| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5523837 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 27 days ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" – Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/1418771873 via StreetComplete 63.4: It's an artificial packed-gravel sort of thing - possibly counts as asphalt? Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/371622.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | Slartibartfast141 ♦476 | Could be resin bound if not asphalt? | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | fisherthewol ♦92 | thank you that is exactly the term I was looking for. Streetcomplete doesn't include it as an option (or it does but I missed it). the way is correctly divided now iirc. | |
| 5498311 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unsure re: layers for the cycleway and tunnel. The cycleway goes through the tunnel, but they are set at different layers - is that correct? Possibly it was a fix for a rendering issue? |
| 2 | ~ 11 days ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | layer=-1 is correct here, there is nothing else on layer -1 around here, and we don't incorrectly tag for the renderer I have updated it | |
| 5439987 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Not a public right of way via StreetComplete 63.4 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/362255.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Aethonatic ♦1,711 | Way currently tagged with access=destination, is this correct? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503445891 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | fisherthewol ♦92 | No. Personally I think - add a node in the way just east of the front of the buildings. That node is a gate. - The way west of the node is "public" insofar as it is part of the pavement. - The node and the way east of the node is access=private | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | fisherthewol ♦92 | Will do it myself when I'm off work if not done. | |
| 5439532 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | In context of overlay "Buildings" – Leonardo Hotels (Hotel) – https://osm.org/way/204097505 via StreetComplete 63.4: Selected type from Street complete - it is a hotel. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Fgjgdrou ♦537 | No mapping changes needed, closing note, thanks. | |
| 5439526 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "Is this still here?" – AQL (Telephone) – https://osm.org/node/5143184324 via StreetComplete 63.4: Currently boarded up and inside a construction fence. Likely now what BT used to call a "internet point" but unsure until boarding comes off |
| 4962991 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "What are the opening hours here?" – Salon Twenty Seven by Sam Reece (Hairdresser) – https://osm.org/node/12986656797 via StreetComplete 61.3: Resurvey when open and shutters are up |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | ntzm ♦601 | Are you planning to re-survey this? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | fisherthewol ♦92 | Will try and remember on my way past this evening - however will likely be shut. Will do my best to remember during the day at some point. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | I'm going to close this due to the fact that it is not actionable, and StreetComplete will continue to ask about it anyway | |
| 5286742 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Gate. Padlocked shut via StreetComplete 63.1 |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | I've added locked=yes | |
| 5286699 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | In context of overlay "Cycleways" – Informal Path – https://osm.org/way/1493649541 via StreetComplete 63.1: Physically possible to cycle up this but only if you work for redbull. Needs editing to be a footpath/hiking route only Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/343866.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | I've added mtb:scale=4 based on my recollection of this path | |
| 4169076 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "Which customers visit this hairdresser?" – De Mar Hair Studio (Hairdresser) – https://osm.org/way/1067642418 via StreetComplete 57.1: Is now "The Stylists; Lifestyle Store". Unsure of what type of store due to shutters, will resurvey when open. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/203536.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦618 | Added type as stylists based on sign. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦618 | #surveyme Who does De Mar Hair Studio serve? Is it unisex? | |
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | fisherthewol ♦92 | Given the theming and the internals, I would suggest it serves mostly a female clientele Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/326409.jpg | |
| 5 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦618 | Looks like it's not a hairdresser but a fashion stylist, unsure how to tag that but have updated everything else. And while they may serve mostly female clientele there is no reason to add any tags about that unless they explicitly state they serve a single gender or are explicitly unisex. If it's unsigned no reason to add a tag. | |
| 6 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | CanopyFalls ♦618 | I've updated to amenity=personal_stylist and have emailed the buisness onwer to find out if they have opening hours or are exclusively by appointment. | |
| 7 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | fisherthewol ♦92 | Agreed re: gender, nothing explicitly signed as far as I can see | |
| 8 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | If there's no signed gender of client then I think this note can be closed | |
| 9 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | ntzm ♦601 | ||
| 10 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | I've added male:signed=no and female:signed=no as well, and updated a few other tags based on what's on the ground | |
| 5154836 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Bus stop westbound should be at this location, not where it is currently via StreetComplete 62.2 |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | Thanks, updated | |
| 5154835 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "Is this stop lit?" – Fulwood Road/Nethergreen Road (Bus Stop) – https://osm.org/node/502439400 via StreetComplete 62.2: Is lit, but by a regular street lamp that happens to be directly above it |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | That means yes | |
| 5154834 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | This is an island junction. Worth altering to represent this? Will consider via StreetComplete 62.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/326408.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | ntzm ♦601 | I think so, I've updated it | |
| 5136722 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | This is a (semi) detached house attached to a block of garages. via StreetComplete 62.2 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/324698.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | philipcullen ♦45 | ||
| 5117714 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | In context of overlay "Things" – S11 364 (Mail Drop Box) – https://osm.org/node/7448950765 via StreetComplete 62.1: Latest collection times sign 2026-01-04: 9am mon-fri, 7am Saturday |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | CjMalone ♦3,850 | Seems to already be tagged | |
| 5048188 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | I would say from signage that this is a footpath cyclists are allowed to use/share, rather than a cycelpath. via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 5048187 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "What type of bollard is this?" – Bollard – https://osm.org/node/4593132884 via StreetComplete 61.3: No bollard, but no legal right of way and the road surface changes to demarc the change of us Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/315853.jpg |
| 5010951 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | The router in CoMaos tried to route me, from Leopold St to Townhead St, which is an illegal right. Will try and survey it at some point via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | fisherthewol ♦92 | Ok, after watching my dashcam back and some investigation, it was trying to route me onto the cycle path and I just completely missed it. IE a lack of signage from SCC + my idiocy; and not bad mapping. | |
| 5010952 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | fisherthewol ♦92 | Unable to answer "What type of bicycle parking is this?" – Bicycle Parking – https://osm.org/node/11149359006 via StreetComplete 61.3: Today couldn't find it - think it's been removed. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | fisherthewol ♦92 | Sorted. |