BeaconOSM have been discussed with 10 replies of this OpenStreetMap ContributorBeaconOSM have been discussed with 10 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 187401365 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-08-13 16:35 ~ 1 month ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Just for future reference, in most of the United States, weight restrictions are expressed in short tons (abbreviated as "tons", "T", or "t"), which should be tagged as 'maxweight=### st', and sometimes in pounds (abbreviated as "lbs"), which should ... |
| 183548706 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-06-02 14:05 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please do not map turn lanes as separate ways unless there is a physical barrier separating the turn lanes from the other lanes (such as what you did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20602563/history). Instead, use the turn:lanes= tag to denote the turning movements permitted from each lane.\... |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Typo: Instead, use the turn:lanes=* tag to denote the turning movements permitted from each lane. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | The incorrect road geometry you mapped at the intersection of the I-81 Exit 137 entrance and exit ramps and Wildwood Road has been fixed in changeset 183990376.https://osmcha.org/changesets/183990376 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/... | |
| 183549387 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-06-02 14:19 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please make sure to include a "via" way/node for turn restricton relations. The turn restriction relations you added in this changeset only have two members, the "from" and "to" ways, which is not correct. Osmose will flag those issues. Turn restriction relations need t... |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Just to clarify, turn restriction relations need to have one "via" node, or one or more "via" ways. The "via" node or way(s) connect "the beginning and end ways representing the attempted turn."https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Members... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | I went ahead and fixed the turn restriction relation issues detected by Osmose by adding the missing "via" node to those turn restriction relations in changeset 184038997.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184038997You can also view changeset 184038997 on OSMCha, which may be ... | |
| 184867228 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-06-30 17:24 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please take the time to leave better changeset comments, what did you change and why? "Franklin County NY" is not sufficient enough to tell the average mapper what you did here. Refer to this OSM Wiki article here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#How_should_I_wr... |
| 181104566 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-09 15:45 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please make sure to modify the geometry of existing OSM elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_historyYou deleted a natural=water way and remapped it as a multipolygon relation in th... |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | BeaconOSM | No new waterways were created. Redundant and un-necessary user waterways existed. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | BeaconOSM | The only objects I ever remove are nonexistant or extraneous objects. I reuse objects when available. Please review the edit more specifically. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | You should reuse every existing map object, even if it's out of alignment or its geometry doesn't match that in aerial imagery, instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. Just modify the geometry of existing map objects to help preserve their editing history. For more information, s... | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | > No new waterways were created. Redundant and un-necessary user waterways existed.I know you did not create any new waterways in this changeset. I was referring to the natural=water way you deleted and remapped as a multipolygon in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37533324/h... | |
| 184533688 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-06-24 16:39 ~ 2 months ago | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please make sure to use better changeset comments, what did you change and why? "Kaz" is not sufficient enough to tell the average mapper what you were trying to do here. For more information, please refer to this OSM Wiki article: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comment... |
| 181018326 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-07 19:58 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please modify the geometry of the existing buildings instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181018326 |
| 181018115 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-07 19:52 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | I see that you deleted some buildings and remapped them anew in this changeset. Please just modify the geometry of existing buildings on OSM instead of deleting them and remapping them anew. It follows good practice on OSM and helps preserve the element's editing history.https://wiki.openstre... |
| 181017425 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-07 19:34 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please modify the geometry of existing roads on OSM instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew, in accordance with good practice on OSM.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/18101... |
| 181017143 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-07 19:26 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Hello BeaconOSM, I see that you deleted some roads and remapped them anew in this changeset. It's good practice to modify the geometry of existing roads rather than delete them and remap them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_his... |
| 181013282 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-07 17:50 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please make sure to modify the geometry of the existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history --- Published using OSMCha: https://osm... |
| 181011898 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-07 17:19 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Please note that it is good practice to just modify the geometry of existing roads instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew. It helps preserve their editing history on OSM.See the OSM Wiki article on "Keep the history": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history ... |
| 180728637 by BeaconOSM @ 2026-04-01 15:31 ~ 5 months ago | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | Frank Peng ♦229 | Roads need to be connected to each other. Otherwise, people can't access them. The service roads you mapped (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1495143714 and openstreetmap.org/way/1495143715) are very close to each other but not connected to each other.Also, it's good practice to modif... |
| 169912580 by BeaconOSM @ 2025-08-03 15:55 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | BPTT ♦96 | Hi. Please be advised that the straight, parallel ways you draw as paths are actually firebreaks and should be tagged as barrier=trench. This is to keep people on designated paths to lessen the impact on the environment. I've retagged them for now, but in the future, please reach out if you hav... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BPTT ♦96 | I mean to say that the preset feature type is Trench but the tag is barrier=ditch, not barrier=trench. | |
| 166451641 by BeaconOSM @ 2025-05-18 23:18 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | quincylvania ♦89 | Hi BeaconOSM, just an FYI I had to revert this changeset since Skippack isn't an admin boundary, it's a census designated place. |
| 169424226 by BeaconOSM @ 2025-07-24 22:22 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | danieldegroot2 ♦740 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19385743Preferably simple polygons are added as area, not multipolygon, unless not otherwise possible, or prefered by the local community (which it is unlikely to be). --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/ch... |
| 134551439 by BeaconOSM @ 2023-04-05 19:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | DUGA ♦552 | Junk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1160031626/history/ removed. |
| 148609728 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:25 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete operator= tag here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609728 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Misuse of operator tag | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | How is it misuse if it lists who's the operator? | |
| 148617097 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617097 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Research of the company shows that this pin was placed here by a bot/person for advertisement purposes and not does not reflect an actual entity address. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Please provide this supporting evidence that it doesn't exist here. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | https://www.brighterdaymh.com/locations/waterbury | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | + In person investigation; its just a Walmart. | |
| 148617237 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:58 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you completely delete this node rather than use lifecycle prefixes? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617237 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Research of the company shows that this pin was placed here by a bot/person for advertisement purposes and not does not reflect an actual entity address. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Even if this company didn't exist here, the address tags are valid and should've been left intact. | |
| 148617250 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this hotel? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617250 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Misuse of description tag | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | How is deleting every other tag of this hotel relates to correcting "Misuse of description tag"? | |
| 148609881 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:30 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete payment tags here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609881 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | Misuse of description tag for a business | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | How is deleting accurate payment tags fixes "Misuse of description tag for a business"? 🤨 | |
| 148617120 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this valid building? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617120 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | BeaconOSM | The building was replaced | |
| 148617233 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:58 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617233 |
| 148617211 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:57 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you complete delete this node rather than fixing its tags? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617211 |
| 148617207 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:57 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617207 |
| 148617200 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:57 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617200 |
| 148617194 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:56 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617194 |
| 148617178 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:56 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags on this feature but didn't fix actually incorrect ones? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617178 |
| 148617154 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:54 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617154 |
| 148617146 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:54 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617146 |
| 148617131 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:53 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid description tag? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617131 |
| 148617103 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this building? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148617103 |
| 148616957 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:43 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616957 |
| 148616947 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:43 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this feature? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616947 |
| 148616918 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:41 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616918 |
| 148616843 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 23:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148616843 |
| 148615382 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 22:26 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148615382 |
| 148615262 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 22:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete contact information from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148615262 |
| 148612830 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:55 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612830 |
| 148612755 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:53 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you not transfer VALID information into proper inscription tag?!There's NO advertisement in this node, please write accurate and meaningful changeset comments. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612... |
| 148612555 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid payment methods from this node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612555 |
| 148612545 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612545 |
| 148612537 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612537 |
| 148612474 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you completely delete a valid business node? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612474 |
| 148612443 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete an apparently valid INSCRIPTION from this statue?Why didn't you change the name of this tag instead of outright just deleting it? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612443 |
| 148612329 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you completely delete this node, instead of actually doing proper tag clean up and preserving at least address information?! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612329 |
| 148612318 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete legitimate description from this school? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612318 |
| 148612308 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete valid tags from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612308 |
| 148611923 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete name= tag from this business? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148611923 |
| 148611859 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:31 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this node of apparently legit business? And why did you do it without transferring address information? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148611859 |
| 148611828 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:30 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Instead of deleting the whole feature and then creating a new one, why didn't you just remove incorrect tags?!Why when you created a new building you didn't restore address tags?! --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/... |
| 148611303 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:16 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Here again, "Opens Summer 2024" is not a real feature name. Feature description must NOT be used as its name.If you want to encode when this station is planned to be operational you can use opening_date= tag as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date ... |
| 148610536 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | "Opens summer 2024" is an invalid feature name. Feature name must NOT be used as its description.We have opening_date= tag, as documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date to indicate a date when a feature finishes construction or activates. --- ... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Additionally, why did you create a multipolygon relation with just a single feature? 17342788 --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148610536 | |
| 148609708 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:24 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Street name tag is invalid here.Why was it necessary merging this node with the building? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609708 |
| 148609691 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:23 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete description tag here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148609691 |
| 148608958 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:01 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete this biz POI?It seems to be there.Or at the very least, why did you not keep the address tags intact? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608958 |
| 148608935 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 19:01 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete all these legitimate tags?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:*https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment:* --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608935 |
| 148608822 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 18:57 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | This is not a valid street name.Why did you just delete amenity= instead of fixing it? Now this POI has no primary category. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608822 |
| 148608649 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 18:51 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete description= tag here? This looks to be a perfectly legitimate, neutral tone description of the business.Also why did you delete nysgissam:nysaddresspointid tag? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148608649 ... |
| 148605647 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 17:40 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Why did you delete nysgissam:nysaddresspointid tag here? --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605647 |
| 148605291 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 17:33 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Once again you deleted a legitimate biz poi... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148605291 |
| 148604974 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 17:26 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Hello.Why did you delete this apparently legitimate business?Valid biz listings on OSM is not advertisement... --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148604974 |
| 148603659 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 16:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Hello.If you were cleaning up ads from the description tag, why did you delete all the biz-specific tags?And even more so, why did you delete all the address tags from this building?!This is borderline map vandalism! The deleted information MUST be restored! --- #REVI... |
| 148612396 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Hello.Why did you delete this law office tags? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/148612396 |
| 148608467 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 18:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Hello.Please do NOT delete nycdoitt:bin=* tags!They uniquely identify each building in NYC DOT's database which allows for metadata conflation and enrichment.If you don't know what a tag does, please do not delete it. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA P... |
| 148611903 by BeaconOSM @ 2024-03-13 20:32 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | jhaluska80 ♦110 | Kind of impressed you found that. I learned about the alt_name tag after making that change and forgot to update it. |
| 141439788 by BeaconOSM @ 2023-09-18 19:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Hello.Could you please elaborate on this edit? The latest satellite imagery shows that this is some sort of construction site or a staging area for one. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/141439788 |
| 126224617 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-09-15 13:20 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Frans S ♦11,020 | Hello Again,This task is not validated as it should be done. Issues with crossed buildings and connected nodes not corrected as well as buildings not squared.Best regards |
| 126224505 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-09-15 13:17 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Frans S ♦11,020 | HelloA remark, I am a Sr validator and review validated tasks at random.You missed here a number of issuesNot all buildings squared. (22)Overlapping buildings, not solved.Untagged ways, issue with crossing.Please also solve issues which pops up when you want to upload your mappings.... |
| 124499173 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:22 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500659 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-05 00:07 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124498937 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500184 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 23:32 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124498105 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 21:25 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124499094 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:17 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500476 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 23:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124498210 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 21:29 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124500525 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 23:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 124499265 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-08-04 22:27 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SomeoneElse_Revert ♦73,702 | This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199. |
| 116436268 by BeaconOSM @ 2022-01-21 15:23 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | mkarau ♦11 | Your Edits are incorrect. You used Aerial imagery, and I used the most up to date GPS traces that actually represent the new road patterns. Please Revert. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | mkarau ♦11 | Your Edits are incorrect. You used Aerial imagery, and I used the most up to date GPS traces that actually represent the new road patterns. Please Revert. | |
| 108714756 by BeaconOSM @ 2021-07-28 02:22 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Hello.Do you have some supporting information that there's a neighborhood named Ravel there?As far as I'm aware that area is referred to as Brooklyn Heights. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108714756 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | jmapb ♦431 | Chiming in -- never heard of this "Brooklyn Community Board Recognized Colloquial Neighborhood" -- what's your source? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | MxxCon ♦3,581 | Since I found nothing about this feature online and this user didn't respond in 4 days, I deleted that neighborhood. Perhaps their other changes should be reviewed as well. |