Kiana_Kaslana have been discussed with 5 replies of this OpenStreetMap ContributorKiana_Kaslana have been discussed with 5 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180850034 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2026-04-04 12:00 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Taksine ♦179 | 现在的一个难点是很多人把ID预设当成标准了，这类问题还要巡查很久 |
| 133963919 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2023-03-22 05:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | 残阳逐流 ♦21 | 个人作为OSM新人有些问题需要请教一下。为何高速公路的桥梁、隧道名称需要用标签“bridge:name=*”“tunnel:name=*”进行标注，而不能像国内一般商业地图一样，直接使用“name=*”进行标注？是有什么约定俗成... |
| 171032805 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2025-08-26 14:15 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | 残阳逐流 ♦21 | 446省道的扎窝隧道和红岩隧道早已通车多时了。本人先前在绘制347国道毛尔盖水电站库区沿岸路段的隧道群时，曾试图将这两座隧道一并绘制进地图中，但由于缺乏参考图层来源与隧道具体走向的数据，最终未能如愿。不知您是... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Kiana_Kaslana | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171682662 | |
| 171387923 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2025-09-03 04:40 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Claudius Henrichs ♦228 | Hi,I still think the correct tagging for the SkyShuttle should be monorail because it does not run on actual iron rails. In fact it is running on rubber wheels and the concrete guiderails serve just as that: guiding the rubber tyred vehicle on the concrete track. See the video here: https://youtu.... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Kiana_Kaslana | Then why not bus_guideway? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Kiana_Kaslana | Besides, its also running on 2 guiderails, monorail where? | |
| 170164170 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2025-08-08 16:10 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | lpf452 ♦7 | zh_CN: 嘿，Kiana_Kaslana 你好！我注意到了您在大竹县绘制的绕城 "construction=trunk" 和 "construction=secondary" 路，看起来精度不错，但是这条路目前在吉林一号和天地图的卫星图上均不可见。我十分好奇，想请问一下绘... |
| 165786303 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2025-05-04 07:17 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | 残阳逐流 ♦21 | 琪亚娜老师真乃OSM劳模也 |
| 162235864 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2025-02-07 08:48 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | NeisBot ♦7,369 | Hi Kiana_Kaslana, thank you for your contribution to the OSM project.Over your latest stretch of time, you've made at least 61 changesets with minimal or no meaningful comments.To enhance collaboration, please consider using the comment field to describe your map changes. This helps oth... |
| 158729663 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2024-11-04 08:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | 残阳逐流 ♦21 | 江习高速的S21编号貌似现在也是过时的了，在《重庆市高速公路网 命名、编号和里程编排方案 （2019—2035 年） （暂行）》里面江习高速跟合璧津高速合并为了编号S49，不过具体到路牌上怎么实施的就不是很清楚了 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Kiana_Kaslana | 重庆市方面已于2023年出台了新版《重庆市高速公路网规划（2023—2035年）》，且该规划出台后新开通的高速公路编号与19年编号方案不符（如S4渝遂复线、S1渝武高速），推测重庆市已经随23年新版高速路网规划同步实行了一套... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Kiana_Kaslana | 补充：https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1K84uebEcS/ 显示，实地实施为“渝高速S21江津至习水高速” | |
| 133286761 by Kiana_Kaslana @ 2023-03-04 11:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Kiana_Kaslana | changeset描述戳啦 并没有分离广泸高速道路关系嗷（ |