Aleksandar Matejevic have been discussed with 57 replies of this OpenStreetMap ContributorAleksandar Matejevic have been discussed with 57 replies of this OpenStreetMap Contributor| Changeset | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 182922644 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2026-05-20 11:18 ~ 18 days ago | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | white monday ♦1 | Thank you for your modifications. I found that Qinghai is missing a label, but for some reason, my modification caused the admin_level to be missing. |
| 179341615 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2026-03-04 10:10 ~ 3 months ago | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | Wildsharky ♦527 | Revert of 179341054 |
| 177887381 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2026-01-30 12:12 ~ 4 months ago | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | Taya_S ♦2,666 | Hello,Please cease attempting to fix this import in Greenland. It was undiscussed and will be reverted.Also, in the future, please make sure the import you are attempting to fix was actually discussed by the community. Your involvement has made reverting everything significantly more complex... |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Taya, please reconsider your decision of reverting all these edits since our team have not done any of the imports and we were focused on fixing natural=coastline items in a way that we created or assigned names to an existing coastline or lakes using rendering on Greenland Topographic Map whic... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | Taya_S ♦2,666 | Hello Aleksandar (and the others on your team no doubt),Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.I'll address that last point first. Woodpeck states that it "can be useful", I find it hard to interpret that as him stating that this import can go ahead.The diary post itself is ... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks for response. We can remove source:type and description tags once you make a decision about the further actions, so you do not need to work on this | |
| 174542472 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-11-12 06:27 ~ 6 months ago | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | AntSom ♦13 | Hello Aleksandar Matejevic,I received a message about the changeset that I made earlier this week for this area. I had made edits to resolve open gap errors that were present at that time for the Map Roulette Challenge Global - Fix Relations with Broken Geometries; https://maproulette.org/browse... |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | AntSom ♦13 | Hello Aleksandar Matejevic, My manager walked me through the edits for this area and what we ended up doing was removing a small way from the relation and changing the inner roles to outer roles for this island. Thanks for your time and have a great day,AntSom | |
| 149171216 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-03-26 11:04 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | Komadinovic Vanja ♦64 | Поздрав,Сређујем планинарске стазе па сам дошао до https://pss.rs/terenipp/sarbanovac-v-porica-baba/ . Када сам је иницијално додавао нисам унео део који си ти повезао са овим changeset и пу... |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Здраво Вања, жена ми је активни планинар и додајем на основу gps traces које прикупи са својим друштвом "Брђанка" из Алексинца. Ово је ишла нешто невезано за друштв... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Додао сам gpx trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aleksandar%20Matejevic/traces/12094371 | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | Komadinovic Vanja ♦64 | Александре,Хвала на брзом одговору и помоћи и извињење за моје одсуство. Контактираћу Boogier да видим на основу чега је обрисао пут. Срдачан поздрав и хвала за трек. ... | |
| 172739230 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-10-02 09:03 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | welzheimerwald ♦95 | Removed redundant Vienna boundary relation after a discussion in the OSM forum (see here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/doppel-mapping-von-geometrisch-identen-verwaltungsgrenzen-wien/136386 ). |
| 172411325 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-09-24 20:12 ~ 8 months ago | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | andershl ♦105 | The coastline was possibly broken because the whole charade was marked as one: Citronen Fjord. The name is Alexander E. Hyde Fjord. The side arms have separate names and I have dropped them there as points. After my bad experiences with separating out Citronen I shall make no further attempts here. ... |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi andershl, plase, proceed with the edits, if something is broken, I will jump in and fix it. Your edit was of a great value; it needed just a small adjustment so no need to stop editing because of this. Keep going and happy mapping !!! | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | andershl ♦105 | Oh, I shall keep editing, but mainly by importing/supplementing official coordinates and place names. Revceived from the authorities. Have some thousands in the pipeline. Can outline rivers and lakes, but no multi polygons. | |
| 171495835 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-09-05 12:19 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Orozcu ♦13 | Buenas noches, ¿De que trata ese limite administrativo que coloco? |
| 171346743 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-09-02 07:29 ~ 9 months ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | woodpeck ♦2,660 | Dear Aleksandar, I have again reverted some politically-motivated edits to boundaries in this area and blocked user "Elizabeth BS"; some reverts collided with some boundary repairs you have done. If you encounter problems in this area in the future I suggest that you let me handle the reve... |
| 104682988 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2021-05-14 11:55 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | dcskobuffs ♦84 | Hello Aleksander Matejevic,I saw you did some work on the ferry routes in Santuario de la Naturaleza Río Cruces y Chorocamayo. I’m reaching out asking if you or your team have any knowledge on ferries in this area. Since this is a sanctuary that is very sparsely populated, and there... |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi dcskobuffs, It was a while ago, but what we did was connecting routes to ferry terminals and piers. I remember this area, and yes, these were some strange routes for which we could not find a lot of information's, but these were more touristic (observation) routes than actual transportatio... | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | dcskobuffs ♦84 | Hi Aleksandar Matejevic,Thank you for your response and providing some context. I will look into those links and see if I can find what I need.Happy mapping,dcskobuffs | |
| 130156436 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-12-16 13:25 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | Hidoo00 ♦80 | Hi, when adding names, please add the correct one. :)I've now fixed all of Ystadvägen (not Ystadsvägen) |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Hidoo00,sorry for the typo and thanks for fixing this. Happy Mapping!!! | |
| 166954694 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-05-30 06:47 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | fserges ♦57 | This is incorrect change. In UA it is true (admin_level=8) but in RU this was correct (admin_level=6). |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi fserges, thanks for the comment. User Grass-snake already made corrections, you can check his changeset also | |
| 166959742 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-05-30 08:53 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Grass-snake ♦279 | Hello, there is a confusion with your changes, which is why I plan to revert your changes.https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166954694https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166954787https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166959742The fact is that there are 2 similar types of borders i... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Grass-snake, thanks for clarification. I have tried to fix overlaps on same admin level after user Mazda05 did some changes, so the only logical fix was to lower its level. Your local knowledge is highly appreciated, and now everything seems aligned so thanks for the extra fix.Happy mapping... | |
| 165978480 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-05-08 11:34 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | ezekielf ♦90 | Hi Aleksandar, it looks like starting in this changeset, and then in a series of others following, you removed `natural=coastline` from a lot of ways and then added it to others going through open water. This moved the location of the coastline significantly and halted global coastline processing.... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks for the info about forum discussion, I have replyed over there | |
| 162777527 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-02-21 12:06 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | apm-wa ♦261 | Ashgabat is not a province. It has the legal rights of a province, but by law is categorized as a city. This relation at admin_level=4 is incorrect and should be deleted. Turkmenistan has five provinces and Ashgabat is not one of them. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I agree that Ashgabat is not a province, that is why I stated that it is "equivalent to a province". By administrative division of Turkmenistan amendments from 2018 and 2022 city of Arkadag become an administrative center of Ahal velayat instead of Ashgabat. Ashgabat is excluded from Ahal ... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | apm-wa ♦261 | Ashgabat has had its own administrative boundary and has been separate from Ahal welaýat since 1992. The capital of Ahal prior to Arkadag was Änew. But that is irrelevant. The relevant fact is that Ashgabat is "equivalent to" a province (i.e., has legal status equal to the lega... | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | apm-wa ♦261 | I refer you to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turkmenistan_Geoname_Changes, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Districts_in_Turkmenistan, and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turkmenistan#Administrative_Subdivisions. These articles are based on information I collected during my tour of duty... | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Koreller ♦61 | In my opinion because Ashgabat is a "City (şäher) with the status of a province (welaýat)" (as apm-wa write here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turkmenistan#Administrative_Subdivisions) it's relevant to tag it at the same level as a province.I agree with "... | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | apm-wa ♦261 | Koreller, "equivalent to" does not mean "the same as". Ashgabat is a city, not a province. | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | apm-wa, as Koreller stated "City with the status of a province" qualifies it to be tagged with the same admin_level tag on OSM. It does not promote it to be a province, just levels its administrative power. All provinces have welaýaty in their name tag. Ashgabat is a city and no one... | |
| 8 | ~ 1 year ago | Koreller ♦61 | @Aleksandar Matejevic Above all, whatever apm-wa's opinion, I think we should adopt what apm-wa proposes as a solution.His knowledge from Turkmenistan is indisputable, he has been in the field (and at what level!) and still updates the wiki pages (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:... | |
| 9 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Koreller, thanks for the reply, I do respect the knowledge of apm-wa and I am fully aware of what he did in Turkmenistan and OSM. Hats off for that. And to be clear, I am not arguing, I am just debating the way of tagging in order to make it precise and functional. I agree with apm-wa fully about... | |
| 10 | ~ 1 year ago | apm-wa ♦261 | I can live with adding the place=city tag if that will settle the matter. I still argue that this leaves some confusion (admin_level=4 implies that Ashgabat is a province even though it is not) and would be happier if the admin_level=4 relation were deleted, but suspect that would eventually lead to... | |
| 11 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks!!! I have added place tags to relations. | |
| 166512029 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-05-20 08:35 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | U rgz-u je bez crtice. Jel ima neka tabla gde vidiš crticu? Ni po pravopisu nema crtice, ja bih rekao (mada Bračko to zna bolje)? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Службени лист општине Алексинац (http://aleksinac.org/index.php/euprava-2/registar-propisa-2?task=callelement&format=raw&item_id=1475&element=f85c494b-2b32-4109-b8c1-083cca2b7db6&method=download&args[0]=0c97f837a4a68c1c116240a6a37e2c60)Страна... | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | Sad cu da izmenim u https://dina.openstreetmap.rs/ar/street_mapping.html da ima crticu. Pa ce report onda da fleguje i adrese da treba da se menjaju, pa cu i to da sredim | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Ali da znaš, nije to jedina ulica sa tim problemom, dosta ih ima u Aleksincu koje imaju zvanično crticu, ali nisu u RGZ upisani sa crticom. Ako hoćeš mogu da ih sve sredim, zajedno sa adresama, i da ti pošaljem koje su pa da ih ubaciš u dina, samo mi treba par dana, mal... | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | ili, možda bolja solucija, da ispravim da name bude bez crtice, a da svima dodam official_name sa crticom, mislim da tako imamo manje posla? | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | ako se ime iz "name" taga i DINA-e ne slaze - bice flegovane, pa ja svakako hocu da u DINI imamo dobro ime. Sto se mene tice, samo nabroj ovde ulice i reci gde da cross-checkujem (jel ovaj sluzbeni list isto?), i prebacicu ja i u DINI, pa posle naknadno moze i u adresama i u ulicama | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | Ispravio sam ovo (sve kucne brojeve i u DINI). Na kraju se ispostavilo da je greska kod mene u mapiranju, a ne u RGZ-u. RGZ je ispravno imao crticu, ali je u nasem mapiranju nije bilo (izbacena je verovatno jer nije bilo po pravopisu ili ne znam kako, ali covek je to uradio), pa je DINA mislila da j... | |
| 166517813 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-05-20 10:42 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | NeisReview ♦2,460 | Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166495679 |
| 163548702 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2025-03-12 23:14 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | Ne znam kako, ali uspeo si da rastumbas sve relacije u ovom changesetu:) (eurovelo sam 1h morao da rekreiram iz delova). Gomila autobusa deluje isto rasparcana, ali nemam snage da i to popravljem. Mislim da je uzrok ovaj kruzni tok i sve linije koje prolaze kroz njega: https://www.openstreetmap.org/... |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Znam da tu ima gomila bus ruta i eurovelo takođe, sređivao sam ih segment po segment (forward, backward) pogledaću da vidim šta se dešava. Neke bus rute su bile i po gradu polomljene pa sam ih sve ispratio | |
| 158501939 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-10-29 14:47 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Rishbh ♦1 | hey please include south mumbai in the bounded region |
| 159091954 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-11-13 13:37 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | 特蕾西娅 ♦4 | 唐兴镇的admin_level可以降一级吗 |
| 158893668 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-11-08 12:27 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | StarTrek2 ♦12 | This is a work in progress by a local mapper. Why are you interfering? REVERTED |
| 151567251 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-05-20 08:47 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,794 | Thanks for reverting https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/151566709 , but it looks like the person who did that also changed the names in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/150898937 . Using https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relation/13407035 I've tried to set the names back... |
| 157283506 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-09-30 07:40 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Herman Lee ♦408 | comment on changeset -> 157279997. |
| 157078508 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-09-25 11:55 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Dino Morica ♦3 | the boundaries are still marked incorrectly |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I have fixed them, but they are broken again, and there is some discussion on another changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157107643 | |
| 149618030 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-04-05 14:28 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | marc__marc ♦1,509 | you only revert/delete the way... leaving a hudge number of orphans nodes for ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11787822615I'll fix the fix :) |
| 152581655 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-06-12 10:54 ~ 1 year ago | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | Bendita Moreira ♦47 | Hello aleksandar base to my observation your mapping is look good so keep it going. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152581655 |
| 151567210 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-05-20 08:47 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,794 | Thanks - some other changes by https://openstreetmap.org/user/noun%20allaoua also look like a problem - are you going to fix those too?(just checking before I do) |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Sorry for the late reply. I thin I covered them all, but if I have missed some, please fix them or send me the list | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,794 | woodpeck's fixed some others and I've picked up a couple of stragglers in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152074367 . | |
| 116062060 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-01-12 11:13 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | jptolosa ♦240 | Hello Aleksandar,I think the relation for Antarctic Peninsula should be excluded the adjacent islands.Regards. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi jptolosa, per Wiki it looks like all islands are included ("consists of a string of bedrock islands"), but also states that it is a mainland, so I am not sure which claim is more accurate. If you think islands should not be part of the relation you can exclude them | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | jptolosa ♦240 | Hi, according I can understand from the wiki, it suggest the presence of the bedrock islands are located beneath the ice.I.e. if all of ice melted, the Antarctic peninsula would become in a string of islands. Does not refer to the current islands. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | OK, makes sense. You can exclude them If you know which ones or you want me to keep just mainland ? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | jptolosa ♦240 | Yes, no problem, I can do it. | |
| 150208823 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-04-19 07:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | BATTLEBOTS_BOI ♦3 | The entirety of Larchmont is part of the Town of Mamaroneck. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I have seen that on https://gis.ny.gov/civil-boundaries/ but there is also part of Mamaroneck that needs to be added to that relation, and the third part is that Tiger data is showing different polygon so since it was not clear what is final solution, I have just fixed the broken boundaries in a wa... | |
| 126549603 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-09-23 13:52 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Lennardderudder ♦17 | I was just validating some stuff in JOSM and saw in some of the census boundaries that the ref:name tag was used instead of just the name tag. JOSM was complaining about that so I was wondering why you chose to use the ref:name tag instead of the name tag? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Lennardderudder,This was done in communication with the community. These are statistical boundaries; some were added with SETTLEMENT and SETTL_NAME tags then we wanted to fill missing data and to unify the tagging. At that moment, the community was against adding name tags, so we agreed to ch... | |
| 146820079 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2024-01-29 12:37 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Tigran Ovanyan ♦1 | Hello,I ask you to cancel this edit, since there is no community of Zaritap, Gladzor or Malishka. These are all outdated administrative units. This topic was raised in the forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hamaynks-and-taratsashrjans-of-armenia/108401/5. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Reverted in changeset 146867633.Can you please help fixing these issues? | |
| 119118369 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-03-30 14:06 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | tms13 ♦82 | Why did you change this name? It was correct to begin with. |
| 144155834 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-11-17 21:44 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,794 | For info I've asked about the provenance of this data at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/odd-data-source-falkland-islands/107317 . |
| 142856461 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-10-20 08:20 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | vng_me ♦141 | You added new coastlines that are not connected. This is a river bank here and I suppose these coastlines should be deleted. Please, use JOSM Validator. |
| 142871799 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-10-20 13:52 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | zstadler ♦1,131 | Hi,Thanks for the revert!It may be useful to add a "reverted" comment in the discussion of the changeset/s you reverted.See the comments on the other changeset by this vandalhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hefiko2692/history |
| 142857974 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-10-20 08:56 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | wireguy ♦568 | Aleksandar... there seems to be two relationsrelation 16528551relation 16528552one seems to be a dup |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Yes, you are right, I have missed it. Thanks for pointing this out. I have removed one there is no duplicate | |
| 142218009 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-10-06 06:59 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | NorthCrab ♦4,531 | Thank You! |
| 140983353 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-09-08 11:38 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,794 | Hello,Apologies if you're already aware, but if you look at e.g. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/relation/1311341 you'll see a regular pattern - one user (in the case of Spain, often the same user) breaks admin boundaries and then "Garmin-User" comes along ... |
| 140787276 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-09-04 06:27 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | TheSwavu ♦645 | Thank you for fixing that ;-) |
| 140315865 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-24 10:43 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | ljc_jlyb ♦52 | Bing imagery could be quite outdated here. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks for the info. I have checked Bing; Mapbox Satellite; Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Esri World Imagery and I am confident that these roads exist. Is there any issue or this is just info about Bing imagery? It shows that images were captured between 1/17/2014-10/29/2021 but on the north im... | |
| 139946204 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-16 06:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | TheAhmed ♦5 | hi, i just saw that you made some changes in delal corniche and removed a tag called "coastline". this is a newly opened project, and it's been working on it recently, please replace it with the old version, I'm ready to send photo or official news source about this project |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Can you be more specific? I have removed coastline tag because it was wringly used. Please read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline | |
| 139799982 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-12 19:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | Please dont do this. I explained why you should not on the OSM-UK Loomio site.The wiki is incorrect! |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I was not using Wiki, I have been using OS OpenMap Local, Mapillary, and what is already with the operator tag of the University of Leicester. I will go over their website to check what is wrong. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | Why is St Georges Tower https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89674881 included?Cheers Phil | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Phil, I have included it because per OS Open Data University of Leicester International Study Centre should be located in this office building | |
| 139796404 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-12 17:22 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | SK53 ♦869 | Once again this is incorrect. You have used a site relation, this is not a site. You have not incorporated either the Ningbo or Malaysia campuses.Did you not think the OSM mappers in this area have not thought of doing something like this, and rejected it. I certainly have on many occasions sinc... |
| 139832345 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-13 16:18 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | HiWhere were these edits discussed with the community?They seem to fall into the category https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations_are_not_categories.The UK has a very active comm |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | The UK has a very active community and this type of edit should have been consulted.I am not sure what this relation achieves, we already have the data which can easily be found with https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yRSI also wonder why, if these relations are a good idea, they weren't crea... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Phil, thanks for your comment and interest in this topic. Yes, I have been involved in discussions about creating relations with the universities in the UK on a couple of channels. The community was against changing current tagging since many universities are using OSM for their website map... | |
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | trigpoint ♦2,672 | I do remember the loomio thread now. Rereading it nobody said it was a good idea. In fact sk53 explained very well why you shouldn't make such relations. | |
| 139796217 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-08-12 17:17 ~ 2 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | Andrew Chadwick ♦64 | eep. That's useful info, thank you.Would you mind adding a reminder about this relation to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Oxford as well, with a description of where the info came from, and how it ought to be maintained? Thanks! |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Sure, will do, just to add some more relations if that is not a problem. | |
| 137049655 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-06-07 10:13 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | wireguy ♦568 | Aleksandar, fixing broken boundaries? The change broke relation 14011690.Since you are using josm, you can select all the relations in the relation window, then right click and choose 'Download incomplete members'.This will load all the relations fully. Then run the josm validator and... |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks wireguy, I have fixed the 14011690 | |
| 135963008 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-05-11 07:06 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Jack Boschert ♦7 | Hi Aleksandar, The relation in this changeset 'Windang (15841243, v1)' appears to be a duplicate of 'Windang (6076761)' (East of Lake Illawarra) and doesn't appear to relate to the locality of Windang NSW as per the DCS NSW Base Map. The change should potentially be remove... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Jack Boschert,yes, you are right, this is the duplicate, I will remove it, I was adding some missing roads and somehow created a duplicate, sorry. Good catch, thanks for notice. | |
| 136298156 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-05-19 12:33 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy ♦568 | fyi, Fairless hills Relation id=188050seems to be broken now |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks for pointing this out. I have fixed this one also | |
| 134714508 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-04-10 07:32 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,574 | Hello! Why did you change the key IBGE:GEOCODIGO to c ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Sorry, there were a lot of broken boundaries to fix and I did that one by mistake. It was unintentional. I have corrected it back to IBGE:GEOCODIGO. Thanks for pointing this out. | |
| 132486692 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-02-13 11:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Jon Snow 47 ♦55 | The city name is Warri not Wado please revert all edits made by user Streetvibes he caused large vandalism to the city |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Jon Snow 47 ♦55 | HelloUser Streetvibes is causing a big vandalism on the city of Warri delta state he created a fake city with the name Wado city it doesn’t exist they and some group came up with the name to change warri city delta state Nigeria to Wado city please the real name is warri city I have made s... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Jon Snow 47 ,have you tries to contact user Streetvibes? If the user is creating vandalism please report that to the DWG (for example you can contact user SomeoneElse which is a member of DWG) because they can block that account.I have just fixed broken relation here, have not changed a... | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I saw that the change is made to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/501462908#map=19/5.55550/5.78501 but you have to correct relations also | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | Jon Snow 47 ♦55 | What is DWG? I’ve contacted everyone if I change it he will continue to vandalize it | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | AutoCorrector ♦8 | The name of the city is warri not Wado I work for the Delta State government I can mail my ID card if requested the name of the city is Warri city not Wado the name Wado city is an idea of an advocacy group it is not legal everything about Wado doesn't exist revert all edits made by user Street... | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I see that user is blocked by Data Working Group (DWG) https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6875I will help you with fixing the name to Warri on all the relations where it was changed to Wado | |
| 132291844 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-02-09 07:42 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦579 | Hi, this boundary is broken (Menasha), are you able to fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Fixed, thanks for the hint | |
| 132345281 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-02-10 08:36 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Wilmer Osario ♦217 | Sorry 😅, I seem to get these errors when I editing boundaries in JOSM.Seems to be caused when I cut a boundary line without downloading all the relations that adhere to it. |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Yes, that is the case, sometimes if you do not download all relations that are influenced by the cut, it can create broken boundaries, but no worries, it can be fixed easily :) | |
| 131056905 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-01-09 14:13 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦579 | Hi! Thanks for fixing the boundary of Anderson Township. Unfortunately two of the segments (Burney Lane) had a role of "inner" when they should have been "outer". I see that you're using JOSM. If you hit the JOSM validator before uploading, it should give you a warning &q... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks for notifying me, I did this one by accident, sorry, I will pay more attention in the future (I usually do, but will double check in the future) | |
| 131468728 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-01-19 14:12 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | These are not duplicated boundaries, it is per official cadastre. Please don't deduplicate them:) I will revert this one |
| 131452596 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-01-19 08:02 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hon約 ♦10 | Thanks |
| 131339628 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2023-01-16 14:01 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Hon約 ♦10 | Thank you |
| 129944516 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-12-10 19:50 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | stevea ♦319 | OK, I do have such knowledge: the tag admin_level=5 (or of any value) is 100% incorrect, as is the tag boundary=administrative. You could coin something like boundary=fire_district, but no CALFire boundary should ever be tagged with boundary=administrative. These will be redacted as they are foun... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi stevea, as I have said, I just corrected the member roles, but boundary looked stranged, so this is why I have put this for someone to review. Thanks for the info, but one question: Should we remove this relation completely since the data for CALFire is not compatible with the OSM one, or to ju... | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | stevea ♦319 | In an interest to "prompt" what I think might be the best effort forward here, I have (already) made the correction to fire_district.I'm not sure what you mean by "data for CALFire is not compatible with the OSM one," so if you could clarify that, I'd appreciate you... | |
| 129928734 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-12-10 10:27 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | ZeLonewolf ♦579 | Thanks! |
| 129050181 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-11-17 16:24 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | SomeoneElse ♦13,794 | Thanks - I've actually posted about the other breakage that occurred here on the community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/changes-to-the-usa-canada-border-at-the-southern-end-of-alaska/6327 - you might want to comment there. |
| 129548769 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-11-30 07:41 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | tms13 ♦82 | Thanks for fixing this before I spotted what I'd broken! :-) |
| 128673123 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-11-09 08:11 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy ♦568 | can you check this change? it may have impacted/broke:relation 7428485relation 11582238relation 191230 |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks for the info, I have fixed them | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | wireguy ♦568 | thanks. check relation 3080946, it also needs attention. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Yes, that one is now fixed | |
| 128379282 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-11-02 08:57 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Wilmer Osario ♦217 | Thanks for fixing it 👍 |
| 127825484 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-10-20 08:33 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | Eman_Mehrez ♦52 | Hello Aleksandar Matejevic;I noticed when you Added Fashloum boundary and added highway=primary" in the boundary.Could you check that and fix it, please?Link for boundary:https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/14713956RegardsEman_Mehrez |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Eman_Mehrez.Thanks for pointing this out, I have checked and corrected this. It was an unintentional mistake. Best regards, Aleksandar Matejevic | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | Eman_Mehrez ♦52 | Hello Aleksandar Matejevic;Thank you for your quick response, and for fixing this issueRegardsEman_Mehrez | |
| 127729722 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-10-18 14:07 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | mego_map ♦46 | Hello Aleksandar Matejevic; I noticed when you Added Kosor Adeiafa boundary and splited many streets and by the wrong way you removed the tag "oneway=yes" Could you check that and fix it, please?Link for boundary:https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/14708293link... |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi mego_map.Thanks for pointing this out, I have checked and corrected all the roads that were affected while creating relations. It was an unintentional mistake. Now it is corrected.Best regards, Aleksandar Matejevic | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | mego_map ♦46 | Hello Aleksandar Matejevic;Thank you for your quick response, and for fixing this issue Regardsmego_map | |
| 122607185 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-06-20 07:41 ~ 3 years ago | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | P-E_LRX ♦8 | Hello Aleksandar,Thank you for you help in maping protected areas. I just received yesterday the new shapefile of Yata Ngaya from the African Lion database coordinated by EWT. This boundaries are from the IUCN boundaries I guess, unfortunatley they are incorrect. In addition, my Andre Felix Nation... |
| 119658651 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-04-13 09:37 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,502 | Hi,After correcting 'intermitent' to 'intermittent', your wetland gets flagged that this key cant go together with wetland, not mentioned in the wetland wiki nor on the intermittent wiki. Maybe the land.Maybe too add wetland=saltmarsh since the water is tagged as salt.\... |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi SekeRob, This was a typo, thanks for fixing it. I was looking how to tag this correctly since it is salt dry part of the lake, so it has some water just when it is under heavy rain. Using wetland=saltmarsh is not applicable since this is for coastal parts only, not for lakes. I think intermitte... | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | SekeRob ♦1,502 | There's a tag value flood_prone with 23000 uses described as "Whether or not the feature is likely to flood after very heavy rain." Anyway, I've pushed the false positive button to indicate the user wants it so :O)ciao | |
| 119981108 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-04-21 05:19 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | zamenio si granicu Kraljeva pogresnom granicom. Tacnije, koristio si granicu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929170531, a ja sam sad vratio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053955952. Cisto da ti kazem, znam da nije namerno, ali rekoh - mozda ti pomogne da provalis sta si radio:) |
| 116620207 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2022-01-26 12:12 ~ 4 years ago | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | Wilmer Osario ♦217 | En Venezuela cubre zonas que no pertenecen a Los Andes 😐. |
| 2 | ~ 4 years ago | jptolosa ♦240 | Hello Aleksandar!In the area of the relation was included many places that are not considered part of Andes mountain range, and probably in other places is not well defined the edge of the mountain range.Perhaps is better to use a "line" instead a polygon.Regards. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | I have added the note that Approximation is done using OpenTopoMap and the idea is to have starting relation created so everyone that have knowledge of the exact boundary can simply adjust the geometry of each part so at the end there is a precise mountain range. I will work on updating it to pr... | |
| 4 | ~ 4 years ago | felipeeugenio ♦3,102 | I really don´t think that the idea of OSM is to draw a huge polygon full of flaws and expect the community to fix it. I just find this thing in the middle of a suburban area in Santiago, Chile, where there is no chance that the Andes start/end.I understand your concern and even admire your... | |
| 92708919 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2020-10-19 12:25 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | pantufla ♦306 | This train track doesn't exist as far as I know |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi pantufla, thanks for the comment. Can you be more specific, I don't know what is the way you are referring to and where it does not exit? | |
| 93542430 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2020-11-04 12:14 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | ScottWalkerAU ♦160 | Looks good - beat me to it! --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93542430 |
| 93537160 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2020-11-04 10:59 ~ 5 years ago | 1 | ~ 5 years ago | radiotrefoil ♦120 | Changeset comment doesn't match location --- #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93537160 |
| 2 | ~ 5 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Sorry for that, JOSM changed the comment because I was using the scroll wheel before I clicked upload, so it picked last used one | |
| 3 | ~ 5 years ago | radiotrefoil ♦120 | Cheers, thanks for the clarification | |
| 82169092 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2020-03-13 14:56 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | I ovde imam slican komentar kao i na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82166997 :) |
| 82166997 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2020-03-13 14:06 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | Molim te, mozes li da se trudis da ne "lepis" administrativne granice za puteve? Ovde si spojio nodehttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7291893604 izmedju puta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301104875 i granice https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474088761. Bas se mucimo da ispeglamo grani... |
| 67461042 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-02-22 10:37 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | aharvey ♦1,942 | The painted traffic island shouldn't count as a lane. I've changed this to have correct lane counts. |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi aharvey, Thank You for comment.According to mapbox mapping guides for adding turn lanes, Yes, access restricted areas are not considered as lanes. But there is a good explanation for painted islands in Australia:https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/road-rules/road-markings.... | |
| 3 | ~ 6 years ago | aharvey ♦1,942 | Fair point, although I wouldn't consider it a lane, I guess the access:lanes=no implies that it isn't a lane. I've changed it back. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Thanks, I would also not count it as lane if it is not wide enough. | |
| 68988603 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-04-07 22:26 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Branko Kokanovic ♦357 | Zdravo,Ova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387117330 - koje joj je pravo ime? name, name:sr i name:sr-Latn se razlikuju?:) |
| 2 | ~ 6 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Po Odluci o utvrđivanju naziva i ulica i drugih delova naseljenih mesta na teritoriji opštine Aleksinac, član 46. stav 5. zvanično ime je Barežka. Ispravio sam š u ž u name:sr_Latn. Hvala puno na komentaru, ne bih tako lako uočio grešku. | |
| 72512474 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-07-22 12:08 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au |
| 72506146 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-07-22 09:27 ~ 6 years ago | 1 | ~ 6 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Correction - government data used: data.sa.gov.au |
| 70586185 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-05-24 13:09 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | user_5359 ♦20,574 | Hello! What is the meaning of the tag tm_data? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | This is key automatically created from task done in Tasking Manager. I have removed all of them. Thanks for hint | |
| 65423642 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2018-12-12 21:36 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | aaronsta ♦62 | Hi Aleksandar Matejevic,Thanks for your edit :)Please make sure you are familiar with how to edit.In this instance, Anzac Road was split (when it should remain / be made one road) and you prevented turning from Lynton Street. (disconnecting the now split road with the opposite direction of t... |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi aaronsta, I was fixing above junction, so I devided Anzac Road until next roundabout because on Esri Worl Imagery you can clearly see island with threes between ways. On DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery which is older date imagery, there was no island. I have also taken this fact in considerati... | |
| 67190343 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-02-14 11:21 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,795 | Hi,this broke administration boundaries... I have fixed it. |
| 66157249 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2019-01-09 10:48 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,795 | Hi,Your entry for Clugstons Road is a duplicate of one made ~ 10 minutes earlier by miroslavuzice87... I'll leave you to delete it and work out how to aviod similar difficulties? |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | Aleksandar Matejevic | Hi Warin61thank You for this. I have deleted duplicated way. The problem that caused this were difficulties with downloading/uploading to OSM server that day. Once again, thanks for the info | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,795 | It is not easy. The problem with a team all working with similar goals in the one area can lead to this duplication. How to over come it? I'd try separating the area and/or the goals of each mapper. But I don't know the team and its goals so cannot say definatly one way of the other... | |
| 65141804 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2018-12-03 22:54 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,795 | HI,Reverted drag of Strathford Park Drive that this changeset caused. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | BrackoNe ♦119 | Hi Warin61,Thanks again for following our work. Can you please tell us what was the problem just to be aware to not to repeat it again.Thanks,Nemanja | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | Warin61 ♦2,795 | I would think it is accidental! When you had selected various nodes/ways .. they were then dragged to the west some 30 metres err yards. It is fairly easy to do .. JOSM warns you if you have over 30 nodes selected .. but less than that and there is no warning. Not following your work .. just p... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 years ago | BrackoNe ♦119 | Oh, I see, Aleksandar Matejevic had aligned whole area with Esri imagery, but he forgot to put source:geometry tag.OK, thanks, no worries, we will leave as it is now.Thanks once again,Nemanja | |
| 63829236 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2018-10-24 11:45 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | aharvey ♦1,942 | I'm not sure that's paved, it can be hard/impossible to tell from the imagery if it's compacted unpaved or gravel or paved. If you're unsure it's probably best to leave it untagged so that it can be picked up by things like StreetComplete to be checked. |
| 63794872 by Aleksandar Matejevic @ 2018-10-23 12:49 ~ 7 years ago | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | mueschel ♦7,169 | Hi,you added 36 objects with the tag 'widht' instead of 'width'. Could you have a look and fix this?Thanks, Jan |