Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12016-06-14 16:00:53 UTCRicoZ The reverted changeset clearly had some errors but I think many of the objects are in fact cave_entrances.
22016-06-14 16:16:17 UTCSomeoneElse @RicoZ Indeed, and local mappers will I'm sure pick those up over time.

The solution to "some cave entrances are incorrectly mapped as caves" is not to change ALL caves to cave entrances - that's just differently wrong.

By their very nature (being underground and not visible on aeria...
32016-06-17 15:20:23 UTCRicoZ Thanks, I have started and am looking at those places now
42017-04-02 08:16:25 UTCzstadler Currently, there is "cave" is not an approved tag.
I find is strange that the most appropriate approved tag "natural=cave_entrance" was replaced by an tag that was proposed at the time of the change.
As a result of this change, applicable caves have disappeared from maps...
52017-07-23 07:38:51 UTCzstadler The proposed "natural=cave" proposal applies to ways and areas.
I therefore changed/reverted all "natural=cave" nodes in Israel and Palestine to "natural=cave_entrance".
62017-07-23 09:23:52 UTCSomeoneElse @zstadler OSM does not have "approved" tags, If someone has mapped something beyond a "cave entrance" as a "natural=cave" then that's perfectly OK. As noted above, as with any "odd tagging" I'd expect local mappers to check examples near them, as I presume y...
72017-07-23 10:04:46 UTCRicoZ @zstadler: most of the nodes natural=cave should be natural=cave_entrance but not all. It may be that in Israel the data is sufficiently homogenous that you can simply replace it but in other countries I found mappers tagged wine cellars, restaurants and many other objects with nodes of type natura...
82017-07-23 15:09:30 UTCzstadler Yes, I'm the original mapper of all recently corrected entries, and they should have been "natural=cave_entrance" in the first place.
@SomeoneElse: The says a proposal can be approved by voting.
12016-05-30 14:46:21 UTCgormo Hi, is there a discussion of your large-scale edits? Although your edits are probably not harmful, prior discussion is necessary (see ). Using JOSM and doing find/replace large scale is considered mechanical editing!
22016-05-30 14:55:53 UTCRicoZ I am always trying to contact the individual authors whose data I am changing by private message and work in small chunks - however in this one case I have accidentaly uploaded too much at once. I am pretty sure that I have contacted most of the affected contributors though.
32016-05-30 14:58:08 UTCgormo thanks for the clarification.
42016-05-30 15:01:32 UTCRicoZ Thanks for having an eye on it, I am also making mistakes often enough.
52017-05-09 20:58:04 UTCletihu Diesen Wasserweg
kann ich auf dem Luftbild nicht sehen. Er kreuzt auch Wege und Gebäude. Vielleicht fehlt "Tunnel" und "Layer -1"
62017-05-10 11:17:28 UTCRicoZ Habe es geändert und vorsichtshalber den OC angeschrieben.
12017-04-18 12:44:16 UTCletihu Dieser Wasserweg
geht vielleicht nicht direkt durch dieses
Haus ;-) Vielleicht kennst Du den richtigen Verlauf.
Wenn Du schon dabei bist, die Straßenquerung mit dem Wasser
22017-04-19 15:31:01 UTCRicoZ Bin leider auch nicht von dort, habe es jetzt so verschoben wie es mit Bing aussieht aber im Zweifelsfall lasse ich lieber einen offensichtlichen Fehler drinstehen als einen gut versteckten.

Irgednwie passt auch die "Flussrichtung" vom Flutgraben und dem verbundenen ditch nicht gut zus...
12016-06-05 07:29:31 UTCPT-53 Nach Deiner Bearbeitung meldet keep right jetzt diesen Fehler:
Würdest Du bitte das erledigen !
22016-06-05 09:33:21 UTCRicoZ Aber gerne, weißt Du zufällig ob an der Stelle ein Culvert, eine Brücke oder ein Ford ist?

Übrigens bin ich nicht der "Verursacher" wie in Deinem dem Keepright Kommentar vermerkt und es ist auch nicht ein "Fehler" sondern eine Warnung.
32016-06-05 10:12:53 UTCRicoZ war ausnahmsweise auf Bing unübersehbar eindeutig, keine Mühe machen.
12016-06-03 22:24:14 UTCRicoZ sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here.
12016-06-03 22:24:09 UTCRicoZ sorry.. wrong changeset comment leftover from an earlier changeset. I was doing some local fixes here.
12016-05-31 12:46:57 UTCwoodpeck I would appreciate it if you could use more precise changeset comments. I can see from the changeset that you edited a waterway but what exactly are you "fixing" (and, preferably, why - as you probably know, we do not usually start retagging everything just because the consensus on taggin...
22016-05-31 13:12:20 UTCRicoZ In this changeset I tried to fix JOSM warnings where the river crosses the lake shore and dam.

Btw I do try to contact the main contributors when I am doing larger scale retagging.
12015-09-09 11:25:44 UTCRicoZ the nudism proposal did not include the value "designated", but as it seems quite frequent I have added a description. Please check if the decription is ok.
12015-09-06 13:24:52 UTCMateusz Konieczny Invalid data should not be kept as "example for wiki"

Just copy tags, list them and make screenshot.
22015-09-06 13:41:41 UTCRicoZ there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?

Btw besides fixing this one bridge I have intended to contact the author of the unlucky mechanical edit causing this because there are a few thousands of bridges with layer=-1 in Italy. It is surpri...
32015-09-06 14:54:56 UTCMateusz Konieczny "there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?"

In that case it would be (note that map rendering is for current...
42015-09-06 14:56:05 UTCMateusz Konieczny or simply
52015-09-06 16:02:37 UTCRicoZ thanks. I was also looking at but does not seem to have the possibility to link a specific version directly.

So the overpass query seems like the only way to get a stable pointer.
62015-09-06 16:36:42 UTCMateusz Konieczny Such feature may be (or already is) requested at
72015-09-06 16:48:42 UTCRicoZ Indeed, it has been requested already -
12015-03-03 23:13:40 UTCRicoZ Hi, you have accidentally deleted the coastline of Huahine Iti so I am reverting this changeset.

Don't hesitate to ask for help when editing and wish you better luck next time.
RicoZ has contributed to 10 changeset discussions(s) with a total of 32 comment(s)