Dartmouthmapmaker participated in the following OpenStreetMap Changeset DiscussionsDartmouthmapmaker participated in the following OpenStreetMap Changeset Discussions| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 163302146 by Birchell @ 2025-03-06 21:00 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | You got Relation: 1100815 so clopped up that now unrepairable |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Birchell ♦2 | if you didn't butt in and mess with what i had in the first place it wouldn't be. my edits got removed for yours so try again buddy.im not done with the wilderness area so just hold yourself before blaming others | |
| 158794336 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2024-11-05 20:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | wolfy1339 ♦42 | Hello,Can you please provide more detailed changeset comments instead of simply Quebec?I see you have tagged numerous telephone exchanges (central offices) with the ref tag with the area code and CO code. While that may be relevant data to add, I don't believe it belongs in the ref tag.... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | OK found it thank you | |
| 150898628 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2024-05-04 21:19 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | kartler175 ♦576 | please check https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-62.55646&lat=44.85302&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_c... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Already fixed it | |
| 147198226 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2024-02-08 01:46 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Frank Bielig ♦4 | As I see you have changed the boundary type from "land_area" to "administrative". This is in my opinion wrong. The real administrative boundary is covered by https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3406826. Probably the boundary tag can be removed completely. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | This under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=administrative?uselang=en | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | trial ♦1,154 | See https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/quels-tags-pour-les-collectivites-doutre-mer/22756 | |
| 145014026 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-12-11 20:42 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Himké ♦79 | Trunk 2 is not signed as "In" nor "Out". Route refs should not have a space after the separator ; |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | It is signs on Upper Water Street are signed 2 Out | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Also there Route 2 signs on Barrington St after Upper Water | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Himké ♦79 | Separate route relations have been created for wayfinding routes that are not officially part of the province’s network | |
| 144254872 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-11-20 16:48 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | clay_c ♦521 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker. I noticed you changed ref="102" to ref="NS 102" on the relation here. This full text displays inside the shield icon in renderers like Americana [1] that take the ref from relations instead of ways. The tag network="CA:NS:H" supplies enough informa... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Thanks for the help | |
| 130995001 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-01-07 20:16 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | jfd553 ♦62 | Hi, I wonder, where did you get the information about electric line voltage? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Its the type of power line configuration used in Quebec | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | jfd553 ♦62 | Really? I did not know. For lines location, you used the imagery? | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | imagery | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | jfd553 ♦62 | Cool, I wanted to be sure it was not from personal knowledge and that I was wrong on image interpretation :-)I'll then change a few segments that seem clearer on new images. | |
| 138694030 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-07-19 03:13 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,555 | Hello! Please take a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1164087791. what is the mean of all theforeign keys? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | copy and paste error | |
| 138786165 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2023-07-20 22:00 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | citrula ♦990 | Hello Dartmouthmapmaker, did you mean to upload a changeset with only nodes and no tags? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | It was uploaded in error | |
| 130579597 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-12-28 02:15 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | PierZen ♦286 | Ce barrage et cette centrale ont été bien décrits avec évacuateur d'eau, amenée d'eau sous pression. La centrale (chemin 188623562) contentait les attributs power:plant et plant:*. Vous avez modifié pur generator et ajouté les attributs plan... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Reverted | |
| 127228098 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-10-09 02:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,555 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/10086084248. What is the meaning of the tags ADD_LOC = YCIV_NUM = 8873STR_TYPE = Road? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Fixed | |
| 126567056 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-09-24 01:12 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | joel56dt ♦197 | I don't believe this plant uses a steam turbine but instead a gasification process. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | its says on the website gasification | |
| 118617020 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-03-18 03:40 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | VLD194 ♦7 | Hello Dartmouthmapmaker,Can you provide more context on this relation. Specifically, which parts are considered Jamieson Community Correctional Centre? If I may pick your thoughts about this relation, I will have a better understanding as to why there are many members scattered about that are ca... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Bedford Commons is a an area of Bedford The Jamieson Community Correctional Centre is in the Burnside Industrial Park in Dartmouth | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Jamieson Community Correctional Centre ? Your changeset replaced the whole CFB Halifax with Jamieson Community Correctional Centre instead of modifying the area where Jamieson Community Correctional Centre is | |
| 126149912 by Paul Blaauw @ 2022-09-13 19:48 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Jamieson Community Correctional Centre replaced the whole CFB Halifax relation fixed the mistake |
| 122384200 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-06-14 18:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Downtown DartmouthStreetlamps |
| 121873340 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-06-03 03:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,555 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/862178622. What is the meaning of the tag street: = Whitecap? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | its called a copy past error and I fix it | |
| 119973147 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-04-20 21:24 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | kartler175 ♦576 | Please fix or remove boundary relation completely:https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.61103&lat=44.63455&zoom=16&opacity=0.95 |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed | |
| 119472569 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-04-08 13:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Ekaterina Butskevich ♦8 | Hi! My name is Ekaterina and I work on improving OpenStreetMap data by fixing errors and adding data for Mapbox.Tell me please is the road that you have plotted really here? It is not visible on satellite images. With best wishes! |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | The road is from open Data of the Halifax Regional Municipality as stated in the source | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Ekaterina Butskevich ♦8 | Thank you very much! | |
| 117785387 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-02-23 19:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed errors |
| 116931853 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-02-02 19:04 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Andre68 ♦88 | Why do you edit coastlines while you don't know how...? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I do fix the warnings and errors when uploading on Jsom till they are repaired | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | vng_me ♦141 | Coastlines are bad. At least what is it?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002470379 | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | The coastlines are bad because they are connected by other ways to form relations of bodies of water | |
| 116320649 by Nate Wessel @ 2022-01-19 00:57 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | No such Place |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Still the area of Halifax NS and is only a part of the Halifax Regional Municipality The Wikipedia titles are far from reality | |
| 115988697 by Nate Wessel @ 2022-01-10 16:20 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | There is no such place or municipality named "City of Halifax " or just Halifax its called "Halifax Regional Municipality " |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Nate Wessel ♦61 | There's no place called "Halifax"?Wikipedia and Wikidata disagree. I'm sure it has a longer official name, but do people actually not just call it "Halifax"? | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I live there its still "Halifax Regional Municipality " | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | Nate Wessel ♦61 | Apologies for stepping on any toes. My impression was that the regional municipality was going as "Halifax" and that the previous city boundary was now defunct as an administrative boundary, but kept around perhaps as a statistical unit, similar to Old Toronto: https://www.openstreetmap.or... | |
| 5 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Halifax.ca is tr website for the the Halifax Regional Municipality ( The actual name) people got this confused with the logo but the official name is Halifax Regional Municipality which the municipality states on that website | |
| 116345718 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-01-19 14:46 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | There is no such place or municipality named "City of Halifax " since April 1 1996 its called "Halifax Regional Municipality " . There are no incorporated cities in Nova Scotia either |
| 115810733 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2022-01-05 19:53 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115810733 |
| 111890429 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2021-09-29 22:56 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Nordpfeil ♦85 | Can you please check the added key=value combination "Maritime=Centre" ? |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed error | |
| 102576956 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2021-04-08 15:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SherbetS ♦155 | Hi, The correct tagging for the communication structure is man_made=mast + tower:type=communication |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Thank You | |
| 102437797 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2021-04-07 01:38 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,835 | can you use changeset comments communicating what was actually changed?Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsEspecially if you import stuff - please specify that in changeset description and obey https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | the building outline was updated | |
| 93886964 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-11-10 22:44 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | woodpeck ♦2,621 | A couple of ways in this changeset - and many ways in other, similar changesets - have tags they should not have, being as they are only the constituents of boundary relations. For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/869903201/history carries a "boundary" and "admin_level" ... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Reverted changeset | |
| 101215136 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2021-03-17 21:49 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,835 | Reverted as made in violation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines You were blocked already for making imports without discussion, please stop doing it again.Note that rule breaking imports may be reverted by anyone, at any time, without any reason required beyond "i... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Trying to delete but jsom will not let me | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Mateusz Konieczny ♦9,835 | Because I deleted them already. | |
| 101680331 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2021-03-25 01:54 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,555 | Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. CIV_POSTAL\tB3N 1J3DISTRICT\t09FULL_CIVIC\t182GSA_NAME\tHalifaxOBJECTID\t56780407PID\t00208603STR_NAME\tSt Margarets Bay RoadPlease explain the meaning of the keys.Bevor you delete this please a look on https:/... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Fixed | |
| 100559754 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2021-03-07 03:11 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | alester ♦187 | You surveyed more than 8000 mailboxes across Canada and determined that they're all named "Canada Post Community Mailbox" (when I didn't think mailboxes had names)? You've also singlehandedly replaced all instances of the long-standing tag type=cmb in favour of a tag with fa... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | because all of them had type=cmb as the initial tag | |
| 71200672 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-06-13 03:30 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | blackboxlogic ♦459 | This (and other edits in the area) have put the tag "land_area=admistrative", which seems like a mis-pelling of "administrative". Please let me know if this was on purpose, if you can fix it, or if you'd like help fixing it.See an example of one: https://www.openstreetmap.... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | could be a spelling mistake | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed | |
| 93138727 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-10-27 18:49 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Greg_Rose ♦180 | Greetings - Why did you mark the industrial zone here as an administrative boundary? Milne Inlet is not an incorporated town, and so does not actually have such a boundary.The same goes for Mary River at the mine mouth.Are you doing this to replace landuse areas marked as villages and towns? Les... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Its an place admin= 8 Incorporated areas are admin=6 | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Greg_Rose ♦180 | It's dependent on the country, actually.For Canada, large municipalities use admin=6, lower-tier/rural municipalities use admin=8. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countriesBut regardless, BOTH levels are for incorporated... | |
| 4 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Large municipalities are incorporated areas that contain individual Communites Municipalities are areas of government Legal address for Canada Post are the name of the place not the name of municipality . Fort Macmurry is a particular place but the municipality is call Wood Buffalo ypu cannot us... | |
| 5 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | The admin levels for the provinces and territories and they reflect the individual juridictions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada_admin_level | |
| 93337475 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-10-31 13:04 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | Himké ♦79 | Marketway Lane is another road |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | This is from HRM and is official It on the HRM open data under street centre lines | |
| 92644149 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-10-17 23:28 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,764 | Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8017619700 is in the middle of the Atlantic. |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed | |
| 89382375 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-08-14 03:36 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz ♦2,933 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,your recent changeset have created again a huge amount of errors in the OSM database:http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.70279&lat=44.94410&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,dupli... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz ♦2,933 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker, this mess is still there. What is your approach to fix it? Can I help out? Did you make yourself familiar with OSM Inspector? Did you review your changesets on a regular base? What were your conclusion?Guido | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fix as per osm inspector | |
| 89064832 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-08-07 03:21 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz ♦2,933 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,your recent changeset have created again a huge amount of errors in the OSM database:http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.70279&lat=44.94410&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,dupli... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Jsom will let me delete the node found in validator | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | deleted a bunch through downloading in current view and search via type:node untagged -child | |
| 88166360 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-07-18 03:23 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | gscholz ♦2,933 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-63.67213&lat=45.06426&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_int... |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Will delete when get home | |
| 82083132 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2020-03-12 00:48 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | Hi,could you explain the meaning of the key 'parter'? This is not used in any other place.Thanks! |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Jointly operated | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | Could you find a tag that is already in use for that? Or at least a common English word... | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I fixed it | |
| 65086244 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-12-02 02:05 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | jambamkin ♦82 | Hello, looks like you left a way untagged in this changeset way/624762799. Didn't want to delete it in case you had use for it. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | It was an orphaned way for which I deleted -Thank You | |
| 77909058 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-12-04 04:48 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | This changeset added more than 600 new nodes with only foreign tags. Please fix this.Jan |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Only one shows up the rest are deleted | |
| 75806712 by Himké @ 2019-10-17 02:07 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Himké ♦79 | Overpass is not yet open to traffic in the other direction |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | That overpass is is open https://www.halifaxtoday.ca/local-news/new-highway-102103-ramp-and-overpass-will-open-on-monday-update-1743298 | |
| 72748446 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-07-28 22:26 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | dkiselev ♦7 | fire_hydrant:type=pillar or whatewer type doesn't have any sense without emergency:fire_hydrant |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Thanks for pointing it out - fixed | |
| 71457781 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-06-20 18:59 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | fx99 ♦133 | There are now 2 admin-relations (9685840,9677637 incompete) level=6, name=Simonds Parish.Which is the correct one? |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | the one that shares boundaries with Saint John County | |
| 71384129 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-06-19 01:27 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | SimonPoole ♦370 | Hi, this edit duplicated all members of relation 71384129 (boundary Contiguous United States). If you can't fix it yourself, please give a heads up and I'll do so. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Contiguous United States is suppose tb the lower 48 but this relation causes issues when trying to merge boundaries for the whole US and should have a level like AL 3 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | skquinn ♦812 | The comment is also completely inaccurate for what the changeset actually is, including the source. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | New Brunswick shares a border with the USa | |
| 70643221 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-05-26 23:07 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Lana Shields ♦2 | Dear Dartmouthmapmaker,I'm classifying this edit as an import. Do you know your responsibilities according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?Kind regards,L. Shields |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Revert for now | |
| 68567965 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-03-27 00:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | interdite Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | No but the history has shown it was fixed by another mapper | |
| 67936951 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-03-08 19:40 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | nplath ♦23 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,is the CFAD Bedford Magazine really an administrative region? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | military areas are administrated areas | |
| 63293084 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-10-08 01:36 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Bytemark ♦50 | Have you really manually reviewed all of the railway lines in this changeset? That you've edited a railway bridge now used as railtrail ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73313825/history ), far away from any other railway tracks, isn't assuming me the best. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | It was done from a way tagged railway | |
| 66866294 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-02-02 22:21 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Matthew Darwin ♦204 | Hello, there seems to be some issue with the Beaver Dam relation. The inner an outer relations intersect with each other. Could you verify? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | The inner relation is a first nations reserve which is not a part of HRM | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | frodrigo ♦51 | As the inner is on the side. Can be juste removed from the relation? | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I see what your saying I have to give it aa try | |
| 5 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I cleaned up the boundaries so Beaver Lake 17 + Beaver Dam share a way plus Beaver Lake 17 +Pleasant Valley share a way | |
| 6 | ~ 7 years ago | frodrigo ♦51 | This relation is still open: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577608854 | |
| 7 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | The way is part of a relation | |
| 8 | ~ 7 years ago | frodrigo ♦51 | Sorry, you are right! | |
| 66588492 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-01-24 04:25 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | timdine ♦4 | Can you explain this changeset deleting this feature? You've listed it was a duplicate, but there is no matching feature that still exists. You've deleted many of these features but they aren't duplicates. --- Published using OSMCha: https://o... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Duplicate Ways from older Stats Canada that were 50 meters off | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | timdine ♦4 | I don't see the feature in OSM that has replaced this feature? All of the features in the related changesets appear to have been deleted without being replaced or being duplicates. Have I missed it and can you identify where it is?If features are being replaced it best practice to maintain ... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | BCNorwich ♦5,164 | Hi timdine, if it helps the deletion was of Way: Pomquet And Afton 23 (149983566), a boundary=administrative. On the same day Way: Paqtnkek-Niktuek 23 (343745602) was amended also by Dartmouthmapmaker.This info can be obtained by temporarily reverting the changeset in JOSM. | |
| 5 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | this is the current boundary Stats Canada does not define boundaries in Nova Scotia the government of NS does | |
| 6 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | the boundaries that where left behind match where they intersect on the interpolation lines on the roads the ones deleted where off while the newer one were exact | |
| 65897205 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-12-30 20:35 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | timdine ♦4 | Have you reviewed these?I would not class Shearwater as 8, it isn't an Unincorporated place like Dartmouth or Brookfield, it's a military base with a small neighbourhood where the married quarters are. This should be reverted. --- Published using ... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | There are no cities in NS anymore since 1996 Shearwater is admin 8 community according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada_admin_level HRM is an upper tier municipalityAL 6 Shearwater is a division of HRM AL 8 | |
| 65428641 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-12-13 03:46 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | freebeer ♦1,598 | hi,could you please be more careful with your edits?with this changeset you have pulled and joined nodes in a manner i associate with beginners using iD.in particular the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4632403571 which is now merged into another way so that the woods has be... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Fixed it | |
| 66039045 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2019-01-05 02:54 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | ລາວ ♦4 | What is a "dupicate"? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | something that is an exact copy of something else: | |
| 64463245 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-14 02:08 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Himké ♦79 | What did you do to Christ Church Cemetery? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Its called a mistake making a boundary | |
| 65218376 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-12-05 21:17 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | OttawaHiking ♦28 | Hello, I'm a bit confused about this object. It seems that it shows Nepean as it was two hundred years ago. It has evolved since that time. Then should not we match it with a part of Ottawa that locals currently call as Nepean? That would probably be Nepean as of 2001 right before it was agglom... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | got it from the city of Ottwa | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | OttawaHiking ♦28 | The boundary of Nepean has been changing over time. Instead of taking the oldest boundary, we better take the most recent one. Would you agree? | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I revised it to be out of the Downtown area of Ottawa I would need to find the postal code FSA boundaries that Canada Post refer Nepean to | |
| 65278905 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-12-07 20:26 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | DannyMcD ♦103 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker,Thanks for adding the Nepean boundary. In terms of tagging, I don't think boundary=administrative is quite right, since Nepean is not a current administrative entity. boundary=traditional or boundary=historical might be better. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Nepean and other areas of Ottawa are still in use and even the City of Ottawa and Canada Post still use Nepean | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | DannyMcD ♦103 | The boundaries you have for Nepean are the original township boundaries, which are used for land registration and a few other purposes. Most references (e.g. by Canada Post) to Nepean are to the old municipality (dissolved in 2001 into Ottawa), which had smaller boundaries. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | However people and business still refer the area as Nepean . There are 2 Costcos and 3 Canadian Tires listed as being in Nepean When a municipality dissolves it only means the municipal government changes not the name of the area . The airport businesses use Gloucester , The term City of Ottawa re... | |
| 64858324 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-25 04:29 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Aleks-Berlin ♦488 | Hi Dartmouthmapmaker, please follow he OSM wiki and write wikipedia="lang:Article" (using language code like "en:"), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipediaThanks, Alex |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | ok thank you | |
| 62956039 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-26 18:56 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | pitscheplatsch ♦6,448 | reverted by https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64844413I'm not sure, if this is correct.Maybe some local contributor could check this?Thanks. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | It from NB open data | |
| 63137110 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-10-02 20:06 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | OpenTopoMap ♦23 | What have you done here? You've tagged a forest as power line: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239523257/historyPlease fix this immediately! |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Fixed | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | OpenTopoMap ♦23 | Thanks. Do you know, that you might be one of the most hurried mappers? Keep cool, the map will keep us working for the next 50 years ;) | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | :) | |
| 64848631 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-24 16:50 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Ryzen Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | ok | |
| 63960519 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-10-28 21:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Steenbuck Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed | |
| 64830794 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-23 19:44 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Ryzen Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Its a county admin 5 with a town and native reserves and another county municipalities . In Nova Scotia counties are divided into municipalities and municipalities are divided into communities (ad 8) ex. 18629 Highway 2 , Alton, Municipality of the County of Colchester, Colchester County, B0N 2J0 ... | |
| 64336447 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-09 19:18 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | STOP THAT. Removin "unnessesary" tags will kill that boundary. and type=land_area is wrong too. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | have to fix when i get back to PC with Jsom on it | |
| 64279158 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-08 02:40 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | type=boundary is very important for admin boundaries. please never ever remove or change that tag.btw: label=* is not recommended. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | btw: you may ask me how to do this better. i'll allways help you.But if you continue like this, I will ask the DWG to block you again - but this time for a longer time. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | i was told to remove tags that did not belong | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | ok | |
| 5 | ~ 7 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | who told you? or where? Because that is partially wrong and i would like to check/fix that.in detail:every relation needs a type. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relationan admin boundary needs additional tags boundary=administrative, admin_level=X and name=*see htt... | |
| 6 | ~ 7 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | the "is_in" tags, "source" tag and "tiger" tags are not being used any more. from my point of view, it's ok to remove those tags. | |
| 64154216 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-03 23:13 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | alester ♦187 | This is a good start, but don't forget to also make the following changes:-Remove area=yes, all of the is_in tags, and land_area=administrative.-Remove place=* from the boundary where a place node already exists for that settlement-Convert to a relation with shared ways rather than overla... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Having internet and family problem but I will fix , Also will check as place nodes do not render the area the true place name | |
| 64180934 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-11-04 23:23 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | alester ♦187 | These substations shouldn't have any addr:* tags if they don't actually have a street address. is_in tags are also unnecessary. Any with a name of "Nova Scotia Power" should have that removed, because that's the operator, not the name of the substation |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Okay thanks | |
| 52314254 by BlueJaysFan86 @ 2017-09-23 20:45 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I tired to do this om Highway 111 in Dartmouth NS lately but it was reverted because it was not allowed according to the reverter |
| 63695039 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-10-20 03:34 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | Please be so kind and stop your imports until you have solved the issues with misspelled tags. There are hundreds of forests and rivers that contain the tag "addrcountry=Canada". Forests don't have addresses, and the tag 'addrcountry' doesn't exist anywhere else. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I did and the instructions and video state that addressing tags are essential in the place ways | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | I don't know which instructions and video you refer to, but I think you misunderstood something. All 'addr:' tags are put on things like buildings, POI, or nodes, but not on streets, rivers or boundaries. This might get 'is_in' tags like 'is_in:city' - but even tha... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Streets and highways etc yes but not natural features JSOM does not know the difference when it auto completes them | |
| 5 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | JOSM is not "intelligent" in a sense that it can determine which tags fit and which don't. That's up to the person operating it. | |
| 63514318 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-10-14 16:55 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | alester ♦187 | Can you explain what's happening here? It seems like some reserves in BC are being tagged with some Nova Scotia information, as well as a number of very odd, non-standard, or outright wrong tags (type=land_area, place=Mi'kmaq Reserve, reserve=first nation, etc.). Was this a test that wasn&... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | fixed | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | alester ♦187 | There were still 5 unnecessary or non-standard tags on the two BC ways, so I've removed those. | |
| 62593117 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-14 19:07 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Field check GPS reads no destination or road just "ramp ahead" NS Open Data HRM |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Himké ♦79 | OSM destination=* tags are used on ways, not nodes. What GPS do you have? | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Garmin and it suppose to work on all Garmins its and itand these changes would make it work great on the GPS if they are changed back it would make the map usless . In other places are tagged the same with the ways labled . without tthe ways and junctions labled the GPS cannot follow the path ... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | Himké ♦79 | That's a problem with Garmin, not OSM. Please refrain from adding superfluous tags. | |
| 62506590 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-12 02:55 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Nova Scotia is in Canada is a Province not a state |
| 62500913 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-11 20:08 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Field check GPS reads no destination or road just "ramp ahead" NS Open Data HRM |
| 62592905 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-14 18:59 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Field check GPS reads no destination or road just "ramp ahead" NS Open Data HRM |
| 62595435 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-14 20:25 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | ield check GPS reads no destination or road just "ramp ahead" NS Open Data HRM |
| 62360191 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-09-07 03:25 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | Hi,you added strange tags to 550 nodes, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5889553759They all got the same address and boundary tags which don't seem to belong there.Could you have a look?Jan |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | it was suppose to be deleted | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I just re deleted it | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | highflyer74 ♦2,451 | Hi there!There are still several nodes in the middle of nowhere. And a wrong tag A=administrative with those nodes. Check this https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/BLTThank you! | |
| 5 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | these are places in Nova Scotia and they real places they come from the government of Nova Scotia people live there they are administrative areas and they are not in the middle of nowhere | |
| 6 | ~ 7 years ago | highflyer74 ♦2,451 | @Dartmouthmapmaker: you got my remark completely wrong... I am well aware of what Nova Scotia is and where it is and have been there a couple of times myself.The reason for mueschel and me to contact you is the fact that on the ways you added there are tons of nodes which carry the same informat... | |
| 7 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | I removed the A=administrative tags including the other obviously wrong tags on 265 nodes. The issues with addr tags on boundaries, water areas tagged as place=village and a huge amount of overlapping nodes (1000 errors in JOSM) still exist. | |
| 8 | ~ 7 years ago | highflyer74 ♦2,451 | Thanks mueschel! | |
| 62295351 by Himké @ 2018-09-05 01:00 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | It is not on the official open data of this being Lakeview Drive not on the HRM data or the NS data - where is your source ? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Himké ♦79 | It is referred to as Lakeview Drive or the Lakeview Connector in planning documents for the MacKay bridge approach road system | |
| 59578616 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-06-05 18:50 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | VlIvYur ♦154 | I think you can use "ref" instead of HYDRANTNUMBERhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=fire_hydrant |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | I did on other edits this was caused by a mistake on JSOM | |
| 59508934 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-06-03 13:31 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | address of sportspitch from HRM |
| 58280667 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-04-21 02:12 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | Hi,are you aware that you completed shredded Darthmouth?you should get more experienced in editin boundaries. that is no easy job.usin iD as editor is not a good choice, iD is not made for that. Please start using josm.because of so many edits by you during the last 2 days, i'm no... |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Replace old boundary that was hand drawing with updated boundary from HRM open data | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | Yes, that is what you tried - but you didn' manage it.i see, that you don't know how Admin Boundaries will be added and tagged in OSM. - Admin Boundarties are *relations* with type=boundary, boundary=administrative, admin_level=X, name=yyy + some less important tags.without those... | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | The boundaries were source from two sources - the municipality (HRM) and the province (NS) I discovered the boundaries from the municipality were of poor quality and did not line up with the County lines so I used the provincial ones are better | |
| 5 | ~ 8 years ago | wambacher ♦437 | Hi, did you not understand, what i was saying? The new "boundaries" are *technically* not ok. May be the ways describing the border are better than before, but there are no boundary relations at all. Therefore this "pseudo boundaries" are not availiable to all OSM software ... | |
| 6 | ~ 8 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Darthmouth? Its Dartmouth and its an actual place in Nova Scotia and its in Halifax County according the NS government where the info is from | |
| 57335513 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2018-03-19 23:26 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | Hi,could you please point me to the Wiki page detailing this import? It looks like it generates lots of problems. - There is a huge amount of foreign tags which shouldn't appear in OSM (like "Shape_Length")- I found "parks" consisting of a two nodes about 10 cm apart... |
| 2 | ~ 8 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | These are from HRM open data - what I did is delete the foreign tag which came along the importing it through JSOM | |
| 3 | ~ 8 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | Thanks for point this out | |
| 4 | ~ 8 years ago | mueschel ♦7,078 | Did you read the guidelines for importing data from other sources?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines | |
| 49481979 by Dartmouthmapmaker @ 2017-06-12 21:13 ~ 8 years ago | 1 | ~ 8 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | HRM open data |
| 44519858 by BillPoster123 @ 2016-12-19 16:29 ~ 9 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | DevonF ♦15 | Hi, just wanted to point out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_commentsHappy mapping! |
| 2 | ~ 9 years ago | Dartmouthmapmaker | new |