OSM note activities of SHARCRASH for the last 12 months
Copyright © Pascal Neis | Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors | More? See ResultMaps | Notes overview worldwide | Autoreload 5:00 min
Overall activities (12 months)
Opened: 0 (0%) Commented: 7 (47%) Closed: 0 (0%) Reopened: 8 (53%)
Stats per month
Latest activities
Latest activities | The colored events are made by SHARCRASH | Limit 500
Note#Tmstmp UTCEventContributorCommentAuto-translation
406529812024-01-13 13:22openedKugelbaum
♦396		In context of "Surfaces" overlay for https://osm.org/way/1027115736 via StreetComplete 56.0: Gone Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/192638.jpg
22024-01-13 16:58closedKugelbaum
♦396		Removed it.
32024-01-21 13:46reopenedSHARCRASH
42024-01-21 13:52commentedSHARCRASHThat's a track with grade 5, totally passable between the large passage between trees and over the small grasses. Grasses are natural and grow, any forestry vehicle, horse riders, pedestrians can recognize it and use it. Many examples exist with tracks with small grasses, OSM's Wiki has examples showing grade 5 tracks with grass. Even if the grasses would be higher the way would still be eligible as a track because grasses grow and its natural to grow, they do not block passage. Don't you understand that? Again and again you deleted data which exists!
52024-01-21 20:55closedKugelbaum
♦396
62024-01-21 20:57reopenedSHARCRASH
72024-01-21 22:40closedKugelbaum
♦396
82024-01-21 22:43reopenedSHARCRASH
92025-06-18 00:02commentedkabelhaai
♦1,852		What is the issue?
102025-06-27 17:36closedKugelbaum
♦396		Same issue. Contrary to the reopener (I reckon), I was actually at that location and I couldn't find a way. Closing it.
112025-06-27 17:42reopenedSHARCRASH
122025-06-27 17:55closedkabelhaai
♦1,852		Put the path on disused so you can open it once it is cleared again. No need to reopen it without interacting. The path is clearly overgrown as you can see on the photo.
132025-06-27 17:57reopenedSHARCRASH
142025-06-27 18:05commentedSHARCRASHHi kabelhaai, I'm don't interact anymore with people who lie, it's a waste of time. If you want, we can go on the location together and I will show you that the way still exists. The track on the photo is not overgrown, grass grows and dies depending on several conditions. Anyway for a for a 4 wheeled vehicle the way is usuable. I've been there in March, it still exists. Here is an activity showing I've been on location https://www.komoot.com/tour/2084058261?share_token=aDEbUx41TtC5bNtw31BQSaNbdh9C5mB3OP5h37s7Xdmo3miVT8&ref=wtd
152025-06-27 18:09commentedkabelhaai
♦1,852		Feel free to add more photos, or show a heatmap of some sorts and add it again if it actually exists.
162025-06-27 20:26commentedSHARCRASHhttps://ibb.co/XfMwsxcD
172025-06-27 21:11commentedKugelbaum
♦396		That heat on the northern "path" is nothing, especially with the much higher heat next to it. From my experience there needs to be a lot more heat to be sure there really is a path. My explanation for this situation here, is a problem on the ground. There seem to MTB folks who create trails from time to time and there is a reason why somebody has put sticks there. Do we need to map these trails that aren't available all the time and maybe even without the go from the forest owner? I don't think so.
182025-06-28 10:34commentedkabelhaai
♦1,852		Starcrash, how old is the heatmap data of the northern path? It could be 2y right? Sticks where?
192025-06-28 10:38commentedkabelhaai
♦1,852		I can see the sticks on other photos. Cant we simply map it as a track in pad state or almost not visible? There was a path and now it seems blocked. The "private" argument does not matter as we can put it on access=private. We map paths and houses on private property all the time.
406529612024-01-13 13:22openedKugelbaum
♦396		In context of "Surfaces" overlay for https://osm.org/way/1027125127 via StreetComplete 56.0: Just some illegal path residues through private forest. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/192636.jpg
22024-01-13 16:57closedKugelbaum
♦396		Removed it.
32024-01-21 13:31reopenedSHARCRASH
42024-01-21 13:45commentedSHARCRASHYou deleted a portion of a way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1239441067 going NE of this note and visible on your photo. Someone used it only 4 days before you deleted it https://www.strava.com/activities/10526379143 and others using it in 2023 https://www.strava.com/activities/9038368641 , https://www.strava.com/activities/9038199083 Again you delete data which exists! Dare I say, you possibly put branches on terrain to make it look like it hasn't been used for ages but as i've shown here someone passed only 4 days ago before you delete it and several others within 2023.
52024-01-21 20:55closedKugelbaum
♦396
62024-01-21 20:57reopenedSHARCRASH
72024-01-21 22:40closedKugelbaum
♦396
82024-01-21 22:43reopenedSHARCRASH
92025-06-18 00:03commentedkabelhaai
♦1,852		 What is the issue?
102025-06-27 17:34closedKugelbaum
♦396		I'm closing it. I was there, no usable path. It even looks like a fed up forest owner put signs so people won't look for paths which aren't there.
112025-06-27 17:37reopenedSHARCRASH
122025-06-27 17:56closedkabelhaai
♦1,852		Overgrown. Put it on disused: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4065298
132025-06-27 18:05reopenedSHARCRASH
142025-06-27 18:13commentedSHARCRASH@kabelhaai, as I said on the other note, on the activity here below, for this path/trail i've been able to join the other one visible with the GPS tracking and there are no signs. https://www.komoot.com/tour/2084058261?share_token=aDEbUx41TtC5bNtw31BQSaNbdh9C5mB3OP5h37s7Xdmo3miVT8&ref=wtd Also I suggest you to not beileve blindly what this other person posts. If you are near the location, please make a survey, and confirm here that Kugelbaum is wrong. Another example is on this where he potsed a misplaced photo. I had been there again and filmed from his misleading location to the actual bridge he had delted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4011865
152025-06-27 19:09closedKugelbaum
♦396
162025-06-27 19:43reopenedSHARCRASH
172025-06-27 19:45commentedkabelhaai
♦1,852		Show heatmaps please. Irrefutable evidence.
182025-06-27 20:25commentedSHARCRASHhttps://ibb.co/XfMwsxcD
406529212024-01-13 13:22openedKugelbaum
♦396		In context of "Surfaces" overlay for https://osm.org/way/1014629003 via StreetComplete 56.0: Where path steep downhill? Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/192632.jpg
22024-01-13 16:54closedKugelbaum
♦396		Removed it. Looks like there were some illegal MTB trails in that private forest years ago.
32024-01-21 13:19reopenedSHARCRASH
42024-01-21 13:23commentedSHARCRASHYour interpretations about "illegal" are based on ZERO FACTS! Again an attempt on misinformation! There is a local yearly official trail running and mountain bike course called "Trail des 7 bosses" and exceptionally there might be authorizations for those courses which might also change yearly or even constant permissive passage.
52024-01-21 20:55closedKugelbaum
♦396
62024-01-21 20:57reopenedSHARCRASH
72024-01-21 22:40closedKugelbaum
♦396
82024-01-21 22:43reopenedSHARCRASH
92024-10-12 10:30commentedThierry1030
♦5,962		mapped as abandoned highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1290771308 is this ok now?
102025-06-27 18:41commentedSHARCRASHHi Thierry1030 Here is are 2 activites showing that I could take that path: 2025 May 13 https://www.komoot.com/tour/2240925309?share_token=agjXii0BzpLJrQHRNtLuoUvaItPgX5JPVOVArIiNdndJFQdz9x&ref=wtd 2025 March 6 https://www.komoot.com/tour/2084058261?share_token=aDEbUx41TtC5bNtw31BQSaNbdh9C5mB3OP5h37s7Xdmo3miVT8&ref=wtd
112025-06-27 19:09closedKugelbaum
♦396
122025-06-27 19:43reopenedSHARCRASH
401186512023-12-02 08:49openedKugelbaum
♦396		In context of "Surfaces" overlay for https://osm.org/way/826280950 via StreetComplete 55.1: No bridge. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/188132.jpg
22023-12-07 19:43closedKugelbaum
♦396		removed it all as nothing visible
32023-12-21 23:45reopenedM!dgard
♦466
42023-12-22 00:27commentedM!dgard
♦466		Hi! The structure that's visible in the photo is a weir, used for water control. It's not the ruins of a bridge. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dweir In fact, I have been shown a video showing that the bridge still exists a bit further, possibly at the location it was mapped.
52023-12-25 08:43closedKugelbaum
♦396		Hi. There was a wooden plank over the stream further east, but it only leads into impassable vegetation. No way on that side of the stream anymore. 10 years ago it was already full of weeds. That structure might have been a weir in the past, now it's just a pile of stones.
62024-01-19 00:17reopenedSHARCRASH
72024-01-19 00:28commentedSHARCRASH Kugelbaum AKA ex tomolobla, ex Capslock_Cleaner, ex Digital-circle, ex ltwo and your sock-puppets grauwutayette, eyasonu, etc… First you say “no bridge” and then contradict yourself admitting there is a “plank”, conveniently worded so to mislead others, structure visible in the video here below. Obviously, you misplaced the photo shot of your note since you know there is a bridge, that’s a deceptive attitude. Then you say “No way on that side of the stream”, though I’ve been able to cross it and continue over 2 steps and then for several meters leading to an intersection in Y, clearly passable. Just a pity I didn’t have the time to continue for the beauty of the evidence. I won’t accept this as an excuse of an innocent mistake. It’s clearly intended to mislead, just like you’ve done in your past mass deletions (and I saved for later). Your original misplaced photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rAg3HBfiprj6Q65yOX2sfReB6oAaL3r1 My video proving your false contributions and deceptive photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1A5muUKDnCzw9YcHVyKRaOn_-KWrf-Q71
82024-01-21 14:46commentedSHARCRASHClear photo of the bridge, not a plank at all, recognizable with the 2 steps on the other side https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qdDT1nW9HE8FKsEKFUvuuij3n55Aupnh
92024-01-21 20:54closedKugelbaum
♦396
102024-01-21 20:56reopenedSHARCRASH
112024-01-21 22:41closedKugelbaum
♦396
122024-01-21 22:43reopenedSHARCRASH
132024-01-22 22:38closedKugelbaum
♦396		Fixed my mistake, added the plank back. Walked on the other side, there was walkable weeds for a few meters and then unwalkable. The other end's bridge is damaged as showed my photo and noted by someone else on the removed ways.
142025-06-27 18:19reopenedSHARCRASH
152025-06-27 18:21commentedSHARCRASHActually nothing has been fixed. How the features have been mapped are not representative of how they are in reality and the data is not the original one with its history edits.
162025-06-27 19:09closedKugelbaum
♦396
172025-06-27 19:43reopenedSHARCRASH
377188312023-07-09 07:52opened---Fort de Fermont Le fort n'est pas situé au bon endroit, sur votre carte
22023-07-09 09:37commentedSyl
♦41,075		Bonjour, pouvez-vous donner plus de détails ? Où est-il actuellement et où devrait-il être ?
32023-08-09 12:05commentedSacha Lyoubovin
♦24		Il s'agit d'un complexe de plusieurs forts? J'identifie un emplacement plus au sud de la D174... N'est-ce pas une deuxième partie du "Fort"? Perplexe, tout comme Syl...
42025-03-14 11:54commentedSHARCRASHOui il s'agit d'un ensemble de bunkers, casemates, etc. Ce n'est pas qu'au sud de cette note, à coté du parking, comme suggéré. Là se trouvent l'entrée principale, le musée... Pour bien faire, il faudrait englober les structures dans une relation et enlever ou convertir la "zone militaire" car il n'y a plus d'activité militaire, c'est juste un lieu touristique.