Latest OSM notes of Hong Kong with complete log (Limit 500)
Id#Tmstmp UTCActionContributorComment
5083046 (iD)12025-12-08 04:20openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404367919 feels like a "descriptive name"
5080918 (iD)12025-12-06 12:27openedkingkingHKDoes Tai Shue Wan https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8791675465 really deserve to be `=suburb`? I don't feel like it's that important.
22025-12-06 20:56commentedKovoschizIt's enough if it stands on its own, cf Sham Wan, Shouson Hill. You thinking it should be in Wong Chuk Hang?
32025-12-07 13:28commentedkingkingHKI feel like it is not really that important when it appears to be unpopulated. But nevermind if the standard is just "standing on its own". I originally noticed this when I saw Carto render Tai Shue Wan over Ap Lei Chau at zoom 12 even though I personally consider Ap Lei Chau to be much more "important", so I wondered if that is caused by the over...
42025-12-07 17:37commentedKovoschiz1. The definition of populated can be debated. If there are hotels, or jails (need to do revision on census definition), are those really "unpopulated"? That's not the same as census definition of populations. Eg Penny's Bay, or Chek Lap Kok may have no residents either. 2. Carto doesn't always work. `population=` is not the only factor in what's ...
5082020 (iD)12025-12-07 13:04openedvectorial8192Kwun Tong Line: The upper and lower rails are stitched together in OSM, which is incorrect; both rails should be separate irl.
5082019 (iD)12025-12-07 13:04openedvectorial8192Yau Tong Station: Review the layering; should probably be `layer=0` or `layer=1`.
4957095 (iD)12025-09-11 13:40openedvectorial8192By pure coincidence, it is discovered that MTR is quite possibly using "vibe routing" here: TKL LOHAS branch LOHAS bound takes distinct paths per the vibes of the signaling system. Some instances may take the upper path while remaining instances take the lower path. This is highly unusual. Then, would the current mapping be correct? How should we...
22025-12-06 13:39commentedkingkingHKSorry I am not too sure what you mean, could you please elaborate? Specifically, which paths does the trains take? Which paths are the "upper path" and "lower path"?
32025-12-06 15:20commentedvectorial8192So basically, one day in September I was irl-reviewing some stuff and noted that the train took the upper path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485648069/history/8 Later, something else happened irl and I decided to visit this area again, but this time, the train took the lower path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428978599/history/1 This is ...
42025-12-06 15:22commentedvectorial8192I want to add that the OSM track layout near LOHAS Park has been confusing/wrong for a long time until the fateful 2-visits discovery that finally resulted in the current OSM track layout.
52025-12-07 10:27commentedkingkingHKDisclaimer: I am not very familiar with railway tagging It seems like the direction of travel of railways is tagged with `railway:preferred_direction` and `oneway=reversible` (only on tracks with a clear normal direction of travel. Then, based on what you said, it seems like www.openstreetmap.org/way/32226078 is used for both train to and from LO...
62025-12-07 10:36commentedkingkingHKSee https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614946
72025-12-07 11:32commentedvectorial8192Not too familiar with railway mapping myself, but it seems almost all segments implicitly have `oneway=reversible`; why this needs to be stated clearly idk. The idea is that at this moment, `oneway=?` is some value, but for another moment, `oneway=?` becomes another value, therefore `=reversible`. Trains may use "the opposite rail" depending on dep...
5081772 (iD)12025-12-07 07:59openedvectorial8192todo: name of feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208701496
22025-12-07 10:19closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614463 ; closing.
5076230 (iD)12025-12-02 13:47openedkingkingHKWhat is this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6546140
22025-12-04 15:28commentedvectorial8192Seems like someone tried to add indoor paths. However, no idea what "NRG" means. These might be 24/7 paths, but idk about this.
32025-12-07 09:53closedkingkingHKI do not know what it means either. It is the only instance of `NRG=` in the entire database, so it's safe to assume that it can simply be deleted. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175613659 ; closing.
5080805 (iD)12025-12-06 11:00openedvectorial8192Dakota Drive ...??? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235498284
22025-12-06 12:53commentedkingkingHKNot sure what you were complaining about exactly, but does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175582314 resolve this note?
32025-12-06 12:56commentedvectorial8192Nope. The quoted section of Dakota drive is hanging as `highway=secondary`, but satellite imagery is unclear whether it should be `highway=residential` as hinted by previous `construction:highway=residential`.
42025-12-06 13:05commentedkingkingHKAfaik for junctions like this, the higher-ranking one of the intersecting roads would be applied to the intersection, which in this case should mean that the quoted section would be `=secondary` (please correct me if this is wrong). Then, I have removed `construction:highway=residential` in the aforementioned changeset as the road has been opened,...
52025-12-06 15:13commentedvectorial8192I will clarify how to map junctions (but feel free to ask/confirm in the Discord for better confirmation, in case I can't explain it cleanly). Basically, the junction is formed first by intersecting the roads together with their "base highway class"; in this case Dakota Drive should be `=residential`. It largely follows the "maintain throughout hi...
62025-12-07 05:31closedkingkingHKOk, upon rethinking, you are right, it should indeed be `=residential`. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175609092 ; closing.
5052159 (iD)12025-11-14 07:54openedkingkingHKI think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188837279 should be 132 kV and not 132 V?
22025-11-14 15:56commentedvectorial8192Also see https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/188837279 - no way any irl power cable runs with just 132V; now is not Victorian - past OSM history shows DWG intervention; possibly good faith but hit innocent changeset of fixing "132V" If we choose to trust changeset 171413551, then this is very obviously a 132kV power line.
32025-11-15 04:09commentedkingkingHKWell, the user who made changeset 171413551 (JacobPierce456) also changed a lot of 400 kV lines to 132 kV, even ones connecting to 400 kV substations, so I'm not sure if it's believable. See also https://openinframap.org/#10.68/22.3758/114.1147 for visualisation of power line and voltages.
42025-12-06 15:30commentedvectorial8192I am no electrical engineer, but I think 400 kV infra can be easily repurposed to become 132 kV infra. Unfortunately survey recommended to see what's going on; might be easier to check at Po Lam side.
5080645 (iD)12025-12-06 09:10openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1134758320 should probably be deleted.
22025-12-06 09:22closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175575513 ; closing.
5080646 (iD)12025-12-06 09:16openedkingkingHKIs Lantau Link Visitors Centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12271148) really a `highway=rest_area`?
5080613 (iD)12025-12-06 08:33openedvectorial8192Roundabout ...?!
22025-12-06 09:08closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175575183 ; closing.
5080639 (iD)12025-12-06 09:06openedvectorial8192What is the name of this park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346575800 ?
5065814 (iD)12025-11-24 11:13openedvectorial8192I think there is a lanes expansion project here?
22025-12-01 09:14commentedkingkingHKHi there, does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175303638 resolve this note?
32025-12-06 06:14closedvectorial8192It does. Thanks for the review. Closing.
5000307 (iD)12025-10-11 09:01openedpppcPerm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-10-28 16:59commentedvectorial8192Probably referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10129934870
32025-11-14 09:50commentedvectorial8192doesn't seem like should be here; also can't find it
42025-11-16 17:56commentedvectorial8192Wait, I feel like I made a mistake somewhere. Gotta recheck it.
52025-12-05 12:50commentedvectorial8192Upon review, I do not think there is such thing as "32D".
62025-12-05 12:54closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175544530 ; closing.
5061240 (iD)12025-11-20 17:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-05 12:39closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175543950 ; closing.
5079402 (iD)12025-12-05 03:49openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8742956918 should probably be deleted
5079399 (iD)12025-12-05 03:14opened5
22025-12-05 03:29closedkingkingHKMeaning is unclear, closing.
5079398 (iD)12025-12-05 03:13opened4
22025-12-05 03:29closedkingkingHKMeaning is unclear, closing.
5034516 (iD)12025-11-02 16:21openedGULU Greek Yogurt
22025-12-04 15:33commentedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6378290625 is referencing a difficult-to-load webpage.
5078742 (iD)12025-12-04 15:21openedkingkingHKname:zh of park? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/576655997
4957938 (iD)12025-09-12 08:07opened足感謝 Fanny Family Massage & Beauty
22025-09-30 11:56commentedkingkingHKCorrect
32025-12-04 14:29commentedvectorial8192Any updates to this note?
42025-12-04 15:05closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175496104 ; closing.
5078637 (iD)12025-12-04 14:03openedvectorial8192Anyone know what this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455730544 is named?
5078621 (iD)12025-12-04 13:52openedkingkingHKIs https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7134763060 supposed to be `amenity=waste_basket` instead?
5078524 (iD)12025-12-04 12:03openedChinese/English mismatched; should be 宏顯樓
22025-12-04 13:46commentedkingkingHKIt is currently tagged as 宏顯樓? Could you please elaborate?
5049048 (iD)12025-11-12 05:48openedvectorial8192Path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100844361 was mentioned to be difficult to use; delete? or mark as hazard?
22025-11-15 12:36commentedvectorial8192afaik this was previously closed due to construction works; it could be that the path was reclaimed by nature. We should first determine how bad the path is. If the path was reclaimed by nature, or it ain't a "slope maintenance path", or any other reason to believe that anyone would care to maintain this path, then we can just straight up delete t...
32025-12-03 13:17commentedkingkingHK1. Re construction works, yes indeed the northern entrance of a footpath here is still being obstructed by construction, but there's an informal bypass. 2. The upper section of the footpath (close to Lung Cheung Road) is actually a slope maintenance path on an artificial slope. 3. The lower section of the footpath (close to Beacon Hill Road) is c...
42025-12-04 13:43closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175491462 ; closing.
5062245 (iD)12025-11-21 13:47openedkingkingHKIs Lantau Link BBI really `access=customers` when https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457969673 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727099908 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762041854 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172848370 exist?
22025-11-24 18:12commentedvectorial8192probably not; seems like "extremely rural" but not fully self-enclosed like "Shing Mun" and "Tuen Chek". similar vibes also see "Lion Rock" where it's also "extremely rural" but still not fully self-enclosed. ref https://www.oasistrek.com/fa_peng_teng.php ; the BBI is mentioned as some place which can be walked away to trivially reach the wildern...
32025-12-04 10:48closedkingkingHKIndeed it is possible to easily walk to the wilderness. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175480960 ; closing.
5065716 (iD)12025-11-24 09:20openedkingkingHKDoes this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349317489 actually exist? Which routes call here?
22025-12-04 10:33closedkingkingHKNope, nothing here. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175480398 ; closing.
5061750 (iD)12025-11-21 03:59openedkingkingHKHas this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/900202005 been reopened?
22025-12-04 10:28closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175480217 ; closing.
5077351 (iD)12025-12-03 12:55openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11530071569 should probably be deleted
22025-12-03 13:40commentedkingkingHKThe changeset that created that node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146429453) has tags " Unintentional Severity: High Unresolved", presumably about this. That person (Russkii) has also added other seeming dubious features, I would recommend reviewing them all.
32025-12-04 10:13closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175479675 ; closing.
5078375 (iD)12025-12-04 10:12openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433769 What is this? Does this actually exist?
5078374 (iD)12025-12-04 10:12openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433869 What is this? Does this actually exist?
5078240 (iD)12025-12-04 06:21openedvectorial8192Name of "house" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993221815 is very suspicious
5027512 (iD)12025-10-29 04:25openedklorydryk"invisible from the road" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI has no name POI types: highway-path #CoMaps android
22025-12-03 12:47commentedvectorial8192Does this mean, there is no perimeter foot path?
32025-12-04 00:19commentedklorydrykYes if is what I mean
5077746 (iD)12025-12-03 19:04openedvectorial8192Rare data incompleteness: name:en of street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243663400 ?
5038060 (iD)12025-11-04 17:29openedvectorial8192I feel like this mall should have a name, but maybe I am wrong.
22025-12-03 15:16closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175449009 ; closing.
5039442 (iD)12025-11-05 15:28openedkingkingHKI suspect that it is legal to cycle from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116287569 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835665902
22025-11-05 15:29commentedkingkingHK* and all the way to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718063548 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149908331 , but not https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227648518
32025-11-05 15:32commentedvectorial8192I don't know the details yet, but bold claim to be allowed to walk/cycle in numbered highways.
42025-11-05 15:40commentedvectorial8192ok, so you mentioned https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227648518 , but this already has `bicycle=no`.
52025-11-06 07:37commentedkingkingHKNumbered highway does not mean anything. Strategic routes have no legal implication. See Lung Cheung Road. Afaik, there are only four situations where cycling is prohibited: 1. on expressways (Cap 374Q (4)(1)) 2. in tunnel areas (Cap 368A (10)(a)) 3. in country parks (Cap 208A (4)(1)) 4. beyond no cycling signs (Cap 374G Sch 1 Fig 126 & 127) Obvi...
62025-11-06 19:56commentedKovoschizIndeed you can legally bike on many roads dangerously without signage. It's likely forgotten to be exempted, as it's at least inconsistent with `=trunk_link` https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850148615
72025-11-06 20:05commentedKovoschiz@vectorial8192 Try to find no bike sign on all `=trunk` fully (Lung Cheung Rd, Kwun Tong Rd, Tseung Kwan O Rd, Lei Yue Mun Rd; former Gloucester Rd, Connaught Rd C)
82025-12-03 13:49closedkingkingHKMy suspicion is correct. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445268 ; closing.
5077338 (iD)12025-12-03 12:45openedvectorial8192Village areas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188488683 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188488680 probably should not have names, but have `addr:*=*` instead.
22025-12-03 13:37commentedkingkingHKSee also the changeset discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145486557 .
32025-12-03 13:47commentedvectorial8192oh yeah; it me this is more like a todo / coordination note
5065720 (iD)12025-11-24 09:23openedkingkingHKDoes this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349312890 actually exist? Which routes call here?
22025-11-25 15:44commentedvectorial8192could just be green minibuses with some "hail on ride" value (not too familiar with that kind of tagging)
32025-12-03 13:32commentedkingkingHKSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5065723
5065723 (iD)12025-11-24 09:25openedkingkingHKDoes this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349317190 actually exist?
22025-12-03 13:05commentedvectorial8192probably public light bus hail-and-ride
32025-12-03 13:31commentedkingkingHKSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5065720 However, hail and ride is tagged with "hail_and_ride" role on the way in the light bus restriction, not with a bus stop node. Afaik `highway=bus_stop` should only be used when there's something physical there e.g. a pole.
42025-12-03 13:32commentedkingkingHK* So the intention of this note is to check if there's anything physical indicating a (mini)bus stop at this location
5077389 (iD)12025-12-03 13:18openedkingkingHKName of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674242942 is dubious.
4691875 (iD)12025-04-01 18:24openedKenkton"Capsule hostel." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Sleep HKG POI types: tourism-hostel internet_access-wlan #organicmaps android
22025-04-04 14:07commentedvectorial8192We don't seem to have a standard tag for capsule hotels.
32025-04-04 18:47commentedKovoschizIt has been decided to use `=hostel` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:tourism=hostel Not literal `=hotel` as they are communal, mostly shared facilities https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/hostel=capsule
42025-04-05 02:12closedKenktonAh, I'll know for the future then. Thanks.
52025-04-05 06:53reopenedvectorial8192
62025-04-05 06:54commentedvectorial8192Still, we can use this opportunity to improve the tagging of this feature.
72025-09-24 11:36commentedkingkingHKWill there be any further discussion on this note? It seems like the current tagging of the feature is fine (already has `tourism=hostel`), and any further improvements of tagging probably isn't very related to this note.
82025-09-24 16:12commentedvectorial8192Don't close it yet. Highly relevant to forum discussion; see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-should-we-tag-capsule-hotels/128371 The intention / end goal is to somehow get this through the OSM wiki / approval process.
92025-09-24 23:08commentedKenktonI believe they should be tagged separately. They are not hostels, where rooms are shared, but they are also not hostels as facilities are shared.
102025-09-24 23:09commentedKenktonI believe they should be tagged separately. They are not hostels, where rooms are shared, but they are also not hotels as facilities are shared.
112025-12-03 12:14closeddiosdios
122025-12-03 12:46reopenedvectorial8192
5074863 (iD)12025-12-01 10:19openedvectorial8192Wang Fuk Court: ref=A to ref=G needs to be reviewed whether they are actually `abandoned=yes` or `ruined=yes`. Preliminary reports by structural engineers are indicating `abandoned=yes`, but full report is not out yet.
22025-12-02 10:27commentedKovoschizIt's no immediate danger, only meaning it will not collapse very soon, not no major damage. It's much more broken than the usual `abandoned=` which can easily be renovated
32025-12-03 09:53closedvectorial8192Yeah, recent close-ups show as if the buildings were from an actual warzone. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175435505 ; closing. RIP.
5070064 (iD)12025-11-27 14:08openedEmojiopenstreetmapFrom the news, Wang Chi House is mostly unaffected. I doubt that marking it as ruined (as with the other seven) is appropriate.
22025-11-27 14:09commentedEmojiopenstreetmapSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5068721
32025-11-27 16:40commentedvectorial8192Local Hong Kong idiom: never follow the car too closely. Technically the fire is not under control; we have no definite proof Wang Chi House is OR is not `=ruined`.
42025-11-27 23:18commentedKovoschizI multi-edited them all for convenience. You can always correct it.
52025-11-28 00:54commentedEmojiopenstreetmapI agree with vectorial8192’s points, that we should put it on hold before things settle down. Relevant discussion on the English Wikipedia on the future of the other seven buildings: https://w.wiki/GLf6
62025-11-28 02:53commentedvectorial8192Indeed. Reading the link to the English Wiki, yes my general point is basically "WP:TRUE". Now, as of writing, I think all fires from ref=A to ref=G are gone for good (await official confirmation). But even then, ref=H (Wang Chi House) is still covered in scaffolding. We need direct visual confirmation to the building itself (e.g. how are the actu...
72025-11-28 07:45commentedKovoschiz@1F616EMO OSM is not Wikipedia. Immediate action is often done for disasters, and it works based on iterative refinement.
82025-11-28 07:46commentedKovoschizIe there's no ban on breaking news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper
92025-12-01 10:16commentedvectorial8192Things should have settled down. I am hopeful Wang Chi House is entirely unaffected, but someone go look under the scaffolding?
102025-12-03 09:25commentedvectorial8192Latest news hint towards the building remains healthy because residents are allowed to retrieve some of their stuff.
112025-12-03 09:42closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175434791 ; closing.
5072015 (iD)12025-11-29 08:29openedmaxso216new pedestrian crossing open #OsmAnd
22025-12-03 09:05closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175434034
5077060 (iD)12025-12-03 08:46openedvectorial8192I think this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243755413 is actually a dam? Is this accessible?
5071092 (iD)12025-11-28 12:45opened严苑nnn鮨政 x 大湖 eng：SUSHI MASA 日料餐廳
22025-12-01 04:39closed3an
32025-12-01 04:39reopened3an
42025-12-01 04:45closed3an
52025-12-01 04:53reopenedkingkingHK
62025-12-03 05:06closedCypp0847Closing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175339293
5076926 (iD)12025-12-03 03:43openedfredrtd3抗日英烈紀念碑轉右進入大網仔路
22025-12-03 04:19closedkingkingHKYes, the memorial exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4308252302 , but this note is not helpful; closing.
5002038 (iD)12025-10-12 11:06openedAbandoned, in disrepair. Survey.
22025-12-03 03:03closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425995
5065714 (iD)12025-11-24 09:19openedkingkingHKAre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349334590 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3484066233 referring to the same bus stop?
22025-11-24 18:01commentedvectorial8192seems like it in particular, this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3484066233/history/1 came first, and is at the (afaik) correct position.
32025-12-03 02:50closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425755
5076281 (iD)12025-12-02 14:38openedkingkingHKIs "Permeant" Aviation Fuel Facility supposed to be Permanent Aviation Fuel Facility instead?
5034408 (iD)12025-11-02 15:40openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-01 15:16closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175360353 ; closing.
5056582 (iD)12025-11-17 10:24openedkingkingHKTodo: Kansu Street between Ferry Street and Battery Street will be reopened on 2025-11-29 https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/WCO/reopen%20of%20kansu%20street_eng.pdf
22025-12-01 13:50closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175356383 ; closing.
5074895 (iD)12025-12-01 10:55openedPablo Strubell"No bus stops here" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-10-21T03:35:21Z POI name: 東涌（達東路） Tung Chung (Tat Tung Road) POI types: public_transport-platform highway-bus_s...
5074572 (iD)12025-12-01 03:48opened3an鮨政x大湖 ENG：SUSHI MASA 日式料理店，該位置缺失商家
22025-12-01 04:45closed3an
5068317 (iD)12025-11-26 06:03openedvectorial8192is the name this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4844606091 or this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450102863 ?
22025-11-26 06:07commentedvectorial8192it turns out, the building is already gone.
32025-11-30 15:24closedvectorial8192Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315457 ; closing.
5068316 (iD)12025-11-26 06:02openedvectorial8192https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450102864 what is with this name?
22025-11-30 15:24closedvectorial8192Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315457 ; closing.
5063775 (iD)12025-11-22 15:30openedvectorial8192Re note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5056582 , see whether this Saigon Street becomes "eastbound only" later.
22025-11-30 13:48commentedkingkingHKAs of yesterday (2025-11-29) it's still oneway westbound, but just in case it changes in the future, I will leave this note open until the nearby works are complete, presumably when the Central Kowloon Bypass opens.
5063739 (iD)12025-11-22 15:12openedkingkingHKWhat is this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4921686325
22025-11-22 15:16commentedvectorial8192share_taxi
32025-11-22 15:17commentedvectorial8192*afaik I think this is share_taxi survey recommended.
42025-11-30 13:46closedkingkingHKIndeed there is a red minibus terminus here. Then, comparing franchised bus tagging where `amenity=bus_station` isn't used for a simple terminus with no further amenities, this probably shouldn't be `=bus_station` either. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175311307 ; closing.
5073245 (iD)12025-11-30 06:54openedHenryEKExplosives dumping ground here
22025-11-30 07:03commentedHenryEKThe hydrographic office writes that "航海人員不宜在爆炸品傾倒區內錨泊、拖綱或進行其他水低或海床作業。Mariners should avoid anchoring, trawling or carrying out any submarine or seabed activities in the explosives dumping ground." on their "charts for local vessels"
5071079 (iD)12025-11-28 12:27openedHenryEKJust curious, how are some roads classified as motorways on OSM yet they are not classified as such by bodies such as the Transport Department and instead considered trunk roads? https://www.td.gov.hk/en/road_safety/road_users_code/index/chapter_5_for_all_drivers/expressways_and_trunk_road_/ I apologise if I am mistaken
22025-11-28 14:54commentedkingkingHKhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong/Transport/Road#%E8%A1%97%E9%81%93%E5%88%86%E9%A1%9E_Classifications_of_streets Currently, tunnel areas are considered `highway=motorway`.
32025-11-29 12:28commentedKovoschiz`highway=` is a functional class. Although `=motorway` is quite an exception, it can be argued for following closely. Tenatively, they are distinguished by `motorway=no` + `motorroad=yes` to reflect their function and status. HK is complicated by Tunnel Area appearing in the middle of Expressway, as in here, and Cheung Tsing Tunnel; as well as Tsi...
42025-11-29 12:30closedKovoschizAlso there's no legal traffic classification as a "trunk road". That's engineering standard, and for census. Expressways, or Tunnel Area, are designated on Trunk Road, and Primary Distributor. Strategic Routes can be routed on Trunk Road, and Primary Distributor.
5016776 (iD)12025-10-21 16:30openedvectorial8192Super overlapped pedestrian paths?
22025-11-26 07:44commentedkingkingHKCould you please elaborate?
32025-11-26 16:58commentedvectorial8192Elaboration: Latest satellite imagery (and therefore irl) shows the sidewalk has been moved north, but then it is super close to an unrelated foot path. What might be happening irl?
42025-11-28 15:26commentedkingkingHKI think they are not at the same vertical level? Ie there might be some sort of retaining wall/cliff between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763946005 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964606433 . Disclaimer: I have never visited this place after the TCL extension works began, but I still vaguely remember there was a retaining wall/embankmen...
5068721 (iD)12025-11-26 11:38openedvectorial8192Great fire; we may need to observe the irl situation and update OSM when needed, this seems like a full loss. Worst case the whole estate is condemned and needs to be rebuilt.
22025-11-27 12:13closedKovoschizUnlikely to become `landuse=residential` directly, changed to `ruined`
4958371 (iD)12025-09-12 11:02openedvectorial8192Quarry Bay station, Exits B1, B2, and B3 are original research.
22025-09-12 11:07commentedvectorial8192*also exit B4
32025-09-12 11:20commentedvectorial8192These B "subexits" are not signposted irl and do not appear in irl official diagrams. IRL only denotes "B". This is different from East Tsim Sha Tsui Station where the J "subexits" are delegated to be under the management of an external party, currently the manager of Victoria Dockside, and each have their own ref. I can personally attest these J ...
42025-09-12 12:04commentedvectorial8192Detected faulty changeset as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16819169 .
52025-09-24 12:14commentedkingkingHKFrom Discord discussion, it seems like this note is a false positive? If so, perhaps we can close it.
62025-09-24 13:53commentedvectorial8192The next step is to check/confirm the railway protection details, and I haven't done that yet.
72025-09-30 12:58commentedvectorial8192So, there really are official documents that write down exist B1 to B4, but they are no longer signposted irl. Then, need to determine the proper next step. Should we keep only the B exit or somehow mix in the preexisting B1 - B4 exits with the newly-mapped B exit?
82025-09-30 13:42commentedkingkingHKImo if it's no longer signposted irl then I don't see why it should still be kept. Official documents can still be outdated or simply wrong.
92025-11-26 06:36commentedkingkingHKAlso, `old_ref` can be considered if you really want to keep the B1-B4.
5034380 (iD)12025-11-02 14:29openedvectorial8192feels like should be "funeral home" with `abandoned=yes`
22025-11-24 17:21commentedvectorial8192I vaguely remember seeing the introduction of this place a few years ago; something like "this place holds dead bodies until ready for burial".
5065844 (iD)12025-11-24 10:36openedEmoriaUnable to answer "Which direction leads upwards here?" – on bridge: Steps – https://osm.org/way/102441834 via StreetComplete 62.0: For both up and down
22025-11-24 15:12commentedvectorial8192...perhaps this is a question too technical for the average user.
32025-11-24 15:18closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175071676 ; closing.
5034310 (iD)12025-11-02 14:06openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-23 13:04closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175024981 ; closing.
5060658 (iD)12025-11-20 05:58openedvectorial8192It seems this now has a name.
22025-11-21 14:52closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174952423 ; closing.
5034414 (iD)12025-11-02 14:42openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-11-20 16:30closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174914313 ; closing.
5034415 (iD)12025-11-02 14:42openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-20 15:52closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174912611 ; closing.
5060660 (iD)12025-11-20 05:59openedvectorial8192This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208702429 seems abandoned.
22025-11-20 15:46commentedvectorial8192School is now at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444417819
32025-11-20 15:47closedvectorial8192Leftover facility marking as abandoned. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174912402 ; closing.
5034431 (iD)12025-11-02 14:46openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic...? What should be happening here?
22025-11-03 12:49commentedkingkingHKOnline information says the Family Medicine Clinic has been relocated to 201B, 2/F, Mei Hei House, i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775540630
32025-11-20 15:45closedvectorial8192Indeed it's moved to the other side for now. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174912282 ; closing.
5034424 (iD)12025-11-02 14:45openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4417156937 What even is this?
22025-11-03 12:51commentedkingkingHKOnline information says there's a Family Medicine Clinic here, but unsure if the current location of the osm node is correct (can very well be some unrelated private clinic)
32025-11-03 13:57commentedvectorial8192It lacking any identifying information (even a `name=[zh]` would be acceptable) is just disappointing. Gotta go there and have a look sometime.
42025-11-03 14:08commentedkingkingHKGiven that the node has been largely untouched for a decade, it's not surprising to lack basic information. However, I did find https://gia.info.gov.hk/general/202510/10/P2025101000532_515333_1_1760100285157.pdf which says there a "南山家庭醫學診所 Nam Shan Family Medicine Clinic" at this location, but it's unsure whether we can just copy f...
52025-11-19 15:29commentedvectorial8192Multiple irl matches. For clarity, I will just delete + remake the node.
62025-11-19 15:34closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174864945 ; closing.
4985564 (iD)12025-09-30 13:56openedkingkingHKTodo: this roundabout will be converted to a signal-controlled junction starting 2025-10-26 06:00
22025-10-08 08:14commentedvectorial8192I am out of the loop, but I think this is only about adding traffic signals to the roundabout?
32025-10-08 12:18commentedkingkingHKSee https://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/sk/doc/2024_2027/tc/committee_meetings_doc/TTC/29515/SK_TTC_2025_026_TC.pdf especially page 5.
42025-10-08 14:20commentedvectorial8192oh, then that's essentially a full remake. huh. Thanks for the info anyways!
52025-11-02 14:22commentedvectorial8192I am once again out of the loop; I think this will be gradually converted into a signalled intersection? So, for a short while, this might be a roundabout with traffic signals?
62025-11-03 02:02commentedkingkingHKWell, when I went there a few days ago, it was already a normal signal-controlled junction and not just a roundabout with signals.
72025-11-19 12:55closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173766938 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173767473 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174804596 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174818679 ; closing.
5042826 (iD)12025-11-08 00:55opened德華中心De Hua Tower
22025-11-19 12:31closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174857147 ; closing.
5034429 (iD)12025-11-02 14:45openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4417156940 What even is this?
22025-11-19 11:11commentedvectorial8192Multiple irl matches; none will "replace" this clinic.
32025-11-19 11:12closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174854179 ; closing.
5058584 (iD)12025-11-18 16:07openedvectorial8192Should Tai Hang Sai Estate still retain landuse=residential? afaik judicial processes are withholding reconstruction, which means this estate is technically still inhabitable.
22025-11-19 09:34commentedKovoschizHave they not lost all the cases?
32025-11-19 09:56commentedvectorial8192This is the part which I am out of the loop. The verdicts and the judicial arguments are convoluting. afaik the Company convinced a significant majority of tenants to leave, but the few remaining made a JR/appeal, which "pins" this estate as `landuse=residential` despite "obviously a construction yard".
42025-11-19 10:45commentedvectorial8192OK, I read the news. Basically, the Company eventually got all the flats back after some verdicts + arbitration. de jure the Estate is still `landuse=residential` until (I think) Dec 2025, but me discovering this situation this late to the story, it would just be a technicality issue, and can't justify an OSM edit. I will just hold this note open...
5057844 (iD)12025-11-18 03:02openedkingkingHKAre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8010179249 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3070117404 duplicates? Why is one of them `place=quarter` and the other `=village`? Any relevancy with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4435507882 `=hamlet`?
22025-11-18 07:30commentedKovoschizYes, the upper village is addressed as TKO Village. So it should be considered part of one somehow, for `addr:place=` to be logical. The most complicated cases are eg So Kwun Wat villages.
5036091 (iD)12025-11-03 12:40openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
22025-11-17 15:27closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174777411 ; closing.
5034398 (iD)12025-11-02 14:37openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-17 13:27closedKX675
5034407 (iD)12025-11-02 14:39openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-16 17:00closedvectorial8192No such thing; I must have read something wrong. Closing.
5021566 (iD)12025-10-25 01:31openedklorydryk"En travaux, pas d'info" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI has no name POI types: shop-bakery #CoMaps android
22025-10-28 15:58commentedvectorial8192Probably referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5193656121
32025-11-12 15:26commentedvectorial8192Google Translate: Under construction, no information available.
42025-11-14 08:38commentedvectorial8192no such bakery
52025-11-16 16:48commentedvectorial8192Also, store list https://jcodonuts.com/hk/en/stores agrees there is no such bakery. With the lack of general "anchoring" information, I will just delete the node.
62025-11-16 16:49closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174736137 ; closing.
5020924 (iD)12025-10-24 13:26openedklorydryk"Boutique de nourriture " The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI has no name POI types: shop-laundry #CoMaps android
22025-10-28 15:59commentedvectorial8192Probably referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4496330689
32025-11-12 15:27commentedvectorial8192Google Translate: Food shop
42025-11-14 08:32commentedvectorial8192no laundry shops here
52025-11-16 13:55commentedvectorial8192To be clear, there are multiple "food shops" here, but there being multiple of them would mean none of them "replaces" this laundry.
62025-11-16 13:56closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174728470 ; closing.
5040687 (iD)12025-11-06 12:34openedSkylark_H_C76K to LONG PING Estate #OsmAnd
22025-11-06 14:21commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6588082 ?
32025-11-06 14:27commentedSkylark_H_CThe stops are not in the relationship. Add the stops if you/simeone have time. Thank you for the help
42025-11-16 12:22closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174724169 ; closing.
5049266 (iD)12025-11-12 08:51openedvectorial8192Is it true that Shanghai Street really only allows "straight on"?
22025-11-14 07:59closedkingkingHKFrom Mapillary imagery (which I believe we can use in OSM), Shanghai Street does indeed prohibit right turns to Waterloo Road, so the current mapping is correct; closing. (Note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1455282 does not prohibit left turns to Waterloo Road since its "via" is set to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/308473180)
32025-11-14 12:10reopenedvectorial8192
42025-11-14 12:12commentedvectorial8192Wrong. I am not here to judge the methodology of using Mapillary Imagery. I'm here to point out that, looking at the Mapillary records saying 2017, it's just too ancient for convincing fact-checking. And irl says "if length > 8m, then no right turns". Therefore we have wrong/outdated info in OSM.
52025-11-14 12:18commentedvectorial8192Also, ignoring the problems with the ancient relics, the (outdated) data on OSM was still wrong. It on OSM being "straight ahead only", while practically equivalent to irl "no right turns", was semantically inconsistent from irl.
62025-11-14 12:30commentedkingkingHKMy apologies for misunderstand this note earlier. It seems like you know more about this situation than I do, so feel free to update the situation based on your knowledge. But re the straight-ahead-only vs no-right-turn problem, I don't see why it's "wrong" when they are functionally equivalent for this specific junction. A semantic difference won...
72025-11-14 13:32commentedvectorial8192Could just be me, but I view highly of semantic correctness.
82025-11-14 14:22commentedkingkingHKI still don't see how any one of them is more correct than the other, unless your definition of "correct" is "uses the same phrasing as the sign". But still, as they are equivalent, it would of course be fine to change it to a no-right-turn restriction. Do what you like.
92025-11-16 11:43closedvectorial8192Hopefully I got the OSM restriction format correct. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174722788 ; closing.
5055198 (iD)12025-11-16 11:24openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036094 (iD)12025-11-03 12:42openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic somewhere around here supposedly, but unclear how it is affected by the redevelopment works.
22025-11-16 11:04commentedvectorial8192I went there recently, and saw it's in the old building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429468747 I would guess it's gonna be relocated into Phase 2 later, so we may choose to ignore this for now.
5036092 (iD)12025-11-03 12:41openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
22025-11-15 13:25commentedvectorial8192Well, for starters, this is a multi-storey building with many clinics.
32025-11-16 10:59closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174721133 ; closing.
5034364 (iD)12025-11-02 14:21openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-02 14:24commentedvectorial8192It seems there might be two such clinics right here?
32025-11-03 13:56commentedkingkingHKNot sure why you think it seems there might be two clinics here, could you please elaborate?
42025-11-14 14:59commentedvectorial8192Basically, I somehow saw 2x Family Medicine Clinics listed in some clinic listing I was looking at. It somehow felt wrong, but one of them should be correct, so someone can check this when they pass by this place.
52025-11-16 07:23commentedkingkingHKJust curious, what clinic list did you use?
62025-11-16 10:31commentedvectorial8192This https://www.ha.org.hk/visitor/ha_visitor_index.asp?Content_ID=200250&Lang=CHIB5&Dimension=100&Parent_ID=10052 The government announcement for the renaming eventually led to this page. Upon rechecking, it seems I might have misread the list... But still, this location is likely to have a Family Medicine Clinic.
5052676 (iD)12025-11-14 15:22openedtsheyd"No 711 in this mall" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-13T21:01:41Z POI name: 7-Eleven POI types: shop-convenience #organicmaps android 2025.10.23-22-Google
22025-11-15 02:42commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.7-eleven.com.hk/en/store agrees.
32025-11-15 15:58commentedvectorial8192Node was added in 2015 with no meaningful update in subsequent years. 2015 this place should have been a construction yard/abandoned building. No idea why they would add it in the first place.
42025-11-16 05:41commentedvectorial8192Alternatively, it may be trying to describe something in the E.T.S.T. station, but then the station is not here. Indeed this feature can't possibly exist.
52025-11-16 05:42closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174713168 ; closing.
5036087 (iD)12025-11-03 12:32openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
22025-11-14 15:02closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174046358 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174652502 ; closing.
5052406 (iD)12025-11-14 11:42openedvectorial8192Tourist attraction for Kowloon Walled City (movie props) should be somewhere inside here.
22025-11-14 14:50commentedvectorial8192In case this is not clear, I am referring to "inside this park".
5034410 (iD)12025-11-02 14:41openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-14 12:05closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174645250 ; closing.
5052324 (iD)12025-11-14 10:04opened康明苑 Cumine Court
5052323 (iD)12025-11-14 10:04opened康麗苑 Cornell Court
5052322 (iD)12025-11-14 10:02opened康和苑 Cornwall Court
5052151 (iD)12025-11-14 06:51openedOur hotel
22025-11-14 07:26closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
5034311 (iD)12025-11-02 14:07openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-12 15:48closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174566072 ; closing.
4997596 (iD)12025-10-09 08:56opened西九碼頭 WestK Quay
22025-10-09 15:52commentedvectorial8192See https://www.cedd.gov.hk/tc/our-projects/major-projects/index-id-160.html
32025-11-12 15:28closedvectorial8192I see this is now mapped alongside the ferry service. Therefore, closing.
4973182 (iD)12025-09-21 14:27openedKeithlo31Incredible Residences has been sold. The building name has been changed to Y36.
22025-09-24 14:08commentedvectorial8192From online sources, Y36 is a "student accommodation" and because this is a new concept in Hong Kong, tagging method is not finalized yet. Should bring to discussion.
32025-09-24 14:10commentedkingkingHK`amenity=student_accommodation` or `building=dormitory`?
42025-09-24 14:31commentedvectorial8192Could/Might actually be `tourism=hostel`. Go ask more people.
52025-11-12 15:28commentedvectorial8192Website for future reference: https://ydotx.com/about/
5034272 (iD)12025-11-02 14:01openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic; we can take this chance to find out where these clinics are located in OSM.
22025-11-03 14:50commentedvectorial8192It seems this family medicine clinic is located inside the clinic building...
32025-11-09 16:40closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174426046 ; closing.
5034312 (iD)12025-11-02 14:07openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-09 16:38closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174425942 ; closing.
5034400 (iD)12025-11-02 14:37openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-09 11:11closedZuborg2012
32025-11-09 11:57reopenedkingkingHK
5043135 (iD)12025-11-08 10:07openedLkwokon石崗燒烤區二號場
22025-11-08 11:33closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12828322182 ; closing.
5043133 (iD)12025-11-08 10:05openedLkwokon石崗燒烤區一號場
22025-11-08 10:06commentedLkwokon石崗燒烤區一號場
32025-11-08 11:32closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12828322181 ; closing.
5043252 (iD)12025-11-08 11:21openedsutoutou2
22025-11-08 11:32closedkingkingHKNote is not helpful; closing.
5043144 (iD)12025-11-08 10:13openedLkwokon賀龍汽車維修中心
5043137 (iD)12025-11-08 10:09openedLkwokon河背營地
5043129 (iD)12025-11-08 10:04openedLkwokon石崗燒烤場一號場
22025-11-08 10:05closedLkwokon
5035617 (iD)12025-11-03 03:37openedkingkingHKDoes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4442544111 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1102985991 really exist? Why are there traffic signals in the middle of nowhere with no junctions?
22025-11-04 06:52commentedvectorial8192Could be "road too narrow" so they set up traffic signals to ensure mutex access. Not every traffic signal needs to be at a junction (e.g. also see tunnel entrance traffic signals).
32025-11-04 10:22commentedkingkingHKCould be, but then there are many roads in Hong Kong narrower and busier than this road that still doesn't have traffic signals, and afaik this road is actually wide enough for two light vehicles to pass by each other. Would still recommend a survey to prove/disprove their existence.
42025-11-08 07:04commentedvectorial8192To add to this, aerial imagery (ESRI World Imagery) (see northeast) shows a section which is single-lane only. We may also faintly see a "stop here" line that often indicates a traffic signal. OSM also has `lanes=1` here. Mutex access is very very likely. It really isn't *that* wide. Perhaps survey is not needed because there is nothing to do.
52025-11-08 08:38closedkingkingHKWell, that sounds believable. Then, situation clarified via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174362311 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174363905 ; closing.
5043056 (iD)12025-11-08 08:19openedWright OneCLP substation
5034478 (iD)12025-11-02 15:01openedvectorial8192We got two separate sets of traffic signals this close to each other?
22025-11-03 03:33commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705233211 seems to be a poor import from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73295866 , made by the same person who caused https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5004149 . https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4773727035 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8451657984 are probably just mapping mistakes from https...
32025-11-07 14:11closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174336106 ; closing.
289507 (iD)12014-12-21 15:32openedK H FungTrails have been submerged weeds and shrubs this area.
22015-04-23 03:07closedmasahiro57
32015-04-23 03:08reopenedmasahiro57
42019-03-26 14:54commentedр
52019-03-26 14:54commentedд
62025-10-06 01:30closedHenryEKand now it isnt
72025-10-14 10:25reopenedkingkingHK
82025-10-14 10:26commentedkingkingHK@seurish Could you please elaborate? What "isn't"? Is the note information wrong?
92025-10-14 23:56commentedHenryEKi had a hike here not so long ago it got cleared
102025-11-05 16:27commentedvectorial8192If it's cleared, then perhaps this note should be closed.
112025-11-06 03:05closedkingkingHKYeah, I just thought "now it isnt" is not really clear enough to understand why the note is closed, so I reopened it. Now with further clarification, then note information is no longer correct, closing.
122025-11-06 03:13reopenedK H Fung
132025-11-06 03:14closedK H Fung
5038058 (iD)12025-11-04 16:28openedvectorial8192I vaguely remember this land has two names: Wai Wah Centre and Chanway Plaza; one for residential, one for retail, but I forgot which is which.
22025-11-05 10:43closedvectorial8192OK, so "Chanway" is the shopping centre part. Rare case where the same building has two names. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174234433 ; closing.
5038051 (iD)12025-11-04 16:26openedvectorial8192where name:zh?
22025-11-04 16:26commentedvectorial8192*area
5038052 (iD)12025-11-04 16:26openedvectorial8192individual buildings and streets, where name:en?
5034421 (iD)12025-11-02 14:44openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-11-04 14:03closedvectorial8192I do remember seeing this clinic as I walked past it on several separate occasion. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174195472 ; closing.
5037709 (iD)12025-11-04 12:33openedkingkingHKHas this construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507734827 been finished? The only source seem to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2327347 , a note from five years ago. Aerial imagery also does not seem to show any signs of construction.
5037695 (iD)12025-11-04 12:28openedkingkingHKHas this construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767852603 been finished? It was last modified almost six years ago, and aerial imagery does not seem to show any signs of construction.
4911234 (iD)12025-08-15 12:17openedkingkingHKName of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6315211233 is dubious.
22025-08-16 03:55commentedKovoschiz`name=` is debated against `board:title=` , which this is should not be `=guidepost`
32025-08-29 14:14commentedkingkingHKIt's actually just a banner on a railing.
42025-11-04 10:54commentedvectorial8192If it's just a banner, then it probably isn't even a "guidepost". imo banners are not worth being mapped into OSM; too transient.
52025-11-04 12:19commentedkingkingHKYeah, agreed on not mapping banners. Originally I thought Kovoschiz might have something to say after my comment on 29/8, but since there doesn't seem to be any further discussion, I guess I will just remove it.
62025-11-04 12:22closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174190901 ; closing.
5034417 (iD)12025-11-02 14:43openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (seems already done)
22025-11-04 12:14closedvectorial8192Improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174190614 ; closing.
5034360 (iD)12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-04 11:31closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174188667 ; closing.
5034327 (iD)12025-11-02 14:11openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-04 10:52closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174186921 ; closing.
5037516 (iD)12025-11-04 10:24openedkingkingHKI suspect that traffic signals might have been/will be added to this junction.
5034354 (iD)12025-11-02 14:18openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-04 06:28closedJinYe777Tuen Mun Wu Hong Clinic
32025-11-04 06:48reopenedvectorial8192
42025-11-04 06:48commentedvectorial8192@JinYe777 does this mean the building is unnamed?
5034330 (iD)12025-11-02 14:11openedvectorial8192The name:zh feels like a generic name / mapping mistake (confirmation needed).
22025-11-03 15:25closedvectorial8192Judging from their website, I don't think it has any Chinese name. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174153180 ; closing.
5036242 (iD)12025-11-03 13:46openedkingkingHKNow that "錦田診所 Kam Tin Clinic" has been renamed to "錦田家庭醫學診所 Kam Tin Family Medicine Clinic", has there been any changes to the bus stop's naming?
22025-11-03 15:11commentedvectorial8192It being KMB they probably won't even care about that.
32025-11-03 15:19commentedvectorial8192Also, now that I looked a bit deeper into the renaming, I am not sure whether it's the entire building being renamed, or that only the clinic (might not be in OSM) being renamed.
5034333 (iD)12025-11-02 14:12openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (seems already updated)
22025-11-03 15:05closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174152392 ; closing.
5034320 (iD)12025-11-02 14:09openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (name:en of clinic?)
22025-11-03 14:58closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174152066 ; closing.
5036161 (iD)12025-11-03 12:52openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036103 (iD)12025-11-03 12:46openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036099 (iD)12025-11-03 12:45openedkingkingHKNow that "將軍澳賽馬會普通科門診診所 Tseung Kwan O Jockey Club General Out-patient Clinic" has been renamed to "將軍澳賽馬會家庭醫學診所 Tseung Kwan O Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic", has there been any changes to the bus stops' naming?
5036097 (iD)12025-11-03 12:44openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036089 (iD)12025-11-03 12:34openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5034471 (iD)12025-11-02 14:55openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034469 (iD)12025-11-02 14:55openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034468 (iD)12025-11-02 14:54openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034465 (iD)12025-11-02 14:54openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034463 (iD)12025-11-02 14:53openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034442 (iD)12025-11-02 14:52openedvectorial8192Should this be a Family Medicine Clinic?
22025-11-02 14:53commentedvectorial8192Seems like it; the placement makes it very unobvious.
5034440 (iD)12025-11-02 14:51openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034439 (iD)12025-11-02 14:50openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034438 (iD)12025-11-02 14:50openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034435 (iD)12025-11-02 14:48openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034434 (iD)12025-11-02 14:48openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034432 (iD)12025-11-02 14:47openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034412 (iD)12025-11-02 14:41openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034406 (iD)12025-11-02 14:39openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (what should be happening here?)
5034404 (iD)12025-11-02 14:38openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034402 (iD)12025-11-02 14:38openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034395 (iD)12025-11-02 14:36openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034394 (iD)12025-11-02 14:36openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034392 (iD)12025-11-02 14:35openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034390 (iD)12025-11-02 14:34openedvectorial8192Is this a Family Medicine Clinic?
5034389 (iD)12025-11-02 14:33openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034387 (iD)12025-11-02 14:33openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034379 (iD)12025-11-02 14:29openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034378 (iD)12025-11-02 14:28openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034377 (iD)12025-11-02 14:28openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034376 (iD)12025-11-02 14:27openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034373 (iD)12025-11-02 14:27openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034371 (iD)12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034370 (iD)12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034363 (iD)12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034361 (iD)12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034359 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034358 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034357 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034356 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034355 (iD)12025-11-02 14:18openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034352 (iD)12025-11-02 14:17openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034350 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034344 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034343 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034341 (iD)12025-11-02 14:15openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034338 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034337 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034335 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034332 (iD)12025-11-02 14:12openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034323 (iD)12025-11-02 14:10openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
4756216 (iD)12025-05-13 02:50opened[飲用水] 此處設有加水機
22025-08-18 17:23commentedvectorial8192This note says there is a drinking fountain here. However, I cannot find references to this fountain from government open data.
32025-11-01 14:11closedkingkingHKThere is really a drinking fountain here. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174064150 ; closing.
5026003 (iD)12025-10-28 07:39openedThis elderly home is closed.
22025-10-29 06:25commentedvectorial8192Online sources seem to agree with this.
32025-11-01 12:30closedkingkingHKIndeed. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174059876 ; closing.
5029552 (iD)12025-10-30 09:46openedvectorial8192Route 8 inconsistency: This section is named Eagle's Nest Tunnel, but the other two sections (Sha Tin Heights Tunnel and Tai Wai Tunnel) are just generically named "Tsing Sha Highway". We should probably apply one of the above styles to all three sections to ensure consistency.
22025-10-31 06:41closedKovoschizThis is intentional. The most well-known naming is applied. Eagle's Nest Tunnel is significant. Cf Lion Rock Tunnel is not "Lion Rock Tunnel Road"
5029749 (iD)12025-10-30 12:26openedJack KokPlato Cafe & Bistro 佐敦店
22025-10-30 12:27closedJack Kok
4015897 (iD)12023-12-05 13:26openedIan HoThe pylons are under the project "Removal of 132kV Overhead Line and Pylons for P-Line". Project started 2022. Total 24 pylons will be removed.
22024-02-07 04:24commentedHighlandPaddyHKConfirmed, I went to visit Osborn's Cairn and the pylon was gone!
32024-11-02 13:05commentedvectorial8192I guess this means the towers are now physically gone? Will need to update OSM data to reflect this (eg there is still a tower area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 )
42024-11-02 15:16commentedIan HoWhen I add the notes, the removal project was still work in progress. Some of the pylons were not removed yet. I did visit 1 or 2 removed pylon sites. Only the base concrete structure (no more than 1 meter high) remains after removal. So I think when the project is complete, we can update OSM.
52025-10-28 16:01commentedvectorial8192Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015896 It seems the towers are now gone?
62025-10-29 03:14commentedkingkingHKSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173778439 But I guess can still verify if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 exists?
4015896 (iD)12023-12-05 13:25openedIan HoThe pylons are under the project "Removal of 132kV Overhead Line and Pylons for P-Line". Project started 2022. Total 24 pylons will be removed.
22025-09-25 11:05commentedHenryEKwhat change is wanted here then
32025-09-25 12:32commentedkingkingHKRelevant note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897 It seems like the latest state has been somewhat reflected afterhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150035446 etc, I guess still can review the latest state of the towers e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785
42025-10-28 16:00commentedvectorial8192Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897
5025999 (iD)12025-10-28 07:21openedvectorial8192Is this clinic open yet?
22025-10-28 07:28commentedkingkingHKAccording to https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BnXjqQHPe/ and https://www.dhc.gov.hk/tc/dhc_yau_tsim_mong.html , probably yes.
32025-10-28 15:58closedvectorial8192Nice. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173890553 ; closing.
5025033 (iD)12025-10-27 13:47openedvectorial8192Any reason why Tuen Mun River changes from `waterway=river` to simply `waterway=drain`?
22025-10-28 07:51closedKovoschizEditing mistake (not changing all)
5025051 (iD)12025-10-27 13:54openedvectorial8192Strange drain; probably a mapping blunder.
22025-10-27 14:15commentedkingkingHKDragged point after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162741126 ?
32025-10-28 02:44closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173863110 ; closing.
5025413 (iD)12025-10-27 17:43openedHong Kong
22025-10-28 02:08closedkingkingHKNote is not helpful, closing.
5025131 (iD)12025-10-27 14:50openedOctoberFifteenthThe path is gone. One cannot reach this path from the pier.
5016316 (iD)12025-10-21 10:17openedvectorial8192Rural roads probably don't need `motor_vehicle=*` since those are already "guarded" by Tung Chung Road & South Lantau Road already having `motor_vehicle=permit`.
22025-10-21 14:06closedkingkingHKWell, most roads here already don't have `motor_vehicle=*`, do they? I think Mui Wo Rural Committee Road and downstream actually has
32025-10-21 14:06reopenedkingkingHK
42025-10-21 14:08commentedkingkingHKSorry previous message got cut off. I think Mui Wo Rural Committee Road and downstream actually has "no motor vehicle" signs, but people ignored the rules anyway, leading to `note=Complicated situation` and `disputed:motor_vehicle=private`.
52025-10-27 13:50commentedvectorial8192I mean, OSM mostly only cares about "signposted data", so even if irl is complicated, imo just flatten them to be `motor_vehicle=no` as signposted. I personally don't think Hong Kong is "adjective" enough to use OSM's post-colonial "local knowledge" approach.
62025-10-27 14:05commentedkingkingHKSee also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware: https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814 https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410 Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything ...
5025035 (iD)12025-10-27 13:48openedvectorial8192Sing Mun River has fixme, presumably about boat access. However, afaik, there are no legal restrictions about boat access.
4908269 (iD)12025-08-13 15:47openedvectorial8192todo: fill in more details about the the north side of the LPH
22025-09-28 15:02closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170396693 ; closing.
32025-09-28 15:02reopenedvectorial8192
42025-09-28 15:02commentedvectorial8192Sorry. I think this is to fill in the details such as block number, facilities, etc.
52025-10-25 12:22commentedkingkingHKHi there, does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173174414 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173178099 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753556 add enough details to resolve this note?
62025-10-26 13:17closedvectorial8192oh nice, I see this has been improved therefore, closing (supposedly can also improve the south side to match detail level, but that would be out of scope of this note and would be "additional improvement")
4957859 (iD)12025-09-12 03:33opened停車場入口
22025-09-12 09:26commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12784120427 ?
32025-09-30 13:09commentedvectorial8192I think the key point is to determine the actual driving direction. This might also be a car park entrance.
42025-10-22 07:32closedIGCHK
52025-10-22 08:29reopenedkingkingHK
62025-10-22 12:36commentedNeisBotHi kingkingHK, Thank you for reopening the note. I noticed there wasn't a comment explaining the reason for reopening. Could you please provide more details or context behind the decision? This will help us better understand and address the note appropriately. #ReopenedWithoutComment
2900900 (iD)12021-10-18 13:35openedWhcohi紅禾坑
22025-10-22 12:20closedkingkingHKAccording to various online sources, "紅禾坑" is an alternative name of "大朗坑". Then, feature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1190828419 after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138764896 , closing.
2900903 (iD)12021-10-18 13:36openedWhcohi紅萬坑 / 萬屋邊石澗
22025-10-22 12:15closedkingkingHKAccording to various online sources, "萬屋邊石澗" is an alternative name of "紅萬坑". Then, feature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1192216754 after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139011724 , closing.
5017883 (iD)12025-10-22 11:20openedvectorial8192Possibly another eminent domain
2578658 (iD)12021-03-14 11:52openedPipChan部份路徑不存在
22025-10-22 10:26closedkingkingHKAppears to have been resolved by the author via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100986308 ; closing.
5017619 (iD)12025-10-22 08:36openedkingkingHKDoes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1443879805 really exist? There's already things there, and online searches do not return any helpful results.
22025-10-22 09:00closedKovoschizFake online business, can be immediately removed first https://www.facebook.com/IGCHKSHOP/
1499178 (iD)12018-08-23 06:02openedThe route is ambushed and almost vanished up
22025-10-22 03:21closedkingkingHKThere is already `trail_visibility=bad` after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96255409 , which should be enough to describe the "ambushed and almost vanished" situation. Then, resolved, closing.
32025-10-22 08:48reopenedKovoschiz
42025-10-22 08:49commentedKovoschiz`=bad` can be on empty land. Should check the `obstacle=vegetation`, and decide whether it's `disused=yes` or even `abandoned:highway=`
5017542 (iD)12025-10-22 07:29openedonosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: IGC HK Hotel addr:street=Kennedy Road addr:place=IGC HK Hotel addr:city=Hong Kong Phone number: 67700016 Website: https://hotel.igchkshop.dpdns.org Category: Hotels Description: IGC HK Hotel Wan Chai Accepted payment methods:
22025-10-22 07:31closedIGCHK
32025-10-22 07:31reopenedIGCHK
42025-10-22 07:31closedIGCHK
5017417 (iD)12025-10-22 04:37openedJoshuap12233Hornets
22025-10-22 06:31closedkingkingHKNote is not helpful, closing.
4316670 (iD)12024-07-02 13:20openedvectorial8192Requesting to update GMB-NT 502 according to latest OSM road data
22025-05-12 07:55closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:15reopenedvectorial8192
42025-05-13 08:16commentedvectorial8192Not done yet; please don't resolve! (Also, there is not any GMB 502 mapped here; there is however GMB 503.)
52025-05-18 07:09commented楊展博Ok
62025-10-22 03:35closedCypp0847www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173607341
5016394 (iD)12025-10-21 11:13openedJack KokPlato Cafe & Bistro Mikiki店
22025-10-21 11:33closedJack Kok
5016360 (iD)12025-10-21 10:47openedJack KokPlato Cafe & Bistro 佐敦店
22025-10-21 10:48closedJack Kok
5012470 (iD)12025-10-18 18:21openedu-turn slip road has been reopened already
22025-10-20 19:04closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86041189
32025-10-21 04:29reopenedjuniusli
42025-10-21 04:29closedjuniusli
52025-10-21 04:31reopenedjuniusli
62025-10-21 04:31closedjuniusli
72025-10-21 09:47reopenedvectorial8192
82025-10-21 09:48closedvectorial8192To add to this strange note, know that OSM tiles are rendered by a separate service (OSM Carto), and sometimes changes are not reflected "immediately". Sometimes it takes up to 7 days for the new changes to "appear on the map".
4973275 (iD)12025-09-21 15:01openedGanjuPanju". ." OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-29T18:18:32Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-atm #organicmaps android
22025-09-23 13:55closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13159853201 ; closing.
32025-09-30 13:02reopenedvectorial8192
42025-09-30 13:03commentedvectorial8192Is this ATM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13159853201 legit? Why is there an ATM in the wilderness? And it is this close to a monastery? Who owns this ATM? (content forwarded from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977687 )
52025-10-17 10:12commentedkingkingHKThe author https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172250971 said it was a mistake.
62025-10-19 03:31closedkingkingHKI apologise for the insufficient due diligence when closing this note initially. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173452639 ; closing.
5004149 (iD)12025-10-13 12:35openedkingkingHKDoes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705213942 really exist? Stand-alone traffic signal in a roundabout? If not, then what is this element supposed to be referring to, and where is traffic signal "NT417" actually at?
22025-10-15 15:27commentedvectorial8192No idea why this was not discovered earlier. Would guess this traffic light tries to refer to the traffic light system located southeast of this note; Wai Tsuen Road & Shek Wai Kok Road.
32025-10-16 02:21commentedkingkingHKBut then, Wai Tsuen Road / Shek Wai Kok Road is already mapped as NT203. Even if we are sure this traffic signal doesn't exist, the bigger mystery is where "NT417" is; is there a way to look up a traffic signal's location based on its ref?
42025-10-16 14:56commentedvectorial8192Well, for starters, we have open data published by the HK gov. See https://data.gov.hk/en-data/dataset/hk-td-tis_16-traffic-aids-drawings-v2 You would need to check whether it's OK to use this, and then interpret the data format yourself. Find this mystic "NT417" from the data dump, or discover that it doesn't exist.
52025-10-17 07:04commentedKovoschizYou can't use that. It doesn't have controller numbering data either.
62025-10-17 09:03commentedvectorial8192Well then, according to Overpass Turbo https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dQa this is the only known instance of "NT417" in Hong Kong. I am then thinking maybe this is a fabrication, that IRL there is no such "NT417" anywhere.
72025-10-17 09:13commentedvectorial8192OSM data has NT414 and NT415 in Fo Tan. It also has NT418 in Yuen Long, NT419 in Kam Tin, and NT420 in Kwai Chung. It seems these serial numbers are dependent on the completion date of these traffic signals. One would guess perhaps some of the traffic signals in Fo Tan (lacking ref) might be the real NT417. If anything, I see no problem deleting...
82025-10-17 10:07commentedkingkingHKTurns out, NT417 is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10025317359
92025-10-18 12:26closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173447973 ; closing.
5008409 (iD)12025-10-16 05:20openedvectorial8192It seems Cheung Tung Estate is now receiving inhabitants.
22025-10-17 09:46closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173401820 . More updates just make more changesets. Closing.
5009959 (iD)12025-10-17 07:18openedMateusz Koniecznyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993410749/history requires fix so that name key carry actual name currently it is name=Kuan Yam Temple (small) name:en=Kuan Yam Temple (small) see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
5009371 (iD)12025-10-16 16:39openedcentral
22025-10-17 02:38closedkingkingHKNote is not helpful, closing.
4964711 (iD)12025-09-16 14:05openedkingkingHKTodo: Check speed limit of Fanling Highway south-east bound between Kai Leng and Wo Hop Shek Interchanges. (I think it's probably 100 or 80, instead of 70)
22025-09-28 14:53commentedvectorial8192OSM Deep History says it was decreased from 100kmh to 70-80kmh. The context would be temporary speed reduction to install noise barriers. Now that the work is done, I suspect this should then be restored to 100kmh, but yes, a survey is recommended because I am also not sure.
32025-10-02 01:57commentedHenryEKpretty sure its the second roundabout from here but i dont know if it affects it https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_81860.html
42025-10-02 12:33commentedkingkingHK@seurish Pretty sure it's not? The temporary reduction you cited only starts on 5 Aug, while the 100->80 change was in 2014 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24419558), and the 80->70 change was in 2020 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92812210). And such a short temporary measure should not be mapped anyway.
52025-10-02 16:18commentedvectorial8192Still, if a notice mentions temporary reduction to "80km/h" then it is a very strong hint it should somehow be higher than that, i.e. might actually be "100km/h" originally.
62025-10-02 16:18commentedvectorial8192(oh at the end it does explicitly say 100km/h...)
72025-10-14 08:58closedkingkingHKWell, if it explicitly says 100 km/h, then I think it's good enough to believe it without further investigation. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173263058 ; closing.
470359 (iD)12015-11-18 03:26openednevilcheung凱昇藝術中心
22015-11-18 03:26closednevilcheung
32015-11-18 03:26reopenednevilcheung
42025-03-28 07:59commentedvectorial8192Correct
52025-03-29 16:57commentedvectorial8192Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3841741635 , but it seems we don't have a tag for "arts school"...?
62025-07-07 04:15closedroylo5112
72025-09-05 13:46reopenedkingkingHK
82025-09-05 13:46commentedkingkingHKPerhaps `education=art_school`?
92025-09-11 14:13commentedvectorial8192I am half split between "yes let's do it" and "but it also targets school kids".
102025-09-11 14:15commentedvectorial8192I might understand this wrongly, but I feel like `education=art_school` is for adults and teens. Like, a higher-education school for future artists, and not for kids.
112025-09-17 04:25commentedkingkingHKThen, perhaps `amenity=prep_school` + `school=art`?
122025-09-17 08:01commentedKovoschiz`=prep_school` is preparing for exams. This is `=training`
132025-09-17 10:22commentedvectorial8192Agree in principle with @kingkingHK and @Kovoschiz, but also consider doing `education=*` instead of `amenity=*` as per latest OSM recommendation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:education
142025-09-17 19:13commentedKovoschizIt's both `amenity=` + `education`
152025-10-14 07:15commentedkingkingHKSo, `amenity=training` + `education=training` + `training=art`?
2902762 (iD)12021-10-20 06:04openedpslauAED Location 金鐘站 2號月台 (近第三卡) 金鐘站 每日 05:55 AM - 01:15 AM
22021-10-20 06:06closedpslau
32021-10-20 06:06reopenedpslau
42021-10-20 06:09closedpslau
52021-10-20 06:09reopenedpslau
62021-10-20 06:09closedpslau
72021-10-20 06:10reopenedpslau
82021-10-20 06:12closedpslau位置：22.279412, 114.164559
92021-10-20 06:13reopenedpslau
102025-10-13 09:42closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173217470 there are actually AEDs in every MTR station
2900890 (iD)12021-10-18 13:29openedWhcohi圓頭南坑
22025-10-13 03:56closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173206279
2912018 (iD)12021-10-27 08:50openedDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
22025-09-25 05:43commentedkingkingHKIs this a useful note? See similar closed note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4468282 ; probably not too useful unless we indoor map the entire hospital.
32025-10-05 03:23commentedkingkingHKI will be closing this note if no one replies to this in a week or so.
42025-10-13 02:57closedkingkingHKNo response, then note is not helpful; closing.
4362571 (iD)12024-08-02 03:03openedAssisted Reproductive Technology Unit
22025-09-25 05:43commentedkingkingHKIs this a useful note? See similar closed note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4468282 ; probably not too useful unless we indoor map the entire hospital.
32025-10-05 03:23commentedkingkingHKI will be closing this note if no one replies to this in a week or so.
42025-10-13 02:57closedkingkingHKNo response, then note is not helpful; closing.
4577980 (iD)12025-01-06 09:56openedvectorial8192Abandoned railway information is very debatable since it can no longer be observed IRL; it has been fully deconstructed (except for a tiny section as an abandoned railway bridge), and should be removed.
22025-01-08 08:08commentedKovoschizThis is debated, but a trackbed or strip of land qualifies as `=abandoned` for what's acceptable. Besides the bridge and Yau King Ln, there's actually embankments left, and some cut slopes seem unmodified.
32025-01-08 12:09commentedvectorial8192The trackbeds is most probably all gone, but not sure about the embankments; my working theory is that the CUHK Campus Circuit North ate up some of the old embankments, and so in practice the abandoned railway is not observable.
42025-10-06 02:14commentedHenryEKthe trackbeds are entirely gone. this was done around 1996 when reclaimation reformed tolo harbour front there is almost no sections of abandoned track still left untouched in hong kong
52025-10-06 02:16commentedHenryEKfrankly even though you say the embankment is enough to keep this abandoned railway thing, it would be like adding "abandoned building" role to something just because the foundation ruins are present, instead of marking them as ruins
62025-10-06 04:05commentedHenryEKi checked every former line of track i know, and theyre all present on the map as features despite not having any sort of indication of their former presence i dont know about you but you know maybe stuff that literally doesnt exist on the map should not exist on the map?
72025-10-06 05:14commentedKovoschiz`railway=abandoned` has a different meaning from `building=` + `abandoned=yes`
82025-10-06 05:47commentedvectorial8192I will only add that in OSM, there seems to exist a British-culture-inspired effort to treat railway features differently than other non-railway features.
92025-10-06 06:19commentedHenryEKbut u do understand what i mean right? i mean for the sha tau kok railway which was dismantled over 90 years ago, its still added onto the map theres like no trace of it besides a few milestones and a station
102025-10-06 14:29commentedvectorial8192@seurish I get what you are trying to say (that's why I opened this note), but so far I have seen the argument of "it helps understand how things are like this today". Extending on this, there are relations in OSM that will likely never happen (see KCR's Northern Loop; and the LRT Sam Shing hypothetical tracks drawn by myself). I am thinking, pe...
112025-10-06 15:00commentedkingkingHK@seurish Well, re Sha Tau Kok Railway, I would just like to point out that the addition was not without disagreements: see Kovoschiz's comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145944753
122025-10-09 04:30commentedKovoschizRoads, paths, and embankments qualify. So both can be examined.
132025-10-12 06:16commentedHenryEKso its just gonna stay like this then?
4919931 (iD)12025-08-20 11:29openedvectorial8192For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769116979, what does it mean by `fixme=PTI?`? Does it mean, the name should somehow contain "PTI"?
22025-08-20 13:51commentedkingkingHKSeems like Kovoschiz added that tag initially. Might be quicker to ask him directly.
32025-08-27 12:54commentedvectorial8192Note to self/others: the problem would be "how to find signage irl with / without the official name". Prove/disprove whether there is a "PTI" in the official name.
42025-09-30 10:00commentedkingkingHKGazette: "Hung Hom Station Bus Terminus" https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/english/gazette/file.php?year=2007&vol=11&no=48&extra=0&type=0&number=7741 No Smoking Area sign: "Hung Hom Station Public Transport Interchange" https://imgur.com/a/1srprjD
52025-09-30 12:32commentedvectorial8192bruh My guess would be that we will be using the gazetted name.
62025-10-10 11:57commentedvectorial8192Oh wait, I think I know what this means. This specific bus terminus at the north side is simply called the bus terminus, while this bus terminus & the east side e.g. taxi stations combined are called the PTI.
72025-10-10 12:00closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173091110 ; closing.
4958494 (iD)12025-09-12 12:44openedkingkingHKLRT Town Centre, I believe the central platforms (2 and 3) are currently unused, and all trains uses the outer platforms (1 and 4) instead. The relevant route relations (namely https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6485218 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2926506 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5955257 https://www.openstreetmap.org/re...
22025-09-15 15:27commentedvectorial8192I have a feeling this is a "perpetual temporary" arrangement. Technically platforms 1 and 4 are still siding while platforms 2 and 3 are still main, and the relevant LRT routes technically are still using the original platforms. Think about it. If 2019 didn't happen, then would platforms 2 and 3 become unused? I think not. 2019 did not change how ...
32025-09-16 12:33closedkingkingHKOddly enough, the original mapping was that platforms 2 and 4 and sidings while 1 and 3 are main, which doesn't really make sense. I have changed all four tracks to main and modified the route relations via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172000755 , closing. (Feel free to reactivate this note if there is anything to add regarding the main...
42025-09-16 13:52reopenedvectorial8192
52025-09-16 13:55commentedvectorial8192Disclaimer: when I commented on this note, I didn't notice which tracks were main/siding. However, looking at the track shape north side, it should be quite clear which one is main/siding: platforms 2/4 have a curve, while platforms 1/3 don't. The logic for main/siding most likely comes from this.
62025-09-24 09:20commentedkingkingHKIs main/siding really decided by the shape geometry though? I feel like this situation is the most similar with e.g. Shatin station, where platform 1 and 4 are tagged as main, even though they are branching out from the mainline, and are rarely used.
72025-09-24 13:55commentedvectorial8192I didn't know about the situation at Shatin station. Now that you mention this, sounds like the outer platforms of Shatin station should be `=siding` instead. But this is getting messy, and we should ask the railway guys for real.
82025-09-24 13:56commentedvectorial8192Shatin station also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977665
92025-09-30 03:03commentedkingkingHKNow that the situation at Shatin station is found to be an editing mistake, would you support changing platform 2 and 3 here to `=siding`? Also, further in response to your "platforms 2/4 have a curve, while platforms 1/3 don't" point, I think platform 4 only has a curve because it needs to dodge the bus bay north of it.
102025-09-30 07:07commentedvectorial8192I quote https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dsiding : > In some cases, may be difficult to distinguish from two parallel main tracks.
112025-10-02 13:33commentedkingkingHKI quote https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/siding : > A second, relatively short length of track just to the side of a railroad track, joined to the main track by switches at one or both ends, used either for loading or unloading freight, storing trains or other rail vehicles; or to allow two trains on a same track to meet (opposite directions) or pas...
122025-10-10 11:25commentedvectorial8192Then, unfortunately, I think the original tagging is correct. This station is not your usual "symmetric" station after all.
132025-10-10 11:43closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090346 ; closing.
4918153 (iD)12025-08-19 12:20openedkingkingHKThe street and buildings are overlapping, implying incorrect positioning of either (or both) of them.
22025-08-20 14:03commentedvectorial8192Might be real if building provides limited/full cover to pedestrian path at its address; common in older urban areas.
32025-08-20 14:10commentedkingkingHKCurrently the buildings are mapped to almost overlap with the carriageway centreline, which I find unlikely.
42025-10-10 08:55closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173083119 Had a walk and indeed there are hanging structures as roofs from some of the buildings, but they are not usually mapped to have the sidewalk "covered" like this
4926705 (iD)12025-08-24 08:11openedHKGn"Closed business." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-04T17:20:14Z POI name: 皇冠窗簾地氈 Crown Curtain POI types: shop-curtain #organicmaps android
22025-08-29 14:05commentedkingkingHKCorrect.
32025-10-10 03:27closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173074682
3071736 (iD)12022-03-03 00:29openedWhcohiThe talus area is grossly exaggerated.
22023-02-26 11:07closedHarry chau527
32023-02-27 04:16reopenedKovoschiz
42025-10-10 03:26closedCypp0847presumably it is meant to be the boundary of Kadoorie Farm. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173074625
4989584 (iD)12025-10-03 14:09openedFathermo彈珠工房
22025-10-03 14:10closedFathermo
32025-10-03 14:10reopenedFathermo
42025-10-04 03:33commentedkingkingHKOnline information says there's a "彈珠基地" at Hop Yick Plaza (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230959025), but no information about "彈珠工房"
52025-10-05 05:24commentedvectorial8192People may misremember names. This note is believable.
62025-10-09 12:49closedkingkingHKTurns out, there really is a "彈珠工房" here. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173049504 ; closing.
4957863 (iD)12025-09-12 03:59openedShall have a development
22025-10-08 14:53commentedvectorial8192So far only found this reference https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2025/chinese/panels/ws/papers/ws20250317cb1-368-5-c.pdf (item number 4) But not sure if this is the one we are talking about, and also no progress for now.
32025-10-09 12:40closedkingkingHKLatest situation reflected via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173049023 , further information can be added once more detail is known. Closing.
4904578 (iD)12025-08-11 14:59openedvectorial8192I don't think node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984688382 should be here / should exist; Fui Sha Wai is 99% located near Ping Shan. See same-name bus stop at Castle Peak Road.
22025-08-11 17:37commentedKovoschizNo, it's simply referring to a location of the same name that historically existed here. This only needs to be judged by relevance in OSM compared to OHM.
32025-08-12 14:09commentedvectorial8192I just don't see its irl relevance when a same-name irl location exists elsewhere quite obviously.
42025-08-12 17:22commentedKovoschizIt's possible for currently relevant locations to share names. That can't be a criteria for deciding.
52025-08-12 17:30commentedKovoschizAlso this is `=locality`
62025-08-12 17:36commentedKovoschizThe actual situation is no one remembered to create it (did now)
72025-10-08 14:42closedvectorial8192I now see node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984688382 has a `fixme=...`, so I guess this situation is done for now. Closing.
535104 (iD)12016-03-29 14:38openedMirror work 汽車護理產品專賣店
22025-08-13 10:22commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL, though already partially mapped with www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329247534.
32025-10-08 14:41closedvectorial8192Improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173008723 ; closing.
2598829 (iD)12021-03-29 08:10openedHang Tone恒通渠務工程有限公司 Hang Tone Drainage Engineering Limited 新界元朗錦田吳家村400號
22025-05-03 11:26commentedvectorial8192Website http://www.hangtone.com.hk/ agrees with this note
32025-08-13 10:21commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL.
42025-10-08 14:40commentedvectorial8192But is it located here? Ng Ka Tsuen is located north of this note, and I am unfamiliar with rural addressing. It would seem to me, if the company really is located here, then it should probably take the address street as Kam Sheung Road.
4917522 (iD)12025-08-19 04:02openedkingkingHKTraffic signals have been added to this junction.
22025-09-15 15:31commentedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705213882 exists for many years, but I suppose the quoted node has nothing to do with this new situation.
32025-10-08 14:36commentedvectorial8192Future reference https://www.cedd.gov.hk/tc/our-projects/major-projects/index-id-70.html
4995594 (iD)12025-10-08 06:19openedOcean 1
22025-10-08 10:13closedvectorial8192Meaning is unclear; closing.
4995751 (iD)12025-10-08 08:08openedDbingo123ku
22025-10-08 08:08commentedDbingo123kuku
32025-10-08 10:13closedvectorial8192Meaning is unclear; closing.
4995748 (iD)12025-10-08 08:08openedDbingo123kuk
22025-10-08 10:12closedvectorial8192Meaning is unclear; closing.
4976975 (iD)12025-09-24 04:55openedpppcPerm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-09-24 14:03commentedvectorial8192Likely referring to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4813666021
32025-09-26 08:50commentedkingkingHKIndeed couldn't find it on https://www.timhowan.com.hk/our-stores/
42025-09-30 09:55commentedkingkingHKCorrect
52025-10-08 10:12closedvectorial8192Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172995914 ; closing.
4976983 (iD)12025-09-24 05:10openedpppcPerm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-09-24 14:03commentedvectorial8192Likely referring to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10111099387
32025-09-30 09:55commentedkingkingHKCorrect
42025-10-08 10:12closedvectorial8192Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172995914 ; closing.
4995522 (iD)12025-10-08 03:42openedUrban Renewal Resource Centre
22025-10-08 10:10closedvectorial8192I quote https://www.urrc.org.hk/en : > For better service provision, starting from 16 October 2025, the URA will integrate resources to provide centralised support for old building owners and corporations on building rehabilitation matters in “Building Rehabilitation Resource Centre” (BRRC). “Urban Renewal Resource Centre” (URRC) located a...
4993667 (iD)12025-10-06 14:38openedvectorial8192Huge blunder to adopt the KCR plans; please revert.
22025-10-08 07:52closedvectorial8192Eventually resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172990392 ; closing.
4994240 (iD)12025-10-07 04:31openedLIttle Tai Hang
22025-10-07 04:37closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555982535 ; closing.
4559590 (iD)12024-12-21 21:28openedDimitar155The 3 sets of 2 buildings each might be semi-detached.
22025-10-06 02:01closedHenryEKfixed
2789883 (iD)12021-08-06 18:11openedWhcohisome of the path are creek
22025-10-06 01:55closedHenryEKfixed
3025902 (iD)12022-01-27 03:55openedthere are two small routes here to go up/down
22025-10-06 01:46closedHenryEK
4922555 (iD)12025-08-21 18:27openedvectorial8192todo: review roundabout mapping
22025-09-16 12:37commentedkingkingHKCould you please elaborate on what the issue this here/what is to be reviewed? I do notice that the mapping around here is a bit odd and most certainly wrong
32025-09-16 13:56commentedvectorial8192The roundabout feels wrong, but aerial imagery cannot see if this is an actual roundabout with an actual concrete kurb or simply just a turning circle.
42025-09-16 14:13commentedkingkingHKThe central island is traversable, so I think it should be `highway=turning_circle`.
52025-09-17 19:14commentedKovoschizThere's a `=give_way` , so not entirely the most common `=turning_circle` , similar to `=mini_roundabout`
62025-09-24 09:23commentedkingkingHKIs the presence of a give way a factor in determining whether something is a turning circle though? I feel like its main purpose is to let buses from the bus terminus do a u-turn and leave, fitting the definition of "a widened area of road that allows vehicles to turn more easily".
72025-09-24 14:10commentedvectorial8192I think the distinction is whether a "central circle" is visible. If a "central circle" is visible then it's basically a `=mini_roundabout`. The problem is, satellite imagery cannot see whether such "central circle" exists.
82025-09-24 14:17commentedkingkingHKNot sure what you mean "visible", but there is indeed a painted circle in the middle: https://imgur.com/a/5uJE9Qi
92025-10-06 01:41commentedHenryEKthis looks more like a mini roundabout than a turning circle
1991488 (iD)12019-11-11 03:52openedThe road ends here
22025-10-06 01:35closedHenryEKfixed
4976976 (iD)12025-09-24 04:57openedpppcPerm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-09-24 14:03commentedvectorial8192Likely referring to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4864636777
32025-09-26 08:51commentedkingkingHKIndeed couldn't find it on https://www.sasa.com.hk/v2/Shop/StoreList/17
42025-09-30 09:55commentedkingkingHKCorrect
52025-10-06 00:58closedWright OneChanged to Market Wholesome in changeset 172890044
4681285 (iD)12025-03-25 04:05openedclcelvisCar Park https://g.co/kgs/AALWUWz
22025-04-07 14:32commentedvectorial8192This information is very believable but the exact area of the car park is unknown. Aerial imagery still shows the probably-disused cargo waiting bays. It is also very difficult to do on-site survey for this. Unactionable for now.
32025-08-05 04:29commentedkingkingHKThe latest Esri aerial imagery shows the car park. Probably actionable now?
42025-08-05 08:26commentedvectorial8192Yeah, we can deal with this now that we have new satellite imagery.
52025-10-05 07:26closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172856074 ; closing.
2217410 (iD)12020-06-04 07:05openednot licensed car park
22021-01-06 04:35closedForestBoar
32021-01-06 13:56reopenedKovoschiz
42025-10-05 06:38commentedvectorial8192From aerial imagery, it feels like this is not a dedicated car park, but more like the villagers haven't decided what to do with the land yet, and by coincidence their cars just park inside of it.
52025-10-05 06:58closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172855507 ; closing.
4989681 (iD)12025-10-03 15:16openedEmoriaUnable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/640101062 via StreetComplete 61.3: Closed private road
22025-10-04 18:26closedKovoschizThis is known. It can still be added eventually.
4935234 (iD)12025-08-29 02:48openedkingkingHKName of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299406864 is dubious. Also, is it really in the middle of the road, instead of, say, on a side?
22025-10-03 00:20commentedWright One已移往靠近路邊位置
32025-10-03 14:04closedkingkingHKThanks @Wright One for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172769037 and further improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172793508 . Resolved, closing.
861105 (iD)12017-01-24 08:52openedBattlealvin2009There should be a footway in this area.
22025-08-08 13:24commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL.
32025-08-22 11:18commentedvectorial8192May you clarify how this footway is aligned? eg connects Stadium Path to somewhere else?
42025-09-30 13:49commentedkingkingHKSorry for the uninformative comment earlier - honestly I'm not sure either, there's a very twisty and turny stair starting from the south-west end of Stadium Path, and most of it is behind a locked gate (slope maintenance path iirc), making it harder to survey. Also I'm pretty sure there's a whole unmapped footway network in this area that's much ...
52025-10-02 16:22commentedvectorial8192Well understandable; if it's a slope maintenance path, might as well pretend it doesn't exist at the moment. It wouldn't affect general map usage.
4960221 (iD)12025-09-13 14:14openedSkylark_H_CAdditional information regarding the building's elevation or height is required, since various sections have distinct levels.
22025-10-02 15:51closedSkylark_H_C
1016596 (iD)12017-06-02 07:41openedMount Davis Fort No.0
22025-10-02 10:47closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171810277
4986366 (iD)12025-10-01 08:55opened555
22025-10-01 09:22closedkingkingHKMeaning is unclear ; closing.
4986365 (iD)12025-10-01 08:54opened12345
22025-10-01 08:55closedkingkingHKMeaning is unclear ; closing.
4961131 (iD)12025-09-14 08:35openedvectorial8192todo: upcoming construction works
22025-09-28 12:10commentedkingkingHKHi there, does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172560871 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172559473 resolve this note?
32025-09-28 13:41commentedvectorial8192Seems not. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193058436 this is still a construction area. Disclaimer: I don't know the details of the upcoming construction works; I only know it will involve somehow moving the bus terminus.
42025-09-30 16:13closedvectorial8192OK, from what I can gather online, CMW at this location will be redeveloped, but because China Merchant is a private entity, exact details are not clear. (Are the plans out yet?) This note intends to track the bus terminus situation. Right now the mapping is OK. So, closing.
4977687 (iD)12025-09-24 14:18openedvectorial8192Is this ATM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13159853201 legit? Why is there an ATM in the wilderness? And it is this close to a monastery? Who owns this ATM? Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4973275
22025-09-30 13:02closedvectorial8192After thinking, closing this note in favor of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4973275 .
4964448 (iD)12025-09-16 11:29opened健康村二期停車場
22025-09-16 12:31commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10199143700 ? Though should probably be `amenity=parking_entrance`.
32025-09-16 14:00commentedvectorial8192Year, 99% sure is that node. Might be a previous mapping mistake.
42025-09-30 12:49closedkingkingHKWell, there are no parking anywhere close to that node other than Healthy Village Car Park, so can be 100% it is just a mapping mistake. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172659307 ; closing.
4922350 (iD)12025-08-21 16:34openedvectorial8192todo: review / update Lee Garden Eight
22025-09-30 10:16commentedkingkingHKCould you please elaborate on what needs reviewing/updating?
32025-09-30 12:46commentedvectorial8192eg, old demolished buildings from 2019 still exists here, and we can kinda see the shapes of new future buildings from satellite images, and also to determine what exactly will be built here (e.g. new district court?)
42025-09-30 12:46commentedvectorial8192* as in exists in the OSM map data
4927798 (iD)12025-08-24 16:19openedplumbtreescaleService staircase via StreetComplete 57.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300761.jpg
22025-09-15 12:31commentedvectorial8192I see. For some reason I am recently noticing a lot of supposedly mountain paths in OSM are actually slope maintenance access irl. Gonna see if there's anything doable about this.
32025-09-30 12:44closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172659136 . Hopefully the interpretation is correct. Closing.
4982986 (iD)12025-09-28 14:42openedSITE
22025-09-28 14:44closedvectorial8192Meaning is unclear; closing.
32025-09-29 12:46reopenedidsajkd
42025-09-29 13:40closedkingkingHKMeaning is still unclear; closing again.
52025-09-30 12:27reopenedidsajkd
62025-09-30 12:32commentedkingkingHK@idsajkd Could you please explain the meaning of this note?
72025-09-30 12:36closedvectorial8192OK, so far I see there is a sewage pumping station right at the location of this note. If this note tries to point out "there should be a sewage pumping station here", then feature already as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321577041 , so closing. If this note is complaining about the lack of rendering of this pumping station, then this is actu...
4975556 (iD)12025-09-23 03:18openedHo Tung Maternity Home
22025-09-23 13:54commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1175924520 ?
32025-09-30 11:03closedCypp0847referring to the same place, closing
1706246 (iD)12019-03-11 00:59openedc1c2t3錦葵園
22019-03-11 01:22commentedc1c2t3Captured some Mapillary photos
32025-09-30 11:01closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1434338701 resolved
1450246 (iD)12018-07-10 12:21openedtrack position is incorrect; the siding is about halfway between yau tong and tiu keng leng stations
22025-09-30 08:09closedCypp0847The current version is now depicting the siding in the midway between the two stations
32025-09-30 10:15reopenedkingkingHK
42025-09-30 10:16commentedkingkingHKThere does not seem to be any changes to the siding's geometry from the date of the note?
1665961 (iD)12019-01-30 17:26openedThis Is A Display Name DesuThis area haven't been completely mapped yet. Please help mapping buildings here
22024-04-10 14:00commentedvectorial8192Detected major offset between satellite imagery and map elements; need a survey with GPS enabled to confirm what is going on.
32025-09-30 07:33closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172646602 resolved
4962505 (iD)12025-09-15 02:42openedDominik Zivcic"This is a non-public slope maintenance path only, closed with a gate. " OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-08T13:08:07Z POI has no name POI types: highway-footway #organicmaps ios
22025-09-29 03:40closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172591505 ; closing.
4976038 (iD)12025-09-23 11:47opened缺少了一個升降機
22025-09-28 15:00closedvectorial8192Believable information. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172571138 ; closing.
4977665 (iD)12025-09-24 13:56openedvectorial8192Shatin station; should outer platforms (aka 1 and 4) be `=siding`?
22025-09-28 12:55commentedKovoschizThis seems simply an editing mistake https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208232752/history/16
32025-09-28 14:43closedvectorial8192Good find. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172570414 ; closing.
4941396 (iD)12025-09-01 17:22openedvectorial8192todo: path reversal
22025-09-28 14:36closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172570161 . As usual, I will let the public transport mappers deal with the bus relations at their own pace. Therefore, closing.
4978246 (iD)12025-09-25 05:45openedkingkingHKI think https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4500785290 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3914317336 are referring to the same 7-11, only with two entrances.
22025-09-27 17:19commentedvectorial8192This https://www.7-eleven.com.hk/en/store lists only 1 shop in this area. The information is believable.
32025-09-28 11:52closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172562964 ; closing.
4954527 (iD)12025-09-09 14:35openedvectorial8192todo: new buildings
22025-09-24 23:43commentedHenryEKim unsure of what to do so can you clarify what features i should delete for the edit (e.g. the construction plot)
32025-09-25 01:51commentedkingkingHKWell, from aerial imagery, there are indeed some new buildings here, so I guess we should add the building elements and update its latest state?
42025-09-25 05:21commentedvectorial8192indeed, because the buildings are nearly completed, the intention is to draw them on the map, and also draw the roads etc (now usually good building shapes are provided by someone else; not sure how they can draw nice-looking building shapes)
52025-09-25 23:43commentedHenryEKso, delete the inland plot feature and add everything else?
62025-09-26 06:57commentedKovoschizNo, the `landuse=construction` is the `landuse=residential`
72025-09-27 15:31closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172531268 ; closing.
4980973 (iD)12025-09-27 03:02openedkingkingHKWhy is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817460283 `highway=unclassified` whereas the rest of Siu Yip Street is `highway=tertiary`? Forgotten to change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147584989?
22025-09-27 07:16closedKovoschizYou know you can simply correct these obvious omissions
4978548 (iD)12025-09-25 09:45openedCypp0847the bridge area got divided up into various pieces as to differentiate opening dates and features. this made the rendering of name is quite clumsy over here. could we try and hide some of the names?
22025-09-25 12:40commentedkingkingHKThis is more of a renderer discussion rather than an osm one, isn't it?
32025-09-26 06:56commentedKovoschizFor implementation, there's `bridge:part=` proposed long ago without much attention, only mass added to a hundred. The fundamental conceptual problem here is how to define a `man_made=bridge` for twin , long, and multi-stage `bridge=viaduct` , as the eastbound on the west is new far apart, and longer span.
42025-09-26 06:57commentedKovoschiz(`bridge:part=` is not a good format either, as `bridge=` isn't a feature, unlike `building=` )
52025-09-26 07:37commentedKovoschiz3. The `start_date=` is difficult to define. In OHM, the object's existing status is used. In OSM, often the oldest applicable is used.
62025-09-26 07:39commentedKovoschiz4. Minor note: I didn't bother to draw the whole IEC western `=viaduct` , so doing this is also a lazy hack
72025-09-26 07:40commentedKovoschiz5. `ref=` is another factor that needs to be considered to define a `man_made=bridge` , aside from `name=` and `start_date=` (etc)
4706786 (iD)12025-04-12 10:18openedBallBILL"closed down" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Jimmy Cake Shop POI types: shop-bakery #organicmaps android
22025-04-13 05:14closedKovoschiz
32025-09-25 08:35reopenedkingkingHK
42025-09-25 08:36commentedkingkingHK@Kovoschiz Why is this note closed without a comment? Is there really a bakery here?
52025-09-26 06:47closedKovoschizUser tried to delete it already https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164848701
4706787 (iD)12025-04-12 10:18openedBallBILL"closed down" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: 7-Eleven POI types: shop-convenience #organicmaps android
22025-04-13 05:14closedKovoschiz
32025-09-25 08:35reopenedkingkingHK
42025-09-25 08:35commentedkingkingHK@Kovoschiz Why is this note closed without a comment? Is there really a 7-11 here?
52025-09-26 06:47closedKovoschizUser tried to delete it already https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164848701
3209599 (iD)12022-06-04 14:31openedIJMacDMannings has closed
22024-05-22 10:55closedAllen2077
32024-05-22 10:56reopenedAllen2077
42024-05-22 10:57closedAllen2077
52025-09-24 13:40reopenedkingkingHK
62025-09-24 13:41commentedkingkingHKIndeed couldn't find a Mannings at this location on https://www.mannings.com.hk/en/store-finder ; survey recommended.
72025-09-24 14:06commentedvectorial8192I don't think you need a survey for this. The website doesn't have it, then because the website is properly maintained, it means the store really does not exist. If the (official!) website contains wrong data then it's entirely their problem and we have no obligation to help them clean it up.
82025-09-25 02:31commentedIJMacDI'm still in the area and can confirm Mannings hasn't returned in the last 3 years. I can pop downstairs and take a photo, or I can just delete it on the map.
92025-09-26 02:30closedIJMacDI have now deleted this branch of Mannings. I should have done it 3 years ago.
3796160 (iD)12023-07-24 09:58opened扶輪亭（涼亭）
22025-09-25 23:50closedHenryEKadded based on street view the gazebo is located more south than this note.
3796163 (iD)12023-07-24 09:59opened涼亭
22025-09-25 23:47closedHenryEKthere is indeed a gazebo here based on street view
4978667 (iD)12025-09-25 11:37openedThis is a testing node
22025-09-25 12:37closedkingkingHKMeaning is unclear (possibly private note), closing.
3654302 (iD)12023-04-22 12:36openedNumber of storeys: 22 Units per floor: 10 Population: 589
22024-03-11 15:44commentedvectorial8192Number of storeys already in OSM data. We don't store population; it is too volatile. We do not have "units per floor"; however, we do have "total units in building". But is it a good idea to store the total?
32024-03-12 08:09commentedKovoschizWhat do you mean? `building:flats=` is a standard, and I haven't seen any question about its usefuleness. Not having units per floor now doesn't mean it can't be created. Also it would be useful to have an `addr:flats=` per floor to show how they are numbered on each floor, as the format is not scalable to list all reliably.
42025-01-16 18:26closedhersonsl
52025-01-17 02:41reopenedvectorial8192
62025-09-24 09:47commentedkingkingHKWill there be any further discussion on this note? Discussions regarding units per floor and address format notation isn't very relevant to this note and is probably better suited elsewhere.
72025-09-24 14:14commentedvectorial8192imo population should not be stored in osm, but I am not too familiar with how that works. can use this opportunity to recheck Tsui Chuk Garden building level/unit correctness, I guess.
82025-09-25 11:03commentedHenryEKwhy is this note still active
4970340 (iD)12025-09-20 09:38openedkingkingHKname:en of park?
22025-09-25 09:47closedCypp0847https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172431103
1738149 (iD)12019-04-07 18:59openedck_lauRecreational Area with table tennis tables at Ground Floor
22024-10-25 09:52commentedvectorial8192Correct, but might be difficult to tag correctly
32025-09-24 14:09commentedkingkingHKWould simply adding `level=` to the relevant elements be fine? From osm wiki: "Highways (and other ways) can be also tagged with level=* when they are essentially bound to a floor of a building complex (such as multilevel parking buildings, railway stations or airports).".
42025-09-24 14:32commentedvectorial8192Oh yeah, `level=` exists. Thanks for the reminder!
52025-09-24 14:35closedvectorial8192It turns out, this feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674327259 , but OSMCarto doesn't render it so it was extremely unobvious to me. Still, the layering has been improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172397559 , so we can close this.
4569195 (iD)12024-12-30 13:04openedvectorial8192Sidewalks have contradictory tags of `highway=footway` but also `foot=no` (?????)
22024-12-31 04:48commentedKovoschizIt is possible draw emergency or maintenance walkways that are illegal to walk into as pedestrians normally. On the contrary, another possibility is misunderstanding no-pedestrian sign, because legally it only refers to prohibited on the roadway. Another factor to be considered is the Expressway Area.
32025-01-03 08:01commentedvectorial8192The Expressway Area is correct. A few years ago you can kinda walk from Tai Po Road to Racecourse on this side, but now that the Racecourse construction is finished, the old path was removed, and now this side is essentially a dead end. The sign probably applies to the motor road, but in effect it also applies to pedestrians. I say remove the si...
42025-03-01 16:55closedvectorial8192No response; then I'm doing it. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163095590 ; closing.
52025-03-01 18:56reopenedKovoschiz
62025-03-01 19:03commentedKovoschizI misunderstood what you are referring to, for what was on the Racecourse side. If the sidewalk still exists physically, it should be kept. Especially if there's no `barrier=` blocking. (even then, it could still be added)
72025-03-01 19:04commentedKovoschizhttps://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1205682018
82025-09-24 13:36commentedkingkingHKWill there be any further discussion on this note? If @vectorial8192 does not disagree with @Kovoschiz's points, then perhaps no action needed and we can close this note.
92025-09-24 13:57commentedvectorial8192I will just redo this as if the path is a "slop maintenance path" then.
102025-09-24 14:02closedvectorial8192The road there is so narrow, it is as if a barrier exists there. The path is kept, but is also marked as if it isn't supposed to be used, just like slope maintenance paths found throughout Hong Kong. Resolved again via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172396030 ; closing.
2518690 (iD)12021-01-30 17:31openedWhcohi鯉魚山 Peak
22022-04-27 02:35closedPoHK鯉魚山 has been marked nearby
32022-04-27 08:04reopenedWhcohi
42022-04-27 08:05commentedWhcohidebatable location
52025-09-17 12:35commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9572208311 ? Also, searching for 鯉魚山 on the internet does not return any results (perhaps it's an obsolete name, as indicated by the tagging of the aforementioned node), in that case "debatable location" is less of a concern as it is not verifiable anyway. If no further discussion, then closing as feature a...
62025-09-24 07:59closedkingkingHKNo further discussion, then feature already exists; closing.
4971582 (iD)12025-09-21 02:56openedPolyU HKCC
22025-09-21 03:20closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230480072 ; closing.
4967038 (iD)12025-09-18 08:13opened小米之家
22025-09-18 08:50closedvectorial8192Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4864609423 ; closing.
4487699 (iD)12024-10-21 04:50openedvectorial8192Clean up public transport relations after changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158152986
22025-09-17 09:26commentedkingkingHKCould you please elaborate on what needs cleaning up? The public transport relations seem fine, unless I missed something.
32025-09-17 10:28closedvectorial8192Entirely possible that someone else came in and really cleaned up the relations after I posted this note & before your comment. Basically iirc, the quoted changeset split some "two way" paths into separate "one way" paths, which breaks the public transport relations. As usual, the iD editor is weak against PT relations so I avoid directly touching...
4894594 (iD)12025-08-06 03:35openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12996644577 is suspicious
22025-08-06 06:27commentedkingkingHKIndeed, and in fact the same user has also added a lot of very dubious names in July. Some of his edits also seem to correlate with names prescribed by protecthknames.
32025-08-06 15:30commentedvectorial8192if protecthknames, then is potentially bannable; we will need some help.
42025-08-06 16:46commentedKovoschizThis is not actionable unless you have commented on at least one changeset to show unresponsiveness and cooperativeness. Discussing here alone isn't enough.
52025-08-06 17:28commentedvectorial8192Apologies, I have forgotten about the "comment on the changeset" again.
62025-09-16 14:01closedvectorial8192I see this specific case is mostly resolved. Therefore, closing this.
4591542 (iD)12025-01-17 06:30opened- 大潭篤水塘南入口 - 路牌左邊梯級上山
22025-08-21 18:25commentedvectorial8192Both features listed seem to already exist.
32025-09-16 13:58closedvectorial8192Re "- 大潭篤水塘南入口", geographically this indeed is the "south side". Re "- 路牌左邊梯級上山", indeed we have the information board https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9938657702 , and then a path up the mountain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156581675 right next to it. Features already exist. Therefore, closing.
4015949 (iD)12023-12-05 14:08openedClosed to public with gate and wires installed after this point. 22.24240° N, 114.17520° E
22025-09-16 07:04closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171997469 ; closing.
4919256 (iD)12025-08-20 00:19openedHenryEKbuilding shape is wrong
22025-08-20 02:28commentedkingkingHKThe building shape seems to match the aerial imagery. Could you please elaborate on what is wrong?
32025-08-21 10:05commentedHenryEKIt does not match aerial imagery but i dont know how to explain it
42025-08-21 16:32commentedvectorial8192It really does not match aerial imagery. One technique in the iD editor I have learned: select the building, press M to move it, and then move the building to the top most level shown in the aerial imagery. The theory is that, even if aerial imagery is wrong about the actual location, it really cannot be wrong about the shape and the size. Here,...
52025-08-21 16:33commentedvectorial8192You can also see that the building is currently not symmetric but almost symmetric (!), which is highly unusual.
62025-08-27 05:18closedHenryEKil just fix it myself but the position might be off
72025-08-27 05:18reopenedHenryEK
82025-09-15 00:11closedHenryEKfixed
2417355 (iD)12020-11-09 16:12opened毛飯煮意 - momoriceism毛飯煮意 - Momoriceism
22025-04-07 15:47closedvectorial8192Curiously, there is no online information about what this is. Assuming this is a restaurant, not even OpenRice has information about this. Note is therefore likely invalid, so, closing.
32025-09-12 13:58reopenedkingkingHK
42025-09-12 14:01commentedkingkingHKAccording to the Company Registry, there exists a company named " 毛飯煮意有限公司 Momoriceism Limited". And according to a very suspicious website (https://coltd.hk/company-72566028-details.htm), it's address is Room 02 & 26, 13/F, Wing Shing Industrial Building, Ng Fong Street, which correlates with the location of this note. Also, https:...
52025-09-12 16:21commentedvectorial8192that coltd website seems like content farm website that simply crawls data from the company registry, I think I saw a few of these websites so far, imo not very indicative. also, the way the facebook post is written, it just seems the organization is simply defunct and is surviving as some sort of an unmaintained shell.
62025-09-12 16:26commentedvectorial8192I propose closing this, but @kingkingHK perhaps you may want to go there once and confirm it for real.
72025-09-14 11:45closedkingkingHKIndeed, couldn't find the company in the building. Also, the entire Wing Shing Industrial Building is very unmaintained/abandoned, so definitely no food production company (as mentioned in the facebook page) there. Closing.
4939458 (iD)12025-08-31 16:03openedvectorial8192"U"nderpass?
22025-09-01 04:03commentedkingkingHKIs the name even gazetted? If not that could explain it. E.g. in https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_76124.html it's called "The underpass leading from Chatham Road North northbound to Gillies Avenue South southbound", and such a clumsy description likely won't be used if there's a gazetted name.
32025-09-01 05:07commentedKovoschiz`name=` is for common names, and many names are in fact not gazetted despite both public and government use. I do a trick to use lowercase for these. Google 1st page results: https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/tokptiso/tdn41159en2.pdf https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2025/english/subleg/negative/2025ln072-e.pdf https://www.td.gov.hk/fileman...
42025-09-01 05:09commentedKovoschizMost famous example might be Rumsey St Flyover. It is used extensively, including at planning and construction historically. But the road is still not gazetted as it or Connaught Rd C.
52025-09-01 07:16commentedvectorial8192I think I saw a map that marks this segment as "Gillies Avenue South" but I can't recall which map. If no gazetted name + no irl signposted name then might as well make it `noname=yes`; at minimum it does not seem like it should be "Wuhu Street".
62025-09-01 11:09commentedKovoschiz1. You have to know whether that map is correct first. Even government map has many mistakes, or at least deviation from reality (depending on definition). They may overextend the gazetted naming. 2. It's not Wuhu St, but an underpass of it. Naming by what it passes is standard. 3. You would have to remove many names by this standard, when those ...
72025-09-01 11:17commentedKovoschizThere's some official and historical basis on top of the above https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/embed.aspx?src=https://www.emsd.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_1148/Appendix%20A%20-%20Building%20Code%20v1.0.xlsx&activecell=B2412 https://search.grs.gov.hk/repository/img?id=%2BB3GmARcUkiYebJGfIJqKA%3D%3D#page=3 https://search.grs.gov.hk/repository...
82025-09-14 10:42closedvectorial8192OK, then the current situation is good enough as-is. Therefore, closing.
4559591 (iD)12024-12-21 21:31openedDimitar155The 3 sets of 2 buildings each might be semi-detached.
22025-03-29 11:49closedvectorial8192OSM does not provide an easy way to see "polygon shape" history, but currently these buildings are now semi-detached. Therefore, closing.
32025-03-29 14:06reopenedDimitar155They aren't tagged as semi-detached. All of them have building=terrace + house=terrace, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103846078 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486759 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486762 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486763 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486764 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12...
42025-03-30 12:13commentedvectorial8192Hi there! Sorry for misunderstanding the note. You may see me around closing notes to clean up the notes interface, to declutter them. This can be reviewed in detail later.
52025-09-12 12:27commentedkingkingHK@vectorial8192 has the "review in detail later" ever happened? Seems like it's still tagged as `building=terrace` and `house=terrace`. Also, you may be interested in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4559590.
62025-09-12 12:37commentedvectorial8192It never happened. I went to do something else. Also yes I know that similar note is placed at Sai Kung. The original plan was to deal with this first, and then deal with the Sai Kung one later.
72025-09-12 15:48commentedvectorial8192To clarify my situation, the blocker was/is that I am extremely unfamiliar with how individual buildings should be mapped. Me not touching this again was not due to anything bad happening. It's entirely my lack of knowledge.
82025-09-12 15:52commentedvectorial8192Another blocker would be to really manually review the several dozen (or hundred?) of buildings.
4957458 (iD)12025-09-11 16:35openedvectorial8192Kwun Tong Line, the directions are sus. "Westbound" but approaches Tiu Keng Leng; and vice versa?
22025-09-11 17:00commentedvectorial8192(Problem observed at Mong Kok)
32025-09-12 08:10closedKovoschizMust have switched the `railway=` , while correct `route=`
4936870 (iD)12025-08-30 04:33openedkingkingHKDoes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170061964 really have a speed limit of 100?
22025-09-11 13:44closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785759 ; closing.
32025-09-11 14:11reopenedvectorial8192
42025-09-11 14:12closedvectorial8192To add to this, this situation could have been a fat finger mistake. I would look at the map and then directly apply the 100 -> 10 change myself.
4686227 (iD)12025-03-28 18:11openedvectorial8192Are you sure this replacement bus terminus is opened?
22025-08-13 10:23commentedkingkingHKStill under construction and not yet opened as of today (2025-08-13).
32025-09-11 12:49closedkingkingHKStill not opened as of today (2025-09-11). I have changed the relevant elements to `highway=construction` via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171783269. Other mappers can update the situation once the bus terminus opens, or reactivate this note if there is anything to add. Closing.
3145328 (iD)12022-04-20 23:24openedckyuthere is a gate which is locked by villaget
22025-09-11 12:30commentedkingkingHKAt least when I attempted to visit the location of this note today, there was a guard dog stopping people from getting close. Might be difficult to verify this note if the situation persists.
4952223 (iD)12025-09-08 08:35openedvectorial8192Is it actually possible to use these steps to reach Castle Peak Road?
22025-09-10 12:35closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171733971 ; closing.
4868226 (iD)12025-07-21 15:14openedvectorial8192Free-hanging railway siding? Missing data that describes how the siding connects back to the mainline?
22025-08-07 07:21commentedCypp0847Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170091126 This would inevitably involve some major changes to the tracks
32025-09-09 10:57closedvectorial8192Well, I have a feeling the quoted changeset was reverted due to potential copyright problems. Anyway, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679335 ; closing. The mapping can still be improved (e.g. where exactly is the siding? how about the public transport mapping?) but that would belong to future work and is out of scope.
4940451 (iD)12025-09-01 08:19openedvectorial8192https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1172161653 I thought this site was purged several times over?
22025-09-08 08:54closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171622097 ; closing.
4810055 (iD)12025-06-17 12:02opened港茂眼鏡公司(泓富廣場)
22025-08-08 13:24commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL.
32025-09-08 08:33closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171621088 ; closing.
4892787 (iD)12025-08-05 03:44openedkingkingHKNeed to confirm name of 38 Hung To Road.
22025-08-07 04:31commentedCypp0847Appears to be an unnamed building
32025-08-07 06:17commentedkingkingHKwww.sharedoffices.hk/building/microtron-building/ claims that it's called "美科大厦 Microtron Building". When I visited the site yesterday, it was covered in dense scaffolding, so I was not able to see if there were any names signposted. Also seems weird to have an unnamed building in such an urban area?
42025-08-20 14:01commentedvectorial8192- even if scaffolding, the name potentially can still be known by visiting the building directory in the lobby - buildings can really have no names, esp in "old urban areas" where (self guess) the building was built as a personal joint venture and not via real estate development companies (eg SHK); in this case it will be known simply as "[Street ...
52025-08-20 14:01commentedvectorial8192However, looking at online sources, it does seem the building is named, so recommend go there again somehow.
62025-08-22 08:28commentedkingkingHKThe building seems closed and the entrance is locked. Outside the building it's simply signposted as "38 Hung To Road", so it's probably really nameless.
72025-09-08 08:29closedvectorial8192Then, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620880 ; closing.
4949232 (iD)12025-09-06 12:21openedkingkingHKName of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4745146323 is dubious.
22025-09-08 08:18commentedvectorial819299% feels like referring to the famous Blue House group, which is next street. Then, this node shouldn't exist.
32025-09-08 08:22closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620551 ; closing.
4869215 (iD)12025-07-22 07:12openedjack_@_@sodo
22025-08-05 04:37commentedkingkingHKMeaning is unclear (perhaps "todo"?), please elaborate.
32025-09-08 08:19closedvectorial8192Meaning is unclear; closing.
4932915 (iD)12025-08-27 14:38openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4867380821 is suspicious (mapper seems inactive)
22025-09-08 08:17closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620363 ; closing.
4899982 (iD)12025-08-09 06:48openedkingkingHKIs the substation really just called "變電站 ESS"?
22025-08-31 14:05commentedkingkingHKThere appears to be a name signposted on the wall, but it's quite far from the fence, making it difficult for outsiders to see the name. A camera with good zoom might be needed to read the sign.
32025-09-08 00:47commentedvectorial8192Then, just delete the name and leave it as unknown.
42025-09-08 08:15closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620254 ; closing.
4937556 (iD)12025-08-30 14:04openedSkylark_H_Ctoilet #OsmAnd
22025-09-01 13:39commentedkingkingHKCorrect.
32025-09-07 15:16closedSkylark_H_CSolved.
4949223 (iD)12025-09-06 12:18openedkingkingHKWhy is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205283541 a link?
22025-09-07 09:17closedKovoschizUser mistake, but should all be `=secondary_link`
4039877 (iD)12023-12-25 13:03opened種植道花園，內有一個涼亭。
22024-09-07 18:45closedCypp0847more surveying required to improve the mapping
32024-09-07 18:45reopenedCypp0847
42025-09-07 04:47closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171567147 ; closing.
828864 (iD)12016-12-26 11:00openedWanderer GoGounpaved down hill slope (45 degree) (OSM data version: 2016-11-05T13:55:03Z) #mapsme
22025-09-06 03:40closedkingkingHKDuplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/829942 ; closing.
4922359 (iD)12025-08-21 16:37openedHave A Nails Day Hong Kong
22025-09-01 13:39commentedkingkingHKCorrect.
32025-09-05 12:48closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171497199 ; closing.
4912480 (iD)12025-08-16 09:03openedkingkingHKAerial imagery shows that a building is being built here.
22025-09-05 12:26closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171496047 ; closing.
4946440 (iD)12025-09-04 14:20openedOwen717A
22025-09-04 14:21closedOwen717
4884398 (iD)12025-07-30 21:15opened大埔四方公園
22025-08-05 04:34commentedkingkingHKProbably referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146471234? If so, feature already exists.
32025-08-18 12:38commentedkingkingHK"大埔四方公園" is probably an alternative name. See e.g.: https://www.facebook.com/ifva.HKArtsCentre/posts/pfbid0oLWg8AStMBm69p7UsGh6kiQVsmAyoz6LU6XptW5QHotmQahHncDjJpavnJVywe8tl https://www.facebook.com/groups/75130008031/permalink/10161481561668032/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/75130008031/permalink/10160584834693032 https://www.faceboo...
42025-09-04 12:31closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171450849 ; closing.
2801715 (iD)12021-08-13 14:14openedMang tang水晶石森林九妹 Little9CRYSTAL
22021-08-13 14:16closedMang tang新界元朗青山公路元朗段95號海外信託銀行大廈9樓A室
32021-08-13 14:16reopenedMang tang
42021-08-13 14:16closedMang tang新界元朗青山公路元朗段95號海外信託銀行大廈9樓A室
52021-08-14 13:54reopenedKovoschiz
62025-09-04 12:20closedkingkingHKIncorrect, feature does not exist IRL. Closing.
4903801 (iD)12025-08-11 07:45openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11353455226 is suspicious
22025-08-11 17:38commentedKovoschizIt's simply another historical location
32025-08-12 14:08commentedvectorial8192To be fair this is my first time hearing about this. For a long time I would just call this area Pat Heung. Again, quoting you, perhaps this should be moved to OHM.
42025-08-12 17:23commentedKovoschizThat's the `=suburb` , and there can be other `place=` under it. `=locality` is already the lowest level.
52025-09-01 17:19closedvectorial8192Then, this note is due to my lack of local (rural) knowledge. Therefore, closing.
4622400 (iD)12025-02-11 07:17openedprodevpUnable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Motor Mech (Car Repair Shop) – https://osm.org/node/4845847910 via StreetComplete 60.1: Golden World Motors
22025-09-01 13:39commentedkingkingHKCorrect.
3112771 (iD)12022-03-30 16:58openedivanbrancoto be fixed with natural=peak
22025-05-12 08:21closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:13reopenedvectorial8192
42025-05-13 08:13commentedvectorial8192Not done yet; please don't resolve!
52025-09-01 06:03closedkingkingHKResolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127477374 ; closing.
2434008 (iD)12020-11-20 15:19openedDogistic Limited 一寵愛有限公司
22025-05-12 07:54closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:13reopenedvectorial8192
42025-05-13 08:14commentedvectorial8192Not done yet; please don't resolve!
52025-09-01 05:45commentedkingkingHKAccording to the Company Registry, a company with the same name has been dissolved in October 2020.
4937016 (iD)12025-08-30 07:34openedvectorial8192Does this "Yau Ma Tei Interchange (N)" have `share_taxi=no`?
22025-08-31 11:56commentedvectorial8192Indeed.
32025-08-31 13:08closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171268691 ; closing.
4937015 (iD)12025-08-30 07:31openedvectorial8192Now that Yau Ma Tei Interchange is restored, does this "Yan Cheung Road (W) -> Hoi Wang Road (S)" have a `share_taxi=no`?
22025-08-31 11:56commentedvectorial8192It turns out, no such signage, but turning northbound does have this signage.
32025-08-31 12:59closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171265947 ; closing.
2237234 (iD)12020-06-21 16:35opened312機槍堡
22025-08-27 05:20closedHenryEKPillbox 312 exists just northeast of this note. Although it is on the map, it for some reason does not show.
32025-08-30 07:22reopenedvectorial8192
42025-08-30 07:25closedvectorial8192To add more information: OSM itself only contains map data. It does not handle map rendering itself. The situation is that OSM Carto (the default rendering style used by OSM) does not render said military ruins, at least as of writing. Most likely, OSM Carto does not know how to render said ruins. This would then be an OSM Carto issue and should...
1706259 (iD)12019-03-11 01:44openedc1c2t3Review the added inserts artwork?
22025-08-29 14:07closedkingkingHKMeaning is not very clear (what artwork?), and it seems adequately mapped after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68006134 etc, closing.
4616685 (iD)12025-02-06 00:31openedNIcholson
22025-08-29 10:44closedCypp0847Amended at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171177047
4616684 (iD)12025-02-06 00:31openedHarston
22025-08-29 10:44closedCypp0847Amended at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171177047
4616686 (iD)12025-02-06 00:32openedThe Repulse Bay Club
22025-08-29 10:43closedCypp0847Amended at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171177047
4698223 (iD)12025-04-06 06:27openedvectorial8192Very confusing mapping of Wah Cheong Street; survey recommended.
22025-08-29 10:35closedCypp0847Amended at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171176770
4927540 (iD)12025-08-24 14:15openedvectorial8192I don't think this is a tomb.
22025-08-25 16:35commentedKovoschiz`=tomb` + `tomb=columbarium` is simply what's used for this. It's only needs to change from `historic=` to `man_made=`
32025-08-26 03:18closedvectorial8192Indeed, I was looking at `historic=*` because that's obviously not the case. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171004732 ; closing.
4927799 (iD)12025-08-24 16:19openedplumbtreescaleDistance post H 048 via StreetComplete 57.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300762.jpg
22025-08-25 03:28closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/288372052 ; closing.
949531 (iD)12017-04-02 10:30openedKoala888洞穴 (OSM data version: 2017-03-06T16:48:02Z) #mapsme
22025-08-22 13:33closedvectorial8192Probable duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/939664 ; closing.
4713020 (iD)12025-04-16 10:33openedvectorial8192Public shower has end_date.
22025-04-16 16:08commentedvectorial8192Note: this is trying to describe a todo, but not a problem.
32025-08-02 12:26commentedkingkingHKThe end_date is marked as 1 June this year, which has already passed. Does that mean the public shower has closed? Any action needed?
42025-08-02 14:41commentedvectorial8192Hi there! Perhaps you are new to OSM editing. The end_date was because I noticed it was scheduled to close down. Supposedly we should go check the news sources etc to see what will be happening to the public bathhouse. Best would be if we can get to the government announcement describing how the bathhouse will be repurposed.
52025-08-02 14:47commentedvectorial8192...it seems there are no repurposing plans yet. Then, we will make it become disused. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
62025-08-22 12:40closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829635 ; closing.
4886297 (iD)12025-08-01 04:33openedvectorial8192Citybus CTB?
22025-08-08 13:20commentedkingkingHKAn NWFB banner at the entrance to the depot has been replaced with a Citybus one, so I suppose so. However I'm not sure where the name "NWFB/CTB Sheung Wan Depot" comes from anyway: I don't see any sign at the site explicitly signposted this name. Perhaps it's from some sort of official document? If so, then we can just find that document and see i...
32025-08-08 14:04commentedvectorial8192Now that you mention "official document", it made me curious, and then I found this document which may be useful https://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/atd/2020/en/section9_1_1.html I am not too sure whether using this document has any copyright concerns, but you may ask around just in case. I think the document is considered "essential for function" jus...
42025-08-22 12:38closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829564 ; closing.
4780054 (iD)12025-05-29 03:48openedjoe1213King’s Flair International (Holdings) Limited
22025-08-08 13:21commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL.
32025-08-22 12:35closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829401 ; closing.
4863511 (iD)12025-07-19 05:09openedonosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: Morii Bar & Restaurant addr:housenumber=279-281 addr:street=德輔道中 addr:city=香港島上環 Phone number: 55769606 Website: https://www.instagram.com/morii.bar Social Network: https://www.instagram.com/morii.bar?igsh=MWVtNmkyejJqOWkxNg== Opening Hours: 12pm -03am ｍon - sat Wheelchair accessib...
22025-08-08 13:22commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL. Though the opening hours signposted at the site is 18:00 to 03:00, which differs from the note's 12:00-03:00.
32025-08-12 09:39closedcliffling
42025-08-13 11:47reopenedkingkingHK
52025-08-22 12:32closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829225 ; closing.
527888 (iD)12016-03-15 00:32openedNAIL 20NAIL 20, 20B, Hillier Commercial Bldg, 89 Wing Lok St, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
22025-08-08 13:22commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL.
32025-08-22 12:28closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829014 ; closing.
4124373 (iD)12024-02-23 06:49openedNinuda HK Limited
22025-05-03 08:26commentedFrances Chin2
32025-08-08 13:22commentedkingkingHKCorrect, feature exists IRL.
42025-08-22 12:25closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170828859 ; closing.
4920224 (iD)12025-08-20 14:15openedMateusz Koniecznyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/426856757/history is it really amenity=vending_machine and shop=general at the same time?
22025-08-21 18:22commentedvectorial8192I think a likely irl situation is that the `shop=general` has a vending machine inside. IMO this still would not justify a full `amenity=vending_machine`. Disclaimer: I have never been to this place before.
32025-08-21 19:21commentedMateusz Koniecznyfor that vending_machine=yes may fit
42025-08-21 19:21commentedMateusz Koniecznyor map it as a separate node
52025-08-22 12:12closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170828170 ; closing.
2489665 (iD)12021-01-08 08:30opened坪洲永安街50號
22021-01-21 22:35closedneutronmapper
32021-01-22 09:53reopenedKovoschiz
42025-08-22 08:14closedCypp0847Mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170816406
2327347 (iD)12020-08-29 09:58openedWright One54號樓宇已拆卸，準備重建
22025-08-22 08:10closedCypp0847Mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170816170
454810 (iD)12015-10-21 07:18openedChris Yip大豐凍肉（BBQ)
22015-10-21 07:19closedChris Yip
32015-10-21 07:19reopenedChris Yip
42025-08-22 08:07closedCypp0847mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170816030
4756211 (iD)12025-05-13 02:33opened這是引自溪水的淡水喉，官方列明溪水未經處理不宜飲用，在地圖上以「飲用水」在標示並不夠準確，或可改用「淡水取水處」較為適合，可方便露營人士，亦不會令行山人士誤會有加水機設施。
22025-08-22 08:02closedCypp0847As amended https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170815822
2046829 (iD)12020-01-05 08:03openedWright One此入口已封
22021-05-19 03:38closedSylvester77
32021-05-19 03:39reopenedSylvester77
42025-08-21 18:23commentedvectorial8192Another path nearby was marked as inaccessible https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154333345 ; related?
4916204 (iD)12025-08-18 09:01opened友愛南巴士總站用地已被收回起樓
22025-08-18 09:24commentedkingkingHKhttps://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/TNTM3/TA_Public%20Transport%20Arrangements%20for%20Temporary%20Closure%20of%20Yau%20Oi%20South%20BT_E.pdf agrees with this.
32025-08-21 17:59closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170793739 ; closing. Note: since public transport mapping cannot be easily/correctly done via the iD editor, I will leave them to work on this at their own pace.
4908929 (iD)12025-08-14 03:29openedkingkingHKWan Po Road south-east bound, why does the `highway=motorway` end here? Shouldn't it be extended to the end of the Wan Po Road/Chiu Shun Road/Po Yap Road Flyover, based on the continuity rule? Cf. Tsing Yi North Coastal Road.
22025-08-14 07:44commentedKovoschizYes, this is a good question. We had a great argument over these situations. But for here, I do think we could slightly relax the standard when it changes at the gore.
32025-08-14 07:45commentedKovoschizAlso Tunnel Area is proposed to be changed to `motorroad=yes` only, and `=trunk` here, instead of all `=motorway`
42025-08-14 19:56commentedKovoschizOn MOS Rd, this was avoided by justifying a `highway=` change at the bus on-slip (although it was edited by someone now)
52025-08-17 13:47closedkingkingHKChanged via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170453952 ; closing.
62025-08-21 17:41reopenedvectorial8192
72025-08-21 17:42closedvectorial8192Re MOS road, I would think there is nothing to continue since both the "main" road and the "slip" road have their motorway status end right at the junction linking them together. But this would be going too off-topic.
2641485 (iD)12021-04-28 09:48openedIan HoSome construction works are being done here. The path is widen by machinery to over 1.5m wide all the way up to the top.
22022-02-16 14:45closedAWX4
32022-02-16 14:45reopenedAWX4
42022-02-16 14:45closedAWX4
52022-02-17 14:53reopenedKovoschiz
62022-02-17 14:53commentedKovoschizMisunderstanding on how Notes work, not yet worked on. Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
72022-09-14 04:36closedHKHikerhang
82022-09-14 05:40reopenedKovoschiz
92022-09-22 04:46commentedIan HoThe new paved path for the start and higher section of the path are different from existing path. So yes it not yet worked on and shouldn't be resolved yet.
102022-11-24 03:17commentedIan HoAs at 2022-11-24, the path is still under construction. Access is officially authorized personnel only. Will keep on update.
112025-08-21 17:39commentedvectorial8192Hi there, it seems the relevant paths may have become available (new OSM edits), may you confirm whether the foot paths / steps are really accessible?
4920238 (iD)12025-08-20 14:23openedkingkingHKSeems like right-turn from Lung Poon Street northbound to the PTI has recently been banned. See: https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_81960.html
22025-08-21 12:27closedkingkingHKTurns out it was already resolved by someone else before I made this note via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170478033 ; closing.
4363631 (iD)12024-08-02 15:00openedivanbrancohttps://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1P90 spammy descriptions to be fixed
22024-09-25 17:55commentedvectorial8192Unexpected to see a real-estate agency being this active on osm by typing out referral messages
32025-08-08 05:03closedultisolIt's been removed
42025-08-08 13:25reopenedkingkingHK
52025-08-08 13:25commentedkingkingHKNot true, www.openstreetmap.org/node/11072361648 has not been fixed yet.
62025-08-21 12:19closedkingkingHKFixed the aforementioned node via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170776657 , closing.
4921002 (iD)12025-08-21 03:41openedmarina cove E side
22025-08-21 07:02closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
2809712 (iD)12021-08-18 17:43openedWhcohiThis FP ends here
22025-08-20 14:10commentedvectorial8192Satellite imagery cannot see some of the paths here when the area is seemingly mostly shrubs; did someone just self-fabricate paths?
32025-08-20 14:14closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170729516 ; closing.
3929592 (iD)12023-10-08 05:46openedTo DB Paza
22025-08-20 14:07closedvectorial8192This is very likely referring to Discovery Bay bus services linking DB to Tung Chung. Then, this was done very recently by someone else (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170287007). Therefore, closing.
4885282 (iD)12025-07-31 12:15opened東莞銀行大廈 Bank of Dongguan Tower
22025-08-07 04:08commentedkingkingHK136 Des Voeux Road C is mapped as BOC Group Life Assurance Tower. Is "Bank of Dongguan Tower" an alternative name? Internet searches does not return any useful results, and this site does not seem to relate to the Bank of Dongguan.
32025-08-08 13:23commentedkingkingHKCorrect, 136 Des Voeux Road C has been renamed to "Bank of Dongguan Tower".
42025-08-20 13:37closedkingkingHKResolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170379317 ; closing.
4731535 (iD)12025-04-28 09:25openedA6pakcac"Специальные скамейки под навесами для зрителей Light Show" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bench #organicmaps android
22025-08-05 07:16commentedkingkingHKTranslation: "Special benches under canopies for Light Show spectators". Probably already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12794340202.
32025-08-20 12:38closedvectorial8192Oh yeah, some mappers will add a feature, and then add a note describing such new feature. In my opinion, sometimes this seems excessive. Feature already exists; closing.
2902724 (iD)12021-10-20 04:25openedpslau AED Location 遠東金融中心 高層客戶服務台 香港金鍾夏愨道16號 每日 09:00 AM - 09:00 PM
22021-10-20 04:26closedpslau
32021-10-20 04:26reopenedpslau
42025-08-20 10:05closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9184291180
4919487 (iD)12025-08-20 07:10openedKathy KuASA Tiles
22025-08-20 07:11closedKathy Ku
32025-08-20 08:40reopenedKathy Ku
42025-08-20 08:40closedKathy Ku
4855958 (iD)12025-07-15 06:24openedliiik"Closed" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z POI name: Zac's POI types: wheelchair-yes amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android
22025-08-20 00:21closedHenryEK
32025-08-20 00:21reopenedHenryEK
42025-08-20 00:24closedHenryEKdeleted point
3232557 (iD)12022-06-20 03:44openedWhcohi花香爐西坑
22025-08-19 09:29closedsirdoningtonMapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1423264602#map=18/22.397211/113.921865
1702879 (iD)12019-03-07 15:06openedc1c2t3There's road surround the classroom outside the main pathway. Pending to add stairs.
22025-08-18 09:59closedCypp0847Mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170606841
1702898 (iD)12019-03-07 15:10openedc1c2t3There're pathways connect hall and campus. Some point has covered
22025-08-18 09:36closedCypp0847Mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170606016
4777047 (iD)12025-05-27 02:12openedWu Kai Sha Pebble Beach
22025-05-28 04:14commentedvectorial8192Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256538274 . Is this a local name of this beach?
32025-08-18 07:56closedCypp0847Further mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170601063
2835016 (iD)12021-09-04 03:02openedKoi pond here, in public stream.
22025-08-18 07:45closedCypp0847Mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170600631
3559720 (iD)12023-02-15 07:01opened千溪水印"試劍石" POI has no name POI types: amenity-shelter OSM data version: 2021-05-24T07:43:34Z #mapsme
22025-08-17 13:52closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10660654905 ; closing.
1460647 (iD)12018-07-20 04:39openedLeafy Glade, unspiritual home of Shek Kong Hash House Harriers
22018-11-18 05:42commentedN2TH3 Run 1891, 21 November 2018, 7.30pm
32025-08-15 12:15closedkingkingHKMost likely private note, closing.
3154255 (iD)12022-04-27 08:13openedWhcohiThe stream is off from actually location
22025-08-15 11:55closedkingkingHKResolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161068851 ; closing.
3154256 (iD)12022-04-27 08:13openedWhcohiThe stream is off from actually location
22025-08-15 11:54closedkingkingHKResolved by someone else via www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161068851 ; closing.
1665976 (iD)12019-01-30 17:40openedThis Is A Display Name DesuFix 3d and indoor tagging in this area
22025-08-15 11:51closedkingkingHKSeems adequately mapped after www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129264085 etc, closing.
4622627 (iD)12025-02-11 10:13openedprodevpUnable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – 小豆島日本料理 Shodoshima (Japanese Restaurant) – https://osm.org/node/5875362954 via StreetComplete 60.1: SUSHI EXPRESS 爭鮮
22025-08-15 08:07closedCypp0847See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170468104
4622634 (iD)12025-02-11 10:17openedprodevpUnable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – on level 1: 薄餅博士 PHD (Pizza Fast Food) – https://osm.org/node/4104739190 via StreetComplete 60.1: Pizza Hut
22025-08-15 08:07closedCypp0847See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170468104
4899970 (iD)12025-08-09 06:33openedResley西貢清水灣道61F號日月山房
22025-08-15 08:06closedCypp0847mapped and closing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052396876
4899068 (iD)12025-08-08 13:52openedkingkingHKVery dubious speed limit (why suddenly speed limit 30 at the middle of a roundabout?).
22025-08-14 19:55closedKovoschizWrong `maxspeed=` and `maxheight=`
2248451 (iD)12020-06-30 13:46openedWhcohibig area of mudflat while water drop below 0.8M-0.0M
22020-12-17 15:58closedDixon313
32020-12-18 16:21reopenedKovoschiz
42020-12-18 16:21commentedKovoschiz@Dixon313 misunderstanding on how Notes work, not yet added
52025-08-05 12:23commentedvectorial8192Can OSM even describe these kinds of tidal landforms?
62025-08-14 12:26commentedvectorial8192OSM can. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dtidalflat
72025-08-14 12:32closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170434638 ; closing.
4831466 (iD)12025-06-29 18:52opened天水围宣道会
22025-08-13 14:30closedvectorial8192- too ambiguous - multiple matches - definitely not here Therefore, closing.
4728573 (iD)12025-04-26 11:22openedvectorial8192LRT Tai Tong Road: is there an entrance/exit here?
22025-08-10 14:01commentedkingkingHKYes, there is a signalled crossing here connecting the footpath of Castle Peak Road west of Fook Hong Street to the west of the platform of Tai Tong Road LRT.
32025-08-13 05:20closedvectorial8192Thanks! Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170369344 ; closing.
947580 (iD)12017-03-31 14:39opened許常善景洪直銷市場門市部 (OSM data version: 2017-03-06T16:48:02Z) #mapsme
22019-04-01 04:31commentedseems like blatant advertizing
32024-10-09 12:38commentedvectorial8192It is still map info
42025-03-04 17:48commentedvectorial8192Item mentioned in webpage https://recipkinhk.exblog.jp/26168072/ ; this at least existed in the past, we only need to verify whether it still exists now.
52025-03-04 17:49commentedvectorial8192The address from the webpage strongly matches the location of this note + the nearby map data, so it is very likely a valid note.
62025-08-10 13:59closedkingkingHKThe shop does not exist anymore. There is no shop with such name along the entire Lee Fat Path, and in fact almost all the shops there are vacant. Outdated info; closing.
564090 (iD)12016-05-12 04:40openedAngelatoAAngelato-handcrafted artisan gelato
22025-03-21 06:52closedmksum_superleekam
32025-03-21 12:21reopenedvectorial8192
42025-03-29 13:09commentedvectorial8192This https://www.openrice.com/en/hongkong/r-angelato-handcrafted-artisan-gelato-tuen-mun-italian-ice-cream-yogurt-r182238 says a restaurant with the same name is closed. Survey recommended.
52025-08-10 13:56closedkingkingHKThere are no such named restaurant in the mall. Additionally, Shop 18, G/F (the address given by Openrice in the link above) is now occupied by another unrelated shop. Info is outdated, closing.
531608 (iD)12016-03-22 15:05openedparco迦南 鍋
22016-03-22 15:28closedparco深井村68號地下
32016-03-22 15:28reopenedparco
42025-08-10 13:54closedkingkingHKIncorrect, feature does not exist IRL. 68 Sham Tseng Village is now another unrelated shop (unsurprising given the note is over 9 years old). Closing.
4383534 (iD)12024-08-14 14:25openedFu Kee Dessert is closed #OsmAnd
22024-10-31 01:11commentedvectorial8192Does this mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12110626405 "Fu Kee Restaurant"?
32025-08-10 13:52closedkingkingHKBoth "Fu Kee Restaurant" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12110626405) and "Fu Kee Chinese Restaurant" (www.openstreetmap.org/node/6456446356) still exist IRL. Note is most likely wrong, closing.
4057288 (iD)12024-01-07 14:40openedPierre LienAdd new location: Carol Yang BlackBox Theatre
22025-03-28 15:00commentedvectorial8192According to online sources, Carol Yang BlackBox Theatre is the newly-named BlackBox Theatre inside Benevolence House, St Stephen's College. Also see https://www.instagram.com/ststephenscollege/p/Cuxxd7PBu69/ .
32025-08-09 16:30closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170211235 ; closing.
3739587 (iD)12023-06-17 20:13openedos-emmerAll over Hongkong there are a lot of missused turning_circles and turning_loops. They should just be used on nodes and nothing else. Also they are sometimes combined with roundabouts. On the link below you can find the places I mean: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wcy
22023-06-17 20:14commentedos-emmerWith this link the scrips runs automaticly https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wcA These places need to be fixed.
32023-06-18 17:37closedKovoschizNo, there aren't, and they shouldn't. Wiki is not an authority to decide everything. What do you propose to use when the `=turning_loop` has been drawn separately to show they are one?
42023-06-18 19:16reopenedos-emmer
52023-06-18 19:20commentedos-emmerHi Kovoschiz, thank you for your responses. I think we need to find a solution for this in general. If a place where I can turn around is mapped as a full road (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111301056) I would follow the wiki: "Draw a closed highway=* way around the traffic island and connect it to the main road, giving it the sa...
62023-06-19 07:39commentedKovoschizThe wiki only provides guidelines on the minimum. There's nothing you can follow for something it doesn't mention. `turning_loop=` is not covered. When there are driveways connected to it, it causes ambiguity on whether the untagged section could be a `junction=` `=circular` or `=roundabout` , which is only implicitly indicated by having a `restri...
72023-06-19 07:42commentedKovoschizIf you blindly follow the wiki for being prescriptive, then I have already documented my method now. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Roundabout_details#Turning_circles_and_loops You should also be aware you need to follow guidelines for re-tagging.
82025-08-09 16:13closedvectorial8192As per the latest ESRI satellite imagery, it is clear this really is a `highway=mini_roundabout`, and the west side one is really a `highway=turning_circle`. I see the discussion has already concluded. Therefore, resolving.
4900209 (iD)12025-08-09 09:39openedonosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: Morii Bar & Restaurant addr:housenumber=13/F, 279-281 addr:street=Des Voeux Road Central addr:city=Hong Kong Island addr:postcode=00000 Phone number: 852-55769606 Website: https://www.instagram.com/morii.bar Social Network: https://www.instagram.com/morii.bar/ Opening Hours: Mo-Sa 1200-0300 Wheelchair...
22025-08-09 11:02closedkingkingHKDuplicate of www.openstreetmap.org/note/4863511, closing
4888375 (iD)12025-08-02 12:39openedkingkingHKname:en of park?
22025-08-08 05:53closedultisolAdded from https://look4.hk/en/Community-Facilities/Lai-Kit-Lau-Sitting-out-Area/237944
32025-08-08 14:15reopenedvectorial8192
42025-08-08 14:15commentedvectorial8192Changeset is controversal; reviving.
707178 (iD)12016-09-10 07:34openedЕлена Ишковабулочная на 1этаже, супермаркет на 4 (OSM data version: 2016-08-22T09:03:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-12 17:32commentedvectorial8192DeepL translate: "bakery on the 1st floor, supermarket on the 4th"
32025-08-08 13:29closedkingkingHKThe shopping mall only goes to the 3rd floor, and indeed the entire 3rd floor is the Wellcome supermarket. I suppose this is what the note creator was trying to mean? (Does Russian floor counting start from ground floor first floor?) The Wellcome already exists as www.openstreetmap.org/node/3125709391. There are no bakeries in the entire mall, perh...
3359975 (iD)12022-09-14 20:38openedTuen Mun Spine Fine Manipulation 手法整脊正骨 Unit 2A, UG/F, Pahsang Industrial Building, 16 San On Street, Tuen Mun
22025-08-08 07:49closedultisolAdded
4446673 (iD)12024-09-22 01:47openedGotsonUnable to answer "What type of tourist information is this?" – Information – https://osm.org/node/4168540490 via StreetComplete 59.0: It's the information counter of the mall. It's manned.
22024-11-12 10:37commentedvectorial8192There seems no consensus on how to map "concierge" or related items. Not actionable for now.
32025-08-08 07:02closedultisolThere is, amenity=reception_desk
4896453 (iD)12025-08-07 05:21openedvectorial8192(northbound) Which of the 3 toll gantries is the real toll gantry?
22025-08-07 06:57closedKovoschizThe one here should be wrong. You should be aware there's always a pair of them for redundancy, not a single one only.
32025-08-07 07:01reopenedKovoschiz
42025-08-07 07:02closedKovoschizThe one on the slip road is wrongly positioned. Should be upstream.
52025-08-07 07:11reopenedKovoschiz
62025-08-07 07:11closedKovoschizAnd southbound is completely wrong (and duplicating one of the correct one by me)
4894772 (iD)12025-08-06 07:27openedvectorial8192no name road, why access=private?
22025-08-07 06:54closedKovoschizDrainage reserve access road (was even `access=no` )
2902609 (iD)12021-10-20 00:53openedcow@2021AED@黃埔站 月台監察亭 每日 06:00 AM - 01:10 AM
22025-08-07 04:39closedCypp0847closing, at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170086374
4894603 (iD)12025-08-06 04:19openedvectorial8192There exists both https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315897141 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12846837 , which may indicate inconsistent data.
22025-08-06 16:49closedKovoschizNo you should check how `type=waterway` works first
2130652 (iD)12020-03-26 07:41openedWine Store : Click Your Wine Limited
22025-08-06 13:55closedkingkingHKResolved via www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170059675 ; closing
4425024 (iD)12024-09-08 05:55opened電單車停泊處
22025-08-06 12:22closedkingkingHKResolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170054800 ; closing.
4895339 (iD)12025-08-06 12:06openedkingkingHKMost of the village is unmapped
1655603 (iD)12019-01-20 06:38openedThis Is A Display Name DesuEntire village remain unmapped
22021-07-19 05:17closedKeitch
32021-07-19 05:17reopenedKeitch
42021-10-30 15:15closedRhodochrosite
52021-10-30 15:16reopenedRhodochrosite
62021-10-30 15:16closedRhodochrosite
72021-10-30 15:16reopenedRhodochrosite
82024-01-09 11:43commentedvectorial8192Village seems adequately mapped; propose resolving this.
92025-08-06 11:04closedCypp0847Closing given its now nearly fully mapped
4681270 (iD)12025-03-25 04:00openedclcelvisPermenant closure of entry/exit road from Sai Sha Road
22025-04-08 15:12commentedvectorial8192Can't seem to find any government announcements for this.
32025-04-11 16:09commentedvectorial8192Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164781488 disagrees with this note; this note is contested. Survey recommended.
42025-04-21 08:05closedvectorial8192Note invalid (fake news); closing.
52025-08-05 15:47reopenedvectorial8192
62025-08-05 15:48commentedvectorial8192Latest ESRI satellite imagery (dated 2025 July) agrees with the content of this note. Therefore, restoring. As a suggestion, please state clearly whether your note is describing a future event or an existing problem. In this case, it is trying to describe a future event.
72025-08-05 16:15closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170015665 ; closing.
2957588 (iD)12021-12-03 09:19openedpath not clear , go back here
22025-08-05 15:42closedvectorial8192It seems there are currently no path already, updated by someone else. (Also see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143772274) Therefore, closing.
4889989 (iD)12025-08-03 12:29openedvectorial8192As per latest satellite imagery (finally), calibrate/beautify path shape for real.
22025-08-05 13:28closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170006937 ; closing.
4636691 (iD)12025-02-22 04:08openedmaxso216new trainning ground constructed #OsmAnd
22025-08-05 12:43closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170004632 ; closing.
3740525 (iD)12023-06-18 13:29openedos-emmerOn the map here is a circular road but on the aerial image I can only see a widened part of the road. I think instead of this circular road here should be a single node with highway=turning_circle and without passing_place=yes and turning_loop=yes. Can someone confirm this?
22025-08-05 12:36closedvectorial8192Latest satellite imagery (ESRI) shows something which looks like a circular road. This matches OSM data. Closing.
4782837 (iD)12025-05-31 04:26openedEmojiopenstreetmapConstruction in progress, not yet built
22025-08-05 12:32commentedvectorial8192Indeed, this somehow is a construction site.
32025-08-05 12:33closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170004138 ; closing.
4803762 (iD)12025-06-13 06:44openedpityiusum正大建築物料有限公司
22025-08-05 11:20closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000572 ; closing.
4620382 (iD)12025-02-09 10:22openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4865106762 (新豐彩廣場) is suspicious.
22025-02-15 07:26commentedvectorial8192See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4620378 for related discussion
32025-08-05 11:15closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000304 ; closing.
4620378 (iD)12025-02-09 10:22openedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4865106763 (Hong Kong Fashion City) is suspicious.
22025-02-15 07:25commentedvectorial8192香港時裝城 However, the mode of operation is unclear. Perhaps this should not even be in OSM at all.
32025-02-15 11:41commentedvectorial8192To elaborate, it feels like this is a "nested intermediate shop" inside the building, where it acts like a shop itself but inside itself there are more shops. The curious thing about this is that irl, there are several such "shops" in the building set.
42025-08-05 11:11commentedvectorial8192I will take these as shops.
52025-08-05 11:15closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000304 ; closing.
4741468 (iD)12025-05-04 09:30openedfeel_like_me_"Amazing view from stone hidden in bushes" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI has no name POI types: tourism-viewpoint #organicmaps android
22025-05-04 09:46commentedfeel_like_me_https://freeimage.host/i/3wSDCaS https://freeimage.host/i/3wSZyzb
32025-08-05 06:18closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12809246001 ; closing.
4741572 (iD)12025-05-04 10:41openedfeel_like_me_"Viewpoint from huge stone https://freeimage.host/i/3wgU4cu" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI has no name POI types: tourism-viewpoint #organicmaps android
22025-08-05 06:17closedkingkingHKFeature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12809318001 ; closing.
4596099 (iD)12025-01-21 09:37openedAnthony Cheung (中原地產 Centaline Property)中原地產北角城市分行 Centaline Property North Point City Garden Branch
22025-08-05 04:52commentedkingkingHKFeature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4860337561 ; closing.
32025-08-05 04:52closedkingkingHK
1701859 (iD)12019-03-06 14:50openedc1c2t3there’s some new statues for photo-taking
22025-08-05 04:36closedkingkingHKProbably referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674839130 , created by the same person on the same day. Thus, closing.
4890190 (iD)12025-08-03 14:05openedKarenlamkkGensō Eki 天馬驛
22025-08-03 14:06closedKarenlamkk
32025-08-03 14:08reopenedKarenlamkk
42025-08-03 14:09closedKarenlamkk
52025-08-03 14:11reopenedKarenlamkk
62025-08-03 14:12closedKarenlamkk
2566618 (iD)12021-03-05 14:29openedgosanyaki"48P 52X 53 234D 261B 962B 962E 962N" POI name: 豪景花園商場 Hong Kong Garden Commercial Complex POI types: highway-bus_stop OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z #mapsme
22025-08-03 05:07closedvectorial8192Information of this note is outdated. Closing.
4804964 (iD)12025-06-13 22:53openedZizidane"the address is definitely correct, but I'm not sure about the exact position on the map, it should be on ground floor of the isky building" OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-15T17:20:20Z POI name: Casa 218 POI types: amenity-restaurant cuisine-seafood cuisine-spanish cuisine-tapas #CoMaps android
22025-06-15 07:21commentedvectorial8192I have moved the location of the restaurant to the center of the building. This is usually enough. However, I have noticed the phone number of this restaurant is invalid. It contains 9 digits while currently the max allowed is 8 digits.
32025-06-16 11:07commentedZizidaneIt is my mistake, please accept my apologies. The correct phone number is 2522 1218, I have corrected it on coMaps, but I dont see the edit yet here on osm website.
42025-06-16 14:44commentedvectorial8192No worries. I just now checked the wiki what is CoMaps, and it seems the new data from CoMaps will be uploaded to OSM sometime later when internet is available again. I will help fix the phone number on OSM itself, but will keep this note open lest the update from CoMaps finally reach OSM.
52025-08-02 17:30closedvectorial8192OK, it seems to me there will not be updates from CoMaps, so I am closing this.
4735799 (iD)12025-04-30 16:17openedvectorial8192relation=no_right_turn (NE direction; Yen Chow Street -> Lai Chi Kok Road) Is this turn restriction's exception only for franchised buses or actually for any kind of bus?
22025-07-31 03:01commentedkingkingHKFranchised bus. The bus lane is a franchised bus lane, and the turn restriction is no right turn except for franchised buses.
32025-08-02 12:45commentedkingkingHKThe current tagging is correct. So I suppose no action needed?
42025-08-02 14:43closedvectorial8192Yeah, no action needed. I was just wondering whether it really is specifically franchised bus or generally any bus. No action needed; then can close this.
4886544 (iD)12025-08-01 08:44openedDear Mapper, There is a couple of new residential buildings here - the town plan is already gazetted. These should be government's housing.
22025-08-02 10:57closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1266836324 ?
4886547 (iD)12025-08-01 08:48openedDear Mapper, There is a confirmed construction project here where a few government housings are being constructed at this very moment. The primary development is underway.
22025-08-02 10:57closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1419355192/
2496132 (iD)12021-01-13 03:08openedCat Walk Dog Come Pet Shop | 犬貓集結號寵物店 香港新界錦田大馬路吉慶圍DD109 LOT283 SA 地下
22025-04-28 12:05commentedvectorial8192It's probably this website https://catwalkdogcome.com/lander , but can't seem to load anything.
32025-08-01 09:02closedvectorial8192"Account suspended". Nice. Closing.
3145479 (iD)12022-04-21 05:10openedChan Tai Man小西灣休憩處已改為興建「小西灣健康中心及社會福利設施大樓」，工程進行中。
22022-04-21 05:10closedChan Tai Man
32022-04-21 05:10reopenedChan Tai Man
42025-08-01 07:43closedCypp0847Closing this as it is adequately mapped already
4599060 (iD)12025-01-23 14:38openedvectorial8192name:en of building?
22025-08-01 02:49closedCypp0847closing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169796293
3600977 (iD)12023-03-17 03:14opened原址重建/升級成元朗淨水設施 (Yuen Long Effluent Polishing Plant)
22025-08-01 02:42closedCypp0847closing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169796201
4886233 (iD)12025-08-01 02:30openedNaiba华车智电(香港)CIEV Hongkong Address: unit B 5/f Shell industrial Building 12 Lee Chung Street Chai Wan Hk
22025-08-01 02:30closedNaiba
4578041 (iD)12025-01-06 10:54openedvectorial8192name (e.g. "Open Space/Short Term Tenancy") feels like not actually a name; noname=yes instead? Survey required.
22025-08-01 02:26closedCypp0847Closing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169795983; remains to be developed
4581725 (iD)12025-01-08 14:35openedvectorial8192name:en of warehouse?
22025-08-01 02:15closedCypp0847closing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169795862
2595571 (iD)12021-03-26 16:51openedblock in front, u can turn right here to the small route
22025-07-31 15:14commentedvectorial8192No idea about the "small route", but it should be clear the barracks is entirely off-limits.
32025-07-31 15:34closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169776724 ; closing.
4745596 (iD)12025-05-06 16:52openedvectorial8192North Side should have been completed recently; info needed.
22025-07-31 15:08closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169277428 by someone else; closing.
4722929 (iD)12025-04-22 15:35openedvectorial8192Yau Pok Road, why access=no?
22025-04-23 16:33commentedKovoschizForgotten to update? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756616939/history/4
32025-07-31 15:07closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167634943 by someone else; closing.
4299442 (iD)12024-06-20 04:03openedA new building here
22024-09-22 06:23commentedvectorial8192Can't see anything from satellite imagery; this is new construction site?
32025-04-11 16:12commentedvectorial8192This https://www.hsu.edu.hk/en/about-hsuhk/campus-and-facilities/ says there is a building "Creative Humanities Hub" here.
42025-07-31 11:11closedCypp0847already opened, closing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169764527
3600986 (iD)12023-03-17 03:49openedFenwick Pier Emergency Egress Point
22023-10-19 09:05closedChan Timothy
32023-10-19 09:05reopenedChan Timothy
42025-07-31 10:42closedCypp0847At https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169763155
2531196 (iD)12021-02-09 03:19openedWright One%E9%87%8D%E5%BB%BA%E4%B8%AD https://www.sracp.org.hk/tc/services/skwh.html
22024-03-10 14:50commentedvectorial8192URL decoded: 重建中
32025-07-31 10:26closedCypp0847At https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169762381
4828104 (iD)12025-06-27 13:03openedtyshing2004超哥印尼餐廳 青山道62號地下B
22025-06-27 13:05closedtyshing2004加入Instagram places
32025-06-27 13:05reopenedtyshing2004
42025-07-31 10:18closedCypp0847At https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169761969
2401470 (iD)12020-10-27 11:58openedentrance
22025-07-29 14:07closedvectorial8192Meaning is unclear (possible "private note"); closing.
4861256 (iD)12025-07-17 16:49openedvectorial8192Improbably narrow cliff/ridge? On the public map?
22025-07-18 05:49commentedKovoschizShould be changed to `=ridge`
32025-07-18 05:50commentedKovoschiz( Should draw `=ridge` , but this is possible)
42025-07-18 15:45commentedvectorial8192If the improbable cliff is trying to describe the ridge line, then yes, I can see where this is going. However, the south side is just improbable imo. Does that mean the terraformed platform extends narrowly for very long towards the north side? I don't think so. Therefore, something sus is going on, and the improbable cliff is probably a mistake...
52025-07-19 04:16closedKovoschizThey can be different land formations, only coincidentally represented by the same object partially. This doesn't matter.
62025-07-19 04:16reopenedKovoschiz
72025-07-23 13:33commentedkingkingHKThe top of the ridge is actually flat for a width of around 1.5 metres, and both sides have a slope of around 40 degrees, which I believe is not steep enough to justify natural=cliff. For the south side, the "cliff" south of the substation is actually of a different elevation of the "cliff" north of it, just tagged with a single way. West of the s...
82025-07-23 16:12commentedvectorial8192OK, I think I am starting to understand this situation. The improbable cliff should be redrawn as a ridge. Embankments are a thing. If the slope is moderate but is still difficult to navigate perpendicular to it, then it is most probably an embankment. Afaik we do not need to draw contours (heightmap is separate from OSM), but some places there ...
92025-07-24 07:29commentedKovoschizIf the top is flat, it can have both `=ridge` along the center, and `=cliff` on both sides. If the latter is argued to be not steep enough, it could be eg `=earth_bank` . The problem is `man_made=` has `=embankment` , but not `=cutting` for cut slopes.
102025-07-24 07:33commentedKovoschizA "contour" can be drawn if it is a fill or cut slope. That's similar to `=embankment` which can be said less sharp topographically than these in some sense. Again the problem is missing `=cutting` , more difficult to observe, and people not being interested in them. Not that this can't be done.
112025-07-27 07:36closedvectorial8192Thanks all for the information. The terrain is improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169542238 ; we can close this.
122025-07-27 10:16reopenedKovoschiz
132025-07-27 10:16closedKovoschizEdited (to show what I meant)
3864023 (iD)12023-08-31 17:00openedunderling7608Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/258610138 via StreetComplete 53.3: Not a tennis court but a mall
22023-12-10 07:30commentedvectorial8192the tennis court is located at the rooftop, which is the "surface" of this land.
32025-07-26 12:22closedvectorial8192@vectorial8192 dum dum you didn't understand the meaning of the "surface" tag. In the context of sport pitches, `surface` is describing the material that is used to pave the ground of the pitch. Examples could be plastic, or natural grass, etc. ------ This "false positive" note from StreetComplete is alas a false positive: the question is valid....
4874024 (iD)12025-07-25 06:54openedkt08Coffee Dino
22025-07-25 06:55closedkt08
32025-07-25 06:55reopenedkt08
42025-07-25 06:55closedkt08
4865203 (iD)12025-07-20 01:34opened陳家小宅
22025-07-20 01:58closed小宅陳家
32025-07-20 01:58reopened小宅陳家
42025-07-20 06:16closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4839937 (iD)12025-07-05 11:44openedHong Kong Air Cadet Corps Headquarters and Training Centre
22025-07-17 03:02closedThereal0000000000
32025-07-17 03:36reopenedCurlingMan13
42025-07-17 03:37commentedCurlingMan13User is vandalizing map and closing notes without taking action or providing comment. They have a previous block for this exact thing and have been reported to DWG for further action.
52025-07-19 13:33closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169152236 ; closing.
4838136 (iD)12025-07-04 00:48openedsignselects新達招牌製作公司
22025-07-19 13:19closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169151679 ; closing.
4776120 (iD)12025-05-26 11:36opened死亡海灘
22025-07-19 13:16closedvectorial8192Note is not useful; closing.
4712170 (iD)12025-04-15 17:14openedvectorial8192Someone confirm whether this has traffic signals?
22025-06-18 12:31commentedkingkingHKThere are traffic signals.
32025-07-19 12:56closedvectorial8192Thanks! Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169150897 ; closing.
1760761 (iD)12019-04-29 02:38opened入口被鐵絲網圍封，且往入口位置道路屬於隧道範圍，禁止行人及車輛進入。
22019-10-20 09:07closed段狗估🤫
32019-10-20 09:07reopened段狗估
42022-11-24 03:26commentedIan Ho現場所見鐵絲網有稍被壓低, 依稀看到似有路跡但又水淹又異味, 真不想嘗試
52025-07-18 16:05closedvectorial8192已由 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169117017 作標註, 消除此註記
2128753 (iD)12020-03-24 16:15opened此路不通，鐵絲網封閉。應往東側才能找到出路
22020-04-05 09:38closedforunner
32021-01-11 08:00reopenedKovoschiz
42025-07-18 16:05closedvectorial8192已由 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169117017 作標註, 消除此註記
4857598 (iD)12025-07-16 03:13openedj6rj
22025-07-16 07:59closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4857600 (iD)12025-07-16 03:23openedMike TsangYLRN 25031117
22025-07-16 07:58closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
32025-07-16 07:59reopenedKovoschiz
42025-07-16 07:59closedKovoschizPlease do not use notes for general discussion or storing information not otherwise used in OpenStreetMap. For example never create notes such as "I was here on Saturday" or "There was a crime at this location".
4857597 (iD)12025-07-16 03:13opened6u6
22025-07-16 07:58closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4137977 (iD)12024-03-03 15:44openedAlbert Tam"水井，土地公" POI has no name POI types: man_made-water_well OSM data version: 2018-01-26T12:04:02Z #mapsme
22025-07-16 03:21closedMike Tsang
4852037 (iD)12025-07-12 19:07openedvectorial8192"Hung Shui Kiu" is only a tentative name, as per usual railway development practice.
4703967 (iD)12025-04-10 11:47openedvectorial8192Fix incorrect building size/shape (Phase 6)
22025-07-10 16:52closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168752658 ; closing.
4845957 (iD)12025-07-09 09:22openedvectorial8192What are those?
22025-07-10 15:20closedvectorial8192Very unclear tagging/information. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168748891 ; closing.
4845771 (iD)12025-07-09 06:46openedzzhccftin sau swimming pool
22025-07-10 04:15closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313120676 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not us...
1719855 (iD)12019-03-23 01:28openedbabalou32"Permanently Closed" The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. POI has no name POI types: amenity-cafe OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z #mapsme
22024-11-16 04:51commentedvectorial8192name:en=Pacific Coffee Emporium
32025-07-04 08:23commentedvectorial8192Indeed
42025-07-04 14:24closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168488174 ; closing.
52025-07-09 02:33reopenedVivilucky
62025-07-09 02:33closedVivilucky
72025-07-09 02:34reopenedVivilucky
82025-07-09 02:36closedVivilucky
4517748 (iD)12024-11-13 07:07openedvectorial8192Recheck highway=pedestrian due to landuse=construction
22025-07-04 15:22closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168490545 ; closing.
32025-07-09 02:34reopenedVivilucky
42025-07-09 02:36closedVivilucky
389154 (iD)12015-06-30 18:14openedFASHION oN 正確地址是香港銅鑼灣東角道24-26號東角 Laforet 2樓 239號, 電話 : +852 2404 6408
22025-07-04 08:44commentedvectorial8192Negative
32025-07-04 14:25closedvectorial8192Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
2387086 (iD)12020-10-15 20:47openedonosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Music & Wine Restaurant phone: 96926239 website: https://www.instagram.com/musicandwinehk/ twitter: undefined hours: Monday to Sunday 16:00 - 02:00 category: Restaurants,Pub Food address: 8 Sugar Street, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
22025-04-10 03:48commentedvectorial8192This https://www.instagram.com/musicandwinehk/ says it is located at 1/F; survey recommended.
32025-07-04 08:16commentedvectorial8192Negative; got "247" instead
42025-07-04 14:18closedvectorial8192Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
4838137 (iD)12025-07-04 00:49openedsignselects新達招牌製作公司
22025-07-04 00:50closedsignselects
32025-07-04 00:50reopenedsignselects
42025-07-04 03:44closedKovoschizDupe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4838136
4838129 (iD)12025-07-04 00:35opened新達招牌製作
22025-07-04 00:46closedsignselects
32025-07-04 00:46reopenedsignselects
42025-07-04 03:44closedKovoschizDupe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4838136
4835097 (iD)12025-07-02 08:44opened綠匯學苑
22025-07-02 16:58closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435199974 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not us...
4820784 (iD)12025-06-24 03:43openedBrietta TsangHong Kong Jockey Club New Club house
22025-06-24 17:32closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639059945
4820783 (iD)12025-06-24 03:42openedBrietta TsangHong Kong Jockey Club Old Club House
22025-06-24 17:32closedKovoschizhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639059945
4588718 (iD)12025-01-14 14:21openedvectorial8192memorial plaque has suspicious name
22025-01-14 14:22commentedvectorial8192(it really do be like that?)
32025-06-22 03:30closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936686 ; closing.
4812509 (iD)12025-06-19 08:41openedSoho House
22025-06-19 08:47closedCW-
4182367 (iD)12024-04-04 15:11openedA座 11~20
22025-02-28 15:52commentedvectorial8192I think this "11~20" means something, but I can't quite get it.
32025-06-16 14:51closedvectorial8192I just can't. Meaning is unclear; closing.
4167498 (iD)12024-03-25 17:03openedvectorial8192Afaik partial, conditional access: Partial: only one direction is permitted Conditional: road closed if weather bad True until further notice
22024-03-25 17:04commentedvectorial8192This is a follow up to the unexpected landslide occurred in Sept 2023.
32025-06-16 14:41closedvectorial8192OK, I believe this issue is fully resolved because I cannot see any mentions of weather-dependent special arrangements from relevant bus companies. Therefore, closing this.
514066 (iD)12016-02-16 11:06opened海怡教育(鯉景灣分校)海怡教育(鯉景灣分校)
22017-07-18 08:39commentedRichard923888okhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E6%B5%B7%E6%80%A1%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2(%E9%AF%89%E6%99%AF%E7%81%A3%E5%88%86%E6%A0%A1)
32025-06-16 14:39closedvectorial8192Following a similarly-named Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/HaiY.i.LKW/ thus revealed a dead link website https://haiyi.com.hk/ . Both are very convincing circumstantial evidences this tutorial center really is/was located here. With this dead link, I will presume the tutorial center is closed. Therefore, resolving and closing this.
4150043 (iD)12024-03-12 12:01openedAre these quarantine facilities still here?
22024-04-07 23:51commentedvectorial8192Facilities are still here but are largely unused; however also not abandoned with minimal maintenance.
32025-06-16 12:48closedKovoschizChanged to `disused:*=`
4709030 (iD)12025-04-13 15:23openedvectorial8192todo: KCR-side Kowloon Tong station correctly map the (underground) train station building.
22025-06-15 10:38closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167644930 ; closing.
4692689 (iD)12025-04-02 09:58openedvectorial8192Eminent Domain in progress
22025-06-13 12:56closedvectorial8192Eventually resolved by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167574552 . That's a very unexpected and ugly event. Resolving.
4803571 (iD)12025-06-13 01:14openedhellowillayNot the Cattle Depot Artist Village building, the correct building is the rectangle building behind it to the bottom left
22025-06-13 01:14closedhellowillay
32025-06-13 01:14reopenedhellowillay
42025-06-13 04:09closedKovoschizNo problem here. What you are looking at is the entire site's icon coincidentally overlapping with it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225873669 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225873672
4795501 (iD)12025-06-08 11:51openedHKMapper1Unable to answer "Which direction leads upwards here?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/750364456 via StreetComplete 61.1: Both up and down
22025-06-10 11:46commentedvectorial8192Hi there, do you know whether the escalators are both-sideways or front-back? And do you know which side escalator goes up?
32025-06-11 13:41closedKovoschizThis is not what it's asking. `incline=` is only about which side is upwards, not the direction of movement (or escalator).
42025-06-11 13:43reopenedKovoschiz
52025-06-11 13:43closedKovoschizAlso something has already wrongly used `escalator=up`
62025-06-11 17:17reopenedvectorial8192
72025-06-11 17:17commentedvectorial8192It is entirely possible that irl has 2 escalators instead of 1, which would then cancel the entire discussion. Reopening this.
82025-06-11 17:19closedvectorial8192Oh, @Kovoschiz I see you have found out about the "2 escalator" situation before my comment. I now see/agree this is resolved.
4798398 (iD)12025-06-10 06:42openedstart point
22025-06-10 09:13closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4796542 (iD)12025-06-09 01:17opened不知名地点
22025-06-09 11:58closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
3518439 (iD)12023-01-14 19:12opened香港一樓一掃樓專員香港四大鳳樓 https://t.me/hk141channel
22025-06-08 12:54closedHF Studio
4785480 (iD)12025-06-01 15:37opened方糖燕窩甜品
22025-06-01 16:11closedTo Meet You Nice方糖燕窩甜品
4756694 (iD)12025-05-13 10:59openedRobin J"Shut down" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-04-18T15:38:17Z POI name: 川婆婆 Chuan Po Po POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android
22025-05-31 11:18closedWright OneRenamed in changeset 167007750
4781601 (iD)12025-05-30 09:51opened1123
22025-05-31 05:25closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4760765 (iD)12025-05-15 14:53openedvectorial8192Potential long temporary reduction of speed due to T4 works
22025-05-28 04:25closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166851324 ; closing.
2468575 (iD)12020-12-21 04:22openedLeekittythere is a dirty footpath down to the Yau Oi Village water-tank. It is shown on the app MyMapHK from gov.hk. This small narrow path is walkable for hiking
22025-05-28 04:17closedvectorial8192If referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446719381 , then we already have such path. Therefore, closing.
4770583 (iD)12025-05-22 09:10openedehcchanWork in progress (May 2025)
22025-05-28 04:13closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166680931 by others; closing.
4642899 (iD)12025-02-26 13:32openedvectorial8192name:zh of building?
22025-05-12 07:47closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:14reopenedvectorial8192
42025-05-13 08:14commentedvectorial8192Not done yet; please don't resolve!
52025-05-27 05:36closedWright OneResolved in changeset 166806635
4631876 (iD)12025-02-18 09:36openedmaxso216elevator to bridge #OsmAnd
22025-05-21 15:18closedvectorial8192Can't see elevator here. Closing.
32025-05-26 10:34reopenedmaxso216
42025-05-26 10:37commentedmaxso216There is an elevator for connection between the bridge across the Z block and main campus to public access at ground floor
52025-05-26 15:34closedvectorial8192If you are talking about the south side, then I can't see it. Closing.
4771561 (iD)12025-05-23 05:34opened22.25478,114.19601
22025-05-24 06:51closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4770587 (iD)12025-05-22 09:12openedehcchanWork in progress (May 2025)
22025-05-23 04:36closedKovoschiz
4770272 (iD)12025-05-22 03:01opened長沙灣政府合署
22025-05-22 14:59closedvectorial8192Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158899311 ; closing.
4741950 (iD)12025-05-04 14:08openedvectorial8192Chek Lap Kok Road: is standard highway but has no speed limit?
22025-05-18 07:05closed楊展博
32025-05-18 11:13reopenedvectorial8192
42025-05-18 11:13commentedvectorial8192Please do not resolve notes without context; in fact it should be obvious there is a discussion going on here.
52025-05-22 03:27closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166592241 ; closing.
4597047 (iD)12025-01-22 01:37opened護慰天使喪親支援服務
22025-05-21 17:48closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166580381 ; closing.
4544780 (iD)12024-12-06 07:11openedGOIP Grouphttps://goipgroup.com GOIP provide a variety of telecom services including Global Internet DIA, MPLS VPN solutions, Dwdm, SOC Security Operation Center, NOC Network Opeartion Center, Managed SD Wan services, Cloud Connectivity, Global Data Centre facilities, Data backup / migration and System Integration for small and large corporate communities.
22025-05-21 17:31closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166579706 ; closing.
4744558 (iD)12025-05-06 02:57openedvectorial8192todo: review correct bridge layers
22025-05-21 15:57closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166575687 ; closing.
2101450 (iD)12020-02-25 08:48openedNs luxury
22025-04-14 15:03commentedvectorial8192This https://www.facebook.com/nsluxurybox/ says it is located at 8 Hart Avenue
32025-05-21 15:18closedvectorial8192Indeed, this is located at 8 Hart Avenue, which means, wrong location. Therefore, closing.
789966 (iD)12016-11-20 16:44opened名品 Famous Leather Care
22016-11-28 18:21closedLo KaKa
32016-11-28 18:21reopenedLo KaKa
42022-04-08 09:29closedOK788
52022-04-15 13:58reopenedKovoschiz
62022-04-15 13:58closedKovoschizPlease don't mass-resolve without comments.
72022-04-15 13:58reopenedKovoschiz
82025-03-07 15:11commentedvectorial8192Online sources say this is at 6/F Kimberly Plaza (45 - 47), but might actually be closed; go confirm this.
92025-05-21 15:17closedvectorial8192Indeed, this is closed. Nothing to do here. Therefore, closing. In the future we probably need a different way of handling these "free hanging" cases; it's getting stupid to just go there to confirm whether the thing actually exists.
4767849 (iD)12025-05-20 09:13openedvectorial8192Reconstruction
22025-05-21 15:16closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166574084 ; closing.
4756442 (iD)12025-05-13 07:32openedOne Pace·117 一步居·117
22025-05-21 15:08closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166573830 ; closing.
2128691 (iD)12020-03-24 15:18opened不存在路徑
22025-05-18 05:07closed楊展博
32025-05-19 08:11reopenedKovoschiz
4744567 (iD)12025-05-06 03:35opened官方路牌警告有山泥傾瀉風險，仍可通過
22025-05-18 05:07closed楊展博
32025-05-19 08:11reopenedKovoschiz
4302737 (iD)12024-06-22 11:08openedtomyan112Sum Yi
22025-05-18 13:37commentedvectorial8192This is not actually mapped?
32025-05-18 15:30closedtomyan112The shop is closed now.
4651185 (iD)12025-03-04 15:07openedvectorial8192Exhibition hall probably closed.
22025-05-18 14:23closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166433520 ; closing.
4302734 (iD)12024-06-22 11:07openedtomyan112Blossom Garden
22025-05-18 13:34closedvectorial8192Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000760003 ; closing.
4302743 (iD)12024-06-22 11:10openedtomyan112HealthCare Medical Centre
22025-05-18 13:33closedvectorial8192Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000623251 ; closing.
4302736 (iD)12024-06-22 11:07openedtomyan112McDonald's
22025-05-18 13:32closedvectorial8192Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000695690 ; closing.
3915496 (iD)12023-09-30 10:56opened飲用水（盛水式水機）
22025-05-18 11:23closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166426241 ; closing.
4759542 (iD)12025-05-15 00:11opened[飲用水] 廁所外設有加水機
22025-05-18 11:19closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166426085 ; closing.
4049857 (iD)12024-01-02 10:37openedPeter NewmanUnable to answer "How many cars can be charged here at the same time?" for https://osm.org/node/3494444748 via StreetComplete 55.1: Probably device rather than car charging
22024-03-05 09:35commentedvectorial8192Agree with the mobile phone charging type. However, there currently seems to have no global consensus on how to tag *mobile phone* charging stations.
32024-10-16 13:30commentedvectorial8192Update: it seems a new tag is available https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddevice_charging_station
42024-10-16 13:48commentedPeter NewmanI should clarify from my "probably" I'm not sure I actually eyeballed this specific unit to check it either way, just noted it was inside an airport so probably wasn't car charging. Although from your "agree" did you actually look at it then @vectorial8192
52024-10-16 16:59commentedvectorial8192I never physically looked at the irl situation, but "obviously" it is not EV charging Will have to leave this open until god knows when
62025-05-18 05:08closed楊展博
72025-05-18 10:49reopenedPeter Newman
82025-05-18 10:50commentedPeter NewmanHi @楊展博 could you be a bit clearer about why you've resolved the note. You don't seem to have touched the node. Is it actually for charging vehicles?
92025-05-18 11:10commentedvectorial8192Guy was/is recently around resolving notes with no explanation.
4761436 (iD)12025-05-16 04:59openedvectorial8192Highway connection does not have speed limit?
22025-05-17 07:42closedvectorial8192Route 7 ends with a merge with Route 5. Here is not Route 7. Situation normal. Therefore, resolving.
4761699 (iD)12025-05-16 08:08opened1
22025-05-16 13:22closedvectorial8192No. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes > For example never create notes such as "I was here on Saturday" or "There was a crime at this location".
4745192 (iD)12025-05-06 12:25openedMateusz Koniecznyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1299465483 is it really amenity=bank and shop=supermarket at the same time?
22025-05-15 15:00commentedvectorial8192I think it's a tagging mistake.
32025-05-15 16:37commentedvectorial8192I think it's an iD editor situation where the supermarket preset did not remove the bank tagging.
42025-05-15 16:37closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166314019 ; closing.
4704090 (iD)12025-04-10 13:45openedvectorial8192todo: MTR-side Kowloon Tong station changeover to "polygon is station" notation, or at least mark the station polygon correctly for correct OSM rendering.
22025-05-15 15:33closedvectorial8192Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166310901 ; closing.
4756198 (iD)12025-05-13 01:51opened屎
22025-05-13 08:28closedKovoschizhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes Notes is a core feature of the OpenStreetMap.org website. It enables you to add a comment on the map to assist others in mapping/editing OpenStreetMap. Other users can respond to your notes, for example to ask for additional details if necessary. Please do not use notes for general discussion or storing inf...
4756215 (iD)12025-05-13 02:47opened[飲用水] 此處設有加水機
2900892 (iD)12021-10-18 13:32openedWhcohi鏡蓉坑 / 龜禾石澗
22025-05-12 08:27closed楊展博