| Id | # | Tmstmp UTC | Action | Contributor | Comment |
|---|
| 5287505 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-13 10:52 | commented | kingkingHK | A link only connecting to a `highway=x` would be `highway=x_link`. Is it really that difficult to understand? |
| 5286443 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-12 19:49 | commented | Kovoschiz | No, there was a bottled gas `shop=` https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=779127392786721
https://www.hongkongssa.com/index.php/Home/Index/CharacteristicMerchant.html https://www.eeb.gov.hk/food/download/committees/fcab/c_SW0150_SW0152.pdf
They moved to inner street (map not updated) https://dsg-energy.com/cylinder-shell-gas/ |
| 5276753 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-12 16:24 | commented | kingkingHK | Ok, I think I am understanding the situation now.
I mistakenly thought that there is a traffic island on Yan Ching Street (east side). If there were, then the Y-shape would be outside the junction, and u-turning along the Y would be equivalent to turning right, going forward a bit, u-turning, then waiting for the traffic signal again and turning l... |
| 5286430 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 21:21 | commented | Kovoschiz | @kingkingHK It's not an adjective "eco" for eco-friendly. It's a noun. `brand:en=Eco` |
| 5286470 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:41 | commented | kingkingHK | > `layer=-1`
Classic. iD users picking a random option in the warning box to make the validator shut up. Same as what the maproulette users did in March. I would just fix it, without further thinking. |
| 5286471 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:37 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
review petrol station (duplicate mapping?) |
| 5286465 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:34 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261873910 "Mobil" is not a known fuel company; did you mean "Esso"? |
| 5286462 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:32 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
review petrol station (duplicate mapping?) |
| 5286453 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:28 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
review petrol station (duplicate mapping?) |
| 5286451 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:26 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5286446 "EXXO" is not a known fuel company; did you mean "Esso"? |
| 5286438 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 15:18 | commented | vectorial8192 | e.g., duplicated mapping? |
| 5286291 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-10 13:55 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813139621 "Feoso" is not a known fuel company; data mistake? |
| 5274944 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-09 14:12 | commented | Kovoschiz | (Should be to open) |
| 5034469 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-05 19:57 | reopened | Crystaltszz | |
| 5208863 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-05 10:07 | commented | kingkingHK | I went there a while ago, and the situation is that, the entrance to the 士多 is inside the restaurant. Or, from another perspective, part of the restaurant has been repurposed to be a 士多. And I think mapping both as nodes just fails to represent this. |
| 2758068 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-02 06:15 | commented | kingkingHK | Out-of-copyright maps show a valley in this area; this is easily armchairrable, but choosing the correct osm tags may require some thoughts.
Also iirc they don't practice during public holidays, so this is technically surveyable if someone wants to (I don't). |
| 3149177 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-01 18:08 | commented | vectorial8192 | I don't know all the steps, but basically "after some time" the LWG will meet up and discuss questions, and then the results will be posted to somewhere at the Wiki or sth. |
| 4434946 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-01 10:18 | commented | kingkingHK | By survey, seems like the station dimension is kinda wrong, which tbh is expected. I will probably summarise my findings in Discord first (Soon™). |
| 5270671 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-29 08:42 | opened | kingkingHK | todo/issue: verify physical separation |
| 5270549 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-29 05:58 | opened | vbertola | "Duplicate with no data"
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-04-04T03:36:32Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps android 2026.04.07-8-Google |
| 3145328 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-28 16:32 | commented | vectorial8192 | They don't call it the Autonomous Region of Yuen Long for lulz and giggles.
Re your 2nd paragraph, when you see a gate on the eastern side that's not on OSM, that alone is enough to motivate a changeset. The fact that the (new) changeset is not directly related to this note is not a problem, that's still a good contribution. |
| 5269824 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-28 16:00 | opened | kingkingHK | todo/issue: review mapping of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16312559 ; probably against "relations are not categories" |
| 5239740 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-27 17:42 | commented | vectorial8192 | Seems like elevator reference number. Deferred survey recommended.
Unsubscribing. |
| 5239739 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-27 17:42 | commented | vectorial8192 | Seems like elevator reference number. Deferred survey recommended.
Unsubscribing. |
| 5267124 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-26 14:02 | opened | kingkingHK | todo/issue: some parts of Heung Yip Road should be bridges |
| 5220076 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-26 13:35 | commented | vectorial8192 | I can see this polygon largely coincides with the Town Planning "Tin Shui Wai" definition, but there are copyright concerns on whether we may directly make use of the graphical definition. |
| 5264909 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-26 13:34 | commented | vectorial8192 | The original plan was to armchair this by searching whether there are any publicly announced construction works for this address, and then clarify the area; but OK with the survey. |
| 5259315 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 14:44 | commented | vectorial8192 | ooof, then this can be classified as a large edit, and we will need to track this. |
| 5257118 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 13:55 | commented | vectorial8192 | We notice that we naturally arrive at the same question again: how/where do we check for 18-District boundaries?
When we know how those are defined, we will know whether we need to disconnect the ways. |
| 5264444 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 09:14 | commented | kingkingHK | https://www.pricerite.com.hk/hk/en/storeInfo/ agrees |
| 5173374 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 09:07 | commented | kingkingHK | One solution I can think of is to tag `hail_and_ride` along the section intended as a stop. |
| 5141141 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-23 17:43 | commented | vectorial8192 | Coordination, splitting, experiences etc is best discussed e.g. in Discord. (Soon™) |
| 4917522 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-21 09:54 | commented | vectorial8192 | Can confirm, we do have this. |
| 5164334 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-20 15:53 | commented | vectorial8192 | Then, I quote the Help Page https://help.archive.org/help/rights/ , esp:
> The Internet Archive does not make guarantees as to the copyright status of items [...]
When the PDF is no longer current, my opinion is that the government has basically retracted the copyright, and the document is now some sort of "government internal document leak". We ... |
| 5257852 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-20 06:19 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bus stop vs stop position |
| 5257117 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 14:41 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
Wo Yi Hop Road: physical separation |
| 4049857 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 14:24 | commented | kingkingHK | "Common sense" should be a strong enough source to support that this is a phone charging and not EV. I think we can make progress on this note. |
| 5215003 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 14:23 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5213335 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 07:40 | commented | kingkingHK | Yes |
| 5128915 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 07:05 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5128914 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 06:51 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5254676 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 04:21 | commented | kingkingHK | https://www.supretail.com.hk/sup-shop-address/3 agrees |
| 5249442 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-14 08:16 | opened | | Shipyard |
| 5180357 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-13 14:54 | commented | vectorial8192 | Well imo the size of the platform is the minimum possible size of the station building; ideally this is true no matter what definition you may be using. What may seem like "unused" underground space could then be used as MTR internal-use office. It still checks out. |
| 5134778 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128949 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128944 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128946 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128947 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 03:59 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128950 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 03:59 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128943 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 03:59 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5164303 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-11 13:34 | commented | kingkingHK | Seeing that it renders identically with other `power=substation`s, I'd say it does not influence render. I.e. useless tag. |
| 5123432 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-09 16:19 | commented | vectorial8192 | Indeed. I often lose focus. My plan was to discuss this first, but it seems we can discuss SMP side first instead. |
| 5240345 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-08 11:58 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
Where are the station exits? |
| 5188738 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-02 08:42 | commented | vectorial8192 | theoretical possibility of loc_name |
| 5214998 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-22 11:30 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5214756 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-22 07:57 | commented | kingkingHK | I vaguely remember this is one of the very few "semi-bicycle crossings" in Hong Kong where the cycleway ends right at the road, not a few meters before it as is usual. So simply turning the cycleways to footways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1418886075 would be fine. |
| 1385516 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 11:39 | commented | kingkingHK | Without physical gates or guards, it is impossible to tell a visitor from a resident, so a visitor can't be kicked out unless a guard confronts him and finds out that he is a visitor, which satisfies `=permissive`.
Don't tag (or not tag) for the renderer; make a PR if you want renderers to show `access=private` differently. |
| 5213340 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Not inside. Outside tennis court."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-drinking_water
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213338 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213339 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Nothing there. Just a white wall."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: tourism-artwork
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213337 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI name: Po's atelier
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213336 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5058584 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-15 12:20 | commented | HenryEK | the sidewalk along wai chi street now has beams along it in preparation for demolition |
| 5077746 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-14 14:07 | commented | kingkingHK | Curiously, searching the name online returns absolutely no result, which shouldn't be the case for any name with actual use. |
| 5106613 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-13 13:31 | commented | kingkingHK | I don't have anything to continue besides mapping/updating the related bus relations, which is already handled with https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5091914 . We can close this note if you have nothing more to map. |
| 5123548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-13 06:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 2218616 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-13 06:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 4015897 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-12 12:01 | commented | kingkingHK | By survey, the quoted way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 no longer exists, and there are nothing remaining other than the concrete bases. |
| 4025846 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-12 12:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 2046829 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-11 17:32 | commented | Kovoschiz | It's not prohibited explicitly. But technically it seems damaging plants is illegal. |
| 3304147 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-11 10:07 | reopened | kingkingHK | |
| 2690777 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-09 04:15 | commented | kingkingHK | I would rather just map the cliff and be done with it.
Also, legally speaking, this area is located inside a drone no-fly zone, due to the low-air economy regulatory sandbox whatever. Practically speaking, no one would notice, but I am not buying a drone just for this one note. |
| 5155801 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-08 16:39 | commented | vectorial8192 | The ultimate original note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1036042 complains of the following:
"The path from 'Lai Tak Tsuen' to 'viewpoint' is impassable and dangerous. Please remove it from the map" |
| 5195386 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-08 05:33 | opened | kingkingHK | Is there a "Sushi Masa x Taiko Sake" at Shop H2B, G/F, Fashion Walk, 9 Kingston Street? |
| 5194221 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-07 11:44 | opened | kingkingHK | Are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173722555 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205445683 connected? |
| 5037709 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-06 11:44 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5166716 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-06 02:47 | commented | kingkingHK | https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14Znxy9BWRS/ agrees. |
| 5025035 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-05 12:39 | commented | kingkingHK | Well, at least for Shing Mun River, `boat=no` should be wrong. We can remove it, alongside with the `fixme=`. |
| 5188594 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-05 12:22 | commented | kingkingHK | Apparently, the entire university is still `access=private`. I guess we would have to wait until aerial imagery updates this. |
| 5175576 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-05 05:18 | commented | kingkingHK | ...ok somehow I didn't notice it was added a few hours before I made this note. But its alignment seems wrong; I will make a changeset soon. |
| 5191006 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-05 02:39 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4486222689 descriptive name; probably need to change to hail_and_ride role on route relations, which appears to be unmapped. |
| 3980686 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-04 11:53 | commented | vectorial8192 | Well, at minimum we should try to see if this is somehow signposted (probably not). We can then see which irl area(s) correspond to this plot of land; at minimum we can clarify the industrial areas into several distinct plots, likely partitioned along the roads.
Ultimately it's sometimes not possible to very clearly and precisely state beforehand ... |
| 2776728 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-04 08:23 | commented | kingkingHK | Highly doubt this; can't see anything on aerial imagery or government maps. |
| 5189634 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-04 05:34 | opened | | High
|
| 5188736 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-03 10:21 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: descriptive name
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6309742344 |
| 5179032 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-24 02:40 | opened | | Learning Habitat Kindergarten (PSLP) |
| 5152477 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 22:14 | commented | HenryEK | it was like those minature railways that went around and around from what i remember years ago but now its just a flat surface much like a table with nothing on it
from what i found when i went like twenty days ago the area is locked behind a gate |
| 5099408 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | Construction not yet finished, but can make a rough sketch first. |
| 5065723 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | Nothing here. |
| 2865034 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | not blocked* sorry |
| 5129081 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:47 | commented | kingkingHK | Construction finished, but somehow I couldn't find the entrance irl. |
| 2434008 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-22 14:15 | commented | kingkingHK | I mean, there's a chance the company that closed has nothing to do with the POI at this location and just coincidentally shares a name. Although this might be too unlikely. |
| 2218614 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-19 12:35 | commented | kingkingHK | The following bus routes call at Ping Tin:
1. KMB 15 (Ping Tin → Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road))
2. KMB 15 (Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road) → Ping Tin)
3. KMB 15A (Ping Tin → Tsz Wan Shan (North))
4. KMB 15A (Tsz Wan Shan (North) → Ping Tin)
5. KMB 16 (Ping Tin → Mong Kok (Park Avenue))
6. KMB 38 (Ping Tin → Kwai Shing (East))
7. KMB 38 (Kwai Shi... |
| 5165581 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-13 12:00 | commented | vectorial8192 | https://restaurants.fiveguys.com.hk/ agrees |
| 3154260 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-12 06:46 | commented | vectorial8192 | iirc this is a named area ("columbarium") with several unnamed small "mini-columbarium" buildings. |
| 5146803 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-10 07:03 | commented | Kovoschiz | Having 2 `=station` is obviously wrong. `railway=stop` should be used on the `railway=` track. The polygon should be enlarged as `area:railway=station` , and a `railway=station` point recreated. |
| 758446 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-06 02:54 | commented | kingkingHK | Eventually, with some guidance from Kovoschiz, I figured out how to overlay historical maps onto editing software.
But then, I felt like if I am mapping a single missing stream, I might as well map all missing streams in this area, which are there hundreds of, making the changeset too big to complete in a single sitting, hence why it took me so l... |
| 5150201 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 13:46 | commented | vectorial8192 | My armchair says that the road is ownership=private |
| 5052159 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 11:33 | commented | kingkingHK | Agree with your thought. Old maps show the power line being constructed in the early 1970s, around the same time Shun Lee Estate was being developed. I also doubt a large voltage change is possible without some structures visible from aerial imagery.
However, the west side was also changed from 400 kV to 132 kV by the same DWG-blocked user in the ... |
| 1684719 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 10:45 | commented | vectorial8192 | Honourable, but this is extra rural. Might not be worth it. |
| 5150364 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 09:53 | opened | kingkingHK | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1213995468 construction finished? |
| 2414889 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 06:59 | commented | kingkingHK | ...why would you resolve a note while admitting you don't have enough information to do so? Anyway, survey needed. But this might be difficult. |
| 5150198 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 06:51 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002255941 etc descriptive name |
| 5034356 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-29 08:57 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here. |
| 5034355 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-29 08:57 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here. |
| 5034400 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 14:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here. |
| 5034406 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 14:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed it is. |
| 5034341 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 07:06 | commented | vectorial8192 | I mean, I have also slowed down.
I now convince myself to don't look at new notes until the previous batch is cleared. Or just create short-lived notes. |
| 5141822 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 04:05 | opened | kingkingHK | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444187633 feels like a descriptive name, but I'm not sure. (Also, it should probably be "Ventilation") |
| 3654302 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 04:03 | commented | kingkingHK | `population=` exists, and the 2021 census gives Tsui Chuk Garden population as 10071. However, the wiki says `population=` should only be used on `place=`. |
| 4113548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 03:38 | commented | kingkingHK | Imo the problem is that you are closing a note alongside with it, which makes it much harder for everyone else to spot potential rooms for improvement. Like, if I weren't here when you closed this note, would anyone notice changing the Country Trail to `access=no` is completely incorrect?
Personally I prefer to make as little guesswork/thinking a... |
| 5105750 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-24 08:57 | commented | kingkingHK | Todo. My plan is to change all `building:part=` towers in Hong Kong to `building=`, then close this note. |
| 5027512 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-23 17:14 | commented | Kovoschiz | As in the connection https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002239786/ |
| 5034335 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-22 13:45 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here. |
| 5137708 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-22 02:31 | commented | kingkingHK | However, one may walk in the pedestrian tunnels, allowing for dead reckoning. The hard part would be accounting for elevation change in the footways, which might not be uniform. |
| 5137391 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-21 08:07 | opened | | Florist |
| 5109341 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-18 14:37 | commented | vectorial8192 | Yes, we may do landuse=brownfield here. |
| 5130601 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-17 08:15 | commented | vectorial8192 | It mentions McDonald's.
This https://mcdonalds.com.hk/en/find-a-restaurant/ says they have a McDonald's here but it isn't open 24/7.
It then becomes "how should we map non-24/7 foot paths". |
| 5035617 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-17 05:47 | commented | kingkingHK | I recently heard that this traffic signal is disused/malfunctioning with no plans of repair. This might be `disused:highway=traffic_signals`. Survey recommended. |
| 5132152 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-17 03:11 | opened | kingkingHK | Todo: add residential entrances, more indoor footways, indoor details, etc.
(continuing from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5104381) |
| 5128917 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 12:12 | opened | | 海豚洗衣24h（堅尼地厚和街店）Dolphin Laundry 24h（Hau Wo Street Store）
堅尼地城厚和街41號厚和閣地下c(41)鋪 |
| 5128916 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 12:12 | opened | | 域是乾洗 堅尼地城吉席街 |
| 5128521 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 02:50 | opened | kingkingHK | Todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/813803780 name |
| 5057844 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-12 07:46 | commented | Kovoschiz | What's the difference of 2 points with existing? |
| 5037695 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-08 10:10 | commented | kingkingHK | Seems like it has. |
| 5034376 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4978548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5034435 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4015896 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5034434 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 2087499 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4029950 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 1655004 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 861105 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 3055825 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4019647 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5036094 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 02:40 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve!
|
| 5112232 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-31 11:49 | opened | vectorial8192 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17147569
Country trail is split in half after 2023 rainstorms (notice the concrete retaining covers); see if it has been redesignated / respecified. |
| 5091914 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-25 14:33 | commented | vectorial8192 | Community guides suggest doing it in JOSM, not in iD editor. I will leave this to the public transport mappers. |
| 5079402 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-18 10:04 | commented | kingkingHK | Afaik if there's something physical (e.g. a monument) saying that it is a movie filming location, it might pass at a tourist attraction. However, I could not find anything here, so I think we can simply delete it. |
| 5034471 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-18 09:56 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here. |
| 5034468 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-18 09:55 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
|
| 5078742 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-11 18:11 | commented | Kovoschiz | No https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2024-05-13#Ticket#2024040710000103_–_Database_for_importing_license_question |
| 5087537 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-11 17:07 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo:
Some clinics have generic names, which may be improved. |
| 4756215 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-10 12:56 | commented | vectorial8192 | Very believable, but that's gonna be very difficult to irl-verify. |
| 4957095 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-07 10:32 | commented | vectorial8192 | Not too familiar with railway mapping myself, but it seems almost all segments implicitly have `oneway=reversible`; why this needs to be stated clearly idk. The idea is that at this moment, `oneway=?` is some value, but for another moment, `oneway=?` becomes another value, therefore `=reversible`. Trains may use "the opposite rail" depending on dep... |
| 5078375 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-04 09:12 | opened | kingkingHK | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433769 What is this? Does this actually exist? |
| 5078374 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-04 09:12 | opened | kingkingHK | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433869 What is this? Does this actually exist? |
| 4691875 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-03 11:46 | reopened | vectorial8192 | |
| 5073245 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-30 06:03 | commented | HenryEK | The hydrographic office writes that
"航海人員不宜在爆炸品傾倒區內錨泊、拖綱或進行其他水低或海床作業。Mariners should avoid anchoring, trawling or carrying out any submarine or seabed activities in the explosives dumping ground." on their "charts for local vessels" |
| 5034438 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-02 14:50 | opened | vectorial8192 | Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?) |
| 5034370 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-02 14:26 | opened | vectorial8192 | Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?) |
| 5034361 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-02 14:20 | opened | vectorial8192 | Family Medicine Clinic |
| 5016316 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-27 14:05 | commented | kingkingHK | See also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware:
https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814
https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410
Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything ... |
| 1499178 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-22 08:49 | commented | Kovoschiz | `=bad` can be on empty land. Should check the `obstacle=vegetation`, and decide whether it's `disused=yes` or even `abandoned:highway=` |
| 5009959 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-17 07:18 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993410749/history requires fix so that name key carry actual name
currently it is
name=Kuan Yam Temple (small)
name:en=Kuan Yam Temple (small)
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names |
| 4922350 (iD) | 1 | 2025-09-30 12:46 | commented | vectorial8192 | * as in exists in the OSM map data |
| 2641485 (iD) | 1 | 2025-08-21 17:39 | commented | vectorial8192 | Hi there, it seems the relevant paths may have become available (new OSM edits), may you confirm whether the foot paths / steps are really accessible? |
| 4888375 (iD) | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:15 | commented | vectorial8192 | Changeset is controversal; reviving. |
| 4895339 (iD) | 1 | 2025-08-06 12:06 | opened | kingkingHK | Most of the village is unmapped |
| 2128691 (iD) | 1 | 2025-05-19 08:11 | reopened | Kovoschiz | |
| 4744567 (iD) | 1 | 2025-05-19 08:11 | reopened | Kovoschiz | |
| 4490712 (iD) | 1 | 2024-10-23 03:41 | opened | | 深圳晶泰科技有限公司 XtalPi Shenzhen |
| 3955633 (iD) | 1 | 2023-10-24 08:46 | opened | | 有”此路不通”牌 |
| 818352 (iD) | 1 | 2022-09-20 07:14 | reopened | 如果菠萝油没被蛋挞打败 | |
| 3100485 (iD) | 1 | 2022-04-14 15:32 | commented | Whcohi | debatable location |
| 2464998 (iD) | 1 | 2020-12-17 14:14 | opened | Dixon313 | Caution on degrading trail type:
Joining an easy shaded mid-level concrete path (1Km, coming from Tsing Shan Monastery for CLP pylon maintenance) is a bare mud trail (400m, southbound downhill to Sun Tuen Mun Center).
Unprepared leisure hikers may have to turn back here. |