OSM note activities of vectorial8192 for the last 12 months
Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | More? See ResultMaps | Notes overview worldwide | Autoreload 5:00 min
Overall activities (12 months)
Opened: 238 (23%) Commented: 345 (33%) Closed: 442 (42%) Reopened: 26 (2%)
Stats per month
Latest activities
Latest activities | The colored events are made by vectorial8192 | Limit 500
Note#Tmstmp UTCEventContributorCommentAuto-translation
5091914
Category: Unknown		12025-12-15 07:57openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: bus stop placeholders, etc.?
5078637
Category: Unknown		12025-12-04 14:03openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Anyone know what this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1455730544 is named?
22025-12-11 02:09commentedHenryEK
♦18		Lung Cheung Road Sitting Out Area
32025-12-11 02:14commentedHenryEK
♦18		zh 龍翔道休憩處 https://www.map.gov.hk/gm/s/S/1503005523
42025-12-11 03:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		@HenryEK are you sure it can be used in terms of copyright?
52025-12-11 05:20commentedHenryEK
♦18		Im not sure what you mean by that sorry Do you mean the place name cannot be used due to copyright or the source?
62025-12-11 05:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OSM has very high standards on what can/cannot be included. One of these standards is "non-copyrighted data". e.g., "do not copy from other maps, e.g. Google Maps". Problem: sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a certain information is copyright-protected.
72025-12-11 11:05commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps/Nokia_Maps/...? If you are unsure whether a map can be copied, it would be the safest to assume that it can't. For this specific case, the easiest solution would be just visiting the site, as park names are usually signposted, and this location is not inconvenient to get to.
82025-12-11 19:12commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5083046 https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licensing_Working_Group/Minutes/2024-05-13#Ticket#2024040710000103_–_Database_for_importing_license_question
92025-12-15 07:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		> and this location is not inconvenient to get to Technically, you are correct, but it just doesn't feel right.
4852037
Category: unknown		12025-07-12 21:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		"Hung Shui Kiu" is only a tentative name, as per usual railway development practice.
22025-12-14 13:16commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Excuse my ignorance on this topic, could you please elaborate on what the "usual railway development practice" is, why "Hung Shui Kiu" is only a tentative name, and how it affects osm mapping/tagging? Thanks in advance.
32025-12-15 05:29commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Basically, the "correct" name is only decided very late into the construction process, which is essentially a month before usage. During construction, the station most likely has a technical but internal name, and ideally we should type that name into the name field, but obviously that's private info and we can't expect to know about that. I opted for e.g. "Hung Shui Kiu Railway Station" to signal this, but then people don't/won't care/know abut this, so this note imo is uncloseable.
42025-12-15 05:30commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		However, imo the real station name will very likely be "Hung Shui Kiu" as most would expect, but right now that's unsubstantiated and would count as "original research"/"fabrication".
5089790
Category: Unknown		12025-12-13 14:17openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: name of feature?
22025-12-14 13:13commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Probably "屯門高爾夫球中心 Tuen Mun Golf Centre" https://www.lcsd.gov.hk/en/golf/tuen_mun.html
32025-12-15 05:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		100%; I just don't have time to type it.
4958371
Category: Unknown		12025-09-12 13:02openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Quarry Bay station, Exits B1, B2, and B3 are original research.
22025-09-12 13:07commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		*also exit B4
32025-09-12 13:20commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		These B "subexits" are not signposted irl and do not appear in irl official diagrams. IRL only denotes "B". This is different from East Tsim Sha Tsui Station where the J "subexits" are delegated to be under the management of an external party, currently the manager of Victoria Dockside, and each have their own ref. I can personally attest these J "subexit" refs have been in use for at least 20 years. Evidence for these B "subexit" refs must be presented; otherwise I will delete them.
42025-09-12 14:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Detected faulty changeset as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16819169 .
52025-09-24 14:14commentedkingkingHK
♦215		From Discord discussion, it seems like this note is a false positive? If so, perhaps we can close it.
62025-09-24 15:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The next step is to check/confirm the railway protection details, and I haven't done that yet.
72025-09-30 14:58commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		So, there really are official documents that write down exist B1 to B4, but they are no longer signposted irl. Then, need to determine the proper next step. Should we keep only the B exit or somehow mix in the preexisting B1 - B4 exits with the newly-mapped B exit?
82025-09-30 15:42commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Imo if it's no longer signposted irl then I don't see why it should still be kept. Official documents can still be outdated or simply wrong.
92025-11-26 07:36commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Also, `old_ref` can be considered if you really want to keep the B1-B4.
102025-12-14 13:28commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Would there be any disagreements if I make all of them `ref=B`, change the `=B1` to `=B4` to `old_ref=`, and close this note?
112025-12-15 05:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I don't know the details, but it seems there can only be 1x `ref=B` as specified by the OSM schema.
122025-12-15 10:55commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It should be acceptable to have multiple `ref=B`
5034465
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:54openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-14 12:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Someone else did it via https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13310973675 ; closing.
5034440
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:51openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-12-14 10:35closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175911639 ; closing.
5034442
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:52openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Should this be a Family Medicine Clinic?
22025-11-02 15:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Seems like it; the placement makes it very unobvious.
32025-12-14 10:33commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Interestingly, it seems there are 2 entrances: one at the low side (Queen's Road), and another at the high side (Hospital Road). Will need to look at this again.
5078621
Category: Unknown		12025-12-04 13:52openedkingkingHK
♦215		Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7134763060 supposed to be `amenity=waste_basket` instead?
22025-12-14 10:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Well, actually I can't find anything like this here. If hypothetically there was a "mobile waste disposal container" (aka "斗") then it still shouldn't be in OSM.
32025-12-14 10:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175911547 ; closing.
5034463
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:53openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-14 09:09closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175909693 ; closing.
4957859
Category: Unknown		12025-09-12 05:33opened---停車場入口Parking lot entrance
22025-09-12 11:26commentedkingkingHK
♦215		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12784120427 ?
32025-09-30 15:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think the key point is to determine the actual driving direction. This might also be a car park entrance.
42025-10-22 09:32closedIGCHK
♦2
52025-10-22 10:29reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
62025-10-22 14:36commentedNeisBot
♦22,495		Hi kingkingHK, Thank you for reopening the note. I noticed there wasn't a comment explaining the reason for reopening. Could you please provide more details or context behind the decision? This will help us better understand and address the note appropriately. #ReopenedWithoutComment
72025-12-13 14:39commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		As suspected, the irl is complex.
82025-12-13 15:17commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The actual correct "parking entrance" node is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12784120428, but this area/path *can* *lead to* the parking entrance. This stuff is stacked. I don't expect the usual kind of navigation software can interpret this correctly.
92025-12-13 15:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Normally, it would be fine to not indoor map multi-story car parks when the parking entrance node is mapped. However, I heard that there is also a parking entrance from Kennedy Road westbound, can you confirm that? (it seems like you surveyed this recently so I suppose you know)
102025-12-13 15:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It doesn't help that some of the access roads on different levels were wrongly stitched together. Still, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175885484 ; closing.
5089784
Category: Unknown		12025-12-13 14:15openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: name:zh of feature?
5034516
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 16:21opened---GULU Greek Yogurt
22025-12-04 15:33commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6378290625 is referencing a difficult-to-load webpage.
32025-12-13 13:57commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		irl does see shop replaced by this note.
42025-12-13 14:00closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175882355 ; closing.
5034439
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:50openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-12-13 13:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175882080 ; closing.
5087538
Category: Unknown		12025-12-11 18:08openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: Some clinics have generic names, which may be improved.
5087537
Category: Unknown		12025-12-11 18:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: Some clinics have generic names, which may be improved.
5016776
Category: Unknown		12025-10-21 16:30openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Super overlapped pedestrian paths?
22025-11-26 07:44commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Could you please elaborate?
32025-11-26 16:58commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Elaboration: Latest satellite imagery (and therefore irl) shows the sidewalk has been moved north, but then it is super close to an unrelated foot path. What might be happening irl?
42025-11-28 15:26commentedkingkingHK
♦215		I think they are not at the same vertical level? Ie there might be some sort of retaining wall/cliff between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763946005 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964606433 . Disclaimer: I have never visited this place after the TCL extension works began, but I still vaguely remember there was a retaining wall/embankment here back then.
52025-12-11 13:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Ok, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964606433 is really on an embankment, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763946005 is lower than it. However, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763946007 simply does not exist. Anyway, there is no "super close footpath" problem then. If you have nothing to say then I will close this note.
62025-12-11 15:05commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not much to add; if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763946007 doesn't really exist then might as well delete it.
72025-12-11 15:06commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hold on, if the way doesn't exist, then what is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763943098 ?
82025-12-11 15:17commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Upon rechecking, my initial statement was wrong. But the actual situation is too complicated to explain in words so I will just make a changeset.
92025-12-11 15:24closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175805782 ; closing,
5034432
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:47openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-11 10:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175791540 ; closing.
5086890
Category: Unknown		12025-12-11 09:10openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Footpaths / service roads are very close to each other. Are these actually connected somehow?
22025-12-11 09:11commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Seems unlikely from the looks, but intend to irl-walk there.
5083046
Category: Unknown		12025-12-08 04:20openedkingkingHK
♦215		https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404367919 feels like a "descriptive name"
22025-12-11 05:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		How to say it, sometimes plots (esp brownfields) don't have obvious names. We may sometimes guess names from newspapers (e.g. new brownfield available for bidding) but that's mostly it.
5086249
Category: Unknown		12025-12-10 16:34openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6143117229 descriptive name
5036089
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 13:34openedkingkingHK
♦215		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-10 16:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175764666 ; closing.
5077338
Category: Unknown		12025-12-03 12:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Village areas https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188488683 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188488680 probably should not have names, but have `addr:*=*` instead.
22025-12-03 13:37commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See also the changeset discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145486557 .
32025-12-03 13:47commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		oh yeah; it me this is more like a todo / coordination note
42025-12-10 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175762046 ; closing.
4756215
Category: unknown		12025-05-13 04:47opened---[飲用水] 此處設有加水機Drinking water is available, a water dispenser is located here
22025-12-10 13:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Very believable, but that's gonna be very difficult to irl-verify.
82994212016-12-27 10:16openedWanderer GoGo
♦15		unpaved 45 degree slope between hill top and camp site (OSM data version: 2016-11-05T13:55:03Z) #mapsme
22025-12-10 13:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No campsites found near this note in OSM; seems like "private note", and may then be closed.
5080918
Category: Unknown		12025-12-06 12:27openedkingkingHK
♦215		Does Tai Shue Wan https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8791675465 really deserve to be `=suburb`? I don't feel like it's that important.
22025-12-06 20:56commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It's enough if it stands on its own, cf Sham Wan, Shouson Hill. You thinking it should be in Wong Chuk Hang?
32025-12-07 13:28commentedkingkingHK
♦215		I feel like it is not really that important when it appears to be unpopulated. But nevermind if the standard is just "standing on its own". I originally noticed this when I saw Carto render Tai Shue Wan over Ap Lei Chau at zoom 12 even though I personally consider Ap Lei Chau to be much more "important", so I wondered if that is caused by the overrating of Tai Shue Wan. Perhaps that can simply solved by adding `population` to Ap Lei Chau, given it's an island so there's no problems with verifiability?
42025-12-07 17:37commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		1. The definition of populated can be debated. If there are hotels, or jails (need to do revision on census definition), are those really "unpopulated"? That's not the same as census definition of populations. Eg Penny's Bay, or Chek Lap Kok may have no residents either. 2. Carto doesn't always work. `population=` is not the only factor in what's important. Eg HKI is less populated than Kowloon and NT. 3. I suspect Carto `population=` only affects `=city` https://github.com/openstreetmap-carto/openstreetmap-carto/pull/1461
52025-12-10 13:49commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		tbf renderers have their choice on picking what to render. Them picking Tai Shue Wan over Ap Lei Chau is their L. Still, specifically for Ap Lei Chau, supposedly renderers should prioritize Ap Lei Chau because it's an island. I would expect "island > suburb".
5085937
Category: Unknown		12025-12-10 12:17openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Locate where "大寶冰室" is located, and map it as a tourist attraction.
22025-12-10 13:12commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Disagree with tourist attraction, it feels like just a fad. But of course we can still map the restaurant itself which seems to be unmapped in osm currently; online information says it is located somewhere near https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515279343
32025-12-10 13:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I have no comments on "is fad" or not, but indeed, at minimum we can map that restaurant into OSM. When memes and copypasta leak into irl, even us at OSM can't possibly ignore them. The "fad" might just result in a new tourist attraction.
42025-12-10 14:52commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Imo meme/copypasta is not sufficient to justify a tourist attraction; at least it needs to have a significant sustained group of people visiting it for the sake of it. While this might be true now, it is still too early to tell if this will last long enough to satisfy the "don't map temporary features/properties on osm" rule.
5034323
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:10openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-10 12:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175753614 ; closing.
5080646
Category: Unknown		12025-12-06 09:16openedkingkingHK
♦215		Is Lantau Link Visitors Centre (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12271148) really a `highway=rest_area`?
22025-12-10 11:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hong Kong does not have rest areas. At most this is a park.
32025-12-13 15:15commentedkingkingHK
♦215		But then, the park already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158307216, the relation merely includes it and the parking nearby (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903452942). Maybe that means the relation is useless?
4622400
Category: StreetComplete		12025-02-11 08:17openedprodevp
♦3		Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Motor Mech (Car Repair Shop) – https://osm.org/node/4845847910 via StreetComplete 60.1: Golden World Motors
22025-09-01 15:39commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct.
32025-12-10 04:39commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Any updates to this note?
42025-12-10 13:52closedkingkingHK
♦215		Apologies for always surveying without mapping. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175758186 ; closing.
5079398
Category: Unknown		12025-12-05 03:13opened---4
22025-12-05 03:29closedkingkingHK
♦215		Meaning is unclear, closing.
32025-12-10 04:30reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-12-10 04:31closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		just a PS: I can contextually guess it tries to write down Wilson Trail sections (also see another highly related note on the east side), but again, these sections already exist.
401589612023-12-05 14:25openedIan Ho
♦33		The pylons are under the project "Removal of 132kV Overhead Line and Pylons for P-Line". Project started 2022. Total 24 pylons will be removed.
22025-09-25 13:05commentedHenryEK
♦18		what change is wanted here then
32025-09-25 14:32commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Relevant note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897 It seems like the latest state has been somewhat reflected afterhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150035446 etc, I guess still can review the latest state of the towers e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785
42025-10-28 17:00commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015897
52025-12-10 04:30commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I see the pylon nodes are deleted from OSM some time ago.
62025-12-10 04:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Yeah, but there are still some left e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 , would need to check if they still exist to decide the next steps.
5077746
Category: Unknown		12025-12-03 19:04openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Rare data incompleteness: name:en of street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243663400 ?
22025-12-09 15:38commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		irl totally no signage, and yet osm history insists this street has name.
32025-12-10 13:34commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Can be "informal name" / "loc_name", commonly used by people from that area but not officially recognise. However, this might be difficult to verify.
5077389
Category: Unknown		12025-12-03 13:18openedkingkingHK
♦215		Name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674242942 is dubious.
22025-12-08 18:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		sounds like "disused parking spot (capacity=5)"
5083727
Category: Unknown		12025-12-08 16:51openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505913501 has descriptive name.
5034380
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:29openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		feels like should be "funeral home" with `abandoned=yes`
22025-11-24 18:21commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I vaguely remember seeing the introduction of this place a few years ago; something like "this place holds dead bodies until ready for burial".
32025-12-08 16:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175673864 ; closing.
145024612018-07-10 14:21opened---track position is incorrect; the siding is about halfway between yau tong and tiu keng leng stations
22025-09-30 10:09closedCypp0847
♦183		The current version is now depicting the siding in the midway between the two stations
32025-09-30 12:15reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
42025-09-30 12:16commentedkingkingHK
♦215		There does not seem to be any changes to the siding's geometry from the date of the note?
52025-12-08 16:45commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I mean, sometimes we may find notes that simply repeat the OSM situation at time of writing. Looking at the history, this seems like one of them. In terms of engineering, assuming the track curves are correct/accurate, then "midway between stations" is indeed the most likely configuration/position of the siding. We may close this.
5082020
Category: Unknown		12025-12-07 13:04openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Kwun Tong Line: The upper and lower rails are stitched together in OSM, which is incorrect; both rails should be separate irl.
5082019
Category: Unknown		12025-12-07 13:04openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yau Tong Station: Review the layering; should probably be `layer=0` or `layer=1`.
22025-12-13 15:19commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Does `layer=` need to correspond absolutely to its surrounding features, though? Afaik `tunnel=` can be used as long as it's long and full covered, and `tunnel=` requires a negative `layer=`, but maybe I am wrong.
32025-12-14 10:12commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`layer=` absolute number has no meaning, and can be anything. Only the relative order matters, and preferably be consistent with the surroundings.
4957095
Category: Unknown		12025-09-11 13:40openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		By pure coincidence, it is discovered that MTR is quite possibly using "vibe routing" here: TKL LOHAS branch LOHAS bound takes distinct paths per the vibes of the signaling system. Some instances may take the upper path while remaining instances take the lower path. This is highly unusual. Then, would the current mapping be correct? How should we map this situation in OSM?
22025-12-06 13:39commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Sorry I am not too sure what you mean, could you please elaborate? Specifically, which paths does the trains take? Which paths are the "upper path" and "lower path"?
32025-12-06 15:20commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		So basically, one day in September I was irl-reviewing some stuff and noted that the train took the upper path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485648069/history/8 Later, something else happened irl and I decided to visit this area again, but this time, the train took the lower path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1428978599/history/1 This is highly unusual/unexpected.
42025-12-06 15:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I want to add that the OSM track layout near LOHAS Park has been confusing/wrong for a long time until the fateful 2-visits discovery that finally resulted in the current OSM track layout.
52025-12-07 10:27commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Disclaimer: I am not very familiar with railway tagging It seems like the direction of travel of railways is tagged with `railway:preferred_direction` and `oneway=reversible` (only on tracks with a clear normal direction of travel. Then, based on what you said, it seems like www.openstreetmap.org/way/32226078 is used for both train to and from LOHAS Park station, in which case it should get `railway:preferred_direction=both`, which you have already done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679335 (although it also has `oneway=reversible` which should probably be removed). Add that with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485648065 having `railway:preferred_direction=forward` and `oneway=reversible`, it seems like the current mapping can express the situation well.
62025-12-07 10:36commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614946
72025-12-07 11:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not too familiar with railway mapping myself, but it seems almost all segments implicitly have `oneway=reversible`; why this needs to be stated clearly idk. The idea is that at this moment, `oneway=?` is some value, but for another moment, `oneway=?` becomes another value, therefore `=reversible`. Trains may use "the opposite rail" depending on deployments and blockages. The concern is not on the physical rails themselves, but the logical "MTR service" relations. How do we even describe which rail is which direction when the pathway(s) is/are vibe-based?
5081772
Category: Unknown		12025-12-07 07:59openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: name of feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208701496
22025-12-07 10:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175614463 ; closing.
5052159
Category: Unknown		12025-11-14 07:54openedkingkingHK
♦215		I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188837279 should be 132 kV and not 132 V?
22025-11-14 15:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Also see https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/188837279 - no way any irl power cable runs with just 132V; now is not Victorian - past OSM history shows DWG intervention; possibly good faith but hit innocent changeset of fixing "132V" If we choose to trust changeset 171413551, then this is very obviously a 132kV power line.
32025-11-15 04:09commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, the user who made changeset 171413551 (JacobPierce456) also changed a lot of 400 kV lines to 132 kV, even ones connecting to 400 kV substations, so I'm not sure if it's believable. See also https://openinframap.org/#10.68/22.3758/114.1147 for visualisation of power line and voltages.
42025-12-06 15:30commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I am no electrical engineer, but I think 400 kV infra can be easily repurposed to become 132 kV infra. Unfortunately survey recommended to see what's going on; might be easier to check at Po Lam side.
5080805
Category: Unknown		12025-12-06 11:00openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Dakota Drive ...??? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1235498284
22025-12-06 12:53commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Not sure what you were complaining about exactly, but does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175582314 resolve this note?
32025-12-06 12:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Nope. The quoted section of Dakota drive is hanging as `highway=secondary`, but satellite imagery is unclear whether it should be `highway=residential` as hinted by previous `construction:highway=residential`.
42025-12-06 13:05commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Afaik for junctions like this, the higher-ranking one of the intersecting roads would be applied to the intersection, which in this case should mean that the quoted section would be `=secondary` (please correct me if this is wrong). Then, I have removed `construction:highway=residential` in the aforementioned changeset as the road has been opened, and I suspected that it was simply forgotten to be removed.
52025-12-06 15:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I will clarify how to map junctions (but feel free to ask/confirm in the Discord for better confirmation, in case I can't explain it cleanly). Basically, the junction is formed first by intersecting the roads together with their "base highway class"; in this case Dakota Drive should be `=residential`. It largely follows the "maintain throughout highway class" rule. Then, depending on whether "slip roads" exist, some junction parts may be changed to `=*_link`. The Dakota Drive being `=secondary` is confusing in that normally, it should be `=residential`, but perhaps there are past situations that I dont know that made it temporarily `=secondary`.
62025-12-07 05:31closedkingkingHK
♦215		Ok, upon rethinking, you are right, it should indeed be `=residential`. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175609092 ; closing.
5080639
Category: Unknown		12025-12-06 09:06openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		What is the name of this park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346575800 ?
5080613
Category: Unknown		12025-12-06 08:33openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Roundabout ...?!
22025-12-06 09:08closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175575183 ; closing.
5065814
Category: Unknown		12025-11-24 11:13openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think there is a lanes expansion project here?
22025-12-01 09:14commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Hi there, does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175303638 resolve this note?
32025-12-06 06:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It does. Thanks for the review. Closing.
5000307
Category: OsmAnd		12025-10-11 09:01openedpppc
♦4		Perm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-10-28 16:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Probably referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10129934870
32025-11-14 09:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		doesn't seem like should be here; also can't find it
42025-11-16 17:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Wait, I feel like I made a mistake somewhere. Gotta recheck it.
52025-12-05 12:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Upon review, I do not think there is such thing as "32D".
62025-12-05 12:54closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175544530 ; closing.
5061240
Category: Unknown		12025-11-20 17:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-05 12:39closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175543950 ; closing.
5076230
Category: Unknown		12025-12-02 13:47openedkingkingHK
♦215		What is this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6546140
22025-12-04 15:28commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Seems like someone tried to add indoor paths. However, no idea what "NRG" means. These might be 24/7 paths, but idk about this.
32025-12-07 09:53closedkingkingHK
♦215		I do not know what it means either. It is the only instance of `NRG=` in the entire database, so it's safe to assume that it can simply be deleted. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175613659 ; closing.
4957938
Category: Unknown		12025-09-12 08:07opened---足感謝 Fanny Family Massage & BeautyThank you Fanny Family Massage & Beauty
22025-09-30 11:56commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct
32025-12-04 14:29commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Any updates to this note?
42025-12-04 15:05closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175496104 ; closing.
5078240
Category: Unknown		12025-12-04 06:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Name of "house" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993221815 is very suspicious
5065723
Category: Unknown		12025-11-24 09:25openedkingkingHK
♦215		Does this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349317190 actually exist?
22025-12-03 13:05commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		probably public light bus hail-and-ride
32025-12-03 13:31commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5065720 However, hail and ride is tagged with "hail_and_ride" role on the way in the light bus restriction, not with a bus stop node. Afaik `highway=bus_stop` should only be used when there's something physical there e.g. a pole.
42025-12-03 13:32commentedkingkingHK
♦215		* So the intention of this note is to check if there's anything physical indicating a (mini)bus stop at this location
5077351
Category: Unknown		12025-12-03 12:55openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11530071569 should probably be deleted
22025-12-03 13:40commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The changeset that created that node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146429453) has tags " Unintentional Severity: High Unresolved", presumably about this. That person (Russkii) has also added other seeming dubious features, I would recommend reviewing them all.
32025-12-04 10:13closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175479675 ; closing.
5027512
Category: CoMaps		12025-10-29 04:25openedklorydryk
♦18		"invisible from the road" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI has no name POI types: highway-path #CoMaps android
22025-12-03 12:47commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Does this mean, there is no perimeter foot path?
32025-12-04 00:19commentedklorydryk
♦18		Yes if is what I mean
4691875
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-01 18:24openedKenkton
♦74		"Capsule hostel." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Sleep HKG POI types: tourism-hostel internet_access-wlan #organicmaps android
22025-04-04 14:07commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		We don't seem to have a standard tag for capsule hotels.
32025-04-04 18:47commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It has been decided to use `=hostel` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:tourism=hostel Not literal `=hotel` as they are communal, mostly shared facilities https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/hostel=capsule
42025-04-05 02:12closedKenkton
♦74		Ah, I'll know for the future then. Thanks.
52025-04-05 06:53reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
62025-04-05 06:54commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Still, we can use this opportunity to improve the tagging of this feature.
72025-09-24 11:36commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Will there be any further discussion on this note? It seems like the current tagging of the feature is fine (already has `tourism=hostel`), and any further improvements of tagging probably isn't very related to this note.
82025-09-24 16:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Don't close it yet. Highly relevant to forum discussion; see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-should-we-tag-capsule-hotels/128371 The intention / end goal is to somehow get this through the OSM wiki / approval process.
92025-09-24 23:08commentedKenkton
♦74		I believe they should be tagged separately. They are not hostels, where rooms are shared, but they are also not hostels as facilities are shared.
102025-09-24 23:09commentedKenkton
♦74		I believe they should be tagged separately. They are not hostels, where rooms are shared, but they are also not hotels as facilities are shared.
112025-12-03 12:14closeddiosdios
122025-12-03 12:46reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
5074863
Category: Unknown		12025-12-01 10:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Wang Fuk Court: ref=A to ref=G needs to be reviewed whether they are actually `abandoned=yes` or `ruined=yes`. Preliminary reports by structural engineers are indicating `abandoned=yes`, but full report is not out yet.
22025-12-02 10:27commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It's no immediate danger, only meaning it will not collapse very soon, not no major damage. It's much more broken than the usual `abandoned=` which can easily be renovated
32025-12-03 09:53closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yeah, recent close-ups show as if the buildings were from an actual warzone. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175435505 ; closing. RIP.
5070064
Category: Unknown		12025-11-27 14:08openedEmojiopenstreetmapFrom the news, Wang Chi House is mostly unaffected. I doubt that marking it as ruined (as with the other seven) is appropriate.
22025-11-27 14:09commentedEmojiopenstreetmapSee also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5068721
32025-11-27 16:40commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Local Hong Kong idiom: never follow the car too closely. Technically the fire is not under control; we have no definite proof Wang Chi House is OR is not `=ruined`.
42025-11-27 23:18commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		I multi-edited them all for convenience. You can always correct it.
52025-11-28 00:54commentedEmojiopenstreetmapI agree with vectorial8192’s points, that we should put it on hold before things settle down. Relevant discussion on the English Wikipedia on the future of the other seven buildings: https://w.wiki/GLf6
62025-11-28 02:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed. Reading the link to the English Wiki, yes my general point is basically "WP:TRUE". Now, as of writing, I think all fires from ref=A to ref=G are gone for good (await official confirmation). But even then, ref=H (Wang Chi House) is still covered in scaffolding. We need direct visual confirmation to the building itself (e.g. how are the actual walls?) to determine whether it should be "damaged" or "ruined".
72025-11-28 07:45commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		@1F616EMO OSM is not Wikipedia. Immediate action is often done for disasters, and it works based on iterative refinement.
82025-11-28 07:46commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Ie there's no ban on breaking news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper
92025-12-01 10:16commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Things should have settled down. I am hopeful Wang Chi House is entirely unaffected, but someone go look under the scaffolding?
102025-12-03 09:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Latest news hint towards the building remains healthy because residents are allowed to retrieve some of their stuff.
112025-12-03 09:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175434791 ; closing.
5077060
Category: Unknown		12025-12-03 08:46openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243755413 is actually a dam? Is this accessible?
5068317
Category: Unknown		12025-11-26 06:03openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		is the name this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4844606091 or this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450102863 ?
22025-11-26 06:07commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		it turns out, the building is already gone.
32025-11-30 15:24closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315457 ; closing.
5068316
Category: Unknown		12025-11-26 06:02openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450102864 what is with this name?
22025-11-30 15:24closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175315457 ; closing.
5068721
Category: Unknown		12025-11-26 11:38openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Great fire; we may need to observe the irl situation and update OSM when needed, this seems like a full loss. Worst case the whole estate is condemned and needs to be rebuilt.
22025-11-27 12:13closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Unlikely to become `landuse=residential` directly, changed to `ruined`
5065720
Category: Unknown		12025-11-24 09:23openedkingkingHK
♦215		Does this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349312890 actually exist? Which routes call here?
22025-11-25 15:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		could just be green minibuses with some "hail on ride" value (not too familiar with that kind of tagging)
32025-12-03 13:32commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5065723
5062245
Category: Unknown		12025-11-21 13:47openedkingkingHK
♦215		Is Lantau Link BBI really `access=customers` when https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457969673 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727099908 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762041854 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172848370 exist?
22025-11-24 18:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		probably not; seems like "extremely rural" but not fully self-enclosed like "Shing Mun" and "Tuen Chek". similar vibes also see "Lion Rock" where it's also "extremely rural" but still not fully self-enclosed. ref https://www.oasistrek.com/fa_peng_teng.php ; the BBI is mentioned as some place which can be walked away to trivially reach the wilderness.
32025-12-04 10:48closedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed it is possible to easily walk to the wilderness. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175480960 ; closing.
5065714
Category: Unknown		12025-11-24 09:19openedkingkingHK
♦215		Are https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4349334590 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3484066233 referring to the same bus stop?
22025-11-24 18:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		seems like it in particular, this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3484066233/history/1 came first, and is at the (afaik) correct position.
32025-12-03 02:50closedCypp0847
♦183		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175425755
5065844
Category: StreetComplete		12025-11-24 10:36openedEmoria
♦2		Unable to answer "Which direction leads upwards here?" – on bridge: Steps – https://osm.org/way/102441834 via StreetComplete 62.0: For both up and down
22025-11-24 15:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		...perhaps this is a question too technical for the average user.
32025-11-24 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175071676 ; closing.
5034310
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:06openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-23 13:04closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175024981 ; closing.
5063775
Category: Unknown		12025-11-22 15:30openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Re note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5056582 , see whether this Saigon Street becomes "eastbound only" later.
22025-11-30 13:48commentedkingkingHK
♦215		As of yesterday (2025-11-29) it's still oneway westbound, but just in case it changes in the future, I will leave this note open until the nearby works are complete, presumably when the Central Kowloon Bypass opens.
5063739
Category: Unknown		12025-11-22 15:12openedkingkingHK
♦215		What is this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4921686325
22025-11-22 15:16commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		share_taxi
32025-11-22 15:17commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		*afaik I think this is share_taxi survey recommended.
42025-11-30 13:46closedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed there is a red minibus terminus here. Then, comparing franchised bus tagging where `amenity=bus_station` isn't used for a simple terminus with no further amenities, this probably shouldn't be `=bus_station` either. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175311307 ; closing.
5060658
Category: Unknown		12025-11-20 05:58openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It seems this now has a name.
22025-11-21 14:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174952423 ; closing.
5034414
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:42openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-11-20 16:30closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174914313 ; closing.
5034415
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:42openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-20 15:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174912611 ; closing.
5060660
Category: Unknown		12025-11-20 05:59openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208702429 seems abandoned.
22025-11-20 15:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		School is now at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444417819
32025-11-20 15:47closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Leftover facility marking as abandoned. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174912402 ; closing.
5034431
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:46openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic...? What should be happening here?
22025-11-03 12:49commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Online information says the Family Medicine Clinic has been relocated to 201B, 2/F, Mei Hei House, i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775540630
32025-11-20 15:45closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed it's moved to the other side for now. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174912282 ; closing.
5034424
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4417156937 What even is this?
22025-11-03 12:51commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Online information says there's a Family Medicine Clinic here, but unsure if the current location of the osm node is correct (can very well be some unrelated private clinic)
32025-11-03 13:57commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It lacking any identifying information (even a `name=[zh]` would be acceptable) is just disappointing. Gotta go there and have a look sometime.
42025-11-03 14:08commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Given that the node has been largely untouched for a decade, it's not surprising to lack basic information. However, I did find https://gia.info.gov.hk/general/202510/10/P2025101000532_515333_1_1760100285157.pdf which says there a "南山家庭醫學診所 Nam Shan Family Medicine Clinic" at this location, but it's unsure whether we can just copy from it given copyright and accuracy and all sort of stuff. So yeah, need to survey it sometime.
52025-11-19 15:29commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Multiple irl matches. For clarity, I will just delete + remake the node.
62025-11-19 15:34closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174864945 ; closing.
5034429
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4417156940 What even is this?
22025-11-19 11:11commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Multiple irl matches; none will "replace" this clinic.
32025-11-19 11:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174854179 ; closing.
5058584
Category: Unknown		12025-11-18 16:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Should Tai Hang Sai Estate still retain landuse=residential? afaik judicial processes are withholding reconstruction, which means this estate is technically still inhabitable.
22025-11-19 09:34commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Have they not lost all the cases?
32025-11-19 09:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This is the part which I am out of the loop. The verdicts and the judicial arguments are convoluting. afaik the Company convinced a significant majority of tenants to leave, but the few remaining made a JR/appeal, which "pins" this estate as `landuse=residential` despite "obviously a construction yard".
42025-11-19 10:45commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, I read the news. Basically, the Company eventually got all the flats back after some verdicts + arbitration. de jure the Estate is still `landuse=residential` until (I think) Dec 2025, but me discovering this situation this late to the story, it would just be a technicality issue, and can't justify an OSM edit. I will just hold this note open until later with no action to take.
5036091
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 12:40openedkingkingHK
♦215		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-17 15:27closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174777411 ; closing.
5034407
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:39openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-16 17:00closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No such thing; I must have read something wrong. Closing.
5021566
Category: CoMaps		12025-10-25 01:31openedklorydryk
♦18		"En travaux, pas d'info" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI has no name POI types: shop-bakery #CoMaps androidUnder construction, no information
22025-10-28 15:58commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Probably referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5193656121
32025-11-12 15:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Google Translate: Under construction, no information available.
42025-11-14 08:38commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		no such bakery
52025-11-16 16:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Also, store list https://jcodonuts.com/hk/en/stores agrees there is no such bakery. With the lack of general "anchoring" information, I will just delete the node.
62025-11-16 16:49closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174736137 ; closing.
5020924
Category: CoMaps		12025-10-24 13:26openedklorydryk
♦18		"Boutique de nourriture " The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z POI has no name POI types: shop-laundry #CoMaps androidFood store
22025-10-28 15:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Probably referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4496330689
32025-11-12 15:27commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Google Translate: Food shop
42025-11-14 08:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		no laundry shops here
52025-11-16 13:55commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To be clear, there are multiple "food shops" here, but there being multiple of them would mean none of them "replaces" this laundry.
62025-11-16 13:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174728470 ; closing.
5049266
Category: Unknown		12025-11-12 08:51openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Is it true that Shanghai Street really only allows "straight on"?
22025-11-14 07:59closedkingkingHK
♦215		From Mapillary imagery (which I believe we can use in OSM), Shanghai Street does indeed prohibit right turns to Waterloo Road, so the current mapping is correct; closing. (Note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1455282 does not prohibit left turns to Waterloo Road since its "via" is set to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/308473180)
32025-11-14 12:10reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-11-14 12:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Wrong. I am not here to judge the methodology of using Mapillary Imagery. I'm here to point out that, looking at the Mapillary records saying 2017, it's just too ancient for convincing fact-checking. And irl says "if length > 8m, then no right turns". Therefore we have wrong/outdated info in OSM.
52025-11-14 12:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Also, ignoring the problems with the ancient relics, the (outdated) data on OSM was still wrong. It on OSM being "straight ahead only", while practically equivalent to irl "no right turns", was semantically inconsistent from irl.
62025-11-14 12:30commentedkingkingHK
♦215		My apologies for misunderstand this note earlier. It seems like you know more about this situation than I do, so feel free to update the situation based on your knowledge. But re the straight-ahead-only vs no-right-turn problem, I don't see why it's "wrong" when they are functionally equivalent for this specific junction. A semantic difference won't have any effects for data consumers; at most it will cause a bit of confusion for mappers.
72025-11-14 13:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Could just be me, but I view highly of semantic correctness.
82025-11-14 14:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		I still don't see how any one of them is more correct than the other, unless your definition of "correct" is "uses the same phrasing as the sign". But still, as they are equivalent, it would of course be fine to change it to a no-right-turn restriction. Do what you like.
92025-11-16 11:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hopefully I got the OSM restriction format correct. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174722788 ; closing.
5036094
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 12:42openedkingkingHK
♦215		Family Medicine Clinic somewhere around here supposedly, but unclear how it is affected by the redevelopment works.
22025-11-16 11:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I went there recently, and saw it's in the old building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429468747 I would guess it's gonna be relocated into Phase 2 later, so we may choose to ignore this for now.
5036092
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 12:41openedkingkingHK
♦215		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-15 13:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Well, for starters, this is a multi-storey building with many clinics.
32025-11-16 10:59closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174721133 ; closing.
5034364
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-02 14:24commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It seems there might be two such clinics right here?
32025-11-03 13:56commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Not sure why you think it seems there might be two clinics here, could you please elaborate?
42025-11-14 14:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Basically, I somehow saw 2x Family Medicine Clinics listed in some clinic listing I was looking at. It somehow felt wrong, but one of them should be correct, so someone can check this when they pass by this place.
52025-11-16 07:23commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Just curious, what clinic list did you use?
62025-11-16 10:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.ha.org.hk/visitor/ha_visitor_index.asp?Content_ID=200250&Lang=CHIB5&Dimension=100&Parent_ID=10052 The government announcement for the renaming eventually led to this page. Upon rechecking, it seems I might have misread the list... But still, this location is likely to have a Family Medicine Clinic.
5052676
Category: Organicmaps		12025-11-14 15:22openedtsheyd
♦2		"No 711 in this mall" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-13T21:01:41Z POI name: 7-Eleven POI types: shop-convenience #organicmaps android 2025.10.23-22-Google
22025-11-15 02:42commentedkingkingHK
♦215		https://www.7-eleven.com.hk/en/store agrees.
32025-11-15 15:58commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node was added in 2015 with no meaningful update in subsequent years. 2015 this place should have been a construction yard/abandoned building. No idea why they would add it in the first place.
42025-11-16 05:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Alternatively, it may be trying to describe something in the E.T.S.T. station, but then the station is not here. Indeed this feature can't possibly exist.
52025-11-16 05:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174713168 ; closing.
5049048
Category: Unknown		12025-11-12 05:48openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100844361 was mentioned to be difficult to use; delete? or mark as hazard?
22025-11-15 12:36commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		afaik this was previously closed due to construction works; it could be that the path was reclaimed by nature. We should first determine how bad the path is. If the path was reclaimed by nature, or it ain't a "slope maintenance path", or any other reason to believe that anyone would care to maintain this path, then we can just straight up delete this path.
32025-12-03 13:17commentedkingkingHK
♦215		1. Re construction works, yes indeed the northern entrance of a footpath here is still being obstructed by construction, but there's an informal bypass. 2. The upper section of the footpath (close to Lung Cheung Road) is actually a slope maintenance path on an artificial slope. 3. The lower section of the footpath (close to Beacon Hill Road) is completely invisible, but there's coincidentally a drain with the exact same geometry. Perhaps tagging mistake?
42025-12-04 13:43closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175491462 ; closing.
5036087
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 12:32openedkingkingHK
♦215		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-14 15:02closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174046358 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174652502 ; closing.
5052406
Category: Unknown		12025-11-14 11:42openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Tourist attraction for Kowloon Walled City (movie props) should be somewhere inside here.
22025-11-14 14:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		In case this is not clear, I am referring to "inside this park".
5034410
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:41openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-14 12:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174645250 ; closing.
5034311
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-12 15:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174566072 ; closing.
4997596
Category: Unknown		12025-10-09 08:56opened---西九碼頭 WestK QuayWest Kowloon Ferry Pier
22025-10-09 15:52commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		See https://www.cedd.gov.hk/tc/our-projects/major-projects/index-id-160.html
32025-11-12 15:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I see this is now mapped alongside the ferry service. Therefore, closing.
4973182
Category: Unknown		12025-09-21 14:27openedKeithlo31Incredible Residences has been sold. The building name has been changed to Y36.
22025-09-24 14:08commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		From online sources, Y36 is a "student accommodation" and because this is a new concept in Hong Kong, tagging method is not finalized yet. Should bring to discussion.
32025-09-24 14:10commentedkingkingHK
♦215		`amenity=student_accommodation` or `building=dormitory`?
42025-09-24 14:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Could/Might actually be `tourism=hostel`. Go ask more people.
52025-11-12 15:28commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Website for future reference: https://ydotx.com/about/
5034272
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:01openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic; we can take this chance to find out where these clinics are located in OSM.
22025-11-03 14:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It seems this family medicine clinic is located inside the clinic building...
32025-11-09 16:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174426046 ; closing.
5034312
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-09 16:38closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174425942 ; closing.
5035617
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 03:37openedkingkingHK
♦215		Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4442544111 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1102985991 really exist? Why are there traffic signals in the middle of nowhere with no junctions?
22025-11-04 06:52commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Could be "road too narrow" so they set up traffic signals to ensure mutex access. Not every traffic signal needs to be at a junction (e.g. also see tunnel entrance traffic signals).
32025-11-04 10:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Could be, but then there are many roads in Hong Kong narrower and busier than this road that still doesn't have traffic signals, and afaik this road is actually wide enough for two light vehicles to pass by each other. Would still recommend a survey to prove/disprove their existence.
42025-11-08 07:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To add to this, aerial imagery (ESRI World Imagery) (see northeast) shows a section which is single-lane only. We may also faintly see a "stop here" line that often indicates a traffic signal. OSM also has `lanes=1` here. Mutex access is very very likely. It really isn't *that* wide. Perhaps survey is not needed because there is nothing to do.
52025-11-08 08:38closedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, that sounds believable. Then, situation clarified via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174362311 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174363905 ; closing.
28950712014-12-21 15:32openedK H FungTrails have been submerged weeds and shrubs this area.
22015-04-23 03:07closedmasahiro57
32015-04-23 03:08reopenedmasahiro57
42019-03-26 14:54commented---р
52019-03-26 14:54commented---д
62025-10-06 01:30closedHenryEK
♦18		and now it isnt
72025-10-14 10:25reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
82025-10-14 10:26commentedkingkingHK
♦215		@seurish Could you please elaborate? What "isn't"? Is the note information wrong?
92025-10-14 23:56commentedHenryEK
♦18		i had a hike here not so long ago it got cleared
102025-11-05 16:27commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		If it's cleared, then perhaps this note should be closed.
112025-11-06 03:05closedkingkingHK
♦215		Yeah, I just thought "now it isnt" is not really clear enough to understand why the note is closed, so I reopened it. Now with further clarification, then note information is no longer correct, closing.
122025-11-06 03:13reopenedK H Fung
132025-11-06 03:14closedK H Fung
5039442
Category: Unknown		12025-11-05 15:28openedkingkingHK
♦215		I suspect that it is legal to cycle from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116287569 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835665902
22025-11-05 15:29commentedkingkingHK
♦215		* and all the way to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718063548 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149908331 , but not https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227648518
32025-11-05 15:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I don't know the details yet, but bold claim to be allowed to walk/cycle in numbered highways.
42025-11-05 15:40commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		ok, so you mentioned https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227648518 , but this already has `bicycle=no`.
52025-11-06 07:37commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Numbered highway does not mean anything. Strategic routes have no legal implication. See Lung Cheung Road. Afaik, there are only four situations where cycling is prohibited: 1. on expressways (Cap 374Q (4)(1)) 2. in tunnel areas (Cap 368A (10)(a)) 3. in country parks (Cap 208A (4)(1)) 4. beyond no cycling signs (Cap 374G Sch 1 Fig 126 & 127) Obviously here the first three don't apply. Then yesterday I was watching some bus videos and found out that when entering Tsing Sha Highway northbound from Tai Po Road, there is only a "no pedestrian" sign, and no "no cycling" sign until https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1311402563 with a "right arrow" sign, which should imply that it is allowed to cycle from Tai Po Road Sha Tin Heights or the Lower Shing Mun Road roundabout to Mei Tin Road and Mei Fai Street. But then I knew bus videos probably aren't acceptable sources for osm, which I why I made this note for future surveys to check where the no cycling sign actually starts.
62025-11-06 19:56commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Indeed you can legally bike on many roads dangerously without signage. It's likely forgotten to be exempted, as it's at least inconsistent with `=trunk_link` https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/850148615
72025-11-06 20:05commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		@vectorial8192 Try to find no bike sign on all `=trunk` fully (Lung Cheung Rd, Kwun Tong Rd, Tseung Kwan O Rd, Lei Yue Mun Rd; former Gloucester Rd, Connaught Rd C)
82025-12-03 13:49closedkingkingHK
♦215		My suspicion is correct. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175445268 ; closing.
5038058
Category: Unknown		12025-11-04 16:28openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I vaguely remember this land has two names: Wai Wah Centre and Chanway Plaza; one for residential, one for retail, but I forgot which is which.
22025-11-05 10:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, so "Chanway" is the shopping centre part. Rare case where the same building has two names. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174234433 ; closing.
5038060
Category: Unknown		12025-11-04 17:29openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I feel like this mall should have a name, but maybe I am wrong.
22025-12-03 15:16closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175449009 ; closing.
5038051
Category: Unknown		12025-11-04 16:26openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		where name:zh?
22025-11-04 16:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		*area
5038052
Category: Unknown		12025-11-04 16:26openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		individual buildings and streets, where name:en?
5034421
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:44openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-11-04 14:03closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I do remember seeing this clinic as I walked past it on several separate occasion. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174195472 ; closing.
5034417
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:43openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (seems already done)
22025-11-04 12:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174190614 ; closing.
5034360
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-04 11:31closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174188667 ; closing.
4911234
Category: unknown		12025-08-15 12:17openedkingkingHK
♦215		Name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6315211233 is dubious.
22025-08-16 03:55commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`name=` is debated against `board:title=` , which this is should not be `=guidepost`
32025-08-29 14:14commentedkingkingHK
♦215		It's actually just a banner on a railing.
42025-11-04 10:54commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		If it's just a banner, then it probably isn't even a "guidepost". imo banners are not worth being mapped into OSM; too transient.
52025-11-04 12:19commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Yeah, agreed on not mapping banners. Originally I thought Kovoschiz might have something to say after my comment on 29/8, but since there doesn't seem to be any further discussion, I guess I will just remove it.
62025-11-04 12:22closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174190901 ; closing.
5034327
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:11openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-04 10:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174186921 ; closing.
5034354
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:18openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-04 07:28closedJinYe777Tuen Mun Wu Hong Clinic
32025-11-04 07:48reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-11-04 07:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		@JinYe777 does this mean the building is unnamed?
52025-12-13 15:07closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175884864 ; closing.
5034330
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:11openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The name:zh feels like a generic name / mapping mistake (confirmation needed).
22025-11-03 15:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Judging from their website, I don't think it has any Chinese name. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174153180 ; closing.
5036242
Category: Unknown		12025-11-03 13:46openedkingkingHK
♦215		Now that "錦田診所 Kam Tin Clinic" has been renamed to "錦田家庭醫學診所 Kam Tin Family Medicine Clinic", has there been any changes to the bus stop's naming?Now that "Kam Tin Clinic" has been renamed to "Kam Tin Family Medicine Clinic", has there been any change to the name of the bus stop?
22025-11-03 15:11commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It being KMB they probably won't even care about that.
32025-11-03 15:19commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Also, now that I looked a bit deeper into the renaming, I am not sure whether it's the entire building being renamed, or that only the clinic (might not be in OSM) being renamed.
5034333
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:12openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (seems already updated)
22025-11-03 15:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174152392 ; closing.
5034320
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:09openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (name:en of clinic?)
22025-11-03 14:58closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174152066 ; closing.
5034412
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:41openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-12-13 15:10commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034408
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:40openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-01 15:16closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175360353 ; closing.
5034373
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:27openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
22025-12-12 10:57closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175838401 ; closing.
5034352
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:17openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-13 15:10commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034350
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:16openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-12-13 15:10commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed there is a family medicine clinic here.
5034478
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 15:01openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		We got two separate sets of traffic signals this close to each other?
22025-11-03 03:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705233211 seems to be a poor import from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73295866 , made by the same person who caused https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5004149 . https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4773727035 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8451657984 are probably just mapping mistakes from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161805671 . Mapillary imagery also only shows a single set of traffic signals.
32025-11-07 14:11closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174336106 ; closing.
5034471
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:55openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034469
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:55openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034468
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:54openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034438
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:50openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034435
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:48openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034434
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:48openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034406
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:39openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (what should be happening here?)
5034404
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:38openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034402
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:38openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034400
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:37openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-09 11:11closedZuborg2012
♦1
32025-11-09 11:57reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
5034398
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:37openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
22025-11-17 13:27closedKX675
♦7
5034395
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:36openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034394
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:36openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034392
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034390
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:34openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Is this a Family Medicine Clinic?
5034389
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:33openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034387
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:33openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034379
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:29openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034378
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:28openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034377
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:28openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034376
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:27openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034371
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034370
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:26openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
4985564
Category: Unknown		12025-09-30 13:56openedkingkingHK
♦215		Todo: this roundabout will be converted to a signal-controlled junction starting 2025-10-26 06:00
22025-10-08 08:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I am out of the loop, but I think this is only about adding traffic signals to the roundabout?
32025-10-08 12:18commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See https://www.districtcouncils.gov.hk/sk/doc/2024_2027/tc/committee_meetings_doc/TTC/29515/SK_TTC_2025_026_TC.pdf especially page 5.
42025-10-08 14:20commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		oh, then that's essentially a full remake. huh. Thanks for the info anyways!
52025-11-02 14:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I am once again out of the loop; I think this will be gradually converted into a signalled intersection? So, for a short while, this might be a roundabout with traffic signals?
62025-11-03 02:02commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, when I went there a few days ago, it was already a normal signal-controlled junction and not just a roundabout with signals.
72025-11-19 12:55closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173766938 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173767473 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174804596 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174818679 ; closing.
5034363
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034361
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:20openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034359
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034358
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034357
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034356
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034355
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:18openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034344
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034343
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:16openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034341
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:15openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic (it seems OSM doesn't have this?)
5034338
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034337
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034335
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:14openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5034332
Category: Unknown		12025-11-02 14:12openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Family Medicine Clinic
5029552
Category: Unknown		12025-10-30 09:46openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Route 8 inconsistency: This section is named Eagle's Nest Tunnel, but the other two sections (Sha Tin Heights Tunnel and Tai Wai Tunnel) are just generically named "Tsing Sha Highway". We should probably apply one of the above styles to all three sections to ensure consistency.
22025-10-31 06:41closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		This is intentional. The most well-known naming is applied. Eagle's Nest Tunnel is significant. Cf Lion Rock Tunnel is not "Lion Rock Tunnel Road"
5026003
Category: Unknown		12025-10-28 07:39opened---This elderly home is closed.
22025-10-29 06:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Online sources seem to agree with this.
32025-11-01 12:30closedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174059876 ; closing.
401589712023-12-05 13:26openedIan Ho
♦33		The pylons are under the project "Removal of 132kV Overhead Line and Pylons for P-Line". Project started 2022. Total 24 pylons will be removed.
22024-02-07 04:24commentedHighlandPaddyHK
♦1		Confirmed, I went to visit Osborn's Cairn and the pylon was gone!
32024-11-02 13:05commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I guess this means the towers are now physically gone? Will need to update OSM data to reflect this (eg there is still a tower area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 )
42024-11-02 15:16commentedIan Ho
♦33		When I add the notes, the removal project was still work in progress. Some of the pylons were not removed yet. I did visit 1 or 2 removed pylon sites. Only the base concrete structure (no more than 1 meter high) remains after removal. So I think when the project is complete, we can update OSM.
52025-10-28 16:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4015896 It seems the towers are now gone?
62025-10-29 03:14commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173778439 But I guess can still verify if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448005785 exists?
5025999
Category: Unknown		12025-10-28 07:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Is this clinic open yet?
22025-10-28 07:28commentedkingkingHK
♦215		According to https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BnXjqQHPe/ and https://www.dhc.gov.hk/tc/dhc_yau_tsim_mong.html , probably yes.
32025-10-28 15:58closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Nice. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173890553 ; closing.
5025051
Category: Unknown		12025-10-27 13:54openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Strange drain; probably a mapping blunder.
22025-10-27 14:15commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Dragged point after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162741126 ?
32025-10-28 02:44closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173863110 ; closing.
5016316
Category: Unknown		12025-10-21 10:17openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Rural roads probably don't need `motor_vehicle=*` since those are already "guarded" by Tung Chung Road & South Lantau Road already having `motor_vehicle=permit`.
22025-10-21 14:06closedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, most roads here already don't have `motor_vehicle=*`, do they? I think Mui Wo Rural Committee Road and downstream actually has
32025-10-21 14:06reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
42025-10-21 14:08commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Sorry previous message got cut off. I think Mui Wo Rural Committee Road and downstream actually has "no motor vehicle" signs, but people ignored the rules anyway, leading to `note=Complicated situation` and `disputed:motor_vehicle=private`.
52025-10-27 13:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I mean, OSM mostly only cares about "signposted data", so even if irl is complicated, imo just flatten them to be `motor_vehicle=no` as signposted. I personally don't think Hong Kong is "adjective" enough to use OSM's post-colonial "local knowledge" approach.
62025-10-27 14:05commentedkingkingHK
♦215		See also relevant discussion in discord, in case you aren't already aware: https://discord.com/channels/550009593468813312/550324691001147422/872080011820150814 https://discord.com/channels/413070382636072960/428214296695144458/873483133931110410 Imo your points make sense and I don't disagree with them, but let's see if @Kovoschiz has anything to add.
5025035
Category: Unknown		12025-10-27 13:48openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Sing Mun River has fixme, presumably about boat access. However, afaik, there are no legal restrictions about boat access.
5025033
Category: Unknown		12025-10-27 13:47openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Any reason why Tuen Mun River changes from `waterway=river` to simply `waterway=drain`?
22025-10-28 07:51closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Editing mistake (not changing all)
4908269
Category: unknown		12025-08-13 15:47openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: fill in more details about the the north side of the LPH
22025-09-28 15:02closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170396693 ; closing.
32025-09-28 15:02reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-09-28 15:02commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Sorry. I think this is to fill in the details such as block number, facilities, etc.
52025-10-25 12:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Hi there, does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173174414 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173178099 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173753556 add enough details to resolve this note?
62025-10-26 13:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		oh nice, I see this has been improved therefore, closing (supposedly can also improve the south side to match detail level, but that would be out of scope of this note and would be "additional improvement")
5017883
Category: Unknown		12025-10-22 11:20openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Possibly another eminent domain
5012470
Category: Unknown		12025-10-18 18:21opened---u-turn slip road has been reopened already
22025-10-20 19:04closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86041189
32025-10-21 04:29reopenedjuniusli
42025-10-21 04:29closedjuniusli
52025-10-21 04:31reopenedjuniusli
62025-10-21 04:31closedjuniusli
72025-10-21 09:47reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
82025-10-21 09:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To add to this strange note, know that OSM tiles are rendered by a separate service (OSM Carto), and sometimes changes are not reflected "immediately". Sometimes it takes up to 7 days for the new changes to "appear on the map".
5008409
Category: Unknown		12025-10-16 05:20openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It seems Cheung Tung Estate is now receiving inhabitants.
22025-10-17 09:46closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173401820 . More updates just make more changesets. Closing.
5004149
Category: Unknown		12025-10-13 12:35openedkingkingHK
♦215		Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705213942 really exist? Stand-alone traffic signal in a roundabout? If not, then what is this element supposed to be referring to, and where is traffic signal "NT417" actually at?
22025-10-15 15:27commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No idea why this was not discovered earlier. Would guess this traffic light tries to refer to the traffic light system located southeast of this note; Wai Tsuen Road & Shek Wai Kok Road.
32025-10-16 02:21commentedkingkingHK
♦215		But then, Wai Tsuen Road / Shek Wai Kok Road is already mapped as NT203. Even if we are sure this traffic signal doesn't exist, the bigger mystery is where "NT417" is; is there a way to look up a traffic signal's location based on its ref?
42025-10-16 14:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Well, for starters, we have open data published by the HK gov. See https://data.gov.hk/en-data/dataset/hk-td-tis_16-traffic-aids-drawings-v2 You would need to check whether it's OK to use this, and then interpret the data format yourself. Find this mystic "NT417" from the data dump, or discover that it doesn't exist.
52025-10-17 07:04commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		You can't use that. It doesn't have controller numbering data either.
62025-10-17 09:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Well then, according to Overpass Turbo https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2dQa this is the only known instance of "NT417" in Hong Kong. I am then thinking maybe this is a fabrication, that IRL there is no such "NT417" anywhere.
72025-10-17 09:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OSM data has NT414 and NT415 in Fo Tan. It also has NT418 in Yuen Long, NT419 in Kam Tin, and NT420 in Kwai Chung. It seems these serial numbers are dependent on the completion date of these traffic signals. One would guess perhaps some of the traffic signals in Fo Tan (lacking ref) might be the real NT417. If anything, I see no problem deleting this and then wait for IRL survey to look at the no-ref traffic lights in Fo Tan to see whether there contains NT417.
82025-10-17 10:07commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Turns out, NT417 is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10025317359
92025-10-18 12:26closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173447973 ; closing.
4919931
Category: unknown		12025-08-20 11:29openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769116979, what does it mean by `fixme=PTI?`? Does it mean, the name should somehow contain "PTI"?
22025-08-20 13:51commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Seems like Kovoschiz added that tag initially. Might be quicker to ask him directly.
32025-08-27 12:54commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note to self/others: the problem would be "how to find signage irl with / without the official name". Prove/disprove whether there is a "PTI" in the official name.
42025-09-30 10:00commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Gazette: "Hung Hom Station Bus Terminus" https://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/english/gazette/file.php?year=2007&vol=11&no=48&extra=0&type=0&number=7741 No Smoking Area sign: "Hung Hom Station Public Transport Interchange" https://imgur.com/a/1srprjD
52025-09-30 12:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		bruh My guess would be that we will be using the gazetted name.
62025-10-10 11:57commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Oh wait, I think I know what this means. This specific bus terminus at the north side is simply called the bus terminus, while this bus terminus & the east side e.g. taxi stations combined are called the PTI.
72025-10-10 12:00closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173091110 ; closing.
4958494
Category: Unknown		12025-09-12 12:44openedkingkingHK
♦215		LRT Town Centre, I believe the central platforms (2 and 3) are currently unused, and all trains uses the outer platforms (1 and 4) instead. The relevant route relations (namely https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6485218 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2926506 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5955257 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6485194 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3515354) needs to be updated. Also, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221325516 is probably missing `service=siding`.
22025-09-15 15:27commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I have a feeling this is a "perpetual temporary" arrangement. Technically platforms 1 and 4 are still siding while platforms 2 and 3 are still main, and the relevant LRT routes technically are still using the original platforms. Think about it. If 2019 didn't happen, then would platforms 2 and 3 become unused? I think not. 2019 did not change how the LRT works, so to speak, and has nothing to do with LRT operations. As such, I see no need to change the main/siding distinction. Just keep it like how it was pre-2019 and should be good. However, the public transport mappers may want to think about whether to really update the LRT relations to use the correct irl observed platforms. (I don't deal with public transport stuff myself since afaik the iD editor will mess them up, and the PT guys will be unhappy.)
32025-09-16 12:33closedkingkingHK
♦215		Oddly enough, the original mapping was that platforms 2 and 4 and sidings while 1 and 3 are main, which doesn't really make sense. I have changed all four tracks to main and modified the route relations via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172000755 , closing. (Feel free to reactivate this note if there is anything to add regarding the main vs siding problem)
42025-09-16 13:52reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
52025-09-16 13:55commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Disclaimer: when I commented on this note, I didn't notice which tracks were main/siding. However, looking at the track shape north side, it should be quite clear which one is main/siding: platforms 2/4 have a curve, while platforms 1/3 don't. The logic for main/siding most likely comes from this.
62025-09-24 09:20commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Is main/siding really decided by the shape geometry though? I feel like this situation is the most similar with e.g. Shatin station, where platform 1 and 4 are tagged as main, even though they are branching out from the mainline, and are rarely used.
72025-09-24 13:55commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I didn't know about the situation at Shatin station. Now that you mention this, sounds like the outer platforms of Shatin station should be `=siding` instead. But this is getting messy, and we should ask the railway guys for real.
82025-09-24 13:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Shatin station also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977665
92025-09-30 03:03commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Now that the situation at Shatin station is found to be an editing mistake, would you support changing platform 2 and 3 here to `=siding`? Also, further in response to your "platforms 2/4 have a curve, while platforms 1/3 don't" point, I think platform 4 only has a curve because it needs to dodge the bus bay north of it.
102025-09-30 07:07commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I quote https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dsiding : > In some cases, may be difficult to distinguish from two parallel main tracks.
112025-10-02 13:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		I quote https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/siding : > A second, relatively short length of track just to the side of a railroad track, joined to the main track by switches at one or both ends, used either for loading or unloading freight, storing trains or other rail vehicles; or to allow two trains on a same track to meet (opposite directions) or pass (same direction) To me, the situation at Town Centre meets the definition. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Siding-tagging.svg
122025-10-10 11:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Then, unfortunately, I think the original tagging is correct. This station is not your usual "symmetric" station after all.
132025-10-10 11:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173090346 ; closing.
4957863
Category: Unknown		12025-09-12 03:59opened---Shall have a development
22025-10-08 14:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		So far only found this reference https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2025/chinese/panels/ws/papers/ws20250317cb1-368-5-c.pdf (item number 4) But not sure if this is the one we are talking about, and also no progress for now.
32025-10-09 12:40closedkingkingHK
♦215		Latest situation reflected via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173049023 , further information can be added once more detail is known. Closing.
4904578
Category: ---		12025-08-11 14:59openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I don't think node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984688382 should be here / should exist; Fui Sha Wai is 99% located near Ping Shan. See same-name bus stop at Castle Peak Road.
22025-08-11 17:37commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		No, it's simply referring to a location of the same name that historically existed here. This only needs to be judged by relevance in OSM compared to OHM.
32025-08-12 14:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I just don't see its irl relevance when a same-name irl location exists elsewhere quite obviously.
42025-08-12 17:22commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It's possible for currently relevant locations to share names. That can't be a criteria for deciding.
52025-08-12 17:30commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Also this is `=locality`
62025-08-12 17:36commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		The actual situation is no one remembered to create it (did now)
72025-10-08 14:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I now see node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10984688382 has a `fixme=...`, so I guess this situation is done for now. Closing.
53510412016-03-29 14:38opened---Mirror work 汽車護理產品專賣店
22025-08-13 10:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL, though already partially mapped with www.openstreetmap.org/way/1329247534.
32025-10-08 14:41closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173008723 ; closing.
259882912021-03-29 08:10openedHang Tone恒通渠務工程有限公司 Hang Tone Drainage Engineering Limited 新界元朗錦田吳家村400號
22025-05-03 11:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Website http://www.hangtone.com.hk/ agrees with this note
32025-08-13 10:21commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL.
42025-10-08 14:40commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		But is it located here? Ng Ka Tsuen is located north of this note, and I am unfamiliar with rural addressing. It would seem to me, if the company really is located here, then it should probably take the address street as Kam Sheung Road.
4917522
Category: unknown		12025-08-19 04:02openedkingkingHK
♦215		Traffic signals have been added to this junction.
22025-09-15 15:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705213882 exists for many years, but I suppose the quoted node has nothing to do with this new situation.
32025-10-08 14:36commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Future reference https://www.cedd.gov.hk/tc/our-projects/major-projects/index-id-70.html
4995594
Category: Unknown		12025-10-08 06:19opened---Ocean 1
22025-10-08 10:13closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4995751
Category: Unknown		12025-10-08 08:08openedDbingo123ku
22025-10-08 08:08commentedDbingo123kuku
32025-10-08 10:13closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4995748
Category: Unknown		12025-10-08 08:08openedDbingo123kuk
22025-10-08 10:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4976975
Category: OsmAnd		12025-09-24 04:55openedpppc
♦4		Perm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-09-24 14:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Likely referring to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4813666021
32025-09-26 08:50commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed couldn't find it on https://www.timhowan.com.hk/our-stores/
42025-09-30 09:55commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct
52025-10-08 10:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172995914 ; closing.
4976983
Category: OsmAnd		12025-09-24 05:10openedpppc
♦4		Perm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-09-24 14:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Likely referring to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10111099387
32025-09-30 09:55commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct
42025-10-08 10:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172995914 ; closing.
4995522
Category: Unknown		12025-10-08 03:42opened---Urban Renewal Resource Centre
22025-10-08 10:10closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I quote https://www.urrc.org.hk/en : > For better service provision, starting from 16 October 2025, the URA will integrate resources to provide centralised support for old building owners and corporations on building rehabilitation matters in “Building Rehabilitation Resource Centre” (BRRC). “Urban Renewal Resource Centre” (URRC) located at Tai Kok Tsui is going to cease operation on the same day. Therefore, closing.
4993667
Category: Unknown		12025-10-06 14:38openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Huge blunder to adopt the KCR plans; please revert.
22025-10-08 07:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Eventually resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172990392 ; closing.
4577980
Category: unknown		12025-01-06 09:56openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Abandoned railway information is very debatable since it can no longer be observed IRL; it has been fully deconstructed (except for a tiny section as an abandoned railway bridge), and should be removed.
22025-01-08 08:08commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		This is debated, but a trackbed or strip of land qualifies as `=abandoned` for what's acceptable. Besides the bridge and Yau King Ln, there's actually embankments left, and some cut slopes seem unmodified.
32025-01-08 12:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The trackbeds is most probably all gone, but not sure about the embankments; my working theory is that the CUHK Campus Circuit North ate up some of the old embankments, and so in practice the abandoned railway is not observable.
42025-10-06 02:14commentedHenryEK
♦18		the trackbeds are entirely gone. this was done around 1996 when reclaimation reformed tolo harbour front there is almost no sections of abandoned track still left untouched in hong kong
52025-10-06 02:16commentedHenryEK
♦18		frankly even though you say the embankment is enough to keep this abandoned railway thing, it would be like adding "abandoned building" role to something just because the foundation ruins are present, instead of marking them as ruins
62025-10-06 04:05commentedHenryEK
♦18		i checked every former line of track i know, and theyre all present on the map as features despite not having any sort of indication of their former presence i dont know about you but you know maybe stuff that literally doesnt exist on the map should not exist on the map?
72025-10-06 05:14commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`railway=abandoned` has a different meaning from `building=` + `abandoned=yes`
82025-10-06 05:47commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I will only add that in OSM, there seems to exist a British-culture-inspired effort to treat railway features differently than other non-railway features.
92025-10-06 06:19commentedHenryEK
♦18		but u do understand what i mean right? i mean for the sha tau kok railway which was dismantled over 90 years ago, its still added onto the map theres like no trace of it besides a few milestones and a station
102025-10-06 14:29commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		@seurish I get what you are trying to say (that's why I opened this note), but so far I have seen the argument of "it helps understand how things are like this today". Extending on this, there are relations in OSM that will likely never happen (see KCR's Northern Loop; and the LRT Sam Shing hypothetical tracks drawn by myself). I am thinking, perhaps the criteria should be whether there are visible traces of the past/hypothetical railway irl; and unfortunately this section of KCR tracks is "pinned into existence" because of this single abandoned railway bridge, which to me is a bit too crazy. I see no problem removing KCR's Northern Loop relations in favor of MTR's Northern Loop relations, but this Pak Shek Kok abandoned rail situation is on the edge.
112025-10-06 15:00commentedkingkingHK
♦215		@seurish Well, re Sha Tau Kok Railway, I would just like to point out that the addition was not without disagreements: see Kovoschiz's comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145944753
122025-10-09 04:30commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Roads, paths, and embankments qualify. So both can be examined.
132025-10-12 06:16commentedHenryEK
♦18		so its just gonna stay like this then?
4681285
Category: unknown		12025-03-25 04:05openedclcelvis
♦2		Car Park https://g.co/kgs/AALWUWz
22025-04-07 14:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This information is very believable but the exact area of the car park is unknown. Aerial imagery still shows the probably-disused cargo waiting bays. It is also very difficult to do on-site survey for this. Unactionable for now.
32025-08-05 04:29commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The latest Esri aerial imagery shows the car park. Probably actionable now?
42025-08-05 08:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yeah, we can deal with this now that we have new satellite imagery.
52025-10-05 07:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172856074 ; closing.
221741012020-06-04 07:05opened---not licensed car park
22021-01-06 04:35closedForestBoar
32021-01-06 13:56reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-10-05 06:38commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		From aerial imagery, it feels like this is not a dedicated car park, but more like the villagers haven't decided what to do with the land yet, and by coincidence their cars just park inside of it.
52025-10-05 06:58closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172855507 ; closing.
4989584
Category: Unknown		12025-10-03 14:09openedFathermo彈珠工房Pinball Factory
22025-10-03 14:10closedFathermo
32025-10-03 14:10reopenedFathermo
42025-10-04 03:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Online information says there's a "彈珠基地" at Hop Yick Plaza (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230959025), but no information about "彈珠工房"
52025-10-05 05:24commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		People may misremember names. This note is believable.
62025-10-09 12:49closedkingkingHK
♦215		Turns out, there really is a "彈珠工房" here. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173049504 ; closing.
86110512017-01-24 08:52openedBattlealvin2009There should be a footway in this area.
22025-08-08 13:24commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL.
32025-08-22 11:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		May you clarify how this footway is aligned? eg connects Stadium Path to somewhere else?
42025-09-30 13:49commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Sorry for the uninformative comment earlier - honestly I'm not sure either, there's a very twisty and turny stair starting from the south-west end of Stadium Path, and most of it is behind a locked gate (slope maintenance path iirc), making it harder to survey. Also I'm pretty sure there's a whole unmapped footway network in this area that's much more extensive than the one I was talking about. Another factor is that I was simply tired on the day I surveyed this and didn't want to climb steps. Re-survey recommended.
52025-10-02 16:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Well understandable; if it's a slope maintenance path, might as well pretend it doesn't exist at the moment. It wouldn't affect general map usage.
4964711
Category: Unknown		12025-09-16 14:05openedkingkingHK
♦215		Todo: Check speed limit of Fanling Highway south-east bound between Kai Leng and Wo Hop Shek Interchanges. (I think it's probably 100 or 80, instead of 70)
22025-09-28 14:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OSM Deep History says it was decreased from 100kmh to 70-80kmh. The context would be temporary speed reduction to install noise barriers. Now that the work is done, I suspect this should then be restored to 100kmh, but yes, a survey is recommended because I am also not sure.
32025-10-02 01:57commentedHenryEK
♦18		pretty sure its the second roundabout from here but i dont know if it affects it https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_81860.html
42025-10-02 12:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		@seurish Pretty sure it's not? The temporary reduction you cited only starts on 5 Aug, while the 100->80 change was in 2014 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24419558), and the 80->70 change was in 2020 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92812210). And such a short temporary measure should not be mapped anyway.
52025-10-02 16:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Still, if a notice mentions temporary reduction to "80km/h" then it is a very strong hint it should somehow be higher than that, i.e. might actually be "100km/h" originally.
62025-10-02 16:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		(oh at the end it does explicitly say 100km/h...)
72025-10-14 08:58closedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, if it explicitly says 100 km/h, then I think it's good enough to believe it without further investigation. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173263058 ; closing.
4961131
Category: Unknown		12025-09-14 08:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: upcoming construction works
22025-09-28 12:10commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Hi there, does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172560871 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172559473 resolve this note?
32025-09-28 13:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Seems not. e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1193058436 this is still a construction area. Disclaimer: I don't know the details of the upcoming construction works; I only know it will involve somehow moving the bus terminus.
42025-09-30 16:13closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, from what I can gather online, CMW at this location will be redeveloped, but because China Merchant is a private entity, exact details are not clear. (Are the plans out yet?) This note intends to track the bus terminus situation. Right now the mapping is OK. So, closing.
4973275
Category: Organicmaps		12025-09-21 15:01openedGanjuPanju
♦2		". ." OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-29T18:18:32Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-atm #organicmaps android
22025-09-23 13:55closedkingkingHK
♦215		Feature exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13159853201 ; closing.
32025-09-30 13:02reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-09-30 13:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Is this ATM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13159853201 legit? Why is there an ATM in the wilderness? And it is this close to a monastery? Who owns this ATM? (content forwarded from https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4977687 )
52025-10-17 10:12commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The author https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172250971 said it was a mistake.
62025-10-19 03:31closedkingkingHK
♦215		I apologise for the insufficient due diligence when closing this note initially. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173452639 ; closing.
4977687
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 14:18openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Is this ATM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13159853201 legit? Why is there an ATM in the wilderness? And it is this close to a monastery? Who owns this ATM? Also see note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4973275
22025-09-30 13:02closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		After thinking, closing this note in favor of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4973275 .
4922350
Category: unknown		12025-08-21 16:34openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: review / update Lee Garden Eight
22025-09-30 10:16commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Could you please elaborate on what needs reviewing/updating?
32025-09-30 12:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		eg, old demolished buildings from 2019 still exists here, and we can kinda see the shapes of new future buildings from satellite images, and also to determine what exactly will be built here (e.g. new district court?)
42025-09-30 12:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		* as in exists in the OSM map data
4927798
Category: StreetComplete		12025-08-24 16:19openedplumbtreescale
♦96		Service staircase via StreetComplete 57.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/300761.jpg
22025-09-15 12:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I see. For some reason I am recently noticing a lot of supposedly mountain paths in OSM are actually slope maintenance access irl. Gonna see if there's anything doable about this.
32025-09-30 12:44closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172659136 . Hopefully the interpretation is correct. Closing.
4982986
Category: Unknown		12025-09-28 14:42opened---SITE
22025-09-28 14:44closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
32025-09-29 12:46reopenedidsajkd
42025-09-29 13:40closedkingkingHK
♦215		Meaning is still unclear; closing again.
52025-09-30 12:27reopenedidsajkd
62025-09-30 12:32commentedkingkingHK
♦215		@idsajkd Could you please explain the meaning of this note?
72025-09-30 12:36closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, so far I see there is a sewage pumping station right at the location of this note. If this note tries to point out "there should be a sewage pumping station here", then feature already as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321577041 , so closing. If this note is complaining about the lack of rendering of this pumping station, then this is actually an OSMCarto problem (see https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/5137), and not strictly a problem handled by OSM itself, so again closing. I am getting tired of this. If this farce continues, I may escalate this to the ones in change. Closing. For real.
4976038
Category: Unknown		12025-09-23 11:47opened---缺少了一個升降機A lift is missing
22025-09-28 15:00closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Believable information. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172571138 ; closing.
4977665
Category: Unknown		12025-09-24 13:56openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Shatin station; should outer platforms (aka 1 and 4) be `=siding`?
22025-09-28 12:55commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		This seems simply an editing mistake https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208232752/history/16
32025-09-28 14:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Good find. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172570414 ; closing.
4941396
Category: Unknown		12025-09-01 17:22openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: path reversal
22025-09-28 14:36closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172570161 . As usual, I will let the public transport mappers deal with the bus relations at their own pace. Therefore, closing.
4978246
Category: Unknown		12025-09-25 05:45openedkingkingHK
♦215		I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4500785290 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3914317336 are referring to the same 7-11, only with two entrances.
22025-09-27 17:19commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.7-eleven.com.hk/en/store lists only 1 shop in this area. The information is believable.
32025-09-28 11:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172562964 ; closing.
4954527
Category: Unknown		12025-09-09 14:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: new buildings
22025-09-24 23:43commentedHenryEK
♦18		im unsure of what to do so can you clarify what features i should delete for the edit (e.g. the construction plot)
32025-09-25 01:51commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, from aerial imagery, there are indeed some new buildings here, so I guess we should add the building elements and update its latest state?
42025-09-25 05:21commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		indeed, because the buildings are nearly completed, the intention is to draw them on the map, and also draw the roads etc (now usually good building shapes are provided by someone else; not sure how they can draw nice-looking building shapes)
52025-09-25 23:43commentedHenryEK
♦18		so, delete the inland plot feature and add everything else?
62025-09-26 06:57commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		No, the `landuse=construction` is the `landuse=residential`
72025-09-27 15:31closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172531268 ; closing.
173814912019-04-07 18:59openedck_lauRecreational Area with table tennis tables at Ground Floor
22024-10-25 09:52commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct, but might be difficult to tag correctly
32025-09-24 14:09commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Would simply adding `level=` to the relevant elements be fine? From osm wiki: "Highways (and other ways) can be also tagged with level=* when they are essentially bound to a floor of a building complex (such as multilevel parking buildings, railway stations or airports).".
42025-09-24 14:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Oh yeah, `level=` exists. Thanks for the reminder!
52025-09-24 14:35closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It turns out, this feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674327259 , but OSMCarto doesn't render it so it was extremely unobvious to me. Still, the layering has been improved with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172397559 , so we can close this.
365430212023-04-22 12:36opened---Number of storeys: 22 Units per floor: 10 Population: 589
22024-03-11 15:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Number of storeys already in OSM data. We don't store population; it is too volatile. We do not have "units per floor"; however, we do have "total units in building". But is it a good idea to store the total?
32024-03-12 08:09commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		What do you mean? `building:flats=` is a standard, and I haven't seen any question about its usefuleness. Not having units per floor now doesn't mean it can't be created. Also it would be useful to have an `addr:flats=` per floor to show how they are numbered on each floor, as the format is not scalable to list all reliably.
42025-01-16 18:26closedhersonsl
52025-01-17 02:41reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
62025-09-24 09:47commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Will there be any further discussion on this note? Discussions regarding units per floor and address format notation isn't very relevant to this note and is probably better suited elsewhere.
72025-09-24 14:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		imo population should not be stored in osm, but I am not too familiar with how that works. can use this opportunity to recheck Tsui Chuk Garden building level/unit correctness, I guess.
82025-09-25 11:03commentedHenryEK
♦18		why is this note still active
4922555
Category: unknown		12025-08-21 18:27openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: review roundabout mapping
22025-09-16 12:37commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Could you please elaborate on what the issue this here/what is to be reviewed? I do notice that the mapping around here is a bit odd and most certainly wrong
32025-09-16 13:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The roundabout feels wrong, but aerial imagery cannot see if this is an actual roundabout with an actual concrete kurb or simply just a turning circle.
42025-09-16 14:13commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The central island is traversable, so I think it should be `highway=turning_circle`.
52025-09-17 19:14commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		There's a `=give_way` , so not entirely the most common `=turning_circle` , similar to `=mini_roundabout`
62025-09-24 09:23commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Is the presence of a give way a factor in determining whether something is a turning circle though? I feel like its main purpose is to let buses from the bus terminus do a u-turn and leave, fitting the definition of "a widened area of road that allows vehicles to turn more easily".
72025-09-24 14:10commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think the distinction is whether a "central circle" is visible. If a "central circle" is visible then it's basically a `=mini_roundabout`. The problem is, satellite imagery cannot see whether such "central circle" exists.
82025-09-24 14:17commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Not sure what you mean "visible", but there is indeed a painted circle in the middle: https://imgur.com/a/5uJE9Qi
92025-10-06 01:41commentedHenryEK
♦18		this looks more like a mini roundabout than a turning circle
320959912022-06-04 14:31openedIJMacD
♦2		Mannings has closed
22024-05-22 10:55closedAllen2077
32024-05-22 10:56reopenedAllen2077
42024-05-22 10:57closedAllen2077
52025-09-24 13:40reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
62025-09-24 13:41commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed couldn't find a Mannings at this location on https://www.mannings.com.hk/en/store-finder ; survey recommended.
72025-09-24 14:06commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I don't think you need a survey for this. The website doesn't have it, then because the website is properly maintained, it means the store really does not exist. If the (official!) website contains wrong data then it's entirely their problem and we have no obligation to help them clean it up.
82025-09-25 02:31commentedIJMacD
♦2		I'm still in the area and can confirm Mannings hasn't returned in the last 3 years. I can pop downstairs and take a photo, or I can just delete it on the map.
92025-09-26 02:30closedIJMacD
♦2		I have now deleted this branch of Mannings. I should have done it 3 years ago.
4976976
Category: OsmAnd		12025-09-24 04:57openedpppc
♦4		Perm. CLOSED #OsmAnd
22025-09-24 14:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Likely referring to node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4864636777
32025-09-26 08:51commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed couldn't find it on https://www.sasa.com.hk/v2/Shop/StoreList/17
42025-09-30 09:55commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct
52025-10-06 00:58closedWright One
♦171		Changed to Market Wholesome in changeset 172890044
4569195
Category: unknown		12024-12-30 13:04openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Sidewalks have contradictory tags of `highway=footway` but also `foot=no` (?????)
22024-12-31 04:48commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It is possible draw emergency or maintenance walkways that are illegal to walk into as pedestrians normally. On the contrary, another possibility is misunderstanding no-pedestrian sign, because legally it only refers to prohibited on the roadway. Another factor to be considered is the Expressway Area.
32025-01-03 08:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The Expressway Area is correct. A few years ago you can kinda walk from Tai Po Road to Racecourse on this side, but now that the Racecourse construction is finished, the old path was removed, and now this side is essentially a dead end. The sign probably applies to the motor road, but in effect it also applies to pedestrians. I say remove the sidewalk altogether.
42025-03-01 16:55closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No response; then I'm doing it. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163095590 ; closing.
52025-03-01 18:56reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
62025-03-01 19:03commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		I misunderstood what you are referring to, for what was on the Racecourse side. If the sidewalk still exists physically, it should be kept. Especially if there's no `barrier=` blocking. (even then, it could still be added)
72025-03-01 19:04commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1205682018
82025-09-24 13:36commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Will there be any further discussion on this note? If @vectorial8192 does not disagree with @Kovoschiz's points, then perhaps no action needed and we can close this note.
92025-09-24 13:57commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I will just redo this as if the path is a "slop maintenance path" then.
102025-09-24 14:02closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The road there is so narrow, it is as if a barrier exists there. The path is kept, but is also marked as if it isn't supposed to be used, just like slope maintenance paths found throughout Hong Kong. Resolved again via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172396030 ; closing.
4967038
Category: Unknown		12025-09-18 08:13opened---小米之家Xiaomi Home
22025-09-18 08:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4864609423 ; closing.
4487699
Category: unknown		12024-10-21 04:50openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Clean up public transport relations after changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158152986
22025-09-17 09:26commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Could you please elaborate on what needs cleaning up? The public transport relations seem fine, unless I missed something.
32025-09-17 10:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Entirely possible that someone else came in and really cleaned up the relations after I posted this note & before your comment. Basically iirc, the quoted changeset split some "two way" paths into separate "one way" paths, which breaks the public transport relations. As usual, the iD editor is weak against PT relations so I avoid directly touching them. Now lgtm, closing.
47035912015-11-18 03:26openednevilcheung凱昇藝術中心
22015-11-18 03:26closednevilcheung
32015-11-18 03:26reopenednevilcheung
42025-03-28 07:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
52025-03-29 16:57commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3841741635 , but it seems we don't have a tag for "arts school"...?
62025-07-07 04:15closedroylo5112
72025-09-05 13:46reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
82025-09-05 13:46commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Perhaps `education=art_school`?
92025-09-11 14:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I am half split between "yes let's do it" and "but it also targets school kids".
102025-09-11 14:15commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I might understand this wrongly, but I feel like `education=art_school` is for adults and teens. Like, a higher-education school for future artists, and not for kids.
112025-09-17 04:25commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Then, perhaps `amenity=prep_school` + `school=art`?
122025-09-17 08:01commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`=prep_school` is preparing for exams. This is `=training`
132025-09-17 10:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Agree in principle with @kingkingHK and @Kovoschiz, but also consider doing `education=*` instead of `amenity=*` as per latest OSM recommendation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:education
142025-09-17 19:13commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It's both `amenity=` + `education`
152025-10-14 07:15commentedkingkingHK
♦215		So, `amenity=training` + `education=training` + `training=art`?
4894594
Category: unknown		12025-08-06 03:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12996644577 is suspicious
22025-08-06 06:27commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed, and in fact the same user has also added a lot of very dubious names in July. Some of his edits also seem to correlate with names prescribed by protecthknames.
32025-08-06 15:30commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		if protecthknames, then is potentially bannable; we will need some help.
42025-08-06 16:46commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		This is not actionable unless you have commented on at least one changeset to show unresponsiveness and cooperativeness. Discussing here alone isn't enough.
52025-08-06 17:28commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Apologies, I have forgotten about the "comment on the changeset" again.
62025-09-16 14:01closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I see this specific case is mostly resolved. Therefore, closing this.
4964448
Category: Unknown		12025-09-16 11:29opened---健康村二期停車場Jiankang Village Phase 2 Parking Lot
22025-09-16 12:31commentedkingkingHK
♦215		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10199143700 ? Though should probably be `amenity=parking_entrance`.
32025-09-16 14:00commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Year, 99% sure is that node. Might be a previous mapping mistake.
42025-09-30 12:49closedkingkingHK
♦215		Well, there are no parking anywhere close to that node other than Healthy Village Car Park, so can be 100% it is just a mapping mistake. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172659307 ; closing.
4591542
Category: unknown		12025-01-17 06:30opened---- 大潭篤水塘南入口 - 路牌左邊梯級上山Tai Tam Tuk Reservoir South Entrance - stairs uphill on the left side of the road sign
22025-08-21 18:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Both features listed seem to already exist.
32025-09-16 13:58closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Re "- 大潭篤水塘南入口", geographically this indeed is the "south side". Re "- 路牌左邊梯級上山", indeed we have the information board https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9938657702 , and then a path up the mountain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156581675 right next to it. Features already exist. Therefore, closing.
4939458
Category: Unknown		12025-08-31 16:03openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		"U"nderpass?
22025-09-01 04:03commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Is the name even gazetted? If not that could explain it. E.g. in https://www.td.gov.hk/en/traffic_notices/index_id_76124.html it's called "The underpass leading from Chatham Road North northbound to Gillies Avenue South southbound", and such a clumsy description likely won't be used if there's a gazetted name.
32025-09-01 05:07commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`name=` is for common names, and many names are in fact not gazetted despite both public and government use. I do a trick to use lowercase for these. Google 1st page results: https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/tokptiso/tdn41159en2.pdf https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr2025/english/subleg/negative/2025ln072-e.pdf https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/TOK/YTM/YT_PDF/2014/tdn_drone_show_in_ https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/TOK/YTM/YT_PDF/2014/tdn_drone_show_in_
42025-09-01 05:09commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Most famous example might be Rumsey St Flyover. It is used extensively, including at planning and construction historically. But the road is still not gazetted as it or Connaught Rd C.
52025-09-01 07:16commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think I saw a map that marks this segment as "Gillies Avenue South" but I can't recall which map. If no gazetted name + no irl signposted name then might as well make it `noname=yes`; at minimum it does not seem like it should be "Wuhu Street".
62025-09-01 11:09commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		1. You have to know whether that map is correct first. Even government map has many mistakes, or at least deviation from reality (depending on definition). They may overextend the gazetted naming. 2. It's not Wuhu St, but an underpass of it. Naming by what it passes is standard. 3. You would have to remove many names by this standard, when those do have common names. Eg Princess Margaret Rd Link and Ferry St Flyover was only gazetted as Hung Hom Bypass and Gascoigne Rd Flyover in recent years.
72025-09-01 11:17commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		There's some official and historical basis on top of the above https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/embed.aspx?src=https://www.emsd.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_1148/Appendix%20A%20-%20Building%20Code%20v1.0.xlsx&activecell=B2412 https://search.grs.gov.hk/repository/img?id=%2BB3GmARcUkiYebJGfIJqKA%3D%3D#page=3 https://search.grs.gov.hk/repository/img?&id=2Q7T7wF%2BeKyyliWLygafDw%3D%3D#page=6
82025-09-14 10:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, then the current situation is good enough as-is. Therefore, closing.
241735512020-11-09 16:12opened毛飯煮意 - momoriceism毛飯煮意 - Momoriceism
22025-04-07 15:47closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Curiously, there is no online information about what this is. Assuming this is a restaurant, not even OpenRice has information about this. Note is therefore likely invalid, so, closing.
32025-09-12 13:58reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
42025-09-12 14:01commentedkingkingHK
♦215		According to the Company Registry, there exists a company named " 毛飯煮意有限公司 Momoriceism Limited". And according to a very suspicious website (https://coltd.hk/company-72566028-details.htm), it's address is Room 02 & 26, 13/F, Wing Shing Industrial Building, Ng Fong Street, which correlates with the location of this note. Also, https://www.facebook.com/CforConscienceHK/posts/106398731734174/ seems to be talking about this. I think all that's left is to verify whether this POI still exists at this location, and decide what exactly this POI is.
52025-09-12 16:21commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		that coltd website seems like content farm website that simply crawls data from the company registry, I think I saw a few of these websites so far, imo not very indicative. also, the way the facebook post is written, it just seems the organization is simply defunct and is surviving as some sort of an unmaintained shell.
62025-09-12 16:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I propose closing this, but @kingkingHK perhaps you may want to go there once and confirm it for real.
72025-09-14 11:45closedkingkingHK
♦215		Indeed, couldn't find the company in the building. Also, the entire Wing Shing Industrial Building is very unmaintained/abandoned, so definitely no food production company (as mentioned in the facebook page) there. Closing.
4559591
Category: unknown		12024-12-21 21:31openedDimitar155
♦3,471		The 3 sets of 2 buildings each might be semi-detached.
22025-03-29 11:49closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OSM does not provide an easy way to see "polygon shape" history, but currently these buildings are now semi-detached. Therefore, closing.
32025-03-29 14:06reopenedDimitar155
♦3,471		They aren't tagged as semi-detached. All of them have building=terrace + house=terrace, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1103846078 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486759 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486762 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486763 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486764 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1268486765
42025-03-30 12:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hi there! Sorry for misunderstanding the note. You may see me around closing notes to clean up the notes interface, to declutter them. This can be reviewed in detail later.
52025-09-12 12:27commentedkingkingHK
♦215		@vectorial8192 has the "review in detail later" ever happened? Seems like it's still tagged as `building=terrace` and `house=terrace`. Also, you may be interested in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4559590.
62025-09-12 12:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It never happened. I went to do something else. Also yes I know that similar note is placed at Sai Kung. The original plan was to deal with this first, and then deal with the Sai Kung one later.
72025-09-12 15:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To clarify my situation, the blocker was/is that I am extremely unfamiliar with how individual buildings should be mapped. Me not touching this again was not due to anything bad happening. It's entirely my lack of knowledge.
82025-09-12 15:52commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Another blocker would be to really manually review the several dozen (or hundred?) of buildings.
4957458
Category: Unknown		12025-09-11 16:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Kwun Tong Line, the directions are sus. "Westbound" but approaches Tiu Keng Leng; and vice versa?
22025-09-11 17:00commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		(Problem observed at Mong Kok)
32025-09-12 08:10closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Must have switched the `railway=` , while correct `route=`
4936870
Category: Unknown		12025-08-30 04:33openedkingkingHK
♦215		Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170061964 really have a speed limit of 100?
22025-09-11 13:44closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171785759 ; closing.
32025-09-11 14:11reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-09-11 14:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To add to this, this situation could have been a fat finger mistake. I would look at the map and then directly apply the 100 -> 10 change myself.
4952223
Category: Unknown		12025-09-08 08:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Is it actually possible to use these steps to reach Castle Peak Road?
22025-09-10 12:35closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171733971 ; closing.
4868226
Category: unknown		12025-07-21 15:14openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Free-hanging railway siding? Missing data that describes how the siding connects back to the mainline?
22025-08-07 07:21commentedCypp0847
♦183		Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170091126 This would inevitably involve some major changes to the tracks
32025-09-09 10:57closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Well, I have a feeling the quoted changeset was reverted due to potential copyright problems. Anyway, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171679335 ; closing. The mapping can still be improved (e.g. where exactly is the siding? how about the public transport mapping?) but that would belong to future work and is out of scope.
4940451
Category: Unknown		12025-09-01 08:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1172161653 I thought this site was purged several times over?
22025-09-08 08:54closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171622097 ; closing.
4810055
Category: unknown		12025-06-17 12:02opened---港茂眼鏡公司(泓富廣場)Kong Mau Eyewear Company (Hang Fung Plaza)
22025-08-08 13:24commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL.
32025-09-08 08:33closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171621088 ; closing.
4892787
Category: unknown		12025-08-05 03:44openedkingkingHK
♦215		Need to confirm name of 38 Hung To Road.
22025-08-07 04:31commentedCypp0847
♦183		Appears to be an unnamed building
32025-08-07 06:17commentedkingkingHK
♦215		www.sharedoffices.hk/building/microtron-building/ claims that it's called "美科大厦 Microtron Building". When I visited the site yesterday, it was covered in dense scaffolding, so I was not able to see if there were any names signposted. Also seems weird to have an unnamed building in such an urban area?
42025-08-20 14:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		- even if scaffolding, the name potentially can still be known by visiting the building directory in the lobby - buildings can really have no names, esp in "old urban areas" where (self guess) the building was built as a personal joint venture and not via real estate development companies (eg SHK); in this case it will be known simply as "[Street Name] [Street Number]" - commercial buildings can change names; this is usually done by having someone purchase the naming rights, sth like that
52025-08-20 14:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		However, looking at online sources, it does seem the building is named, so recommend go there again somehow.
62025-08-22 08:28commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The building seems closed and the entrance is locked. Outside the building it's simply signposted as "38 Hung To Road", so it's probably really nameless.
72025-09-08 08:29closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Then, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620880 ; closing.
4949232
Category: Unknown		12025-09-06 12:21openedkingkingHK
♦215		Name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4745146323 is dubious.
22025-09-08 08:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		99% feels like referring to the famous Blue House group, which is next street. Then, this node shouldn't exist.
32025-09-08 08:22closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620551 ; closing.
4869215
Category: unknown		12025-07-22 07:12openedjack_@_@sodo
22025-08-05 04:37commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Meaning is unclear (perhaps "todo"?), please elaborate.
32025-09-08 08:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4932915
Category: Unknown		12025-08-27 14:38openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4867380821 is suspicious (mapper seems inactive)
22025-09-08 08:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620363 ; closing.
4899982
Category: unknown		12025-08-09 06:48openedkingkingHK
♦215		Is the substation really just called "變電站 ESS"?Is the substation really just called "Transformer Substation ESS"?
22025-08-31 14:05commentedkingkingHK
♦215		There appears to be a name signposted on the wall, but it's quite far from the fence, making it difficult for outsiders to see the name. A camera with good zoom might be needed to read the sign.
32025-09-08 00:47commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Then, just delete the name and leave it as unknown.
42025-09-08 08:15closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171620254 ; closing.
4903801
Category: unknown		12025-08-11 07:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11353455226 is suspicious
22025-08-11 17:38commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It's simply another historical location
32025-08-12 14:08commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To be fair this is my first time hearing about this. For a long time I would just call this area Pat Heung. Again, quoting you, perhaps this should be moved to OHM.
42025-08-12 17:23commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		That's the `=suburb` , and there can be other `place=` under it. `=locality` is already the lowest level.
52025-09-01 17:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Then, this note is due to my lack of local (rural) knowledge. Therefore, closing.
4937016
Category: Unknown		12025-08-30 07:34openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Does this "Yau Ma Tei Interchange (N)" have `share_taxi=no`?
22025-08-31 11:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed.
32025-08-31 13:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171268691 ; closing.
4937015
Category: Unknown		12025-08-30 07:31openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Now that Yau Ma Tei Interchange is restored, does this "Yan Cheung Road (W) -> Hoi Wang Road (S)" have a `share_taxi=no`?
22025-08-31 11:56commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It turns out, no such signage, but turning northbound does have this signage.
32025-08-31 12:59closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171265947 ; closing.
223723412020-06-21 16:35opened---312機槍堡
22025-08-27 05:20closedHenryEK
♦18		Pillbox 312 exists just northeast of this note. Although it is on the map, it for some reason does not show.
32025-08-30 07:22reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-08-30 07:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To add more information: OSM itself only contains map data. It does not handle map rendering itself. The situation is that OSM Carto (the default rendering style used by OSM) does not render said military ruins, at least as of writing. Most likely, OSM Carto does not know how to render said ruins. This would then be an OSM Carto issue and should not be discussed here.
4927540
Category: unknown		12025-08-24 14:15openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I don't think this is a tomb.
22025-08-25 16:35commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`=tomb` + `tomb=columbarium` is simply what's used for this. It's only needs to change from `historic=` to `man_made=`
32025-08-26 03:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, I was looking at `historic=*` because that's obviously not the case. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171004732 ; closing.
94953112017-04-02 10:30openedKoala888洞穴 (OSM data version: 2017-03-06T16:48:02Z) #mapsme
22025-08-22 13:33closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Probable duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/939664 ; closing.
4713020
Category: unknown		12025-04-16 10:33openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Public shower has end_date.
22025-04-16 16:08commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note: this is trying to describe a todo, but not a problem.
32025-08-02 12:26commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The end_date is marked as 1 June this year, which has already passed. Does that mean the public shower has closed? Any action needed?
42025-08-02 14:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hi there! Perhaps you are new to OSM editing. The end_date was because I noticed it was scheduled to close down. Supposedly we should go check the news sources etc to see what will be happening to the public bathhouse. Best would be if we can get to the government announcement describing how the bathhouse will be repurposed.
52025-08-02 14:47commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		...it seems there are no repurposing plans yet. Then, we will make it become disused. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
62025-08-22 12:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829635 ; closing.
4886297
Category: unknown		12025-08-01 04:33openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Citybus CTB?
22025-08-08 13:20commentedkingkingHK
♦215		An NWFB banner at the entrance to the depot has been replaced with a Citybus one, so I suppose so. However I'm not sure where the name "NWFB/CTB Sheung Wan Depot" comes from anyway: I don't see any sign at the site explicitly signposted this name. Perhaps it's from some sort of official document? If so, then we can just find that document and see if they updated it.
32025-08-08 14:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Now that you mention "official document", it made me curious, and then I found this document which may be useful https://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/atd/2020/en/section9_1_1.html I am not too sure whether using this document has any copyright concerns, but you may ask around just in case. I think the document is considered "essential for function" just like how private organizations have their phone numbers on their websites, and those phone numbers are not copyright-protected since they are "essential for function".
42025-08-22 12:38closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829564 ; closing.
4780054
Category: unknown		12025-05-29 03:48openedjoe1213King’s Flair International (Holdings) Limited
22025-08-08 13:21commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL.
32025-08-22 12:35closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829401 ; closing.
4863511
Category: Onosm.org		12025-07-19 05:09opened---onosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: Morii Bar & Restaurant addr:housenumber=279-281 addr:street=德輔道中 addr:city=香港島上環 Phone number: 55769606 Website: https://www.instagram.com/morii.bar Social Network: https://www.instagram.com/morii.bar?igsh=MWVtNmkyejJqOWkxNg== Opening Hours: 12pm -03am ｍon - sat Wheelchair accessibility: unknown Category: Restaurants Accepted payment methods: delivery=Foodpanda and keeta takeaway=yes
22025-08-08 13:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL. Though the opening hours signposted at the site is 18:00 to 03:00, which differs from the note's 12:00-03:00.
32025-08-12 09:39closedcliffling
42025-08-13 11:47reopenedkingkingHK
♦215
52025-08-22 12:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829225 ; closing.
52788812016-03-15 00:32openedNAIL 20NAIL 20, 20B, Hillier Commercial Bldg, 89 Wing Lok St, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong
22025-08-08 13:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL.
32025-08-22 12:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170829014 ; closing.
412437312024-02-23 06:49opened---Ninuda HK Limited
22025-05-03 08:26commentedFrances Chin2
32025-08-08 13:22commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Correct, feature exists IRL.
42025-08-22 12:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170828859 ; closing.
4920224
Category: unknown		12025-08-20 14:15openedMateusz Konieczny
♦36,579		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/426856757/history is it really amenity=vending_machine and shop=general at the same time?
22025-08-21 18:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think a likely irl situation is that the `shop=general` has a vending machine inside. IMO this still would not justify a full `amenity=vending_machine`. Disclaimer: I have never been to this place before.
32025-08-21 19:21commentedMateusz Konieczny
♦36,579		for that vending_machine=yes may fit
42025-08-21 19:21commentedMateusz Konieczny
♦36,579		or map it as a separate node
52025-08-22 12:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170828170 ; closing.
204682912020-01-05 08:03openedWright One
♦171		此入口已封
22021-05-19 03:38closedSylvester77
32021-05-19 03:39reopenedSylvester77
42025-08-21 18:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Another path nearby was marked as inaccessible https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154333345 ; related?
4916204
Category: unknown		12025-08-18 09:01opened---友愛南巴士總站用地已被收回起樓The site of the former Yau Oi South Bus Terminus has been reclaimed for redevelopment
22025-08-18 09:24commentedkingkingHK
♦215		https://www.td.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_13/TNTM3/TA_Public%20Transport%20Arrangements%20for%20Temporary%20Closure%20of%20Yau%20Oi%20South%20BT_E.pdf agrees with this.
32025-08-21 17:59closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170793739 ; closing. Note: since public transport mapping cannot be easily/correctly done via the iD editor, I will leave them to work on this at their own pace.
4908929
Category: unknown		12025-08-14 03:29openedkingkingHK
♦215		Wan Po Road south-east bound, why does the `highway=motorway` end here? Shouldn't it be extended to the end of the Wan Po Road/Chiu Shun Road/Po Yap Road Flyover, based on the continuity rule? Cf. Tsing Yi North Coastal Road.
22025-08-14 07:44commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Yes, this is a good question. We had a great argument over these situations. But for here, I do think we could slightly relax the standard when it changes at the gore.
32025-08-14 07:45commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Also Tunnel Area is proposed to be changed to `motorroad=yes` only, and `=trunk` here, instead of all `=motorway`
42025-08-14 19:56commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		On MOS Rd, this was avoided by justifying a `highway=` change at the bus on-slip (although it was edited by someone now)
52025-08-17 13:47closedkingkingHK
♦215		Changed via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170453952 ; closing.
62025-08-21 17:41reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
72025-08-21 17:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Re MOS road, I would think there is nothing to continue since both the "main" road and the "slip" road have their motorway status end right at the junction linking them together. But this would be going too off-topic.
264148512021-04-28 09:48openedIan Ho
♦33		Some construction works are being done here. The path is widen by machinery to over 1.5m wide all the way up to the top.
22022-02-16 14:45closedAWX4
32022-02-16 14:45reopenedAWX4
42022-02-16 14:45closedAWX4
52022-02-17 14:53reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
62022-02-17 14:53commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Misunderstanding on how Notes work, not yet worked on. Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
72022-09-14 04:36closedHKHikerhang
♦14
82022-09-14 05:40reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
92022-09-22 04:46commentedIan Ho
♦33		The new paved path for the start and higher section of the path are different from existing path. So yes it not yet worked on and shouldn't be resolved yet.
102022-11-24 03:17commentedIan Ho
♦33		As at 2022-11-24, the path is still under construction. Access is officially authorized personnel only. Will keep on update.
112025-08-21 17:39commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hi there, it seems the relevant paths may have become available (new OSM edits), may you confirm whether the foot paths / steps are really accessible?
4919256
Category: unknown		12025-08-20 00:19openedHenryEK
♦18		building shape is wrong
22025-08-20 02:28commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The building shape seems to match the aerial imagery. Could you please elaborate on what is wrong?
32025-08-21 10:05commentedHenryEK
♦18		It does not match aerial imagery but i dont know how to explain it
42025-08-21 16:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It really does not match aerial imagery. One technique in the iD editor I have learned: select the building, press M to move it, and then move the building to the top most level shown in the aerial imagery. The theory is that, even if aerial imagery is wrong about the actual location, it really cannot be wrong about the shape and the size. Here, in this case, with ESRI Imagery, we can see the east wing and the south wing is not large enough / not far enough from the Core. This is a valid todo.
52025-08-21 16:33commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		You can also see that the building is currently not symmetric but almost symmetric (!), which is highly unusual.
62025-08-27 05:18closedHenryEK
♦18		il just fix it myself but the position might be off
72025-08-27 05:18reopenedHenryEK
♦18
82025-09-15 00:11closedHenryEK
♦18		fixed
280971212021-08-18 17:43openedWhcohi
♦239		This FP ends here
22025-08-20 14:10commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Satellite imagery cannot see some of the paths here when the area is seemingly mostly shrubs; did someone just self-fabricate paths?
32025-08-20 14:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170729516 ; closing.
392959212023-10-08 05:46opened---To DB Paza
22025-08-20 14:07closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This is very likely referring to Discovery Bay bus services linking DB to Tung Chung. Then, this was done very recently by someone else (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170287007). Therefore, closing.
4918153
Category: unknown		12025-08-19 12:20openedkingkingHK
♦215		The street and buildings are overlapping, implying incorrect positioning of either (or both) of them.
22025-08-20 14:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Might be real if building provides limited/full cover to pedestrian path at its address; common in older urban areas.
32025-08-20 14:10commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Currently the buildings are mapped to almost overlap with the carriageway centreline, which I find unlikely.
42025-10-10 08:55closedCypp0847
♦183		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173083119 Had a walk and indeed there are hanging structures as roofs from some of the buildings, but they are not usually mapped to have the sidewalk "covered" like this
4731535
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-28 09:25openedA6pakcac
♦19		"Специальные скамейки под навесами для зрителей Light Show" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bench #organicmaps androidSpecial benches under canopies for Light Show spectators
22025-08-05 07:16commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Translation: "Special benches under canopies for Light Show spectators". Probably already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12794340202.
32025-08-20 12:38closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Oh yeah, some mappers will add a feature, and then add a note describing such new feature. In my opinion, sometimes this seems excessive. Feature already exists; closing.
4756216
Category: unknown		12025-05-13 02:50opened---[飲用水] 此處設有加水機Drinking water is available, a water dispenser is located here
22025-08-18 17:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This note says there is a drinking fountain here. However, I cannot find references to this fountain from government open data.
32025-11-01 14:11closedkingkingHK
♦215		There is really a drinking fountain here. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174064150 ; closing.
224845112020-06-30 13:46openedWhcohi
♦239		big area of mudflat while water drop below 0.8M-0.0M
22020-12-17 15:58closedDixon313
32020-12-18 16:21reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42020-12-18 16:21commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		@Dixon313 misunderstanding on how Notes work, not yet added
52025-08-05 12:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Can OSM even describe these kinds of tidal landforms?
62025-08-14 12:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OSM can. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dtidalflat
72025-08-14 12:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170434638 ; closing.
4831466
Category: unknown		12025-06-29 18:52opened---天水围宣道会Tin Shui Wai Evangelical Church
22025-08-13 14:30closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		- too ambiguous - multiple matches - definitely not here Therefore, closing.
4728573
Category: unknown		12025-04-26 11:22openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		LRT Tai Tong Road: is there an entrance/exit here?
22025-08-10 14:01commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Yes, there is a signalled crossing here connecting the footpath of Castle Peak Road west of Fook Hong Street to the west of the platform of Tai Tong Road LRT.
32025-08-13 05:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Thanks! Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170369344 ; closing.
405728812024-01-07 14:40openedPierre LienAdd new location: Carol Yang BlackBox Theatre
22025-03-28 15:00commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		According to online sources, Carol Yang BlackBox Theatre is the newly-named BlackBox Theatre inside Benevolence House, St Stephen's College. Also see https://www.instagram.com/ststephenscollege/p/Cuxxd7PBu69/ .
32025-08-09 16:30closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170211235 ; closing.
373958712023-06-17 20:13openedos-emmer
♦523		All over Hongkong there are a lot of missused turning_circles and turning_loops. They should just be used on nodes and nothing else. Also they are sometimes combined with roundabouts. On the link below you can find the places I mean: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wcy
22023-06-17 20:14commentedos-emmer
♦523		With this link the scrips runs automaticly https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wcA These places need to be fixed.
32023-06-18 17:37closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		No, there aren't, and they shouldn't. Wiki is not an authority to decide everything. What do you propose to use when the `=turning_loop` has been drawn separately to show they are one?
42023-06-18 19:16reopenedos-emmer
♦523
52023-06-18 19:20commentedos-emmer
♦523		Hi Kovoschiz, thank you for your responses. I think we need to find a solution for this in general. If a place where I can turn around is mapped as a full road (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111301056) I would follow the wiki: "Draw a closed highway=* way around the traffic island and connect it to the main road, giving it the same name. If traffic is required to flow in a particular direction around the traffic island, add oneway=yes. This method is preferred for large turning circles, because navigation applications decide whether the user is on- or off-route based on their distance from the roadway. This method also makes it possible to accurately map features inside the loop, such as parking spaces, trees, or a flagpole." Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop I know that the wiki is not an absolute authority but it is at least a very good orientation. In this situation the description in the wiki matches most of the useage worldwide. Hong Kong is basicly the only area with ways tagged as turning_circle or turning_loop (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wdZ). To be fair, there were a small amount of roads tagged similar to how you proposed, that I already edited. But at no point that was widly used. I think we should folow the wiki here and don't use something like turning_loop=yes on ways. Because a road that loops around is just a road and does not need to be labeled as a turning_loop. Only if the turning_loop is tagged as a single node there needs to be an information that shows that we have a turning_loop here. My opinion is the same about the turning_circle tag. I think both of us just want to improve the quality of the map. Do you know what I mean? I would realy like to also read someone elses opinion on this topic. Maybe I am totaly wrong in which case I would of cause undo my last changes.
62023-06-19 07:39commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		The wiki only provides guidelines on the minimum. There's nothing you can follow for something it doesn't mention. `turning_loop=` is not covered. When there are driveways connected to it, it causes ambiguity on whether the untagged section could be a `junction=` `=circular` or `=roundabout` , which is only implicitly indicated by having a `restriction=no_u_turn` at the tail. As the `highway=turning_loop` is improved to a separately drawn road, the same information should be preserved.
72023-06-19 07:42commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		If you blindly follow the wiki for being prescriptive, then I have already documented my method now. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Roundabout_details#Turning_circles_and_loops You should also be aware you need to follow guidelines for re-tagging.
82025-08-09 16:13closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		As per the latest ESRI satellite imagery, it is clear this really is a `highway=mini_roundabout`, and the west side one is really a `highway=turning_circle`. I see the discussion has already concluded. Therefore, resolving.
4888375
Category: unknown		12025-08-02 12:39openedkingkingHK
♦215		name:en of park?
22025-08-08 05:53closedultisol
♦52		Added from https://look4.hk/en/Community-Facilities/Lai-Kit-Lau-Sitting-out-Area/237944
32025-08-08 14:15reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-08-08 14:15commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Changeset is controversal; reviving.
4896453
Category: unknown		12025-08-07 05:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		(northbound) Which of the 3 toll gantries is the real toll gantry?
22025-08-07 06:57closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		The one here should be wrong. You should be aware there's always a pair of them for redundancy, not a single one only.
32025-08-07 07:01reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-08-07 07:02closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		The one on the slip road is wrongly positioned. Should be upstream.
52025-08-07 07:11reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
62025-08-07 07:11closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		And southbound is completely wrong (and duplicating one of the correct one by me)
4894772
Category: unknown		12025-08-06 07:27openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		no name road, why access=private?
22025-08-07 06:54closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Drainage reserve access road (was even `access=no` )
4894603
Category: unknown		12025-08-06 04:19openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		There exists both https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315897141 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12846837 , which may indicate inconsistent data.
22025-08-06 16:49closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		No you should check how `type=waterway` works first
4681270
Category: unknown		12025-03-25 04:00openedclcelvis
♦2		Permenant closure of entry/exit road from Sai Sha Road
22025-04-08 15:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Can't seem to find any government announcements for this.
32025-04-11 16:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164781488 disagrees with this note; this note is contested. Survey recommended.
42025-04-21 08:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (fake news); closing.
52025-08-05 15:47reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
62025-08-05 15:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Latest ESRI satellite imagery (dated 2025 July) agrees with the content of this note. Therefore, restoring. As a suggestion, please state clearly whether your note is describing a future event or an existing problem. In this case, it is trying to describe a future event.
72025-08-05 16:15closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170015665 ; closing.
295758812021-12-03 09:19opened---path not clear , go back here
22025-08-05 15:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It seems there are currently no path already, updated by someone else. (Also see changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143772274) Therefore, closing.
4889989
Category: unknown		12025-08-03 12:29openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		As per latest satellite imagery (finally), calibrate/beautify path shape for real.
22025-08-05 13:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170006937 ; closing.
4636691
Category: OsmAnd		12025-02-22 04:08openedmaxso216
♦16		new trainning ground constructed #OsmAnd
22025-08-05 12:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170004632 ; closing.
374052512023-06-18 13:29openedos-emmer
♦523		On the map here is a circular road but on the aerial image I can only see a widened part of the road. I think instead of this circular road here should be a single node with highway=turning_circle and without passing_place=yes and turning_loop=yes. Can someone confirm this?
22025-08-05 12:36closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Latest satellite imagery (ESRI) shows something which looks like a circular road. This matches OSM data. Closing.
4782837
Category: unknown		12025-05-31 04:26openedEmojiopenstreetmapConstruction in progress, not yet built
22025-08-05 12:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, this somehow is a construction site.
32025-08-05 12:33closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170004138 ; closing.
4803762
Category: unknown		12025-06-13 06:44openedpityiusum正大建築物料有限公司 Chung Tai Building Materials Limited
22025-08-05 11:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000572 ; closing.
4620382
Category: unknown		12025-02-09 10:22openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4865106762 (新豐彩廣場) is suspicious.The Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4865106762 (Xinfeng Color Plaza) is suspicious.
22025-02-15 07:26commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4620378 for related discussion
32025-08-05 11:15closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000304 ; closing.
4620378
Category: unknown		12025-02-09 10:22openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4865106763 (Hong Kong Fashion City) is suspicious.
22025-02-15 07:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		香港時裝城 However, the mode of operation is unclear. Perhaps this should not even be in OSM at all.
32025-02-15 11:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		To elaborate, it feels like this is a "nested intermediate shop" inside the building, where it acts like a shop itself but inside itself there are more shops. The curious thing about this is that irl, there are several such "shops" in the building set.
42025-08-05 11:11commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I will take these as shops.
52025-08-05 11:15closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170000304 ; closing.
256661812021-03-05 14:29openedgosanyaki"48P 52X 53 234D 261B 962B 962E 962N" POI name: 豪景花園商場 Hong Kong Garden Commercial Complex POI types: highway-bus_stop OSM data version: 2021-02-01T11:34:17Z #mapsme
22025-08-03 05:07closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Information of this note is outdated. Closing.
4804964
Category: unknown		12025-06-13 22:53openedZizidane
♦3		"the address is definitely correct, but I'm not sure about the exact position on the map, it should be on ground floor of the isky building" OSM snapshot date: 2025-05-15T17:20:20Z POI name: Casa 218 POI types: amenity-restaurant cuisine-seafood cuisine-spanish cuisine-tapas #CoMaps android
22025-06-15 07:21commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I have moved the location of the restaurant to the center of the building. This is usually enough. However, I have noticed the phone number of this restaurant is invalid. It contains 9 digits while currently the max allowed is 8 digits.
32025-06-16 11:07commentedZizidane
♦3		It is my mistake, please accept my apologies. The correct phone number is 2522 1218, I have corrected it on coMaps, but I dont see the edit yet here on osm website.
42025-06-16 14:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No worries. I just now checked the wiki what is CoMaps, and it seems the new data from CoMaps will be uploaded to OSM sometime later when internet is available again. I will help fix the phone number on OSM itself, but will keep this note open lest the update from CoMaps finally reach OSM.
52025-08-02 17:30closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, it seems to me there will not be updates from CoMaps, so I am closing this.
4735799
Category: unknown		12025-04-30 16:17openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		relation=no_right_turn (NE direction; Yen Chow Street -> Lai Chi Kok Road) Is this turn restriction's exception only for franchised buses or actually for any kind of bus?
22025-07-31 03:01commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Franchised bus. The bus lane is a franchised bus lane, and the turn restriction is no right turn except for franchised buses.
32025-08-02 12:45commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The current tagging is correct. So I suppose no action needed?
42025-08-02 14:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yeah, no action needed. I was just wondering whether it really is specifically franchised bus or generally any bus. No action needed; then can close this.
249613212021-01-13 03:08opened---Cat Walk Dog Come Pet Shop | 犬貓集結號寵物店 香港新界錦田大馬路吉慶圍DD109 LOT283 SA 地下
22025-04-28 12:05commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It's probably this website https://catwalkdogcome.com/lander , but can't seem to load anything.
32025-08-01 09:02closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		"Account suspended". Nice. Closing.
259557112021-03-26 16:51opened---block in front, u can turn right here to the small route
22025-07-31 15:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No idea about the "small route", but it should be clear the barracks is entirely off-limits.
32025-07-31 15:34closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169776724 ; closing.
4745596
Category: unknown		12025-05-06 16:52openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		North Side should have been completed recently; info needed.
22025-07-31 15:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169277428 by someone else; closing.
4722929
Category: unknown		12025-04-22 15:35openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yau Pok Road, why access=no?
22025-04-23 16:33commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Forgotten to update? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756616939/history/4
32025-07-31 15:07closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167634943 by someone else; closing.
240147012020-10-27 11:58opened---entrance
22025-07-29 14:07closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear (possible "private note"); closing.
4861256
Category: unknown		12025-07-17 16:49openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Improbably narrow cliff/ridge? On the public map?
22025-07-18 05:49commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Should be changed to `=ridge`
32025-07-18 05:50commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		( Should draw `=ridge` , but this is possible)
42025-07-18 15:45commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		If the improbable cliff is trying to describe the ridge line, then yes, I can see where this is going. However, the south side is just improbable imo. Does that mean the terraformed platform extends narrowly for very long towards the north side? I don't think so. Therefore, something sus is going on, and the improbable cliff is probably a mistake.
52025-07-19 04:16closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		They can be different land formations, only coincidentally represented by the same object partially. This doesn't matter.
62025-07-19 04:16reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
72025-07-23 13:33commentedkingkingHK
♦215		The top of the ridge is actually flat for a width of around 1.5 metres, and both sides have a slope of around 40 degrees, which I believe is not steep enough to justify natural=cliff. For the south side, the "cliff" south of the substation is actually of a different elevation of the "cliff" north of it, just tagged with a single way. West of the substation, the hill almost exactly the same, whether north or south of the substation, except that there is a flat margin of around 1.5 metres wide surrounding the substation. The substation simply "interrupted" the ridge, forcing it to end early. There is no cliff at the north margin of the substation either; it was smoothed out to a 40 degree slope. In the end, the confusion simply arises from attempting to use the linear natural=cliff to map a 2d slope. So changing it to =ridge should be fine, or simply deleting the entire southern part; we don't need to map contours, do we?
82025-07-23 16:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, I think I am starting to understand this situation. The improbable cliff should be redrawn as a ridge. Embankments are a thing. If the slope is moderate but is still difficult to navigate perpendicular to it, then it is most probably an embankment. Afaik we do not need to draw contours (heightmap is separate from OSM), but some places there are several cliff lines that further describe the shape of the cliff; see near Choi Fook Estate.
92025-07-24 07:29commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		If the top is flat, it can have both `=ridge` along the center, and `=cliff` on both sides. If the latter is argued to be not steep enough, it could be eg `=earth_bank` . The problem is `man_made=` has `=embankment` , but not `=cutting` for cut slopes.
102025-07-24 07:33commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		A "contour" can be drawn if it is a fill or cut slope. That's similar to `=embankment` which can be said less sharp topographically than these in some sense. Again the problem is missing `=cutting` , more difficult to observe, and people not being interested in them. Not that this can't be done.
112025-07-27 07:36closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Thanks all for the information. The terrain is improved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169542238 ; we can close this.
122025-07-27 10:16reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
132025-07-27 10:16closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Edited (to show what I meant)
386402312023-08-31 17:00openedunderling7608Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/258610138 via StreetComplete 53.3: Not a tennis court but a mall
22023-12-10 07:30commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		the tennis court is located at the rooftop, which is the "surface" of this land.
32025-07-26 12:22closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		@vectorial8192 dum dum you didn't understand the meaning of the "surface" tag. In the context of sport pitches, `surface` is describing the material that is used to pave the ground of the pitch. Examples could be plastic, or natural grass, etc. ------ This "false positive" note from StreetComplete is alas a false positive: the question is valid. The sports pitch does exist; us not able to go onto the rooftop to verify things is irrelevant. Therefore, closing.
4839937
Category: unknown		12025-07-05 11:44opened---Hong Kong Air Cadet Corps Headquarters and Training Centre
22025-07-17 03:02closedThereal0000000000
32025-07-17 03:36reopenedCurlingMan13
♦51,140
42025-07-17 03:37commentedCurlingMan13
♦51,140		User is vandalizing map and closing notes without taking action or providing comment. They have a previous block for this exact thing and have been reported to DWG for further action.
52025-07-19 13:33closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169152236 ; closing.
4838136
Category: unknown		12025-07-04 00:48openedsignselects
♦3		新達招牌製作公司Sintat Signboard Manufacturing Company
22025-07-19 13:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169151679 ; closing.
4776120
Category: unknown		12025-05-26 11:36opened---死亡海灘Dead Sea Beach
22025-07-19 13:16closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note is not useful; closing.
4712170
Category: unknown		12025-04-15 17:14openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Someone confirm whether this has traffic signals?
22025-06-18 12:31commentedkingkingHK
♦215		There are traffic signals.
32025-07-19 12:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Thanks! Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169150897 ; closing.
176076112019-04-29 02:38opened---入口被鐵絲網圍封，且往入口位置道路屬於隧道範圍，禁止行人及車輛進入。
22019-10-20 09:07closed段狗估🤫
32019-10-20 09:07reopened段狗估
42022-11-24 03:26commentedIan Ho
♦33		現場所見鐵絲網有稍被壓低, 依稀看到似有路跡但又水淹又異味, 真不想嘗試
52025-07-18 16:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		已由 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169117017 作標註, 消除此註記
212875312020-03-24 16:15opened---此路不通，鐵絲網封閉。應往東側才能找到出路
22020-04-05 09:38closedforunner
32021-01-11 08:00reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-07-18 16:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		已由 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169117017 作標註, 消除此註記
4703967
Category: unknown		12025-04-10 11:47openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Fix incorrect building size/shape (Phase 6)
22025-07-10 16:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168752658 ; closing.
4845957
Category: unknown		12025-07-09 09:22openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		What are those?
22025-07-10 15:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Very unclear tagging/information. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168748891 ; closing.
4517748
Category: unknown		12024-11-13 07:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Recheck highway=pedestrian due to landuse=construction
22025-07-04 15:22closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168490545 ; closing.
32025-07-09 02:34reopenedVivilucky
42025-07-09 02:36closedVivilucky
38915412015-06-30 18:14opened---FASHION oN 正確地址是香港銅鑼灣東角道24-26號東角 Laforet 2樓 239號, 電話 : +852 2404 6408
22025-07-04 08:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
32025-07-04 14:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
171985512019-03-23 01:28openedbabalou32"Permanently Closed" The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. POI has no name POI types: amenity-cafe OSM data version: 2019-03-14T00:11:02Z #mapsme
22024-11-16 04:51commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:en=Pacific Coffee Emporium
32025-07-04 08:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed
42025-07-04 14:24closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168488174 ; closing.
52025-07-09 02:33reopenedVivilucky
62025-07-09 02:33closedVivilucky
72025-07-09 02:34reopenedVivilucky
82025-07-09 02:36closedVivilucky
238708612020-10-15 20:47opened---onosm.org submitted note from a business: name: Music & Wine Restaurant phone: 96926239 website: https://www.instagram.com/musicandwinehk/ twitter: undefined hours: Monday to Sunday 16:00 - 02:00 category: Restaurants,Pub Food address: 8 Sugar Street, Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
22025-04-10 03:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.instagram.com/musicandwinehk/ says it is located at 1/F; survey recommended.
32025-07-04 08:16commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative; got "247" instead
42025-07-04 14:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
4588718
Category: unknown		12025-01-14 14:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		memorial plaque has suspicious name
22025-01-14 14:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		(it really do be like that?)
32025-06-22 03:30closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167936686 ; closing.
418236712024-04-04 15:11opened---A座 11~20A seat, 11-20
22025-02-28 15:52commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think this "11~20" means something, but I can't quite get it.
32025-06-16 14:51closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I just can't. Meaning is unclear; closing.
416749812024-03-25 17:03openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Afaik partial, conditional access: Partial: only one direction is permitted Conditional: road closed if weather bad True until further notice
22024-03-25 17:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This is a follow up to the unexpected landslide occurred in Sept 2023.
32025-06-16 14:41closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		OK, I believe this issue is fully resolved because I cannot see any mentions of weather-dependent special arrangements from relevant bus companies. Therefore, closing this.
51406612016-02-16 11:06opened海怡教育(鯉景灣分校)海怡教育(鯉景灣分校)
22017-07-18 08:39commentedRichard923888okhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E6%B5%B7%E6%80%A1%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2(%E9%AF%89%E6%99%AF%E7%81%A3%E5%88%86%E6%A0%A1)
32025-06-16 14:39closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Following a similarly-named Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/HaiY.i.LKW/ thus revealed a dead link website https://haiyi.com.hk/ . Both are very convincing circumstantial evidences this tutorial center really is/was located here. With this dead link, I will presume the tutorial center is closed. Therefore, resolving and closing this.
4709030
Category: unknown		12025-04-13 15:23openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: KCR-side Kowloon Tong station correctly map the (underground) train station building.
22025-06-15 10:38closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167644930 ; closing.
4692689
Category: unknown		12025-04-02 09:58openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Eminent Domain in progress
22025-06-13 12:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Eventually resolved by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167574552 . That's a very unexpected and ugly event. Resolving.
4795501
Category: StreetComplete		12025-06-08 11:51openedHKMapper1
♦1		Unable to answer "Which direction leads upwards here?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/750364456 via StreetComplete 61.1: Both up and down
22025-06-10 11:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hi there, do you know whether the escalators are both-sideways or front-back? And do you know which side escalator goes up?
32025-06-11 13:41closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		This is not what it's asking. `incline=` is only about which side is upwards, not the direction of movement (or escalator).
42025-06-11 13:43reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
52025-06-11 13:43closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Also something has already wrongly used `escalator=up`
62025-06-11 17:17reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
72025-06-11 17:17commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It is entirely possible that irl has 2 escalators instead of 1, which would then cancel the entire discussion. Reopening this.
82025-06-11 17:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Oh, @Kovoschiz I see you have found out about the "2 escalator" situation before my comment. I now see/agree this is resolved.
4760765
Category: unknown		12025-05-15 14:53openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Potential long temporary reduction of speed due to T4 works
22025-05-28 04:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166851324 ; closing.
246857512020-12-21 04:22openedLeekittythere is a dirty footpath down to the Yau Oi Village water-tank. It is shown on the app MyMapHK from gov.hk. This small narrow path is walkable for hiking
22025-05-28 04:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		If referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446719381 , then we already have such path. Therefore, closing.
4777047
Category: unknown		12025-05-27 02:12opened---Wu Kai Sha Pebble Beach
22025-05-28 04:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256538274 . Is this a local name of this beach?
32025-08-18 07:56closedCypp0847
♦183		Further mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170601063
4770583
Category: unknown		12025-05-22 09:10openedehcchan
♦2		Work in progress (May 2025)
22025-05-28 04:13closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166680931 by others; closing.
4631876
Category: OsmAnd		12025-02-18 09:36openedmaxso216
♦16		elevator to bridge #OsmAnd
22025-05-21 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Can't see elevator here. Closing.
32025-05-26 10:34reopenedmaxso216
♦16
42025-05-26 10:37commentedmaxso216
♦16		There is an elevator for connection between the bridge across the Z block and main campus to public access at ground floor
52025-05-26 15:34closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		If you are talking about the south side, then I can't see it. Closing.
4770272
Category: unknown		12025-05-22 03:01opened---長沙灣政府合署Cheung Sha Wan Government Offices
22025-05-22 14:59closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158899311 ; closing.
4741950
Category: unknown		12025-05-04 14:08openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Chek Lap Kok Road: is standard highway but has no speed limit?
22025-05-18 07:05closed楊展博
32025-05-18 11:13reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-05-18 11:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Please do not resolve notes without context; in fact it should be obvious there is a discussion going on here.
52025-05-22 03:27closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166592241 ; closing.
4597047
Category: unknown		12025-01-22 01:37opened---護慰天使喪親支援服務Comforting Angel Bereavement Support Service
22025-05-21 17:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166580381 ; closing.
4544780
Category: unknown		12024-12-06 07:11openedGOIP Grouphttps://goipgroup.com GOIP provide a variety of telecom services including Global Internet DIA, MPLS VPN solutions, Dwdm, SOC Security Operation Center, NOC Network Opeartion Center, Managed SD Wan services, Cloud Connectivity, Global Data Centre facilities, Data backup / migration and System Integration for small and large corporate communities.
22025-05-21 17:31closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166579706 ; closing.
4744558
Category: unknown		12025-05-06 02:57openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: review correct bridge layers
22025-05-21 15:57closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166575687 ; closing.
210145012020-02-25 08:48opened---Ns luxury
22025-04-14 15:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.facebook.com/nsluxurybox/ says it is located at 8 Hart Avenue
32025-05-21 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, this is located at 8 Hart Avenue, which means, wrong location. Therefore, closing.
78996612016-11-20 16:44opened---名品 Famous Leather Care
22016-11-28 18:21closedLo KaKa
32016-11-28 18:21reopenedLo KaKa
42022-04-08 09:29closedOK788
52022-04-15 13:58reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
62022-04-15 13:58closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
72022-04-15 13:58reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
82025-03-07 15:11commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Online sources say this is at 6/F Kimberly Plaza (45 - 47), but might actually be closed; go confirm this.
92025-05-21 15:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, this is closed. Nothing to do here. Therefore, closing. In the future we probably need a different way of handling these "free hanging" cases; it's getting stupid to just go there to confirm whether the thing actually exists.
4767849
Category: unknown		12025-05-20 09:13openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Reconstruction
22025-05-21 15:16closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166574084 ; closing.
4756442
Category: unknown		12025-05-13 07:32opened---One Pace·117 一步居·117One Step Residence 117
22025-05-21 15:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166573830 ; closing.
4651185
Category: unknown		12025-03-04 15:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Exhibition hall probably closed.
22025-05-18 14:23closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166433520 ; closing.
430273712024-06-22 11:08openedtomyan112
♦14		Sum YiSome tea
22025-05-18 13:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This is not actually mapped?
32025-05-18 15:30closedtomyan112
♦14		The shop is closed now.
430273412024-06-22 11:07openedtomyan112
♦14		Blossom Garden
22025-05-18 13:34closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000760003 ; closing.
430274312024-06-22 11:10openedtomyan112
♦14		HealthCare Medical Centre
22025-05-18 13:33closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000623251 ; closing.
430273612024-06-22 11:07openedtomyan112
♦14		McDonald's
22025-05-18 13:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000695690 ; closing.
391549612023-09-30 10:56opened---飲用水（盛水式水機）
22025-05-18 11:23closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166426241 ; closing.
4759542
Category: unknown		12025-05-15 00:11opened---[飲用水] 廁所外設有加水機There is a water dispenser outside the toilet for drinking water
22025-05-18 11:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166426085 ; closing.
404985712024-01-02 10:37openedPeter Newman
♦2,686		Unable to answer "How many cars can be charged here at the same time?" for https://osm.org/node/3494444748 via StreetComplete 55.1: Probably device rather than car charging
22024-03-05 09:35commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Agree with the mobile phone charging type. However, there currently seems to have no global consensus on how to tag *mobile phone* charging stations.
32024-10-16 13:30commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Update: it seems a new tag is available https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddevice_charging_station
42024-10-16 13:48commentedPeter Newman
♦2,686		I should clarify from my "probably" I'm not sure I actually eyeballed this specific unit to check it either way, just noted it was inside an airport so probably wasn't car charging. Although from your "agree" did you actually look at it then @vectorial8192
52024-10-16 16:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I never physically looked at the irl situation, but "obviously" it is not EV charging Will have to leave this open until god knows when
62025-05-18 05:08closed楊展博
72025-05-18 10:49reopenedPeter Newman
♦2,686
82025-05-18 10:50commentedPeter Newman
♦2,686		Hi @楊展博 could you be a bit clearer about why you've resolved the note. You don't seem to have touched the node. Is it actually for charging vehicles?
92025-05-18 11:10commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Guy was/is recently around resolving notes with no explanation.
4761436
Category: unknown		12025-05-16 04:59openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Highway connection does not have speed limit?
22025-05-17 07:42closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Route 7 ends with a merge with Route 5. Here is not Route 7. Situation normal. Therefore, resolving.
4761699
Category: unknown		12025-05-16 08:08opened---1
22025-05-16 13:22closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes > For example never create notes such as "I was here on Saturday" or "There was a crime at this location".
4745192
Category: unknown		12025-05-06 12:25openedMateusz Konieczny
♦36,579		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1299465483 is it really amenity=bank and shop=supermarket at the same time?
22025-05-15 15:00commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think it's a tagging mistake.
32025-05-15 16:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I think it's an iD editor situation where the supermarket preset did not remove the bank tagging.
42025-05-15 16:37closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166314019 ; closing.
4704090
Category: unknown		12025-04-10 13:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: MTR-side Kowloon Tong station changeover to "polygon is station" notation, or at least mark the station polygon correctly for correct OSM rendering.
22025-05-15 15:33closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166310901 ; closing.
431667012024-07-02 13:20openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Requesting to update GMB-NT 502 according to latest OSM road data
22025-05-12 07:55closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:15reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-05-13 08:16commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not done yet; please don't resolve! (Also, there is not any GMB 502 mapped here; there is however GMB 503.)
52025-05-18 07:09commented楊展博Ok
62025-10-22 03:35closedCypp0847
♦183		www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173607341
4642899
Category: unknown		12025-02-26 13:32openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:zh of building?Name of the building?
22025-05-12 07:47closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:14reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-05-13 08:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not done yet; please don't resolve!
52025-05-27 05:36closedWright One
♦171		Resolved in changeset 166806635
243400812020-11-20 15:19opened---Dogistic Limited 一寵愛有限公司
22025-05-12 07:54closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:13reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-05-13 08:14commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not done yet; please don't resolve!
52025-09-01 05:45commentedkingkingHK
♦215		According to the Company Registry, a company with the same name has been dissolved in October 2020.
311277112022-03-30 16:58openedivanbranco
♦12,210		to be fixed with natural=peak
22025-05-12 08:21closed楊展博
32025-05-13 08:13reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-05-13 08:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not done yet; please don't resolve!
52025-09-01 06:03closedkingkingHK
♦215		Resolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127477374 ; closing.
4736308
Category: Organicmaps		12025-05-01 05:40openedfeel_like_me_
♦4		"Free hot shower 7:00-23:30" OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI has no name POI types: fee-no wheelchair-yes amenity-toilets #organicmaps android
22025-05-03 11:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I highly doubt there really are showers here
32025-05-04 09:24closedfeel_like_me_
♦4		I've been there personally, I took this shower.
42025-05-04 09:24reopenedfeel_like_me_
♦4
52025-05-04 09:27commentedfeel_like_me_
♦4		https://freeimage.host/i/3wSIH7t
62025-05-04 12:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Ah, I see. Your photo reminds me that some toilets do have changing rooms + shower, so this could be one of them. Will check the tagging etc later.
72025-05-11 10:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166102864 ; closing.
4749138
Category: unknown		12025-05-09 05:03opened---Wellcome supermarket has switched Marketplace by jason
22025-05-11 10:10commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Confirmed via https://www.marketplacebyjasons.com/store-locator
32025-05-11 10:10closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166101431 ; closing.
4745032
Category: unknown		12025-05-06 10:53openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: Kwai Chung Road, this is a numbered highway but has no speed limit?
22025-05-07 11:59closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165935397 ; closing.
4744051
Category: unknown		12025-05-05 17:42openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: these can be cleaned up
22025-05-07 04:54closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165919528 ; closing.
4729678
Category: unknown		12025-04-27 07:38openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		LRT Locwood: where are the wheelchair-friendly entrances (if exists)?
22025-05-06 17:04closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165902523 ; closing.
4598868
Category: unknown		12025-01-23 11:48openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Does footpath connect to riverside path?
22025-05-05 08:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yes, with a staircase
32025-05-06 15:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165897480 ; closing.
4598873
Category: unknown		12025-01-23 11:48openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Does footpath connect to riverside path?
22025-05-05 08:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yes, but with an unusual way
32025-05-06 15:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165897480 ; closing.
4598874
Category: unknown		12025-01-23 11:49openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:zh of building?Name of the building?
22025-05-06 15:02closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165896729 ; closing.
4434946
Category: unknown		12024-09-14 17:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Prepare to reactivate the old platforms (irl construction nearing completion)
22025-05-06 14:28commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Worst case this will wait for YOHO WEST Phase 2 to complete, which is expected to be in 2026.
4733283
Category: unknown		12025-04-29 14:16openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Does this exist an opening towards the nearby ped tunnel?
22025-05-05 16:06closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yes. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165853688 ; closing.
4743815
Category: unknown		12025-05-05 15:06openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Road can be potentially remapped (turn restrictions are too crazy/confusing)
22025-05-06 08:29closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		No, there's no raised separation. I tested this was routed correctly by Apple Maps before they changed their data source in HK.
4729685
Category: unknown		12025-04-27 07:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		LRT Tin Shui Wai: seems weird to not have wheelchair-friendly entrance/exit at the middle platform.
22025-05-05 14:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165850227 ; closing.
421197312024-04-23 17:30openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		bridge demolition (slope only) completes on 27 April 2024; someone update the map afterwards.
22025-05-05 12:09closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No one helped this. Sad. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165842777 ; closing.
4742116
Category: unknown		12025-05-04 14:53openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Tung Wing Road: why motorway? I do not see it being special enough to be motorway.
22025-05-05 03:40closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It's a Tunnel Area
378914712023-07-20 07:03opened---Ko Kee Metal & Building Materials Ltd https://goo.gl/maps/eAKXob3KN4vF5rDWA
22025-04-28 12:06closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid; closing. OSM is not allowed to just copy stuff from e.g. Google Maps.
32025-04-29 09:11reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-04-29 09:12closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		It could be acceptable if they know this, and only tried to use Google to tell others. But anonymous notes should be cautioned.
4720002
Category: unknown		12025-04-21 08:13openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: draw the separated turning lane
22025-04-28 11:31closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165544788 ; closing.
251631812021-01-29 03:27openedForestBoarCamp
22021-01-29 03:27closedForestBoar
32021-01-29 03:27reopenedForestBoar
42021-01-29 03:27closedForestBoar
52021-01-29 03:54reopenedForestBoar
62025-04-27 10:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes : > For example never create notes such as "I was here on Saturday" or "There was a crime at this location". Therefore, closing.
4591168
Category: unknown		12025-01-16 18:17openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Generic typhoon shelter? If so, then do noname=yes
22025-04-25 13:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Clarified via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377374453 by someone else; closing.
271279912021-06-14 08:40openedWright One
♦171		地盤範圍，道路封閉
22025-04-25 13:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved because construction is complete (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1377374451 ); closing.
4718367
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-20 08:21openedKenkton
♦74		"This is now located at 168 Wellington Street. They moved last December." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: 王府 Wang Fu POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android
22025-04-25 13:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164986250. A hint regarding OSM: third-party apps that rely on OSM data may not update their dataset that frequently. If problems with outdated data remain, contact the service provider instead of leaving notes on OSM. In the future, repeating notes may be closed as spam.
4722296
Category: unknown		12025-04-22 11:28openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: confirm SPCA center, etc.
22025-04-22 15:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165291600 ; closing.
4722578
Category: unknown		12025-04-22 13:53openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Review site of LPH with reference to https://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/files/applications/en/pp_656/dir_1318/profile/dir296.pdf , figure 5.2
22025-04-23 16:34closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please don't rely on these. They are copyrighted.
379581012023-07-24 02:44opened---P006 EM Lab
22025-04-19 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Wrong location; closing.
435470112024-07-28 05:44openedHal-asterThe Chippy Restaurant via StreetComplete 58.2
22025-04-19 11:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Confirmed via https://www.visitdiscoverybay.com/en/shops-detail/157
32025-04-19 11:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165148617 ; closing.
433944212024-07-18 23:55openedHal-asterUnable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – on level 1: 太平洋咖啡 Pacific Coffee (Coffeehouse) – https://osm.org/node/7855810561 via StreetComplete 58.2: Moojoo Lifestyle Cafe
22025-04-19 10:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Confirmed via https://www.visitdiscoverybay.com/en/shops (D'Deck)
32025-04-19 11:01closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165148350 ; closing.
433944512024-07-18 23:57openedHal-asterDough Bros via StreetComplete 58.2
22025-04-19 10:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		According to https://www.visitdiscoverybay.com/en/shops , no such shop. Therefore, closing.
32025-04-19 10:48reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-04-19 10:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		@vectorial8192 misunderstanding of how that website works.
52025-04-19 10:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Confirmed via https://www.visitdiscoverybay.com/en/shops (D'Deck)
62025-04-19 10:58closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165148224 ; closing.
4711796
Category: unknown		12025-04-15 13:12openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: describe the service roads at MOKO (there are currently not enough of them).
22025-04-17 15:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165078235 ; closing.
430272812024-06-22 11:05openedtomyan112
♦14		CHUBBY's PIZZA
22025-04-17 15:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000690387 ; closing.
430272012024-06-22 11:04openedtomyan112
♦14		Heung Mak Tin BakerySweet Memory Tea Bakery
22025-04-17 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000638399 ; closing.
430272612024-06-22 11:04openedtomyan112
♦14		Circle K
22025-04-17 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000704517 ; closing.
430272512024-06-22 11:04openedtomyan112
♦14		7-eleven
22025-04-17 15:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12000709670 ; closing.
430273812024-06-22 11:08openedtomyan112
♦14		Joe's Image
22025-04-17 15:16closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12007044327 ; closing.
430274012024-06-22 11:09openedtomyan112
♦14		Siu Mei QueenBeautiful Queen
22025-04-17 15:15closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12002228380 ; closing.
4695463
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-04 11:25openedKenkton
♦74		"It moved from 65 Wellington Street to 168 Wellington Street in December." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: 王府 Wang Fu POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android
22025-04-16 10:34closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4695462 instead.
4704846
Category: unknown		12025-04-11 03:48opened---東華三院行政總部Tung Wah Group of Hospitals Administrative Headquarters
22025-04-16 10:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165021870 ; closing.
4699392
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 18:24opened---地点这里有楼梯可以下到D'Aguilar StThere is a staircase here that leads down to D'Aguilar Street
22025-04-16 10:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165021242 ; closing.
4708294
Category: unknown		12025-04-13 09:01openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		寶城大廈 Pottinger HousePottinger House
22025-04-15 15:06closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164989940 ; closing.
4708291
Category: unknown		12025-04-13 09:00openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		金明樓 Golden HouseGolden House
22025-04-15 15:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164989940 ; closing.
64329512016-07-26 06:40openedayn leroyCODA COMMERCIAL BUILDING G/F, CODA COMMERCIAL BUILDING, 57 QUEEN'S ROAD CENTRAL CENTRAL (OSM data version: 2016-07-15T17:38:02Z) #mapsme
22024-09-20 01:07closedwcs91
32024-09-22 07:02reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42024-09-22 07:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		not done yet; don't resolve!
52025-04-15 15:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Collectively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164989940 ; closing.
4695462
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-04 11:25openedKenkton
♦74		"It moved from 65 Wellington Street in December, now at 168 Wellington Street." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: 王府 Wang Fu POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps android
22025-04-15 13:49closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164986250 ; closing.
4445849
Category: Organicmaps		12024-09-21 13:35openedGotson"Closed" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2024-08-10T16:22:45Z POI name: Pastis POI types: amenity-bar #organicmaps android
22025-04-15 13:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed; according to this https://www.pastis.hk/pastis , it is closed.
32025-04-15 13:41closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164985848 ; closing.
4703990
Category: unknown		12025-04-10 12:22openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Duplication of 銀輝茶餐廳; survey recommended.Duplication of Silver Bright Tea Restaurant; survey recommended.
22025-04-15 10:19commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This does exist; then, clean it up.
32025-04-15 13:16closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164984654 ; closing.
4702335
Category: unknown		12025-04-09 06:42openedmagicalcarrotLocation of Priyo Shaad Bangladeshi Curries and Delicacies
22025-04-13 08:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed
32025-04-14 11:23closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164934226 ; closing.
4686193
Category: unknown		12025-03-28 17:42openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5792425354 (Picada) does not seem to be located here.
22025-04-13 03:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Conveniently, according to https://www.instagram.com/picadahk , the *night club* Picada has already closed a long time ago.
32025-04-14 11:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164934052 ; closing.
70720512016-09-10 08:24openedoscardodo
♦2		Calle con tiendas de fotografía (OSM data version: 2016-08-22T09:03:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-04 12:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		DeepL translate: "Street with photo shops"
32025-04-14 09:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This is a very HK-style alley with many HK-style "informal" food stalls; meaning of this note is unclear. Therefore, closing.
264873812021-05-02 03:00opened---Hakawa Chocolate
22022-04-07 14:04closedOK788
32022-04-08 06:27reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42022-04-08 06:27commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
52025-04-04 12:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Website with same name exists https://hakawachocolate.com/pages/our-store ; survey recommended.
62025-04-13 08:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I guess this is correct
72025-04-14 09:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164928935 ; closing.
71371612016-09-16 03:38openedLegogeekgay friendly, stairs to gay bar (OSM data version: 2016-08-08T15:45:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-14 09:13closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4403655090 ; closing.
71370912016-09-16 03:30openedLegogeekgay bar. with gay friendly cafe upstairs (OSM data version: 2016-08-08T15:45:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-14 09:12closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4403654990 ; closing.
150141712018-08-25 01:03openedDare KoslowSoho Printing Press is here
22025-04-01 18:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Its webpage is broken, but this page https://www.facebook.com/SohoPrintingPress/ says it should be elsewhere. Survey is recommended.
32025-04-13 08:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, it is not here.
42025-04-14 09:11closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
228604312020-07-30 14:45openedHokuen金融商業大廈 一洲大廈 岑氏商業大廈 興業商業中心
22025-04-14 09:10closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Already resolved by someone else some time ago; closing.
113520912017-09-11 10:08opened---mochi shop
22025-04-13 08:10commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
32025-04-14 08:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
4616770
Category: unknown		12025-02-06 04:37opened---steamer basket shop
22025-04-13 07:35commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		There do be like this.
32025-04-14 08:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It turns out, feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4862122143 ; therefore, closing.
50276212016-01-23 17:47opened---LIVING ART
22022-04-07 14:04closedOK788
32022-04-08 06:27reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42022-04-08 06:27commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
52025-04-04 11:49commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.openrice.com/en/hongkong/r-living-art-cafe-western-district-western-r435889 says a restaurant with the same name located nearby was closed. Survey recommended.
62025-04-13 07:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
72025-04-14 07:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
65526812016-08-03 08:08openedDAMA A로컬(김뱁천국)식당 1 (OSM data version: 2016-07-15T17:38:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-12 17:31commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		DeepL translation: "Local (Kimbap Heaven) Restaurant 1"
32025-04-13 15:59closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4654833
Category: unknown		12025-03-07 16:27openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		"share_taxi=private" should be simplified to "share_taxi=yes" for obvious reasons
22025-03-07 16:28commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Actually, what does it even mean by "share_taxi=private"?
32025-04-13 15:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Eventually, this should have been "=no". Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164900646 ; closing.
4705842
Category: unknown		12025-04-11 16:23openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Duplicated McDonald's shops.
22025-04-13 06:02commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Functionally, those are the same shop, but practically, there are 2 separate service areas.
32025-04-13 15:21closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		We'll just designate one single shop here. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164900301 ; closing.
4698465
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-06 10:01openedQuoz
♦32		"Not there." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI name: McCafé POI types: amenity-cafe cuisine-coffee_shop #organicmaps android
22025-04-11 16:21commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://mcdonalds.com.hk/mccafe-address-list/#nt disagrees.
32025-04-11 16:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		However, what usually happens is that McCafe is embedded inside an existing McDonalds shop, so this might be an irl misunderstanding.
42025-04-13 15:21closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Therefore, closing.
4698461
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-06 10:01openedQuoz
♦32		"Not here." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI name: 小火焰韓式咖啡廳 Aidan Korean Dessert Cafe POI types: amenity-cafe #organicmaps android
22025-04-13 06:03commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed.
32025-04-13 15:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164900301 ; closing.
4706818
Category: unknown		12025-04-12 10:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Exact path shapes require a survey.
22025-04-13 15:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164900247 ; closing.
4694250
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-03 13:44openedKenkton
♦74		"It's not here now if it ever was. Andō is on floor one." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: Honi Honi POI types: amenity-bar #organicmaps android
22025-04-12 17:57commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It could be that shops are closed and replaced while we are not watching. Recent years saw a lot of shop replacement/abandonment.
32025-04-12 18:07closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164867257 ; closing.
141281312018-06-02 07:24opened---电梯
22025-04-12 17:51closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4445847
Category: Organicmaps		12024-09-21 13:35openedGotson"Closed" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2024-08-10T16:22:45Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bar #organicmaps android
22025-04-12 17:49commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:en=Armani Privee
32025-04-12 17:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Trusting. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164866653 ; closing.
112550512017-09-03 12:17openedNatural PathNATURAL PATH Colon Hydrotherapy Light Touch Therapy Reiki Energy Healing
22025-04-12 17:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		According to https://thenaturalpathhk.com/ , wrong location. Therefore, closing.
125541712018-01-02 12:48openedAlice Shuying8 end stage California tower (OSM data version: 2016-10-10T15:13:03Z) #mapsme
22025-04-01 18:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		California Tower does exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/539988505 but it's not here.
32025-04-12 17:47closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Ultimately, meaning is unclear; therefore, closing.
238481912020-10-13 23:37opened---The Canny Man is now called Delaney's
22024-12-18 14:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Looks like a restaurant inside the hotel?
32025-04-12 17:35commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Whatever, the original data is suspicious, and "Delaney's" website as seen via https://www.discoverhongkong.com/us/interactive-map/delaney-s-the-irish-pub.html is dead.
42025-04-12 17:36closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164866155 ; closing.
70717812016-09-10 07:34openedЕлена Ишковабулочная на 1этаже, супермаркет на 4 (OSM data version: 2016-08-22T09:03:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-12 17:32commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		DeepL translate: "bakery on the 1st floor, supermarket on the 4th"
32025-08-08 13:29closedkingkingHK
♦215		The shopping mall only goes to the 3rd floor, and indeed the entire 3rd floor is the Wellcome supermarket. I suppose this is what the note creator was trying to mean? (Does Russian floor counting start from ground floor first floor?) The Wellcome already exists as www.openstreetmap.org/node/3125709391. There are no bakeries in the entire mall, perhaps just outdated info. Not actionable, thus closing.
4468282
Category: unknown		12024-10-07 08:44opened---Dissection lab
22024-10-19 04:49commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not too useful; propose closing.
32025-04-12 15:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Yeah. Closing.
4468278
Category: unknown		12024-10-07 08:43opened---Theatre
22024-10-19 04:48commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Local knowledge: there is supposed to be a new theatre inside this building, but not sure if the building is finished yet
32025-04-12 15:37closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164861399 ; closing.
4705873
Category: unknown		12025-04-11 16:45openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		todo: recalibrate river shape, and other road calibration stuff.
22025-04-12 10:51closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164850078 ; closing.
4699267
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 17:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Junction cleanup needed
22025-04-11 16:44closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164824966 ; closing.
429944212024-06-20 04:03opened---A new building here
22024-09-22 06:23commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Can't see anything from satellite imagery; this is new construction site?
32025-04-11 16:12commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.hsu.edu.hk/en/about-hsuhk/campus-and-facilities/ says there is a building "Creative Humanities Hub" here.
42025-07-31 11:11closedCypp0847
♦183		already opened, closing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169764527
4705824
Category: unknown		12025-04-11 16:07openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Free-hanging foot paths in the sea are suspicious.
22025-04-13 05:15closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164825617
369405712023-05-18 07:34opened---Alpha Medical Diagnostic Center
22025-04-10 14:10closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164771246 ; closing.
4660652
Category: unknown		12025-03-11 14:18openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Fix incorrect building size/shape
22025-04-10 11:47commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		One note one phase; this is for phase 5.
32025-04-10 12:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164766085 ; closing.
4475273
Category: unknown		12024-10-12 11:06openedht0109國際交易中心2樓1號舖 33 GlasserieInternational Trade Centre, 2/F, Shop 1, 33 Glasserie
22025-04-10 06:58closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164753599 ; closing.
60918312016-06-29 15:34openedGengen123L74一5荷花亲子中心 (OSM data version: 2016-06-01T10:03:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-10 06:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Taking this to mean "there is a store in this building". Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164753263 ; closing.
222155712020-06-08 02:12openedtamkenrickScanwell (H.K.)
22025-04-10 06:44closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164753122 ; closing.
198208312019-11-02 02:09openedbabalou32"Closed" The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. POI has no name POI types: internet_access-wlan amenity-bar OSM data version: 2019-10-19T16:52:54Z #mapsme
22024-11-21 12:40commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:en=Hooray
32025-04-10 03:59commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Website link is dead; can presume it really is closed.
42025-04-10 04:00closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164749486 ; closing.
271539212021-06-16 04:49openeddlamUnable to answer "What type of shop is Invisalign?" for https://osm.org/node/6793319320 via StreetComplete 32.1: Teeth straightening service
22024-11-21 12:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Seems we don't have the proper tag for this; would be strange to assign "beauty" for this
32025-04-10 03:47closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6793319320 again. I see we should tag it as dentist + specialty=orthodontics. This works. Therefore, closing.
232145012020-08-25 06:14openedbabalou32"Place is permanently closed" The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. POI name: Simplylife POI types: building cuisine-american amenity-restaurant OSM data version: 2020-08-03T21:05:25Z #mapsme
22025-04-10 03:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, cannot confirm via https://www.simplylife.com.hk/seeyouthere.php?lang=en
32025-04-10 03:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		(What was that weird way of mapping a restaurant???) Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164749259 ; closing.
4637997
Category: unknown		12025-02-23 06:36openedLD9156_D519520
♦1		A bar gate has been installed recently
22025-04-09 15:39closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10924150968 ; closing.
54949412016-04-18 13:40opened---菜記大排檔-炮仗街
22016-04-18 13:41commented---Fix Map
32016-11-09 11:48commented---#586192
42024-04-02 10:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		According to https://www.openrice.com/zh/hongkong/r-%E8%91%89%E8%A8%98%E5%A4%A7%E6%8E%92%E6%AA%94-%E5%9C%9F%E7%93%9C%E7%81%A3-%E6%BD%AE%E5%B7%9E%E8%8F%9C-r152464 this is closed; survey is recommended.
52025-04-09 07:53commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Hmmm, we have 新菜記大排檔 instead.
62025-04-09 15:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164730484 ; closing.
401964412023-12-08 09:15opened---更衣室及洗手間 [廁所]，洗手間外設有兩部盛水式水機 [飲用水]
22025-04-09 06:20commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This note is believable.
32025-04-09 14:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164727277 ; closing.
403111712023-12-17 07:04openedViajero Perdido
♦443		Braemar
22025-04-09 14:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Perhaps this note wants to describe the peak "Braemar Hill", but it's not located here; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1654612319 Therefore, closing.
164673312019-01-11 12:36openedSergCoda"Franc franc" POI name: 京士頓街 Kingston Street POI types: psurface-paved_good highway-residential OSM data version: 2018-10-30T22:25:02Z #mapsme
22025-04-09 14:15closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The note is somewhat inaccurate; I believe it wants to describe a shop instead of describing a street as written in the note. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164727016 ; closing.
71073812016-09-13 09:15openedJonathan González ManzaneroYat fai (OSM data version: 2016-08-08T15:45:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-09 14:09closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4702891
Category: unknown		12025-04-09 14:06openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		"Causeway Bay" as a place is undocumented in OSM. (?!)
22025-04-10 02:52closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255829293
258098612021-03-16 08:26opened---"Sun Shan Wu Stationary Company" is moved to the old "Shan Wu Stationary Company"
22024-10-25 11:33commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note for mappers" seem to be referring to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4844601182
32025-04-09 09:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Both negative
42025-04-09 14:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
4623703
Category: unknown		12025-02-12 07:13openedSissysungd.k.s.育髮療癒中心De Kai Si Hair Growth Therapy Center
22025-04-08 11:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
32025-04-08 17:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164690198 ; closing.
4698466
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-06 10:01openedQuoz
♦32		"Not there." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI name: Châteraisé POI types: shop-confectionery #organicmaps android
22025-04-08 17:22commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, cannot verify via https://www.chateraise.co.jp/shoplist/hongkong .
32025-04-08 17:23closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164690044 ; closing.
4700496
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-07 15:59openedQuoz
♦32		"Not there." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI name: L'Occitane POI types: shop-cosmetics #organicmaps android
22025-04-08 17:20commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed, cannot verify via https://hk.loccitane.com/pages/store-locator .
32025-04-08 17:21closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164689972 ; closing.
4700497
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-07 15:59openedQuoz
♦32		"Not there." The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-01-21T15:15:53Z POI has no name POI types: shop-outdoor #organicmaps android
22025-04-08 11:41commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed; see https://www.chamonix.com.hk/
32025-04-08 17:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164689829 ; closing. PS: since the old node exists (albeit at wrong location), the new node has been deleted in favor of the old node.
182724312019-06-27 21:17opened---Own Hair Life Style
22024-12-03 06:05commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
32024-12-18 15:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		In retrospect, I didn't expect this to have no online info, and now we may need to reconfirm this.
42025-04-08 12:05commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct ("OWN", 3/F)
52025-04-08 17:11closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164689528 ; closing.
179714712019-05-31 13:58openedmtiiThe C Chord
22025-04-07 16:38commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Online sources say it is located in Prosper Commercial Building; survey recommended.
32025-04-08 11:52commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
42025-04-08 17:09closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
198023312019-10-31 06:21opened---天主教大專聯會
22025-01-16 15:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Official website unavailable, but it seems the fed is really HQ-ed here
32025-02-08 07:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
42025-02-12 14:19commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Now, what is the type of this facility...?
52025-04-08 16:44commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		We will just categorize this as an NGO for now.
62025-04-08 16:45closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164688364 ; closing.
4674243
Category: unknown		12025-03-21 13:34openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		New bus terminus to open real soon
22025-04-08 15:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Eventually, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164684295 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164572072 , by myself and some others. Therefore, closing.
171687612019-03-20 09:47openedNatnat_LSGIEscalator
22019-03-20 09:53closedNatnat_LSGI
32019-03-20 09:54reopenedNatnat_LSGI
42025-01-15 09:36closedCypp0847
♦183		Appears to be referring to this escalator https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122598164/history, closing
52025-01-17 02:42reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
62025-01-17 02:43commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Not really; some time ago I went past this place, and there is an escalator/lift going into the building near this position See if it may be marked with an entrance for something simple
72025-04-07 15:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164641501 ; closing.
421984512024-04-28 17:03openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Bottom 2 bays are blocked for unknown reasons. (from survey)
22025-04-07 15:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I have no idea why it be like this. If the blocked bays would reopen in the future, then someone would know, and would update the map accordingly. Closing.
4607075
Category: unknown		12025-01-30 05:16opened---Sewage Treatment Plant
22025-04-07 14:49closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		There are no evidence supporting this claim. Closing.
314681212022-04-22 00:54openedWhcohi
♦239		This path do not exist
22022-05-10 06:18closedsFai
32022-05-10 06:18reopenedsFai
42025-04-07 14:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510512084 is mapped with `informal=yes`. This is an informal path, use this at your own risk. Therefore, closing.
161100912018-12-07 09:36openedCurtis0104There should be a road from the point to the half of Por Lo Shan
22020-12-17 16:05closedDixon313Correct. This is a paved stepped access to the grave area of Por Lo Shan (菠萝山腰 舊稱黄茅嶺)
32020-12-18 16:21reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42020-12-18 16:21commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		@Dixon313 misunderstanding on how Notes work, not yet added
52025-04-07 11:46closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021078061 ; closing.
209067912020-02-15 10:09openedWright One
♦171		石仔埗街109-111號屋已拆卸
22025-04-07 04:49closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Status already mapped; closing.
197042512019-10-22 14:59openedluk724cave
22019-10-22 14:59closedluk724
32019-10-22 14:59reopenedluk724
42025-04-06 19:24closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature(s) already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5481985727 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5481972425 . Therefore, closing.
314375912022-04-20 04:36opened---this trail is blocked because of military barracks
22022-04-20 06:37closedckyuthis point should be moved about 200m to SW
32022-04-20 10:38reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-04-06 18:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This note is located roughly at 22.257991, 113.855476 . The footpath is noticeably ending roughly at 22.256700, 113.854312 , which is roughly the SW of this note's location. According to the online distance calculator https://www.calculator.net/distance-calculator.html?la1=22.257991&lo1=113.855476&la2=22.256700&lo2=113.854312&lad1=38&lam1=53&las1=51.36&lau1=n&lod1=77&lom1=2&los1=11.76&lou1=w&lad2=39&lam2=56&las2=58.56&lau2=n&lod2=75&lom2=9&los2=1.08&lou2=w&type=3&ctype=dec&x=Calculate#latlog , this distance is 186 meters. Both the direction (SW) and the distance (186m) fits the previous comment's "200m to SW" description, and the description of "blocked" fits map data. Thus, it is safe to say the map data matches what this note (and its comment) tries to say. Therefore, closing.
430273112024-06-22 11:06openedtomyan112
♦14		Pig King
22025-04-06 16:11closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12002187646 ; closing.
249472412021-01-12 07:14openedquantashamEntrance gate. It may be locked.
22025-04-06 14:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		A gate has been mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11270788464 ; presume that gate is related to this, and so this issue is fixed. Therefore, closing.
413797512024-03-03 15:44openedAlbert Tam上水塘石橋 (OSM data version: 2016-06-20T05:57:02Z) #mapsmeShangshui Reservoir Stone Bridge (OSM data version: 2016-06-20T05:57:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-06 08:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164579573 ; closing.
4618364
Category: unknown		12025-02-07 15:06openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Locality https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11584384784 "大廳 Tai Ting" is suspicious.The lobby Tai Ting is suspicious.
22025-04-06 08:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No response. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164578977 ; closing.
412103012024-02-20 16:23openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Would it be a good idea to split the junction of Chi Fu Close into 2 oneway paths? Aerial imagery surely shows 2 oneway paths.
22025-04-06 08:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164578545 ; closing.
40726312015-08-02 03:18opened---Missing Green Minibus routes (69X, 69, 69A, 58, etc)
22022-09-11 00:22closedMaricel Sanchez
32022-09-11 00:22reopenedMaricel Sanchez
42022-09-11 00:22closedMaricel Sanchez
52022-09-11 00:59reopenedMaricel Sanchez
62025-04-06 06:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Eventually, these are all mapped by others. Verify with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26773171 . Therefore, closing.
4698223
Category: unknown		12025-04-06 06:27openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Very confusing mapping of Wah Cheong Street; survey recommended.
22025-08-29 10:35closedCypp0847
♦183		Amended at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171176770
4697657
Category: unknown		12025-04-05 17:11openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Both the pedestrian street and the service road cannot possibly coexist because they seem to be describing the same irl feature.
22025-04-05 17:58closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Reworked
71370712016-09-16 03:24openedLegogeekgay bar. DJ. (OSM data version: 2016-08-08T15:45:02Z) #mapsme
22025-04-05 14:44closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Seems to refer to the bar "FLM", but it is not located here. Resolving.
306089912022-02-22 10:49opened---丸。茶手作 堅尼地城店 Bubbletea Work Kennedy Town
22025-04-04 13:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		An IG page exists https://www.instagram.com/bubbleteawork_kennedytown/ , and conveniently, it says it was recently closed. Therefore, closing.
84927312017-01-12 05:54openedUJ Ryu영업시간 7~22 (OSM data version: 2016-11-23T15:14:03Z) #mapsme
22023-04-04 13:56commentedWright One
♦171		Opening hours of which shop?
32025-04-04 13:00closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		No response. Therefore, closing.
4691805
Category: Mapycz		12025-04-01 15:37openedPan Perníček
♦13,527		Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapycz user, please verify: Restaurant is closed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5172769821
22025-04-04 12:24commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name=Hard Rock Cafe According to https://cafe.hardrock.com/locations.aspx , indeed, the restaurant is closed.
32025-04-04 12:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164505779 ; closing.
4445846
Category: Organicmaps		12024-09-21 13:35openedGotson"Closed" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2024-08-10T16:22:45Z POI name: Topshop POI types: shop-clothes #organicmaps android
22025-04-04 12:21closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Trusting. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164505584 ; closing.
255805212021-02-27 18:35opened---Rampage Leather Crafts
22022-04-07 14:07closedOK788
32022-04-08 06:27reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42022-04-08 06:27commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
52024-04-02 12:01commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Found a similarly-named business: https://rampingleathercrafts.com/ However, cannot confirm location.
62025-04-04 11:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The same website then links to the IG page https://www.instagram.com/rampingleathercrafts/ which is actively maintained, and the marked address is not here. That is, wrong location (and also wrong name!). Therefore, closing.
253413212021-02-11 08:56openedUroko Shop LG02 LG/F Hollywood Central 233 Hollywood Road Sheung Wan
22024-03-31 18:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Ref https://www.openrice.com/zh/hongkong/r-%E9%B1%97-%E4%B8%8A%E7%92%B0-%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%8F%9C-%E5%A3%BD%E5%8F%B8-%E5%88%BA%E8%BA%AB-r700547 it says a restaurant with the same name was closed. Survey recommended.
32025-04-04 11:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Walked past this some time ago, no impression of such restaurant. Can agree it is closed. Therefore, closing.
374143812023-06-19 01:52openedfekleeUnable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" for https://osm.org/node/4770514589 via StreetComplete 52.1: Dim Sum Labs is a hacker space Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/155927.jpg
22025-04-04 11:41closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142129056 ; closing.
68606012016-08-24 12:26openedimfaycTHE CUPPING ROOM (OSM data version: 2016-03-14T15:50:02Z) #mapsme
22024-10-16 03:18commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Found 2 nodes nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6265531209 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4214042291 Survey recommended to confirm exact details
32025-04-04 11:38closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		It turns out no survey needed because they have their own website. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164503892 ; closing.
4694249
Category: Organicmaps		12025-04-03 13:44openedKenkton
♦74		"I wouldn't consider this a viewpoint, it's just some step." OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z POI name: 石板街 POI types: tourism-viewpoint #organicmaps android
22025-04-04 11:33commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Definitely some sort of tourism item, but exact type can be reviewed.
32025-04-04 16:56closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Maps.me spam. I had already added `historic=yes` and `heritage=` , but forgot to add `*_name=` for some reason. `tourism=yes` added further. To draw an area, the surroundings will need to be tidied up.
4692057
Category: unknown		12025-04-01 18:53openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Austin station has impossible platform length
22025-04-02 11:36closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164416884 ; closing.
4570432
Category: unknown		12024-12-31 12:10opened---港大經管學院Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Hong Kong
22025-02-01 11:57closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Ref https://www.hkubs.hku.hk/tc/about-us/contact-us/ Wrong location; resolving.
32025-02-06 09:58reopenedCypp0847
♦183		Reopening, note refers to Cyberport campus https://www.hkubs.hku.hk/tc/about-us/campus/cyberport-facilities-transportation/
42025-04-02 07:27closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Then, resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12561162614 by someone else. Therefore, closing.
52025-04-02 07:27reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
62025-04-02 07:28closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		 Then, feature already exists as osm.org/node/12561162614 , done by someone else. Therefore, closing.
124259512017-12-19 07:29opened---CAR PARK
22025-03-30 08:50closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164277727 ; closing.
278311912021-08-02 17:27openedWhcohi
♦239		白石嶺
22025-03-30 08:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11003290697 ; closing.
279309312021-08-09 04:51opened---品隆長
22025-03-28 07:54commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
32025-03-29 16:54closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
243764512020-11-23 07:37openedBO WONG雞煲王
22020-11-23 07:38closedBO WONG
32020-11-23 07:38reopenedBO WONG
42025-03-28 07:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
52025-03-29 13:26closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164249365 ; closing.
351350412023-01-11 10:42openedFoodiesHiveCouple’s Kitchen 元朗店
22025-03-28 07:43commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
32025-03-29 13:25closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (can't find item irl); closing.
56409012016-05-12 04:40openedAngelatoAAngelato-handcrafted artisan gelato
22025-03-21 06:52closedmksum_superleekam
32025-03-21 12:21reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
42025-03-29 13:09commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This https://www.openrice.com/en/hongkong/r-angelato-handcrafted-artisan-gelato-tuen-mun-italian-ice-cream-yogurt-r182238 says a restaurant with the same name is closed. Survey recommended.
52025-08-10 13:56closedkingkingHK
♦215		There are no such named restaurant in the mall. Additionally, Shop 18, G/F (the address given by Openrice in the link above) is now occupied by another unrelated shop. Info is outdated, closing.
432428212024-07-08 09:34opened---73X missing stops along the route.
22025-03-29 11:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Data of KMB 73X already exists. Therefore, closing.
57152812016-05-23 05:34opened---This is the correct location of Pet Field at 60, Ta Shek Wu.
22025-03-29 11:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164245719 ; closing.
4686997
Category: unknown		12025-03-29 11:14openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Because Pok Oi Interchange has recently received traffic lights, Long Lok Road has potential to be upgraded to `highway=secondary`. This upgrade allows Yuen Long Kau Hui Road to follow along the `highway=secondary` Long Lok Road towards Castle Peak Road.
22025-03-29 11:25commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Moreover, Long Yip Street / Castle Peak Road can also use Long Lok Road to travel towards Castle Peak Road. Another reason Long Lok Road has potential to be `highway=secondary` instead of currently `highway=tertiary`.
32025-03-30 06:15closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		What relationship does this have? The `=secondary` is CPR-YL turning right. Banned turns are served by `=tertiary` fine.
42025-03-30 06:15reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
52025-03-30 06:16closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please avoid using Note to discuss. No one is obliged to read them. They are for adding info. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes
4685959
Category: unknown		12025-03-28 14:32openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		錦河路 Kam Ho Road has potential to be upgraded to highway=secondaryKam Ho Road has the potential to be upgraded to a secondary highway.
22025-03-28 18:08commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Depending on the situation, might as well upgrade it all the way to `=primary`...
32025-03-29 07:00closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		`=secondary` should be used for cross-district. `tertiary=` is important inside a part of a district. Tung Wui Rd is connecting between Kam Sheung Rd and Kam Tin Rd, and connecting Kam Ho Rd.
42025-03-29 07:26reopenedvectorial8192
♦1,073
52025-03-29 07:28commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		The idea is that this section of Kam Ho Road can act as an "extension" of Tung Wui Road. Then, it acts as an alternative path to reach Kam Sheung Road station from Yuen Long. It also has high designed capacity as you can see from its almost-finished road upgrading works.
62025-03-30 06:21closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		This is not relevant. The `=secondary` is not from connecting KSR station, but from connecting Kam Sheung Rd with Kam Tin Rd, and Kam Tin Bypass . `highway=` class is determined from functionality, not physical design standards. I would rather consider demoting the western section of Tung Wui Rd.
72025-03-30 06:37reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
82025-03-30 06:38closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Even for physical standards, that should wait until the dualing is fully opened (at least not edited now)
58192612016-06-03 13:08openedAprfool DorActual location of "After 10 just cut。單剪"
22025-03-28 07:24commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
32025-03-29 07:21closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164236801 ; closing.
48511112015-12-19 10:09opened足之館足之館 RelaxStay
22019-03-26 14:53commented---р
32019-03-26 14:53commented---л
42025-03-28 07:20commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Correct
52025-03-29 07:18closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164236719 ; closing.
173152512019-04-01 16:46opened---Elegant Jewelry
22022-04-07 14:08closedOK788
32022-04-08 06:27reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42022-04-08 06:27commentedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Please don't mass-resolve without comments.
52025-03-29 07:16closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Looks like this https://www.elegantwatch.net/en/store/ But, cannot find such location in the listing. Therefore, closing.
4686227
Category: unknown		12025-03-28 18:11openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Are you sure this replacement bus terminus is opened?
22025-08-13 10:23commentedkingkingHK
♦215		Still under construction and not yet opened as of today (2025-08-13).
32025-09-11 12:49closedkingkingHK
♦215		Still not opened as of today (2025-09-11). I have changed the relevant elements to `highway=construction` via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171783269. Other mappers can update the situation once the bus terminus opens, or reactivate this note if there is anything to add. Closing.
231849112020-08-23 02:49openedmaximilianli
♦1		Missing OBA memorial hall building - gym & library wing for Queen's College
22025-03-28 17:55closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Building already mapped many years ago, and is obvious via aerial imagery. Meaning is unclear. Therefore, closing.
61624512016-07-04 20:23openedvictoria chang18:00~06:00 (OSM data version: 2016-06-20T05:57:02Z) #mapsme
22025-03-28 17:43closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4445845
Category: Organicmaps		12024-09-21 13:35openedGotson"Closed" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2024-08-10T16:22:45Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-bar #organicmaps android
22025-03-28 17:39commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:en=Fringe Club That's not even a bar anyways.
32025-03-28 17:40closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164218694 ; closing.
356592412023-02-19 17:01opened---Stacked Tower
22025-03-28 17:34closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4438074
Category: Onosm.org		12024-09-16 10:27opened---onosm.org submitted note from a business: Name: The Opposites addr:housenumber=49 addr:street=Hollywood Road addr:place=Hilltop Plaza addr:city=Hong Kong Island Phone number: +85227110038 Website: https://www.theopposites.hk/ Social Network: https://www.facebook.com/theoppositeshk/ Opening Hours: Monday to Sunday 5pm-1am Category: Cocktail Bars Accepted payment methods:
22024-09-16 10:28closedStephanieCHC
32024-09-16 10:29reopenedStephanieCHC
42025-03-28 17:32closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164218368 ; closing.
84927412017-01-12 05:54openedUJ Ryu월-토 7~22, 일 ~21 (OSM data version: 2016-11-23T15:14:03Z) #mapsme
22025-03-28 16:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Google translate: "Mon-Sat 7-22, Sun-21" Meaning is unclear (which shop?); therefore, closing.
4453229
Category: StreetComplete		12024-09-26 09:06openedGotsonUnable to answer "What’s the name of this place?" – Swimming Pool Facility – https://osm.org/way/1202611411 via StreetComplete 59.0: It's inside a private apartment building called Corona Tower
22025-03-28 16:36commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Then, can assume the pool has no name.
32025-03-28 16:37closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164216073 ; closing.
424406312024-05-13 12:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Fun Fact: you can walk past The Gate
22025-01-08 15:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		*through
32025-03-28 15:57closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I ain't gonna get myself hate-crimed because of this. This inside joke / urban myth can allegedly ruin lives. Therefore, closing.
42025-03-28 17:40reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
52025-03-28 17:41closedKovoschiz
♦2,156		Rather, we shouldn't draw a `=footway` through any structure with a gap under it. Should be usable.
323620612022-06-22 14:12opened---this path extends to 大石左澗
22023-02-26 11:07closedHarry chau527
32023-02-27 04:16reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-03-28 15:52closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147053978 by someone else some time ago; closing.
4612090
Category: unknown		12025-02-03 05:51openedmataklik4BPB73
22025-02-03 06:03closedmataklik
32025-02-03 06:03reopenedmataklik
42025-02-03 06:04commentedmataklikWrong marking
52025-03-28 15:51closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4663735
Category: unknown		12025-03-14 08:21openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5655134867 (recycler Waste No Mall) seems to be gone already.
22025-03-28 06:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Indeed
32025-03-28 15:48closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164214047 ; closing.
392053112023-10-03 04:28openedGuy Ma KC潮味苑(元朗)
22025-03-28 06:37commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
32025-03-28 15:47closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
55411612016-04-25 04:58opened---元朗大棠路崇正新村15A 御炭燒 (餐廳)
22016-04-25 04:59closedzoeyng
32016-04-25 05:00reopenedzoeyng
42025-03-28 07:02commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
52025-03-28 15:10closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (item does not exist irl); closing.
86392112017-01-25 12:21openedWadia13
♦3		victoria wines, 201B, block b (OSM data version: 2016-08-08T15:45:02Z) #mapsme
22024-04-10 13:50commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		According to https://victoriawines.com.hk/pages/contact , it seems this has been moved
32025-03-28 15:05closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		@vectoria8192, if it has been moved, then it's not here, and the note should be closed. This is the case here. Therefore, closing.
405963512024-01-09 13:55opened---從紫羅蘭山徑看過，已找不到此樓梯的路口
22024-03-08 17:04closedAngie Wongjxieoq1owb2ksjudu9784198698864075
32024-03-09 16:38reopenedKovoschiz
♦2,156
42025-03-28 14:55commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		"Staircase does not exist when viewed from Tsz Lo Lan Shan Path." Aerial imagery agrees.
52025-03-28 14:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164211640 ; closing.
4460269
Category: StreetComplete		12024-10-01 14:04openedGotsonUnable to answer "What’s the name of this place?" – Bar – https://osm.org/node/6581021385 via StreetComplete 59.1: This is the middle of the Beach, the location may be wrong
22024-10-16 08:07commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Might be this one https://www.openrice.com/en/hongkong/r-cabana-repulse-bay-international-r480232 But then it says it is closed, so again, survey recommended
32025-03-28 14:53closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved by someone else via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161447529 some time ago (item truly does not exist); closing.
314681112022-04-22 00:53openedWhcohi
♦239		This path do not exist.
22025-03-28 14:49closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		`highway=path;informal=yes`; this is already mapped as an "informal path". Take this path at your own risk. Therefore, closing.
323620012022-06-22 14:10opened---complete off location please reserve to previous version
22025-03-28 14:46closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
316839912022-05-06 19:55opened---文武廟
22025-03-28 14:45closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Can't see any structures from aerial imagery. Therefore, closing.
279179612021-08-08 09:42openedlam ng田心村102b
22021-08-08 09:42closedlam ng
32021-08-08 09:42reopenedlam ng
42025-03-28 13:14closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4674187
Category: unknown		12025-03-21 12:42openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		New bus terminus opening real soon
22025-03-21 14:21commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Basic sketches available via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163908584 ; next pass needed via irl survey to calibrate/beautify the path shapes
32025-03-25 14:47closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164080741 ; closing.
4653322
Category: unknown		12025-03-06 09:29openedKiiKaneko
♦1		Island School has returned to Borrett Road now
22025-03-24 09:07closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Cumulatively resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164020320 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164020668 , and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164020763 . Therefore, closing.
44839612015-10-09 08:29opened---Hong Kong RFID Ltd. Office
22025-03-24 07:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164018014 ; closing.
100037912017-05-18 16:36opened---新裁縫舖
22025-03-24 07:51closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
4677107
Category: unknown		12025-03-22 23:21openedJoyce CCGREEN@LO TAK WAI
22025-03-24 02:08closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Feature already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8306528464 ; closing.
52884512016-03-17 03:55openedJackie ChanMDW Coating Expert Limited 魔鍍王鍍膜專家 這才正確地址
22024-04-16 20:13commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This says a company with the same name was dissolved https://hkg.databasesets.com/zh-hant/gongsimingdan/number/2324599
32025-03-22 09:45commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
42025-03-22 11:24closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (can't find item irl); therefore, closing.
266584912021-05-12 11:55opened---Terminal 2 Massage
22025-03-22 09:36commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Negative
32025-03-22 11:24closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Note invalid (can't find item irl); therefore, closing.
257856312021-03-14 10:19opened---梅艷芳紀念酒店
22025-03-22 11:23closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		This is a residential area. Meaning is unclear. Therefore, closing.
276116212021-07-19 11:17opened---MEATchelin 肉鮮欲食
22025-03-21 12:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		A cursory online search hints that more info should be available at here https://www.meatchelin.hk/ , but is dead link. Can assume this shop/office is permanently closed. Therefore, closing.
177371412019-05-10 10:48openedFutian ResidentThis place has a (Banyan?-) tree where people place some Buddha figures and burn incence and candles. - Until authorities remove the rubbish that (when Chinese are involved, naturally) piles up, together with the figurines. Then it starts again. via StreetComplete 12.0
22025-02-07 15:04commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		I view the main point is whether there are any signs of worship still visible on-site.
32025-03-21 07:46commentedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Such item does exist
42025-03-21 11:56closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163902412 ; closing.
4642897
Category: unknown		12025-02-26 13:31openedvectorial8192
♦1,073		name:zh of park?What is the name of the park?
22025-03-20 14:19closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163865358 ; closing.
4669560
Category: unknown		12025-03-18 10:04opened---hospice
22025-03-20 09:17closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
324213712022-06-27 09:27opened---成達膠輪 (香港) 有限公司 - 元朗店
22025-03-17 03:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Cannot confirm via https://www.shingtaktyre.com/locations Therefore, closing.
270095312021-06-06 08:51openedWright One
♦171		魚塘遭非法填平 https://m.mingpao.com/pns/%e6%b8%af%e8%81%9e/article/20210606/s00002/1622917007577/%e5%85%83%e6%9c%97%e5%b1%b1%e8%b2%9d%e6%9d%91%e9%ad%9a%e5%a1%98%e9%81%ad%e5%a1%ab%e6%b3%a5-%e8%b6%b3%e5%bb%ba%e4%b8%81%e5%b1%8b-%e9%80%be10%e5%b9%b4%e5%80%92%e6%b3%a5%e9%bb%91%e9%bb%9e-%e9%95%b7%e6%98%a5%e7%a4%be%e6%89%b9%e6%9c%aa%e5%9f%b7%e6%b3%95%e7%b8%b1%e5%ae%b9
22025-03-16 09:31closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Link is dead; but the ponds here can no longer be seen from satellite imagery. Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163679894 ; closing.
412025412024-02-20 04:29opened---樹木圖標：18
22025-03-16 09:20closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing.
174748012019-04-16 04:35openedtoyireneCLP Power Supply
22019-04-16 04:35closedtoyirene
32019-04-16 04:37reopenedtoyirene
42025-03-16 09:09closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Meaning is unclear; closing. (if referring to the HV bridge, then it's not even here.)
4661343
Category: unknown		12025-03-12 01:31openedcal1233211234567將軍澳400仟伏變電站Tseung Kwan O 400kV Substation
22025-03-12 04:11closedvectorial8192
♦1,073		Item already exists as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159829463 ; closing.