Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12017-11-13 22:47:31 UTCDaveF I'm intrigued. Why is it "invalid"?
12017-09-01 09:33:33 UTCSomeoneElse Hi James,
You may want to revisit some of the deletions in here - the DWG's had to revert the offending duplicates added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51210673 et al (see the discussion in there which also suggests a possible Google source of the names).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, ...
12017-08-09 21:52:52 UTCMike Baggaley Hi James, can you check the post office you added (node 4985231337) in this changeset? I believe the one in High Street closed in 2016 - perhaps it is a sorting office?

Thanks,
Mike
22017-08-09 22:12:49 UTCJamesKingdom Hi Mike,
I think it too may have closed, but there must have been something there for me to add it from my visit.
I plan to revisit hopefully in the next few days, and I will check then.
Thanks,
James
12017-07-24 10:06:40 UTCSomeoneElse Hi James,
This looks very much like a mechanical edit - was it discussed anywhere?
Not that I expect that anyone would necessarily have complained, but a "heads up" to anyone who's consuming the data would have been nice.
Also, I presume that you did actually check all 135 nodes to see ...
22017-07-24 10:49:17 UTCJamesKingdom Hi Andy,
Sorry for not notifying, I was just going on the basis that the amount being modified was quite low.
I checked most locations, but I will double check them all later today, or I can revert them if you like.
Sorry for the inconvenience
James
32017-07-24 14:58:11 UTCJamesKingdom Hi Andy,
I have checked on the map and imagery, and all 135 look to be in plausible locations.
Sorry again for the fuss,
James
12017-07-23 14:29:23 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
12017-07-23 14:28:27 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
12017-07-14 15:26:44 UTCdaveemtb This seems to include some incorrect edits based on out of date Bing photos :(
22017-07-14 15:41:53 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50286387 where the changeset comment is: Outdated
32017-07-14 15:43:09 UTCJamesKingdom fixed
42017-07-14 16:15:14 UTCdaveemtb Great - thanks! :)
52017-07-14 16:35:41 UTCdaveemtb DigitalGlobe imagery is up to date, I've now updated the area using this.
62017-07-14 17:14:08 UTCJamesKingdom It is more up to date, but it is misaligned for lots of the area where I am, and aligning it in one place does not continue for the rest of the map sometimes.
72017-07-14 18:31:58 UTCdaveemtb Yeah, I've noticed it's a bit hit and miss but it aligns well with Strava Heatmap for the cycle path next to the a23 so reckon it's fine for this.
12017-06-08 18:19:00 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49375721 where the changeset comment is: Revert mistake by yours truly
12017-05-02 00:00:18 UTCrobert Did you mean to remove the name for "Robin Road" in this edit? It broke a match against OS Locator: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=1012929
22017-05-12 21:48:11 UTCJamesKingdom Sorry about the delay,
I did not mean to remove this name.
12017-04-20 16:51:58 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47977868 where the changeset comment is: incorrect positioning
12017-04-16 16:15:57 UTCJamesKingdom This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47842101 where the changeset comment is: Incorrect imagery offset
12017-03-19 19:00:22 UTCGinaroZ Hi, just to let you know that with roundabouts like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478681438, you need to add the junction=roundabout tag instead of oneway=yes
22017-03-19 19:11:42 UTCJamesKingdom Hi,
Thanks for this info, I have been doing all my roundabouts with one way tag.
I will do it this way from now on.
I have changed this roundabout to the correct format.
James
12017-03-13 22:55:08 UTCMike Baggaley Hi James, welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think you may be having trouble with highway name and ref fields as this change seems to have replaced the names of several roads, with the refs (ways 125936016, 4731859 and 5235810). The name field should hold a name such as "East Avenue" and the ref ...
22017-03-14 07:55:48 UTCJamesKingdom Fixed.
12017-03-11 20:25:26 UTCGinaroZ That's a weird iD version and host...
22017-03-11 20:26:11 UTCJamesKingdom its a new test version
32017-03-11 23:42:55 UTCGinaroZ Oh ok, just seemed a bit unusual :)

But about the changes - just wondering why you made this road primary? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23535091/
14 changeset(s) created by JamesKingdom have been discussed with a total of 28 comment(s)