| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5439394 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | 1F616EMO ♦4 | lift |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | I personally do not recommend it. Closing. | |
| 5104381 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | 1F616EMO ♦4 | Entrance to Kwai Lam Court and the mall here at surface level |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | We don't usually do entrances into individual (residential) buildings, but we can do entrances to the mall. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | kingkingHK ♦493 | The residential entrances sound like they could be `entrance=yes` + `addr:unit=` + `access=private`. They are verifiable after all. I intend to map some basic indoor footpaths in this area soon, so I guess I will also deal with the mall entrances. | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | While we are at it, some indoor paths in this area are mapped as "indoor corridors" so OSMCarto doesn't render them. | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Kovoschiz ♦2,262 | It's not "don't usually do", but "usually not done yet" | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | This time I am not gonna accidentally champion the addition of residential entrances. Such a large scope work is best left for later. Foot paths added via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/177303341 ; closing. | |
| 5070064 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | 1F616EMO ♦4 | From the news, Wang Chi House is mostly unaffected. I doubt that marking it as ruined (as with the other seven) is appropriate. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | 1F616EMO ♦4 | See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5068721 | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | Local Hong Kong idiom: never follow the car too closely. Technically the fire is not under control; we have no definite proof Wang Chi House is OR is not `=ruined`. | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Kovoschiz ♦2,262 | I multi-edited them all for convenience. You can always correct it. | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | 1F616EMO ♦4 | I agree with vectorial8192’s points, that we should put it on hold before things settle down. Relevant discussion on the English Wikipedia on the future of the other seven buildings: https://w.wiki/GLf6 | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | Indeed. Reading the link to the English Wiki, yes my general point is basically "WP:TRUE". Now, as of writing, I think all fires from ref=A to ref=G are gone for good (await official confirmation). But even then, ref=H (Wang Chi House) is still covered in scaffolding. We need direct visual confirmation to the building itself (e.g. how are the actual walls?) to determine whether it should be "damaged" or "ruined". | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Kovoschiz ♦2,262 | @1F616EMO OSM is not Wikipedia. Immediate action is often done for disasters, and it works based on iterative refinement. | |
| 8 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | Kovoschiz ♦2,262 | Ie there's no ban on breaking news https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_newspaper | |
| 9 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | Things should have settled down. I am hopeful Wang Chi House is entirely unaffected, but someone go look under the scaffolding? | |
| 10 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | Latest news hint towards the building remains healthy because residents are allowed to retrieve some of their stuff. | |
| 11 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | vectorial8192 ♦1,489 | Resolved via https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175434791 ; closing. |