Vladislav Konoplev have been discussed with 6 replies of this contributorVladislav Konoplev have been discussed with 6 replies of this contributor| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 168911181 by Vladislav Konoplev @ 2025-07-14 11:09 | 1 | 2025-07-15 15:19 | Evan Carroll ♦13 | I spent hours to research these cabin names. These should not have been removed.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168971073 |
| 2 | 2025-07-15 17:18 | trigpoint ♦2,503 | Hello VladislavPhil from the Data Working Group here.I am a bit concerned by this edit and have some questions.What is there in the names that in any way could be described as profanities?What guided you to this changeset, was it some sort of report or do you have a query which targets cer... | |
| 3 | 2025-07-16 14:17 | Vladislav Konoplev | Hi Evan Carroll and trigpoint!I apologise for this incorrect deletion.This action was not based on any specific report or targeted words. The cabin names were reverted during a standard review because some names, such as ""Idiot's Delight"" and ""Hang Over,... | |
| 4 | 2025-07-18 19:55 | Evan Carroll ♦13 | @Vladislav Konoplev I shouldn't have called your mistake "vandalism." That was rude of me. We're all trying our best and you conducted yourself like a pro when confronted. I acted rash because I was referencing this from an article I wrote, and I had invested a lot of time in it.... | |
| 5 | 2025-07-22 09:47 | Vladislav Konoplev | @Evan Carroll, no problem, I understand. Thanks for the clarification and the article links. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168911181 | |
| 162654121 by Vladislav Konoplev @ 2025-02-18 10:20 | 1 | 2025-02-21 11:44 | cyclist789 ♦37 | You know, you could always *tell me* when you revert my changes, so I learn what I did wrong, and so I don't just repeat it. |
| 2 | 2025-03-21 14:55 | Vladislav Konoplev | Hi! Thank you for bringing this up.I apologize for not communicating the revert of your changes earlier. The reason for reverting was that the geoglyphs you added do not appear to exist according to any satellite imagery sources. It's important to ensure that all features added to the map a... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-22 16:48 | cyclist789 ♦37 | I don't believe I added any glyph, I think I just consolidated the glyphs already there into a smaller number of relations, but I'll take your word for it.I find it messy to have every single line count as its own geoglyph. Just look at this glyph:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relati... | |
| 4 | 2025-03-28 17:03 | cyclist789 ♦37 | Oh, by the way, what do you think about the actual Nazca *lines* being labelled as "geoglyphs" despite each just being a straight line? I find it annoying, but I sure don't know how they *should* be tagged, as they're more or less just ridges dug in sand. | |
| 5 | 2025-04-01 08:27 | ZhannaB ♦10 | Dear cyclist789,I hope you're doing well. My name is Zhanna, and I work with Vladislav Konoplev. I’d like to clarify any misunderstandings you may have had with him and sincerely apologize for any confusion this might have caused.You're absolutely right that mapping geoglyphs as ... | |
| 6 | 2025-04-02 05:25 | cyclist789 ♦37 | No problem at all. | |
| 7 | 2025-04-04 15:26 | ZhannaB ♦10 | Once again, thanks for understanding. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162654121 | |
| 153284190 by Vladislav Konoplev @ 2024-06-28 09:48 | 1 | 2025-03-07 18:34 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦8,738 | czemu usunięto w tej edycji name:pl=Pałac Putina ?why this edit removed name:en=Putin's Palace ? |
| 2 | 2025-03-21 12:11 | Vladislav Konoplev | Hi Mateusz Konieczny,I apologize for the delayed response.Upon reviewing the changes, I realize that the removal of the name "Putin's Palace" was an oversight. The intention was to avoid potential political disputes and maintain neutrality. However, I acknowledge that this inf... | |
| 3 | 2025-03-21 16:19 | Vladislav Konoplev | It's my bad, that I misjudged the edit as previously I faced the similar names but with vandal context. I found that this name is fully valid, so will restore the valid edit and will do my best to avoid such situations in future.Once again, thank you for flagging. --- ... | |
| 155319425 by Vladislav Konoplev @ 2024-08-16 10:01 | 1 | 2024-08-18 05:05 | phoenixsaigon1698 ♦248 | Hi Vladislav Konoplev, i detect some vandalism coming from gamble webstite, but only in manual mode. Could you share me the automation tools to scanning those vandalism edit? |
| 2 | 2024-08-20 12:06 | Vladislav Konoplev | Hello! These edits were detected during the review process of edits for the calendar day. The tool that helped to identify all these edits is OSMCha and OSM ID Editor | |
| 113841113 by Vladislav Konoplev @ 2021-11-16 08:55 | 1 | 2021-11-16 18:30 | mweper ♦436 | Hola. ¿Por qué has borrado la etiqueta de edificio si allí existe tal cosa? Lo he comprobado personalmente, ya que circulo todos los días por esa zona. |
| 101559121 by Vladislav Konoplev @ 2021-03-23 09:01 | 1 | 2021-03-23 23:30 | abakus_uploader ♦9,167 | (Wiadomość automatyczna)Cześć!Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodaÅ‚eÅ› lub zmodyfikowaÅ‚eÅ› adres, który jest niepeÅ‚ny lub bÅ‚Ä™dny.Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porzÄ... |