| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5187074 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | There are no protected bike lane at this intersection. Removed from map but will need a new survey when construction complete. Survey date: March 1st, 2026 |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Minor correction - Comment should have said "marked cycle crossing." There are no road markings at this time. | |
| 5169422 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 20 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | New Perimeter Trail Segment (seen here: https://metrovancouver.org/services/regional-parks/Documents/campbell-valley-regional-park-map.pdf) from 16th to 8th Avenue needs to be mapped as an MUP. |
| 5168019 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 21 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | This bus stop appears to have been eliminated during the bike lane construction. |
| 2 | ~ 15 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | Thanks, removed it | |
| 5164185 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of these bus stops is redundant. |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | Removed lesser detailed one, thanks | |
| 5164184 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of these bus stops is redundant. |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | Removed lesser detailed one, thanks | |
| 5164180 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of these bus stops is redundant. |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | Removed lesser detailed one, thanks | |
| 5164179 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of these bus stops is redundant. |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | ||
| 5164178 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of these bus stops is redundant. |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | ||
| 5164177 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 24 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of these bus stops is redundant. |
| 2 | ~ 23 days ago | closed | maxwellward ♦1,131 | ||
| 4778468 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | --- | This building was replaced with 'Journal in Jubilee' by Aryze, 6 stories. Nice building |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added with address | |
| 5163165 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | This path used to have modal filter gates. Survey needed to confirm their absence. |
| 5163164 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Site survey needed for which buildings are completed or under construction along Nigel Avenue |
| 4274121 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | This is a construction site, and there are separated sidewalks on Nigel Gate. |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | This has been mapped | |
| 5163003 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | Pendergirl4 | This parking lot has had an exit at this end of the lot for several years now. The lot is now entry only off orillia and exit only at both ends. This can be seen on satellite imagery. |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | Pendergirl4 | There are also several paths missing, which are shown in the Saanich GIS map. https://map.saanich.ca/html5viewer/?viewer=Public | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | parking lots updated, paths between fields and across lots added. | |
| 5163001 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 25 days ago | opened | Pendergirl4 | This intersection has recently been changed to a traffic circle (similar to seaton/hampton), and the north side of Regina has had a sidewalk installed through to Tillicum road. There is a link at the bottom of this page to the schematic drawing of what the road now looks like: https://hello.saanich.ca/en/projects/seaton-regina-sidewalk-1 |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Fixed - Regina Ave was also missing name W of Seaton. Sidewalk drawn in approximately. Traffic Circle drawn. | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4962145 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Other segments of McKenzie's lackluster flexpost bike lanes are not marked as protected. |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4955858 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | crassula ♦34 | New school needs to be added here, plus eventually modifications to old building which is in the process of being demolished. |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Approximate school building added, no surrounding infrastructure mapped. | |
| 4856589 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | --- | The bus stop Majestic at Dougall has moved to Majestic at Hawthorne, and there is a new pedestrian crossing. |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | bus stop relocated, crossing added. | |
| 4912172 Category: Organicmaps | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Robert Modelewski | The place has gone or never existed. A user of Organic Maps application has reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2025-06-08T00:18:23Z POI has no name POI types: landuse-forest #organicmaps ios |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | alester ♦466 | It isn't clear what needs to be fixed here. The automated text is saying that the forested area doesn't exist, but I'm reasonably certain they haven't logged the entire area east of the dump and around Prospect Lake | |
| 3 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | This area has no false locations. | |
| 4865336 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | discontinuity ♦46 | This is a shelter under which there are tables for folks to eat at. There are 4 or 5 tables with 4 seats each. via StreetComplete 61.1 |
| 2 | ~ 25 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Structure changed to picnic shelter | |
| 5095573 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | smithkm ♦285 | This segment between the connection to the parking aisle and the intersection with the highway is not built to cycleway standard, it's just a sidewalk made of concrete slabs that has a single sign in one direction designating it as shared. I think highway=footway + bicycle=designated would better represent this than highway=cycleway. The rest, from the connector to the parking lot up to Ravine Way is built as a unsegregated cycleway (wide and smooth asphault). |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Incorrect. This is legally designated as a multi-use path, and that is evident both from the original project drawings, the finished product (seen two weeks ago in person), and the fact that the crossing of Carey has elephants' feet, which are only used on designated MUPs. Please stop arbitrarily declaring your opinion to be the appropriate way to map things. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | smithkm ♦285 | ||
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | I've been trying to clarify what the actual correct way to tag this based on the standards outlined in the wiki is. That's WHY I've been using notes rather than just changing things unilaterally. I want to have things consistent. You're the one who keeps cutting off my attempts to do so while declaring your own opinion to be uncontestable fact. I could be wrong, you could be wrong, or the wiki itself could just be so ambiguous that it's not a matter of right and wrong. That's the entire point. I don't care which of us is the one who is right. I care about making sure that what we put in the database is consistent. | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | I have already stated: The official plans state this is an MUP It is contiguous to the MUP network along Carey Road It is adjoined at all intersections by elephants feet, which denote pedestrian and cyclist use - a feature of MUPs. It is legally designated as an MUP. As it is very new, and the CRD Bikemap is outdated, it does not appear in the CRD Bikemap. I do not see how this has any ambiguity. It is an MUP in every way other than paving style - which is not a method of identifying MUP status in Saanich (another example is the MUP outside the Shelbourne St. Church of Christ). | |
| 7 | ~ 26 days ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Confirmed today. Dual green bubble pedestrian-cycling signage, just as there was when I originally made this edit. It's designated an MUP and it is signed an MUP. This is closed. | |
| 4615440 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | ELW and ECS are both seeing significant renovation/construction. Might be worth making a change to reflect that. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Needs surveying | |
| 4974039 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | techwizard2 ♦3 | The sidewalk on the north side of Ocean Ave between the path to Fourth Street and just east of the crosswalk by the roundabout is a shared pathway (bicycles designated). There's a curb drop just east of the crosswalk to allow cyclists back onto the road. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | That's weird and close to pointless but it's in the map now. | |
| 5155246 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | One of the Eastbound bus stops is gone. Survey needed. |
| 4974036 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | techwizard2 ♦3 | The cycleways here look like they connect across the street but there's no crossing, they merge with the standard bike lanes in either direction. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | this has been corrected for routefinding algorithms, thanks very much mr man | |
| 5095599 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | A pedestrian path here connects the northern end of Bruce Gordon Place to Wallace Drive. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added in. Thank you for all your notes around here! | |
| 5095590 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | A pedestrian path here connects Blackglama Place to Pastel Crescent. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added in, thank you for noting this! | |
| 5086730 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | There is a footpath here liking Kristin Place to Peden Lane. The footpath depicted just north of here does not exist. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | *linking, not liking. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Thank you for noting, this has been fixed. | |
| 5091512 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | There is a pedestrian pathway here. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Thank you for noting it is here - very strange it has never been mapped! | |
| 4663538 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | OpenStreetMap Wiki shows that this should be just part of Harbour Road rather than mapped separately, and tagged as followed: cycleway:left=track cycleway:right=no cycleway:left:oneway=no https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:right:oneway This seems to be a consistent problem throughout the entire CRD. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | I've added cycleway:right=separate to Harbour Road. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | @eldang ♦21 | I advocate for keeping the bike way separate because it's the beginning of a long regional trail, of which only a short segment is shared with Harbour Road. To merge this segment with the road would be less consistent with how locals describe it. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | alester ♦466 | Mapping a cycleway track as a separate way is an accepted way of doing things: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dtrack#Alternatives_to_mapping_using_cycleway=track ...and I would argue it's more consistent with other highway tagging, where a road can be split into a dual carriageway due to a physical barrier between the directions. The one change I would suggest to the current tagging is to add cycleway=sidepath to the Goose way, to indicate that it's acting in the role of "cycleway=separate" to Harbour Road. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dsidepath | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | I would argue against this as, by separating the infrastructure, routing algorithms won't know to tell people to follow Harbour Road, they will instead be following an unnamed random path that the algorithm has no idea is on the pavement shared by the road with only a narrow concrete median separating it. | |
| 4930332 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | crassula ♦34 | Grange Road is undergoing significant active transportation upgrades. Marking to remind myself (or anyone else) to visit then add to OSM https://hello.saanich.ca/en/projects/grange-road-upgrades-1 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Grange Road S. of Burnside now has a two-way MUP connected to Goose. North of Burnside now has a sidewalk but no other modifications. | |
| 4297907 | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | smithkm ♦285 | https://www.saanich.ca/assets/Local~Government/Documents/Engineering/Cycling-%20Network.pdf shows viewmont and Mapleton as shared bikeways. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Also on CRD Map. No sharrows or any infrastructure in place. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 5098063 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | smithkm ♦285 | Significant changes to geometry here. Need to survey some GPS traces of the bike paths and sidewalks. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Geometry updated. No median present on Jutland anymore as SB lane has become a bikeway. | |
| 5065691 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | smithkm ♦285 | Seaton street here is marked as a cycle route, and the pedestrian underpass as a designated bike path. I don't remember and signs designating any of this for bicycles. Need to ground truth. The underpass is clearly designed for pedestrians only. It may be technically allowed for bikes in the basis of not technically being a sidewalk. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Very clearly laid out explicitly in the official CRD bikemap. https://maps.crd.bc.ca/Html5Viewer/?viewer=BikeMap | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | smithkm ♦285 | ||
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | There have to be clear on site indications like markings or signs to count as "designated". At best I'd consider that highway=footpath bicycle=yes. As for Seaton Street, simply marking it orange on that map doesn't seem to count for anything. I already question trying to mark the randomly distributed "bike connector" signs using route relations but an aspirational bit of orange on a map with | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | smithkm ♦285 | ||
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | reopened | smithkm ♦285 | ||
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | It's officially designated on the regional government map, and is a bike route as per painted sharrows on the road along its entire length from the MUP across the playing fields to the tunnel. This includes on the recently rebuilt intersection at Regina Ave, showing that it is not a legacy feature that has been abandoned. This is both officially mapped as a bike route AND marked in real life as a bike route (and is used heavily by cyclists, to boot). StreetView: https://www.google.ca/maps/@48.4558843,-123.387306,3a,48.9y,205.65h,80.17t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sqYI7y88aZBJJwL16HE9aHA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D9.834117373350864%26panoid%3DqYI7y88aZBJJwL16HE9aHA%26yaw%3D205.65105637713535!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e2?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDExMy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D I also biked through there two days ago and can confirm this is a bike route as per pavement markings present in 2026. I am resolving this again. Please do not reactivate it. | |
| 5113973 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Geometry of dedicated bike tracks (PBLs) needs surveying. MUPs on either side of road are currently mapped, need confirmation of where PBLs start and stop around here, especially with bus stops. |
| 4957770 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | --- | This block has been changed. The road has been reopened and there is a protected bike path and separated, sidewalk grade path, on the east and west sides respectively. Can be tagged the same as the adjacent parts of Vancouver. See note above for changes to Pandora intersection. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4957772 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | --- | Road changes. The road has been filled with a median leaving a cycle path and sidewalk on each side. Cars coming eastbound on the Pandora access street have to turn right onto Vancouver, cars coming north on Vancouver have to turn right onto the access street. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 5041182 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Should be a path from here straight across to the right |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | Use a cardinal direction. North or south. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 5090508 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Needs some ongoing surveys for the protected bike lane projects. |
| 4663548 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Do flexposts conform to OSM's definition of cycletrack? |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | Yes, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Buffered_and_protected_bicycle_ways | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | This does not specify flextposts. Is specifically says that unprotected buffer is a standard cycleway=lane, with a buffer. There are no bollards here (flexposts are not bollards). There is literally no protection for cyclists at this point, no physical barrier to being run over by drivers. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | This seems like something that needs to be sorted out on the wiki rather than here on a local note. The important thing is to ensure it's consistent across OSM. | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | No idea how to do that. Not an active user - happy to take it somewhere that would actually have active discussion. This is also a localized issue, as our local government claimed flexposts 40 feet apart are "protection" but I'm willing to bet most people would find that ridiculous. | |
| 4986167 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | --- | A ton of roadwork here needs to be surveyed in the next few months as projects wrap up (bike lanes). |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Some updates are complete. Construction still ongoing. | |
| 4836754 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | This is not a cycleway. A sign westbound (down to Goose) says cyclists must dismount. Didn't see a corresponding sign eastbound. (Up to Gorge Road) |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | crassula ♦34 | It's unclear, there is no sign saying to dismount going the direction up to Gorge Road. Apparently this path is slated for a regrade soon. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | Ah, that makes sense given the new bike infrastructure on Gorge. Do you have a public source for that? I'd like to know more. Given that it's signed in one direction, and this path really isn't well suited to bicycles because of the combined steepness, narrowness, and poor visibility. I think it's safe to assume it's meant to apply both ways. Tagging it as a footpath with bicycle=dismount until it gets upgraded seems appropriate to me. | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | This trail has been demolished and is under reconstruction. | |
| 5033131 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Need confirmation of turn restrictions at this intersection - can general traffic turn Right from Ravine onto South Carey? |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 5012498 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | I believe the bike lanes on Carey are now removed with the MUP opened to the public, but this needs confirmation. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | bike lanes removed | |
| 5022996 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | User CheeseSplatter (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/CheeseSplatter) has vandalized the map here, adding redundant clutter and outright deleting a segment of Shelbourne Street and all its relations. Assistance in reverting this vandalism would be appreciated from the community. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Vandalism has been corrected. | |
| 4787626 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | There was a bridge here. Is it still in place? Survey needed |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4914732 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | discontinuity ♦46 | uptown blvd is pedestrian only from this intersection north - probably up to the next crossing. #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | commented | discontinuity ♦46 | ah and similarly all the parking is gone. there are picnic tables and lounge chair seating | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | This has been fixed. | |
| 4433631 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Barkerville Library and Archives |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433630 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Eldorado Gold Panning and Souvenirs |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433629 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Wesleyan Methodist Church |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433628 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | F.J. McMahon's Confectionery |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433627 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | King Guest House |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433625 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Wake Up Jake Restaurant |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433626 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Goldfield Bakery |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433622 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | St. George Hotel |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433621 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Louis A. Blanc Photographic Gallery |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433623 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Cariboo Masonic Lodge #4 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433620 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | House Hotel Coffee Saloon |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Done | |
| 4433618 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | A. McPherson Watchmaker & Jeweller |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added | |
| 4433617 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Mason & Daly General Merchants |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added | |
| 4433616 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | C. Strouss & Co. |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added | |
| 4433615 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Canada Post |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Named and Added | |
| 4433614 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Theatre Royal |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Named | |
| 4433612 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Main Street |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Named | |
| 4433609 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Halverson House Mining Museum |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added | |
| 4433611 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Lee Chong Co. Store, Chinese Museum |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added | |
| 4433610 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Kwong Sang Wing Gift Shop |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added | |
| 4973806 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Banff is no longer car free. Will update but may need some further edits. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | QuigleyJones ♦2,905 | ||
| 4973734 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Bow valley parkway is seasonally converted into a bike route. Should this be seasonally edited to be turned into a multi-use trail? https://parks.canada.ca/pn-np/ab/banff/info/gestion-management/cyclisme-cycling |
| 4949260 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | DarinJ | The Coquihalla Highway is currently open. The Mine Creek Fire is still active, so further closures may be needed, but at this time (05:39 PST) the highway is open. |
| 2 | ~ 5 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Temporary closures aren't supposed to be marked in OSM. Long-Term construction changes can be shown, but closures lasting a few days or even a week shouldn't be marked. | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Stuart_L ♦135 | ||
| 4973425 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | I am fairly certain this trail does not allow for cycling. It would only be suitable for mountain bikes, and the trailhead doesn't say it is a cycling trail. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Stuart_L ♦135 | Just checked on https://bcparks.ca/skagit-valley-park/ and it says "Bicycles are permitted on all roadways, the Centennial Trail and Skagit River Trail in Skagit Valley Park" so it appears that the trail here permits bicycles unless it is mis-named | |
| 4836756 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | A sign marks this as a bike connector route but there's no ramp or cut out to connect to the bike lane (have to stop in the bike lane, dismount, and lift the bike onto the sidewalk. Also this is obviously not very useful for anyone in the west bound cycle lane. Haven't checked if there is any additional signage on Finlayson Place. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | I checked with city staff because another nearby "connector" is a hilariously steep cliff that even a novice mountainbiker would have a hard time navigating. They are going to be taking down most of these signs over the next year, as it far predates Victoria's now much-improved bike infrastructure standards. | |
| 4861672 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Someone needs to confirm if McKEnzie at Cedar Hill bus stop still exists, as the new University Height bus stop is extremely close to this. |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Bus stop has been removed. | |
| 4838442 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | --- | "Bucanners Road" is misspelled. Should be "Buccaneers Road" |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Resolved - good catch! | |
| 4924364 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Campground needs more accurate mapping. |
| 4924363 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | A more accurate representation of these trails is needed - Galiano Trails has opened a new trail to Dionisio and this area deserves accurate mapping, partly to keep people off trails that may intersect with private property that landowners don't want people on. |
| 4860044 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 7 months ago | opened | --- | The separated one-way (westbound) cycling lane is now open! Along with the bus stop and trees have been planted. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added and moved bus stop to approximate new location | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4730712 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | I don't think this really fits OSM's definitions of a Living Street. I suspect that is more what Government Street is. This street doesn't purport to allow people to walk anywhere they want - it has crosswalks, dedicated car parking, etc. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Without further feedback I will be reverting this to a minor/unclassified/residential street (same as Langley Street). This is not a "living street" as pedestrians do not have the right to walk in the same space as the cars are operating. | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | crassula ♦34 | ||
| 4684894 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | --- | This applies to the central area of UVic in general, but these thicker areas (like where the pin is on now) are also walkable by foot, unlike what Openstreetmap thinks. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | It is tagged as walkable, but some routing engines don't like routing through area geometries. | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | I agree that this is an issue. To many routing systems this is an impassible area. | |
| 4 | ~ 9 months ago | reopened | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4777061 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Why is Craigflower Road marked as unpaved here? |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | looks like the change was made 2 years ago by a user who has since been deleted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140870186#map=17/48.442037/-123.401639&layers=YN | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | smithkm ♦285 | Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/168072147#map=20/48.4415177/-123.4013827&layers=YN | |
| 4774156 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Trail stub heading south from this point, end unknown |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | QuigleyJones ♦2,905 | set as informal | |
| 4734258 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Multi-use path needs continuation to Green Bay Road based on onsite survey rather than imagery as imagery is not up to date. Please ensure that "bike lane mapped separately" is tagged in the cycleway for Boucherie Road. Confirmation of cycleway layout and configuration up to Ogden Road also needed. |
| 4730889 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Kings road is not a "Living Street." A "living street" is something closer to a Woonerf; this only has traffic calming but is still a vehicles-have-priority street. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | crassula ♦34 | Agreed, it doesn't fit the OSM definition. Changed it back to "residential road" | |
| 4669101 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | Canadian Cancer Society - Vancouver Island Lodge https://cancer.ca/en/living-with-cancer/how-we-can-help/accommodation |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Added. | |
| 4704860 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | DENelson83 ♦2,183 | Disconnected road ways. Delete or connect to either View Street or Blanshard Street. |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Resolved by removing ways. Parking area is a private parking lot access through the parkade, so a way in this space is unecessary due to the scale and lack of anyone ever routing through this space. Building shapes corrected as well (building between parking lot and Blanshard Street). | |
| 4679365 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | jeremy77 ♦28 | Are there shared bicycle lanes here? I don't recall any sharrows or other on street infra for bicycles. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | I believe this is one of those "designated routes" where the only infrastructure are pointless signs. I could be wrong. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | jeremy77 ♦28 | It is part of the sea side touring route like the rest of beach drive but I saw this section is tagged as having shared lanes. Which should have at least some on road infrastructure like Graham or the Fernwood connector with sharrows, speed bumps, and modal filters. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Paul Ramsey ♦0 | No infra on this segment of the coastal route, it's unchanged from how it has been for years. | |
| 5 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | Confirmed, rode from clover point to here. There is an of blue line along the south side of Dallas for a ways but no signs or sharrows. | |
| 6 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Sounds like there's not infrastructure. | |
| 4700805 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Bike/pedestrian trail is now paved but not sure how much of it is paved. |
| 4700804 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | To the best of my knowledge and StreetView in 2023 confirms this, there is no crossing at the southwest side of the intersection. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | QuigleyJones ♦2,905 | fixed | |
| 4663535 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | OpenStreetMap has specific tag standards for dual-direction separated bike infrastructure now: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:right:oneway This should be cycleway:left=track cycleway:left:oneway=no There is a lot of separately-mapped on-street protected two-way infrastructure in Victoria in general, this may need a major regional overhaul. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | smithkm ♦285 | tagged as cycleway:left:seperate | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | ||
| 4529273 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | All bike lanes in this area need to be revised to align with actual use cases, many narrow sidewalks are currently marked as separated bike infrastructure in OSM. https://www.tol.ca/en/parks-recreation/resources/parks-trails-and-amenities/trails-and-cycling/Document-Feed-Cycling-Network/2024-Cycling-Network-Infrastructure.pdf |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | eerib ♦176 | I have done most of the mapping of these paths in this area. Most of the street adjacent paths and park paths are marked as highway=cycleway foot=designated bicycle=designated segregated=no surface=concrete/asphalt width=3.0 I marked them as a cycleway because the iD editor recommends this through the preset "Cycle & Foot Path". These paths are also different then a traditional sidewalk/path in that they are usually named, 3 meters wide, and signed as being designated for pedestrians and cyclists. Further, the Township of Langley designates them as an "Off Street Trail" rather then a sidewalk in the map you provided. The street adjacent paths could instead be marked: highway=footway footway=sidewalk foot=designated bicycle=designated segregated=no surface=concrete/asphalt width=3.0 And the park paths could instead by marked: highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated segregated=no surface=concrete/asphalt width=3.0 Either method is ok with me. Something to note is that the map you linked is out of date (even though it says 2024) and has errors that don't match in-person signage. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Interesting that Langley is calling glorified sidewalks 'bikeways...' doesn't surprise me. | |
| 4695052 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Bikes lanes mapped separately should be mapped as part of the road. |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | nyanpsyche ♦88 | Looks like this has been completed | |
| 4584645 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | dgryski ♦65 | 108 between University and 132 is now a designated bike route with protected bike lanes. Surrey plan: https://www.surrey.ca/renovating-building-development/engineering-infrastructure/capital-construction-program/protected Visible also on Street View. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | Updated with details of where protection gaps exist (bus stops, parking, etc). | |
| 4695051 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | 132 St has protected bike lanes. Currently mapped as "standard lane," should be "bike track" in segments that are protected. |
| 4680567 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Haultain and Richmond traffic calming is not correctly mapped - currently doesn't represent the ability for cyclists to turn and carry through where cars are restricted. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | smithkm ♦285 | Updated | |
| 4663539 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Contraflow two-way bike infrastructure should be mapped as part of the street it is associated with: cycleway:left=track cycleway:right=no cycleway:left:oneway=no instead of mapping it as a dedicated cycleway. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:right:oneway This seems to be a consistent problem throughout the entire CRD. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | jeremy77 ♦28 | fixed, in this case there are cycle tracks on both side, only on the right side is it a two way cycle track. | |
| 4663532 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | InfiNorth ♦136 | Yet another cycleway has been mapped off the road despite the road having appropriate cycleway tags already. I do not recall if this stretch is protected or not, so I do not want to remove the inappropriately mapped segment until we know what needs to be fixed. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | smithkm ♦285 | It appears this has been fixed. Possibly someone confused Pandora with Yates and how long the little protected spur on Yates is. | |
| 4474648 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Boris Verkhovskiy ♦181 | coastline should include beach |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | InfiNorth ♦136 | Beach is tidal and shape of beach changes with storms. Should not be changed by my understanding. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | Boris Verkhovskiy ♦181 | ||
| 4654127 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | Why is Esquimalt road shown as having fully protected lanes for its entire length? This is dangerous and irresponsible and does not remotely represent reality. Someone needs to survey this and modify to represent the gaps as they were previously mapped. |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | InfiNorth ♦136 | This has been resolved |