| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 182621234 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-05-13 21:17 ~ 1 day ago | 1 | ~ 16 hours ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Actually, no: It wasn't an iD edit that caused this but a JOSM one, so iD is blameless here.There _is_ a validate button in JOSM which would have caught this before upload, but that button wasn't pressed... |
| 181293382 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-04-13 20:11 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Pink Duck ♦173 | Thanks! |
| 180819515 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-04-03 15:55 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | SomeoneElse2 | Bing looks very much like a surface crossing here |
| 178836108 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-02-20 21:21 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | I also stuck "drinking_water=yes" on the tap based on the existing name.Also added a fixme because https://www.anniesboathouse.co.uk/ says it has changed hands. |
| 177844392 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-29 12:05 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Actually - I suspect it might have been rerouted. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2293737#map=17/55.647246/-4.813637 . I asked the person who added the new names in the earlier changeset. |
| 177785770 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-28 01:30 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | rskedgell ♦1,829 | It looks like this ans some post box tags were inadvertently added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130414569 |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | That explains it - I've restored the original post office node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5743772095/history and moved it to a likely location. | |
| 177115661 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-11 22:29 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2023-February/030061.html , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126152086 |
| 176981135 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-08 11:47 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | rskedgell ♦1,829 | Thanks!In the next few weeks I'll walk both loops, update what I can with StreetComplete and add the metal information=route_marker discs set into the footway. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | See also https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/heavy-handed-rework-of-barbican-london/140254/7 , which suggests that a revert of some of the problem changes needs to happen. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | rskedgell ♦1,829 | I saw that thread. It's unlikely that I'll have time next week, so hopefully it will all resolved before I do anything. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks. I'll let the dust settle before trying to join this up again - I suspect that there is more discussion at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/heavy-handed-rework-of-barbican-london/140254 to come! | |
| 176981180 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-08 11:49 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 | |
| 176981222 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-08 11:51 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 | |
| 176981346 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2026-01-08 11:54 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | trigpoint ♦2,665 | This changeset has been fully reverted by the DWG in changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/177102231 | |
| 176597938 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-12-29 20:44 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | JezCrow ♦168 | This Shopmobility does mobility scooter hire AND sales though, is there a tag that would encompass both? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | That's a good question - I've not heard of a shopmobility that does sales as well. Searching https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values for "mobility" finds a few options; "medical_supply" is obviously a bit more generic. | |
| 176625259 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-12-30 12:15 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | b-unicycling ♦281 | I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | b-unicycling ♦281 | I hadn't deleted anything from any boundary relations, I only created waterway relations and added the waterways to those. That should not affect boundary relations at all. I checked all the boundaries, and all were complete loops in JOSM. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | If you download the relation as it was in Josm between changes you can see one of the problems:[out:xml][timeout:90][date:"2025-12-26T23:00:00Z"];( relation(6270840););(._;>;);out meta;There's a gap corresponding to the section under the N69. I've no idea w... | |
| 176458437 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-12-26 21:39 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | I don't know that there _isn't_ a TRO on it, but information from 3 years ago likely isn't going to help there. |
| 176458193 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-12-26 21:31 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | See even though https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#22/51.70244/-1.27703/H/P for the LA PRoW view. Their PF stops at the gate (as is to be expected). |
| 175024205 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-11-23 12:43 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | I've not been in for years but news reports suggest it was still there in at least 2023. |
| 173250417 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-10-13 22:49 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | What I had to do to edit the SR was to load the SR into iD by editing it from the website, then moving to https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/53.3102525/-1.8310127 where both stages 1 and 2 are. From stage 2 (which was a member of the SR) I could select the SR. I could then go to stage 1 and add... |
| 172801503 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-10-03 16:47 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | SamuraiArmada ♦4 | Okay, that sounds like a reasonable justification. Thank you for your input. |
| 172789012 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-10-03 12:27 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | (based on the imagery) |
| 172561807 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-09-28 11:22 ~ 7 months ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171453477 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172508645 . |
| 171934701 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-09-14 19:55 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | Yes it has! |
| 171841138 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-09-12 16:33 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | There were 27 relations in total. I added them back piecemeal because other people were fixing other errors in the relations at the same time.I've not commented on the changeset that introduced the gaps (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171781477 ) because it's their first change... |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | SomeoneElse2 | I've added an untagged way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1429277102 and added it back to each of the relations. This possibly wasn't the most efficient way of doing it, but it did work.Unfortunately, the iD editor is not good at spotting gaps. You can use overpass to detect problem... | |
| 168717791 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-07-09 23:06 ~ 10 months ago | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | gurglypipe ♦1,044 | leisure=outdoor_seating outdoor_seating=yes doesn’t make any sense.Why make this change? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | It was a cockup on my part - I thought that I was changing the "outdoor_seating" tag on the pub, not the "outdoor_seating" tag on the outdoor seating... | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | gurglypipe ♦1,044 | Hah, yes, I can see how that could happen. Thanks for fixing it(For anyone else who reads this, it was fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168764186) | |
| 165091458 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-04-17 23:06 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | Paul Berry ♦141 | Thanks for picking this up. I've now fixed this on changeset #166645811. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks! | |
| 164812350 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-04-11 11:54 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | motogs ♦29 | The spellings of 2 stops corrected in changeset 165472874 following survey and photos |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks! | |
| 162208606 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-02-06 13:21 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rskedgell ♦1,829 | Thanks. I'll try to walk the Strood/Rochester - Rainham bit soon and check the Saxon Shore way signage. I haven't been there for 10+ years, but I have a feeling that it may be a little bit like the Capital Ring and only signed on one side of the road in places. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks! | |
| 161162793 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-01-09 09:52 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | LordGarySugar ♦246 | Thanks for fixing, I promise I did make a note to come back and fix it myself! |
| 161201098 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-01-10 11:16 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | See my comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/160174336 . No reply there, so I re-added it here. |
| 161130011 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-01-08 11:33 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Grr - forgot to close changeset - and the second part of this (unconnected) is "filled in gap in NCN61_R 31640".There's nothing between Knaresborough and Welwyn in here. |
| 160920427 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2025-01-02 18:24 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse2 | There is a public footpath alongside the main runway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775413485 , and it is not so busy that you can't use it. |
| 159862454 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-12-02 23:48 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse2 | It's worth mentioning that coastal erosion here means that the cliff _will_ cross the road at some point, if it hasn't already. |
| 158716439 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-11-03 20:38 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ◪ Jarv ♦241 | yeah sorry |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks! | |
| 158714662 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-11-03 19:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ◪ Jarv ♦241 | yeah same again here |
| 150363062 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-04-22 19:31 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | DorneyLake123 ♦25 | Hi SomeoneElse, I believe this was me. Could you help me understand what the issue was and if there's a way to prevent this happening again, while still using iD / browser ? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Hello,Sorry for not spotting this comment for 5 months!There are a number of "iD relation" issues, some of which you can see at https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+relation .What happened here was basically due to https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issu... | |
| 156315167 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-09-07 14:20 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | A day after this, the relation reappeared in the list of civil parishes in the local rendering database. |
| 156354917 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-09-08 14:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse2 | The "alleged castle site" (which probably isn't one) is most likely under https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503533422 to the north. |
| 155601006 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-08-22 11:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | rskedgell ♦1,829 | I've got a race in Battersea Park next Wednesday, so I'll check if I have time. I've left a note in case I don't.https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4396917 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Great stuff - thanks! | |
| 155255687 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-08-14 19:02 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | This edit moves horses from the sidewalk onto the road. That's consistent with the current OSM tagging, but it's possible that there is special off-road provision for horses here. If that's the case, it's likely that there's access from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3... |
| 154621851 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-07-30 19:57 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Removed "spur" - and filled in a couple of gaps. |
| 143489769 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-11-01 18:17 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Oops - wrong account - should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | bompstable ♦5 | The bridge and path is now fully open and the sign and barriers have been removed. Should openstreetmap.org/node/11194664395 now just be deleted? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Yes - if the notice board has gone, I'd just delete it! | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | bompstable ♦5 | Thanks. Gone! | |
| 149770918 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-04-09 10:39 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | No, no local knowledge. Josm made that source up; I did not type it in or select it. |
| 149668014 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2024-04-06 18:55 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | https://www.yorkshirewater.com/media/f10fpjkw/yky-bioresources-market-information-2020.xlsx |
| 145697858 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-12-30 13:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | ... based on my visits around that time not selling 98 octane was pretty unlikely too. Obviously it's now 2023, so different again. |
| 145228141 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-12-17 20:17 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | 3 of them (1029956922, 1029956923, 1029956924) also have a "peak=yes" tag. If this is really a "natural=peak", then adding a node where appropriate would also make sense. |
| 144657627 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-12-01 10:54 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | What I can't see is how you'd easily cross east to west. Also, lots of other NCN52 is missing here. |
| 143946925 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-11-12 20:13 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14179282 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14053625 look a bit odd here, TBH. |
| 142299105 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-10-08 10:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | I've now updated NCN1 so that the "new" route here (as far as it is currently mapped) is now in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/15975674 . There are still a couple of "not yet mapped in OSM" gaps around Hull. One is:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1597567... |
| 142455206 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-10-11 23:11 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | This also removes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213130136 as a duplicate outer (the boundaries around the island are already outers). It also patches some unrelated route relations around https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5479823#map=17/53.22412/-4.19076&layers=H . |
| 141136358 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-09-11 23:03 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Also deleting a bit of duplicate former railway across the Link Road in New Earswick. |
| 137196915 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-06-11 09:29 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | ... since the only thing separating the "roads" here is paint, at least according to the Bing imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Cebderby ♦313 | Found that some of the Mapillary traces are from 2023, and show a new high-kerbed island on the Grove Lane exit, presumably to try to enforce what looks like an annoying and arbitrary L-turn-only out of Grove Lane (down to the big roundabout and back to get to the village!?). Specifically, https://... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks - based on the info we have, that looks about right to me! | |
| 136718072 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-05-29 21:18 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Oops, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136718271 for a better description. |
| 136353723 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-05-20 21:28 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | My guess of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996601874 for the route of the CW and the CHT is based on what had been previously mapped to the west. |
| 135220992 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-04-22 09:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135222330 |
| 134304140 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-03-30 13:04 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Also filled in some gaps and clipped some accidental spurs off NCN27. |
| 134303806 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-03-30 12:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Also cuts an accidental spur off. See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1t8l |
| 133061958 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-02-26 22:46 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | This also fixed accidental breakages in these townlands:2a3> -15462715 | Drimna22639d22639< -5523324 | Poppintree (Finglas)28127d28126< -5378792 | Meakstown55288c55287< (55285 rows)---> (55284 rows) |
| 132333622 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-02-09 23:52 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | JassKurn ♦174 | Hi, I recently made edits to this junction that may have caused the issue you fixed. Using the video from recent visit (cycle cam), and images I've previously submitted to Mapillary. I'm confident I can spot the stickers on posts. Made some slight changes to move walking route from carriag... |
| 131855229 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2023-01-29 21:14 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | This was saved by accident. It's part of the next changeset "Filled in gap in NCN6_R 12461". |
| 129598993 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-12-01 11:22 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | Sources here are primarily knowing how Ben will have mapped it 15 years ago (from survey, but without later access to aerial imagery), and knowing the (invalid) reason that Fred73000 will have added an amenity-parking tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111922887 . |
| 126599332 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-09-24 23:13 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 71207555, 71549045, 72076256, 72077397, 72077684, 72077905, 72204939, 72222097, 72222523, 72222664, 72223141, 72223431, 72223506, 72225763, 72226044, 72226597, 72244916, 72245219, 72245975, 72246723, 72250185, 72251855, 72287981, 72329188, ... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Wrong account used in error - should have been https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse_Revert . | |
| 126347785 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-09-18 22:51 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | The edit to the Taff Trail was actually based on a survey from 2014! |
| 126029868 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-09-10 20:56 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 126029718. |
| 126029718 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-09-10 20:50 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126029868 where the changeset comment is: Revert test via ipv6 preferred routing - one tree |
| 124990481 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-08-16 20:55 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Gaps in these relations were also fixed here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8491180#map=15/53.3374/-6.2442https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5500178#map=13/53.3240/-6.2641https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5538330#map=15/53.3407/-6.2413https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation... |
| 123861778 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-07-20 18:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Castleton, not Bagby. |
| 122821522 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-06-24 23:34 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | I've only ever walked this bit and not cycled it. I'm pretty sure that this is the correct west to east route, and suspect that east to west you'd also have to dismount to go straight across at the end of James Street. I don't remember any NCN signage at the crossing (but it wa... |
| 122630532 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-06-20 16:03 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | "from https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1juh" is what it should say. The new route is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jui , north of the canal |
| 122293045 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-06-12 18:13 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Actually, it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122111489 removed a separate sidewalk here. |
| 122201125 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-06-10 09:26 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Actually two spurs - and I'm not 100% about the "proposed" parts (they are mixed in with the rest of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6601510 which isn't "proposed"). |
| 122017999 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-06-06 10:38 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | I also removed some sections of the A44 that seem to have been merged in in error. See also these notes and comments:https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2908156https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112137297#map=14/51.8617/-2.5829https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112335182#map=16/51.... |
| 121943595 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2022-06-04 15:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,836 | note: someone started public mailing list thread ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-June/thread.html#87549 ) to complain about this edit instead of using changeset comment |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,065 | That is because Andy Townsend abused his DWG powers and blocked me from adding a comment here. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | mmd ♦48 | Andy Townsend didn't abuse any DWG powers here. It's nothing more than a bug in the Rails port that still needs to be fixed: https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/3522#issuecomment-1095464792That's really the only reason, why you couldn't comment here.... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,065 | Well, I did get a blocking message, so it was intentional. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | mmd ♦48 | I think you didn't get my point: even though you've been blocked, you would have still been able to comment on this changeset. Because of a bug I've mentioned earlier, this isn't possible at the moment. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | Tomas Straupis ♦2,065 | Ah, ok. Thank you for a clarification. | |
| 100119253 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2021-02-27 23:17 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | Oddly I didn't deliberately edit http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=766557624 or http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=469777304 here. Will revert those |
| 78879084 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2019-12-26 11:52 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | I've actually no evidence that this Strava-traced data actually exists as "paths" at all - if it doesn't it would be perfectly OK to remove it entirely.I'm not familiar with this location but am familiar with the use of Strava on the other side of the Atlantic - very often... |
| 65768107 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2018-12-25 20:39 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Piskvor ♦473 | Good catch, thanks: the US embassy is indeed elsewhere in the city. Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65956426 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Thanks | |
| 64118383 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2018-11-02 16:07 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | (muphry's law strikes again - "des" s/b "does").Also the name ("Ballettschule" does appear to genuninely have the double "t"). |
| 63961961 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2018-10-28 23:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Colin Smale ♦327 | Hi,I assume you didn't mean to delete the Church Stretton / Wistanstow CP boundary? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Indeed not - what I'd imagine I intended to delete was a bit of old waterway around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4585271296#map=19/52.50360/-2.82305 . I see that it's back now though https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479800737/history . | |
| 59688019 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2018-06-09 10:31 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Test comment |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Another test comment | |
| 32309358 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2015-06-30 14:09 ~ 10 years ago | 1 | ~ 10 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | (email test) |
| 26198855 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2014-10-19 18:37 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | test comment on another changeset |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | 19 Oct | |
| 27168772 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2014-12-01 23:32 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | test |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | test | |
| 3 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | test | |
| 4 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | test | |
| 5 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | test | |
| 6 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | test | |
| 26500959 by SomeoneElse2 @ 2014-11-02 11:29 ~ 11 years ago | 1 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | Test comment from another user. |
| 2 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | and a reply | |
| 3 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse2 | another test | |
| 4 | ~ 11 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,769 | and from the other side |