| Changeset | # | Tmstmp UTC | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 132036902 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-03 10:44 | 1 | 2023-03-08 13:22 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo nagalvad,wie passen die Änderungen zu der Linksabbiegespur (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369699850).Da Du zig Quellen angibst, kannst Du mir ja sicher einen Link zu einem Bild angeben, wo die entsprechenden Verkehrszeichen ersichtlich sind. Danke im Voraus.Fragende Grü&szl... |
| 2 | 2023-03-08 13:23 | skyper ♦871 | Ach ja, erneut die Bitte: Kennzeichne Dein Profil mit einem Link zum Projekt. Danke. | |
| 3 | 2023-03-09 10:45 | nagalvad | Hello skyper, Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue . It's an honest mistake from my end. I have revereted back the changes as per the available resources. Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more.Regards,nagalvad | |
| 4 | 2023-03-13 14:53 | map per ♦1,305 | Hello nagalvad,It would have been nice if you had told me that the edit I complained about (1) was a fix for this edit. Please also state in the changeset commet that you are doing a fix for a previous edit. Using comments like "modified road #amap" and on top of that deleting the hist... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-13 18:36 | skyper ♦871 | Hi,siehe zusätzlich https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129308457. Es wird nicht besser! Die Verkehrsinsel scheint es ja zu geben, aber wie sieht das mit den Einbahnstraßen und Abbiegeeinschränkungen aus?Die Problematik ist wohl bekannt, siehe u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.o... | |
| 6 | 2023-03-22 19:57 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi Skyper,Upon checking the history, the initial edit in the changeset 132036902 the editor has added directions based on the lane markings and the keep right sign board seen in the street overlays i.e., mapillary. Please find the link for the same https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4690351108599... | |
| 7 | 2023-03-23 14:39 | skyper ♦871 | Hey,danke für die Quelle.Die Aufteilung der Straße nach Fahrtrichtungen ist dann aber ~20m weiter westlich. Der einzigen Grund warum hier nach Fahrtrichtungen geteilt werden sollte ist wohl die Straßenlaterne (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9880603671). Um Konflikte mit vorh... | |
| 8 | 2023-03-29 18:22 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi Skyper,Thank you for sharing your insights on the adjustment that should actually be made at this intersection so that it is more accurate and in accordance to ground reality.We don't have a lot of experience utilizing JOSM to make these adjustments. To sum up the edit you have requested... | |
| 9 | 2023-04-03 14:28 | skyper ♦871 | Hi Deepikja,please, do not forget that, for me, OSM is just a hobby. I do not get paid for edits nor for reviewing (which is even more time-consuming) neither for teaching paid mappers.If you start editing in an area with lot's of detailed tags, you need to take your time to look at all tag... | |
| 10 | 2023-04-16 17:57 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi Skyper,Thank you for sharing your inputs on the right edit to be made at this intersection. As per the suggestions we have added the relations in accordance to direction of traffic and the lane count as per the markings seen in mapillary in the changeset 134772747. Regards,Deepikja | |
| 11 | 2023-04-21 01:32 | skyper ♦871 | Hi Deepikja,meanwhile I think you do not want to take time to understand the problems and the tagging. The last changeset did not fix anything and even moved the split per direction further to the east instead of the west and the traffic_signal was still wrongly placed. I finally fix it in https:/... | |
| 12 | 2023-04-27 12:41 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi Skyper,Thank you for fixing the issue. We mainly tried to fix the error focusing on directionality, relations and the lane count as the main mistake made by the pervious editor at this junction was corresponding to road directions and we did not want to make any further wrong additions. W... | |
| 13 | 2023-04-28 00:07 | skyper ♦871 | Hi Deepika,well complexity will only rise. Maybe it is time to better train your staff and grow the employees into complete mappers.By the way, problems just continue, see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135005539 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135175317 plus many more.... | |
| 14 | 2023-05-07 17:53 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi Skyper, We have re-evaluated our SOP on directionality for segments based on fish bone parking and are currently working on documenting a full-fledged detailed sop on usage of JOSM for dual carriage way additions. Until then we will keep all the dual carriage way edits on hold. I have made th... | |
| 133473551 by nagalvad @ 2023-03-09 10:44 | 1 | 2023-03-09 18:13 | map per ♦1,305 | Hello nagalvad,are you sure there is no traffic iland physically separating the different road directions any more?The road you deleted was added quite recently.Thanks and best regardsmap per |
| 2 | 2023-03-10 10:51 | nagalvad | Hi, Thank You for highlighting the issue. This is an honest mistake made by me. I have reverted the edit basis the ground reality and added the residential road as before. I will ensure to be mindful going forward. Looking forward to learn more.Regards,nagalvad | |
| 3 | 2023-03-10 11:01 | map per ♦1,305 | Hello nagalvad,this wasn't a proper revert. Please use a tool like the JOSM reverter plugin to restore the history, former geometry and tags of all way you changed.Best regardsmap per | |
| 4 | 2023-03-13 11:19 | nagalvad | Hi map per, Thank you for reviewing my changeset and flagging out the issue. Currently we don't use this tool to restore history, but as per your suggestion and deep dive I have made the necessary changes. Always happy to learn from the community.Thanks once again,looking forward to learn mor... | |
| 5 | 2023-03-13 18:16 | skyper ♦871 | Hi,siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132036902 und jetzt neu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133620352.Zwecks Zurücksetzen und Hinweis auf vorige CSs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129308457Nebenbei, der versprochene Review aus Kommentar 13 wurde entweder gar... | |
| 6 | 2023-03-13 19:12 | map per ♦1,305 | @skyper: Ich warte auch schon seit zwei Wochen darauf das Amazon die Edits von zwei neuen Mappern mit einigen Fehlern noch mal alle reviewed und korrigiert (siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133069997). Aber bei Amazon wird leider immer nur das aller nötigste ausgebessert und die Ko... | |
| 7 | 2023-03-28 13:12 | skyper ♦871 | @nagalvad: Is it a too demanding quest to translate my comments in English and to answer all my questions? What is the problem with providing a link to your project like most of colleagues in your profile (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nagalvad) which I have asked for several times? Are you go... | |
| 8 | 2023-04-02 17:16 | deepikja ♦58 | Hi Skyper, We have requested for your help for the edit at the requested location on the changeset 132036902. Hence, there has been no changes made at the intersection. As we wanted to ensure that we make the edit as per your recommendations which would help us avoid create any errors. Appreci... | |
| 133620352 by nagalvad @ 2023-03-13 11:18 | 1 | 2023-03-13 18:21 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo nagalvad,und täglich grüßt das Murmeltier. Welche Quellen hast Du verwendet? Etliche Buslinien fahren nun erneut entgegen der Einbahnstraße. Ist das korrekt?Wie passen die Änderungen zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132036902? Siehe auch https://www.ope... |
| 132168052 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-06 17:37 | 1 | 2023-02-06 20:36 | Galbinus ♦159 | Hallo nagalvad, Du scheint gerade reihenweise Kreuzungen, die in der Mitte eine runde Verkehrsinsel haben, zu Kreisverkehren umzubauen, obwohl es sich definitiv um keine Kreisverkehre handelt. Bitte schau Dir mal den "note" an und den Verlauf. Zusätzlich lies Dir bitte diese Diskussio... |
| 2 | 2023-02-07 13:57 | skyper ♦871 | Hallo,zusätzlich würde das explizite `oneway=no` mal wieder komplett ignoriert. Das Problem sollte bekannt sein, siehe u.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129308457, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131767540 undhttps://openstreetmap.org/changeset/127717501Aber wenn n... | |
| 3 | 2023-02-10 08:55 | nagalvad | Hello,Thank you for reviewing the changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect addition of junction=roundabout, it’s an honest mistake from my end. Going forward I will ensure not to repeat such error again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn m... | |
| 4 | 2023-02-11 14:06 | Galbinus ♦159 | Thank you, Nagalvad. | |
| 127717501 by nagalvad @ 2022-10-18 10:13 | 1 | 2022-11-22 16:06 | mapboy63 ♦23 | Why have you made these changes to Colwyn Road? It isn't one way between Seal Road and Valley Road as you have mapped. There's a no entry sign to vehicles near the the junction with Valley Road, which I mapped using a very short section of one way road (way 1091941908) quite recently. Maki... |
| 2 | 2022-11-26 13:33 | mapboy63 ♦23 | Haven't had a response, so I've reverted these changes in changeset 129402408. | |
| 3 | 2023-02-10 08:57 | nagalvad | Hello mapboy63, Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits. Going forward, we will ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you. Regards, nagalvad | |
| 131906160 by nagalvad @ 2023-01-31 06:07 | 1 | 2023-02-01 23:08 | timmito ♦172 | Hallo nagalvad, ich habe deinen Changeset revertiert. Die Verkehrsführung in der Stadtmitte von Königstein wurde schon mehrfach geändert. Zuletzt gab es einen Verkehrsversuch, der wieder beendet wurde. Die lokale Community hat das schon im Blick. |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:57 | nagalvad | Hello timmito, Thank you for reviewing our changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for incorrect edits and missing out on checking the latest imageries. It's an honest mistake from my end. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you. Regards, nagalv... | |
| 131767540 by nagalvad @ 2023-01-27 10:56 | 1 | 2023-01-28 11:45 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Moin,du hast hier das oneway wieder drauf gemacht. Der Kommentar auf dem Weg sagt aber das es kein Oneway ist solange da gebaut wird. Was ist denn nun richtig?Flo |
| 2 | 2023-01-29 12:44 | skyper ♦871 | Salli,siehe u.a. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/129308457.Dieser CS zeigt, das Amazon Logistic wohl unfähig ist innerhalb von zwei Monaten wichtige Instruktionen und genauer Beschreibungen an die Mitarbeitenden weiter zu geben.In diesem Fall wäre wohl Kontaktaufnahme der richtig... | |
| 3 | 2023-01-29 13:13 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Nu mal gaaaanz ruhig mit den braunen Pferden. Du musst nicht deinen Streit aus anderen Changesets hier rein ziehen. Das sind alles minimale änderungen, und wenn man das halbwegs monitored dann passieren eben fehler, und die passieren den "neu-mappern" deutlich mehr. Dazu kommt... | |
| 4 | 2023-01-29 22:49 | bielebog ♦271 | Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131857440Street level imagery and ortophotos can't beat ground truth ;-) For a current view have a look at https://www.webcam-profi.de/bilder/bremer/paderborn/hauptbahnhof/cam1/image.jpg | |
| 5 | 2023-01-31 17:33 | skyper ♦871 | Ich wollte eher darauf hinweisen, dass die Aufgabe "added directions " einiges an Gefahren birgt. Dazu habe ich etliche Beispiele und speziell bei dieser Aufgabe kann ich nicht bestätigen, dass gute Arbeit geleistet wird. Zumindest das Ändern der oneway-Werte ohne Ortskenntnis un... | |
| 6 | 2023-01-31 18:07 | flohoff ♦2,368 | "vandalismus" heisst es wird absichtlich kaputt gemacht. Und DAS den Amazons Logistics zu unterstellen halte ich für sehr weit her geholt.Die wollen auch eine gute Karte und die verlassen sich auf die "Crowd" an Fahrern die jeden tag sich da draussen durch den Dschungel ... | |
| 7 | 2023-02-07 14:13 | skyper ♦871 | Wie soll ich es denn nennen, wenn ohne Ortskenntnisse und mit Wissen der Problematik, hier blind links explizit gesetzte Tags ignoriert werden?@Flo:Deine Auswertung in alle Ehre, aber findet die auch falsch eingetragene Kreisverkehre und wie sieht es bei Wohn- und Service-Straßen aus, z.... | |
| 8 | 2023-02-07 14:20 | flohoff ♦2,368 | Wir diskutieren hier DIESEN changeset. Und das ist geklärt. Wenn du grundsätzliche Dinge hast dann ist das eher ein Ding für das Forum. | |
| 9 | 2023-02-10 08:55 | nagalvad | Hello,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. I added direction based on the lane markings present as per the latest aerial image. Apologies for missing out on the note where the construction was mentioned, it’s an honest mistake from my end. Going forward I will ensure... | |
| 132026831 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-03 04:57 | 1 | 2023-02-07 12:45 | klik ♦27 | These are not! oneway roads.Please do not mark roads in germany as oneway unless they are marked either with traffic_sign=DE:220 or traffic_sign=DE:267. |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:54 | nagalvad | Hello klik,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edit, It’s an honest mistake from my end. I’ve removed the direction as per your insights in the changeset 132345958. Going forward I’ll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. T... | |
| 132166417 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-06 16:58 | 1 | 2023-02-06 22:00 | Mammi71 ♦256 | This is not a roundabout!In Germany, only intersections signposted with traffic sign no. 215 are considered roundabouts. Everything else, depending on the situation, are circular intersections, turning loops, turning circles or simply traffic calming measures. Different traffic rules apply! In r... |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:52 | nagalvad | Hello Mammi71,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edit, I’ve done the correction as per your suggestion and removed junction=roundabout in the changeset 132345876. Going forward I’ll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Thank you... | |
| 132169387 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-06 18:14 | 1 | 2023-02-06 21:51 | Mammi71 ♦256 | This is not a roundabout!In Germany, only intersections signposted with traffic sign no. 215 are considered roundabouts. Everything else, depending on the situation, are circular intersections, turning loops, turning circles or simply traffic calming measures. Different traffic rules apply! In r... |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:50 | nagalvad | Hello Mammi71,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edit it’s an honest mistake from my end, the correction is already done by Langlaeufer. Going forward I’ll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Thank you for highlighting the issu... | |
| 132033388 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-03 09:12 | 1 | 2023-02-06 13:24 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦727 | Hey!Are you really sure this is a roundabout and not a simple junction=circular?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabouthttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:49 | nagalvad | Hello OSM_RogerWilco,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edit it’s an honest mistake form my end. I’ve removed junction=roundabout as per your suggestion in changeset 132345774. Going forward I’ll ensure not to repeat such ... | |
| 132040882 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-03 12:30 | 1 | 2023-02-06 13:21 | OSM_RogerWilco ♦727 | Hey!Are really your sure this is a roundabout and not a simple junction=circular?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabouthttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dcircular |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:45 | nagalvad | Hello OSM_RogerWilco,Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. Apologies for the incorrect edit it’s an honest mistake form my end. I’ve removed junction=roundabout as per your suggestion. Going forward I’ll ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Thank you for... | |
| 132149390 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-06 09:46 | 1 | 2023-02-06 13:05 | Langlaeufer ♦1,330 | Please notice that not every round structure is a roundabout. In Germany it need to be signed with the traffic_sign for roundabout. Otherwise different traffic rules apply. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132149390 |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:42 | nagalvad | Hello Langlaeufer,Thank you for reviewing the changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect addition of junction=roundabout. Going forward I will ensure not to repeat such error again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,nagal... | |
| 132155752 by nagalvad @ 2023-02-06 12:32 | 1 | 2023-02-06 13:04 | Langlaeufer ♦1,330 | Please notice that not every round structure is a roundabout. In Germany it need to be signed with the traffic_sign for roundabout. Otherwise different traffic rules apply. In this case there is even no need to go right hand. --- Published using OSMCha: https:... |
| 2 | 2023-02-06 15:14 | Ygramul ♦80 | Addendum: The lack of signage (should be a give way and a circular sign on every entry) is evident on Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=943295216214973 | |
| 3 | 2023-02-10 08:42 | nagalvad | Hello,Thank you for reviewing the changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect addition of junction=roundabout, it’s an honest mistake from my end. Going forward I will ensure not to repeat such error again. Thanks once again for fixing the issue, looking forward to learn m... | |
| 131865174 by nagalvad @ 2023-01-30 06:34 | 1 | 2023-02-06 11:31 | Streifenschmerle ♦2 | Die Änderung der Einbahnstraßenrichtung war falsch - sei ca. Herbst 2022 wurde deren Richtung umgekehrt. Ich habe dies jetzt wieder korrigiert. |
| 2 | 2023-02-10 08:40 | nagalvad | Hello Streifenschmerle,Thank you for highlighting the issue and modifying the edit as per latest evidence. I edited based on the available resources. Thank You again for your insights, looking forward to learn more from you.Regards,nagalvad |