| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5277545 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "Do these traffic lights have a button to request a walk signal?" – Crossing With Pedestrian Signals – https://osm.org/node/13637550622 via StreetComplete 63.1: Button to cross Webster, no button to cross Water |
| 2 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | lattrommi ♦28 | ||
| 5250926 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | --- | Therapy night club closed. A new night club is in it's place called the reserve |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | lattrommi ♦28 | Updated | |
| 5257779 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What street is this on?" – house number 2921: House – https://osm.org/way/778661259 via StreetComplete 63.0: Empty lot |
| 2 | ~ 20 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦10,956 | see an empty one next door instead... | |
| 4662388 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Sidewalk – https://osm.org/way/1336073221 via StreetComplete 60.2: No longer exists. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦52,873 | it looks like it does on aerial imagery. you're saying they riped out the sidewalk? | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | lattrommi ♦28 | I marked the sidewalks with the street complete app. then this appeared as a footpath. I was worried it would imply both a sidewalk and a footpath. which there is not. it showed the footpath ending after crossing Gondert going NE so i thought sidewalk was correct as it does not end there. | |
| 4746797 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Sidewalk – https://osm.org/way/1372808566 via StreetComplete 60.3: There is no footpath here, it is a sidewalk. Can be removed. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | michaelthehutt ♦60 | A sidewalk is a type of footpath. The sidewalk is still there, correct? | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | lattrommi ♦28 | Yes the sidewalk is still there and has been confirmed already. I was worried it would imply there are two sidewalks. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦10,956 | no action needed | |
| 4884524 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – Love Family Dental (Dentist) – https://osm.org/way/667819897 via StreetComplete 61.1: Converted into apartments. Same building. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦52,873 | updated | |
| 4762874 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦38,073 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19198216/history still under costruction? Then it should be highway=construction if blocked or have construction=minor tag if pasable. If it is no longer under construction, then construction tag should be removed |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | lattrommi ♦28 | It is not under construction. I cannot remove the tag with Street Complete app. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦38,073 | changed it, thanks for checking | |
| 4818423 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "Is there a crossing here?" – https://osm.org/node/12173930276 via StreetComplete 61.1: Crossing removed |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | michaelthehutt ♦60 | removed from map, thanks! | |
| 4818422 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "Is there a crossing here?" – https://osm.org/node/12173930288 via StreetComplete 61.1: crossing moved. Image shows where OSM/SC crossing was, and where new one is now located, a short distance NW. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/286249.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | michaelthehutt ♦60 | moved. The photo was helpful, thanks! | |
| 4793374 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "How many car lanes does this road have?" – Harries Street (Residential Road) – https://osm.org/way/132755986 via StreetComplete 61.0: Is a marked, two way street, not a one way. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦52,873 | updated | |
| 3751535 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Justin Clough | Unable to answer "What’s the structure of this bridge?" for https://osm.org/way/959983549 via StreetComplete 53.2: Structure is an old stage made of concrete. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦52,873 | So no bridge, correct? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | Justin Clough | Correct. There is no bridge. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | lattrommi ♦28 | Taken from N Main St. facing structure. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/282654.jpg | |
| 4782741 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/736321966 via StreetComplete 61.0: Path does not exist. |
| 2 | ~ 20 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦10,956 | removed | |
| 4774006 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/194211109 via StreetComplete 61.0: No longer exists |
| 4773999 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Service Road – https://osm.org/way/925191012 via StreetComplete 61.0: Does not exist |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦52,873 | concur. removed | |
| 4765808 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | lattrommi ♦28 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Sidewalk – https://osm.org/way/1059641517 via StreetComplete 61.0: Unsure Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/278968.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | jdmackiewicz | Concreate Sidewalk | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CurlingMan13 ♦52,873 | updated surface |