| Note | # | ⏱️ Last updated | Event | Contributor | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4955105 Category: StreetComplete | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | lamms ♦42 | Needs to be split via StreetComplete 61.3 |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Ewen Hill ♦9,613 | Sorry lamms - what needs to be split? | |
| 3 | ~ 8 days ago | closed | sahshoor ♦55 | Note closed, feel free to reopen with details. Thanks. | |
| 4357294 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | lamms ♦42 | apparently theres a park in this little corner between stubbs terrace and hay st, however I'm finding conflicting information on whether its called Jolimont Park or just Daglish Park |
| 2 | ~ 2 years ago | commented | lamms ♦42 | The City of Subiaco dosen't even have this area listed as a park in their "Places" section, despite the fact that on one of their maps it shows it as "Daglish Park" | |
| 3 | ~ 10 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | I have checked maybe three times but not found any signage to indicate the name. | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Ewen Hill ♦9,613 | Perhaps flip a coin and set it to one or the other and add the other one as alt_name with a note explaining the rationale | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | I think the question is whether there is any name at all. @lamms, is there an online map with a name? Or shall we leave the park nameless? | |
| 4311443 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | sahshoor ♦55 | shift and add buildings |
| 2 | ~ 3 months ago | commented | TheSwavu ♦6,841 | Shift which buildings? | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | I recall I was thinking of aligning buildings nearby with Bing imagery. Feel free to resolve note if that seems unnecessary. | |
| 4 | ~ 1 month ago | closed | GeeMaps! ♦4,326 | Closed | |
| 4537702 Category: unknown | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | sahshoor ♦55 | TODO: add buildings. (Microsoft building footprints were unavailable for this band of latitude.) |
| 2 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | I recall I was thinking of aligning buildings nearby with Bing imagery. Feel free to resolve note if that seems unnecessary. | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | oops wrong note | |
| 4 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | danielbarton ♦52 | Buildings need mapping everywhere, will close | |
| 5118660 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 9 months ago | opened | sahshoor ♦55 | After splitting platforms (6&7, 8&9), I've updated route relations as far as I know. I think they can do with a review anyway. For example, I'm only aware of Byford trains leaving from platform 4, and Thornlie-Cockburn trains leaving from platform 5. |
| 2 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | lamms ♦42 | Please DONT split the platforms!!, they are physically the same playform and tagging their references with ref=5;6 is the correct way to map them. Please see the "Railway stations" page :) | |
| 3 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | lamms ♦42 | platform*, not playform :P | |
| 4 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | No need to shout heheh 😅 Okay it could just be railway=platform_edge. But I don't think the Railway Stations wiki page clearly says what you are saying. For example: railway=platform: "Create an area that covers the whole platform, or different areas if you want to distinguish platforms with different name=* and/or ref=*." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations However the talk page for railway=platform_edge does discuss this. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:railway%3Dplatform_edge Can you point to any specific problems caused by splitting Perth platform islands? You may disagree with such "tagging for the renderer" but it is practical for me at least while not all apps render platform_edge. By the way, platform 4 has been split from platform 5 all along. Also by the way, not just me splitting Transperth platform islands. | |
| 5 | ~ 7 months ago | commented | lamms ♦42 | My reasoning is mostly based on the diagrams present on Railway_stations recommending ref=1;2 for railway "islands" that are in the middle of train tracks, and the general principle of "One feature, One OSM Element" Splitting the platforms creates an ambiguity around their physical reality: are these physically separated platforms (e.g. with a wall) that should be treated and routed to differently? or are these "logically" separated platforms that are still physically the "same" platform?. Whereas having them as a single area with `ref=1;2;etc` clearly indicates that "This is a mapping of a single physical platform that has two platforms on it", even if it creates an ambiguity around where specifically those platforms are. I think Kovposch comment on the `platform_edge` talkpage under "More hassle than it's worth" generally summarises my thoughts as well. As for platforms 4 & 5, I noticed it, and plan to fix it sooner rather than later... but relations are a pain to deal with 🥲 | |
| 6 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | Ewen Hill ♦9,613 | How are we going with this team? | |
| 4370160 | 1 | ~ 2 years ago | opened | sahshoor ♦55 | aerial: looks like dirt ways and in this unmapped area |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | closed | RealTactic ♦2 | Is all fenced, does have a gate which isn't locked | |
| 3 | ~ 8 months ago | reopened | sahshoor ♦55 | ||
| 4 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | 👍 Did you notice anything outside the fenced area? | |
| 5 | ~ 2 months ago | closed | Ewen Hill ♦9,613 | Looking at the large now defunct tank (now removed) next to this area and the name of the road "Wells Road", I would suggest this was the original water supply, now defunct and this is akin to sand blow and doesn't need to be mapped. It may not be suitable for development or now that the tank has been removed, it may be opened up. Anyhoo, doesn't need anything but I updated some of it | |
| 5137905 Category: Unknown | 1 | ~ 8 months ago | opened | sahshoor ♦55 | I think I mixed up the stairs going up to the platforms. They should be reflected, e.g. going up the stairs to platform 1-2 east side you turn left, not right. |
| 2 | ~ 8 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | * you turn right, not left | |
| 3 | ~ 2 months ago | commented | GeeMaps! ♦4,326 | Local knowledge needed to map it | |
| 4715314 Category: EveryDoor | 1 | ~ 1 year ago | opened | Sam Wilson ♦511 | dog park #EveryDoor |
| 2 | ~ 9 months ago | commented | sahshoor ♦55 | Hi Sam, is this note still pending? | |
| 3 | ~ 9 months ago | closed | Sam Wilson ♦511 | No it looks like it's all fine now. Thanks! |