CycleStreets for the last 12 MonthsCycleStreets for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5238258 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Cycle track here now. Pista ciclabile proprio qui. |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | dieterdreist ♦1,138 | already mapped it seems… | |
| 5238257 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Is a left turn from Strada Provinciale Cassanese into this slip road allowed? È consentito svoltare a sinistra dalla Strada Provinciale Cassanese in questa rampa di accesso? |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | LuSirto ♦2,623 | Non è mai stato possibile svoltare a sinistra anche se in molti facevano la "sporca". Oggi fortunatamente la strada temporanea è a senso unico verso Milano. Chiudo la nota | |
| 5216857 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Bicycle repair station in this vicinity - needs mapping. |
| 5164869 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Is there any connection yet with the bridleway? |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | IpswichEdits ♦238 | Hi CycleStreets. Yes, I believe so. When I surveyed this area last year I wasn't certain, but on closer inspection (see image https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.04781900000003&lng=0.969195300000024&z=17&pKey=1947781652341681&focus=photo&x=0.7691743304946579&y=0.45721922733424025&zoom=1.9279869569241892 ) it looks like the gap on the far right is intentional. The other (larger) gap appears to be a break in the fence. I've just added this as a footway to the map. Feel free to change if you think I'm mistaken. I'll leave this note open for you to close when you're happy with the mapping. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Well spotted. Have added surface and informal. Looks like the kind of thing that will/should be improved over time. | |
| 4733217 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Are the roads in this area still 30 mph? Rest of Edinburgh is almost all 20 mph. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CycleStreets ♦325 | https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23cH | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | lottie1040 ♦110 | They've been 20 for a few years now, will try and update them | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | lottie1040 ♦110 | Think that should be them now | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | CycleStreets ♦325 | Thanks. The Overpass Turbo link above shows though that there are still various streets in the area that are still not 20 mph - are they definitely exceptions? | |
| 7 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | lottie1040 ♦110 | Aaaah, there are some in Eskview too, yeah, they're just 20 (or at least they were last time I checked) | |
| 5159167 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Being demolished see: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1335455281952164&set=a.545870827577284 |
| 4748151 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Has this now been upgraded as per the plan at: https://www.essexhighways.org/uploads/downloads/st%20andrew's%20avenue%20overview%20plan.pdf ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | pmmikes ♦67 | Yes, It's now a single stage Toucan crossing | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 5054019 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | There is double-marking of data here which needs to be corrected: a marked contraflow but also the road itself has a one-way cycle exemption. |
| 5039739 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Area needs full survey as the development is now built. https://munrobuildingservices.co.uk/projects/our-projects-category/projects-archive/hinsley-lane |
| 5004158 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Closure for works should probably be reflected as this is taking place over several months. Clarkson Road is the diversion route for cyclists. |
| 3011974 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | We understand from the council there is a modal filter. The Bing imagery appears to show possibly some bollards. Can this be checked out? |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | OSM Warrior ♦500 | These are square blocks, no idea who thought this was a good idea but they are defiantly a trip hazard! Can be seen on google streetview | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | reopened | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Google Street View is a copyrighted source which you should never be using for anything in relation to OSM. Sounds as if you already had local knowledge, however, in this case. | |
| 4251495 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Es podrien afegir molts detalls, p. seients, zones verdes, etc., al llarg del nou Consell de Cent. Hi ha un vídeo de tota la durada, que hem filmat. Lots of detail could be added, e.g. seating, green areas, etc., along the new Consell de Cent. There is a video of the entire length, which we filmed. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1jTuk7BSN4 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | jqngarcia ♦6,735 | Es una nota masa generica | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CycleStreets ♦325 | No, ho hem escrit manualment. La nota diu que ara hi ha un vídeo realitzat específicament per permetre als mapeors afegir molts més detalls al carrer recentment reelaborat. Actualment falten aspectes com espais verds i cadires, així com detalls a cada intersecció. No, we wrote this manually. The note is saying that there is now a video specifically taken to enable mappers to add a lot more detail to the newly-reworked street. Aspects like green space and chairs are currently all missing, as are details at each intersection. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | pantufla ♦2,236 | Hey, thank you for the resource. It's actually very hard to use as such. I recommend you these resources: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Street-level_imagery_services Specially popular ones like Mapillary or KartaView About these missing changes, yes. We want to add them but there's still a lot of work to do. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CycleStreets ♦325 | Yes, sadly I did not have Mapillary installed at the time, and the video was intended more for other purposes originally, but may still be useful for mapping. It obviously requires counting the street crossings to match up the sections. | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | pantufla ♦2,236 | There are ways to record video, take photos and match with GPX recording. It's an interesting workaround but won't be possible for this case. I doubt someone will put the effort from the video. It's gonna be easier to go and register everythin on mapillary. Thank you anyways. Always welcomed in Barcelona. | |
| 8 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | És fantàstic veure que el Consell de Cent ja s'ha cartografiat amb molt de detall. També hem creat imatges mapillars en ambdues direccions, si algú vol fer-hi més millores: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/cyclestreets?lat=41.39656565624608&lng=2.173037277436606&z=17.238832973643614&pKey=938574975104051 -- Excellent to see that Consell de Cent has now been mapped in great detail. We have also now created Mapillary imagery in both directions, if anyone wishes to make further improvements: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/cyclestreets?lat=41.39656565624608&lng=2.173037277436606&z=17.238832973643614&pKey=938574975104051 | |
| 9 | ~ 7 months ago | reopened | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 10 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | flapnuta ♦166 | ||
| 4960703 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | We have had contact from a potential land owner of these 2 paths: "I have it in writing that there are no public paths over the land apart from the tarmacked cycle path to the north of the land" |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171892837 | |
| 4960717 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | User feedback: "this track has been blocked where it attempts to cross the a55 south of chester. one cannot proceed." We don't have the exact location - needs survey. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | reopened | CycleStreets ♦325 | ||
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171893296 | |
| 4940155 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Link opened, no sure of exact location: https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/work-on-track-to-new-timeline-at-botley-road-as-walkway-opens-to-improve-access-for-all |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | gmar5 ♦633 | Added. It goes along the northern side of the construction area. I am assuming it replaces the old one (I have tagged it with access=no for now. If it remains open, it can easily be changed back). Thanks. | |
| 4917041 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | New link opened in this area: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k66CAnmXZ0A |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | Mex ♦7,786 | sketched in, so now routable, but needs #surveyme for more details | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | jtn20 ♦62 | Surveyed and mapped as of changeset 175218667. | |
| 4702717 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Sustrans mapping defines this section as NCN51, joining the existing NCN51 under at the bridge to NCN11 at the Riverside Bridge. https://data-sustrans-uk.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/6336de1429c5459a92563464a6820486_0/explore?location=52.214184%2C0.145254%2C16.11 |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | ieuanj ♦28 | Signage in the area seems to agree Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/298429.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/298430.jpg | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Thanks; fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170551041 | |
| 4894298 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Not possible to drive through now along Carrer de Viriat, but there is a bus route connected to this. This piece of road needs to be removed. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | Marion_Moseby ♦2,327 | I think it is possible now. This section is changing a lot, so difficult to keep up hehe | |
| 4776568 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Cowley Road cycleway now open, but needs full resurvey |
| 4736604 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Corner of Parker's tavern |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Added entrance to Thai restaurant in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633724 Parker's Tavern does not extend this far up. | |
| 4628455 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | ⁶Don't think a single crossing is best representation here. The separate pedestrian crossing is obscure enough on the ground. I'm pretty sure we've discussed how to map these in the past (might find a link when I get home). Specifically this representation is poor for people with limited sight. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Remodelled in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633680 | |
| 4235948 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Rupert Swarbrick ♦189 | Unable to answer "Do you have to pay to park here?" – Parking Lot – https://osm.org/way/221142210 via StreetComplete 57.3: This is wrongly tagged, I think. Private car park Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/211197.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | This is correctly marked as access=customers. | |
| 4669856 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Rupert Swarbrick ♦189 | Unable to answer "Do you have to pay to use this restroom?" – Flush Toilets – https://osm.org/node/9628504284 via StreetComplete 60.3: These aren't accessible without going into the church. Not sure they belong in the map like this. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633486 , marking this as access=customers. | |
| 4320388 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Rupert Swarbrick ♦189 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – house number 60 – https://osm.org/node/3542170057 via StreetComplete 58.1: Part of Little Petra Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/222194.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | This is indeed Little Petra. No data change needed as this is already mapped. | |
| 4632240 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Rupert Swarbrick ♦189 | This bike rack is actually private (I should have got rid of a misplaced one instead of moving it!) via StreetComplete 60.1 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633458 | |
| 4628461 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | SK53 ♦3,856 | Couple of ordinary benches missing here. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Added benches in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166633430 . | |
| 4064105 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | ChildishGiant ♦112 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" for https://osm.org/way/134412955 via StreetComplete_ee 55.11: Now Lifecraft Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/192556.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | apt1002 ♦1 | The building is there. It is used as a community center. For example, the local samba band uses it as a practice space. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Yes, this still exists. The Bath House is used by Lifecraft and Arco Iris. | |
| 2794070 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Robert Whittaker ♦1,696 | A new development along Severn Place has been given planning permission according to https://www.alisonbrooksarchitects.com/project/severn-place-cambridge/ . The postcode CB1 1HL previously allocated to the houses along here has been removed from Code-Point Open. Does this mean that there is now a construction site here? Local survey needed. #surveyme |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | CycleStreets ♦325 | Construction did not take place. The planning consent has probably now expired. Not sure why it didn't happen. | |
| 4770184 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | There is a separately draw-in cycleway. Therefore the road itself should not have cycleway=... present. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | Chris Fleming ♦1,265 | What do we mean by draw-in cycleway? Looking at the cycleway page it reads that we should perhaps be adding cycleway=separate and not having the cycleway:left=track and cycleway:right=no ?? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | GinaroZ ♦7,706 | correct I've added cycleway:left=separate to fix the duplication | |
| 4757567 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | CycleStreets ♦325 | Path has been widened - new width needs surveying. |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | jtn20 ♦62 | Addressed by changeset 168979159. |