| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5209110 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | kylor ♦61 | Is this a real park? |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | It's not listed on Tigard Parks and Recreation's website. It appears to be an HOA greenspace. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦20,382 | updated | |
| 5140818 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Sidewalks have recently been built along most of the length of Jennings |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Looks like this was added. | |
| 5188573 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦125 | Are the "on demand" traffic signals around the county campus actual traffic signals, or are they button-operated crossing beacons that aren't signals? |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | The latter | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦125 | cool I'll change the tags then! | |
| 5185649 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | There are two overlapping reservoir polygons here |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | one was copied straight from the 1970s era topographic map... divided this out into pond and wetland depending on how lidar hit the area | |
| 5185648 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | There are two overlapping reservoir polygons here, and the next reservoir downstream isn't mapped (likely as it doesn't have a GNIS ID). |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | ||
| 5178692 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | kylor ♦61 | Is this wetland still here? Was added 15 years ago and it does not look like a wetland under aerial imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | It looks to me like a poorly aligned attempt to capture the riparian hardwood forest here (maybe this was in the NWI at one point, or came from BLM data). Part of it could have been young regrowth that got misclassified, too. If this area is getting new land-cover mapping I'd probably call this all "natural wood"; I don't know that there's a distinct wetland here. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | kylor ♦61 | converted to wood as I could not find evidence of a wetland here | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | kylor ♦61 | ||
| 5180287 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | please work on this unmapped house |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Use https://maps.clackamas.us/maps/cmap if you need Clackamas County parcel addresses | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | it was another part of 27956 | |
| 5180286 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | please someone work on these two unmapped buildings (very likely houses) because they were unmapped |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Use https://maps.clackamas.us/maps/cmap if you need Clackamas County parcel addresses | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | same as fixed problem above | |
| 5174973 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | I-76 ♦3,385 | Unless seasonal, a number bodies of water here that are mapped seem to have dried out somewhat |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | A lot of these lakes fluctuate seasonally and will dry up in an unusually dry summer. I'm not sure it's worth trying to tag them all as "seasonal". | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | I-76 ♦3,385 | Intermittent? | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | Natfoot ♦1,015 | #fixed | |
| 5113575 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | --- | This is the entrance to the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge and where the maps should lead people. If they wish to route further into the Wildlife Refuge they can, but the road accessible part starts here. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,015 | Sounds like a router issue. anyone want to chime in? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Also, this is one of two separate units of the Refuge with public access, the River S Unit. People should come here for the auto tour but should go to the Carty Unit to the north to hike and see the plankhouse. (The rest of the refuge is closed to public access except for seasonal hunting.) | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,015 | so we need to make sure the point that people navigate to is here rather than in the middle or north? | |
| 5153224 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | I put this down as landfill but is it landfill? I can't tell but if it is let's put this person on the HOARDERS TV show (joke don't be offended) |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | possibly industrial=scrap_yard? but doesn't seem to be cars | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Doesn't seem to be industrial, either. Appears to be an unregulated outdoor junk collection. I don't know that there's a feature type for those; I suppose they're technically "temporary", which means that they wouldn't regularly be mapped. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | I've deleted it. Author is a new mapper creating many issues with low quality edits. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | ||
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | bro that was months ago i am a new but not... new mapper also ive made reasonable edits i like micromapping | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | ||
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | To answer your question, no, it's not a landfill. EButlerEcologist seems to agree that it shouldn't be mapped, so I've deleted it - again. If you have similar questions in the future, please ask on the forum BEFORE mapping. I didn't say you haven't made reasonable edits, just that you have caused many issues, e.g. mapping things you don't know how to map before asking how to map them. | |
| 9 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | thanks for the advice | |
| 10 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | ||
| 5163059 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Can someone verify the natural gas pipeline alignment around here? There's clearly a valve at this point but the pipeline is mapped some distance away. It's hard to tell from surface traces where it runs |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | archpdx ♦1,924 | Realigned using old esri imagery (you can kinda see where they laid down the pipeline based on break in nearby orchards) | |
| 5130844 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | chath_tsu ♦125 | copied from fixme: Can we verify that this is actually a seprate bike path and not just a painted bike lane? If it is a standard bike lane then it shouldn't be mapped as a separate feature - I looked on streetview and looks like the sidepath is for contraflow bike traffic, and bike traffic in the other direction uses a standard painted bike lane? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Aerial imagery (Bing Maps) makes it look like this is a painted bikelane on the westbound side, and there is no bike lane on the eastbound side. There is a detached sidewalk for a short distance on that side just south of the intersection with Lombard, starting right around where this bike lane "ends". | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | chath_tsu ♦125 | yes i think the westbound painted bike lane should be mapped as tags on the main roadway, and the vertically separated side path on the north side should be a multi-use path with oneway EB bicycle (there are markings and signs designating it for bikes and peds but it's not visible from aerials) | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,015 | this might be helpful: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Bicycle_routing | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Natfoot ♦1,015 | whoopse did not mean to leave the hastag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | chath_tsu ♦125 | ||
| 5140817 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | I doubt this is a ford. It's just a few minutes' walk from where I live so I'll scout it this weekend. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Turns out it IS a ford. The creek is intermittent. Changeset incoming. | |
| 5142886 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Per their website, the museum is currently closed due to building damage |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Mora3000 ♦479 | Thank you. I added 'Temporarily Closed' to the name and added info in the desc field. Plus, there is a wikipedia link that talks about the damage as well. At greater than $20 million, looks like this won't be open soon. | |
| 5098097 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Likely culvert under St Helens |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Portland Bureau of Environmental Services seems the most likely entity to have mappable information on culverts under NW Saint Helens Rd. This and pretty much all other creeks draining from Forest Park are piped out to the river and the outlets are generally submerged. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | ah ha: https://pdx.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=807ed51bb0314f9cbd31815c73ff9b6e | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Cool, good find! | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | ||
| 5004804 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | people128256 ♦322 | Is there really a farm here? Last time I checked, it was an empty lot. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦322 | Satellite image suggests that this isn't one; however, it seems there's no official website? And the name varies by sources, either Dinihanian Farm or a Floral Market. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tguen ♦1,466 | https://www.loganfamilytreefarm.com/ This says it's a christmas tree farm which is what it looks like in aerial imagery. Other sources suggest it has a farmers market. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦322 | Yeah, that's the confusing part about it. A ground survey might be needed. | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Dinihanian primarily makes floral and decorative foliage arrangements (holiday wreaths, etc.); most of the vegetation on the property is ornamental holly, and it's been looking pretty overgrown and bramble-choked for years now. I don't know what elements of their business are currently open; my guess is that they're no longer harvesting much material on site but are still using it as a production facility for wholesale merchandise. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | google has the most accurate names so i looked at google earth and it is a tree farm however it is in a different name. after i post this i will change then name. | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | people128256 ♦322 | ||
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦322 | @bobthebuilder423468, please revert your edit ASAP. I appreciate your effort, but we do not use Google Maps or Street View due to copyright reasons. | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦322 | @bobthebuilder423468, please stop copying from Google Maps. I have undone your edit. This is not the first time you have done this, please revert **all** other edits done by Google Maps. | |
| 10 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | bobthebuilder423468 ♦150 | okay thanks. i dont think i can revert all because i have alot of edits but i can revert the ones i remember. | |
| 11 | ~ 20 days ago | commented | people128256 ♦322 | Since this note has been open for 9 months, I did some deeper digging. Here is the tax info obtained from WashCo Intermap: https://washcotax.co.washington.or.us/Property-Detail/PropertyQuickRefID/R603065/PartyQuickRefID According to the above, it was sold from the Dilihahan family in 2024. But the websites still mention the other places at this address, which is confusing to say the least... | |
| 5140813 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | The Five Oaks Museum closed a few years ago due to loss of funding. I believe the building is currently vacant but haven't been there to verify for several months. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | people128256 ♦322 | As it closed in December 2024 but it's not clear what's there instead, I've retagged it as a general building. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | people128256 ♦322 | ||
| 5139658 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | I think this crossing is a bridge but I don't remember for sure--I haven't hiked this stretch in a while. |
| 5098095 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Culvert inferred from satellite, could use verification |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | I suspect the stream alignment near the trailhead might be off; the culvert alignment doesn't look too bad | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | updated | |
| 5098093 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Where does this stream go? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | See my comment on note/5098097 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | updated | |
| 5098090 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Where does this stream go? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | seems misplaced and should be further north according to LIDAR layers | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | See my comment on note/5098097 | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | moved and updated | |
| 5098088 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Where does this stream come out? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | See my comment on note/5098097 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | added | |
| 5098089 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | This obviously has to go into a culvert and come out somewhere, needs surveying |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦13,575 | it's connected to a little lake? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | That's Doane Lake, which is what remains of the wetlands that used to cover most of the west bank of the Willamette. I don't believe Doane Lake has an outlet except to groundwater, but there might be an old pipe in there somewhere. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | ||
| 5098087 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | This is likely culverted somewhere, needs surveying to find where it connects to the river |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,213 | I would recommend a kayak or boat on the river since that is likely where it goes. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | See my comment on note/5098097 | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | ||
| 5098099 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | cincodenada ♦48 | Where does this stream go? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,213 | I would recommend a kayak or boat on the river since that is likely where it goes. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | See my comment on Note 5098097 | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | ||
| 4991999 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Heyitsarkay ♦48 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – FoPo Food Carts (Food Court) – https://osm.org/way/722371681 via StreetComplete 61.3: Some sort of parking lot or car storage lot Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/308905.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | This location closed a few years ago. It's just an empty lot behind a chain-link fence. I'll remove the outdated info. | |
| 4775530 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | This bridge is gone, not sure what happened to it but it's no longer possible to cross the creek (unless you're wearing waders) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | This was me, forgot I wasn't logged in. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦20,382 | changed to a ford | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | ||
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | Cool, but it's a pretty gnarly ford. That water's deep. | |
| 4857004 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Dzertanoj ♦3 | There's no evidence of street access to this "park", and no mention of it on the Oregon City Parks and Recreation page, as well as in any OC Web Maps datasets. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Hypsometric ♦4,452 | An assesors doc shows it was (at least proposed) to call this plat Oak Tree Park. Maybe at one point it was. On street level imagery from 2021, the only way in appears to be blocked. The owners of the properties where it appears you could enter (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1439764979) are using it as their own. My gut says remove it. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | EButlerEcologist ♦35 | It's an undeveloped park operated by City of Oregon City (they own the taxlot), which makes it public property regardless of access. At a minimum the city has the legal right to use their ROW. Other park districts have comparable properties displayed on OSM. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | tguen ♦1,466 | It's listed as a natural area in Metro's ORCA dataset. |