OpenStreetMap Note Activities of 1F616EMO for the last 12 Months
Overall Activities | 12 Months
Opened: 3 (60%) Commented: 2 (40%) Closed: 0 (0%) Reopened: 0 (0%)
Stats per month
Latest | Limit 250
Latest | Limit 250 | The colored events are made by 1F616EMO
Note#⏱️ Last updatedEventContributorComment
5439394
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 days agoopened1F616EMO
♦4
lift
2~ 5 days agoclosedvectorial8192
♦1,489
I personally do not recommend it. Closing.
5104381
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopened1F616EMO
♦4
Entrance to Kwai Lam Court and the mall here at surface level
2~ 7 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,489
We don't usually do entrances into individual (residential) buildings, but we can do entrances to the mall.
3~ 7 months agocommentedkingkingHK
♦493
The residential entrances sound like they could be `entrance=yes` + `addr:unit=` + `access=private`. They are verifiable after all. I intend to map some basic indoor footpaths in this area soon, so I guess I will also deal with the mall entrances.
4~ 7 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,489
While we are at it, some indoor paths in this area are mapped as "indoor corridors" so OSMCarto doesn't render them.
5~ 7 months agocommentedKovoschiz
♦2,262
It's not "don't usually do", but "usually not done yet"
6~ 6 months agoclosedvectorial8192
♦1,489
This time I am not gonna accidentally champion the addition of residential entrances. Such a large scope work is best left for later. Foot paths added via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177303341 ; closing.
5070064
Category: Unknown
1~ 8 months agoopened1F616EMO
♦4
From the news, Wang Chi House is mostly unaffected. I doubt that marking it as ruined (as with the other seven) is appropriate.
2~ 8 months agocommented1F616EMO
♦4
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5068721
3~ 8 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,489
Local Hong Kong idiom: never follow the car too closely. Technically the fire is not under control; we have no definite proof Wang Chi House is OR is not `=ruined`.
4~ 8 months agocommentedKovoschiz
♦2,262
I multi-edited them all for convenience. You can always correct it.
5~ 8 months agocommented1F616EMO
♦4
I agree with vectorial8192’s points, that we should put it on hold before things settle down. Relevant discussion on the English Wikipedia on the future of the other seven buildings: https://w.wiki/GLf6
6~ 8 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,489
Indeed. Reading the link to the English Wiki, yes my general point is basically "WP:TRUE". Now, as of writing, I think all fires from ref=A to ref=G are gone for good (await official confirmation). But even then, ref=H (Wang Chi House) is still covered in scaffolding. We need direct visual confirmation to the building itself (e.g. how are the actual walls?) to determine whether it should be "damaged" or "ruined".
7~ 8 months agocommentedKovoschiz
♦2,262
@1F616EMO OSM is not Wikipedia. Immediate action is often done for disasters, and it works based on iterative refinement.
8~ 8 months agocommentedKovoschiz
♦2,262
Ie there's no ban on breaking news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper
9~ 8 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,489
Things should have settled down. I am hopeful Wang Chi House is entirely unaffected, but someone go look under the scaffolding?
10~ 8 months agocommentedvectorial8192
♦1,489
Latest news hint towards the building remains healthy because residents are allowed to retrieve some of their stuff.
11~ 8 months agoclosedvectorial8192
♦1,489
Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175434791 ; closing.