| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 185742060 by yelisey90 @ 2026-07-14 21:04 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Thanks for your comment |
| 185731990 by yelisey90 @ 2026-07-14 17:31 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Thank you for your comment. |
| 185732538 by yelisey90 @ 2026-07-14 17:41 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Thank you for your comment. Thank you. |
| 185731191 by yelisey90 @ 2026-07-14 17:18 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Adinurbekov ♦8 | Thank you for your attention |
| 184034829 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-12 22:14 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | McKulkin ♦48 | hi. is node/11986715547 safe enough now? Thanks. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | yelisey90 | Well, I didn't notice anything extraordinary at that point. Definitely safe for hiking. I don't remember exactly, maybe there are some obstacles for vehicles... But closer to the top the road has definitely been severly damaged by streams, which created gullies right in the middle of it; s... | |
| 184243514 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-17 20:01 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Thank you for the correction. |
| 184242972 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-17 19:46 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Thank you for the correction. |
| 184242875 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-17 19:43 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Thank you for the correction. |
| 184194506 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-16 18:06 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | birimkulova ♦19 | Hello! Thank you for your comment. Your remarks will be taken into account. Thank you. |
| 184003590 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-12 07:48 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | yelisey90 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5334191 |
| 183845291 by yelisey90 @ 2026-06-08 19:40 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | MappingMore ♦649 | Partially Revert of 183829781 |
| 182899520 by yelisey90 @ 2026-05-19 21:07 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | yelisey90 | fixed properly now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182974495 |
| 181397368 by yelisey90 @ 2026-04-16 06:49 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ffmp ♦20 | Hello, seems this changeset is wrong. Seehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181362737#c1584520 |
| 181018664 by yelisey90 @ 2026-04-07 20:09 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | MappingMore ♦649 | Revert of 181004257 |
| 180342115 by yelisey90 @ 2026-03-24 09:02 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opendcc ♦1,587 | Your logic (and tagging) is simply wrong. Logic: shop, hotel are keywords, not values. kindergarten is one possible value of the keyword amenity. Tagging: the entrance tag denotes the type of entrance, not the kind of craft or amenity behind this entrance. Add description or ref to give additional i... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | yelisey90 | Once again: as long at the *value* shop is used to denote the type of entrance — and it is used for that purpose both according to the wiki and de-facto, like "office", "hotel" etc. — I totally see no reason why "kindergarten" shouldn't be a similarly u... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | opendcc ♦1,587 | If everybody feels free to use any self-invented tagging schema, openstreetmap will die in chaos. The regular way: If you want to introduce new tagging values, apply for a consens among the mapper community - ie put a proposal on the list and let vote on this proposal. If you are not willing to work... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | yelisey90 | Huh, have all the users who had added 632 instances of entrance=office got reported? Or the users who added 574 instances of entrance=restaurant? 21 instances of entrance=hotel? 23 of toilets? 9 of museum? 7 of clinic?So what is your personal distaste of entrance=kindergarten that you start intimi... | |
| 180734252 by yelisey90 @ 2026-04-01 17:50 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Wildsharky ♦795 | Revert of 180728465 |
| 172414535 by yelisey90 @ 2025-09-24 22:26 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | xkillah ♦83 | Почему вдруг жилые улицы стали service alley ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | yelisey90 | Попробовал применить, чего в вики написано для service=alley:In some regions, chiefly in Europe, narrow streets in historic cities that provide access to the main entrances of buildings may also be mapped as alleys, distinguishing them from wider modern str... | |
| 179639340 by yelisey90 @ 2026-03-10 13:22 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | zuradv ♦1 | That site is not a source. This place is currently being planned. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | yelisey90 | https://maps.gov.ge/map/portal is the official source for street names. To view them, in the left menu select სამისამართო >სამისამართო მონაცემები . Only is cases when there are street signs that are newer than the information in th... | |
| 170607274 by yelisey90 @ 2025-08-18 10:01 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | surprizpw ♦1 | yes, but there is simply no sidewalk to walk on |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | Yup, and this is described by sidewalk=no tagging. A (theoretical) router may be set to ignore roads with such tagging. But otherwise, people are free to walk on the rightmost lane of the road, keeping close to the side. | |
| 165648532 by yelisey90 @ 2025-04-30 19:07 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | This is a duplicate of already existing object on this place => please, revert this changeset |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | hmm, the other object lacks historic=memorial tag. So the two objects should be merged | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | "Memorial" tag is always "historic" (from wiki), so I suppose it is optional/implied. Nevertheless, I have added it to the original object | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | "Memorial" tag is always "historic" (from wiki) — yes, but that's only because the only tag for mapping a memorial is "historic=memorial". The tag "memorial=obelisk" doesn't map anything by itself, it only specifies the type of a memorial; but ... | |
| 166688051 by yelisey90 @ 2025-05-24 09:43 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | nikusha ♦11 | ok |
| 164816244 by yelisey90 @ 2025-04-11 13:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Qotola ♦1 | Hi yelisey90. Here is a detailed plan of this building, which is clearly different: https://biota.ge/project/project_one/floor/1 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | Ooops! I've misidentified the photo that I had taken, it was actually of თეთრი კვადრატი ჯიქიაზე nearby.The present building is still invisible from over the fence. I've simplified its geometry and removed levels number for now: https://www.openstre... | |
| 163064856 by yelisey90 @ 2025-02-28 18:28 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | nikusha ♦11 | WTF are You doing? Look at the misplaced roads You returned. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | nikusha ♦11 | https://ibb.co/xK3GYgcthttps://ibb.co/V0bkP5gx | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | If the edit included only the shifting of node positions, I definitely wouldn't have reverted it. But it also changed "tracktype" — and most inexplicably removed "surface" — to give an impression that the road has an artificially improved surface, while the roads... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | nikusha ♦11 | More valuable information is whether the road is driveable by 4X4 crossover, Full 4X4 or modified 4X4 var. The road may have improved surface, but completely undriveable by crossover. | |
| 159790935 by yelisey90 @ 2024-11-30 23:15 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | fix boundary geometryhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159790969 |
| 158499561 by yelisey90 @ 2024-10-29 13:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ffmp ♦20 | JSOM report validation error on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304526745#map=17/41.914449/45.475963 : "type=multipolygon on a way. Should be used in a relation (1)."Likely mistype and need to remove this key-value, but I never worked with multipolygons so not sure. If you mean somet... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | Yes, I just accidentally copied this key-value from the relation in which this house was the only member. Thanks for notifying. | |
| 156308013 by yelisey90 @ 2024-09-07 10:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | literan ♦7,196 | зачем здесь outdoor_seating=no? это же не ресторан |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | Это бага последнего релиза ОМ. Во все редактируемые объекты, и даже в те, где ничего не редактируется, а только заметка оставляется, добавляется outdoor_seating=no. Ждём испр... | |
| 155143819 by yelisey90 @ 2024-08-12 11:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | Can you (or how can I) bring back the line of "not cliff"?I think, "natural=earth_bank" or "man_made=embankment" tags fit instead of a "cliff", reflecting there is no passage over the edge of the road and danger of falling.I can draw it again, but I w... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | BTW, thank you for restoring "area=yes" for cairns! | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | Is it really so steep that you can't cross it? I don't recall anything like that, but if you're sure, I believe you ;)Yes, you can either add embankment=right to a part of the road (but I think it won't be rendered anywhere), or restore the cliff line as an earth bank. You can ... | |
| 155796196 by yelisey90 @ 2024-08-26 18:10 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | *I vouch to revert this changesetDiscussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155785497 |
| 151908744 by yelisey90 @ 2024-05-27 16:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | Hi! Thanks for your effors in mapping the area.For this changeset, have you inspected the area from the ground or from aerial imagery?We spotted a conceptual error that you changed the basin to retaining walls. However, it is still a basin, albeit disused.If you changes were from the ima... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | Hi! As stated in the changeset "source" key, it was based on inspection from the ground.Which basin are you referring to? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1145130593 ? If yes, then first of all, I separated the outer line & the area: this should always be done when different propert... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Greg91 ♦28 | Oh, sorry! I have not looked at "source" of the changeset (not too experienced it that yet).I meant the biggest basin.I already did as you said: big basin is now disused:basin and small one is disused:pond.Thank you for your prompt reply!*Join our OSM Armenia group in Teleg... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | yelisey90 | WRT changes, I'll answer at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155785497 .WRT to invitation: thanks! I visit Armenia only occasionally, and for now it's enough for me to get all the flood from Georgia OSM chat... But I'll definitely bookmark it! | |
| 146410308 by yelisey90 @ 2024-01-18 15:34 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | literan ♦7,196 | это не почты. Корректный тег shop=outpostисправлю |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | yelisey90 | ага, знаю. Это самое близкое по смыслу, что позволяет поставить OM. Спасибо, что поправите ;) | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | literan ♦7,196 | ого, надо же, такой популярный тег, а у них нет. Надо написать issue. | |
| 135863479 by yelisey90 @ 2023-05-08 17:45 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | -Utiashvili ♦8 | Hi. Why did you delete the names? there is no such thing as "unofficial name" in OSM. Or how did you check what is official. People in the community use those names and you disturb them by deleting those. Please reverse all the names. |
| 137572517 by yelisey90 @ 2023-06-20 17:09 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksey Shikhov ♦1 | This mtb trail cannot be used for hiking (too steep). But ok, i won't argue. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | yelisey90 | It can be, I ran it downwards & walked it upward. Good shoes & poles are helpful ;) |