Mateusz Konieczny for the last 12 MonthsMateusz Konieczny for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5570112 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12768286164 is it really a roller coaster? |
| 2 | ~ 7 hours ago | commented | Remlicht89 ♦783 | If you look a bit closer, you have your answer... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1378874596 | |
| 3 | ~ 4 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | yes, I have seen this tagging - that is why I opened the note | |
| 4 | ~ 3 hours ago | commented | Remlicht89 ♦783 | So why not change it instead of the rhetorical question? You can see on the tagging that it's tagged as a waterslide. You can see on aerial photos that it's a slide and that the whole place looks a lot like a swimmingpool / water playground. But still you have to ask if it's a rollercoaster? | |
| 5 | ~ 3 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Because I was approximately as sure in some other cases and (very rarely) my impression was wrong based on extra confirmation I will edit this one | |
| 5539953 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | substation=valv was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1540102763/history Maybe substation=valve was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185924327 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 hours ago | commented | Waldmax ♦0 | thank you, I just corrected this | |
| 4 | ~ 4 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5570342 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 12 hours ago | opened | oo-O-oo ♦3,975 | асфальт дальше #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | this kind of detail is useful to mark. but making notes is not really helpful making single edit with StreetComplete / Vespucci / GoMap!! / on osm.org is more useful than 10 000 notes like this | |
| 3 | ~ 10 hours ago | commented | oo-O-oo ♦3,975 | Son teaches his own father how to fuck. | |
| 4 | ~ 10 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | If you solve them unlike say https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/oo-O-oo/notes?page=250&status=open it is entirely fine but you should not consider likely that others will be able and willing to add surface= based on that | |
| 5 | ~ 10 hours ago | commented | oo-O-oo ♦3,975 | Thank you for the intrusion and unsolicited advice. Before commenting further please consider following. I drive my car and make notes behind steering wheel. It is unsafe to do that and I am okay with that. But it is waaay unsafer to perform edits while driving 80km/hour. Also not every place or country has full coverage of internet. I enter Kyrgyzstan or any other country and do not bother to or obliged to buy local simcard so I am 100% offline and my notes are my homework. I return home and map safely on my desktop. | |
| 6 | ~ 10 hours ago | commented | oo-O-oo ♦3,975 | Thank you for the intrusion and unsolicited advice. Before commenting further please consider following. I drive my car and make notes behind steering wheel. It is unsafe to do that and I am okay with that. But it is waaay unsafer to perform edits while driving 80km/hour. Also not every place or country has full coverage of internet. | |
| 5571197 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232896555 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2412140866 soooo... os it golf or disc golf? |
| 5571194 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5753060469 gluing to road is wrong, right? |
| 2 | ~ 10 hours ago | commented | Mex ♦8,461 | yeah unlikely to be in the road surface | |
| 5519153 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 29 days ago | opened | gavekk ♦53 | PROSZE O POZOSTAWIENIE UWAGI Należy zweryfikować numer tej drogi w terenie, gdy pojawi się oznakowanie, oficjalnie to S19, ale oznakowanie możliwe, że będzie wskazywało S16/S8. |
| 2 | ~ 29 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | pojawi, czyli na razie go nie ma? | |
| 3 | ~ 22 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jaki jest sens kiszenia tej uwagi jak na razie oznakowania brak? | |
| 4 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | puchaczowsky ♦2,024 | na razie to będzie DK65 | |
| 5 | ~ 12 hours ago | reopened | gavekk ♦53 | ||
| 6 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | gavekk ♦53 | To będzie tylko DK65, czy będzie też S19/S16/S8? | |
| 7 | ~ 11 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | otwórz uwagę jak będziesz wiedział że jest błąd | |
| 8 | ~ 11 hours ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 9 | ~ 11 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | lub napisz do tego kto te ref= dodał jak myślisz że za wcześnie na to | |
| 10 | ~ 3 hours ago | closed | puchaczowsky ♦2,024 | https://s1-gddkia.3ck.pl/img/uploads/2026/09/04/km_ok_33_000.jpg zamykam | |
| 5569026 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | --- | Skrócić budowe S74. Nie obejmue fragmentu obok planowego węzła Łagów |
| 2 | ~ 11 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147583850/history | |
| 3 | ~ 11 hours ago | commented | AndyB_66 ♦68 | Granica kontraktu jest nieco dalej na wschód - otagowałem punkty na trasie. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 hours ago | closed | AndyB_66 ♦68 | Skróciłem i poprawiłem znaczniki. | |
| 5551767 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 days ago | opened | --- | GDDKiA Kielce Rejon Starachowice |
| 2 | ~ 11 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | o co chodzi? | |
| 5551772 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 days ago | opened | --- | https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-kielce/rejony |
| 2 | ~ 11 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | o co chodzi? | |
| 5549135 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | --- | W tym miejscu nie ma parkingu publicznego. To jest teren szkoły |
| 2 | ~ 11 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333429198 nie jest zaznaczone jako parking publiczny lub prywatny | |
| 5550107 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | --- | access=forestry |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138793959 czyli zakaz wejścia? wątpię | |
| 5564659 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | --- | Nazwa drogi: Zachodnie Obejście Szczecina |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | to brzmi jak nazwa inwestycji, nie drogi nie ma też podanego źródła nadania tej nazwy | |
| 5553332 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | --- | tu motorway link |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | nie | |
| 5554359 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | Miguelitoo ♦137 | "hydrant nadziemny 2 złączki chodnik" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI has no name POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant #organicmaps android 2026.08.27-18-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | zamierzasz te notki przerobić? może edytuj czymś lepszym jak GoMap!! / Vespucci / StreetComplete co nie oczekuje że inni posprzątają | |
| 5554266 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | Miguelitoo ♦137 | "hydrant nadziemny 2 złączki trawa" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI has no name POI types: emergency-fire_hydrant #organicmaps android 2026.08.27-18-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14248053801 | |
| 5568638 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | Hubert12345 ♦12 | tutaj jest las wyciety i coś tutaj bedą budować |
| 2 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | AndyB_66 ♦68 | Notki nie służą do umieszczania tego typu komentarzy. | |
| 3 | ~ 12 hours ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jak las jest wycięty to błędne dane mamy | |
| 5569231 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | 2t8x9w ♦85 | Czy tutaj jest Auchan? |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jest zmapowany obok - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046449017 coś z tym źle? | |
| 5569250 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | 2t8x9w ♦85 | Czy tutaj jest Auchan? |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jest zmapowane uwaga nie podaje czemu byłoby to błędne | |
| 5569311 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | --- | Czy tutaj jest Pepco? |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jest zmapowane https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12666613845 uwaga nie podaje czemu byłoby to błędne zamykam bez zmian | |
| 5569312 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | --- | Czy tutaj jest DPD Pickup Station PL89885? |
| 2 | ~ 12 hours ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12863302658 | |
| 5570113 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3741911853 is it really a roller coaster? |
| 5570107 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/390450224/history it seems to be rather leisure=slipway |
| 5570037 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 14 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/96122419 viewpoint should be where people observe, not at observed location |
| 5570032 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 14 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33264622 is there really an extra lighthouse in fence surrounding the lighthouse? |
| 5570007 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 14 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26430406 is highway=service really appropriate here? from my memory it seems nowadays for bicycles and foot traffic - maybe it highway=cycleway foot=designated would be more accurate ? |
| 5569983 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | node/559514306 is there really barrier=height_restrictor on path? |
| 5569982 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/559514306 is there really barrier=height_restrictor on footway? |
| 2 | ~ 15 hours ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5569972 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 hours ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/356641263 loading dock directly on highway=secondary ? |
| 2 | ~ 11 hours ago | closed | bxl-forever_repair ♦623 | I agree with you, this is a mistake. It should be either left or right of this road, but it is very hard to survey and there is no imagery for this part (which is a tunnel under the town). I removed the tags. We’ll examine if someone can possibly survey and reintroduce the data, but this time by attaching the node to a building and not to the road. Fixed, thanks. | |
| 3661097 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | Claas Augner ♦317 | Missing street |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Hi. Are you talking about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180833926 or is there something else missing that is not (clearly) visible on the aerial imagery? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 day ago | commented | ut0a6c ♦71 | Private street | |
| 4 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | no response, closing | |
| 5568176 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300951745/history cliff? within retaining wall? |
| 5568011 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 day ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | www.openstreetmap.org/node/661019443 should be highway=ladder - probably |
| 2 | ~ 1 day ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/661019443/history - edited 15 years ago so not pinging original mapper | |
| 5463856 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3785395985/history Are you sure it is Rostic's fast food of KFC brand? AFAIK these are two distinct brands Can you remove an incorrect one? (or let me know that I am wrong and it is somehow correct mix?) |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Олег1993 ♦84 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | remain not fixed and not answered | |
| 5 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Олег1993 ♦84 | Due to sanctions, KFC was renamed Rostic’s. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 day ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 7 | ~ 1 day ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then brand=KFC is wrong, right? As it is now branded differently the same for other brand: tags | |
| 5567780 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318003644 8m wide waterway=ditch ? |
| 2 | ~ 23 hours ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦16,300 | not sure about other languages but it seems perfectly fine per the wiki | |
| 5567640 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/293246281 is it really public transport if it moves goods? |
| 5567638 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274268209 is it really public transport if it moves goods? |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/274268214 | |
| 3 | ~ 15 hours ago | closed | PPete2 ♦7,281 | corrected | |
| 5567489 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/870744198/history lane count seems wrong here and elsewhere also on this motorway |
| 5567483 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/94829731 where this fire hydrant merged into station actually is? |
| 5567479 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2387295896 is it really correctly placed and tagged? trailhead disconnected from any path? |
| 5463857 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4387179621/history Are you sure it is Rostic's fast food of KFC brand? AFAIK these are two distinct brands Can you remove an incorrect one? (or let me know that I am wrong and it is somehow correct mix?) |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Олег1993 ♦84 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Олег1993 ♦84 | Due to sanctions, KFC was renamed Rostic’s. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 6 | ~ 2 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then brand=KFC is wrong, right? As it is now branded differently the same for other brand: tags | |
| 7 | ~ 2 days ago | commented | Олег1993 ♦84 | I can see now that all the information is correct. | |
| 8 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | s777n ♦12,221 | Олег1993, No. It wasnt. It still was wrong. brand, brand:wikidata and other tags still were saying "KFC". Fixed | |
| 5567079 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4508535431 should it be really glues to a road? |
| 5566886 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253778486 bicycle parking glues to river? |
| 5566873 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8634538118 camp site in city? |
| 5566802 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271121808/history definitely misplaced also, is it maybe waterway=weir ? |
| 5563354 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 days ago | opened | Aleksandr Tata ♦80 | OsmAnd QA 5591-20261009-R3. Retest only, no map change required. Will be closed. |
| 2 | ~ 4 days ago | closed | Aleksandr Tata ♦80 | QA test complete. No map change required; closing test note. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | make test notes on test server, not live one | |
| 5295757 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | F |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295792 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | وجبات سريعة |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295790 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | مطعم الاقامة |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5296393 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | idara-eliqama |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5296391 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | maslahat-iwa2 |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295762 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | J |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295765 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | L |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295774 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | المرشات |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295767 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | N |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | Added N ... | |
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295766 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | M |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295759 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | G |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295761 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | I |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295777 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | ملعب رملي |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295771 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | ملعب الإقامة |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295780 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | مصلى الاعتصام |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295752 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | A |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5295760 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Lon312 | H |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | yamada-as ♦1,131 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | reopened | Lon312 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5566610 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1201173718 is it really crossing with subway? |
| 5566609 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10216220733 is it really crossing with subway? |
| 5566608 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10216220732#map=19/39.848008/116.670404 is it really crossing with subway? |
| 5492371 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | matheussaraivaleao ♦3 | This place does not exist: "Estação de Metrô em construção." A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-14T04:20:21Z POI name: Anglo Vestibulares POI types: amenity-school #CoMaps android 2026.08.07-3-Google |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny - bot account ♦40,543 | closing note that is duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5490527 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Tonyaaaaaaa | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | this object does not exist anymore, right? | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | I meant that it does not exist anymore in OSM | |
| 7 | ~ 3 days ago | reopened | Tonyaaaaaaa | ||
| 8 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5564085 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479251145 what it is? underpass area? it needs some main tag man_made=tunnel ? But I think it is for road tunnels... man_made=underground_passage ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | hauke-stieler ♦1,735 | It can be used as underpass but is mainly the entrance area for the subway. It's an area between the road and the platform. I added the indoor=corridor tag and removed the tunnel-tag, because it's not meant for areas. I think now it's correctly tagged, isn't it? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | G4rden3r ♦5,584 | looks good to me | |
| 5564016 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/759408788 - is it really arid if connected to a spring? |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | maybe it is intermittent like spring? | |
| 5564015 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/354446566 spring glued to road? |
| 5564014 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42783077 that is better tagged as waterway=stream, right ? |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | closed | limes11 ♦9,500 | That's a problem with the meaning of the word "stream". It German, the obvious translation "Strom" means a very large river, which is totally inadequate here. "brook" translates to "Bach" (like the composer) which is what the mapper had in mind and which fits. In English however, "stream" is a very general term that says nothing about the size or volume of the body of water. So, as often, while these words have the same German origin, their meaning developed differently over the centuries. Anyways, I changed it. | |
| 5552519 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1158439984/history has tower:platforms = 1,3,5 What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... |
| 2 | ~ 4 days ago | commented | daganzdaanda ♦2,442 | I would guess the diving tower has a platform at 1m, 3m and 5m? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | in such case how it would be tagged? tower:platforms=3 tower:platforms:height=1,3,5 ? (second tag is my ATYL invention) Though maybe it has three tower, not single one with three platforms? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | daganzdaanda ♦2,442 | Your tag invention sounds good and should be easy to understand. On the city's website there's some info about the renovations they had: https://www.stadt-mindelheim.de/unsere-stadt/kommunale-projekte/freibad-sanierung The text mentions > a separate diving pool with a 1 m springboard, as well as 3 m and 5 m platforms and you can kind of make it out on the picture as well. The 1m springboard is next to the tower. Do we have a tag for that? | |
| 5 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | daganzdaanda ♦2,442 | I just saw that the German wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tower:type%3Ddiving recommends tower:platforms=* while the English version has platforms=* only. Maybe we should have the same on both. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:platforms actually mentions the diving tower usage, while it's not (yet) on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:platforms which was only recently added by you. I will add the diving tower info on that page. | |
| 6 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | daganzdaanda ♦2,442 | platforms=* is only used 58 times with diving towers: https://qlever.dev/osm-planet/ub3HAp tower:platforms=* is found 420 times with diving towers: https://qlever.dev/osm-planet/SM7ymD I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Ddiving should be changed to also use tower:platforms | |
| 5294234 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Karol Bujaček ♦38 | Unable to answer "This shop has been vacant. What’s here now?" – Vacant Shop – https://osm.org/node/2311111828 via StreetComplete 61.3: Z popisu mi nie je jasné ako toto označiť. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/344782.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | ticho2 ♦320 | Zhruba takto: shop=beauty opening_hours="by appointment" Vid: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbeauty https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours Mozno este pridat aj tag "appointment=only". | |
| 3 | ~ 4 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | edited lets see how long this shop=beauty will manage to exist | |
| 5196411 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267885802/history construction=yes is a bad idea and should be avoided, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aconstruction%3Dyes Also, is it even still under construction? |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Lyon-St-Clair ♦524 | finished | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then construction=yes should be removed | |
| 5 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Lyon-St-Clair ♦524 | I already did it, it was unnecessary to reopen | |
| 6 | ~ 5 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 7 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | nope, not removed from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/267885802/history | |
| 8 | ~ 4 days ago | closed | Lyon-St-Clair ♦524 | done | |
| 5562170 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11113981137 marina with zero capacity? This does not make much sense maybe it is simply a small pier? |
| 5561830 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/509287218 is it intentional that this stile is next to a path? |
| 5525134 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849158471 is it still operated by military? if yes, then it probably should be operator:type=military not operator=military |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Laci ♦187 | The area can be accessed by anyone and afaik is not used for anything, it's a nature reserve | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then operator=military probably should be removed | |
| 4 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | qstep ♦761 | I'm not even sure the trenches are there anymore, or if they even existed. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then it is probably better to check that | |
| 5561391 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | aeroway=parking_position node within aeroway=parking_position way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/277842785 is it a valid tagging? probably no, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element |
| 5540328 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | --- | torów juz w ogole nie ma |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402915160 chodzi? | |
| 5512758 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Hansov ♦2 | remont drogi |
| 2 | ~ 18 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jakiś długi? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | bez odpowiedzi, zakładam że krótki i się już skończył | |
| 5559903 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Wally_PL ♦109 | Czy aby na pewno ta droga ma mieć taki powykręcany przebieg? |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1531914598/history | |
| 3 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | Gigiliusz ♦13 | Tak, jest taka powykręcana. Nie jest to 1:1 ale wzorowałem się na projekcie z tej strony i tak to ma wyglądać: https://twojekonsultacje.pl/inwestycje/budowa-drogi-gminnej-w-miejscowosci-grabnik/ | |
| 5560272 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | --- | Jest czynna wg informacji ze strony https://manufakturabarbara.pl |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3802873968 | |
| 5560578 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | --- | Zła lokalizacja na mapie .. adres Ludwików 11a z kodem pocztowym 21-077 to lokalizacja Polska, Województwo Lubelskie, Powiat Łęczyńskim, Gmina Spiczyn, |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5560590 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 day ago | commented | lukabułka ♦702 | zła lokalizacja czego? nie ma tu w okolicy numeru domu 11a | |
| 5560590 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | JACEKKPL56 | To jest prawidłowa lokalizacja dla adresu 21-077 Ludwików 11a |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5560578 | |
| 3 | ~ 1 day ago | closed | lukabułka ♦702 | adres jest na mapie | |
| 5560554 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | --- | My house where is near notingham road |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | fajnie | |
| 5561107 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | maraf24 ♦16,509 | Błędny budynek, powinien być teren budowy. |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1539796839 zmieniłem, nie wiem czy coś jeszcze nie jest skopane ale to jest już dobrze | |
| 5561249 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | --- | Poprawić Geometrie |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189746794 | |
| 5349821 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13866913333/history this name ("Plage" on natural=beach) is a description and can be removed, right? |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | GeorgeKaplan ♦27,926 | Yes | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | purged then | |
| 5523350 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 26 days ago | opened | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Do połączenia w jedną linię highway=path zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Drogi_dla_pieszych_i_rower%C3%B3w. via StreetComplete_ee 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/371564.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | kubzon7 ♦185 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189902545, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189924914, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189935267 Połączyłem na Wojska Polskiego, Kujawskiej, Trasie Uniwersyteckiej, proszę o przejrzenie zmian w razie jakiegoś chochlika przy edycji i zamknięcie uwagi. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 days ago | closed | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Dużo zmian, ciężko wszystko zweryfikować. Ale z tego co widziałem wcześniej, nie było błędów w Twoich edycjach, więc zamknę uwagę. Dzięki za dostosowanie mapowania do zalecanego przez dokumentację :) | |
| 4 | ~ 9 days ago | reopened | YomanNH ♦3,361 | ||
| 5 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Został dokonany wandalizm przez Yog Sota i sztuczny podział ma dwie linie, więc ponownie aktywuję uwagę. | |
| 6 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | 1) w której edycji 2) wątpię by wandalizm, wandalizm jest jak się celowo psuje | |
| 7 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | 1) Szybko patrząc na historię edycji (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170759661/history), @kubzon7 usunął sztuczny podział ciągu pieszo-rowerowego na dwie linie w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189935267, a chwilę później jego poprawki zostały wycofane przez Yog Sota w zestawach zmian https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189998832 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190000930, gdzie ponownie stworzył dwie osobne linie, pomimo braku fizycznej separacji, co idealnie widać na zdjęciu w niniejszej uwadze. 2a) Jak w takim razie nazwać celowe rozdzielanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych w Bydgoszczy zaraz po tym, jak ktoś inny (ja i @kubzon7) je poprawiliśmy, żeby spełniały wytyczne dokumentacji? 2b) Jak nazwać tworzenie nieoznakowanych przejść dla pieszych (crossing=unmarked) i dodawanie do nich informacji, że mają zebrę (crossing:markings=zebra)? Już 59 takich tworów jest w Bydgoszczy, wszystkie stworzone przez Yog Sota: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%0Anwr%5B%22crossing%22%3D%22unmarked%22%5D%5B%22crossing%3Amarkings%22%3D%22zebra%22%5D%28%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D%29%3B%0Aout%20geom%3B&C=53.128028%3B18.101692%3B12. Dokumentacja jasno mówi o crossing=unmarked: "This tag is used for pedestrian crossings without zebra crossing or traffic signals". Po zwróceniu na to uwagi, nie przestał tworzyć takich bzdur, tylko wymyślał dziwne arguumenty, że ma rację i kontynuował ich tworzenie. Dyskusja w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189872947. 2c) Jak nazwać usuwanie informacji o nawierzchniach części pieszej i rowerowej, co widać chociażby w historii tej drogi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694052437/history ? 2d) Jak nazwać tworzenie przejazdów rowerowych https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564529395 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1564529394, po których nie można chodzić pieszo (bicycle=designated + foot=no) w miejscu, gdzie jest dzikie przejście przez drogę? | |
| 8 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Podsumowując, oto lista wątpliwych edycji Yog Sota w Bydgoszczy: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189872947 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189879653 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189880353 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189998832 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190000930 Może jest tam jeszcze więcej błędów. | |
| 9 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Co jest złego z https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190000930 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189998832 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189880353 ? | |
| 10 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | "2a) Jak w takim razie nazwać celowe rozdzielanie ciągów pieszo-rowerowych w Bydgoszczy zaraz po tym, jak ktoś inny (ja i @kubzon7) je poprawiliśmy, żeby spełniały wytyczne dokumentacji?" bycie w błędzie nie oznacza że jest to celowe psucie | |
| 11 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Zapytałem się w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189998832 i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189895780 | |
| 12 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | > bycie w błędzie nie oznacza że jest to celowe psucie Tak, jeśli nikt nie wyjaśni użytkownikowi, że jest w błędzie. Jednak było już wiele dyskusji na ten temat w których uczestniczył również Yog Sot. | |
| 13 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > Tak, jeśli nikt nie wyjaśni użytkownikowi, że jest w błędzie. Jednak było już wiele dyskusji na ten temat w których uczestniczył również Yog Sot. bycie upartym i niezdolnym do zmiany opinii mimo iż jest na to odpowiedni moment to co innego niż wandalizm | |
| 5561330 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12375028392 is it zip line or roller coaster? |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | commented | caprieldeluca ♦489 | There are zip lines and board walks. The "stations" are like columns with a platform (https://www.cadena3.com/admin/playerswf/fotos/ARCHI_1048529.jpg). How do you think they should be tagged? | |
| 5561323 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2009961 barrier=lift_gate ? |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | not barrier=swing_gate by any chance? | |
| 5561293 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1002258769 level crossing? on busway? |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | Jordi MF ♦14,243 | He eliminado el "level crossing". Probablemente, se debió a un error trasladado desde el level_crosing cercano. | |
| 5561265 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/416464929 that is not highway=service, right? Or it is not blocked by that turnstile? |
| 5560961 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/124393806 tram on railway=rail ? |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | 0xb7767000 ♦2,932 | looks fine from my armchair perspective. There are both a tram and a train relation on that rail. Also, if both vehicles have the same gauge and get electicity somehow then I can't see a practical issue either. The biggest problem is that tram vehicles are usually much closer to the ground that trains, so the platform has to cover that height difference. But thats a construction issue, not an OSM issue. | |
| 3 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | now looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8545660#map=18/51.319402/9.484168 - it actually goes on as a tram further... tricky case | |
| 5560985 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5556892244 public transport on goods aerialway? |
| 5559602 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | --- | Powoli, powoli, jeszcze tego nie ma. Jest w trakcie budowy |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | czego konkretnie nie ma? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | jacek_zwik ♦1,263 | Ano całości. To, jak mniemam jest plan, bo jeszcze tam teren równają. | |
| 4 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/186582203 | |
| 5 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Fasha4 ♦11 | Jest to teren budowy, zostało wydane Zezwolenie na Realizację Inwestycji Drogowej oraz przekazanie placu wykonawcy, więc w najbliższym czasie również na terenie obwodu drogowego powinny dziać się prace bardziej widoczne dla oka. Fakt faktem, że zapomniałem oznaczyć budynki jako w budowie. Myślę, że ta zmiana powinna rozwiązać tą uwagę. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | "zostało wydane Zezwolenie na Realizację Inwestycji Drogowej oraz przekazanie placu wykonawcy" czyli tylko prawnie? Oznacza to że za wcześnie na mapowanie fizycznych obiektów jako w budowie Ale jak na dniach ruszą Ale te parkingi zaznaczone jako zbudowane to jeszcze nie istnieją? | |
| 7 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | jacek_zwik ♦1,263 | Mopa nie ma, równają teren, zrobili przepust pod drogą DK 11 na skrzyżowaniu z Kujakowicką Skrzyżowanie Szkolna projektowana S 11 pod Bąkowem - wylewają przyczółki wiaduktu. Wiem, że gdzieś jeszcze robili jakiś fundament, być może pod szpilą. Zobaczę jutro, jak nie zapomnę. Ogólnie trwają prace ziemne typu niwelacje, skarpowania. Okolice Protei - nic nie robią na razie ze skrzyżowaniem, podobnie Bąków (Szkolna) i Kluczbork Północ. Trwają niwelacje od ronda Ciarka w kierunku torów i dalej do projektowanych wiaduktów. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 days ago | commented | Fasha4 ♦11 | "czyli tylko prawnie" Nie, wykonawca już dawno wszedł na teren budowy i wykonuje różne prace. Można podejrzeć na stronie nadzoru https://s11-kepno-olesno.gddkia.gov.pl/ | |
| 9 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | jacek_zwik ♦1,263 | Kolega Fasha4 włączył to do terenu budowy, to kończy dywagacje. Wobec tego zamykam uwagę | |
| 5560965 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7401693852 chicane seems misplaced is it applying to footway out of school? If yes, it should be part of that way |
| 5560959 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/593684233 this ladder looks a tad suspect |
| 5560958 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/419248771 is it really waterway=dock ? not waterway=slipway ? |
| 5560954 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1184155673 border control? maybe someone tried to map security control? |
| 5560813 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1238339582 traffic calming on motorway? |
| 5560812 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1666514642 what cycleway=asl is doing here? |
| 2 | ~ 3 days ago | closed | caprieldeluca ♦489 | Thanks! Corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190326090 | |
| 5560797 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/120108475 lift gate here? Not a barrier=swing_gate by any chance? |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | LaLinea ♦2,989 | Die Barriere ist bereits als [barrier=lift_gate] erfasst: https://osm.org/node/120108475 | |
| 5560731 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12394326119 that should be inscription= not name= - right? |
| 5560635 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1138561070 is there really still active level crossing here? |
| 5560619 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6055956269 kombinacja takeaway=only i amenity=restaurant na tym Pizza Hut sensu nie ma |
| 5560346 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/155611310 is it some gate? is it painted on road? mosaic? How this Family Crest manifests here? |
| 5560345 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26241484 it should be also tagged as a gate, but how? man_made=gate ? |
| 2 | ~ 2 days ago | commented | CiaránMooney ♦249 | Its quite possible in this context that "gate" means "where you enter" rather than "big thing that stops you". Have you survey'd this? | |
| 5560340 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5023414705 pipeline=valve should attached to pipeline, not power line, right? |
| 5555018 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | --- | Błędna nazwa przystanku |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | a jaka poprawna? | |
| 5555464 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | --- | człowieku co ty pierdolisz za głupoty?było info na sklepie.teraz jest mrówka już otwarta #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5454951 tak, nie możemy kopiować z Google Maps więc czeka na weryfikacje z innych źródeł anonimowe notki, zwłaszcza z wyzwiskami, nie wystarczają | |
| 5553813 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | unjello ♦7 | Can't answer "Jaka jest tutaj jakość nawierzchni?" for https://osm.org/way/159525548 (Plac-deptak), via StreetComplete 64.0-alpha3: 2/3 od wchodu jest kostka w stanie średnim (dobra kostka ale z przerwami, hulajnoga) a pozostała część od zachody to płyty w stanie złym (rower) |
| 2 | ~ 8 days ago | commented | uprkos ♦8,317 | Nawierzchnia już jest jako 'paving_stones', jakość można ewentualnie odzworować jako smoothness, ale darowałbym sobie jeśli nie jest to jednolite. Natomiast główne pytanie - czy to jest rzeczywiście przestrzeń piesza czy po prostu parking dla (zapewne) nauczycieli... | |
| 3 | ~ 7 days ago | commented | unjello ♦7 | No nie jest jednolite. Częściowo jest to istotnie parking, ale jak to szkolny o 14 pustoszeje a mniejsze dzieci jeżdżą na rowerach, obok są ławki itd. Potrafi żyć to miejsce. Ale faktycznie może nie ma co się przejmować tą gorszą częścią. Większość jest stan hulajnogowy | |
| 4 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | unjello ♦7 | Dobra. Poprawiłem to z edytora na stronie normalnie. Aplikacja to jednak inaczej pokazuje. Dzięki za poświęconą uwagę. | |
| 5 | ~ 6 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 6 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | aplikacje często mają opóźnienie zanim im się mapy zaktualizują | |
| 5558061 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | AlBieganek | Planowany przystanek kolejowy Katowice Akademia |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | czyli na razie nie ma czego mapować? | |
| 5540738 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | ZX_OSM_USER ♦9 | Unable to answer "What diameter is specified on the sign for this fire hydrant?" – Pillar Fire Hydrant – https://osm.org/node/14219777012 via StreetComplete_ee 63.4: Image Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/373470.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | czyli nie jest podane? | |
| 5554020 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | ZX_OSM_USER ♦9 | Unable to answer "What diameter is specified on the sign for this fire hydrant?" – Pillar Fire Hydrant – https://osm.org/node/14247684388 via StreetComplete_ee 63.4: Image Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/375257.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | czyli nie jest podane? | |
| 5558271 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | ZX_OSM_USER ♦9 | Unable to answer "What can be left here for recycling?" – Recycling Bin – https://osm.org/node/14255696290 via StreetComplete_ee 63.4: "Papier", "Szkoło", "Metale i tworzywa sztuczne", "Inne" |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | inne czyli co? | |
| 5559435 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | --- | Zmienić Status drogi na serwisówkę |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jak chcesz zajmować się kategoriami istotnych dróg to zapraszamy na oficjalne forum osm | |
| 5173600 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | --- | Rozbiórka budynku dokonana https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/warszawa-rozbi%C3%B3rki-i-wyburzenia.1971369/page-35 |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | Sylabowy Kot ♦415 | Miesiąc minął a budynek nadal nie zniknął w całości, więc wcale nie dokonana. | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | jak teraz sytuacja wygląda? | |
| 4 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Sylabowy Kot ♦415 | W sumie to już stoi betonowa konstrukcja nowego budynku, więc poniekąd mamy zmapowane prawidłowo. Ale spróbuję dziś tak jak normalnie robimy - skasować zburzony budynek i oznaczyć jako nowy. | |
| 5 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Sylabowy Kot ♦415 | Uzupełniłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190164671 Tu nawet doszło do jakiegoś duplikatu uwagi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5214633 | |
| 5559188 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/383198800/history to jest chyba nieczynne i nie powinno być zaznaczone jako czynne? |
| 5558915 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131409557 is it canal or pipeline? |
| 5558912 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | I do not see this pipeline on aerial |
| 5558877 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216537772/history that name= floating Dock is description, not an actual name? Right? |
| 5525304 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52675638/history segregated=yes and cycleway:surface=paving_stones and footway:surface=paving_stones and bicycle=no seems like some kind of error - which tags of those are wrong? |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/187417559 | |
| 3 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Timo_G ♦82 | thanks :) | |
| 4 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | I removed also segregated=no footway:surface=paving_stones then | |
| 5523111 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 27 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215856856/history has wood=coniferous is it correct and safely migratable to leaf_type=needleleaved ? I was unable to check from aerial also, from aerial it does not look like a forest at all |
| 2 | ~ 27 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | or even as a tree plantation | |
| 3 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | topolusitania ♦3,327 | tree plantation of Pinus pinea | |
| 4 | ~ 8 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5 | ~ 8 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Pinus pinea? With leaf_type=broadleaved ? | |
| 5555483 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353487324 jak to na etapie wariantów jest to chyba nie ma co mapować? |
| 5555328 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/328428653/history is there really a bollard here? It seems not visible on aerial and it seems it should be visible if present here |
| 2 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | fs_LT ♦700 | is still there https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.46053229965801&lng=12.34909466495401&z=17&dateFrom=2026-05-01&pKey=1651464490326714&focus=photo&x=0.7659356531618511&y=0.576603719759932&zoom=0 | |
| 5554505 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Łącznik via StreetComplete 63.4 |
| 2 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | uprkos ♦8,317 | Dodałem. | |
| 5554353 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Fizyczne rozdzielenie jest później via StreetComplete 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/375322.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | uprkos ♦8,317 | Poprawiłem. | |
| 5141627 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | CRGARE ♦4 | Unable to answer "Is this stop lit?" – Carretera a las Palmas y Ecoterra 2 (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/9869285947 via StreetComplete 62.2: No recuerdo si hay iluminación en el parabus. |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | 🌗⚡🥷 | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 6 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > No recuerdo si hay iluminación en el parabus. in such case just do not leave a note | |
| 7 | ~ 9 days ago | reopened | Fizzie-DWG ♦7,739 | Improperly closed Notes reopened by DWG | |
| 8 | ~ 9 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | this one was invalid (though was closed by that account only by chance) | |
| 5078551 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1290609649/history still under construction for amenity = place_of_worship name = Часовня в память о скитальцах и безродных ? |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | ipbatman ♦49 | в память о погибших в войнах | |
| 3 | ~ 9 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ? the note is about that construction=yes tag | |
| 5 | ~ 4 days ago | closed | TrickyFoxy ♦15,818 | Removed the construction=yes tag — it is no longer relevant for this chapel | |
| 5085330 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | lollipop ♦678 | Schule wird derzeit abgerissen https://www.krzbb.de/inhalt.rappenbaum-areal-foerdergelder-verfallen-filter-verrostet-zukunft-des-schulcampus-ungewiss.8d8a9969-9ce3-425c-831b-1b7398dccb8b.html |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | MikeSchwenger ♦2 | Ist bereits abgerissen | |
| 3 | ~ 9 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then it needs fix in OpenStreetMap, right? | |
| 5 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | MikeSchwenger ♦2 | Yes , I am new. I can't try to remove the building on my self or you remove the building. The building has definitely been demolished. | |
| 6 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | MikeSchwenger ♦2 | I meant I could try removing the buildings there myself, but I've never done that before. | |
| 3934665 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | name=Society https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300357722 shop=salon ? Is it shop=beauty or shop=hairdresser by any chance? If shop=salon is intentional - what it means? |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | MikeSchwenger ♦2 | ||
| 3 | ~ 9 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5349739 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Delivery Shiro https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1949388817/history amenity=restaurant + delivery=only makes no sense whatsoever, either it is not a restaurant or delivery tag is wrong Maybe it is caterer=dark_kitchen ? |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | Maicon_Matos ♦3 | Esse local não é Delivery Shiro | |
| 3 | ~ 9 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 9 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then it is even more in need of a fix (rather than closing a note without action, that is unhelpful for legitimate notes) | |
| 5543438 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | --- | To jest kanał Tuga, a nie Tuja |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | A skąd to info? | |
| 3 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | B@ART ♦78 | Ciekawy przypadek - są 2 nazwy - Wikipedia podaję Tuja jako pierwszą ale po weryfikacji na StreetView tabliczki na mostach wskazują jasno że to Tuga. Tuja taguję jako nazwa alternatywna. | |
| 4 | ~ 10 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Absolutnie nie można używać Google Street View do mapowania w OpenStreetMap | |
| 5552922 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Unable to answer "What surface does this road have?" – Track / Land-Access Road – https://osm.org/way/1564722855 via StreetComplete 63.4: Od ddr pole |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5552467 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | incline=upv was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1393616326/history Maybe incline=up was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | dieterdreist ♦1,359 | I agree it is a typo | |
| 5552143 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974653711/history wait, is it really burned and demolished? I edited it based on OSM data itself but on aerial it looks existing is aerial heavily outdated? Or has I fallen for an outdated note? |
| 2 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109976494 | |
| 3 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | \Mike ♦95 | The building had not been replaced last time I went by (maybe 2 years ago) I see it's gone from Mapbox Satellite and Google, but still present in Esri and Bing. Is there any way to see how old an aerial image is? | |
| 5552140 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | incline=upv was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1527539769/history Maybe incline=up was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 5529956 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 23 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Unable to answer "Are these opening hours still correct?" – Żabka (Convenience Store) – https://osm.org/node/4749733823 via StreetComplete 63.4: W budowie, likwidacji czy co? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/372430.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | commented | Olaf56807R2 ♦41 | Nie znalazłem żadnej żabki więc nie wiem | |
| 3 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | no to pewnie w likwidacji | |
| 4 | ~ 10 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | zaznaczam jako pustostan więc, już wtedy myślałem by tego nie zrobić | |
| 5550343 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1019732579 that should be inscription= not name= - right? see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2xqt in general |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦9,474 | Actually is the distance. Done | |
| 5550333 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1214837836 shop=vacant jest chyba do zdjęcia jak tam paczkomat zamieszkał? |
| 2 | ~ 9 days ago | closed | Marek-M ♦644 | Cześć, jasne że tak. Już poprawiłem :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189972932 | |
| 5550283 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106885362 to nie jest czasem intermittent=yes ? |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | tak, płynie pod ziemią/kamieniami: ale na powierzchni na ogół chyba nie ale nie wiem na jakim odcinku jest taka śmieszna | |
| 5550228 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Railway station without railway |
| 5504217 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Alexander Aviles ♦2 | Aparte de la iglesia Católica también está situado el dispensario de la Fundación Mariana de Jesús |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Alexander Aviles ♦2 | Poner el nombre del dispensario y del colegio particular Julio Maria Matovelle | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Alexander Aviles ♦2 | Mariana de Jesús | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | Alexander Aviles ♦2 | ||
| 5 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | Dayana Mendez ♦14 | ||
| 6 | ~ 12 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 7 | ~ 12 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | This seems not yet fixed? | |
| 3855838 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | name=Minidespensa Chavelita https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/736934457 shop=Banco_del_Barrio_de_Guayaquil ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else? |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | Dayana Mendez ♦14 | ||
| 3 | ~ 16 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 12 days ago | commented | Sashacm | En resumen: el dato tiene buena intención pero está mal etiquetado. El lugar puede existir, pero shop= debe indicar el tipo de local, no el nombre del programa. No hace falta crear categoría nueva. | |
| 5 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | Sashacm | ||
| 6 | ~ 12 days ago | reopened | Sashacm | ||
| 7 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | Sashacm | ||
| 8 | ~ 12 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 9 | ~ 12 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Yes, and this problem remains unfixed | |
| 5549533 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6207611658 dajemy do old_name:de czy kasujemy? |
| 5548654 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | should it be name=Calahorra ? |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/272060872 | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦9,474 | Done | |
| 5548652 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/272060890 should it be name=Calahorra ? |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦9,474 | Done | |
| 5548613 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1209052332 is there really power line to nowhere here? is it man_made=guy_wire by any chance? |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Probelnijs ♦196 | Hi Mateusz— thanks, you're right. I've corrected this (and for the surrounding objects) in change set #190124032 | |
| 5548690 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107710978 is it really also a bus stop? |
| 5548269 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/233422380 should it be vertex of the road? |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | here on road I see nothing in aerial - and aerial is in general quite confusing | |
| 3 | ~ 13 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | at least to me | |
| 4 | ~ 13 days ago | commented | Keith Helbley ♦5 | looks like a junction to another service road/driveway to lot, probably a Natural Gas well site. added road per sat imagery. does not look to confusing. see change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189793604#map=19/32.462063/-102.560957 | |
| 5 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Keith Helbley ♦5 | ||
| 6 | ~ 13 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 7 | ~ 13 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | I meant communication tower at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/233422380 | |
| 8 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Keith Helbley ♦5 | unknown without site visit | |
| 9 | ~ 12 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 10 | ~ 12 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | then lets wait for one #surveyneeded (this one is really dubious as nothing appears in aerial) | |
| 11 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,455 | Removed tower since it doesn't appear ın April 2025 Esri imagery | |
| 5548648 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/193302953 - seems to really mismatch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦16,300 | fixed | |
| 5548616 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/262832339 should amenity=waste_disposal be glues to canal here? |
| 5548601 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 12 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3708215513/history is it really also a bus stop? |
| 5548321 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12115522076 is it really in the middle of the street? |
| 5548319 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43121710 highway=primary and boundary=administrative surely should be glued together? If road moves it will not change border, right? |
| 5548313 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5363133576 this statue is not in the middle of the road, right? |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Keith Helbley ♦5 | moved to middle of traffic circle per streetview | |
| 5548270 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | is it oil pumpjack? |
| 2 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Keith Helbley ♦5 | yes | |
| 5548159 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 13 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/21600175 surely this power=catenary_mast stands next to tracks, not on them? |
| 5367913 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | bartgron ♦2,023 | In context of overlay "Ścieżki rowerowe" – Podjazd – https://osm.org/way/1465717414 via StreetComplete 63.2: Droga wewnętrzna |
| 2 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | przetagowałem na highway=residential jeszcze jakieś zmiany potrzebne są? | |
| 3 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | bartgron ♦2,023 | A residential to nie jest za dużo? Nie wystarczyłoby tutaj highway=service tylko bez service=driveway? | |
| 4 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | bartgron ♦2,023 | I sorki że czasami nie odpowiadam na komentarze ale chyba nie wszystkie powiadomienia mi na email przychodzą | |
| 5 | ~ 24 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | to jest takie miejsce że highway=service też pewnie jest do obrony co do powiadomień - https://www.openstreetmap.org/notifications się ostatnio poprawia | |
| 6 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | zaznaczę jako zamknięte service też pewnie moze być | |
| 5545905 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 14 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Unable to answer "Is this building completed?" – Building Under Construction – https://osm.org/way/1155319039 via StreetComplete 63.4: Nie ma chyba |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | skasowałem, na orto było zaplecze budowy | |
| 5544132 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | Sypki kamien via StreetComplete 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/373962.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ta budowa jeszcze trwa, może tu też będą klej wlewać? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | poprawione | |
| 5542637 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Nie ma tu trawników wokół drzew. Tak samo na przystankach Mistrzejowice 02 i Kurzei 02. via StreetComplete_ee 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/373799.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | Z daleka wyglądało jak ziemia w której wyrośnie trawa, ale wczoraj przyjrzałem się z bliska i to są małe kamyczki. Jak to oznaczyć? | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Akurat tu na zdjęciu jest żwir. Na przystankach Mistrzejowice 02 i Kurzei 02 były na oko sklejone ze sobą małe kamyczki, po których bez problemu można chodzić. Nie do końca wiem jak to powinno być otagowane. Niestety tam nie zrobiłem zdjęcia. | |
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Znalazłem zdjęcie pokazujące jak to wygląda na wspomnianych przystankach: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/attachments/imgp0078-jpg.12050997/ | |
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | założyłem temat https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/1554191378903335033/1554191378903335033 | |
| 6 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ta budowa jeszcze trwa, może tu też będą klej wlewać? | |
| 7 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Pewności nie ma, ale podejrzewam, że też będą tam posklejane kamyki. | |
| 8 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | uprkos ♦8,317 | Nawierzchnia to resin_bound, ale czy jest sens mapować te kwadraty? Jeśli tak - jako co, po prostu area? Wg mnie wystarczą drzewa. | |
| 9 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Ta nawierzchnia jest taka zapewne z myślą, że można po tym chodzić. Więc moim zdaniem jedynie można tu jedynie dać area:highway=footway i surface=resin_bound. Bo raczej dzielenie peronu przystankowego na części, które mają różną nawierzchnię, nie ma sensu. Będzie to wyglądało jak kilka osobnych peronów i bedą w StreetComplete pytania o to, jak który peron się nazywa itp. | |
| 10 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | tutaj dodałem surface=gravel jak posklejają to trzeba będzie zmienić na surface=resin_bound na tramwajowych poprawiłem sprawdzałem i są posklejane, więc poprawiłem zgodnie z waszą sugestją | |
| 5544042 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | --- | Budynek nalezy do PKP Cargo |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | no fajnie ale błędu w OSM nie widzę | |
| 3 | ~ 13 days ago | reopened | Wally_PL ♦109 | To posterunek rewidentów. Dodałem informację o tym. | |
| 4 | ~ 13 days ago | closed | Wally_PL ♦109 | ||
| 5423417 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | CBradioCZ ♦4,006 | DPD box |
| 2 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | do you plan to add it ? do you need help with doing it? | |
| 4768484 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | matze089 ♦585 | Unable to answer "How is this power line attached?" – Power Pole – https://osm.org/node/4469473809 via StreetComplete 61.0: Nicht existent |
| 2 | ~ 20 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | can you attach a photo? it is still visible on aerials #surveyneeded | |
| 3 | ~ 20 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | per https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verwaiste-streetcomplete-hinweise/147881/39 photo is actually not needed here and it is known it is demolished maybe proper action is to close this one and open note at next pole then? | |
| 4 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | per https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verwaiste-streetcomplete-hinweise/147881/39 photo is actually not needed here and it is known it is demolished marking this one as demolished, will open note at location where it is needed | |
| 5 | ~ 14 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 6 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | power line segment marked as gone, power pole was marked as gone new note at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5544930 | |
| 5544930 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 14 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12892089033/history - is this power pole demolished? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4469473809 was and this is next one in power line |
| 5543854 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | lelumweneda ♦3 | This place does not exist: "Przy okazji wizyty w winnicy uroczysko (tej przy lesie), spytałem się właściciela czy wie co to jest za wpis (nie wiedział)." A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-18T16:49:24Z POI name: Winnica Uroczysko POI types: landuse-vineyard #CoMaps android 2026.08.31-14-Google |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | uwaga niezrozumiała - o jaki wpis chodzi? | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | lelumweneda ♦3 | Przypadkiem wrzuciłem swoją uwagę z telefonu obok edycji nazwy. "Winnica uroczysko" jest w innym miejscu. Przy okazji, na zdjęciach satelitarnych nie widać tutaj żadnych krzewów winogron. | |
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | to jak nie ma ich to warto sprawdzić co tu się dzieje | |
| 6 | ~ 5 days ago | closed | lelumweneda ♦3 | Changeset: 190204860 Brak informacji o winnicy tutaj, najprawdopodobniej pomyłka przy wprowadzaniu winnicy uroczysko w 2015 ( las na ortofotomapie+archiwalnie, brak informacji w ewidencji gruntów, brak informacji w wykazie winnic) | |
| 5462300 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | stadMex ♦6 | Unable to answer "¿Todavía sigue existiendo?" – Jean Piaget (School Grounds) – https://osm.org/node/3802525721 via StreetComplete 63.4: Oficinas y Locales Comerciales |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Daniel pintoescobedo | 🥷 | |
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 6 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 7 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 8 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 9 | ~ 7 days ago | closed | Hoodiecrow ♦246 | Lo elimine segun las notas note/5462300 | |
| 4123467 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1181439654 primary=fuel? What it means here? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | 🥷⚡🌗 | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | are you trying to be helpful or are you damaging OpenStreetMap on purpose? What is the point of leaving random emoji and closing valid notes? | |
| 5 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | Hoodiecrow ♦246 | Check his profile, he seems to be closing notes without resolution on purpose with no edits/comments made | |
| 6 | ~ 10 days ago | commented | Hoodiecrow ♦246 | I reported it as vandalism, please make a report as well. | |
| 5544138 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | TakMashido ♦6 | Unable to answer "How many levels above the basement does this building have?" – Transportation Building – https://osm.org/way/1346382935 via StreetComplete 63.4: Metro entrance |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | without attached photo this note is not very useful... please ALWAYS attach photos (unless you plan to process them by yourself) | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Sylabowy Kot ♦415 | I'm not sure if it's their fault and what do you mean. What a crazy question from StreetComplete. In my opinion it's a bad mapping - elevator inside a "transportation building" next to a roof building? In reality it's a one building - just a roof (metro entrance, mainly covering stairs) with an elevator. We should fix that. | |
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | well, given that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1346382935 was mapped as a separate building it is not really a bad question but from what I remember building layout is not matching at all what is mapped here | |
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > but from what I remember building layout is not matching at all what is mapped here please ignore that part | |
| 6 | ~ 14 days ago | commented | TakMashido ♦6 | Ok, I'll attach photos next time. It's exactly as Sylabowy Kot described. Glass roof over staircase and elevator next to it. https://pkrajewski.pl/warszawa-metro-ksiecia-janusza/ I think that's one from photos 2-4. Layout is incorrect too. | |
| 3475699 | 1 | ~ 3 years ago | opened | D Monk ♦554 | Unable to answer "What surface does this piece of road have?" for https://osm.org/way/25593991 via StreetComplete 49.2: Es cemento y piedras naturales Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/124388.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | 🌗 | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4258758 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Mlaur ♦38 | "Yoler jewelry store instead" The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2024-04-29T02:50:07Z POI name: Cafesto POI types: amenity-cafe #organicmaps android |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5141630 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | CRGARE ♦4 | Unable to answer "What’s the name of this street?" – Residential Road – https://osm.org/way/696241757 via StreetComplete 62.2: Es vialidad para ingresar al centro comercial Ecoterra Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/325160.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | 🥷⚡🌗 | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 2936050 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Housing Unit? Looks like an unwanted descriptive name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Daniel pintoescobedo | ||
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | please stop closing valid notes in general: closing note is not making edit, and you made so far zero edits to the map | |
| 3378103 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197116258 - this road seems to have significantly inflated importance rank maybe it should be unclassified/tertiary? |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | closed | Molandfreak ♦106 | All of the primary provincial highways in Manitoba seem to be classified as primary. Anyone know the reason why? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Maybe someone confused name in official classification with OSM classes? Thinking that highway=primary is for "primary provincial highways" seems an understandable mistake. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,237 | Please participate in a systematic discussion about road classification in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada/Tagging_guidelines/Road_classification BTW, why is there a primary highway on Unst? Maybe you can ask about that one as well | |
| 6 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,237 | Until it is changed by the proposal linked above, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Manitoba#Quick_guide indicates that PTH 59 should indeed be tagged primary. Would you like to challenge this community guideline? | |
| 7 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Manitoba#Unimportant_provincial_trunk_highways | |
| 8 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | How can you register for OSM Canada Slack? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Slack_workspaces is not mentioning this https://slackinviteosmcanada.herokuapp.com/ from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada#Contact is dead | |
| 9 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,237 | Thank you for mentioning that the OSM-ca Slack invite isn't working, I'm not sure who was the maintainer of the invite app so I added new invite links to the wiki pages instead. (Personally I am really not a fan of how Slack workspaces need an 'invite' link to join and there's no option of a permanent invite link, but some other people were there...) The Slack isn't very active so you might not be missing much. I believe you are also aware of the new Canadian community on the OSM Community Forum <https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/ca/95> which might be an easier place to discuss changing the guidelines. To be honest, I continue to be confused about why you are asking about Manitoba in particular. There are plenty of regions in OSM where roads are classified based on their legal classification rather than network significance. As you might be aware OSM road classification started out with "primary" being drawn directly from UK's primary roads which have A numbers. I mentioned Unst above, it is an island of 600 people with a highway=primary. Will you be asking UK editors to change the OSM classification of its A road? There's highway=trunk on Lofoten archipelago on northern Norway all the way to a dead end in a town with a population of less than a thousand, should E10 be reclassified there? | |
| 10 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,237 | @Mateusz would you like me to start a discussion about this on a wider forum to gauge community consensus about road classification determining OSM tagging, or are you fine keeping the PTH as primary and closing this note? | |
| 11 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | fudoreaper ♦538 | I've been doing some work to check the provincial road networks, and especially the OSM relations that bring all the segments together, tagging them with wikidata tags, and drawing maps on wikipedia. Discussions on specific OSM issues are very hard to manage, as there is no clear and obvious place to have a chat. I have just come across how PTH 59 has been downgraded all the way to 'unclassified' here in Victoria beach. I disagree and think the road is definitely classified as a primary route by the MB gov, even though this north end of it is surely smaller than other segments. I also commented on the Wiki discussion in Manitoba | |
| 12 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | fudoreaper ♦538 | ||
| 13 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > road is definitely classified as a primary route by the MB gov note that road being classified as category called "primary" in some government schema does not mean that highway=primary tag is automatically appropriate | |
| 14 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > Discussions on specific OSM issues are very hard to manage, as there is no clear and obvious place to have a chat https://community.openstreetmap.org/ is often a good place, though some local communities setup forums elsewhere | |
| 5544547 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208753888/history is there really some kind of gambling here? if yes, main tag is missing |
| 5468327 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9680124691/history has self-contradictory tagging, is it place of worship or not? maybe it is now abandoned? ruin? museum? maybe religion=multifaith ('not dedicated to any specific religion') would fit? How can you have irreligious place of worship? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | caprieldeluca ♦489 | Thank you, these wayside shrines to popular saints are common in our country. I corrected the tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189655966 | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Thanks! which religion it is? Christianity? see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion?uselang=en#Values_for_religion | |
| 5 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | caprieldeluca ♦489 | No, it isn't an institutional religion. It can be tagged as folk religion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_religion Yes, I see the wiki values. As other, I searched in TagInfo, tried some overpass queries and religion=popular seems to be the local adoption for these shrines: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2xdz | |
| 6 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | caprieldeluca ♦489 | ||
| 7 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | caprieldeluca ♦489 | We discussed the tagging of Gauchito Gil shrines within the Argentine community and agreed to use historic=wayside_shrine + religion=christian + denomination=folk_catholicism. This was added to the Argentina wiki and corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/190172672. | |
| 5544223 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775043694 to jest substance=hot_water czy substance=steam ? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Ale jak nie wiemy to lepiej nie zgadywać | |
| 3 | ~ 8 days ago | commented | uprkos ♦8,317 | Wątpię czy da się to ustalić... | |
| 4 | ~ 7 days ago | commented | uprkos ♦8,317 | Czy są jakieś przesłanki wskazujące, że to co zostało zmapowane jest niepoprawne? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 days ago | closed | uprkos ♦8,317 | ||
| 5544277 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | substance=drain ? jaki to ma sens? Chyba to po prostu woda deszczowa? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | czyli substance=rainwater | |
| 5541068 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | --- | Budynek na rogu Żarnowieckiej i Łaziennej ma nr 6 https://fotopolska.eu/1324742,foto.html?o=b312943 |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | Dane urzędowe EMUiA nie potwierdzają tego proponuję samodzielną edycje po osobistym potwierdzeniu na miejscu | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | #surveyme | |
| 5541090 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | --- | To jest Żarnowiecka 2 https://www.google.pl/maps/place/%C5%BBarnowiecka+2,+42-436+Pilica/@50.4683728,19.6583497,3a,75y,108.11h,93.38t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1spO2JMEJSZWNJOa6xBa1obQ!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D-3.378513943869393%26panoid%3DpO2JMEJSZWNJOa6xBa1obQ%26yaw%3D108.11487466803824!7i13312!8i6656!4m6!3m5!1s0x47171bccee7fabed:0x38e46a19c6f0e9e7!8m2!3d50.4683214!4d19.6585192!16s%2Fg%2F11csnr7y3v?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDkyMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | mapy google nie są podstawą do zmian Dane urzędowe EMUiA nie potwierdzają tego proponuję samodzielną edycje po osobistym potwierdzeniu na miejscu | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | zamykam by Google Maps nie kusiły | |
| 5542079 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Hoodiecrow ♦246 | Czy to na pewno powinno być jako pedestrian street? Dziwnie to wygląda. Czemu nie foot path? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | bo jest tu pełnowymiarowa droga w sumie raczej reszta powinna być highway=pedestrian bicycle=designated | |
| 3 | ~ 14 days ago | closed | kubahahaha ♦11,361 | Pytałem w changesecie, nikt nie miał nic przeciwko więc zmieniłem na pedestrian https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/179776498 | |
| 4 | ~ 12 days ago | reopened | capt_planet ♦42 | ||
| 5 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | capt_planet ♦42 | ||
| 5543664 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Wikiiiii ♦63 | "kategoria "paczkomat"" OSM snapshot date: 2026-08-26T01:30:29Z POI name: TGO29M POI types: shop-outpost #organicmaps android 2026.08.27-18-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | hej, może StreetComplete /EveryDoor/Vespucci sobie załatwisz? By od razu porządne edycje robić? (CoMaps to lepszy fork Organic Maps ale chyba też tego nie potrafi) | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14226930401 | |
| 5544058 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Bartek444 ♦2,285 | Unable to answer "Jaka jest tutaj nawierzchnia?" – Schody – https://osm.org/way/339933908 via StreetComplete 63.4: Marmur ? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/373946.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | paving stones czyli płytki chodnikowe | |
| 3 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | dodałem surface=paving_stones jak chcesz to można i material= dać ale czy to marmur to pojęcia nie mam | |
| 5543541 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | --- | Poprowadź przez Dankowski szlak |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | niejasne zgłoszenie | |
| 5544231 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1316199935 to jest substance=hot_water czy substance=steam ? substance=heat jest co najmniej nieszczęśliwe Ale jak nie wiemy to lepiej nie zgadywać |
| 5544230 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/821345144 to jest substance=hot_water czy substance=steam ? substance=heat jest co najmniej nieszczęśliwe Ale jak nie wiemy to lepiej nie zgadywać |
| 5544229 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919313902 to jest substance=hot_water czy substance=steam ? substance=heat jest co najmniej nieszczęśliwe Ale jak nie wiemy to lepiej nie zgadywać |
| 5544228 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231190414 to jest substance=hot_water czy substance=steam ? substance=heat jest co najmniej nieszczęśliwe Ale jak nie wiemy to lepiej nie zgadywać |
| 5544063 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/13717276748 natural=water water=no ? |
| 5544062 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254566939 natural=water water=no ? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Lejun ♦6,030 | Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189687208 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0 | |
| 5544060 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135576679 natural=water water=no ? is it intermittently dry? Permanently dry? |
| 5544059 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1303102275 natural=water water=no ? |
| 5544056 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420504060 natural=water water=no ? |
| 5543433 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/14052603988/history does not look natural at all? looks more like a heated pool... |
| 5543424 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 15 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1147800430/history sports centre is larger, right? And covers at least also pool, probably |
| 5537685 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 19 days ago | opened | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Jest tu możliwość przejazdu. via StreetComplete_ee 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/373179.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 19 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Ktoś słupki wyrwał? | |
| 3 | ~ 19 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Nie widziałem. Gdzie były? Od strony Mikołajczyka? Tam to nawet stał nakaz skrętu w prawo, więc ktoś pewnie założył, że może ktoś chcieć przejechać od Okulickiego. | |
| 4 | ~ 19 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Słupki blokowały tylko możliwość wjazdu samochodem na CPR. | |
| 5 | ~ 19 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Od strony Mikołajczyka były | |
| 6 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Dodałem drogę. | |
| 7 | ~ 15 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 8 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | trochę się o nią boję - ona taka jest że lepiej by nawigacje tam nie prowadziły (często to błot totalne + lubi być tirami zastawiona czy innym sprzętem) | |
| 5542759 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2735773453/history has barrier=ticket would barrier=turnstile amenity=ticket_validator be a good more standard tagging? opening note as I am not sure is it turnstile or something else or maybe not existing anymore |
| 5479190 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | Unable to answer "What’s the house number of this building?" – University Building – https://osm.org/way/158296956 via StreetComplete 63.4: Nie jest to osobny budynek |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | YomanNH ♦3,361 | Uprzedzając kolejne uwagi Mateusza, gdy ktoś poprawi tylko ten budynek, z kolejnymi dwoma budynkami jest ta sama sytuacja. Dodatkowo nad chodnikiem jest przejście między budynkami. Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/373808.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/373809.jpg https://streetcomplete.app/p/373810.jpg | |
| 3 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | o dzięki za zdjęcie, jakoś wtedy zapomniałem go zrobić | |
| 4132775 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | extremely suspect building shapes, see say https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548233940 |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Pablo Cuyé ♦56 | ||
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Pablo Cuyé ♦56 | ||
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | do you really think this building has shape like this? | |
| 7 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Pablo Cuyé ♦56 | Hello, I don't know what you mean, however, I don't find any problem with the shape of the buildings. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 9 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | are you sure that say https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548233940 is a valid shape? | |
| 10 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | Pablo Cuyé ♦56 | ||
| 11 | ~ 16 days ago | reopened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 12 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | are you sure that say way/548233940 is a valid shape? | |
| 13 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | Pablo Cuyé ♦56 | ||
| 5542019 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107571719 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its building likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then |
| 5542004 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232819819 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its building likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then |
| 5542003 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318449249 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its building likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦9,474 | Fechu | |
| 5542002 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1323002821 this railway station seems mapped multiple times |
| 5541998 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104895749 is it really merely railway=halt ? either wiki description is bad or it mismatches wiki claims |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | wiki: "A small station, may not have a platform, trains may only stop on request. " | |
| 5541997 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249352880 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its building likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | Dimitar155 ♦4,971 | agree, i've fixed it | |
| 5541995 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1465600899 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its platform likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then (also, it seems to be mapped twice if I see it correctly) |
| 5541993 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368103230 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its building likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | Dimitar155 ♦4,971 | fixed | |
| 5541992 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484966053 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? Station/stop/halt exists also outside its building likely mapping it as node would make far more sense, no specific area is claimed then (also, it seems to be mapped twice if I see it correctly) |
| 5541991 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1558076730 ma to nazwę jakąś? Nie lepiej to jako punkt zmapować przy okazji? |
| 5541990 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237415558 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? likely mapping it as node would make far more sense |
| 5541987 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321447107 this railway=halt area seems dubious if mapped as area it should cover much more, right? likely mapping it as node would make far more sense |
| 3956530 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,680 | EAT. restaurants closed in 2020. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | hidden | woodpeck ♦3,477 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,477 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | woodpeck ♦3,477 | this note was accidentally hidden (sorry) and has now been reopened. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Osmsplonkt | duplet | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦22,922 | ||
| 7 | ~ 18 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3357928344 | |
| 8 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | harg ♦4,291 | Removed it. | |
| 9 | ~ 16 days ago | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦22,922 | ||
| 10 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Đuro Jiří ♦22,922 | isn't it better to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:amenity? | |
| 11 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | maybe, but deleting is better than keeping nonexistent one | |
| 12 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | harg ♦4,291 | Often it would be retagged as shop=vacant (still keeping the old_name but that requires somebody to confirm that it is still vacant and can still be done if somebody does. Tagging it as a disused amenity implies there is some reason to believe that if/when it reopens it is likely to be reopened as an amenity rather than some other kind of shop. Shop=vacant (together with old_name and housenumber) is enough and might even be useful to somebody searching for a vacant shop without the need to also search for other tags that mean the same. | |
| 13 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > Tagging it as a disused amenity implies there is some reason to believe that if/when it reopens it is likely to be reopened as an amenity rather than some other kind of shop no, tagging it as disused amenity indicates that there are still disused remains of amenity (for shops/eateries it would apply if POI was closed but its stuff is stuck at a given location, most applicable if you can still see equipment through windows) | |
| 5533008 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | opened | --- | Nie po polsku a po polskiemu... |
| 2 | ~ 20 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104423547 | |
| 3 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | grappa01 ♦849 | ?? o co chodzi ? | |
| 4 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | chyba o to że jest Łódzki Urząd Celno-Skarbowego w Łodzi a powinno być Łódzki Urząd Celno-Skarbowy w Łodzi | |
| 5 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | grappa01 ♦849 | poporawiona | |
| 5541802 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9765514474 this (and other nearby bollard=irremovable) can be and should be retagged to bollard=fixed - right? See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x7L |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121391181 | |
| 5541804 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10271009851 this (and other nearby bollard=irremovable) can be and should be retagged to bollard=fixed - right? See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x7L |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130205429 | |
| 5541803 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 16 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5395992792 this (and other nearby bollard=irremovable) can be and should be retagged to bollard=fixed - right? See https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x7L |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56152656 | |
| 3960503 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,680 | East went into administration in 2018 and all the shops were closed. |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | hidden | woodpeck ♦3,477 | ||
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | woodpeck ♦3,477 | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | woodpeck ♦3,477 | this note was accidentally hidden (sorry) and has now been reopened. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 year ago | closed | Osmsplonkt | dooplikate | |
| 6 | ~ 1 year ago | reopened | Đuro Jiří ♦22,922 | ||
| 7 | ~ 18 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1801509788 was there reason to mark them as closed at that time (or now?) | |
| 8 | ~ 18 days ago | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,680 | I was told very firmly when I first started mapping that I shouldn't update anything I hadn't personally surveyed. I should just add a note pointing out that the map was wrong. And when there were a lot of notes it would point to an area that needed surveying. These were the 2 discussions when I first started mapping which told me off for marking closed shops as closed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64983881 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65007763 That's why I didn't mark it as closed 3 years ago. (And why I add so many notes!) I don't like confrontation :) | |
| 9 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | > I shouldn't update anything I hadn't personally surveyed I would say that if we know that all shops of brand X closed then it is better to delete them/mark as vacant/retag to shop=yes though that falls under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct I guess? And Polish community is far more liking them than UK one. Though reasking may be a good idea once next chain closes. Having zombie POIs for years/decades is silly. | |
| 10 | ~ 16 days ago | commented | TheUKHighStreet ♦8,680 | >Having zombie POIs for years/decades is silly. Completely agree. This still annoys me. I do tend to update to vacant now for brands that have *just* closed all their stores because there wouldn't be time for something else to have opened so the vacant tag is very likely to be correct. | |
| 5540901 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | bunch of descriptive names to clean |
| 5540898 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/21819847 name=Residential Road ? is there some real chance it is its actual name? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,455 | updated | |
| 5540300 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | conveying=n was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036224060/history Maybe conveying=no was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5540298 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | produce = palm oil was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740521313/history Maybe produce=palm_oil was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 5540296 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | genus=saccarum was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1295087917/history Maybe genus=Saccharum was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 5540236 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062773485/history has building:levels = elevator What this tag means? Integer value is expected here and here is something unusual... |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | aharvey ♦1,518 | fixed | |
| 5540225 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | produce = palm oil was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741921004/history Maybe produce=palm_oil was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 5164760 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Zwiadowca21 ♦874 | Unable to answer "Is there a shelter at this stop?" – Bus Stop – https://osm.org/node/6545185612 via StreetComplete 62.2: Nie widzę w tym miejscu przystanku |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | szkoda że zdjęcia brak | |
| 5539978 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1259827438 supposed to be barrier=yes ? See more at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2x5q |
| 5539698 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | surface=dir was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1287987182/history Maybe surface=dirt was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | commented | Ewen Hill ♦9,679 | Hi Mateusz, in situations like this, just make the change please | |
| 3 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189573682 that went quickly :) | |
| 5539755 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | deleted user used crossing=traffic_signal on way/610621661/history Have they maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Can you check it? If it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 16 days ago | closed | LaLinea ♦2,989 | You’ve interpreted that correctly, it’s a typo. Thank you very much! I’ve corrected it: https://osm.org/way/610621661 | |
| 5539754 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | deleted user used crossing=traffic_signal on way/454510209/history Have they maybe meant crossing=traffic_signals ? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Maybe you can verify it? If it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | santon ♦553 | Added crossing=traffic_signals because there are traffic lights | |
| 5539702 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1286348545/history has building:levels = 3.3 building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some decimal value. Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:est_height or height=* with source:height=* explaining how you got value would work? Current building:levels= is just invalid and is not expressing real level count, right? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5539701 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | way/1128295697/history has building:levels = 3.3 that was added in this edit building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some decimal value. Maybe est_height=* or height=* with source:height=* explaining how you got value would work? Current building:levels= is just invalid and is not expressing real level count, right? See also osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer (added by now deleted account) |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | söm4324 ♦3,743 | Right, onsite situation is different. I've adjusted the building. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/189684321 | |
| 5539697 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 17 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/926678163/history has building:levels = 3.3 building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some decimal value. Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:est_height or height=* with source:height=* explaining how you got value would work? Current building:levels= is just invalid and is not expressing real level count, right? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer |
| 5539552 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | amenity=fue was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/545897931/history Maybe amenity=fuel was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5539554 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | surface=dir was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/774643385/history Maybe surface=dirt was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Hugoren Martinako ♦9,474 | Add a "t": 1 second. Check out the crossing path to see a surface=dirt: 1 second Write down a note for this: Over a minute Weigh the options to figure out which is worthwhile | |
| 5539553 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | surface=dir was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1421944931/history Maybe surface=dirt was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,455 | updated | |
| 5539501 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | roof:shape=dom was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345949683/history Maybe roof:shape=dome was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5539474 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707644285/history this name tag is bogus, right? and should be removed? what about crop= ? Should it be fixed to crop=sugarcane or is it as bogus and should be removed? |
| 5539473 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | crossing:island=noy was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1491619307/history Maybe crossing:island=no was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Mex ♦8,461 | retagged with something sensible | |
| 5539472 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | crossing:island=noa was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1330541153/history Maybe crossing:island=no was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | dannmer ♦23,455 | updated, | |
| 5539466 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6057865347/history are there some ruins remaining from these pylons? or are these razed without trace? |
| 5539464 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620328621/history is it gone without trace? then it should be deleted is it not operational? then stations also should be lifecycle-prefixed, right? are there traces of it? then it is not razed, right? razed is for cases without traces (no idea what is the on the ground situation here) |
| 5539429 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | location=outdoorv was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1557983891/history Maybe location=outdoor was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 18 days ago | closed | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | ||
| 5539430 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620260559/history has it been built? is it still under construction? Has construction been abandoned? |
| 5539427 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598992809/history is it fully razed or are there remain of it? tagging is conflicting with itself |
| 5539426 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | sport=moto was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219373841/history Maybe sport=motor was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 17 days ago | closed | Yod4z ♦192 | Correction made by motocross | |
| 5539309 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15011216/history is it disused, utterly and completely gone or are some historic remains still there? different tags claim different things |
| 5539098 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608499561/history surface=gravel not =grave - right? |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Emersade ♦15 | Correct. Fixed | |
| 5539089 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524465614/history has building:levels = 0.75 building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some decimal value. Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:est_height or height=* with source:height=* explaining how you got value would work? Current building:levels= is just invalid and is not expressing real level count, right? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer |
| 5539088 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119987988/history has building:levels = 0.75 building:levels= is for how many above-ground non-roof levels the building has, so this always should be an integer. Here it has some decimal value. Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:est_height or height=* with source:height=* explaining how you got value would work? Current building:levels= is just invalid and is not expressing real level count, right? See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Mistagging_for_the_renderer |
| 5539025 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 18 days ago | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦41,469 | content=fuelm was used here, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1550700038/history Maybe content=fuel was intended here? I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me). Or maybe this value was used deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning? If you know it is a mistake - can you fix it? |
| 2 | ~ 12 days ago | closed | ContraBand ♦15 | Yes this was a typo, it should be a silo for rain water. |