| Id | # | Tmstmp UTC | Action | Contributor | Comment |
|---|
| 5493225 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 11:06 | commented | Kovoschiz | +1 (before you) |
| 5539576 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 09:52 | commented | kingkingHK | Survey does not seem to provide any useful info. |
| 5455237 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 09:50 | commented | kingkingHK | By survey, the shopspace is now vacant. |
| 5058584 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 09:50 | commented | kingkingHK | By survey, all buildings have been demolished. |
| 5561989 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5566209 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5590644 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-23 04:05 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet, please don't resolve! |
| 5591216 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-20 15:53 | opened | kingkingHK | What is this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1189067711 |
| 5267124 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-20 10:41 | commented | vectorial8192 | I am/was thinking this area should be primarily "fully covered", but I could be wrong; did not look in detail. |
| 5588445 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-19 06:45 | opened | marcolibrary | Unable to answer "这里有饮用水吗？如果有，其来源是什么？" – 飲用水 – https://osm.org/node/6929457118 via StreetComplete 63.4:
瓶裝與小水柱式也有
Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/378831.jpg |
| 5540564 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-18 10:35 | commented | vectorial8192 | It does not seem prudent to assume only the aforementioned "us 3" review notes. Data lag, but I am now aware of a new member who is starting to check notes. |
| 5575090 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-16 13:51 | commented | vectorial8192 | Questionable. It seems when traffic is light, shuttles may just reach the proper position and do standard boarding/alighting.
Standard (franchised) buses may perform alighting outside of the proper position when not for "Alighting Stop" (similar to here), but we do not mark those positions as platform_exit_only. Similar arguments may apply here.
... |
| 5351891 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-15 13:15 | commented | vectorial8192 | 1/F to 4/F https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190551718 |
| 5449549 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-15 09:41 | commented | HenryEK | no, theres a small strip of road for the parking lot below the hkia community building |
| 5476355 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-15 08:34 | commented | vectorial8192 | Alright, we can try to figure out HKU access rights and then perhaps do this note. |
| 5567816 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-12 05:10 | opened | marcolibrary | Unable to answer "站台有遮雨棚吗？" – 華富商場 Wah Fu Commercial Complex (巴士站) – https://osm.org/node/3001890559 via StreetComplete 63.4:
巴士站已暫時停用 |
| 5567804 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-12 04:28 | opened | marcolibrary | Unable to answer "站台有遮雨棚吗？" – 崇文街 Tsung Man Street (巴士站) – https://osm.org/node/6327072225 via StreetComplete 63.4:
巴士站已因工程停用 |
| 2776728 (iD) | 1 | 2026-10-10 18:15 | reopened | Qqqhdhdjz | |
| 5480465 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-29 09:09 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 3955633 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-29 09:09 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5220076 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-22 09:24 | commented | Kovoschiz | Waiting for the geocoder to refresh |
| 4691875 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-21 20:05 | commented | Kenkton | True, but you do then have a private space. The most reason capsule I stayed in in London, Zedwell Piccadilly isn't just enclosed bunk beds. I get your point though. |
| 5394365 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-20 07:30 | commented | HenryEK | i havent paid much attention but the surrounding is mostly unchanged so id assume that applies to the staircase too |
| 5525391 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-18 18:30 | commented | Kovoschiz | Agreed |
| 5525321 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-18 09:43 | opened | kingkingHK | Is the construction of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046775072 complete? |
| 5519924 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-16 15:58 | commented | vectorial8192 | We see the company was (to be) dissolved https://www.stheadline.com/society/3272362/%E9%80%A3%E9%8E%96%E6%99%AE%E9%80%9A%E8%A9%B1%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E4%B8%AD%E5%BF%83101%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%9B%86%E5%9C%98%E9%81%AD%E7%94%B3%E6%B8%85%E7%9B%A4-1115%E6%8F%90%E8%A8%8A |
| 4019647 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-16 11:24 | reopened | Kovoschiz | |
| 5511938 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-10 17:08 | opened | 1F616EMO | Residence No. 10 is still used by "Paid Shuttle Light Buses", but is no longer used by shuttle buses. The stop should not be removed - instead, consider mapping the light bus route. |
| 5503023 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-06 14:13 | opened | Obanazawa Kuri | mini roundabout
#OsmAnd |
| 5486474 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-06 13:01 | commented | vectorial8192 | We have https://www.yunlee.com.hk/ but it does not mention any of its maintenance facilities. |
| 5417944 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-06 11:12 | commented | kingkingHK | 1. How do you know the note creator got the "Hinduistic" part correct?
2. If you don't know, why do you still close the note with a useless changeset? |
| 5497226 (iD) | 1 | 2026-09-03 15:24 | opened | awhchk | Street has been opened (not sure for how long):
* Road surface is paved in some kind of blue asphalt.
* The street is cut short by about half in length?
* The end is a turning circle (protruding to the SE side) with plastic bollards (red-and-white pillars) blocking the centre; there are double solid white lines with diagonal hatching prohibiting d... |
| 5417923 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-29 09:51 | commented | vectorial8192 | I'm gonna maintain my stance of "armchair contextually impossible" but I am open to let someone else look at this. Could be "rural informal/temporary toilet" but I still think this is contextually unlikely.
Unsubscribing. |
| 5474739 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-24 08:28 | opened | Dionysus books | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z
POI name: Anthony's Kitchen
POI types: cuisine-international amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps ios 2026.07.23-6-ios |
| 5474737 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-24 08:28 | opened | Dionysus books | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe cuisine-coffee_shop
#organicmaps ios 2026.07.23-6-ios |
| 5474738 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-24 08:28 | opened | Dionysus books | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z
POI has no name
POI types: cuisine-breakfast cuisine-deli cuisine-international cuisine-sandwich amenity-restaurant cuisine-veget... |
| 5474736 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-24 08:28 | opened | Dionysus books | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z
POI has no name
POI types: cuisine-breakfast amenity-cafe cuisine-cake cuisine-coffee_shop
#organicmaps ios 2026.07.23-6-ios |
| 5457439 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-15 12:12 | opened | flightwastaken | The staircase to 格仔山小徑 is blocked and under construction as of 14/08/2026 |
| 5443429 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-13 07:54 | commented | Kovoschiz | Ps: Many of them either don't have a feature for the waters at all, or no another feautre enclosing both land and water. I'm guess users have not thought about spatially related them. |
| 5296607 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-05 15:07 | commented | vectorial8192 | Distinct from (but is also highly relevant to) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5296561 . For management convenience, progress is to be recorded over there. |
| 5437432 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-05 02:00 | opened | John Nevzer Avrung | "The path goes only to some grave/nowhere and is officaly closed."
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-28T06:39:58Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-grave_yard
#CoMaps android 2026.07.16-10-FDroid |
| 5437431 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-05 02:00 | opened | John Nevzer Avrung | "Gate on wrong path - only on service path/stairs, in that place is only sighn with warning."
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-28T06:39:58Z
POI has no name
POI types: barrier-gate
#CoMaps android 2026.07.16-10-FDroid |
| 5437429 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-05 02:00 | opened | John Nevzer Avrung | Higly dangerous route without safety equepment.
On this part of path missing a ropes and you walk on slippery stones few meter above sea.
The coast route is not a path, it is more as easy ferates.
#CoMaps android 2026.07.16-10-FDroid |
| 5432688 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-04 15:59 | commented | vectorial8192 | Indeed well-accessible, but this feels like a waste of time; my instincts say the business is a fake. |
| 5425960 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-04 13:01 | commented | vectorial8192 | Website https://www.hksh-emc.com/en/contact-us/index.php
says construction is completed. We may see this is a multi-building / multi-plot facility. |
| 5432689 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-03 15:42 | commented | vectorial8192 | Conceptual duplicate; spiritual redirect https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5432688 |
| 3304147 (iD) | 1 | 2026-08-02 09:28 | commented | vectorial8192 | That was 6 months ago. It was definitely not final back then, but now I have some more (concrete) ideas, which was written down in this note. Still, pretty sure we are almost there. |
| 3654302 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-31 13:14 | commented | vectorial8192 | General blunder by past self for suggesting to recheck level/unit correctness. I can't seem to find any usable sources for this, but supposedly there should be ancient sales brochures which should contain these info.
Unsubscribing for now. |
| 5374730 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-29 14:48 | commented | vectorial8192 | I have read that the park is unavailable until October:
https://www.hk01.com/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E/60349826/%E9%AF%89%E9%AD%9A%E9%96%80%E5%85%AC%E5%9C%92-%E6%B8%AF%E7%89%88%E7%81%AB%E7%A5%9E%E5%B1%B1-%E9%9A%94%E9%9B%A2%E8%A8%AD%E6%96%BD%E6%8B%86%E8%B5%B0-%E5%85%AC%E5%9C%926-1%E8%B5%B7%E6%9A%AB%E5%81%9C%E9%96%8B%E6%94%BE4%E5%80%8B%E6... |
| 5374702 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-29 14:47 | commented | vectorial8192 | I have read that the park is unavailable until October:
https://www.hk01.com/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E/60349826/%E9%AF%89%E9%AD%9A%E9%96%80%E5%85%AC%E5%9C%92-%E6%B8%AF%E7%89%88%E7%81%AB%E7%A5%9E%E5%B1%B1-%E9%9A%94%E9%9B%A2%E8%A8%AD%E6%96%BD%E6%8B%86%E8%B5%B0-%E5%85%AC%E5%9C%926-1%E8%B5%B7%E6%9A%AB%E5%81%9C%E9%96%8B%E6%94%BE4%E5%80%8B%E6... |
| 5407288 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-20 16:25 | opened | timonoj | This place does not exist:
"Shop closed over a year ago i think. Now it's a hair treatment center."
A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T04:20:21Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#CoMaps android 2026.07.16-10-FDroid |
| 1499178 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-18 15:54 | commented | vectorial8192 | Very disappointing. I believe I should further elaborate my "very difficult" point at Discord.
Unsubscribing. |
| 2464998 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-16 16:05 | commented | vectorial8192 | OK, now that you are getting into the details, let's briefly dive in.
Who made those maps? (HK or UK?)
If UK, then yes Crown Copyright (the OG one), and Open Government Licence. Proceed.
If HK, then while it largely "starts off" from UK Crown Copyright, it notably has diverged post-1997. Legal reading is required, but I have some quick findings:... |
| 5304217 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-16 15:47 | commented | vectorial8192 | This is getting nowhere. What I am suggesting is that the probability of OP forgetting the housenumbers is much larger than the probability that the OP simply did not know the housenumbers.
Then @kingkingHK how can you be sure that OP definitely didn't know? That it is definitely not human error? I gave example of how human error can contribute to... |
| 5394704 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-14 06:05 | opened | | This is the location of the new UPS Hub that is under construction. See (1) https://www.bd.gov.hk/doc/en/whats-new/monthly-digests/Amendment_MD54_Mar_2026e.pdf — this shows that the new UPS Hub is at 7 Catering Road West — and (2) https://about.ups.com/us/en/newsroom/press-releases/customer-first/ups-to-boost-global-trade-with-enhanced-operati... |
| 5394702 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-14 05:59 | opened | | GSEL has moved out. This will be the location of the new UPS Hub. |
| 5383053 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-13 02:44 | commented | vectorial8192 | Videos are not usable on OSM (copyright concerns), but maybe existing traffic notices by the TD can explain the scope of expressway.
Still, We can do a site visit to try to see if we have any effective hints on the actual Route 5 scope. |
| 5270671 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-12 04:08 | commented | kingkingHK | Not too sure what you mean by "sectional scan", but future reference:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=22.374573389378966&lng=113.98710550320993&z=18.736745870469665&pKey=1016588394374034&focus=photo
and other images in the same capture. |
| 4434946 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 13:52 | commented | vectorial8192 | Seeing no updates to this note, perhaps I may ask some extra questions.
Given that the observed dimensions are different from the OSM mapped dimensions, how different are both measurements? Is it because e.g. the platforms are shifted along some direction, which is not in OSM? |
| 5376252 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 10:15 | commented | HenryEK | already present - node/26412912 - although improvements can be done to it i guess |
| 5374762 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 14:16 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 西湾棱堡及西湾山炮台 |
| 5374582 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 13:40 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 旧鲤鱼门军营第二十五座（军官食堂） |
| 5374577 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 13:38 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 旧鲤鱼门军营第十座（皇家炮兵团军官宿舍） |
| 5374569 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 13:35 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 旧鲤鱼门军营第七座（皇家炮兵团军官宿舍） |
| 5300387 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-25 16:14 | commented | vectorial8192 | We are probably looking at the neis-one statistics. For fair comparison we should be looking at city-states (or equivalent), which I can list as Macau, Singapore, Gibraltar, and Liechtenstein; we should not be looking at "full countries", though the German 95% is very impressive.
As of writing, LI 98%, HK 97%, SG 89%, MO 87%, GI 80%. LI has best "... |
| 5249442 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-16 08:50 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 4607075 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-14 07:36 | commented | Kovoschiz | https://www.hongkongairport.com/en/sustainability/environment/water.page https://www.hidropolitikakademi.org/en/article/31251/hong-kong-airports-triple-water-system |
| 3154260 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-12 11:41 | commented | Kovoschiz | Sites meaning eg "Wo Hop Shek Columbarium". The phases should be something else. Or it depends on whether they are different facilities.
The other problem is whether the 2 phases are different. If yes, they should be separated. |
| 4957095 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-12 10:23 | commented | kingkingHK | Agree with your workaround, but the HK OSM wiki pages look kinda abandoned. We might want to clean them up first, before adding any new info. |
| 5326149 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-08 18:11 | commented | Kovoschiz | Skytopia only includes the quarantine facility, and waters. Doesn't say the Clearance Building belongs to AA. |
| 5180357 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-30 11:59 | commented | vectorial8192 | OK, leaving open, but imo doesn't seem too interesting here; e.g., road crossing need not enter the MTR station.
Unsubscribing. |
| 2218616 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-30 08:40 | commented | kingkingHK | 38. Cross-harbour Bus 601P (Po Tat → Wing Kut Street)
39. Cross-harbour Bus 601P (Hiu Lai Court → Wing Kut Street)
40. Cross-harbour Bus 606 (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort))
41. Cross-harbour Bus 606 (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort) (via Choi Ha Road))
42. Cross-harbour Bus 606A (Choi W... |
| 5311188 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-26 13:24 | opened | Iulian Arcuș | Unable to answer "What kind of artwork is this?" – Artwork – https://osm.org/node/5018345422 via StreetComplete 63.1:
No visible artwork |
| 5311184 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-26 13:19 | opened | Iulian Arcuș | Area needs remapping. Public toilets built and plants have been modified
via StreetComplete 63.1
Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/347192.jpg |
| 5310646 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-26 08:08 | opened | Pan Perníček | Forwarding anonymous report from #mapycom user, please verify: Path doesn't exist. |
| 4978548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-25 11:02 | commented | vectorial8192 | Or maybe I have misunderstood the bridge joint tagging. |
| 5307805 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-24 14:18 | opened | KolaVenter1964 | House 213 |
| 5296627 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 07:15 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296606 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 07:10 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296585 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:51 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296580 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:46 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296578 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:45 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296577 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:43 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296576 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:42 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296561 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:34 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296560 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:32 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 3149177 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-01 16:08 | commented | vectorial8192 | I don't know all the steps, but basically "after some time" the LWG will meet up and discuss questions, and then the results will be posted to somewhere at the Wiki or sth. |
| 5269824 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-28 14:00 | opened | kingkingHK | todo/issue: review mapping of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16312559 ; probably against "relations are not categories" |
| 5264444 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 09:14 | commented | kingkingHK | https://www.pricerite.com.hk/hk/en/storeInfo/ agrees |
| 5173374 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 09:07 | commented | kingkingHK | One solution I can think of is to tag `hail_and_ride` along the section intended as a stop. |
| 5128915 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 07:05 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5128914 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 06:51 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5134778 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5214998 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-22 11:30 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213340 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Not inside. Outside tennis court."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-drinking_water
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213339 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Nothing there. Just a white wall."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: tourism-artwork
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213338 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213337 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI name: Po's atelier
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213336 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5123548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-13 06:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 2046829 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-11 17:32 | commented | Kovoschiz | It's not prohibited explicitly. But technically it seems damaging plants is illegal. |
| 2690777 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-09 04:15 | commented | kingkingHK | I would rather just map the cliff and be done with it.
Also, legally speaking, this area is located inside a drone no-fly zone, due to the low-air economy regulatory sandbox whatever. Practically speaking, no one would notice, but I am not buying a drone just for this one note. |
| 5155801 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-08 16:39 | commented | vectorial8192 | The ultimate original note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1036042 complains of the following:
"The path from 'Lai Tak Tsuen' to 'viewpoint' is impassable and dangerous. Please remove it from the map" |
| 5194221 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-07 11:44 | opened | kingkingHK | Are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173722555 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205445683 connected? |
| 5037709 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-06 11:44 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5191006 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-05 02:39 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4486222689 descriptive name; probably need to change to hail_and_ride role on route relations, which appears to be unmapped. |
| 5099408 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | Construction not yet finished, but can make a rough sketch first. |
| 2218614 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-19 12:35 | commented | kingkingHK | The following bus routes call at Ping Tin:
1. KMB 15 (Ping Tin → Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road))
2. KMB 15 (Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road) → Ping Tin)
3. KMB 15A (Ping Tin → Tsz Wan Shan (North))
4. KMB 15A (Tsz Wan Shan (North) → Ping Tin)
5. KMB 16 (Ping Tin → Mong Kok (Park Avenue))
6. KMB 38 (Ping Tin → Kwai Shing (East))
7. KMB 38 (Kwai Shi... |
| 758446 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-06 02:54 | commented | kingkingHK | Eventually, with some guidance from Kovoschiz, I figured out how to overlay historical maps onto editing software.
But then, I felt like if I am mapping a single missing stream, I might as well map all missing streams in this area, which are there hundreds of, making the changeset too big to complete in a single sitting, hence why it took me so l... |
| 1684719 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 10:45 | commented | vectorial8192 | Honourable, but this is extra rural. Might not be worth it. |
| 2414889 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 06:59 | commented | kingkingHK | ...why would you resolve a note while admitting you don't have enough information to do so? Anyway, survey needed. But this might be difficult. |
| 5150198 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 06:51 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002255941 etc descriptive name |
| 4113548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 03:38 | commented | kingkingHK | Imo the problem is that you are closing a note alongside with it, which makes it much harder for everyone else to spot potential rooms for improvement. Like, if I weren't here when you closed this note, would anyone notice changing the Country Trail to `access=no` is completely incorrect?
Personally I prefer to make as little guesswork/thinking a... |
| 5027512 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-23 17:14 | commented | Kovoschiz | As in the connection https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002239786/ |
| 5137708 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-22 02:31 | commented | kingkingHK | However, one may walk in the pedestrian tunnels, allowing for dead reckoning. The hard part would be accounting for elevation change in the footways, which might not be uniform. |
| 5132152 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-17 03:11 | opened | kingkingHK | Todo: add residential entrances, more indoor footways, indoor details, etc.
(continuing from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5104381) |
| 5128917 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 12:12 | opened | | 海豚洗衣24h（堅尼地厚和街店）Dolphin Laundry 24h（Hau Wo Street Store）
堅尼地城厚和街41號厚和閣地下c(41)鋪 |
| 5128916 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 12:12 | opened | | 域是乾洗 堅尼地城吉席街 |
| 5057844 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-12 07:46 | commented | Kovoschiz | What's the difference of 2 points with existing? |
| 5034376 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 2087499 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4029950 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 1655004 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 3055825 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5112232 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-31 11:49 | opened | vectorial8192 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17147569
Country trail is split in half after 2023 rainstorms (notice the concrete retaining covers); see if it has been redesignated / respecified. |
| 4756215 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-10 12:56 | commented | vectorial8192 | Very believable, but that's gonna be very difficult to irl-verify. |
| 5073245 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-30 06:03 | commented | HenryEK | The hydrographic office writes that
"航海人員不宜在爆炸品傾倒區內錨泊、拖綱或進行其他水低或海床作業。Mariners should avoid anchoring, trawling or carrying out any submarine or seabed activities in the explosives dumping ground." on their "charts for local vessels" |
| 5034370 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-02 14:26 | opened | vectorial8192 | Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?) |
| 5016316 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-27 14:05 | commented | kingkingHK | See also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware:
https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814
https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410
Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything ... |
| 5009959 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-17 07:18 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993410749/history requires fix so that name key carry actual name
currently it is
name=Kuan Yam Temple (small)
name:en=Kuan Yam Temple (small)
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names |
| 4888375 (iD) | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:15 | commented | vectorial8192 | Changeset is controversal; reviving. |
| 4490712 (iD) | 1 | 2024-10-23 03:41 | opened | | 深圳晶泰科技有限公司 XtalPi Shenzhen |
| 818352 (iD) | 1 | 2022-09-20 07:14 | reopened | 如果菠萝油没被蛋挞打败 | |
| 3100485 (iD) | 1 | 2022-04-14 15:32 | commented | Whcohi | debatable location |