| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5423685 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | do these two trees exist? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | I was going off Mapbox, which is more recent than Ortofotomozaika, and they're somewhat visible there. My intention is to survey it all after I'm done with the Great Unparking to remove any discrepancies I might have caused with outdated imagery. It's going to be a long process, so if you find during survey that a mapped tree is not there, feel free to remove it. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | took me a sec to realize the Great Unparking has nothing to do with the new PAAS or any sort of parking | |
| 4 | ~ 20 days ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Checked this bit of grass and I'm surprised myself how accurately I got the trees on it. That is to say, they're there, so I'm closing this note. | |
| 5424966 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | ScarlettB ♦140 | Should these be living streets? There's no sign, and as it is, it looks much more like a footpath with parking spaces on it, so something like highway=footway + motor_vehicles=destination? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | it was historically, they removed the sign ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | to elaborate further; seems that in 2014 the sign was still there, in 2018 its not there https://maps.app.goo.gl/eLwY49zffr1qD5tBA | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Well, it's certainly not there now, thanks for the confirmation. I'll leave this up until I get to this area so I don't forget. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Fixed, closing note | |
| 5425233 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | unlocked path here via StreetComplete_ee 63.21 |
| 2 | ~ 28 days ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note | |
| 5421653 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | informal crossing? there is parking space left out via StreetComplete_ee 63.21 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5421652 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface quality here?" – Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/1208283800 via StreetComplete_ee 63.21: I'd remove this whole path... cars parked all along |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Agreed, it's not necessary for routing. Had to compromise in the south so that the pavement there wasn't left with a stub or unmapped. I didn't want to connect the footway=link directly to the residential road to prevent routing pedestrians on it, so I've connected it at the junction with the driveway instead. I'm leaving the note for you to close in case you get a better idea on it. | |
| 5396568 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | I think all of these are split similarly to the first one via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | Except for the first one, they all only have a single house number in the cadastre, so I'm not sure if splitting them is a good idea. But it needs checking onsite, maybe they are really split housing units and use suffix numbering like 9 and 9A. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | gated community iirc :( | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | Yep, I walked by there yesterday, and was disappointed that it was gated off. But there are house numbers listed outside next to the gate, and I haven't seen any extra ones, so I'd keep those houses unsplit, at least for now. The latest official dataset with addresses from data.slovensko.sk also agrees here. | |
| 5379207 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" for https://osm.org/way/1531896796 via StreetComplete 56.0: this is just a step up before the doors |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Whether it has a handrail or not can still be determined though (usually doesn't). A single step is really just a trivial example of steps with a step count of one. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | additionally (have one more comment queued in streetcomplete) there is steps_count tag on entrance= nodes which could be used in these cases to reduce the path pollution (nearly all doors in KV have these) | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Ohh, didn't know about that one! Sounds good, I'll keep it in mind and possibly fix all the ones already done like this unless the steps are further away from the entrancs | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | although not widely used wouldn't https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dstep be better for this? | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | ^^ that was the street complete note reply :) yeah sounds alright 👍 | |
| 7 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | Wow, I wasn't aware of barrier=step. Someone should add it to the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier page! :) | |
| 8 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | barrier=step sounds alright, but doesn't it just push the boundary of comically short steps from step_count=1 to step_count=2? | |
| 9 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | We'd first need to define what "comically short" means (in this context :) ). To me, "steps" and "stairs" - both nouns are in plural - already means two steps or more. | |
| 10 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Fair, if we take the key name as descriptive, then it's clear enough as it is. Additionally, while a single step doesn't have a clearly defined length that could be equated with a way on the map, two and more steps do, so that's another distinction between 1 and ≥2. I was more going for the fact that it doesn't address the above concern about short and dense footways/steps. Though personally I don't think it needs to be addressed. When that's reality, it's what should be on the map. | |
| 11 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | imho there are so much more 1 step situations in KV than 2 step that it wouldn't really matter additionally I'd wonder where would 1 step stairs begin and end? two steps set a precedent for step length but in 1 step situation the two steps (lower and upper) can be arbitrarily long? (dunno if this makes sense) | |
| 12 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Yeah, that's sort of what I mean with clearly defined length. I think barrier=step for singles and highway=steps for 2 and more is good. I'll keep it in mind and change the single steps I've already done as ways to nodes as I go. If you see any and don't feel like fixing them yourselves, feel free to add a fixme or a note to them or just wait, I'll do it eventually. | |
| 13 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Just crossed my mind, one thing barrier=step doesn't cover as opposed to highway=steps is the direction of the step, whether it's upward or downward, which may be of help to the visually impaired. We can pretty much cover everything else that's normally tagged on highway=steps with separate ways, but direction is lost when switching to a single node. | |
| 14 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | For a step that is in the middle of a way, we can keep using incline=up/down just like for stairs, but you do have a point (hehe) if it is on a point connecting two different ways. | |
| 5407751 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | this whole upper sidewalk is missing? via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407750 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | this part of the sidewalk was turned to parking via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407760 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | steps via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407759 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface quality here?" for https://osm.org/way/1252640601 via StreetComplete 56.0: less of zig-zag, more of L |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407754 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "Are these opening hours still correct?" for https://osm.org/node/10592788791 via StreetComplete 56.0: I think this was closed.... no hours sign, the outside garden is missing |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407756 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | footpath here via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407755 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/1418735041 via StreetComplete 56.0: this ain't exists dawg Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/359241.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407757 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | footpath here via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407758 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "Do these steps have a handrail?" for https://osm.org/way/1453208596 via StreetComplete 56.0: no steps here ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Spr3 ♦133 | ||
| 5407784 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What’s the surface here?" for https://osm.org/way/1536115010 via StreetComplete 56.0: lowkirkuinely ts ain't exist Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/359242.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | My bad, removed | |
| 5407753 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | now is this a step or a stair xd via StreetComplete 56.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/359240.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ticho2 ♦294 | Steps demoted to a kerb, thanks | |
| 5407752 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What kind of building entrance is this?" for https://osm.org/node/10593011415 via StreetComplete 56.0: what building entrance? |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | This quest appears whenever a path, or a path-like way ends on a point that's on the edge of a building polygon. I thought StreetComplete was smarter, because I specifically added the layer=1 tags to the paths here to express that they are going *above* the building. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | I just noticed that the steps way doesn't have layer=1 - since it's not overlapping any other element on the map, I did not deem it necessary. I have now added the tag, let me know if the quest disappears from SC. | |
| 5396570 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | missing steps via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Ygramul ♦5,703 | Added like the one to the north of it (looks basically identical on aerial imagery). Details can be mapped on the ground with StreetComplete. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Ygramul ♦5,703 | Resolved with changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/185761970 by noteSolver_plugin/0.5.0 | |
| 5396569 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | steps via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note | |
| 5396567 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "How does this path cross the barrier here?" for https://osm.org/node/13140096245 via StreetComplete 56.0: not sure if this is leftover, the staircase to the upper deck is now fully passable |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ticho2 ♦294 | It's simply the railing protecting from falling off the upper floor. I split it to add the gap for the footpath that enters the upper floor. | |
| 5394326 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | path here via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note. | |
| 5394325 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | steps via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note. | |
| 5394324 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | missing path via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ticho2 ♦294 | Added, thanks. | |
| 5394321 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | these last 2 have stroller ramps via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note. | |
| 5394323 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | gate - open via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Just a tip, you can insert nodes into ways with Street Complete Expert Edition! Might be better for cases like these, since you can see the precise position much better when surveying I've added the gate, closing note | |
| 5394322 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | impassable - fence via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | I've split the path, but I'd like to map the fence as well. What's its full extent? I can see some shadows on Mapbox sat imagery, but it's not clear where it ends on each side. | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Surveyed, added, closing. | |
| 5394319 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | unmarked crossing - lowered curbs via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note | |
| 5394320 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | ts sidewalk is unusable - used for parking via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Removed, closing note. | |
| 5380342 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | ScarlettB ♦140 | Do we have any source for the names of these parks? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30960209 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20766806 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30960553 None of them are signed on the ground, or have any source for the names provided in the changesets which added the names. In the case of Park Donnerova it's also another case of a non-park, which just makes me further doubt the credibility of these names. |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | I mean if we're on park which hunt park Kútiky has no source as well as far as I can tell... Forget 50 shades of Gray, this is 50 shades of park | |
| 3 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | *witch 🤦 | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | ScarlettB ♦140 | Yeah, I mean, I'm all for tagging parks as what they are and Park Kutiky and Park Donnerova deffo are parks. They have fountains, footways that aren't clearly meant for transit and they're self-contained enough .Here I'm really only concerned about the names. I've noticed this on many entities in the area, they're descriptive names that seem to come out of nowhere and I don't think we should invent these if they're not signed (and even then it's debatable) Personally I'd keep Kempelenova and Kutiky as parks but remove the name, and turn Donnerova into regular grass-and-trees. | |
| 5 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Spr3 ♦133 | I concur | |
| 6 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | I have removed the names, closing the note. | |
| 5379208 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | missing footpath+entrance via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | ScarlettB ♦140 | Added, closing note | |
| 5379209 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What can be left here for recycling?" for https://osm.org/node/8047308571 via StreetComplete 56.0: the bin ain't here... maybe not here on holidays? |
| 5320348 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" for https://osm.org/way/50042106 via StreetComplete 56.0: this is a porch for the 52a house |
| 5320347 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | permanently closed impassable gate, advised to use the opposite via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 5047044 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | this whole path from the stairs to the east to at least the bend uphill is fresh new smooth asphalt via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | ticho2 ♦294 | The paths already are marked with surface=asphalt, is there something missing? | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | ticho2 ♦294 | I checked it on site, and there is nothing missing on the map. | |
| 5047043 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | stairs, concrete, 4 steps, no tactile, no handrail, no ramp via StreetComplete 56.0 |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | closed | ticho2 ♦294 | Overene a pridane. | |
| 5047042 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | Spr3 ♦133 | Unable to answer "What kind of building is this?" for https://osm.org/way/69234657 via StreetComplete 56.0: toto asi patrí k nejakej garáži... |