| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 189688157 by jjyach @ 2026-09-28 16:29 ~ 15 days ago | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | Oregonian3 ♦65 | I'm not going to start an edit war, but seems like this undid a lot of my changes from an hour prior without any comment on my changeset in this area or other notice to me. Was this intentional, or a result of an edit conflict? Would you be able to provide a reason that you undid these? I can p... |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | jjyach | These were just noted differences from road use plans done by the City of Aurora and Arapahoe County based on their tiered systems of how these roads are intended to be used. Namely if there are no driveways on a road and it's purpose is to flow traffic from neighborhoods to collectors or high... | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | Oregonian3 ♦65 | That's definitely fair, and I'll keep this in mind. There are some that I might disagree with (e.g. upgrading Himalaya between Quincy and Hampden to secondary since it doesn't even have a center line), but not worth edit warring over.I'd appreciate if you can leave a changese... | |
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | jjyach | That section is just an odd doughnut hole of unincorporated Arapahoe County squished between Centennial and Aurora. It has high traffic counts but is neglected by the county and it has far more cars traversing it than the section south of Quincy. Since road categories feed into routing algorithms ... | |
| 181935891 by jjyach @ 2026-04-28 11:33 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Flap Slimy Outward ♦385 | Hello, please do not map "express" lanes if there is no physical barrier between them and the main road. Bing Maps Aerial shows that paint is the only separator between the express lanes and the "main" lanes. Please read this for more info: https://osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | jjyach | I understand but you marked the express lanes as hov and they are only tolls not hov. CDOT is also proposing putting in physical dividers onto them to cut off lane crossers. This is also keeping it consistent with all of the other express lanes on I-70 and I-25. Your changes were screwing up rout... | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | pwbriggs ♦507 | When mapped as a single way, change:lanes=* and other *:lanes=* tags can be used to accurately represent the situation on-the ground.If there are not physical barriers on the ground, this should likely be a single way in each direction. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | jjyach | There are not yet any physical barriers, but they are under serious discussion to be implemented soon per CDOT's CTIO office. I am open to mapping it any which way, but regardless there needs to be tags/markings to signify that the left lanes are tolled | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | pwbriggs ♦507 | Good to know | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | Flap Slimy Outward ♦385 | Here's how to tell OSM that the leftmost two lanes of a six-lane freeway are tolled:lanes=6toll:lanes=yes|yes|no|no|no|nochange:lanes=yes|not_right|not_left|yes|yes|yesI hope this helps! | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | jjyach | Okay I will clean up | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | jjyach | and thanks. Sorry for the confusion, but the routing needed the tolls back at least now for folks | |
| 9 | ~ 5 months ago | pmckay419 ♦20 | I'm not super familiar with the rules for freeway mapping since I mostly map 4x4 roads, but I would think the express lanes on C470 should be mapped separately. They are separated from the free lanes by double white lines it's illegal to cross and have designated entry and exit points... | |
| 10 | ~ 5 months ago | pwbriggs ♦507 | Honestly I think it would be better supported if they were separate ways. But, according to convention, the way to designate the entry-exit points is change:lanes=* | |
| 182085046 by jjyach @ 2026-05-01 17:07 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | PomeloOnPizza ♦10 | Oh |
| 182053739 by jjyach @ 2026-04-30 23:29 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Flap Slimy Outward ♦385 | Thank you for fixing these! If and when CDOT decides to add a physical barrier, feel free to revert this (or my) changeset(s) so we can keep the history. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | jjyach | I will try to get the westbound done today | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | jjyach | And complete | |
| 181935412 by jjyach @ 2026-04-28 11:23 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | pwbriggs ♦507 | Be aware, this changeset and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/181935891 are now under discussion at https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1777565665812389. If you don't have an account there, you can sign up at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ |
| 176681386 by jjyach @ 2025-12-31 17:26 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | lolimjoshingyou ♦2 | One of the reasons I started isolating out unit numbers in strip malls is because the units generally stay the same much longer than the occupants. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | jjyach | Then change the business to an address if it changes or is empty, Otherwise things are double tagged, and you do not have the full address. Just putting a unit address with no other details throws constant QA errors and is unacceptable to do like that on here. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | jjyach | It's also better to change the existing node too to preserve it's history rather than deleting and re-creating | |
| 63540917 by jjyach @ 2018-10-15 12:43 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 | These parking lot areas should be combined. It should be one large area that is connected to a roadway and encompasses almost all the parking spots. Individual spots can be mapped, but it should be individual, and not bunches of spots like this.You can read up on it here:https://wiki.openstr... |
| 165331683 by jjyach @ 2025-04-23 12:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | CurlingMan13 ♦2,101 | These parking lot areas should be combined. It should be one large area that is connected to a roadway and encompasses almost all the parking spots. Individual spots can be mapped, but it should be individual, and not bunches of spots like this.You can read up on it here:https://wiki.openstr... |
| 161358107 by jjyach @ 2025-01-14 20:14 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | jjyach | Renamed C-470 Trail Route to be 470 Trail as it uses elements of the E-470 Trail |
| 159089514 by jjyach @ 2024-11-13 12:32 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | GarliccBread1 ♦10 | Please do not undo edits if you aren’t aware of the current road alignment, or mapping practices. Good mapping practice says that unless physically separated from the road, lanes should not be mapped independently from each other, all the right turn lanes mapped along Parker and Arapahoe rd ma... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | jjyach | This is done this way for nav/routing systems to alert people to the junction and to make the lane change. This is how it is done all across the map so it it being consistent with everywhere else. It may look messy but it does a function. I live right here and driver this daily. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | jjyach | I reverted your change back but also fixed the routing error you caused that prompted my change as you did not adjust the lanes, nor turn the restrictions on the lanes which threw that error | |
| 157764567 by jjyach @ 2024-10-11 16:24 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | GarliccBread1 ♦10 | Hi, I don’t believe these were low quality edits, I am a local here, I actually went to that high school a couple years back and, those are the gate road names specified by the school. Google and Waze both show them along with school provided gate names, these are the actual names of the entra... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | jjyach | That is indeed true however on here we do not treat these as road names. You in this case have to use a main entrance tag with a name | |
| 123042209 by jjyach @ 2022-06-30 11:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | watmildon ♦319 | Hello! I've been adding ballot drop boxes in Arapahoe county and was greatly helped by the one you added here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9857971901/history#map=19/39.595986/-104.735573) I have adjusted the tagging slightly but wanted to let you know I bumped into it!Happy mapping!\... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | jjyach | You are greatly welcome! I used it years ago and remember it not being straightforward to find especially when dark out. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | watmildon ♦319 | Yes! This was my experience here in WA so I'm kinda on a mission. If there's a few I can't track down in the area I may ping you to see if you want to do some surveying. ;-) Currently, finding the one listed as "Arapahoe County Fairgrounds" is driving me bonkers. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | watmildon ♦319 | Addresses for the 4 remaining and elusive Arapahoe County drop boxes: 25690 E. Quincy Ave. Aurora, CO 8001618150 E. Vassar Pl. Aurora, CO 800136060 S. Quebec St. Greenwood Village, CO 801114810 E. County Line Rd. Littleton, CO 80126 | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | jjyach | Here you go, I got the fairground one.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156814456I will try and see if I can get the remaining ones | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | jjyach | Okay I got the others on Vassar/Quebec, but according to https://www.arapahoevotes.gov/voter-service-polling-centers there is no ballot box there on County Line Road, though that technically is in Douglas County | |
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | watmildon ♦319 | It's great how obvious that fairground one is once you've place the node on it! Great work.I got my list from this page https://www.arapahoevotes.gov/ballot-drop-locations which does have the County Line one listed. | |
| 8 | ~ 2 years ago | watmildon ♦319 | Found it!https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12187343861/history | |
| 9 | ~ 2 years ago | jjyach | Nicely done! | |
| 155526453 by jjyach @ 2024-08-20 19:28 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | mtmail ♦174 | Do you remember if https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12122850157 was a waste=dog_excrement (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Awaste%3Ddog_excrement) maybe? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | jjyach | It's just a regular trash can. I removed the extra incorrect tag | |
| 152287538 by jjyach @ 2024-06-05 13:07 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ivanbranco ♦2,947 | Hi jjyach,what's the meaning of operator:wikidata=14603? It's not a valid Q-item value, maybe it's supposed to be a ref=* value?thanks and good mapping :) |
| 37543214 by jjyach @ 2016-03-01 14:00 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦11,265 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4034739794/history has shop = machine that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)shop=machine ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values -... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | jjyach | It appears to be a place that will manufacture things for outside customers as a service. Maybe be better suited for a factory type tag | |
| 75717876 by jjyach @ 2019-10-15 12:03 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | marc__marc ♦1,509 | Hello,take care that practice_pitch is with a _ in stead of a whitespace.you are welcome to add the sport that can be play on those training pitch :)I'm not able to guest it using the aerial imageryRegards,Marc |
| 47620072 by jjyach @ 2017-04-10 11:56 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | DUGA ♦552 | Does it have a name? If not, you should name it as "unamed":https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485848464/history#map=19/39.55006/-104.82856 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | DUGA ♦552 | sorry, you should *not*. | |
| 86190605 by jjyach @ 2020-06-04 12:47 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | Howdy :) Thank you for your additions to the map. You may not be aware, but parking areas need to be accessible by some type of road. If they are not, vehicles cannot route to them and they pop up as an error on quality assurance tools. Can you add access to these parking areas? Cheers :) https://wi... |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | jjyach | They have a parking aisle, is that not enough? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | Adamant1 ♦222 | Not to get involved, but in situations like this it's better to map the parking lot as one large area per the "One feature, one OSM element" guideline. Whatever the QA tools think about parking aisles BTW, it sounds more like a problem with the QA tools IMO. There's nothing t... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | Howdy. Thank you for your responses :)The OSM wiki on amenity=parking says,“Do also note that roads, footways, etc. into the parking area should connect to each other within the parking area, not only to the edge of the parking area (a very common mistake).”The key phrase here ... | |
| 5 | ~ 6 years ago | Adamant1 ♦222 | "The key phrase here being, “within the parking area”"The other stuff aside, because I don't want to turn this into a long diatribe, the parking aisles aren't within the parking lots. So, there shouldn't be a problem with the QA tools anyway. They must have a... | |
| 6 | ~ 6 years ago | jjyach | Hey I'll map it however you guys think is best. Funny that none have been flagged before when I've mapped it like this. Usually I do it like this to help better map handicapped lots. Which tool btw flagged it? Thanks for the comments guys! | |
| 7 | ~ 6 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | No probs. I doubt your specific edits here are flagged yet, but they will be ;) It’s takes a day or two for the QA tool to update. The QA tool is Osmose. It's quite good. If you click the link below, you can see the errors for edits very similar to yours, but made by a different user. Whe... | |
| 72021289 by jjyach @ 2019-07-08 16:09 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you added a proposed element. This is popping up as an error on QA tools. Just so you know, the correct way to tag proposed elements is; "The way to tag planned features is to use the main tag (Key, e.g. highway, railway, amenity... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | jjyach | Fixed. Need to check as construction might have begun already on this. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | jjyach | Which QA tools are you usually using? I'm finding some take a while to update. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | I use OSM Inspector, https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/keep right, https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=39.95356&lon=-75.12364and osmose.openstreetmap.frOSM Inspector updates about every 24 hours | |
| 64936006 by jjyach @ 2018-11-27 13:07 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | Howdy, thank you for your additions to the map. I'm wondering about "Diesel Repair & Performance" which you've addressed as being on Pine Lane. I don't see a Pine Lane anywhere near here. Also, the node is place in an area of grass. Is this correct? Thank you :) |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | looking at the v2 node details to see it has a location difference but little else from v1, i somehow suspect this to be the sort of inadvertent node pull that happens rather often with editor iD.Viewing the actual visual representation of what changed in https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?change... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | I'd say that's pretty good detective work. I'll wait to hear back from jjyach. Thanks ;) | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | by the way, i then took a look at a dozen or so random items in this general area, and every single entity was indeed from jjyach two years or more ago and of a high standard.so not a real puzzler for me anymore... :-) | |
| 5 | ~ 7 years ago | jjyach | It has actually moved locations to a new shop area. I still need to get the new address. | |
| 6 | ~ 7 years ago | jjyach | I have updated the address and moved the node over it's building in a new edit. Nice catch chacha. | |
| 7 | ~ 7 years ago | chachafish ♦462 | Thanks for following up :) | |
| 37388692 by jjyach @ 2016-02-23 13:21 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | russdeffner ♦43 | Hi jiyach, it seems you marked large areas with the building tag; I think you want to delineate the 'neighborhood' and that is better with the landuse key. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse |
| 2 | ~ 10 years ago | jjyach | Yes, thank you for fixing that. I fixed a few others as well | |
| 33126201 by jjyach @ 2015-08-05 12:12 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | Stevestr ♦8 | Hi, I am the person who originally edited this path. This path is not exclusive for bike use - therefore should it just be left a general path instead of a cycleway? Curious about your thoughts. |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | jjyach | I know the city, and especially the county do generally consider it to be a designated bike path (Trail width and fundingwise). This feeds into other sites who use the designation for routing info(Strava).Generally I know this community OSM tens to use bike paths as a way to show where bikes ar... | |
| 3 | ~ 11 years ago | Stevestr ♦8 | Hey thanks for the response. I just wanted to make sure there was some consistency too. I see that Cycle Routes can be set to allow pedestrians and you're probably right that this will primarily be used as a bike route. Thanks for the clarification. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 years ago | jjyach | No worries! Also not sure if it was you or someone else, but bikelanes can be tracked on the road they are on.Select the road, and under "tags" type in cycleway and select "lane" if on both sides. If it wasn't you, my appologies. I just noticed some created. |