history

The 4 seems va...
22017-10-21 04:16:55 UTCnaoliv It seems the same case from some nodes in Brazil.
I wouldn't call them *wrong* but incomplete and/or with unnecessary information.
(New) users sometimes misunderstand the "description" tag and are too much verbose when using it.
Instead deleting, is it possible to create a list of affec...
32017-10-21 05:55:29 UTCfunnimonk please never do things like this again. you've basically deleted street names etc from the dataset. some of us rely on these things like names an geometries and now we have to restore them and you know how difficult that is!! to what end, all this deletion? couldn't you just change the descriptions?...
42017-10-21 08:23:30 UTCwoodpeck Hello, I'm sorry if I have accidentally deleted things that were not advertising. I'll look into the IDs specified by muralito and replace them. I have only deleted objects that were created by users who had a very small number of edits (usually, only one edit!) and who have added a long description...
52017-10-21 08:25:44 UTCPrince Kassad This changeset also deleted objects that no longer had SEO advertising in their newest revision, i. e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266904941/history. This is an extremely harmful changeset and should be undone immediately.
62017-10-21 08:54:35 UTCВладимир К is this a joke? all objects i checked are NOT SEO or even advertising! These descriptions were just descriptions. I think it is totally wrong to delete things, you even don''t understand in another language! You even deleted the hole building, that exists on satimagery!
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
72017-10-21 09:05:24 UTCВладимир К in Moscow only 2 of 8 deleted objects have description! and another exxisting building was deleted
82017-10-21 09:49:23 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир К, Prince Kassad, indeed I have removed objects even if they *had* advertising in the past, and other mappers had removed the advertising in the mean time. That was unnecessary. I'll undelete the affected objects. Please refrain from reverting the full changeset because that ...
92017-10-21 10:55:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted this and now re-created things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 - will you now take over and do this properly, removing advertising from where it doesn't belong, or do you expect others to do this?
102017-10-21 20:13:08 UTCmuralito I just wanted to raise the flag that there are some false positives in the algorithm, so i asked for an improvement, I also understand if the algorithm is not disclosed as it can be used by advertisers for "tunning" their ads.

In thousands of elements there are probably a lot of distinc...
112017-10-21 20:38:24 UTCwoodpeck Yes, it was not an algorithm that I was planning to run regularly, I just had identified long-description objects made by users who have contributed very little, and then went through the list manually, using a translating web site for anything other than English and German. Quite possible that I ac...
122017-10-21 22:36:06 UTCSimonvdP Did you even check your example?, removing part of a likely valid secondary road seems worse than leaving it there with the useless description on it,
132017-10-22 22:48:21 UTCChris Fleming This feels excessive to me - generally when I see these added, provided the information is accurate then I don't mind the "spammy description"; but there is also a case for removing. My worry with this changeset is that by completely removing the object we remove information that had been...
142017-10-23 05:47:30 UTCwoodpeck I think that any contribution made by a spammer should be entirely removed because it has not been made with OSM's interests at heart; most likely the coordinates are from a proprietary geocoder and the object will usually be placed with little regard to what's around it. So if the spammer adds a ho...
152017-10-23 13:19:47 UTCChris Fleming Thanks - I think we are in Broad agreeement :)
162017-10-24 07:45:14 UTCGRUBERND i think deleting things by algorithm is the most wrong thing one can to do to the OSM database. especially at this scale. it's the same as an import: automated changes of HUGE amounts of data.

things like these should always run through individual inspection on a case-by-case basis. cue map-roule...
172017-10-24 11:28:46 UTCmuralito @GRUBERND, I would agree if you write that sentence considering that using an algorithm does not necessarily imply automation.
182017-10-24 11:33:29 UTCmuralito @woodpeck (regarding your last comment)
Often a spammer (or any other user) deletes an existing object (street, POI, etc.) and adds a new one with her data. Please consider those cases when deleting or redacting objects.
192017-10-24 18:55:26 UTCwoodpeck I have started carefully removing the spam objects here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53216381 : Where a spammy description and contact information were added to a building but there was no shop/office/amenity tag (just name/phone/payment methods etc), I reduced the object to a mere buildi...
202017-10-24 20:55:42 UTCSafwatHalaby I think the algorithm is horrible.
212017-10-24 20:58:12 UTCSafwatHalaby For instance, this has a slightly "positive tone" but seems to be a 100% valid node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5109075827
.
I think your definition of a "spammy description" need to be narrowed.
222017-10-24 21:00:25 UTCSafwatHalaby Oh, I was reviewing via OSMCHA and I have a long backlog, and it seems that particular node was added back. Please ignore my comment if all the non spammy nodes were reverted.
12017-10-21 11:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Hello Владимир, against my warning you have reverted my changeset 53114647 instead of waiting for me to repair the problems. Now you are responsible for creating things like this: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384176165 and several 1000 other SEO entries in OpenStreetMap. Will you continu...
22017-10-23 21:32:31 UTCwoodpeck I see that you're making edits again; would you kindly comment on my question above? Do you intend to do anything about the SEO entries that you have re-added to OSM in this changeset?
32017-10-24 06:32:31 UTCВладимир К I didn't see any SEO entries. All POIs I saw are quite correct
42017-10-24 11:48:45 UTCSomeoneElse https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899123/history just looks residential to me. Are you sure that there's actually a furniture shop located there? If it's a "work from home" business, and there's nothing visible on the street, then it shouldn't really be in OSM. Also, you've left th...
52017-10-24 12:37:03 UTCwoodpeck The changeset contains a ton of nodes that are meaningless in OSM because they lack a POI type, but that carry advertising messages like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529863394 - or look at the way I pointed to in my comment above (a highway with a spammy description added), or click o...
62017-10-24 12:58:48 UTCВладимир К @SomeoneElse
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4744899123 has website and address on it is same as on the node.
Anyway, I don't see there SEO or something else, you should delete node.

@woodpeck What do you want? revert my revert? You deleted valid buildings, highway, nodes. Do you want others...
72017-10-24 13:01:43 UTCВладимир К all I see are some invalid tags on some of these POI. They should be fixed, not deleted
82017-12-22 08:18:20 UTCMateusz Konieczny Are you aware that you added spam in this edit?
92017-12-22 08:19:29 UTCMateusz Konieczny "I didn't see any SEO entries. All POIs I saw are quite correct"

So you made automatic edit without proper checks. Great.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302768566/history had for example name set to "When you donate your vehicle to Breast Cancer Car Donations, the proceeds f...
102017-12-22 08:20:28 UTCMateusz Konieczny The same for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511823420 and other.
112017-12-23 08:36:17 UTCВладимир К yep, but firstly i reverted the huge autoatic edit without proper checks, In comments for reverted changeset i posted examples, there the hole buildings with adress was deleted! also your examples of roads was copletely deleted! not spam tag, but the whole way! Are your seriously defend such edits??...
12017-10-22 19:30:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello lorec10, please do not add "proposed" boundaries to OSM. They are nearly impossible to verify, they make editing more difficult for everyone who touches one of the members of the relation, and they are of little use. In this particular case, you also fail to explain who is proposing ...
12017-10-22 19:21:27 UTCwoodpeck Hello lorec10, please do not add hardly-verifiable boundaries to OpenStreetMap. Even if you *were* living in the region and could therefore observe what language is spoken there, we don't usually map language areas in OpenStreetMap because they are so difficult to verify. Current administrative boun...
12017-10-22 09:54:25 UTCwoodpeck Hi,

you seem to be adding lots of objects to OSM that have an address and a name but nothing else. This is not useful; you must use a tag that describes *what* the object is. Also I doubt that your use of the name tag is correct, since it would indicate that there must be an object CALLED "J...
12017-10-20 00:56:48 UTCaharvey What's the policy on SEO edits, I encounter them almost every day and not really sure what to do. The ones I encounter it's a new OSM account for each "customer" and they never use the correct format for opening_hours or accepted payments etc.
22017-10-20 05:55:55 UTCwoodpeck There's no written policy but first and foremost the rule is "no advertising", i.e. anything with a "description" tag that tells us how the excellent lawyer has been helping their clients for a decade should be deleted on sight. Another frequent problem is bad or missing tags, or...
12017-10-19 21:11:05 UTCwoodpeck Warum die kommentarlose Löschung von hazmat und lane-Tags?
22017-10-19 21:28:19 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
12017-10-17 00:02:24 UTCwoodpeck Please do not create historic boundaries on OpenStreetMap. They unnecessarily complicate the editing process for others. Check out OpenHistoricalMap for a project to map historic boundaries and other historic facts.
12017-10-14 23:40:03 UTCwoodpeck Why did you remove the end_date=1947 from this boundary in this changeset? Is the "Geographical region of Italy" (that includes Corse and Istria) more than a historic boundary?
12017-10-14 21:25:15 UTCwoodpeck Hello ninjamask, please be more careful when you apply such large-scale fixes. It is obvious that you have *not* really checked these 10,000 objects that you "fixed" here or else you would have seen that a lot of it is really broken data that does not belong in OSM (e.g. https://www.openst...
12017-10-13 05:54:06 UTCwoodpeck Hello Drew_P, are *any* of the edits you made to OSM real, or are they all about fictional stuff and funny names?
22018-07-19 22:51:42 UTCJack the Ripper I'm take "fictional stuff and funny names" for $1,000, Alex.
12017-10-08 18:18:15 UTCfserges Если в отношение добавляются члены, то им должны присваиваться роли. Член без роли по умолчанию воспринимается как outer. В этом changeset были массово добавлены члены пох...
22017-10-11 11:57:11 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted these edits because they violate a DWG resolution regarding the Crimea. Please don't remove Crimea from the Ukraine relation. See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52822088
12017-10-10 19:49:07 UTCrazor74 Hello. Why delete street names contribute by other user than chdr? This is not normal to revert data by assuming that they are copyright violation from google only because that user didnt respond about his sources... It is only assuming... Google copyed from us alot. I aim certain that they copy fro...
22017-10-11 07:39:15 UTCwoodpeck I have deleted only street names contributed by user chdr, not those contributed by other users. The user has been proven to have used Google in some situations and this nourishes the suspicion that he used Google in other areas too. If he had used a different source, it would have been easy for him...
12017-10-10 19:01:38 UTCwoodpeck You specified "Bing aerial imagery" as a data source for this change of a hotel name - surely that can't be right. What is the correct data source for the name change?
22017-10-11 11:15:56 UTCGoWestTravel In this case, I'm the source myself. I visited this hotel last month on the first day of the name change (Sep 18). I was not aware Bing was mentioned as a source here.

Thanks,

GoWestTravel
12017-10-10 11:47:12 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Georg, hier hast Du abermals einem problematischen Datensatz, der eine werbliche "description" enthielt, ein "office=lawyer" hinzugefügt. Als Quelle hast Du "ESRI World Image" angegeben, obwohl das Gebäude darauf nicht ausreichnd zu sehen ist. Dass es hi...
22017-10-10 15:26:54 UTCuser_5359 Hallo, nur weil einer in der description ausschweifend wird, existiert noch lange keine Grund, die Angaben komplett zu löschen, zu mal kein weiterer Grund vorliegt (wie keine ähnliche Straße in der Nähe oder als Kirche gekennzeichnet).

Korrektur der source Angabe Knowledge &...
12017-09-08 18:12:40 UTCbergaufsee Hallo geozeisig,
wo ist jetzt hier dein Problem? Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport#Busse steht doch eindeutig: Wenn ein richtiger Bussteig vorhanden ist -> An der Halteposition des Busses einen Node auf der Straße ... Er erhält auch das Tag highway=bus_stop...
22017-09-09 08:13:57 UTCgeozeisig highway=bus_stop muss auf jeden Fall seitlich am besten da wo das Haltestellenschild ist. Sonst wird die Bushaltestelle mittig gerendert und man weiß nicht für welche Richtung die Haltestelle zuständig ist. Wenn du schon Bussteige einzeichnen willst nimm der vorderen node in Fahrtric...
32017-09-09 10:09:56 UTCbergaufsee Das Thema der Fahrtrichtung ist doch auch bei public_transport=stop_position gegeben?! Das Problem ist doch aber mit der Eintragung der Bussteige gelöst, die sind ja an der richtigen Stelle. Außerdem geht dies auch aus den Busrouten hervor.
Deine Darstellung hat sich nicht bewährt s...
42017-09-10 20:29:26 UTCNakaner Hallo geozeisig,

könntest du bitte, bevor du mit weiteren Umtaggingaktionen in Berlin und Umgebung fortfährst, diese auf der Berliner Mailingliste diskutieren?

Des Weiteren möchte ich dich bitten, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare einzugeben, erst recht, wenn du ...
52017-09-11 06:36:48 UTCgeozeisig Gewöhnlich werden in einem Änderungssatz mehrere verschiedene Änderungen gemacht, die kann man nicht noch einzeln erklären.
Auch ist es unüblich alle Änderung vorher in einem Forum zu diskutieren. Da gibt es immer jemand der ein Bedenken äußert. Und zum Schl...
62017-09-24 14:49:35 UTCbergaufsee CS reverted, ich behalte mir vor ähnlich gelagerte CS die dem wiki entgegenlaufen gleich zu tun. Weitere Kommentare hierzu wird es auch von mir an dieser Stelle nicht mehr geben.
72017-09-25 06:04:13 UTCgeozeisig Da es massenweise Beispiele für Haltekanten gibt, welche von schienengebundenen und nicht schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen gibt wurde dieses Tag durch public_transport=platform ersetzt.
Original Wiki
82017-10-08 11:59:31 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Geozeisig, Du hast insofern recht, als dass Dein Tagging nicht "dem Wiki entgegenläuft", zumindest nicht mehr oder weniger als das, welches bergaufsee bevorzugt; beide Arten sind im Wiki dokumentiert. Letzten Endes ist es Geschmackssache, wie man es macht - ähnlich wie z.B....
92017-11-04 09:58:12 UTCgeozeisig Es gab ein Übersetzungsfehler auf der Seite DE:Public_transport der jetzt behoben ist. So sollte es in Zukunft möglich sein Bushaltestellen (highway=bus_stop) neben der Straße zu mappen, wie es auch landläufig üblich ist.
102017-11-04 11:09:42 UTCNakaner Hallo geozeisig,

die "Korrektur" der Wikiseite stammt von dir. Du hast dort eine Änderung vorgenommen, die am 21. Oktober 2017 der Benutzer Selfish Seahorse auf der englischen Seite vorgenommen hat.

Deine Änderung: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE%3APubli...
112017-11-05 07:01:47 UTCgeozeisig Des Thema wurde schon ausführlich auf https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59047 diskutiert. Für mich gilt aber weiterhin was auf den Wiki-Seiten steht.
Gruß Dieter
12017-10-06 21:04:20 UTCChrissW-R1 Please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4016746
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3870917

It is a peninsula, but boundary=land_area in combination of place=peninsula is a good compromise for me.
22017-10-07 09:42:21 UTCwoodpeck I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
32017-10-07 09:47:17 UTCwoodpeck I have modified those two accordingly. Thank you.
12017-10-04 20:22:17 UTCwoodpeck Hello Nordpfeil, it would be great if you could spend a little more time on setting proper changeset comments. "Details added/updated" is a changeset comment that probably applies to 99% of all edits made in OSM. The changeset comment is there for others to understand the nature of your ed...
12017-10-04 16:13:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52284504, 52289867, 52291481, 52291485, 52291570, 52291644, 52291742, 52291771, 52291830, 52291847, 52291851, 52291859, 52291868, 52291884, 52291913, 52291921, 52291936, 52291971, 52292004, 52292063, 52292082, 52292116, 52292190, 52292222, ...
12017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-09-28 12:02:23 UTCmueschel Hi,
you're adding a huge number of new and undocumented tags on these objects (listed below). Please clean this up. The number of nodes on each object also seems to be much too high - especially those half-circular shapes.

LCC \tA12-A2-A6
aream2 \t97530.06567
date \t1-spt-2017
escala \t1:25k\...
22017-10-04 16:13:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
32017-11-18 11:19:47 UTCmueschel Hi PC10,
did you actually read and understand all the changeset comments and the user block message?
Your edits have been deleted because of their quality. Now you start over and re-import all of this again? Please stop it!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53884840
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 07:58:10 UTCwoodpeck This data is buggy. It does not match available imagery and has strange tracing artifacts. Do not upload more of this data. Discuss it in the imports list and seek help in attaining a proper process.
22017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:38 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:37 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 16:13:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52624316, 52625728, 52627705, 52628655, 52622933, 52626252, 52628233, 52627070, 52623899, 52629111, 52623453, 52626630, 52625217, 52629562, 52624762 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed, buggy imports (blocky geometry, bad...
12017-10-04 11:34:48 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Georg, bitte beachte die Regeln für "mechanisches Editieren". Diese besagen, dass man nicht "blind" an Objekten herumbasteln soll. Du bist ein erfahrener Mapper, wenn Du hier genau hingeschaut hättest, hättest Du gemerkt, dass (1) ein unsinniges Tag "ord...
22017-10-04 15:55:19 UTCfreebeer Hallo 'peck,
ESRI has imagery up to zoomlevel 17 here.
Looks (quickly) the same as Bing, without the artificial overzoom to z19.
Which also seems the same as DigitalGlobe Premium, with a different overzoom process (blocky instead of blurry).
Nonetheless, the area looks like a mess seen by me in ...
32017-10-04 16:30:00 UTCfreebeer Sorry to reply, but after posting I downloaded some history and remember this is a controversial import being reverted.
Not only do all the now-length entries have 5-decimal precision, but many are identical, when I measure nearly 100m for some.
I would guess (why would I even bother?) these are a...
12017-10-04 10:01:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52244481, 52244523, 52244534, 52244547, 52244561, 52244572, 52244592.
12017-09-22 08:44:01 UTCwoodpeck Please explain why you have uploaded a village boundary with name:en="we are evil"?
22017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-09-22 09:05:14 UTCwoodpeck what does "cop=do not share" mean on this boundary?
22017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 10:01:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52620249 where the changeset comment is: Remove buggy admin boundaries added by opengislab after no response received in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244523, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52244481
12017-10-04 08:33:48 UTCwoodpeck Dear user Ladamafria. You seem to be working with users PC10 and/or opengislab and perhaps others on some sort of project. Please have the project lead/coordinator contact the OSMF data working group at data@osmfoundation.org. We need to talk to you. You are uploading data in violation of the data i...
22017-10-04 20:11:26 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636453 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed and buggy import of waterways (bad tags, don't match imagery, intersect with existing geometries, etc.) that is claimed to have been extracted from SRTM
12017-09-22 08:48:51 UTCwoodpeck Hello PC10, these data imports are faulty (they introduce bad keys and they have over-noded, pseudo-precise geometries that seem to come from converting a raster map to vectors). Before you import anything more, please consult the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidel...
22017-09-22 10:23:14 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52...
32017-10-02 18:54:42 UTCmueschel Hi PC10, hi woodpeck,
there are many more nodes and areas imported since, including newly invented tags (aream2, LCC, proyecto, ...). It also seems that most features do not correspond to actual features in the satellite images - e.g. forest multipolygons have the largest trees excluded, borders do...
42017-10-04 08:23:23 UTCwoodpeck Yes they should. We know nothing about the source - it is claimed that there's some community project - but the data suffers from geometry anomalies and bad tagging and the import hasn't been discussed. I am deleting the data now and have asked PC10 to discuss any further plans on the imports list.
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 48865841, 48865877, 49321250, 49486123, 49851029, 49851047, 49851066, 49851084, 49851100, 49851112, 49851130, 49851132, 49851155, 49851185, 49851225, 49851235, 49851258, 49851271, 49851278, 49851308, 49975039, 49975054, 49996614, 49996723, ...
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:27 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:26 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-27 05:02:38 UTCnammala Hi Zowie Polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting valid data and also adding rails over the roads, OSM is the real map of the world and deleting the data is not encourgable. Don't do random edits on the map.

22017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:25 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:24 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:23 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:22 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:21 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:20 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:19 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:18 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:17 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:16 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:14 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-26 12:17:33 UTCwoodpeck What does this change have to do with Northridge shopping center?
22017-07-26 13:58:27 UTCiandees Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50590816
32017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:11 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:10 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:09 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:08 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:05 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:02 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-25 04:49:37 UTCupendrakarukonda Hi Zowie Polie,

This is a known ID editor bug, where it deletes the wikidata tag, while mapping through it. Can you get back the wikidata tag to the feature again?

Regards,

Upendra
22017-10-03 00:05:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:01 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-25 05:45:49 UTCnammala Hi Zowie polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting lot of valuable data. I have reverted your changeset. Please make sure the data in the OSM is crowd sourced and the data is so valuable please don't delete the data.

Regards,
nammala
22017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:05:00 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:59 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:58 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:57 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:56 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-07-26 13:58:01 UTCiandees Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50590816
22017-10-03 00:04:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:47 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:46 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:45 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:44 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-09-16 03:48:23 UTCPaul Johnson I'm probably going to be reverting this changeset as it has appeared to have removed major streets in Guymon, and broken the relations for OK 3, US 54, US 64, and US 412 simultaneously.
22017-09-16 04:09:47 UTCPaul Johnson This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52085816 where the changeset comment is:
32017-09-16 04:21:05 UTCPaul Johnson OK, was able to get that rolled back; sorry if I undid anything you might have done in the process, losing connectivity to four cross-state highways was pretty noticeable. I'm not mad or anything, but I do ask for a little more care when deleting features.
42017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:43 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:41 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:40 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-03 00:04:39 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
12017-10-01 19:07:39 UTCwoodpeck nyuriks, you have in the past made edits claimed to be "as per discussion on talk list" when the discussion on the talk list certainly not meant you had an all clear for the edit. Now you claim to make edits "per community discussion in telegram chat", which third parties cannot ...
22017-10-01 19:27:32 UTCnyuriks fair point (and no, I come from Wikipedia background and really don't like sockpuppets). Take a look at the #osm-ru IRC channel - the channel topic says: "https://telegram.me/ruosm >> жизнь переехала в телеграм" (there are ~250 people there). Also, IRC cha...
12017-09-30 15:17:37 UTCwoodpeck Dear osmviborg, the OSMF Data Working group has received several complaints over your use of the source "SDFE-data/survey/knowledge". You are editing all over Denmark. In the future, please make it clear for every edit whether this comes from a survey or from an external data set and if so...
12017-09-30 15:09:37 UTCwoodpeck Is "stadnina koni" really a tourist attraction?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5088526122

And your "Wieża widokowa Joanna" has already be deleted by someone else.

Please: Only add data to OSM that is actually verifiable on the ground, and that is correct to your kn...
22017-10-01 20:40:34 UTCRicoElectrico @woodpeck This is sadly quite a problem with maps.me edits if you watch the edits regularly. The users apparently aren't told not to enter places for which there's no category.

If only we could push maps.me to improve this (as well as using notes/POI for private bookmarks due to poor UI wording)....
12017-09-29 12:15:15 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has accidentally broken the geometries https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485019675 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157366833 - they now look "blocky" and have many self-intersections. Can you repair this yourself or would you like help in reverting the edit?
22017-09-29 12:59:00 UTCraito @woodpeck I think it is rather this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52402340 that broke it, or the previous one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52165496.

This one with comment "validation" is probably trying to fix it but not properly.
32017-09-29 14:04:58 UTCwoodpeck Indeed. I'll have a look at reverting these two landuse areas.
42017-09-29 23:38:10 UTCDewi Sulistioningrum Hi woodpeck

I will check this changeset on Monday and repair the problem

Thank you
52017-09-29 23:44:01 UTCDewi Sulistioningrum On the changeset, I was validated the infrastructures from survey data and delete import=yes from some line boundary administrative in the area. I didn't changed the landuse, perhaps my team has changed the landuse and broke the landuse. Because we were working with some people for the area.
But,...
12017-09-27 21:17:32 UTCwoodpeck I don't think this is right. Aldi Süd and Aldi Nord are not two different operators of the same brand; the brand is different (different logo, different products on the shelves, etc). I'm unhappy that someone from England feels empowered by Wikidata to make judgements about German supermarkets ...
22017-09-27 21:28:33 UTCpigsonthewing I'm not sure what you mean by "empowered by Wikidata", and the fact that I am from England does not prohibit me from editing an item in Germany, a country I have visited - and shopped in - often, so please tone down the frankly unacceptable nationalist rhetoric.

As to a "common bra...
32017-09-28 06:03:30 UTCR0bst3r Just a question: who needs all this *:wikidata, if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve? You can find brand and operator on this page. Mabe think about it ... the nationalistic rhetoric remembers me of some discussions as I edited some breweries I visited in London. So not very uncommon.
42017-09-28 07:02:07 UTCpigsonthewing " if only wikidata=Q125054 would also serve?"

That case is false, so your question is moot.
52017-09-28 07:03:24 UTCpigsonthewing Also, I'm sorry to hear of your experience editing around London; that is equally unacceptable.
12017-09-25 11:42:45 UTCwoodpeck Dear rondock, there are two issues with this changeset. One is that you aren't giving an appropriate changeset comment - you write "details" but what you are doing is deleting all sidewalks. Your changeset comment should have been "Deleting sidewalks", and it should also have giv...
12017-09-19 18:13:58 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello cat_crash. In the last days, you have edited http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396714343 a lot. Also you have introduced a lot of new (so far unknown) keys (e.g. additional_amenities, own_parking, pets_allowed, ssync:osm). All this with a "new editor", or what is "Services_OpenSt...
22017-09-23 15:09:36 UTCcat_crash Hi,
we are piloting on integration OSM with our cloud solution helps venues keep OSM data up-to-date.
New key will be introduced in accordance with process or removed after piloting. Please notice - we are piloting only on 2 venues. No any mass loads will be done
32017-09-23 20:03:10 UTCwoodpeck Please note there's a development server at https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org that we recommend to be used for testing out new software. I don't know what your cloud solution entails but please keep in mind that it is very important to OSM that those who contribute information react to chang...
12017-09-22 09:08:10 UTCwoodpeck This is an undiscussed import that not only introduces a wrong key ("lenght") but also seems to be totally out of sync with available aerial imagery. Please follow the OSM import guidelines, and discuss such imports before you execute them. The imports will be reverted.
22017-09-22 09:14:29 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52269404 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from opengislab, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245612
12017-09-05 14:25:47 UTCwoodpeck This changesert is vandalism.
12017-09-02 23:31:42 UTCadjuva Hallo Frederik!

Die Bahnsteig-Multipolygone in Luisental und Bous (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1620893 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1620862) waren aus meiner Sicht nicht überflüssig. Sie entsprachen einem im Wiki dokumentiertem Tagging-Schema (http://wiki.openstre...
22017-09-03 07:55:43 UTCwoodpeck Ja, Du hast recht, mit den Bahnsteigkanten habe ich etwas übertrieben. Ich werde das wieder zurück-ändern. Allerdings ist es m.E. trotzdem falsch, die *Bahnsteigkante* als Stop in die Routenrelation aufzunehmen, stattdessen sollte das *Bahnsteigmultipolygon* als Stop in die Route. Ode...
12017-08-30 00:53:49 UTCArlas prima di cancellare i nomi delle strade, perché non chiedi a "Ludovic Drouard" il perché delle sue modifiche? se ha mappato in loco (cosa molto probabile) stai rovinando ore di lavoro di altre persone
22017-08-30 06:15:46 UTCwoodpeck It appears that you are on a crusade to delete names from those small parts of roads that lead on and off roundabouts, and you're doing that not only in your local area but over large parts of Sicily. I think that this is something you should discuss with the community before, as opinions seem to di...
32017-08-30 08:45:40 UTCthetornado76 He deleted also names from pedestrian zone like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51458691
12017-08-30 06:11:55 UTCwoodpeck Why did you delete the name "Via Fernando Magellano" (way 519743740)?
12017-08-20 23:23:52 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Ruhrpottkast, danke fuer Deine Beitraege. Leider ist der "Eisenbahnatlas" keine fuer OSM erlaubte Quelle, daher muss ich diese Aenderungen wieder entfernen. Das heisst nicht, dass die Information falsch waere (ich kenne mich mit Eisenbahnen nicht so gut aus), aber wie gesagt, der Eis...
22017-08-21 18:50:33 UTCRuhrpottkast Wenn man sich zum Beispiel https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/27490724 anschaut, hat die Strecke in OSM schon einen regelmäßigen Wechsel zwischen main und branch hinter sich. Wäre an der Zeit, hier mal zumindest für OSM sich festzulegen. Nirgendwo wird schnell gefah...
12017-08-20 23:23:36 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Ruhrpottkast, danke fuer Deine Beitraege. Leider ist der "Eisenbahnatlas" keine fuer OSM erlaubte Quelle, daher muss ich diese Aenderungen wieder entfernen. Das heisst nicht, dass die Information falsch waere (ich kenne mich mit Eisenbahnen nicht so gut aus), aber wie gesagt, der Eis...
22017-08-21 18:31:53 UTCRuhrpottkast Ich hatte mit dem Changeset mehr geändert als nur branch->main (unter anderem Gleisanzahl).
Das habe ich wiederhergestellt.
Nach § 40 EBO (Fahrgeschwindigkeit) gilt auf Nebenbahnen maximal 100 km/h. Dort gilt aber stellenweise 110 km/h. Folglich ist es auch deshalb als Hauptbahn ident...
32017-08-21 18:42:13 UTCRuhrpottkast Die Strecke hatte zunächst usage=main. Erst mit Changesetz 51314899 wurde dann durch HelgaZ am 16.11.2016 usage=main zu usage=branch geändert. Änderungssatzkommentar war: "Flächennutzung Kiebingen". Quelle war: "Bing; extrapolation". Ist schon reichlich komis...
12017-08-04 21:45:15 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted this changeset because it created one huge building=residential relation that contained the buildings of half a village, and all the outer rings forming the buildings were imported with a ton of non-OSM tags. Please discuss any data import on a suitable mailing list (at least talk-it...
12017-07-28 11:24:17 UTCwoodpeck Hello Seznam2 (and Seznam),
it appears that you are making a very large number of edits to OSM with an automatic script. Please note that we have rules for such kinds of edits (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits) - among other things you are expected to discuss the scope and type of...
12017-07-27 13:42:29 UTCwoodpeck Has this import been discussed / documented somewhere?
22017-07-27 17:08:30 UTCViriatoLusitano https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005014.html
32017-07-27 18:27:28 UTCralley LINZ imports were originally discussed staring 17/08/12 on the imports list. The imports have been going on intermittently since this time as tracked through http://linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz/workslices/list/?ws_state=&dataset=&layer=river_cl&user=&order_by=checked_out_at
Docume...
12017-07-24 12:53:04 UTCwoodpeck This changeset appears to import a large number of duplicate nodes and rectangles that bear no tags that OSM recognizes. It looks as if the OSM database was used to mark the mapping status certain map squares. Can you explain?
12017-04-23 16:21:26 UTCdatendelphin What was your source for the names you added here, for example Halde?
22017-04-24 00:05:56 UTCdonovaly > What was your source?

The GWR. There is an official frontend for this register:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/?zoom=9&lang=de&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.swissimage&catalogNodes=457,491&layers=ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register&X=227873.34&Y=623013.50
32017-04-24 19:19:23 UTCdatendelphin The GWR and generally anything on map.geo.admin.ch are not valid sources for OSM. Don't copy from other maps.
42017-04-25 20:24:44 UTCdonovaly > Don't copy from other maps.

I don't copy from other maps. I had a long discussion with Simon Poole, from the Swiss OSM user groupd about this. In my opinion it does not violate any license to put in official names into OSM. I requested to inform me if I am wrong and the user group discussed ...
52017-04-25 20:53:51 UTCSOSM I gave you all the relevant legal material that shows that the GWR data cannot be used in the way you have used it in the current legal framework. You continued to make up reasons why the laws don't apply to you, we needn't go over that again.
62017-04-25 21:08:02 UTCdonovaly > I gave you all the relevant legal material that shows that the GWR data cannot be used in the way you have used it

That is not true. I clearly stated why I disagree with you, I even offered to pay my lawyer to look over the licenses to clarify what is OK and what not.

It is strange that I...
72017-04-25 21:25:09 UTCSimonPoole Quoting from my response to your first mail:
"Ich kann auch nicht ganz nachvollziehen wieso du auf
http://www.geo.admin.ch/internet/geoportal/de/home/geoadmin/contact.html#copyright
glaubst keinen Hinweis auf eine Beschränkung der Nutzung der GWR-Daten
zu finden, die 6 (mehr oder wenig...
82017-04-25 21:47:10 UTCdonovaly Siehe meine Antwort darauf vom 26.4.2016:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/read/566658

Dort schrieb ich ganz unten:
"Kurzum, ich möchte hiermit die Diskussion beenden und zu einem Ergebnis kommen. Ich bitte Sie mir die entsprechenden Textpassagen aus der GWR-Verordnung zukommen zu...
92017-04-25 21:49:03 UTCdonovaly Um nochmal ganz konkret meine Frage zu stellen:
"
Ist es explizit nicht erlaubt, Folgendes zu tun?: 1. man schaut z.B. in http://qa.poole.ch/ch-roads/VD/5672.html 2. man sucht manuell nach "Forel-sur-Lucens" und gelangt zu https://map.geo.admin.ch/?X=175120.72&Y=553007.53&zo...
102017-04-26 19:20:43 UTCdatendelphin Deine Idee des "reinwaschen der Information" ist nicht neu. Du kannst gerne dazu weitere Meinungen aus des community einholen, z.B. auf der internationalen https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk talk mailingliste. Weil das ist wirklich etwas was die gesamte community betreffen w&uum...
112017-04-26 19:57:40 UTCromanh Danke donovaly für Deine gut gemeinte Arbeit.
Leider ist dies so aber nicht o.k.

GWR-VO Art. 13 Weitergabe der Daten zu anderen Zwecken: 4) "..., oder andere kommerzielle Zwecke, ist untersagt."
Somit ist es nicht für OSM verwendbar, da eine kommerzielle Nutzung der OSM D...
122017-05-10 00:46:27 UTCdonovaly Hallo Roman und Datendelphin,

vielen Dank für eure Erläuterungen. Ich möchte dennoch nicht einfach aufgeben, denn es wird sich nur etwas ändern, wenn man Druck aufbaut, sei es mit einem Rechtsgutachten oder durch direkten Kontakt mit dem BFS und natürlich, indem man Polit...
132017-05-10 21:05:36 UTCSimonPoole OSM ist kein Projekt zur Erforschung rechtlicher Grauzonen (die es in diesem Fall aber gar nicht gibt).

Auch wenn es eine rechtliche Lücke geben würde (die ich aber nicht sehe), die Willensäusserung des Gesetzgebers ist klar. Wir (die Schweizer OSM Community) stehen immer wieder ...
142017-05-10 21:38:40 UTCwoodpeck Und die DWG hat sich hier in Verbindung gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344
152017-05-25 23:59:26 UTCdonovaly > Auch wenn es eine rechtliche Lücke geben würde (die ich aber nicht sehe), die Willensäusserung des Gesetzgebers ist klar.

Dann lass es uns ändern! So klar kann es aber nicht sein, wenn ein Fachanwalt es überhaupt nicht so klar sieht.

> Wir (die Schweizer OSM Co...
162017-05-26 09:59:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo donovaly, Du hast bislang nicht auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 reagiert. Bitte lasse uns bis zum 18.6.2017 eine Liste aller Änderungen, bei denen Du Dich auf GWR-Daten oder andere nicht explizit freigegebene Quellen gestützt hast, zukommen. (Es reicht auch eine wi...
172017-07-23 20:36:58 UTCdonovaly > Bitte lasse uns bis zum 18.6.2017 eine Liste aller Änderungen, bei denen Du Dich auf GWR-Daten oder andere nicht explizit freigegebene Quellen gestützt hast, zukommen.

Servus liebe Kollegen,

was geht denn hier? Ihr habt den Sachverhalt nicht rechtlich klären lassen, obwohl...
182017-07-23 20:41:52 UTCdonovaly > Du hast bislang nicht auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 reagiert.

Doch, hier, denn auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1344 kann ich nichts kommentieren. Mit einem Frederik Ramm, der mich gesperrt hat, hatte ich vorher noch nichts zu tun und es gibt auch keine Inf...
192017-07-23 21:59:52 UTCdas-g > Mit einem Frederik Ramm, der mich gesperrt hat, hatte ich vorher noch nichts zu tun und es gibt auch keine Info wie man ihn erreichen kann.

Frederik Ramm = woodpeck. Du kannst ihm also über seinen OSM-Account eine Message schreiben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck --> http...
202017-07-24 09:10:25 UTCwoodpeck "das-g" hat die Situation richtig erfasst. Wir werden alle Namen, die aus GWR kommen, aus OpenStreetMap rauswerfen, und erbitten Deine (donovalys) Hilfe dabei, zu unterscheiden, wo Du GWR benutzt hast und wo nicht; kannst oder willst Du diese Hilfe nicht leisten, werden alle von Dir beiget...
212017-08-02 13:14:59 UTCSimonPoole Um kurz noch ein rechtliches Update zu geben: am 1. Juli trat die reviderte Fassung des VGWR in kraft: https://www.edi.admin.ch/edi/de/home/dokumentation/mm.msg-id-66999.html und http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/41672

Wie befürchtet bleibt es weiterhin unklar ob die Daten t...
222017-08-06 22:12:47 UTCdonovaly > Wir werden alle Namen, die aus GWR kommen, aus OpenStreetMap rauswerfen, und erbitten Deine (donovalys) Hilfe dabei, zu unterscheiden, wo Du GWR benutzt hast und wo nicht; kannst oder willst Du diese Hilfe nicht leisten, werden alle von Dir beigetragenen Namen entfernt. Diese Entfernung ist bes...
232017-11-01 23:31:22 UTCdonovaly Hallo liebe OSMler,
wie ich sehe, wurde JEDER meiner Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Das verstehe ich nicht. Warum kann man es nicht auf sich beruhen lassen? Es gab keinen von außen, der es moniert hat. Ich habe zugesagt, nichts mehr an OSM in der Schweiz zu machen und fertig. W...
12017-07-22 22:33:17 UTCgeow Ist die Angabe "für Fahrräder nicht erlaubt" per E-Mail nachvollziehbar belegt worden? Falls nein, sollte das Verbot IMHO nicht ohne Vor-Ort-Wissen ergänzt werden.
22017-07-23 08:49:39 UTCwoodpeck Das thüringische Waldgesetz erlaubt das Radfahren (nur) "auf befestigten Wegen und Straßen". Ein Blick auf das Luftbild liess es mir unwahrscheinlich erscheinen, dass sich an dieser Stelle ein befestigter Weg befindet - unwahrscheinlich genug, um der E-Mail zu glauben, die wir e...
32017-07-23 10:05:21 UTCgeow Danke, ich habe noch einen Hinweis ergänzt, in der Hoffnung auf bessere Sichtbarkeit für lokale Kenner, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1075389

Die allgemeine Diskussion zum Wegerecht in Thüringen könnten wir ja im Forum vertiefen, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic...
42017-07-26 19:39:03 UTCgeow Hmm, jetzt hat sich ein neuer user (e-quadrat) angemeldet und die 2 Wegabschnitte südlich des Oberen Hermannsbergsteins gelöscht. Ich habe es hier mal andiskutiert...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50592716
12017-07-10 07:20:22 UTCwoodpeck Hello Aleks-Berlin, you have been warned a number of times not to perform mechanical edits. A mechanical edit is one where you edit objects without looking at them individually. In this changeset you have removed two tags from a series of hydrants, while leaving a ton of other useless tags in place ...
22017-07-10 09:20:35 UTCAleks-Berlin Hello Woodpeck, how should I know that the other tags have no intention (I call them private/unique keys, even others argue that everybody can create his own keys/tags).
Of course I do not like them and I noticed them, but as I read once "we should respect the work of others". This is a c...
12017-06-15 11:18:39 UTCwoodpeck I am concerned that your adding of area data for motorways will make editing unnecessarily complicated. We don't normally do that in OSM - have you discussed these plans with the Polish community?
22017-06-15 22:15:08 UTCRicoElectrico This actual edit aside (I did not check it), what is wrong? There's a 30 pages long thread: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=12337 and also a Wiki page.
32017-06-15 22:17:23 UTCRicoElectrico @woodpeck How did you get here, if I can ask? It wouldn't seem to trip deletion alerts or rarely used key alerts (a:h is somewhat popular).
42017-06-16 09:51:20 UTCwoodpeck I knew that Marek had once done some streets-as-areas mapping in a test area but I wasn't aware of any consensus to do this Poland-wide. But I'm happy to defer to the community about that. -- How I got here? I randomly looked at recent changesets out of idle curiosity.
52017-06-26 08:08:02 UTCmarek kleciak Hi Frederik,
because of our Lobbying OSM community may use the high resolution gov. images for mapping. Some areas are in common sense already "dead" for active mappers, See Wroclaw or Szczecin. The users add there massively the street areas. There are already 4 renderers they use this t...
12017-06-15 11:21:53 UTCwoodpeck Mir scheint, dass Du in diesem Changeset eine Reihe von Straßen gelöscht und dann wieder neu erstellt hast. Warum? Dabei geht ja die Änderungs-Historie verloren, und die ist u.U. nützlich.
22017-06-15 11:24:28 UTCwoodpeck Kann es sein, dass Du es ausserdem versäumt hast, die "neuen" Straßen in die diversen Wanderweg-Relationen einzufügen, in denen die alten steckte, und dadurch jetzt die Relationen Lücken haben?
32017-06-15 14:02:37 UTCma-rt-in Hallo woodpeck,

in diesem Fall wurde die Straßen neuverlegt und dabei entsprechend mit Key´s versehen, gelöscht werden ein einfachhalber. Zudem ist mir bei jetzigem nicht ersichtlich, inwieweit die History nützlich ist.
2. Sind alle Relationen so, wie sie seien sollen.
42017-06-16 08:44:24 UTCNakaner Hallo ma-rt-in,

durch die Versionsgeschichte der Objekte (auch "History" genannt) ist ersichtlich, wer wann ein Objekt bearbeitet hat. Wenn du Objekte löscht und dann neu anlegst, geht diese Information verloren. Darüber hinaus erweckst du damit den Eindruck, dass du die Wege ...
12017-06-13 12:51:45 UTCPaul Johnson Is this in regards to the DACGroup edits?
22017-06-13 13:55:58 UTCwoodpeck Yes, the bulk was deleted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49484818 but some that had been edited by other people remained; it turned out that those edited by others were mostly still useless and they were then deleted in this changeset.
32017-06-13 14:37:34 UTCPaul Johnson OK. Were any of those in Oklahoma east of I 35? I know I worked on conflating some of those with existing data.
42017-06-14 11:27:38 UTCPaul Johnson OK, I think this might have been overzealous. I see this removed Node: 4897994740, which I had fixed.
52017-06-14 11:48:50 UTCwoodpeck I did a spot-check of some of the "fixed" objects and found that in many cases, only a part of the original problem had been repaired - sometimes a tag was fixed but the location was still in the middle of the road, or vice versa. In your particular example, you did fix the amenity tag but...
12017-06-14 11:21:01 UTCwoodpeck You moved the node "satyashor shiva mandir" a little bit - why? The Bing imagery doesn't really agree with the new position. Did you notice that the node was tagged "addr;city" (instead of addr:city), or that it is part of an useless, untagged rectangle that you could have delete...
22017-06-14 19:30:06 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi woodpeck,

in taginfo I saw an "addr;city"-key.
which I tried to fix for node/4908609673 which is close by. But by accident I moved it a little and more sad the key got not fixed. After this I saw, that the building looks rect-like in picture but not in shape of line. So applied the...
12017-06-13 17:35:35 UTCNakaner Hi EliotB,

please stop your ongoing import!

You posted on the Imports mailing list 11 days ago but the documentation page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=LINZ/Address_Import&oldid=1481962) lacks some important information about your import and you are not using a dedicate...
22017-06-13 20:28:09 UTCEliotB Which particular information do you think is lacking? Please comment on the talk page of my documentation page.
BTW others have gone ahead with much bigger imports with zero discussion and no consequence or revert .
(I've been working on this on the NZ list for 2.5 years)
32017-06-13 20:37:14 UTCNakaner I answered your email on the Imports mailing list a few minutes after I commented on this changeset. The Imports mailing list is a qualified place for discussions about imports. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-June/005026.html
42017-06-13 20:52:43 UTCwoodpeck Eliot, feel free to point out those non-discussed other imports and we can deal with them appropriately. -- I notice that you've placed "ref" tags on these address points which is highly unusual and seems to contradict your own wiki page. Don't add "ref" tags.
52017-06-13 21:09:53 UTCEliotB @woodpeck, Yes, I will replace these with LINZ:address_id as on my wiki page.
(or otherwise as results from further discussion)
12017-06-09 13:36:02 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, could you explain more about this "place of worship" named "ALMIGHTY 2WHEEL GODS" that you have added here? I could not discern anything on the aerial imagery that you quoted as a source. Please note that adding fictional data to OSM throws a bad light on *all* you...
12017-06-09 13:33:27 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, can you please explain the source for the names you have assigned in this changeset, especially "Mat(t) Sav Construction Climb", "Tily's Run", and "Princess Kubiak"? As you surely are aware, mapping names requires verifiability, and you can't just add any...
12017-06-09 13:27:55 UTCwoodpeck Hello MTBGuru, could you please explain why you believe that the correct name for this path is "Princess Kubiak", as you seem to have asserted in multiple edits over the past years?
12017-06-03 22:06:29 UTCwoodpeck Are you aware of the guidelines about "mechanical edits"? Please don't make large-scale changes like this without looking at the objects you're editing. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What's_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F for an explanation of the issue.
22017-06-04 14:52:59 UTCmweper @woodpeck Sorry, I revert it?
32017-06-05 23:54:43 UTCRicoElectrico I am fine with my POIs staying as-is now.
12017-05-26 06:22:42 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has uploaded alomost 5000 objects tagged as "shop=TD". What does that mean? And what does the highway tag with a numeric value mean? Further, you have not specificed a data source. Is this from a survey? If not, are you aware of the OSM data import policy?
22017-05-26 07:08:25 UTCDanhthanhnguyen94 Dear sir,
I'm going to do a survey to update address for my city, using ArcGIS and Vespucci (smartphone). Because of the limitnation of the fields in data when using ArcGIS Editor for OpenStreetMap so i have to temporarily use "highway" tag for "address" tag (data imported by A...
32017-05-26 07:31:37 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 48992034, 48991550, 48992768, 48992498, 48992250, 48991347, 48991791 where the changeset comment is: Revert buggy and un-discussed data uploads (shop=TD)
12017-05-24 06:05:07 UTCwoodpeck Hello 25or6to4, it appears that you're importing data from an NRHP data set in this and other similar change sets. Could you please ensure that the import is properly documented on the Wiki (I checked and at least it didn't seem obvious), and that you specify proper sources when making the edits? Th...
12017-05-23 20:37:44 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Miple, es gibt vermehrt Zweifel an der urheberrechtlichen Eignung Deiner Quellen. Bitte gib künftig routinemäßig bei Deinen Edits die Quelle an - "survey", wenn Du es selbst vor Ort erfasst hast, oder eben welches Luftbild es ist, oder bei Straßennamen oder Gren...
22017-08-02 04:03:09 UTCMiple OK, mache ich.
12017-05-23 14:44:26 UTCwoodpeck Hello jeijei66, it would be super helpful if you could make it a habit to add meaningful changeset comments to your edits, instead of ".". See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for a more detailed explanation.
12017-05-23 09:24:28 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Graf Westerholt, bitte beschränke Dich mit solchen Änderungen künftig auf Gegenden, in denen Du Ortskenntnis besitzt.
12017-05-23 04:31:16 UTCMarián Kyral Ahoj, žádná wikidata tam nevidím, zato mraky posunutých bodů, které udělaly zubaté cesty: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.1037/14.3004 :-(
22017-05-23 06:29:31 UTCelkueb Err,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9232412#map=15/48.2464/16.4048

huh?
32017-05-23 06:41:07 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48906966 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally seems to have moved a lot of nodes, breaking geometries
42017-05-23 06:46:11 UTCwoodpeck It appears that this changeset accidentally moved a large number of nodes. Strangely, the longitude has not been changed, and the latitude has been reduced by approximately 0.01 (~ 1 kilometre) for all nodes. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/9232412.png (temporary link) for a screenshot of the...
52017-05-23 15:42:24 UTCrmikke What I have done:

* Loaded results of this query to JOSM: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/peX
* Retrieved wikidata IDs with wikipedia plugin
* Saved that back to OSM.

There were some errors detected when uploading to OSM, but I haven't tried to correct any of them. However, the whole process took...
62017-05-23 15:52:29 UTCrmikke By "errors when uploading to OSM" I mean JOSM's validator detected errors that existed earlier - there was a duplicated relation at least, and countless warnings. I haven't tried to correct any of it exactly because I didn't want to touch anything else than wikidata IDs.
72017-05-23 21:30:55 UTCrmikke OK, I've repeated the procedure. It took much less time now, as most wikidata ids have been added in an earlier run (before the error).
Please check, there should be no displacement.
82017-05-23 21:33:26 UTCrmikke By the way, all the objects returned by the Overpass query now, require some manual action. In Poland it was usually updating a wikipedia link, as someone changed the title of wikipedia article for whatever reason.
12017-05-21 20:22:37 UTCwoodpeck Hello justascii, your data import technically violates the import guidelines which require prior discussion. It is much appreciated that you seem to be local to the area so you know what you're importing - but still, before you import anything larger, please check out and follow http://wiki.openstre...
22017-05-22 21:35:47 UTCjustascii Thank you, I'll go through the guidelines and follow the proscribed steps before bringing in anything else from this dataset. The data is reportedly from 2008, and it does contain outbuildings as well as houses.
12017-05-15 06:41:13 UTCwoodpeck I'm afraid this, again, is a change that breaks the map instead of improving it. I will revert your problematic edits now.
22017-05-15 06:41:57 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
12017-05-07 17:28:04 UTC16356Ahr Sind jetzt alle edits von diesem user verworfen?
22017-05-07 17:28:27 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 46581332, 46582093, 46582131, 46593560, 46594633, 46595576, 46603718, 46661012, 46661261, 46875045, 46929359, 46941721, 46941868, 46955624, 46955627, 46956418, 46977824, 46978128, 46981345, 46982526, 46984675, 46988086, 46988952, 46989056, ...
32017-05-07 17:30:08 UTC16356Ahr Warum? Die meisten waren doch sinnvoll.
42017-05-07 21:11:26 UTCwoodpeck Wenn wir klären können, woher dieser User seine Informationen hat, ob die Quelle zulässig ist, und wenn er aufhört, bei seinen Edits so viele Kollateralschäden zu verursachen, dass sie sich ständig Leute über ihn beschweren, dann können wir ja einige/viele/all...
12017-04-23 08:16:23 UTCwoodpeck What is wrong with you? For the third time now I have asked you to explain why you consider this to "not be a park" when the Long Beach municipal web site clearly lists it as a park - and you would think they should know better, no?
22017-04-28 23:20:14 UTCthomaswest7891 this was put as a park, someone with out being named wants the game pokemon go to spawn more pokemon. it is just a grassy area not a park.
32017-04-29 16:25:20 UTCwoodpeck Ok I'll use simpler language. This area was put as a park. Because it is a park. The City of Long Beach thinks this is a park. They have a description of this park on their web site. Many parks are really just grassy areas. But this grassy area is a park. Please leave it.
42017-04-29 16:29:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48260079 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism
12017-04-28 22:02:23 UTCRichRico Hi Woodpeck_repair, thanks for contibuting with osm.
I found a edition in one of your changeset, you modified the tag of a bridge `bridge = yes` and `bridge:sctructure=suspension` by just `bridge=suspension` acording the wiki the previous edition is correct.
maybe you have another explication
22017-04-29 16:22:11 UTCwoodpeck The problem is that someone simply hit the "fix everything" button on the JOSM validator for a very large number of items. While this did probably do the right thing in many cases, it also did the wrong thing in many cases. The JOSM validator is not a tool to be used indiscriminately like ...
12017-04-21 15:39:32 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48007226 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally moved many nodes by more than 100km
22017-04-24 08:30:43 UTCpfg21 The transfer of points was meaningful, all objects after editing locally validated, and any errors found corrected. Asked to cancel the rollback edits.
32017-04-24 08:32:32 UTCpfg21 The map after edits in fully working state
42017-04-24 09:01:59 UTCwoodpeck The move of the nodes in this changeset was clearly a mistake and has temporarily led to a broken map display. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/47972480.png for an illustration.
52017-04-26 08:24:23 UTCpfg21 I always check the result of my actions in josm.
the error that shows in the picture, sometimes because of problems in the servers of OSM.
Mapnik when updating the tiles gets to the time when the position of points are changed, but the points still belong to the old lines.
If you send /dirty a wh...
62017-04-26 08:32:24 UTCwoodpeck Are you saying that you have re-used node IDs for something entirely different in another area?
72017-04-26 09:09:36 UTCpfg21 Yeah, that happens sometimes
82017-04-27 07:38:51 UTCwoodpeck 1. You shouldn't do that (re-use node IDs), 2. here's the Achavi link that shows the broken changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47972480 - this is not a temporary rendering problem, at least three ways were totally broken in your changeset.
12017-04-25 21:05:05 UTCwoodpeck Please observe the following rules:
1. Do not put advertising copy in your changeset comment. A good changeset comment is "added Qtrust insurance", not what you wrote here.
2. Do not put advertising copy in the "description" tag or any other tag for that matter.
3. If you uplo...
12017-04-23 09:25:59 UTCwoodpeck Sebastic, if you delete polygons and someone else undoes your deletion, the correct approach is to discuss the issue, not stubbornly delete them again.
22017-04-23 09:48:10 UTCKostik https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6129&p=120
32017-04-23 09:55:36 UTCKostik Do not remove the relationship 3767168, 3767169 and the like!
42017-04-23 09:56:31 UTCKostik 3919370, 3919098
52017-04-23 10:17:54 UTCKostik 4471401
62017-04-23 10:23:28 UTCKostik 5372735
72017-04-23 11:18:02 UTCsebastic Please give these relations proper tags so that they don't qualify as old-style multipolygons.
82017-04-23 14:40:01 UTCKostik Before removing something, a good tone to write to the author of editing.
92017-04-23 14:42:42 UTCKostik Is the tag "note" not enough for you?
102017-04-23 14:52:47 UTCKostik I added a tag to the "note:de" for more of your understanding.
112017-04-23 15:31:03 UTCsebastic Neither the "note" nor "note:de" tag is sufficient to not have those relations be considered old-style multipolygons.

If you want to keep those relations in OpenStreetMap you should improve their tagging so they are not considered old-style multipolygons.

I'm not german BTW...
122017-04-23 16:28:04 UTCKostik If you do not want to roll back your vandal corrections, do not touch my relations.
132017-04-23 17:28:15 UTCsebastic If you don't want people to touch your relations, they shouldn't be in the OSM database that anyone with an account can edit. They should live in your own system to which only you have access.
12017-04-23 08:42:52 UTCwoodpeck Can you explain why you reverted this edit? Did it break anything or was it otherwise wrong? Please make it a habit to explain such things directly in the changeset comment when you revert something unless it is totally obvious.
22017-04-23 09:43:42 UTCKostik Были удалены отношения которые не стоило удалять. Причём без должного комментария почему это было сделано. Я вернул нужные мне мультиполигоны.

Relations have been removed are no...
12017-04-14 17:36:34 UTCrgt there are multiple references to this being a park on the internet so actually it is
22017-04-18 22:43:07 UTCiMarbot @rgt they are a malicious account. Look at their change history.
32017-04-19 15:45:35 UTCwoodpeck Curt, could you explain why you believe this is not a park. I found this on the web http://www.longbeach.gov/park/park-and-facilities/directory/marina-green/ which seems to say that at leas the city of Long Beach believes it is a park.
12017-04-19 13:49:07 UTCwoodpeck You appear to have deleted a lot of data in this and other nearby changesets. May I ask why?
12017-04-07 12:08:33 UTCDaveF Hi ti-lo
I've notice you've changed shop=motorcycle_repair to shop=motorcycle
What source did you use to ascertain they sell motorcycles?
22017-04-07 13:43:08 UTCti-lo A shop=motorcycle doesn't have to sell motorcycles. It's possible they repair, sell tyres, clothes or other stuff. To enable frontends to filter this, I'm standardizing the key. This means the "main" category is "shop", the "subcategories" motorcycle *:* (called "s...
32017-04-07 20:27:39 UTCDaveF Even if the revised tagging system is adopted (Was there any discussion?) you haven't confirmed whether it sells motorcycles or not.
42017-04-07 21:37:11 UTCti-lo I'not sure whether I get the point.
Which discussion do you mean, this one ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/service:bicycle
And do you mean I should confirm whether this shop sells motorcycles ?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3179844246
(can't do that as my crystal bal...
52017-04-07 22:06:40 UTCDaveF I'm unsure why you don't get my point.
Was it discussed on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/ ?

"can't do that as my crystal ball is broken" < this is the problem. You've edited a tag from being correct to incorrect without any knowledge.
According to you're wiki ed...
62017-04-08 14:13:35 UTCti-lo Hi Dave,
the former tagging was :
name \tPete Robson
service \tMOT_motorcycle
shop \tmotorcycle_repair
Now it is :
motorcycle:repair \tyes
name \tPete Robson
service \tMOT_motorcycle
shop \tmotorcycle

The description of shop=motorcycle
says since 15 August 2010 :
"A shop that sell...
72017-04-08 14:47:36 UTCDaveF Hi
"as I can't say whether it (meanwhile) possibly sells used bikes." < Again, this is the problem. You've explicitly changed it from 'definitely doesn't sell bikes' to 'definitely does sell bikes' *without* any knowledge.
82017-04-08 15:17:30 UTCti-lo Hi Dave, I'm not sure whether you read my answers. The description of shop=motorcycle INCLUDES REPAIR SINCE 2010 : "A shop that sells motorcycles and/or related accessories, clothes, parts, repair and rental services."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
So this is ...
92017-04-08 15:40:46 UTCDaveF Hi
if I were in your position I wouldn't have made the amendments due to lack of *any* knowledge to justify the changes. Your last sentence confirms why.

shop=motorcycle_repair means it doesn't sell bikes. You've now made it, at best, ambiguous.
102017-04-08 16:18:26 UTCti-lo In my point of view it's just another way to express the same thing (and to enable people to tag further properties of the item).
It would be great if you'd propose how to solve this (in your point of view) "issue" instead of keeping on complaining. In the last seven years there would hav...
112017-04-10 11:25:01 UTCDaveF As explained previously you've change the meaning of the entity, not provided an alternative.

There is no 'issue' to solve. The entity was accurately & legitimately tagged before your amendments.
As you've no knowledge of this shop you should not have made any changes.

I'm 'complaining' b...
122017-04-10 18:28:01 UTCti-lo What do you think about that ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repair
132017-04-10 19:24:36 UTCti-lo Would you please add your concerns to the discussion page ? (So everyone may add his/her point of view) :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle
142017-04-10 20:38:35 UTCDaveF What are your plans to revert your erroneous edits?

PS
"These SHOULD be proposed on the tagging group!!! Not proposed on a wiki page."
152017-04-12 07:15:43 UTCwoodpeck The bulk of ti-lo's motorcycle adjustments have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47664678 and I recommended that a discussion is held on the tagging mailing list before changes are re-introduced.
162017-04-12 10:12:41 UTCDaveF @ti-lo
I look forward discussing your proposal on the Tagging mailing list.
12017-04-10 20:05:30 UTCstreckenkundler Bitte Edit sofort stoppen und im Forum disskutieren:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=640665#p640665
22017-04-11 10:41:53 UTCFahRadler Hi,
habs gerade gelesen.
CS ist kommentiert.
KEIN mech. edit !
Basis sind dooleys Listen und Wikipedia mit den offiziellen Namen.

FahRadler
32017-04-11 11:22:00 UTCstreckenkundler Ich sehe das anders... Vor allem aber auch weil die Changesets nicht räumlich begrenzt sind, habe ich auch ein Problem damit. Gängige Tools wie achavi oder History-Viewer steigen bei diesen aus. Eine Kontrolle ist nicht möglich.

Oder kannst du an einen DSL-Hauptverteiler einn Brief...
42017-04-11 11:31:57 UTCNakaner Hallo FahRadler,

ein mechanischer Edit muss nicht zwangsläufig automatisiert erfolgen. Es genügt eine größere Menge Objekte in JOSM zu ändern, ohne jedes einzelne Objekt zu prüfen. Die von streckenkundler aufgezeigten Beispiele belegen das. Siehe dazu auch https://w...
52017-04-11 11:32:54 UTCwoodpeck streckenkundler hat recht; die genannten Beispiele sind klare Indizien für einen "mechanischen Edit". Der liegt auch dann vor, wenn man z.B. in JOSM alles sucht, was "addr:city=a" hat, und das durch "addr:city=b" ersetzt. Überlasse doch diese Korrekturen Leute...
62017-04-11 11:33:31 UTCwoodpeck Ups, jetzt hat Nakaner fast das gleiche geschrieben und war auch noch früher dran.
72017-04-11 13:37:54 UTCFahRadler wie im Formum beschrieben änderte ich die addr:city Fehler die auf OSMsuspect gelistet wurden.
Meine manuelle Vorgehensweise habe ich geschildert.
Sicher wäre es schön alle "Fehler" (Adressen auf DSL-Hauptverteiler, Parkplatz) zu beseitigen. Mein Fokus in der Bearbeitung l...
12017-04-04 08:46:23 UTCwoodpeck Hello Zowie Polie, this changeset deletes a lot of valid data. Maybe you are not aware that your edits actually affect every user of OSM, not just the map you are seeing. Please stop breaking the map.
22017-05-15 06:41:59 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
12017-03-28 22:10:36 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset you fixed the coastline of Gosti island, but there is a lot of extremely jagged other coastline nearby that you did not touch. May I ask why you focussed on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do...
22017-03-30 02:39:36 UTCJason Roy I focused on Gosti Island because I found it through a Maproulette challenge designed to find jagged islands that can use better alignment. I am part of a small group of OSM users working on improving these islands.
12017-03-28 22:07:47 UTCwoodpeck You have moved the nodes making up this island http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224776118 but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery actually are good enough to even see that island. Your source specification ("Bing") must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit ...
22017-03-30 02:22:06 UTCKate Diaz You are right, I should not have moved the nodes making up that island. It is simply not visible in Bing or Mapbox. Please observe that I made these edits 6 days ago, and since then I have avoided making similar edits when no imagery is available. I certainly won’t any more. I am finding these...
12017-03-28 22:01:06 UTCwoodpeck You aligned this island with Bing but you left the nearby, larger island untouched even though it, too, is very much out of sync with imagery. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 02:36:07 UTCShaun Austin I am finding these islands through a MapRoulette challenge. I did not fix the other island because it may be another task and I wanted to save it for others working on the challenge.
12017-03-28 21:56:27 UTCwoodpeck You modified this island but left the glacier in place that now cuts right through the island which can't be right. Why the focus on just the island geometry? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 03:39:50 UTCEvelyn Desouzaa Hey Woodpeck,




Thanks for pointing that out, I have since fixed the glacier feature to not intersect the island.  This edit was made as part of a MapRoulette challenge for Island and Shoreline alignment.  There's is a small group of us working on fixing small islands in OSM. &nb...
12017-03-28 21:54:59 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery just shows a blurry cloud of white and you can't even see that there's supposed to be an island here so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRou...
22017-03-30 23:39:12 UTCAshley Rose There's some rock visible in Bing here. Its not unreasonable to assume that the blurry rock seen in imagery is the same feature represented by the existing island (w232976567), so I tried to improve the island with Bing. However you are right that I should not have edited this island with only Bing....
12017-03-28 21:53:39 UTCwoodpeck You have improved the coastline for this island, but there's an out-of-sync admin boundary half overlapping the island. Did you notice that? It would have been good if, while modifying the island, you had corrected the admin boundary as well. (Admin boundaries are broken all over the place but if yo...
22017-03-30 02:30:14 UTCEva Blue I noticed the admin boundary, but I was under the impression that these features should only be edited with special resources, especially because they are not visible in imagery. I think that if I was in the habit of editing admin boundaries using only Bing and Mapbox, other OSM users would rightly ...
12017-03-28 21:50:36 UTCwoodpeck You have aligned this one island with Bing imagery, but the three nearby islands were horribly out of sync with imagery and you haven't even made an attempt to repair them too. Why the focus on this one island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct...
22017-03-30 02:43:25 UTCJames Millar I found this island through a MapRoulette challenge, I’m part of a small group who are attempting to improve the alignment of these islands using MapRoulette and JOSM.
32017-04-18 10:15:59 UTCSomeoneElse Hi James.
There have been worrying changes such as this elsewhere; you simply can't rely on Bing imagery where it might be offset (which is anywhere that you don't have something else to corroborate it).
Can you explain who the "small group" are?
Your profile doesn't say anything abou...
42017-04-19 02:09:13 UTCJames Millar Hi Andy,
We also use Mapbox, and by using a combination we can usually make improvements to these islands regardless of potential Bing offset. Alternatively we make the decision to not make any edits in an area (we do this often). Can you point me to some of the worrying changes? I can always fix t...
52017-04-19 07:58:14 UTCSomeoneElse Re "worrying changes", you can see a discussion with comments at http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/imagico/diary/40759 .
Also, you're saying "we" again. Who exactly are "we"?
Best Regards,
Andy
12017-03-28 21:48:52 UTCwoodpeck You have neatly aligned this island with the imagery, but you left the jagged 6-node form of the other nearby Roberts Island unchanged. Why the focus on this one particular island, instead of repairing other things that catch your eye too? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and ...
22017-03-30 02:16:12 UTCkevin Prince Thank you for the compliment, these types of islands are sometimes tough to align because MHWS is not clear in the imagery. Yes, I am using a MapRoulette challenge in order to find these islands, then using JOSM to align the islands with Bing and Mapbox. I did not edit the other island because I tho...
12017-03-28 21:46:13 UTCwoodpeck You have aligned this island to Bing imagery but the nearby coastline, which is equally out of sync, has not been touched by you. Why the focus on this island? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
22017-03-30 03:34:08 UTCJones Sandy Hello,



My edit was confined to the island using Bing imagery as a source because I was focusing on island geometry per a MR task.  We’re a small team working on fixing island geometry.  

Thank you.

12017-03-28 21:41:58 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery is too blurry to discern the shape that you have drawn so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instruct...
22017-03-30 03:32:18 UTCEdward Munch Hi Woodpeck,

Bing imagery was the correct source.  It’s not great, but the resolution was good enough to make improvements to the really angular island geometry that existed prior to my edit.  There is a small group of us working on tasks like this from MapRoulette focusing on sma...
12017-03-28 21:39:23 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery in this area is so cloudy that the island shape cannot be discerned, so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you...
22017-03-30 03:35:43 UTCBecca Wilson Hello Woodpeck,

Bing is okay in this area, but it is a little hard to determine the extent of the island due to the ice.  I aligned the island as best I could and removed the simplified geometry which originally existed. You can check out my edit here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?ch...
12017-03-28 21:37:00 UTCwoodpeck You fixed this island's coastline in this changeset, but you did not change anything about the nearby other coastlines which were equally imprecise. May I ask what was your workflow here - why were you interested in this one island but completely ignorant of the data around it? Have you made this ed...
22017-03-30 19:06:13 UTCSandro Alex Hi Woodpeck,

My workflow was based on fixing tasks from a MapRoulette challenge for Islands and Shorelines, which is why my focus was on a single feature rather than the entire area.  There is a small group of us working on fixing the geometry of islands in OSM.  Thanks!
12017-03-28 21:31:17 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have aligned something to Bing in this changeset, but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery show anything else than a large blurred area here, certainly nothing from which one could move a node. The source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this...
22017-03-30 19:03:38 UTCJenny Johal Hi Woodpeck,

This changeset was a single upload from an edit I made on the entire island feature as seen in this changeset view: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47222149, where I aligned the entire island to Bing.  It’s blurry, but I felt the imagery is good enough to ma...
12017-03-28 21:27:32 UTCwoodpeck Hi, you have modified a large number of buildings that had been tagged "area=yes" and you put "building=yes" instead. However the Mapbox imagery you are using shows many more buildings in the area. May I ask why you chose to edit the existing buildings but not to add the missing ...
22017-03-30 01:34:15 UTCLexi Johnson Hi Woodpeck. These are buildings and area=yes is meaningless without other tags: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area. I'm doing the second step of the HOT Tasking Manager process, which is after someone marks a square as “done” then others double check the “done” task...
12017-03-28 21:21:49 UTCwoodpeck You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery just shows a blurry cloud of white and you can't even see that there's supposed to be an island here so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRou...
22017-03-30 19:07:21 UTCPhilip Guston Hi Woodpeck,

The source for my edit was indeed Bing, though I recognize it’s not the best quality.  I rounded out the small island per what I could see in imagery, and felt that was an improvement to the previous geometry.  There is a small group of us fixing island geometry in Ma...
12017-03-18 08:55:18 UTCwoodpeck Hello, may I inquire about the source of these added POIs? You have added a bunch of restaurants, cafes and gift shops across the planet, without names or specifying where the data came from.
12017-03-16 22:37:36 UTCwoodpeck Hi jcaviborg, it appears that this change set touches a lot of objects without actually changing them (other than the source tag is removed from the objects). What does that mean? Just to pick an example, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220619614/history you remove "source=bing", and ...
22017-03-17 06:39:42 UTCosmviborg All objects are compared against "GeoDanmark Ortofoto". Ortofoto are aerial photos of Denmark taken on yearly basis.
12017-03-12 22:00:10 UTCSomeoneElse Relation 7066589 has 37,948 nodes as members. It's just broken an osm2pgsql import here, and I suspect I wont be the only one.

What is it actually supposed to be?
22017-03-12 22:18:07 UTCwoodpeck I have also noticed that this import seems to have first been raised on talk-br on March 9, two days before the import was started. Problems like a collection relation with 37k members would have been found before the import if people had actually had time to look at what was proposed.
32017-03-12 22:21:56 UTCwoodpeck The survey points seem to contain this message: "Não alterar: coordenadas originais do IBGE". I wonder why they are imported in OSM at all; what use is data that you cannot alter in OSM? Anyone interested in doing anything with the survey points can just use the shape file.
42017-03-12 22:24:37 UTCpnorman Hello,

Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), one of which the community is consulted prior to the import, including the imports@ mailing list.

Because this import is causing technical problems and has not been discussed, I'm go...
52017-03-12 22:29:36 UTCsmaprs Ok, if you think its' better to revert it. We discussed it in Brazilian community thinking these survey points have precise coordinates and can help align imagery in remote regions of Brazil. I'll read carefully your remarks and see what can be done better.
62017-03-12 22:39:38 UTCwoodpeck I have looked that the Bing imagery surrounding some of the points and found nothing visible on the ground that I could have used to align the image though. I think the matter deserves a more thorough discussion. We'll revert it for now but that doesn't mean it can never come back.
72017-03-12 22:51:03 UTCsmaprs Ok. Sorry for the unexpected problems.
82018-03-02 15:28:32 UTCsmaprs Even if many (or any) marks are not visible by now, this is not a good argument to don't have the marks mapped.
Many marks are visible, and that's enough.
Being in the map, people may select them, like in Overpass,
to search for them on the ground, take Mapillary pictures, use it for any reasons...
12017-03-09 20:57:54 UTCwoodpeck This import is badly executed. In blatant contravention to the RABA-KGZ import page on the Wiki, polygons have NOT been combined with neighbouring ones (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479459103 ends clearly at a grid boundary), and data has NOT been visually compared with existing stuff (see...
22017-03-10 15:38:22 UTCPeter_Klofutar_import I've been working on that since. Please review and let me know, if you find any other inconsistencies.
12017-02-09 13:21:13 UTCShinigami Hello Frederik,

I just found you have rolled back hours of my work, when I merged loots of little counties to big polygones with same timezone. Unfortunately you did not revert those countries infos, so big part of the USA is without timezone data now.

Ad mapping of timezones - borders of cou...
22017-02-09 14:06:38 UTCwoodpeck Admin boundaries and maybe sometimes post code boundaries are the big exceptions; their presence in OSM doesn't mean that we can now map any kind of boundaries that are not visible or verifiable on the ground! This just doesn't scale - we can't add all boundaries that someone might find interesting ...
32017-02-09 14:32:15 UTCShinigami Having tons of small polygons tagged with TZ instead of one big does not scale too.. And local time is not something one might find interesting but really important thing. It is common in US, that half of state have one TZ, other second. It means tens of counties with one, tens with other. And borde...
42017-02-10 09:31:38 UTCShinigami Could you please rollback your changes?
52017-02-10 11:06:13 UTCwoodpeck I have reverted my deletions. I still believe it's wrong to map time zones, and all time zone boundaries in OSM should be deleted, but I agree it was premature to delete them nilly-willy. I will bring this matter up for discussion on the tagging mailing list. Please join me there.
62017-03-07 06:46:15 UTCwoodpeck I have started a discussion on the tagging mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-March/031453.html
12017-02-28 19:59:43 UTCwoodpeck How did you manage to draw this building outline with 40 points when all that the Bing imagery shows is a construction site? Is it possible that you forgot to specify a data source?
22017-02-28 20:58:02 UTCaccay Hi,
This a high residential towers that have been developed a few years back. The footprint is exactly what it looks like and this area is develop ed now. The bings imagery is like 10 years old i think. Thats why it is showing a construction site.

The source is land surveyw done by the local sur...
12017-02-28 19:57:51 UTCwoodpeck Could you please explain the source of this data. It appears that you have added a large number of buildings, but forgot to tag them correctly. You've also added a large number of duplicate nodes. It looks like this might be an import that is not following our imports policy http://wiki.openstreetma...
22017-02-28 20:52:24 UTCaccay Hi Woodpeck,

Thank you for the comments.
I am a GIS analyst working at the local goverment authority who is the master planner and developer of this city. Our corporation is called HDC ( 100% goverment). www.hdc.com.mv
Our data is sourced through land and topographic surveys, demarcation surve...
12017-02-27 13:51:02 UTCwoodpeck I'm afraid I will have to remove these imports because they haven't been discussed with the community (as mandated by the import policy), and (probably as a consequence of such lack of discussion) are faulty, using invalid tags and duplicating information that already is in OSM.
12017-02-20 23:16:00 UTCwoodpeck Oh dear, this changeset and the few others you uploaded at the same time have actually *duplicated* almost all the data in the city - now your new data sits on top of the unchanged old data. I think we should remove your new data again, to give you a chance to properly conflate your changes with the...
22017-02-25 00:41:21 UTCcelayer how can i fix the issue ?
32017-02-25 09:25:18 UTCwoodpeck You would have to download the area (or parts of it at at time) into JOSM and then manually delete the duplicate data.

Or, if you want I could simply revert the whole changeset in which you uploaded the duplicate data, and then you could go through your improvements offline and add them piece by ...
42017-02-27 18:51:34 UTCcelayer thank you for explanation Woodpeck
i prefer to do revert for whole changeset.
thank you !
12017-02-21 22:07:15 UTCwoodpeck Importing Canvec data requires some diligence. You cannot just take a Canvec tile and dump it into OSM (else others would have done it long ago). You need to compare Canvec data to existing data or even aerial imagery to make sure you're not making the map worse. See for example https://www.openstre...
22017-02-21 22:13:29 UTCwoodpeck It appears you have imported a new road over an already existing road here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476144200#map=18/49.12053/-70.11346&layers=D and tagged the new road with "lanes=-1"?
32017-02-22 12:01:57 UTCLogicalViolinist I'll fix it up, not sure why JOSM didnt catch that error, I might have to reset my settings.
42017-02-22 12:24:24 UTCLogicalViolinist both instances have been fixed. will check if there's anymore data that had already been added that is overlapping
12017-02-17 13:19:26 UTCwoodpeck Hello, in this changeset you deleted y couple of buildings and your comment says that you deleted them because they are in a security area. However, OSM does not generally respect specific national security interests with regards to mapping. If a building is visible on aerial imagery, then it may be...
12017-02-16 10:47:57 UTCwoodpeck Wie hast Du entschieden, welche Objekte ein "beacon:type=vor-dme" bekommen? Hast Du hierzu eine externe Quelle verwendet, oder Dich rein auf existierende OSM-Tags verlassen? Hast Du jedes einzelne Objekt bei OSM angeschaut, das Du bearbeitet hast? Hast Du diesen mechanischen Edit vorher mi...
22017-02-17 06:48:27 UTCgeozeisig Ich habe mich rein auf die schon existierenden OSM-Tags bezogen. Ja, ich habe die Objekte einzeln bearbeitet. (Bei manchen war die Frequenz in kHz statt MHz angegeben, bei anderen fehlte die Einheit)
12017-02-15 13:15:31 UTCwoodpeck Hello HourOfTheWulf, it is interesting how you're adding 9 playgrounds across all of Holland. Have you recently been on a nationwide playground survey trip, or what is the source of this data?
22017-02-15 21:20:09 UTCmarczoutendijk Recently the Dutch Community has been flooded with user notes pointing to either Playgrounds or Mailboxes.
There has been quiet some discussion on the Dutch Forum about how to handle this:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57192.
With respect to Mailboxes it was agreed NOT to accep...
32017-02-17 10:21:44 UTCligfietser Those playgrounds are probably marked by Pokemon Go players. Those notes appear are all over the place like mushrooms.
42017-05-13 19:04:21 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48656854 where the changeset comment is: Revert HourOftheWulf imports/mechanical edits after multiple complaints from Dutch community, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1347
12017-02-07 14:41:07 UTCsbiribizio Hi,
why did you delete in Casale Monferrato the small landuse=residential and create a big landuse=residential instead?
Your big landuse have inside it some landuse=playground, streets, pitch, etc.
This mapping is not accurate.
Please revert your changes or I'll do it for you.
Thanks
22017-02-07 17:01:07 UTCdieterdreist generally, please do not create big landuse areas with a lot of different stuff in it (especially do not create a single landuse=residential around a village, use place areas for this). Thank you.
32017-02-07 19:29:54 UTCFredie hm.
Is there a common agreement ?
Do you have a link ?
I haven't seen an area tagging for residential anywhere else, yet.
problem encountered on huge landuse ?
Can't see one up today ?
Inform me, please ?
42017-02-07 22:12:20 UTCwoodpeck Hello Fredie, of course if you map new things then you get to decide how you map them; a large landuse area for a whole village or smaller areas - no problem. But you should not delete the work that others have done and replace it with "your style". Also, your changeset deletes a large num...
52017-02-08 07:07:31 UTCFredie you are right
I'll take consequences from this
I'll explain to sbiririzio personally
62017-02-08 07:45:39 UTCsbiribizio Personally you explained to me that:
"I've deleted your post without reading"
I explained in detail my complaints, why don't discuss?
I asked gently for proofs of your work.
No aswer from you.
72017-02-09 11:42:09 UTCdieterdreist for reference, there is also a thread on talk-it about this: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-February/057032.html
82017-02-09 12:00:47 UTCdieterdreist In one of your replies to sbiribizio you (Fredie) have written a lot of alternative facts, which I will comment here:

> All my work is carefully researched used sat data from
> 2016. If you use Bing Sat data make clear that those are pretty > 6
> years old.


Who is the copyright...
92017-02-09 16:27:05 UTCFredie agree
12017-01-29 08:56:19 UTCNakaner-repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45614261 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism (propably Pokémon edits). See https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/ how you should edit OpenStreetMap and why you should not add fictional data!
22017-01-29 08:59:56 UTCNakaner Hallo karottenjunge1,

ich habe dir gestern Vormittag geschrieben, dass deine Beiträge in der Form, wie du sie derzeit hochlädst, bei uns unerwünscht sind. Wir erfassen nur real existierende Dinge. Einträge, die nur darauf abzielen, Pokémons anzulocken werden gelösc...
32017-02-04 06:41:20 UTCkarottenjunge1 Dieser markierte Park existiert wirklich. Dort steht ein Kriegsdenkmal und die Grünfläche ist für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Im Park sind mehrere öffentliche Fußwege inklusive Sitzmöglichkeiten. Der Park bietet weiterhin einen Zugang zur Unterführung...
42017-02-04 06:43:18 UTCkarottenjunge1 Und ohne kritisierend zu wirken, in anderen Kartendiensten ist der Park bereits als Grünfläche markiert :) bitte also um Recherche/Korrektur
52017-02-04 06:55:00 UTCkarottenjunge1 Es handelt sich hierbei übrigens um den öffentlich zugänglichen Garten der St.Bonifatius (katholischen Kirche Metzingen) katholischekirchemetzingen.de Ein Teil des Gartens ist auf der Homepage der Kirche zu erkennen. Liebe Grüße
62017-02-04 11:22:27 UTCwoodpeck Hallo, kann es sein, dass hier ein Missverständnis vorliegt? Die Grünfläche, um die es hier geht - private Gärten im Dreieck Noyon-Allee/Emil-Mörsch-Weg/Herbstweg - ist (a) weder ein Park, (b) noch auf anderen Karten als Grünfläche markiert, (c) noch auf dem Gel&au...
72017-02-05 10:32:20 UTCkarottenjunge1 Tatsache. Nun sehe ich meinen Fehler auch. Der Edit galt dem Grundstück weiter südlich. Ich werde es direkt beheben! Vielen Dank für das Feedback!
12017-02-01 22:55:36 UTCwoodpeck Please explain why this was downgraded from service road to footpath?
22017-02-02 13:17:19 UTCSpanholz He still changes roads to footways, for example in the cemetery above.
12017-02-01 22:53:33 UTCwoodpeck Hello, why did you change 115th avenue into a footway? It looks like a normal residential road to me. Please explain.
12017-01-31 10:01:10 UTCwoodpeck Hello, could you explain the reason for deleting these roads, and your other deletions nearby? Your changeset comment is "Modifications", but this doesn't say why you thought these roads should be removed.

(automatic translation follows)

مرحبا، هل يمكن أن تفسر سب...
22017-01-31 13:09:10 UTCطائر الجنوب تحية طيبة
شكرا لاهتمامك
هذا الطرق التي تم حذفها لم يراعى عند رسمها قوانين المرور وايضا تم رسمها بصورة عشوائية وانا قمت بحذفها لكي اعيد رسمها بصورة صحيحة
تحياتي لك
32017-01-31 21:00:05 UTCPeda You are saying you deleted it to redraw it? But I don't see any new ways. I only see an empty region now. That's why I will revert your deletions. Please do not delete them again. You can improve them or you can add new ways. But if you want to delete existing work from your fellow mappers please di...
42017-01-31 22:54:39 UTCPeda_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
12017-01-20 00:26:38 UTCwoodpeck Du hast bei diesem Changeset als Quelle "Google" angegeben. Es ist uns leider nicht erlaubt, Daten aus Google in OpenStreetMap zu übernehmen. Kannst Du erklären, was Du mit "Google" als Quelle gemeint hast?
22017-01-20 08:13:03 UTCRaymond Gute Frage, ich habe keine Idee, wieso ich "Google" eingetragen habe. Nutze ich für OSM nie. Immer eigene Fotos und eigenes Wissen. Und eigenes Wissen auch in diesem Fall, da ich in der Gegend gewesen war.
12017-01-19 08:02:35 UTCwoodpeck Hello SHARCRASH, please consider using different changeset comments. "See the history of the elements from the according changeset." is without meaning, as checking the history of elements is exactly what one has to do if the changeset comment is missing! Nobody expects you to write a nove...
12017-01-05 22:22:20 UTCwoodpeck Hello Stephen214, in this changeset you seem to have deleted a large number of "mini roundabouts". Can you explain the reasoning behind this? Have you actually looked at the objects in question, or have you simply removed them according to some search/replace logic? Looking, for example, a...
22017-01-05 23:07:06 UTCStephen214 I looked at each one (of thousands, so hours of work) via sat imagery. Many cases, including the one you cited, were actually roundabouts, which have a non-mountable island, rather than mini_roundabouts, which have a mountable (often just paint) island. About as many cases were actually turning_ci...
32017-01-06 10:21:52 UTCPaul Johnson For example, the only mini-roundabout that I have found in the US so far is at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1555921214
42017-01-10 19:36:04 UTCStephen214 These islands look mountable (just paint) as well:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/95712768
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271831024
I have local knowledge these are mountable:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/767536813
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2958897476
In general, I assumed t...
52017-01-11 13:16:45 UTCPaul Johnson Those last two look iffy from the aerials but I'll take your word for it. The first two are definitely mini-roundabouts, good finds!
12017-01-02 12:42:19 UTCwoodpeck Hello richardsonp, in this changeset and a couple others you claim to have traced thousands of buildings from Bing imagery. Many of the buildings you have added have much more detail than can be seen on Bing though, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381251369 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/wa...
12016-12-28 14:05:13 UTCwoodpeck OpenStreetMap maps facts not fiction. Please provide evidence for the existence of this place, or if your edits were meant to be funny, please remove them from OpenStreetMap again. There are other projects like opengeofiction.net that are dedicated to drawing fictional maps; OSM is about reality!
12016-12-20 20:52:36 UTCwoodpeck Dear user LogicalViolinist. I have reverted an earlier import of yours because it was not sufficiently discussed. Now you claim to be "tracing missing buildings" from sources "Bing; Mapbox". I can say with 100% certainty that for example builidng https://www.openstreetmap.org/way...
22016-12-20 21:04:29 UTCLogicalViolinist This is most definitely not an import, I'm currently on mobile and will get back to you. This addition done by hand via mapbox, bing and local survey of the area. I have no desire to import data anymore as it will just get reverted if not passed through the proper channels. I'm currently tracing bui...
32016-12-20 21:16:27 UTCLogicalViolinist I've also been using ortho photos that are compatible with OSM tracing from the city of ottawa and carleton university(carleton you need to be a student to access the data, sorry)
http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/aerial-photographs
http://carleton-u.maps.arcgis.com/apps/PublicInformation/index.html?...
42016-12-20 21:29:09 UTCLogicalViolinist I've learned from past events, its not worth importing. I've even reported imports to the DWG recently. I decide to do something manually and by the books and get threated with a revert. This is pardon my language bullshit.
52016-12-20 21:33:50 UTCwoodpeck Right, so you're saying you have accidentally left out the correct source tag for the imagery you've been using, and that nobody can double-check your statement unless they're students. May I respectfully ask you to be more careful in specifying exactly which imagery you are tracing from in the futu...
62016-12-20 21:39:36 UTCLogicalViolinist I'm sorry, the source field doesnt allow for long ass urls(character cap in JOSM) I will specify my proper sources in future changesets. The only reason you cant access the imagery from CarletonUniversity is because it's in their library that their GIS deparment conducted in 2014(20cm ortho) anyone ...
72016-12-20 21:47:33 UTCwoodpeck Well it doesn't say you need to specify an URL in the source tag. But the source tag is there for a reason. You specified a source tag that was obviously wrong, to anyone who cared to look; not even a local person with local knowledge would have known where to look had they wanted to verify what you...
82016-12-20 21:53:44 UTCLogicalViolinist Would saying CarletonU ortho(2014) and City of Ottawa ortho be sufficient?
92016-12-20 22:42:54 UTCLogicalViolinist I've looked on Bing and although it's offset(all imagery in Aylmer is, which only local knowledge would know) You can still see the details (though a bit pixelated) you can still trace from it with a good decerning(from bad imagery) eye
http://imgur.com/a/FO5dB
102016-12-20 23:54:59 UTCDevonF That's really awesome that aerial imagery is published under their opendata licence. Do you know if anyones converted it to a tile map on a public server? It'd be nice to add it JOSM

Also curious, would you mind posting a screenshot of the imagery you used to trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/w...
112016-12-21 00:19:07 UTCLogicalViolinist Unfortunately DevonF I cannot as although carleton University allows creating derivative works and tracing from their aerial imagery, they do not allow to copy/redistribute it(only for students/faculty at Carleton university), doing so may be punishable by revocation of access to the imagery.

So ...
122016-12-21 00:39:42 UTCLogicalViolinist Also DevonF, if a user cant add 1000ish buildings without being the spanish inquisition, osm will fall behind everyone. It's probably why digital globe and a relief effort have forked OSM and started contributing to their own fork and not OSM, because small time mappers waste their time.
132016-12-21 02:35:23 UTCLogicalViolinist Don't believe me? https://www.nga.mil/MediaRoom/PressReleases/Pages/2015-16.aspx
142016-12-21 04:33:24 UTCDevonF I agree nobody likes it when people are breathing down your neck and it's a waste of time checking every edit. However you have attracted some attention to yourself by some less-orthodox editing practices. But hopefully you'll be able to regain peoples trust. There are good reasons why I care about ...
152016-12-21 04:33:45 UTCDevonF After reading http://lifehacker.com/193343/ask-the-law-geek--is-publishing-screenshots-fair-use I'd say it's pretty damn safe to share a screenshot. But it looks like it's the same as what's hosted at http://maps.ottawa.ca. You can access JS slippy maps and WMTS api via http://maps.ottawa.ca/arcgis/...
162016-12-21 04:33:52 UTCDevonF That's really awesome about https://github.com/ngageoint/hootenanny. There are so many powerful tools which I dream about for making mapping much more fun and safe for everyone. I'm not sure where I see it mentioned about forking though. Many one-off contributors are just as important as massive imp...
172016-12-21 10:31:04 UTCLogicalViolinist I'm not using ottawa'ortho I know its from 2005. Im using the 2014 from carleton u that their gis department took(2014) http://carleton-u.maps.arcgis.com/apps/PublicInformation/index.html?appid=a9602c9a15fd4db898c7b8a264442038
As I am taking classes there, I have access to it.
182016-12-21 11:30:39 UTCLogicalViolinist Here's a ss of that building, now if you dont mind, i'll return to tracing.
http://imgur.com/a/pzdNL
192016-12-22 18:30:30 UTCDevonF The CU and Ottawa datasets are the same for 2014 judging by your screenshot. Here's a side-by-side of the house you added and the 2014 imagery http://imgur.com/a/pQZwP. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a house somewhere else with an incorrect footprint matching this house. I think this strongly re...
202016-12-22 18:33:03 UTCLogicalViolinist Devon quit wasting my time. maybe learn some HOT mapping or learn some building tracing, I'm not here to hold your hand.
212016-12-22 18:38:36 UTCLogicalViolinist This is from bing: http://imgur.com/a/9zU2K I may have missed some of the building, but i'm trying to trace quickly. I admit that the OttawaCarleton imagery is different, but I used a combination of Mapbox,Bing, OttawaOrtho and Carleton.
222016-12-22 18:56:59 UTCDenisCarriere Devon, your numerous comments in Canada are becoming very annoying to many of the "power" mappers. Just because you like to use iD & OSMAnd to map 1-2 features at the time. Some users are using JOSM to map multiple hundreds of buildings at a time.

You should spend your time doing mo...
232016-12-22 19:21:36 UTCwoodpeck Denis, you should be ashamed at trying to pull rank at someone whose comments you don't like. Stick to the facts.
242016-12-22 19:28:09 UTCwoodpeck LogicalViolinist, there is no way anyone would trace the building in http://imgur.com/a/9zU2K from the imagery in that picture. Neither Bing nor Mapbox nor whatever is in that picture has the detail to trace that outline. Not even a combination of all of them. -- And the only thing you have to say i...
252016-12-22 19:33:36 UTCLogicalViolinist Hi woodpeck, as you may know Denis and I know eachother in real life and are local mappers to the Gatineau/Ottawa valley. Is it surprising that I may have linked him my changeset via chat? No? Ok.

http://imgur.com/a/dRNnD
See how the white pixels follow the thing I traced? Well I followed the pi...
262016-12-22 19:39:45 UTCLogicalViolinist http://imgur.com/a/3BmD5
The top I followed the pixels again.
272016-12-22 19:43:36 UTCLogicalViolinist Not sure why so much scrutiny is going into one building when some people would just draw a rectangle over it and call it a day. Would they be brought in a microscope analysis of what they did and did not do? Nope. If you want me to fix the back of the house I'll gladly do it, but don't accuse me of...
282016-12-23 01:23:26 UTCscruss Sorry, but it doesn't look as if you can use the Carleton data to trace from: https://library.carleton.ca/sites/default/files/find/gis/DataUseAgreement.pdf
292016-12-23 10:57:03 UTCLogicalViolinist Thay seems to be talking about the imagery directly and not derivative work scruss
302016-12-23 13:46:13 UTCscruss Are your OSM contributions "for the exclusive purposes of teaching or academic research" at Carleton? If not, you can't use the data here, and you've signed something to say you won't when you started your course. Derivative works retain rights too: that's why we can't copy from Google Map...
312016-12-23 13:53:30 UTCLogicalViolinist I'll start working on reverting the changesets that used this imagery then.
322016-12-23 14:38:39 UTCLogicalViolinist Started the revert process
332016-12-23 16:05:57 UTCosmcanada_fix This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44622688 where the changeset comment is: Reverted traced buildings due to imagery source
12016-12-19 16:57:14 UTCAlexey Lukin Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your chan...
22016-12-19 19:18:40 UTCwoodpeck I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
32016-12-19 19:21:13 UTCAlexey Lukin Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:

I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has
happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street
crossings here, it will become apparent:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999

In fact, the ...
42016-12-19 20:23:47 UTCsamely Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.

Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.
Let me know if you need...
52016-12-20 23:09:54 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
62016-12-21 00:05:06 UTCwoodpeck I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
72017-01-06 14:55:37 UTCsamely Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
12016-12-19 19:16:47 UTCwoodpeck Hello MDIV, it appears that 2 yrs ago you mapped some buildings twice here, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29627050 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330248229 ...
12016-12-18 21:01:51 UTCwoodpeck Dear user Geozeisig, you have been told not to make mechanical edits like this in the past. Please adhere to these rules. It is not plausible that you have indeed looked at the objects you modified here individually because some of them contain other tagging inconsistencies that you have not fixed.
22016-12-19 09:06:10 UTCgeozeisig position=underground ist der falsche Tag. Karten die das auswerten sollen können damit nichts anfangen. Steht auch so in der Wiki
Gruß
12016-12-13 06:46:58 UTCwoodpeck Please write your changeset comment in the "comment" field (not "comments") so that it can properly be processed and displayed.
22016-12-13 08:45:57 UTCWetitpig0 How to reopen a changeset?
32016-12-13 09:43:18 UTCwoodpeck You can't reopen it. I meant just for the future, apparently you're not using one of the standard editors, so whatever software you use, make sure you use the "comment" field not "comments".

Regarding the boundary zone. You have mapped a very large area that is up to 10km wide...
12016-12-12 18:10:04 UTCwoodpeck There are two problems with this. First of all, you must not import data into OSM without following our import guidelines which mandate that you discuss the import before you act. Second, you must not import data that is "free except for commercial use", because the license that OSM itself...
22016-12-13 14:10:57 UTCfredi_alf I will revert back to previous.
Sorry.
32016-12-16 00:45:55 UTCfredi_alf This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
42016-12-16 00:56:42 UTCfredi_alf This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44436223.
12016-12-11 23:33:33 UTCwoodpeck Hello, could you please explain what the data source "ruian" is? Is this building import documented on the Wiki? Has it been discussed on the mailing list?
22016-12-12 05:55:41 UTCJandaM http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RUIAN

RUIAN data are manually traced in JOSM using Tracer plugin.
12016-12-08 19:54:00 UTCmikelmaron @woodpeck_repair was there any public discussion of reverting this import? I agree that imports should have discussion -- but also think reverts should have discussion too, and a chance for things to be made right.
22016-12-08 20:35:54 UTCwoodpeck We don't publicly discuss reverting imports but we usually seek to get in touch with the importers (in this case, three unsuccessful attempts have been made by various people in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37015792 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36896136 http://www.openstreetmap.o...
32016-12-09 15:34:18 UTCmikelmaron Thanks for the reply @woodpeck. I definitely agree we need documented imports, but I'm unclear about the proactive import process, and I'm far from the only one in the community confused by it. A few questions to help get a better picture.

* How are undocumented imports discovered? Are they repor...
42016-12-09 15:34:55 UTCmikelmaron s/proactive import process/proactive import revert process/
12016-12-05 10:11:24 UTChighflyer74 Hi there!

Is there any place where these imports have been discussed? I am just asking this, as your account is quite new and usually it is not the first action for a new OSM member to do large scale imports in several states. In addition to that some of the buildings have bad geometry (not recta...
22016-12-06 14:15:22 UTCosm_rucksackradar Hi, you are right. Another user gave me advice to announce large imports earlier. I will do that in the future on Slack https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ and on talk-us.
I addressed the geometry problem manually, the problem is that many buildings have different shapes than rectangle, for exampl...
32016-12-06 14:34:16 UTChighflyer74 Hi Michael!

Thanks for your quick reply! Concerning the building shape: I was referring to buildings that are actually rectangular. I stumbled across some that were not corrected. I am not sure, as I am not a license specialist, but you might run into major problems if the license under which the...
42016-12-06 16:10:23 UTCNakaner Hi Oliver,

the Talk-us mailing list is not sufficient. See step 2.2 of the Import Guidelines available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_2_-_Community_Buy-in. In addition, I want to point out that Slack is not even mentioned by the Import Guideline and no official comm...
52016-12-06 16:49:41 UTCwoodpeck I would also like to point out that the guidelines do not talk about *announcing* an import; they talk about discussing it and assuring the community is happy for the import to go ahead. A mere announcement is certainly not enough. I'm afraid these edits will have to be reverted.
62016-12-16 20:49:22 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footpr...
12016-11-28 01:29:54 UTCwoodpeck Many of the buildings added in this changeset intersect water areas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454731131) or streets (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454731761). Since you claim that you traced these almost 3,000 buildings from aerial imagery, how come you did not spot these errors?
22016-12-13 17:56:27 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_...
12016-11-28 01:24:43 UTCwoodpeck None of the sources in your source tag show a building in this location that you mapped in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455322726 - could you please specify the correct source?
22016-12-13 17:56:44 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_...
12016-11-28 01:20:54 UTCwoodpeck This changeset appears to create about 24,000 buildings in one go. Are you sure that you have traced these from aerial imagery, as the source tag implies? The footprint of this building for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455207307 is hardly decipherable from either Bing or USGS...
22016-11-28 02:08:52 UTCDavidKewley As a technical note less important than the question of the source(s): The building footprint that woodpeck cited was added in this changeset as two separate but identical ways, it appears.
32016-11-30 10:02:45 UTCbotdidier2020 hi,
there is some mistake with this your changeset :
duplicated tags and geometry
- inside changeset 43886022
- between this changesets : 43962925 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43962925
issues can be see at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=0&country=usa_...
42016-12-13 17:56:41 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_...
12016-11-18 21:03:28 UTCwoodpeck You seem to be using an automated process to match Wikidata tags to exisitng OSM entries. This is a mechanical edit that requires prior discussion and agreement in the community. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
22016-11-18 21:28:46 UTCnyuriks @woodpeck, thanks for the heads up! I was using the JOSM's Wikipedia plugin - "Fetch Wikidata IDs" command to lookup IDs for rels and ways which had Wikipedia tag already. In the process I also uncovered a number of plugin bugs, some of which are now fixed. The process was not automated -...
32016-11-18 21:49:50 UTCwoodpeck Yeah, it is ok (even desirable) to add wikidata plugins to an individual object that you are looking at and that you have knowledge about, but it is not ok to simply mark everything and have the plugin slap on wikidata tags wholesale - that would then count as a mechanical edit.
42016-11-18 22:11:22 UTCnyuriks Understood, I will mostly work on high level objects (admin level <= 6) - those are easy to check, and provide the most interest to me.
52016-11-19 01:01:20 UTCnyuriks P.S. posted my thoughts at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618646#p618646
62016-11-23 15:21:11 UTCwoodpeck I have read your forum entry, and what you are doing there (automatically adding Wikidata IDs with a JOSM plugin) is clearly a mechanical edit. You should not be doing that kind of editing across the globe without involving the local community and discussing your approach on a suitable mailing list,...
72016-11-23 17:17:14 UTCnyuriks Woodpeck, I have already stopped changing any objects except the admin levels regions 1-6, and even those I have greatly slowed down, and began reviewing most of the auto-resolved wikidata IDs. I will cease further automodifications, and instead concentrate on getting wikidata tags quality review fo...
12016-11-23 07:44:06 UTCwoodpeck This changeset seems to add over 40,000 trees at once. May I ask what the source of this data is?
12016-11-19 06:34:15 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43771527, 43735782, 43687220, 43712790, 43740825, 43741976, 43739178, 43713951, 43734444, 43733780, 43708551, 43713727, 43713559, 43713276, 43636853, 43709600, 43687159, 43710431, 43638915, 43701420, 43766338, 43700668, 43765438, 43735945, ...
22016-11-19 21:41:59 UTCDenisCarriere Well if it's such a legal issue, why don't you revert every wikidata tag in the world?? Why single out these changsets, many of these changsets were done manually.
32016-11-22 18:06:59 UTCTeiron what was an issue with this?
42016-11-22 21:32:52 UTCwoodpeck Teiron, major issue being that this was not sufficiently discussed before it was executed. You had a small number of pepole adding Wikidata entries all over the world, for places they had zero local knowledge about, aided by existing geo-information from Wikidata - which is fundamentally different t...
12016-11-18 23:41:03 UTCwoodpeck You have apparently made a series of fantasy edits in this changeset. Please do not use the main OpenStreetMap database for testing! Sign up for an account on master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org if you want to test-drive the editor!
22016-11-18 23:42:31 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43783802 where the changeset comment is:
12016-11-17 20:12:57 UTCaseerel4c26 Hi, please urgently stop your mass edits and explain what you are doing here and where it was discussed. Thank you.
22016-11-17 20:14:39 UTCLogicalViolinist Adding wikidata. You take a place name and look it up here: www.wikidata.org. The resulting ID gives you access to wikipedia pages, meta data etc
32016-11-17 20:15:29 UTCaseerel4c26 Thanks, okay. And how are you doing this? Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
42016-11-17 20:17:23 UTCLogicalViolinist I just told you.
1. Go to name field
2. Ctrl+c
3. www.wikidata.org
4. ctrl+v
5. Find city
6. Find ID
7. Ctrl+c
8. Go back and add wikidata
9. ctrl+v
52016-11-17 20:21:36 UTCLogicalViolinist It's the same idea behind:
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/geocoding-wikidata/
https://www.mapbox.com/blog/id-wikidata/

also the automated edits are not applicable in this case as I am reviewing all the changesets manually. Thank you
62016-11-17 20:21:45 UTCaseerel4c26 You are doing this that fast? Not automated? Quite strange.

So, you did not discuss this edit series somehwere?

Furthermore: could you please explain why you are reducing the percision of coordinates in some cases? E.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=773647546
72016-11-17 20:24:19 UTCLogicalViolinist I downloaded the mapbox QA-tiles a couple days ago. Extracted the nodes with "place" tag. I then have been looking up places with same name. This is the result of my labour.
82016-11-17 20:25:48 UTCLogicalViolinist The 7th position of the decimal is a precision of less than 10cm.....I may have touched it by accident in JOSM
92016-11-17 20:30:51 UTCLogicalViolinist What I find quite strange is if I were to commit this one by one. No one would bat an eye, but I do it in a batch and questions are raised. It's the same thing as if I were doing it through ID or JOSM. The IDs are correct and I am not sure why they are being questioned?
102016-11-17 20:33:29 UTCaseerel4c26 Let me cite the code of conduct: "use of find-and-replace functionality using a standard editor such as JOSM or finding using services such as Overpass API and changing without reviewing cases individually;"

Precision: I doubt that. That would not explain several objects having a loss o...
112016-11-17 20:35:59 UTCLogicalViolinist But i'm not using an API, nor find and replace so what's your point?
122016-11-17 20:36:52 UTCLogicalViolinist also what algorithm please see the steps above.
132016-11-17 20:39:32 UTCLogicalViolinist Why does a offline edit have to be discussed? Do you have to email a mailing list when you edit a road, a building, a tree?
142016-11-17 20:39:50 UTCaseerel4c26 yes, if you would add them manually (e.g. while editing that place node anyway) no one would ask. The thing is: errors happen with automated edits. More eyes spot possible errors better than one person only. You may not have thought of all possible cases which are existing in the data. Automated e...
152016-11-17 20:46:06 UTCaseerel4c26 algorithm: okay, you mentioned "offline". So you did extract all nodes with a place tag from "mapbox QA-tiles" and then look up manually (pressing ctrl+C and so one) each name? Then you looked at the wikidata result and verified that it is the correct city (and not a equally name...
162016-11-17 20:46:17 UTCLogicalViolinist Do you understand English? These. Are. Not. Automated. Edits.
172016-11-17 20:51:20 UTCLogicalViolinist Qa tiles was to obtain node ids thats it. Everything else in josm
182016-11-17 20:53:11 UTCLogicalViolinist If you are scared of poor data, kindly point out a wikidata tag that is wrong
192016-11-17 21:42:11 UTCaseerel4c26 No, I will not look through the wikidata tags. Too hard to verify them one by one.

If those are not automated edits ... wow! I would automate that! :-)

I have asked for comments at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=10
202016-11-17 21:42:39 UTCaseerel4c26 oops, this deeper URL: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56436
212016-11-17 21:44:09 UTCLogicalViolinist Well I am aware that the German populous dislikes imports
222016-11-18 21:08:04 UTCwoodpeck I am appalled that after thoroughly botching an import in your home town, and having a proven history of quite a few under-the-radar imports, you (LogicalViolinist) are still at it, far from home, at full throttle. May I suggest you simply stick to the primitive kind of mapping that other people do,...
232016-11-19 06:32:34 UTCwoodpeck_repair This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
12016-11-13 00:22:36 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43508161, 43401664, 43586101, 43400726, 42346992, 42518732, 42347148, 42512083, 42519026, 42198424, 42346785, 42520415, 43507099, 43401372, 43402690, 42519592, 43507348, 42518667, 42521676, 42521357, 42345941, 43586234, 43402332, 42521584, ...
22017-01-23 19:26:37 UTCSK53 Looks like the reverts didnt go back far enough Lambeth Bridge is a horrendous mess
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:35 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 18:57:00 UTCAlecs01 Same as here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43586101 in this changeset you even joined a bridge to a river https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4490051800, what's the rationale behind this?
22016-11-13 00:22:34 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:33 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
22016-11-13 06:24:23 UTCmavl Здравствуйте, Bonya_23.
В этом пакете правок вы добавили множество общих точек для линий, которые в действительно не пересекаются. Например:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139137576 ...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:32 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:31 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 19:24:50 UTCAlecs01 This changeset created 635 nodes, most of them joining ways on different layers which shouldn't be connected
22016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:30 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 18:35:54 UTCAlecs01 Hi, what are you trying to do here? you created hundreds of nodes joining roads and railways which do not intersect in real world, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4497087495 (a railway and the bridge above) or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4497087605 (an underground railway and anoth...
22016-11-13 00:22:29 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-13 00:22:28 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections...
12016-11-12 22:06:04 UTCwoodpeck What you are mapping here seems to be a very temporary series of agricultural tracks, and why are you using 2000 nodes for every circle - that's way too much!
12016-11-11 21:16:13 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43545192, 43545264.
12016-11-11 09:13:08 UTCfriedl Ich gehe davon aus, dass der Wald nicht komplett gerodet wurde --> habe den Wald wiederhergestellt.
22016-11-11 21:16:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43570082 where the changeset comment is: Datenloeschen revertiert. Bitte unterscheiden zwischen 'Weg existiert nicht' und 'Wegnutzung ist nicht erlaubt'. Auch Privatwege werden erfasst
12016-11-11 21:16:12 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43570082 where the changeset comment is: Datenloeschen revertiert. Bitte unterscheiden zwischen 'Weg existiert nicht' und 'Wegnutzung ist nicht erlaubt'. Auch Privatwege werden erfasst
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43561565, 43561455, 43561935, 43562209, 43561727, 43561667, 43561907, 43562097, 43562261, 43561504, 43560645, 43562146, 43561840, 43561781, 43561788, 43562704, 43561593, 43561628, 43561489.
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:53 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:52 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:51 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-11 19:29:50 UTCwoodpeck This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43566929 where the changeset comment is: revert 'social graph' edits
12016-11-09 12:07:12 UTCSHARCRASH Woodpeck your edits are flawed! You are breaking the elements i created! They didn't need any edit! I'm astonished that someone who has such a position like yours within OSMF makes SUCH MISTAKES! This is not right, you made a circular track whereas it's an area of woods: https://www.openstreetmap.or...
22016-11-09 12:09:26 UTCSHARCRASH The element which i was talking about and must be grass instead of a service area is this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452158351
32016-11-09 12:11:30 UTCSHARCRASH This place was filled with an area element: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.60999/5.90915
42016-11-09 12:21:04 UTCSHARCRASH https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.60357/5.90829
52016-11-09 12:41:16 UTCSomeoneElse @SHARCRASH You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431452509/history as a circular highway=track 4 months ago. Are you saying that that is incorrect?
62016-11-09 12:51:19 UTCSHARCRASH No, i haven't plotted that as a circular track, that's user woodpeck altering and degrading data! I had plotted that element as a MP wood. Something is flawed in the recording process of the history, some edits within MPs are not being recorded.

Also user stereo is making degradations:
https://w...
72016-11-09 13:57:03 UTCwoodpeck Yes, it appears that the "reconstruct polygon" function has a bug when it comes to copying tags. I'll investigate and fix this before I continue, but I definitely intend to "degrade" many more multipolygons created by SHARCRASH - essentially all those where several otherwise unre...
82016-11-09 14:14:24 UTCSHARCRASH Unrelated??? Of course they are JUST woods! Would you care to explain me what makes them so special and so individual one from the other??? And if they are not for some very local reason, the MP can still easily be edited by someone who needs to make that specification. You, what you are doing here ...
92016-11-09 14:25:13 UTCSomeoneElse @SHARCRASH, heres an example where it makes sense to have two polygons linked together: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4807529 . Here the two pieces of natural=wood together form "Breck's Plantation" - they are logically one thing. However it doesn't make sense to join things int...
102016-11-09 14:39:38 UTCSHARCRASH I know that Andy. But why should i be forbidden to use MPs to ease my contributions within iD while i respect in general real features and what's been ruled out in Wiki! This editor doesn't have the complex plugin tools that JOSM has! Using only polygons would slow tremendously the workflow since i ...
12016-10-26 15:14:05 UTCNakaner Hi Aleks-Berlin,

why did you add the area of Russia in this changeset? This number can be retrieved by calculating and therefore does not have to be mapped at OSM.

I will remove this tag (and maybe all other occurences of sqkm=* you uploaded) in the next days.

In addition, I want to inform ...
22016-10-26 17:44:08 UTCAleks-Berlin Hi Michael,

please read my points.

1. how to calc area of oceans (node, no borders) ?
2. all segments have to be in same orientation (e.g. clock wise) before calculation, which is not assured.
3. Huge Relations (e.g. russia.osm = 37 MB), that is much to download for get one number.
4. OSM h...
32016-10-26 17:53:57 UTCNakaner HI Aleks-Berlin,

regarding item 1: If you want to calculate the land area, that's trivial. Even if you want to calculate the area on sea which belongs to Russian territory, it is simple.

regarding item 2: If you software is unable to calculate correctly if the orientation of the segments is wr...
42016-10-26 18:22:50 UTCwoodpeck If I may add 2 points: (a) Just because there is rubbish in OSM, that's not an excuse to add more! (b) Wikidata is more often than not derived from Wikipedia which is licensed CC-BY-SA; I know that Wikidata claims to be CC0 but I highly doubt the legality of this.
52016-10-26 19:00:40 UTCSimonPoole It should be noted that the WMF does not make any representations that the contents of wikidata are actually free of any third party rights, The CC0 licence of wikidata is simply based on a position statement by the WMF that facts can't be copyrighted..
62016-10-26 21:02:43 UTCAleks-Berlin again: how to calc the area of nodes (like place=ocean, that do not have any border) ?
Who should question the free usage of facts?
I understand that area can be calulated 'easy' for smaller objects. But why download megabytes to get one number?
With this argument we should stop overpass-turbo.eu...
72016-10-26 21:31:39 UTCSimonPoole You already have the comfort of looking up the value via the wikidata reference for not essential things (as for example the area).
82016-10-26 21:34:54 UTCNakaner … and therefore there is no need anymore to add this information to OpenStreetMap because the object which represents the territory of Russia (relation 60189) already has wikidata=Q159.
92016-10-27 17:43:58 UTCAleks-Berlin removed again for this relation, but todo (next days) for others
12016-10-25 21:10:01 UTCwoodpeck In this changeset titled "substation refinement", you have added denomination and religion information to many cemeteries. It would be good if you could - for this changeset and in the future - provide information about your sources. Did you run a web search? Consult Wikipedia? Do you live...
22016-10-26 10:47:41 UTC42429 Thanks for your interest in my sources!
1. Yes, the denomination of cemeteries is derived from wikipedia and web search. I should have added a link to Wikipedia articles, thanks for that suggestion!
(cemeteries were a minor by-edit)
2. Substation details are derived from reports (balance sheets, ...
12016-10-09 21:48:00 UTCwoodpeck Hallo Peer van Daalen, dieser Changeset-Kommentar war sehr unhöflich und ist geeignet, Deine ausgezeichneten Edits in Aachen und anderswo mit einem bitteren Beigeschmack zu verderben. Ich hoffe, Du bringst, wenn Du darüber geschlafen hast, die Größe auf, Dich zu entschuldigen.
22016-10-10 06:19:58 UTCPeer van Daalen Guten Morgen und vielen Dank, woodpeck, für Deine freundlichen Worte.
-
So wie es aus dem Wald rein schallt, schallt es auch wieder zurück ...
-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/735717#map=19/50.77080/6.03663&layers=N
-
Hinzu kommt, daß es zwischen dem Mapper wambacher un...
32016-10-10 06:59:25 UTCPeer van Daalen ps: Nochmal zum Thema ´maxspeed´ in "Verkehrsberuhigten Zonen".
-
Gerade diesbezüglich habe ich mir die (oberlehrerhaften) Hinweise von MKnight mittlerweile zu Eigen gemacht und lasse seine Änderungen in dieser Sache an verschiedenen Orten in Aachen ja auch unkommen...
42016-10-10 18:42:56 UTCuvi Hallo Peer, du solltest dir im Klaren sein: Die hier von dir hinterlassenen Kommentare sind öffentlich und somit von jedermann zu lesen. Der von dir verwendete Wortschatz ist - unabhängig des dir möglicherweise entgegengebrachten Unverständnises - nicht zeitgemäß und b...
52016-10-11 21:02:30 UTCJojo4u In beiden Changeset hat Peer van Daalen zuerst diskriminierende, auf die Herkunft der anderen Mapper bezogene Worte gewählt. Dies hat meiner Ansicht nach keinen Platz in unserer Community.
12016-09-03 20:47:48 UTCwoodpeck This changeset looks very similar to a number of semi-automatic changesets by contributors working for Facebook that have been reverted because of low quality and a process violation (imports must be discussed before they are performed). Can you explain the process by which you extracted these ~ 850...
12016-08-08 22:24:59 UTCwoodpeck Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!
12016-08-08 07:53:54 UTCika-chan! UK I've flagged this changeset for revert because it seems this changeset just indiscriminately deleted all data without a good reason, but there are conflicts that I need help with.
22016-08-08 22:24:43 UTCwoodpeck Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!
12016-08-08 07:33:55 UTCika-chan! UK You just deleted some of the most important roads in Hyderabad with this changeset.

With a lack of a meaningful comment I cannot conclude whether this edit was a mistake or a malicious edit.
22016-08-08 22:24:23 UTCwoodpeck Deletions in this changeset have been reverted in #41334400. Please be more careful when deleting objects from OSM!
12016-08-08 00:15:52 UTCreneman Hallo, der User hat vor dem Import sehr viele Flächen gelöscht, Wälder, Wiesen und Felder. Werden die von User Squiffy vor dem Import gelöschten Daten bitte wieder hergestellt?
22016-08-08 21:10:30 UTCwoodpeck Kannst Du das konkretisieren - auf einen Zeitraum oder eine Liste von Changesets? Ich könnte zwar "alle Flächen, die in den X Wochen vor dem Import gelöscht wurden" wiederherstellen, fürchte aber, das wäre dann vielleicht zu viel und würde Duplikate verursache...
32016-08-09 21:18:57 UTCreneman Hallo, ich bin noch 2 Wochen im Urlaub in BG und bin hier nur sporadisch mit Internet versorgt, geschweige denn das ich mein Notebook dabei habe... Ich bin auf dieses Changset aufmerksam geworden, weil ich diverse Flächen in den letzten Jahren in BG erfasst hatte. Nun war mit dem langsamen Inte...
42016-08-09 21:23:57 UTCreneman Wenn ich mir seine Kommentare ansehe, werden vermutlich alle Changesets mit dem Kommentar "error corrections and cleanup of duplicates" mal ausgewertet werden müssen :(
12016-08-08 20:58:56 UTCwoodpeck Hello huanzai, what is a "lanelet" relation, what is "role=regulatory_element", and why do your ways have approximately one node every 5 meters?
12016-08-04 22:16:33 UTCwoodpeck What do you mean with "change road rev for Rand McNally maps" - you are not copying data from Rand McNally are you?
12016-07-27 21:48:05 UTCwoodpeck Why did you delete the country node for Palestine?
22016-07-29 19:25:36 UTCPeda Hello Eliot,
as you didn't reply yet and as more complaints came in, I did revert some of your changesets to restore the deleted boundaries (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41116417).
Please refrain from fixing/touching the boundaries without prior discussion with the local community in th...
12016-07-27 21:47:03 UTCwoodpeck Why were village names deleted in this changeset?
12016-07-24 14:59:51 UTCwoodpeck This appears to be an undiscussed and faulty import of data that's more than 10 years old, with partially overlapping polygons. Can you explain?
22016-07-24 17:37:32 UTCReino Baptista Dear Woodpeck,

The data edited on this changeset (and comment as source:CLC) is from the well known "Corine Land Cover 2006" data set and was inputted accordingly with the osm recommendations on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Corine_Land_Cover.

In what concerns the data age plea...
32016-07-25 13:03:44 UTCwoodpeck RB, the wiki page you cite is not a carte-blanche for undiscussed CLC imports. You are expected to discuss your import on the imports mailing list nonetheless. Many people are of the opinion that CLC data is too old to be valuable. You appear to have deleted a large amount of data, partly forest pol...
42016-07-25 16:03:16 UTCReino Baptista Dear Woodpeck,
Thank you for your opinion.
As I previously stated I did not erase any data.
I added, joined and updated.
After you kind contact I did start revising the CLC data I added, coincidentally, around the coordinates depicted on "deletion.png".
RB
52016-07-25 23:35:15 UTCwoodpeck Dear RB, I am slightly concerned by your choice of words: "Thank you for your opinion". I might not have made myself clear enough. When I asked you to stop importing data, that was not an opinion, but a request of the OSMF Data Working Group that you would ignore at your own peril. I think...
62016-07-26 00:16:24 UTCReino Baptista Dear Woodpeck,

Please don't be alarm.
I used the word "opinion" just referring when you said: "Many people are of the opinion that CLC data is too old to be valuable" Finding this data was my motivation to do the work I did, since it dates from 12/2013. Now I know there are m...
72017-06-05 12:23:40 UTCethylisocyanat @woodpeck: What's the outcome of discussion? IMHO you should revert.
woodpeck has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 1070 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)