| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1121789 | 1 | ~ 9 years ago | opened | Luis36995 | This OSM note is added as per the user feedback from Mapbox: Is the name of the road '147 Trail'? Can someone please confirm the same and update the map accordingly if yes? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | TIGER 2022 does refer to CR 220 here as "147 Trail" as well as "147th Trail". | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | County GIS parcel data and address data support this as well. This issue can also be seen throughout numerous roads in this county as well. Only data source that supports the "County Road X" names is the old TIGER import data, which is known to have problems. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | There is also mapillary photos along US 65 that support renaming the roads in this county. The current data from the TIGER import says County Road 218, but the sign in the photo says "165th Road" https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=793002571621212&focus=photo&lat=39.02738646&lng=-93.19523845&z=17&x=0.7753313383324298&y=0.5265011205189825&zoom=2.3044096728307255 | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Oh wow this road is untouched since the import! Looks like Saline County uses the format "Nth Rd/Trl/Ln/...". Be careful as the numbers are reused with different suffixes (e.g. 165th Trail and 165th Road are distinct yet still near each other). Their GIS data is overpriced (> $0), but Saline County Sheriff has this map on their site: https://www.salinecountysheriff.com/templates/salinecountysheriff.com/images/salinecountymap.jpg That's a MoDOT map derived from MoDOT's own open data, which is not always correct for local government systems, but it usually is, and the Saline Sheriff's office seems to endorse it in its website's footer. It's a decade old, though, so I personally would use MoDOT's latest data: https://traveler.modot.org/hpmaps/ Even if the numbering were correct, the "County Road X" format isn't even applicable, as it doesn't it doesn't specify the suffix. Big job, but I'm all for correcting Saline County, MO, county road names 👍 | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | And one more thing since we're looking at a network of sorts: I like to apply route relations to road systems when it makes sense, but I think the suffix practice here disqualifies that. It's not like cardinal direction suffixes which feel more "set-decomposable" to me. These road names, despite containing digits, appear to be simple character strings for the name tag. Now, my opinion there changes if the county or locals have a systematic way of identifying the roads beyond name abbreviation (e.g. shields) | |
| 8 | ~ 30 days ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Sounds good, I'll go ahead and begin fixing the road names, starting from the northern tip of the county and working my way down | |
| 5351020 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | MO AC is not important enough to be secondary. Tertiary fits better |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Yeah, lots of supplemental roads that should be tertiary around here. Also lots of tertiary county roads that should be residential. I'll help fix it up a bit later | |
| 3 | ~ 3 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | downgraded | |
| 5351019 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Bridge has tertiary classification despite being sandwiched by secondaries |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Road should be tertiary imo since it parallels mo 25 | |
| 3 | ~ 3 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | updated bridge | |
| 4402468 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Classification change |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | dannmer ♦22,645 | what would you like to have done here? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦22,645 | No response, please reactivate if there's more info and provide a clear, detailed description of what needs to be done | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | reopened | tyfi ♦649 | ||
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Yeah sorry bout that Looks like I was pointing out a bad change in classification. It's secondary to the left and tertiary to the right with no reason for the change. Likely an incomplete upgrade as some point | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I'd say MO J should be secondary from this point east to AA | |
| 7 | ~ 3 days ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | updated | |
| 5184295 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | US 63 is marked as a motorway south of discovery parkway, but it has lots of u turn intersections and has a couple of driveways along it too and doesn't seem to meet the criteria of a full motorway. Should it be marked as trunk or just left the way it is? |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | Trunk seems to fit better and it looks like it was tagged that way until a couple years ago. They're trying to get more motorwayish in latest imagery. Also suspect - that west outer road is probably tertiary? | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Loks like the outer road is probably secondary since its a state route | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Interestingly, the account that promoted it from trunk to motorway partially reverted the promotion 4 months ago changeset/175937274 As for the outer road, it does feel tertiaryish to me. MO numbered routes are generally tertiary and up, while MO lettered routes can even be unclassified. I also see a residual motorway_link south of Ashland | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Fixed the motorway_link, downgraded frontage road to tertiary, gonna go ahead and close this | |
| 3153753 | 1 | ~ 4 years ago | opened | JessAk71 ♦1,647 | is this raceway name known? if so it would be useful to add it or a area for the venue |
| 2 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,282 | I couldn't find a name online. Given that the National Guard is nearby, it looks like it could be a training facility for their drivers, or a test and evaluation center for vehicles. | |
| 3 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Could this be it? "MO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL | 6012 EMERGENCY VEHICLE OPERATIONS COURSE (JEFFERSON CITY) | JEFFERSON CITY | 8136012001 | PURSUIT DRIVING TRACK | 2302 MILITIA DRIVE JEFFERSON CITY MO 65109" Source: Page 111 of https://oa.mo.gov/sites/default/files/Site-and-Facility-Numbers.pdf | |
| 4 | ~ 3 years ago | commented | JessAk71 ♦1,647 | the address seems to match, Id say that would probably be it. | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | dannmer ♦22,645 | Anyone going to add this? | |
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I removed sport=motor since it's not a motorsport track; it's used for police training. That was done in changeset #156116193. How should we tag this? The entire site is called "Emergency Vehicle Operations Course" and has the address 2302 Militia Drive. I feel like that can uncontroversially be put on an area surrounding the site. The raceway itself is listed as a "pursuit driving track" in the document above, but I feel like that's not really a true name. It's more of a description. It feels like naming a lamp post "Lamp Post". Thoughts? | |
| 7 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | dannmer ♦22,645 | tagged as highway=service, police=training_area as suggested here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:police%3Dtraining_area | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Anything left to do here? | |
| 9 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 4494271 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Topology on 141 here is making routing awkward, and the name should should actually be a ref/route-relation. I understand the lanes are physically separated, but there may be another way to model this |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | The changeset comment "modified roads" is also not helpful | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | jhaluska80 ♦3,592 | I can't image a GPS working well there with so many links and incorrect lane counts. I suspect the original mapper wasn't aware you could use ways in turn restrictions. I took a few hours and simplified the structure. I reworked the lane counts, turn lanes, placement and change lane tags. I redid the turn restrictions to use ways as vias. | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | !! Thank you. I don't remember exactly how OsmAnd reacted, but it struggled with simply traveling northbound under the bridge | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | Closing now. A new note can always be opened if there's still an issue in the future | |
| 4704468 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | InsidiousReset ♦2 | The sign says the max weight is 40 (st) for "other", as opposed to 30 st for "single". This is outside my scope, and I could not find an example for how to tag similar signs. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Not an expert myself, but I think OSM would call anything other than a single unit vehicle an articulated heavy goods vehicle. So maybe: maxweight=30 st [lower default] maxweight:hgv_articulated=40 st The *:hgv_articulated subkey is in use, and "40 st" is a very common value assigned to it. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=:hgv_articulated https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv_articulated | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | Added in changeset/181744848 | |
| 5263320 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Abbreviations |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | updated fr | |
| 5152489 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | dannmer ♦22,645 | The Strava heat map shows a network of unmapped trails at this location. Here's a link to an official map that shows some of these trails: https://gorctrails.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/matson_0.pdf |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I added an approximate boundary for the park in changeset/181743852 | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | MidwestHikerDude ♦27 | I added the trails in changeset 184997626. The map here has all the trails. https://www.sccmo.org/713/Matson-Hill-Park The map at the link is posted at the trailhead, and there are also sings along the trails with trail names. | |
| 4292044 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Need to check termini of AA and BB |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | LavaFlowsYT ♦18 | ||
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | anticyclonic ♦35 | ?? | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | Please stop marking things as closed without addressing the issue. If you don't know what you're doing, please stop. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | anticyclonic ♦35 | ||
| 7 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | tyfi ♦649 | ||
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | OP here... Looks like both directions of MO AA should reach the northern freeway ramps, and both directions of MO BB should reach the southern freeway ramps. This creates a short concurrency between MO AA and US 40 as well as between MO AA and BB under the interstate. There should be no concurrency between MO BB and US 40. Route relations and some way ref tags need to be updated. Source: https://data-msdis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/MSDIS::mo-modot-roads-routes/explore | |
| 9 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Sorry it's an old note, but there is a change to be made on the map | |
| 10 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I'll go ahead and shuffle those ways around real quick so we can get the note closed | |
| 11 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | changeset/181741500 changeset/181741571 Next time please don't close a note unless you're sure it's either resolved or impossible to resolve. You can always drop a comment to ping discussion participants. This note generated a lot of emails for me in recent days. I think I got it fixed, though...better late than never! | |
| 5236492 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | DIamond -> Diamond |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦22,645 | updated | |
| 4016498 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | MoDOT's designation of DD ends here |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Baloo Uriza ♦16,137 | Going which way? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | MoDOT's travel map shows it ends going south, but not sure if that is a valid source of information | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I left a lot of open notes scattered across MO over the years, yikes. This reads like a todo for myself that I left behind a while ago; sorry I never got around to it. As far as valid, I've found discrepancies before between MoDOT's own travelway data and Bing StreetSide for supplemental state route designations. If by valid you refer to usage rights, the road network data used by MoDOT's Traveler Map is the same stuff offered through MSDIS which is cleared for use: https://data-msdis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/MSDIS::mo-modot-roads-routes/about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_datasources/Local_data#Missouri_Spatial_Data_Information_Service Check out MoDOT's HPMAPs as well. It presents the same open data but in a less distracting way imho: https://traveler.modot.org/hpmaps/ Maybe aerial imagery can locate the transition line from state to municipal maintenance, which could be visual evidence for the true terminus of DD. | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | There's a clear change in pavement color in both Bing and Esri World just under this pin. Combined with open MoDOT data indicating the southern terminus for DD lies at Lake Bluff Drive, I'm convinced State Route DD terminates here. But it also seems that Stone County continues a "DD" designation as part of its county network all the way to Coney Island. This would not be part of the state supplemental route network. There is precedent for this phenomenon with State Route CC in Jefferson County (way/18526984): North of US 67, we have County Road CC; south, we have State Route CC. I think we should change the ref tag south of this note to "CR DD" and mayhap even consider a route relation with network=US:MO:Stone. | |
| 6 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Baloo Uriza ♦16,137 | Wonder if we can get MODOT themselves to provide feedback on this one, it's pretty unusual for state highways to terminate someplace other than a town. | |
| 7 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Baloo Uriza ♦16,137 | Wonder if we can get MODOT themselves to provide feedback on this one, it's pretty unusual for state highways to terminate someplace other than a town or another state highway. | |
| 8 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | It happens, though I don't have numbers on how often. I wonder if Table Rock Lake had something to do with it. | |
| 9 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | Baloo Uriza ♦16,137 | I mean, the only other time I've seen it happen is on WA 504 where WSDOT finally gave up on rebuilding it to Tri-Cities after signing it as "temporarily closed at Johnston Ridge" from 1982 until the Johnston Ridge Volcanic Observatory was remodeled. What feels more plausible is that DD actually does make it to Coney Island but they just repaved part of it or changed materials in order to deal with whatever's going on below the surface of the highway or to save cost. | |
| 10 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Indeed, the entire stretch from MO 13 to Coney Island is named DD in some form. My point is that I think it hands off from state to county at this location. Route B in Benton County seems like a similar case with state->county handoff just before an artificial lake (way/18492787) | |
| 11 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | I know there is also route N up near Platte City MO that has signs that say its maintained by the county for like a mile or two before going into the town | |
| 12 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | @greatnameguys Similar situation, but I think it happened through a different process. State Route N used to reach Platte City, but it was truncated at some point and now terminates at Route D. This is reflected in MoDOT data, and you can follow the signs on Bing StreetSide to confirm. OSM seems to have chosen "Old State Highway N" as the name of the northern stretch, which I think is fine. The tag old_ref="MO N" is also warranted imho @Baloo I don't know much about WA, but MO supplemental routes ("lettered routes") don't always behave like normal state highways. To quote MO's MUTCD, "[u]sually, but not always, double letter routes are farm to market roads that end at county roads" (MoDOT EPG 943.1). It's pretty normal for the pavement on these routes to unceremoniously end and dump you into a tangle of county roads. There's usually a little M19-2 sign that says "MoDOT Maintenance Ends" right next to the pavement transition. Hence why I was focusing on pavement: it's not sufficient to prove a handoff of authority, but that's where it'd be if one exists. | |
| 13 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I dug a little and found that Stone County does have a coherent road identifier system near Table Rock Lake, but I guess nobody's pedantic enough around there to care about it 😊 Since we're right next to Table Rock Lake, the U.S. Army Corps has some public domain maps of the area. This one from 2016 shows State Route DD leading into a county road named DD-25: <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Table_Rock_Lake%2C_Missouri_and_Arkansas_-_USACE-p16021coll10-10699.pdf> This old map from 1986 (not copyrighted in US) agrees with the USACE map: State Route DD ends at some point with "LR DD-25" picking up the slack: <https://digital.shsmo.org/digital/collection/Maps/id/1132/> This old photo from 2003 looking southbound along DD corroborates these maps: <https://datazoneapps.modot.mo.gov/aran-external/Home/AranImage?y=2003&t=2939&i=28874990>. Continuing, the name is "Table Rock Lake Road DD-25", and the road branching off to the left is "Table Rock Lake Road DD-24". Check out the name_1 tag on Lake Bluff Drive..."Dd-24". You can also make out the little 'maintenance ends' sign in the distance Putting it all together, I now think an appropriate tagging setup would be to split DD at this point, replace ref="MO DD" to the south with ref="LR DD-25", add a route relation with ref="DD" and network="US:MO:Supplemental" from this point north to MO 13, and add name="State Highway DD" (or loc_name?) from this point to Coney Island to address the local familiarity issue while not affecting semantics of supplemental route tagging (@Baloo We've both nuked a lot of redundant name="State Highway XX" tags, but this would be an exception) Thoughts? | |
| 14 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | I think that sounds reasonable | |
| 15 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | changeset/180791601 changeset/180791702 changeset/180791714 Closing now, always feel free to reopen | |
| 16 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 17 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Thinking abouyt again, I feel like "State Highway DD" is a little confusing since it isn't maintained by the state, I wonder if County highway DD or just Highway DD would be better | |
| 18 | ~ 5 months ago | reopened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 19 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Oh it's confusing, no doubt about it haha. This one was a challenge for me. I really just wanted to truncate it and move on. MoDOT is pretty clear that they don't consider the southern portion part of the route. What's also clear is that locals have a community identity established around the phrase "DD", so I want to respect that, too | |
| 20 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I already added loc_name="DD", which is a tag meant to document local slang. It's more literal, i.e. it doesn't fully capture the semantics that the route allegedly continues, instead that it's just locally called "DD". But maybe that's fine, and the best move is just to use that and delete the name="State Highway DD" tag entirely | |
| 21 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 5201332 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | crossing |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | dannmer ♦22,645 | updated | |
| 5201127 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Could someone check the tagging on this railroad segment? It was promoted from disused to active with usage=tourism, but I don't know much about railroads. Also there's a typo underneath this note |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I guess I'm mostly just curious about the extent here. At what point should it flip back? Currently that's in Gordonville | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Fixed the typo in changeset/179725786 | |
| 4 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | bdentremont ♦2,297 | I think the edit you are seeing is accurate. The portion of track reactivated, the name assigned, and stations marked look consistent with operations described at this website. https://www.slimrr.com/what-to-expect | |
| 5 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | Wait that actually looks pretty sweet Thanks! | |
| 4928348 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Potatoleum ♦19 | Why was Route B demoted from secondary to tertiary? the changeset that demoted it has no comment about it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158949798 |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Not the demoter, but is there a comparable route to justify a higher rank? If I wanted to drive from, say, New Haven to Warrenton, would locals call me nuts for taking 100->19->94->B->70 instead of just 100->47? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | Potatoleum ♦19 | It's less about New Haven to Warrenton and more about something like Warrenton to Linn, where MO-B is commonly used as a shortcut, definitely more than Route Y is, and Route Y currently has a higher designation. | |
| 5134549 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | LawMomAtLarge | FLOCK Security Camera at this location since 8/31/2025 or prior. Warrenton PD has access to footage however refuses to comply with the Rules of Criminal Procedure requiring disclosure to Defendant in a pending criminal matter. The total lack of tracking and auditing access to this specific FLOCK camera system enable civil Rights and due process violations and place the community at further risk of victimization by a historically corrupt police force and court system. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,282 | Which direction does the ALPR face? | |
| 3 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Added in changeset/179613353 with a FIXME note attached pending more info. 1. Is it on its own pole, strapped to a power pole, etc.? 2. Is it a PTZ camera or always pointed in one direction? 3. Is there a visible solar panel? | |
| 4 | ~ 9 days ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | A duplicate camera node with the direction was placed by a user a few months after this note. Removed the older node without the direction on it and kept the node that had the direction on it | |
| 5197118 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | too much bridge |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | ICT_maps ♦14,827 | updated | |
| 4300747 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Missing bridges on I-44 |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | changeset/179557822 | |
| 5046886 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | lmum ♦1,095 | Substation |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I mapped an outline for the substation based on fences seen in Bing aerials. Can still map transformer if desired | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | Ended up adding transformer | |
| 4367252 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | This full cloverleaf is being converted into a partial cloverleaf with a roundabout to the west of 55 and a loopy bit to the east. This issue will track the progress of that project. https://www.modot.org/node/51487 https://dpv85fgkqesen.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/2024-07/roundabout%203.jpg https://dpv85fgkqesen.cloudfront.net/sites/default/files/2024-07/Roundabout.jpg https://www.modot.org/interstate-55-corridor-upgrades-jefferson https://www.modot.org/sites/default/files/documents/Strip%20Maps%2011_02_2023_7.pdf |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Looks like the west roundabout has been mapped :) | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Looks like someone marked the ramp from north us 67 to south i55 as demolished, Could someone confirm this? | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I haven't been down there in a bit, but it looks like that was planned to happen | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Erm..I take that back..I think. I took a hiatus from OSM for a year or so and need to catch back up with projects :) | |
| 3999692 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Is this really a supplemental business route? |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | I'm looking at this one further because the thought of that is funny to me :) | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | Any update? | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | The road seems like its become overgrown on satellite imagery | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | reopened | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | ||
| 7 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Yeah, looks like an unpaved service road that runs up to the railroad. Def not a state route or a business route thereof. Side note: access=destination is possibly wrong, too, on MO T just to the east | |
| 8 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | greatnameguys2472 ♦361 | I checked on Modot's data site and supposedly its called Mill Bluff Road, so I changed the name to that since I couldn't find any mention of any business route. I also went ahead and turned the overgrown part into a track since it seems like it still exists to some degree, and also fixed the access on route T | |
| 5179055 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Name switchup going on here N Lindbergh Blvd to the left, N Hwy 67 to the right. Former is almost certainly correct |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Taking a look at this one now, actually | |
| 3 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | N Hwy 67 is a peculiar form since it blends county locator direction with state numerical designation, but no route network | |
| 4 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Yeah the primary name should be North Lindbergh Boulevard all the way Looks like the N Hwy 67 name was informed by addressing which is always a fun, totally consistent, and not existentially infuriating phenomenon :) I'll keep the north prefix since that's consistent with existing OSM data (likely from TIGER), but it doesn't seem like STL county does cardinal locator directions anymore. | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | changeset/179019942 changeset/179020136 | |
| 6 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | ||
| 4539409 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | tyfi ♦649 | Ampersand? |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | tyfi ♦649 | Eddie & Park Road | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | CurlingMan13 ♦54,282 | That's what it shows on Bing Streetside imagery: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=38.544271~-90.379828&lvl=17&dir=321.966&style=x&v=2&sV=1 | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | tyfi ♦649 | Fair enough! |