| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4913090 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,707 | Somewhere in here there should be Weird Fish The Greenhouse People Craghoppers Best Fruit Aztec Golf https://www.bluediamond.gg/our-locations/huntingdon-garden-living |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,707 | Found a disused Aztec Golf that I've updated. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 days ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Could only find Craghoppers, others must be part of blue diamond.itsself. | |
| 4913107 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,707 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11596070889 What is the name of this gift shop? |
| 2 | ~ 4 days ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Its part of buue diamond | |
| 5542401 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 19 days ago | opened | Chester Fester ♦1 | Ely Market place surface has lots of rain gullies to negotiate and can be hazardous to wheelchair and scooter users. |
| 2 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | added wheelchair description | |
| 5059436 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | asingardenof ♦0 | Within Central Bedfordshire this road is known as Little Barford Road; Barford Road is the section within Bedford Borough. This has been confirmed with reference to the two authorities' adopted highways maps |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | OK Central Bedfoord is Little Barford Road, However properties such as the Little Barford STW and Biffa waste have Barford road addresses. Precisely where it changes is difficult to know, and I haven't access to Bedford definitive map. Post code finder strangely has no Little Barford Road addresses at all and does not use the road name.. In fact most of the addresses on this road in bedford or bedfordshire have no road name, but that is not unusual for a rural area. Have changed names to what we know. | |
| 5519606 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | Signs on main roundabout say this pub is now under new management as a Queensway Inn |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | changed. | |
| 5498747 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | eteb3 ♦1,596 | Appears now to be fixed park homes, not caravan site |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | ||
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | eteb3 ♦1,596 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | This still needs the tags adjusted. It’s no longer a caravan site | |
| 5397956 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | hackthemap ♦837 | There are 3 very short sections in the road of this roundabout that are named Charing Cross. All the other sections were renamed to King Charles I Island. If that is correct (see below), were those just forgotten? Section 1: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49796163 Section 2: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43118734 Section 3: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4256531 I'm not even sure if it should have been renamed to (only) King Charles I Island. It's not indicated that way on lots of maps. But if that is correct, leaving these 3 short sections with the old name seems wrong. It was edited on 10 December 2025 with reference to "According to how Knowledge of London calls it.". Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175777381 But I couldn't find that reference when looking up Knowledge of London and that street. I could only find various Knowledge of London related websites talking about the island using that name, but not specifically the road. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | harg ♦4,304 | Is there any signage? That is what we should be mapping. If signage about the island is only on the island side of the road, then it should probably be applied to the island rather than the road. If there is signage on the outside of the road, then it should be applied to the road. If there is no signage then it is at least arguable whether it should be mapped at all, but if the name if the island is well known then sensible logic would be to map it to the island only but revert the road around it to its original name. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | harg ♦4,304 | But a web search finds: No results found for "King Charles I Island" and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equestrian_statue_of_Charles_I,_Charing_Cross gives the address as Charing Cross rather than KC1 Island. So I think the name of the island is de-facto NOT well known so the change should probably be reverted. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | The Royal Bank of Scotland (south west corner adjacent to what is marked Whithall) has the official address of 49 Charing Cross Road. A brief look at old O/S maps eg 1965 show Charing cross as from maybe Spring gardens across to Northumberland Avenue, maybe dipping down Whitehall, withan old road configuration. So my gut feeling is the south line of the roundabout should be Charing Cross. or at least alt_name . Unless some one has a more definitive map or signs. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Thingummy ♦191 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | harg ♦4,304 | The changeset justification for calling the iskand's highway King Charles seems to be entirely bogus. I found "Knowledge of London Points List Edition 6 July 2026" at https://content.tfl.gov.uk/knowledge-of-london-points-list.pdf. The phrase King Charles does NOT appear anywhere in it. So unless there is official evidence of some sort (not obtained from third party maps) the name should revert to Charing Cross for its entire circumference. Without signage, there might possibly be grounds for naming https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111971259/ (ie, the traffic island not the highway around it) as King Charles I Island. That would make the phrase searchable for anybody who believes it, without falsifying the name of the highway around it. unless there is installed street signage with that name, or an official press release from TFL or | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | My mistake RBS should be just Charring Cross, Not Charing Cross Road. I realise it is technically copyright, but the map which accompanies the Statue on the Heritage England site has the road area to the south of the island marked Charing Cross, that to the north Trafalgar Square. (Based on OS Vector). No mention of the Charles 1 as a road name. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1357291?section=overview Maybe keep as add as name or loc_name of pedestrian area | |
| 5505651 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Thingummy ♦191 | does this need to be here. It is obviously not THE royal mews, and has no feature type. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | harg ♦4,304 | Node history shows it to be the name of a (former?) bicycle docking station. Is the docking station still here? Most of the tags are preceded by was: If it has gone, then the name should also change to old_name or perhaps the node (last edited 2022) should now be deleted. | |
| 5446246 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | eteb3 ♦1,596 | This path is mapped running through a house. #surveyme |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | CiaránMooney ♦269 | The path is marked as a public right of way. Some further investigation will be required. The right of way may have been rerouted. The tags might need updating to record it as historic perhaps | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | CiaránMooney ♦269 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | I've moved it to a space between the cadastral parcels. That would be a normal reroute for this sort of estate. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | eteb3 ♦1,596 | i think this still needs a #surveyme . i agree the strip between two parcels is a likely candidate on the face of it. militating against, the path as now mapped appears to go through an attached garage, and through a circular thing that could be a trampoline in the back garden. the driveway at the front of the property appears to include the width of both the main house parcel and the strip, with a barrier between it and the next house but no sign of one separating the “footpath parcel” (which I think is closed each end? another point against) so i while i think your interpretation is plausible and definitely possible , it doesn’t reach the level of “likely”, for me | |
| 4850985 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Itsnotmeitsyou | There is now an estate here consisting of roads such as Anchor Avenue, Riverside Close and Dobney Street |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | Added roads from Esri. Road names needed and possibly some tweaking when better aerial / survey available | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | Added couple of road names and moved path to cadastrals. Needs more when available. | |
| 5467934 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | There is a rain gauge here https://check-for-flooding.service.gov.uk/rainfall-station/E24238?v=map-live&lyr=mv,rf&ext=-0.215446,52.320204,-0.197078,52.326364&fid=rainfall_stations.E24238.An |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | I'd like to do this, however published longitude and latitude of practically everything on the flooding service map is around 100m off from where it should be, due to them converting approximate UK grid refs to world coordinates. (In this case the coordinates are in a field, or a built up area, depending on source.) I suspect they do it intentionally (stories of people augmenting rain gauges with pee etc). I could put the rain gauge data in with the building tags, I suppose. Unless you can tell me the precise location. | |
| 5338659 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Carl Sutton | Fallowfields, Mill Lane, St Neots, PE19 1FD |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | Is fallowfields the name of the whole development? I mean a roughly triangular plot with around 6 houses on, facing inwards to a circular centrepiece | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | 5 Houses, ive mapped it from Esri overhead photo, and other published bit, plus the listed addresses. i'll leave it open for now in case anyone has more | |
| 5195939 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | Thingummy ♦191 | Is this road Paxton Hill I think it is marked wromg. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | Paxton Hill is given as an alt_name. It's the same road - the question is where it becomes Paxton Hill. The web generally has the industrial site being on "Paxton Hill", as does OS Open. This far out of town I doubt there are signs, but might be worth a survey. Otherwise it's probably a question of local custom and usage as to where the names are allocated. Or there really are two names in use: "It's on the Huntingdon road" "whereabouts?" "On Paxton Hill". Maybe worth asking the original tagger on the changesets ? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Post code finder has the farm and industrial estate as paxton hill, and the Sewage works is officially listed as Huntingdon Road by Anglian water, so I have gone with that as where it changes. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Thingummy ♦191 | ||
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Actually looks like surrounding area is named after an old manor Paxton Hill House. and the name changes at the railway bridge. | |
| 5469603 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Thingummy ♦191 | We have two areas both marked W&QE1 inside each other, they cannot both be right. I am tempted to delete the smaller, but do not know for sure. |
| 4054744 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | KoiAndBlueBird ♦218 | Is the name of this really "Plantation"? The CS says "local names", but OS doesn't list it. If this is slang, maybe another tag (local_name?) would fit better? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | paceban353 | Why is Kosovo | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | KoiAndBlueBird ♦218 | ||
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Qinyao Huang | ||
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | Qinyao Huang | ||
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | SK53 ♦3,862 | No, clearly the typenof woodland, not the name. Probably copied from text on an old map. | |
| 7 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | christophersanders | I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford | |
| 8 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦7,740 | Reopened by DWG | |
| 9 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Its a birders place i think, Rare brown things get blown tere as its the only cover for miles. | |
| 10 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | SK53 ♦3,862 | ||
| 11 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SK53 ♦3,862 | I wouldn't use viewpoint (even if misspelt!) for places where birders assemble looking for rare birds. Places like Blakeney (whole North Norfolk coast really & Spurn further North) are most popular during Autumn migration & especially if weather conditions are right for a "fall" (rare migrants diverted across North Sea and arrive exhausted). I don't know how busy it is at other times. Clearly these are local names used by those in the know (birders) and not general names. For instance they aren't on OS maps. I think loc_name is more appropriate and have commented on the original changeset as well. | |
| 12 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | You are probably right about using viewpoint=, but I was following the Wiki, although Taginfo shows no use in GB. As for names, there are no official or local names in the area as the rate of change of the topography and colonisation means there is very little fixed to name. So if someone wants to find a location, any identifiable feature, including this first colonisation by trees it is useful. None of the near by names are on any maps new or old. It has a wikimedia page, a Geograph page, and is on Cleybirdclub.org.uk 's sketch map. I gave up counting when i got to 20 distinct websites mentioning it from a google search. | |
| 13 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SK53 ♦3,862 | Oh yes birders locations will crop up on a lot of websites (especially if used for reporting sightings). However they tend to be names used by those 'in the know', rather than general ones. It can be very confusing trying to match birders reports in an unfamiliar location (although this may have lot easier over the past 20 years). So I'm in favour of having the names, but not sure if the name tag is best. On the other point I suspect the wiki is plain wrong. Bird hides and other birding locations are not in general viewpoints in the accepted tourism sense. A few locations (notably narrow straights & mountain passes) are called "raptor niewpoints". | |
| 14 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SK53 ♦3,862 | Oh yes birders locations will crop up on a lot of websites (especially if used for reporting sightings). However they tend to be names used by those 'in the know', rather than general ones. It can be very confusing trying to match birders reports in an unfamiliar location (although this may have lot easier over the past 20 years). So I'm in favour of having the names, but not sure if the name tag is best. On the other point I suspect the wiki is plain wrong. Bird hides and other birding locations are not in general viewpoints in the accepted tourism sense. A few locations (notably narrow straights & mountain passes) are called "raptor niewpoints". | |
| 15 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | SK53 ♦3,862 | In fact the wiki says "tourism=viewpoint is extremely unlikely to be a valid combination, such objects are likely man_made=tower + tower:type=observation". One the bird hide page. | |
| 3618959 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦329 | Is this track private? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | paceban353 | Why is Kosovo | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | CycleStreets ♦329 | ||
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | christophersanders | I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦7,740 | Reopened by DWG | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | No reason to think it is public designated, looks an like old driveway to the hall, but I could be wrong. | |
| 4789783 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Adam-Eye ♦45 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – on bridge: Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/176790662 via StreetComplete_ee 61.0: Wooden walkway with rails onto the beach |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | christophersanders | I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦7,740 | Reopened by DWG | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | tagged as boardwalk with handrail | |
| 5319253 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | NNR (National Nature Reserve) Office for Holkham Nature Reserve. |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | christophersanders | I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦7,740 | Reopened by DWG | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Fixed I think. | |
| 5169767 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Beach Warden ♦0 | "As beach warden, I can assure you that this location is NOT the naturist beach, that is further west and slightly north as also indicated on the map." OSM snapshot date: 2026-01-25T13:04:34Z POI name: Holkham Naturist Beach POI types: natural-beach #organicmaps android 2026.01.26-11-Google |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | christophersanders | I am being SILENCED by Israel! Listen closely: There is a nuclear power plant being built in Alford | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦7,740 | Reopened by DWG | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Deleted. Together with a somewhat suspect viewpoint. | |
| 4727783 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Flic ♦44 | In context of overlay "Buildings" – Row of Townhouses – https://osm.org/way/712529648 via StreetComplete 60.3: 29, 30, 31 and 32 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Mex ♦8,492 | would it make sense to split this into 4 properties? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | ideally, but I'd suggest it's good enough as is, and could close this note? | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | No one will notice the difference. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | ceirios ♦3,934 | ||
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | ceirios ♦3,934 | Split buildings are important in terms of accuracy. There are plenty more buildings in this area that can be split too. | |
| 4654698 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Flic ♦44 | Murfitt Close goes between these buildings not the other side via StreetComplete 60.2 |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | sorry, I don't follow. can you clarify? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Just needed couple of minor adjustments to fit everything in. | |
| 3248938 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | DaveF ♦741 | Is this still a functioning quarry? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | It is still listed with Tarmac and Mick George. Quarries are impossible to predict. They seem dormant for years, then start up again. Unless you are local updating quarries is just too tedious, unless the land is turned into a nature reserve or something. | |
| 5390216 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,576 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1545662156/history place=farm wiki page ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=farm ) claims that it is solely for named farms. Is this tagged incorrectly? Is it named but name is missing from OSM? Is wiki wrong? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | I've tagged it as neighborhood; Name=Rutland Manor, as thete appears to be more workshops and houses than I would expect for just a farm, and I don't know what is farm and what is something else.. My interpretation is that all place=* tags are meaningless without a name=* tag as in the wiki. - building=Farm, building=farm_auxiliary, landuse=Farmyard landuse=residential etc can be added if you know which buildings are which. | |
| 5200978 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | --- | Approximate Point of Collision |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | Unfortunately, unlesss there is permanent visual evidence on a site, this is outside what can be mapped. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | - | |
| 5289224 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | --- | This isn't called the "Milestone at Bell End". That sounds like a joke someone's played: Bell Field is nearby but it's a modern street. I don't think it *has* a name other than "the Brampton milestone" |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Yep t'is. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1006823?section=overview Named after the area of Brampton called Bell End, after the Pub which is now Old Bell House. It is a scheduled monument and listed building by Historic England, Details are in the Tags. | |
| 3505220 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | Robert Whittaker ♦1,763 | New service station under construction somewhere near this junction, according to https://www.suffolknews.co.uk/bury-st-edmunds/news/new-service-station-set-to-include-a-greggs-bp-budgens-and-9277324/ . Needs a survey. #surveyme |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Robert Whittaker ♦1,763 | Looks like the POIs have now been mapped as nodes. When aerial imagery updates, it would be good to get some of the geometry mapped too. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Done from esri, a lot of green field still left, and lacks details so added fixme | |
| 5066554 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Ian Eiloart ♦13 | gravel, driveway #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | thanks | |
| 5201424 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,707 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10946201701 Is this still here? Does it have a name? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,707 | Is it Great Wall? https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/1853355 | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Its moved. across the road nearer town. | |
| 4258901 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | DorneyLake123 ♦6,074 | landuse = farm hard standing ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154151708 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | man_made=bunker_silo? man_made=concrete_apron? I'm not sure there's a satisfactory tag for this. It may be concrete slabs, but many round these parts aren't. I'd like a general tag "apron", but this seems to be available only under the aeroway=* key. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Thingummy ♦191 | Nothing obvious springs to mind but landuse=farmyard + surface=concrete + farmyard=depot or farmyard=storage. Or highway=service + area=yes + surface=concrete + access=private or may be both. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | Good suggestions. Thanks | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | eteb3 ♦1,596 | ||
| 4979856 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Unit 9 |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Added address, however please see nearby note and confirm if it is correctly Paxton Hill, not Huntingdon Foad as currently marked. | |
| 1756118 | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | opened | ThomasGdner | This footbridge is marked on the map and I am unsure if it still exists. |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | I paddled past around a month ago and spotted its sister to the south, but not this one. I wasn't specially looking as I hadn't seen this note, so still possible it's in place but agreed it's doubtful. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | Mex ♦8,492 | don't think I can see it on sat image either | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | I'm sureits gone for good since the viaduct was built | |
| 1907943 | 1 | ~ 7 years ago | opened | eteb3 ♦1,596 | Could someone with the skills please roll back my changeset here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105386882 I've read further documentation that suggests this weir needs done differently - besides being strictly in the wrong place. Thank you - if you could message when done, even more appreciated. eteb3 |
| 2 | ~ 7 years ago | commented | freebeer ♦51,270 | it appears you have edited the way since this request, so i take it this is no longer relevant? | |
| 3 | ~ 7 years ago | commented | eteb3 ♦1,596 | I wish! I don't know how I managed to edit it a second time. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Can't see anything wrong. (I've added a centre line to be precise, but that's a bit pedantic) I guess you are concerned that Inserting the weir split the circular "nature reserve boundary" and "waterarea boundary" into three parts. Then the system recombines the borders automatically into a line "relation". That is normal. Once you have a relation it is more difficult to edit, as it doesn't want you to leave orphan bits of relation behind, so you simply have to remove the relation tag whilst you edit, then replace it. (PS will be using the border relation as a quick way to create land use when I get around to it, so it will come in useful) | |
| 5146259 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Borbus ♦325 | Mosque #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Added, Thanks. | |
| 5152163 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Thingummy ♦191 | Does this footpath continue under the railway.? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Dedpopstar | There is no way of passing under or over the railway at this point. | |
| 239939 | 1 | ~ 12 years ago | opened | Rudolf Mayer ♦202 | Please provide details to the golf course at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128414385, if private, then mark it as such |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,576 | from aerial it does not look like a golf course to me (as of 2025) | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Thingummy ♦191 | Underwood hall is privae land,as far as I know. Any golf is private residential property. (I doubt it exists since it was for sale in2022 ,with a listing of former golf course.) |