| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 178214065 by okwithmydecay @ 2026-02-07 04:37 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | aharvey ♦1,952 | I can't see any markings on this one, so I've changed the tagging. |
| 178502367 by okwithmydecay @ 2026-02-13 12:43 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | aharvey ♦1,952 | surface=concrete:plates are for prefabricated concrete plates, linked together on site. A typical concrete footpath is cast on site and is usually just surface=concrete. |
| 150916877 by okwithmydecay @ 2024-05-05 12:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | spiregrain ♦246 | How should these opening hours be interpreted - "09:00-(sunset-00:30)"? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | okwithmydecay | That should be interpreted as the park closing 30 minutes before sunset, which parses in https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | spiregrain ♦246 | Interesting, and thanks! I generally use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ (YoHours) which makes nothing of it. | |
| 177892829 by okwithmydecay @ 2026-01-30 14:34 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | ceirios ♦122 | Hi there,These AI slop buildings are mostly semi detached and terraced houses, and therefore should be split according to the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels.Can you please ensure you split these to ensure accuracy?DiolchCeirios |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | okwithmydecay | I would have split using the parcels but they aren't loading in the editor, so I didn't have access to that information. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | ceirios ♦122 | Yea, some people have noted they were having issues, no worries then :) | |
| 169906736 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-08-03 13:58 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | gurglypipe ♦1,079 | The ‘Public Rights of Way’ overlay in ID (see Overlays in the Background Settings pane on the right) shows it’s a footpath (green line). It does show the footpath starting from the house’s driveway at the northern end, though. Perhaps that’s why the gate’s locked,... |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | okwithmydecay | Well spotted! I can see there is a stile next to the driveway, so I've adjusted accordingly https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169996518Further survey is needed to see how the path crosses the waterway near Moss Dikes, currently it doesn't align with the overlay | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | gurglypipe ♦1,079 | Nice work, thanks :) | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | okwithmydecay | I've made further adjustments to the path using the overlays https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170002569 | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | gurglypipe ♦1,079 | Fantastic (and thanks for all the other high-quality edits you’ve made in the area recently; I hope you had a nice time :) | |
| 169192748 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-07-20 12:04 ~ 11 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | gurglypipe ♦1,079 | If you’re going to use AI to help with doing building outlines, could you please check what it produces before you submit it? There’s some pretty weird stuff going on in the middle of all these buildings.I’ve fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169218146 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | okwithmydecay | Thank you for adding the extra detail and adjusting the buildings! I had taken to review the building outlines, so I appreciate your tweaks. | |
| 167525327 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-06-12 09:40 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | spiregrain ♦246 | Thank you! Might be handy to have this shortcut mapped! |
| 119164151 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-03-31 14:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,051 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046871528/history has roof = hipped that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Thanks for the heads-up, I have corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167019942 | |
| 123728034 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-07-17 16:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,051 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079267107/history has roof = gabled that was added in this editMaybe roof:shape=gabled was intended here?See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Thanks for the heads-up, I have corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167019846 | |
| 164982022 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-04-15 12:13 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | bxl-forever ♦2,965 | Hello.You created a pedestrian area inside… an existing pedestrian area. I understand that non-local mappers may be confused in our car-free area but despite it looks like there are roads, those are only used by delivery vehicles and residents.Also, the surface of the area in the cen... |
| 163238150 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-03-05 10:16 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,824 | Just wondered - how do you check that this isn't dedicated as a common? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Good question, and to be honest I can't remember how I determined this one. When it has a name, it's possible to do some online research to find out. Are you familiar with this area? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,824 | I'm not familiar with this area - I'm hoping that you were!I'm always puzzled by "what is officially a common and what isn't". In some case it's obviously signed as such on the ground (and you might have get some bylaws posted - one near me has that). Part of a... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | There is https://www.openaccess.naturalengland.org.uk/ and looking at the Woolton area there is no "access land"Though, I am not sure if we can use that as a data source? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,824 | Despite those maps being "© Crown Copyright and database right 2024" I believe that I've seen similar data released under OGL (and hence licence-compatible).I'm a bit confused by what I see at both "Natural England - Open Access maps" and "CROW Section 4 Con... | |
| 163966782 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-03-22 22:56 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Although it would duplicate locked:conditional, would it be worth adding foot=permissive (?) + foot:conditional=no @ (...) for data consumers which are only aware of access tags? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Good point, feel free to update accordingly | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164175528 | |
| 161341750 by okwithmydecay @ 2025-01-14 11:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | spiregrain ♦246 | I've added some more in Changeset #161446192 - mainly to get the building name out of addr:street. |
| 159612607 by okwithmydecay @ 2024-11-26 11:55 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | spiregrain ♦246 | Have added the other existing artworks to the relation in changeset - 159620855. Some aren't on OSM yet. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Thank you! I added this site relation a while ago, but never got around to adding more artworks until now | |
| 156999809 by okwithmydecay @ 2024-09-23 14:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Could this do with foot=permissive as well, assuming that it's private land? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Good point. I am not sure how to tag the cycling access, as the sign says: "cyclists must slow down or dismount". Would it be best to err on the side of caution and use bicycle=dismount? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | I think using dismount would potentially exclude people using a cycle as a mobility aid, or using a cycling profile in a router.Perhaps something like bicycle=permissive + maxspeed:bicycle=walk + note=* might cover it?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Does bicycle=dismount apply to people with mobility issues? In terms of routing, there are other ways around Three Mills that don't have time or bicycle restrictions | |
| 136873747 by okwithmydecay @ 2023-06-02 15:41 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,051 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/928248538/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:s... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Yes, I tagged it as shop=spare_parts as it sells parts for boilers. Though maybe shop=trade is more appropriate | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦10,051 | I added trade=spare_parts_for_boilers | |
| 157285695 by okwithmydecay @ 2024-09-30 08:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ManuelB701 ♦269 | Given the changeset's size and how most of the changes are in Australia, I assume turning Newtown Station in England (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/778717495) into town node is an accident? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | Yes that was accident, I will revert | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | okwithmydecay | This has been reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157292068 | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Omaraltab ♦1 | Lancau la Allah kw pokimak agama Islam Muslim jgan cekap bnyak la I fuck your Allah understand basted criminal Islam Muslim Malaysia | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Omaraltab ♦1 | Allah kw to pokimak fham Babi hahaha | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | Omaraltab ♦1 | Guys fuck your Allah hahaha | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | Omaraltab ♦1 | Eh Babi pokimak agama Islam Muslim kw jgan cekap bnyak ak tendang pokimak agama kw fham sial punya bangsa | |
| 8 | ~ 1 year ago | Omaraltab ♦1 | Mna pergi Allah kw eh bdoh pokimak sial punya bangsa fuck your nobi Mohammed | |
| 157292068 by okwithmydecay @ 2024-09-30 11:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | mcliquid ♦2,088 | This is the revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157285695 |
| 141951164 by okwithmydecay @ 2023-09-30 13:16 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Is there really a legal restriction prohibiting pedestrians here?I can't see any diagram 625.1 "Pedestrians prohibited" signs in the Bing streetside imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | okwithmydecay | Good point, I don't know if there is a legal prohibition, though there is certainly no pavement here. | |
| 138348185 by okwithmydecay @ 2023-07-10 17:54 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Using separate there really ought to be in the wiki and StreetComplete. I'd start an RFC, but I'm insufficiently masochistic. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | okwithmydecay | The transit shelter was already mapped hence the use of separate, but perhaps it's better to delete the shelter and just add shelter=yes to the stop? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | I'd keep the amenity=shelter, possibly changing it to a polygon. There are a places where the shelter and the bus stop are sufficiently distant from each other to justify it, particularly with the high resolution imagery we have in London. | |
| 133910774 by okwithmydecay @ 2023-03-20 18:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | nevw ♦2,259 | Outer ways of multipolygons cannot share the same boundary….just draw the courts as three simple rectangles instead and delete the unnecessary multipolygon.You could draw another polygon around the boundary of the tennis club if you want to name the whole club area.https://wiki.openstreet... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | nevw ♦2,259 | As the Geofabrik osm inspector sees ithttps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.46558&lat=-16.48903&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | okwithmydecay | Thank you, I've updated it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134305054 | |
| 124267308 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-07-30 13:04 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mueschel ♦7,232 | This building and another one got a "addr:streetr" tag - could you check and fix that? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | okwithmydecay | Which was the other building? As for this one that tag was added in a different change set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124256414When I surveyed here I don't recall seeing a house number but if in doubt I could remove it and survey again | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | mueschel ♦7,232 | Oh sorry, I didn't notice there are two changesets on the same day. I'll contact the other mapper. | |
| 121717336 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-05-30 13:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | DaveF ♦1,665 | HiPlease refrain from combining these two tags.landuse=recreation_groundleisure=parkThey are two different types of objects. They are mutually exclusive.Is maproulette or your editor suggesting you add both tags or did you just decide yourself?For the existing objects, what was the... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | okwithmydecay | Thank you for your feedback on this. The instructions for the MapRoulette task said "If the surrounding park isn't mapped, consider adding it, see leisure=park and landuse=recreation_ground", which I interpreted to mean that if the park also contained recreation activities ie playgrou... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | DaveF ♦1,665 | HiThere was a recent discussion on this subject on the tagging forum:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-June/064808.htmlIncluding my own opinion:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-June/064829.html"consider adding it, see..." means r... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | okwithmydecay | Thank you for the links to the discussion. I've fixed the tagging on this park and will start gradually working my way through those edits to revert however it may take me several months on my own. | |
| 121140765 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-05-18 10:46 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | The aquatics centre extends at least part of the way underneath the pedestrian area in order to accommodate the two training pools. Perhaps w163734632 would be better tagged as building:part=yes than building=* |
| 117952102 by okwithmydecay @ 2022-02-28 17:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,795 | Hi,The State Library has an 'underground' connection across to the Mitchell too. I also suspect there is a connection to State Parliament. Multipolygon relation outer ways cannot share segments.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.21293&lat=-33.86641&... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | okwithmydecay | Thank you for the detailed explanation, and happy to defer to you as how the relationship is best modelled. | |
| 111930497 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-09-30 18:33 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Harry Wood ♦108 | Are these the toilets inside the pub? (level=1) |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | okwithmydecay | No, these were separate and below it so I may have tagged the level wrong | |
| 109013597 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-08-02 08:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | 20180911 ♦48 | You requested a review and it looks good. The cycleway in the south does not need a foot=yes tag, as in the UK this is the default. All OK.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA P... |
| 106202999 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-06-11 09:12 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,915 | Hi, I think you copied by mistake the pub fhrs:id in the diet:vegan field, can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | okwithmydecay | Sure I have removed the incorrect value for diet:vegan | |
| 107691172 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-07-09 09:34 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Thanks. I've added the heritage tags from NHLE in changeset #107692732 |
| 106107811 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-06-09 16:50 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | Thanks. The whole building had previously been tagged as leisure=swimming_pool. |
| 105845151 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-06-04 14:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | aharvey ♦1,952 | I don' |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | aharvey ♦1,952 | I don't think this is how it should be done, because this tagging of a building=train_station area inside of a building=roof area implies you have a building inside and then a another completely different roof structure over the building. Usually it would only happen if there is a gap between t... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | okwithmydecay | I get what you mean, what was I was trying to capture is there is a large roof and the building underneath it is only doesn't take up the full width as you can see in these pictures https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=Killara+station&title=Special:MediaSearch&type=image | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | aharvey ♦1,952 | Yeah I suspected that, actually while I don't think overlapping buildings like this is the right way to do this, I'm not sure if there is consensus around how it should be done, so I'll leave it as you've done. | |
| 104563819 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-05-12 10:01 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,264 | Hi, I've replied to your comment regarding Changeset: 7421561 that concerns this path.Regards Bernard. |
| 103947097 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-05-01 08:42 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | DanGlover ♦42 | Hi - RM data suggests there should be two boxes here, one double N1 59/159) and one meter/parcels (N1 61). Has one box been removed? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | okwithmydecay | Well spotted on this, I've reviewed my photos from that survey and I've accidently merged N1 61 with the double. I can revert this next week or feel free to do so on my behalf. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | okwithmydecay | This change set has now been reverted and I've added the second identifier to the double mailbox after cross checking my photos https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104469432 | |
| 103255318 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-04-20 09:10 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | I think it could be worth splitting highway area w373404383 into areas for each of the radial paths (and splitting the linear ways passing through the central "square"), as routers may just take account of the surface=asphalt otherwise. |
| 102071199 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-03-31 17:33 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦399 | Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me. |
| 99969862 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-02-25 10:50 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | rskedgell ♦1,867 | I'm fairly sure QEOP haven't changed these since I uploaded pics to Mapillary, if that's of any help. I'll double check on my run this afternoon.https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/dyTyBiFW21nJkxOqaf9k5Q |
| 99442296 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-02-17 10:17 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦399 | Similar comments to the other one, but this looks good too. |
| 99441648 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-02-17 10:09 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | confusedbuffalo ♦399 | Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.Some would also add location=roofhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source=solarAlso I'm not quite sure about the units. The wiki has kW listed as a suitable units, but I think that with solar kWp (peak) is probably... |
| 96810510 by okwithmydecay @ 2021-01-02 14:39 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Krad ♦3 | Looks correct to me. There is also a part playground anit clockwise from the pavilion. Foot path too. |