Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-10-18 10:47:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
I see that you started to fix these strange numbers. I also want to do that. What do you think that addr:housenumber=KS (or ks / Ks etc) means?
Unfortunately most numbers don't have a valid addr:street tag. Do you see a good reason for this?
12017-01-11 22:52:33 UTCsamely Can you also check this changeset, please?
Eliane
22017-10-18 06:59:18 UTCGerdP I wonder if the primary road is in a tunnel?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464661119
It seems to go straight through buildings with both lanes.
12017-10-18 06:26:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this change because you use highway=crossing on some ways. This tag should only be used for the node shared by the major road and the footway. The way itself should be tagged highway=footway + footway=crossing.
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
Yo...
12017-10-18 06:09:00 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the ways with highway=bus_guideway like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533172280
This is a very special typo of road, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway
Mapbox shows ways with road markings,this would not be needed with a guided way.
12017-10-18 06:04:00 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check my corrections for roads where you entered the name with the highway key:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53030610
12017-10-17 05:00:40 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review 5 roads with highway=R
in this changeset. I assume you meant residential?
Why do you add import=yes to these ways? If these ways are from an import, you should mention the source of this import instead or additional to Digital Globe. In this case I assume you just use copy+paste...
22017-10-17 17:13:37 UTCVLD007 Hello Gerd.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I corrected the misspelling.

Thanks,
Kurt
32017-10-17 17:59:47 UTCGerdP I learned now that you work for the "AI-Assisted Road Tracing" project. My understanding of the wiki page is that you should not tag each way with source=* and import=yes but instead use these tags for the changeset. I think this would be much better.
12017-10-16 13:10:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
What does the rarely used highway=historic mean on these two ways?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506142967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506142970
Maybe you want to express that the ways are no longer usable?
Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for bet...
22017-10-16 20:50:20 UTCDyserth It means it used to be a track road in the past, with a ford across the stream, but isn't any more having fallen into disuse for general traffic and now being sited on private land. The route could still be used for foot traffic but has restricted access.
32017-10-16 21:13:09 UTCGerdP OK, so you think the owners still use if for walking? In that case it would be a highway=footway + access=private
or maybe hw=path, right?
42017-10-17 08:24:19 UTCDyserth No that is not what I meant - it *could* be used for walking down but is unsuitable for vehicles or horses but there are no rights of access. This was originally an old holloway road - hence the historic tag.
52017-10-17 08:39:00 UTCGerdP Since you don't seem to use one of the common prefixes to express this
what about historic=way? This is used far more often than highway=historic.


62017-10-17 12:04:27 UTCDyserth Less common it may be but is it more appropriate in this case? I feel that the highway=historic tag *is* more appropriate as this is what this road used to be. A road. A highway. Not a path or a way.
72017-10-17 13:32:40 UTCGerdP OK, maybe my understanding is too poor. I've asked the UK forum for help
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=668571#p668571
12017-10-17 08:50:07 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You changed a rather large area from landuse=residential to amenity=marketplace
building=yes
name=Ranen Market Centre
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455165941
I've reverted this change, please draw a new way for the marketplace.
12017-10-17 05:44:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
What means highway="path possible, but extremely dangerous" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205949005
I assume you wanted to add this as a note?
22017-10-17 07:40:08 UTCPfad-Finder There used to be a path/footway over the bridge (about 50cm wide, not official), but now large parts of the handrail are stolen and the risk to drop 20 meters to the ground is real. There is already one recently erected cross under the bridge. I dont wan't to encourage anybody to use this bridge for...
32017-10-17 07:44:44 UTCGerdP OK, that is understood. Question is what tag can be used to express this. Since there is no highway on the southern part of the bridge I wonder why you don't simple remove the highway tag.
12017-10-17 05:09:01 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check:
What is meant with import=yes used on some new ways?
They all have the tags import=yes + source=digitalglobe so it doesn't seem to be an import as described here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
12016-02-15 06:27:17 UTCGerdP Moin!
Wenn ich das richtig sehe, sollte es bei diesem Weg historic=highway heissen, nicht highway=historic ?

22016-02-16 09:45:42 UTCLodda Dieser Weg und auch andere sind historisch, also nicht mehr existent und sollen in Mapnik nicht dargestellt werden. Sie werden aber in einer Relation zusammengefasst, die diese Wege wieder sichtbar machen.
Gruß Lodda
32016-02-16 10:04:05 UTCGerdP Dann passt doch historic=highway viel besser, oder ?
ciao,Gerd
42017-09-07 13:24:14 UTCGerdP Bin gerade wieder drüber gestolpert. Soll ich es ändern?
52017-10-16 13:33:39 UTCGerdP Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52982507
Statt hw=razed könnte man auch historic=way in betracht ziehen. Die Relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397631667
ist auch nicht wirklich korrekt, ist ja mehr 'ne Sammelrelation als 'ne route.
12017-10-13 06:00:29 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you added crossing=zebra
to ways with highway=crossing.
The way is a footway and should have the tags highway=footway + footway=crossing
and maybe crossing_ref=zebra were appropriate. The node that is shared by the footway and the major road should have the tags highway=c...
22017-10-15 16:46:14 UTCzorglubu I agree. I wanted to correct a warning of OSM Inspector. There is no footway here (I know the street), I presume I should remove these ways and put some nodes with tags highway=crossing + crossing_ref=zebra on the different ways of the main road . Could you confirm ? Thanks.
32017-10-15 16:55:49 UTCGerdP Yes, since the sidewalk is not mapped as a separate way I think you just have to add the nodes as you suggested.
42017-10-15 16:58:38 UTCzorglubu Thanks for the advice. I will do it in the next days.
12017-10-14 09:29:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review position of this highway=secondary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336091538
Current Bing shows a road next to this roughly drawn way.
22017-10-14 09:32:54 UTCGerdP .. at least in the northern part ;-)
Maybe you also know what this is?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335875843
32017-10-15 09:03:53 UTCcarciofo Hello, there was no high resolution imagery available at the time the way was created, thus the rough alignment. Regarding the northern part (i.e. north of Barbacoas), if you're referring to the weird highway=pendiente tag, I was not the author: I had added it as highway=unclassified but it was chan...
42017-10-15 09:20:35 UTCGerdP OK, thanks, Will have a look at it later.
12017-10-14 20:42:00 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo addr:place="<different>"
on more than 10000 objects near this area, all created by you.
22017-10-15 09:06:46 UTCschadow1 OMG! Fixing it now. Probably had an error with JOSM literally tagging them as <different>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52949461
32017-10-15 09:19:02 UTCGerdP I think I also did that in the past (but noticed it before uploading), but now I am no longer able to reproduce the problem in JOSM. If you can, please open a ticket for JOSM.
12017-10-15 06:34:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review these ways tagged highway=escape. I think they are all hw=track + tracktype=grade1
One is here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532543515
Why did you use hw=escape?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=escape
Why is it not connected to the ways in the we...
22017-10-15 08:00:10 UTCgpesquero Hello GerP! You’re right! I reused the tag <highway=escape> because it was already used in some ways in this area, but it does not apply here at all !! I will change them to <highway=track> + <tracktype=grade1> where appropriate.
32017-10-15 08:06:10 UTCGerdP OK, thanks!
42017-10-15 08:32:09 UTCgpesquero Fixed with changeset #52948681 (www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52948681). Please review...
12017-10-15 06:46:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please watch out for typo highway=residental (missing 2nd i)
I fixed it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52946988
12017-10-15 06:37:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
The tag highway=historic is rarely used. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
for common tagging.
22017-10-15 22:13:17 UTCdaveemtb Thanks, yes, I think the tagging I used was very old. I've edited now - does that look better?
12017-10-15 06:22:06 UTCGerdP Hi!
I changed the unusual highway=driveway to highway=service + service=driveway, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52946622
12017-10-15 06:18:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed highway=bridge here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52946580
12016-03-01 08:56:15 UTCGerdP Hi there!
You have added a few ways with highway=test_track here. This tag is only used here, I am not a local, but I guess you should better use highway=service together with a access=private and maybe a note .
22017-10-14 14:08:19 UTCWookey The ways are unusual. There is a large open-sided shed covering an area of marked out roads (and ramps), clearly for something like taking driving tests or testing vehicles.
I was unable to find a suitable tag so I guess made one up. All the other roads in the facility are 'service' (and maybe priv...
32017-10-14 15:50:06 UTCGerdP Taginfo says that service=test_track is used 27 times, so I think hw=service + service=test_track is okay.
12017-10-14 09:53:29 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual tag highway=historical on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462621213 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441835222
Sat images don't show a highway, so they either existed a long time ago or maybe never?
In the first case I suggest historical=highway or highway=razed, ...
22017-10-14 09:54:40 UTCGerdP oops, sorry, meant historic=highway
12017-08-24 13:05:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=unpaved
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432248519
Maybe you meant landuse=brownfield?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Alanduse%3Dbrownfield
22017-10-14 09:44:44 UTCGerdP Or maybe it is an amenity=parking?
12017-09-25 09:01:34 UTCGerdP Hi!
What is meant with highway=tiny_path
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424375754 ?
Do you want to express that it has a small width?
22017-10-14 09:20:10 UTCGerdP I've changed it back to path:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52919376
12017-10-14 09:13:03 UTCGerdP Bitte mal prüfen:
Es gibt zwei Relationen name=Travemünder Landstraße, ich denke diese kann gelöscht werden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1793028
Allerdings sind nicht alle Member davon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1658339
22017-10-14 09:14:16 UTCGerdP Ach ja, weißt Du evtl. was dies hier ist?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131730185
Evtl. road_marking=dash?
12017-08-26 08:06:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468844630
The sat images show an amenity=parking,
not a circular way. A turning_circle should be mapped as a node, not a way. See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
22017-08-26 11:50:57 UTCRobJN Most satellite imagery is out of date for this location. I am sure I mapped it right but will check again when next in Coventry.
32017-08-26 11:52:58 UTCRobJN I am aware of the turning circle tag and chose not to use that so expect no change required, but as noted, I will check.
42017-10-14 08:48:50 UTCGerdP Esri sat image now shows a turning loop next to an amenity=parking
12017-10-14 06:36:02 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the rarely used highway=access on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532407488
I assume you meant hw=service?
22017-10-14 08:18:50 UTCyourealwaysbe Thanks for this. I'm not sure what to tag it now! Service road may be the right one. It is a road providing access to residential apartments. It's more than a driveway since it's not within property bounds, though residential seems like a an aggrandisation. It fits the Cambridge dictionary definitio...
32017-10-14 08:41:44 UTCGerdP I don't know the road and cannot see it on sat images, so I really don't know for sure. I assume hw=residential may also fit, esp. when you have a name as well.
42017-10-15 22:31:38 UTCyourealwaysbe After staring at it a bit on mapillary, i decided residential
12017-10-14 07:29:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway="residential et éclairée"
Did you mean highway=residential + lit=yes?
12017-10-14 06:43:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've corrected the unusual highway=parking_aisle
to highway=service. I did not add service=parking_aisle because I don't think that this is their main purpose.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52916811
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
22017-10-14 13:44:42 UTCke9tv ok, thanks, must have been going blind after the number of chdr reviews this week.
12017-10-14 06:31:48 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=5 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389925791
Maybe you meant addr:housenumber=5?
22017-10-15 04:56:46 UTCReza_koulivand Hello! Yes, you are right, I have been trying to register the height of the building. thank you
12017-10-13 07:59:38 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I know it is a bit late but I've noticed this changeset because you added a lot of points with tags that are not useful for OSM.
I've removed the data here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52880719
Please let me know if you think that the data is useful for OSM and...
12017-06-27 13:17:57 UTCmueschel Hi,
welcome to OSM. You added a lot of points here, but none of them has any meaningful tags. Please take your time to read in the OSM Wiki how tagging has to be done to be useful in any application that uses OSM data.
22017-10-13 07:40:18 UTCGerdP I've reverted most of this changeset here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52880303
12017-10-13 05:56:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the ways near
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532057738
The tag highway=crossing is only for nodes, the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532057737 has no tags.
12017-10-12 16:40:02 UTCChris Fleming why remove the maxspeed? - also I'm not sure if an area is actually appropriate here. Think that a standard highway tag will be find here.
22017-10-12 16:43:10 UTCGerdP I did not dare to remove the areas. The maxspeed tags are on the normal highway ways and not needed for areas.
If you like, please delete the areas.
I think they were created as an experiment.
12017-10-12 07:29:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474617988 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474617989
Are you sure that these are not roads?
Or are there roads parallel to the drains?
12017-10-12 04:44:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please don't use highway=* for elements of a playground like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531616462
Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
for common tags.
22017-10-12 07:42:03 UTCsimonmikkelsen-dk You are right. I used highway where I ment to use playground. It is fixed now. Thanks!
12017-10-11 08:12:00 UTCGerdP Hi!
This looks like an import to me. Unfortunately the data is not useful for OSM because you did not tag the nodes or connect them with ways. What was the source for these nodes? Did you follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
12017-10-11 08:10:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
This looks like an import to me. Unfortunately the data is not useful for OSM
because you did not tag the nodes or connect them with ways. What was the source for these nodes?
Did you follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
12017-10-11 07:42:21 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please don't add landuse=residential to a building. Maybe use building=residential instead. See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential
12017-10-11 07:35:36 UTCGerdP Hi!
This looks like an import that went wrong. The changeset added many nodes without any tags or ways. Did you follow the import guidelines?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
12017-10-11 07:26:18 UTCGerdP This cs was reverted, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52813945
12017-10-11 07:11:16 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've reverted this changeset because it is of no use for OSM and looks like an undiscussed import. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52813536
12017-10-11 06:54:21 UTCGerdP Hi!
I wonder what you tried to map here. The changeset contains 1157 nodes which are of no use as is because they have no tags and they are not connected to a way or relation.
I assume it is an import that did not work.
Did you follow the instructions for imports given here? http://wiki.openstre...
12017-09-14 15:32:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3612718
Why did you use highway=unclassified
for it?
22017-10-09 22:22:50 UTCprogserega Hmm!
I don't know :-)
Highway=* not need for this area. I think, that is mistake.
32017-10-10 05:50:46 UTCGerdP I think I can see a road on the southern
part. Please check my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52779157
12017-10-09 06:39:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review mapping of this footbrige:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523066079
The correct tags are highway=footbway + bridge=yes + layer=1
Please add bicycle=yes if appropriate.
See also
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
12017-10-08 09:42:19 UTCGerdP Hi!
I fixed a typo highway="te]"
on three ways. I assume you meant tertiary, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52726073
12017-09-08 04:51:02 UTCGerdP Hi!
You used highway=close or closed here.
Both are rarely used. Sat images don't yet show a road. So I wonder what is meant. See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-10-07 16:49:26 UTCfenrisster It is an existing highway (newly built and finished) but since it is closed for public use, so, that is why I used that prefix. If I am mistaken, I will correct it.
32017-10-07 17:07:59 UTCGerdP Maybe you need something like access=private here?
12017-10-06 07:22:20 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
The tag highway=social_path is only used here. If you want to express that nobody is allowed to use a path the tag access=no is enough. If you want to express that there is no path at all you can use was:highway=path or maybe historic:highway=path
12017-10-06 07:16:54 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Why did you revert my correction?
The correct tag is highway="residential"
not highway="highway=residential"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530095171
12017-10-06 06:42:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
What is meant with highway=aerial on this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12507485
I think the last part is part of the driveway,
the middle looks like a hw=track and the first part might be a hw=path.
12017-10-05 06:17:12 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
You changed a lot of ways with highway=footway + footway=crossing to
highway=crossing. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s9s
I assume this was not intended as highway=crossing should only be used to tag the shared node of the footway and the major road.
See http://wiki.openstr...
22017-10-05 15:09:57 UTCDiógenes de Sinope Hi GerdP,

Whops, I made a mistake, I always use iD edit to make edits, seeing as the edits that you refer to are in regards to 'pedestrian crossings' that are raised to be on the same level as the sidewalk, I assumed that the correct representation for this was with the key 'highway:crossing' or ...
32017-10-05 15:18:12 UTCGerdP Ok, maybe also interesting for you:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
42017-10-05 16:03:10 UTCDiógenes de Sinope after investigating the issue, it would appear that the reason why the edit was represented as 'highway=footway, footway=crossing, highway=crossing' is because I had originally tagged the way as a 'pedestrian crossing' (highway=footway, footway=crossing), I then change the way from 'pedestrian cross...
52017-10-05 16:17:37 UTCDiógenes de Sinope I tried to emulate what I just described above but by all accounts, every thing seems to be in order, I think we must be referring to different edits, maybe I did make a mistake with a few of them, if you can local the edits that are tagged incorrectly then I think it would be best that you correct ...
62017-10-05 16:24:21 UTCGerdP If you execute the overpass query you'll find a few ways which are still tagged with highway=crossing. This tag is only meant for nodes.
72017-10-05 16:29:46 UTCDiógenes de Sinope as I mentioned in my previous comment, I think that the edits that 'I thought' you were referring to must be the wrong ones, the wiki page (raised pedestrian crossing) for the edits that I thought you were referring to claims that I tagged the edits correctly, unless I tagged a 'way' as 'highway=cro...
82017-10-05 16:36:48 UTCDiógenes de Sinope okay I see what is going on now, the tags for 'raised pedestrian crossing' are highway=crossing, traffic_calming=table, that is why there is an error, 'highway=crossing' should only be used for nodes
12017-10-05 06:33:55 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual tag highway=stairs instead of steps.
I corrected that already, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530043278
Is this way really still named Isolotto?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328132609
22017-10-05 12:57:30 UTCpicnicjonathan Hey Gerd, thanks for the update - I thought I researched enough to not make this mistake ;-) The way might be called Bastion or Isolotto, I don't really know though :)
12017-10-04 16:31:44 UTCrab Zwischen D356 und D776 sind meiner Meinung nach nur die bessern Wege als Unclassified zu betrachten (regelmässig befahren , Verbindungscharakter, mindestens 3m breit). Der Rest ist grösstenteils ein Überbleibsel aus einem HOT "buildings only" Projekt. Am besten grosszüg...
22017-10-04 16:40:18 UTCGerdP Danke für die Hinweise.
Woran erkenne ich bei Bing die besseren Wege? ImPrinzip scheint es hier je einen mehr oder weniger direkten Weg zwischen den einzelnen Häusern zu geben.
Die meisten buildings sind laut Bing okay,
bei den Straßen gibt / gab es halt jede Menge unverbundene S...
32017-10-04 16:50:38 UTCrab Ich schalte oft den Datenlayer aus und zoome dann aus der Ansicht heraus. Da erkennt man meistens die etwas wichtigeren Verbindungen. Um ein Gefühl für die Wegbreite zu bekommen, ziehe ich eine Linie über die Breite des Weges. Das Measurement plugin zeigt dann die Breite recht zuverl&...
42017-10-04 17:15:08 UTCGerdP Ok, im Prinzip verwenden wir die gleiche Methoden. Ich frage mich aber, ob es nicht eher am Untergrund liegt, ob man die Fahrspuren gut sieht oder nicht. Ich habe halt lanes=1 verwendet, weil 2 der default für unclassified ist.
Ich habe aber nichts dagegen, wenn Du die von mir geänderte...
12017-10-04 07:05:41 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443988643
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443990679
You created some ways with multiple highway values like highway=service;footway or
highway=service;living_street
It seems that this is a common problem in the Go Map! App, so please wa...
12017-10-04 06:56:03 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier einige Wege mit highway=pathless erzeugt.
An dieser Stelle wohl aus Versehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529790396
Warum willst Du z.B. hier nicht einen hw=path verwenden ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529231499
12017-10-03 06:02:45 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the ways with highway=crossing like this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529511129
It should be tagged highway=footway + footway=crossing
and it should share a node wiith the major road. This shared node is tagged highway=crossing and maybe more tags like ...
22017-10-03 20:54:52 UTCTopol65 Thank you for pointing this out! I have fixed these tags.
32017-10-04 06:48:46 UTCGerdP Thanks! See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52615712
where I changed the mapping for one footway. At this place it is not a sidewalk but a crossing, and it is not covered:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529882006
Always make sure that the node with highway=crossing is shared by the foo...
42017-10-04 20:27:04 UTCTopol65 Thanks
12017-07-25 11:27:01 UTCmueschel Was meinst du denn mit "scheduled"? Üblicherweise nehmen wir doch preproposed / proposed / planned / construction.
Gruß, Jan
22017-07-27 21:51:51 UTCJojo4u Ich dachte ich mache nochmal Werbung für mein scheduled-Proposal. Aber jetzt am Desktop sehe ich bei Taginfo nur 2 Objekte. Aber planned wird ja auch noch nicht gerendert...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Scheduled_lifecycle
32017-09-26 09:18:16 UTCGerdP Bitte ändern. Ich finde, wir haben wirklich genug etablierte Möglichkeiten, einen Weg zu mappen, den es nicht gibt.
ciao, Gerd
42017-10-03 19:27:36 UTCJojo4u Welches Tag würdest du bevorzugen? Proposed oder planned?
52017-10-03 19:32:08 UTCGerdP Ich kenne die Sachlage nicht. Scheduled klingt nach "irgendwas in Richtung Bau passiert bereits" und das wäre dann mehr planned als proposed.
62017-10-05 17:55:17 UTCJojo4u habe es als highway=planned gesetzt
12017-10-02 10:41:40 UTCGerdP Moin!
Ich wundere mich gerade, dass dieser Weg mit foot=no gemapt ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61906895
Ich radl dort regelmäßig und wüßte nicht, dort ein Verbotsschild gesehen zu haben.
Woher kam die Info?
12017-10-02 09:59:46 UTCGerdP Moin!
Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass dieser Weg
als hw=track eingetragen ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65747884#map=15/52.9075/8.4260
Ich fahre dort regelmäßig mit dem Rad und habe noch nie einen Trecker oder so gesehen, ausser vielleicht zur Erhaltung des Weges. Warum hast...
12017-10-02 08:13:39 UTCGerdP Hi again!
I am not happy with the changes to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30879935
1) The highway tag contans mixed values, only one can be right:
highway=residential;unclassified
2) The name tag contains now both the chinese and the english name.. Please don't do that. You the tag name:...
12017-10-02 08:03:53 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review mixed types highway="footway; path" on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84617566#map=17/48.78847/-123.62799
Maybe you also know the mtb:scale? See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
12017-10-02 06:54:34 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used
highway=crossing + traffic_calming=table for a footbridge:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529168266
The usual tagging is
highway=footway + bridge=yes [+ layer=1]
I've seen the same problem before and all mappers used the onli...
12017-10-02 06:35:57 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noted this change because of the rarely used tag highway=bridge. I've modified this and also part of the riverbank. Please review my changes made here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52554488
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
Maybe this p...
22017-10-02 06:46:24 UTCGerdP I fixed another typical newbe problem:
You connected some tracks to a power line instead of a track. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52554668
Whenever you draw a highway across a waterway you should try to map if there is a bridge or a ford or if the waterway is in a tunnel.
See for...
12017-09-08 08:25:30 UTCGerdP Moin!
Wie kann denn ein Weg gleichzeitig highway=footway und waterway=river sein
und noch dazu innerhalb eines leisure=swimming_pool ?
Ist das vielleicht ein
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkneipp_water_cure
22017-09-30 07:02:30 UTCkeepright! ler Dies ist der Weg, auf den ich eine Wasserrutsche kartiere:
attraction=waterslide, weil man sich vergnügt
waterway=stream, weil Wasser fließt
highway=footway, damit über die Rutsche geroutet werden kann
oneway=yes, weil eine Richtung vorgegeben ist.
32017-09-30 08:38:36 UTCGerdP Ich bezog mich auf diesen Way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434869315
Eine Wasserrutsche würde ich (wenn überhaupt) auch nur
attraction=waterslide mappen.
Aber was hat so eine Rutsche mit Routing zu tun?
12017-09-30 06:46:30 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped a few underground ways here, but it seems you gave up. The ways are not connected and some have wrong tags.
For example, instead of highway=escalator you should use highway=footway (or steps) + conveying=yes
(see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying)\...
12017-09-30 05:47:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual highway=footpath on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24178264
It was hw=path before, so I assume you wanted to change it to hw=footway ?
22017-10-05 02:33:55 UTC3vivekb_sjsidewalks_import I made the suggested changes in 52641927. Thanks for the suggestion I knew it looked weird.
12017-09-30 05:38:59 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noted that you created two ways with
the unusual tag highway=alley
I changed them to highway=service + service=alley.
You also added some tags with the tiger prefix. Did you get your information from tiger data? If not I would not use these tags.
12017-09-29 06:00:49 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noted this change because you used the tag highway=bus_guideway
on several ways. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s3c
Please note that this is a very special kind of road, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway
I assume you need highway=servic...
22017-09-29 06:33:05 UTCBillLim Hello,
I am aware of the classification and believe it to be appropriate. Several sections of the BRT system runs on dedicated curbed "tracks" that are paralell and separate from the roadway and are therefore not normal bus lanes. Hence, the highway=bus_guideway tag seems appropriate. Fu...
32017-09-29 06:54:10 UTCGerdP I think the important criteria on the wiki page are these:
"Guided buses are buses steered for part or all of their route by external means"
and "Do not use this on normal paved roadways that are designated for buses only. One correct tagging for those is highway=service, access=no,...
42017-09-29 15:31:10 UTCBillLim I did read the wiki thoroughly beforehand. As the wiki also states that "Guidance systems can be either physical, such as kerbs (in American and Canadian English, "curbs"), or remote, such as optical or radio guidance."
In the case of the system in question, it's presence of ph...
52017-09-29 17:22:39 UTCGerdP OK, got it. Thanks for your patience.
12017-09-29 08:39:27 UTCGerdP Hi there!
You have used the tag highway=snow_path
for 4 ways, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183478110
This tag is not used anywhere else. My understanding is that highway=path +
ice_road=yes
might be better here? Or maybe route=piste ?
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ke...
12017-09-29 06:27:09 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this area because of the tag highway=bus_guideway
used on 4 ways here, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524395703
Please note that these are very special ways, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway
22017-10-01 00:50:34 UTCWilmer Osario Thanks, I will correct it to a better tag.
12017-09-29 06:19:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review this area. I don't this that
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195138603
is a way as described here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_guideway
If only busses are allowed, you can use
highway=service + access=no + bus=yes
Is it allowed to access the cinema \...
12017-07-19 19:51:50 UTCletihu Dieses Gebiet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488417193/history
sollte geschlossen sein. Kannst Du das bitte in Ordnung bringen?
22017-09-28 08:37:43 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte prüfen:
Bing und DigitalGlobe zeigen aktuell dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488417204
und viele weitere etwa 50m nord-westlich versetzt.
32017-09-28 12:03:58 UTCFuschi ah, endlich mal Luftbilder, auf denen auch was zu erkennen ist :D
Danke für den Hinweis!
42017-09-28 12:10:44 UTCGerdP Irgendwo muss es da auch eine Straße geben, auf der auch Fahrzeuge dort hinkommen. Im Moment gibt es nur hw=path
52017-09-28 12:21:05 UTCFuschi naja als Straße würde ich das nicht bezeichnen :D
ist auch keinerweise befestigt oder dergleichen
62017-09-28 12:58:11 UTCGerdP Also kommt man dort gar nicht mit einem Auto hin?
12017-09-28 12:32:52 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526879327
What did you try to map here?
It is not a road.
12017-09-28 08:03:28 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf highway=yes an
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370202635
Da hängt ein proposed=residential dran,
ich vermute, das sollte bei highway hin?
12017-09-28 06:42:05 UTCGerdP Moin!
Ich wundere mich, dass es für die Brücke so detailierte access Attribute gibt, aber nicht für den Rest vom "Wirtschaftsweg".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46506382
12017-09-28 05:46:02 UTCGerdP Moin!
Die "Gebäudenummern" sehen für mich nach Hausnummern (addr:housenumber) aus. Oder ist das hier ein Sonderfall?
Beispiel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org
/way/244944709
12017-09-28 04:59:05 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've fixed typo highway=driveway here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292583076
but I think you should review the access tags.I think it is better to have them on the way, not only on the gates. Maybe split the way at the gate. Besides that I wonder why you set access=destination and overw...
12017-09-27 06:07:05 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check the "Maine Huts Trail"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477213220
near this bridge:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481291132
I assume the trail should be split to use this brdige?
It might be better to use a relation to map "Maine Huts Trail". See
ht...
22017-09-27 23:10:36 UTCmcccliv I cannot comment on the bridge you refer to:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481291132

I am not familiar with that area. It was not part of the changes I made.
32017-09-28 04:36:44 UTCGerdP Thanks for the quick reaction. I tried to find out if the bridge should be part of the trail.
As of now, the trail crossies the waterway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481291133
and there is neither a ford nor a bridge.
I just hoped that know more.
12017-09-27 14:32:18 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier aus einem Gebäude eine Straße gemacht. Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263132953
12017-09-27 14:29:20 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374418426
Die Fläche ist größtenteils von Autobahnen bedeckt, da macht natural=scrub eigentlich keinen Sinn.
Ich würde nur die großen Flächen zwischen den Spuren so mappen. An den Straßenrände...
12017-09-27 07:20:35 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=yes
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365990678
Bing only shows trees. Is it a path or an abandoned road?
12017-09-27 05:47:38 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used highway=crossing for a way here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527949637
and here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527949648
The tag is onöy meant for the node shared by a minor way (footway, cycleway) with a major road. ...
22017-09-27 12:50:04 UTCxolrax Yes, I'll correct it. Thank you.
12017-09-26 09:50:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
I try to understand what highway=historical means here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441835222
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462621213
Do you want to map that there was a road in the past which no longer exists?
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix\...
12017-09-25 12:14:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
You used highway=passing_place on a way here. The area looks more like a highway=rest_area to me. The value passing_place should only be used on nodes. Do you think that this place was created to allow two vehicle to pass each other?
22017-09-26 08:12:23 UTCJPERR Hi GerdP,

I can't be 100% sure about the fact this area was meant as a passing place, however the road there is quite narrow, uphill, and there are no other spaces right before or after to stop and let a vehicle pass.
But I guess it would be OK to mark it as a highway=rest_area as well.

Bes...
32017-09-26 09:13:24 UTCGerdP My understanding is that you can stop there to access this viewpoint:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4230873933
A rest_area is probably larger. Please review my changes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52378510
42017-09-29 21:19:20 UTCJPERR I am fine with your changes. Thanks for the input
12017-08-27 06:02:59 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=stream
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508972904
I guess you meant waterway=stream + intermittent=yes ?
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent
22017-09-26 07:44:45 UTCGerdP Please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52375797
I am not sure if there is really a ford here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1817612067
Maybe the water goes through a tunnel=culvert?
12017-09-26 07:14:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review this "roundabout":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527093973
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
12017-09-26 06:59:09 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the rarely used tag highway="de servicio"
Please use the english values as listed here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
You should also connect the roads so that they share a node.
You should not connect a road...
22017-09-26 06:59:47 UTCGerdP Sorry, forgot the link to the road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526838772
32017-10-12 14:38:48 UTCosmtools And please have a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527577480
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527577482
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527577484
Closed areas without any tags?
12017-09-26 06:49:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425847926
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425847918
12017-09-25 09:31:25 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515978533
This looks like a junction=roundabout
or maybe just a circular way with highway=residenital (I can't see an obstacle in the middle on the sat images). The tag highway=mini_roundabout should only be used on nodes.
12017-09-25 08:09:34 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review mixed values highway=unclassified;construction
on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78521329
I assume that only a part of the way is under construction?
12017-09-25 08:00:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check: Why are there two relations named "Niška Transverzala" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6791194
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6793885
They both seem to be incomplete, maybe they should be merged into one?
12017-09-25 07:24:25 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review my corrections on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90723373
done here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52346664
12017-09-25 07:16:19 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier highway=pfad anstatt path verwendet. Absicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527268353
22017-09-25 13:57:16 UTCBillboa Danke für den Hinweis, soeben korrigiert.
12017-09-25 06:23:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please use either highway=disused + disused=* or disused:highway=* for closed roads. See my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52345338
22017-09-25 06:47:31 UTCGerdP Please review also the position of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227611140 and the other ways near it.
Digital Globe Sat image shows them ~ 16m from their actual position.
12017-09-21 08:56:44 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the nodes you created in this area. For example the tags for
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4875071999 look completely wrong.
22017-09-25 06:05:00 UTCGerdP In case you don't know what I meant:
- The key building should be used on ways which describe the outline of a building, like here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39622405
- The key highway is nomally used to map a road (when used on a way) or objects related to the road, like crossings, stop s...
12017-09-24 15:19:35 UTCGerdP Hallo!
Ich habe gerade in D diverse highway=centre_line angeschaut, die meisten waren tatsächlich Leitplanken in der Mitte einer Autobahn/Schnellstraße. Aber was ist dies hier?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342553682
12017-09-24 06:17:54 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've notice the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526943431
because you used the tag highway=* here.
I assume you found this i a wiki page.Please note that * is only a placeholder for a reasonable value, in this case probably "service". You also didn't connect...
22017-09-24 09:34:46 UTCEljah Thanks a lot. I hope everything is fixed, at least I tried )
32017-09-24 13:30:25 UTCGerdP Looked again at the names. I assume that
inscription would be better here. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription
12017-09-24 07:24:34 UTCGerdP Hi!
I am looking at ways with the rarely used tag highway=access_ramp.
I assume this is a footway usable for wheelchairs (and maybe also for delivery)
?
Why didn't you use highway=footway + wheelchair=yes ?
22017-09-24 07:35:36 UTCTararan I guess you are talking about the clinic's ramp that looks like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:SSF_Main_Library_wheelchair_ramp_1.JPG
32017-09-24 07:39:12 UTCGerdP Sorry, forgot the link:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373911488
42017-09-24 07:39:52 UTCTararan I haven't edited OSM for years, please don't ask me about properties and keys.
52017-09-24 07:41:25 UTCTararan It may also look much like the picture in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Access_Ramp : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Accessramp.jpg
62017-09-24 07:43:51 UTCGerdP Ah, thanks for the last link.
72017-09-24 07:46:42 UTCTararan Photos of the ramp: https://yandex.ru/images/search?text=%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%20180
12017-06-14 09:42:47 UTCMinh Nguyen Thanks for your contributions! As you add stoplines, please remember to connect them to the roadways, as that would be more topologically correct.

In fact, since most roadways in OSM are modeled as lines rather than areas, most existing software prefers that stopping positions be mapped as [highw...
22017-09-24 06:51:06 UTCGerdP A typical problem with this approach is here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500770256
The stop line is now part of the sidewalk (and still not part of the major road)
I don't think that a way with highway=stopline is any better than a node on the road with highway=stop.
It is nearly useless ...
32017-09-24 06:56:29 UTCMinh Nguyen There’s some additional discussion about this stopline mapping effort in the thread starting at <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-September/017821.html>.
42017-09-24 07:36:45 UTCGerdP @Minh Nguyen : Thanks for the link.
I noticed that the number of ways with highway=stopline decreased from ~17500 to < 11000 during the last days. Not sure why.
52017-09-24 07:52:29 UTCMinh Nguyen pflier is retagging highway=stopline to road_marking=solid_stop_line at the suggestion of those on the talk-us thread. I welcome this change, and I agree with GerdP that the ways should be connected to the roads they intersect.
12017-09-24 07:33:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
I wonder where this highway=access_ramp leads to and what it is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316942164
Is it a special way for wheelchairs (highway=footway + wheelchair=yes) ?
Is there a lift (highway=elevator) at the end?
12017-09-24 07:28:15 UTCGerdP Moin!
Ich frage mich, ob das selten benutzte highway=access_ramp nicht besser durch
highway=footway + wheelchair=yes ersetzt werden kann.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448354438
12017-08-30 09:16:46 UTCGerdP Moin!
Für nicht mehr vorhandene Wege gibt es ein eigenes Tagging-System, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Die beiden Wege sind Teile von Relationen. Kennst Du deren neuen Verlauf?
22017-09-22 12:25:39 UTCSuidakra Sorry hatte nix passenderes gefunden.
Den neuen Verlauf kenne ich nicht. Es ist bis jetzt auch noch so ausgeschildert. Auf meinen Hinweis wurde nicht reagiert.
32017-09-22 14:11:30 UTCGerdP Vielleicht ist es dann besser, erstmal nur trail_visibility=no zu setzen?
42017-09-23 06:05:06 UTCGerdP Ich sehe gerade, Du hast einen Weg geändert, den anderen noch nicht
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407468277
Nach Deiner Beschreibung würde ich beides eher auf highway=path + trail_visibility=no setzen. Wanderer können ja wahrscheinlich noch durch, oder?
52017-09-24 06:32:37 UTCSuidakra Wandere können da nur durch wenn sie bereit sind eine ca 12m hohen Schotterabhang hinaufzu klettern.
Der restliche Weg ist noch da. Nur das kleine Stück ist weg.
62017-09-24 06:40:49 UTCGerdP Sofern das erlabut ist, kannst Du es ja mit sac_scale erfassen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Asac_scale
12017-09-23 09:27:19 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484607462
What did you try to map here?
22017-09-23 23:31:43 UTCnevw Hi Gerd
I expect it is this stock route
http://www.simoncubit.com.au/blog/ritters-track.
I also note that this tag is proposed
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=milestone?uselang=en
Maybe highway=track|path|bridleway? would be ok in parts too with additional visibility tags with a ...
32017-09-24 06:06:47 UTCGerdP Thanks for the link.I agree regarding the highway tag. I think each stone cairn might be tagged as historic=milestone (used on a node).
The landuse=farmland tag should be removed.
42017-09-25 01:23:09 UTCgreyim Thanks GP historic=milestone seems good... unusually, there is no actual track, long since erased by time and weather
12017-09-23 16:13:05 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello GerdP. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309097494 you have tagged `cylkeway:right:surface` instead of `cycleway:right:surface`, right? #typo
22017-09-23 17:51:28 UTCGerdP Argh! Fixed this also. Hope this was the last one.
12017-08-25 11:58:30 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=passing_place
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411728198
Is this a bridge or a ford?
22017-08-29 13:45:59 UTCzwombie I honestly don't know, I can't remember adding the tag either, doesn't sound like a tag I would use
32017-09-23 10:07:31 UTCGerdP Maybe you just typed pa for path and JOSM autocomplete selected passing_place.
Do you remember if this way is connected to the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411728200 ?
I don't see the path nor the building on any sat image.
12017-09-23 08:32:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the tag highway=cavepassage which is only used here.
I wonder if natural=cave fits better?
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave
12017-09-23 08:21:00 UTCGerdP Hi!
You added some additional ways for cycleways in this area, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454491139
Did you notice that the major roads
were already tagged with
cycleway=lane ?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366922037
12017-09-23 07:58:36 UTCGerdP Hi!
This change looks like an import. Where did you discuss it?
Did you follow the import guidelines? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
All buildings have name=house which makes no sense, maybe you meant building=house?
12017-09-23 06:12:51 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the mapping of this bridge
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110779185
See also https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
Do you know if bicycles are allowed?
12017-09-23 06:09:27 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the two footbridges
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157076842
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467751510
see
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
12017-09-23 05:57:06 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed the unusual highway=driveway to highway=service + service=driveway, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52294912
12017-09-22 09:52:12 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo waterway=damm on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408805550
Is this really a dam as described here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam ?
12017-09-22 09:26:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo waterway=natural
on 3 ways, e.g. this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476643353
How are they connected to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364582091 ?
12017-09-22 09:21:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo waterway=natural on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236816983
See also nearby
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2358796731
Maybe the same object?
12017-09-22 05:59:54 UTCHarald Hartmann Hello GerdP. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309097494 you have tagged `cyckeway:right:surface` instead of `cycleway:right:surface`, right?#typo
22017-09-22 07:38:25 UTCGerdP thanks, fixed
12017-09-06 15:27:52 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no+cycleway=opposite
I assume these should be 3 tags,
but cycleway=opposite
doesn't match the changeset comment "bicycles allowed in both directions"


22017-09-21 10:30:43 UTCbluetandem Hi
I do not seem to understand what you mean. It is a road with
- oneway for cars
- both directions allowed for bicycles
- no bycycle lane

what would be the correct tags? This is how I interpreted http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cycleway
32017-09-21 11:03:43 UTCGerdP Look how OSM stored your data:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94446322
42017-09-21 11:06:21 UTCGerdP The oneway tag should only contain the value yes. The further information should go into different tags.
12017-09-21 05:58:17 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I see that you are very active mapping house numbers :-)
Please don't create tags like addr:housename=a or addr:place=a
If you don't know the name just leave the field empty.
It would be much better if you add the corresponding street name using addr:street, for example t...
12017-09-20 14:10:01 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the position of the rails at this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2365711704
12017-09-17 07:05:15 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped some roads with highway=unpaved here. The highway tag is used to map the importance of the road, not the surface. The roads seem to be for agricultural use, so I've changed them to highway=track. This implies surface=unpaved.
You also used building=yes for a plac...
22017-09-20 12:39:08 UTCGerdP I've now noticed that you moved all nodes of Makurdi to Zaki Biam Road by ~25m. I think this was not intended.
See my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52209779
12017-09-20 06:04:57 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the mapping of this footbridge https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154430617
See https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
Do you know how this bridge is connected to the building in the west ? If I got that right this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way...
12017-09-19 16:00:29 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=Trou du Loup
on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4513495274
22017-09-21 10:53:22 UTCFrédéric Gutkin Hello,

Oops ! I set "highway" instead of "name".
Corrected !

Thanks,
Regards
12017-09-19 06:45:31 UTCGerdP HI and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you changed a highway from unclassified to camino. The highway tag is used to map the importance of a road, e.g. footway or motorway. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
I think that way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231157367
could be a...
12017-09-19 06:26:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed the unusual mapping of the footbridge, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52163293
I guess you were mislead by iD, see also
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
12017-09-18 17:12:23 UTCGerdP Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass es den Spessart zwei mal gibt. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3894648
Die beiden beschreiben unterdessen fast exakt die gleiche Fläche, das soll wahrscheinlich nicht so sein, oder?
22017-09-18 19:25:26 UTCGerdP Wird auch gerade hier diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59786
12017-09-17 07:54:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check this junction:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544152911
The roads are not connected.
12017-09-17 07:37:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review this bride. See
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
12017-09-15 05:17:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this change because of the tag highway=crossing which is used on a way instead of a node. Is Go Map! encouring you to use this wrong tagging?
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
22017-09-15 05:23:59 UTCsamuelrussell Firstly it isn't wrong tagging. The ontology specified within the wiki discourages it because some route mappers are programmed by unaware groups.

Secondly the crossing is a way. It has a length, commencement, terminus and is not a series of separate nodes. Either the road and two rail lines mus...
32017-09-15 05:25:39 UTCGerdP For the way itself the common tagging uses
highway=footway + footway=crossing.
42017-09-15 05:28:49 UTCsamuelrussell And that ontology is neither mandatory nor represents the situation on the ground that this is a single object with length
52017-09-15 05:33:19 UTCGerdP Sorry, you lost me. Do you want to establish a new tagging system here?
62017-09-15 05:36:29 UTCsamuelrussell This is an existed supported tagging system. It is specified in the English language wiki
72017-09-15 05:39:00 UTCGerdP Don't think so. The wiki separates clearly between nodes and ways. Please review.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
I refer to "The tag is set for the node where the both ways are crossing (footway and street, street and railway and so on). For detailed mapping it may be useful ...
82017-09-15 05:41:03 UTCsamuelrussell Wiki>
Tagging crossings as ways

Some mappers tag a way Way segment of a highway=footway or highway=cycleway that crosses multiple roads and/or railways with crossing=traffic_signals to indicate that there is only one traffic light controlling the cyclist or pedestrian, to avoid multiple nodes...
92017-09-15 05:46:08 UTCGerdP You see? No mention of highway=crossing to be used on ways here.
102017-09-15 06:07:51 UTCsamuelrussell Feel free to be as bold as you enjoy and should I be able to make any sense of your tagging I will model it.
112017-09-15 06:30:14 UTCGerdP Well, sorry for sounding bold. English is my 2nd language. It seems that "LPI NSW" sat images are out-dated in this place as they show the road and the rails at a different position. Maybe look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2347313297
This was also created by you and corresponds t...
122017-09-15 06:38:33 UTCsamuelrussell I did check the wiki before using ramp=both which appeared as suggested. I'm using it to code the presence of what are called "pram ramps" in Australian design. 1 m wide useable ramps from a raised footpath to the road level.

In this section of road the road and the railway are separat...
132017-09-15 06:39:04 UTCGerdP By the way: I see some rails with bicycle=y or yes here. What does it mean?
142017-09-15 06:42:57 UTCsamuelrussell The rails with bicycle yes are a combined bidi rails plus way for emergency, rail service motor vehicles bicycle and foot
152017-09-15 06:59:37 UTCGerdP Well, don't know enough about railway mapping, but as a cyclist I know that I don't like to cycle on rails ;-)
I hesitate to edit something here because sat images show the road and the POI next to it at very different positions, e.g.
this fountain
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4027321793\...
162017-09-17 05:15:01 UTCGerdP OK, so I guess that the sat image is outaged, See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52108756
LPI NSW also shows a large building in the south of this place which doesn't appear in the map.
12017-09-16 06:35:11 UTCGerdP Moin!
Warum hast Du z.B. hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403882576
aus Area=0 area=0 gemacht?
Aus meiner Sicht war das irgendein Import, bei dem Area etwas ganz anderes bedeutet als area (=yes/no)
22017-09-16 11:30:25 UTCwambacher weil ich das eventuell nicht erkannt habe?

nun, der Tag ist so oder so nicht wertvoll. Stammt aus einen - damals miserablen und auch wohl nicht angemeldeten - Shape-Import und das ganze ist über ein jahr her. kannst es ja zurückdrehen, ich sehe allerdings keinen Sinn darin
32017-09-16 11:59:30 UTCGerdP Neh, will ich auch nicht. Passiert anders wo auch immer wieder, weil halt JOSM meckert.
Irgendwo hast Du auch einfach alles entfernt, was nicht üblich ist. Könnte man hier evtl auch machen.
12017-09-14 13:21:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
It seems that you changed some outer ways which were tagged area:highway=*
in a way that the modified MP relation now has highway=*
I think you should have kept the old tag key.
22017-09-15 20:28:37 UTCemvee Hi GerdP,

> some outer ways which were tagged area:highway=* are now highway=* is the MP relation

Strange, I did not do things completely by hand but used copying, so I am surprised.

Can you give an example? With that I can have a better look and likely check if I made that error more of...
32017-09-15 20:55:32 UTCemvee I did a OverPass query for relations with highway=pedestrian and no area=yes and added area=yes to all these, so I think the problem is fixed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52081051

Thanks for letting me know!
42017-09-16 05:50:00 UTCGerdP Sorry, seems I forgot to add a link to the object that lead me to this CS :-(
Not sure if that is better. On a single, closed way the tag area:highway is used to map the area covered by the road itself, while highway=pedestrian + area=yes says that the area within the way is usable for pedestrians...
52017-09-16 06:04:30 UTCGerdP Think it was this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5673340
62017-09-16 06:59:15 UTCemvee Aha, thanks, the original way object (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380740812/history) had area:highway=service and now the relation has highway=service.

To find relations with "highway=*" and no area tag, use in JOSM "Download from Overpass API" and past into it:

[out:...
72017-09-16 07:06:52 UTCGerdP Yes, area:highway is used by special renderers.
Looking again at it I think in case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5673340
you really improved the mapping.
Sorry for the noise. I found other cases that IMHO did not improve the data, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/4778338...
82017-09-16 07:49:52 UTCemvee No problem for the "noise" ;-)

For the particular case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5673340 I see how area:highway=area could make sense but before going that way, it would make sense to adds ways indicating how to access this service area and how to drive over it.

sebas...
92017-09-16 08:00:42 UTCGerdP Yes, and another potential problem here is that one may confuse area:highway=service with highway=services + area=yes as in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services
12017-09-16 06:17:44 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
What is meant with highway="whera road" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524838765 ?
Bing shows a way that looks like a highway=residential.

12017-09-16 06:09:33 UTCGerdP Hi!
Did you see my comment here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46530165
12017-09-15 05:31:08 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174901199
I assume you meant service here. I did not correct it because there is also a barrier=gate which is unclear. If you know this place please place the barrier node so that it is not a junction of two different highway ways. See also https...
22017-09-15 12:39:12 UTCSHARCRASH Hello! Yep, i ment service. Thanks you! This area is filled with elements having an offset, wrong tags, etc. I wanted to correct as much as possible before leaving for an appointment. ;)
12017-09-13 12:10:06 UTCliteran Приветствую! ты уверен, что рядом с развязкой, на въезде в Совхоз, именно природный луг (natural=grassland), а не газон (landuse=grass)??
22017-09-13 12:16:44 UTCForstEK Привет! Нет, конечно, там и газон-то у шоссе еле живой, какой там луг. Спасибо, поправлю.
32017-09-15 05:06:58 UTCGerdP Hi again.
Please make sure that you don't use highway=crossing for ways.
The tag is only for the node where the footway / cycleway crosses a major road.
The footway is mapped with highway=crossing + footway=crossing
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524247989#map=19/55.58932/37.72798
42017-09-15 05:56:56 UTCForstEK Thank you for note, i fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52058032
12017-09-15 05:02:02 UTCGerdP Hi!
I changed the mapping of the footbridge, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52057414
and
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
12017-09-14 15:23:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
It seems that you accidentially changed a complex natural=wood multipolygon into something that is now also a bus route.
Also a landuse=residential MP was broken.
I tried to restore the old data with two steps, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52041398
and
https://www.openstre...
12017-09-14 13:17:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5359290
It is now a highway=secondary MP relation, before it was a area:highway=secondary
Same problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360013111
Did you do this change im more places?
22017-09-14 13:58:54 UTCsebastic area:highway doesn't make much sense on a MP relation which is already an area. I've made this kind of change more often while updating old-style multipolygons.
32017-09-14 14:18:14 UTCGerdP I just try to make up my mind what a highway MP is when it comes to routing.
I found many MP which don't describe the same thing as a way with area:highway does. So I think you removed information.
12017-09-13 14:17:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
The tag highway=traffic_calming
is rarely used on ways, can you please explain what you tried to map here?
Maybe you meant maxheight for the service way below the bridge? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
12017-09-13 10:35:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
I found a typo highway=residental here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522967074
and tried to map more ways. Please review
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522967076.
It seems to cross many buildings. Maybe
Bing is outaged? I used Bing with offset 3.58; -5.97, my changes are here:
htt...
12017-09-13 07:03:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the area using around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5102048757
DigitalGlobe Premium sat images. They show the roundabout at a different position.
Besides that the tag highway=crossing should only be used on this node and not on the footway . The footway should be tagged w...
22017-09-13 08:21:35 UTCForstEK Hi! Thank you for comment - I should verify DG-premium! I correct this object, see changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51996582
32017-09-13 08:26:42 UTCGerdP I changed one more highway=crossing here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51996750
42017-09-13 09:05:17 UTCForstEK Klar. Danke schon!
12017-09-02 07:26:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review all ways in this area. I see typo highway=pprop on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463545841 and combination highway=proposed + construction=*
I don't know which one is correct.
22017-09-13 08:17:23 UTCGerdP Please review my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51996550
12017-08-27 06:51:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=ter on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8767499
To me it looks like a secodary_link .
It also seems to be connected to the wrong lane (oneway) in the south.
22017-09-13 07:41:49 UTCGerdP Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51995601
12017-09-13 07:09:37 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524270038
Anstelle von highway=driveway + driveway=service sollte es highway=service + service=driveway heißen, habs entsprechend geändert.
Diesen Fehler sehe ich in letzter Zeit häufiger, ist da irgendwo ein Wiki falsch?
22017-09-13 12:15:46 UTCliondog Hej! Ups, mein Fehler. Hatte mich gewundert, warum JOSM keine Autovervollständigung beim Eingeben anbot. Das irgendwas im Wiki nicht stimmt, davon weiß ich nichts.
32017-09-13 12:17:26 UTCliondog Und vielen Dank für die Korrektur. Bei der Anzahl an an Wald und Wiesen Mappern bleiben solche Fehler manchmal Jahre bestehen.
12017-09-12 13:01:05 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I fear the app Go Map! has corrupted good data here. A footway is now an amenity=recycling:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107910642
Also a former memorial :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3165524080
and so on.
I found no change that looks correct. If you agree I...
22017-09-13 06:43:13 UTCGerdP Done, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51994055
I found miore changes like that caused by Go Map! :-(
I don't know the app, please take care that you don't accidentially change existing data.
12017-09-13 06:33:55 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please use disused:highway=service instead of highway=closed:service. Or use two tags highway=disused + disused=service.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-09-13 11:01:03 UTCCamLewWri Done
12017-09-12 20:23:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
You removed a route=hiking relation here, was that intended?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1150578
The tag highway=track makes no sense for a relation, so I guess you wanted to change a single way.
12017-09-12 08:31:16 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You removed the tags from some relations here and also the members of some. This was probably not intended ?
12017-09-11 09:40:29 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=2
22017-09-11 15:49:31 UTCBaldorider Sorry GeradP did not understand the problem you could explain better?
Did I make any mistakes?
Thank you
Baldorider
32017-09-11 15:56:19 UTCGerdP Yes, the tag highway=2 on way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523242790 makes no sense and I don't know what you wanted to map.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
42017-09-11 16:07:47 UTCBaldorider Ok GeradP understood and correct.
See if it's okay.
Thank you
Baldorider
52017-09-12 08:21:18 UTCGerdP Thanks, you may add tracktype to the tracks there, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
12017-09-12 08:13:52 UTCGerdP Hi!
You used highway=mini_roundabout for a way. I've changed it to junction=roundabout:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51964177
It seems that iD doesn't contain a preset for that?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
12017-09-10 08:09:34 UTCGerdP Please review these changes.
You added new ways on top of or next to existing ways. What did you try to map here?
22017-09-11 11:13:46 UTCRuslan Taxim Good Day! I add new way here. Its named Məhəmmədli Dairəsi.
32017-09-11 12:33:57 UTCGerdP Good Day!
OK, so you did not want to add all the other new ways. I've reverted the change here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51939358
If I got that right you should add
name=Məhəmmədli Dairəsi.
to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176753628
or maybe only a part of the road.
12017-09-11 09:45:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=bridge
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523510273
Did you mean man_made=bridge ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
12017-09-11 09:36:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
Fixed typo highway=driveway again, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51933548
12017-09-11 09:19:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you added addr:place tags in this area. Please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288880029
Do you agree this should have name=Hadeed Road like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288879982 ?
12017-09-10 08:56:12 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You use highway=turning_loop here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48675839
This tag is only meant for nodes, when you don't want to draw the circular way itself. The old tagging was correct, so I've restored it. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtur...
12017-09-10 08:51:19 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You tried to map a roundabout here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351718190
using highway=turning_loop
This tag is only meant for nodes, when you don't want to draw the circular way itself. You should use junction=roundabout for a real roundabout. See
http://wiki.opens...
12017-09-10 08:44:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261944036
Please don't use highway=turning_loop for ways, this tag is only meant for nodes when you don't want to draw the loop itself. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop
22017-09-21 01:51:46 UTCknottga3 Thanks, I stand corrected. I fumble fingered the cleanup on that one. Nice combination attribute for a deeper than normal turning circle/loop.
12017-09-10 08:00:44 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review:
typo highway=reisdent on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376007963
wrong type track for residential roads like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376007965
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
If you want to map that the road ...
12017-09-10 07:51:50 UTCGerdP Hi!
The tag highway=emergency is rarely used,
I assume you meant area:highway ?
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area#traffic_island
22017-09-10 20:09:57 UTCdónal @GerdP thanks for flagging! You were indeed right - I mistagged that area. Fixed now. :)
12017-09-10 07:44:55 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=emergency + area=yes
Maybe you meant area:highway=emergency?
12017-09-10 07:41:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=er on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10852908
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10852904
Did you mean service?
22017-09-10 12:00:19 UTCpkoby Seems it was fixed. I'm not sure what happened there. But it's all good now. Thanks for pointing it out.
12017-09-10 07:38:43 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review typo highway=6 on several
barrier=fence. I guess you meant height=6 ?
12017-09-10 07:31:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
There is no need to draw a polygon to map a sidewalk, you can simply add
sidewalk=* tag to the corresponding highway=residential.
Example:
Instead of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522955616
you can split way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23067832 at node https://www.openstreetmap.o...
22017-09-10 07:33:52 UTCGerdP If you want to map the area please don't use highway. You may use area:highway=footway for this.
12017-09-09 05:40:42 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You changed a lot of complex relations here
so that they have no tags. I assume that was not intended?
22017-09-09 06:49:20 UTCGerdP I've reverted the changes to the relations, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51870499
32017-09-09 07:21:32 UTCGerdP I've also managed to restore the tags of most of the other objects, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51870822
42017-09-09 09:24:50 UTCGerdP I think I was able to restore most of the data deleted data, so I hope the remaining damage is very small :-)
12017-09-09 09:05:15 UTCGerdP I've restored the wetland way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376234910
(you accidentially removed the tags before
in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51836900)
I am not sure if you removed this bridge
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362580439/history
accidentially or not?
22017-09-09 09:10:50 UTCGerdP See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51872135
and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51873009
12017-09-09 08:11:20 UTCGerdP I've reverted this changeset.
See also
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51836900
Please be very careful when deleting ways which belong to relations.
12017-09-09 05:29:07 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Why did you change contstruction=rail to highway=rail ?
When construction is finished you can simply remove the construction tag.
12017-09-09 05:11:09 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
The tag highway=projected is only used here. Please check if https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
helps to find a common tag
12017-08-23 06:57:50 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier im Januar ein FIXME gesetzt, steht da immer noch. Ist die Straße noch in Planung oder sowas?
22017-09-07 17:12:47 UTCandy_wand Es gab schon einen offiziellen Baubeginn, die Trasse ist jedoch noch recht grob gezeichnet und deshalb FIXME.
32017-09-07 18:37:37 UTCGerdP Spricht was dagegen, highway=construction zu verwenden und fixme=position ?
42017-09-08 10:25:19 UTCandy_wand nein
52017-09-09 05:08:24 UTCGerdP erledigt
12017-09-09 04:58:32 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you sometimes used addr:street instead of name. Is this intended?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404122641
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404122634
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404122616
22017-09-09 12:31:54 UTCkoshka Hi, no, that was a mistake. I fixed the tags now.
12017-09-09 04:34:27 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164036190
Du hast hier name=Seestraße auf
addr:street=Seestraße geändert.
Ich finde addr:street=Seestraße an mehreren Straßen, wahrscheinlich ein Versehen?
Abgesehen davon sieht o.g. Weg mehr nach unclas...
12017-09-09 04:04:36 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you mapped some residential roads here. That is good :-)
Two problems:
1) When mapping highways you should not use any tags with the addr: prefix.
Use postal_code instead of addr:postcode, use is_in:city instead of addr:city
2) The name of the city is K...
12017-09-06 06:30:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review both ways.
1) they are not connected to the road network
2) typo (?) highway=services instead of service
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371315208
22017-09-09 02:44:36 UTChayashi You're right.
32017-09-09 03:22:31 UTCGerdP I see you started to fix them. Please review footway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371314770
If you don't plan to map all sidewalks as separate ways I suggest to remove it and add a sidewalk=left to (a part of) the major road. See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
12017-09-08 14:24:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
You added smoothness=excellent
to a way with surface=unclassified (typo)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255286887
I assume it is asphalt?
12017-09-08 12:57:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=es
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489136204
12017-09-08 12:55:01 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=o
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/207089220
12017-09-08 09:10:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=2 way
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490935516
I guess you meant oneway=no ?
More important: The way is not connected in the south and overlaps another road in the north.
12017-09-08 08:56:52 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=ZTM
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504458431
22017-09-10 14:03:14 UTCtkedt Fixed. Thank you for spotting the error.
12017-09-08 08:47:30 UTCGerdP Hi!
please review typo oneway=Lefkada - Vassiliki on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141630015
12017-09-08 08:41:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo oneway=ANZAC Hall
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520206135
22017-09-08 09:28:14 UTCWarin61 Opps !!!
Thanks.
12017-09-08 05:09:10 UTCGerdP Moin!
Mir ist highway=parking aufgefallen, gibt es nur hier. Evtl. meintest Du sowas ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
12017-09-08 05:02:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=emergency_access_point
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502873459
The tag is used to map place outside of cities, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
Please check if the key emergency is suitable: http://wiki.openstreetmap.or...
12017-09-07 15:07:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check strange values for lanes like
lanes=45 or lanes=55
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504761878
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504761877
22017-09-11 15:34:32 UTCMapper794 Corrected lanes (2 lane). Adjust the speed.
12017-09-07 14:48:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes=fence
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466896881
I assume this is a landuse=commercial ?
12017-09-07 14:42:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes=-
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479856210
12017-09-07 14:39:14 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes=왕복 4차선
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145086115
I assume you meant lanes=4 ?
12017-09-07 14:34:50 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes=ㅈ
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258302486
I guess you meant lanes=2 ?
22017-09-07 15:09:11 UTCLantian Oh... yes you are right
My mistake 😅
12017-09-07 14:29:46 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes=as
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38287607
12017-09-07 14:24:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes=125
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512775935
12017-09-07 14:21:30 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf lanes=Fußgängerzone
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490818722
Was war da gemeint?
12017-09-07 14:18:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo lanes="RD QUE-13"
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376621156
Looks like a ref. What about the highway=tertiary at both ends?
12017-09-07 14:07:43 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've notice that you add addr:city=MACHALA
to several roads. Please note that the spelling is Machala. Besides that this tag is not needed for objects inside this boundary relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2670341
I suggest to remove the wrong tag from all o...
12017-09-07 13:56:10 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf lanes=forward=2;backward=1
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27032770
Sollte wohl lanes=3 sowie
lanes:forward und lanes:backward sein?
Ist das nur an diesem Stück so? Ich kann's auf den Sat-Bildern nicht erkennen
12017-09-07 13:11:16 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual tag highway=service_link near this circular way that looks like a junction=roundabout
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470898893
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
22017-09-08 02:10:24 UTCSasha_SH Hello, GerdP!
Thanks you for information, I fixed.
12017-09-07 12:48:39 UTCGerdP Hi mahamoud,

I see that you are one of the active mappers in this area. Unfortunately you don't use tags like building=yes or maybe barrier=wall. You've also added lots of duplicated information in the past, for example these two ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340478694
https://www.ope...
12017-09-07 09:46:16 UTCGerdP Hi!
I wonder why you have mapped Parc del Nord
with so many different types.
I think it Is a leisure=park, not a landuse=village_green. For sure it cannot be both.
I would remove the highway attribute and access tags like bicycle=yes from this way.
Please review also https://www.openstreetmap.o...
12017-09-07 09:21:29 UTCGerdP Hi!
I wonder if you meant landuse=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440589729
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440589722
12017-08-23 08:36:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
please review highway=alley on some roads
I think they are all highway=residential .
Maybe you meant highway=service + service=alley as in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley ?
I think these roads are not that narrow.
Check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474863128\...
22017-09-07 09:13:14 UTCGerdP I've tried to correct them, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51804262
12017-09-07 08:58:34 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7712049
It seems you changed that way accidentially.
22017-09-07 10:22:54 UTCAlan Bragg Nice catch. Yes, that was my mistake. I remember now that I was trying to use the iphone app go map!! .
12017-08-24 06:34:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
You changed the well known tag highway=proposed to highway=planning
which is only used here.
Why?
22017-08-24 10:54:28 UTCStefn That's a very long time and honestly I don't know anymore.
Last year I changed some parts of N171 that had been opened recently. This must be a mistake.

Kind regards
Stéphane
32017-09-07 08:52:43 UTCGerdP Okay. What do you propose as correction?
12017-09-07 08:50:06 UTCGerdP Hi!
Do you know if this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216444836 is connected to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4692097575 ?
12017-09-07 08:44:03 UTCGerdP Hi! Please review:
You used the unusual taghighway=nonexistent
to map a way that no longer exists.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399401575
Do you know if that path ever existed?
I think either was:highway=path or maybe
histioric:highway=path are feasable.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.or...
22017-09-10 06:07:11 UTCvg17613 Thanks for the heads-up again. As far as I can tell the path did exist, the first few meters were visible when going uphill, however the rest was 100% overgrown.
12017-09-07 08:37:03 UTCGerdP Hi! Please review:
You used unusual tags like highway="doesnot exist!"
or highway="doesnotexist!"
to map a way that no longer exists.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70911839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437461426
Do you know if that track ever existed?
I think eith...
12017-09-07 08:06:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the typo highway=Farmington Canal
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496240468
You seem to use the name tag to describe the object. This is not good, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
If you think that a further description is needed y...
12017-08-22 08:51:55 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511938216
What is meant with highway=80 ?
22017-08-22 09:02:34 UTCGerdP I found more high buildings like that. I guess you meant height=* ?
32017-09-07 06:19:47 UTCGerdP I've changed it to height now.
42017-09-08 07:18:55 UTCDookon Thanks for your help ,I was wrong
12017-08-23 06:19:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=14 on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448099547
Guess you meant height=14 ?
22017-08-23 06:26:31 UTCGerdP Same problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459182554
32017-09-07 06:09:38 UTCGerdP I've tried to correct it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51799211
12017-09-07 05:49:40 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
The ususual tag for this is amenity=weighbridge, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dweighbridge
for details how to map
12016-08-16 15:53:56 UTCPT-53 Die Zufahrt zu Geb. 5 Graf-Christoph-Weg ist nicht korrekt mit der Straße Graf-Christoph-Weg verbunden. Siehe keep right - http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=78991445.
Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?
Grüße
22016-08-17 17:23:14 UTCwuff57 Done.
32017-09-07 05:21:39 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte mal prüfen:
Du hast einige Wege mit dem unüblichem tag highway=footpath erzeugt. Sind das highway=path oder highway=footway?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rwm
42017-09-08 12:15:00 UTCwuff57 Hallo, ich hoffe, dass das jetzt alle waren. Habe das Problem auch an den anderen Stellen gefixed.
12017-08-31 08:47:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
You have mapped a lot of ways with highway=turning_loop. I think they are all link roads. A turning_loop is mapped on a node, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_loop
22017-09-07 05:12:56 UTCGerdP I've fixed them now, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51798478
12017-09-07 04:59:41 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review turn:lanes=slight_left;through|slight_right|slight_right;reverse
on way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481455523#map=14/24.8069/67.0669
It seems you have combined two ways with different turn:lanes values here so that the result is invalid.
Please be very careful when comb...
12017-09-01 05:16:48 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed the unusual highway=abandoned_path to
abandoned:highway=path
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-09-07 01:37:20 UTCg246020 Thanks for the link! Now, how does one stay up do date with all the new updates?!
32017-09-07 04:32:03 UTCGerdP Good question. I think whenever you use a tag value for the first time you should try to find a wiki page for it and check taginfo.
So, in this case you might as well use highway=abandoned + abandoned=path
if you like this better.
12017-09-06 15:33:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=70 on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437669283
22017-09-06 21:02:10 UTC*Martin* done. thanks.
12017-09-06 15:29:43 UTCGerdP Hi! Please review typo oneway=RD4
No idea what you meant with this.
12017-09-06 15:23:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=Buckner Ridge
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521289895
22017-09-06 15:27:21 UTCkre3d Fixed. Thanks!
12017-09-06 15:11:24 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=surface on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26401507
22017-09-07 07:17:52 UTCGwilbor Done
12017-09-06 15:05:08 UTCGerdP Moin!
Was bedeutet denn oneway=bollard an
den nord-östlichen Stücken der Wilhelm-Hoegner-Straße ? Tippfehler ?
22017-09-07 06:15:19 UTCgsperb Mea Culpa. DAS war Unfug :-).
Man kann die Strasse von Norden her nur bis zu den Pollern befahren. Aber ich sehe es mir nachher gleich noch mal an.
32017-09-15 16:18:03 UTChsimpson Hi, noch ne kurze Frage dazu:
Ist das gewollt, dass keiner der barrier=bollard ein Teil der Straße ist?
Damit wird das kein Router auslesen können.
Lieber einen Punkt auf die Straße oder das ganze direkt als Linie erfassen.
Grüße
42017-09-16 06:27:36 UTCgsperb Korrigiert
12017-09-06 15:01:35 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409080024
Isn't this a junction=roundabout which would be highway=primary and oneway=yes ?
Current Bing pictures show the roads at very different posotions now.
12017-09-06 14:52:16 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=on
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rv9
Not sure if you meant no or if "on" stands for yes.
12017-09-06 14:47:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=parking
on these service roads.
12017-09-06 14:34:05 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=CV-642
on several ways. I assume you wanted to change ref instead?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rv7
12017-09-06 14:24:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo oneway=roundabout on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148810005
22017-09-06 16:48:52 UTCvoschix Thanks for pointing this out. Corrected.
12017-05-29 06:15:52 UTCeggie Graag commentaar bij wat je edits inhouden.
22017-05-29 06:17:54 UTCeggie Op een landuse=residential horen deze tags niet. surface=.... en maxspeed...
Die haal ik er nu even af,.
wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Probeer je in te lezen in de regels van osm. Zie welkomstmail.
32017-05-29 06:21:04 UTCeggie landuse = residential geeft de grens aan van de bebouwing en is geen weg om op te rijden. Ook oneway=no verwijderd.
42017-09-06 14:21:21 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
What was meant with oneway=both ?
Maybe sidewalk=both ? Or is it simply not a oneway at all?
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rv5
12017-08-23 06:49:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review: You've created 10 ways with
highway=CALLEJON
in this changeset:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rbQ
22017-08-23 07:44:19 UTCGerdP There are also 8 highway=PASAJE:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rc1
32017-08-23 10:58:40 UTCagranizo Thank you for the tip, I will try to review the ways and give them a better tagging.

Best regards,

agranizo
42017-08-31 09:52:58 UTCGerdP Seems something went wrong, I still find these roads.
52017-09-01 00:09:07 UTCagranizo Hi, nothing went wrong yet.
62017-09-01 05:05:04 UTCGerdP Sorry, got impatient ;-)
72017-09-06 11:19:32 UTCagranizo Changes done.
82017-09-06 13:35:06 UTCGerdP thanks!
12017-09-06 09:58:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=agricultural
on 4 ways in this changeset.
Did you mean track or dd you want to map access?
12017-09-06 09:46:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo footway=paved on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494732227
I assume you meant surface=paved?
Looks strange as other roads in this area are not paved.
12017-09-06 07:36:24 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed a lot of nodes here which are not tagged and not connected to any way.
See area around this :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4736342115
Seems you have accidentially deleted the building ways before uploading the data.
22017-09-06 12:18:45 UTCfredi_alf I'll tray to fix it
12017-09-06 06:50:41 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed a few ways with highway=services which don't look lite services areas, so I assume you meant highway=service.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ruG
Some of them look more like highway=path or track.
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservic...
12017-09-06 06:40:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=services on several roads here:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ruF
They seem to be highway=track, not service
22017-09-07 18:22:36 UTCLarsBG Thanks
12017-09-06 06:00:26 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I don't know what happened but you have somehow messed up the data.
See esp. this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5066073932
I think the easiest way to fix this is to revert the changeset. I can do this for you.
12017-09-06 05:45:08 UTCGerdP Hi!
You recently created two ways with highway=er
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521115694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521661720
I assume you wanted to type re for residential?
22017-09-06 10:44:16 UTCfrasty Hi, these ways were supposed to be highway=service. Thank you for pointing me to the error!
12017-09-05 08:22:12 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you sometimes use highway=unknown
I wonder if that means the same as highway=road or if you wanted to use unclassified instead.
See e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100955587
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Droad
22017-09-05 23:12:15 UTCMarina Kudryavceva Hello!

No, this mean is highway=unknown is highway=unknown =)
This road is a detour. It is very low-level road.
And yes, i read this manual.

Thx, for your watch to my mapping!
Together we will make the map better!
32017-09-06 05:35:11 UTCGerdP Thx for the quick reply. I still don't understand why you don't use the common highway=road in such a case.
42017-09-06 06:08:50 UTCMarina Kudryavceva Oh, i'm sorry! I mixed up, "unknown" and "unclassified"!
In the near future, i fixed this trouble. =')
12017-09-05 14:40:37 UTCGerdP Moin!
Mir ist hier ein highway=services
aufgefallen, der wohl eigentlich ein highway=service sein sollte. Allerdings frage ich mich, ob die Zufahrt nicht viel eher durch den Parkplatz führen sollte.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454811407
22017-09-05 16:28:54 UTCste Sorry, das ist natürlich ein Fehler. Behoben und durch den Parkplatz durchgeführt. Vl. kann mal jemand der wieder mal vor Ort ist überprüfen ob man Richtung Westen auch wirklich rausfahren darf.
32017-09-05 16:39:43 UTCGerdP Danke, Ich bin zwar dieses Jahr mit dem Rad in der Gegend gewesen, aber kann mich nicht erinnern ;-)
12017-09-05 06:59:57 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte verwende nicht highway=traffic_island
für Verkehrsinseln. Das tag name=Verkehrsinsel macht auch keinen Sinn hier.
Üblich sind traffic_calming=island oder
landuse=traffic_island, je nachdem, ob da Fußgänger drüberlaufen oder nicht.
Ebenfalls denkbar: high...
22017-09-05 15:02:49 UTCM!Cado Hi,
Danke für den Input. ich war mir sehr unsicher was richtig sein könnte. Der Tag landuse=traffic_island scheint nicht unterstützt zu werden und wird mir in Josm als "unnötiger tag " angegeben.
Der von dir angegebene Link scheint auch nur ein Vorschlag zu sein, so ...
32017-09-05 15:24:43 UTCGerdP Verkehrsinseln dienen eigentlich schon immer der Verkehrsberuhigung. Allerdings willst Du ja die Fläche mappen, nicht die Bedeutung für den Verkehr.
JOSM meckert nur das übflüssige area=yes an, das steckt implizit schon in landuse.
42017-09-05 20:45:02 UTCM!Cado Habe ich abgeändert. Danke.
12017-09-05 14:58:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this area because there are lots of overlapping landuse=residential areas.
It seems that you have mapped buildings with this tag?
I also wonder if the position is correct, the sat images show an offset of ~35 m.
Some roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472374801
seem t...
22017-09-06 19:58:44 UTCEdwinCaldon In that moment I didn't have sat images, but some points are already in a correct way, for the others I'm workng on it. Thanks.
12017-09-05 14:04:42 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you have added quite a lot
of ways with highway=services
Many of them are not service areas, so I assume you meant highway=service instead.
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservices
12017-09-05 13:12:44 UTCGerdP Hi!
I think I found some test data here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376446151
It seems you move these objects from one place to another. Please remove it.
12017-09-05 13:05:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check services ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105269897
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421060167
I assume you wanted to map a service area ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services
and those two ways should be highway=service (not services) ?
12017-09-05 12:46:00 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=services
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353250865
Is that a typo (instead of highway=service) or is there a service area next to it?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services
12017-09-05 06:21:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136505878
No idea what this could be.
Stumbled over it while looking at highway=ford on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136505867
which probably should be highway=track + ford=yes, but the south-east end is now
not connected to any oth...
22017-09-05 12:35:04 UTCPlaneMad It is indeed a ropeway https://www.telegraphindia.com/1091221/jsp/jharkhand/story_11890946.jsp
32017-09-05 12:38:47 UTCGerdP amazing. Maybe add this link as a note.
Do you also know more about the ford?
42017-09-05 12:42:41 UTCPlaneMad Added. Don't know about the ford except that its common for tractors on seasonal rivers in India
12017-08-22 08:37:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322896249
highway=11 looks like a typo and
position looks wrong, way is not connected to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33798326
What was intended?
22017-09-05 09:04:51 UTCGerdP I tried to correct it, please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51742453
12017-08-30 10:33:52 UTCGerdP Please review typo highway=path;service on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392504935
22017-09-05 08:06:29 UTCGerdP changed it to service, guess that's what you wanted to do.
12017-09-05 08:02:56 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the ways building the future highway=cycleway
The normal tagging is highway=planned + planned=cycleway or highway=construction + construction=cycleway, depending on the current status. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
12017-08-31 10:13:30 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway="Travessa do Pico da Igreja"
Did you want to change the name tag?
22017-08-31 11:34:01 UTCNunoCaldeira done
32017-09-05 07:55:57 UTCGerdP Please review again, Which part of the way is highway=steps?
The northern part still has highway=Travessa do Pico da Igreja
12017-08-30 07:33:37 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used the unusual tag highway=bus_corridor on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480913609
I assume it is a road that is only allowed for public transport?
If yes I suggest to use highway=service + access=no + psv=yes
22017-09-05 07:51:13 UTCGerdP I've tried to fix it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51740252
12017-09-05 07:07:06 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please watch out for the typo
highway=unclassfied (wrong) instead of highway=unclassified (correct).
It seems your JOSM suggests the wrong spelling ;-)
I've corrected them now, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51738749
12017-09-05 07:06:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please watch out for the typo
highway=unclassfied (wrong) instead of highway=unclassified (correct).
It seems your JOSM suggests the wrong spelling ;-)
I've corrected them now, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51738749
12017-09-05 06:40:26 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've corrected a typo highway=residental instead of highway=residential on 16 ways,
please check when JOSMs auto-complete suggest it again;-)
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51737938
12017-09-05 06:36:08 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've corrected a typo highway=residencial
instead of highway=residential on some roads in this area. Please watch out when JOSMs auto complete suggests it again ;-)
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51737855
12017-09-05 06:32:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=public
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521224995
It looks like a highway=path.
12017-09-05 06:29:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
highway=plazza is only used here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521260933
Did you mean place=square?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare
22017-09-05 07:01:25 UTCVerdy_p En France, on commente en français...
les valeurs comme plazza sont toujours en discussion. Mais ce qui était avant c'est un morceau de rue (highway=*) fantome que j'ai remplacé par une surface. Il y a eu diverses tentatives pour désigner ces lieux avec place=* ou highwa...
12017-09-05 06:01:24 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual tag highway=construction+construction=footway
I think you the wiki mislead you, it should be two tags, one with highway=construction
and one with construction=footway
I've corrected it, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/chan...
22017-09-05 07:35:12 UTCMarek Vach Yes, you are right. Thank you for you edit.
12017-09-04 06:29:12 UTCGerdP Moin!
Das tag highway=non-existent an
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520938650
gibt es nur hier. Ich schlage
removed:highway=track vor. Siehe auch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Andere Alternative wäre highway=razed
22017-09-04 16:37:48 UTCfx99 N'abend.
Das passt alles nicht so recht, weil der Weg ist zumeist mit Brennnesseln zugewachsen. Aber mit removed:highway=track kann vielleicht jeamnd etwas anfangen.
32017-09-04 16:43:17 UTCGerdP Na ja, Brennnesseln stören einen Trecker ja nicht wirklich, aber wenn der Weg gar nicht mehr als track verwendet wird, dann passt evtl. abandoned:highway=track besser.
12017-09-04 09:08:44 UTCGerdP HI!
Ive noticed that you changed a few footbridges crossing MEX 15 from highway=footway to the (wrong) highway=crossing + traffic_calming=table
What was the reason?
22017-09-04 14:17:38 UTChgocat Hi, GerdP!
I think that is a error because in the spanish version it have a label "Cruce peatonal elevado" derived or that has as root the label "crossing" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=crossing). This label is same to "Sendero peatonal". This gen...
32017-09-04 14:26:09 UTCGerdP Hi hgocat!
Yes, I found several places where mappers made the same mistake, all used ID.
I've opened a ticket for ID and will post a link to this changeset.
12017-09-04 09:49:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review rarely used highway=access
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361988203 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361988109
Did you mean highway=service?
12017-09-04 09:42:54 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review. The tag highway=access is rarely used.
Did you mean highway=service?
22017-09-05 07:38:56 UTCSovxx Yep, I have just corrected it. Thanks
12017-09-04 09:35:35 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the strange mapping of footbridges at and around
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491769641
highway=crossing + traffic_calming=table is not correct, it seems that ID suggests this wrong tagging?
12017-09-04 09:25:25 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you mapped a footbrige as
highway=crossing + traffic_calming=table here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515148119
The correct tagging is highway=footway + bridge=yes + layer=1
for the way that crosses the major road.
You may also split the way and ma...
12017-09-04 09:05:04 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the footbrige https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68873955
It should be mapped with highway=footway, highway=crossing is only used on nodes shared with a major road. I also don't understand why this is a traffic_calming=table now, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap....
12017-09-04 08:36:09 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515397328
This looks like a highway=footway + bridge=yes. Please map also the footways/steps that connect it with the road network.
12017-09-04 08:26:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516361090
I assume it is a highway=footway + bridge=yes
I also suggest to connect the footways / steps with the platform ways.
When you draw footways inside a building please use tunnel=building_passage or highway=corridor.
12017-09-04 08:20:06 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513380871
Looks like a highway=service
I assume the traffic_calming is at this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5018594959
12017-09-04 08:14:57 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515157298
The tag highway=crossing should only be used on nodes, I assume this is a bridge, so it should be bridge=yes + layer=1
What does traffic_calming=table mean here?
Is "Passerelle du Moulin des Enfants" the r...
12017-09-04 08:07:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noted some ways with highway=crossing
here. They are duplicating ways with highway=footway. Is that intended?
The tag highway=crossing should be used on nodes only, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
12017-09-02 08:35:31 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual highway=slide on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511792382
Did you mean piste:type=sled ?
22017-09-04 06:28:42 UTCgormur Thanks.
Better now?
32017-09-04 06:36:45 UTCGerdP Yes, If children use it as a playground.
I don't know the place and can't say from the sat images.
12017-09-04 06:23:18 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte prüfe highway=33 an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35580472
Was war gemeint?
22017-09-04 20:28:08 UTCTBKMrt Mit 33 fällt mir nichts ein, was ich hier hätte einzeichnen wollen oder können.

Meine Vermutung: Nachdem der changeset mit ID entstanden ist und ich bei diesem changeset ein paar Flächen eingezeichnet habe, wird die Änderung unabsichtlich passiert sein als ich den Weg aus...
12017-09-04 06:13:21 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please don't use values like residential_link,
see http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html

12017-08-31 07:34:45 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=* on some ways here:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rnb
I guess you misunderstood the wiki about winter_road. It says
"The highway=* should also be present on the way, and its value should reflect the importance of the given highway."
So, please use e.g. highway...
22017-09-02 18:51:27 UTCBahta Ok i got confused by "*", if road exists only in the winter what tag should i use? And otherwise, in case of summer use - what's the tag difference?
32017-09-03 10:18:12 UTCGerdP The tag winter_road=yes says that the road is only usable in winter. The highway tag should say how it is used in winter.
12017-09-03 09:52:40 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520747393
It has the same name as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4086661
and highway=unclassified_link
should be just unclassified
12017-09-03 09:40:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
The tag highway=ramp is rarely used.
Did you mean highway=footway + ramp:wheelchair=yes or just ramp=yes ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447129331
and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447129330
12017-09-03 09:37:32 UTCGerdP Hi!
The tag highway=ramp is rarely used.
Did you mean highway=footway + ramp:wheelchair=yes or just ramp=yes ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/476422405
22017-09-03 17:05:55 UTCMesowhite Thanks for pointing that out, it has been corrected.
Cheers
12017-09-03 09:34:32 UTCGerdP Hi!
The tag highway=ramp is rarely used.
Did you mean highway=footway + ramp:wheelchair=yes ?
Please map also the way(s) that lead to the platform https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516854080
12017-09-03 09:29:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
I stumbled over highway=pendiente on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335875843
Sat images don't show a road. Do you think that one is planned there?
22017-10-15 09:27:05 UTCcarciofo Hi Federico, I'm not exactly sure what you meant with your note "map better", but as users don't get notifications about such notes, I would suggest leaving either a changeset comment such as this one, or contacting the author directly through a message in OSM might be more effective. Alte...
12017-09-03 08:53:24 UTCGerdP Hi!
I see that you have problems mapping this place.
You shoud not use the highway key on a type=multipolygon relation,
Also highway=passing_place is probably wrong here.
If I got that right you should use leisure=park + name=Largo venticinque aprile
for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4911...
22017-09-03 09:01:32 UTCGerdP Sorry, place=square is probably better than leisure=park, as this is a rather small area.
12017-09-03 08:38:51 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've corrected highway=driveway ->
highway=service + service=driveway
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51687077
and
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
22017-09-03 13:40:11 UTCurkud Thank you!
12017-09-03 08:17:45 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=crossing + footway=crossing on some ways. The correct tagging is highway=footway + footway=crossing
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
22017-09-04 14:47:33 UTCSHARCRASH Hello! This is quite misleading! The page you shared is the one i had seen recently and what i have done actually for this changeset. I had already used the combination highway=footway + footway=crossing though but i don't use very often urban elements, so i had to check again, was confused and I th...
32017-09-04 17:59:43 UTCStereo The crossing=zebra tag is, unfortunately, incorrect. I try to replace it with crossing=uncontrolled/traffic_signals/unmarked when I come across it. Apparently there's more than 1000 in Luxembourg :-/.
42017-09-04 22:54:00 UTCSHARCRASH Yeah people tend to imitate what they see often, even unknowingly errors assuming it is correct.
I've changed the tags i had edited in this area with crossing=traffic_signals or uncontrolled
crossing_ref=zebra
footway=crossing
highway=footway
12017-09-03 07:54:59 UTChighflyer74 Guten Morgen! Sei bitte so nett, Deine Änderungssätze genauer zu beschreiben. Es reicht nicht, "Erweiterungen" zu schreiben. Darunter kann sich keiner Deiner Mit-Mapper etwas vorstellen. Beschreibe bitte konkret, welche Änderungen Du vorgenommen hast. Nachlesen kannst Du die...
22017-09-03 08:08:37 UTCGerdP Schau bitte noch mal auf highway=bus_guideway an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519412145
Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway
32017-09-03 09:13:03 UTCkreuzschnabel Es wäre schön, wenn du …

1. ALLE Quellen nennen würdest. Dass in der Darmstädter Bleichstraße eine 200 Meter lange Spurbusstrecke ist, ist weder auf Bing noch per GPS erkennbar. Also: Woher weißt du, dass da eine solche ist? Wurde sie neu gebaut? Die bisheri...
12017-09-02 09:36:58 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
If you want to map a road you need a highway tag, e.g. highway=residential
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
12017-08-30 07:11:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
You changed highway=track to was:track
Did you mean something like disused, dismantled,abandoned etc?
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

22017-08-30 07:42:45 UTCEugenyN Hello.

:was - it means completely absent on the ground. But can be present in old satellite images. Thanks for link.
32017-09-02 09:32:35 UTCGerdP OK, I've corrected it to was:highway=track
42017-09-02 09:36:19 UTCEugenyN Ah. you about the "highway=was:track". This is typo/misprint. thanks for the fix.
52017-09-02 09:42:31 UTCEugenyN by the way this road exists now. I am fixed.
12017-09-02 09:15:14 UTCGerdP Please explain:
What is meant with highway=ucap on a building?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508712794
Is this related to www.ucap.org ?
12017-08-29 07:55:59 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=route on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459872611
I've also noticed a lot of highway=unclassified what look like highway=residential in this city.
22017-09-02 06:21:01 UTCBotaler Salve.
Lei ha ragione. Essendo la strada inghiaiata l'avevo classificata route. Sicuramente è corretto classificarla residential. Ci sono andato il 31/08/2017: la strada continua ad essere inghiaiata. Ho provveduto a correggere con il gruppo di modifiche #51660966 and #51661196.
Grazie per ...
32017-09-02 08:03:28 UTCGerdP Salve,
thanks for the feedback. I still see some residential roads like Via Monte Grappa or Via Professor Oliva which are tagged unclassified. Maybe you can clean up those as well?
12017-09-02 07:35:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check:
I corrected typo highway=residental
on some ways. Watch out when JOSM
auto complete suggests this again ;-)
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51662618
12017-09-02 07:30:33 UTCGerdP Hi!
Wouldn't it be better to use the normal tagging highway=proposed and add other tags to separate the alternatives, maybe note="alternative xyz" ?
12017-09-02 06:55:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this change because you used the very unusual highway=nonexistent.
Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-09-02 15:10:14 UTCvg17613 Thanks! I just changed the tags from highway=nonexistent to historic:highway=track . If you have a better proposal please let me know.
12017-09-01 05:26:14 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=bridge
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520288430
I assume you meant highway=track + brige=yes instead?
Also strange:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520288434
Is there a bridge and a ford?
If so, please draw two ways.
22017-09-01 07:25:48 UTCsteerage250 Thanks Gerd, I hope it is fixed now. There is a bridge in one place, and a ford in the other.
32017-09-01 20:47:45 UTCGerdP Please check also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520288439
track or path?
42017-09-02 00:05:05 UTCsteerage250 also now fixed (maybe now I will remember the right way to do it next time :-))
52017-09-02 04:47:45 UTCsteerage250 Gerd, how do you spot these errors? I am surprised JOSM didn't tell me "suspicious way type" (or some sort of error message).
62017-09-02 06:00:17 UTCGerdP I use the data from taginfo to find untypical values for the highway key:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/highway#values
Next I use the Overpass API to download the objects. When I see that many
of them were created by the same mapper I contact them.
I also started to open tickets in JO...
72017-09-02 06:40:32 UTCsteerage250 wow, there's untypical values on highway to keep you going for a while. You are obviously a "super-user". Keep up the good work.
82017-09-02 06:46:47 UTCGerdP I will. Thanks for the positive feedback :-)
12017-09-02 06:35:14 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=ford on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259801871
Did you mean ford=yes?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
12017-09-02 06:14:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=farmland
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518737011
Not sure what that is, looks like a path next to a barrier?
12017-08-31 10:24:08 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=alley
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rng
The all look like highway=service + service=driveway to me.
22017-09-01 19:00:54 UTCVerdy_p No typo, this is documented and part of several presets in editors.
What you sugest would be just equivalent if you had used service=alley; but alley is suitable where it is when driveway is not !
32017-09-01 19:09:05 UTCGerdP That's new to me. I don't find that tag in the wiki or in JOSM presets. Where do you find it? Taginfo shows only 7 uses, so I think that editor should be corrected.
42017-09-01 21:37:48 UTCVerdy_p C'est pas grave j'ai pris ta suggestion pour les 4 ways
12017-09-01 12:58:28 UTCGerdP Warum dann nicht highway=service anstelle des seltsamen highway=chess?
Tippfehler?
22017-09-01 15:37:20 UTCTutilo Hallo GerdP,
ich bin direkter Anlieger in diesem Bereich und habe versucht, der Situation so weit wie möglich gerecht zu werden.
Sie ist sehr kompliziert.
Jedenfalls ist es keine Straße, die für die Allgemeinheit von Bedeutung ist. Nach Süden und Südwesten schließt...
32017-09-01 15:43:30 UTCGerdP Hallo Tutilo,
was willst Du denn mit highway=chess beschreiben?
Gerd
42017-09-01 16:13:32 UTCGerdP Falls es noch nicht klar ist: Mir geht es nur um diese Fläche:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333038647
12017-09-01 13:48:24 UTCGerdP Moin!
Was bedeutet denn highway=emergency_access_point
an diesem Weg:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501704665
Ist das ein Fluchtweg oder so was?
Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point
12017-09-01 13:34:34 UTCGerdP Please review:
You have accidentially changed some highway=residential to highway=emergency_access_point:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rp5
12017-09-01 13:12:08 UTCGerdP I've tried to fix mapping of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487482051
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51643049
22017-09-03 19:50:16 UTCjosmougn thanks to your message I corrected a mistake 150m southward, extra oneways after the junctions of the oneway lanes. Some users of routing may have found strange results.
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356340569


12017-08-24 06:41:03 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you map a lot of crossings.
Unfortunately you used highway=crossing + footway=crossing instead of highway=footway+footway=crossing
Please review http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#The_crossing_tag
22017-08-31 13:19:58 UTCGerdP I've changed them all, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51615120
32017-08-31 21:06:45 UTCgetBounds Thanks this was a work project and I haven't had much time to work on it lately. I feel like I got that tag structure from somewhere but not sure where thanks for fixing it. Initially I thought we would do more sidewalk Imports to osm but now not so sure. The import was more difficult than I anticip...
42017-08-31 21:10:32 UTCgetBounds Now I remember. I asked on an OS M Forum how to properly tag the crosswalks so they would render in one of the basic openstreetmap Styles. I got a snarky response so I think that turned me off for a while.
52017-09-01 04:56:11 UTCGerdP Well, many mappers don't like imports at all.
Another reason may be that there are two very different tagging systems for sidewalks, both well established.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
62017-09-01 12:10:25 UTCgetBounds Not to drag this discussion out, but since you did edit these, do you find adding sidewalks important? We could add sidewalks for much of southern Ohio over the coming years if there is interest in the OSM community to do so. We will be mapping them anyway locally outside OSM as part of our work.
72017-09-01 12:56:54 UTCGerdP I cannot speak for the community. I'd prefer the other mapping method as it is less likely to break pedestrian routing. A missing sidewalk tag on a highway=residential is rather harmiess compared to a missing connection between all the highway=footway ways.
82017-09-01 14:39:58 UTCfreebeer Hallo get B. (may I call you get?)
I cannot speak for the community either, nor have I looked at any details of this conversation, but I would welcome the addition of sidewalk data in Ohio and elsewhere, just as I have tried to contribute missing data regardless of importance or appropriateness. S...
12017-09-01 06:26:24 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review. I'd prefer
disused:highway=cycleway.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
You did not change the route relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/272134
I assume the closed ways should be removed?
12017-09-01 05:54:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusal highway=bus_lane on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431384284
I suggest to remove it and add lanes:bus=1
to the major road.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
22017-09-01 05:56:21 UTCGerdP Since there are so many relations you may also just change it to highway=service + access=no + psv=yes if that is apropriate.
12017-08-23 09:08:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=building_passage
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337368502
I think it should be highway=footway and
you should split the way where it enters the building(s). The parts in the building are mapped with tunnel=building_passage.
I would have done that myself but the ...
22017-09-01 05:47:40 UTCGerdP See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51633404
12017-09-01 05:19:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed the unusual highway=abandoned_path to
abandoned:highway=path
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-09-01 05:20:23 UTCGerdP Sorry, it was highway=abandoned:path
12017-08-31 09:50:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
Is Ascenseur really the name of the footway?
22017-08-31 18:43:40 UTCcchatfield There is a small very short footpath from Rue Latour de Brie to a lift. Then there is a footpath bridge from the lift to Rue de Pau.
Ascenseur is the French word for a lift.
32017-08-31 18:45:16 UTCGerdP Yes, that's why I don't think that this is the name of the footway.
12017-08-27 06:46:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo(?) highway=street_sign on these two ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574710
Was it intended? Is it a traffic_sign=* ?
22017-08-31 10:49:05 UTCoba510 It's not a typo. This is a pair of monumental stone street signs (the kind that have the name of the street on them, not a traffic sign) that were built as a formal gateway to the small subdivision on the east side of College Ave. These kind of stone-column street signs are fairly common on the west...
32017-08-31 11:21:10 UTCGerdP What do you think about historic=city_gate?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcity_gate
42017-08-31 11:27:07 UTCGerdP Ah, sorry, there is already a historic tag. I think the highway tag is obsolete here.
52017-08-31 11:43:35 UTCoba510 The highway=street_sign tag is there because it functions (both historically and currently) as a street sign. Looking at taginfo highway=street_sign is the most common tag for such features (even though it is undocumented).
62017-08-31 11:54:25 UTCGerdP That is true, the difference is that you have used the tag on a way, not on a node.
I also assume that many are mistagged traffic_sign=* or maybe tourism=information.
Question is why you want to map the sign,
I think the important thing is that the corresponding highway has the correct name tag.
12017-08-31 06:29:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
Your change has left an invalid no_u_turn restriction:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3525664
Not sure if this should be corrected or removed.
I also don't think that the new restriction is needed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7087744
after I changed the ...
22017-08-31 11:16:41 UTCMatiasJ Hi @GerdP
About this change as left:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3525664
It´s ok because there´s a left turning line.

And thanks for disused advice.
32017-08-31 11:24:46 UTCGerdP Sorry, don't understand. I posted links to two different turn restrictions. One is obsolete, one is incomplete (the no_u_turn)
12017-08-31 08:34:38 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've fixed typo highway=red on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520059565
After doing that I found that the previous tag value unclassified was probably better as this road comes as unclassified from the tertiary in the west. I'd prefer unclassified for Dijksterbuursterlaan and maybe differ...
22017-08-31 10:06:45 UTCJeroenHoek Danke. Das war ein Autovervollständigungsfehler meinerseits.
32017-08-31 10:07:42 UTCGerdP Aber Du bleibst bei residential ?
42017-08-31 10:37:34 UTCJeroenHoek Ich hab es geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51608935#map=18/53.14033/5.43973&layers=N
52017-08-31 10:45:47 UTCGerdP Danke für die Rückmeldung :-)
12017-08-31 10:20:05 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=alley
on lane 3668 and 3671.
Did you mean highway=service + service=alley ?
12017-08-23 07:26:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=L on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215075949
22017-08-31 10:00:04 UTCGerdP Did you mean living_street?
12017-08-31 09:15:57 UTCGerdP Moin!
Warum die Änderung?
Ein turning_loop wird am Knoten erfaßt, siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_loop
Für mich sah die vorherige Variante okay aus.
12017-08-31 09:04:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=turning_loop
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448015846
This tag is used for nodes, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_loop
Sat images don't show the object, so I don't know if it is really that large.
12017-08-31 08:56:48 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=turning_loop on
way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464160701
The tag is only used for nodes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_loop
This looks like a trunk_link.
12017-08-31 08:41:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassfied
instead of highway=unclassified on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519948346 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520238039
Check the auto-complete function in JOSM ;-)
12017-08-31 08:39:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassfied
instead of highway=unclassified on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456356525
12017-08-31 08:21:40 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=give_way on
bridge
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224781497
and connected road.
I assume you wanted to change a node?
22017-08-31 08:51:17 UTCbison166 korrigiert
12017-08-31 08:18:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
You changed a highway=service to highway=give_way here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508754007
I assume you wanted to change a node ?
I also think that service=bus should be removed. Consider to add bus=yes or psv=yes
12017-08-31 08:04:28 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review typo highway="foot way" on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512506829
The correct spelling is highway=footway
12017-08-30 07:39:15 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
The tag highway=closed:motorway_link
is only used here. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Is there an alternative new road instead?
22017-08-30 14:06:55 UTCsizzle17 There is only 1 on-ramp open for I-89 Southbound in Waterbury. The on ramp has two entrances. It is seen to the left of this edit box. One entrance for State Route 100 West Bound Traffic and one for State Round 100 East Bound Traffic
32017-08-30 14:11:54 UTCGerdP I see. Did you find a better tag in the wiki?
42017-08-30 14:17:13 UTCsizzle17 I am not sure there is a better tag. This on-ramp used to be open until recently. It is a motorway_link as it connects State Route 100 to I-89 but it is recently closed, why it is now tagged as closed.
52017-08-30 14:18:53 UTCGerdP I suggest disused:highway=motorway_link
instead of highway=*
62017-08-30 14:23:38 UTCsizzle17 That is incorrect as it marks the section as a highway. The section of road is a motorlink as it connects a roadway to a highway.
72017-08-30 14:27:14 UTCGerdP I think the key disused:highway=* is for closed roads, and that's what you want to map, right?
82017-08-30 14:30:02 UTCsizzle17 Changed to disused:motorway_link=*
92017-08-30 14:58:31 UTCGerdP How did you find that?
102017-08-30 15:23:52 UTCGerdP This key was not used in OSM before.
disused:highway=motorway_link exists 88 times:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/disused%3Ahighway#values
112017-08-31 08:00:39 UTCGerdP Sorry, it seems I've totally confused you here. I've corrected the tagging again.
I hope it is clear now?
12017-08-23 06:05:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
You used highway=* on a waterway=dam here. I think it should be highway=unclassified as the roads to which it is connected, but maybe the road is somehow special?
22017-08-23 06:05:59 UTCGerdP Opps, forgot the link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/410884750
32017-08-31 07:43:40 UTCGerdP I've changed it to highway=unclassified, you probably misunderstood the wiki about waterway=dam
12017-08-31 07:26:54 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=*
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475298078
Bing shows a normal track next to the water which seems to connect two hamlets.
12017-08-31 07:20:19 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual highway=* on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504326309
I assume you meant something like highway=service + access=no + psv=yes
to map a way that can only be used by public transport ?
22017-09-01 03:18:30 UTCandersonguarnier Hey GerdP[http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GerdP], my mistake. I review and made a change like you said
12017-08-31 06:42:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:unclassified
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447048931
If this way still exists
I think disused:highway=unclassified is better,
see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
12017-08-31 06:39:45 UTCGerdP Hi!
I know it's a bit late ;-)
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:tertiary
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464037325 and parallel way.
If this is still closed
I think disused:highway=service is better,
see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-08-31 06:42:26 UTCGerdP ah, sorry, copy+paste error :-(
I meant disused:highway=tertiary
12017-08-31 06:35:35 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual tagging highway=closed:service
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453560865
Did you mean disused:highway=service?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
12017-08-31 06:33:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review unusual tagging
highway=closed:service
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409267010
If this way still exists
I think disused:highway=service is better,
see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
12017-08-31 06:15:22 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed highway=closed:primary
to the common disused:highway=primary.
I've also updates the route relations.
There are several route restrictions on the old roads. I assume these are also obsolete now?
22017-08-31 08:16:21 UTCciubex Yep, you are right.
Thanks for the changes!
12017-08-30 14:25:13 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier ein highway=platform auf platform_edge geändert. Ich kenne nur railway=platform_edge. War das eine Verwechslung?
12017-08-30 14:15:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Why did you change highway=path to the unusual tiny-path?
12017-08-30 13:59:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=Khandor Bari Road
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445974567
Did you mean highway=residential + name=Khandor Bari Road ?
12017-08-30 10:36:39 UTCGerdP Moin. Schau mal auf Tippfehler highway=path;track
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37605496
Passt hier evtl man_made=cutline besser?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dcutline
12017-08-30 10:29:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=path;track
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495176162
22017-08-30 10:36:15 UTCgarl thanks. fixed.
12017-08-30 10:10:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please note that highway=turning_loop
and highway=turning_circle are used for nodes, not for ways. I've seen similar changes by other telenav members.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop
22017-08-31 05:57:37 UTCalinan_telenav Hello.
Thank you for pointing this out. I did the changes that you suggested.
Best regards,
Alina
12017-08-25 11:39:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you often use the tag highway=pathway instead of highway=path
Is that intended?
22017-08-30 09:58:18 UTCGerdP I've now changed them to path, please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51570587
12017-08-25 11:41:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you often use the tag highway=pathway instead of highway=path
Is that intended?
22017-08-25 16:33:04 UTCMiloAS Hey,

No that's accidental, I've only just realised. It must've been a result of tabbing out and it auto completing. Apologies!
32017-08-25 16:35:09 UTCGerdP OK, watch out ;-)
42017-08-30 09:55:51 UTCGerdP I've changed them to path, please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51570471
12017-08-25 11:43:29 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you often use the tag highway=pathway instead of highway=path
Is that intended?
22017-08-25 13:44:16 UTCChibiyuki Thank you for letting me know. I updated.
32017-08-30 09:51:00 UTCGerdP Thanks, I still see some of them:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rlL
12017-08-30 09:36:24 UTCGerdP Hi!
Why do you change highway=residential
to highway=Jalan? This is not good.
Please check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
12017-08-25 09:24:12 UTCGerdP Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du häufiger highway=driveway + driveway=service
anstelle des üblichen highway=service + service=driveway verwendest. Hoffentlich keine Absicht?
22017-08-30 08:56:50 UTCPDVSeifert Hallo Gerd,
ich antworte stellververtretend für den User MPTempel, weil ich im Mutterverlag sitzen und den User eingearbeitet habe und in Richtung OSM die Kommunikation durchführe.
Dem User ist die Josm-Vorlage abhanden gekommen und ich repariere in den nächsten Stunden die falsch g...
32017-08-30 08:58:06 UTCGerdP OK, danke!
42017-08-30 09:19:51 UTCPDVSeifert Hallo Gerd,

ich habe insgesamt 3 falsch getaggte Wege des Users korrigiert, vielen Dank für den frühen Hinweis, sodaß keine größere Menge an falsch getaggten Straßen erfolgte.
viele Grüße Dietmar
52017-08-30 09:31:19 UTCGerdP Habe seinerzeit auch schon einige korrigiert und weitere User angeschrieben.
62017-08-30 09:35:43 UTCPDVSeifert Hallo Gerd,
dann nochmal Danke für Deine schon durchgeführten Korrekturen.
Wir bemühen uns, die Fehler nicht zu wiederholen und sauber zu arbeiten,
Grüße Dietmar
12017-05-29 16:04:44 UTCMarkus366 Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können ...
22017-08-30 09:20:49 UTCGerdP Vielleicht hilft ja https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
um seltsame tags wie highway=never_built
zu vermeiden.
12017-08-30 09:11:41 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you used the unusual tag highway=footway_closed here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371904747
Please see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
for better tagging.
12017-08-30 08:52:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470644326
The sat image shows several buildings here, you should map each single one.
What is meant with highway=Atatürk Caddesi ? I assume there is a residential road with name=Atatürk Caddesi somewhere?
Is there also a boutique...
12017-08-30 08:37:14 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you use unusual tags like
highway=old_track or highway=no_path
I think highway=* should not be used for them. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
22017-08-30 08:53:25 UTCPapayaved Ok
12017-08-30 07:06:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=Новая улица
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474050006
Is this the name?
12017-08-30 06:53:38 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=wood
on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250880550
I think it is a highway=path
If the surface is dirt and the bridge is made of wood this is not important for the highway itself. Maybe use bridge:material=wood
22017-08-30 07:01:24 UTCtheangrytomato Whoops, thanks for catching that! I have corrected the mistake.
12017-08-30 06:28:28 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed several ways with typo highway=unpaved created by you.
Did you mean highway=unclassified + surface=unpaved? See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rll
12017-08-30 05:58:26 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed several ways with typo highway=unclassifed instead of unclassified created by you.
I've corrected them here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51563065
Please watch out when using the auto complete function of JOSM ;-)

12017-08-29 06:27:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo type=destinationsign
on relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/183544
When I changed it to destination_sign JOSM complained "too many roles"
I assume one has to create one relation for each sign?
22017-08-29 14:11:33 UTCalv It's intentionally different type.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destinationsign
32017-08-29 14:59:18 UTCGerdP Ah, thanks. JOSM doesn't seem to know this one.
12017-08-29 08:56:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=unm on three ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480764544
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480764545
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480764546
What was meant?
22017-08-29 13:23:21 UTCSteve8460 Two were abandoned and one track, all corrected.
12017-08-29 08:50:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclasified
instead of unclassified on several ways in this area.
I've corrected it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51532204
Please make sure that JOSMs auto complete function sets the correct value.

12017-08-29 08:18:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noted that you created some ways with highway="service road" instead of highway=service. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rjP
12017-08-29 08:00:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=route on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462408719
Maybe you meant highway=pedestrian?
12017-08-29 07:43:26 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please note:
A roundabout is tagged with junction=roundabout.
I've fixed this error here and on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304703365
12017-08-29 07:06:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=rail on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222217353
This bridge has a lot of tags that differ from the
connected rails
22017-08-29 20:21:04 UTCmagol ooooh, I have fix that now. :-)
12017-08-29 06:53:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=private
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479199149
It looks like a highway=residential,
maybe with access=destination?
12017-08-29 06:47:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=private
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497693624
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497693619
12017-08-29 06:44:46 UTCGerdP Please review typo highway=private
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432940209
12017-08-29 06:42:52 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=private on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482719008
I've also noted some ways with highway=service + access=private + living_street=yes
Did you mean access=destination ?
22017-08-29 15:35:19 UTCMrYadro Hello, highway=private was a mistake but as for other, they are tagger right, it's kinda private part of city where you need to get permission to enter.
12017-08-29 06:31:38 UTCGerdP Hi!
You have mapped a few highway=private here. This is not widely used. I assume you meant highway=service + service=driveway?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rjG
12017-08-29 06:17:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you changed parts of BR-277 from trunk to motorway. Maybe you can help. Please see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41088522
12017-08-29 05:59:21 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you sometimes use highway=footpath here.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rjF
Did you mean path or footway?
12017-08-29 05:43:41 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've found the typo highway=footway
on several ways in this changeset.
Did you mean path or footway?
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rjC
22017-08-29 07:26:31 UTCR0bst3r Das angesprochene Tag ist "highway=footpath". Gewünscht war wohl highway=footway?
32017-08-29 09:52:00 UTCwuff57 Thanks for pointing this out. Was a typo. I've just changed all 6 occurences to highway=footway
12017-08-29 05:37:33 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=footpath
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484897119
Did you mean path or footway?
12017-08-29 05:35:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=footpath
on all three ways in this changeset.
Did you mean path or footway?
12017-08-29 05:29:18 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You've used highway=footpath here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/519350177
It is an area, so I assume you meant highway=pedestrian?
A normal footway is mapped with highway=footway.
12017-08-28 10:19:40 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=undefined
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510068045
Did you mean unclassified?
22017-08-28 10:25:03 UTCGerdP Found a few more ways with this tag created by you. Some look like residential roads, others like hw=track.
If you also don't know they should be hw=road
32017-08-28 14:19:58 UTCkatpatuka First comment fixed in https://osm.org/changeset/51510594 ;
I highway=unclassified a lot with josm so I don't know how undefined could happen :o

But I didn't find anything else with highway=undefined (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/riF ) - so I reckon you've already fixed it ;)
42017-08-28 18:05:11 UTCGerdP They are still in the database:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rj3
12017-08-28 10:44:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
Nach meinem Verständnis sollte der Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48560053
mit highway=path + ford=stepping_stones
erfaßt werden.
12017-08-28 10:10:13 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check again the footways in the middle of the roundabout.
Two problems:
1) The ways are not connected to the rest of the road network
2) They probably should be highway=footway
12017-08-28 09:45:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=motorway_junction
on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467914341
The tag is normally only used on nodes.
Why did you add it here?
12017-08-28 09:39:21 UTCGerdP Hi!
I stumbled over a few ways with highway=motorway_junction. I started to change them to motorway_link but now I wonder why you changed BR-277 from trunk to motorway. The sat images clearly do not show a motorway with separate lanes. See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:Internatio...
22017-08-28 13:50:11 UTCchfranca Olá, eu segui as recomendações do projeto de mapeamento de rodovias do Brasil. Se houver erros, por favor, fique a vontade para editar.
12017-08-28 08:50:25 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=closde:residential
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453562572
Not sure what you tried to map here.
A closed road is normally mapped with highway=disused or with disused:highway=*
To me this looks like a highway=service+service=driveway
(which implies access=pr...
12017-08-28 08:31:05 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425719244
What is meant with highway="foot path" + motor_vehicle=yes ?
How is it connected to the rest of the roads?
12017-08-28 08:14:50 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=events_venue on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/447997790
22017-08-28 21:22:11 UTCNiels Elgaard Larsen tak. gjort
12017-08-27 09:02:52 UTCGerdP Hi!
I guess you already know now:
Please don't use highway=uncassified_link / residential_link etc. These don't exist.
See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html
12017-08-27 08:44:49 UTCGerdP Hi!
please check typo highway=tre on some ways. Not sure if you meant residential or track. See
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rhf
22017-08-28 16:50:30 UTCratrun Thank you -> Fixed.
12017-08-27 08:34:51 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=secondary; unclassified on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411073443
What is correct?
12017-08-27 08:31:28 UTCGerdP please review highway=unclassified; tertiary
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144003908
12017-08-22 14:29:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=unclassified; tertiaryun
What was meant ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144012562#map=14/49.7168/-98.5286
22017-08-27 08:30:11 UTCGerdP similar problem on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125352381
12017-08-27 08:23:55 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=steps;service
on these ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474067462
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92629553
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474067463
12017-08-27 08:20:21 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte schau mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150239156
an, Ist es ein path oder ein track?
Bei
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107174492
ist noch mehr schiefgegangen:
highway=path;track
bicycle=no;yes
22017-10-03 19:56:58 UTCmakren Hi,
Danke für den Mail-Reminder (Info über Diskussionsbeitrag ist nicht angekommen). Habe die Punkte korrigiert.

Gruß
Martin
12017-08-27 08:05:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the type of roads.
I think both are highway=track
12017-08-05 14:09:24 UTCerickdeoliveiraleal Não é proibido retornar a esquerda neste ponto? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5015415429
22017-08-27 07:44:48 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=secondary_link;construction on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512962034
Did you mean highway=construction + construction=secondary_link ?
12017-08-27 07:32:41 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=tracktype on ways for CR31. The whole road looks like a hw=residential to me.
12017-08-27 07:26:50 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=tracktype
on two ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236729313
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236729314
Did you mean highway=track or did you want to add tracktype=* to the bridleway?
12017-08-27 06:38:56 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=street_lamp on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496889601
Looks like a barrier=hedge, but maybe you know more?
22017-08-27 07:47:05 UTCescada Absolutely right. my mistake. Thanks for reporting. I've fixed it
12017-08-27 05:15:40 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check: What did you try to map here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438187615
22017-08-27 12:28:52 UTCAjBelnuovo Aquele trecho é uma parada de ônibus.
12017-08-26 09:19:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442080900
I guess you wanted to map a trunk_link?
12017-08-26 09:08:34 UTCGerdP Moin!
Mir ist aufgefallen, das Du gelegentlich Objekte mit highway=turning_circle wie dieses erzeugst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437345862#map=19/51.30286/6.59065
Passiert offensichtlich aus Versehen, aber vielleicht kannst Du mal drauf achten. Oder ist das doch Absicht?
http://overpass-...
12017-08-26 08:01:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
Du hast duiverse Wege auf highway=turning_circle geändert. Dabei gibt es zwei Probleme:
1) Das tag sollte nur für Punkte verwendet werden
2) Man sollte zwischen turning_loop und turning_circle unterscheiden
Was war denn die maproulette Aufgabe?
12017-08-26 06:28:53 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
Some ways in this area have a highway=turning_circle tag as well as a power=line. The highway tag is obviously a typo, but what was meant ?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rgn
22017-08-26 07:46:03 UTCkre3d Afraid I have a keybind for highway=turning_circle that's easy to accidentally press. I cleaned these up. Thanks for the heads up!
32017-08-26 07:49:06 UTCGerdP OK, thanks!
12017-08-26 06:19:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review this crossing:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422224806
The tag highway=mini_roundabout is for nodes, this looks more like a junction=roundabout, but the sat image is not clear enough. See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterp...
12017-08-26 06:10:44 UTCGerdP HI and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used highway=mini_roundabout to map a roundabout. I've changed that to junction=roundabout. See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Possible_misinterpretations
OK?
12017-08-26 05:56:46 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review :
You used highway=mini_roundabout on ways. The tag should only be used on nodes.
I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164349393
is a mini_roundabout, but sat images show an obstacle in the middle of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154079742
so that is probably a junc...
12017-08-26 05:45:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226829423
The tag highway=mini_roundabout should only be used on nodes, I think what you meant is a junction=roundabout or maybe
just a circular road without special rights of way. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droun...
12017-08-26 05:33:38 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you map the inner areas of roundabout as highway=mini_roundabout + landuse=grass
The landuse tag is good, but the highway tag is wrong is this context.
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundabout
Why are there two inner rings?...
22017-08-26 05:35:27 UTCGerdP Please check also this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515978533
12017-08-26 05:23:36 UTCGerdP Hi!
I know this is a litte late ;-)
I've noticed this change because I am trying to fix some wrong roundabout mappings, and this way poped up:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232268404#map=19/55.59311/-2.43168
Was this an early version of what now is done with area:highway=* ?
12017-08-26 05:18:34 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because you've used highway=mini_roundabout on a way. The tag is meant to be used on nodes only.
The sat image seems to show an obstacle in the middle, in this case it would be a junction=roundabout
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Drounda...
12017-08-23 07:21:14 UTCGerdP Hi!
You changed highway=path to highway="Horse to Horse".
If I got that right you want to map that the ways are no longer usable. I think
abandoned:highway=path should be used for that.
22017-08-26 01:30:26 UTCORMTB TomP Horse to Horse is a mountain bike trail that for the most part does not follow any old roads. It connects the trails near Horse Butte to Horse Ridge roughly paralleling China Hat road. As far as I know it is not an approved trail by the BLM. That area is a wilderness study area. Hopefully you did no...
32017-08-26 05:04:19 UTCGerdP I did not delete anything here, but you did something similar by changing them and your comment seems to say that this was intended. So I am not sure now how what you intended to do.
12017-08-25 08:58:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?
22017-08-25 14:53:50 UTCglebius I don't remember that I did that intentionally. More likely these are leftovers from previous editors.
32017-08-25 15:28:47 UTCGerdP 7 were created by you. Anyway, I know now
that I can change them
12017-08-25 13:49:42 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review. Is this a mini_roundabout or a junction=roundabout ? See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundabout
12017-08-25 13:42:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review this "roundabout" (can't see that on the sat image)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443781165
What did you try to map here?
12017-08-25 13:33:15 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442344775#map=19/46.88093/7.03968
It cannot be a mini_roundabout because of the obstacles in the middle. If It also isn't a junction=roundabout I would simply remove this way.
12017-08-25 13:15:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review this roundabout:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310370843
There is a statue in the middle, so it cannot be a mini_roundabout. It looks like
a junction=roundabout. See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundabout
I also wonder if there is no connect...
12017-08-25 12:37:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the area at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221561218
Is this a rest_area or a passing_place?
The latter is normally used on narrow roads, not on primary, and should be mapped as a node. See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpassing_place
12017-08-25 12:28:19 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte mal prüfen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441936014
Soll dieser highway=passing_place
eine Stelle zum Überholen sein oder ist es ein Tippfehler und es solle path sein.
Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpassing_place
22017-08-25 16:29:16 UTCtheophrastos Da hat wohl die Vervollständigungsfunktion von josm zugeschlagen, ist natürlich path, habs geändert
12017-08-25 12:18:01 UTCGerdP Moin!
Warum hast Du hier einen highway=cycleway auf passing_place geändert? Meintest Du path?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32759420
Was ist mit den hw=unclassified Wegen südlich? Sieht auch eher nach Radweg aus.
22017-08-25 13:44:39 UTCma-rt-in tach,
habe path gemeint. Habs schon geändert.
Passiert mich manchmal wenn ich zu schnell tipp :)
12017-08-25 12:01:51 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=passing_place
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460417362
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpassing_place
22017-08-27 17:24:16 UTCJavier Sanchez +1
Thank you
12017-08-25 11:56:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=passing_place
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16303533
Guess you meant path ?
12017-08-25 11:53:31 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review: You've mapped some highway=passing_place as ways instead of nodes on Carr Moss Lane. You just have to add a note on the road and tag it
highway=passing_place.
12017-08-25 09:43:40 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf highway=driveway
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187984572
Mal abgesehen davon das es hw=service + service=driveway sein sollte:
auf Mapbox sieht es so aus, als ob der Weg durchgeht bis https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460251204
Dann wäre es wohl ein einzige...
12017-08-25 09:36:53 UTCGerdP Moin!
Schau bitte mal auf highway=driveway
an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32976521
Sieht für mich mehr nach Parkplatz aus als nach einer Zufahrt
12017-04-19 14:13:29 UTCrza31 Hello Steve8460,

highway=track is not for Nodes.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/98690758 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/98670420

Check with validator in JOSM before upload show these errors.

Best regards rza31
22017-08-25 09:06:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?
32017-08-25 12:08:55 UTCrza31 Hi GerdP,

you're right, it is a mistake by me. ;-)
12017-08-25 08:59:09 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?
22017-08-25 18:31:50 UTCstevea Whoops, no. Thank you for catching this! Of course, I'm perfectly OK with any correction that you might make to this. As well, I'll look out for any other, similar mistakes I have made and correct them.
12017-08-25 08:55:55 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?
12017-08-25 08:44:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=byway_open_to_all_traffic
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429723068
Guess you refer to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbyway
22017-08-27 18:11:30 UTCJames Derrick This was a pre-existing typo, likely between designation= and highway.
This change set fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37651458 but left this short stub as it was.
Both are now updated following: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions#England_and_Wales
12017-08-24 06:55:56 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you often use the tag highway=crossing on ways like here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430919077
The tag should only be used for nodes, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
I guess you meant highway=footway+footway=crossing ?
22017-08-25 07:51:01 UTCMarcussacapuces91 Hi,
I understand your point of view... and I will follow it from now.
If I have some time (I'm in holidays now) I will correct all such contributions in a near futur.
32017-08-25 07:53:21 UTCGerdP OK. Have a nice holydays!
12017-08-25 07:34:44 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you have added a few ways with highway=truck . I assume you always meant highway=track ?
If yes, please make sure to check the auto-complete function in JOSM ;-)
22017-08-28 09:51:21 UTCBask Hi,
Your assumption is correct ;-) my fault, thank you for corrections.
12017-08-25 07:21:30 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=truck
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503013823
Guess you meant track?
12017-08-25 07:13:14 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you changed some ways
from highway=residential to highway=Jalan or jalan. I think the old tagging was correct.
Please check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
12017-08-25 07:04:56 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've corrected a typo highway=platforms -> platform here, but it seems that the geometry in the south of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421116964
is not correct. I assume the platform ends somewhere higher north. Do you know this place?
12017-08-25 05:42:01 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du verwendest hier und anderswo das tag highway=residential_link
Bitte mach das nicht, es gibt weder unclassified_link noch residential_link
Siehe auch http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
22017-08-25 06:18:31 UTCGerdP Sorry, wrong link. Here is the right one:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html
12017-08-25 05:44:14 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
22017-08-25 06:18:08 UTCGerdP Sorry, wrong link. Here is the right one:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html
12017-08-25 05:51:30 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du verwendest hier und anderswo das tag highway=residential_link
Bitte mach das nicht, es gibt weder unclassified_link noch residential_link
Siehe auch http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
12017-08-25 05:48:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
12017-08-25 05:46:05 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please don't use the tag highway=residential_link, this type doesn't "exist". See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
12017-08-25 05:32:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you changed some highways to "unclassified link"
Please don't do that. See also this discussion in the tagging list:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
22017-08-25 14:57:42 UTCmapmaker1559 Hi GerdP! As you may see, this changeset was from 9 months ago, and another user has already told me that "unclassifed links" aren't valid, so I've stopped using that tag. :)
12017-08-23 14:10:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
highway=grass is not widely used, I assume you meant highway=footway + surface=grass?
22017-08-23 16:25:13 UTCStefan de Konink Nope, it is a routable surface, not a footway.
32017-08-23 16:28:31 UTCGerdP So maybe highway=service ?
42017-08-23 16:36:31 UTCStefan de Konink No, highway=grass.
52017-08-23 16:40:13 UTCGerdP Well, the highway tag is used to map the importance of the road, not the surface.
Why do you think that you have a special case here?
62017-08-23 16:50:24 UTCStefan de Konink Because there is no road.
72017-08-23 16:54:00 UTCStefan de Konink The hole purpose of having added these tags is the ability to route pedestrians over the camping place. Hence the highway tag is used on surfaces which form a graph. The highway=grass is not rendered. Don't do any harm, in the database, and should have been implicitly followed, sadly the OpenStreetM...
82017-08-23 17:03:52 UTCGerdP Sounds somehow crazy. A way that is not a road and should not be displayed as road should still be used like a road?
92017-08-23 17:08:46 UTCStefan de Konink Exactly. The surface is a field of grass used for camping. While passing the surface in the middle moving to another campingfield is a highway activity. Don't want to render it on the map, do want to route over it.
102017-08-23 17:11:22 UTCGerdP What router supports this mapping?
112017-08-23 17:14:33 UTCStefan de Konink OpenTripPlanner, RoutingKit, probably any router that can be configured to use tags.
122017-08-24 07:08:56 UTCGerdP So you tell the people who arrive at the camping to install this software and configure it just to find something like a trampoline? I can't believe that.
Besides that I still think that the highway tag should not be used here.
132017-08-24 14:56:27 UTCSomeoneElse For info - "highway=grass" hasn't exactly troubled the scorers at taginfo:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=highway%3Dgrass . It's only used in this one location.
142017-08-24 19:50:29 UTCStefan de Konink I honestly don't care what you think. You are not familiair in the area, have not micromapped it, and the tagging is part of the openstreetmap database, and has not been used in rendering profiles.

I don't care about scores too. It seems you are only trying to formalize tagging, but don't come wi...
152017-08-25 05:16:25 UTCGerdP A possible alternative may be highway=virtual
It is also undocumented and not often used (64 times) but at least more self explaining,
and I think it is used for the same purpose.
162017-08-25 12:32:24 UTCStefan de Konink Thanks, this is a good suggestion. I would be happy to use it.
12017-08-24 13:42:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425947353
Is that a highway around the building?
12017-08-24 13:37:19 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've fixed a typo highway=unclassfied instead of highway=unclassified
on several ways in this area. This is probably caused by the auto complete function in JOSM, so watch out ;-)
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51407402
12017-08-24 06:03:55 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423022456
because of the uncommon highway tagging.Wouldn't abandoned:highway=path
be better ?
22017-08-24 12:24:03 UTCMarcoR Hi!
I've used highway=collapsed because the bridge that let the passage is currently collapsed and as far as I know, it won't be repaired.

I think that "abandoned:highway" should be used when the way is in bad conditions but it is still somewhere (e.g. under a layer of asphalt); howeve...
32017-08-24 12:37:20 UTCGerdP OK, thanks for the quick reply. I wonder if there is some kind of ford now? Maybe the parts of the bridge build a ford=stepping_stones?
42017-08-24 13:03:10 UTCMarcoR No, the bridge is 1-2 meters above the stream and the vegetation on the sides is too dense to easily go through.

The only way to safely cross is to get the path going east (where the paths and the stream are roughly on the same level).
52017-08-24 13:28:40 UTCGerdP OK, so I think I'll remove the highway tag and add a note
12017-08-24 12:42:21 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430207075
is overlapped by another way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431899659#map=15/49.1266/-79.2204
I assume the 1st should be removed?
22017-08-24 13:04:48 UTCRps333 yes. thanks for the QA
32017-08-24 13:26:47 UTCGerdP ok, removed
12017-08-24 13:24:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've fixed a typo highway=residencial
instead of highway=residential
on several ways in this area. This is probably caused by the auto complete function in JOSM, so watch out ;-)
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51406992
12017-08-24 13:17:07 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've fixed a typo highway=unclassify
instead of highway=unclassified
on several ways in this area. This is probably caused by the auto complete function in JOSM, so watch out ;-)
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51406786
12017-08-24 13:10:17 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You have mapped some highway=unpaved
here. The surface of the road should be mapped with surface=unpaved while
highway should specify the importance of the road.
12017-08-24 12:58:01 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've corrected a typo highway=residental instead of highway=residential on several ways in this CS. Please make sure that you correct the value in JOSMs auto complete function.
12017-08-24 12:54:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've corrected a typo highway=residental instead of highway=residential on several ways in this CS. Please make sure that you correct the value in JOSMs auto complete function.
12017-08-24 12:49:44 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=TD Lane
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408718017
I assume it Is highway=residential + name=TD Lane ?
12017-08-24 05:41:28 UTCGerdP Hi!
You changed highway=proposed to
highway=propos here.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379528069
I 1st thought this was a typo, but it seems intened. What's the reason?
22017-08-24 12:34:25 UTCavm It's a typo, I have correted it.
32017-08-24 12:43:00 UTCGerdP ok, thanks
12017-08-24 06:48:48 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review: You changed a lot of highway=footway to highway=crossing in this area. Was that intended?
12017-08-24 06:44:41 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you have mapped a lot of crossings with highway=crossing on a way.
The tag should be used on nodes only, the object you mean is a highway=footway + footway=crossing
Please review http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#The_crossing_tag
12017-08-24 06:26:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=Ring Road on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/500924614
12017-08-24 06:09:08 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=indoor on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462857216
I assume you meant highway=footway + indoor=yes ?
How is the way connected to the road network?
22017-09-05 18:54:18 UTCacsd fixed
12017-08-24 05:57:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=wall
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465583958
Is it a barrier or a footway?
12017-08-24 05:56:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=ыук
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119276457
Is this the name?
22017-08-24 10:21:43 UTCBatareikin No. Its misprint.
Must be =services
12017-08-24 05:53:15 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503718355
Is this a footway? If yes, where is it connected with 绿地世纪城A区 ?
12017-08-24 05:46:28 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you changed a highway=residential to
highway=Jangalia Ayla Road
I assume this is the name of the road, so I changed it. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51394699
12017-08-24 05:36:12 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you changed a highway=residential to highway="جانبازان" :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/408466431
I've changed that to highway=residential + name="جانبازان". I've also found a way with
name:fa=خیا...
12017-08-23 13:06:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
I found 3 ways with hihway=fof , one created in this CS, all created by you. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407895354
What does it mean?
Just a typo for footway?
22017-08-23 14:44:25 UTCAlaskaDave Sorry, It is a typo, caused by JOSM "remembering" a bad value. I cannot locate any place in JOSM that contains the text "fof" that I used by mistake over a year ago but JOSM insert it sometimes still. It's supposed to be "footway".
32017-08-23 14:50:55 UTCGerdP Maybe search for key=properties.recent-tags
in your preferences.xml and check if you find "fof"
42017-08-23 15:05:15 UTCAlaskaDave Tried that already. It's not there. This is an annoying issue but one I cani' seem to rid myself of.
52017-08-24 05:24:36 UTCGerdP OK. Strange. Please check also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9001118
Can't see much on sat images and the way crosses a river.
62017-08-24 12:20:12 UTCAlaskaDave I changed that one to highway=path - it is much more visible on the new DigitalGlobe imagery. I have no way to tell what the "trail" actually looks like and because of its remoteness I never will, so that's only a guess. I'll work on it again and check the stream crossings when I have more...
12017-08-23 14:44:17 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=o on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472559489
12017-08-23 07:39:53 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway="Mule Deer Lane":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13910599
22017-08-23 14:36:54 UTCGlassman I'm not seeing the typo. Can you point it out? Mule Deer Lane is what the county has in its records.
32017-08-23 14:41:25 UTCGerdP So I guess you meant name=* instead of highway=*
42017-08-23 16:22:24 UTCGlassman Thanks - I missed that. Everything value looked right - its fixed now
12017-08-23 12:39:48 UTCGerdP Moin!
Bitte prüf mal den Tippfehler highway=driveway an
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437484492
Sieht für mich mehr nach einem highway=residential aus als nach hw=service + service=driveway
22017-08-23 14:29:53 UTCfx99 highway=driveway ist syntaktisch falsch (stammt aber nicht von mir).
residential ist es sicher nicht, da wohnt niemand. Es ist die Zufahrt zur SW-Halle, dem Recycling-Platz und der Tennisanlage.
Deshalb jetzt hw=service + service=driveway
32017-08-23 14:39:37 UTCGerdP Ich dachte an residential, weil die Straße einen Namen hat, ist aber wohl grenzwertig.
12017-08-23 14:37:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noticed that you map highway=milestone
with a way instead of a node on the highway. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=milestone
12017-08-23 14:34:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=meadow
on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418673809
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418673790
I guess you meant landuse=meadow, but this really doesn't look like a meadow, so I think landcover=grass would be a better fit
12017-08-23 14:28:04 UTCGerdP Hi!
please review typo highway=lift on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276400334
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Delevator
22017-08-23 15:55:53 UTCMartin Borsje changed lift to elevator
12017-08-23 14:05:53 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=gate on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481262828
Can't see what it realy is.
22017-08-23 16:34:44 UTCnewpavlov Thank you for noticing! Will fix it right away.
12017-08-23 14:02:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=forest on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501082688
Guess it is a path or a track?
22017-08-23 19:41:18 UTCJOJ oops was a bit to hasty there.
Now corrected. Thank you.
12017-08-23 13:52:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=ford on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242757398
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
12017-08-23 13:28:19 UTCGerdP Hi!
please review typo highway=footpath
on two ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194442997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43520756
22017-08-23 20:03:07 UTCmot_tom D'oh! Thanks for that, I've edited them both to highway=footway as they should be
12017-08-23 13:25:48 UTCGerdP Welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used highway=footbridge
instead of highway=footway + bridge=yes
Please check this wiki page to find out more about bridges:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge

22017-08-23 13:26:21 UTCGerdP Sorry, forgot the link to the way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517240097
12017-08-23 13:18:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=foot
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480018331
I guess you meant highway=footway, but I don't see that way and I doubt that it ends on a primary road. Similar problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480018868
22017-08-23 14:36:36 UTCmotogs Hi GerdP,
Thanks for raising this. Yes, both tags should of course be highway=footway and I'll correct them now. I did these 5 months ago and have more experience now! Neither path led anywhere on the map, but this is an area I know very well and have used the steps many times. On the ground th...
12017-08-23 13:10:47 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=foot on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274048100
Did you mean highway=footway ?
Looks unlikely because it connects a residential road with a track.
12017-08-23 12:59:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typos highway=er on two ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19622748
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19620392
22017-08-23 13:30:31 UTChofoen Thanks for advice. I fixed the typos.
12017-08-23 12:51:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=embankment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437965424
If this is a road it should be highway=unclassified, else maybe
man_made=embankment
12017-08-23 12:46:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=drt on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418702547
22017-08-23 15:43:55 UTCratrun Hi. Thank you. Fixed.
12017-08-23 12:32:50 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=destination
on these two ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378036404
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378534478
I assume you wanted to add access=destination?
12017-08-23 08:58:43 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=bridge on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419834962
Did you mean highway=footway+bridge=yes
or is it a part of the building?
12017-08-23 08:53:39 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've changed typo highway=bridge, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51367091
What is meant with surface=boardwalk?
12017-08-23 08:49:23 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=bridge on ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199391867
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510697915
12017-08-23 08:41:27 UTCGerdP Hi!
I've noted that you sometimes use the tag highway=alley, e..g here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481387231
This is an usual tag, I know highway=service + service=alley, but that doesn't seem to apply here. What is meant?
12017-08-23 08:30:44 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review: What does highway="Vers ECC" mean on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388610491 ?
12017-08-23 08:28:02 UTCGerdP Hi!
You sometimes use
highway=Unclassified or highway=Residential
instead of unclassified or residential
Is that intended?
12017-08-23 08:11:16 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typos (?)
highway=U and highway=R
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274965186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274965185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274963729
22017-08-23 10:36:20 UTCArneKimmig Hallo Gerd,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich korrigiert.
Herzliche Grüße
Arne
12017-08-23 08:03:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=Plaça de la Font on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303728532 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/511462073
12017-08-23 07:50:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
please review highway="Piste Cyclable"
Maybe you meant highway=track and name="Piste Cyclable" ?
The combination of tags bicycle=designated and vehicle=no makes no sense as a bicycle is a vehicle. I assume you meant motor_vehicle=no?
22017-08-23 08:01:28 UTCGerdP Sorry, forget the part about vehicle=no and bicycle=*, that is OK
12017-08-23 07:45:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway="Phyliss Lane" on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464167197
12017-08-23 07:41:51 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review typo highway=N05019G
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258146855
12017-08-23 07:29:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check:
You changed 3 roads to highway="Largo della Spiazzola"
What was intended?
22017-08-23 08:11:13 UTCnapo thanks a lot for the suggestion.
I have confused the name with highway.
now it's ok
12017-08-23 07:24:18 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review:
You changed a highway=residential to
highway=L here,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321026870
12017-08-23 07:15:26 UTCGerdP Moin!
Ich schlage vor, anstelle von highway=Geschichte
das üblichere abandoned:highway=path
zu verwenden.Siehe
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/abandoned%3Ahighway
12017-08-23 07:05:53 UTCGerdP Hi!
You used the unusual tag highway="Foot path" for 3 ways in this area. I've changed them to
highway=path, surface=unpaved
See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51363952
OK?
12017-08-23 06:44:46 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=Björkstigen
on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295944749
Guess Björkstigen is the name?
12017-08-23 06:42:10 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier versehentlich drei heighway=<unterschiedlich> erzeugt.
Ich denke, unclassified würde passen, aber Du warst vor Ort.
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420011825 und anschließende.
22017-08-28 17:47:23 UTCroland44 Ja, war ein Fehler. Ist aber schon korrigiert worden.
12017-08-23 06:34:21 UTCGerdP Moin!
Du hast hier zwei Wege mit highway=5 erzeugt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25034094#map=19/51.03863/10.97181
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25034099
Ich vermute, Du wolltest maxspeed=50 auf 5 setzen?
22017-09-03 08:24:10 UTCsennewald63 Ist gefixt.
12017-08-23 06:22:12 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=2 on building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436803183
12017-08-23 06:16:54 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check:
I've deleted a highway=11 here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491299991
It was at the same position as highway=residential
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108292949
12017-08-23 06:08:10 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=0.8 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490954205
I assume you meant height=0.8 ?
22017-08-23 06:12:02 UTCGerdP Same problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490954226
I've changed both to height=*
12017-08-23 05:57:07 UTCGerdP Hi and welcome to OSM!
You have added a roundabout with highway=* here. I fear the wiki for junction=roundabout is missleading:"Also tag the roundabout and approaches with highway=*, the same as the connecting roads."
Whenever you find highway=* in the wiki it means something like "...
12017-08-23 05:49:33 UTCGerdP Hi!
You used highway=* in combination with ice_road=yes for this way.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448457687
The wiki for ice_road might be missleading:
The highway=* should also be present on the way, and its value should reflect importance of the given highway."
I've changed it to h...
12017-08-22 15:51:30 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check: What is meant with highway=C1 Him Lam
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489020902
on a building? Similar:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489020901
12017-08-22 15:48:58 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check: What is meant with highway=cidi on building way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492869210 ?
12017-08-22 15:39:31 UTCGerdP Hi!
please check highway=set
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431603155
Guess service was meant?
22017-08-23 05:02:11 UTCPlaneMad Whoops, fixed. Thank you!
12017-08-22 15:29:16 UTCGerdP Hi!
You did not yet delete the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460549223
What is meant with highway=19/12/2016 ?
12017-08-22 15:25:36 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=Extraurbana secondaria on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137819380
What was meant?
22017-08-22 15:33:01 UTCdan980 just a copy-paste mistake. Thanks for reporting this! I fixed the way (highway=unclassified)
12017-08-22 15:22:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=uns on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467219495
Did you mean highway=path ?
And why does it end somewhere in the middle of the way (according to Bing)?
22017-08-22 15:35:00 UTCpiligab Hi GerdP.
You have the reason. Thank you for your feedback. I updated my changeset.
Regards.
12017-08-22 15:04:43 UTCGerdP Moin!
hier gibt es jetzt einen highway=d
der mal ein highway=service war. Was wolltest Du tatsächlich ändern?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26819749
22017-08-22 15:08:23 UTCanbr Mahlzeit,

Menschen machen halt Fehler...
32017-08-22 15:10:34 UTCGerdP yep ;-)
12017-08-22 15:09:30 UTCGerdP Moin!
Hier ist jetzt ein highway=z der mal ein highway=service war. Was war gemeint?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356272200
12017-08-22 15:06:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
I found a highway=b
on a building. Probably a typo, but what was meant?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488748261#map=19/38.34979/-6.68291
12017-06-02 10:43:29 UTCmueschel Hi,
you added more than 30 ways with the tag "Highway=Footway" - please note that all tags are case sensitive and these should be lower case.

Also, elevators are tagged "min level" and "max level". According to the wiki, this should be e.g. "level = 0;1;2;3&quo...
22017-08-22 15:01:03 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=0
What was meant ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496450447
12017-08-22 14:57:11 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check highway=Küçük Anafarta
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458106270
I assume you meant highway=residential + name=Küçük Anafarta ?
12017-08-22 14:49:26 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check:
typo highway=tunk_link on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471449146#map=19/56.83367/35.80015
Please check also oneway tags for this and the other link road.
12017-08-22 14:39:30 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458271428#map=19/9.43645/-1.06672
highway=Tolon should probably be name=Tolon?
vehicle=no in combination with bicycle=designated makes no sense. Maybe motor_vehicle=no was meant?
22017-08-23 06:16:40 UTCEnock4seth Thanks GerdP.
12017-08-22 14:20:26 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=Vasavägen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223870981#map=18/58.32243/15.13761
22017-08-22 20:41:41 UTCYraFyra Thank you. I have now corrected it.
12017-08-22 14:16:26 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check: The roundabout is not connected with the road network
and highway=Thamarapoo Janction
should probably be name=Thamarapoo Janction?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494580600
12017-08-22 14:09:57 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please chck highway=Sentier Burel
I assume you meant name=Sentier Burel ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272227574
22017-09-30 16:14:27 UTCIIVQ Yes. Gormur already changed it.
My apologies
12017-08-22 10:17:05 UTCGerdP Moin!
Prüf mal bitte highway=Schulstraße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463107356
Ist wahrscheinlich ein unbenannter highway=service ?
12017-08-22 09:53:36 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check typo highway=highway on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474644920
I guess you meant highway=construction?
22017-08-23 12:51:42 UTCStretch Longfellow Whoops. Fixed. Thanks!
12017-08-22 09:51:20 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review the changes at roundabout:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34485191
I've tried to fix it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51333697
12017-08-22 09:38:44 UTCGerdP Moin!
Prüf mal bitte: highway=cic an
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475310833
Was ist gemeint? Der Radweg ist schon im Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4377008
22017-08-28 07:13:39 UTCloominade danke für den hinweis habe das korrigiert. Der radweg ist baulich getrennt
12017-08-22 09:32:40 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review highway=waterway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485045355
12017-08-22 09:12:35 UTCGerdP Welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used
highway=Anadolu Caddesi
for a building. This tag is normally used for roads, so I wonder what you meant?
12017-08-22 08:48:08 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please check: What was meant with
highway=foo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497946400
22017-08-22 10:41:10 UTCEAman Thanks for finding this. It was supposed to be "footway" and I guess I relied on autocompletion.
12017-08-22 08:15:26 UTCGerdP Hi!
Please review way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491894503
I guess it should be highway=path ?
Bing doesn't show anything here.
GerdP has contributed to 500 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 939 comment(s) (limit: 500 changesets)