Dimitar155 have been discussed with 158 replies of this OpenStreetMap ContributorDimitar155 have been discussed with 158 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 184107226 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-06-14 18:56 ~ 3 days ago | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | Dimitar155 | https://council.sofia.bg/documents/d/guest/r-267-2026 |
| 180644327 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-03-30 19:14 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 11 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Обаче https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1494413139 май също е велоалея. Виж маркировката:https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.011918770592956&lng=23.089778352943995&z=18.58592638855147&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&focus=photo&pKey=734706562840637&... |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | Dimitar155 | Отбелязах го, макар че ако това се води велоалея, то аз съм трамвай... | |
| 183629619 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-06-04 07:51 ~ 13 days ago | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Само че, знаеш ли какво? В момента като институция, 29 ДКЦ не се простира върху цялата част на сградата. Дори и сградата по кадастър или исторически да се води buiding=clinic/... |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | И в тази част на сградата(СЗ от miniSopharmacy) се помещава лабораторията на "Рамус". Но не съм влизал вътре и не мога да кажа каква площ заема. Главният вход за ДКЦ–т... | |
| 3 | ~ 13 days ago | Dimitar155 | Мога да го сложа и като възел близо до главния вход. Просто махнах ограждащата площ, тъй като не си личи да е тяхно. На други места е заградено и е ясно че е към болниц... | |
| 4 | ~ 13 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Еми ако възел ще свърши работа и не е необходимо прецизно и подробно разделяне на части и вътрешно картографиране(indoor mapping), добре. Но то така и за другите поликлиник... | |
| 5 | ~ 13 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | След като писах, видях, че сградата е разделена. Ти реши. | |
| 6 | ~ 13 days ago | Dimitar155 | Сградата е разделена за да има по-точен 3D модел. Разделението е по етажност, не по това кой я ползва.Отбелязах ДКЦ-то като възел до входа, тъй като не ми хареса къде ... | |
| 7 | ~ 13 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Да бе, ясно, но на теория можеше съответните части да се обозначат със съответните институции, но затова си трябва абсолютна сигурност за данните(на живо)... Примерно... | |
| 173925050 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-29 11:37 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | plamen ♦82 | Мисля да го махна това Е871 от кръстовището на Цар Борис III с Южната дъга до Бургас. Там свършва маркировката на Гугъл. Табели последно има на ПВ Даскалово. |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | Dimitar155 | По южната дъга на Околовръстното покрай Младост има табели за E871 (примерно при 42.6285417 23.4467138 на Bing Streetside в уеб редактора).И моля те не ползвай Google Maps като източник, т... | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | plamen ♦82 | Май до Бургас е бил маркиран така: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.70594965212263&lng=23.518454551705418&z=18.804172290146546&pKey=137431621776421&focus=photo | |
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | plamen ♦82 | АИ: Ако някъде видите карта или текст, в които Е871 е отбелязан чак до Бургас, това е техническа и географска грешка, породена от грешното отъждествяване на целия нац... | |
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | Dimitar155 | Хм. Май наистина е бил съкратен доста.E 871 Sofia - Kjustendil - Kumanovo https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2016/sc1/ECE-TRANS-SC1-2016-03-Rev1e.pdf стр. 18На картата също е София - Кюстендил - Куманово - https://... | |
| 6 | ~ 15 days ago | plamen ♦82 | По-скоро някой на местно ниво го е продължил до Бургас. Може и да не е умишлено. Може някой да се е объркал. | |
| 7 | ~ 15 days ago | Dimitar155 | Изглежда че е станало през далечната 2013-та година :)changeset/15667779 | |
| 8 | ~ 15 days ago | plamen ♦82 | Мисля, че е добре да се изтрие в ОСМ. Документът в UNECE https://unece.org/transport/list-united-nations-transport-legal-instruments е от 2016, там не е до Бургас. | |
| 182959218 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-05-21 06:51 ~ 28 days ago | 1 | ~ 27 days ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ако "Вековно дърво" е описателно име, има няколко такива в горичката след Княжево на юг |
| 2 | ~ 27 days ago | Dimitar155 | denotation=natural_monument ми се струва същото като name=Вековно дърво.Тукашните вековни дървета в Княжево нямат нищо общо с същите в регистъра на ИАОС. Не съм сигурен откъде и... | |
| 182215394 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-05-04 17:08 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Dimitar155 | https://www.pomorie.bg/new/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Отчет-решения-ноември-юни-2024.pdf |
| 181353994 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-15 07:48 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | В Княжево видях поне 2 такива контейнера с име/марка "Княжевец". Но май са твърде малко за да се създаде и за тях шаблон |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ето едно такова "сърце" https://facebook.com/share/1GMQgBfUaQ/ | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Не са техни май. Вдясно от текста "Княжевецъ" се вижда лого със сърце, но не разпознавам чие е. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Точно де. То със сигурност е на тази инициатива/сдружение. Както и https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13653299950. В смисъл, виждал съм надпис "Княжевецъ". https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=12222488... | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | На табелата най-долу вдясно се вижда логото на капачки за бъдеще | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Едвам го видях :D Еми add-вай бранда(ако можем да ползваме от фейсбук снимки). | |
| 7 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Ц, ще трябва да се разходиш :) | |
| 8 | ~ 1 month ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Така... за това "сърце" в градинката до колелото на 5-цата, отдясно на обложката има няколко лого-та: най-горното на Княжевецъ(по памет, сега не съм точно там), на р... | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Също и на читалището. Имаше и баркод. | |
| 10 | ~ 1 month ago | Dimitar155 | мерси, отбелязах ги като част от капачки за бъдеще | |
| 181513102 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-18 19:16 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Виж на https://www.speedy.bg/bg/speedy-offices-automats?city=68134&formToken=-false 9785 какво дава |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | Fraxi ♦364 | И на сайта на Boxnow няма автомат в този Т-маркет(виж картата) | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | Dimitar155 | Видях само промяната в която променяш бранда и изглеждаше че номера е на BoxNow. Все пак името е излишно. Добавя се защото съм го копнал от шаблона за офис. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Еми като се обнови шаблона, може да се направи едно масово изтриване на всички имена на тези автомати(където има). | |
| 181430048 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-16 20:00 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мерси, но не мислиш ли, че трябва още да се намести в ЮЗ посока? Като гледам, и Mapbox, и MAF не са с идеална перспектива. Но виж например линията, разделяща двете платна СЗ ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | МЗХ е орторектифицирана и би следвало да е 1:1 поне на ниво терен. При грубо наместване на Mapbox спрямо МЗХ, Mapbox има отместване от 1.75, 5.32. При такова изместване изглежда ... | |
| 181320928 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-14 12:39 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Why? I re-added it because it's really not shown on the entrance |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | They are working as of today, so the opening hours should be signed.https://www.instagram.com/p/DXGl7rUgOLc/ | |
| 181305364 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-14 06:16 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ако може, актуализирай и статута на спирките, които се виждат, но не са част от актуалния маршрут. Въпреки че в сайта на ЦГМ пише, че промяната ще е до 20.04. Имам предвид... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Първите две си се ползват, но съм забравил да ги добавя в релацията. Последната съществуваше за кратко.По бележките, тази на 9 часа в кръговото я няма, както и спирк... | |
| 180951778 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-06 14:50 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | There's probably some other company at that location now, so it would be good to just delete the name and keep the history... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | There are quite a few companies in this office building. At least 20. See https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-lm&q=site%3Apapagal.bg+АТАНАС+ДУКОВ%2C+29&udm=14 for a non-exhaustive list. If the link is broken, google "site:papagal.bg АТАНАС ДУКОВ, 29"... | |
| 180963582 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-06 18:25 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ама не съм сигурен, че е само за авточасти. Няколко сгради бяха облепени с плакати на фирмата(вкл. на №298), но няколко обекта не работеха. А отдясно в същата сграда, къ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Затова му дадох hardware, колебаех се и за doityourself | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Освен ако по надписите не е останало нещо от стария обект... Защото наистина и сайта и фейсбук страницата говорят за друг тип дейност. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Доста са разпръснати. Може и да имат два-три обекта в района. Един от тях е сервиз (или по-скоро хале/гараж) за монтаж и демонтаж на това което продават. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Остави го така... Но от това, което си спомням, че видях днес(а такива останки може да се видят и на наземни снимки) е, че имаше надпис на фирмата и на №298, ако не се лъжа... | |
| 180899202 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-05 13:59 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Значи, аз като ги гледам кръгчетата в МЛЗ на https://d2ftgf10aqtt1f.cloudfront.net/8-1775205076-%D0%90801-%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE-page-001.jpg и мисля, че локациите са на места, където и преди е има... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Тоест на Боян Петров... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Виж например бележка https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5211265#map=18/42.659735/23.292882. Защото не знам как да възстановя историята иначе. Но най-сигурно е наистина на място да се обходят. | |
| 180873109 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-04-04 20:58 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мерси! |
| 178765634 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-19 10:34 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, гледай сега... Виж бележка https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5230558Значи- w1480620592 във всички случаи трябва да се разкачи от ул. Иван Сусанин, защото там има ограда(вижда се и на Bing... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Подобен случай и с w725704413, заради кашпите. Отворих https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5230585 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Както виждаш сателитните снимки лъжат. От наземните на бинг ми се струва че има паркинг елементи. Засега го писах без изход, но нямам претенция дали ще е автомобилно... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Не знам за теб, може и да се повтарям, но аз направо считам, че w1480620592 няма нищо общо с w901280183 и нейното продължение w901280184. Виж в по-близък план https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&a... | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Под сграда имам предвид https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175907857/ | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Иначе благодаря за реакцията и промените. | |
| 7 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Съжалявам за спама, но този ъгъл между стените се вижда и на Стрийтсайд ако увеличиш. | |
| 8 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Успях да видя стената. Така мисля че е добре вече. | |
| 153362546 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-06-30 10:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, какво ще кажеш точките като https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12022570126 да се махнат. Когато и да съм минавал, все са имали вид на занемарени(с изключение може би на един, но и той ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | А така само се появяват и при заявки и сигурно пита SC за shop type... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Надеждата умира последна, а в момента в който ги изтрием, веднага ще се заемат половината (по закона на Мърфи).Писах ги abandoned:shop=vacant. Предполагам че така ще се "ск... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Няма да се заемат сигурно, но и това е решение. Мерси! | |
| 180637316 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-03-30 16:04 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Възможно е да има грешка в кадастъра, да знаеш. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Те и табелите може да са грешни. Остава варианта да хвърлям боб 🙃 | |
| 175331721 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-11-30 21:15 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | SLMapper ♦45 | Hi Dimitar, this line has no tags on it after your edithttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1351213418/history |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | Dimitar155 | Hi SL,, The line should've been part of Kalofer's level 8 admin boundary but it has not been added. I've added it. | |
| 180306517 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-03-23 13:43 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мерси все пак. Не съм се запознал подробно нито с ППЗДвП, нито с въпросната Наредба 2. И си мислех, че маркировката е за съвсем друго нещо. |
| 174878185 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-11-19 20:35 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Преместих цветните и сиви кофи, защото бяха насред паркинга на вероятна(според Bing Streetside) позиция. Но може и да са по на североизток. Сложих fixme.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13317... |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | Dimitar155 | Изглежда правдоподобно. Като ги добавях нямаше паркинг за ориентир :). | |
| 179771966 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-03-12 18:48 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ако не беше ти, щях аз :) Хубаво си направил. |
| 179519653 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-03-08 06:20 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Благодаря! |
| 158056087 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-10-18 15:15 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Еми не е там. Мисля да върна промяната и да ти пратя снимка на лично. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | Dimitar155 | Мерси, видях снимката. Явно е така. OsmAnd по едно време ме лъжеше коя посока на къде е (съответно на къде гледа телефона) и може това да ме е подвело. | |
| 178964187 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-23 22:27 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | It doesn't block the recycling quest in SC...There are a couple of those in Studentski grad too |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | Dimitar155 | Unfortunately you are right. I was hoping that it was some caching issue. | |
| 178825110 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-20 15:51 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, май сме се разминали вчера. Една от кофите е излишна. Виж https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13585085710 и близката, която сложих снощи. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | Dimitar155 | Обединих ги | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Има още... :D Чакай... | |
| 170649974 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-19 06:00 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, мисля, че кухня "Лозенец" е южно от Dragzone. Мисля, че не е в едноетажната постройка. Днес минах оттам и това, което е южно от магазина, беше отворено. Другото е ... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=322970612502194&focus=photo&lat=42.6700240374&lng=23.292456725600005&z=18.96657283525481&x=0.5135973240889811&y=0.523013638985189&zoom=0 | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Не съм убеден че е точно така.Занемарената едноетажна сграда си изглежда така по принцип. Иначе съм сигурен че като минавах тогава, кухнята си беше там. Отзад (към ... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Виж къде съм го преместил, виж снимките на Bing Streetside и виж адреса в ОП "Социален патронаж". Дали са бул. България 59, не 57 | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Значи, ако си сигурен кога работят, можеш да минеш пак и ако съм сбъркал, да върнеш промяната. Но това нещо, което е на бул. България 57А, мисля, че изобщо не функционира... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Там пише за №57А "Сграда за обществено хранене". Добре, какъв е тоя обект южно от Dragzone, който работеше днес? | |
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Извинявам се, че наспамих този changeset. Значи, в сайта пише, че и служба "Социален патронаж" е на този адрес. Значи сигурно съм видял службата. И преди години може б... | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Явно трябва отделна точка за службата, а за кухнята да се върне на старото място. Но трябва верификация от човек на живо... | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Ще си разходя носа някой ден в близкото бъдеще :) | |
| 178358835 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-10 12:57 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Моля, добави и тези.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13334674739 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Готово. Скрипта ги минава така или иначе. Стига да има оператор, който да познава. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мерси! Ако искаш, мини и тези от https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178418331. За да не бъдат пропуснати. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Няма как да бъдат пропуснати. Скрипта който съм си направил гледа всички контейнери за рециклиране в цялата страна. | |
| 178360328 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-10 13:32 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Има и един вход между Нани-МР и бившата Пощенска банка. Но не знам дали е staircase. Стъклената врата. Над нея имаше надписи за брокера, за професионалния домоуправител(н... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Дългия блок няма вход от страната на Стефан Тошев, ако не ме лъже паметта. Може би имаш предвид входа до пицарията, който е към съседната сграда? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Това е отделно. Стъклената врата, за която съм споменал. До "Нани-МР" отляво. Това не е към този магазин. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=512297909960221&focus=photo&lat=42.672747765559&lng=23... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | За самия магазин си се влиза през вход отдясно. Под "чорапи" :) | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Колко пъти съм минавал оттам, досега не ми е направило впечатление :) | |
| 178356622 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-10 12:07 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Всъщност Nphone предлагат предимно сервиз на телефониhttps://www.gsmservice.bg/%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BB%D1%83%D0%B3%D0%B8 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Има и аксесоари, но основното е ремонт. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Възможно е, взимал съм само аксесоари от там. Но не съм видял да продават телефони, поради което смених тага. Ако прецениш можеш да го промениш. | |
| 178008461 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-02-02 14:02 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | "accessories" бе Мите, без "а". От accessory :Phttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/178009483 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Много букви много нещо. Мислех да го копирам от друг обект, ама гледам че автокоректа мълчи. Явно ме е подвел :D | |
| 177350992 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-01-17 20:17 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hmm, are you sure about these changes? I think the standard smoothness for new paving_stones (bricks) is "good": I usually tag them "excellent" only when (indoor) floor tiles were used. A surface with smoothness=bad has quite deep potholes, and one with smoothness=very_bad is not... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | I use excellent when I can walk without looking for sinked or raised spots.The sidewalks on the boulevard are in very bad condition - missing tiles, "пльокащи" tiles and they are quite uneven.The asphalt roads feature wide, long and deep potholes and persistent lakes during... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness/Gallery Excellent is for almost seamless paving stones; the bricks normally used have noticeable seams so are "good".The sidewalks are among the worst in Sofia, but if you would drive a car on it, you wouldn't damag... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | For excellent there is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/b/b8/Footway_with_very_smooth_paving.jpg which looks very similar (for comparison - https://youtu.be/63wwQbkYPjM?si=BeCqQ_suAezDetcc&t=1966).> but if you would drive a car on it, you wouldn't damage the undersideI eva... | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | I went to have a look and adjusted the smoothness values to what I usually tag in the area, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177960993The new path pavements around the mathematics faculty are very well made, so to the workmen that made them I'd say that they did an excellent job. B... | |
| 177925379 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-01-31 13:14 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | wow too fast |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | 🏎️ | |
| 159933519 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-04 20:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, Камекс-М, освен, че се занимават с гранит, предлагат и изработка на мебели по поръчка. Т.е. n12396694978 може би трябва да се промени или да се създаде отделна точка за ... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Даже може да не е от южната страна и да съм се объркал, но виж https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=503580227359195&focus=photo | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Ако са два обекта, може да се добави втора точка. Иначе ще започнем да приличаме на SEO агенция :). Добавих им сайта, името, телефононите и работното време. Мисля че е до... | |
| 173613850 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-22 07:53 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Mitko, what's your justification for changing the name of the river? The previous naming (Dragalevska reka and Novachnitsa) is in agreement with the KAIS map. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Dimitar155 | It is quite a headache to explain... In short terms, the cadastre (and the river agency) do not make a difference between local/alternative and official names. Which name is which is debatable. Consider it work in progress since there are still stuff to figure out (both in regards to names and their... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | OK, I don't want to give you a headache but am interested. What does https://kais.cadastre.bg/bg/geonames say? (got the link from ignisf/tevildo_ but don't have the skills to access it myself) | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | Dimitar155 | "Слатинска/Slatinska" | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Still wondering. I would guess it's called Slatinska only from where Vartopo flows into it, and definitely Dragalevska where it flows through Dragalevtsi. On all the paper maps of Sofia and Vitosha that I have, it's called Dragalevska until Loven Park | |
| 177372949 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-01-18 13:11 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Anonymous36863 ♦49 | leisure=playground и natural=sand са нужни за да се вижда с и CoMaps, и osm.org |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Anonymous36863 ♦49 | Без natural=sand няма да пише, че има пясък. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Anonymous36863 ♦49 | Благодаря Ви, че изтрихте ненужни тагове, които могат да създадат проблеми. Заместих тага natural=sand с surface=sand , но не съм съгласен с премахването на fee=no , level=0 и особено, le... | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Не съм @Dimitar155, но бих отговорил: За пясъчника може да се използва https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:playground%3Dsandpit . Ако толкова държите... Относно другите тагове - аз не си спомням да... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | Dimitar155 | Всеки обект в OSM по подразбиране се намира на level=0, освен ако изрично не е посочено друго. Затова добавянето на този таг не носи допълнителна информация. По същия нач... | |
| 177373062 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-01-18 13:14 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, имам въпрос. Може да е била водена такава дискусия преди време, за която не знам. Защо, наистина, да няма маркери за микрорайоните? Или поне така се водеха едно в... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Игнорирай въпроса - след като писах видях https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177373182 | |
| 169920015 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-03 18:29 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Mitko, what made you decide to map https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419693571 like you did? There is a paved triangle in front of Rakevo Milk, but it connects to the pavement so there should be no noexit=yes at the end node. There is no separate dead end path either. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Dimitar155 | Whoops, my bad. It is in the next triangle in ACW direction. Thanks for noticing, I've corrected it. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | There is indeed a path there, I saw it this afternoon. But I haven't surveyed surface, etc there so I removed these tags | |
| 176545943 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-12-28 19:58 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Anonymous36863 ♦49 | Явно не е читалище. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Dimitar155 | Фигурира в регистъра на читалищата - https://chitalishta.com/community/2527/2834 | |
| 177056987 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-01-10 11:12 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Имам въпрос, който не е свързан с конкретната промяна и район, но със сходен смисъл. addr:district deprecated ли е? Ето например тук попаднах на употребата му: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Dimitar155 | По-скоро не, но в случая адресите са отбелязани по особен начин... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Трябваше да кажа "нужен", не "остарял"(deprecated). Използва се. Благодаря за вниманието! | |
| 177056895 by Dimitar155 @ 2026-01-10 11:09 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Anonymous36863 ♦49 | ? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | Dimitar155 | wikipedia тага е за училището, дърветата по подразбиране са на кота 0. Също не съм видял безплатно (или платено) дърво. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | Anonymous36863 ♦49 | Това не просто е дърво, а туристическа атракция - хората искат да знаят дали трябва да платят за да го посетят. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | Dimitar155 | Ако достъпа беше платен, вероятно нямаше да е само за дървото. Вероятно би имало и други "туристически" неща около него и би имало такса вход за самия парк. Прим... | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | Dimitar155 | Може би тага който търсите е denotation=natural_monument или denotation=landmark? | |
| 175927465 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-12-14 17:12 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | И за тези двата от https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175926535 допълних данни |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Dimitar155 | При тях таговете са коректни, не е необходима промяна. | |
| 175821246 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-12-11 21:34 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Благодаря, че си върнал таговете!В iD редактора ми е трудно да намеря https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1457893588. В JOSM ще е по-лесно. |
| 150674097 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-04-29 17:27 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | About the honey shop: there's also a sign that they are buying paper for a certain price, so maybe they're also buying the washed burkani, and it's a recycling shop? amenity=recyclingrecycling_type=centre ? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Dimitar155 | ясно е, че нищо не е ясно :) | |
| 175558785 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-12-05 17:58 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Извинявай, че питам тук, но защо https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13355962089 и другите 2 контейнера в другото приложение са с питанка? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Dimitar155 | Защото беше малко глупаво и очакваше всяка локация да има от всички цветове. Вече е коригирано. | |
| 175138793 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-11-26 06:19 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Двата обекта "Гибко" дублират ли се? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | Dimitar155 | Не се дублират, две отделни локации са. И на двете има указания как да се стигне до втората, ако първата е заключена :). | |
| 169922215 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-03 19:21 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Според мен следва да се върнат "цепките", както са при версия №5. Виж снимките от MAF. А от Bing Streetside(в близкия план, на паркинга), се вижда, че под западната "цепка... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Т.е. при 42.6898156, 23.2466549 | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | На Esri, чиито снимки са най-актуални, изглежда че тези ниши са станали част от магазина. Вижда се покрив, както и стени. Местата за инвалиди са изместени в СЗ ъгъл след ... | |
| 147463149 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-02-14 19:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мите, сигурен ли си за размера(а и наличието) на такава зарядна станция? Това, което се вижда на снимките на редактора и е оградено с такива габарити(w1250505088), е по-скор... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | Да, сигурен съм и за двете неща. Същата като станцията в Гоце Делчев е. Единствената разлика е че шкафовете са в зелените площи до ухото, тъй като там има втора такава... | |
| 120500131 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-05-03 13:22 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | w1056875907 изглежда е паркинг(видно от снимките). Променям тага на amenity=parking. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | 👌 | |
| 173741741 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-25 05:08 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | mueschel ♦7,191 | Hi,instead of "count:blue" (which is not helpful for people not knowing the locally used color scheme for containers) it might be better to state the type of recycling, e.g.recycling:glass_bottles:countCould you change that? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Hi,please see:https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/topic/136856 | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | mueschel ♦7,191 | I don't fully understand the proposal in this post, because automatic translation is too bad. What is the actual significance of the colors, if there are different combinations that is not covered by the common recycling tags? A tagging scheme with only colors is not used in any place, apar... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | Due to local garbage collation issues, it is important to know how may recycling containers of each colour there are.recycling:glass_bottles:count could work for the green containers, but not for the yellow (plastic packaging + cans).Also each company can use either 3 colour bins or 2. The s... | |
| 157895532 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-10-14 20:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | n12251301033 не трябва ли да е всъщност way и barrier=bollard? Същите са като тези антипаркинг топки (https://youtu.be/biGSKjMOAAU?t=2037), но тук на видеото е показана предишната пряка източно. Ето... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Под block си представям нещо масивно, както е на снимките в уикито: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | По-големи са отколкото изглеждат, но определено са по-малки от Морените :). bollard ми се струва че е за колчета, а това не са колчета... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Прилагам няколко линка и затварям свързаната бележка, а ти, ако искаш, прави промени.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_bollard#/media/File:20131207_Istanbul_054.jpghttps://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mapping-several-lar... | |
| 173663840 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-23 09:27 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Там се предават и метални и хартиени опаковки:https://www.ecobulpack.bg/files/ecobulpack-listovka-bg.pdfВиж дали си съгласен с промяната(и последващо процедиране за "Екобулпак" контей... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | Да, добре е.Само имай предвид че понякога слагат един жълт и един зелен, а пред съседната сграда (на 50 метра например) слагат самотен жълт контейнер. | |
| 173646644 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-22 20:43 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | За n11083480722 трябваше ли да сложиш и count=3? Или само за 2 от един цвят и 1 от друг? Защото се сетих за подобни. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | Всъщност не е лоша идея. Получава се като при пътищата с lanes = lanes:forward + lanes:backward. Току-що го добавих, благодаря за коментара. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | И аз впоследствие добавих 3 броя(общо) и съответно 2 жълти и 1 зелен:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173648104#map=18/42.665967/23.281837Идеята беше дали count=* не се явяваше излишно(като са тагн... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | Dimitar155 | Тук е по-удобно ако е за конкретна промяна.По-скоро не е излишно, понеже ясно казваш че действително са 3 и не си изпуснал случайно някой с друг цвт. | |
| 173306854 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-15 07:58 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Dimitar155 | Частично върната.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173420880 |
| 173306736 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-15 07:55 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Dimitar155 | Частично върната.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173420880 |
| 173224060 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-10-13 12:01 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Dimitar155 | Частично върнатаhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173225616 |
| 160016965 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-07 06:39 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Има таг и за аквариуми:https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=aquarium |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | Dimitar155 | Благодаря, промених го | |
| 172645228 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-09-30 06:53 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | Dimitar155 | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/abbreviations-in-bulgarian-street-names/136187/9 |
| 171529287 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-09-06 07:58 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Честит празник!Трябва да е accessories.Оправих го:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171530510 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Честит празник и от мен!Чудех се защо не ми дава линк към уикито, явно това е била причината. Благодаря! | |
| 171309492 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-09-01 11:05 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Mitko, how do you think about having a name:en for public transport stops? I think they don't have one, and the name in Latin script should be in int_name so it appears for all users with a language using Latin script. The translated English names are not helpful because they don't appe... |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Hi Richard,First, this changeset removed names "по желание" and added request_stop=yes + noname=yes. It is not something major. The rest of the changesets added request_stop=yes and/or fixed some typo / naming inconsistency, so everything mostly matches with the official sourc... | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | If names are going to change soon, let's wait. But I think what users should get to see on their map is what's on the signs. That's why I removed name:en=Princess Marie Louise here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171192609 because that name is nowhere to be seen at the station... | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Another example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171134746The river is called Danube in English, but probably no English-speaking person has ever heard of the street, so its name is only Дунав in Cyrillic and Dunav in Latin script. | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Street names are a train wreck on their own :).The change to the metrostation seems fine. Even the map doesn't have such name (https://www.metropolitan.bg/assets/resourceimages/972/MS%20205%20Elevators.jpg). | |
| 170039971 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-06 06:52 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Привет, сигурен ли си, че липсва физическа преграда? На пътя доста ясно се виждат колчета, които разделят платната. https://maps.app.goo.gl/3eZDPRpQrFRBmMWu5 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Здравей,Гумените колчета не са кой знае каква преграда. Ако бяха, пътя през кресненското дефиле също трябваше да е разделен. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Ами, не съвсем. Тук колчетата са доста по-нагъсто (примерно през 3 метра вместо през 15) и имат основи. Дори и да спре напълно, кола няма как да мине от другата страна, до... | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Колчетата са безобидни. Основата е парче пластмаса, закрепена с 2-3 дюбела, а стълбчето е гумено. Ако го бутнеш с ръка, се накланя и после се изправя само.Тяхната цел... | |
| 5 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Островите по кръстовищата също са ниски бордюри и през тях спокойно може да мине кола, но там ги разделяме. Аз мисля, че ако няма преграда, то минаването в другата ле... | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Физическа преграда е елемент, който прави преминаването на автомобил невъзможно без риск от повреди. Колчето е гъвкаво и се гази без щети (освен евентуална драскот... | |
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Не съм съгласен изобщо. | |
| 8 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | А и сам каза, че можеш да си ожулиш колата, което противоречи на твърдението ти за щетите. | |
| 9 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | За да не става объркване, по принцип съм съгласен с аргументите ти. На Кресна например няма смисъл от разделяне, а и на повечето други места, където сложиха колчета. ... | |
| 10 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | За мен драскотина или леки вдлъбнатини, като от градушка или от отваряне на врата на съседна кола, не се броят за сериозна щета. Истинска щета е например счупено стъ... | |
| 11 | ~ 9 months ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Амии, пак не съм убеден, но явно няма да постигнем съгласие. | |
| 170955481 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-25 05:39 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hmm.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1424728113 with layer=-1 connects with the platform at level=-2 at one end, and halfway down steps at the other end, and those steps go up 34 steps from a path at layer=-1 to another also at layer=-1. Something's wrong ;) |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Dimitar155 | Somebody was sleeping :D. Thank you for noticing!The platforms are on level -1, there is a pedestrian tunnel under the tracks that connects the two platforms but it is outside of the paid zone. I've updated it accordingly. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Mapping metro stations correctly is hard, I know... especially because photography is forbidden inside metro stations. Maps like here https://www.metropolitan.bg/shema/dejstvashto-metro/nadezhda are sometimes helpful, esp to relate what's underground with above ground, and to remember where the... | |
| 170281628 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-11 09:08 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | Are you sure the sports pitch on the roof is for football (soccer)? From the street I could see that there are nets to catch balls, but not for what kind of sport it is made. Could it be for tennis, volleyball, etc.? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | Dimitar155 | I don't know. It looks like a football field from space :) | |
| 169801269 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-01 07:06 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | Dimitar155 | *ФзФ |
| 169798645 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-08-01 05:25 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Разгеле! :D Даже от 2025 г. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | Dimitar155 | Горе-долу си спазиха обичайния график :) | |
| 169274928 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-07-22 06:18 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | В ж.к. Иван Вазов(северно от ул. Бяла Черква), е пълно с такива. Ако ти се занимава... |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | Dimitar155 | В района на почти всяка панелка има поне по един, не са само в Иван Вазов :). Конкретно в Иван Вазов има и няколко обществени простора, но не съм видял да се ползват по ... | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Знам, че има. Тук визирах конкретно района и ако ти се занимава да ги добавяш. Иначе за цяла София.... | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | Dimitar155 | До 2040 г. може и да стане, евентуално :) | |
| 161897185 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-01-29 13:17 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | You added the stop 32 СУ Св. Климент Охридски the day after it stopped working according to a sign on the stop (see note I placed there). Why? |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | Dimitar155 | I noticed that it was missing from the map for quite some time so I assumed that it was permanent. Feel free to delete it. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | rhhs ♦216 | OK, it's gone | |
| 167460632 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-06-10 19:29 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Please check the Romanian name. I'm not sure if it is 100% correct, this is what was written on their website. |
| 166681970 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-05-24 06:11 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Maybe we should specify that the node "Министрество на финансите" is not THE ministry, but a small department of it? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | It was used by "АДФИ" some time ago. Currently it is not publicly listed on minfin.bg (google "site:minfin.bg будапеща 17"). It exists in some old procurement documents but that's about it. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Maybe better to remove it (or add disused:)? We don't want people looking for the ministry to go to that address... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | diused: seems fine. After all, the office is still there and some institution might use it someday. Updated accordingly. | |
| 165814244 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-05-04 18:39 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Струва ми се доста голямо по площ за една вилна зона. Може би са няколко, които са свързани? |
| 165601906 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-04-29 17:06 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Използван Bing Streetside |
| 165370641 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-04-24 10:05 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | По бул. Никола Вапцаров има две ленти за ляв завой към Атанас Дуков и две ленти за направо. По-голямата част от трафика минава по Дуков. По ОУП Дуков е заложен като ос... |
| 165042335 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-04-16 18:44 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | The changes are based on the Bulgarian and Romanian cadastre. The border is altered solely for islands where it is clearly established which country they belong to.Discussed in Romania's Telegram chat: https://t.me/OSMRomania/19416The changes are as follow:https://www.openstreetmap.or... |
| 164607410 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-04-06 20:05 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | https://council.sofia.bg/documents/d/guest/r-247-2025 |
| 164173251 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-27 17:01 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | niki88z ♦16 | Мите, малко си избързал с преименуването на станцията ми се струва. Предложението е обсъждано допълнително по време на сесията на СОС и в новинарските сайтове пише,... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Благодаря за бележката. Не съм гледал записа на заседанието, беше ми попаднал пост че са одобрили промените и бяха записани всички промени, както бяха в доклада. Все... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Наистина не е променено. Върнах го в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164474373. | |
| 164092912 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-25 19:02 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Пейките подлежат на проверка, не съм убеден че съм уцелил бройките и позициите им. |
| 164014538 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-24 05:43 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Който маркер е под прикритие (:https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.722691~23.565947&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-13.1&style=x&dir=355.5 |
| 163972077 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-23 05:39 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Трябва да е Buxton?! :Phttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buxton_Brothers_Boulevard |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Благодаря за корекцията, наистина се пише с "ux". Промених и имената на булеварда, за да са по същия начин. | |
| 163623305 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-14 19:03 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | streetlevel imagery;streetside останаха от предните редакции... |
| 163492980 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-11 16:31 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Считано от 04:30 часа на 14.03.2025 г. за трамвайни линии № 1 и 6 се разкрива нова постоянна крайна спирка с код 0624 „ж.к. Иван Вазов“ на ул. „Краище“, на 20 м. преди кр... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Т.е. от петък :P :D | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Календара ме подведе :) | |
| 163296970 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-03-06 18:25 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | source: Drone Reporterhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vF8KGIMXXkkhttps://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/🏪-markets-shops-and-commercial-centers-Пазари-Магазини-и-Търговски-центрове.1566507/page-210?post_id=192382065#post-192382065(и предните 3 ... |
| 162631635 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-02-17 19:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Би трябвало да излезе и официално в утрешния брой на ДВ (№14/17.02.2025) или в по-следващия брой (№15/???). |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | ДВ №15/21.02.2025 г.https://dv.parliament.bg/DVWeb/showMaterialDV.jsp?idMat=233038 | |
| 162538226 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-02-15 14:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ако не възразяваш, да го форматирам в синтаксиса за четни/нечетни дни? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Нямам предпочитание, както решиш. | |
| 161968964 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-01-31 09:08 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Променя се частично постоянната организация на движение на автобусна линия № 66, както следва:... Считано от 13.01.2025 год. спирка код 1176 „Околовръстен път“ преус... |
| 161097096 by Dimitar155 @ 2025-01-07 14:09 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Mitko, why did you add this shop? I didn't see anything looking like a shop there, only a garage. There might be a shop in the garage, but the doors were closed this afternoon |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Hi Richard. It does have garage doors on the outside. When I went past it, they were open and there was a glass storefront with a person and a sewing machine. It should be craft=tailor or similar. I can't remember if there was any name or opening hours. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Ah yes, maybe a шивачка. I've only seen it with the doors closed, and then there's nothing to see. | |
| 160570625 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-24 10:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | The 660 unresolved warnings are related to the fact that buildings don't share nodes and overlap by a few centimeters. It would be nice if someone can fix them. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | harvey76 ♦4 | fixed | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Thanks! | |
| 160714193 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-28 13:39 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | The changeset comment should've been "Updated tags for terraced houses". |
| 160701519 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-28 06:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мерси. |
| 160615334 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-25 19:55 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | За английското име "8th December" (български словоред) или "December 8th" (английски словоред)? За месеца ми се струва по-добре да бъде на английски а не транслитериран... |
| 160407508 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-19 19:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Заявката за преглед е заради кръстовището при node/12434215521 не ми харесва как се получи. Също не съм сигурен как точно би било най-добре да се начертае. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Можеш да пробваш автоматичното начертаване чрез този JOSM плъгин - https://github.com/tsmock/sidewalks/. Първоначално без да качваш промените и с проверка. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Проблема не е пътеката, а кръстовището между трите улици. Ако го начертая както е реално се получава "тройно" кръстовище с триъгълник между тях, а ако го направ... | |
| 160201059 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-12 10:13 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | * Овча купел - МС К. Величиков |
| 160092528 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-12-09 13:31 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | I hope you don't mind that I deleted the partial sidewalk you added along Yakubitsa. I think we shouldn't mix the 2 ways of mapping sidewalks within one street. Maybe we should have a discussion to develop our own "Regional convention" on how to map sidewalks... https://wiki.open... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | The "convention" I was trying out was to map only good sidewalks (like this one which was recently repaved and others which are in good condition). | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Didn't know about that convention... The pavement you added was repaved all the way to the end of the street, except in front of new buildings that already had good pavement. The one ont eh opposite side was repaved a couple of years ago, and even has tactile paving!I think sidewalks should b... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | It's easier for me to survey them in parts and add all details on it. I.e. side by side, segment by segment. I can add all of them in one go but in OsmAnd I can't see their tags so I don't know for which segments to take notes. | |
| 159771608 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-11-30 12:13 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Speedy* |
| 159558185 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-11-25 05:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Мерси, без да искам съм дублирал ключа website. |
| 159219440 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-11-16 18:54 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksei Gurianov ♦16 | Regarding this review: The OpenStreetMap wiki recommends against sharing nodes between entrance and exit connections at roundabout-style junctions. See documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#:~:text=Do%20not%20directly%20connect%20approaching%20with%20depart... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | I'm not sure how it should be done in this specific case. If I separate them, there will be wonky directions (like "Turn slightly right" when you are going straight if you are going north to south). | |
| 158559754 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-10-30 21:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Месарницата Абърдийн е на Раковска 123, отбелязана е там (https://www.osm.org/node/3019219513). |
| 135585912 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-05-01 18:11 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Митко, на снимки от Mapillary от 10.08. тази година не се виждат спирки. Ето една https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1269071583976959 Мисля, че и на снимки от юли 2023 г. е подобно положението. Имало е(... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Оправих ги:https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158267810 Малко избързах с коментара... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Благодаря все пак! Локациите, на които има fixme, са на база преди това въведените данни от 2012 г. (като https://www.osm.org/node/1730814057/history). | |
| 158114774 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-10-20 06:25 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | In this case, the building should be split in two because that's how it is shown in cadastre (you can see it on images as well). Then the addresses can be put on the buildings. I did this with this building and the one east of it (which is 3 buildings). We should have a discussion on how to map... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | The cadastre sometimes does strange things. I wouldn't follow them blindly. The (yet another) addresses discussion suggestion is coming a bit early if you ask me. We can wait until the cadastre is done with whatever it has to do and see what data they will open for public usage. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Agree, they also make mistakes, so ground truth should come first | |
| 157699694 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-10-10 06:27 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Why? I think especially for the buildings next to one of the ramps, it's very useful for routing purposes to have the name. I see no need to delete them. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Because they are ramps. Ramps generally have destinations (be it streets, neighbourhoods or other places) instead of names. If they service surrounding buildings, then it's not really a ramp, is it?In this case, there are signs on all four sides which show various destinations, which I'... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Adding the destinations is great, but removing the names is not an improvement, I think | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Depends on which navigation you are using. OsmAnd, for example, shows the name before the destination and is limited to a single row. In this specific case the name barely fits the screen and the destination is off the screen.You can simulate it on your phone (when setting start/finish, there is... | |
| 156433399 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-09-10 10:36 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Bing Streetside е останал от предната промяна.. |
| 155008314 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-08-09 07:21 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Mitko, I'm wondering where you found the information about these objects... You added them as unspecified shops, but I found most of them here are (vacant) offices. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Hi Richard. I've added them according to Bing Streetside from 2021. Most of them seemed vacant but I made them shop=yes on purpose since in 3 years a lot of things can change. They also have big windows and doors which is not very typical for an office. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Didn't guess that Bing has been around there! Keep adding them, so I'll be challenged to go and check them out! | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Don't worry I've got a few malls partially charted out in OsmAnd for the winter :D. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | rhhs ♦216 | Malls are nice for a hot summer day too! I did level 2 & 3 of Park Center mall a month ago... | |
| 156268813 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-09-06 10:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | https://www.osm.org/note/289506 |
| 155442114 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-08-19 05:10 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Телеугоителен комплекс* |
| 155223899 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-08-14 06:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Ето я локацията на 76https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.313965%7E24.160802&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Не съм дал добър линк, прощавай. Ето:https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=42.313965%7E24.160802&lvl=21.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=-7.5&style=x&dir=207.9 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Благодаря, преместих ги. | |
| 154393445 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-07-25 13:04 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | source тага не е коректен, промяната е направена на база данните в сайта на ДСК. |
| 154043015 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-07-17 07:03 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | source=INSPIRE |
| 153837697 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-07-12 05:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Източник: https://clubz.bg/75941-koy_e_mihalaki_tashev_pitayte_stolichna_obshtina |
| 153549635 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-07-04 13:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | * Землища за Мирково и Буново |
| 153330204 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-06-29 12:29 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Долна Невля* |
| 153144644 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-06-25 08:10 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | Прехвърлено чрез https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/changeset/124788 |
| 153116349 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-06-24 14:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | *районни граници |
| 134606820 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-04-07 09:35 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Fraxi ♦364 | Митко, бензиностанцията (533187534) с това име ли трябва да остане или с "Go Petroleum"? Виж - https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=42.6870572&lng=23.2329436&z=17.359146401211415&dateFrom=2024-02-01&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&am... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dimitar155 | За бензиностанцията/сервиза за гуми не съм сигурен. Даже не ми е направило впечатление, че се е променило.maxxmart-а е предния обект (дясно преди ул. Индустриална), ток... | |
| 152305956 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-06-05 21:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | от трамвайни перони*Дискусия: https://www.osm.org/changeset/152274350 |
| 151868464 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-05-26 20:10 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | literan ♦7,137 | hello. why do you mass delete 'depot:vehicle:tram=yes' tag without any replace? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Hello. For the depots, I've added depot=tram. For the tram/wagon repair shops I haven't added specific tags since I haven't found any tags for them (yet). | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | literan ♦7,137 | I do not see depot=tram tag herehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3277151https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96630863etc | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | literan ♦7,137 | huh, i see these are repair plants. Thank you! | |
| 151108699 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-05-09 16:21 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | https://www.sofiatraffic.bg/bg/transport/routeChanges/2642 |
| 151029130 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-05-07 21:15 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | https://www.sofiatraffic.bg/bg/transport/routeChanges/2639 |
| 150466013 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-04-24 20:20 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | tevildo_ ♦20 | добави всички сервизи и магазини за части на симеон challenge? =) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Работа за 5 минути, ако сложиш по три магазина на всяка сграда :DИначе не е лоша идея, но май никой няма чак толкова свободно време. | |
| 125377773 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-08-25 20:05 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SLMapper ♦45 | Hi Dimitar, on 2023 imagery (esri) I can only partially see existence for power line way 100867883. Mostly north-west. Do you have other sources for this? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | SLMapper ♦45 | As I recognized you had only updated this, I split away the no longer visible part and kept the other one. Have a nice day | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Hi SLMapper,That way is 13 years old (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100867883/history), I've only added a single node (likely by accident). I assume that it has been almost removed and replaced by other power lines. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | You beat me to it :). Have a nice day too! | |
| 149012967 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-03-22 13:08 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Lumikeiju ♦126 | Hi! I used the "survey_date" tag because I wanted to be more specific and indicate that I did indeed survey in person these opening hours at that date.However, it's clear that "check_date" is the de-facto standard in OSM for indicating when something was last verified as... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Thank you for the nice message!Happy mapping,Dimitar | |
| 148615254 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-03-13 22:21 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | KML файла е само за предната редакция, iD го отчете и тук защото забравих да го изключа. |
| 143948274 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-11-12 21:03 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | os-emmer ♦353 | Hi Dimitar155,you mapped here something using emergency=disaster_response before the proposal for this tag got approved. Can you confirm that this object fits to the current definition in the wiki?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1223056866https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=d... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Hi os-emmer,Yes it does fit the definition. It's the civil protection department.Happy mapping,Dimitar | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | os-emmer ♦353 | Thanks for the response! | |
| 147131503 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-02-06 11:40 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | tolio ♦17 | На страницата на куриера навсякъде пише BOX NOW, като отделни думи. Този ref номер 3779 не разбирам какво означава и къде го пише. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Бях останал с впечатление че е една дума, но лесно може да се промени на Box Now. 3779 е номера на автомата в техния сайт. Този номер не се показва в сайта им и май не го пише... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | tolio ♦17 | Да, проверих си имейла и вайбър съобщението от една пратка и там го пише този номер. Интересно, че на страницата им го няма. | |
| 147086891 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-02-05 10:11 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | https://www.sofia.bg/w/Разкрива-се-еднопосочна-спирка-по-автобусна-лин |
| 146986220 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-02-02 13:50 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Коментара към тази промяна трябваше да бъде " Тагове за спирки". |
| 146276621 by Dimitar155 @ 2024-01-15 11:06 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | niki88z ♦16 | Браво за добавените очертания. Необходимо е по същия начин да се „изрежат“ и териториите на ж.к. София парк и ж.к. Синева. Забелязвам, че територията не съвсем т... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Добавих границите на ж.к. София парк и ж.к. Синева. Около пречиствателната станция и лифта се получи нещо. Не е 1:1, но изглежда правдоподобно :D. | |
| 119278396 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-04-03 20:48 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz ♦2,945 | Hi Dimitar155,there has been a broken wood relation in this region for some time, which is much older than this area here but overlapping partly with your here newly created area:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/253825/history#map=10/42.1144/23.5316&layers=Chttps://www.openstreet... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz ♦2,945 | Sorry one link is wrong, here as a nice OSMI link:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=23.53925&lat=42.08579&zoom=10&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Hi Guido,Thank you for the reminder. It was used for the mountain itself. Then someone added forest tag and later we got some landuse imports. After that it became a big mess. I've now manually reverted it to mountain polygon and removed the unneeded members. Hopefully I haven't left h... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | gscholz ♦2,945 | Hi Dimitar,thanks for your quick response.Guido | |
| 145126532 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-12-14 20:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | krb100 ♦28 | Мерси |
| 141999303 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-10-01 17:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Myazyk ♦607 | Ти зробив білий прямокутник на карті на частині цвинтвря |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | Це проблема Carto. Дивіться https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/4319. | |
| 142442803 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-10-11 15:53 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | rhhs ♦216 | The "traffic calming" on the entry ramp to the parking garage are really water drainage grids. Shows how aerial imaging can be deceptive... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | I saw such traffic calming on a similar round ramp but it looks like it wasn't here... Thank you for fixing it! | |
| 142365424 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-10-09 20:16 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Udarian ♦776 | Just a really small nitpicking here, but it would make it easier to understand what you'd done in this change set from the get go if the change set comment had been something along the lines of "fixed typo in turn:lanes of way 345992147". thats all, it would have made it clearer what ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dimitar155 | I agree with you. Unfortunately this editor does not support custom changeset comments. There is an issue about it on Github (https://github.com/Zverik/osmtags-editor/issues/6) but I'm not sure if it will be resolved. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Udarian ♦776 | understood, sorry for the inconvenience, I didn't know that. | |
| 136957710 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-06-05 07:04 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | aleksander_kolev ♦4 | Those changes haven't been inforced yet nor the corespoding signs have been placed.Please look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3657320 and consider reverting for now. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | There is not much point in reverting it and then redoing it in a week. Besides that if I revert them now, this will cause quite a few conflicts with any changes that have been made after adding the oneway tags and before this revert. | |
| 134856852 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-04-13 10:42 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | cyton ♦223 | ah right, i guess i id not check for the value and was led to use this because of the hw=fw + footway=crossing combination, then its on a crossing island, so i used crossing_island.thank you, i hope i remember in future --- Published using OSMCha: https://os... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | You are welcome! | |
| 133822867 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-03-18 13:26 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Здравей, според официалната документация имената на пътните възли са Сливница 1 и Сливница 2:https://www.mediapool.bg/parvite-17-km-ot-magistrala-evropa-mezhdu-dragoman-i-slivnitsa-sa-gotovi-news314279.html |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | По първоначалния план беше само "Сливница" (който в момента е "Сливница 1"). В последствие кмета на Сливница поиска да има втори вход/изход за индустриалнит... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Тук съм съгласен, че всеки ги нарича както си иска без изобщо да се съобразява и се получават конфликти. Например ПВ Благоевград - Юг на Струма го наричат също и ПВ Зе... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Ако ме питаш мен лично това 1/2 е страшно нелепо и Изток/Запад щеше да е много по-смислено. Ако в България, както във 99% от другите страни, възлите се номерираха според ... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | В такъв случай мога да ги върна на изток и запад, а 1 и 2 да ги сложа в official_name? | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | foreigner037 ♦81 | Няма смисъл, нека да стоят така. Все пак са официалните имена, каквото и да си говорим тук. | |
| 133455998 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-03-08 21:12 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Решението е №112. |
| 114513191 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-12-03 08:41 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Dimi, in this changeset you made edits to a set of 4 switches and a crossing at James Bourchier metro station. I surveyed it yesterday to add internal mapping. That crossing can't be where it's mapped now because that's where the metro platform is. The crossing has to be either nor... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | The crossover point is located to the south of the station. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | rhhs ♦216 | OK I guess it was used to reverse the trains before Vitosha station was opened. I'll move them.What's your source for such information? I noticed that the subway tracks are shown as to the west of the centre of the road above, but in reality they appear to be in the centre, and a bit fur... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | That is correct, trains used it to reverse there before Vitosha metro station was constructed. It's a common practice to build 100-150 meters of tunnel after the current last station. In order for the trains to change the tracks, there must be a crossover (a.k.a. X switch). The left track is us... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | rhhs ♦216 | Thanks! The reserve train is easily visible on Sofia Airport metro station :) I'll make the changes as you suggested. | |
| 132362549 by Dimitar155 @ 2023-02-10 14:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | julcnx ♦478 | Thanks. I got confused with the order :) --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132362549 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | No worries, it happens :) | |
| 129717126 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-12-04 20:18 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | gurglypipe ♦1,056 | If you’re going to automatically resolve validator warnings, can you please constrain the edits to a small geographical area? Nobody is going to be able to review this changeset.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesetsCan you please also say *what* ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Sorry about the bbox, I didn't realise that I'm uploading all changes at once.The validator warning that I fixed are footway:* -> sidewalk:*, crossing=island -> crossing:island=yes, oneway=-1 -> oneway=yes (plus reversing the way and all "directional" tags), sloped_ker... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | gurglypipe ♦1,056 | Thanks for clarifying | |
| 129630442 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-12-02 06:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Diógenes de Sinope ♦187 | 👍🏽 |
| 129381676 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-11-25 20:15 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | Hm, was that really worth doing? It’s not like "8 kms" is supported (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features/Units), even if the wiki is permitting of plural time units. Wasn’t a typo of mine. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | There are different rules for maxstay (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxstay#Time_unit). | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | Maxstay wiki is written such that plurals are accepted for plural coefficients, not that plural is the only accepted form. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | The plural form is for numbers bigger than one. As you can see, I haven't changed "1 hour" to "1 hours". | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | "Valid units include: …, hour" - you aren't reading the same as me. You are interpreting the allowance of plural units as de facto. This is all fairly pointless when user agents have to support both forms. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | "Valid units include: …, hour ... and their plural form when the number is above one, e.g., 1 day, 2 days, 5 hours" | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | Sigh, your logic grip is poor. There's nothing there that says singular units are for use with singular coefficients. | |
| 8 | ~ 3 years ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | I meant ‘aren’t‘ | |
| 9 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Plural units are for plural coefficients => singular units are for singular coefficients. | |
| 10 | ~ 3 years ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | In normal language, perhaps. In computational tagging with defined values, change like this adds no value. | |
| 129392287 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-11-26 08:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | akr6n6s ♦1 | This is not a typo.Here is this pylon.https://disk.yandex.ru/i/_ue5bpDM_GYAyAThere are both the poles and the guy. So I settled on the option "yes | pole".Although it doesn't matter anymore. It has already been replaced with concrete. But the tag "guyed=pole" is ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | So everything is fine with the tags now, right? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | akr6n6s ♦1 | Yes. The guy was dismantled as unnecessary. So the tag "guyed=pole" is correct.Someday I'll get there and check it out. | |
| 126602986 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-09-25 05:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | pitscheplatsch ♦6,670 | Hi Dimitar155,I'm curious, is this a data import? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Hi Pascal,Technically it could be (assuming you classify adding a single protected zone an import). The nodes are part of https://www.osm.org/relation/14619347 but this changeset got only nodes since there are so many of them. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | pitscheplatsch ♦6,670 | Thanks for your answer. | |
| 127791808 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-10-19 16:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | rhhs ♦216 | Hi Dimitar, looks like you reverted the changes I made on that crossing yesterday. There is a path by which you can enter the road from the north side pavement of J. Bourchier, but no such path on the south side. That's why I removed the southern half of the crossing. Don't you think that&... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | You are right. I thought that there was a marked crossing there. I've made it as you suggested in your last sentence. | |
| 126561142 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-09-23 19:23 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Коментара на тази промяна трябваше да бъде "Унифициране на брандове". |
| 123692943 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-07-16 15:10 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | azakh-world ♦288 | Hi.Whatever company operates the metro system, the network name is still "Софийско метро".Best regards,Alexey |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Hello Alexey,I've checked the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dsubway) and in both companies which are given as examples (BVG and RMV) own the metro system or the company which operates it. The only diffrence is that I've put the full company name. "Софи... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | azakh-world ♦288 | Nobody requires the 'network' to be a legal entity, like 'name' should contain a commonly used name rather than a legal name in most cases.Try the query https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kcH and you'll see networks Métro de Paris, Pražské metro, London Undergroun... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Dimitar155 | Thank you for pointing it out. I've updated the network tag in NSI for the subway routes of Sofia to be "Софийско метро". | |
| 122305634 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-06-13 05:11 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | plamen ♦82 | Thanks. |
| 100166661 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-03-01 04:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | voschix ♦205 | This changeset made four islands in the River Adige invisible on the map:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354900135/,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355179237/,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706332903/,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355301401/ |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | voschix ♦205 | Furthermore, the River Zero ("Fiume" Zero in Italian) now has a different name on the river centre ("Fiume Zero") and on the riverbank ("Fluro Zero") - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912239873/ | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | Thanks for telling me about these mistakes. I've just fixed them. The only thing that I didn't fix is the first island that you mentioned since it wasn't visible on any imagery. I've also spotted another mistake which I will try to fix now. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | It looks like the fixes have rendered. You can see them herehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100541944https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100544331 | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | It looks you don't understand the differences between a waterway relation (a collection of not closed ways) and a multipolygon (a collection of closed ways) : you destroy a lot of good tags to put bad ones. maybe you should read the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon... | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | Thank you for pointing it out @Fred. I've looked through part of this changeset and I see some broken things. I will try and fix them. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I've fixed a few broken relations. It seems like you have dealt with most of the mistakes. Let me know if there is anything else that is wrong.Best regards,Dimitar | |
| 8 | ~ 4 years ago | Fred73000 ♦223 | Good work.Best regardsFred | |
| 121867197 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-06-02 20:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | gusfak ♦13 | Have you notice how the angles between buildings are are slightly skewed? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | gusfak ♦13 | Sorry for the typos:Have you noticed how the angles between buildings are all slightly skewed? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | Using Bing imagery they look mostly fine. They may be a few degrees off but I can't be so precise in their rotation in iD (nor I can check what's the difference in the angles). | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | gusfak ♦13 | Why don't map good buildings from hand with JOSM? | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I've used it before for mapping buildings and I didn't like it. For one, it's interface is terrible. There are far too many menus which take a lot of time from me to find what is where, same thing for the tools. The shortcuts are a nightmare for remembering since they are different fr... | |
| 119961998 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-04-20 16:21 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,191 | Hi,you used the new tag "emergency:highway=stop" here. This is not used in other places, what does it mean? Is it the sign that is in place in case the traffic lights don't work? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | Yes, it is the sign that is in place in case the traffic lights don't work. | |
| 119533637 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-04-10 12:22 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ManDay ♦13 | Cheers! |
| 118921455 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-03-25 17:46 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,802 | I see someone has marked https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715879092/history as private? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I've checked the cadastre and that road should be in public property. I've left a comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119052738. | |
| 118199660 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-03-07 14:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mueschel ♦7,191 | Hi,could you check this way, it got a strange tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037995523 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I've fixed it. Thank you for pointing it out. | |
| 118337524 by Dimitar155 @ 2022-03-10 19:52 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,901 | Hi Dimitar155,https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9569531605what type of place is this one? place=yes is quite generic |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | Sorry for the late reply, the email for this comment got lost somehow. It's a village. I've added place=village when I saw your note. | |
| 113941523 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-11-18 11:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | JeroenHoek ♦764 | Tip: it helps other mappers if you explain a little bit more in your changeset comment. For example:“Move away from deprecated value for sidewalk:left (none → no)” |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I usually make it like this but I haven't done it this time. I will keep it in mind. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | JeroenHoek ♦764 | Thanks! | |
| 112428814 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-10-12 17:51 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | David Rook ♦3 | tires is correct spelling in US "English" |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I know that "tires" is the correct spelling in the US English but it's accepted to use the UK English for keys. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | maro21 ♦884 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I'm also aware of the fact that this is quite a big changeset. I'm sorry about that. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | snoozingnewt ♦86 | Honestly, if *two* nodes are being edited it'd be much easier to get this done in two tiny changesets than one slightly bigger changeset that spans the entire world. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 years ago | David Rook ♦3 | Hmm. Your change came up while asking for history in a small town in Virginia. I assumed you were making a local change. Looks like you have a bigger problem - pun intended. | |
| 7 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | The changeset shoud've included only the node in Hawaii. I'm not sure from where the node in Russia came. Might've been some error or conflict that I didn't notice. | |
| 8 | ~ 4 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,505 | Using Level0 v1.2 de facto combines EVERYTHING edited in the last hour or two REGARDLESS if saved individually per node. Presume this was driven by maybe the latest key report where it's up front hard to see where the edits are taking place unless zooming out.Believe the key convention at OSM... | |
| 9 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | About your first part: I haven't occurred this issue so far because I try to edit and upload a few elements at a time which are close together (you can see my profile https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dimitar155/history). There is this one and another big changeset made by me using Level0 but ... | |
| 10 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | One tires of enormous changeset bounding boxes, and renewed arguments over tagging syntax.It becomes rather stiff, and inflexible.Can't we have a nice bouncy conversation, which gently rolls along?“Would they be looking for the key, they'd be pulling in both spellings&hel... | |
| 11 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | "The advantage of textual tagging is flexibility (new tags for new situations, without some long bureaucratic approval process). Only problem is, people come up with different ideas of how to do it."Is there a difference between the meaning of service:vehicle:tires and service:vehicle:... | |
| 12 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | “Is there a difference between the meaning of service:vehicle:tires and service:vehicle:tyres?”I don't know, I haven't examined it closely enough. However, in this case (context), probably not.Personally, I'd opt for tyres (regardless of popularity) because it avoi... | |
| 13 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | P.S. there's also a distinction between convergence & consensus.I agree with convergence (in principle, as an ideal), but not by force (which includes the tyranny of the majority).Sometimes converging on the optimal means breaking convention & consensus.Having rules set in s... | |
| 14 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I've read you whole reply but I won't reply to everything of it since my reply would be too big. The service:vehicle:* scheme was introduced by the iD editor. Before that it used the service key with ";" separation for multiple values. That solution wasn't the best one as yo... | |
| 15 | ~ 4 years ago | skquinn ♦812 | I agree that this should have been split into two changesets. The bounding box encompasses the entire continental US without a single change anywhere within it, as well as a huge chunk of Africa and almost all of Europe.I've always seen "curb" in US English, FWIW, never "kerb... | |
| 16 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | “The "issue" with the current way of work of iD is that anybody can write anything in the box and it will pull the closest match from taginfo. If there is no "tires" in taginfo, it won't suggest it. I'm "taking the firehose out of the house" by removing ... | |
| 17 | ~ 4 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,505 | Actually ID pulls many expired tag values thanks to the NDS or whatever the name is. This database is druiven By whats on OSM. Ut in de case of tyres, tested a car repair shop and it lists, yes, that one.Where i often get got out with is fat finger typos, farmland turns out famrland and the sugges... | |
| 18 | ~ 4 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,505 | Sorry for the spell and grammar... Came off the 7x4 phone display. | |
| 19 | ~ 4 years ago | skquinn ♦812 | This is the first time I have ever seen "Yankish" used as a term for US English. DuckDuckGo didn't return any useful results when I searched. Honestly, it's potentially confusing and may lead some to think you're talking about some other language entirely. "Yanks" ... | |
| 20 | ~ 4 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦579 | Lee's commentary is larger than this bounding box. | |
| 112324493 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-10-10 08:36 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Lee Carré ♦666 | Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | Sorry about that. I did try to make them smaller but this one has slipped. | |
| 111509674 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-09-21 18:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | The imagery I used is Bing |
| 109550334 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-08-12 06:21 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | King_Of_The_Road_BG ♦5 | @Dimitar155 the way this connection of entrance & exit of the underground parking is marked, allows the usage of the underground parking as an underground connection/tunnel below the boulevard. There are two ways of solving this routing problem:(1) By adding a max speed limit of 0.1 km/h (my a... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I've added access tags which restrict the usage of the underground roads to destination only. Your edits to the max speed are incorrect since the speed limit isn't 3 neither 0.3 kmph. You can see here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=42.64745%2C23... | |
| 109586795 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-08-12 17:31 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | Forgot to add the reverted changeset: 109431912 |
| 106548614 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-06-17 19:16 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq ♦514 | Check out note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2746734 |
| 106656831 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-06-20 08:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,908 | hi. do you understand why this relation even exists? it now repeats the tags of all its members, doesn't it? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dimitar155 | I'm assuming that this relation exits so that all ways of the river can be easily found. I know that all of it's members have the same tags but this is how it is. If they don't have their tags, they won't be rendered on the map. | |
| 105199885 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-05-24 06:32 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | This changeset was made by mistake. The actual changeset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105200232 |
| 103552722 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-04-24 20:50 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | The source imagery for the buildings is Bing aerial imagery. |
| 100093213 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-02-27 11:28 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | You're breaking perfectly working tags. It is clearly stated in wiki that waterway=riverbank is a perfectly working tag which should not be changed. Reverted changes in Lithuania. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | How am I breaking "perfectly working tags" and what even is "perfectly working tags"? There is no such definition in the wiki. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | The point is you are not "upgrading" any tags. You're just doing a pointless change removing tags which are perfectly fine. Therefore you're not doing anything good to this project. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | And it is also said in wiki that water tags should NOT be changed just for the sake of changing it. You're not doing any improvement to the map, just going around and changing to tags with the same meaning. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | Since when "guarding" a country from other editors is considered good for OSM? | |
| 6 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Since some people start "fixing" stuff which is not broken before getting to know OSM. | |
| 7 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | But you are fixing stuff that are not broken.. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | waterway=riverbank is a perfectly woriking tag and there is no "upgrade" for it. | |
| 9 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | natural=water + water=river is also perfectly working tag. Why wouldn't you want to use it? | |
| 10 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | The original is working very good and the new one does not add anything beneficial. General rule: do not touch things which work well and which you do not understand. Do not change things just in order to do some "change". | |
| 11 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | I see that you haven't seen what I've done in my changesets. I fix the numerous mistakes that were made years ago and no one has fixed them (like disconnected ways, accidentally moved nodes in ways, duplicated ways/nodes etc.). | |
| 12 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | No, you have changed a lot of objects which you have not fixed. And anyway, at the sime time you've decided that you, after spending less than a year in OSM, will force everybody else to use duplicate water tags instead of the ones we used for more than 15 years? Why? | |
| 13 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | There could be things that I have missed and there could be things that I can't fix since the imagery is not the best in some places. About your last question: it's not my decision. It is a project ran by another user. The goal is to unify the tagging system so that data consumers don'... | |
| 14 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | And thus you're doing damage to data consumers, who are using waterway=riverbank for 15 years or more. Ok, this has already wasted too much of my time. DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING in Lithuania. We want data QUALITY, not chaos created by clueless "unifiers". | |
| 15 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | These data consumers won't be here for a lot of time if they haven't changed anything in 15 years. If things don't change, this project will become even bigger chaos. Also you aren't the person to tell me what to do or not to do. | |
| 16 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Data consumers do not want change for the sake of change. The new schema you're forcing does not have ANY advantages. You will not be able to force such changes on larger countries as they also oppose such unprofessional actions. We are here for way more than you have been here and probably wil... | |
| 17 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | The only data consumer that doesn't want the change is you. The new schema does not have any advantages FOR YOU. The world DOES NOT spin around you or Lithuania. I do not enforce these changes since anyone can revert anything if they so desire. I don't know who are you referring by "w... | |
| 18 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Eventually you will grow up and learn not to point fingers when you enter the house. Or maybe not :-) | |
| 19 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | Are there any other countries that are guarded by people like you? Are there any projects except yours that rely on this exact tagging and doesn't want to support the newer standard? I don't think that any company or project that doesn't want to improve over time will not survive for... | |
| 20 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | There are pretty large countries where OSM users also think that duplicate water schema is not only giving no advantage, but has disadvantage from cartographic and mapping perspectives. Bye. | |
| 21 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | This is what we are trying to solve. We want to remove waterway=riverbank in order to not have duplicate water schema. I don't see where is the problem. | |
| 22 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Don't you think it is quite stupid to INTRODUCE duplicate schema and then try to "SOLVE" the duplication? This whole initiative of new water schema was introduced by nerds and is only pushed by nerds, it was never supported by anybody doing serious stuff. | |
| 23 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | I haven't introduced this schema. The problem wouldn't even exist if by creating the new schema, the old one was deprecated. Unfortunately it wasn't done, but if it doesn't get done now it won't get done. | |
| 24 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Google, young soldier, you will find way too many discussions about this same topic. And don't try to find one single truth as there can not be one. | |
| 25 | ~ 5 years ago | GoodClover ♦43 | All good data consumers support both schemas, as they have both existed for quite some time.If you're saying that there are some that don't support natural=water + water=river then I greatly urge you to add support for both schemas.There are large parts of the map that only use the new... | |
| 26 | ~ 5 years ago | GoodClover ♦43 | And if you're claiming you're opinion is more valid because you've got an older account please stop - that's bogus. | |
| 27 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | I'm saying that waterway=riverbank is a perfectly working schema and changing it to a duplicate one just for the sake of changing is stupid and pointless. Better do something useful. | |
| 28 | ~ 5 years ago | GoodClover ♦43 | In that case reverting every time someone does it is equally as pointless - especially when people also fix errors | |
| 29 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Lets call DWG and see what they think about doing semi-automated changes of tagging when it is clearly stated in wiki as well as stated multiple times on multiple mailing lists that this SHOULD NOT BE DONE. Changeset comment is not the place to discuss the tagging schemes, currently BOTH are valid a... | |
| 30 | ~ 5 years ago | Friendly_Ghost ♦658 | I'm just joining this discussion to call for more politeness and understanding to each other. I'm not going to point fingers at any person or action, but this behaviour is not what the OSM community is about. | |
| 31 | ~ 5 years ago | dieterdreist ♦905 | It is one thing to add (alternative) tags (possible as long as different keys are used) and another to remove tags without a need (not necessary if they use a different key). Edits like this, performed on a bigger scale (e.g. also in Italy) must be discussed before they are executed.Cheers,Marti... | |
| 32 | ~ 5 years ago | GoodClover ♦43 | It is documentedhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:ZeLonewolf/Procedure/River_modernizationHowever Lithuania is sticking to the old tagging, so it shouldn't be touched | |
| 33 | ~ 5 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,086 | Wiki has always been, is now, and will probably always stay a place for OPINION, not for authoritative stuff. Brian (ZeLonewolf) or Mateusz are lacking basic experience but baking huge amounts of pages/changes of low quality on wiki which few people actually read. Number of wikians agreeing with t... | |
| 34 | ~ 5 years ago | woodpeck ♦2,673 | With my DWG hat on:1. User ZeLoneWolf had initially not taken enough care to make sure that his approach isn't used in areas where it was not discussed with the community. This has meanwhile been remedied on the respective wiki page.2. User Dimitar155 has not used enough care in following... | |
| 101164988 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-03-17 07:07 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | The description should be "Added some natural areas in Lyulin 6" |
| 100375667 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-03-03 21:33 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Ale_Zena_IT ♦182 | Hello,it seems, seeing your cronology, you are pretty interested to the Italian waterways.Oh, you're probably doing an excellent work.But ...have you ever thougth to send a line or two to the Italian community?Cheer Alessandro |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | It looks like I've forgotten to do that. Where can I write to the Italian community? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Ale_Zena_IT ♦182 | https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it you need to be registered. But you can get in touch with the IT community in several different ways (forum, etc.) | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | I just submitted a post on the Italian forum. I will wait until it gets approved and get feedback before continuing with the changes. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | Ale_Zena_IT ♦182 | Thanks, Cheers Alessandro | |
| 100060517 by Dimitar155 @ 2021-02-26 15:39 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Dimitar155 | *Thessaly and Central Greece |