Macumba Macaca for the last 12 MonthsMacumba Macaca for the last 12 Months| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5461686 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | --- | Protected area "Thier Pirard" extending roughlz between the river bank, the northern boundary of the forest, and the meadow east of the rail tunnel. See e.g. https://geoapps.wallonie.be/webgisdgo4/#VIEWER=BC_PAT#CODECARTO||1=62026-CLT-0005-01#BBOX=235552.955921913,236685.37485341754,129109.21762766197,130704.65831854334 |
| 2 | ~ 6 days ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! | |
| 4843193 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | nwaab ♦12 | Unable to answer "Is drinking water freely available for guests here?" – Base de loisirs d'Haulmé (Campground) – https://osm.org/node/26858507 via StreetComplete 61.1: Exists no more |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Changed to new name (assume that is the issue) | |
| 5509969 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Area needs an update |
| 2 | ~ 27 days ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,897 | small update done | |
| 5500812 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | IGN MNT LIDAR HD: Tranchée? |
| 5495386 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 month ago | opened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Recent changes here are strange. Bad usage of "name", a path added that probably does not exist... What is going on here? |
| 5329511 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | EglA18 ♦11 | This place does not exist: "ce lieu n'existe pas ou plus" A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-03-21T17:13:14Z POI name: Société Générale POI types: amenity-atm amenity-bank #CoMaps android 2026.05.06-11-FDroid |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | ||
| 5307876 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | --- | Hier loopt een trap tussen de huizen door vanaf de maas naar de weg |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | ||
| 5438986 Category: CoMaps | 1 | ~ 2 months ago | opened | Uddlz | This place does not exist: "Despite searching thoroughly, I couldn’t find this path. Maybe it would bei possible to go ofroad, b" A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground. OSM snapshot date: 2026-07-28T06:39:58Z POI has no name POI types: highway-footway #CoMaps android 2026.07.16-10-Google |
| 2 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! | |
| 4065302 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | Kugelbaum ♦488 | In context of "Surfaces" overlay for https://osm.org/way/442601617 via StreetComplete 56.0: Grass patch only, way around. Attached photo(s): https://westnordost.de/p/192642.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | Kugelbaum ♦488 | Removed it. Let people take the semi paved way around. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | SHARCRASH | ||
| 4 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | SHARCRASH | A board visible on your photo in the middle of your "grass patch only" that according you no one can pass over there to join the track on the other side. Where is the logic??? Does this mean government is putting boards on inaccessible grass patches??? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | Kugelbaum ♦488 | ||
| 6 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | SHARCRASH | ||
| 7 | ~ 2 years ago | closed | Kugelbaum ♦488 | ||
| 8 | ~ 2 years ago | reopened | SHARCRASH | ||
| 9 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | RaphaelPasloin ♦1,502 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6325760 take the deleted track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442601617/history see : https://map.geoportail.lu/theme/tourisme?bgLayer=basemap_2015_global&version=3&zoom=19&X=654822&Y=6381291&lang=fr&rotation=0&layers=176&opacities=1&time= I suggest to restore the way but to tag it as a footway ; surface= grass trail_visibility=no | |
| 10 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | Kugelbaum ♦488 | That sounds good. That way routing and trespassing over the grass, especially for bicycles, will be limited and the proper track next to it more favoured. | |
| 11 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | SHARCRASH | Hi Raphael, Thank you for your intervention, insightful observations and the resources, specially for reminding the hiking route! Yesterday on site, panomaric photo: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gpjEvwsyQRs8e_vfuoVtBR9ld00FKJX2 On the other side we can see 2 trails from a vehicle: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U3X8Ch1MVh44yilQ6fmpQC1AJc3yi0Kx The original contributor added it as track and when I passed by years ago, it had clear trails from a vehicle, visible on 2018's aerial photos. I would guess that on rare occasions a vehicle passes here to directly reach the northern field instead of making the complicated manoeuvres around the building, no other entrance because of the river. In this case, I don't care if we add it as track or path as I guess this portion will be very rarely used by large vehicles to access the field, it seems at rest and there are wetland portions but it's not a dedicated footway, there is nothing stating so or forbidding any other kind of user. The anti-bicycle comment is irrelevant and even inappropriate. @Kugelbaum AKA tomolobla, AKA ltwo, AKA grauwutayette, AKA eyasonu and other sock puppets... Well done for showing once again that you make subjective edits and comments, specially anti bicycles. Care to explain why you deleted the way and deviated the hiking route? | |
| 12 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,426 | @SHARCRASH - you were previously blocked for ad-hominem comments like the one above - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6519 . It is perfectly possible to contribute to OSM without comments like this. If you find yourself wanting to refer to another contributor by name, just don't. | |
| 13 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | SHARCRASH | @SomeoneElse, then address the problem at the source, not at the consequences. It's frustrating to see so many deleted or falsified elements misinforming map users and making the repairs. Several tens of examples backed up by third part sources or contributors confirmed the tampered data. Despite all these brought up since 2021, there's been no effort on the other side for self-improvement. In this situation, anyone dedicated to the project can easily loose his composure. | |
| 14 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | SomeoneElse ♦6,426 | @Sharcrash, as an independent observer, that simply isn't my impression. You have been just as guilty of poor mapping as anyone else involved here (perhaps more so). | |
| 15 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | SHARCRASH | The pot calling the kettle black! That's an ad hominem attack you just did there and demonstrates how your judgement is biased. But its' OK, I'm always willing to correct myself, just bring the examples on a forum to see what's that about. I had already invited you on the thread i created, you didn't bring up any! The ones brought by Kugelbaum were unjustified as I explained here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/3-years-issue-with-individual-making-subjective-deletions-created-8-accounts-etc/108368/16 | |
| 16 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Luke_Vader ♦351 | Before I start, I want to make clear that i do now know anything about the background of this conflict, And I most certanly am not interested in reading the related community discussion. That being said, I believe that the statement that there is indeded a path on the south of the building is correct, while simultaneously acknowledging the fact that thare is a more propper path to the north of the building. Additionally, wanting bikes to be routed over the northern path is completely reasonable, as it is the smoother and more comfortable path. It is the path i would choose to go on myself. Taking into account bikes is not inherently "anti bike". In fact, i would consider not including the southern path to be more detremental to people in large vehicles as the router will tell them to do the more complicated manouvers. (1/2) | |
| 17 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | Luke_Vader ♦351 | All that being said, the goal of openstreetmap is to map what is on the ground, and that is irrefutably 2 different paths with 2 different properties. It should be up to the routing engine to determine what path best to take. I suggest adding back the southern path with the trail_visibility=no tag, in addition to surface quality and potentially define access to encourage routing engines to make the best choice. I will leave this issue open for a while, If i have no response i will take the liberty of resolving this issue myself, please do suggest what you believe is the best solution here. Again, my intention here is not hostile in any way, i simply would like to resolve this rather benign issue. (2/2) | |
| 18 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Sharcrash does not seem to edit much anymore. It should now be possible to solve several issues around here without endless emotional discussion about a small bit of grass... | |
| 19 | ~ 1 month ago | commented | Kugelbaum ♦488 | He's editing with other accounts now but yes, it's about time to resolve these notes after 2 years. | |
| 20 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | Kugelbaum ♦488 | On the cadasters official maps there's still only 1 way on this location, so for me it's fine like it is. If someone wants to drive/cycle through grass 🤷 | |
| 5384620 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Reading the description of the cave, I think it should be over here, not 50m to the north? Anybody know for certain? https://cartodoc.wallonie.be/fiches/?ctx=karst&srv=id&value=474-004b |
| 5376816 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | olecky ♦2,322 | Unable to answer "What type of bicycle barrier is this?" – Cycle Barrier – https://osm.org/node/278517061 via StreetComplete 63.2: It's further south |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Ok, moved it | |
| 5376817 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | olecky ♦2,322 | Actual location of the cycle barrier double via StreetComplete 63.2 |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Ok, moved it | |
| 5376725 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 3 months ago | opened | olecky ♦2,322 | In context of overlay "Surfaces" – on bridge: Cycle & Foot Path – https://osm.org/way/1535567905 via StreetComplete 63.2: Not bridge |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | This looks 100% like a bridge to me? | |
| 3 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | olecky ♦2,322 | https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24998539 is 100% a bridge, but https://osm.org/way/1535567905 was not - the dirt path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256660944) didn't connect directly to the end of the bridge, there is a stretch of ravel not on the bridge between the bridge and the path connection. I've tried to make the adjustments, feel free to double-check. | |
| 5026338 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 11 months ago | opened | Bancki ♦169 | Chaussée romaine |
| 2 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Bancki ♦169 | https://www.ardennebelge.be/diffusio/nl/p/ontdekking-en-recreatie/chaussee-romaine-tenneville_TFOLOD-A0-00JZ-08WN/ https://www.foretdesainthubert-tourisme.be/nl/details/LOD-A0-00JZ-08WN&type=11/ | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,897 | Y a-t-il quelque chose de physiquement tangible là-bas ? | |
| 4 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | It's cool, but I don't know what to add to the map? | |
| 5 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | Bancki ♦169 | Je m'excuse: je n'ai pas photographié la plaque informative qui est là. A faire la prochaine fois que j'y passe. | |
| 5151290 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | Joske1020 ♦91 | Il faudrait cartographier la « tourbière à haies plates » située ici et où paissent les bovins.(https://biodiversite-old.wallonie.be/fr/412-plaine-haie.html?IDD=251659430&IDC=1881) https://biodiversite-old.wallonie.be/fr/d-travaux-de-gestion.html?IDC=3103#:~:text=au%20Stock%2C%20Mochamps%2C-,Plaine%20Haie,-et%20Sarw%C3%A9). |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! | |
| 5199818 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | PlayGuide ♦2,958 | Il existe ici une aire de jeux (structure, slide, climbingwall, swing) signalée via l'appli #PlayGuide : https://playguide.eu/app/playground/3da58b73-5be2-4f5b-999a-85a2b017d537 |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Added the items | |
| 5215253 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | --- | max. Durchfahrtshöhe 2,60m #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! | |
| 5212067 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | plicploc ♦236 | Ruisseau ou plan d'eau ici passant sous le pont via StreetComplete 63.0 |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | le ruisseau est probablement le ancien "ditch" to keep the railway dry. I found it on the height map. There are many ditches here, I have drawn the relevant ones. | |
| 5267357 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | tp3 ♦33 | In context of overlay "Parkstreifen" – Route d'Eupen (Ortsstraße) – https://osm.org/way/57110922 via StreetComplete 63.1: Private road, no public access |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! | |
| 5258728 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | DrCampy ♦27 | In context of overlay "Places" – Vacant Shop – https://osm.org/node/4571014197 via StreetComplete 63.0: Taverne de Trooz Serves drinks and food Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/339733.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Taverne de Trooz is bankrupt in 2025: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4571014197/history | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,897 | I closed this note. | |
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | Jakka ♦34,897 | ||
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Jakka ♦34,897 | It look that is reopend https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61574377974476 | |
| 5263869 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | poukram ♦99 | Unable to answer "How many steps are here?" – Steps – https://osm.org/way/754254372 via StreetComplete 63.0: Le mot escalier est un bien grand mot ici... Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/340424.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | :-D Merci! | |
| 3 | ~ 4 months ago | reopened | poukram ♦99 | ||
| 4 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | poukram ♦99 | Bonjour, merci pour l'édit, je mets des notes pour penser à éditer plus tard et puis j'oublie :-) Par contre ici je pense que tout supprimer est un peu trop: seule la partie "escalier" près de ma note n'existe plus, le reste du chemin existe toujours et est praticable. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Ah bon, j'ai "revert" mon change! | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | poukram ♦99 | merci, je supprime la partie escalier qui n'existe plus, je laisse le reste. | |
| 5255891 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | olecky ♦2,322 | In context of overlay "Places" – NMBS/SNCB (Office (Unspecified Type)) – https://osm.org/way/617499245 via StreetComplete 63.0: Not in use Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/339319.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Changed office to building, added "disused" | |
| 4658242 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | malte1030 ♦575 | L'hôtel semble à l'abandon. Dans le village, on nous racontait que ça avait fait faillite il y a deux ans. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,306 | website nog actief: https://www.moulindeboiron.com restaurant wel al dan niet tijdelijk gesloten volgens de website | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Ardennen8 ♦201 | Hotel en Restaurant lijkt te zijn (af)gesloten. Terras zou nog gebruikt te worden/zijn. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Ardennen8 ♦201 | Website naar reserveringen zegt/toont: https://reservations.cubilis.eu/moulin-de-boiron-hotel-gedinne/Error/Inactive ; 'Hi there! It seems like this link is not activated by the property. Please contact them directly for your reservation.'. | |
| 5 | ~ 4 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Clearly not a hotel at the moment. Removed the hotel point. | |
| 6 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | ||
| 5255384 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | olecky ♦2,322 | In context of overlay "Bike paths" – Path – https://osm.org/way/1500739940 via StreetComplete 63.0: No obvious river crossing here Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/339228.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! I removed several very unlikely paths here. | |
| 5229108 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | Joske1020 ♦91 | réserve forestière. https://biodiversite.wallonie.be/home/Sites-interet/rechercher-un-site/informations-sur-l-habitat.html?id=6369&type=lcn&subtype=LCN-RF |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | ajouté Bois d'Ellinchamps | |
| 5306106 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | olecky ♦2,322 | In context of overlay "Surfaces" – on bridge: Path – https://osm.org/way/439023708 via StreetComplete 63.1: Hiking route goes through the bridge not the ford |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Makes sense! Done. | |
| 5296638 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 4 months ago | opened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | This part of the forest seems private, but the western part seems not. This needs to be mapped from the ground. |
| 5255543 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 5 months ago | opened | koningfelix ♦30 | Private road via StreetComplete 63.0 Attached photo(s): https://streetcomplete.app/p/339271.jpg |
| 2 | ~ 4 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Merci! | |
| 5215093 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | --- | 2 Sitzbänke mit Tisch #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Danke! | |
| 5215091 Category: OsmAnd | 1 | ~ 6 months ago | opened | --- | Sitzbank #OsmAnd |
| 2 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Danke! | |
| 4847748 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Gistronics | Closed gate. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,897 | on image cannot see gate is it under the pin ? | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,505 | Likely the border of the park. Private premises vs forest. | |
| 4 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | SFGJimStreet ♦262 | I added a barrier further north along the path (visible by satellite). Is there another barrier at the location of the note? | |
| 5 | ~ 6 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | I've used the domain's tourist map to improve the area of the domain. It makes no sense to have a barrier here in the middle of the domain, so I'll close it. | |
| 5053934 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 10 months ago | opened | --- | Forbidden for cyclists, dangerous, komoot segments will lead you to this path |
| 2 | ~ 10 months ago | closed | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Set to bicycle=no | |
| 4727150 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Kookykooky ♦709 | Forwarding anonymous report from #mapycz user, please verify: "Weg is afgesloten" thank you |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,306 | #OsmBE #SurveyNeeded | |
| 3 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | queerthoughts ♦2,775 | Old note, might have reopened, close? | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | queerthoughts ♦2,775 | No reply from the original author, I'm assuming this was a temporary closure. | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | ||
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | #SurveyNeeded means someone needs to take a look | |
| 4926012 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | joost schouppe ♦4,505 | I'm not sure there is a connection here. When coming from the South, we were forced up the hill and there was not really a way back down. We might have missed the path following the river, but it seems unlikely. Also, there's a gap here in the path along the river if you look at Strava (though that could be a GPS reception issue, given the rocky terrain) |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Thierry1030 ♦6,306 | tweede survey nodig?! :-) | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | SentiersduPhoenix ♦11 | There is a connexion. It's indeed slipery and technical but there is a rope to help to going through. Also, when river is high, it could be quite impossible but it is (with lots of caution). | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | reopened | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | ||
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Reopening because I think this path deserves some tags describing the difficulty (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath ) | |
| 6 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,505 | Which scale is applicable? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale | |
| 7 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | joost schouppe ♦4,505 | I marked a small section as alpine_hiking | |
| 8 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | joost schouppe ♦4,505 | ||
| 4887191 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | --- | EOL 1 Luminus |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | Jakka ♦34,897 | Je ne les vois pas encore sur image PICC Walonmap Avez-vous le GPS exacte ? Créez un compte, connectez-vous et faites votre note, vous ne devez donc pas l'éditer, vous recevrez une notification d'édition pour vérification. | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,505 | other loc see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4887186 | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | Is it a duplicate, or just two places? What is it anyway, new windmills? | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | kabelhaai ♦2,505 | I suppose something like that. | |
| 4952020 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | ArduinCielen | This path is blocked by barbed wire, the steepest part of the path has not been used in a long time and is very dangerous to scale due to loose sand and small pebbles. |
| 2 | ~ 1 year ago | commented | wegspotter ♦210 | Can you map the obstructions and add access tags accordingly? | |
| 3 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | Macumba Macaca ♦568 | I've set the path to "access=no" to prevent people from planning their hikes here until this issue is resolved. | |
| 4 | ~ 11 months ago | commented | wegspotter ♦210 | Perfect! | |
| 5 | ~ 11 months ago | closed | kabelhaai ♦2,505 | Issue resolved. Reopen or make new note when the situation changes. |