| Note | # | Tmstmp UTC | Event | Contributor | Comment | Auto-translation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4921942 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-08-21 14:35 | opened | Zarr ♦1,049 | Sidewalks here have changed via StreetComplete 61.3 | |
| 2 | 2025-12-16 04:53 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | don't see anything new on latest aerial yet, so we can either wait, or someone surveying can try to describe them | ||
| 4348321 | 1 | 2024-07-24 09:55 | opened | Eduardivan | "Road closure on Goreway Dr. Road closed until late september." OSM snapshot date: 2024-07-02T13:27:57Z POI name: Goreway Drive POI types: highway-secondary #organicmaps android | |
| 2 | 2024-08-01 03:15 | commented | lastcommodore ♦396 | Road put under construction. Brampton website says until mid-december, though https://www1.brampton.ca/EN/residents/Roads-and-Traffic/pages/road-closures.aspx | ||
| 3 | 2024-12-26 04:50 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | It may have reopened now? It's no longer on the map on the page linked above, at least | ||
| 4 | 2025-01-03 20:47 | closed | lastcommodore ♦396 | reopened road | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-03 20:51 | reopened | lastcommodore ♦396 | |||
| 6 | 2025-01-03 20:51 | commented | lastcommodore ♦396 | unreopened road; i believe its still closed, probably requires on ground check both mississauga and brampton list it as "under construction" https://www.brampton.ca/EN/residents/Roads-and-Traffic/Planning-and-Projects/pages/goreway-drive.aspx https://www.mississauga.ca/projects-and-strategies/city-projects/goreway-drive-improvement-project/ | ||
| 7 | 2025-11-17 16:45 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | both the Brampton and Mississauga pages linked above indicate that construction has completed, as does local media in October 2025 - marked as opened with a bridge in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174780632 | ||
| 4853472 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-13 14:16 | opened | --- | Walking directions from Queen’s Park to Casa Loma show instances of “unnamed road” labels. However the driving & bike directions’ roads are labeled correctly. | |
| 2 | 2025-11-12 18:20 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | This is because there is no agreement in OSM on how to associate sidewalks with streets they're on. One solution would be to amend routers to use additional data in OSM when giving walking directions, here are Github issues requesting this: https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/3210 https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/7259 | ||
| 4426154 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-08 17:43 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Roundabout under construction | |
| 2 | 2025-09-10 13:51 | commented | Pan Perníček ♦13,549 | #Mapycom user also confirms this information - There's a new roundabout. | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-06 21:15 | commented | Ujene ♦20 | There is a new roundabout. I used it around Sep 29. However I don't have details if the Sentinel Road construction was completed. I have laid the groundwork for a new roundabout and would appreciate someone to review my work. Thanks. | ||
| 4 | 2025-10-18 01:56 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Sentinel Road was open as well. I updated it and it's correct now | ||
| 4984863 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-30 00:03 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Confederation GO station opening October 27, 2025 | |
| 2 | 2025-10-16 14:17 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | I can't see the platform in any imagery, can anyone do an onsite survey, now or on the 27th? GO press releases: https://www.gotransit.com/en/the-future-and-go/service-changes-will-begin-on-october-27 https://www.metrolinx.com/en/news/confederation-go-opens-as-metrolinx-expands-fall-train-service new schedules up on https://www.gotransit.com/en/see-schedules/pdf-schedules | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-27 00:22 | closed | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | added because it opens tomorrow | ||
| 4962308 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-14 20:37 | opened | PcMouse1 ♦243 | bike turn box | |
| 2 | 2025-10-04 01:08 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | added as two_stage_turn_box relations in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/172813529 , I don't know of better tagging | ||
| 3 | 2025-10-04 01:10 | reopened | PcMouse1 ♦243 | |||
| 4 | 2025-10-04 01:10 | closed | PcMouse1 ♦243 | Thank you for resolving this note | ||
| 4960509 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-13 17:28 | opened | Martin Novak - Robar Flooring Canada | Office of Robar Flooring 30 Archerhill Dr, Etobicoke, ON M9B 5P3, Toronto, Canada 416-239-9323 https://robarflooring.ca/ | |
| 2 | 2025-09-14 03:27 | commented | maxwellward ♦639 | Hi, thanks for your note. Is this a public business, such as one that a customer could walk up to and conduct business at, and/or does the business primarily operate out of this location? | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-29 01:55 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | already in OSM for 4 years https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8325275157 since https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97574297 | ||
| 4926614 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-24 06:40 | opened | Church of Sweat ♦2 | Certified HIIT Trainers in Toronto | Church of Sweat Achieve your fitness goals with Certified HIIT Trainers in Toronto at Church of Sweat. Our expert coaches design high-intensity workouts tailored to your strength, endurance, and lifestyle. Join a supportive community and experience results-driven training that pushes you to the next level. https://www.churchofsweat.ca/ | |
| 2 | 2025-09-15 16:12 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | |||
| 4947098 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-04 22:51 | opened | BawkBawkMug ♦8 | Unable to answer "Does this crossing have markings across the roadway?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/10942213922 via StreetComplete 61.3: Continuous sidewalk | |
| 2 | 2025-09-15 16:11 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | crossing tag is not necessary here, removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171974475 | ||
| 4947099 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-09-04 22:51 | opened | BawkBawkMug ♦8 | Unable to answer "Does this crossing have markings across the roadway?" – Crossing – https://osm.org/node/10942213945 via StreetComplete 61.3: Continuous sidewalk | |
| 2 | 2025-09-15 16:11 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | crossing tag is not necessary here, removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171974475 | ||
| 4958980 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-12 19:27 | opened | Laura_Na | 356 College Street | |
| 2 | 2025-09-14 02:39 | commented | jhaluska80 ♦2,789 | Sue Fung is set to 356. Should the entire building be 356 and not 357? | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-15 16:08 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Probably, because north side of the street should have even house numbers in Toronto. 357 is probably a typo | ||
| 4 | 2025-09-15 16:09 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171974401 | ||
| 4944976 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-09-03 14:31 | opened | UnidentifiedWalkingObject ♦4 | "This is a sex shop, or adult toy store, or maybe just "adult store"? I went with Boutique, because it's close, but it's not a helpful description." OSM snapshot date: 2025-08-08T13:08:07Z POI name: Come As You Are POI types: shop-boutique #organicmaps android | |
| 2 | 2025-09-15 15:58 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Definitely a sex shop, retagged and tagged some extra info in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171973762 For what it's worth, "boutique" in OSM was originally supposed to refer only to fancy clothes stores (not erotic clothes), but due to also being generally used for small-ish stores selling different categories of things, it's now discouraged due to its meaning being unclear in practice. | ||
| 809721 | 1 | 2016-12-08 19:34 | opened | --- | underground walkway http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232842124 ends with no connection to the outside, seems unlikely? | |
| 2 | 2017-12-18 18:29 | commented | --- | looks like entrance is through "the shops at aura" in north-east corner of the building | ||
| 3 | 2020-11-26 14:48 | closed | Rps333 ♦15,586 | old | ||
| 4 | 2020-11-29 05:16 | reopened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | |||
| 5 | 2020-11-29 05:17 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | This note contains useful information which has not yet been added to OSM and considering that the building is less than a decade old, is unlikely to be out of date | ||
| 6 | 2025-09-12 22:14 | closed | Laura_Na | |||
| 7 | 2025-09-13 01:54 | reopened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | |||
| 8 | 2025-12-25 00:02 | closed | F16-Falcon ♦5 | Modified the path so that it is more accurate and connects to the outside | ||
| 4958927 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-12 18:36 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | This stretch of tunnel exit road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639140963 is tagged as noone being able to use it. Is that still the case? If so, should it be downgraded, along with the trunk stretch of Park Street East it connects to? | |
| 2 | 2025-09-19 18:04 | commented | Windsor Essex Strong Towns ♦48 | Road should be downgrades to primary road. Does not fit the definition of a trunk road. | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-19 18:04 | commented | Windsor Essex Strong Towns ♦48 | downgraded * | ||
| 4 | 2025-12-16 19:10 | closed | Windsor Essex Strong Towns ♦48 | |||
| 4956553 Category: Unknown | 1 | 2025-09-11 02:04 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | According to https://stmaryandstmartha.org/about/history/ this used to be The Church of the Good Shepherd (one P in Shepherd), and in 2015 it has been renamed St. Mary & St. Martha Anglican Church | |
| 4868780 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | 2025-07-21 20:42 | opened | torontomapped ♦1 | "Wasnt on the map so i added it, its been around for a while so was suprised." OSM snapshot date: 2025-07-08T15:45:36Z POI name: Pala 148 POI types: cuisine-italian_pizza cuisine-pizza amenity-restaurant #organicmaps ios | |
| 2 | 2025-08-30 02:20 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Thanks! | ||
| 4848870 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-07-11 04:49 | opened | Shrinks99 ♦122 | Updated pedestrian bridge allowed access but did not survey the tunnel area which is likely closed now. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-28 02:26 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | tunnel was definitely still open as of July 27th | ||
| 4926210 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-08-23 19:49 | opened | PcMouse1 ♦243 | There is a Bloor UP Express connection here. Connects to sidewalk. | |
| 2 | 2025-08-28 02:25 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | is it the steps mapped as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40474837? last we saw all of that was there, but still blocked off (as mapped), because Metrolinx construction takes forever | ||
| 3 | 2025-09-29 04:54 | closed | Shrinks99 ♦122 | Yeah this is correctly mapped as closed steps. | ||
| 4314772 | 1 | 2024-06-30 23:39 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Is this corner actually part of Centreville? | |
| 2 | 2025-08-28 02:03 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | this is kind of a philosophical question since Centreville doesn't charge admission and has no fences, so the path being inside it or not doesn't make much of a difference however as far as I could tell the corner isn't really part of Centreville in any meaningful way so I removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171109859 | ||
| 3072851 | 1 | 2022-03-03 16:16 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Glen Rd bridge/tunnel closed March 7, 2022 until late 2022 due to construction | |
| 2 | 2023-01-12 17:59 | closed | PcMouse1 ♦243 | Footbridge expected to be completed in late 2023. | ||
| 3 | 2023-01-12 17:59 | reopened | PcMouse1 ♦243 | |||
| 4 | 2024-01-19 00:41 | commented | skfd ♦1,036 | surveyed just now. still work in progress | ||
| 5 | 2025-04-27 19:02 | commented | Shrinks99 ♦122 | Have added updated details based on new satelite imagery. Somehow this bridge STILL isn't open, but hopefully will be soon. | ||
| 6 | 2025-05-31 00:53 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Blog post https://www.twowheeledpolitics.ca/2025/05/glen-road-pedestrian-bridge-now-open.html reported that it's open and I updated it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166994321 Might use some survey on site: - confirm width of bridge and tunnel surfaces and tag approximate (5 m? 7 m?) - I set bicycle=yes + segregated=no on bridge based on photo of one sign in the blog post - would be good to confirm if there's anything about the tunnel and tag that accordingly too - if confirmed OK for cyclists, maybe confirm and map links from Glen Road onto the bridge/tunnel - photos in blog show curb cuts that appear to be for bicycle access | ||
| 7 | 2025-06-09 22:39 | commented | skfd ♦1,036 | shared pathway sign, 4.75 width. mapped. | ||
| 8 | 2025-06-16 03:42 | closed | Shrinks99 ♦122 | Bridge looks good to me! Closing this. | ||
| 3871070 | 1 | 2023-09-04 14:42 | opened | daganzdaanda ♦2,326 | Please check: This branch of the Ontario Court of Justice should now be closed, since the new Toronto courthouse on Armory St has opened. Source: https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/1002759/ontario-opening-new-courthouse-in-toronto | |
| 2 | 2024-07-27 23:46 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | according to Wikipedia citing The Star, some courts remain here until St. Lawrence Market North building opens and that hasn't happened yet | ||
| 3 | 2025-05-28 23:55 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | courthouse has now moved out and i made the change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166896869 | ||
| 4771470 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-05-23 01:19 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Jak możliwy jest wyjazd z tej części Zawiszy Czarnego https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173565278 - obecnie zaznaczonej jako jednokierunkowa w kierunku plaży? | |
| 2 | 2025-05-27 10:45 | commented | Ryzy85 ♦173 | Z tego co pamiętam to na tm odcinku jest zakaz ruchu z wyłączeniem rowerów Marynarki Wojennej i Służb miejskich Podejrzewam ze odcinek jednokierunkowy pozostał po tym jak jeszcze funkcjonował parking obok. | ||
| 3 | 2025-06-18 12:19 | closed | Bartekkmee ♦82 | Byłem, zobaczyłem-droga private za zezwoleniem, niedostępna dla wszystkich, dwukierunkowa, ślepa uliczka. Zamykam uwagę, ulicę zaktualizowałem. | ||
| 4072268 | 1 | 2024-01-16 19:12 | opened | Mateusz Konieczny ♦36,792 | name=The Chelsea Presentation Centre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2587433517 shop=condo ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else? (if anyone wants I can provide list of weird shop values in some country/area - let me know if you are interested) | |
| 2 | 2025-04-30 01:19 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | After discussion on other notes for this tag, osm wiki page has been created | ||
| 4686567 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-03-29 03:16 | opened | Boris Verkhovskiy ♦181 | Is this a garage? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-25 22:00 | commented | hoserab ♦880 | Appears to be a laneway home (https://www.calgary.ca/development/home-building/new-backyard-suite.html). Not really sure how best to tag these... | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-26 19:53 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | (Saw this note on list of notes in Canada, hi!) In Toronto I've started tagging them as building=house + house=laneway_house, that's got a dozen usages from two users now. I'm not really dead-set on it, if only because not all backyard/garden suites are laneway houses and it feels silly to have house=laneway_house, house=backyard_suite, and maybe others. There was some tagging discussion on Github https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1422#issuecomment-2658116635 and in wiki (currently down). As a result https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Accessory_Dwelling_Unit was created, but I don't remember what it suggested and the wiki is currently down... Some thoughts because I can't read the wiki... Ultimately a laneway/backyard house isn't much different from a regular house. The distinction of being the second house on a property isn't _quite_ relevant to OSM. One distinction is possible lack of unique address, whether for mail delivery or for emergency location. In Vancouver laneway houses can be assigned distinct house numbers, but I don't know if they get mail to the door. If Calgary laneway/backyard don't get distinct addresses, we could tag them with same address as the primary house? | ||
| 4 | 2025-05-11 09:13 | commented | Boris Verkhovskiy ♦181 | Possibly a similar situation here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4752442 | ||
| 4364046 | 1 | 2024-08-02 20:11 | opened | Coehill ♦40 | If anybody can do a survey here of bike lanes and surface types, it would be very helpful. There have been 2 cyclists killed nearby in the last few years. via StreetComplete 58.2 | |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 15:32 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | it's accurate as of now | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-24 15:50 | reopened | Coehill ♦40 | Thank you! | ||
| 4 | 2025-04-24 15:50 | closed | Coehill ♦40 | |||
| 4722253 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-22 10:55 | opened | Gdyshsh | Stop A: trinity square garden | |
| 2 | 2025-04-24 15:30 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Hi, the "notes" functionality on OpenStreetMap.org is for noting things that have to be checked or fixed on the map, not for personal bookmarks. Sorry! | ||
| 4495478 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-26 17:12 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | St Louis coming soon | |
| 2 | 2025-01-28 16:47 | closed | djrm2323323 | |||
| 3 | 2025-01-28 16:47 | reopened | djrm2323323 | |||
| 4 | 2025-04-21 20:50 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | it looked to be closed up again on March 11, 2025 -- have to reconfirm on site | ||
| 1826223 | 1 | 2019-06-27 01:17 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | According to the TTC route description, 63B buses make a left here from eastbound St. Clair to northbound Robina. Do they do this via the streetcar right-of-way? We currently have the 63B mapped as looping via the westbound lanes of St. Clair but apparently that's not correct. Does anyone know the area and can confirm or survey? | |
| 2 | 2019-07-06 02:04 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | saw on Mapillary a bus heading westbound through the loop, so from Robina to Oakwood. Still not sure how it actually gets to Robina, from streetcar right-of-way is my guess but I haven't seen it. When I updated relation for 63B https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7888761 I just ended it at St. Clair since it doesn't seem to have stops beyond the one on southeast corner of Oakwood/St. Clair anyway. But a confirmation of what's going on with the loop might help. | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-12 00:01 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Route description on TTC's website confirms the routing: "north on Oakwood, east on St. Clair onto the eastbound streetcar track, serve the eastbound farside passenger platform, then north on Robina and west into Oakwood Loop". However the stop list doesn't list the eastbound streetcar platform as a stop. I added a service way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1376896235 for the buses in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164837102 . I didn't add the streetcar stop to the 63B relation since TTC website is inconsistent and the previous stop is close enough that it doesn't really matter. | ||
| 4703541 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-04-10 04:05 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | This stretch of Bartlett, between the power line / driveway and Geary, looks two-way for cars. Is it? It's currently tagged as one-way except for bikes | |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 04:05 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Looks on aerial imagery, I mean. Can anyone survey on site? | ||
| 3 | 2025-04-10 17:52 | closed | skfd ♦1,036 | you are right, there is a sign where park ends. updated | ||
| 4623304 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-11 17:59 | opened | Nate Wessel ♦209 | City data indicates there should be a contraflow bikelane on Gladstone all the way between College and the park. Survey needed. | |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 01:43 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Is this supposed to be a recent change? From my recollection from summer/fall 2024 there's a stub lane at the Sylvan intersection that then ends - counterflow is allowed but with no lane, same as with south of Lindsey (or on Seaforth east of Lansdowne). See also changeswet comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/151922183 | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-18 19:53 | commented | Nate Wessel ♦209 | Probably not more recent than your edit there. The data I'm looking at isn't detailed enough to indicate how continuous the lane is... Do you remember where the stub lanes are well enough to map them? I'm sure they're buried pretty deep at the moment. I remember mapping a couple little stub lanes on Seaforth recently: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1312611032 | ||
| 4 | 2025-02-19 01:25 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | It's short but I don't remember exactly enough to map. I can pass by once the snow has melted. (April, at this rate?!) | ||
| 5 | 2025-04-10 01:32 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Surveyed and updated details in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164738300 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164747349 BTW, the stub lanes are now kinda visible on the City ortho imagery that's available in JOSM | ||
| 4623302 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-11 17:57 | opened | Nate Wessel ♦209 | City data indicates there should be sharrows on Gladstone between College and Dundas. Survey needed. | |
| 2 | 2025-04-09 18:19 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | confirmed and added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164737575 | ||
| 3391282 | 1 | 2022-10-08 19:08 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Future traffic signals | |
| 2 | 2025-03-28 15:29 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | they've been added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152856594 | ||
| 3973251 | 1 | 2023-11-04 23:54 | opened | --- | Highway 3 in St. Thomas is not being twinned nor is it being extended | |
| 2 | 2025-03-19 15:05 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/163821836 | ||
| 4637629 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | 2025-02-22 18:15 | opened | kent_eh ♦115 | Map shows fork in trail. There is no fork. Only the east path exists via StreetComplete 60.1 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/261945.jpg | |
| 2 | 2025-02-23 01:30 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | The other path is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1306323714 , it is tagged as an informal path with a grass surface, so possibly it's just under the snow? Though I'm not sure why there'd be a separate trail next to what I presume is a paved MUP. Might want a resurvey in spring or summer to see if there's actually a separate path | ||
| 3 | 2025-02-23 05:12 | commented | kent_eh ♦115 | Before summer 2024 this entire path was an informal grass path. During summer 2024 the paved path was installed (asphalt paving), replacing the original informal path. | ||
| 4 | 2025-02-23 05:14 | commented | kent_eh ♦115 | The paved path follows https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1353912227 | ||
| 4623282 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-02-11 17:44 | opened | Nate Wessel ♦209 | City data indicates there is a contraflow bike lane here. Current tagging only indicates bidirectionality for bikes, but not the painted lane. Survey needed to confirm. | |
| 2 | 2025-02-16 01:54 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | The counterflow lane is clearly visible in aerial imagery and I haven't heard anything about it being removed, so I went ahead and added it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162556638 | ||
| 4597128 Category: unknown | 1 | 2025-01-22 04:34 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Website tagged doesn't work. Website I found https://pkpetoronto.wixsite.com/pkpetoronto/contact indicates that the Polish church is now at 85 Thirty First Street which is the St. Paul's United Church two streets down. Perhaps they've moved to share that church. What is here now, then? | |
| 2 | 2025-04-10 13:26 | closed | skfd ♦1,036 | fixed website and location. Not sure what's there in an old church building. | ||
| 4424958 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-09-08 01:53 | opened | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | unlikely name=TTC (Toronto) 405 Etobicoke on highway=service https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1231836678 | |
| 2 | 2024-11-14 21:20 | commented | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | This should be tagged as bus route https://www.ttc.ca/routes-and-schedules/405/1 | ||
| 3 | 2025-01-15 17:16 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | bus route relation already exists, removed the name and fixed access tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161389333 | ||
| 4488945 Category: unknown | 1 | 2024-10-21 21:37 | opened | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Future traffic signal | |
| 2 | 2024-10-26 00:15 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Future meaning when? When was it approved? A traffic signal approved mid-2024 at Roncesvalles and Galley won't be installed until 2025, so when will this one be installed? | ||
| 3 | 2024-11-06 17:36 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | OK, I saw it yesterday - in process of installation. Poles and at least some signal heads are up, but not yet active. | ||
| 4 | 2024-11-21 01:11 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | Still not active today Looks like it'll have pedestrian crossings of Lansdowne on both north and south sides - signal heads are up, as is tactile paving There are also bicycle signal heads on south side of the intersection - I'm not sure where and how that crossing will connect | ||
| 5 | 2025-01-01 01:26 | commented | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | For the record, here is the Council approval for this light https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2021.TE28.41 However, the attached PDF does not have a detailed drawing of the intersection so it's not possible to identify what's going on with the bicycle crossing I haven't been here since my last comment so I can't update. I'll try to pass by sometime | ||
| 6 | 2025-01-04 12:42 | commented | andrewpmk ♦30,742 | Now turned on | ||
| 7 | 2025-01-15 02:05 | closed | Jarek 🚲 ♦4,164 | added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161364466 |