Note Activities of 4eyez

Note	#	⏱️ Last updated	Event	Contributor	Comment
4553071 Category: unknown	1	~ 1 year ago	opened	4eyez ♦166	Add tunnel tag?
	2	~ 7 days ago	commented	GinaroZ ♦7,751	it's tagged as a tunnel?
	3	~ 6 days ago	closed	4eyez ♦166	It is indeed already tagged, my mistake - thank you for checking.
5261014 Category: Unknown	1	~ 28 days ago	opened	4eyez ♦166	Should this now be labelled as a viaduct given that it stopped being an aqueduct some 140 years ago when the canal was closed and the railway built?
5224561 Category: Unknown	1	~ 1 month ago	opened	4eyez ♦166	This railway line is split into 2 ELRs: SUB2 to the south of this marker (as existing), and SUB1 to the north. It is presently shown as SUB2 for its entirety. Reference NR Sectional Appendix SC163/seq 001 and local knowledge. The location of ELR change is that of former Niddrie North Jn. Unable to split line via iD editor.
5052799 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	4eyez ♦166	These two railway underline structures are known as the Forth Viaduct.
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	4eyez ♦166	Already linked via a Wikidata tag field.
5050991 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	---	The railway line reference (ELR) should be MHL1. See https://www.geofurlong.com/loc/edinburgh-south-east.html
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	4eyez ♦166	Fixed - by reference to NR Sectional Appendix.
5050993 Category: Unknown	1	~ 6 months ago	opened	---	The railway line reference (ELR) should be MHL2. See https://www.geofurlong.com/loc/edinburgh-south-east.html
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	4eyez ♦166	Fixed - by reference to NR Sectional Appendix.
5083782 Category: Unknown	1	~ 5 months ago	opened	4eyez ♦166	For consistency, should the `ref` tag be "EGM1", i.e. the ELR? The "046" is the bridge number, and could be included in `other_tags`? This applies to IDs 18482420 and 313660353.
	2	~ 5 months ago	closed	GinaroZ ♦7,751	yes it should, with the ref going into the bridge:ref= tag. I've fixed it and some others in Scotland