Open OSM notes of Hong Kong (Limit 500)
Id#Tmstmp UTCActionContributorComment
5083046 (iD)12025-12-08 04:20openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404367919 feels like a "descriptive name"
5080918 (iD)12025-12-07 17:37commentedKovoschiz1. The definition of populated can be debated. If there are hotels, or jails (need to do revision on census definition), are those really "unpopulated"? That's not the same as census definition of populations. Eg Penny's Bay, or Chek Lap Kok may have no residents either. 2. Carto doesn't always work. `population=` is not the only factor in what's ...
5082020 (iD)12025-12-07 13:04openedvectorial8192Kwun Tong Line: The upper and lower rails are stitched together in OSM, which is incorrect; both rails should be separate irl.
5082019 (iD)12025-12-07 13:04openedvectorial8192Yau Tong Station: Review the layering; should probably be `layer=0` or `layer=1`.
4957095 (iD)12025-12-07 11:32commentedvectorial8192Not too familiar with railway mapping myself, but it seems almost all segments implicitly have `oneway=reversible`; why this needs to be stated clearly idk. The idea is that at this moment, `oneway=?` is some value, but for another moment, `oneway=?` becomes another value, therefore `=reversible`. Trains may use "the opposite rail" depending on dep...
5052159 (iD)12025-12-06 15:30commentedvectorial8192I am no electrical engineer, but I think 400 kV infra can be easily repurposed to become 132 kV infra. Unfortunately survey recommended to see what's going on; might be easier to check at Po Lam side.
5080646 (iD)12025-12-06 09:16openedkingkingHKIs Lantau Link Visitors Centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12271148) really a `highway=rest_area`?
5080639 (iD)12025-12-06 09:06openedvectorial8192What is the name of this park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346575800 ?
5079402 (iD)12025-12-05 03:49openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8742956918 should probably be deleted
5034516 (iD)12025-12-04 15:33commentedvectorial8192Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6378290625 is referencing a difficult-to-load webpage.
5078742 (iD)12025-12-04 15:21openedkingkingHKname:zh of park? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/576655997
5078637 (iD)12025-12-04 14:03openedvectorial8192Anyone know what this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455730544 is named?
5078621 (iD)12025-12-04 13:52openedkingkingHKIs https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7134763060 supposed to be `amenity=waste_basket` instead?
5078524 (iD)12025-12-04 13:46commentedkingkingHKIt is currently tagged as 宏顯樓? Could you please elaborate?
5078375 (iD)12025-12-04 10:12openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433769 What is this? Does this actually exist?
5078374 (iD)12025-12-04 10:12openedkingkingHKhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11620433869 What is this? Does this actually exist?
5078240 (iD)12025-12-04 06:21openedvectorial8192Name of "house" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993221815 is very suspicious
5027512 (iD)12025-12-04 00:19commentedklorydrykYes if is what I mean
5077746 (iD)12025-12-03 19:04openedvectorial8192Rare data incompleteness: name:en of street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243663400 ?
5077338 (iD)12025-12-03 13:47commentedvectorial8192oh yeah; it me this is more like a todo / coordination note
5065720 (iD)12025-12-03 13:32commentedkingkingHKSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5065723
5065723 (iD)12025-12-03 13:32commentedkingkingHK* So the intention of this note is to check if there's anything physical indicating a (mini)bus stop at this location
5077389 (iD)12025-12-03 13:18openedkingkingHKName of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674242942 is dubious.
4691875 (iD)12025-12-03 12:46reopenedvectorial8192
5077060 (iD)12025-12-03 08:46openedvectorial8192I think this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243755413 is actually a dam? Is this accessible?
5076281 (iD)12025-12-02 14:38openedkingkingHKIs "Permeant" Aviation Fuel Facility supposed to be Permanent Aviation Fuel Facility instead?
5074895 (iD)12025-12-01 10:55openedPablo Strubell"No bus stops here" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-10-21T03:35:21Z POI name: 東涌（達東路） Tung Chung (Tat Tung Road) POI types: public_transport-platform highway-bus_s...
5063775 (iD)12025-11-30 13:48commentedkingkingHKAs of yesterday (2025-11-29) it's still oneway westbound, but just in case it changes in the future, I will leave this note open until the nearby works are complete, presumably when the Central Kowloon Bypass opens.
5073245 (iD)12025-11-30 07:03commentedHenryEKThe hydrographic office writes that "航海人員不宜在爆炸品傾倒區內錨泊、拖綱或進行其他水低或海床作業。Mariners should avoid anchoring, trawling or carrying out any submarine or seabed activities in the explosives dumping ground." on their "charts for local vessels"
5016776 (iD)12025-11-28 15:26commentedkingkingHKI think they are not at the same vertical level? Ie there might be some sort of retaining wall/cliff between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763946005 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964606433 . Disclaimer: I have never visited this place after the TCL extension works began, but I still vaguely remember there was a retaining wall/embankmen...
4958371 (iD)12025-11-26 06:36commentedkingkingHKAlso, `old_ref` can be considered if you really want to keep the B1-B4.
5034380 (iD)12025-11-24 17:21commentedvectorial8192I vaguely remember seeing the introduction of this place a few years ago; something like "this place holds dead bodies until ready for burial".
5058584 (iD)12025-11-19 10:45commentedvectorial8192OK, I read the news. Basically, the Company eventually got all the flats back after some verdicts + arbitration. de jure the Estate is still `landuse=residential` until (I think) Dec 2025, but me discovering this situation this late to the story, it would just be a technicality issue, and can't justify an OSM edit. I will just hold this note open...
5057844 (iD)12025-11-18 07:30commentedKovoschizYes, the upper village is addressed as TKO Village. So it should be considered part of one somehow, for `addr:place=` to be logical. The most complicated cases are eg So Kwun Wat villages.
5055198 (iD)12025-11-16 11:24openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036094 (iD)12025-11-16 11:04commentedvectorial8192I went there recently, and saw it's in the old building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429468747 I would guess it's gonna be relocated into Phase 2 later, so we may choose to ignore this for now.
5034364 (iD)12025-11-16 10:31commentedvectorial8192This https://www.ha.org.hk/visitor/ha_visitor_index.asp?Content_ID=200250&Lang=CHIB5&Dimension=100&Parent_ID=10052 The government announcement for the renaming eventually led to this page. Upon rechecking, it seems I might have misread the list... But still, this location is likely to have a Family Medicine Clinic.
5052406 (iD)12025-11-14 14:50commentedvectorial8192In case this is not clear, I am referring to "inside this park".
5052324 (iD)12025-11-14 10:04opened康明苑 Cumine Court
5052323 (iD)12025-11-14 10:04opened康麗苑 Cornell Court
5052322 (iD)12025-11-14 10:02opened康和苑 Cornwall Court
4973182 (iD)12025-11-12 15:28commentedvectorial8192Website for future reference: https://ydotx.com/about/
5034400 (iD)12025-11-09 11:57reopenedkingkingHK
5043144 (iD)12025-11-08 10:13openedLkwokon賀龍汽車維修中心
5043137 (iD)12025-11-08 10:09openedLkwokon河背營地
5043056 (iD)12025-11-08 08:19openedWright OneCLP substation
5038051 (iD)12025-11-04 16:26commentedvectorial8192*area
5038052 (iD)12025-11-04 16:26openedvectorial8192individual buildings and streets, where name:en?
5037709 (iD)12025-11-04 12:33openedkingkingHKHas this construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507734827 been finished? The only source seem to be https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2327347 , a note from five years ago. Aerial imagery also does not seem to show any signs of construction.
5037695 (iD)12025-11-04 12:28openedkingkingHKHas this construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767852603 been finished? It was last modified almost six years ago, and aerial imagery does not seem to show any signs of construction.
5037516 (iD)12025-11-04 10:24openedkingkingHKI suspect that traffic signals might have been/will be added to this junction.
5034354 (iD)12025-11-04 06:48commentedvectorial8192@JinYe777 does this mean the building is unnamed?
5036242 (iD)12025-11-03 15:19commentedvectorial8192Also, now that I looked a bit deeper into the renaming, I am not sure whether it's the entire building being renamed, or that only the clinic (might not be in OSM) being renamed.
5036161 (iD)12025-11-03 12:52openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036103 (iD)12025-11-03 12:46openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036099 (iD)12025-11-03 12:45openedkingkingHKNow that "將軍澳賽馬會普通科門診診所 Tseung Kwan O Jockey Club General Out-patient Clinic" has been renamed to "將軍澳賽馬會家庭醫學診所 Tseung Kwan O Jockey Club Family Medicine Clinic", has there been any changes to the bus stops' naming?
5036097 (iD)12025-11-03 12:44openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5036089 (iD)12025-11-03 12:34openedkingkingHKFamily Medicine Clinic
5034471 (iD)12025-11-02 14:55openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034469 (iD)12025-11-02 14:55openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034468 (iD)12025-11-02 14:54openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034465 (iD)12025-11-02 14:54openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034463 (iD)12025-11-02 14:53openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034442 (iD)12025-11-02 14:53commentedvectorial8192Seems like it; the placement makes it very unobvious.
5034440 (iD)12025-11-02 14:51openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034439 (iD)12025-11-02 14:50openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034438 (iD)12025-11-02 14:50openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034435 (iD)12025-11-02 14:48openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034434 (iD)12025-11-02 14:48openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034432 (iD)12025-11-02 14:47openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034412 (iD)12025-11-02 14:41openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034406 (iD)12025-11-02 14:39openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (what should be happening here?)
5034404 (iD)12025-11-02 14:38openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034402 (iD)12025-11-02 14:38openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034395 (iD)12025-11-02 14:36openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034394 (iD)12025-11-02 14:36openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034392 (iD)12025-11-02 14:35openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034390 (iD)12025-11-02 14:34openedvectorial8192Is this a Family Medicine Clinic?
5034389 (iD)12025-11-02 14:33openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034387 (iD)12025-11-02 14:33openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034379 (iD)12025-11-02 14:29openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034378 (iD)12025-11-02 14:28openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034377 (iD)12025-11-02 14:28openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034376 (iD)12025-11-02 14:27openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034373 (iD)12025-11-02 14:27openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034371 (iD)12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034370 (iD)12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034363 (iD)12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034361 (iD)12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034359 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034358 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034357 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034356 (iD)12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034355 (iD)12025-11-02 14:18openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034352 (iD)12025-11-02 14:17openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034350 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034344 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034343 (iD)12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034341 (iD)12025-11-02 14:15openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034338 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034337 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034335 (iD)12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034332 (iD)12025-11-02 14:12openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
5034323 (iD)12025-11-02 14:10openedvectorial8192Family Medicine Clinic
4015897 (iD)12025-10-29 03:14commentedkingkingHKSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173778439 But I guess can still verify if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 exists?
4015896 (iD)12025-10-28 16:00commentedvectorial8192Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897
5025131 (iD)12025-10-27 14:50openedOctoberFifteenthThe path is gone. One cannot reach this path from the pier.
5016316 (iD)12025-10-27 14:05commentedkingkingHKSee also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware: https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814 https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410 Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything ...
5025035 (iD)12025-10-27 13:48openedvectorial8192Sing Mun River has fixme, presumably about boat access. However, afaik, there are no legal restrictions about boat access.
4957859 (iD)12025-10-22 12:36commentedNeisBotHi kingkingHK, Thank you for reopening the note. I noticed there wasn't a comment explaining the reason for reopening. Could you please provide more details or context behind the decision? This will help us better understand and address the note appropriately. #ReopenedWithoutComment
5017883 (iD)12025-10-22 11:20openedvectorial8192Possibly another eminent domain
1499178 (iD)12025-10-22 08:49commentedKovoschiz`=bad` can be on empty land. Should check the `obstacle=vegetation`, and decide whether it's `disused=yes` or even `abandoned:highway=`
5009959 (iD)12025-10-17 07:18openedMateusz Koniecznyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993410749/history requires fix so that name key carry actual name currently it is name=Kuan Yam Temple (small) name:en=Kuan Yam Temple (small) see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
470359 (iD)12025-10-14 07:15commentedkingkingHKSo, `amenity=training` + `education=training` + `training=art`?
4577980 (iD)12025-10-12 06:16commentedHenryEKso its just gonna stay like this then?
2598829 (iD)12025-10-08 14:40commentedvectorial8192But is it located here? Ng Ka Tsuen is located north of this note, and I am unfamiliar with rural addressing. It would seem to me, if the company really is located here, then it should probably take the address street as Kam Sheung Road.
4917522 (iD)12025-10-08 14:36commentedvectorial8192Future reference https://www.cedd.gov.hk/tc/our-projects/major-projects/index-id-70.html
4922555 (iD)12025-10-06 01:41commentedHenryEKthis looks more like a mini roundabout than a turning circle
861105 (iD)12025-10-02 16:22commentedvectorial8192Well understandable; if it's a slope maintenance path, might as well pretend it doesn't exist at the moment. It wouldn't affect general map usage.
4922350 (iD)12025-09-30 12:46commentedvectorial8192* as in exists in the OSM map data
1450246 (iD)12025-09-30 10:16commentedkingkingHKThere does not seem to be any changes to the siding's geometry from the date of the note?
4978548 (iD)12025-09-26 07:40commentedKovoschiz5. `ref=` is another factor that needs to be considered to define a `man_made=bridge` , aside from `name=` and `start_date=` (etc)
3654302 (iD)12025-09-25 11:03commentedHenryEKwhy is this note still active
4559591 (iD)12025-09-12 15:52commentedvectorial8192Another blocker would be to really manually review the several dozen (or hundred?) of buildings.
3145328 (iD)12025-09-11 12:30commentedkingkingHKAt least when I attempted to visit the location of this note today, there was a guard dog stopping people from getting close. Might be difficult to verify this note if the situation persists.
4622400 (iD)12025-09-01 13:39commentedkingkingHKCorrect.
2434008 (iD)12025-09-01 05:45commentedkingkingHKAccording to the Company Registry, a company with the same name has been dissolved in October 2020.
2046829 (iD)12025-08-21 18:23commentedvectorial8192Another path nearby was marked as inaccessible https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154333345 ; related?
2641485 (iD)12025-08-21 17:39commentedvectorial8192Hi there, it seems the relevant paths may have become available (new OSM edits), may you confirm whether the foot paths / steps are really accessible?
4888375 (iD)12025-08-08 14:15commentedvectorial8192Changeset is controversal; reviving.
4895339 (iD)12025-08-06 12:06openedkingkingHKMost of the village is unmapped
4852037 (iD)12025-07-12 19:07openedvectorial8192"Hung Shui Kiu" is only a tentative name, as per usual railway development practice.
2128691 (iD)12025-05-19 08:11reopenedKovoschiz
4744567 (iD)12025-05-19 08:11reopenedKovoschiz
4049857 (iD)12025-05-18 11:10commentedvectorial8192Guy was/is recently around resolving notes with no explanation.
4756215 (iD)12025-05-13 02:47opened[飲用水] 此處設有加水機
4434946 (iD)12025-05-06 14:28commentedvectorial8192Worst case this will wait for YOHO WEST Phase 2 to complete, which is expected to be in 2026.
3304147 (iD)12025-02-12 22:24commentedti-loSeems to work in a bunch of cases https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:*:type
3600978 (iD)12025-01-16 17:55commentedvectorial8192They say the incinerator will be initiated some time in 2025
4465291 (iD)12024-12-19 10:12commentedKovoschizThere's no standard solution for phases. Using `landuse=residential` again would cause conflicting meaning against housing estates, and result in overlapping or nested `landuse=residential` .
4490712 (iD)12024-10-23 03:41opened深圳晶泰科技有限公司 XtalPi Shenzhen
4306096 (iD)12024-06-24 13:55opened此處並沒有廁所
4137978 (iD)12024-03-03 15:44openedAlbert Tam"練靶場" POI name: 大潭郊野公園（鰂魚涌擴建部份） Tai Tam Country Park (Quarry Bay Extension) POI types: boundary-national_park OSM data version: 2020-02-09T04:19:23Z #mapsme
4113548 (iD)12024-02-15 07:54openedLandslide
4113546 (iD)12024-02-15 07:53openedLandslide
4113544 (iD)12024-02-15 07:52openedLandslide
4029950 (iD)12023-12-15 23:36opened2023年11月走過這條路線，由水壩至接近石澳道樓梯一段，這並不是山徑，而是一條有水的石澗。
4025846 (iD)12023-12-13 03:40opened盛水式加水機 2部 [飲用水] 洗手間下一層
4019647 (iD)12023-12-08 09:22opened閘門，開放時間05:00-21:30
3980686 (iD)12023-11-10 02:46opened粉嶺沙頭角公路DD39, Lot 2645
3955633 (iD)12023-10-24 08:46opened有”此路不通”牌
818352 (iD)12022-09-20 07:14reopened如果菠萝油没被蛋挞打败
3149177 (iD)12022-04-27 08:07commentedWhcohii know, but is it okay to said it out right the ele data is refer to the CEDD?
2218614 (iD)12022-04-20 22:19reopenedMPatrick1013
3100485 (iD)12022-04-14 15:32commentedWhcohidebatable location
2758068 (iD)12022-04-14 09:25commentedKovoschizNot yet added? Please don't resolve without comments if not yet worked on.
3055825 (iD)12022-02-17 22:51openedStart of this path is full of thorns and dense vegetation.
758446 (iD)12022-01-21 17:24reopenedkenny leung
2926575 (iD)12021-11-07 16:23openedWright One條路似乎塞左
2865034 (iD)12021-09-23 00:56openedThis portion of route is blocked.
2776728 (iD)12021-07-29 14:43openedWhcohiSmall temple
2690777 (iD)12021-05-30 04:30opened懸崖洞
2464998 (iD)12020-12-17 14:14openedDixon313Caution on degrading trail type: Joining an easy shaded mid-level concrete path (1Km, coming from Tsing Shan Monastery for CLP pylon maintenance) is a bare mud trail (400m, southbound downhill to Sun Tuen Mun Center). Unprepared leisure hikers may have to turn back here.
2337702 (iD)12020-09-06 14:33opened厕所位"廁所" POI name: 大欖郊野公園 Tai Lam Country Park POI types: boundary-national_park OSM data version: 2020-07-14T11:22:37Z #mapsme
2218616 (iD)12020-06-05 07:45openedkleeahPublic transport Routing at Lam Tin to be added
2087499 (iD)12020-02-12 14:42commentedThis Is A Display Name Desu* Indoor mapping tools needed
1655004 (iD)12019-01-19 12:53openedThis Is A Display Name Desucheck and map all stairs and other paths accessible along the way, including those that are not open to general public
1036042 (iD)12017-06-20 16:58openedRichy_B"The path from 'Lai Tak Tsuen' to 'viewpoint' is impassable and dangerous. Please remove it from the map" POI has no name POI types: landuse-forest OSM data version: 2017-05-11T13:22:09Z #mapsme
939664 (iD)12017-03-25 10:02openedKoala888(可能)日軍手掘洞 (OSM data version: 2017-03-06T16:48:02Z) #mapsme
829942 (iD)12016-12-27 09:16openedWanderer GoGounpaved 45 degree slope between hill top and camp site (OSM data version: 2016-11-05T13:55:03Z) #mapsme