OpenStreetMap Note Activities of mk2k22 for the last 12 Months
Overall Activities | 12 Months
Opened: 0 (0%) Commented: 34 (37%) Closed: 57 (62%) Reopened: 1 (1%)
Stats per month
Latest | Limit 250
Latest | Limit 250 | The colored events are made by mk2k22
Note#⏱️ Last updatedEventContributorComment
5544215
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 16 days agoopened---this segment of track is just a foot oath #OsmAnd
2~ 13 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
looks more like a bad track to me, so i added a tracktype=grade5 tag for now, unless you have some photo proof
5542393
Category: CoMaps
1~ 17 days agoopenedAljaz Mur Erzen
♦1
Paragliding runway for takeoff #CoMaps android 2026.08.31-14-FDroid
2~ 13 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
already in OSM! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6157462184
5542384
Category: CoMaps
1~ 17 days agoopenedAljaz Mur Erzen
♦1
"A bench. Take-off for paragliding. Beginner friendly runway, but low altitude and hard to glide upwards." OSM snapshot date: 2026-09-20T02:18:40Z POI has no name POI types: landuse-forest #CoMaps android 2026.08.31-14-FDroid
2~ 13 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
both already mapped in OSM
3~ 13 days agoreopenedAljaz Mur Erzen
♦1
4~ 13 days agocommentedAljaz Mur Erzen
♦1
Bench is there, but I cannot find any information about the take-off. It's a maintained runway for paragliding "free-flight" sport.
5~ 13 days agoclosedAljaz Mur Erzen
♦1
No wait, I found it, it's just not showing in my app of the website - I had "query features".
5523089
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 28 days agoopenedTi_ti00
♦6
"This place has been closed for couple of years" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI has no name POI types: shop-supermarket #organicmaps ios 2026.09.05-5-ios
2~ 23 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Are you saying Mercator is not here?
3~ 23 days agocommentedTi_ti00
♦6
Yes Mercator is closed for some years now. Even google maps did not update it.
4~ 22 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Is there some other shop or anything now, or should we just remove the node from OSM?
5522563
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 28 days agoopenedTi_ti00
♦6
"This pizzeria was closed years ago" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI name: Pizzeria pod skalco POI types: amenity-restaurant #organicmaps ios 2026.09.05-5-ios
2~ 23 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5510934
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopenedWaWu91
♦0
Hier befindet sich der Gipfel des Cicelj, 836 müNN, laut Gipfelkreuz und Schild vor Ort. Der aktuell als Gipfel markierte Punkt 600 m östlich ist falsch. Dort ist eine unscheinbare Anhöhe auf dem Kamm.
2~ 1 month agoclosedWaWu91
♦0
3~ 1 month agoreopenedWaWu91
♦0
4~ 1 month agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
I've contacted the original mapper (12 years ago). Let's see if they can help. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20979459
5~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Perhaps we can remove the east peak and keep the elevation only, I'll see about it.
6~ 24 days agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
So, do you mean this one is 836m?
7~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Neither is 836 m! The highest point of this ridge is 826 m, which is the east Cicelj's ele as per my correction now. The left one ("main peak") should be 819 m as per what's currently mapped.
8~ 24 days agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Ok, I understand. I'd also be fine with removing the western peak entirely.
9~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
No, it will definitely not be removed entirely. If anything, at least the peak with its ele should remain, if not the name as well.
10~ 24 days agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
OK, I see the problem now. The highest point is not marked in the real world, whereas the lower point is falsely marked as the peak... Yeah, I'd keep this one with name=Cicelj and also keep the eastern point as it is clearly the higher peak. But I wouldn't invent a new name. I'd just remove the name tag from the eastern peak.
11~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Problem is, as can be seen in various other cases around Slovenia, that this ridge has two peaks. And the "main" peak is actually not the highest point of the ridge (which is also not unprecedented in our mountains). The "main" peak with the summit register and all is in fact the lower peak in the west with mere 819 m elevation. There is also a wooden plate with 836 m inscribed on it, which is clearly an error but has spread onto many internet resources. The higher peak in the east is also the highest point of this ridge, at 825.78 m according to LiDAR, rounded to 826 m. The highest point of the ridge should definitely be documented. It’s not uncommon in OSM to label secondary peaks with directional names, e.g. “XY – East Peak”, so I may go that route. I’m checking with another editor whether there’s any marker at all on that eastern peak, as these peaks sometimes have small marking stones with a small cross on them (as in a trigonometric point). If there's any such marked, I'd be even more inclined to keep the name.
12~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
According to another editor, there is indeed a small marker stone on the 'east' Cicelj, last checked in 2021 though. So can OP @WaWu91 reconfirm this?
13~ 24 days agocommentedWaWu91
♦0
I was there in person! The western summit is marked with a sign and a summit register box. I then descended to the east and made a slight ascent to the supposed "East Summit." I found nothing there—not even a stone. The elevation of 819 m seems plausible to me.
14~ 24 days agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Thanks for the research. As said, I agree with you @mk2k22, except that I'd remove the name tag from the eastern peak. But I'm also ok with keeping it.
15~ 24 days agocommentedWaWu91
♦0
As I said, I believe the west summit is higher than the eastern one. But by now, it doesn't matter to me. Do whatever you think best.
16~ 24 days agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
In agreement with the ARSO lidar data (as mentioned by mk2k22), SRTM also clearly shows the eastern peak as the higher one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/46.110374/14.733481&layers=P
17~ 23 days agoclosedWaWu91
♦0
18~ 23 days agoreopenedmk2k22
♦661
19~ 23 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Yeah. Rest assured, we also corrected the peak's elevation to 819 m on hribi.net to avoid confusion.
5510945
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopenedWaWu91
♦0
Hier ist eine unbedeutende Anhöhe auf dem Kamm, und die Höhe stimmt nicht (weniger als 820 müNN). Das Gipfelsymbol sollte gelöscht werden. Der Cicelj (836m) befindet sich ca. 600 m westlich, wo bereits ein Gipfelsymbol ist, allerdings ist dort die Höhe falsch angegeben.
2~ 1 month agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
I've contacted the original mapper (12 years ago). Let's see if they can help. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20979488
3~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Hi, the correct elevation of this "East Cicelj" peak here is 826 m as per LIDAR measurements. The other one (836 m) which is also inserted into OSM as 819 m already has the correct elevation: 819, LIDAR confirms it. 836 m is plainly wrong.
4~ 24 days agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Let's merge the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5510934
5~ 24 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
I corrected the elevation, but I’m still wondering whether to call this “East Cicelj” or just leave it unnamed. Could you reconfirm if there’s actually anything on this East Peak—like a small stone marker or anything else indicating something? It is after all the highest point of this Cicelj ridge, even though the “main peak” is oddly a few meters lower and farther west as it happens with some other peaks around Slovenia.
6~ 23 days agoclosedWaWu91
♦0
5482328
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 month agoopenedSoapz
♦1
"i could not find a website or the email" OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z POI name: Villa Laura POI types: tourism-apartment internet_access-wlan #organicmaps android 2026.07.23-6-Google
2~ 26 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
I noticed you already added email, so I added website as well now
3~ 26 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5524006
Category: Unknown
1~ 27 days agoopenedLukaOSM
♦62
The track/landaccess tags here don't look right. Can someone confirm this segment wasn't paved?
2~ 26 days agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Precej dvomim. Pomoje bi bilo treba spremeniti v highway=cycleway in surface=asphalt kot preostanek trase...
3~ 23 days agocommentedLukaOSM
♦62
Se strinjam. Bom spremenil v cycleway ko pridem za računalnik.
4~ 16 days agoclosedLukaOSM
♦62
5512748
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopened---A new main road missing from the map here.
2~ 28 days agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5491700
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedBestestGuy
♦98
Here is an unmapped path via StreetComplete 63.4
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
added one, hopefully that's it
5491699
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedBestestGuy
♦98
Here is an unmapped path via StreetComplete 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/368380.jpg
2~ 1 month agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
It's questionable if it really leads anywhere or not though..
3~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
I mapped it now as per lidar relief image, where it seems it could be going this way. Hopefully it will be fine.
5491698
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedBestestGuy
♦98
Here is an unmapped stream via StreetComplete 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/368378.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/368379.jpg
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
added now
5477928
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 month agoopenedToky_07"https://www.bohinj.si/nihalka-na-vogel/" OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z POI has no name POI types: aerialway-station #organicmaps android 2026.07.23-6-Google
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5500540
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 month agoopenedEefeef
♦7
"Arrow pointing foothpath to mount Vogel left. There is a car path straight (not on the map)" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI has no name POI types: historic-wayside_cross #organicmaps android 2026.08.27-18-Google
2~ 1 month agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Hi, please can you clarify?
4525227
Category: Mapycz
1~ 1 year agoopenedPan Perníček
♦14,171
Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapycz user, please verify: There are ruins of bunker from 1 WW.
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5472864
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 month agoopenedraccoss
♦94
Unable to answer "Che tipo di colonnina è questa?" – Paletto – https://osm.org/node/6903381767 via StreetComplete 63.4: Can't find any barrier
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5458269
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopenedDavid_gravelPitna voda
2~ 1 month agoclosedDavid_gravel
3~ 1 month agoreopenedDavid_gravel
4~ 1 month agocommentedJanezPavelZebovec
♦247
Is it public?
5~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
added it for now, can still remove it later if needed
5503665
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 month agoopenedfilkampl
♦1
It's a toilet not a bath
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
changed it now
5502828
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 month agoopenedone_true
♦3
"Samo gotovina / Cash only" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI name: Brunarica pri Ingotu POI types: building amenity-restaurant #organicmaps ios 2026.08.27-18-ios
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
added cash only
5482674
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 month agoopenedMerleeenStairs with 3 or 4 steps. Not recommended for biking #OsmAnd
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
added steps now
4418822
Category: unknown
1~ 2 years agoopenedborgofumo
♦51
Agosto 2024: Nuova strada forestale in costruzione in direzione monte Castello. Per ora ho inserito il percorso tratto da eagle FVG con etichetta "in costruzione". Da mappare con un sopralluogo non appena terminati i lavori.
2~ 3 months agoclosedJoSchTe66
3~ 3 months agoreopenedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
4~ 1 month agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
I trust this is now properly mapped? Or is there still something else to be mapped here?
5~ 1 month agoclosedwildmaps
♦2,686
👌
8128641~ 9 years agoopenedborgofumo
♦51
Dicembre 2016: Lavori in corso per costruzione case sugli alberi c/o malga Priu. Nuova strada forestale da mappare. La mulattiera che scende da malga Mezesnik si trasforma in carrereccia in prossimità di malga Priu.
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
39554421~ 2 years agoopenedPan Perníček
♦14,171
Forwarding anonymous report from #Mapycz user, please verify: There's a spring.
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5168960
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopened---Old path here. Newly built forest road with different routing. Old path no longer walkable.
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
28015841~ 5 years agoopenedStephen McPuppaUnable to answer "What is the material of this power pole?" for https://osm.org/node/2419588885 via StreetComplete 33.1: nessun palo
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5452096
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 2 months agoopenedWiggins118
♦2
"É il giardino di casa mia e non esiste nessun memoriale nelle vicinanze " The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T00:42:02Z POI has no name POI types: historic-memorial #organicmaps android 2026.07.23-6-Google
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
4462670
Category: unknown
1~ 2 years agoopened---Hammerack Hotel
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
4881412
Category: unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedsilat
♦203
#mapycom our user indicates maxspeed 70kmh
2~ 1 month agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5100395
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopenedsoshial
♦73
I think the hiking path goes on the west path, not east
2~ 4 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Hm, can you provide some proof?
3~ 4 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
Can't remember now, but I think both were marked with markacija, but the left one had newer painted more recently.
4~ 2 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Was here recently. I saw markacija on the right path, while on the left there were drawn two red marks, kind of like an arrow. Anyway, I suggest to keep it as it was, so let's close this note if that's ok with you.
5~ 2 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Just to be sure, "right"=East ?
6~ 2 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
If markacija is on the east then let's leave it as is.
7~ 2 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5418860
Category: Unknown
1~ 2 months agoopenedsoshial
♦73
A landslide happened this year or last year and the path completely disappeared. I couldn't find it. If someone finds a visible path, please comment out here and please improve the correct position of it. Maybe @mk2k22?
2~ 2 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
I see very strong Strava heatmap activity here, so it seems the path is fine as per what's currently mapped? If I'm not mistaken Strava heatmap shows the gps traces from the past 12 months and is being updated monthly (I could be wrong tho), but from what I can tell it seems the path here is still frequented as is. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the current situation on ground, as I haven't hiked here in a while. Maybe someone else can chime in.
3~ 2 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
Gemini said: > Global Heatmap: This map displays aggregated, public activity data from the last 12 months. It is updated monthly. So this landslide might have happened this spring and noone hiked there since? It's possible, IDK
5033467
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedsoshial
♦73
Planinska pot is here (I saw markings on this path), but I couldn't find it on PZS map. Need clarification
2~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Can't really find it on the official maps, so it may be just a "wild" markacija you saw?
3~ 10 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
I also couldn't find. What's a "wild markacija" in your opinion? =D
4~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Well, you wrote that you "saw markings" on this path - I thought it was some 'rogue' markacijas that you saw. Or did you mean sth else by that?
5~ 10 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
I saw "Knáfelčeva markácija", the classic one. I dont think it can wild markation. WDYT?
6~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Sometimes you can spot Knafelčeva markacija in some areas that are not officially recognized by PZS as marked routes. Those markacijas may have been drawn by random rogue individuals. That's what I meant by "wild markacija".
7~ 10 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
Let's leave the note here unresolved. Maybe I'll go there and try to check where this path goes. Maybe it's a real hiking path that noone has put on maps yet?
8~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
I can see a few Strava heatmap gps traces + some sort of a path on the Lidar layer leading to the Borovniščica stream SE, but it'd be better if you could record a gpx and then we can see if it aligns with lidar/gps traces.
9~ 4 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Any update here?
10~ 4 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
Sorry, I haven't been here yet since. Maybe @mk2k22 has been here?
11~ 4 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
No update here - I can draw a path according to the few Strava gps traces if you likd.
12~ 4 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
like*
13~ 4 months agocommentedsoshial
♦73
Sure, please do! Hvala
14~ 2 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5314654
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedivanbranco
♦14,059
is this street art piece located here? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Invader_-_LJU_13
2~ 3 months agoclosedDrRogla
♦4
https://maps.app.goo.gl/jnpR7PeD66i7EiwU9 It seems to be, yes.
3~ 3 months agoreopenedivanbranco
♦14,059
4~ 3 months agocommentedivanbranco
♦14,059
let's keep the note open as a reminder to map it then, if it's ok with you I can't add it myself because Google Maps is not a compatible source
5~ 2 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
It's still there. But how to map it?
6~ 2 months agoclosedLovranNot important for OSM.
7~ 2 months agoreopenedivanbranco
♦14,059
8~ 2 months agocommentedivanbranco
♦14,059
in OSM we don't map according to notability or importance. We map what's physically present on the ground Invader art can be mapped as: tourism=artwork artist_name=Invader artist:wikidata=Q1671666 artwork_subject=street_art artwork_type=mosaic support=wall
9~ 2 months agocommentedLovranWhy don't you get it done, then?
10~ 2 months agocommentedivanbranco
♦14,059
because I can't survey it myself, so I opened the note asking a local to check it, and if confirmed, map it
11~ 2 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
"Not important for OSM." I agree with ivanbranco that "importance" is not a criterion for mappability in OSM. ------------------ Lovran, it is somewhat confusing that you speak with so much authority; yet this account is very young and void of activity. Would you mind giving other mappers some context?
12~ 2 months agocommentedLovranMy opinion is that it is not the job of OSM to post a picture on a wall. If so, here in this forum trillions and trillions of pictures would have to be posted all over the world. Therefore I change the word importance for relevance: This picture is irrelevant.
13~ 2 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Firstly, it seems to be relevant to someone. Secondly, and more importantly, there is a clear community consensus on what is mappable: - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Scope - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations#Not_everything_is_mappable_in_OSM --------------- "If so, here in this forum trillions and trillions of pictures would have to be posted all over the world." No. Many things *can* be mapped, but nothing *must* be mapped. Things only get mapped if somebody decides to do so. ----------- Your efforts to improve the map are much appreciated. Why not start by mapping some things yourself? Here is a beginner's guide: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Join_the_community The first steps can be learned quickly and mapping is a lot of fun!
14~ 2 months agocommentedLovranI do not want to learn how to map. I only want to deliver infos about things from which I know that they are wrong or outdated or think that they are irrelevant or even spam. But if this picture is really so important for you: Why don't you map it yourself and then close this note ?
15~ 2 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
I don't map it because I haven't verified that it actually exists. "existence" is a criterion for mappability in OSM. I guess you'll just have to put up with this note remaining unresolved for the moment. :-) Sure, it's your own decision in what way you choose to contribute. Should you ever decide to start mapping later, you're welcome to do so anytime!
16~ 2 months agocommentedLovranOkay, very good answer. I can and do easily accept all of your comment.
17~ 2 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Great, thanks! By the way, I dislike unresolved notes as much as you do. :-) But sometimes, they just can't be resolved without going there and checking on ground.
18~ 2 months agoclosedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
I've duplicated this note so mappers on the ground don't have to read through all this. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5428629
4940988
Category: Organicmaps
1~ 1 year agoopenedxlambein
♦1
"water is marked as non potable" OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-08T13:08:07Z POI has no name POI types: amenity-drinking_water #organicmaps android
2~ 3 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
43526271~ 2 years agoopenedGoskj
♦6
Strada a pagamento via StreetComplete_ee 58.2
2~ 3 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5161249
Category: Unknown
1~ 8 months agoopenedJanez ZavasnikZasebno zemljišče ni prehoda
2~ 7 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Pozdravljeni, kakor vem, se je tukaj včasih hodilo na razgledišče Skroti. Je sedaj prav kakšna tabla za zasebno zemljišče na terenu?
3~ 3 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Let's trust the report an tag it as access=private?
4~ 3 months agoclosedJanez ZavasnikTo je bilo včasih ko ni bilo ceste do hiše,sedaj po teka cesta po drugi strani in čez parcelo ni več prehoda
5~ 3 months agoreopenedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
6~ 3 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Ok, potem pa najbolje, da se označi kot access=private...
7~ 3 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
If it doesn't exists in the real world anymore, I'd just remove it from the map.
8~ 3 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Yes, as long as the path doesn’t exist anymore on the ground, then def remove it. But If it still exists yet is private, only the access=private tag should be added I guess.
9~ 3 months agoclosedJanez Zavasnik
10~ 3 months agoreopenedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
11~ 3 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Path removed.
12~ 3 months agoclosedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184241270
5294811
Category: Unknown
1~ 4 months agoopenedivanbranco
♦14,059
memorial to be mapped around here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pod_tem_orehom_je_bil_odlikovan_dvanajstletni_A._M._Slom%C5%A1ek_ob_prvi_%C5%A1olski_sku%C5%A1nji_l._1812.jpg
2~ 4 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5113162
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopened---bike shop no longer exists
2~ 4 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
4385544
Category: unknown
1~ 2 years agoopened---Saisera Hutte
2~ 4 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5224155
Category: Unknown
1~ 6 months agoopenedkig8472
♦280
Is Gostilna Pecolar still open? (I heard it's closed)
2~ 5 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
not true - it's "by appointment" as specified in the tag - i just called and reconfirmed with them
5176841
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopenedToniOpenStreetMapsYbrab 86 Asined 10
2~ 6 months agocommentedJanezPavelZebovec
♦247
Wht does this mean?
3~ 6 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Closing this note due to no reply.
5028191
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedGoran62
♦6
Pahole Rudi - odvetnik (attorney) je umrl (has died) 2020. https://www.kp-velenje.si/index.php/o-podjetju/pogrebi/1895-rudi-pahole-podkraj-6-11-2020
2~ 10 months agocommentedJanezPavelZebovec
♦247
Torej tu ni več odvetniške pisarne (ni je nihče nasledil ali kaj podobnega)?
3~ 6 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Kaj potem, še obstaja ta pisarna ali ne??
4~ 6 months agoclosedJanezPavelZebovec
♦247
Imaš prav. Sem odstranil. Verjetno sem razmišljal, da bi to lahko bila neka večja odvetniška pisarna, ampak vidim, da je le neka zasebna znotraj stanovanjskega bloka.
5184054
Category: Unknown
1~ 7 months agoopened---Start
2~ 7 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
19634861~ 6 years agoopenedjurejorgoscrocefisso (pos. approssimata)
2~ 7 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5111475
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopenedLittleMonkeyFella86
♦9
Eltras d.o.o.
2~ 7 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
dodano
4902171
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 year agoopenedMarc Aurèle
♦147
Work in progress via StreetComplete 59.3 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/297372.jpg
2~ 7 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Reopened on 4. feb.
5121694
Category: Unknown
1~ 9 months agoopened---Vernar
2~ 7 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5166867
Category: CoMaps
1~ 8 months agoopenedk0b0
♦9
"Permanently closed" OSM snapshot date: 2026-02-07T17:28:58Z POI name: Trta POI types: wheelchair-no cuisine-pizza amenity-restaurant #CoMaps android 2026.02.09-4
2~ 7 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5090358
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopenedrichlv
♦3,369
Path here
2~ 9 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
where does it lead?
3~ 9 months agocommentedrichlv
♦3,369
Not quite sure, my traces are a bit lower quality. Might need a bit of a survey.
4~ 3 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Not this one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971761709
5~ 3 months agocommentedrichlv
♦3,369
I think not - here we are approaching the road on the path you linked to: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1736694960336300 And here we are entering the one on the opposite side of the road: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1276040864021879
6~ 3 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Thanks. I've added it.
7~ 3 months agoclosedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184361427
5098567
Category: LocusMap
1~ 9 months agoopened---Lovska opazovalnica #LocusMap
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5086554
Category: CoMaps
1~ 10 months agoopenedanzl
♦13
"Parking is not free" OSM snapshot date: 2025-11-23T09:12:00Z POI has no name POI types: fee-no amenity-parking #CoMaps android 2025.11.25-4
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
changed to fee=yes
5070210
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Zbirno mesto.
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070211
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---1. točka
2~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Kakšne točke so to?
3~ 10 months agocommentedJanezPavelZebovec
♦247
Zgleda kot zasebne opombe v zvezi s kako orientacijo :)
4~ 9 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
Sem mislil, da so morda še kakšne trim točke.. drugače pa potem zaprimo te odprte 'note'...
5~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070212
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Druga točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070213
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Tretja točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070215
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Četrta točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070216
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Peta točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070217
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Šesta točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070218
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Sedma točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070219
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Osma točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070220
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Osma točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5070221
Category: Unknown
1~ 10 months agoopened---Deveta točka
2~ 9 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
Ker ni bilo specificirano, za kakšne točke gre, sklepamo, da gre za neke osebne orientacijske točke, ki pa ne spadajo v OSM.
5013203
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 11 months agoopenedsfphoton
♦259
Unable to answer "What’s the name of this place?" – Fast Food – https://osm.org/way/1268112891 via StreetComplete 61.3: This is just a duplicate POI for Besim Hajdari
2~ 10 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
5073267
Category: CoMaps
1~ 10 months agoopenedYak & Zebra"Path does not exist" The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-22T03:20:49Z POI has no name POI types: highway-path #CoMaps android 2025.11.25-4-FDroid
2~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
What path in particular are you referring to?
3~ 4 months agoclosedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
In the lidar imagery, it's still very well visible.
4930186
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedsoshial
♦73
These three paths should be mapped.
2~ 10 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
where do they lead to?
3~ 3 months agoclosedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/184196211 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0
5027243
Category: Unknown
1~ 11 months agoopenedscabiosa_trenta
♦16
The course of the upper part of the stream Trebuščica seems wrong.
2~ 11 months agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
seems to have indeed been quite terribly mapped.. i attempted to somewhat improve it now as per Lidar
3~ 11 months agocommentedscabiosa_trenta
♦16
Thank you! I have just placed a note to mark a task to be done in hopefully-not-too-distant future, hoping also that somebody will come up with some idea how to fix it. Unfortunately the vegetation is too dense and just from aerial photos nothing much can be seen.
4~ 10 months agocommentedBojanKras
♦119
If it helps, here you can download a file with rivers (first one) it is a zip file, then you upload to josm and it shows. http://www.evode.gov.si/index.php?id=104
5~ 3 months agocommentedmartianfreeloader
♦2,135
Looks pretty good now. Can we close this?
6~ 3 months agoclosedscabiosa_trenta
♦16
Indeed, seems OK now!
4934949
Category: Unknown
1~ 1 year agoopenedsoshial
♦73
Please, check for paths and tracks here at this intersection
2~ 1 year agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
I refined it now as per lidar... i hope that fixes it.
3~ 1 year agocommentedsoshial
♦73
I appreciate your effort, thanks! Although I was unsure about the type of road (path or track) and surface data — these have to be checked on the ground.
4~ 1 year agocommentedmk2k22
♦661
If I remember right the surface is "ground/earth" and it's a wide path (but it could be classified as track too, I guess. Would still need to be rechecked on the ground.
5~ 11 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
4967262
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 year agoopenedBo Jenkins
♦4
Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Zlata ribica (Restaurant) – https://osm.org/node/261039443 via StreetComplete 61.3: Restaurant is now called Balthasar
2~ 11 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
fixed
4909815
Category: OsmAnd
1~ 1 year agoopenedGBAB
♦1,001
building=house #OsmAnd
2~ 11 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
added
5002275
Category: StreetComplete
1~ 1 year agoopenedvrabcek
♦22
Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Path – https://osm.org/way/399420502 via StreetComplete 61.3: This path doesn't exist
2~ 11 months agoclosedmk2k22
♦661
I removed it now.