| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169904752 by NunoCaldeira @ 2025-08-03 13:17 | 1 | 2025-08-04 18:24 | user_5359 ♦19,600 | Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/13045739693. What is the mean of the tagdificio = VV CASA DO RETIROfid = 86189layer = Ponta do Sologr_pkid = F593D238190D3E0ED35B42A675ECBDEC_Address_3734postcode = 9360-310street = Rua Sta Teresinhatipo = Ruatoponimo = Sta teresi... |
| 2 | 2025-08-04 18:29 | NunoCaldeira | hello, you are correct, bad workflow on my side. will fix | |
| 128244501 by NunoCaldeira @ 2022-10-30 12:32 | 1 | 2023-02-01 21:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,837 | Where this import was discussed with a local community? |
| 2 | 2023-02-01 21:24 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,837 | What is the current progress of validation and when it will end at the current rate? | |
| 3 | 2023-02-01 21:32 | NunoCaldeira | hi Mateusz, validation will start soon :) | |
| 4 | 2023-04-07 12:52 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,837 | Has it completed? | |
| 5 | 2024-05-04 06:53 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,837 | What is the status of validation? | |
| 6 | 2025-06-04 22:45 | ivanbranco ♦2,746 | Hi Nuno, I couldn't find the MapRoulette challenge. Any updates after two years? There are still 68424 fixmes (4th value globally). I guess it makes things difficult for people that wants to work with fixmes in this area. | |
| 156194644 by NunoCaldeira @ 2024-09-04 16:12 | 1 | 2025-03-11 10:55 | Pan Perníček ♦12 | Hello, #Mapycz user confirms trail (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318386011) is opened, please verify. https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/atividades-de-natureza/percursos-pedestres-recomendados/percursos-pedestres-recomendados.html |
| 151512343 by NunoCaldeira @ 2024-05-18 21:18 | 1 | 2024-05-25 05:46 | Vivek Dumre ♦84 | Thank you for mapping. The mapping looks great and also the changeset comment. Happy Mapping. #OMGuru --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151512343 |
| 35877228 by NunoCaldeira @ 2015-12-11 03:01 | 1 | 2024-05-06 11:47 | anderfo ♦111 | Hi,for way 126382750 (which you created in this changeset, about 8 years ago) and its nearby segments which probably stem from the same original way, I struggle to understand what mtb:scale=1;2;3 and mtb:scale:uphill=1;2;5 means.Can you clarify?Normally the semicolon means that this tag c... |
| 2 | 2024-05-06 17:54 | NunoCaldeira | hello, you are correct. this probably was the result of an incorrect join of lines. agree with the approach you suggest to fix the data. | |
| 141207970 by NunoCaldeira @ 2023-09-13 12:07 | 1 | 2024-04-02 12:23 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,837 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11181679476/historyIs builing:name needed there? It is already expressed by POI node being within building geometry...What kind of benefit is gained from such duplication? |
| 2 | 2024-04-02 17:30 | NunoCaldeira | yeh, might be adjusted for address as it's the name of the building as stated on the company site at https://lojas.continente.pt/#!/Funchal/1493 | |
| 3 | 2024-04-02 18:52 | Mateusz Konieczny ♦7,837 | If it is used as part of address we have addr:housename - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housename | |
| 4 | 2024-04-02 18:55 | NunoCaldeira | fixed | |
| 43703281 by NunoCaldeira @ 2016-11-16 15:53 | 1 | 2021-12-16 10:52 | Wh0resden ♦3 | Olá minha querida, acho que esta não é a camada 1 e modifiquei a tag de uso .. obrigado |
| 113255161 by NunoCaldeira @ 2021-11-01 21:05 | 1 | 2021-11-02 05:59 | gscholz ♦2,781 | This changeset has reverted changeset 113184290 and excludes again the buildings from the university.Read thishttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversityabout how to map university areas correctly.Guido |
| 85405883 by NunoCaldeira @ 2020-05-18 23:00 | 1 | 2021-10-11 12:29 | Sandal man ♦391 | Way without tags. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/805802199Can you have a look? |
| 2 | 2021-10-11 13:22 | NunoCaldeira | fixed | |
| 80612173 by NunoCaldeira @ 2020-02-06 00:51 | 1 | 2020-02-12 22:58 | hvalentim ♦92 | Qual é que é o interesse em apagar imediatamente o contributo do utilizador:1) Sem lhe dar oportunidade de o melhorar?2) Sem lhe fornecer qualquer tipo de orientação?Para mais com base num pressuposto errado e puramente adivinhado quanto à sua "ficcional... |
| 2 | 2020-02-13 01:41 | NunoCaldeira | Ora viva, como podes verificar ainda não respondeu aos pedidos de esclarecimento.quanto à orientação, é dada quando a primeira edição é feita num tutorial, que inclusive tive o prazer de traduzir para português.Se encontrares alguma r... | |
| 3 | 2020-02-13 09:52 | hvalentim ♦92 | Desde logo, o que é te faz ter tanta certeza de que é um “ele”?Se alguma coisa impede o OSM em Portugal de atingir o pleno potencial é a falta de contribuidores e interessados. Presumir e tratar indiscriminadamente os primeiros contributos como actos de vandalismo... | |
| 4 | 2020-02-13 13:53 | Filohipo ♦31 | No dia 5FEV enviei ao "MadeinSeixal" a seguinte mensagem:"Olá Bem vindo ao OSM Fizeste a tua primeira edição neste mapa colaborativo, mas confesso que esta edição me deixou um pouco confuso. Ao marcares o ponto “Made In Seixal” neste ba... | |
| 5 | 2020-02-13 16:20 | hvalentim ♦92 | Habitualmente, a mente procede por confirmação. Ou seja, procura apoiar os seus pré-juízos. Procurando com abertura não é todavia difícil colocá-los em causa:https://www.facebook.com/madeinseixal/https://empresite.jornaldenegocios.pt/... | |
| 6 | 2020-02-13 16:32 | NunoCaldeira | Como podes ver não bate a bota com a perdigota a localização, as etiquetas e a ausência de resposta do contribuidor. | |
| 7 | 2020-02-13 18:49 | Filohipo ♦31 | Muito obrigado pela informação que o Seixal tem uma associação de Artes e Sabores.Continua sem resposta a minha pergunta:"Ao marcares o ponto “Made In Seixal” neste banco de areia o que pretendes indicar ? " | |
| 8 | 2020-02-13 19:02 | hvalentim ♦92 | Isso não justifica que se aliene o potencial contribuidor e entre com os pés. Nem toda a gente está familiarizada com os procedimentos de georreferência e muito menos com a interface do OSM. As pessoas merecem o benefício da dúvida e um mínimo de tempo... | |
| 79436748 by NunoCaldeira @ 2020-01-10 21:58 | 1 | 2020-01-25 03:14 | DiogoBaptista98 ♦198 | falso, o que acabou de referir é mentiroso, e acabou por destruir novamente material novo e actualizado. o que eu fiz enquadra-se nos padrões, refiz o terminal, coloquei as gates como pontos como indicou e coloquei partes do edificio (as gates) como construções separadas ... |
| 2 | 2020-01-25 06:08 | NunoCaldeira | Bem Diogo, antes de me chamares mentiroso, vê os factos que estão bem documentados.Não reverteste as gates, fizeste novas, não respeitando o histórico dos elementos que já cá estavam há sete, sim sete anos.Quanto aos novos elementos do termi... | |
| 74878152 by NunoCaldeira @ 2019-09-24 21:28 | 1 | 2019-09-24 22:07 | Branko Kokanovic ♦310 | testing notifications |
| 2 | 2019-09-24 22:14 | NunoCaldeira | test | |
| 3 | 2019-09-25 01:23 | Abruzzzo Active block | Comment not displayed. To view it, please select the "Include blocked users" option. | |
| 4 | 2019-09-25 14:31 | Branko Kokanovic ♦310 | No, sorry, I was sloppy when writing comment. Nuno was offering to debug with me (over on Telegram group) why I don't receive mail on notification on comments in changesets. So, I wrote this small "test" comment, and he replied to test if I am receiving mail. My bad for not writing mo... | |
| 74213509 by NunoCaldeira @ 2019-09-07 20:00 | 1 | 2019-09-09 09:13 | NunoLava1998 ♦6 | Só quero dizer que a ER109 é a VE8:https://www.madeira.gov.pt/drestradas/Estrutura/DRE/ctl/Read/mid/3731/InformacaoId/51488/UnidadeOrganicaId/22Não sei porque está marcada como uma estrada terciária. |
| 2 | 2019-09-09 12:42 | NunoCaldeira | Viva, está marcada como terciária, já que a VE8 não está concluída e obedece à regras estabelecidas em portugal para a classificação. | |
| 3 | 2019-09-11 19:28 | NunoLava1998 ♦6 | A VE8 está completamente concluida até o Caminho da Ribeira Grande; até está completamente pintado. Visitei hoje. A parte em construção é entre o Caminho da Ribeira Grande e a Fundoa, que está na 1ª fase.Não vejo nada que fa&cce... | |
| 4 | 2019-09-11 21:21 | NunoCaldeira | conforme mencionei, não obedece as regras padronizadas para Portugal. No caso , liga a uma estrada residencial, logo não pode ser classificada como secundário. | |
| 5 | 2019-09-11 21:33 | NunoCaldeira | E correcção, não liga ao Caminho da Ribeira Grande, mas ao Caminho do Campo do Andorinha. | |
| 6 | 2019-09-12 14:25 | NunoLava1998 ♦6 | Eu foi lá na vida real 2 vezes. Parece que antigamente o Caminho do Campo da Andorinha era o seu caminho, mas agora liga-se à ER109/VE8.E acabei de lembrar-me que aquilo não acaba no Caminho da Ribeira Grande; até acaba no Comandante Camacho de Freitas. Fiz uma imagem d... | |
| 7 | 2019-09-12 14:27 | NunoLava1998 ♦6 | Mas isto é temporário e só uma solução até a extensão para São Roque e a Fundoa seja construida. Isso é porque que o mapa DRE não mostra. | |
| 8 | 2019-09-12 14:30 | NunoCaldeira | a menos que encontre no JORAM a alteração do Caminho da Ribeira Grande e parte do Caminho do Campo do Andorinha para estrada regional, as estradas continuam a ser municipais. logo não fazem parte | |
| 9 | 2019-09-12 14:33 | NunoCaldeira | Acabei de confirmar nas imagens nas images que fiz no Sábado. a placa de toponímia da Rua Campo do Andorinha continua na mesma localização em https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/32.67978/-16.93475 | |
| 10 | 2019-09-12 14:36 | NunoCaldeira | Aí tens a imagem https://ibb.co/6Bb27zm | |
| 11 | 2019-09-12 14:38 | NunoCaldeira | e a imagem da placa toponímia do Caminho da Ribeira Grande https://ibb.co/TrHQJpq | |
| 12 | 2019-09-12 14:49 | NunoLava1998 ♦6 | Ok, mesmo assim mudava o túnel entre a ER107 e a Rotunda Cota 500 para secundário, e possívelmente até o último túnel (onde têm a paragem de auto carro que é o fim da linha 10A: http://www.horariosdofunchal.pt/images/stories/pdf/mapaurbano.pdf) | |
| 13 | 2019-09-12 14:51 | NunoCaldeira | mas isso vai contra as regras. Não faz sentido classificares dessa forma. | |
| 70630209 by NunoCaldeira @ 2019-05-26 11:23 | 1 | 2019-05-26 16:34 | tanonin ♦63 | I allowed you to modify my changes if you have more precise informations but NOT to delete them, if you want to reverse the part in ribeira that was wrong it's ok but I did several changes that I don't want to be removed. I ask you to come back on tour changes |
| 2 | 2019-05-26 16:34 | tanonin ♦63 | *your | |
| 3 | 2019-05-26 20:00 | NunoCaldeira | partially reverted | |
| 4 | 2019-05-26 20:18 | tanonin ♦63 | You pissed me off.I took time to update the map and you TOTALLY erased my changes, they are changes in santana and ribeira too | |
| 5 | 2019-05-26 20:23 | NunoCaldeira | you need to calm down. i didn't erase, i reverted as explained on the previous changeset. As said on that changeset you misaligned the data, because you didn't align the satellite imagery offset. Your edits on Santana, which only the values were kept as the geometry were all misaligned hav... | |
| 6 | 2019-05-26 21:05 | tanonin ♦63 | I'M GIVING UP!I can say the same to you it is quite disrespectful to take me as a noob that didn't now how to offset a map, as said before there are geometrical aberation beetween the different map (probably due to differences between satellite and plane views) and no references to take ... | |
| 7 | 2019-05-26 21:14 | NunoCaldeira | First of all, i didn't call you a noob. You need to respect local knowledge without taking for grant that you are a guru and start wrongly editing and adding incorrect data. I mentioned you did not align satellite imagery. And by your reaction i see you are aware of it, but none the less, decid... | |
| 8 | 2019-05-26 22:28 | tanonin ♦63 | There actually are geometrical aberration on the osm data due to geo. ab. on the imagery, again I was saying that the imagery is terrible not the osm map.I think that having block on the roads is better than nothing even if it isn't exactly the case (I allow you to modify, not to delete you c... | |
| 9 | 2019-05-26 22:36 | NunoCaldeira | again, you did not check the keys on those roads where you incorrectly added blocks, that do not exist. I'm not editing an incorrect edit, that makes no sense. You done more damage than good, i explained that and the lack of offset adjustment and all of a sudden, without reason you are playing ... | |
| 10 | 2019-05-26 22:39 | NunoCaldeira | and about me thinking that you called the map horrible. Here's two quotes from you stating so:"I wish you good luke to deal with this HORRIBLE map" and "I'm sorry if I modified the map wrongly but the map is horrible in madere". Not my interpretation, that's your... | |
| 11 | 2019-05-27 18:55 | tanonin ♦63 | I return you the compliment you're getting less and less pleasant to speak with, not to say xenophobic we can say "chauvinist".All of a sudden I just realize that you have deleted my work that's why I became more angry (I think no one will be happy with that). Again there are... | |
| 12 | 2019-05-27 18:59 | tanonin ♦63 | I didn't have to receive lessons from the one that disrespectfully deleted my changes and the "local knowledge" has better to verify the presence of chains instead of deleting it | |
| 13 | 2019-05-28 05:14 | freebeer ♦1,598 | “Gentlemen, You Can't Fight In Here! This is The War Room!” | |
| 64967843 by NunoCaldeira @ 2018-11-28 11:02 | 1 | 2018-12-30 18:55 | Josef73 ♦274 | Hello, Then is the "Lido" open? The tag opening_hours=Mo-Su 09:00-18:00,09:00-18:00; 09:00-17:00; PH off is not clear. |
| 2 | 2018-12-30 19:03 | NunoCaldeira | I added the opening hours of that shop in place and took those times from the door front opening times | |
| 3 | 2018-12-30 19:27 | Josef73 ♦274 | Okay, I understand. But it is open from Mo-Su from 9 to 18 or 9 to 17 ? | |
| 4 | 2018-12-30 19:28 | NunoCaldeira | I don't recall. As mentioned I added while surveying | |
| 65648183 by NunoCaldeira @ 2018-12-20 18:10 | 1 | 2018-12-23 14:55 | luschi ♦418 | why do you have deleted the layer from the tunnel? |
| 2 | 2018-12-23 20:51 | NunoCaldeira | you said to revert. so i did | |
| 3 | 2018-12-23 21:12 | luschi ♦418 | I said: if you think that all my changes are wrong.not: you should revert it without checking other changes.You should check before revert the entire changeset.And if I look into your changes, you reverted my changeset and after this you deleted the turning circle and added a new to a other ... | |
| 4 | 2018-12-23 21:17 | NunoCaldeira | Nop. you said:Comment from luschi 4 days agothen just add it back, or just revert everything.Your decisionSo i reverted. i didnt create a new one, i reverted and fix it due to satellite imagery offset. and i have a photo for you tomorrow on Mapillary as i went there to confirm to you t... | |
| 5 | 2018-12-23 22:19 | luschi ♦418 | If you use the reverter in Josm you can check all edits from previous changeset or also you can revert a single object. In the most situations, a 100% revert from a changeset is not needed.In the most of your past reverts, a simple deletion brings the same effect.Quote from site you us... | |
| 61959934 by NunoCaldeira @ 2018-08-24 13:56 | 1 | 2018-08-24 14:08 | manihck ♦2 | Regarding the changes I've made to this area, may I ask why you revert them?I fixed the area around Palácio de São Lourenço with accurate data and you reverted the changes so it is now an empty area. What was wrong with the data I've added?It wasn't finished y... |
| 2 | 2018-08-24 14:13 | NunoCaldeira | you changed a churchyard to park, which doesn't apply.you misaligned the geometries, therefore i shared the link on your changeset to read about misaligned satellite imagery.For example the crosswalk on Avenida do Mar in front of Pizza Hut, which was correct and you set it in a incorrect lo... | |
| 3 | 2018-08-24 14:37 | manihck ♦2 | Thank you for the info in the offset, I'll be reading it later when I get home and try to understand how to map it correctly.Also, I needed to change the polygon to reach a point that I couldn't click and forgot about align it again.You could have pointed it out and I would have correc... | |
| 51155377 by NunoCaldeira @ 2017-08-16 00:38 | 1 | 2017-08-31 10:13 | GerdP ♦2,756 | Hi!Please review typo highway="Travessa do Pico da Igreja" Did you want to change the name tag? |
| 2 | 2017-08-31 11:34 | NunoCaldeira | done | |
| 3 | 2017-09-05 07:55 | GerdP ♦2,756 | Please review again, Which part of the way is highway=steps?The northern part still has highway=Travessa do Pico da Igreja | |
| 35937952 by NunoCaldeira @ 2015-12-14 05:17 | 1 | 2015-12-18 17:16 | cloudrider ♦6 | Viva Nuno!Esta rua está em obras e fechada ao trânsito. |
| 2 | 2015-12-18 17:18 | NunoCaldeira | fixed! | |
| 35936697 by NunoCaldeira @ 2015-12-14 02:09 | 1 | 2015-12-17 15:57 | cloudrider ♦6 | Bom trabalho!Sugestão: usar o valor "projected" na tag "highway" no caso de não existir correspondência física no terreno.Abraço |
| 2 | 2015-12-17 16:12 | NunoCaldeira | Acho que neste caso em particular, com as obras em curso o outro atributo ajusta-se (tal como na VE3 para a Ponta do Pargo, que já possui os túneis, faltando os viadutos) . Concordo com o projected na Cota 500 do Lombo dos Aguiares até à Fundoa (como corrigiste) . Abra&c... | |
| 3 | 2015-12-18 12:46 | cloudrider ♦6 | Concordo! | |
| 35935719 by NunoCaldeira @ 2015-12-13 23:41 | 1 | 2015-12-16 12:16 | cloudrider ♦6 | Viva amigo Nuno excelente trabalho! |