Martin Ligabue have been discussed with 23 replies of this contributorMartin Ligabue have been discussed with 23 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 174233749 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-11-05 10:25 | 1 | 2025-11-06 18:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,730 | thanks for a fix! |
| 165492379 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-04-27 07:21 | 1 | 2025-10-03 13:39 | user_5359 ♦20,421 | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9965573725. What is the mean of the tag zcs = 5? |
| 2 | 2025-10-09 19:58 | Martin Ligabue | it was imported badly by Embarto, they already made bad imports in the past, here I just merged the two features without checking for the validity of the data. I have no idea what the meaning might be...https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12790523815/history | |
| 171914896 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-09-14 12:20 | 1 | 2025-09-14 14:16 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,471 | Ciao. Il POI Overkids come hai fatto a rilevarlo? Da Overture? Ciao, Andrea |
| 2 | 2025-09-14 17:12 | Martin Ligabue | sì, l'ho però confuso con un altro poi che vedevo aveva la pagina facebook attiva, ricontrollando la pagina facebook è morta, lo rimuovo. grazie | |
| 3 | 2025-09-14 18:34 | Andrea Musuruane ♦1,471 | Ciao. In genere i POI di Overture sono posizionati male e spesso sono obsoleti. Io non li userei, soprattutto in zone che non conosco. Overkids, inoltre, anche per Overture, aveva una confidenza dello 0.25. Ma non è l'unico. Ad esempio, "A passo di danza" ha una confidenza dell... | |
| 4 | 2025-09-14 19:42 | Martin Ligabue | per ogni posto prima mi guardo informazioni su facebook, siti web e altro che trovo, il feed facebook mi sembrava non troppo male, e la città coincideva, quindi l'ho dato per buono. per overkids come avevo detto l'avevo confuso con un altro poi... in effetti stavolta è stato ... | |
| 171782938 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-09-11 12:41 | 1 | 2025-09-11 13:54 | Martin Ligabue | scusate per la dimensione del cs, pensavo la dividesse da sé, lol, f |
| 157578205 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-10-07 11:44 | 1 | 2025-08-30 17:39 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,730 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54729580/history has access:foot = no that was added in this editWould using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, bu... |
| 2 | 2025-08-30 17:42 | Martin Ligabue | you're right, I don't remember how it happened, mybe streetcomplete added the access wrong, or I made some error, I'll fix it as it's how it is usually tagged | |
| 3 | 2025-08-30 17:45 | Martin Ligabue | I see that it was removed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Josef%20K in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147795404 and explained in the changeset comment. so I'll keep to that as it's native to the placehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171239264 | |
| 4 | 2025-08-30 17:57 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,730 | > mybe streetcomplete added the access wrongnote that this edit was made with SCEE, not with StreetComplete (these are different editors, though SCEE is based on SC) | |
| 170688895 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-08-19 19:30 | 1 | 2025-08-20 13:15 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,265 | Please don't blindly trust Rapid. Pretty much everything that was brought in was either misshapen, out of alignment with the rest of the map, over an existing building, or all of the above. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170688... |
| 2 | 2025-08-20 13:16 | Baloo Uriza ♦2,265 | Please don't blindly trust Rapid. Pretty much everything that was brought in was either misshapen, out of alignment with the rest of the map, over an existing building, or all of the above. --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.... | |
| 3 | 2025-08-20 13:24 | Martin Ligabue | That's on me, I misjudged which aerial map was used, reverting now, I'll try again later whn I'm on pc | |
| 161984775 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-01-31 17:07 | 1 | 2025-05-09 17:45 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,730 | Note that this wikidata value is wrong - as it is about a generic term rather than about this statue |
| 2 | 2025-05-09 17:59 | ivanbranco ♦2,797 | The correct value, as in v3, should be Q21141660 | |
| 3 | 2025-05-09 18:00 | Martin Ligabue | youre absolutely right! sorry | |
| 4 | 2025-05-09 19:51 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,730 | added it back | |
| 144215186 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-11-19 16:35 | 1 | 2025-05-02 10:01 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,730 | Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11362324214/history has fixme:type = stairs that was added in this editIt should be mapped as line with highway=steps ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps ) - not as this weird fixme object |
| 2 | 2025-05-02 10:11 | Martin Ligabue | I just forgot about it, I was from everydoor as you can see, shoul'dve corrected that when back in a normal pc | |
| 162404268 by Martin Ligabue @ 2025-02-11 19:29 | 1 | 2025-04-05 19:06 | os-emmer ♦347 | Hello Martin Ligabue,you added name:etymology:wikidata=L268315;L1047972 to this object:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/43563What does that mean? Wikidata items start with a "Q". Is that a typo? |
| 2 | 2025-04-05 19:18 | ivanbranco ♦2,797 | He used Wikidata lexemes, see: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L1047972Honestly I think we should stick to Q-Items. For complicated cases name:etymology:description=* can be used. We use Q-Items with every other key using the ":wikidata" suffix, making an exception for this tag ju... | |
| 3 | 2025-04-05 20:26 | os-emmer ♦347 | Thanks for the explanation. Do you have a suggestion on what to put in name:etymology:description=*? | |
| 159238603 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-11-17 11:31 | 1 | 2025-03-23 21:08 | DabMK ♦15 | In alcuni casi strade e boundary coincidono e questo è il miglior modo di mapparlo dato che non si dovrebbero mai sovrapporre 2 ways |
| 150492680 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-04-25 11:48 | 1 | 2024-11-29 19:10 | ivanbranco ♦2,797 | Ciao Martin, grazie per le modifiche!se non ho capito male hai aggiunto degli steps, ma un utente ha aperto oggi una nota dicendo che non esistono, magari una svista? o sono stati rimossi durante questi 7 mesi? riesci a verificare? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4537099grazie e buon ... |
| 2 | 2024-12-01 10:26 | Martin Ligabue | grazie a te, non ricordo come sia successo sinceramente, forse ho confuso due percorsi vicini, ho provveduto a ripristinare footway | |
| 156795019 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-09-18 22:03 | 1 | 2024-11-17 11:45 | ivanbranco ♦2,797 | Ciao Martin,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1270653412/historyquesta building:part non mi sembra corretta, comprende anche i buchi dell'edificio. Il wikidata inoltre é l'id della way OSM, non il Q-Item. |
| 156877922 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-09-20 16:55 | 1 | 2024-09-20 22:32 | mtmail ♦161 | I tried to translate the opening times. Does "lun9/12 mer ven 14/18" mean "Mo 09:00-12:00; We-Fr 14:00-18:00" ? |
| 2 | 2024-09-20 22:39 | Martin Ligabue | Sorry, forgot to fix it, almost correct, if you can do it for me, just thu off, or I'll do it at a later time, thanks | |
| 3 | 2024-09-21 01:18 | mtmail ♦161 | I made the change. You can review it here https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo%2009%3A00-12%3A00%3B%20We%2CFr%2014%3A00-18%3A00%3B%20Th%2CSa%2CSu%2CPH%20Off&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0&DATE=1726881360000 | |
| 156503901 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-09-11 21:29 | 1 | 2024-09-12 17:26 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | Hi,Why is this natural area in a type=multipolygon relation and not type=boundary? What is the relation of these 25 'inner' to the protected area? These residential and other areas with buildings like Ospidale Fraticini now show a protected area boundary inner, this set up not seen an... |
| 2 | 2024-09-12 19:53 | Martin Ligabue | I found this line without tags, then looking through history I saw it lost the relation status previously, so I restored it, I didn't see the other duplicate one, so one can just go, but I don't understand how,on the problem with the inners, it seems a lot of years ago they were added duri... | |
| 3 | 2024-09-13 04:08 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | OK, duplicate way removed, inner's gone, converted to a simple polygon outline. As bonus mapped a few orchards and track.BTW, it was not only a duplicate way, it was connected at every of the 1236 nodes to the one which was there before, both with same MP tags. Anyway, the name does/did not... | |
| 4 | 2024-09-13 04:13 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | Found a simple name ref "Parco del Terzolle, and this seeming offical http://www.lavalle-equitazione.it/area-naturale-protetta-del-torrente-terzolle/ "AREA NATURALE ANPIL DEL TORRENTE TERZOLLE" | |
| 5 | 2024-09-13 20:03 | Martin Ligabue | Anpis is the acroniym for "Area naturale protetta di interesse locale", so the name could be shorted to ANPIS del Torrente Terzolle, but the official name I think should stay the long one (also thanks a lot for the fix) | |
| 155462753 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-08-19 14:04 | 1 | 2024-08-19 22:55 | 96wanderer ♦1 | il comune ha dichiarato la zona compresa tra gli incroci da me indicati come area pedonale, chiudendola al passaggio delle auto |
| 2 | 2024-08-19 23:29 | Martin Ligabue | ok, va segnato quindi come strada pedonale, non footway, pensavo fosse solo una ztl, e sarebbe dovuta esser mappata come tale, ma se è strada pedonale è diverso, ma sicuro non un percorso | |
| 151287365 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-05-13 22:00 | 1 | 2024-05-13 22:10 | NorthCrab_upload ♦7,925 | Zauważyłem, że Twoja zmiana zawiera nadmiarowe informacje. Przygotowałem listę obiektów do poprawy oraz dodatkowe informacje:Paczkomat nie powinien mieć nazwy.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9212717217Pozdrawiam! 🦀 |
| 2 | 2024-05-13 22:13 | Martin Ligabue | Thanks, fixed it | |
| 3 | 2024-05-14 12:57 | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | Thank You! It's all good now :-) | |
| 149772070 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-04-09 11:04 | 1 | 2024-04-10 17:11 | stephankn ♦321 | Does Museum cost really an extra fee, additional to garden entrance? If not, tag sounds not right. As you are only able to enter via garden, it's free to enter it then. |
| 2 | 2024-04-10 18:17 | Martin Ligabue | I tought about it a while, and by what I understood from the consensus on the wiki is that the museum is not free, if you want to visit it you need to pay a fee, the fact that you have to walk through the garden to reach it doesn't mean it's free from a fee. it still has it. the only way t... | |
| 3 | 2024-04-10 23:55 | ivanbranco ♦2,797 | I once used fee=included for a similar case. I remember I raised this problem here: https://t.me/OpenStreetMapOrg/96365 | |
| 4 | 2024-04-11 16:55 | Martin Ligabue | I've updated the tags to better reflect what I've learned from this discussion, it's still not perfect. I still don't think a more detailed discussion should take place here, should we open a proposal in osm? there are already many in the discussion of the wiki page | |
| 5 | 2024-04-11 19:45 | stephankn ♦321 | Yes, this changeset comment is not the best way to discuss the tagging.It seems that the wiki has also no established solution for such nested POI. The other way round exists as well. You paid already a basic fee, but you have to pay extra for something. The later case is correct with a fee=yes, b... | |
| 146773852 by Martin Ligabue @ 2024-01-28 11:02 | 1 | 2024-01-28 19:33 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | Hi,Whatever you did there are 113 problems your changes have causedwarnings:mismatched_geometry:area_as_line\t113Not Good. Please fixthanks |
| 2 | 2024-01-28 20:19 | Martin Ligabue | the issues were there before, I just readded some missing relationships in the lines, but they are still to fix, as they were before, I don't have the tools to fix this, as for me it fails with "too many nodes on line" | |
| 3 | 2024-01-28 20:31 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | Well, you managed to cause the whole park boundary to disappear from the Carto map in zoom up to 1km. The 2km and lower gives the falls impression it's still there but those tiles only update Friday night.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968853618/history#map=17/42.20553/14.12846The or... | |
| 4 | 2024-01-28 20:41 | Martin Ligabue | I see, how do I fix it? I just selected all the segments that were part of the park and saw that one of them was without the relationship tag, I tought it was deleted by error, and put it back like in all the other segments.If you can revert it it would be apreciated, as I don't know how to | |
| 5 | 2024-01-28 21:30 | SekeRob ♦1,452 | Unfortunately you did another edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146773891 after this one affecting the park relation, somehow including the node of Falesia Nusca. When I try to revert, because it has to be sequential, I get a mountain of errors 1 being that members are now tagged twice as... | |
| 6 | 2024-01-28 22:23 | Martin Ligabue | I understand, I won't touch this anymore and I won't try again to do relationships anymore | |
| 144474368 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-11-26 14:54 | 1 | 2023-12-12 22:47 | rab ♦573 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237214030#map=19/8.96996/11.38936https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1226921701#map=17/8.96084/11.36062what is this?Have you ever checked these AI roads against the background layer? |
| 143027312 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-10-23 16:58 | 1 | 2023-11-23 21:27 | fititnt ♦107 | Olá.Você tem certeza o elemento https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1212047912/history criado por um mapeador (Shishir Teja) que parece não ter conhecimento local, e mais tarde editada por dois mapeadores que parecem ser validadores (Martin Ligabue e jmsbert) é mesmo um ... |
| 139485002 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-08-05 15:26 | 1 | 2023-08-12 11:41 | mueschel ♦6,744 | Hi,please check this way:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34260316It got a strange tag: motor_vehicle=hgv = permit |
| 2 | 2023-08-12 12:29 | Martin Ligabue | how else would you add that hgvs can access that road only with a permit? | |
| 3 | 2023-08-12 12:36 | mueschel ♦6,744 | That would behgv = permit | |
| 4 | 2023-08-12 17:20 | Martin Ligabue | thanks, I'll fix it | |
| 5 | 2023-08-12 17:22 | Martin Ligabue | I can't save as that, I found hgv:conditional=permit, so I saved it like this | |
| 137755425 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-06-25 14:49 | 1 | 2023-06-25 16:45 | Ryccardo ♦12 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1184832728Puoi mettere sul punto finale amenity=parking_entrance, e rendere la strada a senso unico nel caso fosse solo un ingresso :) |
| 137756953 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-06-25 15:29 | 1 | 2023-06-25 16:41 | Ryccardo ♦12 | Si chiama davvero "via davolio" e basta? Non so benissimo cosa fare in questo caso (magari mettere il nome completo in alt_name od official_name se applicabile)Curioso anche il fatto di avere 3 strade parallele con lo stesso nome (come sempre, finchè è vero, non è ... |
| 137757119 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-06-25 15:34 | 1 | 2023-06-25 16:37 | Ryccardo ♦12 | Buono, non so se kg/mq sia supportato da nulla (anche perchè "mq" non si usa in inglese) ma finchè è vero non hai sbagliato a scriverlopoi, naturalmente se lo sai, quando crei un parcheggio conviene mettere il tipo, che senza aver visto le foto satellitari verosimi... |
| 132577596 by Martin Ligabue @ 2023-02-15 11:39 | 1 | 2023-02-16 13:22 | Lucia Argento ♦16 | Ciao Martin Ligabue, grazie mille per il tuo contributo, ci sono diversi refusi di sovrapposizione ed topologia fra le geometrie da te create e quelle pre-esistenti che andrebbero cancellate e/o modificate. Per favore, tieni conto che le le attività di indoor-mapping seguono procedere ben pre... |
| 2 | 2023-02-16 13:29 | Martin Ligabue | Ciao, ho avuto un problema con l'editor e mi è crashato, se puoi annullare questo changeset mi faresti un piacere, che non son riuscito a finire quello che volevo fare e non son nemmeno riuscito ad annullare queste modifiche. Quei link son quelli che stavo seguendo e i problemi ero in pa... |