Open OSM notes of Hong Kong (Limit 500)
Id#Tmstmp UTCActionContributorComment
1385516 (iD)12026-02-05 09:18commentedvectorial8192This is already new in the grander scheme of things. Look at older designs e.g. Wang Fuk Court next door, that one is old because it has a semi-open access control, which allows surveying and therefore has public interest.
5150715 (iD)12026-02-03 16:55commentedvectorial8192My criteria is to split the ways so that we can have a clear mapping of the (staggered) pedestrian crossings. This doesn't happen regularly so I am not too concerned about scalability, though with continuing urbanization, we will find more and more of this "single -> double" case from irl-upgrading signaled crossings. With me starting to know how ...
5152477 (iD)12026-02-03 02:56openedHenryEKnode 5745603464 seems to no longer exist and is just a blank mount where the attraction once was as of yesterday https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5745603464
3149177 (iD)12026-02-02 14:16commentedkingkingHKUnfortunately, 819.8 m only started appearing in government maps from 1994, meaning we would need to wait until 2044. This note is virtually unactionable unless we somehow triangulate the elevation.
5034332 (iD)12026-02-02 08:54commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5043144 (iD)12026-02-02 08:53commentedkingkingHKIndeed.
5043056 (iD)12026-02-02 08:41commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a power substation here, seemingly built with the data centre.
5065720 (iD)12026-02-02 08:10commentedvectorial8192By survey, there's nothing here.
5151410 (iD)12026-02-02 07:46commentedKovoschizI don't think duplex has such a definition. They are structural only, without regards to sideyard in the lot. It should be further distinguished there, not changed to `=terraced` for this.
5151351 (iD)12026-02-02 02:31openedAAFmapper"Seems to be gone in favor of Lung Fung Mall" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-25T13:04:34Z POI name: 屈臣氏 Watsons POI types: shop-chemist amenity-pharmacy #organicmaps ...
5150201 (iD)12026-02-01 14:46commentedvectorial8192My armchair says that the road is ownership=private
3154260 (iD)12026-02-01 13:34commentedkingkingHKGovernment maps say "Wo Hop Shek Columbarium Phase II & Phase IV" is a building, not an open area. Survey needed.
5052159 (iD)12026-02-01 12:33commentedkingkingHKAgree with your thought. Old maps show the power line being constructed in the early 1970s, around the same time Shun Lee Estate was being developed. I also doubt a large voltage change is possible without some structures visible from aerial imagery. However, the west side was also changed from 400 kV to 132 kV by the same DWG-blocked user in the ...
1684719 (iD)12026-02-01 11:45commentedvectorial8192Honourable, but this is extra rural. Might not be worth it.
5150364 (iD)12026-02-01 10:53openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213995468 construction finished?
2414889 (iD)12026-02-01 07:59commentedkingkingHK...why would you resolve a note while admitting you don't have enough information to do so? Anyway, survey needed. But this might be difficult.
5150198 (iD)12026-02-01 07:51openedkingkingHKtodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002255941 etc descriptive name
5146803 (iD)12026-01-30 04:12commentedkingkingHKThen, sounds like this stop has simply expanded, and the platform moved.
5034358 (iD)12026-01-29 09:57commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5034359 (iD)12026-01-29 09:57commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5034356 (iD)12026-01-29 09:57commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5034355 (iD)12026-01-29 09:57commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5025035 (iD)12026-01-28 14:38commentedvectorial8192Wait, fixme was raised by Kovoschiz; discussion needed.
5122127 (iD)12026-01-28 14:14commentedvectorial8192This shop is probably closed; we got another one elsewhere (see https://www.taikwun.hk/en/lifestyle_enjoyment/shop/sushi-masa-black-and-masa-lounge/122 ).
5117986 (iD)12026-01-27 05:41reopenedCypp0847
5101282 (iD)12026-01-26 13:26commentedvectorial8192Work is further improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177677477
5034400 (iD)12026-01-25 15:03commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5034406 (iD)12026-01-25 15:03commentedkingkingHKIndeed it is.
5098788 (iD)12026-01-25 08:52commentedvectorial8192More context: This https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2406459615 points to this https://www.ylsyk.edu.hk/ , which seems embedded into the church.
2434008 (iD)12026-01-25 08:17commentedvectorial8192The armchair thought is, if the company is closed, then it can't possibly have any in-use features irl. What remains would be e.g. abandoned:building=yes Then, if we don't already have their info on OSM, then we might as well don't do it, and e.g. close the relevant notes. I rather add in-use features in urban areas than to add possibly abandoned ...
5034341 (iD)12026-01-25 08:06commentedvectorial8192I mean, I have also slowed down. I now convince myself to don't look at new notes until the previous batch is cleared. Or just create short-lived notes.
5141822 (iD)12026-01-25 05:05openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444187633 feels like a descriptive name, but I'm not sure. (Also, it should probably be "Ventilation")
3654302 (iD)12026-01-25 05:03commentedkingkingHK`population=` exists, and the 2021 census gives Tsui Chuk Garden population as 10071. However, the wiki says `population=` should only be used on `place=`.
4113548 (iD)12026-01-25 04:38commentedkingkingHKImo the problem is that you are closing a note alongside with it, which makes it much harder for everyone else to spot potential rooms for improvement. Like, if I weren't here when you closed this note, would anyone notice changing the Country Trail to `access=no` is completely incorrect? Personally I prefer to make as little guesswork/thinking a...
3980686 (iD)12026-01-25 04:16commentedkingkingHKImo a plot name is just a fancier/more formal address.
5141141 (iD)12026-01-24 13:06openedkingkingHKtodo: this has been converted to a roundabout
5105750 (iD)12026-01-24 09:57commentedkingkingHKTodo. My plan is to change all `building:part=` towers in Hong Kong to `building=`, then close this note.
5027512 (iD)12026-01-23 18:14commentedKovoschizAs in the connection https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002239786/
2598829 (iD)12026-01-22 13:55commentedkingkingHKYeah, I think it is here. No idea why it's so far from Ng Ka Tsuen.
5043137 (iD)12026-01-22 13:51commentedkingkingHKIndeed.
4306096 (iD)12026-01-22 13:51commentedkingkingHKIndeed.
4917522 (iD)12026-01-22 13:48commentedkingkingHKYeah, traffic signals have been added, and it seems like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705213882 is removed.
5034335 (iD)12026-01-22 13:45commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here.
5123548 (iD)12026-01-22 08:46commentedKovoschiz`name=茶果嶺海濱公園（園景平台） Cha Kwo Ling Promenade (Landscaped Deck)` should be wrong. That's a label for the part inside. Brackets should be presumed not proper names, only descriptive. Cf Scheduled https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap132?xpid=ID_1438402664274_001
5137708 (iD)12026-01-22 02:31commentedkingkingHKHowever, one may walk in the pedestrian tunnels, allowing for dead reckoning. The hard part would be accounting for elevation change in the footways, which might not be uniform.
5137391 (iD)12026-01-21 08:07openedFlorist
5134778 (iD)12026-01-19 05:34openedvectorial8192todo: station is too small
5063775 (iD)12026-01-18 15:03commentedvectorial8192https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_83986.html It seems it's lasting longer than expected. We can recheck this later.
5109341 (iD)12026-01-18 14:37commentedvectorial8192Yes, we may do landuse=brownfield here.
5133340 (iD)12026-01-18 04:45openedkingkingHKTodo: clean up bus relations after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176212586 , see also discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177303927
5133338 (iD)12026-01-18 04:43openedkingkingHKTodo: clean up bus relations after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175908155 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175908590 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175908754 , see also discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177303927
5132180 (iD)12026-01-17 08:16commentedvectorial8192Seems nothing to do here. For some reason there are a bunch of areas in HK that are apparently "completed" but just blocked off as if still "constructing".
5130601 (iD)12026-01-17 08:15commentedvectorial8192It mentions McDonald's. This https://mcdonalds.com.hk/en/find-a-restaurant/ says they have a McDonald's here but it isn't open 24/7. It then becomes "how should we map non-24/7 foot paths".
5035617 (iD)12026-01-17 05:47commentedkingkingHKI recently heard that this traffic signal is disused/malfunctioning with no plans of repair. This might be `disused:highway=traffic_signals`. Survey recommended.
5132152 (iD)12026-01-17 03:11openedkingkingHKTodo: add residential entrances, more indoor footways, indoor details, etc. (continuing from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5104381)
5129081 (iD)12026-01-14 13:36openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889581234 construction probably finished, according to aerial imagery.
5128950 (iD)12026-01-14 12:21openedMissing Location: 保仕 乾洗公司 地舖, Shun Pont Commercial Building, 9號 Thomson Rd, Wan Chai
5128949 (iD)12026-01-14 12:20openedMissing Location: 保美洗衣 灣仔盧押道11-13號修頓商業大廈
5128947 (iD)12026-01-14 12:20openedMissing Location: 天天洗衣 Daily Laundry 灣仔莊士敦道36-42號聯發大廈地下36A1舖
5128946 (iD)12026-01-14 12:19openedMissing Location: Sunshine Laundry Convenience Store 自助洗衣店 http://www.sunshinelaundry.com.hk/
5128944 (iD)12026-01-14 12:19opened清深洗衣專門店 Oceanic Laundry Shop 灣仔晏頓街1號安定大廈
5128943 (iD)12026-01-14 12:19openedMissing Location: British Dry Cleaners 英商乾洗 灣仔月街7號 http://www.britishdrycleaners.com/
5128917 (iD)12026-01-14 12:12opened海豚洗衣24h（堅尼地厚和街店）Dolphin Laundry 24h（Hau Wo Street Store） 堅尼地城厚和街41號厚和閣地下c(41)鋪
5128916 (iD)12026-01-14 12:12opened域是乾洗 堅尼地城吉席街
5128915 (iD)12026-01-14 12:12opened晴天專業洗衣服務 堅尼地城厚和街49號Shop A2
5128914 (iD)12026-01-14 12:11openedGoodwins of London (Kennedy Town Shop) 乾洗店 堅尼地城卑路乍街183號
5128913 (iD)12026-01-14 12:11opened家寶洗衣 西環域多利道1-15 號百年大廈一座地舖 C
5123432 (iD)12026-01-14 07:56commentedvectorial8192I will early-hint that my "exact area" is different from "continue until junction".
5128521 (iD)12026-01-14 02:50openedkingkingHKTodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813803780 name
5057844 (iD)12026-01-12 07:46commentedKovoschizWhat's the difference of 2 points with existing?
758446 (iD)12026-01-11 04:28commentedkingkingHKI was looking at https://www.hkmaps.hk/viewer.html and selected the "1975.1" map. Now after looking into this deeper, I think the "year n" maps on that website actually means "latest map available by year n" instead of "maps drawn on year n" as government map tiles don't update yearly. Looking at https://www.hkmapservice.gov.hk/OneStopSystem/map-se...
5037695 (iD)12026-01-08 10:10commentedkingkingHKSeems like it has.
5115217 (iD)12026-01-03 11:39commentedkingkingHKReviving with parent note.
5037709 (iD)12026-01-03 11:25commentedkingkingHKYes, that's why I made this note so that someone in the future can check the current state when they pass by.
5034376 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4025846 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4015897 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
2046829 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
2690777 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4137978 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5034435 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4978548 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4015896 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5034434 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5086249 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
2087499 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4029950 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
1655004 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
3055825 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
861105 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
939664 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
1036042 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
4019647 (iD)12026-01-03 09:33commentedkmpoppeThis note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists.
5115204 (iD)12026-01-03 08:09commentedvectorial8192Meta-Note: this note helps others to more conveniently notice/click other notes.
5115205 (iD)12026-01-03 08:09commentedvectorial8192Meta-Note: this note helps others to more conveniently notice/click other notes.
2218616 (iD)12026-01-03 02:41commentedkingkingHKNot done yet; please don't resolve!
2218614 (iD)12026-01-03 02:41commentedkingkingHKNot done yet; please don't resolve!
5036094 (iD)12026-01-03 02:40commentedkingkingHKNot done yet; please don't resolve!
5112232 (iD)12025-12-31 11:49openedvectorial8192https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17147569 Country trail is split in half after 2023 rainstorms (notice the concrete retaining covers); see if it has been redesignated / respecified.
5106613 (iD)12025-12-27 14:42commentedvectorial8192For example: Look at ESRI imagery. It shows a west-side construction yard road into the Testing Institute. Does this still exist? The Married Quarters bus stop seems like a bus bay. Is this true? Construction is largely finished, which means the jersey barriers (aerial imagery) should e gone. What replaces them (if exists)? etc.
5058584 (iD)12025-12-25 14:34commentedvectorial8192I have no idea why, but I seem to keep reading about new judicial resolutions way into December. I do not know whether there are more ongoing judicial cases.
5091914 (iD)12025-12-25 14:33commentedvectorial8192Community guides suggest doing it in JOSM, not in iD editor. I will leave this to the public transport mappers.
5099408 (iD)12025-12-25 13:01commentedvectorial8192still pretty raw imo
5079402 (iD)12025-12-18 10:04commentedkingkingHKAfaik if there's something physical (e.g. a monument) saying that it is a movie filming location, it might pass at a tourist attraction. However, I could not find anything here, so I think we can simply delete it.
5034471 (iD)12025-12-18 09:56commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034469 (iD)12025-12-18 09:56commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034468 (iD)12025-12-18 09:55commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5093778 (iD)12025-12-16 13:57commentedkingkingHK1. Escalator from ground level 2. Eastbound platform is at the same level and is connected to Tuen Mun MTR Station. I am not sure if passengers can go from the westbound platform to Tuen Mun MTR without going to ground level first, though. IIRC no at-grade crossing across the tracks.
5034442 (iD)12025-12-14 09:33commentedvectorial8192Interestingly, it seems there are 2 entrances: one at the low side (Queen's Road), and another at the high side (Hospital Road). Will need to look at this again.
5036097 (iD)12025-12-13 14:12commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034350 (iD)12025-12-13 14:10commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034352 (iD)12025-12-13 14:10commentedkingkingHKIndeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5078742 (iD)12025-12-11 18:11commentedKovoschizNo https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2024-05-13#Ticket#2024040710000103_–_Database_for_importing_license_question
5087537 (iD)12025-12-11 17:07openedvectorial8192todo: Some clinics have generic names, which may be improved.
4756215 (iD)12025-12-10 12:56commentedvectorial8192Very believable, but that's gonna be very difficult to irl-verify.
5077746 (iD)12025-12-10 12:34commentedkingkingHKCan be "informal name" / "loc_name", commonly used by people from that area but not officially recognise. However, this might be difficult to verify.
4957095 (iD)12025-12-07 10:32commentedvectorial8192Not too familiar with railway mapping myself, but it seems almost all segments implicitly have `oneway=reversible`; why this needs to be stated clearly idk. The idea is that at this moment, `oneway=?` is some value, but for another moment, `oneway=?` becomes another value, therefore `=reversible`. Trains may use "the opposite rail" depending on dep...
5078375 (iD)12025-12-04 09:12openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433769 What is this? Does this actually exist?
5078374 (iD)12025-12-04 09:12openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433869 What is this? Does this actually exist?
5065723 (iD)12025-12-03 12:32commentedkingkingHK* So the intention of this note is to check if there's anything physical indicating a (mini)bus stop at this location
4691875 (iD)12025-12-03 11:46reopenedvectorial8192
5073245 (iD)12025-11-30 06:03commentedHenryEKThe hydrographic office writes that "航海人員不宜在爆炸品傾倒區內錨泊、拖綱或進行其他水低或海床作業。Mariners should avoid anchoring, trawling or carrying out any submarine or seabed activities in the explosives dumping ground." on their "charts for local vessels"
5034364 (iD)12025-11-16 10:31commentedvectorial8192This https://www.ha.org.hk/visitor/ha_visitor_index.asp?Content_ID=200250&Lang=CHIB5&Dimension=100&Parent_ID=10052 The government announcement for the renaming eventually led to this page. Upon rechecking, it seems I might have misread the list... But still, this location is likely to have a Family Medicine Clinic.
5036099 (iD)12025-11-03 12:45openedkingkingHKNow that "將軍澳賽馬會普通科門診診所 Tseung Kwan O Jockey Club General Out-patient Clinic" has been renamed to "將軍澳賽馬會家庭醫學診所 Tseung Kwan O Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic", has there been any changes to the bus stops' naming?
5034438 (iD)12025-11-02 14:50openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034370 (iD)12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034361 (iD)12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034344 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034343 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034338 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034337 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5016316 (iD)12025-10-27 14:05commentedkingkingHKSee also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware: https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814 https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410 Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything ...
1499178 (iD)12025-10-22 08:49commentedKovoschiz`=bad` can be on empty land. Should check the `obstacle=vegetation`, and decide whether it's `disused=yes` or even `abandoned:highway=`
5009959 (iD)12025-10-17 07:18openedMateusz Koniecznyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993410749/history requires fix so that name key carry actual name currently it is name=Kuan Yam Temple (small) name:en=Kuan Yam Temple (small) see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
4577980 (iD)12025-10-12 06:16commentedHenryEKso its just gonna stay like this then?
4922350 (iD)12025-09-30 12:46commentedvectorial8192* as in exists in the OSM map data
3145328 (iD)12025-09-11 12:30commentedkingkingHKAt least when I attempted to visit the location of this note today, there was a guard dog stopping people from getting close. Might be difficult to verify this note if the situation persists.
2641485 (iD)12025-08-21 17:39commentedvectorial8192Hi there, it seems the relevant paths may have become available (new OSM edits), may you confirm whether the foot paths / steps are really accessible?
4888375 (iD)12025-08-08 14:15commentedvectorial8192Changeset is controversal; reviving.
4895339 (iD)12025-08-06 12:06openedkingkingHKMost of the village is unmapped
2128691 (iD)12025-05-19 08:11reopenedKovoschiz
4744567 (iD)12025-05-19 08:11reopenedKovoschiz
4049857 (iD)12025-05-18 11:10commentedvectorial8192Guy was/is recently around resolving notes with no explanation.
4434946 (iD)12025-05-06 14:28commentedvectorial8192Worst case this will wait for YOHO WEST Phase 2 to complete, which is expected to be in 2026.
3304147 (iD)12025-02-12 22:24commentedti-loSeems to work in a bunch of cases https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:*:type
4490712 (iD)12024-10-23 03:41opened深圳晶泰科技有限公司 XtalPi Shenzhen
3955633 (iD)12023-10-24 08:46opened有”此路不通”牌
818352 (iD)12022-09-20 07:14reopened如果菠萝油没被蛋挞打败
3100485 (iD)12022-04-14 15:32commentedWhcohidebatable location
2758068 (iD)12022-04-14 09:25commentedKovoschizNot yet added? Please don't resolve without comments if not yet worked on.
2865034 (iD)12021-09-23 00:56openedThis portion of route is blocked.
2776728 (iD)12021-07-29 14:43openedWhcohiSmall temple
2464998 (iD)12020-12-17 14:14openedDixon313Caution on degrading trail type: Joining an easy shaded mid-level concrete path (1Km, coming from Tsing Shan Monastery for CLP pylon maintenance) is a bare mud trail (400m, southbound downhill to Sun Tuen Mun Center). Unprepared leisure hikers may have to turn back here.
2337702 (iD)12020-09-06 14:33opened厕所位"廁所" POI name: 大欖郊野公園 Tai Lam Country Park POI types: boundary-national_park OSM data version: 2020-07-14T11:22:37Z #mapsme