| Id | # | Tmstmp UTC | Action | Contributor | Comment |
|---|
| 2464998 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 17:33 | commented | vectorial8192 | Then, perhaps we just need to clarify the trail feasibility, and then we can finish. |
| 5304217 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 17:12 | commented | vectorial8192 | Correction : possibly incomplete work of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/180258566 ? |
| 5384946 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 16:24 | commented | vectorial8192 | Government website has this https://www.dsd.gov.hk/TC/Our_Projects/All_Projects/4200CD.html though it doesn't mention the exact closure dates. |
| 5383053 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 16:18 | commented | vectorial8192 | Aside from the (new) scope of Route 5, what would be the (new) scope of the expressway area? |
| 5257118 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 16:16 | commented | vectorial8192 | Ignoring the boundary definition, one practical blocker was/is that iD cannot easily disambiguate/select features when they perfectly overlap each other.
However, later I found that iD has option to hide admin-bounds. Then, roads become selectable.
JOSM situation notwithstanding, this means we now have a friendlier entrance to at least tackle the... |
| 5270671 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 16:13 | commented | vectorial8192 | Aerial imagery clearly shows "no physical separation".
It's the "chain of laziness". Road expansion works, draw new WIP road (correct). WIP complete, change tags (correct). But then it turns out there are some sections with no physical separation.
We can either focus only on this spot, or we do a sectional scan from Sam Shing to Aegean Coast. |
| 5360205 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 16:08 | commented | vectorial8192 | It seems they took the bridge away and placed a new one back at the same spot?
Either we need a survey, or we find a usable source and armchair this. |
| 4434946 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 15:52 | commented | vectorial8192 | Seeing no updates to this note, perhaps I may ask some extra questions.
Given that the observed dimensions are different from the OSM mapped dimensions, how different are both measurements? Is it because e.g. the platforms are shifted along some direction, which is not in OSM? |
| 5220076 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 15:40 | commented | vectorial8192 | @Kovoschiz I think the hardest question is whether annex diagrams in legal texts can be used for OSM mapping. Do those count as regular diagrams (not for OSM) or extensions of legal documents (OK for OSM)?
When we know the legality, things like checking the correct OSM tag should then be trivial. |
| 5346823 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-11 11:09 | commented | vectorial8192 | Upon further review, the situation is acceptable, though thanks to efforts by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/samho1234567 it seems there is no need for any extra rerouting.
If no extra thing to clarify, then will close soon. |
| 3980686 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-10 19:29 | commented | vectorial8192 | To clarify, the registry has "Sha Tau Kok Road DD39L" but doesn't list specific "2645" plot. But, looking at the registry list, the whole neighbourhood has building name set to null.
Technically because NT is leased, the lack of records is insufficient to prove the lack of land mastery (by government or by private entities), but administratively t... |
| 5381910 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-10 18:58 | commented | vectorial8192 | Hi there, you may use semicolon ";" to indicate multiple floors of the same building.
For example, "1;2" indicates "1/F and 2/F".
Do you remember/know which floors for this shop? |
| 5130601 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-09 07:16 | reopened | vectorial8192 | |
| 5058584 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-08 09:57 | commented | HenryEK | man lee, man shun and man hong house have been demolished |
| 5296571 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-07 16:06 | commented | vectorial8192 | We will start with the physical separation itself, with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185268030 |
| 5380551 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-07 14:32 | opened | vectorial8192 | issue:
CTB 1M
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14134677
Validator warning: route scheme is unspecified; clarify "public_transport:version"
|
| 5380549 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-07 14:31 | opened | vectorial8192 | issue:
CTB 41A
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8161675
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8161682
Validator warning: route scheme is unspecified; clarify "public_transport:version" |
| 5374730 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-07 11:56 | commented | vectorial8192 | According to online info, this area is not open to public.
We may want to confirm this and then e.g. update the access tags. |
| 5374702 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-07 11:55 | commented | vectorial8192 | Nah. We cannot find the "Block 13" in the map. This note is valid. |
| 5375969 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-06 04:37 | commented | HenryEK | this seems to just be part of a mass note creation related to hong kongs historical batteries, regardless of if they exist, or are already present on the map
for this particular note, im sure albion battery no longer exists, so it can simply be resolved without change
however the other stonecutters island batteries are indeed there, but due to wh... |
| 5377849 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-06 04:15 | opened | HenryEK | boundary point 12 (22°14’21.4’’ N 113°49’35.0’’ E) is missing
Order of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China No. 221
https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/A207!en.assist.pdf
page 6 - (2) southern sea section - 4
|
| 5376252 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 12:15 | commented | HenryEK | already present - node/26412912 - although improvements can be done to it i guess |
| 5376163 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 11:49 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 银禧炮台 |
| 5376017 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 11:13 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 昂船洲西炮台(昂船洲炮台群) |
| 5376013 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 11:11 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 昂船洲南海岸炮台(昂船洲炮台群) |
| 5376008 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 11:06 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 昂船洲中央炮台(昂船洲炮台群) |
| 5375999 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 10:58 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 昂船洲东炮台(昂船洲炮台群) |
| 5375990 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-05 10:52 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 百夫长炮台(昂船洲炮台群) |
| 5357794 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 17:48 | commented | vectorial8192 | Probably for "Angus Steak and Wine"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9408983817 |
| 5374762 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 16:16 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 西湾棱堡及西湾山炮台 |
| 5374582 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 15:40 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 旧鲤鱼门军营第二十五座（军官食堂） |
| 5374577 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 15:38 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 旧鲤鱼门军营第十座（皇家炮兵团军官宿舍） |
| 5374569 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-04 15:35 | opened | Rosy-xzy | 旧鲤鱼门军营第七座（皇家炮兵团军官宿舍） |
| 5370720 (iD) | 1 | 2026-07-02 06:53 | opened | | Fame Limpid Design |
| 5368150 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-30 12:30 | opened | Angus Lee | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-06-24T00:53:17Z
POI name: Le Petit Prince
POI types: amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps ios 2026.06.24-17-ios |
| 5366383 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-29 08:02 | opened | Angus Lee | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-06-24T00:53:17Z
POI name: 粵廚點心專門店 Canton's Kitchen Dim Sum Exper
POI types: amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps ios 2026.06.24-17-ios |
| 5360199 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-28 10:39 | commented | kingkingHK | Someone did something: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184731579 |
| 5129081 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-27 11:51 | commented | kingkingHK | If I remember correctly I went near your coordinates, but failed to find any entrances. Although maybe I just missed it. |
| 5357832 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-27 09:09 | commented | vectorial8192 | While I cannot immediately provide examples, some slope maintenance paths are green signposted as roughly "no unauthorized entry", which means instant access=private and case closed, which doesn't care about whether the gates are physically open or not.
It is unclear whether this case is one of them. |
| 5362130 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-26 11:18 | opened | Angus Lee | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z
POI name: Jabbok Piano Co.
POI types: shop-musical_instrument
#organicmaps ios 2026.06.01-1-ios |
| 5304280 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-25 19:10 | commented | vectorial8192 | A better word is "unremarkable". Maybe I should just check the street by myself, seeing that I can't justify the case well.
We did have an answer for "why we have tertiary roads here", but the core issue "why we have a single segment of secondary road here" remains unresolved. To me, ignoring the situation at Whitty Street, it seems the secondary ... |
| 5300387 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-25 18:14 | commented | vectorial8192 | We are probably looking at the neis-one statistics. For fair comparison we should be looking at city-states (or equivalent), which I can list as Macau, Singapore, Gibraltar, and Liechtenstein; we should not be looking at "full countries", though the German 95% is very impressive.
As of writing, LI 98%, HK 97%, SG 89%, MO 87%, GI 80%. LI has best "... |
| 5357793 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-23 13:27 | opened | Angus Lee | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z
POI name: Fu Wing Property Agency
POI types: office-estate_agent
#organicmaps ios 2026.06.01-1-ios |
| 5356624 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-22 17:45 | opened | Angus Lee | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z
POI name: 萬寧 Mannings
POI types: shop-chemist amenity-pharmacy
#organicmaps ios 2026.06.01-1-ios |
| 5356623 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-22 17:45 | opened | Angus Lee | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-05-27T00:05:23Z
POI name: 屈臣氏 Watsons
POI types: shop-chemist amenity-pharmacy
#organicmaps ios 2026.06.01-1-ios |
| 5351891 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-21 17:15 | commented | vectorial8192 | Note that Chungking Mansions https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39315991 is currently tagged as:
- commercial landuse
- retail building
- apartment-style residences |
| 5249442 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-16 10:50 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 4607075 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-14 07:36 | commented | Kovoschiz | https://www.hongkongairport.com/en/sustainability/environment/water.page https://www.hidropolitikakademi.org/en/article/31251/hong-kong-airports-triple-water-system |
| 3154260 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-12 11:41 | commented | Kovoschiz | Sites meaning eg "Wo Hop Shek Columbarium". The phases should be something else. Or it depends on whether they are different facilities.
The other problem is whether the 2 phases are different. If yes, they should be separated. |
| 4957095 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-12 10:23 | commented | kingkingHK | Agree with your workaround, but the HK OSM wiki pages look kinda abandoned. We might want to clean them up first, before adding any new info. |
| 4922350 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-12 10:01 | commented | kingkingHK | A very trivial first step to make progress in this note and also to declutter the data in the area is to delete the demolished buildings, which is done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184008897 . |
| 5326149 (iD) | 1 | 2026-06-08 18:11 | commented | Kovoschiz | Skytopia only includes the quarantine facility, and waters. Doesn't say the Clearance Building belongs to AA. |
| 5309379 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-31 04:54 | commented | kingkingHK | Fine, although I still disagree, this issue is so trivial and nonconsequential I don't even want to spend my energy debating, so whatever. |
| 5180357 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-30 11:59 | commented | vectorial8192 | OK, leaving open, but imo doesn't seem too interesting here; e.g., road crossing need not enter the MTR station.
Unsubscribing. |
| 2218616 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-30 08:40 | commented | kingkingHK | 38. Cross-harbour Bus 601P (Po Tat → Wing Kut Street)
39. Cross-harbour Bus 601P (Hiu Lai Court → Wing Kut Street)
40. Cross-harbour Bus 606 (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort))
41. Cross-harbour Bus 606 (Choi Wan (Fung Shing Street) → Siu Sai Wan (Island Resort) (via Choi Ha Road))
42. Cross-harbour Bus 606A (Choi W... |
| 5311188 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-26 13:24 | opened | Iulian Arcuș | Unable to answer "What kind of artwork is this?" – Artwork – https://osm.org/node/5018345422 via StreetComplete 63.1:
No visible artwork |
| 5311184 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-26 13:19 | opened | Iulian Arcuș | Area needs remapping. Public toilets built and plants have been modified
via StreetComplete 63.1
Attached photo(s):
https://streetcomplete.app/p/347192.jpg |
| 5310646 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-26 08:08 | opened | Pan Perníček | Forwarding anonymous report from #mapycom user, please verify: Path doesn't exist. |
| 4978548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-25 11:02 | commented | vectorial8192 | Or maybe I have misunderstood the bridge joint tagging. |
| 5307805 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-24 14:18 | opened | KolaVenter1964 | House 213 |
| 5164334 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-20 10:13 | commented | kingkingHK | > here the docs never went past the publication stage
...it did? That's exactly what the Wayback Machine shows?
> never gotten any names to begin with
?????? |
| 5296627 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 07:15 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296607 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 07:10 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296606 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 07:10 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296585 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:51 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296580 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:46 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296578 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:45 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296577 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:43 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296576 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:42 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: physical separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296561 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:34 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5296560 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-17 06:32 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: bridge has bollard separation; draw as two ways |
| 5294906 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-16 16:12 | commented | Kovoschiz | Can you update your description template, already explained in last https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5286430 |
| 5274944 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-09 12:12 | commented | Kovoschiz | (Should be to open) |
| 5034469 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-05 17:57 | reopened | Crystaltszz | |
| 3149177 (iD) | 1 | 2026-05-01 16:08 | commented | vectorial8192 | I don't know all the steps, but basically "after some time" the LWG will meet up and discuss questions, and then the results will be posted to somewhere at the Wiki or sth. |
| 5269824 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-28 14:00 | opened | kingkingHK | todo/issue: review mapping of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/16312559 ; probably against "relations are not categories" |
| 5267124 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-26 14:02 | opened | kingkingHK | todo/issue: some parts of Heung Yip Road should be bridges |
| 5259315 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 14:44 | commented | vectorial8192 | ooof, then this can be classified as a large edit, and we will need to track this. |
| 5264444 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 09:14 | commented | kingkingHK | https://www.pricerite.com.hk/hk/en/storeInfo/ agrees |
| 5173374 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-25 09:07 | commented | kingkingHK | One solution I can think of is to tag `hail_and_ride` along the section intended as a stop. |
| 5257117 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 14:41 | opened | vectorial8192 | todo/issue:
Wo Yi Hop Road: physical separation |
| 5215003 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 14:23 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5128915 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 07:05 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5128914 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-19 06:51 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 5134778 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128949 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128944 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128946 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 04:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128947 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 03:59 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128950 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 03:59 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5128943 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-12 03:59 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5123432 (iD) | 1 | 2026-04-09 16:19 | commented | vectorial8192 | Indeed. I often lose focus. My plan was to discuss this first, but it seems we can discuss SMP side first instead. |
| 5214998 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-22 11:30 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-restaurant
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213340 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Not inside. Outside tennis court."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-drinking_water
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213339 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Nothing there. Just a white wall."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: tourism-artwork
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213338 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213337 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI name: Po's atelier
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5213336 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-21 07:23 | opened | Angus Lee | "Closed."
The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-10T00:09:11Z
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-cafe
#organicmaps ios 2026.03.11-12-ios |
| 5123548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-13 06:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 4025846 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-12 12:00 | commented | kingkingHK | Correct |
| 2046829 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-11 17:32 | commented | Kovoschiz | It's not prohibited explicitly. But technically it seems damaging plants is illegal. |
| 3304147 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-11 10:07 | reopened | kingkingHK | |
| 2690777 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-09 04:15 | commented | kingkingHK | I would rather just map the cliff and be done with it.
Also, legally speaking, this area is located inside a drone no-fly zone, due to the low-air economy regulatory sandbox whatever. Practically speaking, no one would notice, but I am not buying a drone just for this one note. |
| 5155801 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-08 16:39 | commented | vectorial8192 | The ultimate original note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1036042 complains of the following:
"The path from 'Lai Tak Tsuen' to 'viewpoint' is impassable and dangerous. Please remove it from the map" |
| 5194221 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-07 11:44 | opened | kingkingHK | Are https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173722555 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1205445683 connected? |
| 5037709 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-06 11:44 | commented | kingkingHK | Not done yet; please don't resolve! |
| 5191006 (iD) | 1 | 2026-03-05 02:39 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4486222689 descriptive name; probably need to change to hail_and_ride role on route relations, which appears to be unmapped. |
| 5099408 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | Construction not yet finished, but can make a rough sketch first. |
| 2865034 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-23 09:49 | commented | kingkingHK | not blocked* sorry |
| 2218614 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-19 12:35 | commented | kingkingHK | The following bus routes call at Ping Tin:
1. KMB 15 (Ping Tin → Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road))
2. KMB 15 (Hung Hom (Hung Luen Road) → Ping Tin)
3. KMB 15A (Ping Tin → Tsz Wan Shan (North))
4. KMB 15A (Tsz Wan Shan (North) → Ping Tin)
5. KMB 16 (Ping Tin → Mong Kok (Park Avenue))
6. KMB 38 (Ping Tin → Kwai Shing (East))
7. KMB 38 (Kwai Shi... |
| 5165581 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-13 12:00 | commented | vectorial8192 | https://restaurants.fiveguys.com.hk/ agrees |
| 758446 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-06 02:54 | commented | kingkingHK | Eventually, with some guidance from Kovoschiz, I figured out how to overlay historical maps onto editing software.
But then, I felt like if I am mapping a single missing stream, I might as well map all missing streams in this area, which are there hundreds of, making the changeset too big to complete in a single sitting, hence why it took me so l... |
| 1684719 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 10:45 | commented | vectorial8192 | Honourable, but this is extra rural. Might not be worth it. |
| 2414889 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 06:59 | commented | kingkingHK | ...why would you resolve a note while admitting you don't have enough information to do so? Anyway, survey needed. But this might be difficult. |
| 5150198 (iD) | 1 | 2026-02-01 06:51 | opened | kingkingHK | todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002255941 etc descriptive name |
| 5034400 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 14:03 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a Family Medicine Clinic here. |
| 3654302 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 04:03 | commented | kingkingHK | `population=` exists, and the 2021 census gives Tsui Chuk Garden population as 10071. However, the wiki says `population=` should only be used on `place=`. |
| 4113548 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-25 03:38 | commented | kingkingHK | Imo the problem is that you are closing a note alongside with it, which makes it much harder for everyone else to spot potential rooms for improvement. Like, if I weren't here when you closed this note, would anyone notice changing the Country Trail to `access=no` is completely incorrect?
Personally I prefer to make as little guesswork/thinking a... |
| 5105750 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-24 08:57 | commented | kingkingHK | Todo. My plan is to change all `building:part=` towers in Hong Kong to `building=`, then close this note. |
| 5027512 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-23 17:14 | commented | Kovoschiz | As in the connection https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002239786/ |
| 5137708 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-22 02:31 | commented | kingkingHK | However, one may walk in the pedestrian tunnels, allowing for dead reckoning. The hard part would be accounting for elevation change in the footways, which might not be uniform. |
| 5137391 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-21 08:07 | opened | | Florist |
| 5109341 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-18 14:37 | commented | vectorial8192 | Yes, we may do landuse=brownfield here. |
| 5132152 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-17 03:11 | opened | kingkingHK | Todo: add residential entrances, more indoor footways, indoor details, etc.
(continuing from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5104381) |
| 5128917 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 12:12 | opened | | 海豚洗衣24h（堅尼地厚和街店）Dolphin Laundry 24h（Hau Wo Street Store）
堅尼地城厚和街41號厚和閣地下c(41)鋪 |
| 5128916 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-14 12:12 | opened | | 域是乾洗 堅尼地城吉席街 |
| 5057844 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-12 07:46 | commented | Kovoschiz | What's the difference of 2 points with existing? |
| 5034376 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5034435 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5034434 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 2087499 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4029950 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 1655004 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 861105 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 3055825 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 4019647 (iD) | 1 | 2026-01-03 09:33 | commented | kmpoppe | This note was part of a mass-closure without any comment. It was subsequently reopened, as it's unclear if the problem mentioned still persists. |
| 5112232 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-31 11:49 | opened | vectorial8192 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17147569
Country trail is split in half after 2023 rainstorms (notice the concrete retaining covers); see if it has been redesignated / respecified. |
| 5079402 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-18 10:04 | commented | kingkingHK | Afaik if there's something physical (e.g. a monument) saying that it is a movie filming location, it might pass at a tourist attraction. However, I could not find anything here, so I think we can simply delete it. |
| 5034471 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-18 09:56 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here. |
| 5034468 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-18 09:55 | commented | kingkingHK | Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
|
| 4756215 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-10 12:56 | commented | vectorial8192 | Very believable, but that's gonna be very difficult to irl-verify. |
| 4691875 (iD) | 1 | 2025-12-03 11:46 | reopened | vectorial8192 | |
| 5073245 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-30 06:03 | commented | HenryEK | The hydrographic office writes that
"航海人員不宜在爆炸品傾倒區內錨泊、拖綱或進行其他水低或海床作業。Mariners should avoid anchoring, trawling or carrying out any submarine or seabed activities in the explosives dumping ground." on their "charts for local vessels" |
| 5034438 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-02 14:50 | opened | vectorial8192 | Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?) |
| 5034370 (iD) | 1 | 2025-11-02 14:26 | opened | vectorial8192 | Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?) |
| 5016316 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-27 14:05 | commented | kingkingHK | See also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware:
https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814
https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410
Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything ... |
| 1499178 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-22 08:49 | commented | Kovoschiz | `=bad` can be on empty land. Should check the `obstacle=vegetation`, and decide whether it's `disused=yes` or even `abandoned:highway=` |
| 5009959 (iD) | 1 | 2025-10-17 07:18 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/993410749/history requires fix so that name key carry actual name
currently it is
name=Kuan Yam Temple (small)
name:en=Kuan Yam Temple (small)
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names |
| 2641485 (iD) | 1 | 2025-08-21 17:39 | commented | vectorial8192 | Hi there, it seems the relevant paths may have become available (new OSM edits), may you confirm whether the foot paths / steps are really accessible? |
| 4888375 (iD) | 1 | 2025-08-08 14:15 | commented | vectorial8192 | Changeset is controversal; reviving. |
| 2128691 (iD) | 1 | 2025-05-19 08:11 | reopened | Kovoschiz | |
| 4744567 (iD) | 1 | 2025-05-19 08:11 | reopened | Kovoschiz | |
| 4490712 (iD) | 1 | 2024-10-23 03:41 | opened | | 深圳晶泰科技有限公司 XtalPi Shenzhen |
| 3955633 (iD) | 1 | 2023-10-24 08:46 | opened | | 有”此路不通”牌 |
| 818352 (iD) | 1 | 2022-09-20 07:14 | reopened | 如果菠萝油没被蛋挞打败 | |
| 3100485 (iD) | 1 | 2022-04-14 15:32 | commented | Whcohi | debatable location |