Changeset No. Date Contributor Comment
12018-01-03 12:01:44 UTCDigne Hi km2bp,

That's quite a changeset. I looked through it briefly and it looks good. Nice detailing.

One small remark: I see you included a name on the recyclages here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5312432527. But I'd advise against doing so, as this information is already captured in the o...
22018-01-14 18:37:31 UTCkm2bp Ok Thank you.
12018-01-03 17:11:02 UTCMartin Borsje Hallo,

Je commentaar is wat cryptisch; het lijkt er op dat je een weg gewijzigd hebt gebaseerd op een gps track.
Binnen de bebouwde kom levert dat meestal een onbevredigend resultaat op wegens de beperkte nauwkeurigheid.
Daar zijn betere bronnen voor, bijvoorbeeld de BGT-kaart.

Ik heb e.e.a...
22018-01-10 21:34:37 UTCkm2bp Ja, daarom bewaar ik de GPS-track met twee telefoons
32018-01-10 21:36:30 UTCMartin Borsje En zelfs dan is de info van BGT nog steeds veel beter dan de twee GPS-tracks van een smartphone...:-)
12018-01-03 12:11:34 UTCDigne Please try not to move the adress information from the node to the area of the building. In the Netherlands adress information is generally stored on nodes instead of buildings. I'll revert that part of the changeset. Other than that, nice work.
22018-01-10 21:30:54 UTCkm2bp I understood
12018-01-03 12:06:48 UTCDigne This review request was also still open. I went through it briefly, it looks good. I've no remarks.
22018-01-10 21:30:16 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 12:16:46 UTCDigne No remarks here. (Just a reply to close the review request).
22018-01-10 21:27:25 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 12:20:26 UTCDigne No remarks here, good work. Again just a reply to close the review request.
22018-01-10 21:27:09 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 19:52:14 UTCDigne This review request was still open. I've got no remarks. It looks fine.
22018-01-10 21:26:51 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 19:54:21 UTCDigne This review request was still open. I've got no remarks. It looks fine.
22018-01-10 21:26:36 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 19:56:24 UTCDigne This review request was still open. I've got no remarks. It looks fine.
22018-01-10 21:26:25 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 19:59:23 UTCDigne This review request was still open. I've got no remarks. It looks fine.
22018-01-10 21:26:10 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 20:01:30 UTCDigne Small remark here: I see you added a name to the waste baskets here, but I doubt they are actually named a number. ref=* is probably a more suitable tag than name=*.
22018-01-10 21:25:48 UTCkm2bp Am using the numbers on the name tag because ref = * tag. it is not visible in the mobile application. I like topographic maps. Numbering as a name is sometimes good. I use mobile application Maps.me. I often add a different video guide to the maps. An example of how to act in practice. https://you...
12018-01-03 20:06:34 UTCDigne Again a small remark on the name tag of this artwork: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5314505751

I doubt the artwork is actually called horse. Please consider using description:en=* instead of name=*
22018-01-10 19:54:04 UTCkm2bp Done. name:en=horse https://goo.gl/maps/sXLnNMyXiv42
12018-01-03 20:11:31 UTCDigne I don't think Bouwjaar/ Geplaatst 1880 adds anything to the name. It simply means built/placed in 1880, which is already represented in the start_date tag.
22018-01-10 19:44:39 UTCkm2bp I will leave it this way, because this is the inscription on this cross
12018-01-03 20:13:08 UTCDigne Again I think the numbers on the name tag are better off as a reference on the ref=* tag.
22018-01-10 19:41:05 UTCkm2bp Am using the numbers on the name tag because ref = * tag. it is not visible in the mobile application. I like topographic maps. Numbering as a name is sometimes good. OSM should also have the Tourist Map layer. Thank you !
12018-01-03 20:14:17 UTCDigne No remarks here. It all looks fine.
22018-01-10 19:25:46 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 20:15:29 UTCDigne No remarks here. It all looks fine.
22018-01-10 19:25:23 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 20:17:58 UTCDigne Looks good, no remarks here.
22018-01-10 19:24:49 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 20:19:36 UTCDigne No remarks here. The changeset looks fine.
22018-01-10 19:23:13 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 20:23:12 UTCDigne Again no remarks. Just a reply to close the review request.
22018-01-10 19:22:35 UTCkm2bp ok
12018-01-03 20:21:31 UTCDigne No remarks here. It looks fine.

You could add a access=private tag for the backyard pools.
22018-01-10 19:21:43 UTCkm2bp Ok "private pool" thank you
12018-01-03 20:41:37 UTCDigne Last one and again no remarks. Just a reply to close the review request.
22018-01-03 20:48:27 UTCDigne One minor thing: I noticed you added a tunnel to go under a roof. covered=* is more appropiate. I made a change to reflect that.

32018-01-10 19:18:48 UTCkm2bp Ok covered=* is more appropiate. thank you
12018-01-03 20:29:54 UTCDigne Again no remarks. Just a reply to close the review request.
12017-11-24 20:22:46 UTCFredrikLindseth This "Ahmaddiyya" sounds like a strange name for the muslim graveyard. Is that is name or is it possily description or denomination or something? Search engines give me no relevant hits
22017-11-26 21:44:11 UTCkm2bp https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48409248 Denne delen av kirkegården er for muslimer. Og har et navn Ahmadiyya. Bilde https://www.flickr.com/photos/jan-tore/4225441971 Hilse!
12017-10-25 10:03:11 UTCLeTopographeFou Hi km2bp, I was recently in St Peter's basilica (Vatican) and where not able to localize the amenities you've mapped there (drinking point, post box...). Do you remind at which level they were ? Assuming level=0 is the basilica, -1 the pope's tombs and -2 the necropole
22017-11-17 14:24:50 UTCkm2bp This is located on the roof. You can go there while visiting the Vatican museum https://youtu.be/-mIMaM8iB1c?t=6m59s
32017-11-20 20:28:20 UTCLeTopographeFou Ok, thank you! I've seen you put layer=3 but I replaced to level=3 which is more suitable to indicate floor levels (whereas layer is only for rendering purposes)
12017-11-19 21:11:52 UTCRicoElectrico Ale to przecież nie ma sensu. ŚJ mają własną stronę, do tego widoczną na każdej sali chyba.
22017-11-20 00:19:07 UTCkm2bp Nie mniej jednak może to być ciekawa lektura dla ludzi którzy będą do tej sekty werbowani za pośrednictwem mapy trafią na informacje jakże odmienne od tych które świadkowie Jehowy sami podają o sobie . Z tego co mi wiadomo to oni nie są zbyt internetowi. Czasu na to nie maj...
12017-11-16 16:40:43 UTCMarc_ch Hello,
4 and 94 aren't a name of an hydrant. it is enought to put the ref number in the ref tag.
Regards,
Marc
22017-11-17 14:32:42 UTCkm2bp Thanks . Not just the "ref". Because in the application Maps.me Hydrant will not have a name https://youtu.be/NhHVryVie8M Regards.
32017-11-18 18:52:38 UTCMarc_ch Hello,
I test maps.me on a hydrant that have a ref in stead of a fake name, it work fine. what 's the problem you try to fix with name tag ?
Regards,
Marc
12017-11-16 20:35:33 UTCNoen Hei!
Det ser ut til at du har tegnet oppgjørselene oppe på gang og sykkelveien. Det blir feil måtte og gjøre ting på, fordi du får overlappende veier. Splitt eller opp gangveien, og gjør om på den når nødvendig.
22017-11-17 14:41:20 UTCkm2bp Jeg korrigerte det bare http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53202543
32017-11-17 14:48:42 UTCkm2bp Og her er tilgangsveien til eiendommen på sykkelstien https://goo.gl/maps/Aezaj4ZWuyA2
12017-10-14 07:38:42 UTCmaraf24 Poprzednia wersja była całkowicie wystarczająca:)
12017-09-19 08:36:18 UTCmaraf24 Zobacz tę uwagę: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1145084
Możliwe?
22017-09-21 06:45:03 UTCkm2bp Altana gdy ją widziałem w maju była w złym stanie technicznym, dlatego przychylnie rozpatrzyłem uwagę że "rozebrana" Być może na to miejsce powstanie nowa , a wtedy ktoś będzie musiał dodać ją do mapy.
32017-09-21 10:39:47 UTCmaraf24 Dzięki:)
12017-08-22 10:12:20 UTCDenisJu Hello km2bp!
You marked a node as a information board with the name "Road invested by Czech Embassy"!
Can you be more detailed please?
Any links/info for this investment?
I didn't find this information board two weeks ago!
Best Regards
Denis
----------
https://www.openstreetmap.or...
22017-08-23 17:06:10 UTCkm2bp 1 files have been published for processing. You will get an email when the images are live on Mapillary.

Meanwhile, you can upload more if you want.
32017-08-23 17:15:31 UTCkm2bp I sent a photo
42017-08-23 19:28:36 UTCkm2bp https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=WCGJ0-8ahMLiyFpzptyBSQ&focus=photo&lat=42.37748083333332&lng=19.794699722222276&z=17

12017-01-05 15:44:47 UTCmarczoutendijk proszę zatrzymać edycji i skontaktować się z forum. Powodem jest to, że wiele tagów z innych mappers zmianie bez konsultacji z nimi. Autostrada = ścieżek rowerowych jest zły tag dla tras MTB. To musi być zrobione z relacjami.

Please read:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic...
12017-01-04 13:43:54 UTCCommodoortje Fixed crossing ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30818267
12017-01-04 13:32:41 UTCCommodoortje fixed connection with path.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4583711257
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463054610
12016-12-23 13:10:35 UTCGazer75 Please don't alter roads that have already been improved with data from Kartverket and/or NVDB. Unless you use an industrial grade GPS, or the road have changed significantly, data from Kartverket will always be better quality.
12016-11-13 22:21:17 UTCkm2bp chodników
12016-08-04 21:19:32 UTCbotdidier2020 hi,
i found some ways exactly duplicated (same geometry and tags) in this changest like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431670149/history
and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431623170/history
12016-04-19 11:48:10 UTCpoornibadrinath Hey, @km2bp
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about O...
12016-03-18 22:13:05 UTCmaraf24 A jakie jest źródło tych ścieżek, bo odbiegają nieco od faktycznego przebiegu?
12016-03-17 09:50:30 UTCmaraf24 Zmiany wycofane.
Jeśli chcesz coś takiego robić, najpierw przedyskutuj to tutaj
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
39 changeset(s) created by km2bp have been discussed with a total of 75 comment(s)