| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4928004 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | IIVQ ♦771 | Wegensituatie busbaan en aansluiting op Burgemeester Stramanweg wordt anders (maar ik kon geen plannen vinden). In deze vijver komt een truckparking. Volgens mij is het pand van Hedin Automotive (Burg. Stramanweg 110/110A) gesloopt maar ik weet dat niet zeker. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | IIVQ ♦771 | Grotendeels ingetekend, als het klaar is oude busbaan verwijderen en nieuwe van construction op busway zetten.Ik heb de busroutes al omgezet. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | JannesBraet ♦21 | Er is hier nu een probleem dat de weg 823599012 eigenlijk ontoegankelijk is geworden. Het is een oneway en door https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11278258 mag hij ook niet afslaan naar de weg 823599013. Klopt die relatie dus wel ? Ik kan ook geen indicatie vinden dat er verkeersborden zijn die dit afdwingen | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | IIVQ ♦771 | Ik zie niet in hoe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/823599012 ontoegankelijk is geworden, via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708309849 etc kan je er nog gewoon naartoe. Wel kan je momenteel neit verder naar Stern Auto. Dat is ook correct, het pand van ex-stern staat leeg, is ontdaan van alle reclame en heeft een andere toegang via de Keienbergerweg. Of begrijp ik niet wat je bedoelt? | |
| 4814467 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | JannesBraet ♦21 | Why is way 1227013791 not the same way as 639654691 under this location ? In reality this is the same way, except that it should be segregated for foot and bike. Also I believe that before the change of 2 months ago this was not the case |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,449 | Please attach a picture if possible. Nothing is visible on aerial due to trees. | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | Mapillary images should be available | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,449 | Looking at mapillary it has one footway and one cycleway. Could be combined or not (?) in a specific double tagged cycleway. But then marked crossings don't fit. Why is there a "path" here on the wrong side of the cycleway? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1227013791 It's gonna need a bit of tweaking to get right without a good image in cadastre or aerial | |
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | you can use this way as an example > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101438034 | |
| 6 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | bxl-forever ♦5,631 | Yes, it is the same problem reported in an earlier note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4718239 A user had single-handedly decided to remap all footways and cycleways to merge them, apparently because they like the iD preset. This was a very bad idea, in particular when crossings with roads are not exactly on the same location. In dense urban areas, it is okay to map them separately. We had already fixed the northern part of the site but not the part here. I did it yesterday. It should be all right now. | |
| 7 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | ||
| 8 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | https://panoramax.mapcomplete.org/api/pictures/0fe95ab4-68b1-42df-af49-549a476e6395/hd.jpg | |
| 9 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | cycleways (in green) run further to the west (until the parking area for cars) > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=829518106027873 | |
| 10 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | bxl-forever ♦5,631 | True, but this was not the purpose of the task here, about repairing a previous edit. I will see if I can spend some more time to draw the rest of the cycle infrastructure, then. | |
| 11 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | JannesBraet ♦21 | I still don't understand why these roads need to be seperate ? at least from under the intersection to where they converge they can be a single road with segregated=yes. Two ways this close together just feels like clutter | |
| 12 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | kabelhaai ♦2,449 | I understand it can feel like clutter but it is what it is. The more detail the better I suppose. | |
| 13 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | ||
| 14 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | missing cycleways are not yet drawn ... | |
| 15 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | bxl-forever ♦5,631 | I added them earlier this week: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411351156 | |
| 16 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | ||
| 17 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | Thanks! Just to be complete: there's also a oneway cycleway southern of Av. de Laerbeek | |
| 18 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,449 | which street is that | |
| 19 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | Laarbeeklaan | |
| 20 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | Thierry1030 ♦6,183 | added missing separate cycleway > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1411351155 | |
| 4817444 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | JannesBraet ♦21 | Isn't this domain private? I passed here today and it all seemed very inacessible, with closed gates. But maybe that's just in the weekends ? I just want to make sure before I start modifying all the roads here to be private |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | bxl-forever ♦5,631 | Indeed, there are multiple restricted access signs (see Mapillary pictures in the source of this changeset). Updated thanks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167962035 | |
| 4796026 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | JannesBraet ♦21 | Shouldn't there be a way here to indicate that this pier is in fact accesible ? |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | waterced ♦4,430 | Indeed, done! | |
| 4767228 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | JannesBraet ♦21 | In reality you are forced to take the loop to get on top of the bridge, however the way it is currently mapped routeplanners think you can skip the loop. I'm just not sure how I can detach the nodes in a good way to make this happen, can anyone help? Similar on the other side of the bridge |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | bxl-forever ♦5,631 | You are right. A mapper attached both ways together, which is a mistake. And the same problem on the eastern side, indeed. It should be all right now. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439212943 |