ika-chan! have been discussed with 34 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributorika-chan! have been discussed with 34 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 188333703 by ika-chan! @ 2026-08-31 22:29 ~ 7 days ago | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | ika-chan! | Revert of changesets 188331283, 188331373, 188332258, 188332342 and 188332524 (vandalism, the last one added a Nazi swastika). |
| 187473738 by ika-chan! @ 2026-08-15 07:00 ~ 24 days ago | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | ika-chan! | Dang it, the source was supposed to be Esri as usual. |
| 187263482 by ika-chan! @ 2026-08-11 05:20 ~ 28 days ago | 1 | ~ 28 days ago | ika-chan! | For context, the time zone polygons, which span multiple countries, had gaps that needed to be closed. |
| 187227911 by ika-chan! @ 2026-08-10 12:10 ~ 28 days ago | 1 | ~ 28 days ago | ika-chan! | Partial revert or modification of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187124661 (they are valid NUTS regions and can be mapped as such). |
| 187109435 by ika-chan! @ 2026-08-07 22:02 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | ika-chan! | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187090024 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187089891 (road type changed against consensus). |
| 2 | ~ 30 days ago | 5mister7 ♦16 | Yes yes yes, Why are random roads, like the EO5 a trunk road, Fuck you | |
| 3 | ~ 30 days ago | 5mister7 ♦16 | *EO3* | |
| 4 | ~ 30 days ago | jimkats ♦84 | Language mister, don't be so inappropriate. And from a previous changeset it seems you live in Serbia, so I don't think you know how road classification in Greece works. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Greece/Highways | |
| 5 | ~ 29 days ago | 5mister7 ♦16 | Yea i live in Serbia because it is my home country. The Serbian classifications works like this: IA roads = motorways | IM roads = trunks | IB roads = primary | IIA roads = secondary | IIB roads = tertiary | IB, IIA and IIB roads that are expressways = trunk. Also i sometimes edit in other countries... | |
| 6 | ~ 29 days ago | 5mister7 ♦16 | Might not be accurate though | |
| 186448350 by ika-chan! @ 2026-07-27 10:32 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | 0000FF berries ♦142 | Καλησπέρα ika-chan! :)Πρώτ' απ' όλα να πω ότι δεν μπορώ τις εταιρείες SEO &pi... |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | 0000FF berries ♦142 | Κι επίσης ευχαριστώ, που φροντίζεις να είναι καθαρά τα δε&del... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | ika-chan! | Hello, I think that on this occasion, the addition was spam: I remember that OpenStreetMap does not like these kind of edits where businesses add themselves with obvious advertising in description=* or note=*. It is likely they are a home business or a business with no physical presence.I report... | |
| 186179606 by ika-chan! @ 2026-07-22 13:55 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | ika-chan! | See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/report-vandalism-or-concerns-about-edits-here/4223/240 |
| 186007060 by ika-chan! @ 2026-07-19 13:16 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | ika-chan! | The changeset comment parser seems to autocorrect "highway = *_link" badly. |
| 185937226 by ika-chan! @ 2026-07-18 03:00 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | ika-chan! | For context, all three main imageries (Bing, Esri and Mapbox) do not show the filter road. If the change in road layout occurred very recently, please use source="Survey of 2026-MM-DD" on affected ways and do the same for the changeset's source. We err on the side of caution due to a ... |
| 182624022 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-13 23:30 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | The proposed road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690813874 was also pulled due to insufficient progress in years. IMO, it only makes sense to add proposed roads when the construction contract is signed and construction is imminent. |
| 182383193 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:38 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 132008203, 132007922, 132007851, 132007575, 131932356, 131391070, 131300605, 131300490 and 131046925 (unexplained removal of map data over a long period of time). |
| 182381806 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:09 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | Apparently, JOSM's upload selection feature doesn't recognise elements I deleted, as part of repairs to the map data. |
| 182381461 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:01 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 140351621, 139649465, 138552150, 138461084, 138458109, 138451374, 138009637, 137921299, 136149904, 136149871, 135705249, 135039503, 134560203, 132081569, 132066325, 132066205, 132066187, 132066107, 132044735, 132008723, 132008526, 132008457, 132008455... |
| 182381454 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:01 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 140351621, 139649465, 138552150, 138461084, 138458109, 138451374, 138009637, 137921299, 136149904, 136149871, 135705249, 135039503, 134560203, 132081569, 132066325, 132066205, 132066187, 132066107, 132044735, 132008723, 132008526, 132008457, 132008455... |
| 182381444 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:01 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 140351621, 139649465, 138552150, 138461084, 138458109, 138451374, 138009637, 137921299, 136149904, 136149871, 135705249, 135039503, 134560203, 132081569, 132066325, 132066205, 132066187, 132066107, 132044735, 132008723, 132008526, 132008457, 132008455... |
| 182381434 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:00 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 140351621, 139649465, 138552150, 138461084, 138458109, 138451374, 138009637, 137921299, 136149904, 136149871, 135705249, 135039503, 134560203, 132081569, 132066325, 132066205, 132066187, 132066107, 132044735, 132008723, 132008526, 132008457, 132008455... |
| 182381422 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 13:00 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 140351621, 139649465, 138552150, 138461084, 138458109, 138451374, 138009637, 137921299, 136149904, 136149871, 135705249, 135039503, 134560203, 132081569, 132066325, 132066205, 132066187, 132066107, 132044735, 132008723, 132008526, 132008457, 132008455... |
| 182380247 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 12:30 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 157086899, 156709537, 156700105, 154486246, 154408688, 151530890, 148619181, 148619026, 148618912, 148618839, 146386706, 146386647, 146386591, 146386523, 146386514, 146386458, 145453446, 142480446, 142241150, 141691165, 141341609, 141118368, 140810669... |
| 182380240 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 12:30 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 157086899, 156709537, 156700105, 154486246, 154408688, 151530890, 148619181, 148619026, 148618912, 148618839, 146386706, 146386647, 146386591, 146386523, 146386514, 146386458, 145453446, 142480446, 142241150, 141691165, 141341609, 141118368, 140810669... |
| 182378972 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 11:55 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 160857496, 160857257, 160856998, 160626062, 160626010, 160625797, 160625585, 160625501, 160625460, 158852511, 158852277, 158335130, 158335022, 158334901, 158334831, 158321482, 158321262, 158321015, 157607764, 157473665, 157471035, 157470511, 157470387... |
| 182378700 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 11:48 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 160857496, 160857257, 160856998, 160626062, 160626010, 160625797, 160625585, 160625501, 160625460, 158852511, 158852277, 158335130, 158335022, 158334901, 158334831, 158321482, 158321262, 158321015, 157607764, 157473665, 157471035, 157470511, 157470387... |
| 182378661 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 11:48 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 160857496, 160857257, 160856998, 160626062, 160626010, 160625797, 160625585, 160625501, 160625460, 158852511, 158852277, 158335130, 158335022, 158334901, 158334831, 158321482, 158321262, 158321015, 157607764, 157473665, 157471035, 157470511, 157470387... |
| 182377591 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 11:22 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 168451327, 168451233, 167028857, 167028655, 167010097, 163278723, 161614208, 161614089, 161613945 and 160857989. |
| 182377071 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-08 11:07 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | This changeset reverts part or all of changesets 182339934, 182337246, 182337057, 180666666, 179851320, 176961714, 174575534, 174575332, 173785558, 173785532, 173785380, 173785114, 173785011 and 173784920 for unexplained removal of map data. |
| 182227827 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-05 01:12 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | Manual revert of changeset 180950166 (reason in this changeset's comment). |
| 182175144 by ika-chan! @ 2026-05-03 19:08 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | Revert of changeset 181895552 as the proposal is likely imaginary or speculative. |
| 182051827 by ika-chan! @ 2026-04-30 21:47 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | Correction of 182024293 (wrong classification). |
| 181718724 by ika-chan! @ 2026-04-23 13:28 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | Partial revert of 181690183. |
| 106331322 by ika-chan! @ 2021-06-14 11:08 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | Καλησπέρα, αναρωτιέμαι για τη χρησιμότητα να διευκρινίζουμ&... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | lit=* tag beyond scope removed as requested. | |
| 181576227 by ika-chan! @ 2026-04-20 10:54 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | lit=* tag beyond scope removed as requested. |
| 181310018 by ika-chan! @ 2026-04-14 08:30 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | Revert of 181309164 with addition of elements to disprove said changeset. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | ika-chan! | I'm sorry if I sounded a bit harsh in the changeset comment, but the issue is that the feature has to physically exist, and we in Greece have been dealing with people who add things that turn out not to exist. It's like we all suffer from the effects of "once bitten, twice shy". | |
| 180977759 by ika-chan! @ 2026-04-07 04:40 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Wildsharky ♦926 | Revert of 180960619 |
| 180480478 by ika-chan! @ 2026-03-27 00:29 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | ika-chan! | Sorry, I meant "and", not "land". |
| 180053850 by ika-chan! @ 2026-03-18 11:17 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | ika-chan! | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180052696 (junction is genuinely staggered). |
| 179778133 by ika-chan! @ 2026-03-12 21:49 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | ika-chan! | Revert of 179764090 (SEO spam in said changeset's comment). |
| 179537557 by ika-chan! @ 2026-03-08 15:03 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | ika-chan! | Revert of 179531865; okay, it seems the details went into a multipolygon, but I think it is still a hazard to pass between the visible parts… for now. |
| 179394759 by ika-chan! @ 2026-03-05 12:39 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | MappingMore ♦690 | Revert of 179384494 |
| 179157684 by ika-chan! @ 2026-02-28 05:19 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | Manos Roudas ♦2 | Hi! We are a legitimate business in Glyfada. Actually we are THE legitimate business you refer to. We tried to add our business point in Glyfada marina and was rejected and suggested to change the name of our business from "1852 Private Boat Tours" to "1852 Private Boat Dock". So... |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | ika-chan! | The node was originally rejected because you added promotional language in description=*, and removed a cafe. You can add the node back, but without the promotional description, and without removing another business. OpenStreetMap is taking a tougher line on spamming: we are a map database, not a bu... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | Manos Roudas ♦2 | Haha it was not our intention to remove our neighbour cafe! And of course in the description we copy our main description which is not spam neither promo. We do private boat tours on luxury powerboats and we describe what we offer. We happen to be in the luxury yacht sector. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | Manos Roudas ♦2 | Do you think you can put us on the map?? | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | pitscheplatsch ♦6,977 | You did it already @Manos RoudasSee https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179164832 | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | pitscheplatsch ♦6,977 | PS: The bot's concern only relates to the description text, which was/is still spammy. | |
| 7 | ~ 6 months ago | Manos Roudas ♦2 | Thanks for taking the time, but what exactly is the spam? We are a company that does private boat tours with skipper and crew to the islands. And the truth is that we do that on luxury crafts, which I removed so none feels offended. What else should I remove, what is spammy? | |
| 179021729 by ika-chan! @ 2026-02-25 07:11 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | MappingMore ♦690 | Revert of 178984113 |
| 178520217 by ika-chan! @ 2026-02-13 20:08 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | ika-chan! | Hello, you seem to be very new here: the introduction guide is at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute, and you can ask questions from your new account at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/gr/68 |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | ika-chan! | Darn it! In true clumsy ika-chan! fashion, I accidentally talked to myself. | |
| 174463083 by ika-chan! @ 2025-11-10 13:24 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Snusmumriken ♦163 | on what grounds did you make that addition? |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | ika-chan! | Sorry, I must have slipped up with Esri due to tiredness. I fixed that under https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174468252 | |
| 173954843 by ika-chan! @ 2025-10-30 02:39 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | ika-chan! | The destination waypoint name mentioned on the EO6 and EO15 relation is Mourgani bridge, not Mourgani. |
| 173737923 by ika-chan! @ 2025-10-24 23:09 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | ika-chan! | Thankfully, the changeset bounding box turned out to be tiny, but editing programs can be a bit of a troll at times. |
| 171494254 by ika-chan! @ 2025-09-05 11:45 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | The size of the bounding box was unavoidable since the ferry routes had to be moved to the newly-mapped berthing positions. Otherwise the routing would break. |
| 170914355 by ika-chan! @ 2025-08-24 09:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Sadly, there was nothing I could do to control the bounding box in JOSM, since ferry routes have to be a single way regardless of how long it is. |
| 170367495 by ika-chan! @ 2025-08-13 03:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | BTW, the size of the bounding box is because a sockpuppet of Delta Evas ALL added ways directly to the main E55 relation (according to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/21572/history/1599), instead of one of the country. Combined with fake junction layouts and other bad mapping, it is clear tha... |
| 170153244 by ika-chan! @ 2025-08-08 12:30 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | JOSM can be a painful with bounding boxes. I expected the bounding box to cover the Zlatograd Municipality and about the same size south of it. |
| 170017803 by ika-chan! @ 2025-08-05 16:58 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Also used Mapillary for lighting data. |
| 169413832 by ika-chan! @ 2025-07-24 17:51 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Source has a typo: it was supposed to be "Ministerial Decision Γ25871/1963 (ΦΕΚ Β 319/23.07.1963);Register of National Roads (1998)". |
| 167596392 by ika-chan! @ 2025-06-14 01:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | The first word of the comment was a typo: it was supposed to read EO2. |
| 167453285 by ika-chan! @ 2025-06-10 16:23 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | …and one way roads, too. While the National roads should be as close to the city centre as possible, practicality is a major factor. |
| 166820440 by ika-chan! @ 2025-05-27 11:11 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | CRCulver ♦235 | This relation:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17501427has a ref tag with a value "Snow Road". This is likely to be incorrect: 1) ref= tags usually bear a numerical value, and 2) default names in Greek should be in the Greek language, not English. If you are responsible for t... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | It was first added by blocked user Delta Evas ALL. The relation has been removed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167372596 | |
| 46404683 by ika-chan! @ 2017-02-25 22:31 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Beau Jonckers ♦25 | Hey. Is the land around Feutersoey used as farmland or is used as a meadow ? I did not see any plowing going on. Thanks in advance. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Must have changed since then. Updated at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165943023 | |
| 165516013 by ika-chan! @ 2025-04-27 17:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Scratch this edit (superseded by 165516263), the landuse was playing silly games with me, which kinda says a lot about how easy (or not) it is to edit via iD. The documentation probably needs refining to show up on iD. |
| 132811744 by ika-chan! @ 2023-02-20 23:03 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | Ενώ κοιτάμε την ίδια ιστοσελίδα, κάποια ονόματα είναι εντε&la... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | @sheldonelectric, You have changed the junction names to a format that I am confident that the Greek community has not agreed on. At this stage, I am concerned that you are editing disruptively and causing rife in our community.There is a reason you need to work together with the Greek editing c... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | The Greek community passed a consensus (which you saw and replied, without objecting) that it's ok to add 26500 mistakes, when it's too much work to control first...Back on topic, junction names cannot be found by survey (correct me if I'm wrong). Junctions had wrong names, for ex... | |
| 151127350 by ika-chan! @ 2024-05-10 05:39 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | @ika-chan! here you have a concrete example where transliteration was a bad idea. Your transliteration was IVI but the official int_name is HBH according to their website https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2786684222 if somebody was looking for HBH (with latin characters) the search would give no re... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | I think OASA telematics is wrong on that one, because neither the sign or ISO 843 transliterates "ΗΒΗ" to "HBH". ISO 843 transliterates to "IVI" while the sign on the ground says "IBI", which I think is a proofreading error. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | I'm not sure what you mean "on the ground" because the bus stop signs only have hellenic alphabet.... I'm using OASA telematics because you prompted me to! | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | The bus stop in question has the new telematics sign with a transliteration under the display: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=155682059852880&lat=38.047122179108&lng=23.807580644422&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.9192711115323823&y=0.4626969546625346&zoom=2.9381096328510843 | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | I see. So we're supposed to make a survey for each and every bus stop? There's still a lot of bus routes which have changed after they were put on osm. I cannot ride all these buses and survey the spelling of the stops. For now I'd rather just copy telematics, and copy them again late... | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | nikospag ♦64 | No you dont need a survey.We ALWAYS follow ISO 843 for transliteration. | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | Then feel free to correct what I copy/pasted from the official website. | |
| 65917191 by ika-chan! @ 2018-12-31 16:42 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | Hey there, I'd like to ask what is the source for all these languages : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4789397377/history |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Personal memory, based on what I know about transcription. I did not make them up, but tried to transcribe the name to the alphabet of other languages.I am very ill right now, but:1. Just because it does not appear on the sign does not mean we cannot use foreign names and transcriptions.... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | jimkats ♦84 | Before anyone proceeds to fixes/corrections about any name:*, we will discuss it, again, in the forum and document it properly into wiki about Greece, because every now and then stuff are being forgotten and issues are being raised. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | The wiki is already correctly documented that we use name and int_name. We have also discussed the necessity and agreed that we should use name:el IF there is another name:xxI am currently verifying the validity of the name:xx I found. Either it's a fake name or an erroneous name, the resul... | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | jimkats ♦84 | Forum is needed for proper documented discussion for all to see. Because you don't take into account the history of the changes of an element that had the respected name:xx been added. You would see there that most of them are just transliterations into other writings and not, usually, actually... | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | @jimkats I'm inviting you to read the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability I must somehow be able to verify the foreign name. | |
| 47511905 by ika-chan! @ 2017-04-06 15:45 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | Hey there, as I haven't seen it on the street sign, I wanted to ask your source for the name:fr ; name:enosm.org/way/245250248/history |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164638568 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | από ερωτήσεις που κάνω σε ξένους, από που προκύπτουν τα ονόμ... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | I already corrected the translation error for you, even though the names "Alexander the Great" and "Alexandre le Grand" are common human knowledge in the respective linguistic communities. I remain available at your disposal. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | nikospag ♦64 | @DWGI reported sheldonelectric last month because he was deleting foreign languages and you did nothing.Now this user keeps deleting languages. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | nikospag ♦64 | @ika-chan!You should report him too. | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | I have asked a lot of foreign contributors about the languages they added, and absolutely none of them provided a source.@DWG I have reported nikospag last month because he added 26500 wrong names for his (wrongly set) consumer to work better. | |
| 164660995 by ika-chan! @ 2025-04-08 05:36 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Dang, I thought some of the errors in the list were in Australia rather that in the Ivory Coast … maybe my mind is genuinely malfunctioning. |
| 155799048 by ika-chan! @ 2024-08-26 19:19 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Ritam Saha ♦17 | I have noticed that in some railway platforms you have used `highway=steps` in combination with `bridge=yes`. Is that the correct convention? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | "highway=steps" and "bridge=yes" is a valid combination worldwide. If you could sit under them, then it's part of a bridge. | |
| 158103844 by ika-chan! @ 2024-10-19 18:49 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | kapazao ♦1,041 | Hi, thank you for fixing tracks geometry, but please do not change them to highway=residential :(Regards --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158103844 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | I understand. Is this one better? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158129020 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | kapazao ♦1,041 | I have checked the area and I have fixed some ways that were bad classified. Try to keep way classification if you are not sure about changing and watch spanish wiki about how to map some of these ways. Not every country maps in the same way.In this case there were a lot of tracks that were mapped... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | I'll try my best. | |
| 157694333 by ika-chan! @ 2024-10-10 01:03 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | I mean a stub, not a stud. |
| 156852880 by ika-chan! @ 2024-09-20 07:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ika-chan! | Also, naming consistency … you know, the "[Type] [Number]: [Start] → [End]" format according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dtrain, except Unicode allows real arrows to be used? |
| 152910823 by ika-chan! @ 2024-06-19 19:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ika-chan! | Relation 17373533 was a generic E-road relation which duplicated the established network of E-road relations. |
| 150744335 by ika-chan! @ 2024-05-01 11:01 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ika-chan! | The reason for this changeset is that based on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/601734050/history, Map-Finder decided to declare most of Attiki Odos as untolled, despite the fact that toll=yes applies to ways to and from the toll booth. In doing so, many drivers were unwillingly tricked into paying... |
| 147988157 by ika-chan! @ 2024-02-27 20:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ika-chan! | Dang, I didn't realise that the unused mapping guidelines had THAT many nodes. |
| 146013327 by ika-chan! @ 2024-01-08 03:40 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ika-chan! | Sorry about the size: I was working straight off https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=4763179, which has no indication of location. |
| 144714823 by ika-chan! @ 2023-12-03 09:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ika-chan! | Specifically, the bridge was claimed to be under construction by the same user associated with the fictional motorway proposals and therefore it could not be verified. If it is true that the bridge is closed, please redo the closure but add a source and estimated reopening date. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | jimkats ♦84 | The bridge really was closed, and opened about the time you made the last edit on there. I was about to change it to that, but it seems you did it before me, accidentally :d.And yes, considering the user who closed it, it indeed would seem suspicious, but I didn't "fix" it, as I kne... | |
| 144445057 by ika-chan! @ 2023-11-25 15:41 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | JohanKhan ♦1 | While I don't have real-time information on specific Product Hunt challenges, individuals or companies, including custom web designers in Chicago, may launch challenges or showcase their products on Product Hunt to gain visibility within the tech community. It's a platform where innovators... |
| 138043817 by ika-chan! @ 2023-07-03 01:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | I can assure you that this is not an import, but a testament to how fast I can edit with Potlatch 3: the development of Potlatch must continue. |
| 137340589 by ika-chan! @ 2023-06-14 18:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! UK-USA ♦77 | Dang it, forgot to close the changeset before moving to another area. |
| 137263504 by ika-chan! @ 2023-06-13 00:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mboesch ♦4 | Are you sure? Two weeks ago the road was blocked, there was a big red and white sign "no motorized traffic", they were working on conrete tunnels for the stream and of course with an offroad vehicle or tractor you can pass, but visitors should not be routed there until the road is finished... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | mboesch ♦4 | We wanted to hike this part of E6, the scenery was nice, but it was, definitely, a road under construction. I guess there will be a tarmac road next time we pass there, regards mb | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | I can accept that the changeset comment was a bit off because of me using Potlatch, but I did my best to keep the access restrictions for motor vehicles.According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction, I cannot mark a road as under construction if anything other than motor vehi... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | mboesch ♦4 | We were there, and thought to be able to drive part of the way. There was a sign Road closed at the beginning and concrete blocks on the road after the thater. You can pass on foot or by bike as its park of long distance hiking trail E6 (you find some very old rusty signs...)Bulldozers have mad th... | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | I have now marked the affected roads with "motor_vehicle=destination" to signify no access to motor vehicles except, for example, access to farms. It may take a while for the routers to pick up the restrictions. | |
| 136437968 by ika-chan! @ 2023-05-23 05:09 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | 0000FF berries ♦142 | Thanks ika-chan! :) |
| 136564915 by ika-chan! @ 2023-05-26 02:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | Context: the Maxar Premium Imagery layer in Go Map!! is not working because it uses an expired API key. Updates to the app appear to be sparse. |
| 136235573 by ika-chan! @ 2023-05-18 04:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | 0000FF berries ♦142 | Thanks ika-chan! :) |
| 135562643 by ika-chan! @ 2023-05-01 07:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | Dang it! I thought I had saved the Greek changes in another changeset. |
| 134258793 by ika-chan! @ 2023-03-29 11:31 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | Dang it: I forgot to close the changeset before moving south! |
| 133721673 by ika-chan! @ 2023-03-15 18:46 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | A few redundant u-turn relations (with the same "start" and "end" way) were also removed. |
| 133455420 by ika-chan! @ 2023-03-08 20:49 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | Accidentally hit the "C" key while working on it. |
| 132855776 by ika-chan! @ 2023-02-21 22:21 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | This changeset failed, because of a bug in Potlatch. |
| 132384454 by ika-chan! @ 2023-02-10 22:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ika-chan! | CORRECTION: that was meant to be scrubland. 🤦🏻♀️ |
| 125622240 by ika-chan! @ 2022-08-31 17:26 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu ♦36 | OSM uses local language names in the name key; using English because some people would prefer it to render in Carto is mapping for the renderer. Context for other tags does not work so well otherwise as well, for example, in name:etymology it is assumed etymology of the local name. Ludhiana does not... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu ♦36 | Also note that Punjabi city names can inflect for grammatical case, that is they are expected to change in the context of the sentence. Poland already has implemented this with name:dative and name:genitive; this way more grammatically sophisticated directions can be generated. This is not really po... | |
| 122686301 by ika-chan! @ 2022-06-21 21:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | jimkats ♦84 | I just saw your edits of adding the nodes of the villages. Great job, really :) (was gonna do it soooomeday, same with Mani peninsula :d) (now the edits in Wikidata for Wiki Loves Monuments are much easier :P) |
| 116428871 by ika-chan! @ 2022-01-21 12:09 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | R66_Mapper ♦56 | epic mountain name |
| 121170121 by ika-chan! @ 2022-05-19 02:12 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ika-chan! | I forgot to say that provincial roads are generally highway=secondary, so therefore I am applying this rule to nearly all cases. |
| 89099288 by ika-chan! @ 2020-08-07 15:20 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | CRCulver ♦235 | Hi, I see that you have tagged a number of solar farms in Greece. However, you used the power=generator tag etc. According to the OSM wiki:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:plant:source%3Dsolar#Enclosed_solar_power_plantthat tagging is only appropriate when adding each individual panel... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | ika-chan! | Hello, it's a rather old changeset, and I have already been tagging new solar plants with power=plant et al for quite a while now. | |
| 118262157 by ika-chan! @ 2022-03-09 05:35 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ika-chan! | Correction: The source should be should be existing OSM data. This is why I think we need multiple profile support on JOSM. |
| 116664442 by ika-chan! @ 2022-01-27 12:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | ika-chan! | Source typo alert: it's actually Maxar Premium Imagery. |
| 113208585 by ika-chan! @ 2021-10-31 20:50 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | A24 IS a motorway according to the law. Thats what the "A" means in the A24 name. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | ika-chan! | If you are referring to ΦΕΚ 253ΑΑΠ/2015, then that has to be taken with a grain of salt because Mapillary imagery suggests the A24 south of Papageorgiou to be an expressway rather than a motorway: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=826090858115075 and https://www.ma... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | Yes, i am referring to ΦΕΚ 253ΑΑΠ/2015. We have decided to follow the law and no the signs. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | Its feels wrong for me that i tried to come back. I have seen a lot of "fouls". One guy messes with the national boundariesm another guy/gal messes with the motorways, and so on...Sorry bad i had enough.Buy again!!!! | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | ika-chan! | With all due respect, we have to balance legislation with what is really on the ground (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground). For example, if the law specifies that the A642 is the A621, but the signs on the ground still say A642, then it has to be assumed th... | |
| 106110591 by ika-chan! @ 2021-06-09 18:05 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ika-chan! | Also, duplicate church nodes were removed: amenity=place_of_worship can go to building=* and that should be sufficient. |
| 67505200 by ika-chan! @ 2019-02-23 22:50 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,908 | hola. todavía mapeas? te acuerdas porqué pusiste unos https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=slipway en el área? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | ika-chan! | Fixed: made it into a deep ford. | |
| 98185467 by ika-chan! @ 2021-01-26 21:53 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ika-chan! | Dang it, that was meant to be Maxar Premium. I think RapID struggles when the browser is open for a long time. |
| 94088800 by ika-chan! @ 2020-11-13 22:27 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | sheldonelectric ♦241 | I had replaced the name:en name:de name:fr with int_name. According to the wiki we shall copy nothing more than what is on the ground, which are prefix (optional), name, int_name. Why did you re-add the name:en? |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | ika-chan! | I'm sorry, I must have slipped up with copying the name, probably due to the confusion with editors going for different localisation tags. Is there anything that I can fix for you? | |
| 94649123 by ika-chan! @ 2020-11-23 16:17 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ika-chan! | The source was supposed to be Maxar-Premium. |
| 94522354 by ika-chan! @ 2020-11-20 20:19 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ika-chan! | Imagery was supposed to be "Maxar-Premium" - something is wrong with RapiD. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Bonkles ♦2 | We received your note about this 'imagery_used' bug and are looking into it! | |
| 90312060 by ika-chan! @ 2020-09-02 15:18 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | CORRECTION: it appears that "railway=stop" is a valid (but rare in some places) tag referring to the stop position of trains, but I think it has fooled new editors (as well as me) to thinking that it represents a smaller stop. Ouch.However, removing stop positions is not a good idea, b... |
| 88817107 by ika-chan! @ 2020-08-01 14:55 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | jimkats ♦84 | That's pretty good edits and mostly additions you did there, great job :d |
| 88589981 by ika-chan! @ 2020-07-28 01:18 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | Oops, I meant the Old NH9 in the changeset comment. |
| 81031066 by ika-chan! @ 2020-02-15 02:25 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,908 | Hi Ika-Chan, very interesting data you contributed here! |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | I think it is only a fraction of all the woodland around the area. It takes a long time just to map a small area of woodland when it is so patchy. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | mariotomo ♦1,908 | may I invite you to have a look in Northern Veraguas? it should be quite quick, it's almost just a single patch of natural wood. the openings are slash-and-burn areas, or settlements. | |
| 82431771 by ika-chan! @ 2020-03-20 12:39 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | Oh, I forgot, I extended the translated name in Macedonian for the A1, for consistency's sake. |
| 81636453 by ika-chan! @ 2020-03-01 06:58 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | Thank you for cleaning up Map-Finder mess. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | I think the Greek road authorities have some responsibility in not taking road numbers seriously. This is why there is so much confusion, especially with a user taking JayCBR's numbering idea seriously. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | Just to be fair, its not JayCBR's fault for expressing his idea, but it is Map-Finder's fault for putting this idea into action. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | Yes, I know JayCBR meant well, since it was Rick Sanchez C-137 that sort of jumped the gun in the north. ;-) | |
| 5 | ~ 6 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | You are probably talking about the not existing A19. Here we are talking about the not existing A13. | |
| 6 | ~ 6 years ago | nikospag ♦64 | OK, message received. | |
| 79200938 by ika-chan! @ 2020-01-04 22:25 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | Not again… the source was supposed to be Bing Aerial Imagery. |
| 70556776 by ika-chan! @ 2019-05-23 15:46 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | a question,what do you mean on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/692014414 with s=no ?thanks |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | ika-chan! | Yeah, that was the editor going haywire. I fixed it now. | |
| 61753670 by ika-chan! @ 2018-08-17 18:07 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Florent972 ♦4 | I've corrected some informations regarding the operator at Paris-Nord, the actual operator is SNCF Mobilités, SNCF Réseau (RFF from 1998 to 2014) is the actual owner. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | ika-chan! | That's odd. I thought that if SNCF Mobilités were merely running trains on the network, then they could not be listed as an operator. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Florent972 ♦4 | In railway terms that's what an operator is, it's the company responsible for running trains on the network which SNCF Mobilités is while SNCF Réseau owns the railway network. But at the end of the day it's still SNCF who is indierctly both the owner and the operator on ... | |
| 66963145 by ika-chan! @ 2019-02-06 13:01 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ika-chan! | Dang! It was supposed to be DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery as the source. |
| 62822924 by ika-chan! @ 2018-09-22 11:31 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | JayCBR ♦39 | so would you care to say why you started changing names and refs to ΠΕΟ/ΝΕΟ???i dont know whats your deal, i m tired of all this |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | ika-chan! | George_ath actually came up with this scheme. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | ika-chan! | Source for the above message: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32502470/history. | |
| 62445397 by ika-chan! @ 2018-09-10 08:45 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ika-chan! | The large number of node changes were caused by buildings straddling over roads and landuse. |
| 53225426 by ika-chan! @ 2017-10-25 05:14 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | datendelphin ♦335 | You added even more details. Thanks :) |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | ika-chan! | Side note: one of the reasons I use turn restrictions in "strict mode" is to make it harder for routers to suggest stupid directions like https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=47.1930%2C8.4760%3B47.1985%2C8.4719#map=16/47.1957/8.4741 (as of 25 October 20... | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | datendelphin ♦335 | Sure. My comment was specific for the situation at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/339958083 where the merging of separated traffic coincides with an intersection, where a u-turn could be taken.And that is a really bad route from graphhopper. They should improve their routing weights. | |
| 53197690 by ika-chan! @ 2017-10-24 06:06 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | datendelphin ♦335 | Why did you shuffle the lanes to different ways on the bridge? Why split up the trunk south of the roundabout? There is no turn restriction. See https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Mxyk_ORixW4OX7iRxppetQ |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | ika-chan! | According to https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/OCGA2618o24nDCjHRoQGuQ the northbound lanes south of the roundabout are only separated by a white line, hence I thought I should use "change:lanes", and the u-turn was created because I believe I cannot just do that at any junction. Nevertheles... | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | ika-chan! | I should also add that I map each direction separately if the road is separated by a visible central reservation raised by a kerb, regardless of surface. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | datendelphin ♦335 | You are right about the split ways. I'm sorry, I misremembered that situation.True it is an awkward turn, but it is not prohibited, so I would not map it.As for not good enough, rest assured you are good. Sorry that I cam across as harsh, I was merely puzzled, and my apologies especially be... | |
| 51814852 by ika-chan! @ 2017-09-07 14:46 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | Typo in changeset comment – should be "Refining main roads to village". |
| 51587556 by ika-chan! @ 2017-08-30 17:14 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | Sorry, typo in changeset comment - supposed to be Landuse and service roads traced in according to DigitalGlobe-Premium. |
| 50177978 by ika-chan! @ 2017-07-10 14:24 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | Typo in comment: should be turn restrictions added. |
| 48506734 by ika-chan! @ 2017-05-08 16:30 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | Source: Bing - Potlatch isn't recording imagery information. |
| 48341755 by ika-chan! @ 2017-05-02 17:18 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | Source is Bing Aerial Imagery: it turns out Potlatch isn't saving background imagery information to the attributes any more (it used to). |
| 46424129 by ika-chan! @ 2017-02-26 19:39 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | To clarify, changeset 45907040 reverted 17 changesets by athinaios, which had Google as its source. However, it unwittingly affected the integrity of the carefully ordered National and Provincial road relations. |
| 44970983 by ika-chan! @ 2017-01-07 01:22 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | The changeset comment I meant to write was "Street lamps added". |
| 43437778 by ika-chan! @ 2016-11-06 10:11 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | ika-chan! | Source should have been "Bing Aerial Imagery". Sorry. |